5.2
Impact Factor
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Corrigendum
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Full Length Article
Full lenth article
Letter to Editor
Original Article
Research article
Retraction notice
Review
Review Article
SPECIAL ISSUE: ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY
5.3
Impact Factor
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Corrigendum
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Full Length Article
Full lenth article
Letter to Editor
Original Article
Research article
Retraction notice
Review
Review Article
SPECIAL ISSUE: ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
ARTICLE IN PRESS
doi:
10.25259/AJC_1106_2025

Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of novel coumarin-1, 2, 4-triazole derivatives as dual inhibitors of α-glucosidase and PTP1B

Clinical Trails Center, The Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, China
State Key Laboratory of Discovery and Utilization of Functional Components in Traditional Chinese Medicine, Engineering Research Center for the Development and Application of Ethnic Medicine and TCM (Ministry of Education), Guizhou Provincial Engineering Research Center for the Development and Application of Ethnic Medicine and TCM, Guizhou Medical University, Guian New Area, China

Corresponding author: E-mail address: wanggch123@163.com (G. Wang)

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Abstract

Multi-target inhibitors are one of the important directions in the current research on anti-diabetic drugs. To develop new dual-target inhibitors of protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B (PTP1B) and α-glucosidase, fourteen coumarin-1, 2, 4-triazole derivatives (10a-10n) were design and synthesized. All synthetic compounds were screened for their in vitro α-glucosidase inhibitory activity by using yeast α-glucosidase enzyme. In comparison with the positive acarbose (IC50: 309.83 ± 8.74 μM), these derivatives had moderate to high active inhibitory activity against α-glucosidase with IC50 values between 9.71 ± 0.28 μM and 160.67 ± 5.10 μM. In addition, the most active compound 10n also exhibits PTP1B inhibitory activity as compared to the positive ursolic acid (IC50: 4.55 ± 1.08 μM), with an IC50 value of 7.31 ± 1.55 μM. SAR analysis demonstrated a significant improvement in α-glucosidase inhibitory activity upon the introduction of substituents with increased steric hindrance. α-Glucosidase inhibition mechanism experiments demonstrate that 10n is a mixed-type inhibitor. Compound 10n reduced the fluorescence intensity of glucosidase by 47.5% through a static quenching manner. The outcome of synchronous fluorescence indicated the location where 10n bound to the protein was closer to tryptophan residue. The results of CD (α-helix: 36.8% to 26.9%; β-sheets: 15.5% to 21.4%; β-turns: 16.3% to 18.1%; random coils: 29.4% to 37.3%) and 3D fluorescence (reduce the fluorescence intensity of characteristic peak 1 and 2) demonstrated the addition of compound 10n could destroy the original conformation of α-glucosidase. Importantly, molecular docking uncovered 10n could enter active pockets both α-glucosidase (binding energy: -11.7 kcal•mol-1) and PTP1B (binding energy: -8.3 kcal•mol-1) and interacted with residues through hydrogen bond, hydrophobic contact, π-π stacking interaction. The in vivo experiment found 10n (20 mg/kg, n = 8) could lower postprandial blood sugar levels in Kunming mice (ethical approval has been obtained).

Keywords

α-Glucosidase
Coumarin
Dual inhibitor
PTP1B
Triazole

1. Introduction

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a metabolic disease marked by persistently elevated blood glucose levels over an extended period, which causes dysfunction and chronic damage in various tissues, including the kidneys, eyes, blood vessels, heart and nerves and there are approximately 537 million people living with diabetes worldwide [1]. α-Glucosidase (α-Glu) is a key hydrolase involved in carbohydrate digestion, and inhibiting its activity can reduce levels of postprandial blood glucose [2-4]. Although clinically used α-glu inhibitors benefit diabetes management, they have limitations due to side effects (abdominal pain, flatulence, diarrhea) [5]. Besides, protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B (PTP1B) belongs to the family of phosphatases, and negatively regulates insulin signalling pathways through dephosphorylation of tyrosine residues on the insulin receptor or its substrate [6], which could lead to insulin resistance and eventually cause the occurrence of type 2 diabetes. Therefore, inhibiting the activity of PTP1B could be one of the effective ways to treat T2DM [7,8]. Since diabetes is a complex multifactorial disease, α-glu/PTP1B dual-target inhibitors can exert a synergistic therapeutic effect. Hence, they have now become one of the important directions in current anti-diabetic drug research.

In the literature, some 1,2,4-triazole derivatives have been reported as α-glu or PTP1B inhibitors (Figure 1) [9-11]. Furthermore, extensive research endeavors have been devoted to investigating and developing coumarin derivatives as inhibitors of α-glu or PTP1B (Figure 1) [12-14]. Among them, 4-hydroxy Pd-C-III is a natural coumarin compound that exhibits dual inhibitory activity against α-glu and PTP1B [15]. In our prior work, with 4-hydroxy Pd-C-III as the lead compound, we synthesized a series of coumarin derivatives, and biological evaluations confirmed the most active one as a potent dual α-glu/PTP1B inhibitor (Figure 1) [16].

Structures of some representative inhibitors containing 1,2,4-triazole or coumarin.
Figure 1.
Structures of some representative inhibitors containing 1,2,4-triazole or coumarin.

Based on these significant findings, coumarin and 1,2,4-triazole moieties are important pharmacophores for constructing α-glu and PTP1B inhibitors. Despite extensive research on coumarin or triazole-based inhibitors separately, hybrid coumarin-triazole derivatives with dual α-Glu/PTP1B inhibitory activity remain underexplored. By hybridizing them into a single molecule according to the molecular hybridization principle, it is expected to synergistically enhance the inhibitory activity and obtain novel and highly potent α-glu/PTP1B dual-target inhibitors.

Herein, we report the design and synthesis of a novel series of coumarin-1, 2, 4-triazole derivatives according to the strategy of molecular hybridization [17,18]. All compounds were tested for α-glu and PTP1B inhibition activity. Furthermore, the structure-activity relationship (SAR), mechanism of action, safety profiles, and in vivo hypoglycemic activity of these new inhibitors were also performed.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Material and instruments

The α-glu enzyme (G5003-1KU) originating from Saccharomyces cerevisiae was sourced from Sigma-Aldrich in the United States, while the substrate p-NPG (p-Nitrophenyl-α-D-galactopyranoside) was acquired from Macklin, a company based in Shanghai, China. The 1H NMR and 13C NMR were monitored by JNM spectrometer. Besides, the high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) were recorded by the instrument of UHPLC Q-Exactive Plus.

2.2. Chemistry

2.2.1. Synthesis of 4-(oxiran-2-ylmethoxy)-2H-chromen-2-one (3)

Firstly, 4-hydroxycoumarin (1, 37.04 mmol, 6 g) was dissolved in EtOH (300 mL), then KOH (43.48 mmol, 2.44 g) was added, and the mixture was stirred thoroughly. Next, epichlorohydrin (2, 472.26 mmol, 37 mL) was slowly added into the reaction system while stirring continuously at room temperature [19]. After that, the reaction system was transferred to an oil bath and reacted at 80°C for 5 h. When the reaction finished, the intermediate 3 (4-(oxiran-2-ylmethoxy)-2H-chromen-2-one) was obtained after cooling to room temperature, filtering and drying. The crude product was subjected to silica gel chromatography (PE/EA = 5/1 as the eluent) purification to afford 3. Rf (PE/EA = 1:1) = 0.6.

2.2.2. Synthesis of 2-phenoxyacetic acid (5)

Anhydrous sodium hydroxide (175 mmol, 7 g) was dissolved in 15 mL water, then phenol (4, 63.8 mmol, 6 g) was added and stirred thoroughly. Chloroacetic acid (114.8 mmol, 6.87 mL) was added to the system slowly during the stirring process [9]. Then, the mixture was reacted at 80°C for 5 h. Upon completion of the reaction, 175 mL of cold water was added to the system. Subsequently, the pH was adjusted to 2 using HCl, and the obtained white solid (intermediate 5) was filtered and dried, which was used as such without the need for further purification. Rf (PE/EA = 1:1) = 0.1.

2.2.3. Synthesis of 4-amino-5-(phenoxymethyl)-4H-1,2,4-triazole-3- thiol (7)

The key intermediate 5 (23 mmol, 3.5 g) and raw material thiocarbohydrazide (23 mmol, 2.44 g) were added to the round-bottom flask and reacted at 160°C for 1 h, and the reaction was detected by thin layer chromatography (TLC) [9]. After the reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature, it was crushed in water, followed by filtration and washing with water. After drying, intermediate 7 was obtained and used without the need for further purification. Rf (PE/EA = 1:1) = 0.4.

2.2.4. Synthesis of intermediates 9a-9n

A 25 mL pear-shaped flask was charged with intermediate 7 (2 mmol, 445 mg), substituted benzaldehyde 8a-8n (2 mmol), and glacial acetic acid (12 mL), followed by heating at 120°C for 4 h to allow the reaction to proceed [9]. Upon completion of the reaction, the resulting solid was filtered, washed extensively with water, and dried to yield intermediates 9a-9n, which were used as such without the need for further purification. Rf (PE/EA = 1:1) = 0.1∼0.8.

2.2.5. Synthesis of target compounds 10a-10n

Intermediate 3 (0.5 mmol, 109 mg) and intermediates 9a-9n (0.5 mmol) were taken up in anhydrous ethanol (15 mL) and subsequently refluxed for 5 h. The solvent in the system was spun dry and purified by silica gel column chromatography (PE/EA = 5/1∼1/1 as the eluent), and the final products 10a-10n were finally obtained [20]. For all compounds, dimethyl sulfoxide-d6 (DMSO)-d6 was used as the solvent for NMR analysis. The 1H NMR spectra were recorded at 400 MHz, and the 13C NMR spectra at 100 MHz.

(E)-4-(2-hydroxy-3-((4-((3-hydroxybenzylidene)amino)-5-(phenoxymethyl)-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)thio)propoxy)-2H-chromen-2-one (10a).Yield 47%; white solid; m.p. 187.0-190.0°C; 1H NMR: 3.35-3.36 (m, 1H, CH2), 3.47 (dd, J = 13.6 Hz, 5.2 Hz, 1H, CH2), 4.16-4.24 (m, 3H, CH2+CH), 5.18 (s, 2H, PhCH2O), 5.75 (d, J = 5.2 Hz, 1H, OH), 5.84 (s, 1H, chromen-2-one), 6.82 (d, 2H, J = 8.4 Hz, Ar), 6.90-6.94 (m, 1H, Ar), 6.97-6.99 (m, 2H, Ar), 7.21-7.26 (m, 2H, Ar), 7.29-7.33 (m, 1H, Ar), 7.35-7.37 (m, 1H, Ar), 7.60-7.65 (m, 1H, Ar), 7.63 (d, 2H, J = 8.4 Hz, Ar), 7.87 (dd, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz, 1.6 Hz, Ar), 8.69 (s, 1H, CH=N), 10.45 (s, 1H, PhOH); 13C NMR: 35.7 (1C, SCH2), 60.0 (1C, OCH), 67.6 (1C, OCH), 72.5 (1C, OCH), 91.2 (1C, chromen-2-one), 115.5 (2C, Ar), 115.7 (1C, Ar), 116.6 (2C, Ar), 116.9 (1C, Ar), 122.1 (1C, Ar), 123.0 (1C, Ar), 123.8 (1C, Ar), 124.7 (1C, Ar), 130.1 (2C, Ar), 131.9 (2C, Ar), 133.3 (1C, Ar), 148.6 (1C, Ar), 149.1 (1C, Ar), 153.3 (1C, Ar), 157.9 (1C, Ar), 162.2 (1C, Ar), 162.8 (1C, Ar), 165.5 (1C, Ar), 167.3 (1C, Ar); HRMS: 545.1486, calcd for [M+H]+ C28H25N4O6S+: 545.1489.

(E)-4-(2-hydroxy-3-((4-((4-hydroxybenzylidene)amino)-5-(phenoxymethyl)-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)thio)propoxy)-2H-chromen-2-one (10b). Yield 55%; white powder; m.p. 178.6-181.3°C; 1H NMR: 3.34-3.36 (m, 1H, CH2), 3.47 (dd, J = 13.2 Hz, 4.4 Hz, 1H, CH2), 4.16-4.24 (m, 3H, CH2+CH), 5.18 (s, 2H, PhCH2O), 5.75 (d, J = 5.2 Hz, 1H, OH), 5.84 (s, 1H, chromen-2-one), 6.82 (d, 2H, J = 8.0 Hz, Ar), 6.90-6.94 (m, 1H, Ar), 6.97-6.99 (m, 2H, Ar), 7.22-7.26 (m, 2H, Ar), 7.29-7.33 (m, 1H, Ar), 7.35 (d, 1H, J = 8.4 Hz, Ar), 7.60-7.66 (m, 1H, Ar), 7.63 (d, 2H, J = 8.4 Hz, Ar), 7.87 (dd, 1H, J = 7.6 Hz, 2.0 Hz, Ar), 8.69 (s, 1H, CH=N), 10.45 (s, 1H, PhOH); 13C NMR: 36.0 (1C, SCH2), 60.2 (1C, OCH), 67.8 (1C, OCH), 72.5 (1C, OCH), 91.2 (1C, chromen-2-one), 115.6 (1C, Ar), 115.7 (1C, Ar), 115.8 (1C, Ar), 116.6 (1C, Ar), 116.71 (1C, Ar), 122.0 (1C, Ar), 123.1 (1C, Ar), 123.8 (1C, Ar), 124.6 (1C, Ar), 130. 0 (1C, Ar), 131.8 (1C, Ar), 133.2 (1C, Ar), 148.7 (1C, Ar), 149.0 (1C, Ar), 153.3 (1C, Ar), 158.1 (1C, Ar), 162.1 (1C, Ar), 162.8 (1C, Ar), 165.5 (1C, Ar), 167.15 (1C, Ar), 167.24 (1C, Ar); HRMS: 545.1489, calcd for [M+H]+C28H25N4O6S+: 545.1489.

(E)-4-(2-hydroxy-3-((4-((4-hydroxy-3,5-dimethylbenzylidene)amino)-5-(phenoxymethyl)-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)thio)propoxy)-2H-chromen-2-one (10c). Yield 51%; pink powder; m.p. 213.2-215.4°C; 1H NMR: 2.12 (s, 6H, CH3), 3.33-3.35 (m, 1H, CH2), 3.46 (dd, J = 13.2 Hz, 4.4 Hz, 1H, CH2), 4.16-4.23 (m, 3H, CH2+CH), 5.17 (s, 2H, PhCH2O), 5.73 (d, J = 4.8 Hz, 1H, OH), 5.82 (s, 1H, chromen-2-one), 6.90-6.99 (m, 3H, Ar), 7.22-7.36 (m, 6H, Ar), 7.60-7.63 (m, 1H, Ar), 7.86 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H, Ar), 8.60 (s, 1H, CH=N), 9.26 (s, 1H, PhOH); 13C NMR: 17.0 (1C, CH3), 17.1 (1C, CH3), 35.9 (1C, SCH2), 60.0 (1C, OCH), 67.6 (1C, OCH), 72.5 (1C, OCH), 91.2 (1C, chromen-2-one), 115.4 (2C, Ar), 115.5 (1C, Ar), 115.7 (1C, Ar), 116.9 (1C, Ar), 122.1 (1C, Ar), 122.8 (1C, Ar), 123.8 (1C, Ar), 124.6 (1C, Ar), 125.5 (1C, Ar), 129.6 (1C, Ar), 129.8 (1C, Ar), 130.1 (2C, Ar), 130.3 (1C, Ar), 133.3 (1C, Ar), 148.7 (1C, Ar), 149.0 (1C, Ar), 153.3 (1C, Ar), 158.0 (1C, Ar), 158.2 (1C, Ar), 158.9 (1C, Ar), 162.2 (1C, Ar), 165.5 (1C, Ar), 167.5 (1C, Ar); HRMS: 571.1661, calcd for [M+H]+ C30H27N4O6S-: 571.1657.

(E)-4-(2-hydroxy-3-((4-((4-methylbenzylidene)amino)-5-(phenoxymethyl)-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)thio)propoxy)-2H-chromen-2-one (10d). Yield 45%; white powder; m.p. 138.5-141.9°C; 1H NMR: 2.32 (s, 3H, CH3), 3.35-3.37 (m, 1H, CH2), 3.48 (dd, J = 13.2 Hz, 4.4 Hz, 1H, CH2), 4.15-4.23 (m, 3H, CH2+CH), 5.24 (s, 2H, PhCH2O), 5.76 (d, J = 4.0 Hz, 1H, OH), 5.82 (s, 1H, chromen-2-one), 6.90-6.99 (m, 3H, Ar), 7.22-7.37 (m, 6H, Ar), 7.60-7.68 (m, 3H, Ar), 7.87 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H, Ar), 8.82 (s, 1H, CH=N); 13C NMR: 21.8 (1C, CH3), 35.9 (1C, SCH2), 60.1 (1C, OCH), 67.6 (1C, OCH), 72.5 (1C, OCH), 91.1 (1C, chromen-2-one), 115.5 (2C, Ar), 115.7 (1C, Ar), 116.9 (1C, Ar), 122.1 (1C, Ar), 123.8 (1C, Ar), 124.6 (1C, Ar), 129.5 (1C, Ar), 129.5 (2C, Ar), 130.1 (2C, Ar), 130.3 (2C, Ar), 133.3 (1C, Ar), 144.3 (1C, Ar), 148.6 (1C, Ar), 149.5 (1C, Ar), 153.3 (1C, Ar), 157.9 (1C, Ar), 162.2 (1C, Ar), 165.4 (1C, Ar), 166.7 (1C, Ar); HRMS: 543.1690, calcd for [M+H]+ C29H27N4O5S+: 543.1697.

(E)-4-(3-((4-((3-chloro-4-hydroxybenzylidene)amino)-5-(phenoxymethyl)-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)thio)-2-hydroxypropoxy)-2H-chromen-2-one (10e). Yield 48%; white powder; m.p. 152.3-153.9°C; 1H NMR: 3.35-3.36 (m, 1H, CH2), 3.47 (dd, J = 13.2 Hz, 4.4 Hz, 1H, CH2), 4.15-4.23 (m, 3H, CH2+CH), 5.22 (s, 2H, PhCH2O), 5.76 (m, 2H, OH+chromen-2-one), 6.92 (t, 1H, J = 7.2 Hz, Ar), 6.97 (d, 2H, J = 8.4 Hz, Ar), 7.03 (d, 1H, J = 8.4 Hz, Ar), 7.22-7.26 (m, 2H, Ar), 7.29-7.33 (m, 1H, Ar), 7.35 (d, 1H, J = 8.4 Hz, Ar), 7.60-7.63 (m, 2H, Ar), 7.75 (s, 1H, Ar), 7.87 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H, Ar), 8.71 (s, 1H, CH=N), 11.29 (s, 1H, PhOH); 13C NMR: 35.9 (1C, SCH2), 60.1 (1C, OCH), 67.6 (1C, OCH), 72.5 (1C, OCH), 91.2 (1C, chromen-2-one), 115.5 (2C, Ar), 115.7 (1C, Ar), 116.9 (1C, Ar), 117.6 (1C, Ar), 121.1 (1C, Ar), 122.1 (1C, Ar), 123.8 (1C, Ar), 124.1 (1C, Ar), 124.6 (1C, Ar), 129.9 (1C, Ar), 130.1 (2C, Ar), 131.3 (1C, Ar), 133.3 (1C, Ar), 149.3 (1C, Ar), 153.3 (1C, Ar), 157.9 (1C, Ar), 158.2 (1C, Ar), 162.2 (1C, Ar), 165.5 (1C, Ar), 165.6 (1C, Ar); HRMS:579.1097, calcd for [M+H]+ C28H24ClN4O6S+: 579.1100.

