Translate this page into:
An efficient and simple synthesis of α-amino phosphonates as ‘drug like’ molecules catalyzed by silica-supported perchloric acid (HClO4–SiO2)
*Corresponding author. Tel./fax: +98 5412446565 mt_maghsoodlou@yahoo.com (Malek Taher Maghsoodlou)
-
Received: ,
Accepted: ,
This article was originally published by Elsevier and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.
Peer-review under responsibility of King Saud University.
Available online 25 July 2010
Abstract
An efficient and direct protocol is described for the preparation of α-amino phosphonates derivatives by employing a multi-component, one-pot condensation reaction of aldehyde, amine and trialkyl phosphite in the presence of silica-supported perchloric acid (3 mol%) under solvent-free conditions. The thermal solvent-free green procedure offers advantages such as shorter reaction time, simple work-up, high yield, recovery and reusability of catalyst.
Keywords
α-Amino phosphonates
Silica supported perchloric acid
Heterogeneous catalyst
Multi-component
Trialkyl phosphite
1 Introduction
The synthesis and use of phosphonate-containing molecules as an important class of active compounds, have received increased attention during the last two decades (Engle and Cohen, 2003; Savignac and Iorga, 2003). In this relation, the utilities of α-amino phosphonates as HIV protease (Peyman et al., 1992, 1994), anti-therombotic agents (Meyer and Barlett, 1998), enzyme inhibitors (Allen et al., 1989), antibiotics (Atherton et al., 1986), peptid mimics (Kafarski and Leczak, 1991), herbicides, fungicides, insecticides (Maier and Spörri, 1990), as well as important role for antibody generation (SmithIII et al., 1994), are well documented. Because of their pharmacological and biological importance, many procedures for the synthesis of α-amino phosphonates have been developed. Among the numerous reported methods, the nucleophilic addition reaction of phosphites with imines is one of the most convenient of these methods, and usually catalyzed by base (Pudovik, 1952), Bronsted (Petrov et al., 1974), or Lewis acids such as BF3–OEt2 (Ha and Nam, 1992), SnCl4 (Laschate and Kunz, 1992). However, these methods are not devoid of their limitation as many imines are hygroscopic and are not sufficiently stable for isolation. In the other hands, these reactions cannot be proceeded in a one-pot reaction involving a carbonyl compound, an amine and a trialkyl phosphite, because the amines and water exist during imine formation can decompose or deactivate the Lewis acid (Yokomatsu et al., 1994).
To overcome some of these problems, recently one-pot three-component synthesis of α-amino phosphonates has been developed. This conversion has been carried out by employing catalysts including lanthanide triflate (Qian and Huang, 1998), indium(Ш) chloride (Ranu et al., 1999) lithium perchlorate (Saidi and Azizi, 2002), magnesium perchlorate (Bhagat and Chakraborti, 2007), TaCl5–SiO2 (Chandrasekhar et al., 2001), PhNMe3Cl (Heydari and Arefi, 2007), TiO2 (Hosseini-Sarvari, 2008), sulfamic acid (Mitragotri et al., 2008), In(OTf)3 (Ghosh et al., 2004) CF3CO2H (Akiyama et al., 2003), Amberlite-IR 120 (Bhattacharya and Rana, 2008), H3PW12O40 (Heydari et al., 2007), Amberlyst-15 (Tajbakhsh et al., 2008), oxalic acid (Vahdat et al., 2008), trifluoroethanol (Heydari et al., 2009), Na2CaP2O7 (Elmakssoudi et al., 2005),[emim]Br (Yavari and Hajinasiri, 2009). However, many of these methods have drawbacks: for instance, long reaction time, environmental pollution caused by means of organic solvents, and expensive catalyst. Therefore, there is a need to develop a facile one-pot synthesis of α-amino phosphonates without these problems. The use of solid acidic catalysts supported on silica has attracted much attention in organic synthesis due to their advantages such as, reusability, inexpensiveness, ease of preparation and handling, nontoxicity, operational simplicity and ease of isolation from the reaction mixture. Silica-supported perchloric acid (HClO4–SiO2) is well known as an efficient heterogeneous catalyst for various chemical reactions (Chakraborti and Gulhane, 2003; Kumar et al., 2007, 2006; Khan et al., 2006; Bigdeli et al., 2007; Das et al., 2007; Kantevari et al., 2007; Shaterian et al., 2007). In continuation of our research works in the synthesis of α-amino phosphonates (Maghsoodlou et al., 2009, 2010), herein, we employed the silica-supported perchloric acid as an efficient and reusable heterogeneous acid catalyst for one-pot three-component synthesis of α-amino phosphonates under solvent-free conditions at 80 °C (Scheme 1).Synthesis of α-amino phosphonates.
2 Experimental
Melting points and IR spectra of all compounds were measured on an Electrothermal 9100 apparatus and a Shimadzu IR-460 spectrometer, respectively. The 1H, 13C and 31P NMR spectra were obtained on BRUKER DRX-250 AVANCE instruments with CDCl3 as a solvent. Elemental analyses were performed using a Heraeus CHN-O-Rapid analyzer. Mass spectra were recorded on Agilent Technology (HP) spectrometer operating at an ionization potential of 70 eV. All reagents and solvents obtained from Fluka and Merck were used without further purification.
2.1 General experimental procedure
The aldehyde (1 mmol), amine (1.2 mmol) and HClO4–SiO2 (60 mg, 3 mol%) were stirred for a few minutes. Then trialkyl phosphite (1 mmol) was added. The mixture was stirred at 80 °C in oil bath for the appropriate time (see Table 2). After completion of the reaction (followed by TLC), the reaction mixture was cooled and CH2Cl2 (20 mL) was added. The catalyst was separated by simple filtration and the filtrate was washed with H2O (3 × 10 mL). The organic layer was dried over anhydrous Na2SO4 and was evaporated. The crude product was purified by silica gel column chromatography with n-hexane/ethyl acetate (7:3) as eluent to provide pure α-amino phosphonates. Spectral data for new products are represented below:
2.2 Compound 16 (Table 2, entry 16)
Yellow solid, mp 131–133 °C. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 250 MHz) δ: 3.45 (3H, d, 3JPH = 10.5 Hz, P–OCH3), 3.67 (3H, s, OCH3), 3.75 (3H, s, OCH3), 3.80 (3H, d, 3JPH = 10.7 Hz, P–OCH3), 3.89 (3H, s, OCH3), 4.18 (1H, br, NH), 5.25 (1H, d, 2JPH = 24.0 Hz, CHP), 6.44–6.70 (6H, m, Ar), 7.37 (1H, m, Ar); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 62.5 MHz) δ: 48.12 (d, 1JPC = 156.3 Hz), 53.68 (d, 2JPC = 6.9 Hz), 53.84 (d, 2JPC = 6.9 Hz), 55.27, 55.61, 55.79, 98.52, 104.90 (d, J = 2.5 Hz), 114.67, 115.05, 116.40, 128.97 (d, J = 5.0 Hz), 140.02 (d, J = 15.6 Hz), 152.61, 158.18 (d, J = 6.9 Hz), 160.51; 31P NMR (CDCl3, 101 MHz) δ: 26.41; IR (KBr) υ: 3320 (NH), 1235 (P⚌O), 1060, 1039 (P–O–Me); MS m/z (%): 381 (M+, 14), 272 (100), 259 (10), 257 (11), 149 (88), 123 (53), 121 (69), 109 (6), 92 (10), 79 (18), 77 (17). Anal. Calcd. for C18H24NO6P: C, 56.69; H, 6.34; N, 3.67; Found: C, 56.83; H, 6.49; N, 3.75.
2.3 Compound 17 (Table 2, entry 17)
White solid, mp 84–85 °C. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 250 MHz) δ: 3.54 (3H, d, 3JPH = 10.5 Hz, P–OCH3), 3.83 (3H, d, 3JPH = 10.5 Hz, P–OCH3), 3.85 (3H, s, OCH3), 3.98 (3H, s, OCH3), 4.63 (1H, br, NH), 5.43 (1H, d, 2JPH = 24.0 Hz, CHP), 6.56–7.11 (7H, m, Ar); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 62.5 MHz) δ: 47.74 (d, 1JPC = 156.4 Hz), 53.68 (d, 2JPC = 6.9 Hz), 53.90 (d, 2JPC = 6.9 Hz), 55.65, 60.93, 112.16 (d, J = 2.4 Hz), 113.34 (d, J = 2.6 Hz), 114.51(d, J = 18.4 Hz), 118.02 (d, J = 6.9 Hz), 119.70 (d, J = 4.0 Hz), 124.31 (d, J = 2.6 Hz), 124.53 (d, J = 3.4 Hz), 129.27, 134.42 (dd, J = 14.7 Hz, J = 11.3 Hz), 147.03 (d, J = 7.3 Hz), 151.90 (d, 1JFC = 273.8 Hz), 152.33 (d, J = 1.7 Hz); 31P NMR (CDCl3, 101 MHz) δ: 25.17; IR (KBr) υ: 3316 (NH), 1240 (P⚌O), 1052, 1030 (P–O–Me); MS m/z (%): 369 (M+, 6), 260 (100), 245 (10), 135 (16), 123 (13), 122 (11), 111 (21), 109 (10), 95 (8), 79 (10). Anal. Calcd. for C17H21FNO5P: C, 55.29; H, 5.73; N, 3.79. Found: C, 55.41; H, 5.70; N 3.76.
2.4 Compound 18 (Table 2, entry 18)
White solid, mp 94–96 °C. 1H NMR (250 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 3.62 (3H, d, 3JPH = 10.8 Hz, P–OCH3), 3.86 (3H, d, 3JPH = 10.9 Hz, P–OCH3), 4.62 (1H, br, NH), 5.80 (1H, d, 2JPH = 28.8 Hz, CHP), 6.49–6.54 (2H, m, Ar), 7.14–7.37 (5H, m, Ar); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 62.5 MHz) δ: 52.74 (d, 1JPC = 156.9 Hz), 53.63 (d, 2JPC = 6.9 Hz), 53.93 (d, 2JPC = 7.5 Hz), 110.79, 115.26, 128.55 (d, J = 1.3 Hz), 129.66 (d, J = 3.1 Hz), 130.58 (d, J = 2.5 Hz), 130.68, 132.06, 134.75 (d, J = 5.0 Hz), 136.66 (d, J = 6.9 Hz), 144.57 (d, J = 15.6 Hz); 31P NMR (CDCl3, 101 MHz) δ: 22.54; IR (KBr) υ: 3324 (NH), 1255 (P⚌O), 1061, 1017 (P–O–Me); MS m/z (%): 439 (M+, 8), 332 (80), 330 (100), 328 (86), 294 (9), 249 (8), 184 (14), 157 (13), 155 (13), 109 (6), 76 (18). Anal. Calcd. for C15H15BrCl2NO3P: C, 41.03; H, 3.44; N, 3.19. Found: C, 41.20; H, 3.49; N, 3.28.
2.5 Compound 19 (Table 2, entry 19)
White solid, mp 136–137 °C. 1H NMR (250 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 3.48 (3H, d, 3JPH = 10.5 Hz, P–OCH3), 3.82 (3H, d, 3JPH = 10.7 Hz, P–OCH3), 3.86 (3H, s, OCH3), 3.96 (3H, s, OCH3), 4.26 (1H, br, NH), 5.35 (1H, d, 2JPH = 24.0 Hz, CHP), 6. 54 (2H, d, J = 8.8 Hz, Ar), 6.82–7.08 (3H, m, Ar), 7.17 (2H, d, J = 8.8 Hz); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 62.5 MHz) δ: 48.06 (d, 1JPC = 155.6 Hz), 53.80 (d, 2JPC = 6.9 Hz), 53.85 (d, 2JPC = 6.9 Hz), 55.67, 60.94, 110.40, 112.18 (d, J = 2.5 Hz), 115.48, 119.64 (d, J = 4.4 Hz), 124.34 (d, J = 2.5 Hz), 129.00, 131.92, 144.88 (d, J = 15.0 Hz), 146.95, 152.33; 31P NMR (CDCl3, 101 MHz) δ: 25.42; IR (KBr) υ: 3317 (NH), 1267 (P⚌O), 1054, 1018 (P–O–Me); MS m/z (%): 431 (M + 2, 6), 429 (M+, 7), 322 (100), 320 (89), 241 (6), 154 (8), 135 (13), 121 (9), 109 (9), 91 (6), 79 (8). Anal. Calcd. for C17H21BrNO5P: C, 47.46; H, 4.92; N, 3.26. Found: C, 47.41; H, 4.97; N 3.24.
2.6 Compound 20 (Table 2, entry 20)
Brownish solid, mp 112–114 °C. 1H NMR (250 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 3.46 (3H, d, 3JPH = 10.5 Hz, P–OCH3), 3.70 (3H, s, OCH3), 3.80 (3H, d, 3JPH = 10.6 Hz, P–OCH3), 3.88 (3H, s, OCH3), 4.25 (1H, br, NH), 5.32 (1H, d, 2JPH = 24.8 Hz, CHP), 6.51–7.04 (7H, m, Ar); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 62.5 MHz) δ: 47.93 (d, 1JPC = 156.9 Hz), 53.70 (d, 2JPC = 6.9 Hz), 53.87 (d, 2JPC = 6.9 Hz), 55.63, 56.37, 111.78, 113.80, 113.96, 114.79, 123.04, 124.74, 128.99, 144.47, 144.71, 151.44; 31P NMR (CDCl3, 101 MHz) δ: 25.47; IR (KBr) υ: 3310 (NH), 1252 (P⚌O), 1040, 1024 (P–O–Me); MS m/z (%): 385 (M+, 9), 276 (100), 261 (37), 246 (30), 149 (21), 140 (18), 111 (16), 109 (8), 79 (11). Anal. Calcd. for C17H21ClNO5P: C, 52.93; H, 5.49; N, 3.63. Found: C, 53.04; H, 5.45; N 3.71.
3 Results and discussion
Silica-supported perchloric acid was prepared according to the literature procedure (Chakraborti and Gulhane, 2003). In order to find out the optimum quantity of silica-supported perchloric acid, a reaction between benzaldehyde, aniline and trimethyl phosphite was carried out under solvent-free conditions using different quantities of HClO4–SiO2 (Table 1 and Fig. 1). As seen in Fig. 1, silica-supported perchloric acid with 3 mol% gives excellent yield in 65 min at 80 °C.
Entry
Catalyst (mol%)
Time (min)
Yield (%)a
1
1
100
76
2
2
85
88
3
3
65
95
4
5
55
94
5
10
35
92
The reaction between benzaldehyde, aniline and Trimethyl phosphite in the presence of different mol% of HClO4–SiO2.
Hence, a series of α-amino phosphonates were prepared in high to excellent yields from the reaction between aldehyde (1 mmol), amine (1.2 mmol) and trialkyl phosphites (1 mmol) in the presence of silica-supported perchloric acid (3 mol%). The results are summarized in Table 2.
Entry
R1
Ar
R2
Time (min)
Yield (%)a
Ref.b
1
Ph
Ph
Me
65
95
Bhagat and Chakraborti, 2007
2
Ph
Ph
Et
100
93
Qian and Huang, 1998
3
4-NO2–C6H4
Ph
Me
40
94
Heydari and Arefi, 2007
4
4-NO2–C6H4
Ph
Et
55
95
Hosseini-Sarvari, 2008
5
3-NO2–C6H4
Ph
Et
46
91
Bhattacharya and Rana, 2008
6
4-OH–C6H4
Ph
Me
90
89
Bhagat and Chakraborti, 2007
7
4-F–C6H4
Ph
Et
75
94
Bhattacharya and Rana, 2008
8
2-Cl–C6H4
Ph
Me
55
94
Vahdat et al., 2008
9
2-Cl–C6H4
Ph
Et
90
93
Hosseini-Sarvari, 2008
10
3-Cl–C6H4
Ph
Et
100
90
Hosseini-Sarvari, 2008
11
4-Cl–C6H4
Ph
Me
60
94
Heydari and Arefi, 2007
12
4-Me–C6H4
Ph
Et
180
81
Bhattacharya and Rana, 2008
13
4-NMe2–C6H4
Ph
Me
80
92
Bhagat and Chakraborti, 2007
14
CH3CH2CH2
Ph
Me
120
73
Tajbakhsh et al., 2008
15
CH3CHCH3
Ph
Me
120
71
Tajbakhsh et al., 2008
16
2,4-di-OMe-C6H3
4-OMe-C6H4
Me
70
97
–
17
2,3-di-OMe-C6H3
2-F-C6H4
Me
70
96
–
18
2,6-di-Cl-C6H3
4-Br-C6H4
Me
45
98
–
19
2,3-di-OMe-C6H3
4-Br-C6H4
Me
70
95
–
20
2,5-di-OMe-C6H3
4-Cl-C6H4
Me
75
95
–
21
3-NO2-C6H4
3-NO2-C6H4
Et
120
93
Ghosh et al., 2004
22
4-NO2-C6H4
4-NO2-C6H4
Me
85
90
Bhagat and Chakraborti, 2007
23
4-NO2-C6H4
4-NO2-C6H4
Et
120
89
Bhagat and Chakraborti, 2007
As can be seen from Table 2, each benzaldehyde containing electron-deficient or electron-releasing groups reacts efficiently with aniline for generation of the corresponding α-amino phosphonates (Table 2, entries 1–13). Also the reactions between substituted aniline, substituted benzaldehyde and trimethyl/triethyl phosphite led to the desired α-amino phosphonate in good yield (Table 2, entries 16–23). In addition, this method is effective even with aliphatic aldehydes, which normally produce low yields due to their intrinsic lower reactivity (Table 2, entries 14 and 15). On the basis of experimental results, the rate of all the reactions in the presence of trimethyl phosphite was increased in comparison with triethyl phosphite under constant conditions. The wide applicability of the present method is evident from the fact that it is tolerant towards various functional groups including alkoxy, halides and nitro groups. We have also prepared five new analogues of these compounds in excellent yields (Table 2, entries 16–20). These new compounds characterized by melting point, IR, NMR (1H, 13C and 31P), Mass spectroscopies and Elemental analyses.
The reusability of the catalysts is an important benefit in present method and makes it useful for commercial applications. Thus, the recyclability of the catalyst was checked for the reaction between benzaldehyde, aniline and trimethyl phosphite in the presence of HClO4–SiO2 (3 mol%). The separated catalyst can be reused after washing with MeOH and drying at 100 °C. The results indicate that the catalyst can be used five times without any loss of its activity (Table 3).
4 Conclusion
Thus, we have demonstrated that silica supported perchloric acid is an efficient and green catalyst for the synthesis of α-amino phosphonates. α-amino phosphonate derivatives were prepared via a one-pot three-component reaction between aryaldehyde, amine and trialkyl phosphite in the presence of catalytic silica-supported perchloric acid in solvent-free conditions. The thermal solvent-free green procedure offer advantages such as shorter reaction time, high yields, environmentally benign, simple work-up, cost effective recovery and the reusability of catalyst for a few times without a significant change in its activity.
Acknowledgment
Authors sincerely thank the University of Sistan and Baluchestan for providing the financial support of this work.
References
- Synlett. 2003;1463
- J. Med. Chem.. 1989;32:1652.
- J. Med. Chem.. 1986;29:29.
- J. Org. Chem.. 2007;72:1263.
- Tetrahedron Lett.. 2008;49:2598.
- J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem.. 2007;275:25.
- Chem. Commun.. 2003;1896
- Tetrahedron Lett.. 2001;42:5561.
- J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem.. 2007;271:131.
- C. R. Chimie. 2005;8:1954.
- Synthesis of Carbon-Phosphorus Bonds (second ed.). CRC Press; 2003.
- J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem.. 2004;210:53.
- Synth. Commun.. 1992;22:1143.
- Catal. Commun.. 2007;8:1023.
- Catal. Commun.. 2007;8:1224.
- Tetrahedron Lett.. 2009;50:77.
- Tetrahedron. 2008;64:5459.
- Phosphorus, Sulfur, Silicon Relat. Elem.. 1991;63:193.
- J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem.. 2007;269:53.
- J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem.. 2006;225:230.
- J. Mol. Catal. A.: Chem.. 2006;247:27.
- Synthesis. 2007;299
- Synthesis. 1992;90
- Heteroatom Chem.. 2009;20:316.
- Chin. J. Chem.. 2010;28:285.
- Phosphorus, Sulfur, Silicon Relat. Elem.. 1990;53:43. Phosphorus, Sulfur, Silicon Relat. Elem.. 1991;61:69.
- J. Am. Chem. Soc.. 1998;120:4600.
- Catal. Commun.. 2008;9:1822.
- Usp. Khim.. 1974;43:2045. Chem. Abstr. 82, 449 (1975)
- Tetrahedron Lett.. 1992;33:4549.
- Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.. 1994;4:2601.
- Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR. 1952;83:865. Chem. Abstr. 47, 4300 (1953)
- J. Org. Chem.. 1998;63:4125.
- Org. Lett.. 1999;1:1141.
- Synlett. 2002;1347
- Modern Phosphonate Chemistry. CRC Press; 2003.
- J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem.. 2007;272:142.
- Tetrahedron Lett.. 1994;35:6853.
- Synthesis. 2008;352
- Tetrahedron Lett.. 2008;49:6501.
- Iran. J. Org. Chem.. 2009;4:230.
- J. Org. Chem.. 1994;59:7930.