10.8
CiteScore
 
5.3
Impact Factor
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Corrigendum
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Full Length Article
Full lenth article
Letter to Editor
Original Article
Research article
Retraction notice
Review
Review Article
SPECIAL ISSUE: ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY
10.8
CiteScore
5.3
Impact Factor
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Corrigendum
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Full Length Article
Full lenth article
Letter to Editor
Original Article
Research article
Retraction notice
Review
Review Article
SPECIAL ISSUE: ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Review
9 (
2_suppl
); S1225-S1232
doi:
10.1016/j.arabjc.2012.01.011

Formation study of Bisphenol A resole by HPLC, GPC and curing kinetics by DSC

Chemistry Dept., Faculty of Science, University of Aleppo, Syria
Analytical Chemistry Dept., Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Aleppo, Syria
Applied Mechanic Dept., Faculty of Mechanic Engineer, University of Aleppo, Syria

⁎Corresponding author. Tel.: +963 944802640; fax: +963 212125060. sgharibe@hotmail.com (Samer Gharibe)

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Elsevier and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Peer review under responsibility of King Saud University.

Abstract

The formation study of Bisphenol A (BPA) resole resins catalyzed by sodium hydroxide has been studied by HPLC, GPC. Resoles have been synthesized under controlled conditions: 90 °C, F/BPA = 1.5 (R1), 2.0 (R2), and 2.5 (R3). The resole with the high molar ratio has shown lower BPA content remained in the final product. The changes in molecular weights of Bisphenol A (BPA)–formaldehyde reaction have been identified by GPC as a result of measurements, an increase in molecular weight has been observed with an increase of reaction time and molar ratio. Curing reaction kinetics of resins as a function of molar ratio have been studied by differential scanning calorimetric DSC technique. The activation energies increased with an increase in molar ratio and molecular weights.

Keywords

Bisphenol A
Resole
Curing
HPLC
GPC
DSC
1

1 Introduction

Thermosetting resins, such as phenolics and epoxies are generally used as adhesive and coating materials either alone or as a mixture with other polymers (Petrie, 2000). In order to utilize Bisphenol A (BPA) resins more efficiently in adhesives/coating systems and to develop new phenolic adhesives, it is important to realize the reaction of BPA with formaldehyde (Pilato, 2010; Gardziella et al., 2000). Resoles oligomers are prepared using an excess of formaldehyde over phenolic derivatives under basic conditions. In order to study the structures and kinetics of resoles, several analytical techniques have been utilized including: high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), gel permeation chromatography (GPC), carbon and proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (C13-NMR and H1-NMR), differential scanning calorimetric (DSC), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) (Gardziella et al., 2000).

It was realized that high pressure liquid size exclusion (SEC) or GPC are the best techniques to evaluate molecular weight distribution of the phenolic resins. The molecular weight distribution (MWD) has a major role to characterize the performance capabilities of the phenolic resins such as cure speed, viscosity, green strength development, substrates penetration and adhesion (Dillardd et al., 2000). Therefore, the growth of molecular weight with the time of reaction for BPA–formaldehyde resole syntheses has been monitored by using GPC with monodisperse polystyrene as calibration standards (Gardziella et al., 2000). The higher molecular oligomers go around the smaller pores in packing column and elute faster. As a result, they come out at lower retention time (volumes). On the other hand, the smaller molecular oligomers stay in the pores and elute slower; hence, they have a longer retention time (Gibson et al., 2002).

In addition, in order to analyze the cure process of these thermosetting resoles, differential scanning calorimeter (DSC) has been used. This procedure has measured the reaction activation energy and the rate constants as a function of temperature (Alonso et al., 2004; Ghaemy et al., 2010; Lei et al., 2006).

The aim of this paper is to explain the synthesis of BPA–formaldehyde resole resins, the molecular weight achievable and their curing kinetic parameters. In addition, the use of these resoles in adhesives or coating formulations and their mechanical tests will be published in the future papers.

2

2 Experimental

2.1

2.1 Materials

Formaldehyde (37% solution in water) was obtained from Surechem products Ltd., On the other hand, Bisphenol A (BPA) (99.9%), sodium hydroxide (99.9%), phosphoric acid (85%), hydroxylamine hydrochloride, hydrochloride acid, acetonitrile, and unstabilized tetrahydrofuran (THF) were obtained from Merck. Deionized water was prepared by our lab apparatus.

2.2

2.2 Synthesis of BPA formaldehyde resoles using sodium hydroxide as a catalyst

Resole-type BPA resins were prepared at varying formaldehyde–BPA molar ratios (F/BPA: 1.5, 2.0, and 2.5, R1, R2, and R3 respectively) in the presence of NaOH (0.017 mol per 1 mol of BPA), where the pH was kept at 8.2.

BPA formaldehyde solution and catalyst were placed in the glass reactor with magnetic stirrer, thermometer and reflux condenser. The mixture was stirred and heated to 90 °C (heating rate: 2.5–3.5 °C/min). Samples were taken during synthesis every 10 min. Zero time was defined when the condensation temperature reached (90 °C). The reaction stopped after two hours, cooled to 70 °C and then neutralized with a solution of phosphoric acid 41% until pH reached 6.0. The contents of the reactor were then subjected to a vacuum to stripe the water from the reaction mixture at 75–80 °C until a total extraction of water. The scheme of the reaction of BPA with formaldehyde is proposed in Fig. 1 as follow:

The reaction of Bisphenol A with formaldehyde.
Figure 1
The reaction of Bisphenol A with formaldehyde.

2.3

2.3 Determination of formaldehyde by hydroxylamine hydrochloride method (DIN EN ISO 9397)

The free formaldehyde was determined by an oximation reaction with hydroxylamine hydrochloride. The formed hydrochloride acid from this reaction has been determined by potentiometric titration using sodium hydroxide solution.

(1)
HCHO + HO - NH 2 · HCl H 2 N = NOH + H 2 O + HCl Samples (0.2–0.5 g) were taken from the reaction mixture and poured into a beaker. Then, they were dissolved by 50 ml of a mixture (three volumes of propan-2-ol, and one volume of water) using a magnetic stirrer. The solution was adjusted to pH 3.5 with 0.1 M HCl (for neutralized resins). Twenty-five milliliters of hydroxylamine hydrochloride solution (10% w/w in water) was stirred for 10 min. The sample was then back-titerd to pH 3.5 with 0.1 M NaOH (DIN EN ISO 9397, 1997).

2.4

2.4 High performance liquid chromatography

High performance liquid chromatography was used to quantitatively determine the free BPA during the addition and condensation reactions that remained in the mixture reaction. An analysis was conducted with Merck-Hitachi L-7100 chromatography equipped with an U.V. detector set at 280 nm. The analytical column was an EMR ODS (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 μm). The mobile phase A was acetonitrile and mobile phase B was water. The system was run in linear gradient. From zero to 20 min, phase A would change from 25% to 50%. While from 20 to 25 min phase A would change from 50% to 100%. The change would be held for 5.0 min, then after 30 min, it would decrease from 100% to 25% for 10 min. The change would be held again for another 5 min to stop completely at 45 min. The chromatographic analysis was performed at 25 °C with flow rate of 1.0 ml/min and injection volume of 20 μl (Quanwei et al., 2006).

The chromatograms are shown in Figs. 2 and 3.

Chromatogram of standard Bisphenol A.
Figure 2
Chromatogram of standard Bisphenol A.
Chromatogram of sample from the mixture of reaction for R3 at 120 min (B).
Figure 3
Chromatogram of sample from the mixture of reaction for R3 at 120 min (B).

2.5

2.5 Molecular weight and molecular distribution determined via GPC

The GPC instrument was purchased from shimadzu, Japan. It consists of LC-20AD pump and equipped with RID-10A refractive index detector. The conditions for the measurement of molecular weight of resin are given below.

Standards: Polymer Lab narrow polystyrenes standards (162D, 615D, 1270D, 3360D). Mobile phase: THF, flow rate: 1.0 ml/min. temperature: 25 ± 2 °C. Columns: polymer Lab PL gel 5 μm Mixed-C, PL gel 3 μm 100 Ǻ in series. Internal Standard: sulfur, the injection volume: 200 μl.

The molecular weight distribution and with it number – and weight average molecular weights can be calculated as follows (Chi-san, 1995):

Number – average molecular weight:

(2)
Mn = niMi ni = i = 1 N Ai i = 1 N Ai Mi = hi hi Mi Weight – average molecular weight:
(3)
Mw = niMi 2 niMi = i = 1 N Ai,Mi i = 1 N Ai = i = 1 N hi,Mi i = 1 N hi
Polydispersity
(4)
Dp = Mw Mn
where

  • ni: The number of molecules of molecular weight Mi,

  • Mi: Molecular weight,

  • Ai: Slice area at each interval of molecular weight Mi,

  • hi: Peak height at each interval of molecular weight Mi.

The resins were examined according to ASTM D 5296 (ASTM D5296, 2005).

2.6

2.6 DSC measurements

The calorimetric measurements of resins were performed on LINSEIS DSC PT10 Platinum series calorimetric; using copper pans with 120 μl can withstand vapor pressures up to 10 MPa at four different heating rates (7.5, 10.0, 12.5, and 15.0) between 50 and 280 °C. The resins were mounted in a vacuum dried oven at 40 °C for 48 h in order to remove the moisture,

2.6.1

2.6.1 Kinetic methods

Thermal analysis system was used to study the cure reactions of pure BPA/F resins. The total area under the exothermal curve, based on the extrapolated baseline, was used to determine the heat of cure. One of the most commonly used techniques for cure kinetic studies of thermoset materials is DSC (Brown and Gallagher, 2008; Cheng, 2002; Menczel and Prime, 2009).

The equation of the kinetic models for thermoset polymers that clarifies the conversion rate at constant heating rate can be expressed as follows (Lei et al., 2006):

(5)
d dt = k ( T ) f ( ) where

  • k(T) is the rate constant (that depends on the temperature T according to Arrhenius law) (s−1).

  • f(∝): is a function of ∝ only. It relates to the reactant concentration and it is assumed to be independent of temperature and dependent on kinetic approach applied.

The rate constant k (T) can be expressed by an Arrhenius equation as follows:

(6)
K = Ae E a RT where A is the pre-exponential factor (s−1), Ea is the activation energy (J mol−1), R is the gas constant (J mol−1K−1), and T is the absolute temperature (K).

For dynamic curing practice with constant heating rate, the temperature increases with the rise of cure time. The correlation between d dt and d dT can be expressed as:

(7)
d dt = dT dt d dT where dT dt is the heating rate (K/min) and is simplified by β.

The essential assumption to use in DSC for thermoset cure is that the measured heat flow dH dt is proportional to the rate of conversion or rate of cure ( s dt ) , as Eqs. (8) and (9):

(8)
= ( Δ H T ) t Δ H 0
(9)
d dt = 1 Δ H 0 dH dt
where ( Δ H t ) t is the heat of reaction at a curing time (t).

  • Δ H 0 is the total exothermic heat of the cure reaction.

  • dH dt is the heat flow (peak height under the exothermal curve at temperature (T).

Substituting Eq. (6) into (5) yields:

(10)
d dt = Ae - E a RT f ( ) One of the non-isothermal methods to characterize the curing kinetic (Ea, A, and k) is achieved from multiple heating rate method such as Ozawa's method. It is utilized by plotting log β (heating rate, K min−1) versus 1/T, where T is the peak maximum in Kelvin (Ozawa, 1970). Consequently, the curing activation energy can be calculated from the slope, as follows:
(11)
E a - 2.19 R dlog β d 1 / T
Another method is Kissinger method which is used by plotting - In β T 2 (heating rate, K min−1) versus 1/T, where T peak maximum in Kelvin (Kissinger, 1957). The curing activation energy can be calculated from the slope, as following equation:
(12)
- In β T 2 = E a RT - In kR E a
The Arrhenius pre-exponential factor (A) can be calculated as follows
(13)
A = β E ae E a / RT RT 2

3

3 Results and discussion

3.1

3.1 Determination the remaining formaldehyde

Fig. 4 exhibits the disappearance of free formaldehyde versus condensation time. The decrease in the concentration of formaldehyde in resoles R1 is close to that for resole R2 until 60 min of condensation times. Then R2 becomes higher at the end of the reaction. While concentration of formaldehyde in resole R3 is higher throughout the reaction time. It is found that the concentration of free formaldehyde increased with an increase in the ratio of formaldehyde to BPA.

Disappearance of formaldehyde by the titration method.
Figure 4
Disappearance of formaldehyde by the titration method.

3.2

3.2 Determination of the remaining Bisphenol A

Fig. 5 shows the disappearance of BPA for three prepolymers quantitatively followed by HPLC. It is observed that R3 is the fastest consumption of BPA followed by R1, and R2. This phenomenon means that an increase of the molar ratio F:BPA in the reaction mixture would reach faster to a steady value of BPA concentration. In addition, it is observed that a constant amount of BPA remains in the reaction mixture after 60 min for all resoles.

Decrease of Bisphenol A by HPLC.
Figure 5
Decrease of Bisphenol A by HPLC.

3.3

3.3 Molecular weight determination via GPC

The calibration graph is shown in Fig. 6. The GPC calibration details are given in Table 1. GPC chromatograms of R1, R2, and R3 are shown in Fig. 7. For all resins, it is found that the peaks are shifted toward lower elution times as the average molecular weights increased.

GPC calibration plot.
Figure 6
GPC calibration plot.
Table 1 GPC calibration table.
Mw Mn Mw/Mn Mw × Mn (Mw × Mn)1/2 Rt (min) Log (Mw)
Standard (1) 3360 3240 1.03 108,86,400 3299.45 14.31 3.51
Standard (2) 1270 1200 1.06 15,24,000 1234.50 15.43 3.09
Standard (3) 615 544 1.13 334,560 578.41 16.39 2.76
Standard (4) 162 162 1.00 26,244 162 18.11 2.21
GPC chromatograms of BPA resins R1, R2 and R3 as a function of time (30, 60, 90 and 120 min).
Figure 7
GPC chromatograms of BPA resins R1, R2 and R3 as a function of time (30, 60, 90 and 120 min).

By plotting average molecular weight versus time (t) for all series, a linear increase of Mw as function of time is taken a place as shown in Table 2 and Fig. 8. Furthermore, it is found that the Mw is increased with an increase in the molar ratio.

Table 2 Qualitative molecular weights and polydispersities of BPA resins.
Time (min) Mn Mw Dp
(R1)F:BPA = 1.5:1.0
30 434.46 478.52 1.10
60 447.16 507.66 1.14
90 487.77 600.60 1.23
120 524.24 674.27 1.29
(R2)F:BPA = 2.0:1.0
30 473.57 540.80 1.14
60 498.23 600.37 1.21
90 514.78 646.33 1.26
120 536.74 701.36 1.31
(R1)F:BPA = 2.5:1.0
30 501.24 581.87 1.16
60 535.41 669.71 1.25
90 573.67 797.82 1.39
120 612.08 905.75 1.48
The growing of Mw with time.
Figure 8
The growing of Mw with time.

3.4

3.4 Thermal analysis calculations

Fig. 9 shows DSC thermographs for BPA/F resoles at four different heating rates. All the curves show one sharp exothermic peak proportional to the heating rate. The exothermic peak shifted toward higher temperature as the heating rate is increased (see Fig. 10).

Dynamic DSC curves R1, R2, and R3.
Figure 9
Dynamic DSC curves R1, R2, and R3.
Plotting of In β T 2 versus 1/T for resins.
Figure 10
Plotting of In β T 2 versus 1/T for resins.

From Table 3, Arrhenius activation energies for BPA/F cure reaction were determined by using DSC according to ASTM E 698 (ASTM E 698, 2001), plotting - In β T 2 versus 1/T as shown in Fig. 9, and using Eq. (11) to calculate Ea. Fig. 11 shows changes of Ea versus increase in molar ratio.

Table 3 DSC data for curing BPA/F at different heating rates.
Resoles β (°C/min) Tp (°C) The equation Ea (kJ/mol)
R1 7.5 202.4 y = 6.012x−2.316 R2 = 0.994 49.99
10 213.2
12.5 220.2
15 225.9
R2 7.5 207 y = 6.953x−4.156 R2 = 0.999 57.81
10 215
12.5 222
15 228
R3 7.5 209.4 y = 7.424x−5.046 R2 = 0.999 61.72
10 217.1
12.5 223.9
15 229.3
Changes of Ea versus increase of molar ratio.
Figure 11
Changes of Ea versus increase of molar ratio.

4

4 Conclusion

Comparison of resoles (R1, R2, and R3) from HPLC data noted that R3 has the lowest concentration BPA remaining than the other resoles, where the reaction consumes most of the BPA. Gel permeation chromatography GPC is an useful tool to evaluate the BPA resins during the formation of resoles. The growing of molecular weights that result from the addition and condensation reactions has been evaluated. GPC data have also shown the molecular weights of the resins increase when the molar ratio F/BPA increases. Curing reaction was analyzed by DSC at different curing rates. The activation energy values of the cure reaction increased as a function of increasing molar ratio of F/BPA. This phenomenon is explained due to the need for higher energy to present an increase in the crosslink density when molar ratio is increased.

References

  1. , . Determination of curing kinetic parameters of lignin-phenol-formaldehyde resol resins by several dynamic differential scanning calorimetry methods. Thermochimica Acta. 2004;419:161-167.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. ASTM D5296-2005. Test Method for Molecular Weight Averages and Molecular Weight Distribution of Polystyrene by High Performance Size-Exclusion Chromatography.
  3. ASTM E 698-2001.Standard Test Method for Arrhenius Kinetic Constants for Thermally Unstable Materials.
  4. Brown, M. E., Gallagher, P. K., 2008. Handbook of thermal analysis and calorimetry, volume 5 recent advances, techniques and applications. Elsevier, The Netherlands.
  5. Cheng, S. Z. D., 2002. Handbook of thermal analysis and calorimetry volume 3 Applications to polymers and plastics. Elsevier Science B.V, The Netherlands.
  6. , . Handbook of size exclusion chromatography. New Jersey: Cherry Hill; .
  7. , , , . Adhesion science and engineering. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier; .
  8. DIN EN ISO 9397., 1997. Phenolic resinsDetermination of free formaldehyde content by hydroxylamine hydrochloride method.
  9. , , , . Phenolic resins: chemistry, applications, standardization, safety, and ecology. Germany: Springer; .
  10. , . Curing kinetics of DGEBA/UF resin system used as laminates in impregnated decorative paper. Iranian Polymer Journal. 2010;19(9):661-668.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , . Controlled molecular weight cresol- formaldehyde oligomers. Polymer. 2002;42:2017-2029.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , . Reaction kinetics in differential thermal analysis. Analytical Chemistry. 1957;29:1702-1706.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. , . Cure kinetic of aqueous phenol- formaldehyde resins used for oriented strandboard manufacturing: analytical technique. Journal of Applied Polymer Science. 2006;100:1642-1650.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. , , . Thermal analysis of polymers fundamentals and applications. Hoboken, New Jersey: A John Wiley & Sons, Inc; .
  15. , . Kinetic analysis of derivative curves in thermal analysis. Journal of Thermal Analysis. 1970;2:301-324.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. , . Handbook of adhesives and sealants. United States of America: The McGraw-Hill Companies; .
  17. , . Phenolic resins: a century of progress. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; .
  18. , . HPLC analysis of BPA and 4-nonylphenol in serum, liver and testis tissues after oral administration to rats and its application to toxic kinetic study. Journal of Chromatography B. 2006;830:322-329.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections