10.8
CiteScore
 
5.3
Impact Factor
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Corrigendum
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Full Length Article
Full lenth article
Letter to Editor
Original Article
Research article
Retraction notice
Review
Review Article
SPECIAL ISSUE: ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY
10.8
CiteScore
5.3
Impact Factor
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Corrigendum
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Full Length Article
Full lenth article
Letter to Editor
Original Article
Research article
Retraction notice
Review
Review Article
SPECIAL ISSUE: ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
4 (
4
); 481-485
doi:
10.1016/j.arabjc.2010.07.010

An efficient and simple synthesis of α-amino phosphonates as ‘drug like’ molecules catalyzed by silica-supported perchloric acid (HClO4–SiO2)

Department of Chemistry, The University of Sistan and Baluchestan, P.O. Box 98135-674, Zahedan, Iran

*Corresponding author. Tel./fax: +98 5412446565 mt_maghsoodlou@yahoo.com (Malek Taher Maghsoodlou)

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Elsevier and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Peer-review under responsibility of King Saud University.

Available online 25 July 2010

Abstract

An efficient and direct protocol is described for the preparation of α-amino phosphonates derivatives by employing a multi-component, one-pot condensation reaction of aldehyde, amine and trialkyl phosphite in the presence of silica-supported perchloric acid (3 mol%) under solvent-free conditions. The thermal solvent-free green procedure offers advantages such as shorter reaction time, simple work-up, high yield, recovery and reusability of catalyst.

Keywords

α-Amino phosphonates
Silica supported perchloric acid
Heterogeneous catalyst
Multi-component
Trialkyl phosphite
1

1 Introduction

The synthesis and use of phosphonate-containing molecules as an important class of active compounds, have received increased attention during the last two decades (Engle and Cohen, 2003; Savignac and Iorga, 2003). In this relation, the utilities of α-amino phosphonates as HIV protease (Peyman et al., 1992, 1994), anti-therombotic agents (Meyer and Barlett, 1998), enzyme inhibitors (Allen et al., 1989), antibiotics (Atherton et al., 1986), peptid mimics (Kafarski and Leczak, 1991), herbicides, fungicides, insecticides (Maier and Spörri, 1990), as well as important role for antibody generation (SmithIII et al., 1994), are well documented. Because of their pharmacological and biological importance, many procedures for the synthesis of α-amino phosphonates have been developed. Among the numerous reported methods, the nucleophilic addition reaction of phosphites with imines is one of the most convenient of these methods, and usually catalyzed by base (Pudovik, 1952), Bronsted (Petrov et al., 1974), or Lewis acids such as BF3–OEt2 (Ha and Nam, 1992), SnCl4 (Laschate and Kunz, 1992). However, these methods are not devoid of their limitation as many imines are hygroscopic and are not sufficiently stable for isolation. In the other hands, these reactions cannot be proceeded in a one-pot reaction involving a carbonyl compound, an amine and a trialkyl phosphite, because the amines and water exist during imine formation can decompose or deactivate the Lewis acid (Yokomatsu et al., 1994).

To overcome some of these problems, recently one-pot three-component synthesis of α-amino phosphonates has been developed. This conversion has been carried out by employing catalysts including lanthanide triflate (Qian and Huang, 1998), indium(Ш) chloride (Ranu et al., 1999) lithium perchlorate (Saidi and Azizi, 2002), magnesium perchlorate (Bhagat and Chakraborti, 2007), TaCl5–SiO2 (Chandrasekhar et al., 2001), PhNMe3Cl (Heydari and Arefi, 2007), TiO2 (Hosseini-Sarvari, 2008), sulfamic acid (Mitragotri et al., 2008), In(OTf)3 (Ghosh et al., 2004) CF3CO2H (Akiyama et al., 2003), Amberlite-IR 120 (Bhattacharya and Rana, 2008), H3PW12O40 (Heydari et al., 2007), Amberlyst-15 (Tajbakhsh et al., 2008), oxalic acid (Vahdat et al., 2008), trifluoroethanol (Heydari et al., 2009), Na2CaP2O7 (Elmakssoudi et al., 2005),[emim]Br (Yavari and Hajinasiri, 2009). However, many of these methods have drawbacks: for instance, long reaction time, environmental pollution caused by means of organic solvents, and expensive catalyst. Therefore, there is a need to develop a facile one-pot synthesis of α-amino phosphonates without these problems. The use of solid acidic catalysts supported on silica has attracted much attention in organic synthesis due to their advantages such as, reusability, inexpensiveness, ease of preparation and handling, nontoxicity, operational simplicity and ease of isolation from the reaction mixture. Silica-supported perchloric acid (HClO4–SiO2) is well known as an efficient heterogeneous catalyst for various chemical reactions (Chakraborti and Gulhane, 2003; Kumar et al., 2007, 2006; Khan et al., 2006; Bigdeli et al., 2007; Das et al., 2007; Kantevari et al., 2007; Shaterian et al., 2007). In continuation of our research works in the synthesis of α-amino phosphonates (Maghsoodlou et al., 2009, 2010), herein, we employed the silica-supported perchloric acid as an efficient and reusable heterogeneous acid catalyst for one-pot three-component synthesis of α-amino phosphonates under solvent-free conditions at 80 °C (Scheme 1).

Synthesis of α-amino phosphonates.
Scheme 1
Synthesis of α-amino phosphonates.

2

2 Experimental

Melting points and IR spectra of all compounds were measured on an Electrothermal 9100 apparatus and a Shimadzu IR-460 spectrometer, respectively. The 1H, 13C and 31P NMR spectra were obtained on BRUKER DRX-250 AVANCE instruments with CDCl3 as a solvent. Elemental analyses were performed using a Heraeus CHN-O-Rapid analyzer. Mass spectra were recorded on Agilent Technology (HP) spectrometer operating at an ionization potential of 70 eV. All reagents and solvents obtained from Fluka and Merck were used without further purification.

2.1

2.1 General experimental procedure

The aldehyde (1 mmol), amine (1.2 mmol) and HClO4–SiO2 (60 mg, 3 mol%) were stirred for a few minutes. Then trialkyl phosphite (1 mmol) was added. The mixture was stirred at 80 °C in oil bath for the appropriate time (see Table 2). After completion of the reaction (followed by TLC), the reaction mixture was cooled and CH2Cl2 (20 mL) was added. The catalyst was separated by simple filtration and the filtrate was washed with H2O (3 × 10 mL). The organic layer was dried over anhydrous Na2SO4 and was evaporated. The crude product was purified by silica gel column chromatography with n-hexane/ethyl acetate (7:3) as eluent to provide pure α-amino phosphonates. Spectral data for new products are represented below:

2.2

2.2 Compound 16 (Table 2, entry 16)

Yellow solid, mp 131–133 °C. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 250 MHz) δ: 3.45 (3H, d, 3JPH = 10.5 Hz, P–OCH3), 3.67 (3H, s, OCH3), 3.75 (3H, s, OCH3), 3.80 (3H, d, 3JPH = 10.7 Hz, P–OCH3), 3.89 (3H, s, OCH3), 4.18 (1H, br, NH), 5.25 (1H, d, 2JPH = 24.0 Hz, CHP), 6.44–6.70 (6H, m, Ar), 7.37 (1H, m, Ar); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 62.5 MHz) δ: 48.12 (d, 1JPC = 156.3 Hz), 53.68 (d, 2JPC = 6.9 Hz), 53.84 (d, 2JPC = 6.9 Hz), 55.27, 55.61, 55.79, 98.52, 104.90 (d, J = 2.5 Hz), 114.67, 115.05, 116.40, 128.97 (d, J = 5.0 Hz), 140.02 (d, J = 15.6 Hz), 152.61, 158.18 (d, J = 6.9 Hz), 160.51; 31P NMR (CDCl3, 101 MHz) δ: 26.41; IR (KBr) υ: 3320 (NH), 1235 (P⚌O), 1060, 1039 (P–O–Me); MS m/z (%): 381 (M+, 14), 272 (100), 259 (10), 257 (11), 149 (88), 123 (53), 121 (69), 109 (6), 92 (10), 79 (18), 77 (17). Anal. Calcd. for C18H24NO6P: C, 56.69; H, 6.34; N, 3.67; Found: C, 56.83; H, 6.49; N, 3.75.

2.3

2.3 Compound 17 (Table 2, entry 17)

White solid, mp 84–85 °C. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 250 MHz) δ: 3.54 (3H, d, 3JPH = 10.5 Hz, P–OCH3), 3.83 (3H, d, 3JPH = 10.5 Hz, P–OCH3), 3.85 (3H, s, OCH3), 3.98 (3H, s, OCH3), 4.63 (1H, br, NH), 5.43 (1H, d, 2JPH = 24.0 Hz, CHP), 6.56–7.11 (7H, m, Ar); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 62.5 MHz) δ: 47.74 (d, 1JPC = 156.4 Hz), 53.68 (d, 2JPC = 6.9 Hz), 53.90 (d, 2JPC = 6.9 Hz), 55.65, 60.93, 112.16 (d, J = 2.4 Hz), 113.34 (d, J = 2.6 Hz), 114.51(d, J = 18.4 Hz), 118.02 (d, J = 6.9 Hz), 119.70 (d, J = 4.0 Hz), 124.31 (d, J = 2.6 Hz), 124.53 (d, J = 3.4 Hz), 129.27, 134.42 (dd, J = 14.7 Hz, J = 11.3 Hz), 147.03 (d, J = 7.3 Hz), 151.90 (d, 1JFC = 273.8 Hz), 152.33 (d, J = 1.7 Hz); 31P NMR (CDCl3, 101 MHz) δ: 25.17; IR (KBr) υ: 3316 (NH), 1240 (P⚌O), 1052, 1030 (P–O–Me); MS m/z (%): 369 (M+, 6), 260 (100), 245 (10), 135 (16), 123 (13), 122 (11), 111 (21), 109 (10), 95 (8), 79 (10). Anal. Calcd. for C17H21FNO5P: C, 55.29; H, 5.73; N, 3.79. Found: C, 55.41; H, 5.70; N 3.76.

2.4

2.4 Compound 18 (Table 2, entry 18)

White solid, mp 94–96 °C. 1H NMR (250 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 3.62 (3H, d, 3JPH = 10.8 Hz, P–OCH3), 3.86 (3H, d, 3JPH = 10.9 Hz, P–OCH3), 4.62 (1H, br, NH), 5.80 (1H, d, 2JPH = 28.8 Hz, CHP), 6.49–6.54 (2H, m, Ar), 7.14–7.37 (5H, m, Ar); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 62.5 MHz) δ: 52.74 (d, 1JPC = 156.9 Hz), 53.63 (d, 2JPC = 6.9 Hz), 53.93 (d, 2JPC = 7.5 Hz), 110.79, 115.26, 128.55 (d, J = 1.3 Hz), 129.66 (d, J = 3.1 Hz), 130.58 (d, J = 2.5 Hz), 130.68, 132.06, 134.75 (d, J = 5.0 Hz), 136.66 (d, J = 6.9 Hz), 144.57 (d, J = 15.6 Hz); 31P NMR (CDCl3, 101 MHz) δ: 22.54; IR (KBr) υ: 3324 (NH), 1255 (P⚌O), 1061, 1017 (P–O–Me); MS m/z (%): 439 (M+, 8), 332 (80), 330 (100), 328 (86), 294 (9), 249 (8), 184 (14), 157 (13), 155 (13), 109 (6), 76 (18). Anal. Calcd. for C15H15BrCl2NO3P: C, 41.03; H, 3.44; N, 3.19. Found: C, 41.20; H, 3.49; N, 3.28.

2.5

2.5 Compound 19 (Table 2, entry 19)

White solid, mp 136–137 °C. 1H NMR (250 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 3.48 (3H, d, 3JPH = 10.5 Hz, P–OCH3), 3.82 (3H, d, 3JPH = 10.7 Hz, P–OCH3), 3.86 (3H, s, OCH3), 3.96 (3H, s, OCH3), 4.26 (1H, br, NH), 5.35 (1H, d, 2JPH = 24.0 Hz, CHP), 6. 54 (2H, d, J = 8.8 Hz, Ar), 6.82–7.08 (3H, m, Ar), 7.17 (2H, d, J = 8.8 Hz); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 62.5 MHz) δ: 48.06 (d, 1JPC = 155.6 Hz), 53.80 (d, 2JPC = 6.9 Hz), 53.85 (d, 2JPC = 6.9 Hz), 55.67, 60.94, 110.40, 112.18 (d, J = 2.5 Hz), 115.48, 119.64 (d, J = 4.4 Hz), 124.34 (d, J = 2.5 Hz), 129.00, 131.92, 144.88 (d, J = 15.0 Hz), 146.95, 152.33; 31P NMR (CDCl3, 101 MHz) δ: 25.42; IR (KBr) υ: 3317 (NH), 1267 (P⚌O), 1054, 1018 (P–O–Me); MS m/z (%): 431 (M + 2, 6), 429 (M+, 7), 322 (100), 320 (89), 241 (6), 154 (8), 135 (13), 121 (9), 109 (9), 91 (6), 79 (8). Anal. Calcd. for C17H21BrNO5P: C, 47.46; H, 4.92; N, 3.26. Found: C, 47.41; H, 4.97; N 3.24.

2.6

2.6 Compound 20 (Table 2, entry 20)

Brownish solid, mp 112–114 °C. 1H NMR (250 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 3.46 (3H, d, 3JPH = 10.5 Hz, P–OCH3), 3.70 (3H, s, OCH3), 3.80 (3H, d, 3JPH = 10.6 Hz, P–OCH3), 3.88 (3H, s, OCH3), 4.25 (1H, br, NH), 5.32 (1H, d, 2JPH = 24.8 Hz, CHP), 6.51–7.04 (7H, m, Ar); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 62.5 MHz) δ: 47.93 (d, 1JPC = 156.9 Hz), 53.70 (d, 2JPC = 6.9 Hz), 53.87 (d, 2JPC = 6.9 Hz), 55.63, 56.37, 111.78, 113.80, 113.96, 114.79, 123.04, 124.74, 128.99, 144.47, 144.71, 151.44; 31P NMR (CDCl3, 101 MHz) δ: 25.47; IR (KBr) υ: 3310 (NH), 1252 (P⚌O), 1040, 1024 (P–O–Me); MS m/z (%): 385 (M+, 9), 276 (100), 261 (37), 246 (30), 149 (21), 140 (18), 111 (16), 109 (8), 79 (11). Anal. Calcd. for C17H21ClNO5P: C, 52.93; H, 5.49; N, 3.63. Found: C, 53.04; H, 5.45; N 3.71.

3

3 Results and discussion

Silica-supported perchloric acid was prepared according to the literature procedure (Chakraborti and Gulhane, 2003). In order to find out the optimum quantity of silica-supported perchloric acid, a reaction between benzaldehyde, aniline and trimethyl phosphite was carried out under solvent-free conditions using different quantities of HClO4–SiO2 (Table 1 and Fig. 1). As seen in Fig. 1, silica-supported perchloric acid with 3 mol% gives excellent yield in 65 min at 80 °C.

Table 1 Optimization amount of silica supported perchloric acid for the reaction between benzaldehyde, aniline and trimethyl phosphite under solvent-free conditions at 80 °C.
Entry Catalyst (mol%) Time (min) Yield (%)a
1 1 100 76
2 2 85 88
3 3 65 95
4 5 55 94
5 10 35 92
Yields refer to the pure isolated products.
The reaction between benzaldehyde, aniline and Trimethyl phosphite in the presence of different mol% of HClO4–SiO2.
Figure 1
The reaction between benzaldehyde, aniline and Trimethyl phosphite in the presence of different mol% of HClO4–SiO2.

Hence, a series of α-amino phosphonates were prepared in high to excellent yields from the reaction between aldehyde (1 mmol), amine (1.2 mmol) and trialkyl phosphites (1 mmol) in the presence of silica-supported perchloric acid (3 mol%). The results are summarized in Table 2.

Table 2 Preparation of α-amino phosphonates.
Entry R1 Ar R2 Time (min) Yield (%)a Ref.b
1 Ph Ph Me 65 95 Bhagat and Chakraborti, 2007
2 Ph Ph Et 100 93 Qian and Huang, 1998
3 4-NO2–C6H4 Ph Me 40 94 Heydari and Arefi, 2007
4 4-NO2–C6H4 Ph Et 55 95 Hosseini-Sarvari, 2008
5 3-NO2–C6H4 Ph Et 46 91 Bhattacharya and Rana, 2008
6 4-OH–C6H4 Ph Me 90 89 Bhagat and Chakraborti, 2007
7 4-F–C6H4 Ph Et 75 94 Bhattacharya and Rana, 2008
8 2-Cl–C6H4 Ph Me 55 94 Vahdat et al., 2008
9 2-Cl–C6H4 Ph Et 90 93 Hosseini-Sarvari, 2008
10 3-Cl–C6H4 Ph Et 100 90 Hosseini-Sarvari, 2008
11 4-Cl–C6H4 Ph Me 60 94 Heydari and Arefi, 2007
12 4-Me–C6H4 Ph Et 180 81 Bhattacharya and Rana, 2008
13 4-NMe2–C6H4 Ph Me 80 92 Bhagat and Chakraborti, 2007
14 CH3CH2CH2 Ph Me 120 73 Tajbakhsh et al., 2008
15 CH3CHCH3 Ph Me 120 71 Tajbakhsh et al., 2008
16 2,4-di-OMe-C6H3 4-OMe-C6H4 Me 70 97
17 2,3-di-OMe-C6H3 2-F-C6H4 Me 70 96
18 2,6-di-Cl-C6H3 4-Br-C6H4 Me 45 98
19 2,3-di-OMe-C6H3 4-Br-C6H4 Me 70 95
20 2,5-di-OMe-C6H3 4-Cl-C6H4 Me 75 95
21 3-NO2-C6H4 3-NO2-C6H4 Et 120 93 Ghosh et al., 2004
22 4-NO2-C6H4 4-NO2-C6H4 Me 85 90 Bhagat and Chakraborti, 2007
23 4-NO2-C6H4 4-NO2-C6H4 Et 120 89 Bhagat and Chakraborti, 2007
Yields refer to the pure isolated products.
All known products have been reported previously in the literature and were characterized by comparison of IR and NMR spectra with authentic samples. All new compounds characterized by melting point, IR, NMR (1H, 13C and 31P), Mass spectroscopies and Elemental analyses.

As can be seen from Table 2, each benzaldehyde containing electron-deficient or electron-releasing groups reacts efficiently with aniline for generation of the corresponding α-amino phosphonates (Table 2, entries 1–13). Also the reactions between substituted aniline, substituted benzaldehyde and trimethyl/triethyl phosphite led to the desired α-amino phosphonate in good yield (Table 2, entries 16–23). In addition, this method is effective even with aliphatic aldehydes, which normally produce low yields due to their intrinsic lower reactivity (Table 2, entries 14 and 15). On the basis of experimental results, the rate of all the reactions in the presence of trimethyl phosphite was increased in comparison with triethyl phosphite under constant conditions. The wide applicability of the present method is evident from the fact that it is tolerant towards various functional groups including alkoxy, halides and nitro groups. We have also prepared five new analogues of these compounds in excellent yields (Table 2, entries 16–20). These new compounds characterized by melting point, IR, NMR (1H, 13C and 31P), Mass spectroscopies and Elemental analyses.

The reusability of the catalysts is an important benefit in present method and makes it useful for commercial applications. Thus, the recyclability of the catalyst was checked for the reaction between benzaldehyde, aniline and trimethyl phosphite in the presence of HClO4–SiO2 (3 mol%). The separated catalyst can be reused after washing with MeOH and drying at 100 °C. The results indicate that the catalyst can be used five times without any loss of its activity (Table 3).

Table 3 Recyclability of the catalyst for the reaction between benzaldehyde, aniline and trimethyl phosphite in the presence of HClO4–SiO2 (3 mol%).
Run No. Yield (%)a
1 95
2 94
3 91
4 88
5 83
Yields refer to the pure isolated recovered catalyst.

4

4 Conclusion

Thus, we have demonstrated that silica supported perchloric acid is an efficient and green catalyst for the synthesis of α-amino phosphonates. α-amino phosphonate derivatives were prepared via a one-pot three-component reaction between aryaldehyde, amine and trialkyl phosphite in the presence of catalytic silica-supported perchloric acid in solvent-free conditions. The thermal solvent-free green procedure offer advantages such as shorter reaction time, high yields, environmentally benign, simple work-up, cost effective recovery and the reusability of catalyst for a few times without a significant change in its activity.

Acknowledgment

Authors sincerely thank the University of Sistan and Baluchestan for providing the financial support of this work.

References

  1. , , , . Synlett. 2003;1463
  2. , , , , , . J. Med. Chem.. 1989;32:1652.
  3. , , , . J. Med. Chem.. 1986;29:29.
  4. , , . J. Org. Chem.. 2007;72:1263.
  5. , , . Tetrahedron Lett.. 2008;49:2598.
  6. , , , . J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem.. 2007;275:25.
  7. , , . Chem. Commun.. 2003;1896
  8. , , , , . Tetrahedron Lett.. 2001;42:5561.
  9. , , , . J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem.. 2007;271:131.
  10. , , , , , . C. R. Chimie. 2005;8:1954.
  11. , , . Synthesis of Carbon-Phosphorus Bonds (second ed.). CRC Press; .
  12. , , , , . J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem.. 2004;210:53.
  13. , , . Synth. Commun.. 1992;22:1143.
  14. , , . Catal. Commun.. 2007;8:1023.
  15. , , , . Catal. Commun.. 2007;8:1224.
  16. , , , . Tetrahedron Lett.. 2009;50:77.
  17. , . Tetrahedron. 2008;64:5459.
  18. , , . Phosphorus, Sulfur, Silicon Relat. Elem.. 1991;63:193.
  19. , , , . J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem.. 2007;269:53.
  20. , , , . J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem.. 2006;225:230.
  21. , , , , . J. Mol. Catal. A.: Chem.. 2006;247:27.
  22. , , , . Synthesis. 2007;299
  23. , , . Synthesis. 1992;90
  24. , , , , , , , . Heteroatom Chem.. 2009;20:316.
  25. , , , , , , . Chin. J. Chem.. 2010;28:285.
  26. , . Phosphorus, Sulfur, Silicon Relat. Elem.. 1990;53:43.
    , , . Phosphorus, Sulfur, Silicon Relat. Elem.. 1991;61:69.
  27. , , . J. Am. Chem. Soc.. 1998;120:4600.
  28. , , , , . Catal. Commun.. 2008;9:1822.
  29. , , , . Usp. Khim.. 1974;43:2045. Chem. Abstr. 82, 449 (1975)
  30. , , , , , . Tetrahedron Lett.. 1992;33:4549.
  31. , , , , , . Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.. 1994;4:2601.
  32. , . Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR. 1952;83:865. Chem. Abstr. 47, 4300 (1953)
  33. , , . J. Org. Chem.. 1998;63:4125.
  34. , , , . Org. Lett.. 1999;1:1141.
  35. , , . Synlett. 2002;1347
  36. , , . Modern Phosphonate Chemistry. CRC Press; .
  37. , , , . J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem.. 2007;272:142.
  38. , , , , . Tetrahedron Lett.. 1994;35:6853.
  39. , , , , , . Synthesis. 2008;352
  40. , , , , , . Tetrahedron Lett.. 2008;49:6501.
  41. , , . Iran. J. Org. Chem.. 2009;4:230.
  42. , , , . J. Org. Chem.. 1994;59:7930.
Show Sections