Translate this page into:
Design, synthesis and evaluation of 2-(4-(substituted benzoyl)-1,4-diazepan-1-yl)-N-phenylacetamide derivatives as a new class of falcipain-2 inhibitors
⁎Corresponding author at: Department of Pharmacy, FD-3, Birla Institute of Technology & Science, Pilani 333031, Rajasthan, India. Fax: +91 01596244183. sourabh_mundra@yahoo.co.in (Sourabh Mundra)
-
Received: ,
Accepted: ,
This article was originally published by Elsevier and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.
Peer review under responsibility of King Saud University.
Abstract
The cysteine protease, falcipain-2 is an important drug target in human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. A new series of 2-(4-(substituted benzoyl)-1,4-diazepan-1-yl)-N-phenylacetamide derivatives 5(a–t) were designed as per pharmacophoric requirements of falcipain-2 inhibitors using ligand-based approach. The target compounds were synthesized from the key intermediate, 2-(1,4-Diazepan-1-yl)-N-phenylacetamide, by coupling it with appropriate carboxylic acids using carbodiimide chemistry. Structural features of target compounds were characterized by spectral data (1H NMR, and mass) and elemental analyses. The purity of the final compounds was confirmed by HPLC. The compounds were tested for their in vitro falcipain-2 inhibitor activity on recombinant falcipain-2 enzyme. Five compounds 5b, 5g, 5h, 5j, 5k showed good inhibitory activity (>60%), against falcipain-2 at 10 μM concentration, and fifteen compounds showed weak to moderate inhibitor activity. Compound 5g, the most potent compound from this series showed 72% inhibition at 10 μM concentrations.
Keywords
Malaria
Plasmodium falciparum
Structure–activity relationships (SARs)
Ligand-based drug design
Antimalarial agents
1 Introduction
The increasing ratio of malaria in terms of morbidity and mortality in humans turns it into a major public health problem in tropical and subtropical countries. World Health Organization Malaria report 2012 indicates that in 2010, there were 219 million malaria cases leading to approximately 660,000 malaria deaths, mostly among African children. Out of reported 90% malaria casualties in Africa alone the majority were children under five (Vangapandu et al., 2007). Globally, 80% of malaria deaths occur in just 14 African countries. Together, the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Nigeria account for over 40% of the estimated total of malaria death worldwide (World Malaria Report, 2012). Rapid spread of resistance is becoming most apparent in Plasmodium falciparum species toward first-line treatment, chloroquine and sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (Marfurt et al., 2010). To enhance the efficacy and delayed onset of resistance, the WHO began recommending for use of Artemisinin based combination therapies (ACTs) since 2005 (Rogerson and Menendez, 2006). ACTs have potential clinical efficacy, paradoxically the history of antimalarial chemotherapy predicts that it is a matter of time before parasitic resistance emerges and spreads (Ekland and Fidock, 2008). Nevertheless, safe and cost effective novel chemical classes of antimalarial agents are urgently needed to treat malaria (Guerin et al., 2002).
Among various potential new targets, the cysteine protease falcipain-2 (FP-2) of P. falciparum is the most intensely studied enzyme, and its structural and functional data suggest that it is an attractive target for therapeutic intervention (Pandey et al., 2005; Wang et al., 2006). FP-2 is a principal cysteine protease that plays a major role in parasite food assimilation by its ability to degrade hemoglobin. Many in vitro studies have affirmed that inhibitors of falcipain-2 can inhibit the parasite hemoglobin hydrolysis and prevent the growth of culture parasites (Shenai et al., 2003; Lee et al., 2003; Domínguez et al., 1997; Huang et al., 2002). Some of them were also effective against murine malaria in vivo (Domínguez et al., 2005; Rosenthal et al., 1993; Sajid and McKerrow, 2002). However, the literature indicates that most of the reported FP-2 inhibitors are mainly derived from peptide analogues (Choi et al., 2013; Mallik et al., 2012; Schulz et al., 2007; Schirmeister and Kaeppler, 2003; Shenai et al., 2003; Lee et al., 2003), which have expressed nanomolar IC50 values, due to the formation of covalent interactions between the electrophilic groups, such as aldehydes, nitriles, vinyl sulfones and epoxides with thiolate of the catalytic cysteine amino acid. In addition, most of the existing standard ligands for falcipain-2, and cystine protease inhibitors such as Leupeptin (N-acetyl-l-leucyl-l-leucyl-l-argininal) (Moldoveanu et al., 2004), and E-64 (N-(trans-epoxysuccinyl)-l-leucine 4-guanidinobutylamide) (Moldoveanu et al., 2004; Varughese et al., 1989) possess chiral center(s), (Fig. 1) which increases the synthetic cost of these drugs.
This discussion clearly stresses the requirements of non-peptidic inhibitors that would bind non-covalently to the target enzyme in order to reduce toxicity and cost while retaining the potential for high activity and selectivity. The present study demonstrates the design, synthesis and in vitro activity of 2-(4-(substituted benzoyl)-1,4-diazepan-1-yl)-N-phenylacetamides as falcipain-2 inhibitors. Compounds 5(a–t) were synthesized through the route outlined in Scheme 1. Furthermore, docking studies were performed for the active compounds to predict their relative binding affinities and binding modes in the active site of the falcipain-2 enzyme. Molecular docking studies of most active analogues (5g, 5h, 5j, and 5k) revealed that they interacted with Gln 36, Gln 83, Asn 173 and Hip 174 residues of 3BPF protein, via hydrogen bonding. Moreover, in silico pharmacokinetics and toxicity (ADMET) parameters for the selected analogues were estimated using online tool admetSAR and QikProp module of Schrodinger.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 General
Melting points (m.p.) were determined in open capillary tubes and on a Buchi 530 melting point apparatus and were uncorrected. Thin layer chromatography (TLC) was performed to monitor progress of the reaction and assess purity of the compounds; spots were detected by their absorption under UV light. 1H NMR, spectra were recorded with Bruker DPX operating at 400 MHz in CDCl3 or DMSO-d6 solvent, with tetramethylsilane (TMS) as an internal standard. Chemical shifts are shown as δ values (ppm); the J values are expressed in Hertz (Hz). Signals are represented as s (singlet), d (doublet), t (triplet), q (quintet) or m (multiplet). Mass spectra (ESI) of most of the compounds exhibited molecular ion as (M+1)+/(M+Na)+. Purity of final compounds 5(a–t) was evaluated on a Waters™ LC/MS system equipped with a photodiode array detector using an XBridge C18 5 μm 4.6 mm × 150 mm column. The methods used were of three types. Method A: 15% MeOH in H2O (1 mL/min, isocratic), Method B: 25% MeOH in H2O (1 mL/min, isocratic), and Method C: 20% CH3CN (0.05% TFA) in H2O (1 mL/min, isocratic). Elemental analysis was performed on a PE-2400 elemental analyzer; the C, H and N analysis was repeated twice. The chemicals were purchased commercially from Aldrich, Fluka, and Spectrochem.
2.2 Synthesis of 2-chloro-N-phenylacetamide (2)
In a round bottom flask (500 mL), compound 1 (1 g, 10.7 mmol) and triethylamine (2.9 mL, 21.4 mmol) were suspended in anhydrous DCM (200 mL) and cooled to 0 °C. To this chloroacetylchloride (1.7 mL, 21.4 mmol) was added. The reaction mixture was then stirred at room temperature for 20 min; quenched with saturated sodium hydrogen carbonate (10 ml) and washed with water. The organic layer was separated and dried over sodium sulfate. The organic layer was evaporated under reduced pressure, and the crude reaction mixture was purified by column chromatography using chloroform and methanol as a mobile phase to obtain a pure compound 2 as a white solid. Yields 66%, 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 8.18 (s, 1H), 7.47 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.28 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.10 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 4.12 (s, 2H).
2.3 Synthesis of tert-butyl 4-(2-oxo-2-(phenylamino)ethyl)-1,4-diazepane-1-carboxylate (3)
To a solution of compound 2 (1.0 g, 5.8 mmol), K2CO3 (4.0 g, 29.4 mmol), in anhydrous acetonitrile (10 ml) was stirred for 10 min at 100 °C. To the above solution N-Boc-homopiperazine (1.4 ml, 7.0 mmol) was added and refluxed for 5 h. Completion of the reaction was monitored by TLC. Acetonitrile was removed under vacuum, and the reaction crude was diluted with ethyl acetate. The organic layer was then washed with water, dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate and evaporated under vacuum to get a crude mixture which was purified by column chromatography using chloroform and methanol as a mobile phase to obtain a pure compound 3 as a brown solid. Yields 68%, 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ: 9.16 (s, 1H), 7.51 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.27 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.05 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 3.52 (s, 2H), 3.45 (m, 2H), 3.25 (m, 2H), 2.79 (m, 4H), 1.84 (m, 2H), 1.40 (s, 9H).
2.4 Synthesis of 2-(1,4-diazepan-1-yl)-N-phenylacetamide (4)
To a solution of 3 (1.0 g, 3.0 mmol) in anhydrous DCM (20 mL) in a round bottom flask at 0 °C, trifluoroacetic acid (1.1 mL, 15.0 mmol) was added. The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 6 h. Upon completion of the reaction, solvent was removed under vacuum. To the residue, saturated solution of sodium bicarbonate was added, and extracted with ethyl acetate. Ethyl acetate portion was evaporated to obtain the free amine as off white solid. Yield: 70%, 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ: 9.14 (s, 1H), 7.56 (dd, J = 8.0 Hz, 1 Hz, 2H), 7.25 (m, 2H), 7.04 (m, 2H), 3.28 (s, 2H), 3.12 (m, 4H), 2.89 (m, 2H), 2.81 (m, 2H), 1.92 (m, 2H).
2.5 General procedure for the synthesis of 2-(4-(substituted benzoyl)-1,4-diazepan-1-yl)-N-phenylacetamide derivatives 5(a–t)
To an appropriate carboxylic acid (1 g), DIPEA (2.4 equiv), EDC·HCl (1.5 equiv), and HOBt (0.8 equiv) in anhydrous DCM (10 ml) were added and the reaction was stirred for 5 min at 0 °C. To this reaction mixture the compound 4 (1.1 equiv) was added. The reaction was stirred for 6 h at room temperature and then solvents were removed under reduced pressure. The residue was dissolved in ethyl acetate, and the organic phase was washed with 5% aqueous sodium bicarbonate solution (twice) and saturated brine solution (once). The organic layer was dried over anhydrous magnesium sulfate and evaporated under reduced pressure, and the crude product was purified by column chromatography.
2.5.1 2-(4-Benzoyl-1,4-diazepan-1-yl)-N-phenylacetamide (5a)
Semi solid, purity 99% (method B); 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ: 9.10 (s, 1H), 7.62 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.53 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.41 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 5H), 7.33 (q, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H), 7.12 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H), 3.84 (m, 2H), 3.55 (m, 2H), 3.34 (s, 1H), 3.26 (s, 1H), 3.02 (m, 1H), 2.88 (m, 1H), 2.81 (m, 2H), 2.04 (m, 1H), 1.85 (m, 1H); MS (ESI): m/z 338.18 (M+1)+; Anal. calcd for C20H23N3O2 C, 71.19; H, 6.87; N, 12.45; found C, 71.21; H, 6.81; N, 12.41.
2.5.2 2-(4-(3-Fluorobenzoyl)-1,4-diazepan-1-yl)-N-phenylacetamide (5b)
White solid, purity 97% (method B); 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ: 9.09 (s, 1H), 7.61 (m, 1H), 7.50 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.46 (m, 2H), 7.34 (m, 3H), 7.12 (m, 2H), 3.83 (m, 2H), 3.57 (m, 2H), 3.44 (s, 1H), 3.16 (s, 1H), 3.12 (m, 1H), 3.01 (m, 3H), 2.12 (m, 1H), 1.92 (m, 1H); MS (ESI): m/z 356.19 (M+1)+; Anal. calcd for C20H22FN3O2 C, 67.59; H, 6.24; N, 11.82 found C, 67.61; H, 6.21; N, 11.81.
2.5.3 2-(4-(2-Fluorobenzoyl)-1,4-diazepan-1-yl)-N-phenylacetamide (5c)
Brown solid, purity 96% (method A); 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ: 9.08 (s, 1H), 7.61 (dd, J = 8.5, 1.0 Hz, 1H), 7.55 (dd, J = 8.5, 1.0 Hz, 1H), 7.37 (m, 4H), 7.21 (m, 1H), 7.12 (m, 2H), 3.87 (m, 2H), 3.48 (m, 2H), 3.34 (s, 1H), 3.26 (s, 1H), 3.01 (m, 1H), 2.88 (dd, J = 6.2, 5.1 Hz, 1H), 2.81 (dd, J = 10.8, 6.7 Hz, 2H), 2.04 (m, 1H), 1.86 (m, 1H); MS (ESI): m/z 356.19 (M+1)+; Anal. calcd for C20H22FN3O2 C, 67.59; H, 6.24; N, 11.82; found C, 67.61; H, 6.21; N, 11.81.
2.5.4 2-(4-(3-Chlorobenzoyl)-1,4-diazepan-1-yl)-N-phenylacetamide (5d)
Semi solid, purity 95% (method A); 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ: 8.99 (s, 1H), 7.61 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.53 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.40 (m, 2H), 7.33 (m, 4H), 7.12 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 3.83 (m, 2H), 3.57 (m, 1H), 3.53 (t, J = 6.2 Hz, 1H) 3.37 (s, 1H), 3.28 (s, 1H), 3.04 (m, 1H), 2.85 (m, 3H), 2.06 (m, 1H), 1.89 (m, 1H); MS (ESI): m/z 371.21 (M)+ and 372.23 (M+1)+; Anal. calcd for C20H22ClN3O2 C, 64.60; H, 5.96; N, 11.30; found C, 64.62; H, 5.97; N, 11.31.
2.5.5 2-(4-(4-Chlorobenzoyl)-1,4-diazepan-1-yl)-N-phenylacetamide (5e)
Semi solid, purity 95% (method B); 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ: 9.16 (s, 1H), 7.61 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.52 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.36 (m, 6H), 7.12 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 3.83 (m, 2H), 3.53 (m, 2H), 3.38 (s, 1H), 3.28 (s, 1H), 3.05 (m, 1H), 2.85 (m, 3H), 2.06 (m, 1H), 1.88 (m, 1H); MS (ESI): m/z 371.21 (M)+ and 372.23 (M+1)+; Anal. calcd for C20H22ClN3O2 C, 64.60; H, 5.96; N, 11.30; found C, 64.62; H, 5.97; N, 11.31.
2.5.6 2-(4-(2-Chlorobenzoyl)-1,4-diazepan-1-yl)-N-phenylacetamide (5f)
Semi solid, purity 98% (method C); 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ: 9.06 (s, 1H), 7.70 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.62 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 7.48 (m, 5H), 7.21 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 3.80 (m, 2H), 3.57 (m, 2H), 3.48 (s, 1H), 3.38 (s, 1H), 3.15 (m, 1H), 3.05 (m, 3H), 2.36 (m, 1H), 1.78 (m, 1H); MS (ESI): m/z 371.21 (M)+ and 372.23 (M+1)+; Anal. calcd for C20H22ClN3O2 C, 64.60; H, 5.96; N, 11.30; found C, 64.62; H, 5.97; N, 11.31.
2.5.7 N-Phenyl-2-(4-(3-(trifluoromethyl)benzoyl)-1,4-diazepan-1-yl) acetamide (5g)
White solid, purity 96% (method A); 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ: 9.04 (s, 1H), 7.70 (d, J = 5.7 Hz, 2H), 7.61 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H), 7.54 (dd, J = 13.9, 7.8 Hz, 2H), 7.34 (q, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H), 7.13 (m, 1H), 3.86 (m, 2H), 3.56 (m, 1H), 3.51 (t, J = 6.4 Hz, 1H) 3.38 (s, 1H), 3.29 (s, 1H), 3.06 (m, 1H), 2.87 (m, 2H), 2.09 (m, 2H), 1.90 (m, 1H); MS (ESI): m/z 406.21 (M+1)+; Anal. calcd for C21H22F3N3O2 C, 62.21; H, 5.47; N, 10.36; found C, 62.22; H, 5.45; N, 10.35.
2.5.8 N-Phenyl-2-(4-(4-(trifluoromethyl)benzoyl)-1,4-diazepan-1-yl)acetamide (5h)
Yellow solid, purity 95% (method A); 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ: 9.04 (s, 1H), 7.69 (t, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 7.61 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.54 (t, J = 8.5 Hz, 3H), 7.34 (q, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 7.13 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 3.86 (m, 2H), 3.55 (t, J = 5.1 Hz, 1H), 3.50 (t, J = 6.2 Hz, 1H), 3.36 (s, 1H), 3.28 (s, 1H), 3.04 (m, 1H), 2.90 (m, 1H), 2.82 (m, 2H), 2.07 (m, 1H), 1.87 (m, 1H); MS (ESI): m/z 406.21 (M+1)+; Anal. calcd for C21H22F3N3O2 C, 62.21; H, 5.47; N, 10.36; found C, 62.22; H, 5.45; N, 10.35.
2.5.9 N-Phenyl-2-(4-(2-(trifluoromethyl)benzoyl)-1,4-diazepan-1-yl) acetamide (5i)
White solid, purity 94% (method A); 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ: 9.04 (s, 1H), 7.69 (m, 2H), 7.61 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.54 (m, 3H), 7.34 (m, 2H), 7.13 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 3.90 (m, 2H), 3.55 (d, J = 6.2 Hz, 1H), 3.49 (t, J = 6.2 Hz, 1H), 3.38 (s, 1H), 3.30 (s, 1H), 3.12 (m, 1H), 2.95 (m, 1H), 2.87 (m, 2H), 2.12 (m, 1H), 1.85 (m, 1H); MS (ESI): m/z 406.21 (M+1)+; Anal. calcd for C21H22F3N3O2 C, 62.21; H, 5.47; N, 10.36; found C, 62.22; H, 5.45; N, 10.35.
2.5.10 2-(4-(2-Methoxybenzoyl)-1,4-diazepan-1-yl)-N-phenylacetamide (5j)
Semi solid, purity 96% (method B); 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ: 9.16 (s, 1H), 7.63 (dd, J = 8.6, 1.0 Hz, 1H), 7.54 (m, 1H), 7.34 (m, 3H), 7.23 (m, 1H), 7.11 (m, 1H), 6.99 (m, 1H), 6.92 (dd, J = 8.3, 4.5 Hz, 1H), 3.95 (m, 1H), 3.84 (m, 1H), 3.81 (s, 3H), 3.45 (m, 1H), 3.35 (s, 2H), 3.26 (m, 1H), 2.99 (m, 1H), 2.81 (m, 4H), 2.04 (m, 1H); MS (ESI): m/z 368.21 (M+1)+; Anal. calcd for C21H25N3O3 C, 68.64; H, 6.86; N, 11.44; found C, 68.65; H, 6.87; N, 11.46.
2.5.11 2-(4-(3-Methoxybenzoyl)-1,4-diazepan-1-yl)-N-phenylacetamide (5k)
Semi solid, purity 95% (method A); 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ: 9.09 (s, 1H), 7.62 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.53 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.33 (dd, J = 14.8, 7.8 Hz, 3H), 7.12 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H), 6.97 (m, 3H), 3.86 (m, 1H), 3.81 (s, 3H), 3.78 (m, 1H), 3.55 (m, 2H), 3.34 (s, 1H), 3.26 (s, 1H), 3.01 (m, 1H), 2.88 (m, 1H), 2.80 (m, 2H), 2.04 (m, 1H), 1.85 (m, 1H); MS (ESI): m/z 368.21 (M+1)+; Anal. calcd for C21H25N3O3 C, 68.64; H, 6.86; N, 11.44; found C, 68.65; H, 6.87; N, 11.46.
2.5.12 2-(4-(4-Methoxybenzoyl)-1,4-diazepan-1-yl)-N-phenylacetamide (5l)
Semi solid, purity 99% (method A); 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ: 9.11 (s, 1H), 7.57 (m, 2H), 7.40 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.33 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 2H), 7.11 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 6.91 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 3.84 (m, 1H), 3.83 (s, 3H), 3.79 (m, 1H), 3.59 (m, 2H), 3.30 (s, 2H), 3.01 (m, 1H), 2.95 (m, 1H), 2.82 (m, 2H), 2.04 (m, 1H), 1.87 (m, 1H); MS (ESI): m/z 368.21 (M+1)+; Anal. calcd for C21H25N3O3 C, 68.64; H, 6.86; N, 11.44; found C, 68.65; H, 6.87; N, 11.46.
2.5.13 2-(4-(3-Ethoxybenzoyl)-1,4-diazepan-1-yl)-N-phenylacetamide (5m)
Semi solid, purity 98% (method B); 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ: 9.17 (s, 1H), 7.67 (m, 2H), 7.50 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.37 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 2H), 7.21 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 6.90 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 4.15 (q, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 3.85 (m, 1H), 3.78 (m, 1H), 3.61 (m, 2H), 3.40 (s, 2H), 3.19 (m, 1H), 2.90 (m, 1H), 2.83 (m, 2H), 2.04 (m, 1H), 1.87 (m, 1H), 1.32 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 3H); MS (ESI): m/z 382.31 (M+1)+; Anal. calcd for C22H27N3O3 C, 69.27; H, 7.13; N, 11.02; found C, 69.24; H, 7.11; N, 11.04.
2.5.14 2-(4-(2-Ethoxylbenzoyl)-1,4-diazepan-1-yl)-N-phenylacetamide (5n)
Semi solid, purity 96% (method A); 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ: 9.12 (s, 1H), 7.77 (m, 2H), 7.57 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.37 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 2H), 7.23 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 6.79 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 4.21 (q, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 3.88 (m, 1H), 3.82 (m, 1H), 3.71 (m, 2H), 3.45 (s, 2H), 3.29 (m, 1H), 2.89 (m, 1H), 2.81 (m, 2H), 2.14 (m, 1H), 1.97 (m, 1H), 1.30 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 3H); MS (ESI): m/z 382.31 (M+1)+; Anal. calcd for C22H27N3O3 C, 69.27; H, 7.13; N, 11.02; found C, 69.24; H, 7.11; N, 11.04.
2.5.15 2-(4-(4-Ethoxybenzoyl)-1,4-diazepan-1-yl)-N-phenylacetamide (5o)
Semi solid, purity 95% (method B); 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ: 9.14 (s, 1H), 7.62 (m, 2H), 7.51 (t, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.37 (m, 2H), 7.21 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 6.90 (m, 2H), 4.19 (q, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 3.81 (m, 1H), 3.80 (m, 1H), 3.71 (m, 2H), 3.34 (s, 2H), 3.29 (m, 1H), 2.92 (m, 1H), 2.79 (m, 2H), 2.14 (m, 1H), 1.84 (m, 1H), 1.28 (t, J = 8.1 Hz, 3H); MS (ESI): m/z 382.31 (M+1)+; Anal. calcd for C22H27N3O3 C, 69.27; H, 7.13; N, 11.02; found C, 69.24; H, 7.11; N, 11.04.
2.5.16 2-(4-(3-Methylbenzoyl)-1,4-diazepan-1-yl)-N-phenylacetamide (5p)
Semi solid, purity 98% (method A); 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ: 9.10 (s, 1H), 7.62 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.52 (t, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.41 (m, 4H), 7.21 (m, 2H), 7.06 (m, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 3.90 (m, 2H), 3.65 (m, 2H), 3.31 (s, 1H), 3.20 (s, 1H), 3.12 (m, 1H), 2.78 (m, 3H), 2.05 (m, 1H), 2.33 (s, 3H) 1.79 (m, 1H); MS (ESI): m/z 352.23 (M+1)+; Anal. calcd for C21H25N3O2 C, 71.77; H, 7.17; N, 11.96; found C, 71.76; H, 7.18; N, 11.95.
2.5.17 2-(4-(4-Methylbenzoyl)-1,4-diazepan-1-yl)-N-phenylacetamide (5q)
Semi solid, purity 96% (method B); 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ: 9.11 (s, 1H), 7.62 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.52 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.32 (m, 4H), 7.21 (m, 2H), 7.11 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 3.83 (m, 2H), 3.55 (dd, J = 14.2, 7.9 Hz, 2H), 3.34 (s, 1H), 3.26 (s, 1H), 3.02 (m, 1H), 2.83 (m, 3H), 2.05 (m, 1H), 2.38 (s, 3H) 1.85 (m, 1H); MS (ESI): m/z 352.23 (M+1)+; Anal. calcd for C21H25N3O2 C, 71.77; H, 7.17; N, 11.96; found C, 71.76; H, 7.18; N, 11.95.
2.5.18 2-(4-(2-Methylbenzoyl)-1,4-diazepan-1-yl)-N-phenylacetamide (5r)
Semi solid, purity 97% (method A); 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ: 9.10 (s, 1H), 7.62 (m, 1H), 7.53 (m, 1H), 7.32 (m, 3H), 7.20 (m, 3H), 7.12 (m, 1H), 3.92 (m, 2H), 3.37 (m, 4H), 3.06 (s, 1H), 2.87 (m, 2H), 2.75 (s, 1H), 2.34 (s, 3H), 2.07 (m, 1H), 1.84 (m, 1H); MS (ESI): m/z 352.23 (M+1)+; Anal. calcd for C21H25N3O2 C, 71.77; H, 7.17; N, 11.96; found C, 71.76; H, 7.18; N, 11.95.
2.5.19 2-(4-(4-Ethylbenzoyl)-1,4-diazepan-1-yl)-N-phenylacetamide (5s)
Semi solid, purity 96% (method C); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) δ: 10.98 (s, 1H), 7.79 (s, 1H), 7.68 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 2H), 7.38 (m, 2H), 7.28 (m, 3H), 7.11 (t, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 4.32 (m, 2H), 3.85 (m, 1H), 3.59 (m, 4H), 3.26 (s, 2H), 2.68 (q, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 2.58 (m, 2H), 2.48 (m, 1H), 1.25 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 3H); MS (ESI): m/z 366.28 (M+1)+; Anal. calcd for C22H27N3O2 C, 72.30; H, 7.45; N, 11.50; found C, 72.31; H, 7.42; N, 11.51.
2.5.20 2-(4-(3-Ethylbenzoyl)-1,4-diazepan-1-yl)-N-phenylacetamide (5t)
Semi solid, purity 94% (method B); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) δ: 10.78 (s, 1H), 7.80 (s, 1H), 7.66 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 2H), 7.38 (m, 2H), 7.30 (m, 3H), 7.21 (t, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 4.30 (m, 2H), 3.75 (m, 1H), 3.57 (m, 4H), 3.46 (s, 2H), 2.66 (q, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 2.60 (m, 2H), 2.58 (m, 1H), 1.95 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 3H); MS (ESI): m/z 366.28 (M+1)+; Anal. calcd for C22H27N3O2 C, 72.30; H, 7.45; N, 11.50; found C, 72.31; H, 7.42; N, 11.51.
2.6 Enzyme assay
The protocol for the purification and refolding of recombinant protein falcipain-2 as described by Shenai et al. (2000) and Korde et al. (2008) was followed. In brief, a mixture of 100 mM NaOAc, 10 mM DTT, 6 μM enzyme and 10 μM of test inhibitors at pH 5.5, 10 mM of fluorogenic substrate benzyloxycarbonyl-Phe-Arg-7-amino-4-methylcoumarin hydrochloride (ZFR-AMC) was added and the release of 7-amino-4-methylcoumarin (AMC) was monitored (excitation 355 nm; emission 460 nm) over 30 min at RT using Perkin Elmer Victor 3 multi-label counter. Preliminary assays were performed to determine the percentage inhibition of the enzyme at a concentration of 10 μM based on DMSO as control represented in Table 1.
| Compound | R | Inhibition ratec at 10 μm% | Compound | R | Inhibition rate at 10 μm% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5a | -H | 49 | 5k | m-OCH3 | 64 |
| 5b | m-F | 61 | 5l | p-OCH3 | 55 |
| 5c | o-F | 60 | 5m | m-OCH2CH3 | 32 |
| 5d | m-Cl | 47 | 5n | o-OCH2CH3 | 36 |
| 5e | p-Cl | 47 | 5o | p-OCH2CH3 | 30 |
| 5f | o-Cl | 36 | 5p | m-CH3 | 49 |
| 5g | m-CF3 | 72 | 5q | p-CH3 | 47 |
| 5h | p-CF3 | 68 | 5r | o-CH3 | 48 |
| 5i | o-CF3 | 50 | 5s | p-CH2CH3 | 30 |
| 5j | o-OCH3 | 70 | 5t | m-CH2CH3 | 24 |
| E-64 | 97.4 |
2.7 Docking studies
To understand the structural basis for the activities of the inhibitors and to support the in vitro activity results, we studied the binding models of the top four active analogues; 5g, 5h, 5j and 5k with falcipain-2 enzyme using Glide 5.9 (Schrodinger, LLC, New York, NY, 2013) running on maestro version 9.4 installed in a machine on Intel Xenon W 3565 processor and Cent OS Linux Enterprise version 6.3 as the operating system (Friesner et al., 2004; Halgren et al., 2004). The crystal structure of falcipain-2 (PDB entry 3BPF) from P. falciparum was retrieved from the Protein Database Bank with a resolution of 2.9 Å. The downloaded FP-2 protein carries four chains named A, B, C, and D; complexed with epoxysuccinate E64 (Wang et al., 2000). The catalytic triad of Cys 42, Asn 173 and His 174 is located in the cleft between the two structurally distinct domains (Wang et al., 2014). Protein preparation module of Schrodinger suite was used for protein preparation. Proteins were pre-processed separately by deleting the substrate co-factor as well as the observed water molecules were removed from the coordinate set, followed by optimization of hydrogen bonds. Charge and protonation state was assigned and energy was minimized with Root Mean Square Deviation (RMSD) value of 0.3 Å using Optimized Potentials for Liquid Simulations-2005 (OPLS-2005) force field (Jorgensen et al., 1996). Potential of non-polar parts of receptors was softened by scaling van der Walls radii of ligand atoms by 1.00 Å to generate the grid. Analogues and Standard Drug E-64 structures were drawn using ChemSketch and converted to 3D structure with the help of 3D optimization tool. LigPrep module was used to optimize the geometry of the drawn ligands.
3 Results and discussion
Existing falcipain-2 inhibitors, (Desai et al., 2004; Li et al., 2009) were used as a template for making a pharmacophore model for falcipain-2 inhibitors, and some of the compounds (I–VIII), which possess moderate to potent activities are represented in Fig. 2. Among the represented compounds, particular imine (I) and phenyl hydrazones (IV and VIII), probably inhibit the enzyme by covalent interactions.
The most common features present in the aforementioned falcipain-2 inhibitors are, an aromatic residue (monocyclic/bicyclic) which is attached to the hydrophobic moiety; commonly an aromatic residue through a hydrogen bond donor and acceptor atom(s) as linker. The distance between the aromatic residue and the hydrophobic group ranged from 9 to 14 Å. The hydrogen bond donor (HBD) and hydrogen bond acceptor (HBA) atom(s) are present as either in heterocyclic/alicyclic or open chain form. The numbers of hydrogen bond donor and acceptor atoms range from 0 to 2 and 2 to 6, respectively. The reported molecules are basic in nature due to 2° or 3° amino moiety. By considering these common features as pharmacophore for falcipain-2 inhibitors, a pharmacophore model was built as shown in Fig. 3. Among the broad range of heterocyclic templates particularly, the piperazine core is found as the most encouraging leading heterocyclic ring, present in a number of drugs and clinical candidates that address a broad spectrum of serious targets (Han et al., 2012). Therefore, initially we synthesized some derivatives based on piperazine nucleus, and tested in vitro against falcipain-2 enzyme; unfortunately, the insignificant activity of the compounds (unpublished observation), prompted us to focus our efforts to increase the ring size especially, on utilizing 1,4-diazepam as a core nucleus (Ettari et al., 2009; Micale et al., 2006), with the aim of improving the drug like profile of this novel class of compounds, as shown by basic structure 5(a–t) in Scheme 1.
The least energy conformation (three minimum energy conformations for each compound) for each designed compound was generated by ACDLABS-12.0 product version 12.01/3D viewer (CHARMM parameterizations), and the pharmacophoric distances were measured from the centroid of an aromatic residue to a hydrophobic residue. The observed distances between the pharmacophoric elements of all the designed compounds are in agreement with our proposed pharmacophore model. To achieve the better pharmacokinetic profile, Lipinski’s Rule of Five (Lipinski et al., 1997) was adopted for the designed molecules. Lipophilicity is an important parameter to be considered while designing ligand to manifest drug-like behavior. Thus, Log P values of all the designed molecules were calculated utilizing JME Molecular Editor (Courtesy of Peter Ertl, Novartis).
The target compounds were prepared as outlined in Scheme 1. First, compound 4 was synthesized in multi-gram scale from the starting material aniline in a sequence of reactions. Chloroacetyl chloride was subjected to nucleophilic substitution reaction with aniline, which afforded compound 2. This intermediate was reacted with N-Boc protected homopiperazine, to obtain compound 3. Subsequently, deprotection of the Boc group with trifluroacetic acid furnished the intermediate 2-(1,4-diazepan-1-yl)-N-phenylacetamide 4. This key intermediate was coupled with appropriate carboxylic acids in the presence of coupling agents 1-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-3-ethylcarbodiimide hydrochloride (EDC·HCl) and 1-hydroxybenzotriazole (HOBt) under nitrogen atmosphere to afford target compounds 5(a–t). Synthesized compounds were isolated as pure and characterized by 1H NMR, mass spectroscopy, HPLC and elemental analysis. The analytical and spectral data of the compounds confirmed the structures and purities of the final compounds.
All synthesized compounds were evaluated for their in vitro falcipain-2 inhibitor activity. Several compounds showed significant inhibitory activity (>60%), against falcipain-2 at 10 μM presented in Table 1, and their chemical structures and physical constants are shown in Table 2.
| Compound | R | Molecular Weight | Molecular Formula | % Yielda | m.p. (°C) | Log Pb |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5a | -H | 337.44 | C20H23N3O2 | 62 | Semi solid | 1.79 |
| 5b | m-F | 355.40 | C20H22FN3O2 | 82 | 125–127 | 1.95 |
| 5c | o-F | 355.40 | C20H22FN3O2 | 68 | 118–120 | 1.95 |
| 5d | m-Cl | 371.86 | C20H22ClN3O2 | 81 | Semi solid | 2.35 |
| 5e | p-Cl | 371.86 | C20H22ClN3O2 | 65 | Semi solid | 2.35 |
| 5f | o-Cl | 371.86 | C20H22ClN3O2 | 62 | Semi solid | 2.35 |
| 5g | m-CF3 | 405.41 | C21H22F3N3O2 | 68 | 122–124 | 2.71 |
| 5h | p-CF3 | 405.41 | C21H22F3N3O2 | 61 | 156–158 | 2.71 |
| 5i | o-CF3 | 405.41 | C21H22F3N3O2 | 61 | 140–142 | 3.22 |
| 5j | o-OCH3 | 367.44 | C21H25N3O3 | 64 | Semi solid | 1.66 |
| 5k | m-OCH3 | 367.44 | C21H25N3O3 | 73 | Semi solid | 1.66 |
| 5l | p-OCH3 | 367.44 | C21H25N3O3 | 87 | Semi solid | 1.66 |
| 5m | m-OCH2CH3 | 381.46 | C22H27N3O3 | 66 | Semi solid | 2.0 |
| 5n | o-OCH2CH3 | 381.46 | C22H27N3O3 | 71 | Semi solid | 2.0 |
| 5o | p-OCH2CH3 | 381.46 | C22H27N3O3 | 71 | Semi solid | 2.0 |
| 5p | m-CH3 | 351.44 | C21H25N3O2 | 66 | Semi solid | 2.27 |
| 5q | p-CH3 | 351.44 | C21H25N3O2 | 81 | Semi solid | 2.27 |
| 5r | o-CH3 | 351.44 | C21H25N3O2 | 62 | Semi solid | 2.27 |
| 5s | p-CH2CH3 | 365.40 | C22H27N3O3 | 70 | Semi solid | 2.69 |
| 5t | m-CH2CH3 | 365.46 | C22H27N3O2 | 79 | Semi solid | 2.69 |
Retaining the common 2-(4-(substituted benzoyl)-1,4-diazepan-1-yl)-N phenylacetamide framework, compounds 5a, 5b were screened, initially. Fortunately, these two compounds 5a and 5b exhibited inhibitory activity against falcipain-2 enzyme at 10 μM concentrations with inhibition values of 49% and 61%, respectively. Based on its moderate potency and synthetic feasibility, compound 5b served as a solid starting point for the future drug discovery program. Thus, various substitutions were introduced around the scaffold based on 5b specifically in the aromatic moiety. The effect of the fluorine group, an electron withdrawing substituent, was investigated at position 2 on the phenyl moiety (compound 5c). This modification did not result in any improved potency, and compound exhibited 60% enzyme inhibition value close to the compound 5b. Placement of another electron withdrawing substituent such as chloro in the aromatic ring, generated molecules (5d, 5e, 5f) with less potency (47% inhibition by 5d and 5e, and 36% by 5f). When a strong electron withdrawing group, trifluoromethyl was introduced at the 3 position to get the compound 5g (72% inhibition) and position 4 to get the compound 5h (68% inhibition), both compounds showed higher potency than the hit compound 5b. However, investigation of a trifluoromethyl group at the 2 position (compound 5i) of the phenyl ring showed lesser potency (50% inhibition) compared to compound 5b.
Consequently, a methoxy group, an electron releasing substituent was introduced at 2 and 3 positions of the phenyl ring resulting in compounds 5j and 5k, with improved inhibition potency (70% and 64%), greater than the hit compound 5b from this series. Attachment of the methoxy group in the 4 position of the phenyl ring gave rise to compound 5l, with inhibition potency (55%), which was lesser than that of 5b. Compounds 5m, 5n and 5o achieved by replacement of the methoxy group with the ethoxy group lose (32%, 36% and 30%) potency markedly. Replacement of the methoxy group in the phenyl ring with another weak electron releasing group such as methylene (5p, 5q and 5r) at 2, 3 and 4 positions and the ethylene (5s and 5t) group at 3 and 4 positions leads to a decrease in the potency.
This discussion clearly indicates that the strong electron withdrawing group (trifluoromethyl) at 3 and 4 positions and a strong electron releasing group (methoxy) at 2 and 3 positions generated compounds that displayed marked inhibition as evidenced by compounds 5g, 5h, 5j, and 5k compared to the non-substituted derivatives i.e., compound (5a). Higher homologation of electron releasing groups, methoxy to ethoxy (5m, 5n, 5o) and methylene to ethylene (5s, 5t) in the phenyl ring generated compounds with lesser inhibition.
The prepared ligands were docked with proteins using extra precision mode (XP). The best docked pose obtained from Glide was analyzed. Results of docking simulations using Glide are summarized as XP Gscore, lipophilic energy, H-bond energy and electrophoretic energy in Table 3. Comparison of interacting residues of these analogues (5g, 5h, 5j, 5k) shows that the amino acids Ala 175, Trp 43, Ile 85, Leu 84, Cys 42, Trp 206, Val 152 and Asp173 of falcipain-II protein are most commonly involved as shown in Fig. 4(A–D). Among these, the residue Asp 173 was the hydrogen bonding common interacting residue of falcipain-II with ligands (5g, 5h, 5j, 5k). Compound 5g showed eight hydrophobic interactions, Ala 175, Trp 43, Ile 85, Leu 84, Leu172, Cys 42, Trp 206, Val 152; two hydrogen bonds, Gln 36 (2.08 Å), Asn 173 (2.19 Å). Compound 5h showed nine hydrophobic interactions, Ala 175, Trp 43, Ile 85, Leu 84, Leu 172, Cys 42, Trp 206, Val 152, Ile 84; two hydrogen bonds, Asn 173 (2.25 Å), Gln 36 (2.27 Å). Compound 5j showed seven hydrophobic interactions, Ala 175, Trp 43, Ile 85, Leu 84, Cys 42, Trp 206, Val 152; two hydrogen bonds, Asn 173 (2.34 Å), Hip 174 (2.06 Å). Compound 5k showed nine hydrophobic interactions, Ala 175, Trp 43, Ile 85, Leu 84, Leu 172, Cys 42, Trp 206, Val 152, Val 150; three hydrogen bonds, Asn 173 (2.51 Å), Hip 174 (1.93 Å), Gln 83 (2.49 Å).
| Name of ligand | G-score | Lipophilic EvdW | H bond | XP Electro |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5g | −6.405 | −3.426 | −1.583 | −0.7663 |
| 5h | −6.380 | −3.509 | −1.582 | −0.7637 |
| 5j | −6.404 | −3.720 | −2.439 | −0.5968 |
| 5k | −6.128 | −3.744 | −2.096 | −0.5546 |

In the present study, validation of the docking was done by removing co-crystallized ligand E-64 from the active site and subjecting it again to dock into the binding pocket in the conformation found in the crystal structure. It is important to note that E-64 is a covalent inhibitor of several cysteine proteases and is potent non-selective due to the formation of covalent bond with the active site thiol (Li et al., 2009; Schiefer et al., 2013). Therefore, to validate the docking protocol, we used E-64 with an open epoxide ring as reported in the literature (Mugumbate et al., 2013). Furthermore, a set of studies were performed to compute the RMSD value between the pose of co-crystallized inhibitor present in the enzyme and its best ranked pose (Fig. 5), in the protein. As a result, the RMSD value calculated for co-crystallized ligand, E 64 was <2 Å against the target enzyme. The best scoring pose of the reference drug inside the FP-2 showed that interactions are in resemblance with the reported X-ray pose interactions (Kerr et al., 2009). These results suggested that our docking procedure, and software protocol could be relied on to predict the experimental binding mode of the designed analogues.
As discussed earlier, physicochemical properties such as molecular weight (180–500), log Po/w (−0.4 to 5.6), of all the designed analogues follow Lipinski’s Rule of Five. Furthermore, Qik–prop module of Schrodinger, and online software admetSAR (http://www.admetexp.org/predict/), were used to generate in silico pharmacokinetics and physicochemical parameters for compounds 5g, 5h, 5j and 5k in order to estimate their drug-likeness properties. The recommended range (Ntie-Kang et al., 2013; Cheng et al., 2012) of some physicochemical and pharmacokinetic parameters, which plays an important role to both pre-clinical research and clinical development, such as: log S (−6.0 to 0.5), log BB (−3.0 to 1.0), % Human oral absorption (⩽25% is poor and ⩾80% is high) was predicted (Table 4). In addition, AMES toxicity, acute oral toxicity and carcinogenicity were also predicted and represented as qualitative terms with probability (in bracket) in Table 4. Range of Caco-2 cell permeability gives a view to select a molecule as lead compound at early stage by determining the capability to transport about across the cell membrane of the gut. The physicochemical properties and in silico predicted ADMET properties as mentioned in Tables 2 and 4, for selected analogues are in the acceptable range of druggable profile.
| Properties | 5g | 5h | 5j | 5K | Range for drug likeness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Log Sd | −4.20 | −4.20 | −3.04 | −3.28 | −6.5–0.5 |
| Log BBe (probability) | 0.983 | 0.982 | 0.953 | 0.971 | – |
| Human oral absorption (%)f | 97.5 | 97.2 | 95.8 | 96.0 | ⩾80% is high, ⩽25% is poor |
| Caco-2 permeabilityg | 1.103 | 1.103 | 1.255 | 0.935 | – |
| AMES toxicity (probability) | Non toxic (0.707) | Non toxic (0.707) | Non toxic (0.764) | Non toxic (0.789) | – |
| Carcinogens (probability) | Non-carcinogen (0.8372) | Non-carcinogens (0.8372) | Non-carcinogens (0.9062) | Non-carcinogens (0.9104) | – |
| Acute oral toxicityh (probability) | III 0.6166 | III 0.6166 | III 0.7543 | III 0.7813 | – |
Although, representatives of this new series did not exhibit strong falcipain-2 activities as compared to the existing nonpeptidic FP-2 inhibitors such as chalcones (Li et al., 1995; Liu et al., 2001), which are biosynthetic precursors of flavonoids, thiosemicarbazones (Chiyanzu et al., 2003) and isoquinolines (Sajid and McKerrow, 2002; Batra et al., 2003). However, this work shows that indirect drug design protocol can be successfully expedited for the discovery of small molecule cysteine protease inhibitors. Overall, the discussed efforts toward the design of inhibitors of the malarial cysteine proteases clearly demonstrate the effectiveness of combining computational techniques with organic synthesis in delivering novel potential inhibitors and in providing directions for further improvements.
4 Conclusion
In summation, a series of 2-(4-(substituted benzoyl)-1,4-diazepan-1-yl)-N-phenylacetamide with twenty novel derivatives, using ligand based approach were synthesized and screened for falcipain-2 inhibition. The structures of the compounds were assigned on the basis of 1H NMR and mass spectral data. The preliminary SARs indicate that, overall, the compounds having 3-F (5b), 3-CF3 (5g), 4-CF3 (5h), 2-OCH3 (5j) and 3-OCH3 (5k) substituent in the aromatic ring displayed marked inhibition. Compound 5g is the most potent compound from this series, with lesser toxicity predicted by softwares (admetSAR and QikProp module of Schrodinger), and it can be utilized as a potential lead compound in the designing of new candidates to optimize the inhibitory potencies of this class of compounds, with potent antimalarial activity. Docking result provided the fundamental structural information to maintain the inhibitory activity, and was helpful for future inhibitor design. Moreover, to get the conclusive results, plasmodia study has to be done which will be the futuristic extension of the work. Thus, the present approach could be an excellent starting point for the development of novel cysteine protease inhibitors, and in general, for the development of new drugs for malaria.
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the Department of Biotechnology (BT/IN/Canada/22/AM/2009), New Delhi, India as part of ISTP Canada-DBT collaborative R&D Program. Authors are also thankful to Birla Institute of Technology & Science (BITS), Pilani, India, and SAIF, Panjab University, Chandigarh, India, for providing the infrastructure facilities and analytical facilities, respectively, and Dr. Asif (ICGEB, New Delhi) for critically evaluating the manuscript.
References
- Structure-based approach to falcipain-2 inhibitors: synthesis and biological evaluation of 1,6,7-trisubstituted dihydroisoquinolines and isoquinolines. Bioorg. Med. Chem.. 2003;11:2293-2299.
- [Google Scholar]
- AdmetSAR: a comprehensive source and free tool for assessment of chemical ADMET properties. J. Chem. Inf. Model.. 2012;52:3099-3105.
- [Google Scholar]
- Synthesis and evaluation of isatins and thiosemicarbazone derivatives against cruzain, falcipain-2 and rhodesain. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.. 2003;13:3527-3530.
- [Google Scholar]
- Anti-malarial activity of new N-acetyl-l-leucyl-l-leucyl-l-norleucinal (ALLN) derivatives against Plasmodium falciparum. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.. 2013;23:1293-1296.
- [Google Scholar]
- Identification of novel parasitic cysteine protease inhibitors using virtual screening. 1. The ChemBridge database. J. Med. Chem.. 2004;47:6609-6615.
- [Google Scholar]
- Synthesis and evaluation of new antimalarial phenylurenyl chalcone derivatives. J. Med. Chem.. 2005;48:3654-3658.
- [Google Scholar]
- Synthesis and antimalarial effects of phenothiazine inhibitors of a Plasmodium falciparum cysteine protease. J. Med. Chem.. 1997;40:2726-2732.
- [Google Scholar]
- In vitro evaluations of antimalarial drugs and their relevance to clinical outcomes. Int. J. Parasitol.. 2008;38:743-747.
- [Google Scholar]
- Novel peptidomimetics containing a vinyl ester moiety as highly potent and selective falcipain-2 inhibitors. J. Med. Chem.. 2009;52:2157-2160.
- [Google Scholar]
- Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy. J. Med. Chem.. 2004;47:1739-1749.
- [Google Scholar]
- Current status of control, diagnosis, treatment, and a proposed agenda for research and development. Lancet Infect. Dis.. 2002;2:564-573.
- [Google Scholar]
- Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 2. Enrichment factors in database screening. J. Med. Chem.. 2004;47:1750-1759.
- [Google Scholar]
- The design and synthesis of 1,4-substituted piperazine derivatives as triple reuptake inhibitors. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc.. 2012;33:2597-2602.
- [Google Scholar]
- Identification of potent and selective mechanism-based inhibitors of the cysteine protease cruzain using solid-phase parallel synthesis. J. Med. Chem.. 2002;45:676-684.
- [Google Scholar]
- Development and testing of the OPLS all-atom force field on conformational energetics of organic liquids. J. Am. Chem. Soc.. 1996;118:11225-11236.
- [Google Scholar]
- Structures of falcipain-2 and falcipain-3 bound to small molecule inhibitors: implications for substrate specificity. J. Med. Chem.. 2009;52:852-857.
- [Google Scholar]
- A prodomain peptide of Plasmodium falciparum cysteine protease (Falcipain-2) inhibits malaria parasite development. J. Med. Chem.. 2008;51:3116-3123.
- [Google Scholar]
- Antimalarial activities of novel synthetic cysteine protease inhibitors. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.. 2003;47:3810-3814.
- [Google Scholar]
- Identification of novel falcipain-2 inhibitors as potential antimalarial agents through structure-based virtual screening. J. Med. Chem.. 2009;52:4936-4940.
- [Google Scholar]
- In vitro antimalarial activity of chalcones and their derivatives. J. Med. Chem.. 1995;38:5031-5037.
- [Google Scholar]
- Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.. 1997;23:3-25.
- [Google Scholar]
- Antimalarial alkoxylated and hydroxylated chalcones: Structure activity relationship analysis. J. Med. Chem.. 2001;44:4443-4452.
- [Google Scholar]
- Synthesis and evaluation of peptidyl alpha, beta-unsaturated carbonyl derivatives as anti-malarial calpain inhibitors. Arch. Pharmacal Res.. 2012;35:469-479.
- [Google Scholar]
- Plasmodium falciparum resistance to anti-malarial drugs in Papua New Guinea: evaluation of a community-based approach for the molecular monitoring of resistance. Malaria J.. 2010;9:8.
- [Google Scholar]
- Novel peptidomimetic cysteine protease inhibitors as potential antimalarial agents. J. Med. Chem.. 2006;49:3064-3067.
- [Google Scholar]
- Crystal structures of Calpain– E64 and leupeptin inhibitor complexes reveal mobile loops gating the active site. J. Mol. Biol.. 2004;343:1313-1326.
- [Google Scholar]
- Novel anti-plasmodial hits identified by virtual screening of the ZINC database. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des.. 2013;27:859-871.
- [Google Scholar]
- Assessing the pharmacokinetic profile of the CamMedNP natural products database: an in-silico approach. Org. Med. Chem. Lett.. 2013;3:10.
- [Google Scholar]
- The Plasmodium falciparum cysteine protease falcipain-2 captures its substrate, hemoglobin, via a unique motif. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2005;102:9138-9143.
- [Google Scholar]
- Treatment and prevention of malaria in pregnancy: opportunities and challenges. Exp. Rev. Anti Infect. Ther.. 2006;4:687-702.
- [Google Scholar]
- Inhibition of a Plasmodium vinckei cysteine proteinase cures murine malaria. J. Clin. Invest.. 1993;91:1052-1056.
- [Google Scholar]
- Cysteine proteases of parasitic organisms. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol.. 2002;120:1-21.
- [Google Scholar]
- Design, synthesis, and optimization of novel epoxide incorporating peptidomimetics as selective calpain inhibitors. J. Med. Chem.. 2013;56:6054-6068.
- [Google Scholar]
- Non-peptidic inhibitors of cysteine proteases. Mini Rev. Med. Chem.. 2003;3:361-373.
- [Google Scholar]
- Screening of protease inhibitors as antiplasmodial agents. Part I: aziridines and epoxides. ChemMedChem. 2007;2:1214-1224.
- [Google Scholar]
- Characterization of native and recombinant falcipain-2, a principal trophozoite cysteine protease and essential hemoglobinase of Plasmodium falciparum. J. Biol. Chem.. 2000;275:29000-29010.
- [Google Scholar]
- Structure-activity relationships for inhibition of cysteine protease activity and development of Plasmodium falciparum by peptidyl vinyl sulfones. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.. 2003;47:154-160.
- [Google Scholar]
- Lig Builder: A multi-purpose program for structure-based drug design. J. Mol. Model.. 2000;6:498-516.
- [Google Scholar]
- TIMP-3 inhibits the procollagen N-proteinase ADAMTS-2. Biochem. J.. 2006;398:515-519.
- [Google Scholar]
- Identification of diverse natural products as falcipain-2 inhibitors through structure-based virtual screening. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.. 2014;24:1261-1264.
- [Google Scholar]
- World Malaria Report 2012, second ed., 2010. WHO Press: Geneva
