5.2
Impact Factor
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Corrigendum
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Full Length Article
Full lenth article
Letter to Editor
Original Article
Research article
Retraction notice
Review
Review Article
SPECIAL ISSUE: ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY
5.3
Impact Factor
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Corrigendum
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Full Length Article
Full lenth article
Letter to Editor
Original Article
Research article
Retraction notice
Review
Review Article
SPECIAL ISSUE: ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original article
1st Nano Update
5 (
4
); 419-424
doi:
10.1016/j.arabjc.2010.09.031

BF3·nano SiO2 as a catalytic system for one-pot green synthesis of pyrophthalone derivatives under microwave conditions

Laboratory of Organic Chemistry Research, Department of Organic Chemistry, College of Chemistry, University of Kashan, 87317-51167, Kashan, Iran

*Corresponding author. Tel.: +98 361 591 2320; fax: +98 361 591 2935 Safari@kashanu.ac.ir (Javad Safari)

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Elsevier and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Available online 6 October 2010

Abstract

The expeditious and solvent-free approach that involves the exposure of neat reactants to microwave (MW) irradiation in conjunction with the use of supported catalysts was described. A simple one-pot and green reaction of methylpyridine derivatives and phthalic anhydride derivatives on the surface of a nano silica gel impregnated with BF3 as solid supported catalysts under microwave irradiation without any solvent according to green chemistry was developed. The salient features of these high yield protocols are the enhanced reaction rates, greater selectivity and the experimental ease of manipulation.

Keywords

Pyrophthalone
Green chemistry
Nano solid support catalysts
Organic solvent-free
Microwave irradiation
1

1 Introduction

Heterogeneous organic reactions have proven useful to chemists in the laboratory as well as in the industrial context. These reactions are affected by the reagents immobilized on the porous solid supports and have advantages over the conventional solution phase reactions because of the good dispersion of active reagent sites, associated selectivity and easier work-up. The recyclability of some of these solid supports renders these processes into truly eco-friendly green protocols. In recent years, the use of solid supports under microwave irradiation has become more popular in synthetic organic chemistry (Ranu et al., 2000; Gershonov et al., 2007) and heterogeneous reactions facilitated by supported reagents on various solid inorganic surfaces have received more attention (Song and Lee, 2002). Solvent-free microwave irradiation is well known as an environmentally benign method, which offers several advantages including shorter reaction times, cleaner reaction profiles and simple experimental/product isolation procedures (Zhang et al., 2008). It is well known that microwave (MW) irradiation can accelerate a great number of chemical processes, and, in particular, the reaction time and energy input are supposed to be mostly reduced in the reactions that are run for a long time at high temperatures under conventional conditions (Loupy, 2002). On the other hand, the most successful examples of microwave applications are necessarily found to be related to the use of solvent-free systems, in which microwaves interact directly with reagents and, therefore, can more efficiently drive chemical reactions (Deshayes et al., 1999; Bogdal et al., 2003). The acceleration of reactions by microwaves results from material–microwave interactions leading to thermal and non-thermal effects (Perreux and Loupy, 2001; Jacob et al., 1995; Caddick, 1995).

Indane-1,3-dione derivatives that contain a heterocyclic nitrogen-containing substituent are called phthalones. Pyrophthalone derivatives have been proposed as photo semiconductors for the preparation of electrophotographic materials (Tomanek-Kunitzer, 1968). A study of the electrophysical properties of pyrophthalones in thin-film systems (Balode, 1971) showed that pyrophthalone, tetrachlorophyrophthalone and γ-pyrophthalone have considerable photosensitivity and the quantum efficiency (β) is 10−3–10−1 electron/photon at 300–500 nm. Some of the pyrophthalone derivatives display considerable anticoagulant activity and low toxicity. Antiphlogistic and analgesic action have been found for these compounds (Ploquin et al., 1973; Le Bant et al., 1973). The complexation properties of some derivatives of pyrophthalone, and quinophthalone towards some transition metal ions have been studied (Bontchev et al., 1983; Mitewa et al., 1983, 1985). These ligands are used as dyes, organic semiconductors, and anti-inflammatory and anaesthetic agents (Manukian and Mangini, 1970; Tomanek-Kunitzer, 1968; Ploquin et al., 1972; Bant et al., 1974; Neiland and Katzen, 1975). Pyrophthalone was first synthesized by Jacobsen and Reimer (Jacobsen and Reimer, 1883) and later by von Huber (Huber, 1903) by the condensation of α-picoline with phthalic anhydride. Kuhn (1903) used dimethyl sulfate and the sodium salt of pyrophthalone for the synthesis of N-methylpyrophthalone. Herein we have modified the method for the synthesis of pyrophthalone derivatives by one-pot reaction of methylpyridine derivatives (1ac) and phthalic anhydride derivatives (2ae), under microwave irradiation without any-solvent in the presence of BF3·nano SiO2 as catalyst (Scheme 1).

Green synthesis of pyrophthalone on BF3·nano silica gel under microwave irradiation.
Scheme 1
Green synthesis of pyrophthalone on BF3·nano silica gel under microwave irradiation.

2

2 Experimental

2.1

2.1 Materials

Chemicals were purchased from the Merck Chemical Company in high purity. All of the materials were of commercial reagent grade.

2.2

2.2 Apparatus

Melting points were determined in open capillaries using an Electrothermal Mk3 apparatus. The reactions were carried out in a microwave oven (ETHOS 1600, Milestone) with a power of 600 W specially designed for organic synthesis, with continuous stirring. IR spectra were recorded using a Perkin–Elmer FT-IR 550 spectrophotometer. 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker DRX-500 spectrometer for the sample as indicated with tetramethylsilane as an internal reference. UV spectra were recorded on a Hitachi 200-20 spectrophotometer using spectrophotometeric grade chloroform (Baker). MS spectra were recorded on a Finnigan MAT 44S, with an ionization voltage of 70 eV. The elemental analyses (C, H, N) were obtained from a Carlo ERBA Model EA 1108 analyzer carried out on Perkin–Elmer 240c analyzer, their results were found to be in good agreement (±0.2%) with the calculated values. Yields refer to isolated products.

2.3

2.3 Preparation of Catalyst

5 ml of methanol containing 0.6 g (4.2 mmol) of BF3–OEt2 and 0.4 g of unpreheated nano silica gel was stirred for 1 h at room temperature. The slurry was dried slowly on a rotary evaporator at 40 °C. The obtained solid was dried at ambient temperature for 2 h and then stored in a dry container for at least 3 months.

2.4

2.4 General synthesis of pyrophthalone derivatives

A mixture of methylpyridine derivative (1 mmol), phthalic anhydride (1mmol) and BF3·nano SiO2 (25 mg) were stirred well in a beaker at room temperature. Then the mixture was irradiated in a microwave oven (max. power 600 W, applied power up to 35%) for 3–6 min at the end of the reaction, the reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature and the catalyst was filtered off and the solvent was removed in vacuo to yield the crude product, which was crystallized from ethanol and the pure pyrophthalones were obtained as crystalline in 88–97% yield (Table 1).

Table 1 Synthesis of Pyrophthalone derivatives under conventional conditions and microwave irradiation.
Entry Product Yield (%) Time (min)
Δa MWa
1 aa 72 (35) 90 (6)
2 ab 83 (24) 88 (3)
3 ac 75 (30) 88 (2)
4 ad 76 (30) 91 (3)
5 ae 82 (24) 92 (2)
6 ba 70 (35) 91 (6)
7 bb 80 (25) 95 (4)
8 bc 75 (30) 95 (3)
9 bd 77 (30) 97 (4)
10 be 80 (25) 91 (3)
Isolated yield based on pyridine derivative.

2.5

2.5 Spectral data for products

2.5.1

2.5.1 3-Hydroxy-2-(2-pyridyl)-1H-indene-1-one (aa, C14H9NO2)

Yield: 90%, mp: 280–282 °C. IR (KBr, cm−1): 1675, 1640, 1620, 1455 cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 13.7 (s, 1H, O–H, imine enol form), 7.2 (dd, 1H, 3J: 5.1, 3J: 7.9, Ar–H), 8.3 (dd, 1H, 3J: 5.1, 4J: 2.2, Ar–H), 8.0 (dd, 1H, 3J: 7.1, 4J: 1.7, Ar–H), 7.4-7.7 (m, 5H, Ar–H) ppm. 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 190 (C⚌O), 176.2 (C–O), 162.0 (C), 149.0 (C), 146.1 (CH), 144.1 (CH), 137.0 (CH), 134.5 (C), 131.8 (CH), 128.1 (CH), 127.1 (CH), 126.6 (CH), 124.6 (CH), 116.8 (C) ppm. MS (70 eV) m/z = 225 (M+.), 197, 78. UV (CHCl3): λmax(ɛ) = 390, 323, 236 nm. MS (70 eV) m/z = 225 (M+.), 197, 78. Anal. Calcd for C14H9NO2: C, 75.213; H, 4.06; N 6.27. Found: C, 74.90; H 3.92; N 6.13.

2.5.2

2.5.2 4, 5, 6, 7-Tetrabromo-3-hydroxy-2-(2-pyridyl)-1H-indene-1-one (ab, C14H5NO2Br4)

Yield: 88%, mp: 300–301 °C. IR (KBr, cm−1): 1675, 1646, 1615, 1460 cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 13.5 (s, 1H, O–H, imine enol form), 7.1 (ddd, 1H, 3J: 7.8, 3J: 5.4, 4J: 1.9, Ar–H), 7.3 (dd, 1H, 3J: 7.6, 4J: 1.9, Ar–H), 7.7 (ddd, 1H, 3J: 7.8, 3J: 7.6, 4J: 2.0, Ar–H), 8.5 (dd, 1H, 3J: 5.4, 4J: 2.0, Ar–H) ppm. 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 190.2 (C⚌O), 178.1 (C–O), 159.6 (C), 148.0 (CH), 146.1 (C), 144.0 (C), 139.0 (CH), 136.5 (C), 131.2 (C), 125.0 (C), 122.5 (CH), 120.1 (CH), 119.2 (C), 114.6 (C). MS (70 eV) m/z = 535 (M+.), 537 (M + 2), 539 (M + 4), 541 (M + 6), 543 (M + 8), 507, 78. UV (EtOH): λmax(ɛ) = 392, 320, 235 nm. Anal. Calcd for C14H5NO2Br4: C (31.21), H (0.94), N (2.06). Found: C (31.08), H (0.88), N (1.96).

2.5.3

2.5.3 3-Hydroxy-2-(2-pyridyl)-7-nitro-1H-indene-1-one (ac, C14H8N2O4)

Yield: 88%, mp: 293–294 °C. IR (KBr, cm−1): 1678, 1640, 1620, 1450, 1550, 1334 cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 13.8 (s, 1H, O–H, imine enol form), 7.1 (ddd, 1H, 3J: 5.5, 3J: 7.8, 4J: 2.1, Ar–H), 7.3 (dd, 1H, 3J: 7.5, 4J: 2.1, Ar–H), 7.6 (ddd, 1H, 3J: 7.5, 3J: 7.8, 4J: 2.0, Ar–H), 7.9 (dd, 1H, 3J: 7.7, 3J: 8.2, Ar–H), 8.2 (dd, 1H, 3J: 7.7, 4J: 2.1, Ar–H), 8.4 (dd, 1H, 3J: 8.2, 4J: 2.1, Ar–H), 8.6 (dd, 1H, 3J: 5.5, 4J: 2.0, Ar–H) ppm. 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 190.0 (C⚌O), 185.0 (C–O), 153.1 (C), 150.2 (C), 146.8 (CH), 143.2 (C), 140.5 (CH), 136.3 (CH), 132.7 (CH), 127.9 (CH), 125.3 (C), 118.9 (CH), 116.4 (CH), 108.5 (C) ppm. MS (70 eV) m/z = 268 (M+.), 238, 222, 194, 78. UV (EtOH): λmax(ɛ) = 394, 297, 218. Anal. Calcd for C14H8N2O4: C (62.69), H (3.01), N (10.44). Found: C (62.51), H (2.92), N (10.31).

2.5.4

2.5.4 4, 5, 6, 7-Tetracholoro-3-hydroxy-2-(2-pyridyl)-1H-indene-1-one (ad, C14H5NO2Cl4)

Yield: 91%, mp: 297–299 °C. IR (KBr, cm−1): 1675, 1642, 1610, 1450 cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 13.8 (s, 1H, O–H, imine enol form), 7.2 (ddd, 1H, 3J: 7.7, 3J: 5.5, 4J: 2.2, Ar–H), 7.5 (dd, 1H, 3J: 7.6, 4J: 2.2, Ar–H), 7.8 (ddd, 1H, 3J: 7.8, 3J: 7.6, 4J: 2.0, Ar–H), 8.7 (dd, 1H, 3J: 5.5, 4J: 2.0, Ar–H) ppm. 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 191.2 (C⚌O), 183.5 (C–O), 161.2 (C), 148.8 (CH), 146.2 (C), 144.3 (C), 138.6 (CH), 137.2 (C), 132.5 (C), 125.4 (C), 124.5 (CH), 120.2 (CH), 118.5 (C), 114.5 (C) ppm. MS (70 eV) m/z = 359 (M+.), 361 (M + 2), 363 (M + 4), 365 (M + 6), 367 (M + 8), 331, 78. UV (EtOH): λmax(ɛ) = 390, 317, 230 nm. Anal. Calcd for C14H5NO2Cl4: C (64.58), H (1.4), N (3.88). Found: C (64.41), H (1.1), N (3.70).

2.5.5

2.5.5 3-Hydroxy-2-(2-pyridyl)-6-nitro-1H-indene-1-one (ae, C14H8N2O4)

Yield: 92%, mp: 292–294 °C. IR (KBr, cm−1): 1675, 1640, 1613, 1450, 1550, 1330 cm−1. 1H NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 13.8 (s, 1H, O–H, imine enol form), 7.2 (ddd, 1H, 3J: 5.4, 3J: 7.8, 4J: 2.2, Ar–H), 7.5 (dd, 1H, 3J: 7.7, 4J: 2.2, Ar–H), 7.7 (ddd, 1H, 3J: 7.7, 3J: 7.8, 4J: 2.0, Ar–H), 7.9 (d, 1H, 3J: 8.0, Ar–H), 8.3 (dd, 1H, 3J: 8.0, 4J: 2.2, Ar–H), 8.6 (dd, 1H, 3J: 5.5, 4J: 2.0, Ar–H), 8.7 (d, 1H, 4J: 2.2, Ar–H) ppm. 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 190.0 (C⚌O), 189.0 (C–O), 152.4 (C), 151.4 (C), 150.7 (CH), 146.0 (C), 142.1 (CH), 139.6 (C), 129.1 (CH), 121.9 (CH), 117.0 (CH), 115.5 (CH), 115.2 (CH), 104.5 (C) ppm. MS (70 eV) m/z = 238 (M+., 100), 222 (26), 194 (16), 78(22), UV (EtOH): λmax(ɛ) = 395, 305, 232 nm. Anal. Calcd for C14H8N2O4: C (62.69), H (3.01), N (10.44). Found: C (62.51), H (2.92), N (10.31).

2.5.6

2.5.6 3-Hydroxy-2-(4-methyl-2-pyridyl)-1H-indene-1-one (ba, C15H11NO2)

Yield: 91%, mp: 290–293 °C. 1675, 1643, 1610, 1450 cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 13.7 (s, 1H, O–H, imine enol form), 7.1 (dd, 1H, 3J: 5.1, 4J: 2.1, Ar–H), 8.2 (d, 1H, 3J: 5.1, Ar–H), 8.0 (dd, 1H, 3J: 7.1, 4J: 1.7, Ar–H), 7.5-7.7 (m, 4H, Ar–H). ppm. 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 189.0 (C⚌O), 174.5 (C–O), 160.0 (C), 149.0 C), 145.8 (CH), 145.1 (C), 136.0 (CH), 134.0 (C), 131.2 (CH), 129.4 (CH), 128.2 (CH), 126.0 (CH), 124.2 (CH), 116.3 (C), 20.1 (CH3). ppm. MS (70 eV) m/z = 237 (M+., 100), 222 (16), 209 (26). UV (EtOH): λmax(ɛ) = 388, 318, 234 nm. Anal. Calcd for C15H11NO2: C (75.94), H (4.67), N (5.90). Found: C (75.85), H (4.60), N (5.82).

2.5.7

2.5.7 4, 5, 6, 7-Tetrabromo-3-hydroxy-2-(4-methyl-2-pyridyl)-1H-indene-1-one (bb, C15H7NO2Br4)

Yield: 95%, mp: 310–312 °C. IR (KBr, cm−1): 1675, 1642, 1610, 1450 cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 13.7 (s, 1H, O–H, imine enol form), 7.0 (d, 1H, 3J: 5.4, Ar–H), 7.4 (s, 1H, Ar–H), 8.5 (d, 1H, 3J: 5.4, Ar–H), 2.4 (s, 3H, CH3). ppm. 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 190.6 (C⚌O), 177.1 (C–O), 160.8 (C), 147.2 (C), 145.8 (CH), 143.3 (C), 138.5 (C), 136.8 (C), 131.7 (C), 124.2 (C), 122.5 (CH), 119.4 (CH), 116.0 (C), 114.2 (C), 20.4 (CH3) ppm. MS (70 eV) m/z = 549 (M+., 100), 551 (M + 2), 553 (M + 4), 555 (M + 6), 557 (M + 8), 470, 416, 335, 230. UV (EtOH): λmax(ɛ) = 391, 320, 235 nm. Anal. Calcd for C15H7NO2Br4: C (32.59), H (1.28), N (2.53). Found: C (32.45), H (1.23), N (2.48).

2.5.8

2.5.8 3-Hydroxy-2-(4-methyl-2-pyridyl)-7-nitro-1H-indene-1-one (bc, C15H10N2O4)

Yield: 95%, mp: 303–304 °C. IR (KBr, cm−1): 1675, 1639, 1613, 1450, 1550, 1334 cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 13.7 (s, 1H, O–H, imine enol form), 7.0 (d, 1H, 3J: 5.5, Ar–H), 7.3 (s, 1H, Ar–H), 7.8 (dd, 1H, 3J: 7.7, 3J: 8.2, Ar–H), 8.1 (dd, 1H, 3J: 7.7, 4J: 2.1, Ar–H), 8.4 (dd, 1H, 3J: 8.2, 4J: 2.1, Ar–H), 8.8 (d, 1H, 3J: 5.5, Ar–H), 2.5 (s, 3H, CH3). ppm. 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 190.0 (C⚌O), 188.0 (C–O), 152.2 (C), 150.7 (C), 144.8 (C), 142.5 (CH), 139.5 (C), 135.3 (CH), 130.7 (C), 126.9 (CH), 124.3 (CH), 116.9 (CH), 115.4 (CH), 105.5 (C), 20.8 (CH3) ppm. MS (70 eV) m/z = 282 (M+., 100), 283 (M + 1), 284 (M + 2), 236, 76. UV (EtOH): λmax(ɛ) = 390, 293, 218 nm. Anal. Calcd for C15H10N2O4: C (63.83), H (3.57), N (9.92). Found: C (63.77), H (3.50), N (9.88).

2.5.9

2.5.9 4, 5, 6, 7-Tetracholoro-3-hydroxy-2-(4-methyl-2-pyridyl)-1H-indene-1-one (bd, C15H7NO2Cl4)

Yield: 97%, mp: 308–310 °C. IR (KBr, cm−1): 1675, 1643, 1610, 1450 cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 13.8 (s, 1H, O–H, imine enol form), 7.2 (d, 1H, 3J: 5.5, Ar–H), 7.5 (s, 1H, Ar–H), 8.7 (d, 1H, 3J: 5.5, Ar–H), 2.4 (s, 3H, CH3) ppm. 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 192.6 (C⚌O), 174.2 (C–O), 161.8 (C), 149.0 (C), 146.5 (CH), 144.3 (C), 139.1 (C), 138.8 (C), 132.7 (C), 125.6 (C), 123.5 (CH), 120.5 (CH), 117.0 (C), 115.2 (C), 20.8 (CH3) ppm. MS (70 eV) m/z = 373 (M+., 100), 375 (M + 2), 377 (M + 4), 379 (M + 6), 381 (M + 8), 358, 345. UV (EtOH): λmax(ɛ) = 391, 320, 235 nm. Anal. Calcd for C15H7NO2Cl4: C (48.04), H (1.88), N (3.73). Found: C (47.91), H (1.83), N (3.70).

2.5.10

2.5.10 3-Hydroxy-2-(4-methyl-2-pyridyl)-6-nitro-1H-indene-1-one (be, C15H10N2O4)

Yield: 91%, mp: 300–302 °C. IR (KBr, cm−1): 1675, 1640, 1613, 1450, 1550, 1330 cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 13.8 (s, 1H, O–H, imine enol form), 7.0 (d, 1H, 3J: 5.1, Ar–H), 7.3 (s, 1H, Ar–H), 8.2 (dd, 1H, 3J: 8.3, 4J: 2.5, Ar–H), 7.9 (d, 1H, 3J: 8.3, Ar–H), 8.7 (d, 1H, 3J: 5.1, Ar–H), 9.6 (d, 1H, 4J: 2.5, Ar–H), 2.5 (s, 3H, CH3) ppm. 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 190.0 (C⚌O), 189.0 (C–O), 152.4 (C), 151.4 (C), 150.7 (C), 146.0 (C), 142.1 (CH), 139.6 (C), 129.1 (CH), 121.9 (CH), 117.0 (CH), 115.9 (CH), 115.2 (CH), 104.5 (C), 20.8 (CH3) ppm. MS (70 eV) m/z = 282 (M+., 100), 283 (M + 1), 284 (M + 2), 236, 75. UV (EtOH): λmax(ɛ) = 391, 303, 231 nm. Anal. Calcd for C15H10N2O4: C (63.83), H (3.57), N (9.92). Found: C (63.74), H (3.45), N (9.90).

3

3 Results and discussion

To determine the optimum quantity of BF3·nano SiO2, the reaction of 2-methylpyridine (1a) and phthalic anhydride (2a) as starting materials was carried out under microwave irradiation as a model reaction. The use of 25 mg of catalyst resulted in the highest yield in 6 min (Fig. 1), consequently this catalyst was selected for subsequent experiments.

Optimization quantity of BF3·nano SiO2.
Figure 1
Optimization quantity of BF3·nano SiO2.

In order to investigate the effect of irradiation, various pyrophthalones were prepared from pyridine derivatives and phthalic anhydride derivatives under (i) conventional and solvent-free condition (ii) microwave irradiation, in the presence of a catalyst. The results are summarized in Table 1.

As shown in Table 1, in microwave irradiation condition, the yield of the reaction was high and the reaction time was low toward thermal condition. Also the suppotred nano SiO2 increase contact surface of material to react quickly. The SEM image of BF3·nano SiO2 is shown in Fig. 2. As can be seen, the sample shows a nanocrystalline structure with a spherical like shape.

SEM image of the BF3·nano SiO2.
Figure 2
SEM image of the BF3·nano SiO2.

Study out on products indicated that the methyl group in 2-position of pyridine ring is more active and reactive than methyl group in 4-position (Scheme 2).

Regioselectivity in synthesis of pyrophthalone.
Scheme 2
Regioselectivity in synthesis of pyrophthalone.

Several limiting structures-intraionic (betainlike) (C, C′), enaminone form (B), and enol (D) can be written for pyrophthalones .23. An interamolecular hydrogen bond is formed in each of the four cases (Scheme 3).

Tautomeric forms in pyrophthalone structure.
Scheme 3
Tautomeric forms in pyrophthalone structure.

The structure of the pyrophthalone products have confirmed by their spectroscopic data. These data demonstrated a stabilized pseudo aromatic enol cheated ring (D). In IR spectra, the presence of signals at 1640 and 1670 cm−1 are related to the carbonyl groups in a conjugated system. In the 1H NMR spectra enolic proton could be seen at δ 13.8 ppm.

4

4 Conclusion

The combination of supported reagents and microwave irradiation can be used to carry out a wide range of reactions in short times and with high conversions and selectivity, without the need for solvents. This approach can prove beneficial since the recovery of solvents from conventional reaction systems always results in some losses. Recovery of both products and inorganic support/catalyst is generally possible, leading to an efficient and low waste route to a range of products. Replacement of liquid acids with solid acid is among all the desirable factors for the chemical industry which we have considered in our green chemistry approach. Moreover, a new feature here is the fact that the reaction is heterogeneous. We believe that the present methodology would be an important addition to existing methodologies.

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the research council of University of Kashan.

References

  1. Balode, D.R., Gailis, A.K., Silinsh, E.A., Taure, L.F., Katsen, Y.Y., Neiland, O.Y. 1971. Summaries of Papers Presented at the 3rd All-Union Conference on the Chemistry of Dicarbonyl Compounds 1971, 18.
  2. , , , , . Bull. Soc. Pharm.. 1974;18:74-77.
  3. , , , , . Adv. Polym. Sci.. 2003;163:193-217.
  4. , , , , , . J. Prakt. Chem.. 1983;325:803-810.
  5. , . Tetrahedron. 1995;51:10403-10432.
  6. , , , . Tetrahedron. 1999;55:10851-10870.
  7. , , , , . Tetrahedron. 2007;63:3762-3769.
  8. , . Chemische Berichte. 1903;36:1653-1666.
  9. , , , . J. Mater. Sci.. 1995;30:5321-5326.
  10. , , . Chemische Berichte. 1883;16:2602-2608.
  11. , . Ann.. 1903;516:155-159.
  12. , , , , , , . Bull. Soc. Chim. Belg.. 1973;15:43-47.
  13. , . Microwaves in Organic Synthesis. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH; . pp. 121
  14. , , . Chimia. 1970;24:382-386.
  15. , , , , , . C. R. Acad. Bulg. Sci.. 1983;36:1311-1316.
  16. , , , , , . J. Prakt. Chem.. 1985;327:516-520.
  17. , , . Khim. Geterozikl. Soed. 1975:435-438.
  18. , , . Tetrahedron. 2001;57:9199-9223.
  19. , , , , , , . Chim. Ther.. 1972;32:35-38.
  20. , , , , , , . Chim. Ther.. 1973;35:120-124.
  21. , , , . Synth. Commun.. 2000;30:4167-4170.
  22. , , . Chem. Rev.. 2002;102:3495-3502.
  23. Tomanek-Kunitzer, M. 1968. West German Pat. No. 1265582.
  24. Tomanek-Kunitzer, M. 1968. US Patent, 1265582.
  25. , , , , , . Dyes Pigm.. 2008;79:205-209.
Show Sections