Translate this page into:
Design and synthesis of benzimidazoles containing substituted oxadiazole, thiadiazole and triazolo-thiadiazines as a source of new anticancer agents
⁎Corresponding author. Tel.: +91 11 26059681, 26059688x5647, mobile: +91 9891116086; fax: +91 11 16988874. drasifhusain@yahoo.com (Asif Husain) ahusain@jamiahamdard.ac.in (Asif Husain)
-
Received: ,
Accepted: ,
This article was originally published by Elsevier and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.
Peer review under responsibility of King Saud University.
Abstract
New benzimidazole derivatives clubbed with biologically active heterocyclic moieties (4a–g, 5a–f, 8a–b & 9a–b) were designed and synthesized under microwave irradiation. Initial screening of compounds showed good to remarkable anticancer activity by NCI panel. Compound 4f exhibited significant growth inhibition and was further referred for five dose level study. The present study may result in the development of new anticancer agents in the near future.
Abstract
Based on the heterocyclic core of bendamustine, four series (4a–g, 5a–f, 8a–b and 9a–b) of benzimidazole derivatives were designed and synthesized starting from 4-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)-4-oxobutanehydrazide. In the rational design of target molecules, the benzimidazole ring of bendamustine was retained and the bis-(chloroethyl) amine group (mechlorethamine) was substituted with several biologically active scaffolds such as oxadiazole, thiadiazole, and triazolo-thiadiazines, in the hope of obtaining novel cytotoxic agents with improved efficacy and safety. Cytotoxic activities of the designed analogues were carried out at the National Cancer Institute (NCI), USA, against full NCI 60 human cell lines. Among all the tested compounds, 4f (761982/1) exhibited significant antiproliferative activity and was further screened at 10-fold dilutions of five different concentrations (0.01, 0.1, 1, 10 and 100 μM) with GI50 values ranging from 0.09 to 16.2 μM and found superior for CNS cancer cell line SNB-75 (GI50 0.09, TGI 1.39, LC50 >100 and log10GI50 −7.0, log10TGI-5.86, log10LC50 >−4.00). Docking study was also performed to provide an insight about the binding mode into binding sites of topoisomerase enzyme. Hopefully in future, compound 4f could be used as a lead compound for developing new anticancer agents.
Keywords
Bendamustine
Benzimidazole
Chlorambucil
Sulforhodamine B
Human cell lines
- mp
-
melting point
- TLC
-
thin layer chromatography
- IR
-
infra-red spectroscopy
- 1H NMR
-
hydrogen nuclear magnetic resonance
- 13C NMR
-
carbon nuclear magnetic resonance
- ESI-MS
-
electron spray ionization method of Mass spectrometry
- PGs
-
percentage growth
- MG-MID
-
mean graph midpoint
- CLL
-
chronic lymphocytic leukemia
- NHL
-
non-hodgkin’s lymphoma
- NCI
-
national cancer institute
- DTP
-
developmental therapeutics program
- TGI
-
total growth inhibition
- LC50
-
50% lethal concentration
- GI50
-
50% growth inhibition
- FDA
-
food and drug administration
- MWI
-
microwave irradiation
- SRB
-
Sulforhodamine B
Abbreviations
1 Introduction
Cancer is a disease in which uncharacteristic cells grow and proliferate in an uncontrolled manner. It can occur in all the living cells at any stage of life. Cancer is a major health problem across the globe and its prevalence is on the rise. Millions of people worldwide are suffering from this dreaded disease which not only affects the health of the patient, but also puts significant socioeconomic, mental and physical burden on the family members (Lee et al., 2002; Kidwai et al., 2002). Cancer is considered to be one of the leading causes of mortality due to diseases and the projected death toll due to cancer alone would touch approximately 10 million by the end of year 2020 (Schumacher et al., 2011). In spite of considerable development in the understanding of molecular mechanisms of pathogenesis of the disease, yet no specific treatment is available to cure the disease completely. The current approaches used to treat cancer involve surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy either alone or in combination, but due to metastasis i.e. invasion of nearby tissues by cancerous cells and spreading of disease to other parts of the body, can cure only 40% patients and thus associated with the high rate of mortality. The other approaches such as hormonal, antibodies treatments, biological response modifier, and complementary and alternative medicine treatments are also practiced worldwide to curb this group of different and distinct diseases. Chemotherapy is considered to be the main weapon against the neoplastic diseases and the majority of the clinically used anticancer molecules are of synthetic origin. These chemopreventive molecules act by various molecular mechanisms which may involve inhibition of initiation, promotion, progression and metastasis of cancerous cells but in the process can also kill normal cells leading to toxicity. There is an urgent need to design and synthesize potent and highly selective molecules to improve the current anticancer therapy with least or no toxicity to normal cells.
Benzimidazole (a phenyl ring fused to an imidazole ring) is a well known bioactive heterocyclic ring system that is present in several natural and synthetic medicinal compounds. Benzimidazole is known to be a versatile scaffold that possess potential anticancer, antitumor and antiproliferative activities (Refaat, 2010; Gumus et al., 2009; Sun et al., 2011; Abonia et al., 2011; Ramla et al., 2006; Demirayak et al., 2002; Romero-Castro et al., 2011) along with other useful biological actions. Similarly, oxadiazole, thiadiazole, triazolo-thiadiazines and triazolo-thiadiazoles are a course group of heterocyclic compounds, which have engrossed significant attention of medicinal chemists owing to their wide range of useful pharmacological actions particularly cytotoxic activities against DNA topoisomerase I (Formagio et al., 2008; Kumar et al., 2010; Sarhan et al., 2010).
Bendamustine hydrochloride, a potent DNA alkylating agent, is used clinically to treat chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and B-cell non-hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) (Lissitchkov et al., 2006; Gandhi and Burger, 2009). The central core of Bendamustine is a benzimidazole heterocyclic ring having a mechlorethamine side chain on the 5th position, a butyric acid substituent on a 2nd position and N-substituted methyl group on 1st position. Thus, chemically bendamustine is; (1H-benzimidazole-2-butanoicacid-5-[bis(2-chloroethyl)amino]-1-methylmonohydro chloride) and was developed as a rational design of purine analogue and alkylation hybrid of chlorambucil (Fig. 1). In view of these facts, we intended to synthesize some novel and potent anticancer agents based on the rationally designed template of bendamustine and chlorambucil i.e. molecules having benzimidazole residue as a pharmacophoric group (Romero-Castro et al., 2011) with butyric acid substituent and further clubbed with related heterocyclic rings such as oxadiazole, thiadiazole, triazolo-thiadiazole and triazolo-thiadiazine (Fig. 1). The designed template was further used to synthesize library of analogue molecules (Schemes 1–3) by incorporating heterocyclic ring systems of several antitumor agents reported in the literature such as proxazole (Duanmu et al., 1989), IMC-094332 (Britten et al., 2001) (having oxadiazole ring, 4a–g), SNS-032 (Penning et al., 2008) (having thiazole ring, 5a–f), levamisole (Tolner et al., 2001) and ATEK 10934 (Albert et al., 2007) (having diazole–thiazole & triazolo-thiadiazole ring; 8a–b & 9a–b) (Fig. 2). Chemical structures of some other reported antitumor agents containing benzimidazole nucleus and other biologically active monocyclic or bicyclic heterocyclic ring system along with the similarly prepared molecules (4f, 5e and 9a) are presented in Chart 1. Molecules such as, Nocodazole (NSC-238189) (1) (Duanmu et al., 1989), FB642 (2) (Britten et al., 2001), A-620223 (3) (Penning et al., 2008), Hoechst-33258 (4) (Tolner et al., 2001), ABT-888 (5) (Albert et al., 2007), Phortress (6) (Bradshaw and Westwell, 2004), SNS-032 (7) (Misra et al., 2004), Proxazole (8) (Dalip et al., 2011), CYC116 (9) (Griffiths et al., 2008), thiadiazole derivative (10) (Matysiak and Opolski, 2006), Levamisole (11) (Remrs et al., 1982), imidazo[2,1-b][1,3,4] thiadiazole analogues (12) (Taher et al., 2012), triazolo [1,3,4] thiadiazole derivative (13) (Ibrahim, 2009), ATEK 10934 (14) (Ibrahim, 2009), and IMC-094332 (15) (Maria et al., 2010) have shown potential to be used as antitumor agents and some of them are in the final stages of drug development.





Our previous and ongoing research work on the synthesis of benzimidazole derivatives bearing different heterocyclic rings in search of new anticancer agents have revealed that these compounds are selective toward Leukemia cancer subpanel with mean GI50 6.59, GI50 12.62 and GI50 1.04 (Rashid et al., 2012a,b; Husain et al., 2012, 2013). From these results, we have observed that substituted benzimidazoles have the potential to provide the anticancer lead candidate or a drug molecule and thus are worthy of further studies. The study was undertaken with an aim to find new structures which could be used as a lead candidate in the field of cancer. We report herein the synthesis of some new molecules in which benzimidazole core of bendamustine drug is endowed with oxadiazole, triazolo-thiadiazine and triazolo-thiadiazole nuclei, in an attempt to significantly improve the anticancer activity of the marketed anticancer drug. The in-vitro anticancer activities of newly designed and synthesized compounds were carried out at the National Cancer Institute (NCI), Chemotherapeutic Research division, USA. The cytotoxic effects of the compounds were tested on nine human systems against full NCI 60 cell line panel. The tested compounds were also granted NCS code by NCI and are shown in Table 1.
| Compd. | NSC: code | The most sensitive cell line | Growth % of the most sensitive cell lineb | Range of growth, % | Mean | Activitya |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 758071/1 | UO-31 (Renal Cancer) | 86.64 | 86.64–134.77 | 102.34 | Inactive |
| 4 | 755135/1 | MALME-3M (Melanoma) | 82.96 | 82.96–121.44 | 102.35 | Inactive |
| 4a | 755140/1 | UO-31 (Renal Cancer) | 84.84 | 84.84–129.33 | 106.04 | Inactive |
| 4b | 755141/1 | CCRF-CEM (Leukemia) | 28.46 | 28.46–125.48 | 96.09 | Active |
| 4c | 755142/1 | SR (Leukemia) | 82.01 | 82.01–126.78 | 105.73 | Inactive |
| 4d | Ntc | – | – | – | – | – |
| 4e | 755143/1 | MALME-3M (Melanoma) | 77.82 | 77.82–123.77 | 104.78 | Inactive |
| 4f | 761982/1 | MDA-MB-435 (Melanoma) | −45.79 | −45.79–90.70 | 20.03 | Active |
| 4g | 761983/1 | MOLT-4 (Leukemia) | 8.54 | 8.54–104.24 | 78.75 | Active |
| 5a | Ntc | – | – | – | – | – |
| 5b | Ntc | – | – | – | – | – |
| 5c | Ntc | – | – | – | – | – |
| 5d | 755144/1 | UO-31 (Renal Cancer) | 85.04 | 85.04–121.47 | 102.43 | Inactive |
| 5e | 755145/1 | CCRF-CEM (Leukemia) | 68.09 | 68.09–116.72 | 94.39 | Active |
| 5f | 755146/1 | UO-31 (Renal Cancer) | 85.11 | 85.11–124.27 | 107.30 | Inactive |
| 6 | 759213/1 | HL-60(TB) (Leukemia) | 72.55 | 72.55–128.74 | 104.14 | Inactive |
| 7 | Ntc | – | – | – | – | – |
| 8a | 760467/1 | UO-31 (Renal Cancer) | 72.63 | 72.63–126.41 | 97.18 | Inactive |
| 8b | 761989/1 | K-562 (Leukemia) | 3.14 | 3.14–129.13 | 93.97 | Active |
| 9a | 761988/1 | K-562 (Leukemia) | 5.84 | 5.84–116.27 | 92.86 | Active |
| 9b | Ntc | – | – | – | – | – |
2 Experimental
2.1 General information
The melting points of the all the synthesized compounds were measured on a liquid paraffin bath in open capillary tubes and are uncorrected. The progress of the chemical reaction as well as the purity of the target compounds was checked by using TLC plates, pre-coated with silica gel G in solvent systems of toluene: ethyl acetate: formic acid (5:4:1, v/v/v) and benzene: acetone (9:1, v/v). The spots on TLC plates were visualized after exposing to iodine vapors or under UV-light. Chemical synthesis was carried out in a scientific microwave synthesizer (model No. CATA-R, Catalyst systems, India). Flash chromatography technique was used to purify the target compounds using hexane and ethyl acetate mixture as an eluent mixture. 1H- and 13C-Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra of the pure compounds in DMSO-d6/CDCl3 were recorded on Bruker spectrospin DPX-300 MHz instrument. Tetramethylsilane was used as an internal reference and the exchangeable protons of OH and NH were confirmed by the D2O shaking test. Mass spectra were recorded on LCMS/MS (Perkin–Elmer and LABINDIA, Applied Biosystem) model no. API 3000 and is presented as m/z. IR spectra of the compounds were recorded on FT/IR (Jasco, Japan), model no. 410. An elemental analysis was done on a Perkin–Elmer 240 analyzer and was found in the range of ±0.5% for each element analyzed (C, H and N).
2.2 Synthesis
2.2.1 4-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)-4-oxobutanoicacid (1)
It was prepared as per the previously reported method (Husain et al., 2012). The identity of the compound was established after comparing its physical properties and spectral data which are found to be in good agreement with the reported literature values.
2.2.2 Ethyl-4-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)-4-oxobutanoate (2)
It was prepared as per the previously reported method (Husain et al., 2012). The identity of the compound was established after comparing its physical properties and mass spectral data with the literature values.
2.2.3 4-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)-4-oxobutanehydrazide (3)
It was prepared as per the previously reported method (Husain et al., 2012). The identity of the compound was established after comparing its physical properties and spectral data which are found to be in good agreement with the reported literature values.
2.2.4 1-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)-3-(5-(chloromethyl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl) propan-1-one (4)
An equimolar mixture of 4-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)-4-oxobutanehydrazide (3; 0.001 mol) and a chloroacetic acid (0.001 mol) in POCl3 (5 mL) was placed in a microwave reaction compatible glass vessel having a magnetic stirrer bar for mixing. The reaction mixture was irradiated at a power level of 6 (60%, 420 W) for 13 min in a scientific microwave synthesizer. The reaction mixture was cooled, poured slowly onto the crushed ice and finally neutralized with sodium bicarbonate solution to produce the solid precipitates. The mixture was filtered, washed with plenty of water and dried. Yield: 78%, mp 223–224 °C, Rf = 0.61. IR (KBr, cm−1): 3348(N—H), 3020(—C—H, Ar—H), 2936(—C—H, CH2), 1709(C⚌O), 1684(—C⚌N), 1573(C⚌C), 1305(—N—N⚌C), 1166(C—O—C, asymmetric), 1027(C—O—C, symmetric), 712(C—Cl). 1H NMR (CDCl3): 12.50(s, 1H, NH, D2O exchangeable), 7.79(d, 1H, J = 7.8 Hz, H-4, benzimidazole ring), 7.47(t, 1H, J = 7.2 Hz, H-7, benzimidazole), 7.35(t, 2H, J = 5.4 Hz, H-5,6, benzimidazole), 4.39(s, 2H, —CH2Cl), 3.29(t, 2H, J = 6.9 Hz, CH2), 2.90(t, 2H, J = 6.6 Hz, —CH2C⚌O). 13C NMR (CDCl3): 168.45(C⚌O), 158.23, 156.37(C, oxadiazole), 154.69(C⚌N), 136.14, 132.24, 132.15, 126.55, 126.12, 124.83(Ar—C), 51.02(CH2Cl), 39.76(CH2, CH2CO), 28.51(CH2). ESI-MS (m/z): 290(M+). Anal. calcd. for C13H11ClN4O2: C, 53.71; H, 3.81; N, 19.27. Found: C, 53.74; H, 3.90; N, 19.30. Eluent mixture ratio (9:1).
2.2.5 General procedure for the synthesis of 1-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)-3-(5-(methyl substituted)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl)propan-1-one (4a–g)
An equimolar amount compound 4 (0.003 mol) and a secondary amine (0.003 mol) were suspended in absolute ethanol (10 mL). The suspension was added to a magnetic stir bar equipped microwave reaction vessel and just before microwave irradiation, sodium acetate (0.001 mol) was added. The microwave was operated at a power level of 5 (50%, 350 W) for 8–14 min. The content of the reaction mixture was cooled, poured onto crushed ice and acidified with glacial acetic acid to obtain a solid mass. The solid product was filtered, repeatedly washed with water to flush the inorganic components and finally dried.
2.2.5.1 3-(5-((6-amino-9H-purin-9-yl)methyl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl)-1-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)propan-1-one (4a)
Yield: 90%, mp 225–226 °C, Rf = 0.67. IR (KBr, cm−1): 3352(N—H), 3027(C—H, Ar—H), 2987(C—H, CH2), 1716(C⚌O), 1682(C⚌N), 1568(C⚌C), 1312(N—N⚌C), 1160(C—O—C, asymmetric), 1022(C—O—C, symmetric), 834(C—N).1H NMR (CDCl3): 12.63(s, 1H, NH,D2O exchangeable, benzimidazole), 8.51(s, 2H, NH2,D2O exchangeable, adenine), 8.37(s, 1H, adenine), 7.97(s, 1H, adenine), 7.70(d, 1H, J = 7.5 Hz, H-4, benzimidazole), 7.49(t, 1H, J = 7.8 Hz, H-7, benzimidazole), 7.27(t, 2H, J = 7.5 Hz, H-5,6, benzimidazole), 4.17(s, 2H, CH2, adenine), 2.96(t, 2H, J = 7.2 Hz, CH2), 2.51(t, 2H, J = 7.2 Hz, CH2CO). 13C NMR (CDCl3): 175.31(C⚌O), 161.74, 160.12(C, oxadiazole), 153.17(C⚌N), 141.32, 138.61, 137.52, 136.79, 134.92, 129.81, 129.03, 128.56, 127.63, 124.74, 122.87(Ar—C), 63.41(CH2, adenine), 30.72(CH2, CH2CO), 28.45(CH2). ESI-MS (m/z): 389(M+). Anal. calcd. for C18H15N9O2: C, 55.52; H, 3.87; N, 32.38. Found: C, 55.86; H, 3.96; N, 32.47. Eluent mixture ratio (8:2).
2.2.5.2 1-((5-(3-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)-3-oxopropyl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl)methyl)-1H-purin-6(9H)-one (4b)
Yield: 87%, mp 233–234 °C, Rf = 0.65. IR (KBr, cm−1): 3364(N—H), 3086(C—H, Ar—H), 2952(C—H, CH2), 1724(C⚌O), 1672(C⚌N), 1480(C⚌C), 1328(N—N⚌C), 1116(C—O—C, asymmetric), 1020(C—O—C, symmetric). 1H NMR (CDCl3): 12.31(s, 1H, NH, D2O exchangeable, benzimidazole), 10.87(s, H, NH, D2O exchangeable, guanine), 8.02(s, 1H, guanine), 7.85(s, 1H, guanine), 7.78(d, 1H, J = 7.8 Hz, H-4, benzimidazole), 7.40(t, 1H, J = 7.8 Hz, H-7, benzimidazole), 7.27(t, 2H, J = 7.5 Hz, H-5,6, benzimidazole), 3.92(s, 2H, CH2, guanine), 3.23(t, 2H, J = 6.9 Hz, CH2), 2.85(t, 2H, J = 7.2 Hz, CH2CO). 13C NMR (CDCl3): 168.73(C⚌O), 166. 23(C⚌O, guanine), 158.45, 157.31(C, oxadiazole), 156.85(C⚌N), 137.93, 137.12, 136.87, 134.92, 127.53, 126.74, 124.56, 124.01, 122.87, 120.91(Ar—C), 57.37(CH2, guanine), 38.61(CH2, CH2CO), 25.43(CH2). ESI-MS (m/z): 390(M+). Anal. calcd. for C18H14N8O3: C, 55.38; H, 3.60; N, 28.71. Found: C, 55.41; H, 3.74; N, 28.92. Eluent mixture ratio (8:2).
2.2.5.3 3-(5-((1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-yl)methyl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl)-1-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl) propan-1-one (4c)
Yield: 92%, mp 221–222 °C, Rf = 0.56. IR (KBr, cm−1): 3321(N—H), 3178(C—H, Ar—H), 2819(C—H, CH2), 1724(C⚌O), 1662(C⚌N), 1523(C⚌C), 1384(N—N⚌C), 1191(C—O—C, asymmetric), 1033(C—O—C, symmetric), 848(C—N). 1H NMR (CDCl3): 12.03(s, 1H, NH, D2O exchangeable), 8.04(s, 1H, H-5, triazole), 7.88(s, 1H, H-3, triazole), 7.79(d, 1H, J = 8.1 Hz, H-4, benzimidazole), 7.63(t, 1H, J = 7.2 Hz, H-7, benzimidazole), 7.45(t, 2H, J = 7.2 Hz, H-5,6, benzimidazole), 4.73(s, 2H, CH2, triazole), 3.29(t, 2H, J = 6.9 Hz, CH2), 2.87(t, 2H, J = 6.9 Hz, CH2CO). 13C NMR (CDCl3): 172.87(C⚌O), 165.11, 161.19(C, oxadiazole), 155.05(C⚌N), 132.83, 131.96, 129.86, 128.52, 124.73, 123.48, 117.67, 115.68(Ar—C), 60.24(C, triazole), 30.23(CH2, CH2CO), 28.20(CH2). ESI-MS (m/z): 323(M+). Anal. calcd. for C15H13N7O2: C, 55.72; H, 4.05; N, 30.33. Found: C, 55.75; H, 4.13; N, 30.39. Eluent mixture ratio (7:3).
2.2.5.4 3-(5-((4H-1,2,4-triazol-4-ylamino)methyl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl)-1-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl) propan-1-one (4d)
Yield: 85%, mp 215–217 °C, Rf = 0.53. IR (KBr, cm−1): 3319(N—H), 3104(C—H, Ar—H), 2994(CH2), 1698(C⚌O), 1612(C⚌N), 1574(C⚌C), 1356(N—N⚌C), 1178(C—O—C, asymmetric), 1036(C—O—C, symmetric), 834(C—N). 1H NMR (CDCl3): 12.47(s, 1H, NH, D2O exchangeable), 7.89(s, 2H, triazole), 7.61(d, 1H, J = 7.8 Hz, H-4, benzimidazole), 7.33(t, 1H, J = 7.5 Hz, H-7, benzimidazole), 7.26(t, 2H, J = 7.8 Hz, H-5,6, benzimidazole), 3.72(s, 2H, CH2, CH2NH), 3.21(t, 2H, J = 6.9 Hz, CH2), 2.92(t, 2H, J = 6.9 Hz, CH2CO), 2.63(s, IH, NH). 13C NMR (CDCl3): 176.10(C⚌O), 163.41, 160.85(C, oxadiazole), 155.71(C⚌N), 137.32(C, aminotriazole), 129.63, 128.91, 124.73, 123.86, 121.18, 120.83(Ar—C), 66.51(CH2, NHCH2), 32.68(CH2, CH2CO), 28.38(CH2). ESI-MS (m/z): 338(M+). Anal. calcd. for C15H14N8O2: C, 53.25; H, 4.17; N, 33.12. Found: C, 53.43; H, 4.25; N, 33.71. Eluent mixture ratio (7:3).
2.2.5.5 3-(5-((1H-imidazol-1-yl)methyl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl)-1-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl) propan-1-one (4e)
Yield: 82%, mp 207–208 °C, Rf = 0.57. IR (KBr, cm−1): 3348(N—H), 3054(C—H, Ar—H), 2942(C—H, CH2), 1726(C⚌O), 1685(C⚌N), 1532(C⚌C), 1328(N—N⚌C), 1176(C—O—C, asymmetric), 1042(C—O—C, symmetric). 1H NMR (CDCl3): 11.87(s, 1H, NH, D2O exchangeable), 8.07(s, 1H, H-2, imidazole), 7.74(d, 1H, J = 7.5 Hz, H-4, benzimidazole), 7.30(t, 1H, J = 7.5 Hz, H-7, benzimidazole), 7.27(t, 2H, J = 7.5 Hz, H-5,6, benzimidazole), 6.65(d, 1H, J = 7.2 Hz, H-5, imidazole), 6.48(d, 1H, J = 8.1 Hz, H-4, imidazole), 4.03(s, 2H, CH2, imidazole), 3.12(t, 2H, J = 7.2 Hz, CH2), 2.85(t, 2H, J = 6.9 Hz, CH2CO). 13C NMR (CDCl3): 175.21(C⚌O), 161.92, 158.32(C, oxadiazole), 154.63(C⚌N), 136.25, 132.53, 131.54(C, imidazole), 126.43, 125.82, 123.35, 122.61, 121.57, 119.64(Ar—C), 60.73(CH2, imidazole), 35.31(CH2, CH2CO), 27.93(CH2). ESI-MS (m/z): 322(M+). Anal. calcd. for C16H14N6O2: C, 59.612; H, 4.37; N, 26.06. Found: C, 59.74; H, 4.25; N, 26.35. Eluent mixture ratio (8:2).
2.2.5.6 3-((5-(3-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)-3-oxopropyl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl)methyl)-5-methyl pyrimiidine-2,4 (1H, 3H)-dione (4f)
Yield: 85%, mp236 °C, Rf = 0.58. IR (KBr, cm−1): 3344(N—H), 3105(C—H, Ar—H), 29774(C—H, CH2), 1724(C⚌O), 1662(C⚌N), 1566(C⚌C), 1384(N—N⚌C), 1180(C—O—C, asymmetric), 1064(C—O—C, symmetric). 1H NMR (CDCl3): 14.10(s, 1H, NH, D2O exchangeable, pyrimidine), 12.37(s, 1H, NH, D2O exchangeable, benzimidazole), 8.03(s, 1H, pyrimidine), 7.68(d, 1H, J = 7.7 Hz, H-4, benzimidazole), 7.43(t, 1H, J = 7.2 Hz, H-7, benzimidazole), 7.29(dd, 2H, J = 7.8 Hz, J = 7.5 Hz, H-5,6, benzimidazole), 4.09(s, 2H, CH2, pyrimidine), 3.49(t, 2H, J = 6.9 Hz, CH2), 3.09(t, 2H, J = 7.0 Hz, CH2, CH2CO), 2.57(s, 3H, CH3). 13C NMR (CDCl3): 173.61(C⚌O), 173.14, 172.15(C⚌O, pyrimidine), 159.29, 159.13(C, oxadiazole), 156.41(C⚌N), 132.54, 130.94, 129.78, 129.84, 128.87, 128.48, 124.16, 115.70(Ar—C), 60.55(CH2, pyrimidine), 30.40(CH2, CH2CO), 28.05(CH2), 14.31(CH3). ESI-MS (m/z): 380(M+). Anal. calcd. for C18H16N6O4: C, 56.84; H, 4.24; N, 22.10. Found: C, 56.87; H, 4.33; N, 22.17. Eluent mixture ratio (9:1).
2.2.5.7 1-((5-(3-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)-3-oxopropyl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl)methyl)-4-amino pyrimidin-2(1H)-one (4g)
Yield: 82%, mp 234–235 °C, Rf = 0.59. IR (KBr, cm−1): 3372(N—H), 3043(C—H, Ar—H), 2957(C—H, CH2), 1703(C⚌O), 1674(C⚌N), 1587(C⚌C), 1372(N—N⚌C), 1184(C—O—C, asymmetric), 1065(C—O—C, symmetric). 1H NMR (CDCl3): 12.17(s, 1H, NH, D2O exchangeable), 8.34(d, 1H, J = 8.1 Hz, pyrimidine), 8.01(s, 2H, NH2,D2O exchangeable), 7.71(d, 1H, J = 7.5 Hz, H-4, benzimidazole), 7.33(t, 1H, J = 7.2 Hz, H-7, benzimidazole), 7.24(t, 2H, J = 8.1 Hz, H-5,6, benzimidazole), 6.72(d, 1H, J = 7.5 Hz, pyrimidine), 4.13(s, 2H, CH2, pyrimidine), 3.28(t, 2H, J = 7.2 Hz, CH2), 2.76(t, 2H, J = 6.9 Hz, CH2CO). 13C NMR (CDCl3): 174.53(C⚌O), 165.01(CO, pyrimidine), 160.23, 159.10(C, oxadiazole), 155.41(C⚌N), 138.10, 135.29, 130.13, 129.69, 128.43, 123.14, 120.34, 118.72, 110.51(Ar—C), 55.72(CH2, pyrimidine), 32.56(CH2, CH2CO), 27.13(CH2). ESI-MS (m/z): 365(M+). Anal. calcd. for C17H15N7O3: C, 55.89; H, 4.14; N, 26.84. Found: C, 55.97; H, 3.64; N, 26.95. Eluent mixture ratio (8:2).
2.2.6 1-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)-3-(5-mercapto-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl)propan-1-one (5)
The compound 3 (0.015 mol) and potassium hydroxide (0.020 mol) were dissolved in ethylalcohol (40 mL) to form a solution. Afterward, carbon disulfide (0.020 mol) was slowly introduced into the reaction mixture with constant stirring and left at room temperature for 10 h. After that the ice cold conc. H2SO4 (5 mL) was gradually added in small increments over a period of 10 min and the resulting mixture was further stirred for 4 h at room temperature. It was then poured over crushed ice to obtain the solid precipitate which was recrystallized with carbinol.
Yield: 74%; Mp. 223–225 °C; Rf = 0.43(T:E:F). IR (KBr, cm−1): 3343(N—H), 3058(C—H, Ar—H), 2931(C—H, CH2), 2589(S—H), 1694(C⚌O), 1651(C⚌N), 1607(C⚌C), 1380(N—N⚌C), 1067(C—S—C). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 13.23(s, 1H, SH, D2O exchangeable), 11.37(s, 1H, NH, D2O exchangeable), 7.85(d, 1H, J = 7.5 Hz, H-4, benzimidazole), 7.51(t, 1H, J = 6.9 Hz, H-7, benzimidazole), 7.30(t, 2H, J = 7.5 Hz, H-5,6, benzimidazole), 3.34(t, 2H, J = 6.9 Hz, CH2), 2.84(t, 2H, J = 6.9 Hz, CH2, CH2CO). 13C NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 175.11(C⚌O), 161.73, 155.61(2C, thiadiazole), 157.72(C⚌N), 133.87, 132.65, 130.61, 129.41, 124.72, 116.81(Ar—C), 32.45(CH2, CH2CO), 21.75(CH2). ESI-MS (m/z): 290(M+). Anal. calcd. for C12H10N4OS2: C, 49.64; H, 3.48; N, 19.30. Found: C, 49.61; H, 3.51; N, 19.47.
2.2.7 General procedure for the synthesis of 1-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)-3-(5-mercapto substituted-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl) propan-1-one (5a–f)
A solution of compound 5 (0.001 mol) and an aryl or alkyl chloride compound (0.001 mol) in ethanolic alkali solvent (0.08 g KOH in 15 mL ethanol) was placed in the scientific microwave synthesizer and irradiated at power level of 5 (50%, 350 W) for 10–14 min, The reaction mixture was decomposed by adding on to the crushed ice which on usual workup yielded the solid dried products (5a–f).
2.2.7.1 5-(3-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)-3-oxopropyl)-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl-2-chloroethanethioate (5a)
Yield: 85%, mp 239 °C, Rf = 0.45. IR (KBr, cm−1): 3398(N—H), 3097(C—H, Ar—H), 2896(CH2), 1724(C⚌O), 1612(C⚌N), 1504(C⚌C), 1384(N—N⚌C), 1060(C—S—C), 837(C—Cl), 759(C—S). 1H NMR (CDCl3): 11.75(s, 1H, NH, D2O exchangeable), 7.81(d, 1H, J = 8.7 Hz, H-4, benzimidazole), 7.49(t, 1H, J = 7.8 Hz, H-7, benzimidazole), 7.35(t, 2H, J = 7.8 Hz, H-5,6, benzimidazole), 3.72(s, 2H, CH2Cl), 3.32(t, 2H, J = 7.2 Hz, CH2), 2.92(t, 2H, J = 6.9 Hz, CH2CO). 13C NMR (DMSO-d6): 175.57(C⚌O), 168.76(C⚌O, COCH2Cl), 162.24, 159.67(C, thiadiazole), 154.96(C⚌N), 132.21, 131.84, 130.19, 128.57, 124.65, 123.64(Ar—C), 34.25(CH2, CH2Cl), 31.37(CH2, CH2CO), 29.32(CH2). ESI-MS (m/z): 366(M+). Anal. calcd. for C14H11ClN4O2S2: C, 45.84; H, 3.03; N, 15.27. Found: C, 45.87; H, 3.08; N, 15.41. Eluent mixture ratio (8:2).
2.2.7.2 2-(5-(3-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)-3-oxopropyl)-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-ylthio)acetic acid (5b)
Yield: 84%, mp 245–247 °C, Rf = 0.43. IR (KBr, cm−1): 3371(O—H), 3299(N—H), 3060(C—H, Ar—H), 2968(C—H, CH2), 1722(C⚌O), 1650(C⚌N), 1516(C⚌C), 1365(N—N⚌C), 1064(C—S—C), 718(C—S). 1H NMR (CDCl3): 12.62(s, 1H, NH, D2O exchangeable), 10.44(s, 1H, OH, D2O exchangeable), 7.59(d, 1H, J = 7.5 Hz, H-4, benzimidazole), 7.23(t, 1H, J = 7.8 Hz, H-7, benzimidazole), 7.19(t, 2H, J = 7.5 Hz, H-5,6, benzimidazole), 4.15(s, 2H, CH2COOH), 2.95(t, 2H, J = 7.2 Hz, CH2), 2.58(t, 2H, J = 6.9 Hz, CH2CO). 13C NMR (CDCl3): 173.45(C⚌O), 170.83(C⚌O, COOH), 163.27, 162.35(C, thiadiazole), 154.21(C⚌N), 131.74, 129.51, 124.63, 123.45, 122.05, 121.67(Ar—C), 37.51(CH2, CH2COOH), 33.84(CH2, CH2CO), 28.30(CH2). ESI-MS (m/z): 348(M+). Anal. calcd. for C14H12N4O3S2: C, 48.26; H, 3.47; N, 16.08. Found: C, 48.37; H, 4.05; N, 16.75. Eluent mixture ratio (9:1).
2.2.7.3 1-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)-3-(5-(2-bromoethylthio)-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl)propan-1-one (5c)
Yield: 92%, mp 237–238 °C, Rf = 0.52. IR (KBr, cm−1): 3375(N—H), 3043(C—H, Ar—H), 2952(C—H, CH2), 1720(C⚌O), 1643(C⚌N), 1502(C⚌C), 1312(N—N⚌C), 1082(C—S—C), 720(C—S), 664(C—Br). 1H NMR (CDCl3): 12.10(s, 1H, NH, D2O exchangeable), 7.71(d, 1H, J = 7.8 Hz, H-4, benzimidazole), 7.41(t, 1H, J = 7.5 Hz, H-7, benzimidazole), 7.29(t, 2H, J = 7.8 Hz, H-5,6, benzimidazole), 3.92(t, 2H, J = 6.9 Hz, CH2Br), 3.54(t, 2H, J = 6.9 Hz, CH2S), 3.23(t, 2H, J = 7.2 Hz, CH2), 2.87(t, 2H, J = 7.2 Hz, CH2CO). 13C NMR (CDCl3): 174.61(C⚌O), 162.74, 160.53(C, thiadiazole), 153.82(C⚌N), 132.54, 130.12, 128.32, 124.57, 123.42, 122.81(Ar—C), 45.23, 40.35(CH2CH2Br), 31.92(CH2, CH2CO), 27.73(CH2). ESI-MS (m/z): 397(M+). Anal. calcd. for C14H13BrN4OS2: C, 42.32; H, 3.30; N, 14.10. Found: C, 41.86; H, 3.51; N, 14.23. Eluent mixture ratio (8:2).
2.2.7.4 5-(3-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)-3-oxopropyl)-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl-benzothioate (5d)
Yield: 80%, mp 235 °C, Rf = 0.56. IR (KBr, cm−1): 3367(N—H), 3058(C—H, Ar—H), 2977(C—H, CH2), 1677(C⚌O), 1600(C⚌N), 1504(C⚌C), 1384(N—N⚌C), 1045(C—S—C), 752(C—S). 1H NMR (CDCl3): 12.37(s, 1H, NH, D2O exchangeable), 8.14(d, 1H, J = 7.5 Hz, H-4, benzimidazole), 7.79(t, 1H, J = 8.1 Hz, H-7, benzimidazole), 7.61(t, 2H, J = 7.2 Hz, H-5,6, benzimidazole), 7.50–7.26(m, 5H, phenyl), 3.29(t, 2H, J = 6.9 Hz, CH2), 2.90(t, 2H, J = 6.9 Hz, CH2CO). 13C NMR (CDCl3): 175.85(C⚌O), 175.31(C⚌O, phenyl), 162.32, 160.72(C, thiadiazole), 154.67(C⚌N), 133.54, 132.27, 132.05, 131.97, 131.34, 130.72, 129.32, 128.73, 124.58, 123.21, 121.67, 120.67(Ar—C), 32.81(CH2, CH2CO), 27.94(CH2). ESI-MS (m/z): 394(M+). Anal. calcd. for C19H14N4O2S2: C, 57.85; H, 3.59; N, 14.20. Found: C, 57.91; H, 3.52; N, 14.35. Eluent mixture ratio (8:2).
2.2.7.5 1-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)-3-(5-(benzylthio)-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl)propan-1-one (5e)
Yield: 78%, mp 223–224 °C, Rf = 0.66. IR (KBr, cm−1): 3362(N—H), 3053(C—H, Ar—H), 2947(C—H, CH2), 1697(C⚌O), 1664(C⚌N), 1582(C⚌C), 1368(N—N⚌C), 1052(C—S—C), 724(C—S). 1H NMR (CDCl3): 12.47(s, 1H, NH, D2O exchangeable), 7.87(d, 1H, J = 7.8 Hz, H-4, benzimidazole), 7.77(t, 1H, J = 8.1 Hz, H-7, benzimidazole), 7.60(t, 2H, J = 7.8 Hz, H-5,6, benzimidazole), 7.53–6.96(m, 5H, phenyl), 3.87(s, 2H, CH2S), 3.42(t, 2H, J = 7.2 Hz, CH2), 2.88(t, 2H, J = 7.2 Hz, CH2CO). 13C NMR (CDCl3): 173.15(C⚌O), 163.87, 162.10(C, thiadiazole), 156.30(C⚌N), 132.91, 132.14, 131.48, 130.17, 129.65, 128.71, 125.80, 124.01, 123.27, 123.12, 118.54, 117.93(Ar—C), 41.35(CH2, CH2S), 31.53(CH2, CH2CO), 27.43(CH2). ESI-MS (m/z): 380(M+). Anal. calcd. for C19H16N4OS2: C, 59.98; H, 4.24; N, 14.73. Found: C, 60.3; H, 4.51; N, 14.85. Eluent mixture ratio (6:4).
2.2.7.6 2-(5-(3-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)-3-oxopropyl)-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-ylthio)acetamide (5f)
Yield: 76%, mp 225–226 °C, Rf = 0.54. IR (KBr, cm−1): 3381(N—H), 3053(C—H, Ar—H), 2932(C—H, CH2), 1727(C⚌O), 1652(C⚌N), 1527(C⚌C), 1373(N—N⚌C), 1047(C—S—C), 720(C—S). 1H NMR (CDCl3): 12.51(s, 1H, NH, D2O exchangeable), 8.31(s, 2H, NH2, D2O exchangeable), 7.90(d, 1H, J = 7.5 Hz, H-4, benzimidazole), 7.65(t, 1H, J = 7.2 Hz, H-7, benzimidazole), 7.39(t, 2H, J = 7.8 Hz, H-5,6, benzimidazole), 3.97(s, 2H, CH2CONH2), 3.19(t, 2H, J = 6.9 Hz, CH2), 2.85(t, 2H, J = 7.2 Hz, CH2CO). 13C NMR (CDCl3): 173.21(C⚌O), 171.34(C⚌O, CONH2), 161.51, 158.72(C-thiadiazole), 155.63(C⚌N), 130.42, 129.51, 128.53, 124.16, 123.93, 123.25(Ar—C), 58.17(CH2, CH2CONH2), 31.02(CH2, CH2CO), 25.31(CH2). ESI-MS (m/z): 347(M+). Anal. calcd. for C14H13N5O2S2: C, 48.40; H, 3.77; N, 20.16. Found: C, 48.47; H, 3.75; N, 20.41. Eluent mixture ratio (7:3).
2.2.8 1-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)-3-(5-mercapto-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl)propan-1-one (6)
It was prepared as per the previously reported method (Husain et al., 2013). The identity of the compound was established after comparing its physical properties and spectral data which are found to be in good agreement with the reported literature values.
2.2.9 3-(4-amino-5-mercapto-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)-1-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)propan-1-one (7)
It was prepared as per the previously reported method (Husain et al., 2013). The identity of the compound was established after comparing its physical properties and spectral data which are found to be in good agreement with the reported literature values.
2.2.10 General procedure for synthesis of 1-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)-3-(6-substituted-7H-[1,2,4] triazolo[3,4-b] [1,3,4]thiadiazin-3-yl)propan-1-one (8a–b)
An equimolar solution of compound 7 (0.003 mol) and α-chloro containing methyl compound (0.003 mol) was prepared in absolute ethanol (15 mL). The solution after refluxing for 3–4 h was cooled to room temperature and then neutralized with ammonia solution to yield a solid product.
2.2.10.1 1-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)-3-(6-phenyl-7H-[1,2,4]triazolo[3,4-b][1,3,4]thiadiazin-3-yl) propan-1-one (8a)
Yield: 65%, mp 240–241 °C, Rf = 0.67. IR (KBr, cm−1): 3354(N—H), 3027(C—H, Ar—H), 2968(C—H, CH2), 1694(C⚌O), 1612(C⚌N), 1575(C⚌C), 1363(N⚌C—S), 1258(N—N⚌C). 1H NMR (CDCl3): 12.31(s, 1H, NH, D2O exchangeable), 8.10–7.86(m, 5H, —C6H5), 7.78(d, 1H, J = 7.8 Hz, H-4, benzimidazole), 7.48(t, 1H, J = 7.5 Hz, H-7, benzimidazole), 7.30(t, 2H, J = 7.5 Hz, H-5,6, benzimidazole), 3.73(s, 2H, CH2, cyclic), 3.35(t, 2H, J = 7.2 Hz, CH2), 2.93(t, 2H, J = 6.9 Hz, CH2, CH2CO). 13C NMR (CDCl3): 170.42(C⚌O), 161.54, 160.72(C, triazole), 156.20, 154.86(C⚌N), 135.38, 132.19, 131.94, 129.52, 129.12, 128.23, 127.43, 126.75, 125.73, 117.24, 116.71, 115.76(Ar—C), 51.75(CH2, cyclic), 29.96(CH2, CH2CO), 27.97(CH2). ESI-MS (m/z): 388(M+). Anal. calcd. for C20H16N6OS: C, 61.84; H, 4.15; N, 21.63. Found: C, 61.95; H, 4.37; N, 21.69. Eluent mixture ratio (6:4).
2.2.10.2 1-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)-3-(6-(4-methoxyphenyl)-7H-[1,2,4]triazolo[3,4-b] [1,3,4] thiadiazin-3-yl) propan-1-one (8b)
Yield: 60%, mp 231–232 °C, Rf = 0.62. IR (KBr, cm−1): 3361(N—H), 3037(C—H, Ar—H), 2965(C—H, CH2), 1703(C⚌O), 1652(C⚌N), 1582(C⚌C), 1374(N⚌C—S), 1237(N—N⚌C). 1H NMR (CDCl3): 12.03(s, 1H, NH, D2O exchangeable), 7.99–7.69(m, 4H, phenyl), 7.45(d, 1H, J = 8.1 Hz, H-4, benzimidazole), 7.32(t, 1H, J = 7.8 Hz, H-7, benzimidazole), 7.24(t, 2H, J = 7.5 Hz, H-5,6, benzimidazole), 4.11(s, 2H, CH2, cyclic), 3.52(s, 3H, OCH3), 3.24(t, 2H, J = 6.9 Hz, CH2), 2.86(t, 2H, J = 6.9 Hz, CH2CO). 13C NMR (CDCl3): 176.26(C⚌O), 159.04, 158.83(C, triazole), 156.20, 154.75(C⚌N), 133.29, 132.05, 129.69, 128.43, 123.14, 122.13, 121.63, 120.72, 117.38, 116.81, 115.97, 115.78(Ar—C), 50.52(OCH3), 34.82(CH2, cyclic), 28.80(CH2, CH2CO), 26.90(CH2). ESI-MS (m/z): 418(M+). Anal. calcd. for C21H18N6O2S: C, 60.27; H, 4.34; N, 20.08. Found: C, 61.54; H, 4.73; N, 20.35. Eluent mixture ratio (7:3).
2.2.11 General procedure for synthesis of 1-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)-3-(6-(substituted)-[1,2,4] triazolo[3,4-b] [1, 3, 4]thiadiazol-3-yl)propan-1-one (9a–b)
An equimolar solution of compound 7 (0.003 mol) and α-chloro containing carbonyl compounds (0.003 mol) was prepared in absolute ethanol (15 mL). The solution after refluxing for 3–4 h was cooled to room temperature and then neutralized with ammonia solution to yield a solid product.
2.2.11.1 1-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)-3-(6-phenyl-[1,2,4]triazolo[3,4-b][1,3,4]thiadiazol-3-yl)propan-1-one (9a)
Yield: 61%, mp 220–22 °C, Rf = 0.62. IR (KBr, cm−1): 3398(N—H), 3016(C—H, Ar—H), 2904(C—H, CH2), 1728(C⚌O), 1665(C⚌N), 1616(C⚌C), 1384(N⚌C—S), 1265(N—N⚌C). 1H NMR (CDCl3): 11.01(s, 1H, NH, D2O exchangeable), 7.83(d, 1H, J = 8.4 Hz, H-4, benzimidazole), 7.73(t, 1H, J = 8.1 Hz, H-7, benzimidazole), 7.65(t, 2H, J = 7.2 Hz, H-5,6, benzimidazole), 7.51–7.34(m, 5H, phenyl), 3.01(t, 2H, J = 8.1 Hz, CH2), 2.51(t, 2H, J = 8.1 Hz, CH2, CH2CO). 13C NMR (CDCl3): 170.37(C⚌O), 159.25, 156.25(C, triazole), 153.97(C⚌N), 148.68(C, thiadiazole), 132.51, 130.48, 129.51, 128.40, 128.01, 127.47, 126.95, 125.89, 123.58, 122.31, 117.38, 116.81(Ar—C), 30.65(CH2, CH2CO), 28.03(CH2). ESI-MS (m/z): 374(M+). Anal. calcd. for C19H14N6OS: C, 60.95; H, 3.77; N, 22.45. Found: C, 61.07; H, 3.80; N, 22.55. Eluent mixture ratio (6:4).
2.2.11.2 1-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)-3-(6-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-[1,2,4]triazolo[3,4-b][1,3,4]thiadiazol-3-yl)propan-1-one (9b)
Yield: 68%, mp 231–232 °C, Rf = 0.59. IR (KBr, cm−1): 3371(N—H), 3061(C—H, Ar—H), 2951(C—H, CH2), 1695(C⚌O), 1627(C⚌N), 1587(C⚌C), 1345(N⚌C—S), 1250(N—N⚌C). 1H NMR (CDCl3): 11.97(s, 1H, NH, D2O exchangeable), 7.75(d, 1H, J = 7.8 Hz, H-4, benzimidazole), 7.43(t, 1H, J = 7.8 Hz, H-7, benzimidazole), 7.34(t, 2H, J = 7.5 Hz, H-5,6, benzimidazole), 7.27–7.03(m, 4H, phenyl), 6.15(s, 1H, OH), 3.27(t, 2H, J = 7.2 Hz, CH2), 2.95(t, 2H, J = 6.9 Hz, CH2CO). 13C NMR (CDCl3): 169.27(C⚌O), 158.33, 157.51(C, triazole), 154.15(C⚌N), 144.23(C, thiadiazole), 130.82, 128.63, 128.35, 127.47, 126.95, 125.89, 123.58, 122.28, 122.16, 117.38, 116.81, 115.97(Ar—C), 34.82(CH2, CH2CO), 28.25(CH2). ESI-MS (m/z): 390(M+). Anal. calcd. for C19H14N6O2S: C, 58.48; H, 3.62; N, 21.523. Found: C, 58.48; H, 3.86; N, 21.74. Eluent mixture ratio (7:3).
2.3 In vitro anticancer methodology
The medium RPMI 1640 having a 5% fetal bovine serum and 2 mM l-glutamine was used to grow the human tumor cell lines. The Microtiter plates were inoculated with the cancer cells followed by incubation at ideal conditions for growth, such as 37 °C temperature, 5% CO2, 95% air and 100% relative humidity for a period of 24 h before treatment with the tested compounds. After the incubation for 24 h, cell population of each cell line at the time of sample addition (Tz) was measured by fixing two plates of each cell line with TCA in situ. The sample was dissolved in DMSO at 400-fold of the desired final maximum test concentration and stored in frozen conditions until its further use in experiments. An aliquot of frozen concentrate of test sample was shaken to liquefy the content at the time of sample addition to cell lines and diluted to twofold with the complete medium containing 50 μg/mL gentamicin of the desired final maximum concentration. In addition to this, another four, 10-fold or ½ log serial dilutions were prepared to have five different concentrations and a control. The different dilutions of sample in aliquots of 100 μL were added to the appropriate Microtiter wells having 100 μL of medium to obtain the desired final sample concentrations. After the addition of sample, the plates were again incubated for an additional 48 h at the standard temperature, air and humidity conditions. An accurately measured 50 μL of cold 50% (w/v) TCA (final concentration, 10% TCA) was gently added to fix the cells in situ and incubated at 4 °C for a duration of 60 min. The supernatant was rejected and the plates were thoroughly washed five times with tap water and finally dried in air. A 4% (w/v) solution of Sulforhodamine B (SRB) (100 μL) prepared in 1% acetic acid was added to each Microtiter well and the plates were incubated at room temperature for another 10 min. A 10 mM Trizma base was subsequently added to solubilize the bound stain and the absorption of resulting mixture was recorded at 515 nm using an automated micro plate reader (Grever et al., 1992; Monks et al., 1991). A total of seven absorbance (optical density) readings were recorded at [time zero, (Tz), control growth (C) and test growth in the presence of sample at five concentration levels (Ti)]. The Percentage Growth (PG) i.e. the effect of the compound on growth of a cell line was calculated as by using the following formula: where Mean ODtzero represents an average of optical density (OD) measurements of SRB-derived color just before exposure of cells to the screened sample. Mean ODtest is the average of optical OD measurements of SRB-derived color after 48 h exposure of cells to the screened sample. Mean ODctrl stands for an average of OD measurements of SRB-derived color after 48 h with no exposure of cells to the test compound. Each concentration was expressed as the log10 (molar or μg/mL) and the response parameters values of GI50, TGI and LC50 were interpolated which indicate the concentrations at which the PG is +50, 0 and −50 respectively.
The IC50 value has been renamed by NCI into special concentration parameters (GI50, TGI and LC50). Percentage growth inhibition was calculated as follows:
Three dose response parameters viz. GI50, TGI and LC50 were calculated for each cell line subpanel. GI50 or Growth inhibition of 50% was deduced from [(Ti − Tz)/(C − Tz)] × 100 = 50 (It is the drug concentration which results in a 50% decrease in the net protein increase). Total growth inhibition (TGI) was calculated from the Ti = Tz (i.e. a concentration at which the total growth inhibition is 100%) while LC50 was calculated from [(Ti − Tz)/Tz] × 100 = −50 (concentration of the drug which results in a 50% reduction in the measured protein at the end of the drug exposure as compared to that in the beginning) indicating a net loss of the cells (Holbeck et al., 2010; Boyd and Paull, 1995). The dose response curve is plotted to get a fair idea about the growth percentage inhibition of cell lines at a particular concentration of the tested sample. The points at which the curve crosses the horizontal grid lines correspond to parameters; GI50 (crosses at +50 line), TGI (crosses at 0 line) and LC50 (crosses at −50 line), respectively.
2.4 Molecular docking studies
The molecular docking studies were performed with the help of a Maestro 9.0 docking software (Schrodinger Inc. USA) on the 3D structure of DNA topoisomerase complex enzyme. A windows 7 based 64 bit operating systems using an HCl computer [Intel (R) Core (TM) i5-2400 CPU @ 3.10 GHz, 8 GB memory] was used to carry out the docking studies. The 3D structure of DNA topoisomerase enzyme for the study was downloaded from the Protein Data Bank (PDB ID: 1SC7). It has 96% similarity with the human cell enzyme and all active site residues in the vicinity of cofactor have exact counterparts. The downloaded structure was further refined for ideal docking results (Staker et al., 2005). The PDB enzyme structure was thoroughly analyzed for missing atoms, bonds and/or contacts. All the residues and water molecules except ligand from the enzyme structure were removed manually. A builder molecule was used to construct the ligand molecules and then to obtain a stable structure, the energy of the molecule was also minimized. With the help of a grid box, the active sites were generated on the molecule. The conformation corresponding to the lowest energy was selected and subjected to an energy minimization.
3 Results and discussion
3.1 Chemistry
The target compounds were prepared as per the synthetic route outlined in Schemes 1–3. The starting material 4-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)-4-oxobutanoic acid (1) was synthesized by oxidative cyclization of 1,2 diaminobenzene with α-ketoglutaric acid in an acidified solution (4NHCl). The compound (1) was converted to an ethyl ester (2) by simple Fischer esterification reaction followed by treatment with hydrazine hydrate to obtain 4-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)-4-oxobutane hydrazide (3). The hydrazide (3) upon reaction with chloroacetic acid in the presence of cyclizing agent, (POCl3) under microwave irradiation yielded a compound (4). The chloro group at the 5th position of the oxadiazole ring of compound 1-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)-3-(5-(chloromethyl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl) propan-1-one (4) was further substituted with eight heterocyclic secondary amines. The reaction of compound (4) with substituted secondary amines was carried out in the presence of NaOAc by employing microwave radiations to accomplish the synthesis of 1-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)-3-(5-(methylsubstituted)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl)propan-1-ones (4a–g) (Scheme 1). The compounds of the series (5a–f); (1-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)-3-(5-mercaptosubstituted-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl) propan-1-one) were synthesized by reacting compound 1-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)-3-(5-mercapto-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl)propan-1-one (5) with six different chloro compounds (Scheme 2). Compound (3) was also cyclized with CS2/KOH in ethanol to produce, 1-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)-3-(5-mercapto-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl) propan-1-one (6) which on further treatment with hydrazine hydrate gave a compound 7, (3-(4-amino-5-mercapto-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)-1-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)propan-1-one). Benzimidazole clubbed triazolo compounds (7) were then condensed with two substituted methyl chloride and two carbonyl chloride compounds to get benzimidazole bearing substituted triazolo-thiadiazine and triazolo-thiadiazole derivatives i.e. 1-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)-3-(6-substituted-7H-[1,2,4]triazolo[3,4-b] [1,3,4]thiadiazin-3-yl)propan-1-one (8a–b) and 1-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)-3-(6-(substituted)-[1,2,4]triazolo [3,4-b][1,3,4]thiadiazol-3-yl)propan-1-one (9a–b), respectively (Scheme 3).
The structures of newly prepared compounds were elucidated using modern, sophisticated analytical techniques viz. FT-IR, 1H & 13C NMR and mass spectral data. The results of C, H, N analysis were consistent with the proposed structures and found within ±0.5% as compared with the theoretical values. In general, for all the synthesized compounds, the absorption bands for carbonyl (C⚌O) and secondary amino (N—H) were observed in the range 1666–1728 and 3317–3429 cm−1, respectively. The absorption peaks around 2599 and 1660 cm−1 were accounted for S-H and C⚌N. In 1H NMR spectra, the presence of a singlet around δ 12.3 is indicative of ring N—H and another singlet further downfield, at δ 13.4 is assigned to S—H, both these signals were disappeared upon D2O shaking, which confirm the presence of these groups in the synthesized molecules. The appearance of peaks at δ 173.1 and 154.9 in 13C NMR spectra could be related to C⚌O and C⚌N. The distinct bands observed in IR spectra nearly at 1384, 1060 and 1028 cm−1 were accounted for N—N⚌C, C—S—C and C—O—C which indicates the incorporation of oxadiazole and thiadiazole ring in the benzimidazole analogs. 1H NMR spectra of all the compounds exhibited two triplets at appropriate position around δ 2.8 (J = 6.9 Hz) and 3.2 (J = 7.2 Hz) and also in 13C NMR spectra two signals were obtained around δ 30.2 and 27.9, which could be assigned to two methylene groups (—CH2—CH2—) spacer, linker or bridge groups between the benzimidazole ring and the other heterocyclic rings such as oxadiazole, thiadiazole, triazolo-thiadiazole, and triazolo-thiadiazine. The signals for benzimidazole hydrogens in proton NMR appeared as doublet, triplet at around δ 7.6, 7.4 and 7.2 (7.8 Hz, 7.5 Hz, 7.5 Hz). The characteristic signals in 13C NMR spectra which appeared at around δ 161.1, 159.1 are related to oxadiazole carbon ring and other signals at δ 162.3, 160.7 are indicative of the thiadiazole carbon ring. The 3D, optimization and viewer of few designed molecules such as 4f, 5e, 9a and clinically used anticancer drug, bendamustine have been shown with space fill model (Fig. 3).
3.2 In vitro anticancer screening
A total of fifteen compounds were submitted to NCI for in vitro anticancer screening against 60 human cell lines obtained from nine clinically isolated cancer types and were granted NCS-codes (Table 1). The prepared compounds were tested at a single dose and added at a concentration (1 × 10−5 M) followed by incubation of culture for the duration of 48 h. A protein binding dye “Sulforhodamine B” was used for the end point determinations (Shoemaker, 2006; Grever et al., 1992). The result of each tested compound on the growth of cells is expressed in terms of percent growth of treated cells in comparison with the untreated control cells.
Those compounds which diminished or inhibited the cell line growth to 32% or less were regarded (a negative value is suggestive of cell kills) as in vitro active (Table 1) (Corona et al., 2009). Among all the tested compounds, 4b, 4f, 4g, 5e, 8b and 9a were observed to be active against CCRF-CEM (leukemia), MDA-MB-435 (melanoma), MLT-4 (leukemia), CCRF-CEM (leukemia) and K-562 (leukemia) cell lines respectively. Except compound 4f, all other agents exhibited low antiproliferative activity. The compound 4f (NSC: 761982/1) was the most active anticancer agent which met the pre – determined criteria of growth inhibition and thus was further chosen for the NCI full panel of five dose assay method at 10-fold dilutions of five different concentrations (0.01, 0.1, 1, 10 and 100 μM) (Table 2). Compound 4f showed remarkable antiproliferative activity at all the five dosage levels and therefore, further referred to Biological Evaluation Committee of NCI for advanced study (Monks et al., 1991).
| Panel | Cell line name | Developmental therapeutics program one dose mean graph value (10 μM) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Growth percent | Growth inhibition percenta | ||
| Leukemia | HL-60(TB) | −0.43 | 100.43 |
| K-562 | 10.38 | 89.62 | |
| MOLT-4 | 9.42 | 90.58 | |
| RPMI-8226 | 17.25 | 82.75 | |
| SR | 4.57 | 95.43 | |
| Non-small cell lung cancer | A549/ATCC | 21.13 | 78.87 |
| EKVX | 54.89 | 45.11 | |
| HOP-62 | 17.72 | 82.28 | |
| HOP-92 | 53.21 | 46.79 | |
| NCI-H226 | 31.72 | 68.28 | |
| NCI-H23 | 36.88 | 63.12 | |
| NCI-H460 | 9.27 | 90.73 | |
| NCI-H522 | 12.71 | 87.29 | |
| Colon cancer | COLO 205 | −32.71 | 132.71 |
| HCC-2998 | −27.87 | 127.87 | |
| HCT-116 | 6.25 | 93.75 | |
| HCT-15 | 65.29 | 34.71 | |
| HT29 | 8.43 | 91.57 | |
| KM12 | 4.98 | 95.02 | |
| SW-620 | 28.93 | 71.07 | |
| CNS cancer | SF-268 | 36.63 | 63.37 |
| SF-295 | 21.47 | 78.53 | |
| SF-539 | −15.22 | 115.22 | |
| SNB-19 | 33.18 | 66.82 | |
| SNB-75 | −32.99 | 132.99 | |
| U251 | 16.65 | 83.35 | |
| Melanoma | LOX IMVI | 35.59 | 64.41 |
| MALME-3M | 47.85 | 52.15 | |
| M14 | −16.65 | 116.65 | |
| MDA-MB-435 | −45.79 | 145.79 | |
| SK-MEL-2 | 25.22 | 74.78 | |
| SK-MEL-28 | 40.86 | 59.14 | |
| SK-MEL-5 | 13.22 | 86.78 | |
| UACC-257 | 81.40 | 18.60 | |
| UACC-62 | 41.05 | 58.95 | |
| Ovarian cancer | IGROV1 | 47.82 | 52.18 |
| OVCAR-3 | −14.80 | 114.80 | |
| OVCAR-5 | 13.80 | 86.20 | |
| OVCAR-8 | 21.03 | 78.97 | |
| NCI/ADR-RES | 90.70 | 9.30 | |
| SK-OV-3 | −7.95 | 107.95 | |
| Renal cancer | 786-0 | 28.74 | 71.26 |
| A498 | 11.54 | 88.46 | |
| ACHN | 61.12 | 38.88 | |
| CAKI-1 | 63.47 | 36.53 | |
| RXF 393 | −7.83 | 107.83 | |
| SN12C | 30.25 | 69.75 | |
| TK-10 | 64.11 | 35.89 | |
| UO-31 | 44.15 | 55.85 | |
| Prostate cancer | PC-3 | 19.30 | 80.70 |
| DU-145 | −35.32 | 135.32 | |
| Breast cancer | MCF7 | 9.44 | 90.56 |
| MDA-MB-231/ATCC | 26.05 | 73.95 | |
| HS 578T | 10.15 | 89.85 | |
| BT-549 | 18.86 | 81.14 | |
| T-47D | 34.34 | 65.66 | |
| MDA-MB-468 | −1.54 | 101.54 | |
| Mean | 20.03 | ||
The compound 4f (NSC: 761982/1) displayed remarkable significant cytotoxic potential against all the investigated cell lines which represent diverse sub-panels with GI50 values obtained between 0.09 to 16.2 μM falling within the sensitive range and exhibiting an outstanding antiproliferative activity (Table 3). The compound was also found to be sensitive against some individual cell lines and demonstrated the highest activity against CNS cancer cell lines, such as SNB-75 (GI50 0.09, TGI 1.39, LC50 > 100 and log10GI50 −7.0, log10TGI −5.86, log10LC50 >−4.00). The analyzed date also indicated an evident sensitivity profile against colon cancer subpanel (GI50 value vary from 0.23 to 15.20 μM), least for HT29 and highest for HCT-15 cell lines. The tested compound 4f was also noted to be quite sensitive against other cell lines like in leukemia, melanoma, CNS, prostate, breast cancer, etc., and in each case the concentration required by the compound to exhibit the activity was observed to be under 2 μM. All the screened melanoma cancer cell lines were sensitive against the tested compound and GI50 value was observed to be less than 1.56 μM. The maximum inhibition of growth of cell lines was noted against the SNB-75 CNS cancer cell line (GI50 value 0.09 μM) and the least growth inhibitory activity against ovarian cancer, NCI/ADR-RES ovarian cancer cell line (GI50 value 16.2 μM). The rest of all other subpanel cell lines exhibited maximum sensitivity against the tested compound with not more than 16.2 μM concentrations (Table 3). LC50 values for the majority of the cell lines were greater than 100 μM with exception to COLO 205 and DU-145, where LC50 was observed to be very low (20.2 μM & 24.3 μM, respectively) (Table 3). The log molar concentration (logGI50) values of compound 4f against various cell lines ranged from −7.00 to −4.79. The minimum concentration (−7.00) was observed against CNS cancer subpanel of SNB-75 cell line, while for NCI/ADR-RES cell line of ovarian cancer subpanel, logGI50 was the highest (−4.79). The majority of the cell lines of subpanel showed logTGI and logLC50 values to be more than >−4.00 and except COLO 205 (colon cancer) and DU-145 (prostate cancer) cell lines for which logLC50 were noted to be −4.69 and −4.61, respectively. Furthermore, a mean graph midpoint (MG-MID) value of 4f was also calculated for logGI50, logTGI and logLC50 parameters. MG-MID value is the averaged activity parameter of GI50, TGI, or LC50 values of all cell lines in the subpanel or the full panel toward the tested compound. The values were found on the lower side, logGI50 (−6.04), logTGI (−4.38) and logLC50 (−4.02) which indicates efficacy of the screened compound (Table 4). The selective index, which is a ratio of average sensitivity of all cell lines to the average sensitivity of all cell lines of a particular subpanel toward the tested compound, was also calculated to measure the compound selectivity toward cell lines (Rostom, 2006). The selective index values between 3 and 6 indicate moderate selectivity; ratios >6 is considered to have high selectivity toward the corresponding cell line, while compounds not meeting either of these criteria are referred to as nonselective i.e. mild selectivity toward the corresponding subpanel. Compound 4f, in the study exhibited moderate selectivity toward prostate cancer cell lines with a selective index 3.66 and observed to be mild selective against breast cancer, melanoma, leukemia and CNS cancer with a selective index of 2.78, 2.71, 2.55 and 2.03, respectively (Table 3). A dose response curve of synthetic compound 4f after exposure to various cancer cell lines in NCI60 panel was plotted between log10 of respective molar concentration of the sample versus percentage growth (PGs). The horizontal grid lines for comparison purpose are drawn across the plot at percentage growth values of +50, 0 and −50. The curved lines were coded with different colors as per origin of tissues such as blue color for lung cancer; red color for leukemia cell line; the gray color for central nervous system cancer; green color for colon cancer; purple color for ovarian cancer; pink color for breast cancer cell line; coral color for melanoma; golden color for renal cancer; turquoise color for prostate cancer cell lines (Fig. 4). The plots of percentage growth in cancer cell lines vs sample concentration at five different dose levels (1 log dilutions from 10−4 mol/L to 10−8 mol/L) after treatment with compound 4f are shown in Fig. 5.
| Panel | Cell line | GI50 (μM) | TGI (μM) | LC50 (μM) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Concentration per cell line | Subpanel concentration | Subpanel MIDb | Selectivity index | ||||
| Leukemia | CCRF-CEM | 0.459 | 4.932 | 0.82 | 2.55 | >100 | >100 |
| HL-60(TB) | 0.966 | >100 | >100 | ||||
| K-562 | 1.03 | >100 | >100 | ||||
| MOLT-4 | 1.69 | >100 | >100 | ||||
| RPMI-8226 | 0.340 | >100 | >100 | ||||
| SR | 0.447 | >100 | >100 | ||||
| Non-small cell lung cancer | A549/ATCC | 0.542 | 22.248 | 2.47 | 0.85 | >100 | >100 |
| EKVX | 3.90 | >100 | >100 | ||||
| HOP-62 | 1.37 | >100 | >100 | ||||
| OP-92 | 1.44 | >100 | >100 | ||||
| NCI-H226 | 12.7 | >100 | >100 | ||||
| NCI-H23 | 0.627 | >100 | >100 | ||||
| NCI-H322M | 0.904 | >100 | >100 | ||||
| NCI-H460 | 0.394 | >100 | >100 | ||||
| NCI-H522 | 0.371 | 2.86 | >100 | ||||
| Colon cancer | COLO 205 | 0.354 | 17.503 | 2.50 | 0.84 | 1.36 | 20.2 |
| HCC-2998 | 0.459 | 4.88 | >100 | ||||
| HCT-116 | 0.233 | 80.6 | >100 | ||||
| HCT-15 | 15.2 | >100 | >100 | ||||
| HT29 | 0.237 | >100 | >100 | ||||
| KM12 | 0.415 | 10.9 | >100 | ||||
| SW-620 | 0.605 | >100 | >100 | ||||
| CNS cancer | SF-295 | 1.61 | 5.1791 | 1.03 | 2.03 | 36.2 | >100 |
| SF-539 | 0.799 | 29.9 | >100 | ||||
| SNB-19 | 2.21 | >100 | >100 | ||||
| SNB-75 | 0.099 | 1.39 | >100 | ||||
| U251 | 0.461 | >100 | >100 | ||||
| Melanoma | LOX IMVI | 0.543 | 6.97 | 0.77 | 2.71 | >100 | >100 |
| MALME-3M | 1.26 | >100 | >100 | ||||
| M14 | 0.386 | 2.80 | >100 | ||||
| MDA-MB-435 | 0.174 | 0.393 | ntc | ||||
| SK-MEL-2 | 1.53 | >100 | >100 | ||||
| SK-MEL-28 | 0.829 | >100 | >100 | ||||
| SK-MEL-5 | 0.304 | 54.9 | >100 | ||||
| UACC-257 | 1.29 | >100 | >100 | ||||
| UACC-62 | 0.654 | >100 | >100 | ||||
| Ovarian cancer | IGROV1 | 0.914 | 20.637 | 2.95 | 0.71 | >100 | >100 |
| OVCAR-3 | 0.353 | 1.82 | >100 | ||||
| OVCAR-4 | 0.558 | >100 | >100 | ||||
| OVCAR-5 | 1.42 | >100 | >100 | ||||
| OVCAR-8 | 0.661 | >100 | >100 | ||||
| NCI/ADR-RES | 16.2 | 49.7 | >100 | ||||
| SK-OV-3 | 0.531 | 15.5 | >100 | ||||
| Renal cancer | 786-0 | 2.84 | 40.686 | 5.08 | 0.41 | 38.7 | >100 |
| A498 | 0.296 | 3.78 | >100 | ||||
| ACHN | 10.0 | >100 | >100 | ||||
| CAKI-1 | 11.5 | >100 | >100 | ||||
| RXF 393 | 2.11 | 6.77 | >100 | ||||
| SN12C | 2.51 | >100 | >100 | ||||
| TK-10 | 5.42 | >100 | >100 | ||||
| UO-31 | 6.01 | >100 | >100 | ||||
| Prostate cancer | PC-3 | 0.725 | 1.149 | 0.57 | 3.66 | >100 | >100 |
| DU-145 | 0.424 | 1.94 | 24.3 | ||||
| Breast cancer | MCF7 | 0.216 | 4.502 | 0.75 | 2.78 | >100 | >100 |
| MDA-MB- | 0.902 | >100 | >100 | ||||
| 231/ATCC | 0.413 | 5.41 | >100 | ||||
| HS 578T | 0.539 | 42.1 | >100 | ||||
| BT-549 | 2.22 | >100 | >100 | ||||
| T-47D | 0.212 | ntc | >100 | ||||
| MDA-MB-468 | |||||||
| Total cell lines and total concentration | 59 | 123.81 | |||||
| MIDa | 2.09 | ||||||
| Cancer disease | Used cell lines | Potencya in μmol/L | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Log10 GI50 | Log10 TGI | Log10 LC50 | ||
| Leukemia | CCRF-CEM | −6.34 | >−4.00 | >−4.00 |
| HL-60(TB) | −6.01 | >−4.00 | >−4.00 | |
| K-562 | −5.99 | >−4.00 | >−4.00 | |
| MOLT-4 | −5.77 | >−4.00 | >−4.00 | |
| RPMI-8226 | −6.47 | >−4.00 | >−4.00 | |
| SR | −6.35 | >−4.00 | >−4.00 | |
| Non-small cell lung cancer | A549/ATCC | −6.27 | >−4.00 | >−4.00 |
| EKVX | −5.41 | >−4.00 | >−4.00 | |
| HOP-62 | −5.86 | >−4.00 | >−4.00 | |
| OP-92 | −5.84 | >−4.00 | >−4.00 | |
| NCI-H226 | −4.89 | >−4.00 | >−4.00 | |
| NCI-H23 | −6.20 | >−4.00 | >−4.00 | |
| NCI-H322M | −6.04 | >−4.00 | >−4.00 | |
| NCI-H460 | −6.40 | >−4.00 | >−4.00 | |
| NCI-H522 | −6.43 | −5.54 | >−4.00 | |
| Colon cancer | COLO 205 | −6.45 | −5.87 | −4.69 |
| HCC-2998 | −6.34 | −5.31 | >−4.00 | |
| HCT-116 | −6.63 | −4.09 | >−4.00 | |
| HCT-15 | −4.82 | >−4.00 | >−4.00 | |
| HT29 | −6.63 | >−4.00 | >−4.00 | |
| KM12 | −6.38 | −4.96 | >−4.00 | |
| SW-620 | −6.22 | >−4.00 | >−4.00 | |
| CNS cancer | SF-295 | −5.79 | −4.44 | >−4.00 |
| SF-539 | −6.10 | −4.53 | >−4.00 | |
| SNB-19 | −5.66 | >−4.00 | >−4.00 | |
| SNB-75 | −7.00 | −5.86 | >−4.00 | |
| U251 | −6.34 | >−4.00 | >−4.00 | |
| Melanoma | LOX IMVI | −6.26 | >−4.00 | >−4.00 |
| MALME-3M | −5.90 | >−4.00 | >−4.00 | |
| M14 | −6.41 | −5.55 | >−4.00 | |
| MDA-MB-435 | −6.76 | −6.41 | ntb | |
| SK-MEL-2 | −5.81 | >−4.00 | >−4.00 | |
| SK-MEL-28 | −6.08 | >−4.00 | >−4.00 | |
| SK-MEL-5 | −6.52 | −4.26 | >−4.00 | |
| UACC-257 | −5.89 | >−4.00 | >−4.00 | |
| UACC-62 | −6.18 | >−4.00 | >−4.00 | |
| Ovarian cancer | IGROV1 | −6.04 | >−4.00 | >−4.00 |
| OVCAR-3 | −6.45 | −5.74 | >−4.00 | |
| OVCAR-4 | −6.25 | >−4.00 | >−4.00 | |
| OVCAR-5 | −5.85 | >−4.00 | >−4.00 | |
| OVCAR-8 | −6.18 | >−4.00 | >−4.00 | |
| NCI/ADR-RES | −4.79 | −4.30 | >−4.00 | |
| SK-OV-3 | −6.28 | −4.81 | >−4.00 | |
| Renal cancer | 786-0 | −5.55 | −4.41 | >−4.00 |
| A498 | −6.53 | −5.42 | >−4.00 | |
| ACHN | −5.00 | >−4.00 | >−4.00 | |
| CAKI-1 | −4.94 | >−4.00 | >−4.00 | |
| RXF 393 | −5.68 | −5.17 | >−4.00 | |
| SN12C | −5.60 | >−4.00 | >−4.00 | |
| TK-10 | −5.27 | >−4.00 | >−4.00 | |
| UO-31 | −5.22 | >−4.00 | >−4.00 | |
| Prostate cancer | PC-3 | −6.14 | >−4.00 | >−4.00 |
| DU-145 | −6.37 | −5.71 | −4.61 | |
| Breast cancer | MCF7 | −6.67 | >−4.00 | >−4.00 |
| MDA-MB-231/ATCC | −6.04 | >−4.00 | >−4.00 | |
| HS 578T | −6.38 | −5.27 | >−4.00 | |
| BT-549 | −6.27 | −4.38 | >−4.00 | |
| T-47D | −5.65 | >−4.00 | >−4.00 | |
| MDA-MB-468 | −6.67 | ntb | >−4.00 | |
| MID | −6.04 | −4.38 | −4.02 | |
| Delta | 0.96 | 2.03 | 0.67 | |


The dose response curve of compound 4f (NSC: 761982) plotted for seven subpanels of colon cancer (Fig. 6), illustrates the endpoint calculations for GI50, TGI and LC50 at five dose concentrations. A value equal to ‘0’ growth percent suggests no net growth or multiplication during the whole assay and the number of cells at remain equals to quantity at time zero. The calculated endpoints for the cell line COLO 205 of colon subpanel (red open circle) were found as GI50 = 0.35, TGI = 1.36 and LC50 = 20.2. All other cell lines of the colon cancer subpanel such as HCC-2998 (red open diamond), HCT-116 (red open triangle), HCT-15 (red open square), HT29 (solid blue circle), KM12 (solid blue diamond), and SW-620 (solid blue triangle) were found to be less sensitive than COLO 205 against the screened compound (Fig. 6). The in vitro anticancer activity of compound 4f, the most potent and active compound among the entire library of synthesized compounds based on rational design was also compared with the biological data obtained from the NCI web site for the clinically used anticancer drugs (Bendamustine and Chlorambucil) in terms of potency (μmol/L) by three response parameters and the results are presented in Table 5. The tabulated results clearly indicate that the compound 4f has lower mean values of log molar concentration for response parameters viz. GI50 and TGI50 and slightly higher mean value of LC50 as compared to clinically used anticancer agents, bendamustine and chlorambucil. Also, the mean graph midpoint GI50 value (arithmetical mean value of treated cancer cell lines) of the most potent compound 4f was observed to be only 2.09 μM, which is much lower than the reference anticancer agents (60 and 52 μM, respectively) suggesting that the benzimidazole endowed 1,3,4 oxadiazole compound holds promise as a potential anticancer agent. It has been reported in the literature that benzimidazole derivatives act by inhibiting DNA topoisomerase complex (Selcen et al., 2009; Singh and Tandon, 2011) and their binding mode to DNA varies from intercalation to groove binding based on the number of benzimidazole rings (Kubota et al., 1999). Therefore, there is a high probability that antiproliferative effects of compound 4f, a benzimidazole derivative which is attached to pyrimidine and 1,3,4 oxadiazole rings could be due to DNA intercalation. However, the studies focusing on the mechanism of action of these derivatives are currently under progress in our laboratory.
| Compd. | NSCa no. | Log (high conc.) | Potency in log10(M) unit in μmol/L | No. of expts | N.C.L.e | MIDf GI50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unit | GI50 EDPd (mean value) | TGI EDPd (mean value) | LC50 EDPd (mean value) | ||||||
| 4f | 761982 | −4.79 | log10(M) | −6.04 | −4.38 | −4.02 | 2 | 59 | 2.09 |
| BENDAb | 138783 | −4.0 | log10(M) | −4.153 | −4.018 | −4.004 | 3 | 60 | 60 |
| CHLBc | 3088 | −5.0 | log10(M) | −4.758 | −4.282 | −4.062 | 2 | 59 | 52 |
3.3 Structural activity relationship (SAR)
On the basis of the obtained results, it can be concluded that, benzimidazole analogues endowed with oxadiazole possess excellent antiproliferative activities as compared to the other benzimidazole clubbed thiadiazole, triazolo-thiadiazines and triazolo-thiadiazoles derivatives. It was observed that the presence of electron withdrawing groups such as oxygen at ortho (2nd position), meta (3rd position) or para (4th position) position on aromatic ring of target compounds influences the antiproliferative activity. Compound 4g having free oxygen group at ortho (2-one) position of phenyl ring, chemically as, 1-((5-(3-(1H-benzo [d] imidazol-2-yl)-3-oxopropyl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl)methyl)-4-amino pyrimidin-2(1H)-one, demonstrated high sensitivity (78.75%) against NCI cancer cell lines panel and likewise when the same group is disubstituted on ortho and para (2,4-dione) positions of phenyl ring, an augment in the sensitivity (20.03%) was observed for the compound, 3-(5-(3-(1H-benzo [d] imidazol-2-yl)-3-oxopropyl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl)methyl)-5-methylpyrimidine-2,4(1H, 3H)-dione (4f). Contrary to this, the electron donating groups such as methoxy (—OCH3) attached at para (4th position) position of the phenyl ring, a decrease in the sensitivity (93.97%) was observed for compound 8b, namely, 1-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)-3-(6-(4-methoxy phenyl)-7H-[1,2,4] triazolo [3,4-b] [1, 3] thiazin-3-yl) propan-1-one. Similarly, the presence of methyl group also decreased the sensitivity (94.39%) as observed for the compound 5e, namely, 1-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)-3-(5-(benzylthio)-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl) propan-1-one. However, the sensitivity of unsubstituted aromatic ring such as in compound 9a noted to be increased to (92.86%) in comparison with the compounds bearing electron donating groups such as methoxy and methyl as in compounds 8b and 5e.
3.4 Molecular docking studies
A number of research studies conducted elsewhere have reported that benzimidazole derivatives act by inhibiting DNA topoisomerase complex (Selcen et al., 2009; Singh and Tandon, 2011). Therefore, the molecular interactions of the compound 4f with the target protein, topoisomerase enzyme complex were studied with the help of Maestro 9.0 molecular docking software. The most fitting binding modes of compound 4f in the active site of topoisomerase enzyme (1SC7) are presented in Figs. 7 and 8.

Docking of the most active synthesized compound 4f into the enzyme active site yielded a number of molecular interactions showing hydrogen bond, π interaction and hydrophobic interactions between the drug and enzyme and are considered to be accountable for the noted affinity of the compound. Though, compound 4f lacks Zwitter ion but it is able to form hydrogen bonds with the enzyme through its secondary amino group of benzimidazole/pyrimidine rings and carbonyl group with the Arg 364 residue which is the same residue where the natural inhibitor binds (Staker et al., 2005). In the hydrogen bond interaction between the nitrogen (—N—) of the imidazole ring of the compound 4f and the carboxyl group (C⚌O) of the side chain residue of Arg 364 (1.73 Å), the former acts as a hydrogen bond donor while the later behaves as a hydrogen bond acceptor. Further, in the second Hydrogen bond interaction, the carbonyl group (C⚌O) of the compound 4f acts as the hydrogen bond acceptor and an amino group (N—H) of the side chain residue of Arg 364 (2.39 Å) is a hydrogen bond donor (Fig. 7). The amide group of compound 4f seems to have an important role in strong hydrogen bonding because the lone pair electrons on nitrogen atom of the amide delocalized into the carbonyl group of compound. Pi–π interactions were also observed between the compound and the binding site of enzyme, which are considered to play a significant role in the inhibitory activity. As it can be seen in the Lig plot (Fig. 8) of compound which shows the interactions with binding site, it appears that oxadiazole and phenyl ring of benzimidazole are properly oriented toward the more lipophilic area of 1SC7 binding site and form CH-π interaction with Arg 364 (4.83 Å) and DNA pointed DG 12 (4.29 Å) resides. In addition to this, several hydrophobic interactions were also observed between the phenyl ring, oxadiazole and pyrimidine ring of compound 4f with the amino acid residues of the enzyme topoisomerase including DA 14, DA 13, Tgp 11, Lys 532, Thr 718, Ile 535 and Asp 533 and shown in Figs. 7 and 8. The compound 4f was found to have a glide score value of −5.39, indicating a high affinity and better interaction between the compound and the enzyme.
4 Conclusion
A total of 22 novel heterocyclic compounds based on the benzimidazole nucleus were prepared and characterized and among them 15 molecules were chosen for studying their anticipated antiproliferative activity against various human cell lines by in vitro methods at NCI, USA. Notably, compound 4f (3-(5-(3-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)-3-oxopropyl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl)methyl)-5-methylpyrimidine-2,4 (1H, 3H)-dione) was identified as lead candidate exhibiting excellent antiproliferative activity with MG-MID value GI50(2.09), log10GI50(−6.04), log10TGI(−4.38) and log10LC50(−4.02). The cytotoxic effects of 4f molecule were at par with the marketed anticancer drugs, chlorambucil and bendamustine. Furthermore, molecular docking studies performed with the help of Maestro 9.0 software program (Schrodinger Inc. USA) provided an insight into the binding patterns of the compound 4f into the binding sites of the DNA-topoisomerase complex. In view of these outcomes, the further investigations on compound 4f may be carried in search of potential new anticancer agents.
Acknowledgments
The authors are thankful to UGC, New Delhi, Government of India, for funding the Research Project [file no. 36-107/2008 (SR)] and National Cancer Institute (NCI), Chemotherapeutic Agents Repository, Fisher Bio Services, USA, for anticancer screening.
References
- Synthesis of novel 1,2,5-trisubstituted benzimidazoles as potential antitumor agents. Eur. J. Med. Chem.. 2011;46:4062-4070.
- [Google Scholar]
- Inhibition of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase enhances cell death and improves tumor growth delay in irradiated lung cancer models. Clin. Canc. Res.. 2007;13:3033-3042.
- [Google Scholar]
- Some practical considerations and applications of the national cancer institute in-vitro anticancer drug discovery screen. Drug Dev. Res.. 1995;34:91-109.
- [Google Scholar]
- The development of the antitumour benzothiazole prodrug, phortress, as a clinical candidate. Curr. Med. Chem.. 2004;11:1241-1253.
- [Google Scholar]
- A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of FB642 administered orally on a daily schedule to patients with advanced solid tumors. Proc. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol.. 2001;20:2129.
- [Google Scholar]
- Synthesis and in-vitro antitumor activity of new quinoxaline derivatives. Eur. J. Med. Chem.. 2009;44:1579-1591.
- [Google Scholar]
- Synthesis of novel 1,2,4-oxadiazoles and analogues as potential anticancer agents. Eur. J. Med. Chem.. 2011;46:3085-3092.
- [Google Scholar]
- Synthesis and anticancer and anti-HIV testing of some pyrazino[1,2-a]benzimidazole derivatives. Eur. J. Med. Chem.. 2002;37:255-260.
- [Google Scholar]
- Tubulin-dependent hydrolysis of guanosine triphosphate as a screening test to identify new antitubulin compounds with potential as antimitotic agents: application to carbamates of aromatic amines. Canc. Res.. 1989;49:1344-1348.
- [Google Scholar]
- Synthesis and antitumoral activity of novel 3-(2-substituted-1,3,4-oxadiazol-5-yl) and 3-(5-substituted-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl) β-carboline derivatives. Bioorg. Med. Chem.. 2008;16:9660-9667.
- [Google Scholar]
- Bendamustine in B-cell malignancies: the new 46-year-old, kid on the block. Clin. Canc. Res.. 2009;15:7456-7461.
- [Google Scholar]
- The national cancer institute: cancer drug discovery and development program. Semin. Oncol.. 1992;19:622-638.
- [Google Scholar]
- Anti-tumor activity of CYC116, a novel small molecule inhibitor of aurora kinases and VEGFR2. Proc. Am. Assoc. Canc. Res. 2008:49. (Abs. 5644)
- [Google Scholar]
- Synthesis, cytotoxicity and DNA interactions of new cisplatin analogues containing substituted benzimidazole ligands. J. Med. Chem.. 2009;52:1345-1357.
- [Google Scholar]
- Analysis of food and drug administration approved anticancer agents in the NCI60 panel of human tumor cell lines. Mol. Canc. Ther.. 2010;9:1451-1460.
- [Google Scholar]
- Benzimidazole bearing oxadiazole and triazolo-thiadiazoles nucleus: Design and synthesis as anticancer agents. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.. 2012;22:5438-5444.
- [Google Scholar]
- Benzimidazole clubbed with triazolo-thiadiazoles and triazolo-thiadiazine: new anticancer agents. Eur. J. Med. Chem.. 2013;62:785-798.
- [Google Scholar]
- Synthesis and biological evaluation of 3,6-disubstituted[1,2,4]triazolo[3,4-b][1,3,4]thiadiazole derivatives as a novel class of potential anti-tumor agents. Eur. J. Med. Chem.. 2009;44:2776-2781.
- [Google Scholar]
- The interaction of benzimidazole compounds with DNA: intercalation and groove binding modes. Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser.. 1999;42:53-54.
- [Google Scholar]
- Synthesis and anticancer activity of 5-(3-indolyl)-1,3,4-thiadiazoles. Eur. J. Med. Chem.. 2010;45:4664-4668.
- [Google Scholar]
- A novel stereo-selective sulfonylurea, 1-[1-(4-aminobenzoyl)-2,3-dihydro-1H-indol-6-sulfonyl]-4-phenyl-imidazolidin-2-one, has antitumor efficacy in in-vitro and in-vivo tumor models. Biochem. Pharmacol.. 2002;64:473-480.
- [Google Scholar]
- Phase-I/II study to evaluate dose limiting toxicity, maximum tolerated dose, and tolerability of bendamustine HCl in pre-treated patients with B-chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (Binet stages B and C) requiring therapy. Canc. Res. Clin. Onco.. 2006;132:99-104.
- [Google Scholar]
- Antitumor Activity of IMC-038525, a Novel Oral Tubulin Polymerization Inhibitor. Vol vol. 3. New York, USA: ImClone Systems Inc.; 2010. 318–325
- Synthesis and antiproliferative activity of N-substituted 2-amino-5-(2,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-1,3,4-thiadiazoles. Bioorg. Med. Chem.. 2006;14:4483-4489.
- [Google Scholar]
- N-(cycloalkylamino)acyl-2-aminothiazole inhibitors of cyclin-dependent kinase-2, N-[5-[[[5-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-2-oxazolyl]methyl]thio]-2-thiazolyl]-4-piperidinecarboxamide (BMS-387032), a highly efficacious and selective antitumor agent. J. Med. Chem.. 2004;47:1719-1728.
- [Google Scholar]
- Feasibility of a high-flux anticancer drug screen using a diverse panel of cultured human tumor cell lines. J. Natl. Canc. Inst.. 1991;83:757-766.
- [Google Scholar]
- Discovery and SAR of 2-(1-propylpiperidin-4-yl)-1H-benzimidazole-4-carboxamide: a potent inhibitor of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) for the treatment of cancer. Bioorg. Med. Chem.. 2008;16:6965-6975.
- [Google Scholar]
- Synthesis and antitumor activity of 1-substituted-2-methyl-5-nitrobenzimidazoles. Bioorg. Med. Chem.. 2006;14:7324-7332.
- [Google Scholar]
- Synthesis of benzimidazoles bearing oxadiazole nucleus as anticancer agents. Eur. J. Med. Chem.. 2012;54:855-866.
- [Google Scholar]
- 1-(1H-Benzimidazol-2-yl)-3-[5-(trichloromethyl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl] propan-1-one. Molbank. 2012;M766:1-4.
- [Google Scholar]
- Synthesis and anticancer activity of some novel 2-substitutedbenzimidazole derivatives. Eur. J. Med. Chem.. 2010;45:2949-2956.
- [Google Scholar]
- Text Book of Organic, Medicinal and Pharmaceuticals Chemistry. Philadelphia: Lippincott Company; 1982.
- Synthesis and preliminary evaluation of selected 2-aryl-5(6)-nitro-1H-benzimidazole derivatives as potential anticancer agents. Arch. Pharm. Res.. 2011;34:181-189.
- [Google Scholar]
- Synthesis and in-vitro antitumor evaluation of some indeno[1,2-c] pyrazolene substituted with sulfonamide, sulfonylurea(-thiourea)pharmacophores and some derived thiazole ring systems. Bioorg. Med. Chem.. 2006;14:6475-6485.
- [Google Scholar]
- Cell cycle disruption and apoptotic activity of 3-aminothiazolo[3,2-a]benzimidazole-2-carbonitrile and its homologues. Eur. J. Med. Chem.. 2010;45:2689-2694.
- [Google Scholar]
- Gold from the sea: marine compounds as inhibitors of the hallmarks of cancer. Biotechnol. Adv.. 2011;29:531-547.
- [Google Scholar]
- Biological activity of bis-benzimidazole derivatives on DNA topoisomerase I and HeLa, MCF7 and A431 cells. J. Enzyme Inh. Med. Chem.. 2009;24:844-849.
- [Google Scholar]
- The NCI60 human tumour cell line anticancer drug screen. Nat. Rev.. 2006;6:813-823.
- [Google Scholar]
- Synthesis and biological activity of novel inhibitors of topoisomerase I: 2-Aryl-substituted 2-bis-1H-benzimidazoles. Eur. J. Med. Chem.. 2011;46:659-669.
- [Google Scholar]
- Structures of three classes of anticancer agents bound to the human topoisomerase I-DNA covalent complex. J. Med. Chem.. 2005;48:2336-2345.
- [Google Scholar]
- Synthesis and biological evaluation of analogues of AKT (Protein Kinase B) inhibitor-IV. J. Med. Chem.. 2011;54:1126-1139.
- [Google Scholar]
- Novel 1,3,4-heterodiazole analogues: synthesis and in-vitro antitumor activity. Eur. J. Med. Chem.. 2012;47:445-451.
- [Google Scholar]
- Transcriptional regulation of topoisomerase II alpha at confluence and pharmacological modulation of expression by bis-benzimidazole drugs. Mol. Pharmacol.. 2001;59:699-706.
- [Google Scholar]
