Translate this page into:
Cs2.5H0.5PW12O40-catalyzed conjugate addition of indole to α, β-unsaturated ketones
⁎Corresponding authors. Tel./fax: +98 341 322 2033. hkhabazzadeh@mail.uk.ac.ir (Hojatollah Khabazzadeh), etavakoly@yahoo.com (Esmat Tavakolinejad Kermany)
-
Received: ,
Accepted: ,
This article was originally published by Elsevier and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.
Peer review under responsibility of King Saud University.
Abstract
Conjugate addition of indole to a variety of α, β-unsaturated ketones was catalyzed by the cesium salt of tungstophosphoric acid as a heterogeneous catalyst. The reaction was performed in molten tetrabutyl ammonium bromide.
Keywords
Indole
Conjugate addition
α, β-Unsaturated ketones
Heterogeneous
Heteropoly acid
Cesium salt
Tungstophosphoric
1 Introduction
Catalysis by heteropoly acids (HPAs) is a well established area (Hirano et al., 1996). Arguably, it is one of the most successful areas in contemporary catalysis, where systematic studies of HPA catalysts at the molecular level have led to a string of large-scale industrial applications. HPAs possess unique physicochemical properties, with their structural mobility and multifunctionality being the most important for catalysis (Kozhevnikov, 1998).
A major drawback to the HPAs is their high solubility in water and polar solvents, which impedes recovery and reuse of the catalyst. To conquer this shortcoming, several studies have put efforts into the immobilization of the HPAs on high-surface-area solid supports, such as zeolite, SiO2, and TiO2 (Friesen et al., 2000; Ozer and Ferry, 2002). Another way to overcome this problem is by changing these HPAs into their corresponding salts, which are generally insoluble in polar solvents.
The salts of heteropoly acids have many applications, such as catalysts in oxidation, alkylation, or hydrosulfurization reactions, resulting in many cases in higher specific conversion rates than those obtained with their parent acids (Misono and Nojiri, 1990; Nomiya et al., 1980; Izumi et al., 1983) and in higher thermal stability (Kobayashi and Iwamoto, 1998; Matsuo et al., 2000).
Ionic liquids (ILs) are very attractive and environmentally acceptable solvents because they have very low vapor pressure and are stable in a wide temperature range (Wasserscheid et al., 2000a,b). Therefore, they can be used as environmentally benign solvents for a number of chemical processes, such as separations (Huddleston et al., 1998), reactions (Sheldon, 2001), homogeneous two-phase catalysis (Holbrey and Seddon, 1999) and extractions (Eber et al., 2004).
The current emphasis on novel reaction media is motivated by the need for efficient methods for replacing of toxic or hazardous solvents and catalysts. The use of ionic liquids as novel reaction media may offer a convenient solution to both the solvent emission and the catalyst recycling problem (Gmouh et al., 2003). Another promising class of new media is molten salts which can be used instead of ionic liquids. Molten salts are generally thermally stable and chemically resistant.
Addition reactions of indoles to α, β-unsaturated compounds have received much interest because their derivatives occur in nature and possess a variety of biological activities (Sundberg, 1996). Since 3-position of indole is the preferred site for electrophilic substitution reaction, 3-alkyl or acyl indoles are versatile intermediates for the synthesis of a wide range of indole derivatives (Moore et al., 1984). The simple and direct method for the synthesis of 3-alkylated indoles involve the conjugate addition of indoles to α, β-unsaturated compounds in the presence of either protic (Szmuszkovicz, 1957) or Lewis acids (Bandini et al., 2002).
However, the acid-catalyzed conjugate addition of indoles requires careful control of acidity to prevent side reactions such as dimerisation or polymerization. Further, many of these procedures involve strongly acidic conditions, expensive reagents, longer reaction time, low yields of products due to the dimerisation of indoles or polymerization of vinyl ketones and cumbersome products isolation. Thus, a number of milder reagents and Lewis acids catalysts such as Al2O3 (Ranu et al., 1991) rhodium complex (Paganelli et al., 1991) Bi(NO3)3 (Khodaei et al., 2008), HClO4/SiO2 (Khan et al., 2006), have been developed over the past few years.
As a part of our ongoing research program to develop new synthetic methodologies (Khabazzadeh et al., 2009; Seyedi et al., 2009; Mozaffari Majd et al., 2010) we performed Cs2.5H0.5PW12O40 catalyzed conjugate addition of indole with α, β-unsaturated ketones in molten salt media (Scheme 1). Previously, molten tetrabutylammonium bromide (TBAB) was used as cost-effective ionic liquid in a number of useful synthetic transformations so we used it as the reaction media.Cs2.5H0.5PW12O40 catalyzed conjugate addition of indole with α, β-unsaturated ketones.
2 Materials and methods
All commercially available chemicals were obtained from Merck and Fluka companies, and used without further purifications. All products are known and were identified by the comparison of their spectral data and physical properties with those of the authentic samples. 1H and 13C NMR spectra were determined on a Bruker 500-DRX Avance instrument at 500 and 125 MHz.
2.1 General procedure for the conjugate addition of indole to chalcones
A mixture of indole (1 mmol), chalcone (1 mmol), tetrabutyl ammonium bromide (1 mmol) and Cs2.5H0.5PW12O40 (0.05 mmol) was stirred for appropriate time at 110oC (checked by TLC). When the reaction was completed, 2 mL of ethanol was added and after the filtration of catalyst the mixture was poured into ice cold water. The resulting precipitate was recrystallized from ethanol to give the pure product.
2.2 Spectral data for selected compounds
Compound 2a: IR (KBr): 1452, 1491, 1597, 1679, 2924, 3027, 3056 cm−1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO) δ(ppm): 3.79 (dd, J = 16.7 Hz, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H, CH), 3.81 (dd, J = 16.7 Hz, J = 6.8 Hz, 1H, CH), 5.15 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 1H, CH), 6.98 (s, 1H, CH indole ring), 7.08 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H, arom), 7.18–7.61 (m, 11H, arom), 8.00 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H, arom), 8.07 (s, broad, 1H, NH). 13C NMR (125 MHz, DMSO) δ(ppm): 38.7, 45.7, 111.6, 119.6, 119.8, 119.9, 121.9, 122.5, 126.7, 127.1, 128.3, 128.5, 128.9, 129.1, 133.5, 137.1, 137.6, 144.7, 199.2.
Compound 2c: IR (KBr): 1454, 1489, 1589, 1681, 2899, 2965, 3028, 3057, 3414 cm−1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO) δ(ppm): 3.73 (dd, J = 16.6 Hz, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H, CH), 3.81 (dd, J = 16.6 Hz, J = 6.8 Hz, 1H, CH), 5.09 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H, CH), 6.99 (d, J = 1.6 Hz, 1H, CH, indole ring), 7.07 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H, arom), 7.17–7.55 (m, 10 H, arom), 7.88 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H, arom), 8.03 (s, broad, 1H, NH). 13C NMR (125 MHz, DMSO) δ(ppm): 38.8, 45.6, 111.6, 119.5, 119.91, 119.92, 121.9, 122.6, 126.8, 127.0, 128.2, 128.9, 129.2, 129.9, 135.9, 137.1, 139.8, 144.4, 197.9.
Compound 2e: IR (KBr): 1456, 1605, 1671, 2919, 3050, 3124, 3433 cm−1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO) δ(ppm): 2.32 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.44 (s, 3H, CH3), 3.71 (dd, J = 16.5 Hz, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H, CH), 3.82 (dd, J = 16.5 Hz, J = 6.8 Hz, 1H, CH), 5.07 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 1H, CH), 7.00 (s, 1H, CH indole ring), 7.04–7.50 (m, 12H, arom), 7.89 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H, arom), 7.99 (s, broad, 1H, NH). 13C NMR (125 MHz, DMSO) δ(ppm): 21.4, 22.1, 38.3, 45.6, 111.5, 119.7, 120.0, 121.8, 122.3, 127.1, 128.1, 128.7, 129.5, 129.7, 135.1, 136.1, 137.1, 141.7, 144.2, 198.7.
Compound 2f: IR (KBr): 1510, 1679, 2903, 2932, 2956, 3056, 3412 cm−1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO) δ(ppm): 3.74 (dd, J = 16.6 Hz, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H, CH), 3.79 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.81 (dd, J = 16.7 Hz, J = 6.6 Hz, 1H, CH), 5.08 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H, CH), 6.73 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H, arom), 6.98 (d, J = 1.8 Hz, 1H, CH indole), 7.07 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H, arom), 7.17–7.64 (m, 8H, arom), 7.98 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 2H, arom), 8.07 (s, broad, 1H, NH). 13C NMR (125 MHz, DMSO) δ(ppm): 37.9, 45.8, 55.6, 111.6, 114.3, 119.8, 119.9, 120.0, 121.8, 122.5, 127.1, 128.5, 128.9, 129.0, 133.4, 136.8, 137.1, 137.6, 158.4, 199.4.
3 Results and discussion
In this article, we are reporting a simple and facile method for the conjugate addition of indoles to chalcones. In a preliminary experiment, treatment of indole with 1,3-diphenylpropenone in molten TBAB using 5 mol% Cs2.5H0.5PW12O40 as a catalyst at 110 °C afforded the 3-substituted indole adduct 2a in 70% yield after recrystallization from ethanol–water.
Interestingly, no by-products arising from 1,2-addition or bis-addition were observed. Compared to conventional solvents, enhanced reaction rates and improved yields are notable features observed using the Cs2.5H0.5PW12O40-molten TBAB catalytic system.
Under the optimized reaction conditions, a variety of chalcones were tested. The reactions proceeded easily and the products were isolated in good yields in short reaction times. Substituted groups such as chlorine and methoxy groups have no considerable effect on the yields and reaction times.
The results are summarized in Table 1.
Entry
Product
Time (min)
Yield (%)
2a
45
70
2b
40
67
2c
40
85
2d
40
73
2e
45
80
2f
45
75
2g
50
72
2h
50
80
A plausible mechanism for the Cs2.5H0.5PW12O40-catalyzed conjugate addition of indole to chalcones is presented in scheme 2.A plausible mechanism for the conjugate addition of indole to chalcones.
4 Conclusion
In conclusion, we have developed an efficient and cost effective method for Michael addition of indole to α, β-unsaturated ketones using cesium salt of tungtophosphoric acid as the catalyst. This method has advantages such as ease of process, mild condition, relatively high yields, and short reaction times.
Acknowledgment
We gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the Research Council of Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman.
References
- J. Org. Chem.. 2002;67:3700-3704.
- Green Chem.. 2004;6:316-322.
- Photochem. Photobiol. A: Chem.. 2000;133:213-220.
- Org. Lett.. 2003;5:2219-2222.
- Chem. Lett.. 1996;12:1111-1112.
- Clean Prod. Process. 1999;1:223-236.
- Chem. Commun. 1998:1765-1766.
- Mol. Catal.. 1983;18:299-314.
- Trans. Metal Chem.. 2009;34:463-469.
- H. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2006:2226-2231.
- J. Heterocycl. Chem.. 2008;45:1-5.
- Tetrahedron Lett.. 1998;39:4697-4700.
- Chem. Rev.. 1998;98:171-198.
- Synlett. 2000;3:403-405.
- Appl. Catal.. 1990;64:1-30.
- J. Am. Chem. Soc.. 1984;106:6456-6457.
- Phosphorus, Sulfur and Silicon and the Related Elements. 2010;185:325-329.
- Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn.. 1980;53:827-828.
- J. Phys. Chem. B. 2002;106:4336-4342.
- Tetrahedron Lett.. 1991;32:2807-2810.
- Tetrahedron Lett.. 1991;32:2811-2812.
- Mol. Divers.. 2009;13:337-342.
- Chem. Commun. 2001:2399-2407.
- The Chemistry of Indoles. New York: Academic Press; 1996. p. 113
- J. Am. Chem. Soc.. 1957;79:2819-2821.
- Angew. Chem.. 2000;112:3926-3945.
- Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.. 2000;39:3773-3789.