5.2
Impact Factor
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Corrigendum
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Full Length Article
Full lenth article
Letter to Editor
Original Article
Research article
Retraction
Retraction notice
Review
Review Article
SPECIAL ISSUE: ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY
5.3
Impact Factor
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Corrigendum
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Full Length Article
Full lenth article
Letter to Editor
Original Article
Research article
Retraction
Retraction notice
Review
Review Article
SPECIAL ISSUE: ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original article
10 (
2
); 157-166
doi:
10.1016/j.arabjc.2015.10.004

Access to the substituted benzyl-1,2,3-triazolyl hesperetin derivatives expressing antioxidant and anticancer effects

Organic Research Laboratory, Department of Bioresources and Food Science, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, Konkuk University, Seoul, South Korea
Laboratory of Growth Regulators, Centre of the Region Haná for Biotechnological and Agricultural Research, Institute of Experimental Botany ASCR & Palacký University, Šlechtitelů 27, 783 71 Olomouc, Czech Republic
Department of Food Science and Biotechnology, Dongguk University, Biomedical Campus, 32 Dongguk-ro, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang-si, Gyenggi-do, Republic of Korea

⁎Corresponding author at: Department of Food Science and Biotechnology, Dongguk University, Biomedical Campus, 32 Dongguk-ro, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang-si, Gyenggi-do, Republic of Korea. rahul.svnit11@gmail.com (Rahul V. Patel)

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Elsevier and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Peer review under responsibility of King Saud University.

Abstract

Azide–alkyne cycloaddition was attempted to generate a flavanone hesperetin based phenyl substituted 1,2,3-triazolyls as semi-synthetic natural product derivatives utilizing copper-catalyzed click chemistry. All final compounds were analyzed for their in vitro antioxidant abilities using DPPH and ABTS bioassay. Moreover, cancerous cell inhibitory prospect of titled compounds was screened against cervical cancer cell lines, HeLa and CaSki and an ovarian cancer cell line SK-OV-3 implementing SRB assay. Bearable toxicity of 6a-s was examined employing Madin–Darby canine kidney (MDCK) non-cancer cell line. Overall, 6a-s indicated remarkable antioxidant power in scavenging DPPH and ABTS•+; particularly, an analog 6o with meta-methoxy substituent showed most potent radical scavenging activity, whereas scaffolds 6d with para-fluoro, 6k with ortho-methyl, and 6o with meta-methoxy performed excellently in inhibiting both the cervical cancer cell lines and analog 6q with meta-trifluoromethyl substituent expressed excellent sensitivity toward ovarian cancer cell line. From the structure–activity point of view, nature and position of the electron withdrawing and electron donating functional groups on the phenyl ring attached to the triazole core may contribute to the anticipated antioxidant and anticancer action. Structure of final compounds was adequately confirmed exploring different spectroscopic techniques and elemental analysis in addition to the measurements of some physical properties.

Keywords

Hesperidin
Hesperetin
Cycloaddition
Click chemistry
Anticancer
Antioxidant
1

1 Introduction

ROS, reactive oxygen species carrying unpaired electrons are highly reactive molecules, for example superoxide (O2•−), hydroxyl (HO), peroxyl (ROO), alkoxyl (RO), and nitric oxide (NO) radicals capable of rapidly bind the molecules in adjacent cells. Cellular metabolism processes yield ROS and their access amount results into the damage of essential components of cells such as DNA, lipids and proteins which lead to the occurrence of diseases such as neurological disorders, hypertension, cancer, and diabetes (Weidinger and Kozlov, 2015). This oxidative damage to different kinds of biomolecules is referred to as “oxidative stress”. Oxidative stress is regarded to considerably promote the growth of a number of illnesses, particularly age-related diseases (Schieber and Chandel, 2014). Oxidation process is known as a substance response that exchanges hydrogen atom or electrons from a material to an oxidizing agent. The description of antioxidant is initially relevant to elements that avoid the intake of oxygen by human tissues. In other terms, an antioxidant is a compound or varieties that decrease or stops the oxidation of another compound (Göçer et al., 2013).

Among a plenty of natural product verities, polyphenols are the most abundant antioxidants (Scalbert et al., 2005a). Current evidence strongly facilitates a participation of polyphenols to the protection of heart illnesses and malignancies, and indicates a role in the protection of neurodegenerative illnesses and type 2 diabetes (Scalbert et al., 2005b). Hesperidin (3′,5,7-trihydroxy-4′-methoxy-flavanone-7-rhamnoglucoside) is a member of the flavanone group of flavonoids and its deglycosylated forms are known as hesperetin. A number of studies have examined the antioxidant or radical scavenging (Cho, 2006) and anticancer properties (Roohbakhsh et al., 2015; Jeong et al., 1999) of hesperidin and hesperetin. Studies suggested that hesperidin is inactive or only moderately active (Garg et al., 2001; Wilmsen et al., 2005). In contrast, hesperetin was shown to have potent antioxidant effects (Hirata et al., 2005). In addition, reports suggest that hesperetin is a potent inhibitor of the human cervical cancer cell lines (Alshatwi et al., 2013). In a view of enlightened standpoint, we have decided to select hesperetin a as nodule of the rationale design which is connected to the diverse triazole core (Patel and Park, 2014) known to inhibit angiogenesis, a tool for stopping tumor growth and metastasis (Kallander et al., 2005). As cancers figure among the leading causes of fatalities and death rate globally, with approximately 14 million new cases and 8.2 million melanoma related fatalities in 2012 (World Cancer Report, 2014; WHO, 2015) including its direct correlation with ROS, we have decided to prepare new substituted benzyl-1,2,3-triazolyl flavanone derivatives with an aim to obtain newer generation of antioxidant and anticancer agents.

2

2 Experimental

Commercially available chemicals and solvents were used without purification or after distillation and treatment with drying agents. Hesperidin was purchased from Sigma–Aldrich Company Ltd. Reactions were monitored by thin-layer chromatography (TLC) on pre-coated silica gel plates (Kieselgel 60 F254, Merck) and visualized by UV254 light. Shimadzu 8400-S FT-IR spectrophotometer was used to obtain FT-IR spectra of the title compounds. NMR spectra were taken using a Bruker AVANCE III 400 instrument (1H NMR, 400 MHz; 13C NMR, 100 MHz). 1H NMR spectra are represented as follows: chemical shift, multiplicity (s = singlet, d = doublet, t = triplet, q = quartet, m = multiplet), integration, and coupling constant (J) in Hertz (Hz). 1H NMR and 13C NMR chemical shifts are reported relative to CDCl3 as internal standard. Purity of compounds was determined by elemental analyses performed using CHN analyzer.

2.1

2.1 Synthesis of 5,7-dihydroxy-2-(3-hydroxy-4-methoxyphenyl)chroman-4-one (2)

A mixture of 1 (5.7 mmol) and H2SO4 (10 mL) in anhydrous CH3OH (280 mL) was stirred at 60 °C for 9 h, and ethyl acetate (1.2 L) was then added at 20 °C. The solution was washed with H2O (420 mL), and dried (Na2SO4). Evaporation afforded pale-yellow powder. The crude product was dissolved in acetone (70 mL) and added dropwise (60 min) to a stirred mixture of H2O/acetic acid (150:1, 700 mL) at 95 °C. The slurry was cooled to 45 °C and the product filtered and dried in vacuo to give 2: Yield: 89%, M.p. 222–224 °C.

2.2

2.2 Synthesis of 5-hydroxy-2-(3-hydroxy-4-methoxyphenyl)-7-(prop-2-ynyloxy)chroman-4-one (4)

Propargyl bromide (3) (0.5 mmol) was dropwise added to a solution of compound 2 (1 mmol) in acetonitrile and the reaction mixture was stirred at 75 °C for 4 h. Reaction was monitored by TLC and the crude product was subjected to column chromatography (Hexane: EtOAc) to give pure compound 4. Yield: 58%. IR (KBr) cm−1: 3365 (OH), 1627 (C⚌O), 1438 (Ar). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 12.18 (s, 1H, OH), 9.11 (s, 1H, OH), 6.91–6.86 (m, 3H, Ar—H), 6.38 (d, J = 2.2 Hz, 1H), 6.21 (d, J = 2.3 Hz, 1H), 5.47 (dd, J = 2.6, 12.2 Hz, 1H), 5.22 (s, 2H, OCH2), 3.82 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.19 (dd, J = 12.7, 17.2 Hz,1H, 3-H trans), 2.61 (dd, J = 2.8, 17.2 Hz, 1H, 3-H cis), 2.29 (s, 1H, CH). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 186.4, 165.7, 163.3, 161.5, 157.6, 154.2, 135.1, 119.0, 111.9, 110.1, 102.4, 98.5, 93.8, 84.2, 80.3, 78.7, 66.5 (OCH3), 64.4 (OCH2), 45.6. EMI–MS (m/z): 341.69 (M+). Anal. Calcd. for C19H16O6: C, 67.05; H, 4.74. Found: C, 67.22; H, 4.59.

2.3

2.3 General procedure for the synthesis of compounds 6a-6s

Appropriate benzyl derivatives (0.65 mmol) were sonicated at 35 °C in the presence of a solution of NaN3 (0.8 mmol) in DMF (15 mL) and the progress of the reaction was monitored by TLC. After completion, CuSO4·5H2O (0.12 mmol) and sodium ascorbate (0.30 mmol) as well as intermediate 4 (0.5 mmol) were added and reaction was allowed to stir at room temperature for another 3 h. After completion, mixture was filtered, and solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure. The crude thus obtained was extracted with dichloromethane (3 × 40 mL) and the combined organic layer was dried over sodium sulfate and purified through column chromatography (MeOH:CHCl3) to afford the final product 6a-6s in 40–85% yield.

2.3.1

2.3.1 7-((1-benzyl-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)methoxy)-5-hydroxy-2-(3-hydroxy-4-methoxyphenyl)chroman-4-one (6a)

Yield: 53%. M.p. 189–191 °C. IR (KBr) cm−1: 3391 (OH), 1644 (C⚌O), 1560 (C⚌C, triazole), 1466 (C—N, triazole), 1450 (Ar), 1403 (N⚌N, triazole). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 12.12 (s, 1H, OH), 9.18 (s, 1H, OH), 7.62 (s, 1H, triazole-H), 7.41–7.34 (m, 5H, Ar—H), 6.95–6.87 (m, 3H, Ar—H), 6.30 (d, J = 2.2 Hz, 1H), 6.18 (d, J = 2.3 Hz, 1H), 5.51 (dd, J = 2.6, 12.2 Hz, 1H), 5.29 (s, 2H, CH2), 5.17 (s, 2H, OCH2), 3.77 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.21 (dd, J = 12.7, 17.2 Hz,1H, 3-H trans), 2.65 (dd, J = 2.8, 17.2 Hz, 1H, 3-H cis). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 182.2, 180.9, 165.3, 163.1, 161.6, 160.6, 157.4, 154.8, 146.2 (C-4, triazole), 141.5, 137.1, 135.3, 132.9 (C-5, triazole), 130.7, 129.1, 125.4, 124.6, 123.8, 119.9, 110.1, 106.5, 98.2, 93.8, 66.2 (OCH3), 64.3 (OCH2), 54.6 (N—CH2). EMI–MS (m/z): 474.67 (M+). Anal. Calcd. for C26H23N3O6: C, 65.95; H, 4.90; N, 8.87. Found: C, 66.03; H, 4.98; N, 8.96.

2.3.2

2.3.2 7-((1-(2-fluorobenzyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)methoxy)-5-hydroxy-2-(3-hydroxy-4-methoxyphenyl)chroman-4-one (6b)

Yield: 44%. M.p. 161–163 °C. IR (KBr) cm−1: 3360 (OH), 1650 (C⚌O), 1553 (C⚌C, triazole), 1472 (C—N, triazole), 1444 (Ar), 1409 (N⚌N, triazole). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 12.06 (s, 1H, OH), 9.12 (s, 1H, OH), 7.56 (s, 1H, triazole-H), 7.44–7.31 (m, 4H, Ar—H), 6.97–6.89 (m, 3H, Ar—H), 6.42 (d, J = 2.3 Hz, 1H), 6.18 (d, J = 2.2 Hz, 1H), 5.39 (dd, J = 2.7, 12.4 Hz, 1H), 5.23 (s, 2H, CH2), 5.11 (s, 2H, OCH2), 3.71 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.15 (dd, J = 12.6, 17.1 Hz,1H, 3-H trans), 2.71 (dd, J = 2.9, 17.3 Hz, 1H, 3-H cis). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 181.1, 179.2, 166.8, 164.6, 162.0, 159.7, 156.2, 153.0, 145.8 (C-4, triazole), 142.6, 138.5, 136.8, 132.7 (C-5, triazole), 131.2, 128.0, 126.8, 125.1, 124.5, 118.2, 111.8, 107.4, 98.6, 94.9, 67.1 (OCH3), 65.0 (OCH2), 55.1 (N—CH2). EMI–MS (m/z): 492.29 (M+). Anal. Calcd. for C26H22FN3O6: C, 63.54; H, 4.51; N, 8.55. Found: C, 63.67; H, 4.37; N, 8.42.

2.3.3

2.3.3 7-((1-(3-fluorobenzyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)methoxy)-5-hydroxy-2-(3-hydroxy-4-methoxyphenyl)chroman-4-one (6c)

Yield: 41%. M.p. 173–175 °C. IR (KBr) cm−1: 3402 (OH), 1636 (C⚌O), 1567 (C⚌C, triazole), 1459 (C—N, triazole), 1437 (Ar), 1415 (N⚌N, triazole). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 12.18 (s, 1H, OH), 9.06 (s, 1H, OH), 7.68 (s, 1H, triazole-H), 7.42–7.33 (m, 4H, Ar—H), 6.94–6.86 (m, 3H, Ar—H), 6.36 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 1H), 6.24 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 1H), 5.45 (dd, J = 2.5, 12.3 Hz, 1H), 5.36 (s, 2H, CH2), 5.06 (s, 2H, OCH2), 3.83 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.27 (dd, J = 12.5, 17.3 Hz,1H, 3-H trans), 2.77 (dd, J = 2.7, 17.1 Hz, 1H, 3-H cis). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 182.4, 180.7, 166.6, 163.3, 162.8, 160.4, 157.6, 153.1, 146.4 (C-4, triazole), 142.8, 137.3, 135.9, 133.0 (C-5, triazole), 130.5, 128.8, 125.6, 124.8, 123.6, 118.4, 110.3, 107.6, 99.8, 93.6, 66.4 (OCH3), 64.8 (OCH2), 54.4 (N—CH2). EMI–MS (m/z): 492.63 (M+). Anal. Calcd. for C26H22FN3O6: C, 63.54; H, 4.51; N, 8.55. Found: C, 63.69; H, 4.63; N, 8.45.

2.3.4

2.3.4 7-((1-(4-fluorobenzyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)methoxy)-5-hydroxy-2-(3-hydroxy-4-methoxyphenyl)chroman-4-one (6d)

Yield: 49%. M.p. 182–184 °C. IR (KBr) cm−1: 3380 (OH), 1645 (C⚌O), 1561 (C⚌C, triazole), 1467 (C—N, triazole), 1451 (Ar), 1404 (N⚌N, triazole). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 12.13 (s, 1H, OH), 9.19 (s, 1H, OH), 7.63 (s, 1H, triazole-H), 7.40–7.30 (m, 4H, Ar—H), 6.96–6.85 (m, 3H, Ar—H), 6.31 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 1H), 6.19 (d, J = 2.2 Hz, 1H), 5.52 (dd, J = 2.5, 12.4 Hz, 1H), 5.30 (s, 2H, CH2), 5.18 (s, 2H, OCH2), 3.78 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.22 (dd, J = 12.6, 17.3 Hz,1H, 3-H trans), 2.66 (dd, J = 2.7, 17.1 Hz, 1H, 3-H cis). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 181.3, 179.4, 165.5, 164.8, 161.4, 159.5, 156.4, 154.6, 145.1 (C-4, triazole), 141.9, 138.7, 136.4, 133.5 (C-5, triazole), 131.4, 129.3, 126.6, 125.3, 124.3, 119.7, 111.6, 106.7, 99.4, 94.7, 67.3 (OCH3), 65.2 (OCH2), 55.0 (N—CH2). EMI–MS (m/z): 492.75 (M+). Anal. Calcd. for C26H22FN3O6: C, 63.54; H, 4.51; N, 8.55. Found: C, 63.41; H, 4.39; N, 8.40.

2.3.5

2.3.5 7-((1-(2-chlorobenzyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)methoxy)-5-hydroxy-2-(3-hydroxy-4-methoxyphenyl)chroman-4-one (6e)

Yield: 51%. M.p. 176–178 °C. IR (KBr) cm−1: 3356 (OH), 1651 (C⚌O), 1554 (C⚌C, triazole), 1473 (C—N, triazole), 1445 (Ar), 1410 (N⚌N, triazole), 750 (C—Cl). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 12.07 (s, 1H, OH), 9.13 (s, 1H, OH), 7.57 (s, 1H, triazole-H), 7.43–7.32 (m, 4H, Ar—H), 6.98–6.90 (m, 3H, Ar—H), 6.43 (d, J = 2.3 Hz, 1H), 6.13 (d, J = 2.3 Hz, 1H), 5.40 (dd, J = 2.6, 12.3 Hz, 1H), 5.24 (s, 2H, CH2), 5.12 (s, 2H, OCH2), 3.72 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.16 (dd, J = 12.7, 17.2 Hz,1H, 3-H trans), 2.72 (dd, J = 2.9, 17.2 Hz, 1H, 3-H cis). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 181.7, 180.5, 165.7, 163.5, 161.2, 160.2, 157.8, 154.4, 146.6 (C-4, triazole), 141.7, 138.9, 135.5, 132.3 (C-5, triazole), 130.3, 129.5, 125.8, 124.0, 123.4, 119.5, 110.5, 106.9, 98.8, 93.4, 66.8 (OCH3), 64.1 (OCH2), 55.3 (N—CH2). EMI–MS (m/z): 508.78 (M+). Anal. Calcd. for C26H22ClN3O6: C, 61.48; H, 4.37; N, 8.27. Found: C, 61.36; H, 4.51; N, 8.40.

2.3.6

2.3.6 7-((1-(3-chlorobenzyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)methoxy)-5-hydroxy-2-(3-hydroxy-4-methoxyphenyl)chroman-4-one (6f)

Yield: 43%. M.p. 193–195 °C. IR (KBr) cm−1: 3410 (OH), 1637 (C⚌O), 1568 (C⚌C, triazole), 1460 (C—N, triazole), 1438 (Ar), 1416 (N⚌N, triazole), 765 (C—Cl). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 12.19 (s, 1H, OH), 9.07 (s, 1H, OH), 7.69 (s, 1H, triazole-H), 7.45–7.35 (m, 4H, Ar—H), 6.93–6.88 (m, 3H, Ar—H), 6.37 (d, J = 2.2 Hz, 1H), 6.25 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 1H), 5.46 (dd, J = 2.7, 12.2 Hz, 1H), 5.37 (s, 2H, CH2), 5.07 (s, 2H, OCH2), 3.84 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.28 (dd, J = 12.5, 17.1 Hz,1H, 3-H trans), 2.78 (dd, J = 2.8, 17.3 Hz, 1H, 3-H cis). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 182.6, 179.6, 166.4, 164.4, 162.6, 160.0, 156.6, 153.3, 145.3 (C-4, triazole), 142.1, 137.5, 136.2, 132.5 (C-5, triazole), 131.6, 128.6, 126.4, 125.5, 124.7, 118.6, 111.4, 107.8, 98.4, 94.5, 67.5 (OCH3), 65.4 (OCH2), 54.2 (N—CH2). EMI–MS (m/z): 508.72 (M+). Anal. Calcd. for C26H22ClN3O6: C, 61.48; H, 4.37; N, 8.27. Found: C, 61.35; H, 4.29; N, 8.38.

2.3.7

2.3.7 7-((1-(4-chlorobenzyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)methoxy)-5-hydroxy-2-(3-hydroxy-4-methoxyphenyl)chroman-4-one (6g)

Yield: 52%. M.p. 165–167 °C. IR (KBr) cm−1: 3376 (OH), 1646 (C⚌O), 1562 (C⚌C, triazole), 1468 (C—N, triazole), 1452 (Ar), 1405 (N⚌N, triazole), 778 (C—Cl). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 12.14 (s, 1H, OH), 9.20 (s, 1H, OH), 7.64 (s, 1H, triazole-H), 7.41–7.31 (m, 4H, Ar—H), 6.95–6.89 (m, 3H, Ar—H), 6.32 (d, J = 2.2 Hz, 1H), 6.20 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 1H), 5.53 (dd, J = 2.7, 12.2 Hz, 1H), 5.31 (s, 2H, CH2), 5.19 (s, 2H, OCH2), 3.79 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.23 (dd, J = 12.5, 17.1 Hz,1H, 3-H trans), 2.67 (dd, J = 2.8, 17.3 Hz, 1H, 3-H cis). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 182.1, 179.8, 166.2, 163.7, 162.4, 159.3, 157.2, 153.5, 146.8 (C-4, triazole), 142.3, 137.7, 135.7, 132.7 (C-5, triazole), 130.1, 128.4, 125.0, 124.2, 123.2, 118.8, 110.7, 107.2, 99.6, 93.2, 66.9 (OCH3), 64.7 (OCH2), 54.1 (N—CH2). EMI–MS (m/z): 508.96 (M+). Anal. Calcd. for C26H22ClN3O6: C, 61.48; H, 4.37; N, 8.27. Found: C, 61.62; H, 4.32; N, 8.34.

2.3.8

2.3.8 7-((1-(2-bromobenzyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)methoxy)-5-hydroxy-2-(3-hydroxy-4-methoxyphenyl)chroman-4-one (6h)

Yield: 47%. M.p. 156–158 °C. IR (KBr) cm−1: 3362 (OH), 1652 (C⚌O), 1555 (C⚌C, triazole), 1474 (C—N, triazole), 1446 (Ar), 1411 (N⚌N, triazole). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 12.08 (s, 1H, OH), 9.14 (s, 1H, OH), 7.58 (s, 1H, triazole-H), 7.44–7.33 (m, 4H, Ar—H), 6.97–6.86 (m, 3H, Ar—H), 6.44 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 1H), 6.14 (d, J = 2.3 Hz, 1H), 5.41 (dd, J = 2.5, 12.4 Hz, 1H), 5.25 (s, 2H, CH2), 5.13 (s, 2H, OCH2), 3.73 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.17 (dd, J = 12.6, 17.3 Hz,1H, 3-H trans), 2.73 (dd, J = 2.7, 17.1 Hz, 1H, 3-H cis). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 181.5, 180.3, 165.9, 164.2, 161.0, 159.1, 156.8, 154.2, 145.5 (C-4, triazole), 141.8, 138.2, 136.9, 133.9 (C-5, triazole), 131.8, 129.7, 126.2, 125.7, 124.9, 119.3, 111.2, 106.1, 98.0, 94.3, 67.7 (OCH3), 65.6 (OCH2), 55.5 (N—CH2). EMI–MS (m/z): 553.55 (M+). Anal. Calcd. for C26H22BrN3O6: C, 56.53; H, 4.01; N, 7.61. Found: C, 56.38; H, 4.13; N, 7.50.

2.3.9

2.3.9 7-((1-(3-bromobenzyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)methoxy)-5-hydroxy-2-(3-hydroxy-4-methoxyphenyl)chroman-4-one (6i)

Yield: 42%. M.p. 186–188 °C. IR (KBr) cm−1: 3415 (OH), 1638 (C⚌O), 1569 (C⚌C, triazole), 1461 (C—N, triazole), 1439 (Ar), 1417 (N⚌N, triazole). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 12.20 (s, 1H, OH), 9.08 (s, 1H, OH), 7.70 (s, 1H, triazole-H), 7.42–7.34 (m, 4H, Ar—H), 6.94–6.85 (m, 3H, Ar—H), 6.38 (d, J = 2.3 Hz, 1H), 6.26 (d, J = 2.2 Hz, 1H), 5.47 (dd, J = 2.6, 12.3 Hz, 1H), 5.38 (s, 2H, CH2), 5.08 (s, 2H, OCH2), 3.85 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.29 (dd, J = 12.7, 17.2 Hz,1H, 3-H trans), 2.79 (dd, J = 2.9, 17.2 Hz, 1H, 3-H cis). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 182.8, 180.1, 165.1, 163.9, 161.1, 160.9, 157.0, 154.9, 146.1 (C-4, triazole), 141.6, 137.4, 135.1, 132.1 (C-5, triazole), 130.9, 129.2, 125.1, 124.4, 123.9, 119.1, 110.9, 106.3, 99.2, 93.0, 66.6 (OCH3), 64.9 (OCH2), 55.7 (N—CH2). EMI–MS (m/z): 553.23 (M+). Anal. Calcd. for C26H22BrN3O6: C, 56.53; H, 4.01; N, 7.61. Found: C, 56.65; H, 4.14; N, 7.70.

2.3.10

2.3.10 7-((1-(4-bromobenzyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)methoxy)-5-hydroxy-2-(3-hydroxy-4-methoxyphenyl)chroman-4-one (6j)

Yield: 50%. M.p. 175–177 °C. IR (KBr) cm−1: 3394 (OH), 1647 (C⚌O), 1563 (C⚌C, triazole), 1469 (C—N, triazole), 1453 (Ar), 1406 (N⚌N, triazole). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 12.15 (s, 1H, OH), 9.21 (s, 1H, OH), 7.65 (s, 1H, triazole-H), 7.40–7.32 (m, 4H, Ar—H), 6.96–6.87 (m, 3H, Ar—H), 6.33 (d, J = 2.3 Hz, 1H), 6.21 (d, J = 2.2 Hz, 1H), 5.54 (dd, J = 2.6, 12.3 Hz, 1H), 5.32 (s, 2H, CH2), 5.20 (s, 2H, OCH2), 3.80 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.24 (dd, J = 12.7, 17.2 Hz,1H, 3-H trans), 2.68 (dd, J = 2.9, 17.2 Hz, 1H, 3-H cis). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 181.2, 179.9, 166.7, 164.0, 162.2, 159.0, 156.9, 153.7, 145.7 (C-4, triazole), 142.5, 137.9, 135.8, 132.8 (C-5, triazole), 131.1, 128.9, 126.9, 125.2, 124.8, 118.9, 111.1, 107.0, 98.9, 94.1, 67.9 (OCH3), 65.8 (OCH2), 54.3 (N—CH2). EMI–MS (m/z): 553.62 (M+). Anal. Calcd. for C26H22BrN3O6: C, 56.53; H, 4.01; N, 7.61. Found: C, 56.61; H, 4.09; N, 7.52.

2.3.11

2.3.11 5-hydroxy-2-(3-hydroxy-4-methoxyphenyl)-7-((1-(2-methylbenzyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)methoxy)chroman-4-one (6k)

Yield: 46%. M.p. 160–162 °C. IR (KBr) cm−1: 3353 (OH), 1653 (C⚌O), 1556 (C⚌C, triazole), 1475 (C—N, triazole), 1447 (Ar), 1412 (N⚌N, triazole). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 12.09 (s, 1H, OH), 9.15 (s, 1H, OH), 7.59 (s, 1H, triazole-H), 7.43–7.30 (m, 4H, Ar—H), 6.98–6.88 (m, 3H, Ar—H), 6.45 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 1H), 6.15 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 1H), 5.42 (dd, J = 2.7, 12.2 Hz, 1H), 5.26 (s, 2H, CH2), 5.14 (s, 2H, OCH2), 3.74 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.18 (dd, J = 12.5, 17.3 Hz,1H, 3-H trans), 2.74 (dd, J = 2.8, 17.1 Hz, 1H, 3-H cis), 1.94 (s, 3H, CH3). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 181.4, 180.0, 165.0, 163.2, 161.3, 160.7, 157.1, 153.9, 146.3 (C-4, triazole), 141.4, 137.2, 136.6, 133.2 (C-5, triazole), 130.8, 128.2, 125.3, 124.9, 123.7, 118.7, 110.2, 107.1, 99.1, 93.9, 67.0 (OCH3), 64.5 (OCH2), 54.4 (N—CH2), 20.4. EMI–MS (m/z): 488.27 (M+). Anal. Calcd. for C27H25N3O6: C, 66.52; H, 5.17; N, 8.62. Found: C, 66.65; H, 5.25; N, 8.50.

2.3.12

2.3.12 5-hydroxy-2-(3-hydroxy-4-methoxyphenyl)-7-((1-(4-methylbenzyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)methoxy)chroman-4-one (6l)

Yield: 48%. M.p. 153–155 °C. IR (KBr) cm−1: 3408 (OH), 1639 (C⚌O), 1570 (C⚌C, triazole), 1462 (C—N, triazole), 1440 (Ar), 1418 (N⚌N, triazole). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 12.21 (s, 1H, OH), 9.09 (s, 1H, OH), 7.71 (s, 1H, triazole-H), 7.45–7.36 (m, 4H, Ar—H), 6.93–6.84 (m, 3H, Ar—H), 6.36 (d, J = 2.2 Hz, 1H), 6.27 (d, J = 2.3 Hz, 1H), 5.48 (dd, J = 2.5, 12.3 Hz, 1H), 5.30 (s, 2H, CH2), 5.09 (s, 2H, OCH2), 3.86 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.30 (dd, J = 12.6, 17.1 Hz,1H, 3-H trans), 2.80 (dd, J = 2.7, 17.3 Hz, 1H, 3-H cis), 1.83 (s, 3H, CH3). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 182.0, 179.7, 166.9, 164.1, 162.9, 160.5, 156.7, 154.7, 145.0 (C-4, triazole), 141.2, 138.6, 136.7, 132.6 (C-5, triazole), 130.6, 129.4, 125.5, 124.7, 123.5, 119.0, 111.5, 106.2, 98.7, 94.2, 66.7 (OCH3), 65.1 (OCH2), 55.9 (N—CH2), 22.7. EMI–MS (m/z): 488.67 (M+). Anal. Calcd. for C27H25N3O6: C, 66.52; H, 5.17; N, 8.62. Found: C, 66.61; H, 5.08; N, 8.70.

2.3.13

2.3.13 2-((4-((5-hydroxy-2-(3-hydroxy-4-methoxyphenyl)-4-oxochroman-7-yloxy)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)methyl)benzonitrile (6m)

Yield: 40%. M.p. 185–187 °C. IR (KBr) cm−1: 3367 (OH), 1648 (C⚌O), 1564 (C⚌C, triazole), 1470 (C—N, triazole), 1454 (Ar), 1407 (N⚌N, triazole). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 12.16 (s, 1H, OH), 9.22 (s, 1H, OH), 7.66 (s, 1H, triazole-H), 7.41–7.32 (m, 4H, Ar—H), 6.95–6.88 (m, 3H, Ar—H), 6.34 (d, J = 2.3 Hz, 1H), 6.22 (d, J = 2.3 Hz, 1H), 5.55 (dd, J = 2.6, 12.4 Hz, 1H), 5.33 (s, 2H, CH2), 5.21 (s, 2H, OCH2), 3.81 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.25 (dd, J = 12.6, 17.1 Hz,1H, 3-H trans), 2.69 (dd, J = 2.8, 17.1 Hz, 1H, 3-H cis). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 182.9, 180.2, 165.2, 163.4, 162.7, 159.8, 157.3, 154.5, 146.5 (C-4, triazole), 142.7, 138.8, 135.6, 133.8 (C-5, triazole), 131.3, 128.5, 126.7, 125.9, 124.0, 119.8, 117.3, 110.4, 106.4, 99.3, 93.7, 66.5 (OCH3), 65.3 (OCH2), 55.2 (N—CH2). EMI–MS (m/z): 499.31 (M+). Anal. Calcd. for C27H22N4O6: C, 65.05; H, 4.45; N, 11.24. Found: C, 64.97; H, 4.33; N, 11.12.

2.3.14

2.3.14 4-((4-((5-hydroxy-2-(3-hydroxy-4-methoxyphenyl)-4-oxochroman-7-yloxy)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)methyl)benzonitrile (6n)

Yield: 43%. M.p. 178–180 °C. IR (KBr) cm−1: 3374 (OH), 1654 (C⚌O), 1557 (C⚌C, triazole), 1476 (C—N, triazole), 1448 (Ar), 1413 (N⚌N, triazole). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 12.10 (s, 1H, OH), 9.16 (s, 1H, OH), 7.60 (s, 1H, triazole-H), 7.44–7.35 (m, 4H, Ar—H), 6.97–6.87 (m, 3H, Ar—H), 6.46 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 1H), 6.16 (d, J = 2.2 Hz, 1H), 5.43 (dd, J = 2.7, 12.4 Hz, 1H), 5.27 (s, 2H, CH2), 5.15 (s, 2H, OCH2), 3.75 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.19 (dd, J = 12.7, 17.2 Hz,1H, 3-H trans), 2.75 (dd, J = 2.9, 17.2 Hz, 1H, 3-H cis). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 181.6, 179.5, 166.5, 164.3, 161.5, 159.6, 156.0, 153.2, 145.2 (C-4, triazole), 142.9, 137.4, 135.2, 132.4 (C-5, triazole), 131.5, 129.6, 126.5, 125.4, 124.6, 118.5, 119.7, 111.3, 107.3, 98.5, 94.4, 67.8 (OCH3), 64.6 (OCH2), 54.5 (N—CH2). EMI–MS (m/z): 499.62 (M+). Anal. Calcd. for C27H22N4O6: C, 65.05; H, 4.45; N, 11.24. Found: C, 64.98; H, 4.54; N, 11.33.

2.3.15

2.3.15 5-hydroxy-2-(3-hydroxy-4-methoxyphenyl)-7-((1-(3-methoxybenzyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)methoxy)chroman-4-one (6o)

Yield: 50%. M.p. 164–166 °C. IR (KBr) cm−1: 3405 (OH), 1640 (C⚌O), 1571 (C⚌C, triazole), 1463 (C—N, triazole), 1441 (Ar), 1419 (N⚌N, triazole). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 12.22 (s, 1H, OH), 9.10 (s, 1H, OH), 7.72 (s, 1H, triazole-H), 7.42–7.31 (m, 4H, Ar—H), 6.94–6.88 (m, 3H, Ar—H), 6.40 (d, J = 2.3 Hz, 1H), 6.28 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 1H), 5.49 (dd, J = 2.5, 12.3 Hz, 1H), 5.31 (s, 2H, CH2), 5.10 (s, 2H, OCH2), 3.87 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.83 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.31 (dd, J = 12.5, 17.3 Hz,1H, 3-H trans), 2.81 (dd, J = 2.7, 17.3 Hz, 1H, 3-H cis). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 182.7, 179.3, 165.4, 163.6, 162.5, 160.3, 157.5, 153.4, 146.7 (C-4, triazole), 141.1, 138.0, 136.5, 133.6 (C-5, triazole), 130.4, 128.3, 125.7, 124.5, 123.3, 119.6, 110.6, 107.5, 99.9, 93.5, 67.6 (OCH3), 66.2, 64.4 (OCH2), 55.4 (N—CH2). EMI–MS (m/z): 504.66 (M+). Anal. Calcd. for C27H25N3O7: C, 64.41; H, 5.00; N, 8.35. Found: C, 64.30; H, 4.88; N, 8.47.

2.3.16

2.3.16 5-hydroxy-2-(3-hydroxy-4-methoxyphenyl)-7-((1-(4-methoxybenzyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)methoxy)chroman-4-one (6p)

Yield: 53%. M.p. 157–159 °C. IR (KBr) cm−1: 3359 (OH), 1641 (C⚌O), 1565 (C⚌C, triazole), 1471 (C—N, triazole), 1455 (Ar), 1408 (N⚌N, triazole). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 12.17 (s, 1H, OH), 9.23 (s, 1H, OH), 7.67 (s, 1H, triazole-H), 7.40–7.33 (m, 4H, Ar—H), 6.96–6.86 (m, 3H, Ar—H), 6.35 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 1H), 6.23 (d, J = 2.3 Hz, 1H), 5.56 (dd, J = 2.7, 12.2 Hz, 1H), 5.34 (s, 2H, CH2), 5.22 (s, 2H, OCH2), 3.82 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.80 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.26 (dd, J = 12.6, 17.2 Hz,1H, 3-H trans), 2.70 (dd, J = 2.8, 17.2 Hz, 1H, 3-H cis). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 181.0, 180.4, 163.3, 164.5, 161.7, 159.4, 156.3, 154.3, 145.4 (C-4, triazole), 142.0, 137.6, 136.3, 132.2 (C-5, triazole), 130.2, 129.8, 125.9, 124.3, 123.1, 118.3, 111.9, 106.6, 98.3, 94.6, 66.3 (OCH3), 65.9, 65.5 (OCH2), 54.7 (N—CH2). EMI–MS (m/z): 504.36 (M+). Anal. Calcd. for C27H25N3O7: C, 64.41; H, 5.00; N, 8.35. Found: C, 64.32; H, 5.09; N, 8.27.

2.3.17

2.3.17 5-hydroxy-2-(3-hydroxy-4-methoxyphenyl)-7-((1-(3-(trifluoromethyl)benzyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)methoxy)chroman-4-one (6q)

Yield: 44%. M.p. 194–196 °C. IR (KBr) cm−1: 3420 (OH), 1655 (C⚌O), 1558 (C⚌C, triazole), 1477 (C—N, triazole), 1449 (Ar), 1414 (N⚌N, triazole). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 12.11 (s, 1H, OH), 9.17 (s, 1H, OH), 7.61 (s, 1H, triazole-H), 7.43–7.34 (m, 4H, Ar—H), 6.98–6.89 (m, 3H, Ar—H), 6.47 (d, J = 2.2 Hz, 1H), 6.17 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 1H), 5.44 (dd, J = 2.6, 12.4 Hz, 1H), 5.28 (s, 2H, CH2), 5.16 (s, 2H, OCH2), 3.76 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.20 (dd, J = 12.7, 17.1 Hz,1H, 3-H trans), 2.76 (dd, J = 2.9, 17.3 Hz, 1H, 3-H cis). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 182.5, 180.8, 165.6, 163.8, 162.3, 160.1, 157.7, 153.6, 146.9 (C-4, triazole), 142.2, 138.1, 135.4, 133.4 (C-5, triazole), 131.7, 128.7, 126.3, 125.6, 124.9, 124.4, 119.4, 110.8, 106.0, 99.5, 93.3, 66.1 (OCH3), 65.7 (OCH2), 55.6 (N—CH2). EMI–MS (m/z): 541.32 (M+). Anal. Calcd. for C27H22F3N3O6: C, 59.89; H, 4.10; N, 7.76. Found: C, 59.96; H, 4.23; N, 7.89.

2.3.18

2.3.18 5-hydroxy-2-(3-hydroxy-4-methoxyphenyl)-7-((1-(4-(trifluoromethyl)benzyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)methoxy)chroman-4-one (6r)

Yield: 43%. M.p. 190–192 °C. IR (KBr) cm−1: 3411 (OH), 1642 (C⚌O), 1572 (C⚌C, triazole), 1464 (C—N, triazole), 1442 (Ar), 1420 (N⚌N, triazole). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 12.23 (s, 1H, OH), 9.11 (s, 1H, OH), 7.73 (s, 1H, triazole-H), 7.45–7.32 (m, 4H, Ar—H), 6.93–6.83 (m, 3H, Ar—H), 6.41 (d, J = 2.3 Hz, 1H), 6.29 (d, J = 2.2 Hz, 1H), 5.50 (dd, J = 2.5, 12.3 Hz, 1H), 5.32 (s, 2H, CH2), 5.05 (s, 2H, OCH2), 3.88 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.32 (dd, J = 12.6, 17.3 Hz,1H, 3-H trans), 2.82 (dd, J = 2.8, 17.1 Hz, 1H, 3-H cis). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 181.8, 179.1, 166.0, 164.7, 161.9, 159.2, 156.1, 154.1, 145.6 (C-4, triazole), 141.3, 137.8, 135.0, 132.0 (C-5, triazole), 131.9, 129.0, 126.1, 125.8, 125.3, 124.2, 118.1, 111.7, 107.7, 98.1, 94.8, 67.4 (OCH3), 64.2 (OCH2), 54.9 (N—CH2). EMI–MS (m/z): 541.68 (M+). Anal. Calcd. for C27H22F3N3O6: C, 59.89; H, 4.10; N, 7.76. Found: C, 59.77; H, 4.02; N, 7.64.

2.3.19

2.3.19 5-hydroxy-2-(3-hydroxy-4-methoxyphenyl)-7-((1-(4-nitrobenzyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)methoxy)chroman-4-one (6s)

Yield: 45%. M.p. 177–179 °C. IR (KBr) cm−1: 3389 (OH), 1642 (C⚌O), 1566 (C⚌C, triazole), 1465 (C—N, triazole), 1443 (Ar), 1407 (N⚌N, triazole). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 12.07 (s, 1H, OH), 9.24 (s, 1H, OH), 7.63 (s, 1H, triazole-H), 7.43–7.35 (m, 4H, Ar—H), 6.95–6.86 (m, 3H, Ar—H), 6.48 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 1H), 6.19 (d, J = 2.3 Hz, 1H), 5.57 (dd, J = 2.7, 12.4 Hz, 1H), 5.35 (s, 2H, CH2), 5.23 (s, 2H, OCH2), 3.71 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.21 (dd, J = 12.5, 17.2 Hz,1H, 3-H trans), 2.72 (dd, J = 2.7, 17.3 Hz, 1H, 3-H cis). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 182.3, 180.6, 165.8, 163.0, 162.1, 160.8, 157.9, 153.8, 146.0 (C-4, triazole), 142.4, 138.3, 136.1, 133.1 (C-5, triazole), 130.0, 128.0, 125.2, 124.1, 123.0, 119.2, 110.0, 106.8, 99.7, 93.1, 67.2 (OCH3), 65.9 (OCH2), 55.8 (N—CH2). EMI–MS (m/z): 519.60 (M+). Anal. Calcd. for C26H22N4O8: C, 60.23; H, 4.28; N, 10.81. Found: C, 60.36; H, 4.15; N, 10.92.

2.4

2.4 Biological assays

2.4.1

2.4.1 DPPH free radical scavenging assay

Free radicals exercise deleterious role in biological systems and in foods and hence radical scavenging activities are very useful. Various chemical reactions running in the biological systems usually furnish free radicals which are responsible to cause damage to the building block of biologics such as DNA and lipids. Reduction of a stable free radical, 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl is the base of DPPH antioxidant bioassay. It has an odd electron which exerts a maximum absorption band of 517 nm (deep violet color) in ethanol. The DPPH bioassay is the widely used and acceptable method for inspecting the free radical scavenging efficacy of the intended compound. Such substances donate a hydrogen atom when it mixes with the DPPH thereby introducing its reduced congener, diphenylpicrylhydrazine (nonradical) with the loss of violet color.

In the present study, DPPH bioassay was adopted to screen 6a-s for their in vitro antioxidant potencies. The results of this bioassay screenings were presented in the form of the percentage of radical scavenging antioxidant activity (RSA%) of each substance. The investigation of the DPPH radical scavenging activity was operated according to the methodology described by Brand-Williams et al. (1995). A stable free radical, 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl was allowed to react with 6a-s in methanol solvent as 20 μL quantities of titled compounds were mixed up with 180 μL of DPPH in MeOH. These titled compounds donated hydrogen in this mixing thereby carried out reduction of DPPH and hence a change in the color was observed from deep violet to light yellow at 517 nm after 25 min of reaction using a UV–Visible spectrophotometer (Perkin Elmer). The lank reading was also performed using the mixture of methanol (20 μL) and sample (180 μL of DPPH). Ascorbic acid served as a control drug in this assay and its solution was prepared upon mixing methanol (20 μL) and DPPH radical solution (180 μL). The results of this bioassay, RSA% (the radical scavenging activity in percentage) were determined according to Mensor et al. (2001) as described in below equation. % Scavenging = Absorbance of blank - Absorbance of test Absorbance of blank × 100

A plot between concentration of test compounds and % scavenging introduced IC50 levels in the presence of Ascorbic acid as standard.

2.4.2

2.4.2 ABTS radical scavenging assay

The ABTS•+ radical cation scavenging efficacies of the test compounds were determined according to the method described earlier (Re et al., 1999). Mixing of an equal amount of 7 mM ABTS•+ (2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid)) stock solution with 2.45 mM potassium persulfate stock solution produces the ABTS•+ cation. The mixture was kept in dark place at 0 °C temperature for 12 h and ABTS solution was diluted with MeOH so that it gives UV absorption value of 0.700 (±0.200) at the 734 nm. The 1000 μL stock solutions of titled compounds 3a-j were established upon dissolving them in MeOH and further dilutions furnish 100 μL, 10 μL, 1 μL, and 0.1 μL of quantities of samples. 180 μL solutions of compounds to be evaluated and 20 μL of the ABTS solution was mixed in 96 well plates in dark place which were then incubated for 10 min to measure UV absorption at 734 nm. Mixture of 180 μL ABTS and 20 μL mL methanol was used as a control determination, whereas ascorbic acid was used as a reference drug. The UV absorption data represented the radical scavenging rates which give the corresponding IC50 levels for the test compounds.

The scavenging capability of ABTS•+ radical was calculated using the following equation: % Scavenging = Absorbance of blank - Absorbance of test Absorbance of blank × 100

2.5

2.5 In vitro anticancer bioassay

The test compounds 6a-s were checked for their in vitro anticancer potential against cervical cancer cell lines (HeLa and CaSki) and an ovarian cancer cell line (SK-OV-3) and cytotoxic action against Madin Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells which were purchased from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC). All the cell lines were well maintained in a humidified cell culture incubator in the presence of 5% of CO2 at 32 °C temperature. Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM) and RPMI-1640 Medium supplemented with 10% of fetal Bovine Serum (FBS) and 1% of Antibiotic–Antimycotic solution (100×) were used for HeLa, CaSki, SK-OV-3 and MDCK cell growth respectively. DMEM, RPMI-1640, trypsin–EDTA, Antibiotic–Antimycotic Solution 100× and FBS were purchased from Welgene (150-Seongseo Industrial complex Bukro, Dalseogu, Daegu, 704–948 Republic of Korea).

In the 96 well plates, all cancer cell lines (HeLa, CaSki and SK-OV-3) and a non-cancer cell line (MDCK) were seeded and plates were concentrated as 2 × 104 cells per well plate. Cancerous cells were allowed to grow for 1 day initially and after that the 96 well plates were washed twice with phosphate buffer saline (PBS). DMEM and RPMI-1640 medium contained trypsin–EDTA were used to dilute HeLa, CaSki, SK-OV-3 and MDCK cells up to 5 × 103 level which was used for the infection followed by placing of 10 μL of compound quantities and 90 μL of cell solution onto the 96 well plates in which HeLa, CaSki, SK-OV-3 and MDCK cells were grown the previous day. 0.1 μL, 1 μL, 10 μL and 100 μL concentrations of the test compounds were used in 96 well plates for the analysis with three replicates of observations. Infected plates were incubated in CO2 incubator for a period of 48 h. After incubation the medium was removed and washed twice with PBS buffer. After that, 70% of acetone was added to fix the cells and was incubated for 1 h at 4 °C temperature. After incubation, solvent was removed and plates were dried in an oven at 60 °C temperature. The dried plates were overnight incubated with 100 μL of SRB (0.4 mg/L) followed by SRB removal and washing thrice with 1% of acetic acid and dried again under hot air oven at 60 °C. Microscopic observation was carried out to determine the morphology of the cells and after this observation the SRB strain was dissolved with 10 mM of Tris base and incubated overnight (Adaramoye et al., 2011; Mistry et al., 2015). Spectrophotometric data were recorded at 510 nm to calculate the inhibition concentration of 50% (IC50) and cytotoxic concentration of 50% (CC50).

3

3 Results and discussion

3.1

3.1 Chemistry

Titled compounds 6a-s were synthesized via efficient reaction sequences as described in Scheme 1. Hesperidin (1) was subjected to hydrolysis in the presence of sulfuric acid in methanol to give hesperetin 2 (Seitz and Wingard, 1987). Nucleophilic substitution reaction of 2 with propargyl bromide (3) yielded intermediate 4. Desired benzyl halides were diazotized in acidic conditions and then treated with sodium azide to construct corresponding azides (5a-s) Jin et al., 2014. CuSO4·5H2O and sodium ascorbate in DMF were utilized for the azide–alkyne cycloaddition through click chemistry between aromatic azides (5a-s) and intermediate 4 to furnish final 1,2,3-triazole based hesperetin analogs 6a-s in reasonably good yields. Structural elucidation using 1H NMR, 13C NMR and mass spectrometry was in good accordance with assumed structures. Newer compounds gave C, H and N analyses within 0.4% points from the theoretical values, i.e. in acceptable range.

Synthesis of substituted benzyl-1,2,3-triazolyl hesperetin derivatives 6a-s.
Scheme 1 Synthesis of substituted benzyl-1,2,3-triazolyl hesperetin derivatives 6a-s.

3.2

3.2 Pharmacology

3.2.1

3.2.1 Antioxidant activities

DPPH and ABTS•+ scavenging bioassay are the most common spectrophotometric methods to inspect the antioxidant power of the tested molecules. These free radicals interact with molecules subjected for testing which are capable to reduce the stable DPPH radical to the yellow colored diphenylpicrylhydrazine via donating a hydrogen due to the formation of the nonradical form, DPPH-H, during the reaction. To evaluate the free radical scavenging activity of 6a-s, a DPPH assay was performed and the results are expressed in terms of IC50 value (concentration required to inhibit 50% of the radicals) as summarized in Table 1. New flavanone derivatives 6a-s possessed 30.75 ± 1.965 − 83.57 ± 0.456 μM and 9.118 ± 1.002 − 39.356 ± 0.644 μM of IC50 levels in DPPH and ABTS bioassay, respectively and can be comparable to ascorbic acid exerting 12.72 ± 0.274 μM (DPPH) and 5.0925 ± 0.2090 μM (ABTS) of IC50 levels. In general, titled scaffolds expressed encouraging results against ABTS•+ when compared to DPPH. It was observed that types and position of electron withdrawing (EWD) or electron donating (ED) substituent played an essential role in delivering corresponding radical scavenging sensitivities. For example, molecules bearing EWD presented significant antioxidant power against DPPH radical, for example an analog 6o carrying 3-OCH3 group demonstrated 30.75 ± 1.965 μM of IC50 level. Moreover, 6l bearing 4-CH3 as well as 6p holding 4-OCH3 functionalities showed 33.21 ± 2.675 μM and 33.17 ± 1.245 μM of IC50 levels, respectively against DPPH. Overall data suggested that to achieve antioxidant activity against DPPH the nature of substituent was important than its position on the phenyl ring. However, in case of scaffolds carrying EWD halogen(s) groups, those with para-substitution were more active than their meta- and ortho-congeners. For example, 6j with 4-Br group expressed 35.89 ± 1.643 μM of IC50 toward DPPH, whereas 6h (2-Br) and 6i (3-Br) showed nearly 41 μM of IC50. Compound 6a with no substituent present on the phenyl ring displayed weak antioxidant power against DPPH, and the fact was suggestive of the importance of placing appropriate substituent on the phenyl ring to achieve anticipated radical scavenging potencies. It was noticed that increasing number of halogen atoms resulted into the scaffolds exercising positively influenced antioxidant effects, as 6q and 6r with CF3 group had 36.79 ± 2.645 μM and 35.28 ± 1.258 μM of IC50 levels, respectively and were higher than the antioxidant power of remaining halogen based analogs. Among EWD and ED based flavanones, antioxidant activity order can be presented as OCH3 > CH3 and CF3 > Br > F > Cl > NO2 > CN, respectively.

Table 1 Screening results of DPPH and ABTS radical scavenging activity of 6a-s.
No. R IC50 μM ± SDa
DPPH ABTS
6a H 56.45 ± 2.339 8.545 ± 0.545
6b 2-F 52.12 ± 1.568 12.645 ± 0.733
6c 3-F 44.96 ± 2.034 15.645 ± 2.280
6d 4-F 37.34 ± 3.397 13.534 ± 0.471
6e 2-Cl 43.85 ± 1.645 17.532 ± 1.325
6f 3-Cl 71.27 ± 1.143 19.542 ± 0.843
6g 4-Cl 41.90 ± 0.754 33.582 ± 2.422
6h 2-Br 41.63 ± 1.533 16.608 ± 0.356
6i 3-Br 41.57 ± 0.854 14.338 ± 1.098
6j 4-Br 35.89 ± 1.643 14.092 ± 0.313
6k 2-CH3 38.09 ± 0.741 13.445 ± 2.188
6l 4-CH3 33.21 ± 2.675 12.621 ± 0.235
6m 2-CN 83.57 ± 0.456 34.952 ± 2.032
6n 4-CN 73.55 ± 2.534 18.135 ± 0.134
6o 3-OCH3 30.75 ± 1.965 9.118 ± 1.002
6p 4-OCH3 33.17 ± 1.245 17.742 ± 0.424
6q 3-CF3 36.79 ± 2.645 21.433 ± 1.955
6r 4-CF3 35.28 ± 1.258 18.621 ± 1.456
6s 4-NO2 66.20 ± 0.423 39.356 ± 0.644
Ascorbic acid 12.72 ± 0.274 5.0925 ± 0.2090
The results are average of triplicate analysis.

The ABTS•+ assay is based on a single electron transfer, the ABTS radical-cation decolorization, which is based on the reduction of ABTS•+ radicals by antioxidants. To evaluate the free radical scavenging activity of 6a-s, ABTS assay was performed and the results are expressed in terms of IC50 value (concentration required to inhibit 50% of the radicals) as summarized in Table 1. Similar to DPPH assay, compound 6o carrying 3-OCH3 group had most potent scavenging activity against ABTS•+ with 9.118 ± 1.002 μM of IC50, and was comparable to that of control ascorbic acid at 5.0925 ± 0.2090 μM. In fact, the position of the substituent had no influence of the corresponding ABTS•+ scavenging efficacies of 6a-s. Analogs 6b with 2-F and 6l with 4-CH3 expressed 12.645 ± 0.733 μM and 12.621 ± 0.235 μM of IC50 levels, respectively and were the second most active group of molecules against ABTS•+. Furthermore, it was found that analogs with EWD fluorine (6d) and ED methyl (6k) groups had contributed at a larger extent in presenting ABTS•+ sensitivities with IC50 levels nearby 13 μM. Bromine bearing scaffolds (6i-6j) demonstrated 13.445 ± 2.188 μM − 14.338 ± 1.098 μM of IC50 levels and can be comparable to the most active molecules in the series tested against ABTS•+. Opposite to DPPH assay, it was observed that increasing the number of halogen atoms had negative influence of the corresponding ABTS•+ scavenging efficacies of the result scaffolds as 6q and 6r had weak antioxidant effects with 21.433 ± 1.955 μM and 18.621 ± 1.456 μM of IC50 levels. Among EWD and ED based flavanone derivatives, the activity order can be placed as F > Br > Cl > CF3 > CN > NO2 and OCH3 > CH3, respectively.

3.2.2

3.2.2 Anticancer activities

Analogs 6a-s were screened in the three cancer cell lines panel consisting of HeLa and CaSki (cervical) as well as SK-OV-3 (ovarian). End point determinations were made with a protein binding dye, sulforhodamine B (SRB) called SRB assay and the results of anticancer screening tests for 6a-s against cervical cancer cell lines are summarized in Table 2.

Table 2 Screening results of activity of 6a-s against cervical cancer cell lines.
No. R IC50 μM ± SDa IC50 μM ± SDa CC50 μM ± SDa
HeLa CaSki MDCK
6a H 39.645 ± 1.234 52.822 ± 1.088 302.8 ± 2.348
6b 2-F 17.754 ± 0.754 27.644 ± 0.159 289.2 ± 1.573
6c 3-F 27.333 ± 0.674 22.535 ± 1.321 204.3 ± 1.907
6d 4-F 18.272 ± 0.544 15.453 ± 0.153 257.4 ± 0.394
6e 2-Cl 25.138 ± 1.556 33.274 ± 0.222 301.2 ± 2.571
6f 3-Cl 44.051 ± 0.986 31.546 ± 1.130 238.6 ± 3.422
6g 4-Cl 27.923 ± 0.578 42.832 ± 1.245 287.6 ± 2.575
6h 2-Br 33.456 ± 1.644 12.721 ± 0.256 198.9 ± 1.700
6i 3-Br 61.631 ± 1.463 15.547 ± 1.096 233.3 ± 0.207
6j 4-Br 38.574 ± 0.761 19.146 ± 0.134 261.4 ± 3.772
6k 2-CH3 34.258 ± 2.003 16.046 ± 1.097 334.7 ± 2.792
6l 4-CH3 37.731 ± 0.445 19.543 ± 0.146 329.1 ± 4.250
6m 2-CN 89.643 ± 0.613 67.634 ± 2.189 179.8 ± 1.415
6n 4-CN 69.354 ± 1.856 54.445 ± 1.097 237.1 ± 3.634
6o 3-OCH3 56.753 ± 0.534 14.925 ± 0.078 290.9 ± 0.856
6p 4-OCH3 61.083 ± 1.344 29.842 ± 2.269 312.2 ± 2.980
6q 3-CF3 102.754 ± 1.521 27.329 ± 1.267 238.5 ± 5.931
6r 4-CF3 74.521 ± 0.634 49.531 ± 0.129 273.3 ± 4.436
6s 4-NO2 46.982 ± 0.744 77.841 ± 0.251 306.7 ± 1.162
The results are average of triplicate analysis.

Overall results suggested that nature and position of the substituents had considerable impact of the anticancer effects of tested molecules. Compounds holding EWD halogen atoms were more active against HeLa cell line than their ED based congeners. For example, 6b (2-F) and 6d (4-F) expressed 17.754 ± 0.754 μM and 18.272 ± 0.544 μM of IC50 levels, respectively and were the most active anticancer agents against HeLa among all tested. These two molecules had tolerable cytotoxicity toward MDCK cell line with 289.2 ± 1.573 μM and 257.4 ± 0.394 μM of CC50 levels. The fact was suggestive of the importance of fluorine for potency against HeLa cell line, but it was noticed that increasing the number of fluorine atoms diminished the activity of corresponding scaffolds, for example 6q and 6r had 102.754 ± 1.521 μM and 74.521 ± 0.634 μM of IC50 levels against HeLa, respectively. Moreover, analogs 6e and 6g with chlorine group presented 25.138 ± 1.556 and 27.923 ± 0.578 μM of IC50 levels, and 301.2 ± 2.571 and 287.6 ± 2.575 μM of CC50 levels, respectively. The data suggested that ortho- and para-position has reasonable influence on the corresponding anticancer action of the resultant EWD based molecules against HeLa cell line. In addition, halogen based molecules holding meta-substitution were found poorly active against HeLa, as scaffolds 6c (3-F), 6f (3-Cl) and 6i (3-Br) displayed 27.333 ± 0.674 μM, 44.051 ± 0.986 μM and 61.631 ± 1.463 μM of IC50 levels, respectively. Among ED based flavanones, an analog with ortho-methyl substituent (6k) exerted 34.258 ± 2.003 μM of IC50, but had significantly remarkable cytotoxicity toward MDCK cell line at 334.7 ± 2.792 μM of CC50. In fact, its para-congener (6l) also showed 37.731 ± 0.445 μM of IC50 and can be considered to have desirable anticancer effects against HeLa cell line. Overall among EWD and ED based flavanones, anticancer effects against HeLa cell line can be respectively placed as F > Cl > Br > NO2 > CF3 > CN and CH3 > OCH3. The bioassay outcomes observed against CaSki cell lines were irrespective of the nature of the substituent present on the phenyl ring of these flavanones. For example, both EWD based 6d (4-F) and ED based 6l (4-CH3) demonstrated 15.453 ± 0.153 and 19.543 ± 0.146 μM of IC50 levels, respectively. Likewise to bioassay results against HeLa cell line, increasing number of fluorine atom had negative effect on anticancer profiles of resultant analog, as CF3 based 6q and 6r displayed 27.329 ± 1.267 μM and 49.531 ± 0.129 μM of IC50 levels, respectively. Furthermore, 6k with 2-CH3 functionality presented the best result as anticancer molecule among all tested in the series with 16.046 ± 1.097 μM of IC50, whereas 6o holding ED 3-OCH3 group had 14.925 ± 0.078 μM of IC50. These results suggested that ED group had achieved considerable attention in expressing anticancer effects against CaSki cell line than those carrying EWD groups unlike outcomes observed in SRB assay with HeLa cell line. Furthermore, bromine based flavanone (6h) appeared with lowest IC50 levels at 12.721 ± 0.256 μM, but was found to exercise somewhat cytotoxicity at 198.9 ± 1.700 μM. Another two bromine based molecules, 6i and 6j were succeeded to present 15.547 ± 1.096 μM and 19.146 ± 0.134 μM of IC50 levels, respectively, which were at remarkable level when compared to the potency of highly active molecules in the series. Overall among EWD and ED based flavanones, anticancer effects against CaSki cell line can be respectively placed as Br > F > Cl > CF3 > CN > NO2 and 2-CH3 > 3-OCH3 > 4-CH3 > 4-OCH3.

Analogs 6a-s were tested to inspect their in vitro inhibitory efficacies against ovarian cancer cell line SK-OV-3 and the results of anticancer screening tests for 6a-s are summarized in Table 3. Although, the activity profiles seen for 6a-s against SK-OV-3 were weak when compared to those observed against cervical cancer cell lines, still the activity against SK-OV-3 was appreciable in terms of constructing detailed SAR analysis, as unlike above bioassay results, compounds 6q bearing highly electronegative EWD 3-CF3 group had 33.259 ± 1.534 μM of IC50, 238.5 ± 5.931 μM of CC50, which was very remarkable. These data implied that increasing number of halogen atoms may help to promote anticancer potential of the resultant molecules against ovarian cancer cell line. In addition, 6o holding ED 3-OCH3 expressed 41.479 ± 0.334 μM of IC50, 290.9 ± 0.856 μM of CC50 and was also found to have high anticancer effects against SK-OV-3. It was also found that anticancer results of 6a-s against SK-OV-3 had reversed than those observed against cervical cancer cell line in terms of position of substituents. For example, meta-position for EWD based molecules was found beneficial to exert anticancer effects against SK-OV-3, as 6c (3-F), 6f (3-Cl) and 6i (3-Br) had 36.610 ± 1.270 μM, 36.792 ± 0.542 μM and 39.120 ± 1.239 μM of IC50 levels, respectively than that of their ortho- and para-substituted congeners at >43 μM. However, in case of ED methyl carrying molecules, compound holding para-substitution was observed to have better sensitivity in inhibiting SK-OV-3, as 6l showed 56.438 ± 1.542 μM of IC50 when compared to that of 6k (2-CH3) at 59.875 ± 2.099 μM. Furthermore, unsubstituted phenyl ring was found to yield better results against SK-OV-3 than molecules holding NO2 and CN functionalities, as 6a had 61.651 ± 2.681 μM of IC50, whereas 6m, 6n and 6s displayed 78.541 ± 0.218 μM, 95.346 ± 0.911 μM and 65.115 ± 2.541 μM of IC50 levels, respectively. Overall among EWD and ED based flavanones, anticancer effects against SK-OV-3 cell line can be respectively placed as CF3 > Cl > F > Br > NO2 > CN and OCH3 > CH3.

Table 3 Screening results of activity of 6a-s against ovarian cancer cell line.
No. R IC50 μM ± SDa CC50 μM ± SDa
SK-OV-3 MDCK
6a H 61.651 ± 2.681 302.8 ± 2.348
6b 2-F 54.239 ± 1.923 289.2 ± 1.573
6c 3-F 36.610 ± 1.270 204.3 ± 1.907
6d 4-F 77.541 ± 1.456 257.4 ± 0.394
6e 2-Cl 47.229 ± 0.731 301.2 ± 2.571
6f 3-Cl 36.792 ± 0.542 238.6 ± 3.422
6g 4-Cl 56.873 ± 2.801 287.6 ± 2.575
6h 2-Br 43.665 ± 2.439 189.9 ± 1.700
6i 3-Br 39.120 ± 1.239 233.3 ± 0.207
6j 4-Br 64.542 ± 0.671 261.4 ± 3.772
6k 2-CH3 59.875 ± 2.099 334.7 ± 2.792
6l 4-CH3 56.438 ± 1.542 329.1 ± 4.250
6m 2-CN 78.541 ± 0.218 179.8 ± 1.415
6n 4-CN 95.346 ± 0.911 237.1 ± 3.634
6o 3-OCH3 41.479 ± 0.334 290.9 ± 0.856
6p 4-OCH3 47.580 ± 2.002 312.2 ± 2.980
6q 3-CF3 33.259 ± 1.534 238.5 ± 5.931
6r 4-CF3 49.561 ± 0.678 273.3 ± 4.436
6s 4-NO2 65.115 ± 2.541 306.7 ± 1.162
The results are average of triplicate analysis.

4

4 Conclusion

Copper-catalyzed azide–alkyne cycloaddition yielded 1,2,3-triazole core connecting a natural product flavanone hesperetin and substituted phenyls via click chemistry. With an aim to discover semi-synthetic flavanones with antioxidant and anticancer effects, titled scaffolds 6a-s were screened for their DPPH and ABTS•+ scavenging effects and cancerous cell inhibitory effects against cervical (HeLa and CaSki) and ovarian (SK-OV-3) cancer cell lines. From the bioassay outcomes it was noticed that nature and position of the EWD and ED substituents had remarkable effects. Molecules bearing ED groups demonstrated strong sensitivities in scavenging both DPPH and ABTS radicals and inhibiting CaSki cell line, whereas, those holding EWD groups presented excellent results against HeLa cell lines. Both EWD and ED based molecules exercised similar action against ovarian cancer cell line. In general, all the tested flavanone based 1,2,3-triazoles displayed good pharmacological potential and can be a tool to develop further set of highly potent antioxidant and anticancer agents.

Acknowledgment

This article was supported by the KU Research Professor Program of Konkuk University, Seoul, South Korea. This work was financed by Czech Ministry of Education Grant from the National Program for Sustainability I (LO1204).

References

  1. , , , , , , , , . Phytother. Res.. 2011;25:1558-1563.
  2. , , , , . Fundam. Clin. Pharmacol.. 2013;27:581-592.
  3. , , , . Lebenson Wiss. Technol.. 1995;28:25-30.
  4. , . Arch. Pharm. Res.. 2006;29:699-706.
  5. , , , , . Phytother. Res.. 2001;15:655-669.
  6. , , , , , . Arch. Pharm. Chem. Life Sci.. 2013;346:783-792.
  7. , , , , , . Anticancer Res.. 2005;25:3367-3374.
  8. , , , , . Arch. Pharm. Res.. 1999;22:309-312.
  9. , , , , , , , , , . Drug Des. Devel. Ther.. 2014;8:1047-1059.
  10. , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . J. Med. Chem.. 2005;48:5644-5647.
  11. , , , , , , . Phytother Res.. 2001;15:127-130.
  12. , , , . J. Chem. Res.. 2015;39:470-474.
  13. , , . Eur. J. Med. Chem.. 2014;71:24-30.
  14. , , , , , , . Free Radical Biol. Med.. 1999;26:1231-1237.
  15. , , , , , . Life Sci.. 2015;124:64-74.
  16. , , , . Am. J. Clin. Nutr.. 2005;81:215S-217S.
  17. , , , , , . Crit. Rev. Food. Sci. Nutr.. 2005;45:287-306.
  18. , , . Curr. Biol.. 2014;24:R453-R462.
  19. , , . Agric Food Chem.. 1987;26:278-280. J.
    , , , , , , , , . Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.. 2012;22:7194-7197.
  20. , , . Biomolecules. 2015;5:472-484.
  21. WHO, 2015. <http://www.who.int/cancer/en/> (accessed on June 18th, 2015).
  22. , , , . Agnc. Food Chem.. 2005;53:4757-4761.
  23. World Cancer Report, 2014. <http://www.iarc.fr/en/publications/books/wcr/wcr-order.php> (accessed on June 18th, 2015).
Show Sections