(E)-4-(3-((4-((4-fluorobenzylidene)amino)-5-(phenoxymethyl)-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)thio)-2-hydroxypropoxy)-2H-chromen-2-one (10f). Yield 48%; white powder; m.p. 133.6-135.1°C; 1H NMR: 3.35-3.38 (m, 1H, CH2), 3.49 (dd, J = 13.2 Hz, 4.4 Hz, 1H, CH2), 4.15-4.23 (m, 3H, CH2+CH), 5.26 (s, 2H, PhCH2O), 5.72-5.84 (m, 2H, OH+ chromen-2-one), 6.90-6.99 (m, 3H, Ar), 7.22-7.37 (m, 6H, Ar), 7.60-7.64 (m, 1H, Ar), 7.85-7.89 (m, 3H, Ar), 8.88 (s, 1H, CH=N); 13C NMR: 35.9 (1C, SCH2), 60.1 (1C, OCH), 67.5 (1C, OCH), 72.5 (1C, OCH), 91.2 (1C, chromen-2-one), 115.5 (2C, Ar), 115.7 (1C, Ar), 116.9 (1C, Ar), 117.0 (1C, Ar), 117.2 (1C, Ar), 122.2 (1C, Ar), 123.8 (1C, Ar), 124.7 (1C, Ar), 128.8 (1C, Ar), 130.1 (1C, Ar), 132.0 (d, J = 10.0 Hz, 2C), 133.4 (1C, Ar), 148.6 (1C, Ar), 149.6 (1C, Ar), 153.3 (1C, Ar), 157.9 (1C, Ar), 162.2 (1C, Ar), 164.2 (1C, Ar), 165.3 (d, J = 11.0 Hz, 2C), 166.7 (1C, Ar); HRMS: 547.1439, calcd for [M+H]+ C28H24FN4O5S+: 547.1446.

(E)-4-(3-((4-((2-fluoro-4-hydroxybenzylidene)amino)-5-(phenoxymethyl)-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)thio)-2-hydroxypropoxy)-2H-chromen-2-one (10g). Yield 57%; pale yellow powder; m.p. 183.9-185.4°C; 1H NMR: 3.35-3.37 (m, 1H, CH2), 3.49-3.52 (m, 1H, CH2), 4.17-4.23 (m, 3H, CH2+CH), 5.20 (s, 2H, PhCH2O), 5.76 (s, 1H, chromen-2-one), 5.83 (d, J = 3.2 Hz, 1H, OH), 6.61-6.34 (m, 1H, Ar), 6.70 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H, Ar), 6.90-6.99 (m, 3H, Ar), 7.22-7.36 (m, 4H, Ar), 7.59-7.63 (m, 1H, Ar), 7.76-7.80 (m, 1H, Ar), 7.86 (d, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz, Ar), 8.84 (s, 1H, CH=N), 10.97 (s, 1H, PhOH); 13C NMR: 36.0 (1C, SCH2), 60.2 (1C, OCH), 67.7 (1C, OCH), 72.5 (1C, OCH), 91.2 (1C, chromen-2-one), 103.6 (1C, Ar), 110.9 (1C, Ar), 113.8 (1C, Ar), 115.6 (1C, Ar), 115.8 (1C, Ar), 116.9 (1C, Ar), 122.2 (1C, Ar), 123.8 (1C, Ar), 124.6 (1C, Ar), 129.9 (1C, Ar), 130.1 (1C, Ar), 133.3 (1C, Ar), 148.6 (1C, Ar), 149.4 (1C, Ar), 153.3 (1C, Ar), 157.9 (1C, Ar), 159.8 (1C, Ar), 162.1 (1C, Ar), 162.3 (1C, Ar), 164.6 (1C, Ar), 164.7 (1C, Ar), 165.2 (1C, Ar), 165.5 (1C, Ar); HRMS: 563.1396, calcd for [M+H]+ C28H24FN4O6S+: 563.1395.

(E)-4-(2-hydroxy-3-((4-((4-hydroxy-2,6-dimethylbenzylidene)amino)-5-(phenoxymethyl)-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)thio)propoxy)-2H-chromen-2-one (10h). Yield 52.8%; white powder; m.p. 184.5-186.7°C; 1H NMR: 2.34 (s, 6H, CH3), 3.35-3.38 (m, 1H, CH2), 3.49-3.52 (m, 1H, CH2), 4.18-4.24 (m, 3H, CH2+CH), 5.19 (s, 2H, PhCH2O), 5.75 (s, 1H, chromen-2-one), 5.82 (d, 1H, J = 3.2 Hz, OH), 6.51 (s, 2H, Ar), 6.91-6.99 (m, 3H, Ar), 7.22-7.37 (m, 4H, Ar), 7.60-7.64 (m, 1H, Ar), 7.87 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H, Ar), 8.97 (s, 1H, CH=N), 10.13 (s, 1H, PhOH); 13C NMR: 22.3 (2C, CH3), 35.7 (1C, SCH2), 59.9 (1C, OCH), 67.6 (1C, OCH), 72.5 (1C, OCH), 91.1 (1C, chromen-2-one), 115.2 (2C, Ar), 115.7 (1C, Ar), 116.7 (2C, Ar), 116.9 (1C, Ar), 120.1 (1C, Ar), 122.0 (1C, Ar), 123.8 (1C, Ar), 124.6 (1C, Ar), 130.1 (2C, Ar), 133.3 (1C, Ar), 143.2 (2C, Ar), 148.4 (1C, Ar), 149.2 (1C, Ar), 153.3 (1C, Ar), 158.0 (1C, Ar), 160.9 (1C, Ar), 162.2 (1C, Ar), 165.5 (1C, Ar), 165.9 (1C, Ar); HRMS: 573.1800, calcd for [M+H]+ C30H29N4O6S+: 573.1802.

(E)-4-(2-hydroxy-3-((4-((4-hydroxy-3-nitrobenzylidene)amino)-5-(phenoxy-methyl)-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)thio)propoxy)-2H-chromen-2-one (10i). Yield 50.9%; yellow powder; m.p. 100.3-102.1°C; 1H NMR: 3.35-3.40 (m, 1H, CH2), 3.48 (dd, J = 13.2 Hz, 4.4 Hz, 1H, CH2), 4.15-4.23 (m, 3H, CH2+CH), 5.26 (s, 2H, PhCH2O), 5.75 (d, J = 5.2 Hz, 1H, OH), 5.83 (s, 1H, chromen-2-one), 6.89-6.93 (m, 1H, Ar), 6.97-7.00 (m, 2H, Ar), 7.16-7.25 (m, 3H, Ar), 7.29-7.36 (m, 2H, Ar), 7.59-7.63 (m, 1H, Ar), 7.87 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H, Ar), 7.94 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H, Ar), 8.26 (s, 1H, Ar), 8.82 (s, 1H, CH=N); 13C NMR: 35.5 (1C, SCH2), 59.8 (1C, OCH), 67.2 (1C, OCH), 72.1 (1C, OCH), 90.8 (1C, chromen-2-one), 115.2 (2C, Ar), 115.3 (1C, Ar), 116.5 (1C, Ar), 120.5 (1C, Ar), 121.7 (1C, Ar), 122.6 (1C, Ar), 123.4 (1C, Ar), 124.2 (1C, Ar), 127.5 (1C, Ar), 129.7 (2C, Ar), 132.9 (1C, Ar), 134.0 (1C, Ar), 137.3 (1C, Ar), 148.3 (1C, Ar), 149.0 (1C, Ar), 152.9 (1C, Ar), 156.4 (1C, Ar), 157.5 (1C, Ar), 161.7 (1C, Ar), 164.2 (1C, Ar), 165.1 (1C, Ar); HRMS: 590.1340, calcd for [M+H]+ C28H24N5O8S+: 590.1340.

(E)-4-(3-((4-((4-chlorobenzylidene)amino)-5-(phenoxymethyl)-4H-1,2,4-tria-zol-3-yl)thio)-2-hydroxypropoxy)-2H-chromen-2-one (10j).Yield 62.2%; white powder; m.p. 168.4-170.2°C; 1H NMR: 3.94-3.98 (m, 1H, CH2), 4.24-4.41 (m, 1H, CH2), 4.85-4.67 (m, 3H, CH2+CH), 5.71 (s, 2H, PhCH2O), 6.21-6.24 (m, 2H, OH+chromen-2-one), 7.31-7.42 (m, 3H, Ar), 7.63-7.75 (m, 4H, Ar), 7.94-8.03 (m, 3H, Ar), 8.19-8.29 (m, 3H, Ar), 9.30 (s, 1H, CH=N); 13C NMR: 35.5 (1C, SCH2), 59.8 (1C, OCH), 67.1 (1C, OCH), 72.0 (1C, OCH), 90.7 (1C, chromen-2-one), 115.2 (2C, Ar), 116.4 (1C, Ar), 121.7 (1C, Ar), 123.3 (1C, Ar), 124.1 (1C, Ar), 129.4 (2C, Ar), 129.6 (2C, Ar), 130.5 (2C, Ar), 137.9 (1C, Ar), 148.1 (1C, Ar), 149.3 (1C, Ar), 152.8 (1C, Ar), 157.4 (1C, Ar), 161.7 (1C, Ar), 164.2 (1C, Ar), 164.9 (1C, Ar); HRMS: 563.1174, calcd for [M+H]+ C28H24ClN4O5S+: 563.1150.

(E)-4-(3-((4-((4-bromobenzylidene)amino)-5-(phenoxymethyl)-4H-1,2,4-tria-zol-3-yl)thio)-2-hydroxypropoxy)-2H-chromen-2-one (10k). Yield 61.7%; tawny powder; m.p. 139.2-142.7°C; 1H NMR: 3.97-3.99 (m, 2H, CH2), 4.64-4.69 (m, 3H, CH2+CH), 5.75 (s, 2H, PhCH2O), 6.24-6.28 (m, 2H, OH+chromen-2-one), 7.37-7.45 (m, 3H, Ar), 7.68-7.80 (m, 4H, Ar), 8.05-8.33 (m, 6H, Ar), 9.32 (s, 1H, CH=N); 13C NMR: 35.5 (1C, SCH2), 59.8 (1C, OCH), 67.1 (1C, OCH), 72.1 (1C, OCH), 90.7 (1C, chromen-2-one), 115.1 (2C, Ar), 115.2 (1C, Ar), 116.4 (1C, Ar), 121.7 (1C, Ar), 123.3 (1C, Ar), 124.1 (1C, Ar), 127.0 (1C, Ar), 129.7 (2C, Ar), 130.7 (2C, Ar), 130.9 (1C, Ar), 132.4 (2C, Ar), 132.8 (1C, Ar), 148.1 (1C, Ar), 149.3 (1C, Ar), 152.8 (1C, Ar), 157.4 (1C, Ar), 161.7 (1C, Ar), 164.4 (1C, Ar), 165.0 (1C, Ar); HRMS: 607.0660, calcd for [M+H]+ C28H24BrN4O5S+: 607.0645.

(E)-4-(2-hydroxy-3-((4-((4-hydroxy-3-methoxy-5-nitrobenzylidene)amino)-5-(phenoxymethyl)-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)thio)propoxy)-2H-chromen-2-one(10l). Yield 47.3%; yellow oil; m.p. 158.6-159.2°C; 1H NMR: 3.35-3.54 (m, 2H, CH2), 3.83 (s, 3H, OCH3), 4.16-4.24 (m, 3H, CH2+CH), 5.27 (s, 2H, PhCH2O), 5.76-5.83 (m, 2H, OH+chromen-2-one), 6.91 (t, J = 3.2 Hz, 1H, Ar), 6.98 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H, Ar), 7.21-7.36 (m, 5H, Ar), 7.54-7.63 (m, 2H, Ar), 7.86-7.89 (m, 2H, Ar), 8.80 (s, 1H, CH=N); 13C NMR: 36.1 (1C, SCH2), 57.2 (1C, OCH3), 60.2 (1C, OCH), 67.6 (1C, OCH), 72.5 (1C, OCH), 91.2 (1C, chromen-2-one), 112.7 (1C, Ar), 115.6 (2C, Ar), 116.9 (1C, Ar), 120.4 (1C, Ar), 121.9 (1C, Ar), 122.1 (1C, Ar), 123.8 (1C, Ar), 124.6 (1C, Ar), 130.1 (2C, Ar), 133.3 (1C, Ar), 137.5 (1C, Ar), 148.0 (1C, Ar), 148.8 (1C, Ar), 149.2 (1C, Ar), 150.8 (1C, Ar), 153.3 (1C, Ar), 158.0 (1C, Ar), 162.1 (1C, Ar), 164.9 (1C, Ar), 165.5 (1C, Ar); HRMS: 618.1298, calcd for [M+H]+ C29H24N5O9S-: 618.1300.

(E)-4-(3-((4-((3-chlorobenzylidene)amino)-5-(phenoxymethyl)-4H-1,2,4-tria-zol-3-yl)thio)-2-hydroxypropoxy)-2H-chromen-2-one (10m). Yield 62.4%; white powder; m.p. 168.5-171.1°C; 1H NMR: 3.34-3.54 (m, 2H, CH2), 4.16-4.24 (m, 3H, CH2+CH), 5.31 (s, 2H, PhCH2O), 5.76 (d, J = 5.2 Hz, 1H, OH), 5.84 (s, 1H, chromen-2-one), 6.91-7.01 (m, 3H, Ar), 7.22-7.37 (m, 4H, Ar), 7.50-7.54 (m, 1H, Ar), 7.62-7.66 (m, 2H, Ar), 7.74-7.78 (m, 2H, Ar), 7.87 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 1H, Ar), 8.88 (s, 1H, CH=N); 13C NMR: 36.2 (1C, SCH2), 60.4 (1C, OCH), 67.7 (1C, OCH), 72.5 (1C, OCH), 91.2 (1C, chromen-2-one), 115.6 (1C, Ar), 115.7 (1C, Ar), 115.8 (1C, Ar), 116.5 (1C, Ar), 116.9 (1C, Ar), 122.2 (1C, Ar), 122.6 (1C, Ar), 123.8 (1C, Ar), 124.6 (1C, Ar), 128.0 (1C, Ar), 128.7 (1C, Ar), 130.1 (1C, Ar), 131.7 (1C, Ar), 133.3 (1C, Ar), 134.3 (1C, Ar), 134.5 (1C, Ar), 148.8 (1C, Ar), 149.7 (1C, Ar), 153.3 (1C, Ar), 158.0 (1C, Ar), 162.1 (1C, Ar), 164.4 (1C, Ar), 165.5 (1C, Ar); HRMS: 563.1151, calcd for [M+H]+ C28H23ClN4O5S+: 563.1150.

(E)-4-(3-((4-(([1,1’-biphenyl]-4-ylmethylene)amino)-5-(phenoxymethyl)-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)thio)-2-hydroxypropoxy)-2H-chromen-2-one (10n). Yield 58.2%; yellow powder; m.p. 125.4-127.8°C; 1H NMR: 3.35-3.55 (m, 2H, CH2), 4.17-4.24 (m, 3H, CH2+CH), 5.28 (s, 2H, PhCH2O), 5.83-5.86 (m, 2H, OH+ chromen-2-one), 6.90-7.01 (m, 2H, Ar), 7.22-7.40 (m, 6H, Ar), 7.44-7.48 (m, 2H, Ar), 7.60 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H, Ar), 7.70 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H, Ar), 7.77-7.79 (m, 2H, Ar), 7.86-7.90 (m, 3H, Ar), 8.93 (s, 1H, CH=N); 13C NMR: 36.1 (1C, SCH2), 60.3 (1C, OCH), 67.7 (1C, OCH), 72.5 (1C, OCH), 91.2 (1C, chromen-2-one), 115.6 (1C, Ar), 115.8 (1C, Ar), 116.8 (1C, Ar), 116.9 (1C, Ar), 122.2 (1C, Ar), 123.8 (1C, Ar), 124.6 (1C, Ar), 127.5 (2C, Ar), 127.9 (2C, Ar), 129.0 (1C, Ar), 129.6 (2C, Ar), 130.1 (4C, Ar), 131.2 (1C, Ar), 133.3 (1C, Ar), 139.4 (1C, Ar), 145.1 (1C, Ar), 148.7 (1C, Ar), 149.5 (1C, Ar), 153.3 (1C, Ar), 158.0 (1C, Ar), 162.1 (1C, Ar), 165.5 (1C, Ar), 166.0 (1C, Ar); HRMS: 605.1852, calcd for [M+H]+ C34H28N4O5S+: 605.1853.

2.3. Evaluation of α-glu inhibition

In this experiment, all coumarin-1, 2, 4-triazole derivatives were dissolved in DMSO, the reference drug acarbose, substrate p-PNG and α-glu were solubilized in a 100 μM phosphate buffer at pH 6.8. First, 10 μL of the compound with various concentrations was dispensed into a 96-well plate, then mixed with α-glu (0.1 U/mL, 150 μL) and incubated at 37°C for 0.25 h 15 min. After that, 40 μL p-NPG (1.25 mM) was added into the reaction system and incubated for 0.5 h 30 min, the optical density (OD) values were monitored at 405 nm. The values of half-maximal inhibitory concentration were evaluated by GraphPad Prism 8, and all data were repeated three times.

2.4. Assay of PTP1B inhibitory activity

The inhibitory activity of 10n against PTP1B protein was detected [21]. Compound 10n was prepared in a 10% DMSO solution, with a 5 µL aliquot being introduced into a reaction mixture (50 µL) to ensure the final concentration of DMSO was 1%. The assessment of enzyme inhibitory activity was carried out at room temperature for 0.5 h within a 50 µL solution that included 25 mM 3-(N-morpholino)propanesulfonic acid (MOPS) buffer (pH 7.0), sodium chloride (50 mM), dithiothreitol (DTT) (3 mM), 0.05% Tween 20, 6,8-difluoro-4-methylumbelliferyl phosphate, (DiFMUP) (10 µM), the phosphatase and compound 10n. The fluorescence intensity of PTP1B protein was detected utilizing a plate reader (Tecan Infinite M1000) with excitation was 358 nm and emission was 455 nm. Then, the fluorescence intensity data were dealt with GraphPad Prism 8.

2.5. Enzyme kinetics study of 10n on α-glu

The inhibition mode of active compound 10n on α-glu was identified by the method of enzyme kinetics. Firstly, based on the IC50 value of 10n to set the concentrations of 10n around about half of the IC50 value. Varied concentrations of 10n (0 µM, 4 µM, 8 µM) and 0.05 U/mL α-glu were co-incubated in 96-well plates at 37°C for 0.25 h. After that, p-PNG (1mM, 1.5 mM, 2.0 mM, 2.5 mM) was added to the mixture and the OD values were monitored at 405 nm. Finally, the data were dealt with Origin 64, and the relevant constants were obtained from the Lineweaver-Burk plot.

2.6. Fluorescence quenching

For studying whether 10n could change the α-glu fluorescence intensity, the fluorescence quenching assay was conducted based on the previous method with subtle modification [22]. Compound 10n (0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 μM) was mixed with 2 mL α-glu (3.5 U/mL) thoroughly, scanning and recording the fluorescence intensity under the condition of excitation wavelength: 280 nm, emission wavelength: 290-450 nm, slit width: 5 nm.

In this experiment, all outcomes were calculated by the equation: F0/F = 1+ Kqτ0 [Q] =1+Ksv [Q]. F0 stands for the fluorescence intensity of α-glu in the absence of the compound, while F denotes the fluorescence intensity of α-glu with the compound, respectively. Kq stands for the constant of bimolecular quenching rate, Ksv is the constant of fluorescence quenching, [Q] is the concentration of quencher 10n, and τ0 (10-8 s) stands for the average lifetime of the biomolecules without the quencher. Besides, Formula log [(F0-F)/F] = nlog[Q] +logKa was applied to compute the number of binding sites (n) and the binding constant (Ka).

2.7. Synchronous fluorescence

Setting the parameters of the steady-state/transient fluorescence spectrometer (FLS 1000, Edinburgh) as follows: wavelength range of 240 nm to 350 nm, both slit widths set to 5 nm, Δλ = 15 nm, and Δλ = 60 nm. The fluorescence spectra of α-glu without compound 10n and with different concentrations of 10n were scanned under Δλ = 15 nm and Δλ = 60 nm, respectively. Before scanning, the solvent was scanned to subtract the background. The relative synchronous fluorescence quenching ratio (RSFQ) was calculated using the formula: RSFQ = 1 - F/F0, where F and F0 were as mentioned in the part of fluorescence quenching.

2.8. Circular dichroism spectra

The method was performed according to our reported work [1]. Briefly, before scanning, the solvent should be scanned to subtract the effect of the background. Then, 2 mL of α-glu (3 U/mL) was prepared, and compound 10n of 0, 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 μM were added to the enzyme system. Then, circular dichroism (CD) was monitored from 200-260 nm using a CD spectrometer Chirascan Plus (Applied Photophysics, Leatherhad, UK). The data were processed by Origin 64 software, and the results were analyzed by CDNN.

2.9. Three-dimensional (3D) fluorescence spectra

The 3D fluorescence spectra of α-glu and the compound-enzyme mixture were acquired based on the previously reported method [5]. Both the wavelength of emission and excitation were set to 200-500 nm, and the slit width was 5 nm. Firstly, the absorption of solvent was scanned to subtract the background. After that, the spectra of α-glu (1 U/mL) were recorded, then adding 5 μM compound 10n into the enzyme system rapidly and mixing well, scanning under the same conditions.

2.10. Cytotoxicity assay in vitro

HEK-293 cells were selected to test the effect of compound 10n on normal cytotoxicity as described as reported work previously [3,9,16]. Before the addition of various concentrations of 10n, cells need to be placed into 96-well plates and allowed to incubate for a period of 24 h. After cells were co-cultured with 10n for 24 h, 15 μL MTT (5mg/mL) was added into the plates and cultured for 1-4 h, discarding the supernatant and adding 150μL DMSO, shaking the mixture and measuring the OD values at 490 nm.

2.11. Molecular docking

Docking modes of 10n with both enzymes were performed by the software of Autodock vina 1.1.2 [23]. Besides, the search grid for α-glu featured center coordinates x: -19.676, y: -7.243, z: -21.469, and dimensions size_x: 17, size_y: 17, size_z: 17, and the search grid of PTP1B was the same as in previous work [16]. Between these two proteins, the exhaustiveness was 16. If not mentioned, use the default parameters. Selecting the best pose evaluated by Vina docking scores and performing a visual analysis using PyMOL 1.7.6.

2.12. The sucrose-loading test in vivo

The in vivo sucrose-loading test was carried out to detect whether compound 10n could exert an effect on the postprandial blood glucose levels, mainly based on the method reported previously [2]. The normal male Kunming mice (7-8 weeks, 30-35 g, SCXK (2019-0010)) were purchased from SPF (Beijing) Biotechnology Co., (Beijing, China). These experiments were approved by the Laboratory Animal Management and Ethics Committee of Guizhou Medical University (Ethics Code: 2402935). After the experimental mice were adapted to culture for 7 days, all mice were fasted but drank water normally for 12 h. All animals were divided into four groups (n = 4) randomly, which included the blank group, positive acarbose group, control and treated group with 10n. Before the experiment, compound 10n (4 mg/mL), sucrose (0.7 g/mL) and acarbose (2 mg/mL) were homogeneously suspended in 0.5% CMC-Na aqueous solution. After that, each mouse in each group was numbered and weighed. Subsequently, both the compound group and acarbose group were gavaged with a dosage of 20 milligrams per kilogram (20 mg/kg). After 40 min, the control and blank groups were gavaged with the pre-prepared sucrose solution (2.5 g/kg) and 0.5% CMC-Na aqueous solution, respectively. Immediately thereafter, using the Roche Accu-Chek Instant blood glucose meter to monitor the concentrations of blood glucose in the tail tip of the mice at 0, 15, 30, 60, 90, and 120 min after the administration of sugar. The outcomes of the experiment were analyzed using Origin 64.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Chemistry

The synthetic route of coumarin-1, 2, 4-triazole derivatives 10a-10n was demonstrated in Figure 2. At first, treatment of 4-hydroxycoumarin with epichlorohydrin and KOH in EtOH yields key intermediate 4-(oxiran-2-ylmethoxy)-2H-chromen-2-one (3). Secondly, phenol reacted with chloroacetic acid to yield the intermediate 2-phenoxyacetic acid (5). Subsequently, intermediate 5 undergoes a cyclization reaction with thiosemicarbazide 6 under high temperature to form intermediate 4-amino-5-(phenoxymethyl)-4H-1,2,4-triazole-3-thiol (7) [9]. Moreover, substituted benzaldehydes (8a-8n) reacted with intermediate 7 to obtain intermediates substituted (E)-4-((benzylidene)amino)-5-(phenoxymethyl)-4H-1,2,4-triazole-3-thiol (9a-9n). Finally, the intermediate 3 yielded in the first step was reacted with 9a-9n to get the final products coumarin-1, 2, 4-triazole derivatives 10a-10n. During the synthesis of the compounds, our primary objective was to obtain the target compounds for the evaluation of their biological activities; thus, we did not dedicate excessive research efforts to optimizing compound yields and synthetic conditions. In addition, a chiral center is generated in the final reaction step, which makes the target compound a racemate. In this study, we did not perform resolution, and the subsequent studies were conducted in the form of the racemate. All title compounds were confirmed by the method of 1H NMR, 13C NMR, and HRMS (Supplementary materials).

Supporting Materials
The synthetic route of title compounds 10a-10n. (a) NaOH, EtOH, 80°C, 5h; (b) NaOH, EtOH, 80°C, 5h; (c) 160°C, 1 h; (d) AcOH, 120°C, 4h; (e) EtOH, 80°C, 5h.
Figure 2.
The synthetic route of title compounds 10a-10n. (a) NaOH, EtOH, 80°C, 5h; (b) NaOH, EtOH, 80°C, 5h; (c) 160°C, 1 h; (d) AcOH, 120°C, 4h; (e) EtOH, 80°C, 5h.

For example, the 1H NMR spectrum of compound 10d (with R = 4-CH3) showed a singlet signal for three protons at 2.32 ppm, which was assigned to the methyl (CH3) substituent. According to the literature [19], 3.32-3.70 (m, 1H), 3.48 (dd, 1H, J = 13.2 Hz, 4.4 Hz), and 4.15-4.23 (m, 3H) are assigned to the C-H signals of the linker between coumarin and 1,2,4-triazole. For the other compounds in this series, the peaks at 3.32-3.37 ppm are partially obscured by the water peak in the deuterated solvent DMSO and thus not clearly observed, because their chemical shift is very close to that of the water peak. The hydroxyl group (-OH) on the linker appears as a doublet with a coupling constant J = 4.0 Hz at 5.76 ppm. The singlet at 5.24 ppm with an integration of two is assigned to the methylene group (-CH2OPh) of the phenoxymethylene side chain. The singlet at 5.82 ppm is the signal for the C-3 hydrogen of coumarin. The remaining hydrogen signals of the coumarin ring are observed at 7.38-7.32 ppm (m, 2H), 7.60-7.64 ppm (m, 1H), and 7.87 ppm (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H) [24]. The phenyl ring peaks of the phenoxy side chain are observed at 6.90-6.94 ppm (m, 1H) and 7.22-7.29 ppm (m, 4H). Two double peaks at 6.97 and 7.66 ppm with a coupling constant of 8.0 Hz were attributed to the aromatic protons of C3,5-H and C2,6-H at the 4-methylphenyl moiety, respectively. For the other compounds in this series, different aromatic hydrogen signals will be exhibited in the range of 6.5-8.5 ppm due to differences in substituents. The singlet peak of the CH proton of the hydrazone moiety was observed at 8.82 ppm.

In the 13C NMR spectra of compound 10d, the five carbon signals in the range of 0-75 ppm are assigned to aliphatic carbons, including methyl (CH3) substituent, methylene group (-CH2OPh), and linker (-OCH2CHOHCH2S-). The peak at 91.1 ppm is the signal for the C-3 carbon of coumarin. The seven peaks in the downfield region above 145 ppm are assigned to carbons directly bonded to heteroatoms (O, N, or S). The signals in the range of 110-145 ppm are the remaining aromatic ring carbon signals. Furthermore, the HRMS analysis of all compounds 10a-10n was consistent with their respective molecular formulas. Hence, the characterizations by 1H NMR, 13C NMR, and HRMS clearly confirmed the structural correctness of the target compounds in this study.

3.2. α-Glu inhibitory activity

All target compounds 10a-10n were tested for their α-Glu inhibitory activity. As depicted in Table 1, compounds 10a (28.62 ± 0.54 μM), 10b (31.07 ± 1.10 μM), 10e (24.95 ± 1.57 μM), 10g (16.68 ± 0.63 μM), 10h (21.22 ± 0.65 μM), 10i (37.31 ± 1.00 μM), and 10n (9.71 ± 0.28 μM) displayed excellent inhibitory activity more than the positive control acarbose (IC50 = 309.83 ± 8.74 μM). Compounds 10c, 10f, 10l, 10m exhibited moderate α-glu inhibitory activity with IC50 values of 160.67 ± 5.10 μM, 125.50 ± 0.92 μM, 39.40 ± 0.92 μM, 65.82 ± 0.39 μM, respectively. Other compounds 10d (4-CH3), 10j (4-Cl) and 10k (4-Br) showed low inhibitory activity with IC50 values more than 200 μM. Amongst them, compound 10n demonstrated the strongest inhibition with an IC50 value was 9.71 ± 0.28 μM, which was approximately 32-fold that of acarbose. Since compounds 10a-10n share the same chemical scaffold and 10n is the most active compound in this series, 10n will be selected subsequently as the representative compound of this series to conduct studies on its mechanism of action and activity evaluation.

Table 1. α-Glu inhibitory activity of compounds 10a-10n.
Compound R IC50±SD (μM)
10a 3-OH 28.62 ± 0.54f
10b 4-OH 31.07 ± 1.10f
10c 3,5-Me₂, 4-OH 160.67 ± 5.10b
10d 4-CH₃ >200
10e 3-Cl, 4-OH 24.95 ± 1.57g
10f 4-F 125.50 ± 0.92c
10g 2-F, 4-OH 16.68 ± 0.63i
10h 2,6-Me₂, 4-OH 21.22 ± 0.65h
10i 3-NO₂, 4-OH 37.31 ± 1.00e
10j 4-Cl >200
10k 4-Br >200
10l 3-NO₂, 4-OH, 5-OCH₃ 39.40 ± 0.92e
10m 3-Cl 65.82 ± 0.39d
10n Phenyl 9.71 ± 0.28j
Acarbose - 309.83 ± 8.74a

All data have been presented as mean ± SD. a-j, significant differences.

3.3. PTP1B inhibitory activity

On the basis of the results of α-glu inhibition, derivative 10n with the strongest α-glu inhibitory activity was selected to detect its PTP1B inhibitory effect. In this experiment, ursolic acid was chosen as the reference compound according to the previous literature [25]. Results displayed that the activity of PTP1B could be decreased after being treated with compound 10n with different concentrations, and the downward trend of PTP1B activity in the 10n treatment group was similar to the positive ursolic acid [16]. The results revealed that 10n exhibited excellent PTP1B inhibition with an IC50 value was 7.31 ± 1.55 μM, as compared to the positive ursolic acid (4.55 ± 1.08 μM) (Figure 3).

PTP1B inhibitory activity of compound 10n and ursolic acid.
Figure 3.
PTP1B inhibitory activity of compound 10n and ursolic acid.

3.4. Analysis of SAR

A total of fourteen compounds (10a-10n) were synthesized, and their α-glu inhibitory activity was tested, but compounds with different substituents displayed varied α-glu inhibition. Therefore, for the purpose of discussing the relationship between the difference of R groups and α-glu inhibition, the structure-activity relationships (SAR) were analyzed. Through SAR discussion of these compounds, it was found that compounds containing -OH (10a, 10b, 10e, 10g and 10h) were beneficial for improving the inhibitory activity of α-glu. Especially, by comparing compound 10e (R: 3-Cl, 4-OH) and 10g (R: 2-F, 4-OH) that introducing the halogen groups could enhance the inhibition. However, when the substitutes were only halogen, the enzyme inhibition could be reduced (10f and 10l) or even inactive (10i and 10k), which depended on the position of the halogen. These results suggest that introducing an electron-donating substituent (OH) at the para position of the benzene ring enhances inhibitory activity, while introducing electron-withdrawing substituents (F, Cl, Br) at the para position results in decreased activity. However, if the electron-withdrawing group (NO2) is at the meta position, it has little effect on activity. This suggests that the electronic effect exerts a significant influence on activity, and the effect of substituents at the para position on the compound’s electron cloud is much greater than that at the meta position. Additionally, the existence of electron-donating groups like -CH3 had a great influence on α-glu inhibition. For example, comparing compounds 10c (R: 3,5-Me2, 4-OH) and 10h (R: 2,6-Me2, 4-OH), despite their identical substituents, but there was a large difference in inhibiting α-glu for changing the positions of methyl. Changing the 2,6-dimethyl substitution to 3,5-dimethyl substituents resulted in a decrease in inhibitory activity by approximately 8-fold. The introduction of a phenyl at the para position of benzene ring (10n) significantly enhanced the α-glu inhibitory activity, indicating that the larger steric hindrance of the compound may be favorable for enhancing activity (Figure 4).

Analysis of SAR between 10a-10n and α-glu inhibition.
Figure 4.
Analysis of SAR between 10a-10n and α-glu inhibition.

3.5. Inhibition kinetics

For further understanding of the inhibition mode of the most active compound 10n on α-glu, the enzyme inhibition kinetics test was carried out. The Lineweaver-Burk plot was used to describe the relationship between concentrations of substrate (p-NPG) and activity of residual enzyme. According to Figure 5(a), a group of straight lines intersecting in the second quadrant was detected, which suggests compound 10n was a mix-type inhibitor. This type of inhibition indicates that 10n could both inhibit free α-glu enzyme and the complex of α-glu and substrate. In addition, after quadratic plotting of the double reciprocal plot, the constant of inhibitor binding to the free enzyme (Ki = 21.12 μM) was calculated to be greater than the constant of inhibitor binding to the enzyme-substrate complex (Kis = 4.96 μM) (Figures 5b and c), demonstrating that compound 10n was more inclined to bind to the enzyme-substrate complex [26]. Simultaneously, the result revealed that as the concentration of compound 10n increased, the Km value progressively climbed, whereas the Vmax value steadily declined.

Analysis of enzyme inhibition kinetics of compound 10n against α-glu. (a) Lineweaver-Burk plot for 10n; (b) The plot between slope and concentrations of 10n; (c) The plot between Y-intercept and concentrations of 10n.
Figure 5.
Analysis of enzyme inhibition kinetics of compound 10n against α-glu. (a) Lineweaver-Burk plot for 10n; (b) The plot between slope and concentrations of 10n; (c) The plot between Y-intercept and concentrations of 10n.

3.6. Fluorescence quenching

Fluorescence spectroscopy is currently the most popular tool for detecting ligand-protein interactions because it is easy to operate and the experimental results are accurate [27]. As shown in Figure 6(a), the distinctive fluorescence peak of α-glu was found at 331 nm. Besides, the addition of 10n could decrease the fluorescence intensity of this enzyme from 1.62×106 to 8.51×105 (a decrease of 47.5%), demonstrating that 10n could inhibit the activity of α-glu by quenching the fluorescence intensity of α-glu.

(a) The fluorescence spectra of α-glu treated with various concentrations of compound 10n. (b) The Stern-Volmer plot of α-glu enzyme. (c) The double log plots of α-glu. (d) Synchronous fluorescence spectra of α-glu at ∆λ = 15 nm. (e) Synchronous fluorescence spectra of α-glu at ∆λ = 60 nm. (f) The fluorescence-quenching ratio of Tyr and Trp. (g) The CD spectra of α-glu after being treated with compound 10n (0, 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 μM).
Figure 6.
(a) The fluorescence spectra of α-glu treated with various concentrations of compound 10n. (b) The Stern-Volmer plot of α-glu enzyme. (c) The double log plots of α-glu. (d) Synchronous fluorescence spectra of α-glu at ∆λ = 15 nm. (e) Synchronous fluorescence spectra of α-glu at ∆λ = 60 nm. (f) The fluorescence-quenching ratio of Tyr and Trp. (g) The CD spectra of α-glu after being treated with compound 10n (0, 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 μM).

The mechanism of fluorescence quenching contains static quenching and dynamic quenching. These two mechanisms are led by a complex combination of enzymes and compounds and the diffusion and collision of molecules, respectively. For exploring the fluorescence quenching mechanism of compound 10n on α-glu, the data were analyzed utilizing the Stern-Volmer equation [4]. As depicted in the Stern-Volmer plot (Figures 6b and c), the linear relationship between the fluorescence intensity ratio (F0/F) and the concentration of the quencher within the specified range indicated that the quenching of α-glu by 10n was governed by a single quenching mechanism. Ksv (0.75×105 L∙mol-1) represented the quenching constant of fluorescence, and Kq (0.75×1013 L∙mol−1∙S−1) was the bimolecular quenching rate constant. As Kq (0.75×1013 L∙mol−1∙S−1) surpassed the maximum diffusion constant for collision quenching (2×1010 L∙mol−1∙S−1), it confirmed that 10n quenched α-glu via a static quenching mechanism. The Ksv and Kq values calculated in this study are similar to those reported in the literature, and both fall within the same order of magnitude [28]. By calculating the binding constant (Ka = 7.53×103 L∙mol−1) and the number of binding sites (n = 0.98), which was close to one, it was further demonstrated that 10n and α-glu had only one binding site.

3.7. Synchronous fluorescence

Synchronous fluorescence spectroscopy, as a means of studying changes in the microenvironment near functional fluorescent groups in enzymes, is often applied to the mechanistic study of various enzymes. ∆λ refers to the difference between the wavelength of excitation and emission. For tyrosine residues (Tyr), the wavelength difference (∆λ) is 15 nm, whereas for tryptophan residues (Trp), the wavelength difference (∆λ) is 60 nm. As shown in Figures 6 (d and e), as the concentrations of 10n increased, the fluorescence intensity decreased progressively at Δλ = 15 nm and Δλ = 60 nm, which was consistent with the outcomes of fluorescence quenching. The decrease in fluorescence intensity indicated that 10n bound to the α-glu. The results in Figure 6(f) exhibited that under identical concentration conditions, the quenching ratio (RSFQ%) of tryptophan residues exceeded that of tyrosine residues, suggesting that the binding site of 10n was closer to the tryptophan residues, which led to faster quenching of this amino acid residue.

3.8. Thermodynamics analysis

Non-covalent interactions are the primary contributors to the stability of enzyme-small molecule complexes, including hydrophobic forces, hydrogen bonds, Van der Waals forces, and electrostatic forces. All these forces are critical to the thermodynamic parameters of the complex. To explore the binding mechanism between compound 10n and α-glu, the corresponding thermodynamic parameters (ΔG, ΔH, and ΔS) were derived from the van’t Hoff equation (Table S1). Negative ΔG values suggested that the binding of compound 10n to α-glu was a spontaneous process. Additionally, the results showed ΔH<0 and ΔS>0, which indicated that both hydrogen bonds and the hydrophobic interactions served as the dominant driving force for this binding [29].

3.9. Circular dichroism

Circular dichroism (CD) was an effective tool to detect the effect of inhibitors on the conformational changes of the enzyme. Therefore, the CD spectra were recorded to further elucidate how the compound 10n affected the protein conformation [30]. From Figure 6 (g), two distinct negative peaks at 209 nm and 220 nm were observed, which were typical peaks of α-helixes of α-glu. With an increase in the concentrations of 10n, these two characteristic negative peaks gradually flattened, indicating that the addition of compound 10n could change the secondary structure of α-glu. Besides, this phenomenon also indicates that the inhibitor induces folding or unfolding of the polypeptide chains composing the enzyme, resulting in a decrease in the content of α-helixes. As shown in the calculations in Table 2, it was evident that with the concentrations of 10n increased, the α-helix content decreased from 36.8% to 26.9%, the β-sheets content and β-turns respectively increased from 15.5% to 21.4% and 16.3% to 18.1%, respectively. The proportion of random coils also rose from 29.4% to 37.3%, suggesting that the α-glu secondary structure became more unstable and looser after interacting with 10n. The reduction in enzymatic activity was primarily attributed to alterations in α-glu’s secondary structure and microenvironment. The alterations of the secondary structure and microenvironment may affect the conformation of the α-glu active center, modify its binding affinity and catalytic efficiency towards substrates, and thereby influence its enzymatic activity [16,31].

Table 2. Secondary structural analysis of α-glu.
10 n α-Helix (%) β-Sheet (%) β-Turn (%) Random coil (%)
0 36.8 15.5 16.3 29.4
1 34.9 16.4 16.6 30.7
3 32.3 17.8 17.1 32.6
5 31.1 18.5 17.3 33.8
7 28.9 20.1 17.7 35.8
9 26.9 21.4 18.1 37.3

3.10. 3D fluorescence

The function and activity of a protein could be affected by the interaction of a ligand through changing the conformation and structure of the target protein [32]. Thus, 3D fluorescence spectroscopy was employed to assess the influences of 10n on the conformation and structural integrity of α-glu. The data presented in Figure 7 shows that there were two distinctive peaks in the spectra of fluorescence in 3D of α-glu. Peak 1 (λex/λem: 310/380 nm) and peak 2 (λex/λem: 230/401 nm) represented the absorption peaks of tryptophan and tyrosine residues, as well as the fluorescence characterization of peptide backbone structure, respectively. As Figures 7(a,c) displayed that the addition of 10n could reduce the fluorescence intensity of these two characteristic peaks, demonstrating that compound 10n could destroy the three-dimensional structure of α-glu. All these results were similar to the reported literature [33].

3D fluorescence spectroscopy of α-glu with compound 10n. (a) 3D fluorescence spectra of α-glu. (b) Contour maps of α-glu. (c) 3D fluorescence spectra of α-glu with 10n. (d) Contour maps of α-glu with 10n.
Figure 7.
3D fluorescence spectroscopy of α-glu with compound 10n. (a) 3D fluorescence spectra of α-glu. (b) Contour maps of α-glu. (c) 3D fluorescence spectra of α-glu with 10n. (d) Contour maps of α-glu with 10n.

3.11. HEK-293 cytotoxicity

To investigate whether the compound 10n had significant toxicity to normal human cells, an MTT assay was performed to examine the impact of 10n at concentrations of 300, 150, 75, 37.5, 18.75, and 9.375 μM on the survival rates of human embryonic kidney cells (HEK-293). The experiment found that at the maximum concentration of 10n (300 μM), the cell survival rate reached 96.34%, demonstrating that 10n was almost non-toxic to normal human cells. Other more in-depth safety evaluations will be conducted in future research.

3.12. Molecular docking between α-glu and compound 10n

Molecular docking of 10n to the active pocket of α-glu was illustrated in Figure 8 (a,b), where 10n was well wrapped within the interaction site of α-glu. The evaluated binding energy between the α-glucosidase and 10n was -11.7 kcal•mol-1. Derivative 10n was found to be situated in a hydrophobic pocket, flanked by residues Phe157, Leu176, Phe177, Leu218, Pro240, Ala278, Phe300, Val303, and Phe311, which together established robust hydrophobic contacts (Figure 8 c and d). Besides, the coumarin moiety of compound 10n engaged in a π-π stacking association with the phenylalanine residue at position 157, and the biphenyl group formed a π-π stacking interaction with Phe300. Notably, a significant hydrogen bond was detected between 10n and the amino acid residue Arg312 (bond length: 2.6 Å). These interactions facilitated the strong binding of compound 10n to the active site of α-glu, thereby exerting its inhibitory activity.

Molecular docking of 10n in α-glu. (a) Compound 10n. (b) The overall structure of compound 10n binding to α-glu. (c) Binding posture of 10n at the active pocket of α-glu. (d) Binding posture of 10n in the surface of the binding of α-glu.
Figure 8.
Molecular docking of 10n in α-glu. (a) Compound 10n. (b) The overall structure of compound 10n binding to α-glu. (c) Binding posture of 10n at the active pocket of α-glu. (d) Binding posture of 10n in the surface of the binding of α-glu.

3.13. Molecular docking between PTP1B and compound 10n

There were two active sites in PTP1B, containing the catalytic active site and the second aromatic active site. The former is composed of amino acid residues Cys215-Arg221, and Cys215 being the catalytic center, and the latter consists of six amino acid residues: Arg24, Arg254, Met258, Gly259, Gln262, and Gln266 [34]. Importantly, it is significant to introduce aromatic structures into PTP1B inhibitors, which could enhance PTP1B inhibition. Therefore, in order to observe the binding mode between PTP1B protein and the active compound 10n, the molecular docking was carried out, and docking outcomes of compound 10n with PTP1B protein were shown in Figure 9 (a, b). The evaluated binding energy between the PTP1B and 10n was -8.3 kcal•mol-1. The 2H-chromene-2-one framework of 10n was positioned at the catalytic active site, surrounded by residues Phe182, Ala217, and Ile219, forming a strong hydrophobic interaction. The phenyl group of 10n could extend to the secondary aromatic binding pocket of PTP1B and form van der Waals forces with it (Figure 9 c and d). Additionally, the 2H-chromene-2-one framework of compound 10n established a π-π stacking interaction with the phe182 and a CH-π interaction with the tyrosine residue at position 46. Obviously, a significant hydrogen bond was identified between 10n and the Gln262, with a bond length of 2.3 Å. These combined interactions effectively secured 10n within the active pocket of PTP1B.

Molecular docking of 10n in PTP1B. (a) The structure of compound 10n. (b) Compound 10n at the binding site. (c) Compound 10n is in the surface of the binding pocket.
Figure 9.
Molecular docking of 10n in PTP1B. (a) The structure of compound 10n. (b) Compound 10n at the binding site. (c) Compound 10n is in the surface of the binding pocket.

3.14. Sucrose-loading test in vivo

To ascertain whether compound 10n could lower blood sugar levels after meals, a sucrose-loading test was done following previously reported protocols [3,5,16]. As depicted in Figure 10, during the test, the blood sugar levels of the blank group remained stable. After the administration of sucrose (2.5 g/kg), there was a rapid increase in the control group, reaching a peak at 15 min. Compared to the control group, both acarbose and compound 10n could quickly decrease the concentrations of postprandial blood sugar at 15 min after administration. From Figure 10(a), it could be found that although the effect of compound 10n on reducing postprandial blood sugar was lower than acarbose, it still had a good blood sugar-lowering effect compared to the blank group. As illustrated in Figure 10(b), the area under the curve (AUC) administered with acarbose and 10n was remarkably lower in comparison with the blank group (p<0.05), demonstrating compound 10n has the capacity to decrease postprandial blood sugar levels in mice, and the results were similar to the reported literature [16]. In our future research, we plan to use normal mouse models and diabetic mouse models, respectively. By investigating long-term administration and different administration doses, we aim to further clarify the therapeutic effect of compound 10n on diabetes.

Sucrose-loading test of 10n. (a) Postprandial blood glucose in mice (n = 8). (b) Blood glucose AUC in mice at 150 min post-administration. (***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001 vs. the control)
Figure 10.
Sucrose-loading test of 10n. (a) Postprandial blood glucose in mice (n = 8). (b) Blood glucose AUC in mice at 150 min post-administration. (***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001 vs. the control)

4. Conclusions

To sum up, several new coumarin-1,2,4-triazole derivatives had been designed and synthesized based on our recently reported structure, and these compounds had high active potential to inhibit α-glu and PTP1B activities. Among all synthesized derivatives, compound 10n with substituent of benzene exhibited excellent activity against these two enzymes. Detailed SAR analysis also displayed that the type and position of the substituents would have a great impact on enzyme inhibition of compounds, especially the introduction of a large steric hindrance substituent would significantly enhance the inhibitory activity of compounds. Additionally, the investigation of further enzymatic mechanisms demonstrated the existence of 10n could inactivate the activity of α-glu by affecting the polypeptide backbone, secondary structure, and spatial conformation of the enzyme. Moreover, the inhibition of PTP1B had been improved significantly, which was close to ursolic acid in potency. Importantly, the in vivo experiment further demonstrated that compound 10n had an improvement effect on postprandial hyperglycemia in Kunming mice. Furthermore, compound 10n exhibited lower cytotoxicity on the normal human cell line HEK-293.

However, the activity of the compounds reported in this study is not sufficiently potent, with their hypoglycemic activity in in vivo animal experiments being weaker than that of acarbose. In future studies, it will be necessary to further modify their structures to enhance their in vitro and in vivo activities. Additionally, due to the relatively small number of compounds, the discussion on the SAR is insufficient. In future research, it will be necessary to perform structural optimization on moieties such as the linker and coumarin ring, and synthesize a variety of derivatives with diverse structures, so as to further clarify the SAR of this class of compounds. On the other hand, this study evaluated only the short-term effect of compound 10n on postprandial blood glucose in normal mouse models. In future research, it will be necessary to employ normal mouse models and diabetic mouse models, respectively, to assess the therapeutic effect of compound 10n on diabetes following long-term administration and administration at different doses. In this study, normal human HEK-293 cells were used to evaluate the safety of the compounds. In future research, more in-depth safety evaluations of this class of compounds need to be conducted from perspectives such as animal models and target selectivity. In future research, we will also conduct pharmacokinetic and toxicological studies to assess the drug-likeness of this class of compounds. In conclusion, compound 10n can serve as a lead compound for the development of multi-target anti-diabetic drugs.

Acknowledgment

National Natural Science Foundation of China (82560690); Guizhou Provincial Basic Research Program (Natural Science), China (Qian Ke He Jichu-MS[2025]533, Qian Ke He Jichu-[2024] Qingnian 256).

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Zhiyun Peng: Methodology, Formal analysis, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Writing - original draft; Wei Yang: Methodology, Formal analysis, Software, Data curation, Writing - original draft; Guangcheng Wang: Validation, Conceptualization, Supervision, Project administration, Funding acquisition, Writing - review & editing.

Declaration of competing interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Declaration of generative AI and AI-assisted technologies in the writing process

The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.

Supplementary data

Supplementary material to this article can be found online at https://dx.doi.org/10.25259/AJC_1106_2025.

References

  1. , , , , . Chromone-based benzohydrazide derivatives as potential α-glucosidase inhibitor: Synthesis, biological evaluation and molecular docking study. Bioorganic Chemistry. 2023;131:106276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioorg.2022.106276
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , . Investigation on the anti-α-glucosidase mechanism of aspergillus triazolate A from oxalis corniculate L. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2024;279:135457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.135457
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , . Novel carbazole-oxadiazole derivatives as anti-α-glucosidase and anti-α-amylase agents: Design, synthesis, molecular docking, and biological evaluation. European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 2024;275:116600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2024.116600
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , , . Mechanisms of sesamol and sesamin inhibiting α-glucosidase activity by spectroscopy and molecular docking. Food Bioscience. 2023;53:102680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbio.2023.102680
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , , , . Synthesis and biological evaluation of indole derivatives containing thiazolidine-2,4-dione as α-glucosidase inhibitors with antidiabetic activity. European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 2024;264:115957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2023.115957
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , , , . A critical review on role of available synthetic drugs and phytochemicals in insulin resistance treatment by targeting PTP1B. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology. 2022;194:4683-4701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-022-04028-x
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , . Discovery of novel high potent and cellular active ADC type PTP1B inhibitors with selectivity over TC-PTP via modification interacting with C site. European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 2018;144:692-700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2017.12.064
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Recent advance on PTP1B inhibitors and their biomedical applications. European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 2020;199:112376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2020.112376
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , . Design, synthesis, biological evaluation, and docking study of new triazole-phenylacetamide derivatives as α-glucosidase inhibitors. Bioorganic Chemistry. 2023;141:106844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioorg.2023.106844
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , , . Synthesis, in vitro evaluation and molecular docking studies of novel triazine-triazole derivatives as potential α-glucosidase inhibitors. European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 2017;125:423-429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2016.09.067
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , , . Design, synthesis of novel azolyl flavonoids and their protein tyrosine phosphatase-1B inhibitory activities. Bioorganic Chemistry. 2018;80:195-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioorg.2018.06.008
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , , , . Synthesis, in vitro α-glucosidase inhibitory activity and molecular dynamics simulation of some new coumarin-fused 4H-pyran derivatives as potential anti-diabetic agents. Journal of Molecular Structure. 2023;1284:135349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2023.135349
    [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , , , , . Valeriaquinone A, a unique anthraquinone–coumarin hybrid with selective inhibition of PTP1B from Knoxia valerianoides. Chinese Chemical Letters. 2022;33:2919-2922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cclet.2021.10.072
    [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , . Identification of natural products as selective PTP1B inhibitors via virtual screening. Bioorganic Chemistry. 2020;98:103706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioorg.2020.103706
    [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , , , , , , . Synthesis and inhibitory activity of euparin derivatives as potential dual inhibitors against α-glucosidase and protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B (PTP1B) Fitoterapia. 2023;169:105596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fitote.2023.105596
    [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , . Design, synthesis and enzymatic inhibition evaluation of novel 4-hydroxy Pd–C-Ⅲ derivatives as α-glucosidase and PTP1B dual-target inhibitors. European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 2024;280:116938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2024.116938
    [Google Scholar]
  17. , , , , , , , . Structure–activity relationship investigation of coumarin–chalcone hybrids with diverse side-chains as acetylcholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterase inhibitors. Molecular Diversity. 2018;22:893-906. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11030-018-9839-y
    [Google Scholar]
  18. , , , , , , , , , , . Synthesis, bioactivity evaluation and theoretical study of nicotinamide derivatives containing diphenyl ether fragments as potential succinate dehydrogenase inhibitors. Journal of Molecular Structure. 2024;1308:138331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2024.138331
    [Google Scholar]
  19. , , , , , . One-pot and three-component synthesis, characterization and biological evaluation of some new 1,2,4-triazine-coumarins. Heterocycles. 2016;92:1430. https://doi.org/10.3987/com-16-13491
    [Google Scholar]
  20. , , , , , , , , , , . Unveiling tetrahydroberberine–1,3,4-oxadiazole hybrids as potent anticancer agents and MMP-9 inhibitors with comprehensive insights from in silico, in vitro, and ex vivo permeation studies. Bioorganic Chemistry. 2025;163:108791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioorg.2025.108791
    [Google Scholar]
  21. , , , , , , , . Development of a colorimetric and a fluorescence phosphatase-inhibitor assay suitable for drug discovery approaches. Journal of Biomolecular Screening. 2013;18:899-909. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087057113486000
    [Google Scholar]
  22. , , , . Synthesis and biological evaluation of new kojic acid-1,3,4-oxadiazole hybrids as tyrosinase inhibitors and their application in the anti-browning of fresh-cut mushrooms. Food Chemistry. 2023;409:135275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.135275
    [Google Scholar]
  23. , . AutoDock Vina: Improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading. Journal of Computational Chemistry. 2010;31:455-461. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.21334
    [Google Scholar]
  24. , , , , , , , . Nickel-catalyzed deallylation of aryl allyl ethers with hydrosilanes. Tetrahedron Letters. 2021;81:153341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tetlet.2021.153341
    [Google Scholar]
  25. , , , , , . 1,5-Anhydro-d-glucitol derivative and galloylated flavonoids isolated from the leaves of acer ginnala Maxim. as dual inhibitors of PTP1B and α-glucosidase enzymes: In vitro and in silico studies. Phytochemistry. 2023;213:113769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2023.113769
    [Google Scholar]
  26. , , , , . Development of novel pyrazole-1,2,4-triazole derivatives as tyrosinase inhibitors: Design, preparation, mechanism of action and anti-browning application. Food Chemistry. 2024;460:140722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2024.140722
    [Google Scholar]
  27. , , , . Comparison of binding interaction between β-lactoglobulin and three common polyphenols using multi-spectroscopy and modeling methods. Food Chemistry. 2017;228:143-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.01.131
    [Google Scholar]
  28. , , , , , , , , . Comprehending the inhibition mechanism of indole-based bis-acylhydrazone compounds on α-glucosidase: Spectral and theoretical approaches. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2024;276:133489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.133489
    [Google Scholar]
  29. , , , . Interaction studies of copper complex containing food additive carmoisine dye with human serum albumin (HSA): Spectroscopic investigations. Luminescence: The Journal of Biological and Chemical Luminescence. 2017;32:1319-1327. https://doi.org/10.1002/bio.3328
    [Google Scholar]
  30. , , , , . Novel kojic acid-1,2,4-triazine hybrids as anti-tyrosinase agents: Synthesis, biological evaluation, mode of action, and anti-browning studies. Food Chemistry. 2023;419:136047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.136047
    [Google Scholar]
  31. , , . Inhibition of enzymatic browning in fresh-cut potatoes by 1,3,4-oxadiazole-2-thiol analogs and elucidation of their tyrosinase inhibition mechanism. Food Chemistry. 2025;492:145632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2025.145632
    [Google Scholar]
  32. , . Molecular modeling of conformational dynamics and its role in enzyme evolution. Current Opinion in Structural Biology. 2018;52:50-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbi.2018.08.004
    [Google Scholar]
  33. , , , , , , , . Synthesis and biological evaluation of chromone-thiazolidine-2,4-dione derivatives as potential α-glucosidase inhibitors. Arabian Journal of Chemistry. 2023;16:105279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2023.105279
    [Google Scholar]
  34. , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Structure-based optimization of protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B inhibitors: From the active site to the second phosphotyrosine binding site. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 2007;50:4681-4698. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm0702478
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections