5.2
Impact Factor
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Corrigendum
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Full Length Article
Full lenth article
Letter to Editor
Original Article
Research article
Retraction
Retraction notice
Review
Review Article
SPECIAL ISSUE: ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY
5.3
Impact Factor
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Corrigendum
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Full Length Article
Full lenth article
Letter to Editor
Original Article
Research article
Retraction
Retraction notice
Review
Review Article
SPECIAL ISSUE: ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Review
12 (
8
); 3129-3140
doi:
10.1016/j.arabjc.2015.08.005

Acoustic and volumetric investigations in aromatic, cyclic and aliphatic ketones with dimethyl sulphoxide at 308.15 K

Department of Physics, KRK Govt. Degree College, Addanki 523201, A.P., India
Department of Physics, NM Govt. Degree College, Jogipet 502270, Telangana, India
Department of Physics, PBN College, Nidubrolu 522124, A.P., India
Department of Physics, Acharya Nagarjuna University, Nagarjuna Nagar, 522 510, A.P., India

⁎Corresponding author. Tel.: +91 863 2354395 (R), +91 9440712142. krdhanekula@yahoo.co.in (Sk.Md Nayeem)

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Elsevier and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Peer review under responsibility of King Saud University.

Abstract

Ultrasonic velocities, u, and densities, ρ, of binary liquid mixtures of dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO) with ketones such as acetophenone (AP), cyclohexanone (CH), and 3-pentanone (3P), including pure liquids, over the entire composition range have been measured at 308.15 K. Using the experimental data, deviation in ultrasonic velocity, Δu, deviation in isentropic compressibility, Δks, excess molar volume, V m E , excess intermolecular free length, L f E and excess acoustic impedance, ZE, partial molar volumes, V m , 1 , V m , 2 , and excess partial molar volumes, V m , 1 E , V m , 2 E have been calculated. Molecular interactions in the systems have been studied in the light of variation of excess/deviation values of calculated properties and these properties have been fitted to Redlich–Kister type polynomial equation. The observed positive values of V m E , Δks, L f E and negative values of Δu, ZE for all the binary liquid mixtures studied clearly indicate the presence of the dominance of weak physical interactions between the components of molecules. Further, FTIR spectra support the conclusions drawn from deviation/excess properties. Moreover, theoretical values of ultrasonic velocity in the mixtures have been evaluated using various theories and such values were compared with experimental velocities to verify the applicability of such theories to the systems investigated.

Keywords

Ultrasonic velocity
Density
Excess properties
Redlich–Kister type polynomial
Theoretical velocity models
1

1 Introduction

Ultrasonic velocities, densities and derived thermodynamic and acoustical parameters are of considerable interest in understanding the intermolecular interactions in binary as well as in ternary liquid mixtures (Armugam et al., 1998; Ali et al., 1999; Bhatt et al., 2000; Thirumaran, 2002; Deepali, 2004; Aralaguppi et al., 1991; Aminabhavi et al., 1999). In the chemical industry knowledge of the thermodynamic properties of non-electrolyte solutions is essential in the design involving chemical separation, heat transfer, mass transfer and fluid flow. Ultrasonic studies can also be used to determine the extent of complexation and to calculate the formation constant values of charge transfer complexes (Prakash, 1980; Kannappan, 2009; Zorebski and Kostka, 2008). Measurement of ultrasonic velocity has been adequately employed in understanding the nature of molecular interaction in pure liquid and liquid mixtures. The practical application of mixed solvents rather than single solvent in industrial and biological process has been recognized all over the world as they provide a wide choice of solutions with appropriate properties (Ali and Nain, 2001).

The present study deals with the thermodynamic study of mixed solvent system at 308.15 K temperature. The liquids under investigation have been chosen on the basis of their industrial applications. These applications have greatly stimulated the need for extensive information on the thermodynamic, acoustic and transport properties of these solvents and their mixtures (Oswal and Desai, 2001; Thirumaran and Karthikeyan, 2011; Rathnam, 2012).

The selected components for the present study are dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO) and ketone group liquids acetophenone (AP)/cyclohexanone (CH)/3-pentanone (3P). These have wide applicability in various food and pharmaceutical industries. Cyclohexanone and 3-pentanone are used in fragrances. Acetophenone is commonly used as flavoring in many cherry flavored sweets and drinks.

The common solvent chosen here is DMSO. The present investigation related to thermodynamic properties of binary liquid mixtures containing DMSO, which is aprotic, strongly associated due to highly polar S⚌O group molecule, large dipole moment and dielectric constant. The study of DMSO is important because of its utilization in a broad range of applications in medicine (Jyostna and Satyanarayana, 2005; Gonzalez et al., 2007; Alonso et al., 2011).

Study on thermo physical properties data of binary liquid mixtures containing ketones has attracted considerable interest in the literature (Pereiro et al., 2005a,b, 2006; Iloukhani and Rostami, 2007a,b; Rathnam et al., 2011). Literature survey reveals that Radhamma et al. reported density and ultrasonic velocity data for binary mixtures of DMSO and certain ketones at 303.15 K (Radhamma et al., 2008).

2

2 Experimental details

High purity Analytical Reagent (AR) grade samples of DMSO (sd fine chemicals), cyclohexanone (Fluka), 3-pentanone procured from Merck and acetophenone procured from Sigma Aldrich were used. Before measurements all the liquids were carefully dried over 0.4 nm molecular sieves and stored in dark bottles. These samples were further purified by standard methods (Vogel, 1989; Riddick et al., 1986). The solutions of binary mixtures of DMSO with AP, CH and 3P have been prepared in the specially designed glass bottles with airtight stoppers and adequate precautions have been taken to minimize evaporation losses. These samples were distilled just before use. The purity of these liquids was ascertained by Gas Chromatography (HP 8610) using a FID detector and the analysis indicated mole per cent purities >99.5%. The weighing of solutions has been made using a METTLER TOLEDO (Switzerland make) ABB5-S/FACT digital balance with an accuracy of ±0.01 mg. The uncertainty in the mole fraction is 10−4. The ultrasonic velocities (u) of pure liquids and liquid mixtures have been measured using an ultrasonic interferometer (Mittal type, Model M-82) working at 2 MHz fixed frequency with an accuracy of ±0.01 m s−1. Densities (ρ) of pure liquids and their mixtures have been determined by using a 10 cm3 two stem double-walled Parker & Parker type pycnometer (Parker and Parker, 1925). The procedure for measuring u and ρ has been described in our previous papers (Nayeem et al., 2014a,b,c). The reproducibility in the measured parameter of density is 3 in 104 parts and in mole fraction it is ±0.0002.

3

3 Results and discussion

The experimentally measured values of ultrasonic speed (u) and density (ρ) at 308.15 K of all pure liquids have been compared with the literature values (Palani et al., 2008; Rathnam et al., 2014) in Table 1 and these values have been used to evaluate the various volumetric and acoustic properties such as molar volume, Vm, isentropic compressibility, ks, intermolecular free length, Lf, acoustic impedance, Z, using their standard relations. The measured values of ρ, and u have been presented in Table 2. In order to understand the nature of the molecular interactions between the components of the liquid mixtures, it is of interest to discuss the same in terms of excess properties rather than actual values. Non-ideality arises from the differences between interactions in mixtures and pure components. The difference between the properties of the real mixture (Yreal) and those corresponding to an ideal mixture (Yideal = ∑xiYi) values, namely excess/deviation parameters (YE) have been computed by the relation

(1)
Y E = Y real - x i Y i where YE =  V m E , L f E , ZE and Δu; xi is the mole fraction and Yi is the value of the property of the ith component liquid of mixture.
Table 1 Comparison of experimental values of ultrasonic velocity, u, and density, ρ, of pure liquids with the corresponding literature values at 308.15 K.
Liquid u (m s−1) ρ (kg m−3)
Present work Literature Present work Literature
DMSO 1455.80 1456.0a 1084.60 1084.7a
1456.0b 1085.4b
Acetophenone 1441.10 1441.2c 1013.35 1013.5c
1441.10d 1013.30d
Cyclohexanone 1362.70 1362.00e 939.60 939.60e
1362.0f 939.6f
3-Pentanone 1217.60 1218.80d 801.00 801.00d
Table 2 Experimental values of densities, ρ (kg m−3), ultrasonic velocities, u (m s−1), molar volume, Vm (10−5 m3 mol−1), acoustic impedance, Z (106 kg m−2 s−1), isentropic compressibility, ks (10−10 Pa−1), inter molecular free length, Lf (10−10 m), excess molar volume, V m E (10−5 m3 mol−1), excess acoustic impedance, ZE (106 kg m−2 s−1), deviation in isentropic compressibility, Δks (10−10 Pa−1), excess intermolecular free length, L f E (10−10 m), and deviation in ultrasonic velocity, Δu (m s−1), with mole fraction (x1) of DMSO at T = 308.15 K.
x1 ρ (kg m−3) u (m s−1) Vm (10−5 m3 mol−1) Z (106 kg m−2 s−1) ks (10−10 Pa−1) Lf (10−10 m) V m E (10−5 m3 mol−1) ZE (106 kg m−2 s−1) Δks (10−10 Pa−1) L f E (10−10 m) Δu (m s−1)
DMSO+AP
0.0000 1013.35 1441.10 11.8550 1.4607 4.7502 0.4565 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00
0.1021 1016.52 1441.59 11.3976 1.4654 4.7337 0.4557 0.0176 −0.0074 0.0246 0.0012 −1.11
0.2120 1020.80 1441.88 10.8975 1.4719 4.7119 0.4546 0.0287 −0.0139 0.0470 0.0023 −2.46
0.3233 1026.20 1442.36 10.3843 1.4802 4.6839 0.4533 0.0333 −0.0188 0.0639 0.0032 −3.62
0.4023 1030.70 1442.97 10.0170 1.4873 4.6596 0.4521 0.0335 −0.0211 0.0714 0.0036 −4.18
0.5196 1038.37 1444.40 9.4683 1.4998 4.6161 0.4500 0.0305 −0.0225 0.0751 0.0038 −4.49
0.6021 1044.49 1445.82 9.0809 1.5102 4.5798 0.4482 0.0269 −0.0219 0.0720 0.0036 −4.29
0.7023 1052.72 1447.98 8.6100 1.5243 4.5307 0.4458 0.0222 −0.0197 0.0631 0.0032 −3.61
0.8657 1068.02 1452.27 7.8438 1.5511 4.4393 0.4413 0.0161 −0.0123 0.0373 0.0019 −1.74
0.9112 1072.69 1453.55 7.6314 1.5592 4.4123 0.4399 0.0154 −0.0096 0.0286 0.0014 −1.13
1.0000 1084.60 1455.80 7.2029 1.5793 4.3488 0.4367 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00
Experimental uncertainties: u(Vm) = ±0.0011 × 10−5 m3 mol−1, u(Z) = ±0.0002 × 106 kg m−2 s−1, u(ks) = ±0.0007 × 10−10 Pa−1, u(Lf) = ±0.0001 × 10−10 m, u V m E  = ±0.0011 × 10−5 m3 mol−1, u(ZE) = ±0.0032 × 106 kg m−2 s−1, uks) = ±0.0101 × 10−10 Pa−1, u L f E  = ±0.0001 × 10−10 m, uu) = ±0.01 m s−1
DMSO+CH
0.0000 939.60 1362.70 10.4459 1.2804 5.7313 0.5014 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00
0.1221 943.83 1368.21 10.1401 1.2914 5.6596 0.4982 0.0902 −0.0255 0.0986 0.0047 −5.87
0.2695 953.94 1378.53 9.7233 1.3150 5.5164 0.4919 0.1514 −0.0460 0.1636 0.0079 −9.31
0.3423 960.95 1381.95 9.5007 1.3280 5.4489 0.4889 0.1649 −0.0547 0.1991 0.0096 −12.68
0.4951 980.00 1391.86 9.0039 1.3640 5.2673 0.4807 0.1636 −0.0644 0.2332 0.0113 −17.03
0.5434 987.24 1395.80 8.8399 1.3780 5.1991 0.4775 0.1562 −0.0648 0.2326 0.0113 −17.60
0.6867 1012.18 1409.49 8.3386 1.4267 4.9728 0.4670 0.1197 −0.0590 0.2047 0.0100 −17.28
0.7213 1018.97 1413.23 8.2150 1.4401 4.9135 0.4642 0.1083 −0.0559 0.1927 0.0095 −16.76
0.8544 1047.92 1429.86 7.7338 1.4984 4.6674 0.4525 0.0587 −0.0374 0.1263 0.0064 −12.55
0.9221 1064.36 1440.50 7.4871 1.5332 4.5278 0.4456 0.0316 −0.0228 0.0767 0.0039 −8.22
1.0000 1084.60 1455.80 7.2029 1.5793 4.3488 0.4367 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00
Experimental uncertainties: u(Vm) = ±0.0001 × 10−5 m3 mol−1, u(Z) = ±0.0007 × 106 kg m−2 s−1, u(ks) = ±0.0055 × 10−10 Pa−1, u(Lf) = ±0.0003 × 10−10 m, u V m E  = ±0.0001 × 10−5 m3 mol−1, u(ZE) = ±0.0085 × 106 kg m−2 s−1, uks) = ±0.0298 × 10−10 Pa−1, u L f E  = ±0.0003 × 10−10 m, uu) = ±0.62 m s−1
DMSO+3P
0.0000 801.00 1217.60 10.7528 0.9753 8.4209 0.6077 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00
0.1113 811.60 1219.16 10.5026 0.9895 8.2894 0.6030 0.1449 −0.0530 0.3282 0.0143 −24.97
0.2021 824.14 1226.97 10.2546 1.0112 8.0598 0.5946 0.2192 −0.0862 0.4798 0.0215 −38.80
0.3333 848.44 1247.37 9.8372 1.0583 7.5752 0.5764 0.2676 −0.1183 0.5494 0.0257 −49.68
0.4323 871.61 1268.94 9.4849 1.1060 7.1253 0.559 0.2667 −0.1304 0.5157 0.0252 −51.72
0.5968 919.29 1314.26 8.8497 1.2082 6.2976 0.5256 0.2155 −0.1276 0.3676 0.0200 −45.61
0.6343 931.77 1325.95 8.6991 1.2355 6.1042 0.5174 0.1980 −0.1229 0.3265 0.0182 −42.86
0.7321 967.11 1358.31 8.3002 1.3136 5.6045 0.4958 0.1463 −0.1039 0.2181 0.0133 −33.82
0.8136 999.66 1386.90 7.9648 1.3864 5.2007 0.4776 0.1002 −0.0803 0.1352 0.0090 −24.65
0.9283 1050.24 1428.81 7.4938 1.5006 4.6640 0.4523 0.0364 −0.0354 0.0416 0.0033 −10.09
1.0000 1084.60 1455.80 7.2029 1.5793 4.3488 0.4367 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00
Experimental uncertainties: u(Vm) = ± 0.0001 × 10−5 m3 mol−1, u(Z) = ±0.0001 × 106 kg m−2 s−1, u(ks) = ±0.0004 × 10−10 Pa−1, u(Lf) = ±0.0001 × 10−10 m, u V m E  = ±0.0001 × 10−5 m3 mol−1, u(ZE) = ±0.0178 × 106 kg m−2 s−1, uks) = ±0.1602 × 10−10 Pa−1, u L f E  = ±0.0001 × 10−10 m, uu) = ±0.05 m s−1

Combined uncertainties: u(ρ) = ±0.17 kg m−3, u(u) = ±0.23 m s−1, u(Vm) = ±0.0011 × 10−5 m3 mol−1, u(z) = ±0.0007 × 106 kg m−2 s−1, u(ks) = ±0.0056 × 10−10 Pa−1, u(Lf) = ±0.0003 × 10−10 m, u V m E  = ±0.0011 × 10−5 m3 mol−1, u(ZE) = ±0.0199 × 106 kg m−2 s−1, uks) = ±0.1632 × 10−10 Pa−1, u L f E  = ±0.0006 × 10−10 m, uu) = ±0.62 m s−1 (level of confidence = 95).

Accuracies of the derived properties (basing on combined uncertainties) are within the range of: Vm (10−5 m3 mol−1) == ±0.0019, Z (106 kg m−2 s−1) == ±0.0012, ks (10−10 Pa−1) == ±0.0095, Lf (10−10 m) = ±0.0004, V m E (10−5 m3 mol−1) = ±0.0019, ZE (106 kg m−2 s−1) = ±0.0308, Δks (10−10 Pa−1) = ±0.2774, L f E (10−10 m) = ±0.0005, Δu (m s−1) = ±1.07.

The deviation in isentropic compressibility, Δks has been calculated from the following equation (Ali et al., 2003):

(2)
Δ k s = k s - ( Φ 1 k s 1 + Φ 2 k s 2 )

Since ks is not additive on mole fraction but is additive on volume fraction (Nayeem et al., 2015), hence, such values have been calculated using volume fraction (Φ)

(3)
Φ = x i V i x i V i

The excess/deviation values are also tabulated in Table 2. The excess/deviation properties have been fitted to a Redlich–Kister type polynomial equation (Redlich and Kister, 1948) as follows:

(4)
Y E = x 1 x 2 i = o j A i ( x 2 - x 1 ) i where Y E = V m E , L f E , ZE and Δu; x1 is the mole fraction of DMSO.

The values of Δks have been fitted to Redlich–Kister type polynomial with volume fraction (Φ) instead of mole fraction (x) in the above polynomial and Ai are the adjustable parameters of the function and are determined using the least square method. In the present investigation ‘i’ values have been taken from 0 to 4. The corresponding standard deviations σ(YE) have been calculated using the expression:

(5)
σ ( Y E ) = Y exp E - Y cal E 2 ( m - n ) 1 / 2 where ‘m’ is the total number of experimental points and ‘n’ is the number of coefficients in Eq. (4). The calculated values of the coefficients Ai along with the standard deviations (σ) are given in Table 3 at T = 308.15 K under investigation.
Table 3 Redlich–Kister coefficients of deviation/excess properties and corresponding standard deviations (σ) for all the systems at T = 308.15 K.
A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 σ
DMSO+AP
V m E (10−5 m3 mol−1) 0.1255 0.0781 0.0127 −0.0980 0.1197 0.0006
ZE (106 kg m−2 s−1) −0.0898 0.0075 0.0064 0.0198 −0.0298 0.0001
Δks (10−10 Pa−1) 0.3007 −0.0039 −0.0475 −0.0625 0.0847 0.0004
L f E (10−10 m) 0.0152 −0.0004 −0.0026 −0.0033 −0.0037 0.0001
Δu (m s−1) −17.93 1.33 7.26 0.04 0.32 0.01
DMSO+CH
V m E (10−5 m3 mol−1) 0.6519 0.2567 −0.0020 −0.0083 0.0011 0.0001
ZE (106 kg m−2 s−1) −0.2577 0.0484 0.0188 −0.0056 −0.0741 0.0002
Δks (10−10 Pa−1) 0.9324 −0.1434 −0.2660 0.1175 0.0057 0.0021
L f E (10−10 m) 0.0452 −0.0075 −0.0112 −0.0032 0.0276 0.0001
Δu (m s−1) −68.34 39.48 24.52 −10.17 −76.23 0.26
DMSO+3P
V m E (10−5 m3 mol−1) 1.0072 0.5834 0.0322 −0.0292 −0.0047 0.0001
ZE (106 kg m−2 s−1) −0.5307 −0.0041 −0.0020 0.0010 −0.0035 0.0001
Δks (10−10 Pa−1) 1.8578 1.7656 0.2850 −0.1460 −0.0421 0.0001
L f E (10−10 m) 0.0944 0.0615 0.0078 −0.0034 −0.0011 0.0001
Δu (m s−1) −200.02 −64.86 0.92 3.30 −6.09 0.03

In DMSO, the group (S+—O) plays vital role in chemical reactions. Ketones are organic compounds that contain a carbonyl group and two aliphatic or aromatic substituents containing the chemical formula RCOR1. Here, R and R1 may be same or different incorporated into a ring (alkyl, aryl and heterocyclic radicals). The chemical reactivity of the carbonyl group (C⚌O) plays vital role in chemical reactions and is influenced considerably by steric effects. The greater electro negativity of O and high dipole moment makes ketones polar. The structures of the ketones in the present study i.e., AP, CH and 3P are also shown below.

Fig. 1 represents the variation of V m E with mole fraction of DMSO. The excess molar volume is the resultant contribution from several opposing effects, namely chemical, physical and structural (Sankar et al., 2014). The chemical or specific interactions result in volume contractions, leading to negative excess molar volume and these include charge-transfer complexes, dipole–dipole and dipole-induced dipole interactions and H-bonding between component molecules. The physical interactions or non-specific interactions are weak and these include breaking of the structure of one or both of the components in the solution, i.e. the loss of dipolar association between the molecules (dispersion forces), steric hindrance of the molecules and H-bond rupture. The structural contributions are mostly negative and arise from several effects such as interstitial accommodation and geometrical fitting of one component into another due to the differences in the molar volumes between components. In the present investigation, the variation of V m E is found to be positive over the entire composition range. Further, it is noticed from Fig. 1 that the values of V m E become more positive as we move from AP to 3P i.e., over the entire composition range of DMSO, positive values of V m E follow the order: (DMSO + AP) < (DMSO + CH) < (DMSO + 3P). Further, positive V m E indicate the possibility of existence/dominance of weak interactions (Nayeem et al., 2014a,b,c; Aralaguppi et al., 1992) and strength of weak interactions follows the order: (DMSO + AP) < (DMSO + CH) < (DMSO + 3P).

Plots of excess molar volume V m E against mole fraction, x1 of DMSO for the binary mixtures of DMSO + AP (♦), DMSO + CH (■) and DMSO + 3P (▴).
Figure 1 Plots of excess molar volume V m E against mole fraction, x1 of DMSO for the binary mixtures of DMSO + AP (♦), DMSO + CH (■) and DMSO + 3P (▴).

The nature of existing interaction in a binary liquid can also be analysed by knowing their individual chemical and physical properties (physico-chemical properties). The presence of chemical or specific interactions is certainly absent in the present systems at all temperatures. This is due to the fact that the chemicals which are used in the present investigation lack hydroxyl group and hence formation of H-bond is trifling. With regard to physical or non-specific interactions, according to the authors (Rajagopal and Chenthilnath, 2010a,b), when ketones are mixed with polar molecules, the strength of interaction between the participating molecules depends on the dipole moment/polarizability and geometry (i.e., steric hindrance) of the interacting molecules. It is evident that DMSO and the present ketones are polar and their dipole moment values follow μD = 4.06 D > μAP = 3.02 D > μCH = 2.87 D > μ3P = 2.70 D. In the present study, positive V m E values suggest the possibility of loss of dipolar association (dispersion forces) (Radhamma et al., 2008) between DMSO and ketone molecules. As the difference between dipole moment values of the binary system increases, the strength of interaction decreases (Kondaiah et al., 2013). Therefore in the present investigation strength of interaction follows the order: (DMSO + AP) > (DMSO + CH) > (DMSO + 3P). Further, based on the geometry (i.e., steric effect), the order of strength of weak interaction can be written as: (DMSO + aromatic ring with CH3 group of AP) < (DMSO + cyclic CH) < (DMSO + aliphatic 3P). This implies that the presence of larger —CH3—CH2— chain attached to carbonyl group of aliphatic 3P causes much more steric hindrance to DMSO over the other ketones leading to highest positive values of V m E . Thus in the present study, dispersion forces and steric hindrance of physical interactions play vital role in deciding the observed positive values of V m E . With respect to structural contribution, the molar volumes of pure components of DMSO, AP, CH and 3P are 7.2029, 11.8550, 10.7528 and 10.4459 (×10−5 m3 mol−1) respectively at 308.15 K. From these values geometrical fitting of smaller molecules into the voids created by the bigger molecules is most favourable in (DMSO + AP) rather than (DMSO + CH) and (DMSO + 3P) binary systems. Therefore, the observed positive values of V m E and the order of strength of weak interactions are due to cumulative effect of all the above mentioned facts. In DMSO + ketone binary systems, the dominance of prevailing physical interactions over the other factors (structural) makes the molecules of the binary liquid move apart leading to the observed positive values of V m E . Similar type of study was reported in polar lower alcohol of 2-methyl-2-propanol with aromatic and aliphatic ketone (Rajagopal and Chenthilnath, 2010a,b). Moreover, the same type of positive values of V m E trend was observed in N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone with ketones (Gnana Kumari et al., 2009) and in cyclohexane with ethyl acrylate, butyl acrylate, methyl methacrylate, and styrene (Peralta et al., 2002, 2003). Thus, this analysis gives an idea about the participation tendency of aromatic, cyclic and aliphatic ketones in molecular interactions with DMSO.

The existing molecular interactions in the systems are well reflected on the properties of partial molar volumes. Partial molar volume is the contribution that a component of a mixture makes to the overall volume of the solution. Thus, the partial molar volume is a function of mixture composition. The partial molar volumes V m , 1 of component 1 (DMSO) and V m , 2 of component 2 (ketones) in the mixtures over the entire composition range have been calculated by using the following relations:

(6)
V m , 1 = V m E + V 1 + x 2 V m E x 1 T , P
(7)
V m , 2 = V m E + V 2 - x 1 V m E x 1 T , P
where V 1 and V 2 are the molar volumes of components of DMSO and ketones respectively. The derivates in the above equations are obtained by differentiating Redlich–Kister Eq. (4) which leads to the following equations for V m , 1 and V m , 2 :
(8)
V m , 1 = V 1 + x 2 2 i = 0 4 A i ( x 2 - x 1 ) i - 2 x 1 x 2 2 i = 1 4 A i ( i ) ( x 2 - x 1 ) i - 1
(9)
V m , 2 = V 2 + x 1 2 i = 0 4 A i ( x 2 - x 1 ) i + 2 x 2 x 1 2 i = 1 4 A i ( i ) ( x 2 - x 1 ) i - 1

Using the above equations V m , 1 E , V m , 2 E have been calculated using,

(10)
V m , 1 E = V m , 1 - V 1
(11)
V m , 2 E = V m , 2 - V 2
The values of V m , 1 and V m , 2 are shown in Table 4. From this table, the values of V m , 1 and V m , 2 for both the components in the mixtures are greater than their respective molar volumes in the pure state, i.e. an expansion of volume takes place on mixing DMSO with ketones. These results also support the observed positive values of V m E in all the binary systems. Fig. 2 represents the variation of excess partial molar volumes of V m , 1 E and V m , 2 E for DMSO and ketones in the binary mixtures respectively. Examination of these figures reveals that weak interactions exist between the unlike molecules as most of V m , 1 E and V m , 2 E are positive except at a mole fraction of x1 (of DMSO) > 0.7321–0.9283, the excess partial molar volume V m , 1 E of DMSO is negative (considerably small in the magnitude) pertinent to DMSO + 3P system. It may be due to the volume occupied by a given number of DMSO molecules decreases due to the interaction between DMSO and the mixture in this range. This figure also supports the conclusions drawn from V m E .
Table 4 Partial molar volumes of DMSO ( V m , 1 ) and AP/CH/3P ( V m , 2 ) with mole fraction (x1) of DMSO of all the binary systems at T = 308.15 K.
DMSO + AP DMSO + CH DMSO + 3P
x1 V m , 2 V m , 1 x1 V m , 2 V m , 1 x1 V m , 2 V m , 1
(10−5 m3 mol−1) (10−5 m3 mol−1) (10−5 m3 mol−1)
0.0000 11.8550 7.5499 0.0000 10.4459 8.1023 0.0000 10.7528 8.7918
0.1021 11.8646 7.3367 0.1221 10.4648 7.8061 0.1113 10.7835 8.2592
0.212 11.8768 7.2654 0.2695 10.5283 7.5414 0.2021 10.8466 7.9174
0.3233 11.8848 7.2430 0.3423 10.5707 7.4448 0.3333 10.9746 7.5620
0.4023 11.8911 7.2319 0.4951 10.6698 7.3049 0.4323 11.0812 7.3886
0.5196 11.9041 7.2167 0.5434 10.7011 7.2760 0.5968 11.2349 7.2383
0.6021 11.9127 7.2098 0.6867 10.7834 7.2232 0.6343 11.2610 7.2220
0.7023 11.9165 7.2076 0.7213 10.7996 7.2164 0.7321 11.3067 7.2001
0.8657 11.9167 7.2081 0.8544 10.8428 7.2040 0.8136 11.3166 7.1968
0.9112 11.9307 7.2064 0.9221 10.8512 7.2029 0.9283 11.2829 7.2012
1.0000 12.0250 7.2029 1.0000 10.8485 7.2029 1.0000 11.2333 7.2029
Plots of excess partial molar volumes of DMSO V ‾ m , 1 E and AP/CH/3P V ‾ m , 2 E against mole fraction, x1 of DMSO for binary mixtures of DMSO with AP (♦), CH (■), and 3P (▴).
Figure 2 Plots of excess partial molar volumes of DMSO V ‾ m , 1 E and AP/CH/3P V ‾ m , 2 E against mole fraction, x1 of DMSO for binary mixtures of DMSO with AP (♦), CH (■), and 3P (▴).

Furthermore, the partial molar volumes and excess partial molar volumes of the components at infinite dilution respectively, V m , 1 , V m , 2 , V m , 1 E , and V m , 2 E , were obtained by putting x1 = 0 in Eq. (8) and x1 = 1 in Eq. (9).

(12)
V m , 1 E , = A 0 + A 1 + A 2 + A 3 + = V m , 1 - V 1
(13)
V m , 2 E , = A 0 - A 1 + A 2 - A 3 + = V m , 2 - V 2
The pertinent values of V m , 1 , V m , 2 , V m , 1 E , and V m , 2 E , are shown in Table 5. This table shows that these values are positive, from which we conclude that weak interactions exist among the unlike molecules of the mixtures. The magnitude of the excess partial molar volumes at infinite dilution also follows the order 3P > CH > AP, which supports the trends of V m E values observed in these systems.
Table 5 Values of partial molar volume of the components at infinite dilution ( V m , 1 , V m , 2 ) and excess partial molar volume at infinite dilution ( V m , 1 E , and V m , 2 E , ) for all the systems at T = 308.15 K.
System V m , 1 V m , 2 V m , 1 E , V m , 2 E ,
(10−5 m3 mol−1)
DMSO + AP 7.4409 12.1328 0.2380 0.2778
DMSO + CP 8.1023 10.8485 0.8994 0.4026
DMSO + 3P 8.7918 11.2333 1.5889 0.4805

The sign and magnitude of Δu play important roles in describing molecular rearrangements as a result of molecular interactions occurring among the component molecules in the mixtures. The variation of deviation in ultrasonic speed (Δu) with mole fraction of DMSO is shown in Fig. 3. Here we observed that the Δu values are negative for all binary systems over the entire range of composition at 308.15 K temperature. Positive deviations in Δu indicate the increasing strength of interaction between component molecules of binary liquid mixtures. If the strong interactions arise among the components of a mixture, it may lead to the formation of molecular aggregates and attains more compact structures, then sound will travel at faster rate through the mixture by means of longitudinal waves and hence the ultrasonic speed deviations with respect to the linear behavior will be positive. If the structure-breaking factor in the mixture predominates resulting expansion then the speed of sound through the mixture will be slower resulting in negative Δu. The negative values in Δu generally indicate the presence of weak interactions (Nain, 2008; Kawaizumi et al., 1977). This negative deviation in u also supports the inference drawn from excess molar volume in all the systems studied.

Plots of deviation in ultrasonic velocity (Δu) against mole fraction, x1 of DMSO for the binary mixtures of DMSO + AP (♦), DMSO + CH (■) and DMSO + 3P (▴).
Figure 3 Plots of deviation in ultrasonic velocity (Δu) against mole fraction, x1 of DMSO for the binary mixtures of DMSO + AP (♦), DMSO + CH (■) and DMSO + 3P (▴).

Fig. 4 represents the variation of deviation in isentropic compressibility (Δks) with the mole fraction of the DMSO over the entire composition range. The experimental values of Δks may be attributed to the relative strength of effects which influence the free space, defined by the author (Jacobson, 1952). According to this hypothesis addition of ketone molecules to DMSO will induce breaking of clusters of DMSO molecules thereby releasing several dipoles, which interact with dipoles of ketone. This causes an increase in free space, decrease in sound velocity and positive deviation in isentropic compressibility. However, this effect will be counteracted due to the interaction between carbonyl group of ketone and S⚌O group of DMSO, changes in free volume in the real mixtures and interstitial accommodation of component molecules into each other’s structure resulting to negative deviation in compressibility. The actual values of Δks, therefore, would depend upon the relative strengths of two opposing effects. The experimental values of the deviation in isentropic compressibility, Δks, in the present investigation show that the factors responsible for positive Δks are dominant over the entire volume fraction. This supports the inference made from the variation of deviation in all ultrasonic speeds.

Plots of deviation in isentropic compressibility (Δks) against mole fraction, x1 of DMSO for the binary mixtures of DMSO + AP (♦), DMSO + CH (■) and DMSO + 3P (▴).
Figure 4 Plots of deviation in isentropic compressibility (Δks) against mole fraction, x1 of DMSO for the binary mixtures of DMSO + AP (♦), DMSO + CH (■) and DMSO + 3P (▴).

The variation of excess acoustic impedance (ZE) and excess free length ( L f E ) with mole fraction of DMSO in the mixtures has been presented in Figs. 5 and 6 respectively. From Fig. 5 it has been observed that the values of ZE are negative over the entire mole fraction range which indicates the decreasing strength of interactions between component molecules of the mixture (Krishna Rao and Sreekanth, 2011). From Fig. 6 it has been observed that the values of L f E are positive. The positive L f E values should be attributed to the weak dispersive forces (Fort and Moore, 1965). These inferences further support the presence of weak interaction forces in all the present systems studied.

Plots of excess acoustic impedance (ZE) against mole fraction, x1 of DMSO for the binary mixtures of DMSO + AP (♦), DMSO + CH (■) and DMSO + 3P (▴).
Figure 5 Plots of excess acoustic impedance (ZE) against mole fraction, x1 of DMSO for the binary mixtures of DMSO + AP (♦), DMSO + CH (■) and DMSO + 3P (▴).
Plots of excess free length L f E against mole fraction, x1 of DMSO for the binary mixtures of DMSO + AP (♦), DMSO + CH (■) and DMSO + 3P (▴).
Figure 6 Plots of excess free length L f E against mole fraction, x1 of DMSO for the binary mixtures of DMSO + AP (♦), DMSO + CH (■) and DMSO + 3P (▴).

FTIR spectra for the present pure liquids along with their binaries in equal ratio are shown in Figs. 7–9. Usually in an IR spectrum, the change in the intensity is related to the interaction between solute and solvent. In this spectra, considerable changes in the intensity of transmission/absorption show strong interaction in the system otherwise no or small changes show weak interactions (Rajendran, 1996). Furthermore, intensity of transmission/absorption in an IR spectrum is related to the change in dipole moment that occurs during the vibration (Karunakar and Srinivas, 2013). The characteristic peaks in pure DMSO and binaries (1:1) are tabulated in Table 6. Pure DMSO exhibits peaks at 1436 cm−1, 1406 cm−1, 1311 cm−1 and a broad vibrational mode around 1041 cm−1. The modes at wave numbers 1436 cm−1 and 1406 cm−1 correspond to the antisymmetric bending of CH3as CH3), and the peak at 1311 cm−1 is identified as a symmetric deformation of CH3s CH3) group that is attached to the S atom. A broad vibrational mode around 1041 cm−1 can be assigned to S⚌O stretching (ν SO). From Table 6, it is evident that the symmetric deformation caused by δs CH3 of DMSO is affected reasonably in DMSO + AP system whereas antisymmetric bending vibration δas CH3 of DMSO is not that much influenced in DMSO + 3P. From the FTIR spectra of binary liquids, it is concluded that the order of weak interactions is as follows: (DMSO + aliphatic 3P) > (DMSO + cyclic CH) > (DMSO + aromatic AP) and it also supports the inferences drawn from excess/deviation properties.

Fourier Transform Infrared spectra of pure DMSO (Blue), DMSO + AP (Green) in the ratio 1:1 and pure AP (Red).
Figure 7 Fourier Transform Infrared spectra of pure DMSO (Blue), DMSO + AP (Green) in the ratio 1:1 and pure AP (Red).
Fourier Transform Infrared spectra of pure DMSO (Blue), DMSO + CH (Green) in the ratio 1:1 and pure CH (Red).
Figure 8 Fourier Transform Infrared spectra of pure DMSO (Blue), DMSO + CH (Green) in the ratio 1:1 and pure CH (Red).
Fourier Transform Infrared spectra of pure DMSO (Blue), DMSO + 3P (Green) in the ratio 1:1 and pure 3P (Red).
Figure 9 Fourier Transform Infrared spectra of pure DMSO (Blue), DMSO + 3P (Green) in the ratio 1:1 and pure 3P (Red).
Table 6 FT-IR vibrational modes in pure DMSO and binary liquids (1:1) of DMSO + AP/DMSO + CH/DMSO + 3P.
DMSO DMSO + 3P DMSO + CH DMSO + AP Peak assignments
(cm−1) (cm−1) (cm−1) (cm−1)
1436 1435 1435 1435 Antisymmetric bending of CH3as CH3)
1406 1408 1406 1406 Antisymmetric bending of CH3as CH3)
1311 1311 1311 1305 Symmetric deformation of CH3s CH3)
1041 1043 1043 1043 S⚌O stretching vibration (ν SO)

In the present study, semi-empirical sound velocities have been evaluated by considering ketones as one component and DMSO as the other component in the binary mixture. Such an evaluation of semi-empirical sound velocity is useful to verify the applicability of various postulates of the theories of liquid mixtures and to arrive at some useful inferences regarding the (strength of) molecular interactions between component liquids in some cases. The semi-empirical values of ultrasonic velocity with percentage deviation are summarized in Table 7 and standard deviations of these empirical values are shown in Table 8.

Table 7 Mole fraction (x1), experimental, empirical and percentage deviation in ultrasonic velocities of equations ((14)–(19)) at T = 308.15 K for all the systems.
x1 Uexpt UN UV UI UR UJ UN UV UI UR UJ
(m s−1)
DMSO+AP
0.0000 1441.20 1441.20 1441.20 1441.20 1441.20 1441.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.1021 1441.59 1443.27 1429.88 1442.84 1426.52 1442.55 0.11 −0.81 0.09 −1.05 0.07
0.2120 1441.88 1445.32 1421.14 1444.54 1414.86 1444.31 0.23 −1.44 0.18 −1.87 0.17
0.3233 1442.36 1447.22 1415.72 1446.23 1407.29 1446.10 0.33 −1.85 0.27 −2.43 0.26
0.4023 1442.97 1448.47 1413.92 1447.41 1404.43 1447.36 0.38 −2.01 0.31 −2.67 0.30
0.5196 1444.40 1450.20 1414.31 1449.15 1403.90 1449.20 0.40 −2.08 0.33 −2.80 0.33
0.6021 1445.82 1451.33 1416.79 1450.35 1406.16 1450.48 0.38 −2.01 0.31 −2.74 0.32
0.7023 1447.98 1452.62 1422.30 1451.80 1411.75 1452.00 0.32 −1.77 0.26 −2.50 0.28
0.8657 1452.27 1454.55 1437.42 1454.11 1427.50 1454.40 0.15 −1.02 0.13 −1.71 0.15
0.9112 1453.55 1455.06 1443.06 1454.75 1433.33 1455.05 0.10 −0.72 0.08 −1.39 0.10
1.0000 1456.00 1456.00 1456.00 1456.00 1456.00 1456.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
DMSO+CH
0.0000 1362.70 1362.70 1362.70 1362.70 1362.70 1362.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.1221 1368.21 1374.74 1367.39 1375.61 1330.56 1370.82 0.48 −0.06 0.54 −2.75 0.19
0.2695 1378.53 1389.02 1375.28 1390.57 1319.04 1382.07 0.76 −0.24 0.87 −4.32 0.26
0.3423 1381.95 1395.98 1380.09 1397.71 1321.96 1388.09 1.02 −0.13 1.14 −4.34 0.44
0.4951 1391.86 1410.37 1392.31 1412.23 1341.73 1401.69 1.33 0.03 1.46 −3.60 0.71
0.5434 1395.80 1414.86 1396.79 1416.69 1350.90 1406.27 1.36 0.07 1.50 −3.22 0.75
0.6867 1409.49 1428.03 1411.95 1429.56 1383.13 1420.66 1.31 0.17 1.42 −1.87 0.79
0.7213 1413.23 1431.17 1416.05 1432.59 1391.58 1424.31 1.27 0.12 1.37 −1.53 0.78
0.8544 1429.86 1443.14 1433.52 1443.98 1424.23 1439.03 0.93 0.26 0.99 −0.39 0.64
0.9221 1440.50 1449.15 1443.51 1449.62 1439.86 1446.93 0.60 0.29 0.63 −0.04 0.45
1.0000 1456.00 1456.00 1456.00 1456.00 1456.00 1456.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
DMSO+3P
0.0000 1217.60 1217.60 1217.60 1217.60 1217.60 1217.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.1113 1219.16 1238.47 1236.13 1252.17 1177.40 1225.63 1.58 1.39 2.71 −3.43 0.53
0.2021 1226.97 1256.36 1252.35 1278.48 1159.92 1234.22 2.39 2.07 4.20 −5.46 0.59
0.3333 1247.37 1283.65 1277.72 1313.83 1156.27 1250.16 2.91 2.43 5.33 −7.30 0.22
0.4323 1268.94 1305.49 1298.55 1338.62 1168.83 1265.49 2.88 2.33 5.49 −7.89 −0.27
0.5968 1314.26 1344.36 1336.83 1376.64 1216.19 1299.11 2.29 1.72 4.75 −7.46 −1.15
0.6343 1325.95 1353.71 1346.28 1384.80 1231.35 1308.52 2.09 1.53 4.44 −7.13 −1.31
0.7321 1358.31 1379.02 1372.31 1405.27 1278.08 1336.88 1.52 1.03 3.46 −5.91 −1.58
0.8136 1386.90 1401.20 1395.71 1421.49 1324.72 1365.59 1.03 0.63 2.49 −4.48 −1.54
0.9283 1428.81 1434.21 1431.59 1443.12 1401.61 1416.19 0.38 0.19 1.00 −1.90 −0.88
1.0000 1456.00 1456.00 1456.00 1456.00 1456.00 1456.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Table 8 Standard deviations for ultrasonic velocities evaluated from different empirical equations ((14)–(18)) in DMSO + AP/DMSO + CH/DMSO + 3P systems at T = 308.15 K.
System σN σV σI σR σJ
DMSO + AP 1.08 6.09 0.85 8.39 0.61
DMSO + CH 1.03 0.72 1.06 3.39 0.90
DMSO + 3P 6.53 5.76 11.08 13.89 2.39

Nomoto (1958) established the following relation for sound velocity based on the assumption of the linearity of the molecular sound velocity and the additivity of molar volume:

(14)
U N = x i R i x i V i 3

The Impedance Dependence Relation (Baluja and Parsania, 1995) is given as follows:

(15)
U imp = x i Z i x i ρ i

Van Dael (Van Dael and Vangeel, 1969) obtained the Ideal Mixture Relation

(16)
x i M i / u i 2 = 1 x i M i 1 U V 2

Rao’s (specific sound velocity) (Sreekanth et al., 2011) relation is given by

(17)
U R = x i r i ρ 3 where r i = ( u i ) 1 3 ρ i is Rao’s specific sound velocity of ith component of the mixture.

Junjie’s (Savaroglu and Aral, 2004) equation is given by

(18)
U Jun = x i V i x i M i 1 / 2 x i V i ρ i u i 2 - 1 / 2 where xi is mole fraction, Mi is molecular weight, Ri is the molar sound speed, Zi is acoustic impedance, ρi is density, Vi is the molar volume, ui is the velocity of sound of the ith component and UV is the Van Dael’s velocity.

Percentage deviation in ultrasonic speed is given by

(19)
% Δ u = 100 1 - U cal u exp It is clear from Tables 7 and 8 that, among all the empirical theories, Jungie’s relation gives the best estimate of experimental values of sound velocity in all the systems followed by Nomoto’s relation. In the present binary systems, the difference between experimental and theoretical velocities is greater where the mole fraction of DMSO varies in the region 0.4–0.6. Hence it can be qualitatively inferred that the strength of interaction in the binary mixtures is more in this range of composition of binary mixtures.

4

4 Conclusions

  • Densities and ultrasonic velocities for binary liquids of DMSO with AP/CP/3P have been measured experimentally over the entire composition range at T = 308.15 K.

  • From the experimental data parameters such as V m E , Δks, L f E , ZE and Δu have been evaluated. The excess and deviation properties have been fitted to Redlich–Kister type polynomial and corresponding standard deviations have been calculated. In the present binary liquid systems of DMSO+ different geometrical ketones, the observed positive values of V m E , Δks, L f E and negative values of ZE, Δu clearly indicate the dominance of weak physical interactions (dispersion and steric hindrance). The order of weak interactions is as follows: (DMSO + aliphatic 3P) > (DMSO + cyclic CH) > (DMSO + aromatic AP).

  • The observed higher partial molar volumes in the liquid mixture when compared to the respective molar volumes of pure components also support the presence of weak physical interactions in the systems.

  • The FT-IR spectra also support the inferences drawn from excess/deviation properties.

  • The ultrasonic velocities computed from different velocity theories have been correlated with the experimentally measured ultrasonic velocities and their percentage deviations have been evaluated. Among all the empirical theories Jungie’s relation is found to give the best estimate of experimental values of sound velocity in all the systems investigated.

Acknowledgements

One of the authors Sk.Md Nayeem is highly thankful to U.G.C., New Delhi, Government of India for sanction of financial grant under XII plan towards MRP (MRP-4671/14(SERO/UGC)).

