Translate this page into:
Application of carbon nanotubes in extraction and chromatographic analysis: A review
⁎Corresponding author at: Chemistry Department, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. zaothman@ksu.edu.sa (Zeid Abdullah ALOthman)
-
Received: ,
Accepted: ,
This article was originally published by Elsevier and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.
Peer review under responsibility of King Saud University.
Abstract
Carbon nanotube (CNT), a well-known carbon-based nanomaterial has drawn much attention in many application fields including chemistry in the last few decades. Many researchers and scientists have shown huge interest to improve the extraction methodologies and adopt their applications in combination with chromatography technique. With respect to this, the exceptional applications of CNTs have been introduced as extraction sorbent due to their excellent inborn physical and chemical properties. In particular, CNTs have consistently been used as adsorbents in various techniques including solid-phase micro-extraction, solid-phase extraction, micro dispersive slid phase extraction, magnetic dispersive solid phase extraction, analytes enrichment, sample fractionation and clean-up as well as support for many derivatization reactions. Many research papers have discussed the successful use of CNTs to overcome the limitations of the extraction techniques due to their excellent sorbent capacity. In addition, considering the clear need to make chromatographic technique more successful, the applications of CNTs have been reported in the literatures in details as stationary and pseudo-stationary phases for the separation and extraction of challenging compounds. Because of the higher thermal and chemical stability, CNTs have been anticipated as stationary phase modifier for chromatographic applications to avoid bleeding of the columns and enable the analysis even at very high temperature (1200 °C). In liquid chromatography CNTs have primarily been used in combination with other packing materials (silica) and sometimes incorporated in a porous polymeric monolith. Therefore, the recent utilizations of CNTs as extraction materials and stationary phases have been illustrated in the current review and a table listing the details applications of CNTs in aforementioned field is provided as well. We believe that the review will help researcher to gain vast knowledge about application of carbon nanotubes in the field of separation chemistry.
Keywords
Carbon nanotubes
Extraction
Stationary phase
Chromatography
Application
- CNT (s)
-
carbon nanotube (s)
- SWCNT (s)
-
single-walled carbon nanotube (s)
- MWCNT (s)
-
multi-walled carbon nanotube (s)
- SPE
-
solid-phase extraction
- SPME
-
solid phase microextraction
- GC
-
gas chromatography
- LC
-
liquid chromatography
- CEC
-
capillary electro-chromatography
- CE
-
capillary electrophoresis
- HPLC
-
high-performance liquid chromatography
- PAHs
-
polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
- SEM
-
scanning electron microscopy
- TEM
-
transmission electron microscopy
- (d-SPE)
-
dispersive solid phase extraction
- (tR)
-
retention time
- OT-CEC
-
open-tubular capillary electro-chromatography
- ACN
-
acetonitrile
- APTS
-
3-aminopropyl-triethoxysilane
- CRM
-
certified referenced material
- DCM
-
dichloromethane
- DMSO
-
dimethyl sulfoxide
- DAD
-
diode array detector
- FAAS
-
flame atomic absorption spectroscopy
- FD
-
fluorescence detector
- HSPIMP
-
3-hydroxy-4-((3-silylpropylimino) methyl) phenol
- MeOH
-
methanol
- MIP
-
molecularly imprinted polymer
- ODA
-
octadecylamine
- o-MWCNTs
-
oxidized multi-walled carbon nanotubes
- PDPA
-
polydiphenylamine
- PDDA
-
poly(dimethyldiallylammonium)
- PVA
-
poly(vinyl alcohol)
- RRLC
-
rapid resolution liquid chromatography
- TCD
-
thermal conductivity detector
- UPLC
-
ultra-performance liquid chromatography
- ECD
-
electron capture detector
- FPD
-
flame photometric detector
- m-dSPE
-
magnetic dispersive solid phase extraction
- µ-dSPE
-
micro-dispersive solid-phase extraction
- MEKC
-
micellar electrokinetic chromatography
- m-NPs
-
magnetic nanoparticles
- NIP
-
non-imprinted polymer
- NPD
-
nitrogen phosphorus detector
- UHPLC
-
ultra-high performance liquid chromatography
Abbreviations
1 Introduction
Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) are the cylindrical allotrope nanostructures of carbon compose by rolling-up graphite planes with the diameters in the nanometer scale (Iijima, 1991; Dresselhaus et al., 1995; Thostenson et al., 2001). Two types of CNTs are mainly available, first one is single-walled CNT (SWCNT) and second one is multiwalled CNT (MWCNT) (Dresselhaus et al., 1995; Thostenson et al., 2001; Yakobson and Avouris, 2001). The SWCNTs are formed by rolled up single graphene layer into a seamless cylinder, while to prepare MWCNT, two or more graphene sheets are coaxially arrange around a central hollow core by the help of Vander Waals forces (Dresselhaus et al., 1995; Thostenson et al., 2001; Yakobson and Avouris, 2001). Based on the rolling angle of the graphene sheets they are called as armchair, zigzag and chiral (Fig. 1) (Madani et al., 2013). The special structural arrangements of CNTs provide exceptionally good inborn properties and become potentially useful materials for an extensive range of applications in the field of analytical chemistry. CNTs of various types have vastly been used individually or in conjugation with polymer composites in the field of photovoltaic applications as well, such as in solar cells (Jeon et al., 2017; Jeon et al., 2018; Ahn et al., 2018; Bhattacharyya et al., 2014; Kymakis et al., 2006; Rowell et al., 2006; van de Lagemaat et al., 2006). The application MWCNT can be found in the field of electrochemistry to modify the surface of glassy carbon electrode (Alothman et al., 2010; Wang et al., 2017; Wei et al., 2017). Wei et al. (2017) in their research work were used two types of metallic foams modified either with graphene or CNTs, and were applied them to discriminate rice wines with excellent results. The sp2 covalent bonds presents between the carbon atoms of CNTs makes the materials strongest and hardest, because the sp2 covalent bonds help to rise the tensile strength and elastic modulus of the materials. In general, the unique thermal and mechanical properties support the materials to use in other fields as well, including drug delivery, gene-therapy, neuro-engineering, chemical and biological sensor technology, and biomedical and tissue engineering. All these applications make CNT probably one of the most intensively studied nanostructured materials of different types (Goenka et al., 2014; Mundra et al., 2014; Meyyappan, 2004). The surface of the CNTs including SWCNTs and MWCNTs can easily be modified via the covalent or non-covalent bonding to improve the sorption capacity, and as well as thermal and chemical stability of the materials.
Models of single-walled and multi-walled CNTs and the various forms of SWCNTs (Madani et al., 2013).
In the last decades, plenty of methodologies based on pre-concentration and chromatographic separations have been established to improve the adsorption and retention efficiency of the sorbent materials. Regarding this, few research approaches have tried to incorporate a trivial quantity of carbonaceous nanomaterials into the porous stationary structure (Chambers et al., 2011a, 2011b; Aqel et al., 2012a; Mayadunne and El Rassi, 2014; Tong et al., 2013). Most commonly used material among them is CNT (Aqel et al., 2012b). Considering the large surface area and higher mechanical and thermal stability, CNTs have been used to produce sufficient interaction sites inside the sorbent and CNT has become an auspicious adsorbent material (Mayter and Elimelech, 2008). The earlier reports already have described the excellent adsorption capacity of CNTs and their application for the preparation of new stationary and pseudo-stationary phases (Speltini et al., 2013a, 2012, 2013b, 2014; Zhang and Qiu, 2015; Herrera-Herrera et al., 2012). The combination of the CNTs with other stationary phase was provided outstanding advantages to the separation techniques in terms of efficient separations. The potential applications of CNTs as stationary phases can be found substantially in the field of chromatography, including gas chromatography (GC), capillary electrochromatography (CEC), liquid chromatography (LC), etc. They have also been used as pseudo-stationary phases in capillary electrophoresis (CE) technique (Trojanowicz, 2006; Valcárcel et al., 2008; Scida et al., 2011; Peng et al., 2017; Herrero Latorre et al., 2012; Hemasa et al., 2017; Castillo-García et al., 2016; Pérez-López and Merkoci, 2012). Additionally, due to their good sorption capacity and capability to form a large numbers of interactions with foreign molecules, they have been very useful in many analytical fields, such as solid phase extraction (SPE) and solid phase microextraction (SPME) (Herrero Latorre et al., 2012; Ravelo-Pérez et al., 2010). In this review, a detailed outline for the latest applications of CNTs in liquid chromatography, gas chromatography, capillary electro-chromatography and for sample preparation has been discussed which are relevant to the chromatographers.
2 CNTs in separation techniques
In the recent years, countless efforts has been made to increase, modify and improve the separation efficiency of various stationary phases utilized in separation methods and especially in chromatographic techniques (Urban and Jandera, 2008; Zhang et al., 2006; Svec, 2010; Brett and Nesterenko, 2005). Carbon nanomaterials have received much attention to the improvements of chromatography technology and their applications mainly focus on the development of new stationary phases. In this regard, number of nanoparticles including gold (Lu and Chen, 2011; Xu et al., 2010; Yang et al., 2010a; Li et al., 2009a), silica (Lu and Chen, 2011; Dong et al., 2008; Wang et al., 2006), zirconia (Duan et al., 2004) and fullerenes (Kartsova and Makarov, 2004; Moliner-Martinez et al., 2008) have been used earlier as stationary phases to attained improve selectivity and efficient separation in the high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), GC, capillary electro-chromatography (CEC) and capillary electrophoresis analysis. In addition, due to the versatile behaviors of carbon nanomaterials, they have been used as modifiers and stabilizers and it was reported that the introduction of CNTs have improved the chemical stability, selectivity and separation efficiency of chromatography technique (Pedrosa et al., 2010; Yang et al., 2010a; Chambers et al., 2011a). The major applications of CNTs in the field of analytical chemistry are shown in Fig. 2.
Principal applications of CNTs in analytical chemistry.
However, the main challenges for the application of CNTs in analytical chemistry is to earn highly pure and well-characterized CNT materials (Hou et al., 2008). On addition, the commercially accessible CNTs are made of different diameters and lengths depending on the manufacturer, which undoubtedly disturbs their performances. Therefore, it is demanding to carefully chosen the type, dimensions and producer of CNTs to ensure their successful application in the laboratories.
2.1 CNTs in liquid chromatographic and electro-chromatographic applications
The use of CNTs as stationary phases in LC has explored in various research papers (Duan et al., 2011). The CNTs have mainly been used in combination with another silica based packing material or merged in a porous polymeric monolith (Peng et al., 2017). It has reported that the performances of the both SWCNTs and MWCNTs incorporated monolithic columns were improved due to the hydrophobic interactions between CNTs and the target compounds. The incorporation of MWCNTs in reversed-phase liquid chromatography has also found in the literature (Kwon and Park, 2006) and the combination of SWCNT with cellulose trisphenylcarbamate has reported to increase the enantio-selectivity of chiral column (Chang et al., 2007a). The bonding of SWCNT and functionalized SWCNT with 3-aminopropyl silica gel for the preparation of stationary phases were reported by many researchers, and were used such phases to separate various compounds including, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), terpenic compounds and polychlorinated biphenyl isomers (Chang et al., 2007b; Andre et al., 2009).
For example, Aqel et al. (2012c) of our group has published a paper reporting the effect of MWCNTs assimilation into benzyl methacrylate monolithic columns in capillary liquid chromatography. The work describes in details the preparation of polymer based monolithic materials and their application as stationary phases in preparation of capillary column. For this purpose, MWCNTs were incorporated into a mixture of co-monomers benzyl methacrylate and ethylene dimethacrylate. The cross-section and bulk region scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images, Optical micrograph (with a 100 × magnification) and Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of various columns are illustrated in Fig. 3. The efficiencies of the columns and the mobile phase flow rates tested by them at room temperature. The results for the separation of acetophenone, acetone, aminophenol, butyrophenone, chlorophenol and nitrophenol using the prepared columns are shown in Fig. 4. All the obtained results have been represented in terms of retention time (tR), theoretical plate height (H) and resolution of the peaks (Table 1).
(a–c). Cross-section SEM images of C1, C2 and C3 columns respectively. (d–i) Bulk region SEM images of C1, C2 and C3 columns respectively. (j) Optical micrograph (with a 100× magnification) of C1 column. (k and l) TEM images showing the MWCNT structure for C3 column monolith. Adapted from reference (Aqel et al., 2012a) with permission from Royal Society of Chemistry.

Chromatograms on columns C1 (left) and C3 (right) of: (A) ketones with a binary acetonitrile/water (50:50, v/v) with 1% formic acid mobile phase at 1 mL min_1, where: (a) acetone, (b) acetophenone and (c) butyrophenone, (B) phenols using acetonitrile/water (50:50, v/v) with 1% formic acid mobile phase at 1.5 mL min_1, where: (a) aminophenol, (b) nitrophenol and (c) chlorophenol. Adapted from reference (Aqel et al., 2012a) with permission from Royal Society of Chemistry.
| Components | Flow rate (µl/min) | Performances of columns | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stationary phase without CNTs (C1) | Stationary phase with CNTs (C3) | Hc1/Hc3 | ||||||
| tR/min | H/mm | Rs | tR/min | H/mm | Rs | |||
| Acetone | 1.0 | 15.36 | 0.716 | – | 15.41 | 0.092 | – | 7.78 |
| Acetophenone | 1.0 | 22.04 | 0.804 | 1.25 | 22.25 | 0.092 | 3.67 | 8.74 |
| Butyrophenone | 1.0 | 33.60 | 0.862 | 1.39 | 33.99 | 0.103 | 4.07 | 8.37 |
| Aminophenol | 1.0 | 10.32 | 0.366 | – | 14.12 | 0.136 | – | 2.69 |
| Nitrophenol | 1.0 | 13.97 | 0.448 | 1.44 | 19.42 | 0.140 | 2.61 | 3.20 |
| Chlorophenol | 1.0 | 17.91 | 0.485 | 1.10 | 24.75 | 0.143 | 1.96 | 3.39 |
| Acetone | 1.5 | 11.37 | 0.604 | – | 10.28 | 0.092 | – | 6.57 |
| Acetophenone | 1.5 | 16.30 | 0.636 | 1.39 | 14.70 | 0.101 | 3.48 | 6.30 |
| Butyrophenone | 1.5 | 24.90 | 0.733 | 1.54 | 23.33 | 0.112 | 4.24 | 6.54 |
| Aminophenol | 1.5 | 8.33 | 0.323 | – | 9.45 | 0.148 | – | 2.18 |
| Nitrophenol | 1.5 | 10.38 | 0.642 | 1.01 | 14.25 | 0.147 | 3.24 | 4.37 |
| Chlorophenol | 1.5 | 14.25 | 0.587 | 1.23 | 16.69 | 0.140 | 1.28 | 4019 |
| Acetone | 2.0 | 8.91 | 0.575 | – | 7.75 | 0.091 | – | 6.32 |
| Acetophenone | 2.0 | 12.99 | 0.641 | 1.46 | 11.27 | 0.090 | 3.77 | 7.12 |
| Butyrophenone | 2.0 | 19.30 | 0.653 | 1.49 | 16.95 | 0.114 | 3.83 | 5.73 |
| Aminophenol | 2.0 | 6.88 | 0.322 | – | 7.02 | 0.137 | – | 2.35 |
| Nitrophenol | 2 | 9.47 | 0.590 | 1.43 | 10.92 | 0.145 | 3.53 | 4.07 |
| Chlorophenol | 2 | 11.96 | 0.613 | 0.92 | 12.63 | 0.137 | 1.19 | 4.47 |
The incorporation of non-functionalized pure CNTs prevents the column bleeding and enables the column to operate at higher temperatures compared to other conventional columns (Valcárcel et al., 2005). Such type of modified columns was produced by deposit a thin layer of nanotubes on the surface of stationary phase through Chemical vapor deposition technique (Valcárcel et al, 2008). It has been claimed that the modification allows a better peak separation and shape and warned to consider the thermal stability carefully during the modification, because it has direct adverse effect on the column performance and reliability (Speltini et al., 2010). The number of literature in this field that concerns mainly the separation of standard mixtures of various compounds can be found in the literature. An example of separation of eleven acidic, neutral and alkaline organic components (sulphadimidine, resorcinol, aniline, p-toluidine, benzylalcohol, p-methoxybenzaldehyde, 2-naphthol, N,N-dimethylaniline, anisole, 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene and 2-methoxynaphthalene) on different PS-DVB columns containing 0%, 1% and 5% MWCNTs is provided in Fig. 5 (Zhong et al., 2010).
Separation of 11 organic compounds on (a) PS-DVB column, (b) PS-DVB-CNT columns (1% MWCNTs) and (c) PS-DVB-CNT column (5% MWCNTs). Column: PS-DVB and PS-DVB-CNT particles packed in 4.6 mm × 150 mm stainless-steel column. Mobile phase: methanol/water (90:10, v/v). Detection: UV detector with 254 nm. Flow rate: 1.0 mL/min. Peak identification: (1) resorcinol; (2) sulphadimidine; (3) benzylalcohol; (4) aniline; (5) p-toluidine; (6) 2-naphthol; (7) p-methoxybenzaldehyde; (8) anisole; (9) N,N-dimethylaniline; (10) 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene; (11) 2-methoxynaphthalene. Adapted from reference (Zhong et al., 2010) with permission from Elsevier.
CNTs easily immobilized onto the walls of silica capillaries through non-covalently or covalently bonding and those modified capillaries used to perform open-tubular CEC (OT-CEC) for the determination of different target compounds (Peng et al., 2017). Regarding this, various research paper reports the development of CNTs incorporated porous polymer monolithic capillary columns to achieve the enhanced separation of various small molecules (Chambers et al., 2011a; Hou et al., 2008). Among them, Chambers and his coworkers have described that the monolith column without CNTs modifications exhibited very low efficiency of only 1800 plates/m compared to modified column (Chambers et al., 2011a). The addition of a small quantity of MWCNTs was increased the efficiency of the column to greater than 15,000 plates/m at flow rates of 1 µL/min, and more than 35,000 plates/m when the flow set at 0.15 µL/min. The incorporation of small quantity of MWCNTs within porous silica beads helps to increase the affinity of the stationary phase towards aromatic compounds and provide better selectivity and retention to the column. There have found few applications of CNTs in chips to perform chip-CEC for the determination of thioamides, alkanes, colorings, and DNA fragments (Peng et al., 2017). In general, so far less works using CNTs have been reported in the chromatographic and electro-chromatographic fields, but the number of published papers likely to be more increase in future because of the interesting results of CNTs.
It has been noted that the resolution of chromatographic peaks and the plate number both reduced with the incorporation of MWCNTs (Zhong et al., 2010), but the applications of such materials increases day by day in chromatography field. Most of the reported works are only investigated for the text mixtures of analytes and the complex methodologies have not been established for the analysis of real samples. Another important issue regarding the application of CNTs as stationary phase that has not been considered in most of the research paper is the mechanical stability of the CNTs loaded stationary phase under different mobile phase flow environments. It can certainly be anticipated that the diameter, the length-to-diameter ratio and the number of CNTs will have a big impact with respect to the mechanical stability of the column. In this regard, it has been reported that the hydrodynamically driven flow systems required higher mechanical stability, as very high pressure applied in this systems (Mogensen and Kutter, 2012). Therefore, so much experimental evidences are still required in order to prepare CNTs incorporated stationary phase for the application in chromatographic separation with better understanding. In addition, further research is also demanded to understand the mechanism to achieve better electroosmotic flow on CNT-loaded stationary phases. Because, the oxidative state and/or the surface charge of the CNTs directly influence the retention properties of the column, which might makes the separation more challenging on such an electroosmotic flow system, compared to hydrodynamical flows based system.
The price of CNTs are also very important parameter, which can limits their applications in chromatography and separation science. Both CNTs powder and suspension are commercially available in a wide variety in terms of tube length, diameter and purity. Obviously, the application of CNTs is less expensive and very easy in the sense that the modification steps does not required any special equipment. The immobilization or deposition of CNTs on the stationary phases are easily performed by using their suspensions. Also according to various reported paper the regeneration of the CNTs and their reuses have been efficiently achieved once they used as extraction sorbent materials. However, the protocols needed for the purification and to prepare suspensions without the aggregation of the CNTs is quite labor intensive, challenging, and makes their applications limited.
2.2 CNTs applications in GC
The CNTs have anticipated preparing the stationary phases for GC because of their excellent adsorbent ability, intrinsic properties, and thermal and chemical stability. In very earlier literature, the application of both MWCNTs and SWCNTs can found in a GC packed column to separate halogenated and aromatic hydrocarbons, alkanes, ketones, alcohols, esters, ethers, etc. (Li and Yuan, 2003). The GC columns of various dimensions fabricated by self-assembly of a CNT film onto the capillary surface to prepare stable stationary phase and it was reported that the MWCNT modified column shown better selectivity and separation efficiency than SWCNT toward alkanes (Karwa and Mitra, 2006; Hussain et al., 2010). The use of SWCNTs as microfabricated stationary phase of GC capillary column has also reported in the literature (Stadermann et al., 2006). In other researches, SWCNTs were embedded to the inner surface of the capillary tubing to enhance the separation of alcohols, alkanes, ketones, aromatic compounds and racemate mixtures (Yuan et al., 2006; Zhao et al., 2011).
The application of homemade packed glass column using derivatized MWCNT found for the separation of alkanes and aromatic hydrocarbons (Speltini et al., 2010). Li et al. (2005) were combined SWCNT with an organic polymer and used them as monolithic stationary phase and better performance in terms of chromatographic retention of neutral molecules was achieved compared to a monolithic column without incorporated SWCNT. Detail lists of the applications of CNTs in sample preparations and chromatographic analyses listed in Table 2.
| Target compounds | Real Sample | Types of CNTs useda | Elution components | Method used | %age Recovery | LODs | Remarks | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 sulfonamides | Milk | SWCNTs/C18 and MWCNTs/C18 (d.: 110–170 nm) | MeOH (0.1 mL) | CE-DAD | 99–103 | 103 µg/L | [HMIm][PF6] composite was used for sorbent preparation and MWCNTs/C18 provided the better results than SWCNTs/C18 | Polo-Luque et al. (2013) |
| 3 sulfonamide antibiotics | Sewage, Lake, and river water | MWCNTs (–) | 5% NH3 in MeOH (1 mL) | HPLC-FD | 80–90 | – | µ-SPE; comparison with graphene, HLB, C18, PCX, SCX sorbents | Sun et al. (2014) |
| Macrolides | Fish tissues | MWCNTs (–) | MeOH (3 mL) | UPLC–MS/MS | 78–92 | – | Comparison with C18 and graphene | Wu et al. (2013) |
| Rhodamine B | Chili powder | MWCNTs-COOH (–)/MIPs | MeOH (5 mL) | UV | 99 | 99–992570 µg/kg | Rhodamine B was used as template and the selectivity of sorbent was confirmed using: amaranth, carmine, sunset yellow and tartrazine | Liu et al. (2013) |
| 5 aromatic hydrocarbons | Tap, bank filtrate, and wastewater | MWCNTs (–) | He (0.5 mL) | GC–MS | 85 | 0.002–0.011 µg/L | HS-needle- µ-SPE | |
| 5 pharmaceuticals | Water | MWCNTs, MWCNTs-ODA, MWCNTs-COOH (–) | ACN (–) | HPLC-UV | – | 0.08–4.5 µg/L | Comparison with C18; needle- µ-SPE | Bhadra et al. (2011) |
| 7 marine toxins | Shellfish muscle | MWCNTs (–) | 5% NH4OH (v/v) in ACN (200 _L) | UPLC–MS/MS | 70–90 | – | Comparison with GP, HLB, Strata-X and C18 sorbents; µ-SPE | Shen et al. (2013) |
| 14 multiclass pesticides | Distilled and river water | MWCNTs (–)/PDPA | ACN (0.2 mL) | GC–MS | – | 0.01–0.2 µg/L | _-SPE; sorbent packed in a syringe | Bagheri et al. (2012) |
| Rhein | Root of kiwi | MWCNTs (d.: 30–50 nm)/MIPs | MeOH:acetic acid 9:1 (v/v) (10 mL) | HPLC-UV–vis | 80–92 | – | Rhein as template | Chen et al. (2012a) |
| Oleanolic acid | Roots of kiwi | MWCNTs (–)/MIPs | 10% acetic acid (v/v) (3 mL) | HPLC-UV | 84–93 | 2.56 µg/L | Oleanolic acid as template | Chen et al. (2012b) |
| 4 VOCs | Air | SWCNT/silica composite | – | GC–MS | – | 0.001–0.01 µg/L | Comparison with PDMS and SPME CAR/PDMS cartridge | Heidari et al. (2012) |
| 4 cobalamins | Pig liver (CRM), seafood | MWCNTs (d.: 9.5 nm) | DMSO (0.4 mL) | HPLC-DAD | 76–102 | 0.35–30.0 µg/L | µ-SPE | Viñas et al. (2011) |
| 5 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons | Water | CNTs (–)/Silica composite | – | GC–MS | 74–114 | 0.001–0.01 µg/L | HS-needle- µ-SPE | Bagheri et al. (2011) |
| 16 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons | River water 20 mL | MWCNTs (–) | ACN (0.1 mL) | GC–MS | 72–99 | 4.2 × 10−3–46.5 × 10−3 µg/L | µ-SPE | Guo and Lee (2011) |
| 16 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons | Surface water | MWCNTs (o.d.: 60–100 nm) | MeOH (0.4 mL) | GC–MS | 72–93 | 0.001–0.15 _g/L | On line-SPE; µ-SPE | Wu et al. (2010) |
| 16 PAHs | River water, tap and seawater | MWCNTs (i.d.: 60–100 nm) | n-hexane (15 mL) | GC–MS | 70–127 | 0.002–0.0085 _g/L | Comparison with C18 | Ma et al. (2010) |
| 3 PAHs Reservoir, | well and wastewater | MWCNTs (i.d.: 60–100 nm)/PVA | Hexane (15 mL) | HPLC-FD | 89–98 | 0.005–0.008 _g/L | Comparison with C18 sorbent | Kueseng et al. (2010) |
| Chloramphenicol | Egg, honey and milk | MWCNTs (d.: 40–60 nm) | ACN (5 mL) | HPLC–MS – | 96–102 | 0.003–0.004 µg/L, 0.003 µg/kg | – | Lu et al. (2010) |
| 7 sulfonylurea herbicides | Tap, spring, ground and well water | MWCNTs (d.: 60–100 nm) | 1% acetic acid (v/v) in ACN (12 mL) | HPLC–MS/MS | 82–111 | 1 × 10−5–2 × 10−4 µg/L | Comparison with C18 sorbent | Fang et al. (2010) |
| Octane | Clean air | SWCNTs film/sealed Pyrex glass (–) | He (–) | GC-FID | – | – | _-SPE. On-line SPE | Takada et al. (2010) |
| Trans and cis-resveratrol | Red wine | MWCNTs (–) | 0.1% formic acid:ACN 8:2 (v/v) (–) | HPLC–MS/MS | 77–109 | 2 × 10−5 µg/L | On line-SPE | Lu et al. (2011) |
| 11 triazine herbicides | River water | MWCNTs (i.d.: 40–60 nm) | ACN:H2O 9:1 (v/v) (5 mL) | RRLC–MS/MS | 73–98 | <1 × 10−4 _g/L | – | Yu et al. (2010a) |
| 3 triazine herbicides | Water | MWCNTs (–) | Butyl acetate (0.22 mL) | GC–MS | – | – | µ-SPE; aniline-ortho-phenylene diamine, C18, polypyrrole, charcoal sorbents; sorbent content in the PP membrane and the performance were checked | Bagheri et al. (2010) |
| 2 sulfonylureas | Lake, creek, reservoir and underground water | MWCNTs (o.d.: 13–16 nm) | MeOH:ACN:H2O 50:2:48 (v/v/v) (0.250 mL) | CE-UV | 86–108 | 0.40, 0.36 _g/L | On line-SPE; µ-SPE | Springer and Lista (2010) |
| Methane | – | MWCNTs (–) | N2 | GC-TCD | – | – | On-line SPE; comparison was performed with other carbon based sorbents such as (CarbosieveTM, CarboxeneTM, CarbopackTM) | Saridara et al. (2010) |
| CO2 | Flue gases | MWCNTs-APTS (–) | Thermal/vacuum desorption | GC-TCD | – | – | A comparison with the MWCNTs was tested; sorption studies (isotherms) | Hsu et al. (2010) |
| Mefenacet, hydroxybenzothiazole, N-methylaniline, 2-benzothiazoloxyacetic acid | River water | o-MWCNTs (i.d.: 40–60 nm) | Ethyl acetate (5 mL) | RRLC-UV-MS | 86–101 | 0.02–0.04 µg/L | – | Yu et al. (2010b) |
| Bovine serum albumin | Bovine calf serum | Fe3O4/o-MWCNTs (–)/MIP | NaCl 5 mM (–) | HPLC-UV | 92–97 | – | Efficiencies of Fe3O4/o-MWCNTs (–)/MIP materials were compared with Fe3O4/o-MWCNTs (–)/NIP material; MIP-MWCNTs delivered better results; ovalbumin, bovine hemoglobin, human serum albumin and lysozyme were used to investigate the sorbent selectivity | Zhang et al. (2011a) |
| Methylene blue | Distilled | MWCNTs-COOH (o.d.: 10–20 nm)/biochar | – | UV–vis spectrometry | – | – | Sorption studies were performed and isotherm studies and mechanism were also discussed | Inyang et al. (2014) |
| 9 triazine herbicides | River, well, tap water | MWCNTs (o.d.: 6–9 nm) | MeOH (2.5 mL) | UHPLC-UV | – | – | µ-dSPE; dispersion aided by effervescence precursors (NaH2PO4, Na2CO3) was checked | Lasarte-Aragonés et al. (2013) |
| Tetracycline | Water 25 | MWCNTs, MWCNTs-OH and MWCNTs-COOH | AlCl3 3 M (10 mL) | HPLC-DAD | >80 | – | µ-dSPE; CNTs of 2 different dimensions were tried for each sorbent and the MWCNTs of longest length showed the highest adsorption capacity | Zhang et al. (2011b) |
| 40 multiclass pesticides | Apple, cabbage and potato | MWCNTs (o.d.: 10–20 nm) | – | LC–MS/MS | 7–117 | 1–15 µg/kg | dSPE used as clean-up; MWCNTs were used in combine with 150 mg PSA and 750 mg of MgSO4 | Zhao et al. (2013) |
| 6 perfluorinated compounds | Water | SWCNTs (o.d.: 2.1 nm), MWCNTs (o.d.: 6.7 nm, 23.2 nm, 30.2 nm, 56.1 nm), MWCNTs-OH (o.d.: 61.8 nm), MWCNTs-COOH (o.d.: 63.9) | – | HPLC–MS/MS | 98–102 | – | µ-dSPE; sorption studies (isotherm and mechanism); non retained analyte determined | Deng et al. (2012) |
| 6 chemical warfare agents | Distilled, tap and muddy water | Fe3O4/o-MWCNTs (o.d.: 7–15 nm) | MeOH (800 µL) and chloroform (3 mL) | GC-FPD | 56–96 | 0.05–1.0 µg/L | Results were compared with MWCNTs and C18 in classical SPE; MWCNTs in classical SPE showed slightly higher recoveries; C18 showed worse results | Pardasani et al. (2011) |
| 78 multiclass pesticides | Tea | MWCNTs (o.d.: 20–30 nm) | – | GC–MS/MS | 65–116 | – | dSPE was used as clean-up in QuEChERS; MWCNTs were used in combination with 150 mg PSA and 750 mg of MgSO4 with excellent results | Hou et al. (2014) |
| 12 multiclass pesticides | Milli-Q water | MWCNTs (o.d.: 10–15 nm) | DCM (35 mL) | Nano LC-UV | 36–102 | 0.02–0.87 µg/L | MWCNTs was regenerated and could be reused after washing | Asensio-Ramos et al. (2011) |
| Gatifloxacin | Serum | Fe3O4/o-CNTs (o.d.: 10–20 nm)/MIP | MeOH:acetic acid 6:4 (v/v) (5 mL) | HPLC-DAD | 79–89 | 6 µg/L | m-dSPE; the obtained results were compared with other composite, e.g. m-NPs/MIP, Fe3O4/o-CNTs/NIP and m-NPs/NIP | Xiao et al. (2013a, 2013b) |
| 6 polychlorinated biphenyls | Tap and river water 500 mL | Fe3O4/MWCNTs-COOH (o.d.: <5 nm)/PDDA | DCM:n-hexane was taken in the ratio 1:1 (15 mL) | GC–MS | 71–99 | 0.027–0.059 µg/L | m-dSPE; the results obtained by proposed composite were compared with MWCNTs, MWCNTs-COOH/PDDA and C18-NH2 and the results were similar in all cases | Zeng et al. (2012) |
| 15 organophos-phorus pesticides | Run-off, mineral and tap water | MWCNTs (o.d.: 6–13 nm) | DCM (25 mL for run-off and tap water and 30 mL for mineral water) | GC-NPD | 67–107 | 1.16 –93.6 ng/L | – | González-Curbelo et al. (2013) |
| 8 Organochlorine pesticides (α-HCH, β-HCH, γ-HCH, heptachlor, aldrin, heptachlor epoxide, α-endosulfan and dieldrin) | Honey and tea | CoFe2O4/oMWCNTs (o.d.: 30–60 nm) | Ethyl acetate (200 _L) | GC-ECD | 73–129 | 1.3–3.6 ng/L | µ-dSPE; m-dSPE | Du et al. (2013) |
| Bisphenol A, bisphenol F and their diglycidyl ethers | Tap, river and snow water | Fe3O4/o-MWCNTs (i.d.: 60–10 nm) | MeOH (5 mL) | GC–MS/MS | 89–115 | 0.001–0.06 µg/L | m-dSPE | Jiao et al. (2012) |
| Triclosan | River and lake water | MWCNTs (o.d.: 60–100 nm)-MIP MWCNTs (o.d.: 60–100 nm)-NIP | Ethanol:HCl 6 M 1:1 (v/v) | HPLC-UV | 91–95 | – | Extraction efficiency and selectivity of CNTs-NIPs are much lower than those of CNTs-MIPs; several sorption studies were also developed | Gao et al. (2010) |
| 11 sulfonamides | Milli-Q, low mineral content and very low mineral content water 250 mL | MWCNTs (o.d.: 6–9 nm) Fe3O4/MWCNTs (1:1, w/w), (1:2, w/w) and (1:3, w/w) | MeOH (25 mL) | UHPLC-DAD | 40–110 for MWCNTs 46–77 for Fe3O4/MWCNTs (1:2, w/w) | 7.00–32.0 ng/L | Different proportions of m-NPs and MWCNTs were combined (1:1, 1:2, 1:3) and tested; different amounts of sorbents were selected in order to maintain constant the mass of MWCNTs; results demonstrated the need of a drying step for m-CNTs | Herrera-Herrera et al. (2013) |
| 3 estrogens | Honey, tap and mineral water 1.0 g (honey) | Fe3O4/MWCNTs-OH (o.d.: <8 nm) | MeOH (2 mL) | Sweeping- MEKC-UV | 90–100 | 0.9–1.7 µg/L | m-dSPE | Guan et al. (2010) |
2.3 Application of CNTs in extraction technique
The unique surface chemistry of CNTs such as p-conjugative structure with extremely hydrophobic surface and excellent porosity makes them highly efficient sorption materials compared to other conventional solid phase adsorbent materials. Number of articles have stated the usage of CNT for the extraction and quantitative detection of different target analytes using separation techniques (Hadjmohammadi et al., 2010; Li and Chi, 2009; Dong et al., 2009a, 2009b; Liu et al., 2009; Zhou et al., 2009). A recent study by Hadjmohammadi et al. (2010) reports the comparison of the extraction efficiencies of two components (chlorpyrifos and phosalone) using MWCNT and C-18 silica as the solid phase extraction adsorbents. It was shown by them that cartridges made of MWCNT tolerated much higher flow rates and in the same time used smaller quantities of dichloromethane for preconditioning. Also the limits of detection obtained with the MWCNT were almost 3 folds lower than that using C-18 silica. Another study by Li et al. (2009b) disclosed that oxidized CNTs are well suited for the extraction of a number of compounds from aqueous samples and was efficient as conventional Oasis HLB solid phase cartridges.
Our group was also used the MWCNTs as extraction adsorbent for the high-performance liquid chromatography analysis of polyphenol contents in different natural Yemeni honeys of various floral sources with excellent extraction recovery and regeneration properties (Badjah Hadj Ahmed et al., 2014). We have reported another ultra-high performance liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry method for the simultaneous separation, identification and determination of many phenolic constituents in honey from various floral origin using MWCNTs as solid-phase extraction sorbents (Wabaidur et al., 2015). In this case, also the regeneration of solid phase adsorbent to be reused and recovery results were found to be excellent. The application of CNTs was further elongated by surface functionalization that generally revise their hydrophobic nature and was found their applications as hybrid silica monolith (Zheng et al., 2009; Mendoza et al., 2012; Huang et al., 2012; Wang et al., 2011) for the determination of sulfonamides in egg or other food samples.
2.3.1 CNTs as sorbent supports
Few unique characteristics of CNTs are responsible to make them ideal supports to deposit various coating materials such as polymers and MIPs on their surfaces. The depositions of MIPs onto CNTs were carried out for the preparation of highly selective extraction procedures (Turiel and Martín-Esteban, 2010). The MIPs linkage provides many additional advantages over conventional MIPs used in extraction procedures, such as greater mechanical power and chemical stability (Socas-Rodrígueza et al., 2014). All these properties greatly improves the accessibility of the template molecule and in the same time enhance the extraction efficacy. Also with non-supported MIPs or immune sorbents it was obvious that the high specificity hampers multi residue analysis, but the methodologies that use CNTs/MIPs can overcome these limitations and devoted to the analysis of closely related analytes. Therefore, to determine those organic (Xiao et al., 2013a, 2013b; Madrakian et al., 2013; Yang et al., 2014, 2013; Prasad et al., 2013, 2014) and inorganic (Ebrahimzadeh et al., 2013; Zhang et al., 2010a, 2010b) compounds, which cannot be separated with traditional sorbents material was easily separated by using the CNTs/MIPs extraction sorbents.
2.3.2 CNTs in solid phase extraction (SPE)
In the last decade, SPE has become the very popular and traditional sample enrichment techniques and it has largely been used in the field of separation science. Compared to other different types of SPE adsorbents, CNTs are well reputed because of its π-conjugative structure, porosity and heterogeneity that dramatically facilitate the diffusion and extraction of solid materials (Yan et al., 2005).
Now from the detailed review of the aforementioned literature it can deduce that CNTs has the adequate sorption capacity to be used for the extraction of both inorganic and organic components. Furthermore, the changeable selectivity due to the introduction of non-covalent or covalent functionalization onto their surface has preferred their widespread usage in the field of extraction (Peng et al., 2017; Herrero Latorre et al., 2012; Ravelo-Pérez et al., 2010; Sitko et al., 2012).
However, there is a drawback of covalent functionalization, since it leads to the distortion of graphitic structure of CNTs and results significant changes in their physical properties. Even the whole graphitic structure can be destroyed if the amount of functionalization is too high. Regarding this in a recent work of Yang et al. (2010b) the influence of different concentrations of NaOCl on the oxidation of MWCNTs has been discussed. They have proved that when the tested percentages of NaOCl was highest, the CNTs structure destroyed and carbon found as larger agglomerated particles (Fig. 6).
FE-SEM images for (a) raw CNTs, (b) 1%, (c) 3%, (d) 5% and (e) 7% of o-CNTs. Reprinted from (Yang et al., 2010b) with permission of the Society of Chemical Industry.
The chemical interaction between CNTs and metal ions also occurs during the functionalization of the CNT surface and consequently the metal ions removal capability of CNTs increase due to the presence of large number of active sites on the inner cavities, surface, and inter-nanotube space (Pyrzynska, 2010). Additionally, the effect of pH is crucial for the adsorption studies and it was carefully been considered by the researcher during their experiment. Because, at the “point of zero charge” or “isoelectric point”, the electrical charge density on the CNTs surface is zero and the surface become negatively charged at a pH higher than that and vice versa (Boem, 2002). Thus, when the surface is negatively charged the adsorptions of cationic species are improved. On the other hand, when the pH is lower than “isoelectric point”, the protons might compete with metal cations to be adsorbed in the same sites on the surface of CNTs. Due to this phenomenon solutions having acidic additives are normally used to encourage the elution of metal ions. There are number of methodologies have been reported for metal ion extraction using oxidized CNTs (o-MWCNTs and/or o-SWCNTs). The oxidized CNTs were obtained by placing CNTs to a strong acid media at very high temperatures. Due to this, the introduction of —COOH, —OH and —CO— groups occur on the CNTs surfaces. Similarly, the immobilizations of organic molecules or biomolecules on CNTs surfaces have also been reported, and this further extend their applications (Sitko et al., 2012). Also there are enormous works have been developed to extract inorganic compounds from aqueous samples, while only a few reports have dealt with semi-solid or solid matrices (Peng et al., 2017; Ravelo-Pérez et al., 2010; Sitko et al., 2012).
The strong adsorptive capacity of CNTs for organic analytes has been attributed due to π-π electron donor-acceptor interaction between the aromatic system of organic molecules that work as electron acceptors and the highly-polarizable graphene sheets of CNTs which act as electron donors (Trojanowicz, 2006). Considering this fact, many authors have worked with as synthesized CNTs mainly for the extraction of pesticides (Ravelo-Pérez et al., 2010; Pyrzynska, 2011), pharmaceuticals, parabens, PAHs, phthalate esters, antioxidants, phenolic and so many biological compounds (Peng et al., 2017; Ravelo-Pérez et al., 2010).
On contrary, the functionalized or modified CNTs used more efficiently for the retention of polar organic analytes due to the more selective interaction of the functionalized CNTs (Trojanowicz, 2006; Zhao et al., 2012; Deng et al., 2005). The SEM images of pristine MWCNTs and composites of Fe/MWCNTs where the initial mass ratios of ferrocene with CNTs were (b) 1:1, (c) 2:1 and (d) 3:1 are shown in Fig. 7 (Zhao et al., 2012).
SEM images of (a) pristine MWCNTs and Fe/MWCNTs composites with an initial mass ratio of ferrocene to CNTs of (b) 1:1, (c) 2:1 and (d) 3:1. Adapted from reference (Zhao et al., 2012) with permission from Elsevier.
2.3.3 CNTs in solid phase microextraction (SPME)
The coating procedure is the most important task for performing CNTs modified SPME technique. A number of methods can be found in the literature to deposit CNTs in SPME fibers. The reported familiar techniques are chemical bonding, sol-gel method, electrophoretic deposition method, physical agglutinate, electrochemical polymerization technique, magnetron sputtering and atom transfer radical polymerization method (Samanidou and Karageorgou, 2012; Mehdinia and Aziz-Zanjani, 2013). Habitually, fused silica has normally been utilized as an appropriate SPME fiber material due the presence of silanol groups on the silica surface but they are fragile. Thus, the fragile fused-silica fibers were replaced by stainless steel wires to overcome such important limitation. The sol-gel technique has also been used vastly for preparing SPME fiber but it has shown inadequate reproducibility and make way for other optional technique, such as chemical bonding methods (Mehdinia and Aziz-Zanjani, 2013) where an electrochemical polymerization is occurred. The lack of bonding between the coating materials and the substrate generates low thermal stability fibers that can swell easily in organic solvents. Another method reported was Physical agglutination with adhesives to prepare fibers but it also showed low stability and resistance and the glues has the tendency to block the coating pores of the fibers or even can change the extraction selectivity. Similarly, electrophoretic deposition technique was emerged as an alternative SPME fiber preparing methodology to prepare stronger and more stable CNT-SPME fibers and was largely utilized for SPME technique (Peng et al., 2017; Ravelo-Pérez et al., 2010; Mehdinia and Aziz-Zanjani, 2013).
2.3.4 CNTs in dispersive solid phase extraction
It has been well reported that the extraction methods are surface-dependent as their kinetic directly relies on the contact area between the extracting sample and the sorbent phase. The better dispersion of the extractant directly enhances the contact area between the sample and stationary phase improving the extraction efficiency of the method. In this regard, Lasarte-Aragonés et al. (2013) have described in their research the effectiveness of CNTs dispersion in the micro-solid-phase extraction (µ-SPE) of certain herbicides from environmental waters samples (104). They were used methanol to eluted retained compounds from the analyte enriched MWCNTs. They optimized the µ-SPE technique for the determination of number of herbicides as model analytical problem in waters and determine them using ultra performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) combined with ultraviolet detection (UV) technique. Hou et al. (2014) were reported a multi-residue technique for the quantitation of pesticides in tea samples using MWCNTs as a dispersive solid phase extraction sorbent. Using their methods, it was possible to analyzed 78 pesticide residues in tea (Hou et al., 2014). The MWCNTs modified dispersive solid phase extraction (d-SPE) technique is easy, quick, cheap, effective, rugged and safe and was validated using gas chromatography in combination with tandem mass spectrometry (GC–MS/MS). The MWCNTs were reported to be a promising d-SPE sorbent material with excellent cleanup efficiency and suitable for the wide application of pesticide residues analysis. Many other applications of CNTs as d-SPE have been listed in Table 2.
2.3.5 CNTs in magnetic dispersive solid phase extraction (m-dSPE)
Xiao et al. (2013a, 2013b) have described a method for the preparation of molecularly imprinted magnetic dispersive SPE materials (m-dSPE) using magnetic CNTs as extraction sorbent and applied for the determination of gatifloxacin antibiotic in biological samples using HPLC technique. They have found that the adsorption using the magnetic CNTs imprinted polymers are rapid and possessed a high adsorption capacity toward gatifloxacin. The developed imprinted polymer was collected and separated them very fast using external magnetic field and shown exceptional mechanical properties with high surface-to-volume ratio. In addition, such type of MWCNTs incorporated polymer was re-generable and has shown negligible loss of recoveries after their uses for few cycles. In another research, Du et al. (2013) reported the synthesis of a novel magnetic SPE technique using MWCNTs in combination with cobalt ferrite and applied for the screening of pesticides mainly organochlorine pesticides in honey and tea samples with GC analysis. The developed MWCNTs modified SPE technique was used for the extraction of eight organochlorine pesticides with the enrichment factors ranging 52–68. In this research methodology, the MWCNTs were used as efficient components to extract both nonpolar and less polar target analytes from a complex matrix. A number of other applications of various CNTs in combination with other materials have been enlisted in Table 2 as well.
3 Conclusions
From the detailed studies mentioned above, it is obvious that the combination of unique structures, dimensions and surface morphologies make CNT an interesting sorption material, and so far, it has widely been used in research in the field of separation science. Although, applications of CNTs in GC and LC as stationary phases and in CE as pseudo-stationary phases are gaining much more attention. In the same time, their progressive applications in sample preparation techniques, mainly in SPE, has substantially increased and huge number of paper published in this area and few of them have been listed above in the tabular form. The unique properties of CNTs towards functionalization, binding of complex foreign molecules and solubilization makes them very exciting and powerful materials and rapidly expands their application in the field of separation chemistry. The CNTs are found to be a promising SPE sorbent material with excellent cleanup efficiency for the wide application for multi residues analysis. However, the relatively high cost of highly pure CNTs due to low yields during their synthesis steps make it difficult for their use in sample preparation. Therefore, a reduction in their prices will leads to the uses of these materials more common, particularly in sample preparation it will add lot of potential for the future applications. Although, the application of CNTs is less expensive in the sense that it does not need any special equipment for the modification purposes. Because, the immobiliztion of CNTs on various stationary phases can be performed easily by using their suspensions.
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to the Deanship of Scientific Research, King Saud University for funding through Vice Deanship of Scientific Research Chairs.
References
- Simultaneous electrochemical determination of dopamine and acetaminophen using multiwall carbon nanotubes modified glassy carbon electrode. Sens. Actuat. B. 2010;146:314-320.
- [Google Scholar]
- A novel stationary phase based on amino derivatized nanotubes for HPLC separations: theoretical and practical aspects. J. Sep. Sci.. 2009;32:1757-1764.
- [Google Scholar]
- Carbon nanotubes science and technology part (I) structure, synthesis and characterization. Arab. J. Chem.. 2012;5:1-23.
- [Google Scholar]
- Effect of multi-walled carbon nanotubes incorporation into benzyl methacrylate monolithic columns in capillary liquid chromatography. Analyst. 2012;137:4309-4317.
- [Google Scholar]
- Effect of multi-walled carbon nanotubes incorporation into benzyl methacrylate monolithic columns in capillary liquid chromatography. Analyst. 2012;137:4309-4317.
- [Google Scholar]
- Multi-walled carbon nanotubes-dispersive solid-phase extraction combined with nano-liquid chromatography for the analysis of pesticides in water samples. Anal. Bioanal. Chem.. 2011;400:1113-1123.
- [Google Scholar]
- High-performance liquid chromatography analysis of phenolic acid, flavonoid, and phenol contents in various natural Yemeni honeys using multi-walled carbon nanotubes as a solid-phase extraction adsorbent. J. Agri. Food Chem.. 2014;62:5443-5450.
- [Google Scholar]
- A novel needle trap sorbent based on carbon nanotube-sol-gel for microextraction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from aquatic media. Anal. Chim. Acta. 2011;683:212-220.
- [Google Scholar]
- Reinforced polydiphenylamine nanocomposite for microextraction in packed syringe of various pesticides. J. Chromatogr. A. 2012;1222:13-21.
- [Google Scholar]
- Membrane protected conductive polymer as micro-SPE device for the determination of triazine herbicides in aquatic media. J. Sep. Sci.. 2010;33:1132-1138.
- [Google Scholar]
- Effect of carbon nanotube functionalization in micro-solid-phase extraction, μ-SPE) integrated into the needle of a syringe. Anal. Bioanal. Chem.. 2011;402:1029-1039.
- [Google Scholar]
- Use of carbon nanotubes, CNTs with polymers in solar cells. Molecules. 2014;19:17329-17344.
- [Google Scholar]
- Surface oxides on carbon and their analysis: a critical assessment. Carbon. 2002;40:145-149.
- [Google Scholar]
- Novel ion chromatographic stationary phases for the analysis of complex matrices. Analyst. 2005;130:134-146.
- [Google Scholar]
- Nanomaterials as tools in chromatographic methods. TrAC-Trends Anal. Chem.. 2016;82:385-393.
- [Google Scholar]
- Porous polymer monoliths functionalized through copolymerization of C60 fullerene-containing methacrylate monomer for highly Efficient Separations of Small Molecules. Anal. Chem.. 2011;83(24):9478-9484.
- [Google Scholar]
- Incorporation of carbon nanotubes in porous polymer monolithic capillary columns to enhance the chromatographic separation of small molecules. J. Chromatogr. A. 2011;1218:2546-2552.
- [Google Scholar]
- Effect of single-walled carbon nanotubes on cellulose phenylcarbamate chiral stationary phases. Chem. Res. Chin. Univ.. 2007;23:646-649.
- [Google Scholar]
- Single-wall carbon nanotubes used as stationary phase in HPLC. J. Liq. Chromatogr. Relat. Technol.. 2007;30:2953-2958.
- [Google Scholar]
- Molecularly imprinted polymers based on multi-walled carbon nanotubes for selective solid-phase extraction of oleanolic acid from the roots of kiwi fruit samples. Talanta. 2012;99:959-965.
- [Google Scholar]
- Novel molecularly imprinted polymers based on multiwalled carbon nanotubes with bifunctional monomers for solid-phase extraction of rhein from the root of kiwi fruit. J. Sep. Sci.. 2012;35:2414-2421.
- [Google Scholar]
- Sorption mechanisms of perfluorinated compounds on carbon nanotubes. Environ. Pollut.. 2012;168:138-144.
- [Google Scholar]
- Preparation, characterization and application of magnetic silica nanoparticle functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Chem. Commun.. 2005;44:5548-5550.
- [Google Scholar]
- Use of multiwalled carbon nanotubes as a SPE adsorbent for analysis of carfentrazone-ethyl in water. Chromatographia. 2009;69:73-77.
- [Google Scholar]
- Using multiwalled carbon nanotubes as solid phase extraction adsorbents for determination of chloroacetanilide herbicides in water. Microchim. Acta. 2009;165:123-128.
- [Google Scholar]
- A mesoporous silica nanoparticles immobilized open-tubular capillary column with a coating of cellulose tris(3,5-dimethylphenyl-carbamate) for enantioseparation in CEC. Electrophoresis. 2008;29:3933-3940.
- [Google Scholar]
- Novel magnetic SPE method based on carbon nanotubes filled with cobalt ferrite for the analysis of organochlorine pesticides in honey and tea. J. Sep. Sci.. 2013;36:3387-3394.
- [Google Scholar]
- Nanoparticles as stationary and pseudo-stationary phases in chromatographic and electrochromatographic separations. TrAC-Trends Anal. Chem.. 2011;30:484-491.
- [Google Scholar]
- Layer-by-layer self-assembly of multilayer zirconia nanoparticles on silica spheres for HPLC packings. Anal. Chem.. 2004;76:5016-5023.
- [Google Scholar]
- Novel ion imprinted polymer coated multiwalled carbon nanotubes as a high selective sorbent for determination of gold ions in environmental samples. Chem. Eng. J.. 2013;215–216:315-321.
- [Google Scholar]
- Multiwalled carbon nanotubes as SPE adsorbents for simultaneous determination of seven sulfonylurea herbicides in environmental water by LC–MS–MS. Chromatographia. 2010;72:403-409.
- [Google Scholar]
- Synthesis and evaluation of molecularly imprinted core-shell carbon nanotubes for the determination of triclosan in environmental water samples. J. Chromatogr. A. 2010;1217:8095-8102.
- [Google Scholar]
- Graphene-based nanomaterials for drug delivery and tissue engineering. J. Control. Release. 2014;173:75-88.
- [Google Scholar]
- Analysis of pesticides residues in environmental water samples using multiwalled carbon nanotubes dispersive solid-phase extraction. J. Sep. Sci.. 2013;36:556-563.
- [Google Scholar]
- Preparation of multi-walled carbon nanotubes functionalized magnetic particles by sol–gel technology and its application in extraction of estrogens. Talanta. 2010;83:337-343.
- [Google Scholar]
- Development of multiwalled carbon nanotubes based micro-solid-phase extraction for the determination of trace levels of sixteen polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in environmental water samples. J. Chromatogr. A. 2011;1218:9321-9327.
- [Google Scholar]
- Comparison of C18 silica and multi-walled carbon nanotubes as the adsorbents for the solid-phase extraction of Chlorpyrifos and Phosalone in water samples using HPLC. J. Sep. Sci.. 2010;33:1044-1051.
- [Google Scholar]
- A novel needle trap device with single wall carbon nanotubes sol–gel sorbent packed for sampling and analysis of volatile organohalogen compounds in air. Talanta. 2012;101:314-321.
- [Google Scholar]
- Application of carbon nanotubes in chiral and achiral separations of pharmaceuticals, biologics and chemicals. Nanomaterials. 2017;7:186-217.
- [Google Scholar]
- Carbon nanotubes applications in separation science: a review. Anal. Chim. Acta. 2012;734:1-30.
- [Google Scholar]
- Comparison between magnetic and non magnetic multi-walled carbon nanotubes-dispersive solid-phase extraction combined with ultra-high performance liquid chromatography for the determination of sulfonamide antibiotics in water samples. Talanta. 2013;116:695-703.
- [Google Scholar]
- Carbon nanotubes as solid phase extraction sorbents prior to atomic spectrometric determination of metal species: a review. Anal. Chim. Acta. 2012;749:16-35.
- [Google Scholar]
- A multi-residue method for the determination of pesticides in tea using multi-walled carbon nanotubes as a dispersive solid phase extraction absorbent. Food Chem.. 2014;153:121-129.
- [Google Scholar]
- Thermodynamics and regeneration studies of CO2 adsorption on multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Chem. Eng. Sci.. 2010;65:1354-1361.
- [Google Scholar]
- Determination of sulfonamides in food samples by membrane-protected micro-solid phase extraction coupled with high performance liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A. 2012;1219:66-74.
- [Google Scholar]
- Self-assembly of carbon nanotubes via ethanol chemical vapor deposition for the synthesis of gas chromatography columns. Anal. Chem.. 2010;82:5184-5188.
- [Google Scholar]
- Synthesis, characterization, and dye sorption ability of carbon nanotube–biochar nanocomposites. Chem. Eng. J.. 2014;236:39-46.
- [Google Scholar]
- Perovskite solar cells using carbon nanotubes both as cathode and as anode. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2017;121:25743-25749.
- [Google Scholar]
- Determination of bisphenol A, bisphenol F and their diglycidyl ethers in environmental water by solid phase extraction using magnetic multiwalled carbon nanotubes followed by GC-MS/MS. Anal. Methods. 2012;4:291-298.
- [Google Scholar]
- New fullerene-based stationary phases for gas chromatography. Anal. Chem.. 2004;59:724-729.
- [Google Scholar]
- Chromatography of self-assembled singe walled carbon nanotubes. Anal. Chem.. 2006;78:2064-2070.
- [Google Scholar]
- Multiwalled carbon nanotubes/cryogel composite, a new sorbent for determination of trace polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Microchem. J.. 2010;96:317-323.
- [Google Scholar]
- Intermolecular interactions on multiwalled carbon nanotubes in reversed-phase liquid chromatography. J. Sep. Sci.. 2006;29:945-952.
- [Google Scholar]
- Post-fabrication annealing effects in polymer-nanotube photovoltaic cells. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys.. 2006;39:1058-1062.
- [Google Scholar]
- Effervescence-assisted carbon nanotubes dispersion for the micro-solid-phase extraction of triazine herbicides from environmental waters. Anal. Bioanal. Chem.. 2013;405:3269-3277.
- [Google Scholar]
- Chip-based enantioselective open-tubular capillary electrochromatography using bovine serum albumin-gold nanoparticle conjugates as the stationary phase. Electrophoresis. 2009;30:1022-1029.
- [Google Scholar]
- Determination of carbendazim with multiwalled carbon nanotubes-polymeric methyl red film modified electrode. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol.. 2009;93:101-104.
- [Google Scholar]
- Solid-phase extraction of polar organophosphorous pesticides from aqueous samples with oxidized carbon nanotubes. J. Environ. Monitor.. 2009;11:439-444.
- [Google Scholar]
- Evaluation of multi-walled carbon nanotubes as gas chromatographic column packing. J. Chromatogr. A. 2003;1003:203-209.
- [Google Scholar]
- Incorporation of single-wall carbon nanotubes into an organic polymer monolithic stationary phase for μ-HPLC and capillary electrochromatography. Anal. Chem.. 2005;77:1398-1406.
- [Google Scholar]
- A novel multiwalled carbon nanotubes bonded fused-silica fiber for solid phase microextraction-gas chromatographic analysis of phenols in water samples. Talanta. 2009;78:929-935.
- [Google Scholar]
- Spectrometric determination of rhodamine B in chili powder after molecularly imprinted solid phase extraction. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc.. 2013;34:3381-3386.
- [Google Scholar]
- Recent advances of enantioseparations in capillary electrophoresis andcapillary electrochromatography. Anal. Meth.. 2011;3:488-508.
- [Google Scholar]
- Multiwalled carbon nanotubes as sorbent for online solid-phase extraction of resveratrol in red wines prior to fused-core C18-based ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry quantification. J. Agric. Food Chem.. 2011;59:70-77.
- [Google Scholar]
- Multi-walled carbon nanotubes as solid-phase extraction adsorbent for the ultra-fast determination of chloramphenicol in egg, honey, and milk by fused-core C18-based high-performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Bioanal. Chem.. 2010;398:1819-1826.
- [Google Scholar]
- Determination of 16 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in environmental water samples by solid-phase extraction using multi-walled carbon nanotubes as adsorbent coupled with gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A. 2010;1217:5462-5469.
- [Google Scholar]
- Selective solid-phase extraction of naproxen drug from human urine samples using molecularly imprinted polymer-coated magnetic multi-walled carbon nanotubes prior to its spectrofluorometric determination. Analyst. 2013;138:4542-4549.
- [Google Scholar]
- Facile preparation of octadecyl monoliths with incorporated carbon nanotubes and neutral monoliths with coated carbon nanotubes stationary phases for HPLC of small and large molecules by hydrophobic and – interactions. Talanta. 2014;129:565-574.
- [Google Scholar]
- Environmental applications of carbon-based nanomaterials. Environ. Sci. Technol.. 2008;42:5843-5859.
- [Google Scholar]
- Recent advances in nanomaterials utilized in fiber coatings for solid-phase microextraction. TrAC-Trends Anal. Chem.. 2013;42:205-215.
- [Google Scholar]
- Validation of antibiotics in catfish by on-line solid phase extraction coupled to liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Food Chem.. 2012;134:1149-1155.
- [Google Scholar]
- Meyyappan, M., 2004. In: O’Connell, M.J. (Ed.), Carbon Nanotubes-Science and Applications. Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton.
- Comparative study of carbon nanotubes and C60 fullerenes as pseudostationary phases in electrokinetic chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A. 2008;1194:128-133.
- [Google Scholar]
- Carbon nanotube based stationary phases for microchip chromatography. Lab Chip. 2012;12:1951-1958.
- [Google Scholar]
- Magnetic multi-walled carbon nanotubes assisted dispersive solid phase extraction of nerve agents and their markers from muddy water. Talanta. 2011;86:248-255.
- [Google Scholar]
- Enhanced stability of enzyme organophosphate hydrolase interfaced on the carbon nanotubes. Coll. Surf. B. 2010;77:69-74.
- [Google Scholar]
- Separation of metal ions via capillary electrophoresis using a pseudostationary phase microfunctionalized with carbon nanotubes. Microchim. Acta. 2017;184:1747-1754.
- [Google Scholar]
- Carbon nanotubes and graphene in analytical sciences. Microchim. Acta. 2012;179:1-16.
- [Google Scholar]
- Solid phase extraction-capillary electrophoresis determination of sulphonamide residues in milk samples by use of C18-carbon nanotubes as hybrid sorbent materials. Analyst. 2013;138:3786-3791.
- [Google Scholar]
- Electrochemically grown imprinted polybenzidine nanofilm on multiwalled carbon nanotubes anchored pencil graphite fibers for enantioselective micro-solid phase extraction coupled with ultratrace sensing of d- and l-methionine. J. Chromatogr. B. 2013;912:65-74.
- [Google Scholar]
- Molecularly imprinted micro solid-phase extraction technique coupled with complementary molecularly imprinted polymer-sensor for ultra trace analysis of epinephrine in real samples. Colloids Surf. B. 2014;113:69-76.
- [Google Scholar]
- Carbon nanostructures for separation, preconcentration and speciation of metal ions. TrAC-Trends Anal. Chem.. 2010;29:718-727.
- [Google Scholar]
- Carbon nanotubes as sorbents in the analysis of pesticides. Chemosphere. 2011;83:1407-1413.
- [Google Scholar]
- Organic solar cells with carbon nanotube network electrodes. Appl. Phys. Lett.. 2006;88:233506.
- [Google Scholar]
- Methane preconcentration in a microtrap using multiwalled carbon nanotubes as sorbents. Anal. Chim. Acta. 2010;677:50-54.
- [Google Scholar]
- Recent applications of carbon-based nanomaterials in analytical chemistry: critical review. Anal. Chim. Acta. 2011;691:6-17.
- [Google Scholar]
- Graphene based pipette tip solid phase extraction of marine toxins in shellfish muscle followed by UPLC-MS/MS analysis. Talanta. 2013;116:770-775.
- [Google Scholar]
- Modification of carbon nanotubes for preconcentration, separation and determination of trace-metal ions. TrAC-Trends Anal. Chem.. 2012;37:22-31.
- [Google Scholar]
- Recent applications of carbon nanotube sorbents in analytical chemistry. J. Chromatogr. A. 2014;1357:110-146.
- [Google Scholar]
- Solid-phase extraction of PFOA and PFOS from surface waters on functionalized multiwalled carbon nanotubes followed by UPLC-ESI-MS. Anal. Bioanal. Chem.. 2014;406:3657-3665.
- [Google Scholar]
- Radiation-induced grafting of carbon nanotubes on hplc silica microspheres: theoretical and practical aspects. Analyst. 2013;138:3778-3785.
- [Google Scholar]
- Improving selectivity in gas chromatography by using chemically modified multi-walled carbon nanotubes as stationary phase. Anal. Bioanal. Chem.. 2012;403:1157-1165.
- [Google Scholar]
- Analytical application of carbon nanotubes, fullerenes and nanodiamonds in nanomaterials-based chromatographic stationary phases: a review. Anal. Chim. Acta. 2013;783:1-16.
- [Google Scholar]
- Separation of alkanes and aromatic compounds by packed column gas chromatography using functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes as stationary phases. J. Chromatogr. A. 2010;1217:2918-2924.
- [Google Scholar]
- A simple and fast method for chlorsulfuron and metsulfuron methyl determination in water samples using multiwalled carbon nanotubes, MWCNTs) and capillary electrophoresis. Talanta. 2010;83:126-129.
- [Google Scholar]
- Ultrafast gas chromatography on single-wall carbon nanotube stationary phases in microfabricated channels. Anal. Chem.. 2006;78:5639-5644.
- [Google Scholar]
- A self-assembly pipette tip graphene solid-phase extraction coupled with liquid chromatography for the determination of three sulfonamides in environmental water. Anal. Chim. Acta. 2014;810:25-31.
- [Google Scholar]
- Porous polymer monoliths: amazingly wide variety of techniques. J. Chromatogr. A. 2010;1227:902-924.
- [Google Scholar]
- Proceeding of IEE Sensors, 2010. 2010. p. :2500. Article No. 5690110
- Advances in the science and technology of CNTs and their composites: a review. Compos. Sci. Technol.. 2001;61:1899-1912.
- [Google Scholar]
- A strategy to decorate porous polymer monoliths with graphene oxide and graphene nanosheets. Analyst. 2013;138:1549-1557.
- [Google Scholar]
- Analytical applications of carbon nanotubes: a review. TrAC-Trends Anal. Chem.. 2006;25:480-489.
- [Google Scholar]
- Molecularly imprinted polymers for sample preparation: a review. Anal. Chim. Acta. 2010;668:87-99.
- [Google Scholar]
- Polymethacrylate monolithic columns for capillary liquid chromatography. J. Sep. Sci.. 2008;31:2521-2540.
- [Google Scholar]
- Carbon nanostructures as sorbent materials in analytical processes. TrAC-Trends Anal. Chem.. 2008;27:34-43.
- [Google Scholar]
- Present and future applications of carbon nanotubes to analytical science. Anal. Bioanal. Chem.. 2005;382:1783-1790.
- [Google Scholar]
- Organic solar cells with carbon nanotubes replacing In2O3: Sn as the transparent electrode. Appl. Phys. Lett.. 2006;88:233503.
- [Google Scholar]
- Multi-walled carbon nanotubes as solid-phase extraction adsorbents for the speciation of cobalamins in seafoods by liquid chromatography. Anal. Bioanal. Chem.. 2011;401:1393-1399.
- [Google Scholar]
- Ultra high performance liquid chromatography with mass spectrometry method for the simultaneous determination of phenolic constituents in honey from various floral sources using multiwalled carbon nanotubes as extraction sorbents. J. Sep. Sci.. 2015;38:2597-2606.
- [Google Scholar]
- Direct electrodeposition to fabricate 3D graphene–carbon nanotubes network modified electrode for sensitive electrochemical determination of maltol. J. Electrochem. Soc.. 2017;164(14):H1033-H1040.
- [Google Scholar]
- Automatic sample preparation of sulfonamide antibiotic residues in chicken breast muscle by using dynamic microwave assisted extraction coupled with solid-phase extraction. J. Sep. Sci.. 2011;34:2489-2497.
- [Google Scholar]
- Modification of poly, dimethylsiloxane) microfluidic channels with silica nanoparticles based on layer-by-layer assembly technique. J. Chromatogr. A. 2006;1136:111-117.
- [Google Scholar]
- Nickel and copper foam electrodes modified with graphene or carbon nanotubes for electrochemical identification of Chinese rice wines. Microchim. Acta. 2017;184:3441-3451.
- [Google Scholar]
- Flow injection solid-phase extraction using multi-walled carbon nanotubes packed micro-column for the determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in water by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A. 2010;1217:2911-2917.
- [Google Scholar]
- Application of graphene-based solid-phase extraction coupled with ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry for determination of macrolides in fish tissues. Food Anal. Meth.. 2013;6:1448-1457.
- [Google Scholar]
- Development of novel molecularly imprinted magnetic solid-phase extraction materials based on magnetic carbon nanotubes and their application for the determination of gatifloxacin in serum samples coupled with high performance liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A. 2013;1274:44-53.
- [Google Scholar]
- Preparation of molecularly imprinted polymers on the surface of magnetic carbon nanotubes with a pseudo template for rapid simultaneous extraction of four fluoroquinolones in egg samples. Analyst. 2013;138:3287-3296.
- [Google Scholar]
- Porous polymer monolithic column with surface-bound gold nanoparticles for the capture and separation of cysteine-containing peptides. Anal. Chem.. 2010;82:3352-3358.
- [Google Scholar]
- Adsorption of methylene blue dye onto carbon nanotubes: a route to an electrochemically functional nanostructure and its layer-by-layer assembled nanocomposite. Chem. Mater.. 2005;17:3457-3463.
- [Google Scholar]
- Assessment of adequate sodium hypochlorite concentration for pre-oxidization of multi-walled carbon nanotubes. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol.. 2010;85:699-707.
- [Google Scholar]
- Use of cyclodextrin-modified gold nanoparticles for enantioseparations of drugs and amino acids based on pseudostationary phase-capillary electrochromatography. Electrophoresis. 2010;31:1697-1705.
- [Google Scholar]
- Molecularly imprinted polymers coated on multi-walled carbon nanotubes through a simple indirect method for the determination of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid in environmental water. Appl. Surf. Sci.. 2013;284:692-699.
- [Google Scholar]
- Novel molecularly imprinted polymers with carbon nanotube as matrix for selective solid-phase extraction of emodin from kiwi fruit root. Food Chem.. 2014;145:687-693.
- [Google Scholar]
- Oxidized multi-walled carbon nanotubes as SPE sorbent for determination of mefenacet and its degradation products residues in water samples by RRLC-UV-ESI-MS. Chro-matographia. 2010;72:33-38.
- [Google Scholar]
- Application of SPE using multi-walled carbon nanotubes as adsorbent and rapid resolution LC-MS-MS for the simultaneous determination of 11 triazine herbicides residues in river water. Chromatographia. 2010;72:1073-1081.
- [Google Scholar]
- Single-walled carbon nanotubes used as stationary phase in GC. Anal. Chem.. 2006;78:6384-6390.
- [Google Scholar]
- Enrichment of polychlorinated biphenyls from aqueous solutions using Fe3O4 grafted multiwalled carbon nanotubes with poly dimethyl diallyl ammonium chloride. Int. J. Mol. Sci.. 2012;13:6382-6398.
- [Google Scholar]
- A novel electrochemical sensor based on molecularly imprinted solid-phase extraction for rapid determination of ractopamine in pig urine. Anal. Lett.. 2010;45:1736-1748.
- [Google Scholar]
- Studies on the removal of tetracycline by multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Chem. Eng. J.. 2011;178:26-33.
- [Google Scholar]
- Progress in stationary phases modified with carbonaceous nanomaterials for high-performance liquid chromatography. TrAC-Trends Anal. Chem.. 2015;65:107-121.
- [Google Scholar]
- Applications of nanomaterials in liquid chromatography: opportunities for separation with high efficiency and selectivity. J. Sep. Sci.. 2006;29:1872-1878.
- [Google Scholar]
- Novel magnetic bovine serum albumin imprinted polymers with a matrix of carbon nanotubes, and their application to protein separation. Anal. Bioanal. Chem.. 2011;401:2855-2863.
- [Google Scholar]
- Novel surface molecularly imprinted material modified multi-walled carbon nanotubes as solid-phase extraction sorbent for selective extraction gallium ion from fly ash. Talanta. 2010;82:304-311.
- [Google Scholar]
- Synthesis and characterization of magnetic Fe/CNTs composites with controllable Fe nanoparticle concentration. Physica B. 2012;407:2495-2499.
- [Google Scholar]
- Single-walled carbon nanotubes for improved enantioseparations on a chiral ionic liquid stationary phase in GC. Anal. Bioanal. Chem.. 2011;399:143-147.
- [Google Scholar]
- Multiplug filtration clean-up with multiwalled carbon nanotubes in the analysis of pesticide residues using LC-ESI-MS/MS. J. Sep. Sci.. 2013;36:3379-3386.
- [Google Scholar]
- Hybrid organic–inorganic silica monolith with hydrophobic/strong cation-exchange functional groups as a sorbent for micro-solid phase extraction. J. Chromatogr. A. 2009;1216:7739-7746.
- [Google Scholar]
- Preparation, characterization, and analytical applications of a novel polymer stationary phase with embedded or grafted carbon fibers. Talanta. 2010;82:1439-1447.
- [Google Scholar]
- Enrichment of pyrethroid residues in environmental waters using a multiwalled carbon nanotubes cartridge, and analysis in combination with high performance liquid chromatography. Microchim. Acta. 2009;164:419-424.
- [Google Scholar]
