5.2
Impact Factor
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Corrigendum
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Full Length Article
Full lenth article
Letter to Editor
Original Article
Research article
Retraction notice
Review
Review Article
SPECIAL ISSUE: ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY
5.3
Impact Factor
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Corrigendum
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Full Length Article
Full lenth article
Letter to Editor
Original Article
Research article
Retraction notice
Review
Review Article
SPECIAL ISSUE: ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
9 (
2_suppl
); S1478-S1486
doi:
10.1016/j.arabjc.2012.03.012

Complexation of trivalent lanthanide cations by different chelation sites of malic and tartric acid (composition, stability and probable structure)

Laboratory of Materials Interface and Chemistry of the Environment (LIME), University Hassan II, Faculty of Sciences, Ain Chock, BP 5366, Maârif, Casablanca, Morocco
Laboratory of Polymers, Biopolymers, Surfaces, UMR 6270 CNRS, University of Rouen, Faculty of Sciences, F-76821 Mont-Saint-Aignan, France

⁎Corresponding author. Tel.: +212 667898763. medriri@gmail.com (Mohammed Riri)

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Elsevier and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Peer review under responsibility of King Saud University.

Abstract

The formation of colorless gadolinium complexes (x,y,z) between x gadolinium ions, y ligands and z protons of some organic acids has been studied in aqueous solution. In this work we shall present the results of investigations on the interaction of the gadolinium ion (Gd3+) with different chelation sites of malic and tartric acid formed in dilute solution for pH values between 5.50 and 7.50. The structures of these new organometallic complexes are Gd3(C4H4O5)2·(NO3)3·nH2O and Gd3(C4H4O6)2·(NO3)3·nH2O ( C 4 H 4 O 5 2 - : malate ions and C 4 H 4 O 6 2 - : tartrate ions). These colorless gadolinium complexes of malate and tartrate ions have no absorption band UV–visible, the indirect photometry detection (IPD) study; have identified major tri-nuclear complexes of these dicarboxylic acids, giving for these colorless complexes a (3,2,2) and (3,2,3), respectively. Composition and apparent stability constant depends on the acidity of the medium. To complement previous results and to propose probable structures for these new complexes detected in solution FT-IR and FT-Raman spectroscopy have been conducted to identify the different chelation sites for both ligands.

Keywords

Gadolinium complexes
Malate ions
Tartrate salt
Indirect photometry detection (IPD)
Apparent stability constant
Chelation sites
1

1 Introduction

In the field of analysis of very dilute solutions, we developed a new detection technique for determining the compositions and stabilities of some colorless organometallic complexes, which have no absorption band UV–visible. This technique is the indirect photometry detection (IPD), based on competitive reactions by ligand–ligand exchange. The method is simple, reproducible, effective and applicable to very dilute solutions. Thus, the importance of IPD technique was also revealed by its adaptation to other techniques of separation and determination, such as liquid chromatography (Rocklin, 1991; Verchère and Dona, 1992; Meek and Pietrzyk, 1988), capillary electrophoresis (Morin et al., 1994) and continuous flow analysis (FIA) (Hlaibi, 1995; Ramshing et al., 1980). Some studies (Hlaïbi et al., 1995) show that this technique is very effective in identifying some colorless tungstate complexes of sugars and organic acids. The detection or monitoring of certain diseases sometimes requires injection of contrast agent based gadolinium because of the interesting electronic and magnetic properties of this ion (Nonat et al., 2006; Chatterton et al., 2005). Most of the contrast agents that are used in MRI are complexes of amino acids and carboxylic acids with lanthanides (Anelli et al., 1997). Currently, most contrast agents used in MRI are complexes types of gadolinium–DTPA, gadolinium–BOPTA, gadolinium–DOTA (Möller and Dulski, 2010; Nwe et al., 2010) and its analogs which are modified to enhance the contrast effect on fabric (Seun Ah Lee et al., 2011; Möller et al., 2011; Kuan-Ju et al., 2011). Recent studies have shown that the lanthanide complexes of coumarin-3-carboxylic acid (2-oxo-2H-chromene-3-carboxylic acid) (Kostova et al., 2007; Stifan et al., 2008), exhibit antiproliferative activity (Kostova et al., 2007). In this work, investigations by indirect photometry detection (IPD) were carried out to study the interaction of the trivalent gadolinium ions, with malate and tartrate ions (conjugate base of malic and tartric acid), detecting the majority of colorless complexes formed in solution and determining their composition and stability. To elucidate the structure and the chelation sites of these major malate and tartrate complexes of Gd3+ ions, the technique FT-IR and FT-Raman spectroscopy has been used fruitfully. Indeed, these three techniques (IPD, IR and Raman spectroscopy) are very useful for elucidating the formation reaction of the major complexes for the system (Gd(III)-malic acid and Gd(III)-tartric acid), hence help precisely determine the composition, stability and the nature of chelation sites for each of ligands, involved in the composition of detected complexes and propose probable structures for these new gadolinium complexes.

2

2 Experimental methods

2.1

2.1 Chemicals

Malic acid, tartric acid, Chrome Azurol S (H4Ch), Gd(III) nitrate and other chemicals were commercial products (Aldrich, Prolabo,…) of the purest available and analytical grade, used as received.

2.2

2.2 Indirect photometric detection

A standard Helios γ UV–visible spectrometer controlled by Vision 32 software was used for spectrometric measurements, using quartz cells of optical path length l = 1 cm. The absorption measurements have been performed at room temperature and at wavelength λmax = 545 nm. Stock solutions of Gd(III) nitrate and Chrome Azurol S (H4Ch), were prepared with concentrations of respectively 10−2 M and 10−3 M. In a typical experiment, a solution (v = 50 mL) of the colored sacrificial complex (Gd(III)-H4Ch) was prepared ([Gd3+]/[H4Ch] = 1.5), using it as a buffer of MESH (0.1 M) [2-(N-morpholino) sulfonic ethane acid]. The initial solution also contained a calculated amount of 1 M NaOH in order to obtain the desired pH value (pKa(MESH) = 6.2, experimental pH range (5.50–7.50). pH values are measured with a microprocessor pH meter HANNA 210 equipped with a combined electrode glass and calibrated with commercial buffers (pH 4.00 and 7.00). Then aliquots (v = 0.100–0.200 ml) of an aqueous solution of the malic and tartric acid (CL = 2 g/L) were added, using a Gilson micropipet of 0.200 ml. After each addition, the resulting solution was left at least 5 min in order to reach equilibrium (and thus a constant absorption value). Addition was repeated until a maximum volume of 2.00 ml of the organic acids solution was added. The change in the total volume was neglected. For fixed pH environments, the apparent formation constants log  K xyz was calculated from the equilibrium of the reaction of formation of these complexes. The absorption values for the undissociated (AF) and the totally dissociated (AI), sacrificial complex (Gd(III)-H4Ch), are used as determined in experiments using pure Chrome Azurol S (H4Ch), and an excess of Gadolinium(III) (performed at pH intervals of 0.20). Assuming various integers for the Gadolinium and organic acids stoichiometry, a formation constant is calculated for each added amount of ligands and corresponding absorption value. The results are rejected when a systematic variation of log  K xyz occurs with increasing added-up amount of ligands or when individual values of log  K xyz differed from the mean value by more than 2%.

2.3

2.3 IR spectroscopy

Samples were prepared by weighing the appropriate amount of malic and tartric acid (ligands) and (Gd(NO3)3·6H2O) adding H2O, mixing and finally adjusting the pH with concentrated HCl or NaOH. Concentrations of analyzed samples are 10−3 M. Analyses were performed using an infrared spectrometer, Fourier transform (FT-IR) Perkin Elmer BX, equipped with a DTGS detector, a splitter and a cesium iodide window. In this configuration, the interval of analysis is that the middle infrared, 6000–250 cm−1 and analysis are conducted on small samples, whose size is less than 1 mm3. Liquid samples are placed between two plates of very pure salt (KBr), these plates are transparent to infrared light and the spectra relative to free ligands and complexes have been plotted for frequencies from 4400 to 400 cm−1.

2.4

2.4 FT-RAMAN spectroscopy

The complexes are precepitated quickly at room temperature, at a concentration of 1 × 10−2 M and fixed pH values (higher than the acidity constant of acids studied). The precipitates were filtered, and dried in a drying oven. The complexes were insoluble in water, methanol and ethanol and well soluble in DMSO. The Raman spectra of the ligands (malic and tartric acid) and their new Gd(III) complexes were performed using a Raman spectrometer Fourier transform (FT-Raman) VERTEX 70 with a range of measurement (4000–50) cm−1, laser source NdYag (1.064 μm), a nominal power of 500 MW, detecting Ge with high sensitivity and a resolution of 4 cm−1 (64 scan). The spectra relative to free ligands (carboxylate ions) and complexed (Gd(III)-carboxylate ions), have been plotted for frequencies from 3600 to 200 cm−1.

3

3 Results and discussion

3.1

3.1 Indirect photometric detection study

The complexation reaction of x gadolinium ions (Gd3+) with y malate ions and y tartrate ions, and z protons (H+), is given by expression (I):

(I)
x Gd 3 + + y L 2 - + z H + ( x , y , z ) ( 3 x - 2 y + z ) + + n H 2 O Where L2− represents the ligands (malate and tartrate ion). The formation constant Kxyz (or stability constant βxyz) of the complexes are defined as the equilibrium constant:
(1)
K xyz = [ ( x , y , z ) ] · [ Gd 3 + ] - x · [ L 2 - ] - y · [ H + ] - z
Additionally, a conditional equilibrium constant K xyz is defined in case of constant pH value (buffered solution):
(2)
K xyz = [ ( x , y , z ) ] · [ Gd 3 + ] - x · ( C L ) - y
Where CL represents the analytical concentration of the uncomplexed ligand, all experiments are performed for pH values higher than pKa1 and pKa2 of malic acid and tartric acid, therefore. We have CL = [L2−] Using this equality, Eq. (1) can be written as:
(3)
K xyz = [ ( x , y , z ) ] · [ Gd 3 + ] - x · ( C L ) - y · [ H + ] - z = K xyz · [ H + ] - z
(4)
Thus log K xyz = log K xyz + z · pH
The complexation of the ligands can be studied using a spectrophotometric method. Since the reagents (malic and tartric acid) and their gadolinium complexes do not possess a characteristic UV–visible absorption spectrum, a second ligand (called the sacrificial ligand) is introduced. This second ligand must absorb in the UV–visible spectrum and form a colored complex with Gd3+ ions. Based on ligand–ligand displacement, the photometry method is said to be in the indirect mode. The dissociation of this colored complex has to cause large variations in the UV–visible spectrum which allows for the calculation of the concentration of the sacrificial complex. Using the formation constant of this colored complex, the concentration of the unknown complex can be obtained. Therefore, the sacrificial ligand must form a single colored complex of lower stability than the gadolinium complex under study. In this work, 3″-sulfo-2″,6″-dichloro-3,3′-dimethyl-4′-hydroxy-fuchsone-5,5′-dicarboxylic acid, often called Chrome Azurol S and notable H4Ch, has been used as sacrificial ligand. Chrome Azurol S is a tetraprotic acid with pKa values of 2.25 (H3Ch/(H2Ch2−), 4.71 (H2Ch2−/HCh3−) and 11.82 (HCh3−/(Ch4−) (Langmyhr and Klausen, 1963). In the experimental pH range (5.50–7.50), the formation of H4Ch, H3Ch and H2Ch2− has been neglected. It is an indicator which is generally used for the photometric proportioning of the metal ions in solution (Dona and Verchère, 1991; Malt, 1961). The interaction of the H4Ch with gadolinium ions (Gd3+), gives a colored reagent (λmax = 545 nm) of average stability for values of pH ranging between 5.50 and 7.50. The buffer “MESH”. [2-(N-Morpholino) sulfonic ethane acid] was adopted to fix pH in the study of the sacrificial complex (Gadolinium-H4Ch), gadolinium–malate and gadolinium–tartrate complexes. We chose this buffer because it does not present any interaction with Gd3+ ions and so we would be able to work in the range of pH where the stability of the sacrificial complex is maximal.

3.2

3.2 Formation of the colored sacrificial complex Gd-Chrome Azurol (HCh3−)

The majority of organometallic complexes studied are colorless. Thus the study of the formation of the sacrificial complex Gd(III)-HCh3− is very important, because this steps decisive parameters (composition and stability) of these new complexes gadolinite. In this sense and in the recent work published (Riri et al., 2011) we saw that the composition and stability of the sacrificial complex were determined colorful, they found a complex type (3,2,3) and stability constant log K323 = 16.27 by the following reaction:

(II)
3 Gd 3 + + 2 HCh 3 - + 3 H + ( 3 , 2 , 3 ) + nH 2 O ( II ) We use these results to study organometallic complexes gadolinium–malate and gadolinium–tartrate.

3.3

3.3 The composition and stability of the Gd(III)-acids system

If the studied ligands (OOC–CH2–CHOH–COO (malate) and OOC–CHOH–CHOH–COO (tartrate)) are added to a colored solution of the sacrificial complex (3,2,3), this Chrome Azurol S (HCh3−) complex will dissociate. To calculate the complex concentration of the HCh3− ions, the absorption values of the totally complexed (AF), and the completely dissociated (AI) HCh3− ions have to be determined. Then the following equations can be used:

(5)
[ ( 3 , 2 , 3 ) ] = ( C HCh ) initial ( A - A I ) / ( A F - A I )
(6)
( C HCh ) free = ( C HCh ) initial · ( A F - A ) / ( A F - A I )
When the conditional equilibrium constant K 323 of the sacrificial complex is known, the concentration of free gadolinium ion ([Gd3+]), can be calculated using Eqs. (5) and (6).

Knowing [(3,2,3)] and [Gd3+], the concentration of the gadolinium complex under study [(x,y,z)] (balanced reaction I) can be determined using the gadolinium balance equation:

(7)
x [ ( x , y , z ) ] = C Gd - [ ( 3 , 2 , 3 ) ] - [ Gd 3 + ] CGd the initial gadolinium concentration.

In a similar way, the concentration of the free ligand is obtained by Eq. (8):

(8)
( C L 2 - ) free = ( C L 2 - ) initial - y · [ ( x , y , z ) ] It should be also noted that a perfect knowledge of the characteristics of the sacrificial colored complex (Gd3HCh2) is necessary. The determination of the composition and the stability of the sacrificial complex and the precision of the conditions of its formation are paramount stages to apply the indirect photometry technique. In each experiment, the ligands (OOC–CH2–CHOH–COO (malate) and OOC–CHOH–CHOH–COO (tartrate)) are added stepwise in order to measure the absorption at different values (at least 12) of the overall initial concentration of these studied ligands. The correct K xyz is looked for by varying x and y in order to obtain a constant value for all values of C L 2 - . If K xyz is determined at different pH values, the slope of the log  K xyz vs. pH plot reveals the number z of protons that is necessary for the formation of the studied gadolinium complexes by the use of Eq. (4), since the value of Kxyz is independent of pH. Now the stability and the total composition of the gadolinium–malate and gadolinium–tartrate complexes have been determined.

3.4

3.4 Determination of the composition and the stability constant of these new gadolinium complexes

With an aim of determining the composition and the stability constant of the gadolinium–malate and gadolinium–tartrate complexes, we monitored the evolution of the absorbance during the disappearance of the sacrificial complex by the addition of increasing quantities of dicarboxylate ions. For a given volume (50 ml) of a solution containing sacrificial complex (3,2,3) (10−4 M), we added increasing quantities of solution (OOC-CH2-CHOH-COO (malate) and OOC–CHOH–CHOH–COO (tartrate)), with known concentration. The spectrophotometric study carried out with fixed wavelength (λmax = 545 nm), showed a reduction in the absorbance of the solution progressively with the addition of the dicarboxylate ions (Fig. 1). The dissociation of the sacrificial complex, relating to the reduction in the absorbance by the addition of malate and tartrate ions solution, is done in favor of the formation of the colorless complex between Gd3+ and dicarboxylate ion species.

Formation of colored sacrificial complex (Gd3HCh2) and decomposition of this complex by addition of malic and tartric acid.
Figure 1
Formation of colored sacrificial complex (Gd3HCh2) and decomposition of this complex by addition of malic and tartric acid.

The curves C2 and C3 in Fig. 1, clearly show that the absorbance decreases and stabilizes. This stability indicates that all Gd3+ ions, initially present in the solution have reacted to added malate and tartrate ions. Knowing the concentration of gadolinium ions and the quantity of (OOC–CH2–CHOH–COO and OOC–CHOH–CHOH–COO) ions from the added volume of the malic and tartric acid solution, necessary to reach this stage of absorption, we could determine the molar ratio q (gadolinium/carboxylate), involved in the complexation reaction. The preceding experiment was carried out for different values of pH between 5.50 and 7.50, the way in which the absorption decreases, depends on the pH of the medium and on the formation constant of the detected complex (Gadolinium–acid), as well as on the absorption values (AI) and (AF) of the free and totally complexed Chrome Azurol S (HCh3−). Analyzing the experimental data with the computer program written from the balanced reaction (I), the results confirm the reproducibility of the molar ratio “q” and to determine the composition and apparent stability constant K xyz (Table 1). The ratio q = [Gd3+]/[Ligand] = x/y is determined experimentally from a computer program written in Microsoft Excel and expressed from the reaction of complex (reaction I). This program is not a theoretical modeling. But this is a translation of the reaction steps of the balance (I) for ease of calculation. Fig. 2 Represents an example of calculating the ratio q at pH 5.60 of tartric acid complexed with gadolinium, where we inserted the two experimental values: the volumes added (Va) of ligand and the absorbance (A) correspond for each added volume Va, to seek the values of x and y to the value of conditional constant (log K′) which remains constant. The calculations are repeated for different experimental pH between 5.50 and 7.50. We obtained a ratio q = x/y for the two acids equal 3/2. We conducted several studies of the complexation of acids with the gadolinium ion, and we obtained values of q depending on the nature of the acid studied (q = 2/1, 2/2, 3/2, 5/2...).

Table 1 The apparent stability of the tri-nuclear detected complexes, depending on the acidity of the medium.
pH 5.63 5.80 6.00 6.11 6.30 6.54
log K 32 z Gd–malate 20.21 19.86 19.26 18.88 18.38
Gd–tartrate 19.73 19.28 18.69 17.75 17.20
q = x(Gd3+)/y(L2-) 3/2

Buffer (MES/MESH), λmax = 545 nm, l = 1 cm; [HCh3−]total = 10−4 M, [L2−]init = 2 g/L.

With L2− represent malate ions and tartrate ions.

Example of program image used to calculate the ratio q the stability and log K′moy at pH 5.60.
Figure 2
Example of program image used to calculate the ratio q the stability and log K′moy at pH 5.60.

The data-processing treatment of the preceding experimental results, shows that these tri-nuclear detected complexes are formed between the gadolinium ions and carboxylate ions (malate and tartrate), resulting from the interaction of three Gd3+ ions equivalents with two equivalents of carboxylate species, so a molar ratio q = x(Gd3+)/y(L2−) = 3/2 in all pH range between 5.50 and 7.50.

Therefore, for the complexation reaction of Gd3+ ions with malate and tartrate ions at this pH range, these results and the Eqs. ()()()(1)–(3) allow us to write the following expressions.

(III)
3 Gd 3 + + 2 L 2 - + z H + ( 3 , 2 , z ) + n H 2 O The value of z can be positive, negative or null. The stability constants of these complexes are defined by:
(9)
K 32 z = [ ( 3 , 2 , z ) ] · [ Gd 3 + ] - 3 · [ L 2 - ] - 2 · [ H + ] - z
Conditional stability constant K 32 z which is defined in case of constant pH value (buffered solution):
(10)
K 32 z = [ ( 3 , 2 , z ) ] · [ Gd 3 + ] - 3 · ( C L ) - 2
For these experimental pH values higher than the pKa1 and pKa2 of carboxylic acids studies, CL = [L2−], thus:
(11)
K 32 z = [ ( 3 , 2 , z ) ] · [ Gd 3 + ] - 3 · ( C L ) - 2 · [ H + ] - z = K 32 z · [ H + ] - z
(12)
And log K 32 z = log K 32 z - z · pH
The evolution of log  K 32 z at different pH values is represented in Fig. 3, this evolution is linear and the slope of the straight line is equal to −2 for gadolinium–malate and −3 for gadolinium-tartrate. The value (z = 2 and 3) represents the number of protons involved in the formation reaction of these new tri-nuclear complexes (3,2,2) and (3,2,3) for gadolinium–malate and gadolinium–tartrate, respectively.
Evolution of log  K 32 z ′ for gadolinium complexes.
Figure 3
Evolution of log  K 32 z for gadolinium complexes.

The Eq. (12) allowed us to calculate the stability constants of complexing reaction of acids studied with gadolinium ion, the experimental results obtained by the IPD for gadolinium–malate (log K322 = 31.52 ± 0.05) and gadolinium–tartrate (log K323 = 36.70 ± 0.05).

Consequently, the spectrophotometric results concerning the interaction of the Gd3+ ion with tartrate and malate show that the complexation reaction uses three Gd3+ ions, two carboxylates and fixation of two and three H+ protons. According to the literature (Hummel et al., 2002), the Gd3+ ion can be presented in various hydrolyzed forms in aqueous solution and these new tri-nuclear gadolinium complexes detected in solution at an experimental pH range are probably formed from the hydrolyzed form Gd ( OH ) 2 + . In order to confirm our results, to have more information on the nature of these new gadolinium complexes and likely to propose a probable structure for these tri-nuclear species, we carried out IR and Raman spectroscopy investigations.

4

4 Vibrational analysis

4.1

4.1 Infrared spectral study

IR spectroscopic studies are used to identify different groups of malic acid and tartric acid (ligands) involved in chelation sites to form gadolinium complexes which are detected in solution. Table 2 presents the bibliographic data (Colthup et al., 1990; Jhon et al., 1979), theory vibration value of various groups: –OH, –C⚌O, –COO– and –C–C⚌O and the experimental vibration value of analyzed spectra of two free carboxylic acids and their complexes studied in this work.

Table 2 Infrared vibration frequencies for malic, tartric acid and their complexes.
Groups Experimental spectra Reduction of the free acid bands after complexation % Réf. [13] Réf. [14]
v (cm−1) Gd–tartrate Gd–malate v (cm−1) v (cm−1)
–O-H 3600–3300 96 93 3550–3500 3650–3590
–C⚌O 1700–1650 93 89 1800–1740 1750–1700
–COO 1050–400 97 97 700–590
CC⚌O 550–465

Experimental measures IR spectra for the two solutions free acid and its complex in interval [4400–400 cm−1].

The experimental spectra obtained declared in Table 2 for the analyzed samples, clearly indicate that the vibration bands of the groups:–OH,–C⚌O and COO–, have seriously reduced passing the free to complexed ligands. So, for each of the two ligands involved in the formation of these detected tri-nuclear complexes, the four oxygen atoms of the ionized carboxylic groups, participate in chelation sites, and the OH group in α,β-positions of the ionized group (–COO–) of tartric and malic acid (Riri et al., 2011). Moreover, the vibration Infra red of Gd(III)-O which is formed in the detectable complexes is located in 150–780 cm−1 region with weak spectra (Kostova et al., 2007; Roeges, 1994).

4.2

4.2 Raman spectral study

A detailed analysis of vibrations in Raman spectroscopy was performed on the basis of comparison of experimental vibrational spectra obtained of malic acid, tartric acid and their gadolinium complexes. One of these FT-Raman spectra of free ligands and their complexes with Gd(III) are shown in Fig. 4. Tables 3 and 4 represent different Raman vibrations for free ligands (tartric and malic acid) and their complexes.

Experimental FT-Raman spectra in the range 3600–200 cm−1 of free Malic acid and Gd(III)–malate complex.
Figure 4
Experimental FT-Raman spectra in the range 3600–200 cm−1 of free Malic acid and Gd(III)–malate complex.
Table 3 Experimental Raman vibrational frequencies of free malic acid and its Gd(III) complex.
Malic acid Assignments
Free Complex
3395 vw ν(OH)
2990 m ν(CH)
2945vs 2936 m ν(CH)
1677 sbr ν ( C⚌O ) ν ( C⚌O ) Two C⚌O vibrations for free malic acid because they aren t the same environment
1635 sbr
1600 wbr ν(H2O)
1445 m 1451 w νs(C–C) + δ(CH2)
1423 s νs(C–C) + δ(COO-)
1379 w/1351 s νs(C–C) + δ(OH) + δ(COO)
1386 m δ(CCH) + γ(CH2) + ν(C–O)
1310 w 1325 vw δ(CCH) + δ(C–O–H) + t(CH2)
1277 vw 1280 vw ν(CCCC) + ν(C–O) + ν(C–C) + τ(CH2)op
1222 vw 1211 vw ν(C–O)ip + ν(C–C)ip + δ(CH2)
1186 w/1099 w δ(CCCC) + δ(CH2)+δ(CC–O)
1069 vs νas(NO3)
1048 w δ(NO2)
965 vs/913 m ν(C–C)ip + ρ(CH2) + γ(OH)
973 vw ν(CCCC) + δ(CCH)op
884 m 886 w ν(C–O)op + ν(C–C)op + νs(NO2)
750 s δ(O–C⚌O) + δ(C–O)
725 m δ(ONO)
662 w/612 m δas(C–C–O–H) + γ(C⚌O)
600w ν(Gd–O) (carboxylic)
547 w ν(Gd–O) (carboxylic)
536 w τ(C–O) + δ(C–C–O)
441 w ρ(O–C⚌O)
402 w ω(O–C⚌O)
346 w t(OH)
285 w δas(C–C–C–C)
187 s ν(Gd–O) (NO3)

Notation: ν:stretching; νas: asymmetric stretching; νs: symmetric stretching; δ: in-plane bending; γ: out-of-plane bending; ω: wagging; τ: twisting; ρ: rocking; t: torsional.

vs: very strong; s: strong; w: weak; vw: very weak; m: medium; br: broad.

Table 4 Experimental Raman vibrational frequencies of free tartric acid and its Gd(III) complex.
Tartric acid Assignments
Free Complex
3400 vw ν(OH)
3210 vw ν(OH)
2975 vs 2946 m ν(CH)
2931vs νs(CH2)
1684 sbr ν(C⚌O) A single C⚌O vibration for free tartric acid because this molecule is symmetrical.
1610 wbr ν(H2O)
1463/1441s 1447 m νs(C–C) + δ(CH2) + δ(COO)
1412 vs νs(C–C) + δ(OH) + δ(COO)
1374/1338 s 1386 s δ(CCH) + γ(CH2) + ν(C–O) δ(C–O–H)
1280 m 1292 w ν(CCCC) + ν(C–O) + ν(C–C) + τ(CH2)op
1244 m 1233 w ν(C–O)ip + ν(C–C)ip + δ(CH2)
1212/1112 m δ(CCCC) + δ(CH2)+δ(CC–O)
1067 vs δ(CC–O) + δ(C–C–C–C)
1060 vs νas(NO3)
1046 s δ(NO2)
993/923 vs 1008/940 m ν(C–C)ip + ρ(CH2) + γ(OH) + ν(CCCC) δ(CCH)op
885 vs ν(C–O)op + ν(C–C)op
850 m 859 m δ(O–C⚌O) + δ(C–O) + ρ(CH2) + νs(NO2)
811vs δ(ONO)
748 w ν(Gd–O) (carboxylic)
725 m ν(Gd–O) (carboxylic)
721 m δas(C–C–O–H) + γ(C⚌O) + t(–C–C)
644/610 m 563 w τ(C–O) + δ(C–C–O) + ν(C–C)
537 vs ρ(O–C⚌O) + ν(C–C)
490 m ω(O–C⚌O)
370 w t(OH) + δ(C–C–O)
344w δas(C–C–C–C) + τ(C–C)
200 s ν(Gd–O) (NO3)

Notation: ν:stretching; νas: asymmetric stretching; νs: symmetric stretching; δ: in-plane bending; γ: out-of-plane bending; ω: wagging; τ: twisting; ρ: rocking; t: torsional.

vs: very strong; s: strong; w: weak; vw: very weak; m: medium; br: broad.

The Raman spectra obtained show the OH vibrations (3450 ± 150 cm−1) (Kostova et al., 2007; Roeges, 1994). We also see two bonds of OH group (3400 and 3210 cm−1) for free tartric acid one of carboxylic groups and the other for OH in α position. Vibrations of C⚌O are located in (1680 ± 45 cm−1) (Roeges, 1994; Sundaraganesan et al., 2007), the free malic acid presents two vibrations of C⚌O group (1677 and 1635 cm−1) because this molecule is not symmetric, the free tartric acid presents one vibration C⚌O because this molecule is symmetric, these vibration bands of the free acids were not detected in the spectra of the complexes indicating that the deprotonated ligands form participates in the complexes. Vibrational band of the group O–C⚌O has been reduced passing from free ligand to complex. Therefore all the oxygen atoms are involved in the formation of these new gadolinium complexes. There are also vibration spectra (weak broad) of the complexes in (1630 ± 20 cm−1) indicating the existence of water molecules (Horiba, xxxx), Intense spectra that are observed in the complex near 1060 cm−1 indicate the existence of the nitrate ion (Kostova et al., 2007) and the vibrations located in 1048 cm−1 for Gd–malate and 1046 cm−1 for Gd–tartrate are vibrations of deformation of NO2 (Sundaraganesana et al., 2005). Vibrations of the bonds formed of Gd(III)-oxygen carboxylic acids are located in 600, 547 cm−1 with a weak spectra for Gd–Malic acid and in 748, 725 cm−1 with a weak spectra for Gd–Tartric acid (Horiba, xxxx; Smith and Geoffrey, 2005). The links Gd(III)-oxygen of nitrate are in the vicinity of 190 ± 15 cm−1 (Sundaraganesana et al., 2005). Different vibrations of C–C (aliphatic chains) appeared in a long field [(350 ± 70 cm−1 and 1220 ± 100 cm−1)] with intensities medium and intense intensities (Horiba, xxxx; Padmaja et al., 2006; Sundaraganesan et al., 2007). Bands in the 2950 ± 80 cm−1 region were assigned to the vibration modes of CH and CH2 (Gunasekaran and Ponnusaymy, 2005]. So, for each of the two malate ions involved in the formation of this detected tri-nuclear complexes, the four oxygen atoms of the ionized carboxylic groups, participate in chelation sites, and the OH group in α-position of the ionized group (–COO–). Therefore, these new tri-nuclear gadolinium complexes contain two types of sites, a single central bidentate mono-nuclear site with the participation of only OH groups in α,β-positions and two lateral tetradentate mono-nuclear sites, each consisting of four oxygen atoms of two ionized carboxylic functions, belonging to the two malate ions and two tartrate ion (–OOC-CH2-CHOH-COO– and –OOC-CHOH-CHOH-COO–) that are involved in the formation of these new detected gadolinium organometallic complexes. The OH group in α,β-positions of the carboxylic function is involved in the formation of new gadolinium complexes without ionization, a complex of europium ion with erythritol was synthesized in a ratio 2:2 (Yang and Xu, 2004), the authors showed that the four OH groups of erythritol were involved in the formation of the complex Eu-erythritol. Indeed, all these results can offer for these tri-nuclear complexes on the studied systems <<gadolinium–malic acid and gadolinium–tartric acid>>, and the developed structures of complexes obtained which are presented in Fig. 5.

Probable structure for the new organometallic complexes “gadolinium–malate” and “gadolinium–tartrate”.
Figure 5
Probable structure for the new organometallic complexes “gadolinium–malate” and “gadolinium–tartrate”.

5

5 Conclusion

In this work, we used three techniques to study the interactions of the trivalent Gd(III) ions with different ionic forms of malic and tartric acid and identify the composition, stability, different chelation sites for the reactions of complexation and structures of the major colorless complexes, formed in solution for pH values between 5.50 and 7.50. The indirect photometry detection (IPD) was used successfully to determining the composition and the stability of these major gadolinium complexes. The Gd(III)3-malate2(NO3)3·nH2O and Gd(III)3-tartrate2(NO3)3·nH2O were two new organometallic complexes with the composition (3,2,2), (3,2,3) and a high stability log K322 = 31.52 ± 0.05, log K323 = 36.70 ± 0.05 respectively. Thus, two different organometallic complexes had been identified for the interval of studied pH. The results of studies done FT-IR and Raman spectroscopy, clearly showed that in these tri-nuclear complexes type of Gd3+ ions, all oxygens of the two ionized carboxylic functions (–COO) and the oxygen atom of OH group in the α-position, were involved in chelation sites, while, studies conducted by (Hlaïbi et al., 2009) showed, that for the tungstic complexes of α-hydroxyl carboxylic acids, carbonyl function (–C⚌O) were excluded. In addition, all these results also indicate that the combination of these three techniques were very effective identifying and characterizing the colorless organometallic complexes of Gd3+ ions.

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to the National Center for Scientific and Technical Research (CNRST) and Afric Phar Laboratories in Morocco, services Raman and infrared spectroscopy. They are grateful to the reviewers for their valuable suggestions and relevant comments that have contributed to a better presentation of results, and thank Mr. Mohammed AJMANI professor of English language.

References

  1. , , , , , , , , . Acta Radiologica.. 1997;38:125-133.
  2. , , , , , , . J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. 2005:1129.
  3. , , , . Introduction to Infrared and Raman Spectroscopy. Academic Press; .
  4. , , . Analyst. 1991;116:533.
  5. , , . Indian J. Pure Appl. Phys.. 2005;43:838-843.
  6. M.Hlaibi, PhD Thesis, 1995. University Hassan II Ain Chock, Casablanca, Morocco.
  7. , , , , . Inorg. Chem.. 1995;34:4434.
  8. , , , , , . J. Mol. Struct.. 2009;920:310.
  9. Horiba Jobin Yvon Inc., 3880 Park Avenue, Edison, NJ 08820–3012. USA.
  10. , , , , , . Radiochimica Acta.. 2002;90(9–11):805.
  11. , , . Problème de chimie organique moderne. Paris: Interedition; .
  12. , , , . Metal-Based Drugs. 2007;15925 Article ID 15925
    [CrossRef]
  13. Kuan-Ju Chen, Stephanie M. Wolahan and al., 2011. Biomaterials. 32, 2160–2165.
  14. , , . Anal. Chem. Acta.. 1963;29:149.
  15. , . Anal. Chim. Acta.. 1961;25:289.
  16. , , . Anal. Chem.. 1988;60:1397-1400.
  17. , , . Chemie der Erde.. 2010;70:125-136.
  18. , , , , . Appl. Geochem.. 2011;26:140-149.
  19. , , , . Analusis. 1994;22:178-187.
  20. , , , , . Chem. Eur. J.. 2006;12:7133.
  21. , , , , , . Bioorg. Med. Chem.. 2010;18:5925-5931.
  22. , , , , , . J. Raman Spectrosc.. 2006;37:1427.
  23. , , , . Anal. Chim. Acta.. 1980;114:165.
  24. , , , , , , . J. Mater. Environ. Sci.. 2011;2:303-308.
  25. , . J. Chromatogr.. 1991;546:175-187.
  26. , . A Guide to the Complete Interpretation of Infrared Spectra of Organic Structures. New York: Wiley; .
  27. , , , , , , , . Magn. Reson. Imag.. 2011;29:83-90.
  28. Ewen Smith and Geoffrey Dent, 2005. Modern Raman Spectroscopy–A Practical Approach, ISBN 0-471-49668-5 (cloth:alk. paper) -ISBN 0-471-49794-0 (pbk.: alk. paper), Wiley. P. 15-19.
  29. Stifan Lis, Krzysztof Staninski, Tomasz Grzyb, 2008. International Journal of Photoenrgy. Article ID 131702.
  30. , , , , . Indian J. Pure Appl. Phys.. 2007;45:969-978.
  31. , , , , , , . Spectrochimica Acta.. 2005;61:2995-3001.
  32. , , . Analusis. 1992;20:437-450.
  33. , , , , , . Carbohydr. Res.. 2004;339:1679-1687.
Show Sections