References

  1. , , . Study of intermolecular interaction in binary mixture of formamide with 2-propanol, 1,2-propanediol and 1,2,3-propandeol through ultrasonic speed measurement. Ind. J. Pure. Appl. Phys.. 2001;39:421.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , . Studies on molecular interactions in binary liquid mixtures by viscosity and ultrasonic velocity measurements at 303.15 K. J. Mol. Liq.. 1999;79:89.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , . Molecular interactions in formamide + isomeric butanol: an ultrasonic and volumetric study. J. Sol. Chem.. 2003;32:865.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , . Thermodynamics of ketone + amine mixtures 7. Volumetric and speed of sound data at (293.15, 298.15 and 303.15) K for 2-pentanone + aniline, + N-methylaniline, or + pyridine systems. J. Mol. Liq.. 2011;160:180.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , . Thermodynamic interactions in binary mixtures of styrene with n-alkanes at 298.15 K. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn.. 1999;72:1187.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , . Thermodynamic interactions in mixtures of bromo for with hydrocarbons. J. Phys. Chem.. 1991;95(13):5299.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , . Excess molar volume, excess isentropic compressibility and excess molar refraction of binary mixtures of methyl acetoacetate with benzene, toluene, m-xylene mesitylene and anisole. Fluid Phase Equilib.. 1992;71:99.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , . Classical areas of pheno-menology (including applications) – ultrasonic studies on edible oils. Ind. J. Pure Appl. Phys.. 1998;36:578.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , . Acoustical properties of 3-α-furyl acrylic acid in protic and aprotic solvents. Asian J. Chem.. 1995;7:417.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , , . Acoustical parameters of some molecular liquids. J. Acoust. Soc. Ind.. 2000;28:293.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , . Ultrasonic behaviour and study of molecular interactions of substituted azole in N,N dimethylformamide at different temperatures and concentrations. Ind. J. Chem.. 2004;43:2102.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , , . Adiabatic compressibility of binary liquid mixtures. Trans. Faraday Soc.. 1965;61:2102-2111.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , , , . Excess molar volumes and ultrasonic studies of N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone with ketones at T = 303.15 K. J. Chem. Thermodyn.. 2009;41:586.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , , . Enthalpies of mixing and heat capacities. J. Food Eng.. 2007;79(3):1104.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. , , . Densities and derived thermodynamic properties of binary mixtures of diethylcarbonate, acetophenone, and 1-hexanol at T = (293.15 to 323.15) K for the liquid region and at ambient pressure. J. Chem. Thermodyn.. 2007;39:1231.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. , , . Densities, viscosities, speeds of sound, and refractive indices for binary mixtures of diethylcarbonate, acetophenone, and 1-hexanol at (293.15, 303.15, 313.15, and 323.15) K for the liquid region and at ambient pressure. J. Chem. Eng. Data. 2007;52:921.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. , . Intermolecular free lengths in the liquid state. Isentropic and isothermal compressibilities. Acta Chem. Scan.. 1952;6:1485-1498.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. , , . Ultrasonic studies on binary mixtures of some aromatic ketones with acrylonitrile at 308.15 K. Ind. J. Pure Appl. Phys.. 2005;43:591.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. , . Determination of stability constants of charge transfer complexes of iodine monochloride and certain eathers in solutions at 303k by ultrasonic method. Ind. J. Pure Appl. Phys.. 2009;47:97.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. , , . Thermo acoustic and infrared study of molecular interactions in binary mixture aniline + 1-butanol. J. Pure Appl. Phys.. 2013;1(1):5-10.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. , , , . Ultrasonic and volumetric investigation of aqueous solutions of amides. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn.. 1977;50:2229.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. , , , , . Volumetric and viscometric properties of propanoic acid in equimolar mixtures of N,N-dimethyl formamide + alkanols at T/K = 303.15, 313.15, and 323.15. J. Sol. Chem.. 2013;42:494.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. , , . Study of molecular interactions in the mixtures of secondary alcohols with equimolar mixture of ethanol + formamide from acoustic and thermodynamic parameters. J. Chem. Pharm. Res.. 2011;3(4):29-41.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. , . Ultrasonic and viscometric studies of molecular interactions in binary mixtures of formamide with ethanol, 1-propanol, 1,2-ethanediol and 1,2-propanediol at different temperatures. J. Mol. Liq.. 2008;140(1):108.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. , , , , . Ultrasonic investigations of molecular interactions in binary mixtures of cyclohexanone with isomers of butanol. J. Appl. Chem. 2014
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. , , , , . Thermo acoustic, volumetric and viscometric investigations in binary liquid system of cyclohexanone with benzyl benzoate at T = 308.15 K, 313.15 K and 318.15 K. J. Thermodyn. 2014
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. , , , , . Volumetric and viscometric study of aqueous ethylene glycol in butan-2-ol and propan-2-ol. J. Chem. Biol. Phys. Sci.. 2014;4:3092.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. , , , , . Comparative study of molecular interactions in aromatic, cyclic and aliphatic ketones with 1-octanol at 308.15 K: an insight from ultrasonic velocity and density. J. Mol. Liq.. 2015;207:286.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. , . Empirical formula for sound velocity in binary liquid mixtures. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.. 1958;13:1528-1532.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. , , . Studies of viscosity and excess molar volumes of binary mixtures: 1-alkanols + di-npropyleneamine + di-n-butyl amine mixtures at 303.15 and 313.15 K. Fluid Phase Equilib.. 2001;186:81.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. , , , , . Physico-chemical behaviour of binary liquid mixtures of some monohydroxyalcohols with DMSO as common solvent. Ras. J. Chem.. 2008;1(3):481.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. , , . Densities of certain aqueous potassium chloride solutions as determined with a new pycnometer. J. Phys. Chem.. 1925;29:130.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. , , , , , . Volumetric properties of cyclohexane with ethyl acrylate, butyl acrylate, methyl methacrylate, and styrene at 298.15 K. Thermochim. Acta. 2002;390:47.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. , , , , , . Densities and excess volumes of benzene with ethyl acrylate, butyl acrylate, methyl methacrylate, and styrene at 298.15 K. Thermochim. Acta. 2003;398:39.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. , , , , . Measurement of the isobaric vapor–liquid equilibria of dimethyl carbonate with acetone, 2-butanone, and 2-pentanone at 101.3 kPa and density and speed of sound at 298.15 K. J. Chem. Eng. Data. 2005;50:481.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. , , , , . Vapor liquid equilibria for systems of diethyl carbonate and ketones and determination of group interaction parameters. Fluid Phase Equilib.. 2005;235:83.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. , , , , , . Thermodynamics of mixtures involving some linear or cyclic ketones and cyclic ethers. J. Chem. Thermodyn.. 2006;38:651.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. , . Thermodynamic and transport properties of binary liquid systems. Ind. J. Chem.. 1980;58:942.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. , , , , , . Excess molar volumes and ultrasonic studies of dimethylsulphoxide with ketones at T = 303.15 K. J. Chem. Thermodyn.. 2008;40:492.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. , , . Excess parameter studies on the binary mixtures of toluene with ketones at different temperatures. J. Chem. Thermodyn.. 2010;42:675.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. , , . Excess thermodynamic studies of binary liquid mixtures of 2-methyl-2-propanol with ketones. Ind. J. Pure Appl. Phys.. 2010;48:326.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. , . Volumetric, viscometric and ultrasonic behaviour of n-heptane with isomeric alcohols at 298.15 K. Ind. J. Pure Appl. Phys.. 1996;34:52.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. , . Molecular interaction study of binary mixtures of methyl benzoate: viscometric and ultrasonic study. J. Mol. Liq.. 2012;166:9.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. , , , . Thermophysical properties of binary mixtures (dimethyl carbonate + ketones) at T = (303.15, 308.15 and 313.15) K. J. Mol. Liq.. 2011;163:170.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. , , , , . Study on thermophysical properties of binary mixtures of butyl propionate and ketones at 303.15 and 313.15 K. Eur. Chem. Bull.. 2014;3(2):166.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. , , . Algebraic representation of thermodynamic properties and the classification solutions. Ind. Eng. Chem.. 1948;40:345.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. , , , . Techniques in Chemistry (fourth ed.). New York: Wiley; .
  48. , , , , . Molecular interactions between amine and cyclic ketones at different temperatures. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim.. 2014;115:1821.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. , , . Densities, speeds of sound and isentropic compressibilities of the ternary mixture 2-propanol + acetone + cyclohexane and the constituent binary mixtures at 298.15 and 303.15 K. Fluid Phase Equilib.. 2004;215:253.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. , , , , . Study of molecular interactions in the mixtures of secondary alcohols with equimolar mixture of ethanol + formamide from acoustic and thermodynamic parameters. J. Chem. Pharm. Res.. 2011;3(4):29.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. , , , , , . Study of molecular interactions in binary liquid mixtures containing higher alcohols at different temperatures. Res. Rev. – J. Chem.. 2013;2(1):12.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. , , , . Ultrasonic velocity of binary mixture of acetone and dioxane with dimethylsulphoxide as one component. Ind. J. Pure Appl. Phys.. 2005;43(11):844.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. , . Ultrasonic method of determination of stability constants of charge transfer complexes of certain carbonyl compounds and diethylamine in N-hexane. Phys. Chem. Liq.. 2002;40:507.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. , , . Thermo-acoustical and excess thermodynamic studies of ternary liquid mixtures of substituted benzenes in aqueous mixed solvent systems at 303.15, 308.15 and 313.15 K. Int. J. Chem. Res.. 2011;3(3):83.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Van Dael, W., Vangeel, 1969. In: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Calorimetry and Thermodynamics, Warsaw, p. 556.
  56. , . Textbook of Organic Chemistry (fifth ed.). New York: Wiley; .
  57. , , . Thermodynamic and transport properties of (1,2-ethanediol + 1-nonanol) at temperatures (298.15 to 313.15) K. J. Chem. Thermodyn.. 2008;41:197.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections