5.2
Impact Factor
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Corrigendum
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Full Length Article
Full lenth article
Letter to Editor
Original Article
Research article
Retraction
Retraction notice
Review
Review Article
SPECIAL ISSUE: ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY
5.3
Impact Factor
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Corrigendum
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Full Length Article
Full lenth article
Letter to Editor
Original Article
Research article
Retraction
Retraction notice
Review
Review Article
SPECIAL ISSUE: ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original article
10 (
2_suppl
); S2004-S2008
doi:
10.1016/j.arabjc.2013.07.028

Comparative conductimetric studies of salicylic acid in methanol–water mixtures at 25 °C

Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Sciences and Technology-Mohamed Boudiaf-Oran, P.O.B.1505 EL M’naouar, 31003 Oran, Algeria
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Sciences and Technology-Mohamed Boudiaf-Oran, P.O.B.1505 EL M’naouar, 31003 Oran, Algeria

⁎Corresponding author. Tel.: +213 771537746. adelaliothman@gmail.com (Adil A. Othman)

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Elsevier and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.
This paper is dedicated to the memory of the late Ali H. AL-Taiar.

Abstract

Conductivity data of salicylic acid in methanol–water mixtures were measured at 25 °C. The data were analyzed in two methods, the Hsia–Fuoss’s and Fuoss 78’s conductance equations and a comparison was made. The two methods concern the derivation of thermodynamic association constants and limiting molar conductivities for all solvent compositions. The limiting equivalent conductance decreases with the increase of methanol content in the binary mixtures over the whole range of the solvent composition, but the variation does not give a constant value of Walden product. The electrolytes were found to be practically completely associated in all studied solvent mixtures. The association constant of acid decreases with the increase in relative permittivity of the mixtures. The values of ionic coefficients of self diffusion and the ionic conductance at infinite solutions were estimated.

Keywords

Salicylic acid
Association constants
Walden product
Electrolyte conductivity
Diffusion coefficient
Ionic conductance
1

1 Introduction

Salicylic acid (o-hydroxybenzoic acid) is a phenolic compound present in plants, it is an important intermediary in the production of aspirin, and its derivatives were also used in the pharmaceutical and polymer industries for manufacture of disinfectants, antiseptics, and detergents (Khiati et al., 2007). Thermodynamic association constant values for salicylic acid in some alcohols and water solutions were derived potentiometrically (Grunwald and Berkowitz, 1951; Novãk et al., 1997; Völgyi et al., 2007).

Literature reveals that there is little work on the conductimetric behavior of salicylic acid in these solvents mixtures (Bray et al., 1957; Dippy et al., 1964; Mandal and Lahiri, 1976; Papadoupolis and Avarans, 1991; Sadiq et al., 1993; Sadiq and Khan, 1993). We present in this paper the conductance data of salicylic acid at 25 °C in methanol–water mixtures in composition from 0 to 90.59 mass% of the co-solvent. Also we used the Hsia–Fuoss and Fuoss 78 equation to analyze the conductance–concentration data and to derive the thermodynamic association constants, KA, the limiting molar conductivities, Λ0 and Walden product.

2

2 Experimental

Salicylic acid (o-hydroxybenzoic acid, puriss. p.a., ⩾99.5% from Aldrich was used without purification), methanol (purity >99%) and triply distilled water with the specific conductivity of 0.5 μS cm−1 were used for the preparation of binary mixtures. Densities of the mixtures were determined in a 20 mL pycnometer at (25.00 ± 0.05) °C. Viscosities of the mixtures were measured with Falling Ball viscometer “Gilmont instruments” with 0.2–1% of precision. Solvent mixtures were made up by weight, the densities, viscosity and relative permittivity constants of mixed solvents are given in Table 1.

Table 1 Properties of the solvent mixtures (methanol–water) at 25 °C.
Mass (%) CH3OH ρa/g m−3 ηb/centipoises ɛrc
0 0.996 0.891 78.48
19.79 0.971 1.526 69.85
37.54 0.934 1.572 61.50
49.97 0.919 1.569 55.76
72.55 0.869 1.356 45.32
90.59 0.822 1.033 36.63
Density of solvents.
Viscosity of solvents.
Relative permittivity data incorporated in this table have been taken from the literature(Xue and Traina, 1996).

The conductance measurements were carried out for the prepared solutions using a conductimeter CDM230 (with 0.2% of precision) with the cellule CDC641T (comprising two platinized platinum electrodes) connected to an ultra-thermostat to maintain the temperature constant at the desired temperature (±0.05 °C).

All solutions were made up by weight and volume concentrations in mole per liter by gradual dilution were calculated using the densities of the solvents. The molar conductivities, Λ, were calculated from the experimental electrolytic conductivities after correcting for the electrolytic conductivity of the pure solvent.

3

3 Data analysis

The experimental data were analyzed with Fuoss and Hsia (1967) and Fuoss 78 conductance equation (Fuoss, 1978).

3.1

3.1 Hsia–Fuoss method

For the partially dissociated (1:1) electrolytes Hsia and Fuoss proposed that:

(1)
Λ = Λ 0 - S γ c + E ( γ c ) In ( γ c ) + J 1 ( γ c ) + J 2 ( γ c ) 3 1 + K A cf 2 γ The activity coefficient was calculated according to the reference (Kuba and Hawlicka, 2003):
(2)
f = exp - A γ c 1 + BR γ c
with:
(3)
A = 2.791 × 10 6 ( ε γ T ) 3 / 2
(4)
B = 50.29 ( ε γ T ) 1 / 2

R is cosphere diameter, γ is the degree of dissociation, KA is the association constant for ion pairs and f is the mean activity coefficient of the free ions. Other terms have their usual meanings.

S, E, J1 and J2 were calculated using the equations given by Fernandez Prini (Prini, 1969).

The Eq. (1) is resolved for Λ0 and KA which minimizes:

(5)
σ 2 = j [ Λ j ( calcd ) - Λ j ( obsd ) ] 2 / ( n - 3 ) where n is the number of data points.

3.2

3.2 Fuoss 78 method

The limiting molar conductivity, Λ0, and association constant, KA, were deduced from the following equations:

(6)
Λ = p [ Λ 0 ( 1 + RX ) + EL ]
(7)
γ = 1 - K A c γ 2 f 2
(8)
In f = - β k 2 ( 1 + kR ) , β = e 2 ε r kT
which minimize the standard deviation:
(9)
σ 2 = j Λ j ( calcd ) - Λ j ( obsd ) 2 / ( n - 2 )
For additional precision and since the H2 polynoms of Fuoss are not equal at the explicit form correspondent, the expressions for RX and EL in Eq. (6) are the explicit relaxation and hydrodynamic terms respectively (Fuoss, 1978).

4

4 Results and discussion

Conductivity data for salicylic acid in methanol–water mixtures (36.63 ⩽ εr ⩽ 78.48; 0.891 ⩽ η ⩽ 1.572 poises) were measured in the concentration range (2.2910−6 ⩽ c ⩽ 1.1210−2mol L−1) at 25 °C. In the case of 90.59% of methanol the measures were unstable; hence we take the average value of conductivities.

For the two methods, no minimum is observed in Rσ% plots in accordance with the Fuoss conclusion (Fuoss, 1978), the R values were used equal to the Bjerrum distance according to the suggestions of Justice and others (Justice, 1971; Sadiq et al., 1993; Papadoupolis and Avarans, 1991).

Ostwald law to estimate initial values of Λ0 and KA was used. The conductance parameters of the acid: The molar conductance at infinite dilution, Λ0, standard deviations σ% based on the observed and calculated Λ values and acid association constants obtained by using the two methods are exhibited in Table 2.

Table 2 Conductance parameters of the salicylic acid in methanol–water mixtures at 25 °C.
Equationa Λ0/S cm2 mol−1 10−3KA/dm3 mol−1 σ% R/A
% CH3OH
0%
H–F 384.17 0.962 0.100 3.57
F78 386.06 1.004 0.024 3.57
19.79%
H–F 249.64 1.653 0.099 4.01
F78 249.99 1.699 0.002 4.01
37.54%
H–F 169.92 3.921 0.094 4.56
F78 170.03 4.000 0.022 4.56
49.97%
H–F 149.72 5.847 0.103 5.02
F78 150.16 6.013 0.054 5.02
72.55%
H–F 103.84 18.015 0.049 6.43
F78 105.45 19.126 0.042 6.43
90.59%
H–F 70.12 891.130 0.079 7.65
F78 70.29 900.887 0.076 7.65
H–F and F78 represent results obtained by using the Hsia–Fuoss and Fuoss 78 equations respectively.

Table 2 shows that Λ0 values were approximately similar; the limiting conductance for salicylic acid in aqueous solution calculated by H–F equation is in good agreement with the values 384.2 (Sadiq and Khan, 1993), 384.23 (Sadiq et al., 1993) reported in the literature using other methods of analysis.

The Λ0 values for salicylic acid in methanol water mixtures and those derived by using the Lee–Wheaton method (Sadiq et al., 1993) are compared (Fig. 1). The limiting equivalent conductance decreased with the increase in the contents of methanol in water suggesting the increased ion–solvent and solvent–solvent interactions.

Variation of the limiting equivalent conductance with composition of methanol.
Figure 1 Variation of the limiting equivalent conductance with composition of methanol.

Fig. 2 shows that the molar conductance for the acid decreases with the increase in the content of methanol in water and that is a result to the reduction of dissociates power of solvent tie in its relative permittivity. Less concentration conductance dependency is observed when the composition of methanol is more than 50%.

Variation of the molar conductance for the acid with composition of the solvent mixtures at 25 °C.
Figure 2 Variation of the molar conductance for the acid with composition of the solvent mixtures at 25 °C.

The σ% values show that the F78 model describes the conductivity of the acid in water rich region of the mixtures better than the HF model while they are comparable in methanol rich region of the mixtures. The difference between the KA values calculated by application of the two methods increases with composition of methanol in the mixtures.

The variation of Walden product with composition of the solvent mixtures (Fig. 3) presents a maximum between 12–20 mol% methanol, as has been found in this binary mixture for various electrolytes (Broadwater and Kay, 1970; Broadwater and Kay, 1971, 1976).The presence of this maximum shows that the limiting conductance of the solutions decreases more slowly along with growing of the methanol content in the mixture than it would be expected from the increase of viscosity of the mixed solvents in water rich region. The constancy of the Walden product also fails in general for small ions in mixed solvents (D’Aprano and Fuoss, 1963, 1975; Fuoss, 1959; Hemms, 1974; Skinner and Fuoss, 1966; Zwanzig, 1963, 1970).

Variation of the Walden product with the composition of the solvent mixture.
Figure 3 Variation of the Walden product with the composition of the solvent mixture.

The dependence of the thermodynamic acid dissociation pKa on the inverse of the solvents relative permittivity and a comparison of the values calculated by the H–F, F78 and Lee–Wealthon (Sadiq et al, 1993) methods are shown in Fig. 4. A similar variation was found for salicylic acid in water with other cosolvent mixtures such as ethanol (Mandal and Lahiri, 1976), 1-propanol (Papadoupolis and Avarans, 1991) and acetone (Sadiq et al., 1993). The pKa in aqueous solutions calculated by the two methods is in agreement with those found by other analyzed methods (Bray et al., 1957; Dippy et al., 1964; Papadoupolis and Avarans, 1991; Sadiq and Khan, 1993). The increased association on added methanol was interpreted by stabilization of anion with existence of an internal hydrogen bond formed between the carboxyl and hydroxyl groups (Bray et al., 1957; Dippy et al., 1964; Papadoupolis and Avarans, 1991).

Dependence of Pka on the inverse of the dielectric constants.
Figure 4 Dependence of Pka on the inverse of the dielectric constants.

The self diffusion coefficient of the proton D + 0 at infinite dilution was estimated from the work of Solntsev et al. 2000. The limiting conductance of proton Λ 0 + in the mixtures is calculated using the Nernst equation:

(10)
D + 0 = R T F 2 λ 0 + R and F denote gas and Faraday’ constants, respectively. Our Λ 0 + values are in agreement with the values reported in the literature (Apelbat, 2008, 2011). The Kohlrauch equation for the independent motion of ions and the Eq. (10) allowed us to calculate the limiting conductivity and self-diffusion coefficient of salicylate ion D - 0 (Table 3). The influence of the solvent composition on the ion limiting self diffusion coefficients and limiting ionic conductivities in methanol–water mixtures are shown in Fig. 5 and Figs. 6 and 7 respectively. The limiting self-coefficient diffusion of salicylate lies beneath that of proton, this is due to lower mobility of the anion compared with the hydronium ion, and D - 0 varies slightly with relative permittivity than D + 0 .
Table 3 Walden product, ion limiting self-diffusion coefficient (10−5 cm2 s−1), and limiting ionic conductivity (S cm2 mol−1) in methanol water mixtures at 25 °C.
W% CH3OH Λ0η Λ 0 + Λ 0 - D 0 + D 0 -
0 3.44 349.92 36.14 9.34 0.96
19.79 3.81 226.94 23.05 6.06 0.61
37.54 2.67 151.24 18.79 4.04 0.50
49.97 2.36 132.43 17.73 3.54 0.47
72.55 1.43 87.28 18.17 2.33 0.48
90.59 0.73 48.46 21.89 1.29 0.58
Limiting diffusion coefficient of proton and salicylate in water methanol mixtures.
Figure 5 Limiting diffusion coefficient of proton and salicylate in water methanol mixtures.

The variation of the limiting ionic conductivities (Fig. 6) and (Fig. 7) composition of methanol confirms that the interaction ion–solvent is very different for the two ions. Fig. 6 shows that the decrease of Λ0 depends on the reduction of excess mobility of proton in adding the methanol in water.

Variation of limiting conductance of proton with composition of methanol.
Figure 6 Variation of limiting conductance of proton with composition of methanol.
Variation of limiting conductance of salicylate with composition of methanol.
Figure 7 Variation of limiting conductance of salicylate with composition of methanol.

The variation of limiting ionic conductance of salicylate with composition of methanol divided the solvent mixtures into two regions: the water rich region where this anion is more stabilized by hydrogen bonding of the two solvents, and the methanol rich region where it becomes less solvated so its mobility is increased. By extrapolating this curve, we estimated the value of 24.73 S cm2 mol−1 of salicylate ion methanol.

5

5 Conclusions

Conductivity data of salicylic acid in methanol–water solution mixtures were obtained by using the two methods (Hsia–Fuoss and Fuoss78) at 25 °C. This study shows that the Λ0 variation with the composition of methanol in the mixtures is the same found by the H–F, F78 and Lee–Wheaton conductance equations while the association constant depends on the model than is the limited conductance. Until more data are available no conclusions will be drawn about the magnitudes of KA values obtained here.

The Λ0η does not show constancy with change in solvent composition indicating appreciable ion–solvent interactions.

The limiting conductance of salicylate in water methanol mixtures is sensitive to electrostatic and hydrodynamic interactions in this solution.

References

  1. , . Representation of electrical conductances for polyvalent electrolytes by the Quint–Viallard conductivity equation. Universal curves of limiting conductances and Walden products of electrolytes in mixed solvents. J. Solution Chem.. 2011;40:1544.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , . Limiting conductances of electrolytes and the Walden product in mixed solvents in a phenomenological approach. Phys. Chem. B. 2008;112:7032.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , . Potentiometric pKa determination of water-insoluble compounds: validation study in methanol/water mixtures. Int. J. Pharm.. 1997;151:235.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , . Chemical constitution and the dissociation constants of monocarboxylic acids. Part XVII. Ortho-effects in substituted salicylic acids. J. Chem. Soc 1957:2405.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , . Solvent structure in aqueous mixtures. II. Ionic mobilities in tert-butyl alcohol–water mixtures at 25°. J. Phys. Chem.. 1970;74:3802.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , . Electrolyte-solvent interaction. X. Dipole solvation. J. Phys. Chem.. 1963;67:1722.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , . Conductance in isodielectric mixtures III. i-Butyronitrile with chlorobenzene, o-dichlorobenzene, p-dichlorobenzene, 1,2-dichloroethane, and n-pentanol. J. Solution Chem.. 1975;4:175.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , . Chemical constitution and the dissociation constants of monocarboxylic acids. Part XIX. Some substituted benzoic and phenyl-acetic acids in 10 and 25% (w/w) acetone–water solutions. J. Chem. Soc. 1964:1275.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , . Dependence of the Walden product on dielectric constant. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.. 1959;45:807.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , . Conductance–concentration function for the paired ion model. J. Phys. Chem.. 1978;82:2427.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , , . Association of 1-1 salts in water. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.. 1967;57:1550.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , , . The measurement and correlation of acid dissociation constants for carboxylic acids in the system ethanol–water. Activity coefficients and empirical activity functions. J. Am. Chem. Soc.. 1951;73:4939.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. , . Influence of true chemical equilibrium on the viscosity–mobility product of electrolytes. J. Phys. Chem.. 1974;78:907.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. , . An interpretation for the distance parameter of the Fuoss–Onsager conductance equation in the case of ionic association. Electrochim. Acta. 1971;16:701.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. , , . Solvent structure in aqueous mixtures-I. ionic mobilities in dioxane–water mixtures at 25 °C. Electrochim. Acta. 1971;16:676.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. , , . Solvent structure in aqueous mixtures. III. Ionic conductances in ethanol–water mixtures at 10 and 25 °C. J. Solution Chem.. 1976;5:57.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. , , , . Synthesis and antibacterial activity of 1,3,4-oxadiazole and 1,2,4-triazole derivatives of salicylic acid and its synthetic intermediates. S. Afr. J. Chem.. 2007;60:20. (references there in)
    [Google Scholar]
  18. , , . Hydration and association in solutions of tetraalkylammonium iodides. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.. 2003;5:4858.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. , , . Determination of the dissociation constants of salicylic acid in water–ethanol mixtures by modified conductometric methods. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn.. 1976;49:1829.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. , , . Dissociation of salicylic acid, 2,4-,2,5-and 2,6-dihydroxybenzoic acids in 1-propanol–water mixtures at 25 °C. J. Solution Chem.. 1991;20:293.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. , . Conductance of electrolyte solutions. A modified expression for its concentration dependence. Trans. Faraday Soc.. 1969;65:3311.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. , , . Thermodynamic dissociation constants of salicylic and monochloroacetic acids in mixed solvent systems from conductance measurements at 25 °C. J. Solution Chem.. 1993;22:437.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. , , , . Conductivities and thermodynamic dissociation constants for salicylic acid in binary mixed solvent systems at 298.15. J. Chem. Eng. Data.. 1993;38:288.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. , , . Effect of pressure on conductance. II. Walden products and ionic association in methanol. J. Phys. Chem.. 1966;70:1426.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. , , , , . Photochemistry of “super” photoacids. 2. Excited-state proton transfer in methanol/water mixtures. J. Phys. Chem. A. 2000;104:4658.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. , , , , , , . Potentiometric and spectrophotometric pKa determination of water–insoluble compounds: validation study in a new cosolvent system. Anal. Chim. Acta. 2007;583:418.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. , , . Stability of metal−organic complexes in acetone− and methanol−water mixtures. Environ. Sci. Technol.. 1996;30:3177.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. , . Dielectric friction on a moving ion. J. Chem. Phys.. 1963;38:1603.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. , . Dielectric friction on a moving ion. II. Revised theory. J. Chem. Phys.. 1970;52:3625.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections