10.8
CiteScore
 
5.3
Impact Factor
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Corrigendum
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Full Length Article
Full lenth article
Letter to Editor
Original Article
Research article
Retraction notice
Review
Review Article
SPECIAL ISSUE: ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY
10.8
CiteScore
5.3
Impact Factor
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Corrigendum
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Full Length Article
Full lenth article
Letter to Editor
Original Article
Research article
Retraction notice
Review
Review Article
SPECIAL ISSUE: ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original article
9 (
2_suppl
); S988-S999
doi:
10.1016/j.arabjc.2011.10.002

Equilibrium and thermodynamic studies for the removal of As(V) ions from aqueous solution using dried plants as adsorbents

Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, B.P. 8106, Hay Dakhla, Agadir 80000, Morocco
Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Chemical Engineering and Environmental Protection, Technical University “Gh. Asachi”, 71 D. Mangeron, Iasi, Romania

⁎Corresponding author. Tel.: +212 (0)660 60 22 29; fax: +212 (0)528 22 01 00. mmchiban@yahoo.fr (Mohamed Chiban)

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Elsevier and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Peer review under responsibility of King Saud University.

Abstract

This paper reports the feasibility of using dried plants to remove As(V) from aqueous solution under different experimental conditions. For this purpose, micro-particles of both Calami rhizoma and Withania frutescens plants, have been separately used without pre-treatment as natural adsorbents. Effect of various process parameters, namely adsorbent dose, contact time, initial As(V) concentration, temperature, and pH has been studied. The experimental data were analyzed using Freundlich, Langmuir, and Temkin isotherm models to determine the mechanistic parameters related to the adsorption process. It was found that the Langmuir and Freundlich models fitted well. Thermodynamic parameters, viz, free energy change (ΔG0), enthalpy change (ΔH0), and entropy change (ΔS0), were also determined. The negative values of free energy change indicated the spontaneous nature of the adsorption and the positive values of enthalpy change suggested the endothermic nature of the adsorption process. The presence of some competing ions like Cl, NO 3 - , Mg2+, Cd2+, Cu2+, and Zn2+ did not affect the arsenate uptake or removal, whereas HPO 4 2 - strongly interfered negatively.

Keywords

Arsenate
Dried plants
Adsorption isotherms
Thermodynamic study
Wastewater treatment

Nomenclature

Tc

contact time (min)

m

mass of dried plant (g)

v

volume of arsenate ion solution (ml)

m/v

ratio (g/l)

C0

initial ionic concentration (mg/l)

Ce

equilibrium ionic concentration (mg/l)

Cr

adsorbed ionic concentration at any time (mg/l)

Qa

adsorption capacity at any time (mg/g)

Qe

equilibrium uptake of arsenate ion adsorbed (mg/g)

Qmax

maximum adsorption capacity (mg/g)

T

absolute temperature (K)

R

universal gas constant (8.314 J/(mol K))

KL

Langmuir constant related to the free adsorption energy (l/mg)

RL

separation factor in Langmuir isotherm model

n

Freundlich constant indicative of the intensity of adsorption

KF

Freundlich constant indicative of the relative adsorption capacity of the adsorbent (mg/g)

pHi

initial pH

pHe

equilibrium pH

ΔG0

Gibb's free energy change (kJ/mol)

ΔS0

entropy change (J/(mol K)

ΔH0

enthalpy change (J/mol)

1

1 Introduction

Heavy metal pollution of surface water and wastewater is a common environmental threat, since the toxic element ions dissolved can eventually reach the top of the food chain and thus become a risk factor for human health. Arsenic is one of the most toxic metal ions and possesses a serious health risk in many countries of the world, which could increase the risk of skin, lung, and kidney cancer (Chen et al., 1992). The major source of arsenic pollution in the environment is the smelting of ores such as those of gold, silver, copper, and others. Arsenic from these sources is distributed in the air, water, and soil and finds its way into the human system by way of direct inhalation or through contamination of food and consumer products. The World Health Organisation (WHO) recommended that many authorities reduce their regulatory limits and it has established a provisional guideline value of 10 μg/l for arsenic in drinking water. For example in Europe (Directive 98/83/CE), and in the USA (United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2001), where they were lowered from 50 to 10 μg As/l (0.13 μM) (WHO, 2004). Processes to remove excess arsenic from drinking water and wastewater are therefore urgently required. Arsenic exists in both organic and inorganic forms in nature; inorganic arsenic is mostly found in natural water systems. Generally, inorganic arsenic has two different oxidation states, that is, trivalent and pentavalent, in natural aqueous systems (Elizalde-Gonzalez et al., 2001; Chutia et al., 2009). The mobility of arsenical forms in water is very dependent on pH, Eh conditions and the presence of different chemical species (Smedley et al., 2002). Pentavalent arsenic (As(V), arsenate) is stable in oxidative condition and exists as a monovalent ( H 2 AsO 4 - ) or divalent ( HAsO 4 2 - ) anion, while trivalent arsenic (As(III), arsenite) is stable in reductive conditions (Grossl et al., 1997) and exists as an uncharged ( H 3 AsO 3 0 ) or anionic species ( H 2 AsO 3 - ). Generally, inorganic arsenic is more toxic than organic arsenic, and As(III) is approximately 10 times more toxic than As(V) (Pontius et al., 1994).

Many various physicochemical techniques have been developed to remove arsenic from both water and wastewater. The conventional methods used to remove arsenic are membrane techniques (reverse osmosis, nanofiltration, etc.), oxidation/precipitation (hydroxides, sulfides, etc.), coagulation and flocculation, ion-exchange, adsorption by activated carbon (Nguyen et al., 2009; Choonga et al., 2007; Fierro et al., 2009; Hossain, 2006; Mohan and Pittman, 2007; Atkinson, 2006; Mondal et al., 2006; Sun et al., 2006), etc. However, these methods have several disadvantages, which include incomplete metal removal, high capital and operational cost or the disposal of the residual metal sludge, and are not suitable for small-scale industries. Adsorption processes are effective techniques and they have long been used in water and wastewater industries to remove inorganic and organic pollution for easy handling, minimal sludge production and its regeneration capability. Liquid-phase adsorption is one of the most efficient methods for the removal of toxic pollutants from industrial effluents. Granular or powdered activated carbon is the most widely used adsorbent (Fierro et al., 2009) but its use is usually limited due to high cost. That is why increasing attention and this problem have led many workers to search for cheaper adsorption substitutes including natural raw materials (chitosan, alginate, biomass, etc.), clays (clinoptilolite, montmorillonite, kaolinite, etc.), and agricultural or industrial wastes (red mud, fly ash, lignite, peat, bone char, rice polish, etc.) (Mohan and Pittman, 2007; Ranjan et al., 2009; Carja et al., 2008; Chen et al., 2008; Genc-Fuhrman et al., 2004; Mohan et al., 2007), due to their local abundance and low cost. There are large numbers of studies in the literature in which various adsorbents are used for the removal of arsenic from aqueous solution. Two recent reviews reported by Mohan et al. (2007) and Hossain (2006) can be referred for the other possible adsorbents for the removal of arsenic oxyanions. Although these materials are regarded as cheap and effective adsorbents, there are several problems (their impurities, unknown stability and regeneration, low adsorption capacity and slow kinetics) associated with their use (Ranjan et al., 2009; Chen et al., 2008; Rahaman et al., 2008; Gimenez et al., 2007). For the past few years, the focus of the research is to use cheap materials as potential adsorbents and the processes developed so far are based on exploring those natural adsorbents, which can prove economic and bring cost effectiveness (Benhima et al., 2008).

Removal of heavy metals by these materials might be attributed to their protein, carbohydrates, and phenolic compound contents, which have metal-binding functional groups such as carboxyl, hydroxyl, sulfate, phosphate, and amino groups (Shin et al., 2007). Mohan and Pittman (2007) observed that the loss of metal ions from their solutions in the presence of natural materials may be due to the adsorption on surface and pores, and to complexation by these materials.

In our previous works, we have investigated the biochemical composition of some inert plants (Chiban et al., 2007) and also the adsorption of phosphate, nitrate, cadmium, and lead from aqueous solutions onto micro-particles of dry plants (Benhima et al., 2008; Chiban et al., 2005, 2011a). In this paper, we have tested the removal of arsenate on two dried plants as low cost adsorbents collected from two different regions; Calami rhizoma as Romanian plant and Withania frutescens as Moroccan plant, in order to compare the uptake capacities of these materials as well as with the one obtained by different authors in the literature. In this meaning, the kinetics of adsorption, the adsorption isotherms as well as the influence of several parameters such as: contact time, initial concentration, pH, temperature on the adsorption of arsenate by both dried plants individually was studied. The effect of some anions and cations on the adsorption of arsenate onto both dried plants was also presented.

2

2 Materials and methods

2.1

2.1 Adsorbent preparation

The low-cost materials used in the present work were obtained from dried plants such as C. rhizoma as Romanian plant and W. frutescens as Moroccan plant. A recent screening (Chiban et al., 2007, 2011b) for chemical composition and surface characterization has shown that the major functional groups on W. frutescens plant are polar hydroxyl, aldehydic, and carboxylic groups. These groups have made these plants to have great potential as adsorbents for cations and anions ions in aqueous solutions. In addition, the micro-particles of these plants are also known to be non-toxic (Ahmad et al., 1990) and their selection was made in relation to their relative abundance in all the zones where they are considered as a worthless matter. The plant parts (leaves and stems) were dried under permanent air-conditioning during 1 week. These organs were chopped into small fragments, then washed several times with double distilled water and again dried in an oven at 35 °C during 24 h. After drying, the organs were pulverized with an electric grinder to get fine powders. The micro-particles of these dried plants are used as adsorbent materials in batch experiments without any pre-treatment to avoid extra expenditure.

2.2

2.2 Solution preparation

Stock solution of arsenate (1 g/l) was prepared by dissolving 4.164 g of sodium arsenate (Na2HAsO4·7H2O, Sigma, product of USA) in double distilled water to make a solution volume of 1 l. The aqueous solution was diluted with double distilled water to obtain the As(V) synthetic solution of desired concentration. Other agents used, such as KNO3, NaCl, Na2HPO4·12H2O, Na2SO4·10H2O, Mg(NO3)2·6H2O, Cd(NO3)2·4H2O, Cu(NO3)2·3H2O, and Zn(NO3)2·6H2O were all of analytical grade and without further purification. All experiments employed double distilled water.

2.3

2.3 Instrumentation

A UV–Vis Spectrophotometer (Jasco, model V-550, Japan) was employed to measure residual arsenate ion concentrations. The pH of the solutions was measured with Titroline (SCHOTT instruments) pH meter with a glass electrode. A mechanical shaker model Labotec was used for shaking the adsorption batches. The centrifuge HETTICH model EBA 21 was used to separate the micro-particles of plants from the solutions after complete adsorption experiments. An analytical balance Precisa model XT 220A was used for weighting the dried plants and salts samples.

2.4

2.4 Experimental procedure

2.4.1

2.4.1 Adsorption studies

Adsorption experiments were made by a batch technique at room temperature (except when the effect of temperature was studied). The batch mode was selected because of its simplicity and reliability. Known amounts of dried plant were placed in different stoppered Erlenmeyer glass flasks of 100 ml capacity containing 40 ml of As(V) anion solution of known concentration and pH. The solutions were shaken vigorously for a given time period to reach equilibrium. The agitation speed was kept constant for each run to ensure equal mixing. After contact time t (Tc, min), the Erlenmeyer containing the sample was withdrawn from the shaker, the suspensions were centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 10 min and the supernatant was filtered through a Whatman filter paper. The filtrates were then prepared for analysis according to the molybdate blue method (Lenoble et al., 2003). The concentration of unadsorbed As(V) in the filtrate was analyzed by the UV spectrophotometer at a wavelength of 842 nm. The concentration of As(V) removed (Cr) from aqueous solutions was calculated by the difference of initial concentration, Ci, and the concentration at time t (Cr = Ci −Ct). The removal percentage of arsenate from aqueous solutions (%) on micro-particles of both plants was calculated from: % Removal = C i - C t C i × 100

The amount of arsenate adsorbed on a given adsorbent (Qt, mg/g) is calculated by the following equation: Q t = C i - C t m × v where Ci is the initial concentration of arsenate in the feed solution (mg/l), Ct is the concentration of arsenate in solution at a given time t (mg/l), v is the total volume of the feed solution (ml); and m is the weight of the adsorbent (g).

At adsorption equilibrium, arsenate concentration in the feed Ct becomes the equilibrium concentration Ce and adsorbed amount Qt becomes Qmax.

Adsorption experiments for the effect of solution pH were conducted as follows: 1 g of dried plant was suspended in 40 ml of arsenate solutions containing 100 mg/l for both dried plants separately. The pH of the solution was adjusted to 2–12 by adding dilute solution of hydrochloric acid or sodium hydroxide (0.5 M NaOH or 0.5 M HCl), the agitation time was fixed to 12 h and the temperature was 22 ± 2 °C.

Adsorption isotherm studies were conducted by adding 1 g of both dried plants individually in the solution containing 40 ml with various initial concentrations of As(V) at different temperatures. The initial arsenate concentrations ranged between 200 and 1000 mg/l and the temperature of the solutions ranged from 25 to 40 °C.

The effect of competing ions (cations and anions) on the removal of arsenate was tested at room temperature. Arsenate solutions containing different competing ions individually (i.e., Cl, NO 3 - , SO 4 2 - , HPO 4 2 - , Mg2+, Cd2+, Cu2+, and Zn2+) were prepared by dissolving various amounts of their salts in arsenate solutions (100 mg/l). The initial concentrations of coexisting ions are the same as initial As(V) concentration at pH 6. at pH 6. 1 g, different concentrations were then added to each of the solutions in 100 ml Erlenmeyer and the suspensions were stirred for 12 h. After filtering the suspensions through membrane filters, the concentrations of arsenate in the filtrates were determined as before.

2.4.2

2.4.2 Desorption studies

Desorption of As(V) was carried out as follows: a series of an Erlenmeyer that contained 1 g of adsorbent were treated with 40 ml As(V) solution (100 mg/l). The arsenate-loaded adsorbents were filtered after 12 h of contact time and washed gently several times with double distilled water to remove any excess of unadsorbed As(V). It was then treated with 20 ml of hydroxide solution at different concentrations (0.01–0.07 M) for a period equal to the adsorption time and then filtered. The volumes used for adsorption and for desorption were, respectively, Va = 40 ml and Vd = 20 ml and the ratio Vd/Va equaled 0.5 (Elizalde-Gonzalez et al., 2001; Lenoble et al., 2002). The filtrates were analyzed for As(V) desorbed. The amounts desorbed of arsenate are calculated by the following equation: % Desorption = released As(V)(mg/l) initially As(V)adsorbed(mg/l) × 100

2.4.3

2.4.3 Regeneration studies

One gram of adsorbent was treated with 40 ml As(V) solution (100 mg/l) in an Erlenmeyer and after equilibrium time (12 h) was filtered. The adsorbent was then treated with 20 ml NaOH solution (0.07 M) for a period equal to the adsorption time. It was filtered and the filtrate was then analyzed for As(V) desorbed. The adsorbent was washed several times with double distilled water in order to remove any excess of NaOH. It was again treated with 40 ml of As(V) solution at 100 mg/l.

3

3 Results and discussion

3.1

3.1 Effect of adsorbent mass

Fig. 1 shows the arsenate ions removal and pH final of medium as a function of adsorbent mass using batch adsorption technique. These graphs show the increase of As(V) ions removal against the increase in the weight of both dried plants up to a weight of 1 g for 100 mg/l of arsenate initial concentration. The arsenate adsorption for an agitation time of 12 h increased from 59% (2.36 mg/g) to 91% (3.64 mg/g) and 33% (1.32 mg/g) to 72% (2.88 mg/g) when the adsorbent amount was increased from 0.25 to 1 g for C. rhizoma and W. frutescens, respectively. Increasing the amount of the adsorbent makes a large number of sites available leading to an increase in adsorption. There are many factors that can contribute to this adsorbent concentration effect. The most important factor is that adsorption sites remain unsaturated during the adsorption reaction. This is due to the fact that as the mass of adsorbent is increased, there is a less commensurate increase in adsorption resulting from the lower adsorptive capacity utilization of the adsorbent. It is also seen from Fig. 1 that pH of solution after contact with both dried plants decreased and remained nearly constant at about 6 for C. rhizoma and 7 for W. frutescens. This difference can be explained by the difference in the chemical composition of these plants. In order to achieve experiments for maximum retention of the As(V) ions, the plant weight has been chosen to be 1 g in all experiments.

Effect of amount of both dried plants individually on the adsorption of As(V) at initial As(V) concentration, 100 mg/l; temperature, 22 °C; contact time, 12 h; and initial pHi = 8.3.
Figure 1
Effect of amount of both dried plants individually on the adsorption of As(V) at initial As(V) concentration, 100 mg/l; temperature, 22 °C; contact time, 12 h; and initial pHi = 8.3.

3.2

3.2 Effect of contact time and initial concentration

The contact time of adsorbate and adsorbent has a great importance in adsorption, because it depends on the nature of the system used. Figs. 2 and 3 show the effect of contact time on batch adsorption of different initial arsenate concentrations ranging between 0.1 and 1 g/l at ambient temperature for W. frutescens and C. rhizoma, respectively. The pH of the solutions was not fixed but measured before and after each experiment. The amount of As(V) adsorbed increases very rapidly up to about 120 min and slowly reaches saturation at about 180 min. The adsorption of As(V) remained constant after 180 min implying that equilibrium had been reached. The plots also show that the time of equilibrium as well as time required to achieve a definite fraction of equilibrium adsorption is independent of the initial concentration. With the increase in the initial concentration of As(V) from 0.1 to 1 g/l, the amount adsorbed increased from 3.04 mg/g (73%) to 16.88 mg/g (42%) for W. frutescens and from 3.64 mg/g (91%) to 22.04 mg/g (55%) for C. rhizoma. At higher initial concentration the available sites of adsorption become fewer and hence the percentage adsorption depends on the initial concentration. These values depend to some extent on the type of plant. For a fixed adsorbent dose, the total available adsorption sites are limited, there by adsorbing almost the same amount of the adsorbate, thus resulting in a decrease in percentage adsorption corresponding to an increase in initial adsorbate concentration. The increase of loading capacities of adsorbents with the increase of arsenate ion concentration is probably due to higher interaction between arsenate ions and adsorbent. The fast adsorption kinetics observed for both adsorbents represents a key advantage for designing water treatment systems based on this principle. In comparison, the equilibrium time for the adsorption of As(V) by some other adsorbents in the literature is acceptable. For example, Ranjan et al. (2009), using agricultural residue ‘rice polish' for biosorption of arsenic from aqueous solution, found that the equilibrium time needed for As(III) and As(V) sorption on rice polish was 60 and 40 min, respectively. Gimenez et al. (2007) using different natural iron oxides for the removal of both As(III) and As(V) oxyanions, found that equilibrium was reached in less than 2 days and the kinetics of sorption seems to be faster for goethite and magnetite than for hematite. However, the results from Jeon et al. (2009) were similar to those found in this investigation.

Effect of contact time and initial arsenate ion concentration on the removal of As(V) by W. frutescens: m/v = 25 g/l, pHi = 8.3, and temperature ∼22 °C.
Figure 2
Effect of contact time and initial arsenate ion concentration on the removal of As(V) by W. frutescens: m/v = 25 g/l, pHi = 8.3, and temperature ∼22 °C.
Effect of contact time and initial arsenate ion concentration on the removal of As(V) by C. rhizoma: m/v = 25 g/l, pHi = 8.3, and temperature ∼22 °C.
Figure 3
Effect of contact time and initial arsenate ion concentration on the removal of As(V) by C. rhizoma: m/v = 25 g/l, pHi = 8.3, and temperature ∼22 °C.

3.3

3.3 Effect of solution pH

One of the most critical parameters in the adsorption process of arsenic ions from aqueous solutions is the pH of the medium (Gimenez et al., 2007). The initial pH of adsorption medium is related to the adsorption mechanisms onto the adsorbent surface from water and reflects the nature of the physicochemical interaction of the species in solution and the adsorptive sites of adsorbents (Sari and Tuzen, 2009). The standard range of pH in drinking water varies from 6.5 to 8.5 (Menhage-Bena et al., 2004) and therefore the investigation of the effect of a wide range of pH on arsenate removal is needed. Hence, the effect of initial pH on the uptake capacities of As(V) on both dried plants was studied at room temperature. The pH range studied was between 2.0 and 12.0 for 100 mg/l of initial As(V) concentration. Equilibrium pH (pHfinal) values as well as the retained arsenate concentration, Cr (mg/l), are measured and the results are presented in Fig. 4. It is clear that the pH of the medium affected the adsorption of arsenate by the adsorbents and the micro-particles of the plants used as adsorbents shown to be effective for the quantitative removal of As(V) at pH ranging from 6 to 9. It was found that in the lower pH range (below 9.0) the adsorption of arsenate was good, but above pH 9.0, the adsorptivity decreases sharply. This can be due to the fact that at the higher pH range there is a competition between the hydroxyl ions present at higher pH and arsenic species, for the adsorption sites. In addition, the carboxyl, hydroxyl, and amide groups of the plants will be negatively charged in alkaline conditions. Therefore, there exists a repulsive force between the negatively charged adsorbent and anionic species of arsenic, resulting in reduced adsorption efficiency (Rahaman et al., 2008). For both adsorbents, the pHfinal increases smoothly with the increase of pHinitial (Fig. 4). However, in case of C. rhizome adsorbent, a plateau is found up to pH 6 and then again starts to increase with initial pH (Fig. 4). In both cases, arsenate uptakes increase up to near pH 6 and afterward decrease with the increase of pH. At pH 6, maximum arsenate removal percent of 70% and 89% is obtained for W. frutescens and C. rhizoma, respectively. As(V) speciation is affected by the solution pH through the following equilibrium (Yusof and Malek, 2009):

(1)
H 3 AsO 4 H 2 AsO 4 - + H + , pK a 1 = 2.3
(2)
H 2 AsO 4 - H AsO 4 2 - + H + , pK a 2 = 6.8
(3)
H AsO 4 2 - AsO 4 3 - + H + , pK a 3 = 11.6
The effect of initial pHi on adsorption of As(V) onto C. rhizoma and W. frutescens: initial concentration of As(V) was 100 mg/l, temperature was 22 °C, dose of dried plants was 25 g/l, and mixing time was 12 h.
Figure 4
The effect of initial pHi on adsorption of As(V) onto C. rhizoma and W. frutescens: initial concentration of As(V) was 100 mg/l, temperature was 22 °C, dose of dried plants was 25 g/l, and mixing time was 12 h.

From Eqs. (1)–(3), the As(V) species occurs mainly in the form of H 2 AsO 4 - in the pH range between 3 and 6, while a divalent anion HAsO 4 2 - dominates at higher pH values (such as between pH 8 and 11). In the intermediate region which is in the pH range between 6 and 8, both species coexist with one another (Kim et al., 2004). Thus, it is evident that the adsorption of As(V) by dried plants is pH dependent.

3.4

3.4 Adsorption isotherms

Adsorption isotherms are mathematical models that describe the distribution of the adsorbate species among the solid and liquid phases, and are important data to understand the mechanism of adsorption. Several models have been published in the literature to describe experimental data of adsorption isotherms. The Langmuir, Freundlich and Temkin models are the most frequently employed models. In this study, these three models were used to describe the relationship between the adsorbed amount of arsenate on dried plants and its equilibrium concentration in solution.

3.4.1

3.4.1 Langmuir adsorption isotherm

The data obtained were then fitted to the Langmuir adsorption isotherm applied to equilibrium adsorption assuming monolayer adsorption onto a surface with a finite number of identical sites and is expressed by the following equation (Langmuir, 1918):

(4)
q e = q max K L C e 1 + K L C e

It can be expressed in the linear form in Eq. (5)

(5)
1 q e = 1 q max + 1 q max K L C e where qe is the equilibrium arsenate concentration on the adsorbent (mg/g), Ce is the equilibrium As(V) concentration in the solution (mg/l), qmax is the maximum adsorption capacity of the adsorbent (mg/g), and KL is the Langmuir adsorption constant (l/mg) and is related to the free energy of adsorption (Chen et al., 2008). The plot of 1/qe versus 1/Ce for both dried plants gives a straight line of slope 1/qmaxKL and intercepts 1/qmax (Figs. 5 and 6). The values of the adsorption capacity (qmax), the Langmuir constant (KL), and the coefficient of determination (r2) were presented in Table 1. The values of the coefficient of determination for both dried plants were 99% and 98% for W. frutescens and C. rhizoma, respectively, indicating a good fit of the Langmuir model to the adsorption of arsenate on the two plants. The Langmuir model is an indication of surface homogeneity of the adsorbent. The basic assumption of Langmuir adsorption isotherm is also based on monolayer coverage of the adsorbate on the surface of adsorbent. The adsorption capacity of the adsorbent increased on increasing the temperature. The highest value of qmax obtained at 40 °C was 29.06 mg/g for W. frutescens and 34.72 mg/g for C. rhizoma. It appears to be the highest in comparison with the uptake obtained at the other temperatures (Table 1). The essential feature of the Langmuir isotherm can be expressed by means of ‘RL', a dimensionless constant referred to as separation factor or equilibrium parameter to predicting whether an adsorption system is favorable or unfavorable. RL is calculated using the following equation (Weber and Chakkravorti, 1974):
(6)
R L = 1 1 + K L C i
where Ci is the initial As(V) concentration (mg/l). The parameter RL indicates the shape of the isotherm and nature of the adsorption process. According to the value of RL the isotherm shape may be interpreted as follows (Bulut et al., 2007) (Table 2):
Langmuir adsorption isotherm for As(V) on C. rhizoma at various temperatures: m/v = 25 g/l, pHi = 8.3, Tc = 12 h.
Figure 5
Langmuir adsorption isotherm for As(V) on C. rhizoma at various temperatures: m/v = 25 g/l, pHi = 8.3, Tc = 12 h.
Freundlich adsorption isotherm for As(V) on C. rhizoma at various temperatures: m/v = 25 g/l, pHi = 8.3, Tc = 12 h.
Figure 6
Freundlich adsorption isotherm for As(V) on C. rhizoma at various temperatures: m/v = 25 g/l, pHi = 8.3, Tc = 12 h.
Table 1 Isotherm constants for As(V) adsorption onto both dried plants at different temperatures: m/v = 25 g/l, pHi = 8.4, Tc = 12 h.
C. rhizoma W. frutescens
25 °C 30 °C 35 °C 40 °C 25 °C 30 °C 35 °C 40 °C
Langmuir
Qmax 35.97 33.33 35.97 34.72 23.53 21.98 28.57 29.07
KL 0.004 0.005 0.005 0.007 0.004 0.005 0.007 0.011
r2 0.979 0.981 0.992 0.983 0.992 0.990 0.982 0.997
RL 0.198–0.553 0.159–0.486 0.157–0.482 0.13–0.427 0.198–0.553 0.158–0.484 0.123–0.413 0.079–0.300
Freundlich
1/nf 0.71 0.66 0.65 0.63 0.57 0.55 0.58 0.53
Kf 0.36 0.50 0.58 0.70 0.47 0.58 0.73 1.19
r2 0.988 0.991 0.997 0.990 0.981 0.987 0.997 0.988
Temkin
B 9.33 8.86 8.91 8.95 5.70 5.71 7.65 7.60
KT 0.032 0.039 0.044 0.051 0.033 0.038 0.048 0.07
r2 0.900 0.910 0.948 0.944 0.963 0.961 0.946 0.911
Table 2 Type of isotherm for different values of RL.
Value of RL Type of isotherm
RL > 1 Unfavorable
RL = 1 Linear
0 < RL < 1 Favorable
RL = 0 Irreversible

In this study, the values of RL calculated from Eq. (6) were incorporated in Table 1. Further, for C0 from 0.2 to 1 g/l used in the present study, the values of RL at all temperatures studied range from 0.079 to 0.553 for W. frutescens and 0.129 to 0.553 for C. rhizoma, therefore, the adsorption is favorable.

3.4.2

3.4.2 Freundlich adsorption isotherm

The adsorption data obtained were then fitted to the Freundlich adsorption isotherm (Freundlich, 1906), which is the earliest relationship known describing the adsorption equilibrium and is expressed by Eq. (7) and its linear form in Eq. (8):

(7)
q e = K f C e 1 / n
(8)
Ln q e = Ln K f + 1 n Ln C e

The Freundlich isotherm constants Kf and n are constants incorporating all factors affecting the adsorption process such as of adsorption capacity and intensity of adsorption. The constants Kf and n were calculated from Eq. (8) and Freundlich plots (Figs. 7 and 8). The amount of absorbent required to reduce any initial concentration to predetermined final concentration can be calculated. The values for Freundlich constants and correlation coefficients (r2) for the two adsorbents used during the study are also presented in Table 1. The values of n between 1 and 10 (i.e., 1/n less than 1) represent a favorable adsorption (Faust and Aly, 1987). The values of n, reflects the intensity of adsorption. The numerical values of n at all temperatures lies between 1.792 and 2.177 and is greater than unity, indicating that arsenate ions are favorably adsorbed by both dried plants at all the temperatures studied. In general, both Freundlich and Langmuir models had a good agreement with the data for arsenate adsorption, evidenced by the high r2 values (all greater than 0.97) (Table 1). These experiments confirm the efficiency of the micro-particles of dried plants to remove As(V) from aqueous solution.

Temkin adsorption isotherm for As(V) on C. rhizoma at various temperatures: m/v = 25 g/l, pHi = 8.3, Tc = 12 h.
Figure 7
Temkin adsorption isotherm for As(V) on C. rhizoma at various temperatures: m/v = 25 g/l, pHi = 8.3, Tc = 12 h.
Langmuir adsorption isotherm for As(V) on W. frutescens at various temperatures: m/v = 25 g/l, pHi = 8.3, Tc = 12 h.
Figure 8
Langmuir adsorption isotherm for As(V) on W. frutescens at various temperatures: m/v = 25 g/l, pHi = 8.3, Tc = 12 h.

3.4.3

3.4.3 Temkin Isotherm

The Temkin adsorption isotherm model based on the heat of adsorption of the ions, which is due to the adsorbate and adsorbent interactions taken (Temkin and Pyzhev, 1940). The Temkin isotherm equation is given as:

(9)
q e = RT b Ln ( K T · C e ) where RT / b = B

A linear form of the Temkin isotherm can be expressed as:

(10)
q e = B Ln ( K T ) + B Ln ( C e ) where T is absolute temperature in Kelvin and R the universal gas constant, 8.314 J/(mol K). b (J/mol) is Temkin isotherm constant and constant B (dimensionless) is related to the heat of adsorption (Bulut et al., 2008). KT (l/mg) is the equilibrium binding constant (l/g) corresponding to the maximum binding energy. The Temkin isotherm plot for both plants at four temperatures are presented in Figs. 9 and 10 and the isotherm parameters are given in Table 1. The Temkin constant (B) related to the heat of adsorption for the two dried plants was between 5.7 and 7.6 kJ/mol for W. frutescens and from 8.86 to 9.33 kJ/mol at studied temperature ranges. It has been reported (Ho et al., 1996) that the typical range of bonding energy for ion-exchange mechanism is 8–16 kJ/mol. The low values in this study in case of W. frutescens indicate a weak interaction between adsorbate and adsorbent, supporting an ion-exchange mechanism for the present study. From linear regression of the data points, the r2 values range from 0.91 to 0.96 for W. frutescens and 0.90 to 0.94 for C. rhizoma, respectively, are rather low indicating that the adsorption of As(V) did not follow the Temkin isotherm closely.
Freundlich adsorption isotherm for As(V) on W. frutescens at various temperatures: m/v = 25 g/l, pHi = 8.3, Tc = 12 h.
Figure 9
Freundlich adsorption isotherm for As(V) on W. frutescens at various temperatures: m/v = 25 g/l, pHi = 8.3, Tc = 12 h.
Temkin adsorption isotherm for As(V) W. frutescens at various temperatures: m/v = 25 g/l, pHi = 8.3, Tc = 12 h.
Figure 10
Temkin adsorption isotherm for As(V) W. frutescens at various temperatures: m/v = 25 g/l, pHi = 8.3, Tc = 12 h.

3.5

3.5 Thermodynamic studies

The thermodynamic parameters such as standard Gibbs free energy change (ΔG0), enthalpy change (ΔH0), and entropy change (ΔS0) were estimated to evaluate the feasibility and nature of the adsorption process. The values of standard Gibbs free energy change for the adsorption process were evaluated by using KL values obtained from the Langmuir model at different temperatures and thermodynamic parameters are presented in Table 3. The Gibbs free energy change, of the process is related to equilibrium constant by following the equation (Parfitt and Rochester, 1983; Bulut and Tez, 2007):

(11)
Δ G 0 = - RT Ln k L where T is temperature in Kelvin, R is the gas constant having a value of 8.314 × 10−3 kJ/(mol K), and KL is the equilibrium constant obtained from the Langmuir model.
Table 3 The thermodynamic parameters at various temperatures for As(V) adsorption by both dried plants separately.
Adsorbent T (°C) KL (l/mol) Ln KL −ΔG0 (kJ/mol) ΔH0 (J/mol) ΔS0 (J/(mol K))
C. rhizoma 25 306.15 5.72 14.18 23.27 125.91
30 395.27 5.98 15.06
35 401.35 5.99 15.35
40 502.13 6.22 16.18
W. frutescens 25 302.38 5.71 14.15 53.67 227.19
30 399.16 5.99 15.09
35 532.04 6.27 16.07
40 873.08 6.77 17.62

According to thermodynamics, the Gibbs free energy change is also related to the enthalpy change (ΔH0) and entropy change (ΔS0) at constant temperature by the following equation,

(12)
Δ G 0 = Δ H 0 - T Δ S 0

Now using Eqs. (12) and (11) can be transformed to Eq. (13).

(13)
Ln K L = Δ S 0 R - Δ H 0 RT

The values of enthalpy change (ΔH0) and entropy change (ΔS0) were calculated from the slope and intercept of the plot of Ln KL versus 1/T (Fig. 11) (Bulut and Tez, 2007). The calculated values of these parameters are given in Table 3. It can be seen in Table 3 that ΔG0 values were found to be negative for all temperature conditions studied, verifying that the adsorption process was spontaneous in nature (Bulut and Tez, 2007). However, the decreasing value of ΔG0 with increasing temperature implies that the spontaneity degree of the adsorption process increases with increasing of the temperature. The results for ΔH0 and ΔS0 were found to be 53.67 and 227.19 kJ/mol of W. frutescens and 23.27 and 125.91 for C. rhizoma, respectively. Unlu and Ersoz (2006) stated that although there are no certain criteria that are related to the ΔH0 values defining the adsorption, heats of adsorption between 20.9 and 418.4 kJ/mol, which are heats of chemical reactions, are frequently assumed to be comparable to those associated with the chemisorption processes. Based on the result of ΔH0 value, this study suggests that the adsorption of As(V) onto dried plants proceeded via chemisorption and that the adsorption process was endothermic in nature. This result is also supported by the increase in the value of uptake capacity of adsorbents with the rise in temperature. Han et al. (2006) stated that the increasing sorption capacity of the sorbent with temperature is attributable to the enlargement of pores and/or the activation of the sorbent surface. In addition to that, the positive value of entropy (ΔS0) revealed that the degrees of free active sites increased at the solid–liquid interface during the adsorption of As(V) onto dried plants.

Plot of ln KL vs. (1/T) for estimation of thermodynamic parameters for both dried plants.
Figure 11
Plot of ln KL vs. (1/T) for estimation of thermodynamic parameters for both dried plants.

3.6

3.6 Desorption and readsorption capacity

Desorption studies will help to elucidate the nature of adsorption process and to recover the As(V) from both adsorbents individually. Moreover, it also will help to regenerate the adsorbents so that it can be used again to adsorb arsenate ions, and to develop the successful adsorption process. The desorption experiments were carried out at 25 °C by using various NaOH solutions and the effect of initial concentration of NaOH on desorption of As(V) from the adsorbents is shown in Table 4. It was expected that increased concentration of OH- ions should compete greatly with the already adsorbed arsenate on both dried plants, hence sodium hydroxide solution was used to desorb arsenic from the adsorbent. Generally, desorption of the arsenate ions was more favored in strong alkaline solution. With 0.03 M NaOH solution, 78% of the adsorbed As(V) from W. frutescens plant was desorbed, and desorption percent could arrive at 91% if the concentration of NaOH was higher than 0.07 M. With regard to C. rhizoma plant, satisfactory desorption (40%) of the arsenate adsorbed ions achieved with relatively higher concentration of NaOH (0.07 M NaOH) (Table 4). A noticeable amount of arsenate can be readsorbed in a second procedure by W. frutescens plant treated with 0.7 M of NaOH at 12 h, although it does not reach the amounts retained in the first contact, it is probably due to a residual adsorption level. The readsorption percentage of arsenate onto both dried plants was found to be 52% (2.08 mg/g) for W. frutescens and 30% (1.2 mg/g) for C. rhizoma plant.

Table 4 Desorption data for As(V) adsorbed on both adsorbents using different concentrations of NaOH by batch process.
Adsorbent Concentration initial of As(V) (mg/l) Removal efficiency (%) Desorption (%) with NaOH
0.01 M 0.02 M 0.03 M 0.05 M 0.07 M
C. rhizoma 100 92.21 21.28 27.66 34.52 39.70 39.53
W. frutescens 100 73.6 40.01 43.98 78.36 90.81 91.69

3.7

3.7 Effect of the coexisting ions

Till now all the adsorption results discussed above were obtained by taking the arsenate anions as adsorbate (As(V) alone). However, in reality the contaminated water contains several other ions (both cations and anions) which can affect the adsorption of arsenate. In a representative test, the effects of the presence of individual and simultaneous anions and cations such as: sulfate, chloride, nitrate, phosphate, magnesium, cadmium, copper, and zinc on the adsorption capacity of both crushed dried plants for As(V) were investigated. The amount of arsenate removal values in the absence and the presence of these anions and cations are given in Fig. 12. Generally, no interference was observed between arsenate and studied cations. The adsorption capacity of arsenate on C. rhizoma decreased by 42.6% and 8.1% in the presence of phosphate and sulfate anions separately; while no evidently competitive effects on the adsorption of As(V) onto the two plants separately were observed with other coexisting anions such as chloride and nitrate (Fig. 12). The significant interference on As(V) adsorption by phosphate is due to the similar chemical properties of arsenate with phosphate in aqueous solution at pH 6.0 (Hughes, 2002). Similar results were reported by Rahman et al. (2008) and Mkandawire et al. (2004) about the removal of arsenic by Spirodela polyrhiza L. and Lemna gibba L., respectively. These results probably meant that these dried plants had also high adsorption ability to phosphate or sulfate under some conditions that we had in our experiment. The results also show that the arsenate uptakes by both dried plants were not affected by the presence of simultaneous bivalent cations, nitrate, and chloride.

Effect on the removal of As(v) on C. rhizoma and W. frutescens with coexisting ions at initial concentration for each ion was 100 mg/l; temperature was 22 °C; contact time was 12 h; and initial pHi was 6.
Figure 12
Effect on the removal of As(v) on C. rhizoma and W. frutescens with coexisting ions at initial concentration for each ion was 100 mg/l; temperature was 22 °C; contact time was 12 h; and initial pHi was 6.

3.8

3.8 Comparison of adsorption capacity with different adsorbents reported in literature

In order to justify the validity of dried plants as adsorbents for adsorption, its adsorption potential must be compared with other various adsorbents used for this purpose. The values of maximum adsorption capacity of the adsorbents for the removal of As(V) reported in the literature are given in Table 5. The direct comparison of the adsorbent capacity of studied adsorbents with other adsorbents capacity reported in the literature is difficult due to the varying experimental conditions employed in those studies; however, both dried plants in this study possess reasonable adsorption capacity in comparison with other adsorbents. The adsorption capacity differences of arsenate ions uptake are ascribed to the properties of each adsorbent such as adsorbent structure, functional groups and surface areas (Ozsoy and Kumbur, 2006).

Table 5 Maximum dried plants adsorption capacities (Qmax, mg/g) of As(V) compared with other adsorbents (in mg per g of solid material).
Adsorbent Initial pH Concentration range Qmax (mg/g) References
Raw mixed (hydr)oxide 8 5–500 mg/l 26.8 Escudero et al. (2009)
Inonotus hispidus biomass 2 10–500 mg/l 59.6 Sari and Tuzen (2009)
Rice polish 4 100–1000 μg/l 0.14 Ranjan et al. (2009)
Modified zeolite 6 10–50 mg/l 1.34 Yusof and Malek (2009)
Maghemite nanoparticles 3 1–11 mg/l 50.0 Tuutijärvi et al. (2009)
Fish scale 4 0.2–1 mg/l 0.03 Rahaman et al. (2008)
Lassonia nigrescens 2.5 50–600 mg/l 45.2 Hossain (2006)
Tea fungal biomass 7.2 0.9 mg/l 4.95 Hossain (2006)
Bone char 10 0.5–1.5 mg/l 1.43 Chen et al. (2008)
Leather waste 1 10–100 mg/l 26 Oliveira et al. (2008)
Calcium alginate 5 to 6 6 mg/l 6.75 Lim and Chen (2007)
Orange juice residue 10 67.43 Ghimire et al. (2002)
Red mud 3.5 10 mg/l 0.52 Altundogan et al. (2002)
Red mud 2.3 2.5–30 mg/l 0.51 Altundogan et al. (2000)
Coconut coir pith 7 5–100 mg/l 13.57 Anirudhan and Unnithan (2007)
Chitosan 4 400 mg/l 58 Mcafee et al. (2001)
Chitosan 3,5 0–10 mg/l 14.16 Kwok et al. (2009)
C. rhizoma 8 1000 mg/l 22.04 This study
W. frutescens 8 1000 mg/l 16.88 This study

4

4 Conclusion

This study indicates that micro-particles obtained from dried plants such as C. rhizoma and W. frutescens can be used as adsorbents for the treatment of wastewater contaminated with arsenate. The adsorption process has been shown to be affected from experimental conditions such as pH, initial arsenate ion concentration and contact time. Batch adsorption studies under varying experimental conditions showed that the adsorption of arsenate ions is fairly rapid in the first 60 min and thereafter increases slowly to reach equilibrium in about 3 h. The maximum arsenate removal was observed at about pH 8.0. The percentage removal of arsenate from aqueous solutions by both dried plants was 91% (3.64 mg/g) for C. rhizoma and 72% (2.88 mg/g) for W. frutescens at an initial arsenate concentration of 100 mg/l. The equilibrium data fitted well to Langmuir, Freundlich, and Temkin isotherm models, in the studied concentration range at all temperatures studied. The data obtained from adsorption isotherms at different temperatures were used to calculate thermodynamic parameters such as ΔG0, ΔH0, and ΔS0 of adsorption. A positive value of the standard enthalpy change suggests that the interaction of As(V) adsorbed by both plants is of endothermic nature. The negative adsorption standard free energy changes indicate that the adsorption reaction is a spontaneous process. The natural materials used in this work are suitable candidates as adsorbents in As(V) removal techniques, considering that these adsorbents are naturally abundant and relatively low-cost materials.

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the Francophone University Agency (AUF) for their financial support during this study. The support of the PNCDI II contracts NATOEPA 71020/2007 and Capacitati LACAFIA 134 is also acknowledged.

References

  1. Ahmad, A.M., Miro, M., Ocete, M.A., Jimenez, J., Navarro, M.C., 1990. Ecballium elatertrium (L.) A. Richard.-III. Assessment of its anti-inflammatory behaviour, Ethnopharmacologie: Sources, Méthodes, Objectifs, Paris-Metz, Ed. SFE–ORSTOM, pp. 389–392.
  2. , , , , . Arsenic removal from aqueous solutions by adsorption on red mud. Waste Manag.. 2000;20:761-767.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , . Arsenic adsorption from aqueous solutions by activated red mud. Waste Manag.. 2002;22:357-363.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , . Arsenic(V) removal from aqueous solutions using an anion exchanger derived from coconut coir pith and its recovery. Chemosphere. 2007;66:60-66.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , . Filtration technology verified to remove arsenic from drinking water. Membr. Technol.. 2006;3:8-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , , . Removal of Cd(II) and Pb(II) ions from aqueous solution by adsorption onto micro-particles of dry plants. Colloids Surf. B: Biointer.. 2008;61:10-16.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , . Adsorption studies on ground shells of hazelnut and almond. J. Hazard. Mater.. 2007;149:35-41.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , . Equilibrium and kinetics studies for adsorption of direct blue 71 from aqueous solution by wheat shells. J. Hazard. Mater.. 2007;144:300-306.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , . Equilibrium and kinetic data and process design for adsorption of Congo Red onto bentonite. J. Hazard. Mater.. 2008;154:613-622.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , , . Uptake of As(V) from aqueous solution by anionic clays type FeLDHs. Desalination. 2008;223:243-248.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , , . Cancer potential in liver, lung, bladder and kidney due to ingested inorganic arsenic in drinking water. Br. J. Cancer. 1992;66:888-892.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , . Study of arsenic(V) adsorption on bone char from aqueous solution. J. Hazard. Mater.. 2008;160:168-172.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , , , . Isotherms and kinetic study of dihydrogen and hydrogen phosphate ions ( H 2 PO 4 - and HPO 4 2 - ) onto crushed plant matter of the semi-arid zones of Morocco: Asphodelus microcarpus, Asparagus albus and Senecio anthophorbium. J. Phys. IV. 2005;123:393-399.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , , , , . Phytochemical study of some inert plants from the South-Western region of Morocco (Etude phytochimique de certaines plantes inertes du sud marocain) Rev. Biol. Biotech.. 2007;6:40-43.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , , . Single, binary and multi-component adsorption of some anions and heavy metals on environmentally friendly Carpobrotus edulis plant. Colloids Surf. B: Biointer.. 2011;82:267-276.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , , , . Characterization and application of dried plants to remove heavy metals, nitrate and phosphate ions from industrial wastewaters in a batch system. CLEAN – Soil, Air, Water. 2011;39 376-283
    [Google Scholar]
  17. , , , , , . Arsenic toxicity, health hazards and removal techniques from water: an overview. Desalination. 2007;217:139-166.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. , , , , . Arsenic adsorption from aqueous solution on synthetic zeolites. J. Hazard. Mater.. 2009;162:440-447.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. , , , , . Sorption on natural solids for arsenic removal. Chem. Eng. J.. 2001;81:187-195.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. , , , , . Arsenic removal by a waste metal (hydr)oxide entrapped into calcium alginate beads. J. Hazard. Mater.. 2009;164:533-541.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. , , . Adsorption Process for Water Treatment. USA: Butterworth; .
  22. , , , , , . Arsenic removal by iron-doped activated carbons prepared by ferric chloride forced hydrolysis. J. Hazard. Mater.. 2009;168:430-437.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. , . Adsorption in solution. Phys. Chem. Soc.. 1906;40:1361-1368.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. , , , . Adsorption of arsenic from water using activated neutralized red mud. Environ. Sci. Technol.. 2004;38:2428-2834.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. , , , , . Adsorptive removal of arsenic using orange juice residue. Sep. Sci. Technol.. 2002;37:2785-2799.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. , , , , , . Arsenic sorption onto natural hematite, magnetite, and goethite. J. Hazard. Mater.. 2007;141:575-580.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. , , , , , . Arsenate and chromate retention mechanisms on Goethite, Kinetic evaluation using a pressure–jump relaxation technique. Environ. Sci. Technol.. 1997;31:321-326.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. , , , , , , . Removal of copper(II) and lead(II) from aqueous solution by manganese oxide coated sand: II. Equilibrium study and competitive adsorption. J. Hazard. Mater.. 2006;137:480-488.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. , , , . Removal of lead ions from aqueous solution using sphagnum moss peat as adsorbent. Water SA. 1996;22:219-224.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. , . Arsenic contamination in Bangladesh: an overview. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.. 2006;113:1-16.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. , . Arsenic toxicity and potential mechanisms of action. Toxicol. Lett.. 2002;133:1-16.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. , , , , , . Adsorption characteristics of As(V) on iron-coated zeolite. J. Hazard. Mater.. 2009;163:804-808.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. , , , , , . Arsenic removal using mesoporous alumina prepared via a templating method. Environ. Sci. Technol.. 2004;38:924-931.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. , , , , . Novel model development for sorption of arsenate on chitosan. Chem. Eng. J.. 2009;151:122-133.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. , . The adsorption of gases on plane surfaces of glass, mica and platinum. J. Am. Chem. Soc.. 1918;40:1361-1403.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. , , , , , . Arsenic adsorption onto pillared clays and iron oxides. J. Colloid Interface Sci.. 2002;255:52-58.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. , , , , . Arsenite oxidation and arsenate determination by the molybdate blue method. Talanta. 2003;61:267-276.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. , , . Synthesis of an innovative calcium-alginate magnetic sorbent for removal of multiple contaminants. Appl. Surf. Sci.. 2007;253:5772-5775.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. , , , , . Biosorption of metal ions using chitosan, chitin and biomass of Rhizopus oryzae. Sep. Sci. Technol.. 2001;36:3207-3222.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. , , , , , . Evaluation of some natural zeolites and their relevant synthetic types as sorbents for removal of arsenic from drinking water. Iran. J. Public Health. 2004;33:36-44.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. , , , , . Toxicity of arsenic species to Lemna gibba L. and the influence of phosphate on arsenic bioavailability. Environ. Toxicol.. 2004;19:26-35.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. , , . Arsenic removal from water/wastewater using adsorbents – A critical review. J. Hazard. Mater.. 2007;142:1-53.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. , , , , , , , , , , . Sorption of arsenic, cadmium, and lead by chars produced from fast pyrolysis of wood and bark during bio-oil production. J. Colloid Interface Sci.. 2007;310:57-73.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. , , , . Laboratory, based approaches for arsenic remediation from contaminated water: recent developments. J. Hazard. Mater.. 2006;137:464-479.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. , , , , , . Arsenic removal by a membrane hybrid filtration system. Desalination. 2009;236:363-369.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. , , , , . Removal of As(V) and Cr(VI) from aqueous solutions using solid waste from leather industry. J. Hazard. Mater.. 2008;151:280-284.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. , , . Adsorption of Cu(II) ions on cotton boll. J. Hazard. Mater.. 2006;136:911-916.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. , , . Adsorption from Solution at the Solid/Liquid Interface. Orlando: Academic Press; .
  49. , , , . Health implications of arsenic in drinking water. J. Am. Water Work Assoc.. 1994;86:52-63.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. , , , . The removal of As(III) and As(V) from aqueous solutions by waste materials. Bioresour. Technol.. 2008;99:2815-2823.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. , , , , , . Arsenic uptake by aquatic macrophyte Spirodela polyrhiza L.: interactions with phosphate and iron. J. Hazard. Mater.. 2008;160:356-361.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. , , , . Biosorption of arsenic from aqueous solution using agricultural residue ‘rice polish' J. Hazard. Mater.. 2009;166:1050-1059.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. , , . Biosorption of As(III) and As(V) from aqueous solution by macrofungus (Inonotus hispidus) biomass: equilibrium and kinetic studies. J. Hazard. Mater.. 2009;164:1372-1378.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. , , , . Adsorption mechanism of cadmium on juniper bark and wood. Bioresour. Technol.. 2007;98:588-594.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. , , , , , . Hydrogeochemistry of arsenic and other inorganic constituents in groundwaters from La Pampa. Argentina. Appl. Geochem.. 2002;17:259-287.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. , , , , , . Treatment of ground water polluted by arsenic compounds by zero valent iron. J. Hazard. Mater.. 2006;129:297-303.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. , , . Kinetics of ammonia synthesis on promoted iron catalysts. Acta Physiochimica USSR. 1940;12:217-222.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. , , , , . As(V) adsorption on maghemite nanoparticles. J. Hazard. Mater.. 2009;166:1415-1420.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2001. National primary drinking water regulations, Arsenic and clarifications to compliance and new source contaminants monitoring, Final rule, In Federal Register Part VIII (40 CFR Parts 9, 141 and 142, January 2001), pp. 6976–7066.
  60. , , . Adsorption characteristics of heavy metal ions onto a low cost biopolymeric sorbent from aqueous solutions. J. Hazard. Mater.. 2006;136:272-280.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. , , . Pore and solid diffusion models for fixed bed adsorbers. Am. Instit. Chem. Eng. J.. 1974;20:228-232.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. WHO (World Health Organization), 2004. Guidelines for Drinking-Water Quality, Volume 1: Recommendations. Annex 4, third ed. Geneva.
  63. , , . Removal of Cr(VI) and As(V) from aqueous solutions by HDTMA-modified zeolite Y. J. Hazard. Mater.. 2009;162:1019-1024.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections