Translate this page into:
Effect of Fe2O3 precursors on physicochemical and catalytic properties of CuO/Fe2O3 system
⁎Corresponding author. Tel.: +20 19 2609104; fax: +20 02 22581243. nabil_egypt92@yahoo.com (Nabil H. Amin)
-
Received: ,
Accepted: ,
This article was originally published by Elsevier and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.
Peer review under responsibility of King Saud University.
Abstract
CuO/Fe2O3 catalysts were prepared by impregnation method and calcined at 400 °C. The effect of changing the precursors of Fe2O3 and CuO loading on thermal, crystal, surface, spectral and catalytic properties of the catalysts were characterized by TG/DTG/DTA, XRD, N2-adsorption at −196 °C, FT-IR and the catalytic decomposition of H2O2 at 30 °C. The results obtained revealed that the investigated catalysts consisted of nanosized Fe2O3 as a major phase besides CuFe2O4 phase. The precursor of Fe2O3 (nitrate or sulfate) affects the thermal properties of CuO/Fe2O3 system. The SBET of CuO/Fe2O3 system calcined at 400 °C increases with using nitrate precursor of Fe2O3. The catalytic activity of H2O2 decomposition on all CuFeOn catalysts (nitrate precursor) is higher than that of CuFeOs catalysts (sulfate precursor).
Keywords
Amorphous materials
H2O2 decomposition
Catalysis
FT-IR
X-ray diffraction
1 Introduction
Metal oxides are interesting solids due to their surface acid–base properties (Khaleel et al., 2010) and oxidation–reduction potentials (Cao et al., 2008). Therefore, they constitute the largest family of heterogeneous catalysts. The oxidation–reduction behavior of several transition metal oxides is due to the ease with which they are alternately reduced and oxidized which means that they can be used as oxidizing agents and then readily be regenerated (Khaleel and Al-Nayli, 2008). Iron (III) oxide, α-Fe2O3, and several iron oxide-based catalysts are of significant importance in catalysis, especially in oxidation processes (Al-Sayari et al., 2007; Wang et al., 2008). Besides its catalytic potential, α-Fe2O3 is used for many applications because of its non-toxicity, low processing cost, availability, and high resistance to oxidative change (Cao et al., 2008; Liu et al., 2008; Mishra and Parida, 2006). Their disadvantages are low thermal stability against sintering and crystal growth which are typically accompanied by considerable surface area reduction and, hence, rapid deactivation in catalytic investigations (Liu et al., 2008). Therefore, modification of iron oxide by mixing it with other oxides attracted the attention of many researchers (Cao et al., 2008; Liu et al., 2008; Mishra and Parida, 2006). Mixed oxide catalysts usually exhibit modified textural, structural, and catalytic properties as compared with their corresponding metal oxide (Wachs, 2005). A mixed metal oxide catalyst, copper oxide/iron oxide (CuO/Fe2O3) was selected as potential volatile organic compounds’ (VOCs) oxidation catalyst (Minico et al., 2000), carbon monoxide (CO) oxidation (Cao et al., 2008), hydrogen production reactions (Chang et al., 2009), organic oxidation reactions (Litt and Almquist, 2009), and peroxide decomposition reactions (Shaheen, 2001).
Catalytic decomposition of H2O2 is an oxidation–reduction reaction, one of its applications as a green fuel/propellant instead of carcinogenic hydrazine in spaceflight at certain conditions (Teshimal et al., 2004). Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) can be used as an oxidizer in the fuel cells (Sanli and Aytac, 2011). The oxidative removal of natural organic matter (NOM) from water takes place by using hydrogen peroxide (Kitis and Kaplan, 2007). Furthermore, hydrogen peroxide has none of the environmental problems associated with most other chemical oxidizers (Selvarani et al., 2008). After learning that hydrogen peroxide could be made from water and solar energy, it was decided that H2O2 would be a suitable alternative fuel (Wee, 2006).
The catalyst preparation conditions, such as precursor, calcination temperature and doping can affect the catalyst properties, including surface area, morphology, crystallinity, and dispersion (Litt and Almquist, 2009; El-Molla et al., 2009; Amin, 2000).
In this paper, we aimed to investigate the effect of iron oxide precursors at different CuO loading to CuO/Fe2O3 system on the catalytic activity of H2O2 decomposition.
2 Experimental
2.1 Material and methods
Iron hydroxides were precipitated from both of iron nitrate Fe(NO3)3·9H2O (1 M) solution and iron sulfate Fe2(SO4)3 (1 M) solution using ammonia solution (0.2 M) at 70 °C and pH = 8. The precipitates were carefully washed with bi-distilled water till free from ammonium and nitrate or sulfate ions, then filtered and dried at 110 °C till constant weight. The formula of the prepared hydroxide precipitated from iron nitrate can be expressed as Fe2O3·1.5H2O while that from iron sulfate can be expressed as Fe2O3·3H2O (Pailhé et al., 2008). The catalysts were calcined in air at 400 °C for 4 h.
Nine specimens of CuO/Fe2O3 catalysts were prepared by wet impregnation method. A known mass of iron hydroxide was impregnated with solutions containing different amounts of copper nitrate dissolved in the least amount of bi-distilled water sufficient to make pastes which were dried at 110 °C followed by calcination at 400 °C for 4 h. The nominal compositions of the impregnated catalysts from nitrate precursor were 0.05, 0.10, 0.15, 0.20CuO/Fe2O3, which correspond to 2.42, 4.73, 6.94, and 9.04 wt% CuO, respectively. The nominal compositions of the impregnated catalysts from sulfate precursor were 0.025, 0.035, 0.050, 0.075, 0.100CuO/Fe2O3, which correspond to 1.23, 1.71, 2.42, 3.59, and 4.73 wt% CuO, respectively.
The all catalysts prepared from nitrate and sulfate precursors were nominated as XCuFeOn and XCuFeOs (X is the CuO concentration), respectively. All chemicals used in the experiment were of analytical grade.
2.2 Characterization techniques
Thermogravimetric (TG), differential thermogravimetric (DTG), and differential thermal analysis (DTA) curves of the catalysts were obtained using Shimadzu TGA/DTA-50H thermogravimetric analyzer, the rate of heating was kept at 10 °C/min, and the flow rate of nitrogen was 30 ml/min.
X-ray diffractograms of various prepared solids were determined a Brucker diffractometer (Brucker Axs D8 Advance Germany). The patterns were run with CuKα1 with secondly monochromator (λ = 0.15404 Å) at 40 kV and 40 m A at a scanning rate of 2° in 2θ/min.
The infrared transmission spectra of various solids were determined by FT-IR spectroscopy (Jasco FT-IR 4100 spectrometer (Japan)) employing samples prepared as KBr disks. The IR spectra were measured from 400 to 4000 cm−1. The most important and characteristic absorption bands thus determined were compared with those reported in the literature.
The specific surface area (SBET) of the prepared catalysts were determined from nitrogen adsorption isotherms measured at −196 °C using a Quantachrome NOVA 2000 automated gas-sorption apparatus model 7.11. All catalysts were degassed at 200 °C for 2 h under a reduced pressure of 10−5 Torr before undertaking such measurements.
The catalytic activities of the various catalysts were measured by studying the decomposition of H2O2 in their presence at 30 °C using 100 mg of a given catalyst sample with 0.5 ml of H2O2 of known concentration diluted to 20 ml with distilled water. The reaction kinetics was monitored by measuring the volume of O2 liberated at different time intervals until no further oxygen was liberated.
3 Results and discussion
3.1 Thermal properties
TG/DTG and DTA-curves of uncalcined 0.05CuFeOn and 0.05CuFeOs catalysts are shown in Figs. 1(A, B) and 2(A, B), respectively, and the data are listed in Table 1. It is shown that (i) the TG-curves of 0.05CuFeOn and 0.05CuFeOs catalysts were the same and consist of three stages. The first and second steps characterized the departure of physisorbed water and some water of crystallization of iron hydroxide with a complete thermal decomposition of copper nitrate into copper oxide CuO (Deraz, 2008). The last step indicated the complete decomposition of iron hydroxide into iron oxide Fe2O3. (ii) Three endothermic peaks were obtained from the DTA-curves of the 0.05CuFeOn and 0.05CuFeOs catalysts which correspond to the removal of water of crystallization, decomposition of copper nitrate and iron hydroxide, respectively. Two exothermic peaks were also obtained from DTA-curves, due to the formation of copper ferrite. (iii) It was clear that the thermal evolution of the sulfate precursor toward the formation of different oxides (copper, iron) and spinel phase (CuFe2O4) was slower than the nitrate precursor (Martín de Vidalesa et al., 1999). (iv) The difference between the total practical weight loss and theoretical value is attributed to the removal of surface hydroxyl groups which need thermal treatment ⩾ 800 °C (Cao et al., 2008). Rt: room temperature.Thermograms of uncalcined 0.05CuFeOn catalysts: (A) TG/DTG and (B) DTA.
Thermograms of uncalcined 0.05CuFeOs catalysts: (A) TG/DTG and (B) DTA.
Catalyst
0.05CuFeOn
0.05CuFeOs
T1 (°C) (weight loss %)
Rt → 86 (3.5)
Rt → 87 (3.2)
T2 (°C) (weight loss %)
87 → 305 (9)
88 → 303 (12.6)
T3 (°C) (weight loss %)
306 →782 (2.8)
304 →799 (12.9)
Calculated total weight loss %
18.3
29.6
Found total weight loss %
15.3
28.7
T (°C) of endothermic peaks
45, 228, 448
65.5, 288, 428
T (°C) of exothermic peaks
519, 558
633, 735
3.2 Crystal structure and surface properties
3.2.1 XRD analysis
The XRD patterns of 0.05CuFeOn, 0.20CuFeOn, 0.05CuFeOs, and 0.10CuFeOs catalysts being calcined at 400 °C were determined and illustrated in Fig. 3. It is seen that all of the detectable peaks at 2θ = 33.1, 41.1, 49.5, 54.1, and 64° can be indexed to the Fe2O3 hematite phase (JCPDS 33-0664). Also, another peaks at 2θ = 35.6 and 62.6° can be indexed to the CuFe2O4 phase (JCPDS 34-0425). No CuO phase was observed in the XRD patterns of the investigated catalysts due to diffusion of CuO into the matrix of α-Fe2O3 forming copper ferrite CuFe2O4 phase, monolayer dispersion of CuO on the surface of α-Fe2O3 and/or complete amorphization of CuO (Jiang et al., 2005).XRD patterns of CuFeO catalysts prepared from different Fe2O3 precursors calcined at 400 °C. Lines (1) refer to α-Fe2O3 and lines (2) refer to CuFe2O4 phases.
The effects of changing the Fe2O3 precursors on the degree of ordering and the crystallite sizes of different phases in the investigated catalysts were emerged from the data listed in Table 2. Inspection of Table 2 shows the following: (i) the diffractograms of CuFeOn and CuFeOs consist of Fe2O3 and CuFe2O4 with a moderate degree of ordering. (ii) Increasing of CuO loading on Fe2O3n was accompanied by decreasing the degree of ordering and the crystallite sizes of hematite phase while increasing in the case of copper ferrite phase. (iii) Increasing of CuO loading on Fe2O3s was accompanied by increasing the degree of ordering and the crystallite sizes of hematite and copper ferrite phases. The smallest degree of ordering was found in CuFeOs (sulfate precursor). All phases present in the investigated catalysts have nano-crystallite sizes ⩽ 24 nm. (iv) The degree of ordering and the crystallite sizes of Fe2O3 phase in 0.05CuFeOn were higher than those of 0.05CuFeOs catalysts. –: not measured.
Catalyst
Intensity count (a.u.)
Crystallite size (nm)
SBET (m2/g)
Fe2O3
CuFe2O4
Fe2O3
CuFe2O4
Fe2O3n
–
–
–
–
27.5
0.05CuFeOn
8.7
7.9
12.4
16.3
84.6
0.20CuFeOn
8.5
8.5
10.6
23.7
71.2
0.05CuFeOs
4.6
4
6.9
24.3
52.3
0.10CuFeOs
5.6
5.5
7.1
18.3
–
The explanation of different behavior of 0.05CuFeOs with comparison to 0.05CuFeOn catalysts may be due to the difference in the thermal properties as shown in (TG-DTG-DTA) analysis section. This could be attributed to the lower thermal stability of the uncalcined 0.05CuFeOn catalyst relative to 0.05CuFeOs catalyst.
3.2.2 Surface properties
The specific surface areas of the investigated catalysts calcined in air at 400 °C were determined from nitrogen adsorption isotherms conducted at −196 °C. Specific surface areas (SBET) calculated for various adsorbents are listed in Table 2. Inspection of the results in Table 2 shows that (i) the SBET of Fe2O3n was significantly enhanced by loading 2.42 wt% CuO. This behavior can be explained by creation of new pores during the liberation of nitrogen oxide gases during the thermal decomposition of copper nitrate (Radwan et al., 2004; Avgouropoulos and Ioannides, 2003) and fine dispersion of CuO particles on the surface of hematite. Further loading of 9.04 wt% CuO on Fe2O3n leads to dissipation in the SBET value with about 15.8% due to the aggregation of small copper species during preparation process (Wang et al., 2002). (ii) 0.05CuFeOs prepared from sulfate precursor had the smallest SBET value. (iii) The SBET of 0.05CuFeOn catalyst prepared from the nitrate precursor was the biggest one. This event can be related to the crystallite sizes of CuFe2O4 phase in 0.05CuFeOs (24.3 nm) which were bigger than those in 0.05CuFeOn (16.3 nm).
3.3 Spectral properties
Fig. 4(A and B) shows the FT-IR spectra of pure α-Fe2O3 obtained from thermal decomposition of iron hydroxides precipitated from iron nitrate and iron sulfate (α-Fe2O3n, α-Fe2O3s) in air at 400 °C, respectively. Sample (A) showed absorption in the regions 3417, 1619, 540, and 455 cm−l. Sample (B) showed absorption in the regions 3414, 1626, 1121, 537, and 450 cm−l. The general range of 3600–3100 cm−l may be assigned to antisymmetrical and symmetrical O–H bonding stretching vibrational modes for water of hydration (Apte et al., 2007). The bonding in the region of 1670–1600 cm−l also relates to O–H bonding bending vibrational modes (Apte et al., 2007). The bands at 455 and 540 cm−l observed in two samples can be attributed to metal oxygen stretching vibrational modes (Apte et al., 2007). In addition, the spectrum of α-Fe2O3s showed a band at 1121 cm−1 arising from the symmetric stretching mode of SO4 anion (Zhang et al., 2006). No NO3 anion band is observed in FT-IR spectrum of α-Fe2O3n.IR spectra of (A) α-Fe2O3n and (B) α-Fe2O3s catalysts calcined at 400 °C.
3.4 Catalytic activity
Catalytic decomposition of H2O2 is a model reaction chosen to study the redox properties of the prepared catalysts. Fig. 5(A and B) shows the first-order plots of catalytic decomposition of H2O2 conducted at 30 °C over CuFeOn and CuFeOs catalysts at different CuO loading calcined at 400 °C, respectively. The variation of reaction rate constant (k) as a function of wt% of CuO for the CuFeOn and CuFeOs catalysts precalcined at 400 °C is graphically represented in Fig. 6(A and B), respectively. It is shown from Fig. 5(A and B) that (i) the catalytic activity of all CuFeOn and CuFeOs catalysts is higher than the pure Fe2O3 catalyst. (ii) The catalytic activity of CuFeOn catalysts is higher than CuFeOs catalysts at all CuO loadings. Inspection of Fig. 6(A and B) revealed that (i) the increase in amount of CuO content from 2.42 to 9.04 wt% is accompanied with a progressive increasing of the catalytic activity of CuFeOn catalysts calcined at 400 °C. (ii) The catalytic activity of CuFeOs catalysts increases progressively by increasing the amounts of CuO up to a certain extent reaching to a maximum at 2.42 wt% of CuO. Further increase in the amount of CuO 2.42 wt% was followed by a decrease in the catalytic activity.First-order plots of H2O2 decomposition conducted at 30 °C over (A) CuFeOn and (B) CuFeOs catalysts at different CuO loading calcined at 400 °C.
Variation of reaction rate constant (k) as a function of the wt% of CuO for the catalytic decomposition of H2O2 conducted at 30 °C over (A) CuFeOn and (B) CuFeOs catalysts calcined at 400 °C.
The observed increase in the catalytic activity of all CuFeO catalysts calcined at 400 °C in comparison to pure Fe2O3 can be interpreted in terms of the concept of bivalent catalytic centers (Shaheen, 2007) such as Cu2+–Fe3+ and/or Cu1+–Fe2+ ion pairs beside the one component sites Cu2+–Cu+1, Fe3+–Fe2+. The presence of Cu2+–Fe3+ and/or Cu1+–Fe2+ ion pairs is a result of mutual charge interaction that is involved in H2O2-decomposition reaction (Shaheen, 2008). From the electronic theory of catalysis and the principle of bivalent catalytic sites there are two kinds of catalytic sites in equilibrium on the catalyst surface, i.e. donor and acceptor sites, which may be formed by metal catalyst ions in various valence states (depending on oxidation or reduction potential of each cation relative to that of H2O2) or by charge defects stabilized on the catalyst surface. Therefore, the catalytic reactions proceed on the catalytic sites constituted from the ion pairs (Fe3+–Fe2+) and/or (Cu2+–Cu+1) where one of the ions occurs in a lower and the second ion in a higher oxidation state (Radwan, 2004; Hasan et al., 1999; Radwan, 2006).
Alternatively, the modification of the surface area of the catalysts might be another critical reason for promoting the catalytic activity (see Table 2). Also, this behavior was due to greater lattice oxygen mobility in the mixed oxide catalysts than single one. The presence of Cu decreases the strength of nearly Fe–O bonds, thus increasing the mobility of lattice oxygen and facilitating redox reactions on the catalyst surface (Litt and Almquist, 2009).
Changing the precursor of Fe2O3 as shown in CuFeOn increased the catalytic activity. The catalytic activity of CuFeOn is higher than CuFeOs catalysts at all CuO loadings. This could be attributed to the presence of traces of sulfate anions in CuFeOs catalysts as shown from FT-IR section. The presence of ions leads to increase of the reaction solution acidity and then decrease of the H2O2-decomposition rate (Zhang et al., 2006). These results agree with the results of Schumb et al., (1955) which reported that the hydrogen peroxide is more stable at low pH. In addition, the ions can adsorb strongly on the iron oxide surface instead of surface hydroxyl groups, especially at low concentrations (Martin and Smart, 1987). This leads to the formation of a surface complex between and α-FeOOH. This surface complex inhibits the catalytic decomposition of H2O2, possibly by affecting the surface charge or redox potential at the catalyst surface by decreasing H2O2 adsorption on decomposition sites (Watts et al., 1999; Sigg and Stumm, 1981; Choudhary et al., 2006; El-Shobaky et al., 2001).
4 Conclusions
The precursor of iron (nitrate or sulfate) affects the thermal, structural, and spectral properties of CuO/Fe2O3 system. The SBET of CuO/Fe2O3 system calcined at 400 °C is significantly enhanced in the case of nitrate precursor of Fe2O3 in comparison to sulfate precursor. Catalysts based on nitrate precursor exhibit high catalytic decomposition of H2O2 relative to catalysts based on sulfate precursor.
References
- Au/ZnO and Au/Fe2O3 catalysts for CO oxidation at ambient temperature: comments on the effect of synthesis conditions on the preparation of high activity catalyst prepared by coprecipitation. Top. Catal.. 2007;44:123-127.
- [Google Scholar]
- Some physicochemical, surface and catalytic properties of the MoO3/Al2O3 system. Adsorp. Sci. Technol.. 2000;18:409-419.
- [Google Scholar]
- Synthesis of nanosize-necked structure α- and γ-Fe2O3 and its photocatalytic activity. J. Am. Ceram. Soc.. 2007;90:412-414.
- [Google Scholar]
- Selective CO oxidation over CuO–CeO2 catalysts prepared via the urea–nitrate combustion method. Appl. Catal. A. 2003;244:155-167.
- [Google Scholar]
- Mesoporous CuO–Fe2O3 composite catalysts for low-temperature carbon monoxide oxidation. Appl. Catal. B. 2008;79:26-34.
- [Google Scholar]
- Production of hydrogen by partial oxidation of methanol over bimetallic Au–Cu/TiO2–Fe2O3 catalysts. J. Mol. Catal. A. 2009;313:55-64.
- [Google Scholar]
- Factors influencing decomposition of H2O2 over supported Pd catalyst in aqueous medium. J. Mol. Catal. A. 2006;260:115-120.
- [Google Scholar]
- Production and characterization of pure and doped copper ferrite nanoparticles. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis. 2008;82:212-222.
- [Google Scholar]
- Influence of precursor of MgO and preparation conditions on the catalytic dehydrogenation of iso-propanol over CuO/MgO catalysts. J. Alloys Compd.. 2009;484:280-285.
- [Google Scholar]
- Decomposition of H2O2 on pure and ZnO-treated Co3O4/Al2O3 solids. Adsorp. Sci. Technol.. 2001;19(1):45-58.
- [Google Scholar]
- Promotion of the hydrogen peroxide decomposition activity of manganese oxide catalysts. Appl. Catal. A. 1999;181:171-179.
- [Google Scholar]
- Nanostructured CuO–α-Fe2O3 solid solution obtained by high-energy ball-milling. Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 2005;392:179-183.
- [Google Scholar]
- Supported and mixed oxide catalysts based on iron and titanium for the oxidative decomposition of chlorobenzene. Appl. Catal. B. 2008;80:176-184.
- [Google Scholar]
- Nanostructured chromium–iron mixed oxides: physicochemical properties and catalytic activity. Colloids Surf. A. 2010;355:75-82.
- [Google Scholar]
- Advanced oxidation of natural organic matter using hydrogen peroxide and iron-coated pumice particles. Chemosphere. 2007;68:1846-1853.
- [Google Scholar]
- An investigation of CuO/Fe2O3 catalysts for the gas-phase oxidation of ethanol. Appl. Catal. B. 2009;90:10-17.
- [Google Scholar]
- Preparation and catalytic properties of Pt supported Fe–Cr mixed oxide catalysts in the aqueous-phase reforming of ethylene glycol. Catal. Commun.. 2008;9:2316-2318.
- [Google Scholar]
- X-ray photoelectron studies of anion adsorption on goethite. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.. 1987;51:54-56.
- [Google Scholar]
- The effect of the starting solution on the physico-chemical properties of zinc ferrite synthesized at low temperature. J. Alloys Compd.. 1999;287:276-283.
- [Google Scholar]
- Catalytic combustion of volatile organic compounds on gold/iron oxide catalysts. Appl. Catal. B. 2000;28:245-251.
- [Google Scholar]
- Effect of sulfate on the surface and catalytic properties of iron–chromium mixed oxide pillared clay. J. Colloid Interface Sci.. 2006;301:554-559.
- [Google Scholar]
- Correlation between structural features and vis–NIR spectra of α-Fe2O3 hematite and AFe2O4 spinel oxides (A = Mg, Zn) J. Solid State Chem.. 2008;181:1040-1047.
- [Google Scholar]
- Modification of surface and catalytic properties of Fe2O3 due to doping with rare-earth oxides Sm2O3 and Y2O3. Appl. Catal. A. 2004;273:21-33.
- [Google Scholar]
- Influence of La2O3 and ZrO2 as promoters on surface and catalytic properties of CuO/MgO system prepared by sol–gel method. Appl. Catal. A. 2006;299:103-121.
- [Google Scholar]
- Cordierite as catalyst support for cobalt and manganese oxides in oxidation–reduction reactions. Appl. Catal. A. 2004;274:87-99.
- [Google Scholar]
- Response to Disselkamp: direct peroxide/peroxide fuel cell as a novel type fuel cell. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2011;36:869-875.
- [Google Scholar]
- Hydrogen Peroxide. New York: American Chemical Society, Rienholt Publishing; 1955.
- A direct borohydride fuel cell employing Prussian blue as mediated electron-transfer hydrogen peroxide reduction catalyst. J. Power Sources. 2008;178:86-91.
- [Google Scholar]
- Thermal solid–solid interaction and physicochemical properties of CuO–Fe2O3 system. Int. J. Inorg. Mater.. 2001;3:1073-1081.
- [Google Scholar]
- Thermal behaviour of pure and binary Fe(NO3)3·9H2O and (NH4)6Mo7O24·4H2O systems. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2007:113-121.
- [Google Scholar]
- Thermal solid–solid interactions and physicochemical properties of NiO/Fe2O3 system doped with K2O. Thermochim. Acta. 2008;470:18-26.
- [Google Scholar]
- The interaction of anions and weak acid with the hydrous goethite (α-FeOOH) surface. Colloids Surf.. 1981;2:l0l-l17.
- [Google Scholar]
- Catalytic decomposition of hydrogen peroxide by a flow-through self-regulating platinum black heater. Anal. Chim. Acta. 2004;510:9-13.
- [Google Scholar]
- Recent conceptual advances in the catalysis science of mixed metal oxide catalytic materials. Catal. Today. 2005;100:79-94.
- [Google Scholar]
- Selective CO oxidation in rich hydrogen over CuO/samaria-doped ceria. Appl. Catal. A. 2002;232:107-120.
- [Google Scholar]
- Catalytic oxidation of gaseous PCDD/Fs with ozone over iron oxide catalysts. Chemosphere. 2008;71:388-397.
- [Google Scholar]
- Hydrogen peroxide decomposition in model subsurface systems. J. Hazard. Mater. B. 1999;69:229-243.
- [Google Scholar]
- Which type of fuel cell is more competitive for portable application: direct methanol fuel cells or direct borohydride fuel cells? J. Power Sources. 2006;161:1-10.
- [Google Scholar]
- Influence of nature of precursors on the formation and structure of Cu–Ni–Cr mixed oxides from layered double hydroxides. J. Phys. Chem. Solids. 2006;67:1678-1686.
- [Google Scholar]