10.8
CiteScore
 
5.3
Impact Factor
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Corrigendum
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Full Length Article
Full lenth article
Letter to Editor
Original Article
Research article
Retraction notice
Review
Review Article
SPECIAL ISSUE: ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY
10.8
CiteScore
5.3
Impact Factor
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Corrigendum
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Full Length Article
Full lenth article
Letter to Editor
Original Article
Research article
Retraction notice
Review
Review Article
SPECIAL ISSUE: ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original article
9 (
2_suppl
); S1875-S1883
doi:
10.1016/j.arabjc.2014.08.004

Eco-sustainable synthesis and biological evaluation of 2-phenyl 1,3-benzodioxole derivatives as anticancer, DNA binding and antibacterial agents

Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Gokaraju Rangaraju College of Pharmacy, Osmania University, Bachupally, Kukatpally, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India
Department of Biotechnology, Gokaraju Rangaraju College of Pharmacy, Osmania University, Bachupally, Kukatpally, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India

⁎Corresponding author. Address: Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Gokaraju Rangaraju College of Pharmacy, Osmania University, Bachupally, Kukatpally, Hyderabad 500090, Andhra Pradesh, India. Tel.: +91 40 3291 2937, mobile: +91 9393744933; fax: +91 40 2304 0860. sayandg@rediffmail.com (Sayan Dutta Gupta)

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Elsevier and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Peer review under responsibility of King Saud University.

Abstract

The current research and development scenario in medicinal chemistry demands small molecules synthesized in a simple, fast and effective way with enhanced activity and fewer side effects than the existing ones. Therefore, one-pot, microwave assisted green and efficient synthesis of a series of derivatives belonging to 2-phenyl 1,3-benzodioxole (1a14a) and 2-phenyl 1,3-benzodioxole-4-ol (1b14b) class were carried out and subsequently investigated for their anticancer, antibacterial and DNA binding potential. Compound 3c proved to be the most active one among the screened derivatives possessing anticancer and antibacterial potency greater than the standard reference compound (cisplatin and cinoxacin for anticancer and antibacterial activity, respectively). The most active compound in terms of DNA binding capacity was found to be 5b. A rewarding feature of the work is a facile, convenient, eco friendly one step synthesis of compounds demonstrating attenuated activity against cancer and bacterial cell with an inherent potential of binding to DNA. Subsequently, a hit molecule for further anticancer, antibacterial (compound 3c) and DNA binding studies (compound 5b) was also identified.

Keywords

Benzodioxole
Anticancer
Antibacterial
DNA binding
Green chemistry
1

1 Introduction

The design of small molecules for better treatment of diseases has become an important therapeutic objective, given the wide-ranging side effects of existing molecules and rapid resistance developed to them (Leaf, 2004; Allerberger and Mittermayer, 2008). The benzothiazole nucleus is found in many such promising small molecule anticancer and antibacterial agents which were evaluated up to advanced preclinical stage (Racane et al., 2013). Among the small molecules with a benzothiazole nucleus, the study of 2-phenyl substituted benzothiazole (Fig. 1) derivatives is of considerable current interest owing to their diverse biophysical and biological properties. They are reported to possess antitumor (Kadri et al., 2008), antibacterial (Bandyopadhyay et al., 2011), antifungal (Dutta Gupta et al., 2010), antiparasitic (Kuvaev et al., 2005) and antioxidant activity (Sharma et al., 2013). Further they have strong activity profile as imaging agents for β-amyloid protein which aids in non-invasive diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease (Weekes and Westwell, 2009).

2-aminophenyl benzothiazole.
Figure 1
2-aminophenyl benzothiazole.

The benzodioxole ring which is an isostere of benzothiazole nucleus is also studied as antitumor (Wei et al., 2012), antibacterial (Leite et al., 2004), antifungal (Bakhite and Radwan 1999), antiparasitic (Kamau et al., 2011), antimalarial (Nelson and Hoosseintehrani 1982) and antioxidant agents (Zhao et al., 1997). Additionally some benzodioxole derivatives are also used as pesticides or pesticide intermediates and herbicides (Ugolini et al., 2005). The 1,3-benzodioxole system is also an integral part of many natural products like sesamol (Shenoy et al., 2011) and piperine (Srinivasan 2007). The extensive review of the literature revealed that the 2-phenyl substituted benzodioxole ring system is yet to be explored for various biological activities.

Discovery and development of a new drug molecule is a lengthy and costly affair which may lead to stifling of innovation (DiMasi et al., 2003). Moreover, environment contamination involved in the discovery process of new chemical entities is a global concern. Therefore, current medicinal chemistry research strives for rapid synthesis of small molecules with increased efficacy and lesser side effects than the existing ones in a simple, effective and environment friendly fashion.

From the above mentioned facts and based on the principle of bioisosterism, fourteen compounds belonging to 2-phenyl 1,3-benzodioxole (Fig. 2a) and 2-phenyl 1,3-benzodioxol-4-ol series (Fig. 2b) were synthesized using green chemistry approach and subsequently evaluated for anticancer and antibacterial activity. Subsequently, DNA binding studies were also carried out to ascertain the mechanism of action of the compounds.

Chemical structures of benzodioxole nucleus synthesized.
Figure 2
Chemical structures of benzodioxole nucleus synthesized.

2

2 Experimental

2.1

2.1 Chemistry

The chemicals, reagents and solvents employed for synthesis were procured from Hi-media Laboratories (Mumbai, India) and SD fine-chem limited (Mumbai, India). The progress of the reaction and purity were monitored by using TLC Silica gel 60 F254 aluminium sheets (Merck F254, Darmstadt, Germany) developed in mobile phase containing ethyl acetate and petroleum ether (1:1). The melting point of the synthesized compounds was determined by DRK Digital melting point apparatus. IR spectra were recorded on Shimadzu IR-Affinity spectrometer using KBr pellets. The 1H spectra of the compounds synthesized were acquired in deuterated DMSO on a Bruker ARX 400 MHz (Bruker AG, Fallanden, Switzerland) instrument. Tetramethylsilane was used as the internal standard and all chemical shift values were expressed in parts per million (δ, ppm). The mass spectra were obtained from 6120 Quadrupole LC/MS mass spectrometer using electron spray ionization method. (Agilent Technologies, California, USA).

Compounds 1(a) to 14(a) were synthesized according to the literature (Dutta Gupta et al., 2012).

2.1.1

2.1.1 General Procedure for the synthesis of 1(b) to 14(b)

Pyrogallol (1 mol equivalent) and benzoic acid derivatives (1.05 mole equivalent) were heated in the microwave (Biotage Initiator 2.5 at 350 W, 100 °C for 30–120 s) in the presence of polyphosphoric acid (0.1 mol equivalent, Tables 1 and 2). TLC was observed to monitor the completion of the reaction by using ethyl acetate: petroleum ether in the ratio of 1:1 as the mobile phase. The reaction mass was neutralized with 10% NaOH solution and then filtered. The crude product was recrystallized using 70% alcohol (Fig. 3).

Table 1 Details of 2-phenyl benzodioxole derivatives synthesized.
S. No. R1 R2 R3 R4 Reactant II Reaction time (s) Physical description Melting point °C Rf value % yield
1a H H H H Benzoic acid 30 White crystals 50–51 0.703 80.2
2a Cl H H H 4-Chloro benzoic acid 45 Light grey powder 102–105 0.393 75.8
3a Me H H H 4-Methyl benzoic acid 60 Brownish powder 57–58 0.721 78.3
4a Me OMe H H 3-methoxy-4-methyl benzoic acid 45 Greyish powder 99–101. 0.750 82.5
5a H H OH H 2-hydroxy benzoic acid 90 White crystals 115–118 0.786 60.6
6a NH2 H H H 4-amino benzoic acid 120 Brownish crystals 120–125 0.667 65.5
7a H NH2 H H 3-amino benzoic acid 120 Creamish powder 130–134 0.634 68.9
8a H H NH2 H 2-amino benzoic acid 105 Light brown crystals 188–190 0.626 62.8
9a H H N-CH3 H N-methyl-2-amino benzoic acid 120 Light brown powder 174–175 0.661 68.4
10a OH OCH3 H H Vanillic acid 45 White crystals 54–59 0.421 60.6
11a Cl H Cl H 2,4–dichloro benzoic acid 90 White powder 171–174 0.722 78.1.
12a OH OH H OH Gallic acid 120 Greyish crystals 178–180 0.328 61.3
13a H H OAc H Aspirin 105 White crystals 78–80 0.698 81.3
14a H H COOH H Phthalic acid 60 Greyish crystals 102–105 0.746 70.5
Table 2 Details of 2-phenyl benzodioxole-4-ol derivatives synthesized.
S. No. R1 R2 R3 R4 Reactant II Reaction time (s) Physical description Melting point °C Rf value % yield
1b H H H H Benzoic acid 30 White crystals 113–114 0.323 72.6
2b Cl H H H 4-Chloro benzoic acid 30 Pale white crystals 99–103 0.256 78.2
3b Me H H H 4-Methyl benzoic acid 90 Greyish powder 122–125 0.465 82.4
4b Me OMe H H 3-Methoxy-4-methyl benzoic acid 60 Dark brown powder 87–89 0.333 68.6
5b H H OH H 2-Hydroxy benzoic acid 60 White crystals 110–112 0.286 70.8
6b NH2 H H H 4-Amino benzoic acid 90 Light brown crystals 165–168 0.376 65.1
7b H NH2 H H 3-Amino benzoic acid 90 Creamish powder 154–156 0.365 60.6
8b H H NH2 H 2-Amino benzoic acid 120 Brownish crystals 180–182 0.343 61.4
9b H H N-CH3 H N-Methyl-2-amino benzoic acid 120 Brown powder 164–168 0.423 68.8
10b OH OCH3 H H Vanillic acid 30 Cream coloured crystals 72-73 0.289 62.6
11b Cl H Cl H 2,4-Dichloro benzoic acid 90 White powder 184–185 0.523 80.5
12b OH OH H OH Gallic acid 120 Cream coloured powder 180–183 0.275 60.2
13b H H OAc H Aspirin 90 White crystals 87–90 0.462 75.5
14b H H COOH H Phthalic acid 45 Greyish powder 112–113 0.491 76.8
Scheme of synthesis.
Figure 3
Scheme of synthesis.

2.2

2.2 In vitro cytotoxicity studies

The in-vitro cytotoxicity potential of the test compounds was evaluated on A549 human lung carcinoma cells using MTT [3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide] based cell proliferation assay (Van Meerloo et al., 2011; Ferrari et al., 1990). The carcinoma cell lines were obtained from National Centre for Cell Science (NCCS), Pune (India) and cultivated in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's red medium (DMEM) (Sigma Life Science, USA) containing 10% foetal bovine serum (FBS). An equal number of cells were incubated at 37 °C with 5% CO2 in a 96 well micro plates. Thereafter, the cells were treated with test compounds and standard at concentration of 100 μg/ml. Control cells were supplemented with 0.5% DMSO. After 72 h treatment, 5 μl of MTT reagent along with 45 ml of phenol red and FBS free DMEM was added to each well and plates were incubated at 37 °C with 5% CO2 for 4 h. Subsequently, 50 ml of solubilization buffer was added to each well to solubilize the coloured formazan crystals produced by the reduction of MTT. After 24 hrs, the optical density was measured at 550 nm using a spectrophotometer in a microplate reader (Bio-Rad, USA). Cisplatin was used as standard reference compound.

2.3

2.3 DNA binding studies

The interaction of the compounds with calf thymus DNA was studied in phosphate buffer of pH 7 using UV visible spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, UV 1800) (Mansuri-Torshizi et al., 2001). The hypochromic effect observed in the absorption spectra of the molecules with increasing concentrations of DNA (0–100 μM) is shown in Fig 4. The change in absorbance was measured at 210–320 nm for synthetic compounds–DNA complex. Scatchard equation was utilized to build the binding isotherm. The half reciprocal UV plot obtained on the basis of absorbance data for synthetic compounds-DNA complex is depicted in Fig. 5. The linear plots obtained indicate the involvement of one binding process with independent binding sites on DNA. The parameters, λmax, hypochromicity, isobestic point and binding constant were found from the absorption spectra (Mansouri-Torshizi et al., 2008). The intrinsic binding constant (Ki) for a given complex with DNA was obtained from a plot of Dεapp versus D according to equation, Dεapp = Dε + 1/Δε × K, where D = concentration of DNA in base molarities, Δεapp = |εa − εf| and Δε = |εb − εf|, where εa and εf are respective extinction coefficients of the complex in the presence and absence of DNA. The apparent extinction coefficient εa is obtained by calculating Aobs/[Acridones]. The data were fitted to the equation with a slope equal to 1/Δε and Y-intercept equal to 1/(Δε × K). Thereafter the intrinsic binding constant (Ki) was determined from the slope of Y-intercept.

Effect of CT DNA on synthesized compound 3b.
Figure 4
Effect of CT DNA on synthesized compound 3b.
Half reciprocal UV plots for the binding of synthesized compound 3b to DNA.
Figure 5
Half reciprocal UV plots for the binding of synthesized compound 3b to DNA.

2.4

2.4 Antibacterial studies

The microorganisms were procured from MTCC, Mumbai, India. The in vitro antibacterial studies were carried out by disc diffusion method in nutrient agar medium (Dutta Gupta et al., 2010, Ednie et al., 2000) The screening of the compounds was performed against Escherichia coli (MTCC 40, Gram negative), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MTCC 424, Gram negative) Bacillus subtilis (MTCC 441, Gram positive) and Staphylococcus aureus (MTCC 3160, Gram positive) at concentration of 60, 80, 100, 120 and 140 μg/ml. Cinoxacin was used as standard reference drug. The required concentrations of the compounds were prepared in sterile DMSO. The sterile growth medium was poured into the petri plate and allowed to solidify. Subsequently, the microbial suspension was swabbed on agar bed using a sterile cotton swab. This was followed by placing a sterile paper disc uniformly on the agar bed. The synthesized compounds and standard drug contained in sterile paper disc were allowed to diffuse for 10 min. Thereafter, the petri plates were incubated for 24 h at 37 °C. The zone of inhibition was measured in mm to determine the antimicrobial potency of the compounds.

3

3 Results and discussion

3.1

3.1 Chemistry

A series of 2 phenyl substituted 1,4-benzodioxole derivatives were synthesized (Fig. 3) by green chemistry approach and characterized as per literature (Dutta Gupta et al., 2012). In a similar environment friendly fashion, one-pot synthesis of a series of 2 phenyl substituted 1,4-benzdioxole-4-ol derivatives were carried out by using polyphosphoric acid as solvent/catalyst under microwave irradiation (Fig. 3). The physical properties of the synthesized compounds are summarized in Tables 1 and 2. The reaction is believed to proceed by the attack of the hydroxyl group of benzoic acid by ‘H’ of polyphosphoric acid to form the protonated benzoic acid which is attacked by catechol/pyrogallol to form a tetrahedral intermediate that further cyclizes to form the 1,3-benzodioxole ring. The formation of the synthesized compounds was confirmed by IR, 1H NMR and mass spectral analysis. In the IR spectra of compounds (1b14b), the stretching bands due to one OH group were detected in the range of 3498–3317 cm−1. The compounds 6b9b showed a characteristic NH stretching band between 3325 and 3381 cm−1. In case of compound 2b and 11b, corresponding C–Cl stretching was observed at 732 cm−1 and 761 cm−1, respectively. In 1H NMR spectra of the compounds (1b14b), a single peak corresponding to the CH proton of the dioxole ring system was observed between 7.0 and 7.5. The physical properties and percentage yield of the synthesized compounds along with their IR, 1H NMR and mass spectral data are given below.

3.1.1

3.1.1 2-Phenylbenzo[d][1,3]dioxole (1a) (Cole et al., 1980)

It was obtained as a light grey solid, 80.2% yield, mp 50–51 °C.

3.1.2

3.1.2 2-(4-Chlorophenyl)benzo[d][1,3]dioxole (2a)

It was obtained as a light grey solid, 75.8% yield, mp 102–105 °C. IR (KBr cm−1): 1089 (C—O stretching), 3115 (aromatic CH stretching), 758 (C—Cl stretching). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ: 6.8(d, 1H, ArH, J = 6.4), 6.9 (d, 1H, ArH, J = 6.5), 7.1 (d, 2H, ArH, J = 7.1), 7.4 (s, 1H, dioxole CH), 7.6 (t, 2H, ArH), 8.1 (d, 2H, ArH, J = 7.6). Mass (m/z): 199 (M+1).

3.1.3

3.1.3 2-(4-Methylphenyl) benzo[d][1,3]dioxole (3a)

It was obtained as a brown solid, 78.3% yield, mp 57–58 °C. IR (KBr cm−1): 1174 (C—O stretching), 3032 (aromatic CH stretching). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ: 6.8 (d, 2H, ArH, J = 6.4), 6.9 (d, 2H, ArH, J = 6.5), 7.1 (t, 2H, ArH), 7.4 (s, 1H, dioxole CH), 8.0 (d, 2H, ArH, J = 7.6), 2.4 (s, 1H, CH3). Mass (m/z): 232.6 (M+1).

3.1.4

3.1.4 2-(3-Methoxy-4-methylphenyl benzo[d][1,3]dioxole (4a)

It was obtained as a grey solid, 82.5% yield, mp 99-101 °C. IR (KBr cm−1): 1149 (C—O stretching), 3066 (aromatic CH stretching). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ: 6.9 (d, 1H, ArH, J = 6.5), 7.0 (d, 1H, ArH, J = 6.5), 7.1 (s, 1H, ArH), 7.3 (s, 1H, dioxole CH), 7.5 (d, 1H, ArH), 7.6 (d, 1H, ArH, J = 7.3), 7.7 (t, 2H, ArH, J = 7.1), 2.3 (s, 1H, CH3), 3.9 (s, 1H, OCH3). Mass (m/z): 242.2 (M+1).

3.1.5

3.1.5 2-(2-Hydroxyphenyl benzo[d][1,3]dioxole (5a)

It was obtained as a white solid, 60.6% yield, mp 115–118 °C. IR (KBr cm−1): 1155 (C—O stretching), 3007 (aromatic CH stretching), 3238 (OH stretching). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ: 6.9 (d, 3H, ArH, J = 6.4), 7.5 (d, 1H, ArH, J = 7.5), 7.5 (t, 1H, ArH), 7.5 (s, 1H, dioxole CH), 7.7 (t, 1H, ArH), 7.7 (t, 2H, ArH, J = 7.1), 5.2 (s, 1H, OH). Mass (m/z): 214.0 (M+1).

3.1.6

3.1.6 2-(4-Aminophenyl) benzo[d][1,3]dioxole (6a)

It was obtained as a brown solid, 65.5% yield, mp 120–125 °C. IR (KBr cm−1): 1070 (C—O stretching), 3008 (aromatic CH stretching), 3361 (NH stretching), 1332 (C≡N stretching). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ: 6.6 (d, 3H, ArH, J = 6.3), 7.2 (d, 1H, ArH, J = 7.0), 7.6 (t, 1H, ArH), 7.2 (s, 1H, dioxole CH), 7.8 (t, 1H, ArH), 7.8 (d, 2H, ArH, J = 7.4), 4.0 (s, 1H, NH stretching). Mass (m/z): 213.0 (M+1).

3.1.7

3.1.7 2-(3-Aminophenyl) benzo[d][1,3]dioxole (7a)

It was obtained as a cream solid, 68.9% yield, mp 130–134 °C. IR (KBr cm−1): 1153 (C—O stretching), 2985 (aromatic CH stretching), 3404 (NH stretching), 1274 (C≡N stretching). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ: 6.7 (d, 3H, ArH, J = 6.3), 7.0 (d, 2H, ArH, J = 6.5), 7.1 (t, 2H, ArH), 7.6 (s, 1H, dioxole CH), 7.1 (d, 1H, ArH, J = 6.5), 4.9 (s, 1H, NH stretching). Mass (m/z): 213.0 (M+1).

3.1.8

3.1.8 2-(2-Aminophenyl) benzo[d][1,3]dioxole (8a)

It was obtained as a light brown solid, 62.8% yield, mp 188–190 °C. IR (KBr cm−1): 1091 (C—O stretching), 2950 (aromatic CH stretching), 3300 (NH stretching), 1313 (C≡N stretching). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ: 6.5(d, 2H, ArH, J = 6.3), 6.7 (d, 2H, ArH, J = 6.5), 7.6 (t, 1H, ArH), 7.2 (s, 1H, dioxole CH), 7.6 (d, 1H, ArH, J = 7.2), 7.7(t, 1H, ArH), 4.9 (s, 1H, NH stretching). Mass (m/z): 213.0 (M+1).

3.1.9

3.1.9 2-(N-methyl-2-aminophenyl) benzo[d][1,3]dioxole (9a)

It was obtained as a light brown solid, 68.4% yield, mp 174–175 °C. IR (KBr cm−1): 1100 (C—O stretching), 2941 (aromatic CH stretching), 3387 (NH stretching), 1253 (C≡N stretching).. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ: 6.5 (d, 2H, ArH, J = 6.3), 6.6 (d, 2H, ArH, J = 6.3), 7.3 (t, 2H, ArH), 7.3 (s, 1H, dioxole CH), 7.7 (t, 1H, ArH), 2.8 (s, 1H, CH3), 4.8 (s, 1H, NH stretching). Mass (m/z): 227.1 (M+1).

3.1.10

3.1.10 2-(3-Methoxy-4-hydroxyphenyl) benzo[d][1,3]dioxole (10a)

It was obtained as a white solid, 60.6% yield, mp 54–59 °C. IR (KBr cm−1): 1100 (C—O stretching), 3242 (aromatic CH stretching), 3435 (OH stretching). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ: 6.2 (d, 2H, ArH, J = 6.0), 6.6 (s, 2H, ArH), 6.9 (t, 1H, ArH), 7.3 (s, 1H, dioxole CH), 7.3 (t, 1H, ArH), 3.8 (s, 3H, OCH3), 5.1 (s, 1H, OH stretching). Mass (m/z): 243.1 (M+1).

3.1.11

3.1.11 2-(2,4-Dichlorophenyl) benzo[d][1,3]dioxole (11a)

It was obtained as a white solid, 78.1% yield, mp 171–174 °C. IR (KBr cm−1): 1116 (C—O stretching), 2993 (aromatic CH stretching), 696 (C—Cl stretching). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ: 7.2 (d, 2H, ArH, J = 6.8), 7.5 (s, 2H, ArH), 7.7 (d, 1H, ArH, J = 7.3), 7.6 (s, 1H, dioxole CH), 7.8 (t, 2H, ArH). Mass (m/z): 267.1 (M+1).

3.1.12

3.1.12 2-(3,4,5-Trihydroxyphenyl) benzo[d][1,3]dioxole (12a)

It was obtained as a grey solid, 61.3% yield, mp 178–180 °C. IR (KBr cm−1): 1072 (C—O stretching), 3051 (aromatic CH stretching), 3460 (OH stretching). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ: 6.7 (s, 2H, ArH), 6.7 (d, 1H, ArH, J = 6.3), 6.9 (d, 1H, ArH, J = 6.4), 7.4 (s, 1H, dioxole CH), 6.9 (t, 2H, ArH), 5.1 (s, 1H,OH stretching). Mass (m/z): 246.9 (M+1).

3.1.13

3.1.13 2-(2-Acetyloxyphenyl) benzo[d][1,3]dioxole (13a)

It was obtained as a white solid, 81.3% yield, mp 78–80 °C. IR (KBr cm−1): 1105(C—O stretching), 3028(aromatic CH stretching). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ: 6.9 (d, 1H, ArH, J = 6.4), 7.1 (d, 1H, ArH, J = 6.5), 7.3 (d, 1H, ArH, J = 6.8), 7.4 (s, 1H, dioxole CH), 7.7 (t, 1H, ArH), 7.4 (d, 1H, ArH), 7.6 (d, 1H, ArH, J=7.3) 7.7 (d, 1H, ArH, J= 7.2), 7.9 (t, 1H, ArH), 2.2 (s, 1H, OCH3). Mass (m/z): 256.1 (M+1).

3.1.14

3.1.14 2-(2-Carboxyphenyl) benzo[d][1,3]dioxole (14a)

It was obtained as a grey solid, 70.5% yield, mp 102–105 °C. IR (KBr cm−1): 1111 (C—O stretching), 2980 (aromatic CH stretching), 3429 (OH stretching). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ: 7.1 (d, 1H, ArH, J = 6.5), 7.5 (d, 3H, ArH, J = 7.2), 7.5 (s, 1H, dioxole CH), 7.6 (d, 2H, ArH, J = 7.3), 7.6 (t, 2H, ArH), 13 (s, 1H, COOH). Mass (m/z): 242.2 (M+1).

3.1.15

3.1.15 2-Phenylbenzo[d][1,3]dioxol-4-ol (1b)

It was obtained as a white solid, 72.6% yield, mp 113–114 °C. IR (KBr cm−1): 1141 (C—O stretching), 3182 (aromatic CH stretching), 3498 (OH stretching). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ: 7.4 (d, 2H, ArH J = 7.3), 7.6 (d, 2H, ArH J = 7.4), 7.3 (s, 1H, dioxole CH), 8.1(t, 4H, ArH), 5.2 (s, 1H, OH). Mass (m/z): 213.9 (M−1).

3.1.16

3.1.16 2-(4-Chlorophenyl) benzo[d][1,3]dioxol-4-ol (2b)

It was obtained as a pale white solid, 78.2% yield, mp 99–103 °C. IR (KBr cm−1): 1107 (C—O stretching), 3050 (aromatic CH stretching), 732 (C—Cl stretching). 3412 (OH stretching). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ: 6.4 (d, 2H, ArH, J = 6.3), 6.6 (d, 1H, ArH, J = 6.4), 6.8(d, 1H, ArH), 7.3 (s, 1H, dioxole CH), 7.4 (d, 1H, ArH, J = 7.2), 7.9 (d, 1H, ArH, J = 7.4), 7.9 (t, 1H, ArH), 5.2 (s, 1H, OH). Mass (m/z): 248.7(M+1).

3.1.17

3.1.17 2-(4-Methylphenyl) benzo[d][1,3]dioxol-4-ol (3b)

It was obtained as a grey solid, 82.4% yield, mp 122–125 °C. IR (KBr cm−1): 1107 (C—O stretching), 3050 (aromatic CH stretching), 3414(OH stretching). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ: 6.2 (d, 2H, ArH, J = 6.1), 6.4 (d, 1H, ArH, J = 6.2), 6.8 (d, 1H, ArH, J = 6.7), 7.3 (s, 1H, dioxole CH), 7.4 (d, 1H, ArH, J = 7.3), 7.8 (d, 1H, ArH, J = 7.4), 7.8 (t, 1H, ArH), 2.3(s, 3H, CH3). Mass (m/z): 22.1 (M+1).

3.1.18

3.1.18 2-(3-Methoxy-4-methyl phenyl) benzo[d][1,3]dioxol-4-ol (4b)

It was obtained as a dark brown solid, 68.6% yield, mp 87–89 °C. IR (KBr cm−1): 1103 (C—O stretching), 2937(aromatic CH stretching), 3417 (OH stretching). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ: 6.6 (d, 2H, ArH, J = 6.3), 7.2 (s, 1H, dioxole CH), 7.5(s, 1H, ArH), 7.5 (d, 2H, ArH, J = 7.3), 7.6 (d, 1H, ArH, J = 7.3), 7.6(t, 1H, ArH), 2.3 (s, 3H, –OCH3), 2.3 (s, 3H, CH3). Mass (m/z): 258.8 (M+1).

3.1.19

3.1.19 2-(2-Hydroxyphenyl) benzo[d][1,3]dioxol-4-ol (5b)

It was obtained as a white solid, 70.8% yield, mp 110–112 °C. IR (KBr cm−1): 1128 (C—O stretching), 2974 (aromatic CH stretching), 3381 (OH stretching). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ: 6.9 (d, 3H, ArH, J = 6.5), 7.3(s, 1H, dioxole CH), 7.5 (d, 1H, ArH, J = 7.3), 7.5 (t, 1H, ArH), 7.7 (d, 2H, ArH, J = 7.4), 5.0 (s, 2H, OH). Mass (m/z): 230.1 (M+1).

3.1.20

3.1.20 2-(4-Aminophenyl) benzo[d][1,3]dioxol-4-ol (6b)

It was obtained as a light brown solid, 65.1% yield, mp 165–168 °C. IR (KBr cm−1): 1128(C—O stretching), 3051(aromatic CH stretching), 1325(C≡N stretching), 3381 (N—H stretching), 3460 (OH stretching). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ: 6.2 (d, 3H, ArH, J = 6.0), 6.5 (d, 1H, ArH, J = 6.3), 6.5 (t, 1H, ArH), 7.2 (s, 1H, dioxole CH), 7.6 (t, 2H, ArH), 4.2 (s, 1H, –NH), 5.0 (s, 1H, OH). Mass (m/z): 229.1 (M+1).

3.1.21

3.1.21 2-(3-Aminophenyl) benzo[d][1,3]dioxol-4-ol (7b)

It was obtained as a cream solid, 60.6% yield, mp 154–156 °C. IR (KBr cm−1): 1153 (C—O stretching), 2985 (aromatic CH stretching), 1332 (C≡N stretching), 3300 (N—H stretching), 3406(OH stretching). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ: 6.2 (d, 1H, ArH, J = 6.0), 6.4 (d, 1H, ArH, J = 6.3), 6.7(d, 2H, ArH, J = 6.3), 6.7 (t, 1H, ArH), 7.0 (t, 2H, ArH), 7.1 (s, 1H, dioxole CH), 4.0(s, 1H, –NH), 5.0 (s, 1H, OH). Mass (m/z): 228.1 (M−1).

3.1.22

3.1.22 2-(2-Aminophenyl) benzo[d][1,3]dioxol-4-ol (8b)

It was obtained as a brown solid, 61.4% yield, mp 180–182 °C. IR (KBr cm−1): 1249 (C—O stretching), 3028 (aromatic CH stretching), 1319 (C≡N stretching), 3373 (N—H stretching), 3473 (OH stretching). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ: 6.4(d, 1H, ArH, J = 6.3), 6.6 (d, 1H, ArH, J = 6.4), 7.1 (s, 1H, dioxole CH), 7.3(d, 2H, ArH, J = 7.2), 7.6(t, 1H, ArH), 7.7 (t, 2H, ArH), 5.6(s, 1H, OH), 4.0(s, 1H, -NH). Mass (m/z): 229.1 (M+1).

3.1.23

3.1.23 2-(N-methyl-2-aminophenyl) benzo[d][1,3]dioxol-4-ol (9b)

It was obtained as a brown solid, 68.8% yield, mp 164–168 °C. IR (KBr cm−1): 1095 (C—O stretching), 3050 (aromatic CH stretching), 1280 (C≡N stretching), 3325 (N—H stretching), 3450 (OH stretching). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ: 6.5(d, 1H, ArH, J = 6.3), 6.6 (d, 1H, ArH, J = 6.4),7.0 (d, 1H, ArH, J = 6.6), 7.3(d, 1H, ArH, J = 7.1), 7.3(t, 1H, ArH), 7.4 (s, 1H, dioxole CH), 7.7 (t, 2H, ArH), 5.6 (s, 1H, OH), 4.8 (s, 1H, –NH), 2.8(s, 3H, CH3). Mass (m/z): 243.1 (M+1).

3.1.24

3.1.24 2-(3-Methoxy-4-hydroxyphenyl) benzo[d][1,3]dioxol-4-ol (10b)

It was obtained as a cream coloured solid, 62.6% yield, mp 72–73 °C. IR (KBr cm−1): 1100 (C—O stretching), 3174 (aromatic CH stretching), 3431 (OH stretching). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ: 6.5 (d, 2H, ArH, J = 6.3), 6.9 (d, 1H, ArH, J = 6.4), 7.3 (s, 1H, dioxole CH), 7.7 (s, 1H, ArH), 7.8 (t, 1H, ArH), 5.2 (s, 1H, OH), 3.8 (s, 3H, OCH3). Mass (m/z): 260.0 (M+1).

3.1.25

3.1.25 2-(2,4-Dichlorophenyl) benzo[d][1,3]dioxol-4-ol (11b)

It was obtained as a white solid, 80.5% yield, mp 184–185 °C. IR (KBr cm−1): 1091 (C—O stretching), 2981 (aromatic CH stretching), 761 (C—Cl stretching). 3431 (OH stretching). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ: 6.2 (d, 2H, ArH, J = 6.1), 6.4(d, 1H, ArH, J = 6.2), 7.5 (s, 1H, dioxole CH), 7.7 (d, 1H, ArH, J = 6.3), 7.8 (s, 1H, ArH), 7.9 (t, 1H, ArH), 5.2(s, 1H, OH). Mass (m/z): 283.0 (M+1).

3.1.26

3.1.26 2-(3,4,5-Trihydroxyphenyl) benzo[d][1,3]dioxol-4-ol (12b)

It was obtained as a cream coloured solid, 60.2% yield, mp 180–183 °C. IR (KBr cm−1): 1095 (C—O stretching), 3050 (aromatic CH stretching), 3456 (OH stretching). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ: 6.2(d, 1H, ArH, J = 6.1), 6.4 (d, 1H, ArH, J = 6.3), 6.7(s, 1H, ArH), 6.9 (s, 1H, ArH), 6.9 (t, 1H, ArH), 6.9 (t, 1H, ArH), 7.0 (s, 1H, dioxole CH), 5.1 (s, 2H, OH), 5.2 (s, 2H, OH). Mass (m/z): 262.1 (M+1).

3.1.27

3.1.27 2-(2-Acetyloxyphenyl) benzo[d][1,3]dioxol-4-ol (13b)

It was obtained as a white solid, 75.5% yield, mp 87–90 °C. IR (KBr cm−1): 1149(C—O stretching), 3018(aromatic CH stretching), 3452(OH stretching). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ: 6.8(d, 2H, ArH, J = 6.5), 7.1 (d, 1H, ArH, J = 6.9), 7.4 (d, 1H, ArH, J = 7.1), 7.3(s, 1H, dioxole CH), 7.6 (d, 1H, ArH, J = 7.2), 7.7 (d, 1H, ArH, J = 7.3), 7.8(t, 1H, ArH), 5.0 (s, 1H, OH), 2.2 (s, 3H, OCH3). Mass (m/z): 272.2 (M+1).

3.1.28

3.1.28 2-(2-Carboxyphenyl) benzo[d][1,3]dioxol-4-ol (14b)

It was obtained as a grey solid, 76.8% yield, mp 112–113 °C. IR (KBr cm−1): 1095 (C—O stretching), 3051 (aromatic CH stretching), 3452(OH stretching). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ: 7.2 (s, 1H, dioxole CH), 7.5 (d, 2H, ArH, J = 7.1), 7.5 (d, 3H, ArH, J = 7.2), 7.6 (d, 1H, ArH, J = 7.4), 7.6 (t, 1H, ArH), 5.1 (s, 1H, OH), 12.8 (s, 1H, COOH). Mass (m/z): 258.8 (M+1).

3.2

3.2 In vitro cytotoxicity studies

All the compounds exhibited considerable amount of anticancer activity against A 549 human lung carcinoma cells in terms of percentage cell proliferation inhibition (% CPI) at a concentration of 100 μgm/ml. Compound 3a (% CPI = 78.80) and 9b (% CPI = 52.90) were found to be more potent than the standard (% CPI = 49.50). It was revealed that mostly compounds belonging to benzodioxole-4-ol category (2b, 6b14b) showed better anticancer activity than the compounds without a hydroxy group at fourth position of the benzodioxole ring (2a, 6a14a). However this phenomenon was reversed for compounds with unsubstituted phenyl ring (1a, 1b), methyl (3a, 3b) or hydroxy (4a, 5a, 4b, 5b) substituted phenyl ring. Subsequently it was observed that among 2-phenyl benzodioxole derivatives, mono substitution at para position of the phenyl ring with a methyl group (3a) was the most potent. In case of 2-phenyl benzodioxole-4-ol derivatives, mono substitution with a methyl amino group at second position of the phenyl ring (9b) was found to be the most active compound. The percentage cell proliferation inhibition of the synthesized compounds is depicted in Table 3.

Table 3 In-vitro cytotoxicity studies of synthesized benzodioxole derivatives against A549 human lung carcinoma cells.
Compound code % Proliferation inhibition Compound code % Proliferation inhibition
1a 32.10 1b 12.30
2a 24.00 2b 34.80
3a 78.80 3b 31.40
4a 30.90 4b 10.64
5a 24.90 5b 19.80
6a 24.60 6b 36.00
7a 9.74 7b 20.30
8a 32.70 8b 40.30
9a 33.90 9b 52.90
10a 28.10 10b 43.10
11a 30.90 11b 36.10
12a 21.10 12b 28.30
13a 28.10 13b 38.50
14a 26.90 14b 32.70
Cisplatin 49.5

3.3

3.3 DNA binding studies

The ability of the synthesized compounds to bind with DNA as determined by binding constant value was found to be moderate to mild. This can be attributed to a different mechanism of action via which the compounds exhibit their cytotoxic effects. The 2-phenyl benzodioxole-4-ol derivatives (1b14b) were found to be more effective than the 2-phenyl benzodioxole class of compounds (1a14a). Compound with a hydroxyl group at second position of the phenyl ring (5a and 5b) was found to be the most active in their respective series. The binding constant (Ki), λmax, % hypochromicity and isobestic point is highlighted in Table 4.

Table 4 Binding constant and photometric properties of 2-phenyl 1,2-benzodioxole derivatives in complex with CT DNA.
Compound Code Binding constant (Ki) λ max (nm) % Hypochromicity Isobestic point Compound Code Binding constant (Ki) λ max (nm) % Hypochromicity Isobestic point
1a 1.6100 255 53.2 210 1b 1.7215 275 76.9 225
2a 0.6739 270 50.6 Unclear 2b 0.7346 295 43.2 Unclear
3a 0.6763 255 42.0 220 3b 0.9081 267 39.0 210
4a 0.9134 260 40.3 220 4b 1.3237 270 48.5 210
5a 2.5118 289 60.7 Unclear 5b 5.8739 310 83.5 218
6a 1.1641 296 41.0 245 6b 0.4257 315 36.6 220
7a 0.0442 290 22.3 250 7b 0.5481 309 30.8 Unclear
8a 1.4361 260 44.8 Unclear 8b 1.6860 273 52.5 215
9a 1.6878 260 65.6 210 9b 0.3419 271 45.5 Unclear
10a 0.3444 258 76.2 205 10b 0.6581 270 82.0 230
11a 0.6978 261 47.3 215 11b 0.7346 275 43.2 Unclear
12a 1.5067 260 58.2 218 12b 2.6540 275 64.4 235
13a 0.6154 259 60.5 Unclear 13b 1.1289 269 50.2 210
14a 1.5186 255 55.8 209 14b 0.5602 268 72.6 Unclear

3.4

3.4 Antibacterial studies

Antibacterial studies on the compounds bearing 2-phenyl benzodioxole ring system (1a14a) revealed that compound 3a is more potent than the standard against all the strains of bacteria (Table 5). Compound 4a exhibited better activity than the standard in terms of inhibiting S. aureus. It was further disclosed that the activity of the compounds either remained same or decreased when the phenyl ring is substituted with any group other than methyl at para position. Substitution at other position of the phenyl ring did not result in any significant increase in potency. The activity data of compounds belonging to 2-phenyl benzodioxole-4-ol category (1b14b) showed that all have considerable antibacterial activity but none are potent than the reference standard. Subsequently, a closer look at the activity profile of this series of compounds demonstrated that there is no marked improvement in antibacterial property of the compounds with a substitution in the phenyl ring at any position as compared to unsubstituted phenyl ring (1b). However, in this series also, compound 3b (methyl group at para position of the phenyl ring, i.e. analogue of 3a) was the exception which exhibited enhanced activity among all the derivatives of the series. The result of antibacterial studies of the synthesized compounds against various strains of bacteria is depicted in Table 5.

Table 5 Antibacterial activity of the compounds.
Compound Code Zone of inhibition (mm) in 100 μg/ml Compound Code Zone of inhibition (mm) in 100μg/ml
Strain I Strain II Strain III Strain IV Strain I Strain II Strain III Strain IV
1a 28 16 24 20 1b 18 14 16 12
2a 20 14 18 12 2b 12 12 16 12
3a 32 18 30 24 3b 20 15 22 16
4a 22 17 18 21 4b 12 9 18 11
5a 25 15 22 19 5b 15 14 20 14
6a 26 16 24 20 6b 16 16 22 18
7a 22 16 20 18 7b 12 14 16 13
8a 20 14 15 16 8b 10 10 13 12
9a 20 14 14 16 9b 12 11 12 11
10a 16 15 14 15 10b 11 12 10 13
11a 18 14 15 15 11b 16 14 15 14
12a 18 15 16 16 12b 15 11 16 16
13a 24 16 20 22 13b 17 14 19 19
14a 18 13 13 15 14b 11 11 9 10
Cinoxacin 31 16 28 20

Note: Strain I: Bacillus subtilis MTCC 441; Strain II: Staphyllococcous aureus MTCC 3160.

Strain III: Escherichia coli MTCC 40; Strain IV: Pseudomonas aeruginosa MTCC 424.

4

4 Conclusion

The present study identified some 2-phenyl 1,3-benzodioxole derivatives with significant anticancer and antibacterial property, which may be associated with their DNA binding capacity. For 2-phenyl 1,3-benzodioxole series, it was concluded that substitution of 4 position of the phenyl ring with an electron donating group having a atom with no unshared pair of electron (CH3) markedly increases anticancer and antibacterial potential. In case of 2-phenyl 1,3-benzodioxole-4-ol series, it was revealed that there is a drastic increase in anticancer and antibacterial property when the second position of the phenyl ring was substituted with a mono substituted atom bearing a lone pair of electron (NCH3). Subsequently, the research work identifies 2-(4-methyl phenyl) 1,3-benzodioxole (3a) as a hit molecule for further improvement of anticancer and antibacterial potency and 2-(2-hydroxy phenyl) 1,3-benzodioxole-4-ol (5b) as a hit molecule for the future development of DNA binding agents. This study also provides a protocol for simple, rapid, eco-sustainable and effective synthesis of 2-phenyl 1,3-benzodioxole derivatives which may be explored further for better activity profile against cancer and bacterial cells.

Acknowledgements

We are thankful to DST (Fast track Scheme: SR/FT/CS-079/2009) and AICTE (RPS Scheme: 8023/BOR/RID/RPS-102/2009-10) for providing financial assistance for this project. The authors are also thankful to the President, Gokaraju Rangaraju Educational Trust, and the Principal, Gokaraju Rangaraju College of Pharmacy, for providing the laboratory facility, Dr. Reddy's Laboratories for providing Scifinder search, and Laxai Avanti for carrying out the NMR and mass spectral studies. Special thanks are due to Laila Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd., Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh, India for the execution of anticancer studies.

References

  1. , , . Antimicrobial stewardship. Clin. Microbiol. Infect.. 2008;14:197-199.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , . Pharmazie. 1999;54:491-498.
  3. , , , , , , , . Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.. 2011;21:7306-7309.
  4. , , , . Aus. J. Chem.. 1980;33:675-680.
  5. , , , . J. Health. Econ.. 2003;22(2):151-185.
  6. , , , . Int. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci.. 2010;2:57-62.
  7. , , , . Green Chem. Lett. Rev.. 2012;5:609-620.
  8. , , , . J. Antimicrob. Chemother.. 2000;45:525-528.
  9. , , , . J. Immunol. Methods. 1990;131(2):165-172.
  10. , , , , , . J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem.. 2008;23(5):641-647.
  11. , , , , , , . Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.. 2011;55:5438-5451.
  12. , , , , , . Med. Parazitol.. 2005;4:40-41.
  13. , . Fortune. 2004;149:76-82.
  14. , , , , , . Eur. J. Med. Chem.. 2004;39:1059-1065.
  15. , , , . Bioorg. Med. Chem.. 2008;16(21):9616-9625.
  16. , , , . Chem. Pharm. Bull.. 2001;49:1517-1520.
  17. , , . J. Econ. Entomol.. 1982;75:877-878.
  18. , , , , , , , . Eur. J. Med. Chem.. 2013;63:882-891.
  19. , , , , , . J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem.. 2013;28:240-266.
  20. , , , , , , . J. Ethnopharmacol.. 2011;133:608-612.
  21. , . Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr.. 2007;47:735-748.
  22. , , , , , . J. Agric. Food Chem.. 2005;53:7494-7501.
  23. , , , . Methods Mol. Biol.. 2011;731:237-245.
  24. , , . Curr. Med. Chem.. 2009;16:2430-2440.
  25. , , , , , , , . J. Cancer Res. Ther.. 2012;8:532-536.
  26. , , , . Chem. Bizol. Interact.. 1997;108:107-118.

Appendix A

Supplementary data

Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2014.08.004.

Appendix A

Supplementary data

Supplementary data

Supplementary data IR, NMR and mass spectra of some of the synthesized compounds.

Show Sections