5.2
Impact Factor
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Corrigendum
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Full Length Article
Full lenth article
Letter to Editor
Original Article
Research article
Retraction notice
Review
Review Article
SPECIAL ISSUE: ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY
5.3
Impact Factor
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Corrigendum
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Full Length Article
Full lenth article
Letter to Editor
Original Article
Research article
Retraction notice
Review
Review Article
SPECIAL ISSUE: ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original article
9 (
2_suppl
); S1523-S1531
doi:
10.1016/j.arabjc.2012.04.004

Benzothiazole incorporated thiazolidin-4-ones and azetidin-2-ones derivatives: Synthesis and in vitro antimicrobial evaluation

Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, KIET School of Pharmacy, Ghaziabad 201206, UP, India
Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Jamia Hamdard (Hamdard University), New Delhi 110062, India

⁎Corresponding author. Tel.: +91 9891128162; fax: +91 0120 2675091. gilanisadaf@gmail.com (Sadaf J. Gilani)

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Elsevier and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Peer review under responsibility of King Saud University.

Abstract

In this study, a series of novel thiazolidin-4-ones (5ag) and azetidin-2-ones (6ag) were synthesized from N-(6-chlorobenzo[d]thiazol-2-yl)hydrazine carboxamide derivatives of the benzothiazole class. Antimicrobial properties of the title compound derivatives were investigated against one Gram (+) bacteria (Staphylococcus aureus), three Gram (−) bacteria (Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae) and five fungi (Candida albicans, Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus flavus, Monascus purpureus and Penicillium citrinum) using serial plate dilution method. The investigation of antibacterial and antifungal screening data revealed that all the tested compounds showed moderate to good inhibition at 12.5–200 μg/mL in DMSO. It has been observed that azetidin-2-ones derivatives are found to be more active than thiazolidin-4-ones derivatives against all pathogenic bacterial and fungal strains.

Keywords

N-(6-chlorobenzo[d]thiazol-2-yl)hydrazine carboxamide
Benzothiazole
Thiazolidin-4-ones
Azetidin-2-ones
Antimicrobial activity
1

1 Introduction

Antimicrobial agents are among the most commonly used and misused of all drugs (Nogrady and Weaver, 2005). They reduce or completely block the growth and multiplication of bacteria. This has made them unique for the control of deadly infectious diseases caused by a variety of pathogens (Gilani et al., 2011a,b). Although deaths from bacterial and fungal infections have dropped in the developed world, these are still major causes of death in the developing world. The inevitable consequence of the widespread use of antimicrobial agents has been the emergence of antibiotic-resistant pathogens, fueling an ever-increasing need for new drugs. In the design of new compounds, development of hybrid molecules through the combination of different pharmacophores in one structure may lead to compounds with increased antimicrobial activity.

In addition, the 2-azetdinone ring system, a common structural feature of a number of wide spectrum β-lactam antibiotics, including penicillins, cephalosporins, carbapenems, nocardicins and monobactams, have been widely used as chemotherapeutic agents to treat bacterial infections and microbial diseases. The azetidin-2-one derivatives have been reported to possess a wide range of biological activities like antibacterial (Patel and Patel, 2011), antifungal (Halve et al., 2007), anti-inflammatory (Gurupadayya et al., 2008), analgesic (Ishwar Bhat et al., 2003), anticonvulsant (Gilani et al., 2009), anticancer (Veinberg and Vorona, 2004), and antitubercular (Kagthara et al., 2000). Similarly, thiazolidin-4-ones are a class of heterocycles which have attracted significant interest in medicinal chemistry and they have a wide range of pharmaceutical and biological activities including antimicrobial (Mohan and Kumar, 2003), anti-inflammatory (Vigorita et al., 2003), analgesic (Kumar et al., 2007), antitubercular (Kucukguzel et al., 2006) and antidiabetic (Pattan et al., 2005). Biocidal activities of Schiff bases have also been well established. These have been attributed to the toxophoric C⚌N linkage in them. Schiff base acquired broad spectrum biological activities like antibacterial (Iqbal et al., 2007), antifungal (Mishra et al., 2005), antitubercular (Lourenco et al., 2007) and anticonvulsant (Ragavendran et al., 2007).

The rationale for the study includes the designing of the derivatives having some common structural features that are important for the compound to exhibit an antimicrobial activity that includes the following:

  1. A lipohilic bicyclic aromatic ring system.

  2. Another bulky lipophilic group (e.g. phenyl, tert butyl) as a side chain.

  3. Two lipophilic domains linked by a spacer of appropriate length with polar center at defined position, for example, naftifine, butenafine, terbinafine, debacarb, penicillins and cephalosporins (Nussbaumer et al., 1994, 1995).

In view of the above mentioned facts and in continuation of our interest in the synthesis of heterocycles containing benzothiazole moiety, to identify new candidates that may be of value in designing new, potent, selective and less toxic antimicrobial agents, we report herein the synthesis and antimicrobial evaluation of some novel structural hybrids incorporating both the benzothiazole moiety with thiazolidin-4-one and azetidin-2-one ring systems through different linkages. This combination was suggested in an attempt to investigate the influence of such hybridization and structural variation on the anticipated antimicrobial activity, hoping to add some synergistic biological significance to the target molecules. The substitution pattern of thiazolidin-4-one (5ag) and azetidin-2-one (6ag) rings was carefully selected so as to confer different electronic environment to the molecules.

2

2 Experimental

2.1

2.1 General

All the solvents were of AR grade and were obtained from Merck, CDH and S.D. Fine chemicals. Melting points were determined in open capillary tubes and are uncorrected. All the compounds were subjected to elemental analysis (CHN) and the measured values agreed within ±0.4% with the calculated ones. Thin layer chromatography was performed on silica gel G (Merck). The spots were developed in an iodine chamber and visualized with an ultraviolet lamp. The solvent systems used were benzene–acetone (8:2, v/v) and toluene–ethyl acetate–formic acid (5:4:1, v/v). Ashless Whatman No. 1 filter paper was used for vacuum filtration. The spots were developed in an iodine chamber and visualized under an ultraviolet (UV) lamp. The IR spectra were recorded in KBr pellets on a (BIO-RAD FTS 135) WIN-IR spectrophotometer. The FAB mass spectra of all the compounds were recorded on a JEOL SX102/ /DA-600 mass spectrometer using argon/xenon (6 kV, 10 mA) as the FAB gas. 1H NMR spectra (d, ppm) were recorded in DMSO-d6 solutions on a Varian-Mercury 300 MHz spectrometer using tetramethylsilane as the internal reference. 13C NMR spectra were recorded in DMSO-d6 solutions on a Bruker Avance II 400 spectrometer at 400 MHz using tetramethylsilane as the internal reference. 2-Amino-6-chloro-benzothiazole 1 was synthesized by the literature procedure (Gilani et al., 2011b).

2.2

2.2 Synthesis of 1-(6-chlorobenzo[d]thiazol-2-yl)urea (2)

To the solution of sodium cyanate in minimum quantity of water, glacial acetic acid (5 mL) was added. This solution was heated with 2-amino-6-chloro-benzothiazole 1 (0.01 mol) in alcohol till the contents of the mixture became turbid and the volume remained half of the original volume. The contents were added to ice cool water. The solid obtained was filtered off, dried and recrystallised from a suitable solvent.

IR (KBr) λmax (cm−1): 3310 (NH), 1628 (C⚌O), 1560 (C⚌N), 830 (C–Cl), 645 (C–S–C benzothiazole); 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 9.14 (s, 1H, NHC⚌O), 6.68–6.70 (m, 3H, Ar-H, J = 6 Hz), 6.34 (s, 2H, NH2).

2.3

2.3 Synthesis of N-(6-chlorobenzo[d]thiazol-2-yl)hydrazine carboxamide (3)

To the warm hydrazine hydrate solution of compound 2 in alcohol, conc. NaOH was added and refluxed for 6 h. The reaction mixture was poured into crushed ice and solid obtained was filtered off and dried. The solid collected out was recrystallized from a suitable solvent to get the compound N-(6-chlorobenzo[d]thiazol-2-yl)hydrazine carboxamide.

IR (KBr) λmax (cm−1): 3300 (NH), 1660 (C⚌O), 1588 (C⚌N), 817 (C–Cl), 657 (C–S–C benzothiazole); 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 9.12 (s, 1H, NHC⚌O), 7.28 (s, 1H, NHNH2), 7.70–7.74 (m, 3H, Ar-H, J = 12 Hz).

2.4

2.4 Synthesis of 2-Substituted benzylidene-N-(6-chlorobenzo[d]thiazol-2-yl)hydrazinecarboxamide (4ag)

To an equimolar methanolic solution of N-(6-chlorobenzo[d]thiazol-2-yl)hydrazine carboxamide (3) (0.1 mol) and substituted benzaldehyde (0.1 mol), a few drops of glacial acetic acid were added. The mixture was then refluxed on a water bath for 5–6 h. It was then allowed to cool, poured onto crushed ice and recrystallised from methanol.

2.4.1

2.4.1 2-Benzylidene-N-(6-chlorobenzo[d]thiazol-2-yl)hydrazinecarboxamide (4a)

IR (KBr) λmax (cm−1): 3318 (NH), 1668 (C⚌O), 1588 (C⚌N), 827 (C–Cl), 663 (C–S–C benzothiazole); 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 9.12 (s, 1H, NHC⚌O), 7.90 (s, 1H, N⚌CH), 7.77–7.781 (m, 8H, Ar-H, J = 12 Hz), 6.10 (s, IH, NH); MS [EI] m/z 330 [M+], 331 [M++1], 332 [M++2].

2.4.2

2.4.2 N-(6-Chlorobenzo[d]thiazol-2-yl)-2-(2-chlorobenzylidene)hydrazinecarboxamide (4b)

IR (KBr) λmax (cm−1): 3314 (NH), 1672 (C⚌O), 1582 (C⚌N), 811 (C–Cl), 649 (C–S–C benzothiazole); 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 9.10 (s, 1H, NHC⚌O), 7.92 (s, 1H, N⚌CH), 7.73–7.77 (m, 7H, Ar-H, J = 12 Hz), 6.14 (s, IH, NH); MS [EI] m/z 365 [M+], 364 [M+−1].

2.4.3

2.4.3 N-(6-Chlorobenzo[d]thiazol-2-yl)-2-(2,4-dichlorobenzylidene)hydrazinecarboxamide (4c)

IR (KBr) λmax (cm−1): 3320 (NH), 1662 (C⚌O), 1587 (C⚌N), 818 (C–Cl), 654 (C–S–C benzothiazole); 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 9.11 (s, 1H, NHC⚌O), 7.94 (s, 1H, N⚌CH), 7.79–7.83 (m, 6H, Ar-H, J = 12 Hz), 6.12 (s, IH, NH); MS [EI] m/z 401 [M++2]. 399 [M+], 397 [M+−2].

2.4.4

2.4.4 N-(6-Chlorobenzo[d]thiazol-2-yl)-2-(2-methylbenzylidene)hydrazinecarboxamide (4d)

IR (KBr) λmax (cm−1): 3311 (NH), 1669 (C⚌O), 1580 (C⚌N), 819 (C–Cl), 640 (C–S–C benzothiazole); 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 9.09 (s, 1H, NHC⚌O), 7.97 (s, 1H, N⚌CH), 7.72–7.76 (m, 7H, Ar-H, J = 12 Hz), 6.13 (s, IH, NH); MS [EI] m/z 346 [M++2], 345 [M++1], 344 [M+].

2.4.5

2.4.5 2-[{2-(6-Chlorobenzo[d]thiazol-2-ylcarbamoyl)hydrazono}methyl]phenyl acetate (4e)

IR (KBr) λmax (cm−1): 3319 (NH), 1664 (C⚌O), 1589 (C⚌N), 822 (C–Cl), 644 (C–S–C benzothiazole); 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 9.17 (s, 1H, NHC⚌O), 7.91 (s, 1H, N⚌CH), 7.75–7.79 (m, 7H, Ar-H, J = 12 Hz), 6.16 (s, IH, NH); MS [EI] m/z 389 [M++1], 388 [M+], 390 [M++2].

2.4.6

2.4.6 N-(6-Chlorobenzo[d]thiazol-2-yl)-2-(4-methoxybenzylidene)hydrazinecarboxamide (4f)

IR (KBr) λmax (cm−1): 3317 (NH), 1662 (C⚌O), 1586 (C⚌N), 816 (C–Cl), 654 (C–S–C benzothiazole); 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 9.07 (s, 1H, NHC⚌O), 7.96 (s, 1H, N⚌CH), 7.77–7.81 (m, 7H, Ar-H, J = 12 Hz), 6.18 (s, IH, NH); MS [EI] m/z 362 [M++2], 361 [M++1], 360 [M+].

2.4.7

2.4.7 N-(6-Chlorobenzo[d]thiazol-2-yl)-2-(4-nitrobenzylidene)hydrazinecarboxamide (4g)

IR (KBr) λmax (cm−1): 3323 (NH), 1674 (C⚌O), 1591 (C⚌N), 822 (C–Cl), 651 (C–S–C benzothiazole); 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 9.17 (s, 1H, NHC⚌O), 7.98 (s, 1H, N⚌CH), 7.78–7.82 (m, 7H, Ar-H, J = 12 Hz), 6.20 (s, IH, NH); MS [EI] m/z 377 [M++2], 376 [M++1], 375 [M+].

2.5

2.5 Synthesis of 1-(6-chlorobenzo[d]thiazol-2-yl)-3-(4-oxo-2-substituted phenylthiazolidin-3-yl)urea (5ag)

A mixture of 4 (0.01 mol) and thioglycollic acid (0.01 mol) was heated on an oil-bath at 120–125 °C for 12 h. The reaction mixture was cooled and treated with 10% sodium bicarbonate solution. The product was isolated and recrystallised from methanol–dioxane (4:1).

2.5.1

2.5.1 1-(6-Chlorobenzo[d]thiazol-2-yl)-3-(4-oxo-2-phenylthiazolidin-3-yl)urea (5a)

IR (KBr) λmax (cm−1): 3216 (NH), 3126 (C–H aromatic), 1726 (C⚌O thiazolidinone), 1664 (C⚌O), 1538 (C⚌C aromatic), 1440 (C–N benzothiazole), 830 (C–Cl), 692 (C–S–C thiazolidinone), 614 (C–S–C benzothiazole); 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 11.85 (s, 1H, CONH), 8.05 (s, 1H, NH), 7.65–7.79 (m, 8H, Ar-H), 2.48 (s, 2H, CH2 thiazolidinone); 13C NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 174.5, 168.8, 153.8, 151.3, 139.2, 132.3, 129.8, 128.6, 127.1, 126.9, 125.8, 121.2, 118.3, 63.8, 35.2 (CH2 thiazolidinone); MS [EI] m/z 406 [M++2], 405 [M++1], 404 [M+].

2.5.2

2.5.2 1-(6-Chlorobenzo[d]thiazol-2-yl)-3-(2-(2-chlorophenyl)-4-oxothiazolidin-3-yl)urea (5b)

IR (KBr) λmax (cm−1): 3211 (NH), 3120 (C–H aromatic), 1721 (C⚌O thiazolidinone), 1668 (C⚌O), 1542 (C⚌C aromatic), 1438 (C–N benzothiazole), 836 (C–Cl), 696 (C–S–C thiazolidinone), 620 (C–S–C benzothiazole); 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 11.83 (s, 1H, CONH), 8.03 (s, 1H, NH), 7.51–7.71 (m,7H, Ar-H), 2.42 (s,2H, CH2 thiazolidinone); 13C NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 174.5, 168.8, 153.8, 151.3, 134.0, 132.3, 130.1, 129.8, 128.7, 128.5, 126.7, 125.8, 121.2, 118.3, 102.5, 58.7, 35.2 (CH2 thiazolidinone); MS [EI] m/z 441 [M++2], 439 [M+], 438 [M+−1], 437 [M+−2].

2.5.3

2.5.3 1-(6-Chlorobenzo[d]thiazol-2-yl)-3-(2-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-oxothiazolidin-3-yl)urea (5c)

IR (KBr) λmax (cm−1): 3214 (NH), 3112 (C–H aromatic), 1730 (C⚌O thiazolidinone), 1661 (C⚌O), 1536 (C⚌C aromatic), 1430 (C–N benzothiazole), 838 (C–Cl), 681 (C–S–C thiazolidinone), 612 (C–S–C benzothiazole); 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 11.81 (s, 1H, CONH), 8.01 (s, 1H, NH), 7.59–7.76 (m, 6H, Ar-H), 2.46 (s, 2H, CH2 thiazolidinone); 13C NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 174.5, 168.8, 153.8, 151.3, 135.4, 134.1, 132.3, 131.5, 130.3, 129.8, 126.8, 125.8, 121.2, 118.3, 100.6, 58.7, 35.2 (CH2 thiazolidinone); MS [EI] m/z 475 [M++2], 473 [M+], 471 [M+-2].

2.5.4

2.5.4 1-(6-Chlorobenzo[d]thiazol-2-yl)-3-(4-oxo-2-o-tolylthiazolidin-3-yl)urea (5d)

IR (KBr) λmax (cm−1): 3217 (NH), 3119 (C–H aromatic), 1737 (C⚌O thiazolidinone), 1667 (C⚌O), 1531 (C⚌C aromatic), 1427 (C–N benzothiazole), 842 (C–Cl), 691 (C–S–C thiazolidinone), 618 (C–S–C benzothiazole); 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 11.79 (s, 1H,CONH), 8.07 (s, 1H, NH), 7.62–7.71 (m, 6H, Ar-H), 2.44 (s, 2H, CH2 thiazolidinone), 2.34 (s,3H, CH3); 13C NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 174.5, 168.8, 153.8, 151.3, 139.0, 136.5, 132.3, 130.3, 129.8, 128.6, 127.0, 125.8, 125.6, 121.2, 118.3, 61.3, 35.2 (CH2 thiazolidinone), 18.4; MS [EI] m/z 420 [M++2], 419 [M++1], 418 [M+].

2.5.5

2.5.5 2-(3-(3-(6-Chlorobenzo[d]thiazol-2-yl)ureido)-4-oxothiazolidin-2-yl)phenyl acetate (5e)

IR (KBr) λmax (cm−1): 3225 (NH), 3122 (C–H aromatic), 1724 (C⚌O thiazolidinone), 1674 (C⚌O), 1540 (C⚌C aromatic), 1436 (C–N benzothiazole), 844 (C–Cl), 687 (C–S–C thiazolidinone), 622 (C–S–C benzothiazole); 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 11.81 (s, 1H, CONH), 8.00 (s, 1H, NH), 7.62–7.69 (m,7H, Ar-H), 2.60(s,3H, OCOCH3), 2.51 (s, 2H, CH2 thiazolidinone), 2.31 (s,3H, CH3); 13C NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 174.5, 169.0, 168.8, 153.8, 151.3, 150.0, 132.3, 129.8, 127.5, 127.0, 125.8, 125.4, 123.8, 121.5, 121.2, 118.3, 57.8, 35.2 (CH2 thiazolidinone), 20.3; MS [EI] m/z 464 [M++2], 463 [M++1], 462 [M+].

2.5.6

2.5.6 1-(6-Chlorobenzo[d]thiazol-2-yl)-3-(2-(2-methoxyphenyl)-4-oxothiazolidin-3-yl)urea (5f)

IR (KBr) λmax (cm−1): 3230 (NH), 3127 (C–H aromatic), 1729 (C⚌O thiazolidinone), 1681 (C⚌O), 1543 (C⚌C aromatic), 1441 (C–N benzothiazole), 849 (C–Cl), 693 (C–S–C thiazolidinone), 617 (C–S–C benzothiazole); 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 11.77 (s, 1H, CONH), 8.05 (s, 1H, NH), 7.58–7.61 (m, 7H, Ar-H), 3.88 (s, 1H, OCH3), 2.55 (s, 2H, CH2 thiazolidinone); 13C NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 174.5, 168.8, 158.3, 153.8, 151.3, 151.3, 132.3, 129.8, 128.1, 127.6, 125.8, 121.2, 120.9, 118.3, 116.5, 112.2, 57.9, 56.1, 35.2 (CH2 thiazolidinone); MS [EI] m/z 436 [M++2], 435 [M++1], 434 [M+].

2.5.7

2.5.7 1-(6-Chlorobenzo[d]thiazol-2-yl)-3-(2-(4-nitrophenyl)-4-oxothiazolidin-3-yl) urea (5g)

IR (KBr) λmax (cm−1): 3236 (NH), 3136 (C–H aromatic), 1737 (C⚌O thiazolidinone), 1691 (C⚌O), 1551 (C⚌C aromatic), 1457 (C–N benzothiazole), 1369 (NO2), 854 (C–Cl), 688 (C–S–C thiazolidinone), 628 (C–S–C benzothiazole); 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 11.71 (s, 1H, CONH), 8.08 (s, 1H, NH), 7.46–7.54 (m, 7H, Ar-H), 2.52 (s, 2H, CH2 thiazolidinone); 13C NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 174.5, 168.8, 153.8, 151.3, 146.3, 145.3, 132.3, 129.8, 129.6, 125.8, 123.8, 121.2, 63.8, 35.2 (CH2 thiazolidinone); MS [EI] m/z 451 [M++2], 450 [M++1], 449 [M+].

2.6

2.6 1-(3-Chloro-2-oxo-4-substituted phenylazetidin-1-yl)-3-(6-chlorobenzo[d]thiazol-2yl)urea (6ag)

A solution of 4 (0.01 mol) in dioxane (20 mL) was added to a well stirred mixture of chloroacetylchloride (0.012 mol) and triethylamine (Et3N) (0.012 mol) in dioxane (10 mL) at 0–5 °C. The reaction mixture was then stirred for 8 h, kept for 2 days at room temperature and then treated with cold water. The solid thus obtained was filtered, washed with water and recrystallised from methanol.

2.6.1

2.6.1 1-(3-Chloro-2-oxo-4-phenylazetidin-1-yl)-3-(6-chlorobenzo[d]thiazol-2yl)urea (6a)

IR (KBr) λmax (cm−1): 3250 (NH), 1745 (C⚌O β lactam ring), 1670 (C⚌O), 1560 (C⚌C), 1442 (C–N benzothiazole), 742 (C–Cl), 638 (C–S–C benzothiazole); 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 10.41 (s, 1H, CONH), 7.70 (s, 1H, N–CH β lactam ring), 6.61–6.69 (m,8H,Ar-H); 13C NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 174.5, 163.5 (β lactam ring), 153.8, 151.3, 143.5, 132.3, 129.8, 128.5, 126.9, 126.7, 125.8, 121.2, 118.3, 66.9, 63.7; MS [EI] m/z 410 [M++3], 408 [M++1], 407 [M+].

2.6.2

2.6.2 1-(3-Chloro-2-(2-chlorophenyl)-4-oxoazetidin-1-yl)-3-(6-chlorobenzo[d]thiazol-2yl)urea (6b)

IR (KBr) λmax (cm−1): 3244 (NH), 1752 (C⚌O β lactam ring), 1673 (C⚌O), 1566 (C⚌C), 1447 (C–N benzothiazole), 742 (C–Cl), 643 (C–S–C benzothiazole); 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 10.44 (s, 1H, CONH), 7.72 (s, 1H, N–CH β lactam ring), 6.64–6.69 (m, 8H, Ar-H); 13C NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 174.5, 163.5 (β lactam ring), 153.8, 151.3, 143.5, 132.3, 132.2, 129.8, 128.6, 128.3, 128.1, 126.6, 125.8, 121.2, 118.3, 63.2, 61.8; MS [EI] m/z 443 [M++3], 441 [M+], 439 [M+-2].

2.6.3

2.6.3 1-(3-Chloro-2-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-oxoazetidin-1-yl)-3-(6-chlorobenzo[d]thiazol-2-yl)urea (6c)

IR (KBr) λmax (cm−1): 3253 (NH), 1758 (C⚌O β lactam ring), 1677 (C⚌O), 1568 (C⚌C), 1456 (C–N benzothiazole), 751 (C–Cl), 647 (C–S–C benzothiazole); 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 10.42 (s, 1H, CONH), 7.71 (s, 1H, N–CH β lactam ring), 6.68–6.72 (m, 6H, Ar-H); 13C NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 174.5, 163.5 (β lactam ring), 153.8, 151.3, 151.1, 141.6, 133.7, 132.3, 131.1, 129.8, 126.7, 125.8, 121.2, 119.6, 118.3, 63.2, 61.8; MS [EI] m/z 477 [M++1], 475 [M+−1], 473 [M+−3].

2.6.4

2.6.4 1-(3-Chloro-2-oxo-4-p-tolylazetidin-1-yl)-3-(6-chlorobenzo[d]thiazol-2-yl)urea (6d)

IR (KBr) λmax (cm−1): 3261 (NH), 1768 (C⚌O β lactam ring), 1675 (C⚌O), 1574 (C⚌C), 1460 (C–N benzothiazole), 767 (C–Cl), 651 (C–S–C benzothiazole); 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 10.46 (s, 1H, CONH), 7.75 (s, 1H, N–CH β lactam ring), 6.58–6.62 (m,7H, Ar-H), 2.37 (s, 3H, CH3); 13C NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 174.5, 163.5 (β lactam ring), 153.8, 151.3, 140.5, 136.4, 132.3, 129.8, 128.8, 125.8, 125.3, 121.2, 118.3, 66.9, 63.7, 21.3; MS [EI] m/z 423 [M++2], 422 [M++1], 421 [M+].

2.6.5

2.6.5 4-(3-Chloro-1-(3-(6-chlorobenzo[d]thiazol-2-yl)ureido)-4-oxoazetidin-2-yl)phenyl acetate (6e)

IR (KBr) λmax (cm−1): 3259 (NH), 1772 (C⚌O β lactam ring), 1681 (C⚌O), 1577 (C⚌C), 1454 (C–N benzothiazole), 771 (C–Cl), 656 (C–S–C benzothiazole); 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 10.45 (s, 1H, CONH), 7.74 (s, 1H, N–CH β lactam ring), 6.56–6.61 (m,7H,Ar-H), 2.61 (s,3H, OCOCH3); 13C NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 174.5, 163.5 (β lactam ring), 169.0, 153.8, 149.3, 140.3, 132.3, 129.8, 126.0, 125.8, 121.4, 121.2, 66.9, 63.7, 20.3; MS [EI] m/z 466 [M++1], 465 [M+], 464 [M+−1].

2.6.6

2.6.6 1-(3-Chloro-2-(4-methoxyphenyl)-4-oxoazetidin-1-yl)-3-(6-chlorobenzo[d]thiazol-2-yl)urea (6f)

IR (KBr) λmax (cm−1): 3266 (NH), 1781 (C⚌O β lactam ring), 1684 (C⚌O), 1577 (C⚌C), 1453 (C–N benzothiazole), 773 (C–Cl), 658 (C–S–C benzothiazole); 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 10.44 (s, 1H, CONH), 7.73 (s, 1H, N–CH β lactam ring), 6.58–6.67 (m, 7H, Ar-H), 3.85 (s, 1H, OCH3); 13C NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 174.5, 163.5 (β lactam ring), 158.6, 153.8, 151.3, 135.8, 132.3, 129.8, 126.6, 125.8, 121.2, 118.3, 114.1, 66.9, 63.7, 55.8; MS [EI] m/z 438 [M++1], 437 [M+], 436 [M+−1].

2.6.7

2.6.7 1-(3-Chloro-2-(4-nitrophenyl)-4-oxoazetidin-1-yl)-3-(6-chlorobenzo[d]thiazol-2-yl)urea (6g)

IR (KBr) λmax (cm−1): 3264 (NH), 1784 (C⚌O β lactam ring), 1676 (C⚌O), 1580 (C⚌C), 1457 (C–N benzothiazole), 1374 (NO2), 776 (C–Cl), 660 (C–S–C benzothiazole); 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 10.43 (s, 1H, CONH), 7.75 (s, 1H, N–CH β lactam ring), 6.55–6.60 (m, 7H, Ar-H); 13C NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 174.5, 163.5 (β lactam ring), 153.8, 151.3, 149.6, 145.9, 132.3, 129.8, 125.8, 123.7, 123.4, 121.2, 66.9, 63.7; MS [EI] m/z 453 [M++1], 452 [M+],451 [M+−1].

2.7

2.7 Antimicrobial activity

All the synthesized compounds were tested for their in vitro antimicrobial activity against the Gram positive bacteria Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC-25923), the Gram-negative bacteria Escherichia coli (ATCC-25922), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC-27853) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (ATCC-700603) in the nutrient agar media, and fungi Candida albicans (ATCC-2091), Aspergillus niger (MTCC-281), Aspergillus flavus (MTCC-277), Monascus purpureus (MTCC 369) and Penicillium citrinum (NCIM-768) in Sabouraud dextrose medium at 200, 100, 50, 25 and 12.5 μg/mL concentrations by using serial plate dilution method. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC’s) values were determined by comparison to ofloxacin and ketoconazole as the reference drugs for bacterial and fungal activity, respectively, as shown in Tables 2 and 3. Standard antibiotics ofloxacin and ketoconzole were used as reference drugs at 50, 25 and 12.5 μg/mL concentrations. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was defined as the lowest concentration of the compounds that inhibited the visible growth of microorganisms on the plate.

3

3 Results and discussion

3.1

3.1 Chemistry

1-(6-Chlorobenzo[d]thiazol-2-yl)-3-(4-oxo-2-substituted phenylthiazolidin-3-yl)urea (5ag) and 1-(3-chloro-2-oxo-4-substituted phenylazetidin-1-yl)-3-(6-chlorobenzo[d]thiazol-2yl)urea (6ag) were prepared according to the procedure outlined in Scheme 1. The required 2-substituted benzylidene-N-(6-chlorobenzo[d]thiazol-2-yl)hydrazinecarboxamide (4ag) was synthesized by reacting N-(6-chlorobenzo[d]thiazol-2-yl)hydrazine carboxamide (3) with substituted aromatic aldehyde in ethanol. This salt underwent ring closure by condensation with thioglycollic acid to give the required title compounds (5a–g). The synthesis of compounds (6ag) was also accomplished in a single step by reacting the 2-substituted benzylidene-N-(6-chlorobenzo[d]thiazol-2-yl)hydrazinecarboxamide (4a–g) with chloroacetyl chloride and triethylamine in the presence of dioxane, respectively. The structure of the synthesized compounds was confirmed by elemental analysis and spectral data (IR, 1H NMR, 13C NMR & Mass). Physicochemical data for the 2-substituted benzylidene-N-(6-chlorobenzo[d]thiazol-2-yl)hydrazinecarboxamide derivatives (4ag, 5ag, 6ag) are given in Table 1.

Synthetic route for the synthesis of title compounds.
Scheme 1
Synthetic route for the synthesis of title compounds.
Table 1 Physical and analytical data of benzothiazole derivatives 4, 5 & 6ag.
Compound R Mol. formula Yield (%) M.P. (°C) Mol. weight Rf Analysis % found (calculated)
C H N
4a C15H11ClN4OS 84 153 330.79 0.8 54.46 3.35 16.94
(54.50) (3.37) (16.63)
4b C15H10Cl2N4OS 88 198 365.24 0.6 49.33 2.76 15.34
(49.38) (2.71) (15.39)
4c C15H9Cl3N4OS 80 136 399.68 0.7 45.08 2.27 14.02
(45.11) (2.29) (14.08)
4d C16H13ClN4OS 76 149 344.82 0.9 55.73 3.80 16.25
(55.67) (3.76) (16.28)
4e C17H13ClN4O3S 83 164 388.83 0.6 52.51 3.37 14.41
(52.54) (3.39) (14.44)
4f C16H13ClN4O2S 79 157 360.82 05 53.26 3.63 15.53
(53.29) (3.57) (15.50)
4g C15H10ClN5O3S 81 181 375.79 0.8 47.94 2.68 18.64
(47.78) (2.62) (18.67)
5a C17H13Cl N4O2S2 77 222 404.89 0.7 50.43 3.24 13.84
(50.46) (3.28) (13.66)
5b C17H12Cl2N4O2S2 79 238 439.34 0.6 46.47 2.75 12.75
(46.49) (2.71) (12.69)
5c C17H11Cl3N4O2S2 70 208 473.78 0.8 43.10 2.34 11.83
(43.14) (2.37) (11.76)
5d C18H15ClN4O2S2 66 258 418.92 0.7 51.61 3.61 13.37
(51.58) (3.64) (13.39)
5e C19H15ClN4O4S2 71 214 462.93 0.9 49.30 3.27 12.10
(49.34) (3.31) (12.14)
5f C18H15ClN4O3S2 74 280 434.92 0.6 49.71 3.48 12.88
(49.67) (3.50) (12.74)
5g C17H12ClN5O4S2 80 202 449.89 0.8 46.40 3.46 15.03
(46.43) (3.51) (15.09)
6a C17H12Cl2N4O2S 71 226 407.27 0.7 50.13 2.97 13.76
(50.17) (2.88) (13.64)
6b C17H11Cl3N4O2S 78 232 441.72 0.9 46.22 2.51 12.68
(46.28) (2.54) (12.65)
6c C17H10Cl4N4O2S 73 262 476.16 0.5 42.88 2.12 11.77
(42.79) (2.16) (11.72)
6d C18H14Cl2N4O2S 76 217 421.30 0.7 51.32 3.35 13.30
(51.37) (3.39) (13.34)
6e C19H14Cl2N4O4S 77 238 465.31 0.9 49.04 3.03 12.04
(49.10) (3.07) (12.08)
6f C18H14Cl2N4O3S 72 219 437.30 0.8 49.44 3.23 12.81
(49.47) (3.27) (12.76)
6g C17H11Cl2N5O4S 75 210 452.27 0.6 45.15 2.45 15.48
(45.19) (2.48) (15.51)
Table 2 Antibacterial activity of the title compounds 5 & 6ag.
Compounds Zone of inhibition in mm and MIC (minimum inhibitory concentration) in μg/mL
S. aureus E. coli P. aeruginosa K. pneumoniae
5a 13 (100) 17 (50) 19 (50) 19 (50)
5b 5 (<200) 8 (<200) 4 (<200) 8 (<200)
5c 22 (25) 25 (25) 29 (12.5) 27 (12.5)
5d 22 (25) 30 (12.5) 28 (12.5) 27 (12.5)
5e 3 (<200) 8 (<200) 6 (<200) 7 (<200)
5f 14 (100) 19 (50) 18 (50) 20 (50)
5g 27 (12.5) 30 (12.5) 27 (12.5) 30 (12.5)
6a 14 (100) 19 (50) 19 (50) 20 (50)
6b 8 (<200) 7 (<200) 9 (<200) 7 (<200)
6c 22 (25) 29 (12.5) 30 (12.5) 28 (12.5)
6d 12 (100) 17 (50) 19 (50) 18 (50)
6e 4 (<200) 9 (<200) 8 (<200) 7 (<200)
6f 24 (25) 27 (12.5) 29 (12.5) 30 (12.5)
6g 13 (100) 20 (50) 19 (50) 16 (50)
Ofloxacin 22 (25) 30 (12.5) 27 (12.5) 29 (12.5)

The figures in the table show the zone of inhibition (mm) and the corresponding MIC (μg/mL) values in brackets.

Table 3 Antifungal activity of the title compounds 5 & 6ag.
Compound Zone of inhibition in mm and MIC (minimum inhibitory concentration) in μg/mL
C. albicans A. niger A. flavus M. purpureus P. citrinum
5a 19 (50) 19 (50) 14 (100) 13 (100) 19 (50)
5b 18 (50) 11 (100) 14 (100) 20 (50) 17 (50)
5c 28 (12.5) 29 (12.5) 25 (25) 24 (25) 30 (12.5)
5d 29 (12.5) 28 (12.5) 27 (12.5) 21 (25) 23 (25)
5e 19 (50) 14 (100) 20 (50) 20 (50) 15 (50)
5f 22 (25) 24 (25) 29 (12.5) 25 (25) 29 (12.5)
5g 18 (50) 12 (100) 14 (100) 19 (50) 14 (100)
6a 16 (50) 19 (50) 18 (50) 13 (100) 19 (50)
6b 20 (50) 14 (100) 15 (100) 13 (100) 20 (50)
6c 20 (50) 15 (100) 13 (100) 18 (50) 19 (50)
6d 7 (<200) 8 (<200) 9 (<200) 6 (<200) 7 (<200)
6e 24 (25) 30 (12.5) 29 (12.5) 26 (12.5) 25 (25)
6f 8 (<200) 9 (<200) 8 (<200) 4 (<200) 7 (<200)
6g 30 (12.5) 27 (12.5) 30 (12.5) 22 (25) 29 (12.5)
Ketoconazole 30 (12.5) 28 (12.5) 25 (25) 30 (12.5) 24 (25)

The figures in the table show the zone of inhibition (mm) and the corresponding MIC (μg/mL) values in brackets.

The IR spectra of compounds 4ag showed absorption peaks at 3318 and 1668 cm–1 due to N–H, C⚌O and –N⚌CH stretching vibrations. The appearance of the stretching of the C⚌O of thiazolidinone and β-lactam ring at 1726 and 1745 cm–1, respectively, in the spectra of the derivatives, together with the C⚌O stretching at 1664 and 1670 cm–1 confirmed the formation of the compounds 5ag and 6ag.

The 1H-NMR spectra of compounds 4ag revealed a multiplet at δ 7.77–7.81 ppm for the aromatic ring and singlets at δ 6.10 and 7.90 ppm for –NH and –N⚌CH, respectively. The disappearance of the singlet peak of –N⚌CH and the presence of a singlet peak at δ 2.48 and 7.70 of –CH2 of thiazolidinone and –N–CH of β-lactam ring proved that these compounds participated in the cyclisation reaction and formed the desired compounds.

This was further confirmed by 13C–NMR spectrum of the title compounds 5ag and 6ag which showed peaks at 35.2 and 163.5 ppm suggesting the presence of –CH2 and –C⚌O of thiazolidine and β-lactam ring, respectively.

The elemental analysis and molecular ion peaks of compounds 5ag and 6a–g were consistent with the assigned structure.

3.2

3.2 Antimicrobial activity

The investigation of antibacterial and antifungal screening data revealed that all the tested compounds 5a–g and 6a–g showed good to moderate inhibition at 12.5–200 μg/mL in DMSO. The compounds 5c, 5d, 5g, 6c and 6f showed comparatively good activity against all the bacterial strains. The good activity is attributed to the presence of pharmacologically active 2,4-dichloro (5c), methyl (5d), 4-nitro (5g) groups attached to the phenyl group at position 2 of the thiazolidin-4-one ring, whereas 2,4-dichlorophenyl (6c) and phenoxy group (6f) attached at the fourth position of the β-lactam moiety. When these groups were replaced by 2-chlorophenyl (5b, 6b) and acetyl phenyl (5e, 6e), a sharp decrease in activity against most of the strains was observed. Compounds 5a, 5f, 6a, 6d and 6g exhibited moderate activity compared to that of standard ofloxacin against all the bacterial strains. Further, the result showed that Gram-negative exhibited better activity than Gram positive organisms.

Compounds 5c, 5d, 5f, 6e and 6g showed comparatively good activity against all the fungal strains. The structure of these compounds contains biologically active 2,4-dichlorophenyl (5c), methylphenyl (5d) and phenoxy (5f) groups attached at position 2 of the thiazolidin-4-one ring and acetyl (6e) and 4-nitrophenyl (6g) groups attached at the fourth position of β-lactam ring, respectively. Compounds 5a, 5b, 5e, 5g, 6a, 6b and 6c showed moderate activity compared to that of the standard against all the fungal strains. All the compounds showed good to moderate activity against all pathogenic fungal strains except compounds 6d and 6f having methyl and phenoxy groups attached at the fourth position of the β-lactam nucleus.

4

4 Conclusion

  • The presence of 2,4-dichloro, methyl and 4-nitro groups attached to the phenyl at position 2 of the thiazolidin-4-ones ring and the presence of 2,4-dichloro and phenoxy groups attached at fourth position of azetidin-2-ones moiety showed good activity against all the bacterial strains.

  • Replacing the above substituent with one chloro and acetyl group results in a sharp decrease of antibacterial activity for both thiazolidin-4-ones and azetidin-2-ones nucleus.

  • Presence of 2,4-dichloro, methyl and phenoxy groups attached at position 2 of the thiazolidin-4-ones ring and presence of acetyl and nitro groups attached at the fourth position of the β lactam moiety showed increase in activity against all the fungal strains.

  • Replacing the above substituent of the β lactam moiety with methyl and phenoxy groups attached at fourth position results in sharp decrease of antifungal activity.

  • Further, β lactam derivatives are found to be more active than thiazolidinone derivatives against all pathogenic bacterial and fungal strains. The result also shows that gram-negative exhibited better activity than gram positive organisms.

  • Thus, heterocycles accommodating either of the subunits i.e. thiazolidine-4-ones or azetidin-2-ones are expected to prove the therapeutic relevance and their utility in medicinal chemistry and drug development. Ongoing research focuses on the same molecular hybrid template with the incorporation of more effective substituents in search of new specific and effective antimicrobial agents.

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to the Head of the Department, Pharmaceutical Chemistry for providing laboratory facilities, Central Drug Research Institute (CDRI) for spectral analysis of the compounds. Authors are also thankful to Dr. Qadir, Head, IGIB, New Delhi for providing bacterial and fungal strains.

References

  1. , , , , , . Der. Pharm. Lett.. 2009;1(2):1-8.
  2. , , , , . Acta. Pol. Pharm. Drug Res.. 2011;68(2):205-211.
  3. , , , , , , . J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem.. 2011;26(3):332-340.
  4. , , , , . Indian J. Pharm. Sci.. 2008;70(5):572-577.
  5. , , , . Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.. 2007;17(2):341-345.
  6. , , , , , . Molecules. 2007;12:245-254.
  7. , , , . Indian J. Heterocycl. Chem.. 2003;13:183-184.
  8. , , , , . Indian J. Heterocycl. Chem.. 2000;10:9-12.
  9. , , , , , . Eur. J. Med. Chem.. 2006;41(3):353-359.
  10. , , , . Bioorg. Med. Chem.. 2007;15(8):3089-3096.
  11. , , , , , , , . Arkivoc. 2007;15:181-191.
  12. , , , . J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol.. 2005;51:133-141.
  13. , , . Indian J. Heterocycl. Chem.. 2003;12:189-192.
  14. , , . Medicinal Chemistry: A Molecular & Biochemical Approach. Oxford University Press; . p. 559
  15. , , , . J. Med. Chem.. 1994;37:610-615.
  16. , , , , . J. Med. Chem.. 1995;38:1831-1836.
  17. , , . Arabian J. Chem.. 2011;4:403-411.
  18. , , , , , , . Indian J. Chem.. 2005;44B:2404-2408.
  19. , , , , , , , . Eur. J. Med. Chem.. 2007;42:146-151.
  20. , , . Bioorg. Med. Chem.. 2004;12:147-150.
  21. , , , , , , , , , , . Bioorg. Med. Chem.. 2003;11(6):999-1006.
Show Sections