5.2
Impact Factor
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Corrigendum
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Full Length Article
Full lenth article
Letter to Editor
Original Article
Research article
Retraction notice
Review
Review Article
SPECIAL ISSUE: ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY
5.3
Impact Factor
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Corrigendum
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Full Length Article
Full lenth article
Letter to Editor
Original Article
Research article
Retraction notice
Review
Review Article
SPECIAL ISSUE: ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
:19;
2242025
doi:
10.25259/AJC_224_2025

Analysis of environmental behavior and potential toxic metal(loid)s barrier countermeasures for lithium leach residue stockpiling

School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, JiangXi University of Science and Technology, Ganzhou, Jiangxi, China
College of Materials and Chemical Engineering, Pingxiang University, Pingxiang, Jiangxi, China
Cooperative Innovation Center jointly established by the Ministry and the Ministry of Rare Earth Resources Development and Utilization, Ganzhou, Jiangxi, China
Jiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution Prevention and Control in Mining and Metallurgy, Ganzhou, Jiangxi, China

*Corresponding author: E-mail address: jxlgcm@163.com (M. Chen)

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Abstract

The leaching and migration of potentially toxic metal(loid)s (PTMs) during stockpiling of lithium leach residue (LLR) presents a serious environmental risk. Herein, the environmental behavior of PTMs in LLR, including leaching, migration, and microbial stress response, were systematically investigated. Priority pollutants and their geochemical fractionation characteristics were identified, and effective barrier measures were proposed. The research results indicated that the concentrations of thallium (Tl) and beryllium (Be) during the leaching process exceeded the standards by 11 and 3 times, respectively, representing the primary environmental risk factors during the leaching process. Meanwhile, the leaching concentrations of nickel (Ni), cobalt (Co), and mercury (Hg) are more pronounced under neutral conditions, making these metals key focus points. The scanning electron microscopy-energy dispersive spectroscopy (SEM-EDS) results revealed that Tl was mainly enriched in the gypsum phase, while Be might be present in the amorphous glass. In the migration behavior, the Tl content in the soil around LLR was 2.18 times higher than the background value, and the microbial community structure in the soil around LLR shifted to a dominant community dominated by Proteobacteria under the influence of PTMs. Variance partition analysis (VPA) further demonstrated that environmental risk factors, particularly Tl, contributed most strongly to the relative abundance and diversity of microbial communities, confirming that Tl is a priority pollutant for LLR. Recognizing that Tl in LLR and soil predominantly exists in the highly mobile and unstable exchangeable (TlExc.), a strategy based on the gradual conversion of TlExc. More stable reduced (TlRed.) and oxidized (TlOxi.) forms can be implemented using effective physical, chemical, and biological barriers to mitigate ecological pollution from LLR stockpiles. Our work provides a detailed exploration of the environmental behavior and mechanisms of LLR, aiming to offer an effective strategy for reducing environmental pollution caused by large-scale LLR accumulation.

Keywords

Effective strategies
Environmental factors
Lithium leach residue
Potentially toxic metal(loid)s
Risk potential

1. Introduction

Lithium (Li) is currently recognized as a strategic metal [1] due to its indispensable role in the advancement of high-technology industries, including new energy batteries, high-capacity energy storage systems, and capacitors for wireless technologies [2,3]. However, the production of lithium salts is associated with substantial solid waste generation, typically ranging from 50 to 60 tons per ton of lithium salt produced [4,5]. A significant component of this waste stream is lithium leach residue (LLR), a byproduct of alkaline leaching processes employed to extract lithium from ores [6]. Notably, LLR can act as a reservoir for potentially toxic metal(loid)s (PTMs), such as thallium (Tl), beryllium (Be), lead (Pb), mercury (Hg), cadmium (Cd), chromium (Cr), arsenic (As), barium (Ba), copper (Cu), nickel (Ni), cobalt (Co), and zinc (Zn), particularly in the presence of sulfate, which can facilitate their accumulation as sulfate salts [7].

Since Tl, Be, and Li are associated minerals, they should be given special attention. Among them, Tl, as the lithophilic and sulphophilic element, possesses higher dispersibility. Moreover, the ionic radius of Tl+ (1.5 Å) is remarkably similar to that of K+ (1.38 Å) and Rb+ (1.52 Å), facilitating its substitution for K+ and Rb+ in the crystal lattices of potassium feldspar and mica minerals. As a result, Tl and Be are typically enriched in LLR in the form of high-concentration sulfides [2]. However, the ecological toxicity of Tl and Be cannot be overlooked. For example, long-term exposure to Be can cause granulomatous lung disease, which is a recognized modern industrial hazard [8]. Meantime, Tl is a highly toxic trace metal whose acute and chronic toxicity exceeds those of elements such as Hg, Pb, and Cd in the vast majority of organisms [9]. Consequently, Tl has been classified as the priority pollutant by numerous countries, including the United States, Russia, Australia, and China [10]. Despite their considerable toxicity, the environmental hazards posed by Tl and Be have historically received less attention compared to other heavy metals, which may be attributed to their lower storage in the Earth's crust (the average concentration of Tl is only 0.5 μg/g) [11].

China possesses abundant lithium resources, with reserves of 3.5 million tons, ranking third globally [2]. Extensive mining has resulted in China producing a total of more than 1.5 × 107 tons of LLR since 2020 [7]. Previously, the large amount of LLR generated during the smelting process was mainly disposed of through open-air stacking, driving the dissolution of PTMs under the action of acid rain and leaching, or their release and migration from the soil during continuous weathering. Among them, non-degradable PTMs [12] have a direct and irreversible serious impact on the ecological environment, such as soil and groundwater [1315]. Due to their long-term nature and uncertainty, the migration, disturbance, and stress responses of PTMs in accumulated LLR on the surrounding soil biodiversity remain poorly understood, and their potential ecological and environmental risks associated need to be further assessed. Existing literature on the environmental behavior of PTMs in LLR is relatively limited [7], with a lack of systematic tracking of their storage behavior. Therefore, conducting in-depth research on the release mechanisms and migration pathways of PTMs in LLR, constructing feasible risk barrier models, and thereby assessing their primary risks and developing corresponding environmental management strategies hold significant academic value and practical significance.

In this work, the samples were collected from an LLR yard in Jiangxi Province, China, and the concentrations of PTMs and microbial community structure in the soil surrounding the landfill were monitored and analyzed. It's noteworthy that this study not only elucidates the leaching and release patterns and mechanisms of PTMs from LLR but also clarifies the migration pathways of PTMs in soil and the impact of environmental stress on microbial community structure. Accordingly, the primary risk drivers and their potential environmental consequences have been clearly defined. Based on the identification of the behavioral patterns of these primary risk factors, effective physical, chemical, and biological (including plant and microbial) barrier strategies have been proposed.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study area and sample collection

LLR and soil samples were collected from a representative LLR yard in Pingxiang, Jiangxi Province, China, characterized by an average annual rainfall of 1603 mm, a mean annual temperature of 17.3°C, approximately 1600 h of sunshine, and an average elevation of 274 m. The yard comprises two storage areas where waste is directly deposited and covered with ordinary films. The yard's topography slopes from east to west (stockpile area 1: 97.4 m; stockpile area 2: 101.5 m), directing rainwater runoff towards a collection pond on the western side. Wastewater from this pond, after sedimentation, is discharged into the downstream farmland. Consequently, soil samples were collected from three zones: soil around stockpile area 1 (Zone 1, Z1), soil downstream of stockpile area 2 (Zone 2, Z2), and soil in the farmland downstream of the discharge outlet (Zone 3, Z3). A total of 15 sampling points were strategically deployed across these zones (Figure 1). Around the LLR slag yard, soil sampling zones were established at straight-line distances of 10, 20, 50, and 100 m, reflecting actual site conditions. The soil sampling method was implemented in accordance with the Chinese standard HJ/T166-2004. Each sampling unit was arranged in a plum-shaped arrangement, and a total of five surface soil samples of 0–20 cm were collected using a wooden shovel, which was mixed into one experimental sample. Soil samples were retrieved and passed through 10-mesh, 40-mesh, and 200-mesh nylon sieves for the determination of soil physicochemical indexes. A part of them was kept in a −20°C refrigerator for high-throughput sequencing. Additionally, five LLR samples were randomly collected from two stockpile areas and thoroughly mixed. The LLR was in powder form, air-dried after retrieval, and ground to <200 mesh for storage for further testing.

Location of the study area and distribution map of sampling points.
Figure 1.
Location of the study area and distribution map of sampling points.

2.2. Determination of samples

2.2.1. Determination of basic properties

The samples were shaken for 5 min at a liquid-solid ratio of 2.5:1 and then left for 20 min, and the pH value was determined by a pH meter (Starter 3100C, China). Cation exchange capacity (CEC) was measured according to the Chinese standard HJ 889–2017, with a 10% parallel sample rate per batch and a standard curve R2 = 0.99912. Moisture content (MC) was determined based on the Chinese standard HJ 613–2011. The resulting LLR exhibited a pH of 8.2±0.013, an MC of 2.51%±0.01, and a CEC of 0.08±0.002 cmol/kg. Furthermore, the elemental distribution of PTMs within the samples was characterized by combining a cold field emission scanning electron microscope (SEM, Hitachi 8010, Japan) with an energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS, Bruker Q200).

2.2.2. Leaching release experiment of PTMs in LLR

The leaching of PTMs was analyzed according to the Chinese standard HJ/T299-2007 by utilizing the pH gradient leaching test. Considering that Tl+ is soluble and more soluble in the pH range of 0–13, TlOH precipitation will be formed at pH > 13 [16]. Therefore, the acidic leachate with pH 1, 3.21, and 5 was prepared by the H2SO4-HNO3 method, the neutral and natural weakly acidic acid rain conditions with pH 7 and 6 were simulated by applying ultrapure and carbonated water, and the alkaline leachate with pH 12 and 13 was prepared by the NaOH method. After leaching, the content of PTMs was determined through inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS, PinAAcle 900H). Details of the leachate configuration and leaching method can be found in the Supplementary Materials A.

Supplementary Information

2.2.3. Determination of metal content and sequential extraction procedure

The total amount of each metal element was detected in accordance with the Chinese standard HJ1315-2023. The concentration of PTMs was analyzed with an ICP-MS (PinAAcle 900H). The presence of Tl was assessed via an improved Bureau Community of Rearence (BCR) three-step extraction method [17]. This method separates heavy metals into different components, covering exchangeable components (TlExc.), reducible components (TlRed.), oxidized components (TlOxi.), and residual components (TlRes.). The concentrations in the extraction solutions were quantified with the ICP-MS. Detailed procedures have been presented in the Supplementary Materials B.

2.3. Soil DNA extraction and analyses of soil microbial communities

Total genomic DNA was extracted from soil samples via the Cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB) method [18]. PCR amplification of the V3-V4 region of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene locus was performed with specific primers 341F (5′-CCTAYGGGRBGCASCAG-3′) and 806R (5′-GGACTACNNGGTATCTAAT-3′). DNA concentration, integrity, and purity were examined from an Agilent 2100. Libraries were constructed by utilizing the NEB Next ® UltraTM DNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina (NEB, USA). The tested DNA samples were randomly broken into fragments of about 350 bp by a Covaris ultrasonic crusher, and the DNA fragments were then subjected to end repair, ployA tailing, sequencing junction, purification, and PCR amplification to complete the preparation of the libraries. Following PCR amplification, the resulting products underwent purification via the AMPure XP system. The insert size of the generated libraries was subsequently assessed utilizing an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer, and the library concentration was quantified from real-time PCR. Metagenomic sequencing was then performed, employing the Illumina high-throughput sequencing platform to generate raw metagenomic data pertaining to the bacterial communities present within the soil samples. Alpha diversity indices, richness estimates, and sequencing depth metrics were then determined, leveraging the diversity plugin implemented within the QIIME2 software package. To facilitate downstream statistical analyses, including confidence interval estimations, the relative abundance of Amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) was calculated through rarefaction, randomly subsampling each sample to an equal sequencing depth prior to computing ASV relative abundance.

2.4. Measurement and characterization

One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA, p<0.05) was conducted by using SPSS 27.0 to assess significant differences between treatments, followed by an least significant difference (LSD) test. Pearson correlation analysis and two-tailed significance test (p<0.05) were applied to evaluate correlation. Data were carried out with Microsoft Excel 2019, followed by correlation graphs by Origin 2022. All values are shown as mean ± standard deviation, and all treatments were replicated three times. Variance partitioning analysis (VPA) of environmental factor correlations of environmental factors was performed by adopting Canoco 5.0 software.

2.5. Simulation methods

The samples from our work were forest and farmland soils, and the ground accumulation index method was used to comprehensively evaluate the pollution status of metal elements in soils. The calculation method was as follows (Eq. 1) [19]:

(1)
I g e o = l o g 2 C i K × B i

Where Ci is the measured value of soil metal elements (mg/kg); Bi is the geochemical background value of soil metal elements (mg/kg) in Pingxiang City, Jiangxi Province. K is the coefficient of variation of the background value caused by crustal movement, which is generally 1.5. The scoring criteria and Bi values have been shown in the Supplementary Materials, Table C.1.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Risk and behavioral mechanisms of PTMs release by leaching behavior

Metal(loid)s are present in various forms in different smelting slags, resulting in completely different release profiles through dissolution, precipitation, and adsorption/desorption processes at different pH values [20]. Therefore, leaching tests were conducted on LLR with leaching agents of different pH values (Figure 2). The results showed that in leaching solution with a pH value of 3.21, the concentrations of Tl and Be detected in LLR were 57.59 μg/L and 57.99 μg/L, respectively, both exceeding the limits established by the Chinese national standard GB 5085.3-2007 for leaching toxicity of hazardous waste (Tl: 5 μg/L, Be: 20 μg/L), with exceedances of 11 and three times, respectively. As a result, it is necessary to attach great importance to the leaching and migration risks of heavy metals in LLR.

Leaching concentration and release pattern of PTMs at different pH. In parentheses are the standard minimum concentration limits for the identification of hazardous wastes stipulated by GB 5085.3-2007, and 3.21 is the leaching pH value stipulated by GB 5085.3-2007.
Figure 2.
Leaching concentration and release pattern of PTMs at different pH. In parentheses are the standard minimum concentration limits for the identification of hazardous wastes stipulated by GB 5085.3-2007, and 3.21 is the leaching pH value stipulated by GB 5085.3-2007.

Compared to other PTMs, Hg, Co, and Ni exhibit the highest leaching concentrations in neutral leaching solutions (pH = 5, 6, and 7). Among these, the affinity of Hg for sulfur results in its primary existence as HgS in LLR. After oxidation, the HgS and HgSO4 formed on the slag surface are easily leached under neutral conditions. Furthermore, Co and Ni are both amphoteric elements [21]. The stable Co2+ and Ni2+ are difficult to oxidize by O2 under acidic conditions, and therefore their release is restricted. However, under weakly acidic or neutral conditions, Co2+ and Ni2+ react with H2O to form hydrated ions, which are more easily released. On the other hand, under alkaline conditions, hydrated ions gradually hydrolyze, and Co2+ and Ni2+ are oxidized to Co3+ and Ni3+ under the action of H2O and O2, forming Co(OH)3 and Ni(OH)3 precipitates (e.g., 4 Co(OH)2 + O2 + 2H2O = 4Co(OH)3), thereby reducing leaching concentrations. Therefore, LLR stored under natural conditions (weakly acidic or neutral) poses a significant environmental risk of Hg, Co, and Ni contamination.

The leaching behavior of other PTMs was consistent, with release concentrations decreasing as alkalinity increased. The leaching mechanism can be explained from the following two aspects. On the one hand, the release of heavy metal elements is associated with the dissolution of different minerals or their desorption processes from adsorbed mineral particles. For instance, the concentration of released metals is decreased with precipitation or adsorption under alkaline conditions. On the other hand, since pH increases are negatively correlated with cation release and positively correlated with anion release, they are more easily released under acidic conditions, particularly in strongly acidic water environments with pH < 4, where the leaching rate of PTMs significantly increases [22]. In LLR, metal sulfides are replaced by H2S, and PTMs dissolve in aqueous solutions as metal ions, exhibiting high leaching concentrations. Conversely, metal oxide precipitates are formed and stripped from alkaline solutions.

The leaching experiments revealed that Tl and Be pose the primary environmental risks associated with LLR storage. In natural environments, the leaching and migration of Ni, Hg, and Co also warrant attention. Further analysis of the distribution of the five heavy metals using SEM-EDS (Figure. 3) revealed that Tl in LLR is primarily concentrated on mineral surfaces and highly enriched in rod-shaped crystalline gypsum phases. There is an overlapping region between Tl and Hg, indicating that these three metallic elements may exist in similar forms. The high SO2 content of up to 20% in the rod-shaped enrichment zones is attributed to Tl's affinity for both minerals and sulfur, leading to its enrichment in sulfide ores and exists in the form of sulfides in smelting slag [23]. However, Be, Co, and Ni are not significantly enriched in the surface sweep, which may be because most of Be cannot be swept out, Co and Ni are located in amorphous vitrinite.

SEM-EDS results for Tl, Be, Co, Ni, and Hg in LLR.
Figure 3(a-h).
SEM-EDS results for Tl, Be, Co, Ni, and Hg in LLR.

3.2. Analysis of environmental impacts and sources of PTMs in soil transport behavior

During stockpiling, PTMs such as Tl and Be in LLR can be transported in rainwater leaching, thereby influencing the surrounding soil environment and disturbing the microbial community structure, diversity, and relative abundance.

3.2.1. Evaluation of soil contamination

The pH value, CEC, MC, and analysis results for each sample have been detailed in the SI. The statistical data for PTMs at sampling points Z1 and Z2 have been shown in Table 1. The maximum values were compared with the local soil background values, and the excess multiples of PTMs were obtained in the following order: Tl (3.66)>Hg (2.18)>Be (1.36)>Cd (1.32)>Co (1.05)>Pb (0.63)>Zn (0.21)>As (0.17) >Cu (0.11) >Ni (0.1) >Cr (0.05). All PTM concentrations from Zone Z3 (Table 2) were lower than those in Zones Z1 and Z2, indicating that the migration risk in rainwater was lower than that in soil.

Table 1. Statistical data on the concentration of various metals in soil samples from Z1 and Z2.
Metal(loid)s Concentration (mg/kg) SD CV (%) BGVa (mg/kg) RSVb (mg/kg) RIVb (mg/kg) Igeo (max)
Maximum Minimum Median Average
Tl 2.6 0.13 0.7 0.86 0.80 92.96 0.71 0.87 n/a 1.27
Hg 0.24 0.016 0.12 0.11 0.06 57.75 2.11 3.4(2.4) 6(4) 0.5
Be 2.86 1.16 2.2 2.14 0.51 23.78 0.11 15 98 < 0
Co 12.8 0.313 8.52 7.57 3.74 49.44 12.2 20 190 < 0
Cd 0.33 0.09 0.2 0.19 0.08 41.21 0.25 0.6(0.3) 4(3) < 0
Cr 3.94 0.18 2.45 2.12 1.02 48.32 79.9 250(200) 1300(1000) < 0
As 1.71 0.13 0.59 0.65 0.45 69.63 10.2 25(30) 100(120) < 0
Pb 22.2 8.72 12.2 12.99 3.58 27.52 35.5 170(120) 1000(700) < 0
Ni 2.69 0.033 1.55 1.38 0.78 56.78 27.4 190(100) n/a < 0
Zn 21.37 1.95 6.23 7.87 5.54 70.42 101 300(250) n/a < 0
Cu 2.44 0.27 1.19 1.24 0.61 49.36 23 100 n/a < 0

Note: n/a means the value is unknown. CV is the coefficient of variation. BGVa is the background value of soil heavy metals in Pingxiang City, Jiangxi Province. RSVb and RIVb are the risk screening value and risk control value, respectively. Tl, Be, Co implement Chinese standard DB36/1282–2020, others implement Chinese standard GB15168–2018 standard. According to the requirements, soil sampling sites with 6.5 < pH ≤ 7.5 implement the standards within (), and samples with pH > 7.5 implement the standards outside ().

Table 2. Statistical data on the concentration of various metals in soil samples from Z3.
Metal(loid)s Concentration (mg/kg) SD CV (%) BGVa (mg/kg) RSVb (mg/kg) RIVb (mg/kg) Igeo (max)
Maximum Minimum Median Average
Tl 0.585 0.18 0.5 0.41 0.17 42.25 0.71 0.87 n/a < 0
Hg 0.192 0.08 0.102 0.12 0.05 40.04 2.11 1(0.6) 6(4) 0.2
Be 3.2 1.71 1.92 2.25 0.64 28.30 0.11 15 98 < 0
Co 13.8 6.76 8.25 9.54 3.06 32.09 12.2 20 190 < 0
Cd 0.23 0.15 0.22 0.20 0.04 18.58 0.25 0.8(0.6) 4(3) < 0
Cr 3.506 2.093 2.64 2.75 0.60 21.64 79.9 350(300) 1300(1000) < 0
As 0.996 0.53 0.85 0.79 0.20 25.16 10.2 20(25) 100(120) < 0
Pb 15.345 11.26 11.55 12.65 1.65 13.05 35.5 240(140) 1000(700) < 0
Ni 1.94 1.23 1.72 1.65 0.30 18.52 27.4 190(100) n/a < 0
Zn 43.24 5.88 10.1 19.52 17.23 88.26 101 300(250) n/a < 0
Cu 2.66 1.23 1.34 1.74 0.68 38.77 23 200 n/a < 0

Note: Same as Table 1.

Additionally, the mean values (n=3) of each point in the three plots were compared with the corresponding risk screening values to obtain the exceedance rate P (Figure 4). The results showed that only the Tl concentrations at sampling points Z11 and Z15 exceeded the standard, indicating that the concentration of Tl in the soil decreases with increasing distance, with a maximum exceedance rate of 2.84. Furthermore, all other PTMs were lower than the standard level. According to the Igeo assessment classification standards, the soil contamination level of Tl was classified as Level 2 and that of Hg as Level 1, indicating that the PTMs contamination risk around the LLR storage site was relatively low.

Plot of exceedances of metal elements in soil at sampling points (taking the maximum concentration), where P < 1 represents non-exceedance points and P ≥ 1 represents exceedance points.
Figure 4.
Plot of exceedances of metal elements in soil at sampling points (taking the maximum concentration), where P < 1 represents non-exceedance points and P ≥ 1 represents exceedance points.

3.2.2. Source analysis of PTMs in soil

The release pathways of PTMs from smelting slag piles [20,24] are typically categorized into the following aspects. Firstly, unstable minerals attached to the surface of the slag are immediately released under the shear action of rainwater when coated with salts and enter the soil with the rainwater. Secondly, as soluble minerals on the surface are eroded, the slag contacts rainwater, PTMs are released through surface oxidation, and migrate into the soil. To further analyze the migration mechanisms of PTMs in lithium leaching slag, multivariate statistical analysis was employed to identify the sources of heavy metal contamination in the soil. Pearson correlation analysis was performed with SPSS software (Table 3), and the original data were validated through Kaiser-Meyer Olkin (KMO) and Bartlett's Sphericity (BS) tests. The results showed that the KMO value was 0.533, and the significance level of the BS test was <0.01, demonstrating that the data were suitable for principal component analysis. Based on the criterion of eigenvalues > 1, three principal components were extracted, explaining 87.82% of the total variance (Table 4).

Table 3. Correlation matrix for soil metal(loid)s.
Metal(loid)s Tl Hg Be Co Cd Cr As Pb Ni Zn Cu
Tl 1
Hg 0.595** 1
Be −0.690** −0.502** 1
Co −0.792** −0.579** 0.809** 1
Cd 0.482** 0.109 −0.226 −0.459** 1
Cr −0.813** −0.537** 0.869** 0.877** −0.454** 1
As −0.519** −0.31 0.139 0.29 −0.068 0.357* 1
Pb −0.082 −0.089 0.475** 0.172 0.597** 0.198 0.014 1
Ni −0.875** −0.520** 0.705** 0.855** −0.691** 0.919** 0.386* −0.11 1
Zn −0.21 −0.139 0.688** 0.488** 0.2 0.486** 0.059 0.634** 0.247 1
Cu −0.592** −0.324 0.776** 0.812** −0.380* 0.707** 0.225 0.181 0.675** 0.766** 1
p ≤ 0.05.
p ≤ 0.01.
Table 4. Matrix of the main components of metal (metalloid) elements in the soil surrounding the LLR yard.
Metal(loid)s PC1 PC2 PC3
Tl −0.878 0.185 0.132
Hg −0.589 0.056 0.367
Be 0.702 0.043 −0.615
Co 0.916 0.118 0.176
Cd −0.445 0.808 −0.081
Cr 0.955 0.057 0.007
As 0.438 0.045 0.296
Pb 0.13 0.717 −0.619
Ni 0.925 −0.325 −0.026
Zn 0.471 0.662 0.51
Cu 0.801 0.298 0.368
Eigenvalue 5.49 1.86 1.44
Contribution rate (%) 54.89% 18.58% 14.35%

The first principal component (PC1) explained 54.89% of the total variance, primarily reflecting information on components such as Be (0.702), Co (0.916), Cr (0.955), Ni (0.925), and Cu (0.801), with all component loadings exceeding 0.7. Pearson correlation analysis revealed highly significant positive correlations (P < 0.01) between Be and Co, Cr, Ni, and Cu, suggesting that they have the same origin. Moreover, SEM-EDS also confirmed that Co, Ni, and other elements were not distributed on the surface of LLR, while the distribution of Cr and Ni in the soil was mainly influenced by the parent material and soil formation process [25]. Co is generally considered to originate from rock weathering [26]. Therefore, it can be inferred that PC1 (including Be, Co, Cr, Ni, and Cu) is the second stage of slag release, representing natural source.

The second principal component (PC2) accounted for 18.58% of the total variance, mainly reflecting the compositional information of Cd (0.808), Pb (0.717), and Zn (l0.662). The CV% of such type metal(loid)s (Table 1) is greater than that of PC1, confirming that it is more affected by anthropogenic activities than PC1. Therefore, PC2 (including Cd, Pb, and Zn) migration has already initiated, and both natural and pollutant sources exist simultaneously.

The third principal component (PC3) explained 14.35% of the total variance, mainly representing the correlated components of Tl (0.132) and Hg (0.367). There was a highly significant positive correlation (P < 0.01) between Tl and Hg, suggesting that the two can be considered synchronously in the management. The CV% of Tl was observed to be 92.96% (Table 1), highlighting that Tl is the most heavily polluted element in the LLR inventory. Consequently, PC3 (including Tl and Hg) can be identified as the first stage of LLR release, and has become a source of pollution in the soil.

3.3. Driving effects on the structural characteristics of microbial communities under Tl contamination

3.3.1. Influence of soil microbial community characterization

Microorganisms are important components of soil ecosystems, which respond rapidly and sensitively to environmental changes and disturbances, particularly in cases of high concentrations of heavy metal pollutants [27]. Moreover, the sensitive populations in the soil were gradually decreased during heavy metal exposure, and heavy metal-tolerant strains ultimately dominated the core position [28], thereby inhibiting the colonization of other sensitive bacteria. Regarding classification at the bacterial phylum level (Figure 5), the community structure of Z11 was homogeneous. This is due to the poor structure of the surrounding soil, low pH, lack of organic matter and nutrients, high concentration of metallic elements, and loss of biodiversity. Secondly, soil bacteria primarily belong to Proteobacteria, Gemmatimonadota, Actinobacteriota, Acidobacteriota, Bacteroidota, Chloroflexota. Among them, Proteobacteria, Acidobacteriota, Actinobacteriota, and Gemmatimonadota accounted for an average of 76.12% of the total microorganisms, constituting the dominant bacterial communities in the soil surrounding the LLR yard. These findings are consistent with those observed in granite tailings [29] (duration > 10 years) and gold tailings [30] (duration > 5 years), demonstrating that long-term interference from metallic elements has an impact on the uniformity of bacterial community composition in the soil environment of various types of tailings.

Relative abundance of the major bacterial phyla at different sampling sites. The bacterial phyla with low frequencies (< 0.1%) in all the samples were pooled and are denoted “others”.
Figure 5.
Relative abundance of the major bacterial phyla at different sampling sites. The bacterial phyla with low frequencies (< 0.1%) in all the samples were pooled and are denoted “others”.

In addition, several studies found that the flora of Proteobacteria, Acidobacteriota, Firmicutes, and Chloroflexota could tolerate the concentration of high concentrations of metal, thereby becoming dominant flora during long-term accumulation [31,32]. Li et al.[33] discovered that the relative abundance of Proteobacteria in the soil around the rare-earth mining area increased under the action of pioneer plants, and it exhibited the highest sensitivity to soil metal(loid) s concentrations. These results revealed that the transformation of metalloids by Proteobacteria is a gradual process influenced by the presence of metals in the tailings area. Although the storage behavior of LLR is relatively short-term (<3 years), the surrounding soil microorganisms have gradually developed the Proteobacteria community structure with tolerance to metal(loid)s concentrations. The migration disturbance of metals in LLR has affected the microbial community structure of the surrounding soil environment.

3.3.2. Influence of soil microbial diversity and community structure

In response to the transport perturbation of PTMs in LLR, the microbial community of the soil environment around the yard has gradually formed a characteristic structure with Proteobacteria as the dominant group. From an ecotoxicological perspective, metal toxicity inhibits microbial activity, leading to changes in microbial diversity and community structure [34]. Figure 6(a) shows that Z3 has the highest Chao1 index, indicating higher community diversity than Z1 and Z2. This is related to two situations: (1) The previously analyzed soil migration risk exceeds that of rainwater leaching, resulting in reduced LLR perturbation in Z3; (2) Z3 is an agricultural plot where long-term cultivation has resulted in high microbial abundance; whereas, the relative abundance of Proteobacteria in the Z1 contaminated area was low, except at sampling sites Z11 (31.41–79.1%) and Z2 (28.6%–70.6%), This indicated that the transport perturbation of metals had a direct inhibitory effect on soil microbial abundance.

Microbial community α-diversity of different soil samples from three plots: (a) Chao index, OTU level of (b) Shannon index; RDA of correlation of environmental factors (c) correlation of regional plots with environmental factors. (d) VPA analysis of soil microbial communities by E1 (Tl, Hg), E2 (other metal(loid)s), and E3 (soil physicochemical properties).
Figure 6.
Microbial community α-diversity of different soil samples from three plots: (a) Chao index, OTU level of (b) Shannon index; RDA of correlation of environmental factors (c) correlation of regional plots with environmental factors. (d) VPA analysis of soil microbial communities by E1 (Tl, Hg), E2 (other metal(loid)s), and E3 (soil physicochemical properties).

The Shannon indices (Figure 6b) of the three plots were comparable, with Z1 slightly higher than the Z2 and Z3 plots, indicating that microbial diversity gradually increases in soils affected by metal stress in the LLR. Its mean Shannon index was 8.87, comparable to the mean of 7.62 in sedimentary samples from abandoned Pb-Zn mining areas [35]. We found that the relationship between PTMs-induced disturbance effects on soil in LLR and microorganisms is complex, with context-dependent outcomes. Overall enrichment of PTMs inhibits microbial activity, leading to lower microbial abundance. However, since different microorganisms have different tolerances to the toxicity of PTMs, the diversity of the contaminated plots gradually increased, while overall microbial abundance decreased. For example, Proteobacteria demonstrate excellent tolerance to Cd and Pb [36], Chlamydiae and Proteobacteria have high relative abundance at high heavy metal contamination levels, and Proteobacteria show high response to Pb levels in different ecosystems [15].

The migratory enrichment of metals in LLR stockpiling behavior not only limits the soil microbial community but also interacts with the distinctive soil physicochemical properties of the site, which further affect metal toxicity; these three elements are correlated [37]. Therefore, the effects of environmental factors (three soil physicochemical properties: pH, CEC, and MC; and PTMs: Cr, Hg, As, Pb, Cu, Ni, Zn, Be, Tl, Cd, and Co) on the microbial community were analyzed using Redundancy Analysis (RDA) based on the abundance of sequences in the Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs) (Figure 6c). When considering single factors, Tl was the most dominant factor influencing the structure of the biological community under the LLR stockpile. It was positively correlated with the Z1 and Z2 sampling sites, in which Tl contributed the most to the contamination, whereas Z3 was more affected by Zn, Hg, and Ni. These findings are consistent with the previously analyzed results identifying Tl as the main environmental risk factor of LLR. Meanwhile, pH, MC, and CEC were negatively correlated with Tl, indicating that soil physicochemical properties were not the main influencing factors for the migration and enrichment of Tl. In contrast, CEC, pH, and MC showed positive correlations with Hg, Zn, and other metals. It can be attributed to the fact that at higher pH values, many metal(loid)s form solid phases through complexation with organic matter or precipitation as carbonates (e.g., Zn/Cd), while these compounds are dissolved at lower pH values, thereby enhancing metal mobility [38].

The microbial community structure (relative abundance and diversity) served as the response variable, and the VPA quantified the relative contributions of environmental risk factors and soil physicochemical properties (Figure 6d), and all the environmental factors collectively explained 43.53% of the variation in the soil microbial community, with the independent contributions being approximately 7.29% from primary and secondary environmental risk factors, 5.97% from other environmental risk factors, and 6.89% from soil physicochemical properties. In addition, environmental factors exhibited interactions, with PTMs accounting for 36.63% of the total variation and soil physicochemical properties explaining 24.54%. The effect of E1 alone slightly exceeded that of E2 and E3. The results showed that the microbial community structure of the surrounding soil was influenced by multiple factors from LLR stockpiling activities, among which E1 (Tl, Hg) dominated over soil physicochemical properties and should be identified as the primary factor affecting microbial communities.

3.4. Determination of priority pollutants for LLR stockpile behavior and analysis of barrier countermeasures

3.4.1. Identification and analysis of priority pollutants

PTMs in LLR storage undergo leaching and soil migration, adversely impacting ecosystems and microbial communities. Leaching processes primarily pose environmental risks from Tl, Be, Ni, Co, and Hg, while soil migration is dominated by Tl, Hg, Be, Cd, and Co. The combination classified their environmental risks into four levels (Figure 7a), identifying Tl as the priority pollutant. Therefore, Tl migration in LLR stockpiles represents a major environmental risk requiring primary management attention.

(a) Classification of potential ecological and environmental risks in the LLR and to the surrounding soil potential ecological and environmental risks, summarizing the major environmental risk factors and minor risk factors. Among them, level 1 risk is the largest, and level 4 is the smallest. (b) Percentage of each extracted state in the sequence extraction results of Tl in LLR and each soil sampling site, (c) Concentration of each extracted state, (d) Pearson correlation analysis of each extracted state with pH.
Figure 7.
(a) Classification of potential ecological and environmental risks in the LLR and to the surrounding soil potential ecological and environmental risks, summarizing the major environmental risk factors and minor risk factors. Among them, level 1 risk is the largest, and level 4 is the smallest. (b) Percentage of each extracted state in the sequence extraction results of Tl in LLR and each soil sampling site, (c) Concentration of each extracted state, (d) Pearson correlation analysis of each extracted state with pH.

In LLR, Tl can enter sulfides (e.g., ZnS, PbS, FeS) through isomorphous substitution, replace K, Rb, and other elements within the crystal lattice of silicate minerals, and adsorb onto mineral colloid surfaces. This results in diverse chemical species across different storage patterns, where the toxicity and stability of metals depend not only on their concentration but also on their speciation [24]. Based on this, Tl concentrations in LLR and surrounding sampling points were further analyzed via BCR extraction (Figures 7b,c). The results indicate that the highest concentrations of TlExc. were found in LLR and the surrounding soil. The concentrations of each form, ranked by abundance, are as follows: TlExc. (0.089–6.12 mg/kg) > TlRed. (0.11–2.089mg/kg) > TlOxi. (0.067–0.396 mg/kg) > TlRes. (0.006–0.226 mg/kg). This suggests that Tl in LLR primarily binds to tailings particles through carbonate co-precipitation and electrostatic adsorption, a mechanism consistent with prior studies [39,40]. At the same time, TlExc. is the main storage form in the soil surrounding LLR stockpiles, which suggests that the mobility of Tl in LLR is very high and has a great impact on the surrounding environment. While TlRed. and TlOxi. dominated topsoil speciation, TlOxi. exhibited significantly lower mobility than TlExc. along vertical soil profiles [41]. This implies that converting TlExc. to TlRed. or TlOxi. in LLR-affected zones would effectively reduce Tl migration through soil profiles. Meanwhile, soil TlExc. and TlRed. were found to have a high correlation with pH (Figure 7d). In alkaline soils, released TlExc. is adsorbed by Fe-Mn oxides and oxidized to TRed. [42]. This redox transformation forms the basis for PTMs immobilization strategies.

3.4.2. Blocking or repairing pathways

Based on the blocking path approach, a remediation mechanism was developed (Figure 8): (i) Physical method: Incorporate lime and alkaline stabilizers to suppress TlExc. mobility and promote its conversion to more stable TlRed. Subsequently, apply inorganic-organic composites to reduce Tl reactivity, thereby controlling further contamination. (ii) Chemical method: Leverage Tl's dual valence states (Tl+/Tl3+). Oxidize Tl+ to Tl3+ to form insoluble Tl2O3 with lower mobility and toxicity [43], Fe-Mn oxides can convert TlExc. to TlRed. [42], reducing its mobility and toxicity. Alternatively, manganese oxide-based adsorbents, such as activated carbon-supported MnO2(Mn-AC) or metal-organic framework- loaded MnO2 (Mn-MOF) [16,43], enable the formation of insoluble Tl2O3 or Tl(OH)3 co-precipitation of Tl with PTMs (Al, Mg, Zr) in LLR on the surface of Mn oxides [27]. Or enhancing soil organic matter (SOM) or S content. Metal sulfides were employed to further convert TlRed. to TlOxi. [23] and improve long-term stability. (iii) Plant and biological methods: The ionic radii of Tl+ and K+ are similar [11], so plants highly enriched in K+ can be preferred as pioneer plants. For example, cinnamon violet [44], kale, foxtail algae, and ferns exhibit significant Tl accumulation. Specifically, kale shows a Tl enrichment coefficient up to 10.7, with higher efficiency for Tl+ than Tl3+, the latter primarily retained in roots. In microbial remediation, while microorganisms cannot directly degrade heavy metals, they alter metal speciation and bioavailability by modifying physicochemical properties (e.g., redox potential, pH), thereby reducing environmental impacts [39]. Acidovorax can oxidize Fe2+, sulfides, and sulfide minerals, whereas Pseudomonas fluorescens has a strong affinity for Fe2+. Two species have been shown to convert TlExc. [45].

Diagram of Tl contamination barrier pathways and mechanisms in LLR stockpiles.
Figure 8.
Diagram of Tl contamination barrier pathways and mechanisms in LLR stockpiles.

4. Conclusions

In this work, the leaching extent of PTMs and soil migration pollution risks at the LLR yard were assessed. Priority pollutants, along with their corresponding pollution mechanisms and distribution patterns, were precisely identified and analysed to explore barrier (remediation) strategies. Specifically, Tl and Be were the primary environmental risk factors in leaching behavior, while Hg, Co, and Ni posed higher leaching risks in natural environments due to their unique leaching mechanisms. Furthermore, the ranking of PTMs exceeding the standard in the surrounding soil was as follows: Tl > Hg > Be > Cd > Co > Pb > Zn > As > Cu > Ni > Cr. Owing to the disturbance of PTMs, the distinctive Tl-tolerant Proteobacteria community structures have been formed, and VPA analysis confirmed that Tl is the primary concern pollutant in LLR.

Considering that Tl in LLR is primarily concentrated in the gypsum phase, and TlExc. has been identified as the primary form of Tl in LLR and its surrounding soil, it is possible to convert TlExc. into more stable forms, such as TlRed. and TlOxi., through chemical methods. For instance, altering the soil pH environment or adding iron manganese oxides, manganese oxide catalysts loaded with activated carbon (Mn-AC), manganese oxide-loaded organic metal frameworks (Mn-MOF) adsorbents, and metal sulfides can block the migration of pollutants and reduce their toxicity. Furthermore, plant barriers (such as cinnamon, cabbage, foxtail grass, and ferns) or biological barriers (such as Acidobacteria or Pseudomonas) can be employed for treatment. This study offers valuable insights into the environmental management of large LLR inventories and establishes a theoretical basis for their safe and resource-efficient disposal.

Acknowledgment

This work was funded by the National Key R&D Program of China [No. 2019YFC1805100], the Pingxiang Innovation Consortium Project [No. 2024C0106], the Pingxiang Science and Technology Project [No. 2024C0103], the Jiangxi Provincial Natural Science Foundation [No. 20232ACB203026], the National Natural Science Foundation of China [No. 51664025], and Jiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution Prevention and Control in Mining and Metallurgy [No. 2023SSY01071].

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Zongli Wang: Experimental studies, Data acquisition, Manuscript preparation, Manuscript editing and review. Ming Chen: Design, Concepts. Haifeng Guo: Design. Xianli Luo: Data acquisition, Data analysis. Ziqin Wang: Literature search. Haibin Hong: Data curation.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Declaration of generative AI and AI-assisted technologies in the writing process

The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.

Supplementary data

Supplementary material to this article can be found online at https://dx.doi.org/10.25259/AJC_224_2025.

References

  1. , , , , , . Crystallization sequence of the spodumene-rich alijó pegmatite (Northern Portugal) and related metasomatism on its host rock. Minerals. 2024;14:701. https://doi.org/10.3390/min14070701
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , , . Global lithium resources: Relative importance of pegmatite, brine and other deposits. Ore Geology Reviews. 2012;48:55-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2012.05.006
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , . Geochemistry and mineralogy of a spodumene-pegmatite lithium ore at various mineral beneficiation stages. Minerals Engineering. 2023;202:108312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2023.108312
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , . Preparation and study of magnesium ammonium phosphate cement from waste lithium slag. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2021;316:128371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128371
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , . Insight into the growth mechanism of low-temperature synthesis of high-purity lithium slag-based zeolite A. Materials (Basel, Switzerland). 2024;17:568. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17030568
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , , , . Efficient extraction of lithium and rubidium from polylithionite via alkaline leaching combined with solvent extraction and precipitation. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering. 2020;8:14462-14470. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c04437
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , , , . Leaching behavior of lithium slag at various pH conditions. Cement and Concrete Composites. 2025;159:105985. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2025.105985
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , . Beryllium: A modern industrial hazard. Annual Review of Public Health. 2007;28:259-277. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.28.021406.144011
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , . Preparation of lightweight ceramsite from solid waste lithium slag and fly ash. Construction and Building Materials. 2023;398:132419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.132419
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , , , , , , , , . Geochemical fractionation of thallium in contaminated soils near a large-scale Hg-Tl mineralised area. Chemosphere. 2020;239:124775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.124775
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , , , , , , , . Quantification of smelter-derived contributions to thallium contamination in river sediments: Novel insights from thallium isotope evidence. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2022;424:127594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127594
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , , , , , , , . Comprehensive evaluation of metal(loid)s pollution risk and microbial activity characteristics in non-ferrous metal smelting contaminated site. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2022;344:130999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130999
    [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , , , . The study on the effect of mercury pollution on soil microorganisms around mercury mining area. Scientific Reports. 2023;13:21605. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-48932-6
    [Google Scholar]
  14. , , . An overview of soil pollution and remediation strategies in coal mining regions. Minerals. 2023;13:1064. https://doi.org/10.3390/min13081064
    [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , , , , , , , , , , . Response of bacterial communities to Pb smelter pollution in contrasting soils. The Science of the Total Environment. 2017;605–606:436-444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.06.159
    [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , , , , , , , . Efficient removal of thallium(I) from wastewater using flower-like manganese dioxide coated magnetic pyrite cinder. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2018;353:867-877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.07.169
    [Google Scholar]
  17. , . Assessment of heavy metal contamination in Hindon River sediments: A chemometric and geochemical approach. Chemosphere. 2012;87:945-953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.01.055
    [Google Scholar]
  18. , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Multi-omics of permafrost, active layer and thermokarst bog soil microbiomes. Nature. 2015;521:208-212. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14238
    [Google Scholar]
  19. . Index of geoaccumulation in sediments of the Rhine River. GeoJournal. 1969;2(3):108-118.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. , , , , . The potential environmental risk implications of heavy metals based on their geochemical and mineralogical characteristics in the size-segregated zinc smelting slags. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2021;315:128199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128199
    [Google Scholar]
  21. , , , . Acidic leaching of potentially toxic metals cadmium, cobalt, chromium, copper, nickel, lead, and zinc from two Zn smelting slag materials incubated in an acidic soil. Environmental Pollution (Barking, Essex : 1987). 2018;238:359-368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.03.022
    [Google Scholar]
  22. , , , , . Leaching of heavy metals from tungsten mining tailings: A case study based on static and kinetic leaching tests. Environmental Pollution (Barking, Essex : 1987). 2024;342:123055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2023.123055
    [Google Scholar]
  23. , , , , , , , , , , , , . Microbial diversity in paddy rhizospheric soils around a large industrial thallium-containing sulfide utilization zone. Environmental Research. 2023;216:114627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.114627
    [Google Scholar]
  24. , , . Leaching of heavy metals from lead-zinc mine tailings and the subsequent migration and transformation characteristics in paddy soil. Chemosphere. 2022;291:132792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132792
    [Google Scholar]
  25. , , , , . Multiscale analysis of heavy metal contents in Spanish agricultural topsoils. Chemosphere. 2008;70:1085-1096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.07.056
    [Google Scholar]
  26. , , , , , . Pollution characteristics, risk assessment, and source apportionment of heavy metals in road dust in Beijing, China. The Science of the Total Environment. 2018;612:138-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.123
    [Google Scholar]
  27. , , , , , , . Assessment of heavy metal pollution and the effect on bacterial community in acidic and neutral soils. Ecological Indicators. 2020;117:106626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106626
    [Google Scholar]
  28. , , , , , , , . Microbiome-environment interactions in antimony-contaminated rice paddies and the correlation of core microbiome with arsenic and antimony contamination. Chemosphere. 2021;263:128227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128227
    [Google Scholar]
  29. , , , , , , . Spatial distribution and succession of microbial communities in biological soil crusts as affected by microtopography factors in the granite tailing areas of Macheng, China. CATENA. 2024;247:108532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2024.108532
    [Google Scholar]
  30. , , , , . Understanding the variation of microbial community in heavy metals contaminated soil using high throughput sequencing. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 2017;144:300-306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.06.048
    [Google Scholar]
  31. , , , , , , . Long-term industrial metal contamination unexpectedly shaped diversity and activity response of sediment microbiome. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2018;344:299-307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.09.046
    [Google Scholar]
  32. , , , . Effects of tree-herb co-planting on the bacterial community composition and the relationship between specific microorganisms and enzymatic activities in metal(loid)-contaminated soil. Chemosphere. 2019;220:237-248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.12.073
    [Google Scholar]
  33. , , , , , , , . Pioneer plants enhance soil multifunctionality by reshaping underground multitrophic community during natural succession of an abandoned rare earth mine tailing. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2024;472:134450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.134450
    [Google Scholar]
  34. , , , , , , , , , . Soil microbial community in lead smelting area and the role of sulfur-oxidizing bacteria. Journal of Central South University. 2024;31:1050-1063. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-024-5601-z
    [Google Scholar]
  35. , , , . Potentially toxic metal contamination and microbial community analysis in an abandoned Pb and Zn mining waste deposit. The Science of the Total Environment. 2019;675:367-379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.223
    [Google Scholar]
  36. , , , , , . Mechanisms of heavy metal-induced rhizosphere changes and crop metabolic evolution: The role of carbon materials. Environmental Research. 2024;263:120196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2024.120196
    [Google Scholar]
  37. , , . A review on cobalt phosphate-based materials as emerging catalysts for water splitting. Ceramics International. 2021;47:16385-16401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.02.215
    [Google Scholar]
  38. , , , . Study on the influence of soil microbial community on the long-term heavy metal pollution of different land use types and depth layers in mine. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 2019;170:218-226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.11.136
    [Google Scholar]
  39. , , . Soil microbial biomass, activities and diversity in Southern Italy areas chronically exposed to trace element input from industrial and agricultural activities. Applied Soil Ecology. 2022;174:104392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2022.104392
    [Google Scholar]
  40. , , , , , . Distribution of natural and anthropogenic thallium in the soils in an industrial pyrite slag disposing area. The Science of the Total Environment. 2005;341:159-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.09.024
    [Google Scholar]
  41. , , , , , , , , , , . Thallium geochemical fractionation and migration in Tl-As rich soils: The key controls. The Science of the Total Environment. 2021;784:146995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146995
    [Google Scholar]
  42. , , , , , , , , , , . Thallium isotopic fractionation in industrial process of pyrite smelting and environmental implications. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2020;384:121378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121378
    [Google Scholar]
  43. , , , , , , , , , , , . Efficient removal of thallium from flue gas using manganese-based MOF catalysts by gas-solid phase catalytic oxidation and adsorption. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 2020;59:12955-12963. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.0c01673
    [Google Scholar]
  44. , , , , . Microcolumn-based speciation analysis of thallium in soil and green cabbage. The Science of the Total Environment. 2018;630:146-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.02.147
    [Google Scholar]
  45. , , , . An archaeal iron-oxidizing extreme acidophile important in acid mine drainage. Science (New York, N.Y.). 2000;287:1796-1799. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.287.5459.1796
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections