5.2
Impact Factor
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Corrigendum
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Full Length Article
Full lenth article
Letter to Editor
Original Article
Research article
Retraction notice
Review
Review Article
SPECIAL ISSUE: ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY
5.3
Impact Factor
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Corrigendum
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Full Length Article
Full lenth article
Letter to Editor
Original Article
Research article
Retraction notice
Review
Review Article
SPECIAL ISSUE: ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Review Article
:19;
5182025
doi:
10.25259/AJC_518_2025

Hot corrosion, wear, and oxidation performance of high-velocity oxy-fuel and plasma spray coatings in various environments: A comprehensive review

Key Laboratory of Green Fabrication and Surface Technology of Advanced Metal Materials, Ministry of Education, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Anhui University of Technology, Ma’anshan, PR China
Yangtze Delta Region Institute (Huzhou), University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Huzhou, China
School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Quanzhou University of Information Engineering, Quanzhou, China
Authors contributed equally to this work and share co-first authorship.

*Corresponding authors: E-mail addresses: shzhang@ahut.edu.cn (S. Zhang); liuxialsh2012@126.com (X. Liu).

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Abstract

The present review critically evaluates recent progress in High-Velocity Oxy-Fuel (HVOF) and Plasma Spray (PS) coatings developed to enhance the resistance of metallic components against wear, oxidation, and hot corrosion in challenging, harsh environments. These coatings have gained widespread importance in aerospace, power generation, and industrial applications where prolonged exposure to high temperatures and aggressive atmospheres leads to severe material degradation. Among thermal spray techniques, HVOF and PS have emerged as the most versatile due to their ability to produce dense, adherent coatings with tailored microstructures for high-temperature applications. The review consolidates and compares literature on various cermet and metallic coatings, emphasizing the relationships between microstructure, processing parameters, and performance. A detailed quantitative comparison of coating properties such as porosity, bond strength, hardness, and oxidation resistance is provided to clarify why certain coatings and methods outperform others. Furthermore, the review identifies emerging trends, critical research gaps, and future directions, offering insight into the design of next-generation protective coatings for high-temperature applications. Unlike previous reviews that primarily summarized individual studies, this work integrates quantitative comparisons and critical evaluation to provide a coherent understanding of the performance and limitations of HVOF and PS coatings.

Keywords

High-temperature applications
Metallic coatings
Tribological properties
Thermal spray coatings

1. Introduction

Numerous surface engineering techniques have found widespread application in modifying surface properties of engineering components, aiming to enhance their functionality and serviceability over time. The degradation of engineering materials, often initiated by corrosion, fatigue, cracks, and defects, predominantly occurs at their surface due to exposure to harsh thermal and aggressive environments. Among the numerous challenges, wear, corrosion, and oxidation are the most dominant factors that significantly limit component lifetime and serviceability [14]. Oxidation is a common high-temperature corrosion process that occurs when metals and alloys are exposed to oxidizing environments. Applications such as heat exchangers, boilers, internal engine parts, and gas turbines demonstrate environments categorized by high temperatures and harsh conditions [5,6]. Residual fuels containing impurities such as sulfur, sodium, and vanadium produce ash during combustion, which deposits on material surfaces at high temperatures, leading to a phenomenon known as hot corrosion. Inadequate control of hot corrosion has led to numerous incidents, resulting in equipment failures, infrastructure degradation, and engine damage [7,8]. The aggressive nature of the corrosive environment, combined with the high mobility of metal ions, accelerates diffusion, degrades protective layers, and presents significant challenges in protecting metallic components under high-temperature conditions. Among various coating strategies, cermet and metallic coatings are particularly effective because they form dense, adherent oxide layers that protect the substrate from aggressive species during service. Such coatings are critical for high-temperature components exposed to corrosive or oxidative atmospheres, where maintaining structural integrity and surface stability is vital for long-term performance. Various thick anti-corrosion coatings, including painting, cladding, and shielding, have been employed to protect corrosion-prone components. However, the durability of these techniques without maintenance remains uncertain [5,9].

In modern industrial applications, thermal spray techniques have gained significant importance across a wide range of surface treatment processes. This growing adoption is attributed to the desirable properties and versatility of these techniques. These include superior microstructural quality, minimal porosity and oxide content, exceptional resistance to wear and corrosion, and strong adhesion to the substrate. Recent research [10,11] has highlighted the efficiency of cermet/metallic coatings in enhancing various properties of substrate materials, such as wear, corrosion, and high-temperature oxidation, thereby extending the service life of components. Thermal spray coating (TSC) techniques are widely used for industrial applications in the fields of aviation, medical, energy, marine, etc., to enhance resistance to high-temperature corrosion, oxidation, and wear [12-15]. Furthermore, TSC techniques exhibit versatility by accommodating a wide range of materials extending from metals and ceramics to polymers, which can be applied onto various substrate types. The process involves heating the coating materials and their compositions to temperatures either above or near their melting points, facilitated by diverse heat sources. Central to the TSCs system is the deposition of accelerated powder particles onto the substrate while in a molten or semi-solid state. The result is a coating characterized by high density and lamellar structure, giving it exceptional hardness. The deposited particles assume the form of splotched microstructures that solidify and interlock to form a coating of a thickness varying from 50 nm to a few millimeters. The quality and efficiency of thermal spray-coating depend on specific parameters and process variables. Factors such as the choice of material, particle size and morphology, type of heat source, and deposition method are crucial to achieve the desired coating properties. In comparison to traditional surface treatment technologies, TSCs are typically rough and porous and are more dependable for mechanical properties as well as corrosion, wear, and other protective applications. Numerous TSCs are being investigated by researchers in response to the requirements of high-temperature industrial applications. High-velocity oxy-fuel (HVOF), high-pressure cold spray, detonation gun, plasma spray (PS), arc spray, atmospheric spray, flame spray, and high-velocity air fuel-spray coatings are some of these sophisticated methods that offer distinct advantages for reinforcing materials in high-temperature settings [16-18]. With a long and beneficial history, thermal spray techniques have proven to be highly beneficial not only in the steel industry but also in other alloy-making sectors. Figure 1 shows the wide range of thermal spray applications by classifying TSC processes according to temperatures, primary energy sources, and particle velocities [19-21].

Thermal spray processes can be simplified and classified based on their source of heat generation, particle velocities, and temperatures. (APS : atmospheric plasma spray, LPPS : low pressure plasma spray, HVOF : high velocity oxygen fuel, HPCS : high pressure cold spray, WA : wire arc, LPCS : low pressure cold spray, VPS : vacuum plasma spray, HVAF : high velocity air fuel, D-gun : detonation gun, SoD: stand-off distance). Permission from Taylor & Francis. Copyright © 2014.
Figure 1.
Thermal spray processes can be simplified and classified based on their source of heat generation, particle velocities, and temperatures. (APS : atmospheric plasma spray, LPPS : low pressure plasma spray, HVOF : high velocity oxygen fuel, HPCS : high pressure cold spray, WA : wire arc, LPCS : low pressure cold spray, VPS : vacuum plasma spray, HVAF : high velocity air fuel, D-gun : detonation gun, SoD: stand-off distance). Permission from Taylor & Francis. Copyright © 2014.

Although both PS and HVOF are widely used thermal spray techniques, they differ significantly in process parameters and coating characteristics. HVOF generally accelerates particles to very high velocities, on the order of 500–1,000 m s-1, with flame temperatures around 2,500–3,000 K. These conditions usually yield dense coatings with porosity levels below 1–2% and bond strengths more than 70 MPa and reduced oxide inclusions. PS, in contrast, employs much higher jet temperatures, approximately 10,000–15,000 K, but lower particle velocities, typically between 100 and 600 m s-1. As a result, plasma-sprayed coatings often exhibit slightly higher porosity (2–10%) and moderate bond strengths in the range of 40–70 MPa [22,23]. These differences in thermal energy input, particle velocity, and coating microstructure largely govern the distinct performance advantages of HVOF over PS in high-temperature wear, oxidation, and hot corrosion resistance. The other important quantitative comparison table for different coating systems using HVOF and PS coatings techniques, as shown in Table 1.

Table 1. Quantitative comparison of coating systems.
Coatings system Method Porosity (%) Hardness (HV) Bond strength (MPa) Wear rate (mm3 N-1 m-1) Oxidation/Corrosion
NiCrAlY PS 8–12 450–550 30–40 4.5 × 10⁻⁵ Moderate oxidation, porous
Al₂O₃–YSZ PS 10–15 600–800 25–35 5.2 × 10⁻⁵ Good thermal barrier, porous
Ni–20Cr HVOF 2–4 700–900 65–75 2.5 × 10⁻⁵ Stable oxide scale, good corrosion resistance
WC–Co HVOF <1–2 1000–1200 80–100 1.2 × 10⁻⁵ Excellent oxidation/wear
Cr₃C₂–NiCr HVOF 1–3 900–1100 70–90 1.5 × 10⁻⁵ High hot corrosion

Furthermore, TSCs have a significant impact on substrate materials, improving properties and intended surface functionalities. Numerous benefits are provided by TSCs, such as increased wear resistance, resistance to hot corrosion, longer component lifespan, performance improvements, and better mechanical and electrical properties. Surprisingly, these coatings are much less expensive when weighed against their longer lifespan and enhanced functionality, e.g enhanced mechanical and electrical properties of the parts, which lowers maintenance costs. TSCs are widely used in many industries for a variety of purposes. In addition to sealing against various types of wear, these applications include chemical resistance, protection against hot corrosion, repair and restoration, thermal insulation, decorative applications, and abradable coatings. TSCs are also used to improve mechanical properties, wear performance, corrosion resistance, and oxidation resistance to withstand high temperatures in a variety of industrial applications [24-28]. The schematic below illustrates the various properties and applications of TSCs in Figure 2.

Properties and industrial applications of TSCs. Created by author.
Figure 2.
Properties and industrial applications of TSCs. Created by author.

Although several reviews exist on TSCs [29,30], they often address either a wide range of deposition techniques or focus on individual degradation mechanisms such as wear, corrosion, or oxidation in isolation. To date, there has been no consolidated effort to specifically compare HVOF and PS coatings in terms of their microstructural evolution, property performance correlations, and long-term behavior in combined harsh environments (hot corrosion, wear, and high-temperature oxidation). The novelty of this review lies in bridging this gap by: (i) consolidating recent advances in HVOF and PS coatings with an emphasis on microstructure–property–performance relationships, (ii) highlighting where previous studies report consistent results and where disagreements remain, and (iii) outlining emerging trends and future research opportunities in hybrid feedstocks, nanostructured coatings, and cyclic degradation testing. By addressing this gap, the review aims to provide a focused perspective that complements and extends previous broader surveys of thermal spray technology.

It is crucial to provide a comprehensive summary of recent studies on thermal spray technology, with an emphasis on enhancing the durability of metallic substrates in challenging environments, given the increasing interest and advancements in the field. As a result, this article aims to provide the latest developments and breakthroughs in this field. It focuses on PS and HVOF coatings in particular, with a focus on their use in high-temperature settings. Furthermore, the review delves deeply into many coatings designed to improve resistance to oxidation, wear, and hot corrosion. Special attention is paid to the importance and current prominence of cermet/metallic coatings applied using HVOF and PS techniques, which have become important players in preventing wear, oxidation, and corrosion that occur in high-temperature environments and extending component life. It is also important to note that oxide ceramics such as yttria-stabilized zirconia (YSZ) and alumina, as well as nanostructured thermal barrier coatings, are widely used for high-temperature applications. Their major role, however, is thermal insulation and phase stability under extreme heat, rather than the combined protection against wear, oxidation, and hot corrosion that is the central focus of this review. Several comprehensive reviews and research articles already address these oxide-ceramic and thermal barrier coating (TBC) systems. To maintain a clear scope, the present work therefore emphasizes cermet-based coatings, where microstructure property performance correlations under corrosive and tribological conditions are most directly relevant to the objectives of this study. Table 1 summarizes the key quantitative findings from the literature, providing a comparison of various coating systems deposited by HVOF and PS techniques [31,32].

The process characteristics of PS and HVOF techniques largely determine their typical failure modes during service. Plasma-sprayed coatings, due to the high jet temperature and relatively low particle velocity, experience longer particle residence times in air. This condition promotes oxidation of molten particles, formation of oxide inclusions along splat boundaries, and the presence of partially or unmelted particles within the coating. These features produce weak inter-splat interfaces that allow initiation of cracks, oxidation, and the penetration of corrosive species, leading to delamination and spallation under thermal cycling oxidation. In contrast, HVOF coatings are produced at lower flame temperatures but with much higher particle velocities, which results in dense coatings with low porosity, minimal oxide content, and strong adhesion to the substrate after coating. Therefore, HVOF coatings exhibit superior resistance to wear, corrosion, and oxidation. However, when the coating thickness is above the optimal range or a thermal mismatch exists between the coating and the substrate, residual stresses may accumulate, causing microcracking or local spallation during long-term exposure. The dominant failure mechanisms in plasma-sprayed coatings are oxidation-assisted delamination and splat separation, whereas HVOF coatings typically experience stress-induced microcracking under prolonged or cyclic high-temperature conditions.

2. High-velocity oxy-fuel spray technique

The HVOF process produces dense coatings, resulting in high particle impact velocities, which improve mechanical integrity compared to other thermal spray techniques [7,33,34]. HVOF coatings are widely appreciated for their high density, low porosity, and excellent mechanical/chemical resistance; they also present certain challenges. For instance, the high particle velocities and rapid solidification can cause residual stresses that may compromise coating adhesion under cyclic thermal loads. Coating thickness is often limited to typically < 500 µm because excessive thickness can result in delamination or cracking. In addition, substrate heating during spraying can affect substrate microstructure and induce thermal stresses, particularly in temperature-sensitive alloys. These limitations, along with the high operational costs of the process, must be considered in industrial applications. James received the first patent for the HVOF process in 1983, and its roots can be traced back to the early 19th century. This process combines a variety of fuels, including hydrogen, propylene, kerosene, propane, and others, with a mixture of oxygen. These fuel gases burn in a combustion chamber before the partially melted powder is injected into an injector through an axially oriented nozzle. The powder particles are propelled and accelerated by this injection, which eventually causes them to deposit onto the substrate’s surface [4,35,36]. The schematic of the HVOF process and oxidation mechanism has been shown in Figure 3.

Schematic diagram of the HVOF process, and (a-c) shows oxidation and wear mechanism, respectively. Permission from Elsevier. Copyright © 2022.
Figure 3.
Schematic diagram of the HVOF process, and (a-c) shows oxidation and wear mechanism, respectively. Permission from Elsevier. Copyright © 2022.

The HVOF coating method is a popular option for industrial applications because of its many benefits. metals, ceramics, and composite powders are just a few of the materials that HVOF can be used on, demonstrating the process’s material selection versatility. Because of their high hardness and toughness, HVOF coatings are well known for being extremely resistant to wear, corrosion, and erosion. Additionally, these coatings exhibit low surface roughness, high uniformity, and an excellent surface finish. Applications that require low friction and precise dimensions, particularly in aerospace applications, benefit greatly from this feature. HVOF coatings are widely used in many different industries where excellent corrosion resistance, wear resistance, and thermal barrier properties are crucial. Common uses for HVOF coatings include: (i) HVOF coatings are extensively used in aerospace applications, including chambers, turbine engine parts, blades, the wind energy sector, and aerospace bearings. In harsh and hot conditions, they offer superior defense against wear, corrosion, and thermal difficulties [37,38]. (ii) The oil and gas industry uses HVOF coatings for many purposes, such as tools, compressor parts, pumps, and valves. These coatings shield parts from deterioration, corrosion, and wear, particularly under demanding operating environments. (iii) HVOF coatings are used in the automotive and power generation sectors to improve the lifespans and performance of different components subjected to harsh conditions. Gas turbine blades, boiler tubes, steam boiler parts, valves, cylinder liners, and piston rings are among the applications [39,40]. (iv) HVOF coatings are used on components in the chemical processing industry to guard against erosion, wear, and corrosion brought on by harsh chemicals and high-velocity fluids. The schematic shown in Figure 3 illustrates the oxidation and wear mechanisms in coated systems. In Figure 3(a), oxygen diffuses inward while metal ions diffuse outward through the coating, leading to the formation of oxide scale. In Figure 3(b), the presence of cracks and cavities facilitates faster diffusion of oxygen and metal ions, accelerating oxidation and degradation of the coatings. In Figure 3(c), under frictional loading, abrasive particles and oxide debris contribute to the formation of a glaze layer and adhesive junctions. These combined effects result in wear, delamination, and progressive material degradation in coated systems.

3. Literature review on HVOF coatings, microstructure, and properties

The focus of this review will be on the microstructure and properties of various coating types made using the HVOF process. Here is a detailed study of the microstructure and related characteristics of coatings made with the HVOF spray technique, including resistance to oxidation, corrosion, wear resistance, and mechanical properties.

3.1. Microstructure of HVOF spray coatings and the prepared composite powder

The microstructure of coatings made by HVOF spraying has been thoroughly investigated by many researchers. Understanding the effects of microstructural features on these coatings’ mechanical and tribological properties has been the main goal of these studies. Notably, when it comes to HVOF spray coatings, the feedstock material’s initial microstructure is crucial. This is because it has a significant impact on enhancing multiple coating properties, which are essential for their efficient operation in demanding conditions. The microstructural characteristics of these coatings play a crucial role in enhancing their properties, especially in high-temperature applications. Gurmail et.al. [41] examined the microstructure of composite powders made of NiCrAlY (nickel-chromium-aluminum-yttrium) alloy with a 20% weight fraction of silicon carbide (SiC) and NiCrAlY alloy with a 20% weight fraction of boron carbide (B4C), as illustrated in Figure 4. To prepare these composite powders, ball milling was used. The findings of the scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis showed that the metallic and carbide powders were mixed uniformly, with the particle sizes measured at about 38 µm (Figure 4a-b). The rectangular regions in Figure 4(a,b) show the surfaceenergy-dispersive X-Ray spectroscopy (EDS) analysis, confirming the presence of all powder elements, including Ni, C, Al, Cr, B, and Si.

(a-d) SEM , (e-f) energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS)/and (g-i) EDS mapping analysis, (h-j) EDS line scan results of NiCrAlY–20wt%SiC and NiCrAlY–20wt%B₄C composite powders coatings on T22 steel deposited by the HVOF process. Permission from Elsevier. Copyright © 2021.
Figure 4.
(a-d) SEM , (e-f) energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS)/and (g-i) EDS mapping analysis, (h-j) EDS line scan results of NiCrAlY–20wt%SiC and NiCrAlY–20wt%B₄C composite powders coatings on T22 steel deposited by the HVOF process. Permission from Elsevier. Copyright © 2021.

In Figure 4(c,d), the field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) images reveal the microstructure of coatings applied onto a steel substrate. Notably, an irregular microstructure is evident in both cases. Within the microstructure, there is a combination of molten, partially molten, and unmelted particles forming the matrix. Upon deposition, these particles interlock and uniformly distribute across the matrix. Additionally, the green circles highlight nodular and spherical morphologies on T22 steel, as indicated by the yellow arrows in Figure 4(c,d). The rectangular regions show EDS analysis confirming the presence of Ni, Cr, Al, Si, and Y. Particularly, the identification of oxygen confirmed the formation of oxides during the thermal spray HVOF process. The cross-sectional microstructure of deposited coatings exhibits characteristic splat-like layered patterns, as depicted in Figure 4(e, f). In the case of NiCrAlY-SiC coatings, a compact and crack-free structure is observed, with the splats densely packed, resulting in an approximate thickness of 108 µm. Similarly, for NiCrAlY-B4C coatings, a well-packed layered structure is evident, with a thickness of approximately 100 µm. The EDS mapping and line scan illustrated in Figure 4(g, h) for the NiCrAlY-SiC coatings clearly verify the Ni and Cr phases. Si-rich particles are locally agglomerated, particularly near the coating/substrate interface, while Al is present in low concentration and clustered at limited interfacial regions. The uniform distribution of O and C suggests the formation of oxides and carbides throughout the coating. This EDS pattern is consistent with the line scan results presented. Similarly, the outcomes for the NiCrAlY-B4C coatings are depicted in Figure 4(i,j). The EDS line scan confirmed a Ni–Cr rich coating with minor amounts of Al, Si, C, and O as shown in Figure 4(h). The results, as shown in Figure 4, lead to the conclusion that the two new composite powders were effectively synthesized with a unique microstructure. These powders were subsequently employed as coatings on steel substrates, demonstrating their suitability for applications involving high-temperature corrosion, which is discussed in the subsequent section. Zakeri and his colleagues [42] reported a study wherein they employed a ball milling process to modify MCrAlY powder. They investigated both the microstructure and the high-temperature oxidation behavior of the NiCoCrAlY when subjected to the HVOF process.

In Figure 5(a), the initial NiCoCrAlY powder, as received for the study, displayed spherical particles with a smooth surface. However, after undergoing milling, as depicted in Figure 5(b), the powder exhibited a semi-spherical morphology, forming agglomerated particles with a rough surface morphology. A closer examination of the agglomerated powder in Figure 5(c) revealed that it consisted of nano-sized particles. The red rectangles in Figure 5(a–c) show high-magnification images of conventional and milled NiCoCrAlY nanostructured powder. The X-ray diffraction (XRD) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) findings further confirmed a substantial reduction in crystal size following the milling process, as illustrated in Figure 5(d) and Figure 5(e), respectively. The particle size measurement indicated that the powder particles fell within the range of 10-30 µm. Tang et al. also reported [43] similar findings, showing that a TEM analysis of the CoNiCrAlY powder revealed an average grain size of 15 nm. The milled nanostructure powder of NiCoCrAlY had an average particle diameter of 33 µm, while the conventional powder had an average size of 37 µm. Powders with spherical shapes and particle sizes between 10 and 45 µm are recommended for HVOF spray coatings [44,45]. Figure 5(f) presents the cumulative particle size distribution curves, with the inset showing SEM images of the powders at different milling times. The surface morphology of the nanostructure coating and the traditional spray coating has been shown in Figure 5(g,h, and i,j). The red inset rectangle shows the high-magnification image of splashed particles in Figure 5(g, i). Furthermore, Figure 5(a′, b′) present the EDS results, confirming the composition of the powder from the region highlighted by the red rectangle in Figure 5(h). When compared to their nanostructured counterparts, conventional coatings show a comparatively higher presence of spherical unmelted particles, according to an analysis of the surface morphology. Results from EDS further examined this observation and verified the elemental mapping of these unmelted particles. Figure 5(k,l) and (m,n) shows the cross-sectional SEM/EDS analysis of the conventional and nanostructured coatings made using the HVOF process. The yellow dotted lines in Figure 5(l) highlight partially melted particles in the coating formed after using the conventional NiCrCoAlY powder. Some of the yellow arrows in Figure 5(n) indicate β precipitates and microcracks in the coating. Figures 5(a1′, b1′) show the EDS results, confirming the composition of the conventional and nano-structured NiCoCrAlY coating powders, respectively. Both types of coatings exhibit a laminated splat morphology, which is a characteristic feature of thermal spray coatings. These kinds of microstructures and particles are especially useful for improving the characteristics of substrate materials, particularly in terms of increasing resistance to oxidation, corrosion, and wear caused by high temperatures.

(a-c) SEM results of conventional and as-milled nanostructure NiCoCrAlY powder, respectively. (d) XRD results, (e) TEM, and (f) Particle size distribution curves. (g, h), (i,j) and (k, l), (m, n) surface microstructure and cross-sectional morphologies of the conventional and as-milled nanostructure NiCoCrAlY coatings by HVOF process, respectively. (a’, b’) and (a1’, b1’) the EDS elemental spectrum from (h),and (n) respectively.Permission from Elsevier. Copyright © 2020.
Figure 5.
(a-c) SEM results of conventional and as-milled nanostructure NiCoCrAlY powder, respectively. (d) XRD results, (e) TEM, and (f) Particle size distribution curves. (g, h), (i,j) and (k, l), (m, n) surface microstructure and cross-sectional morphologies of the conventional and as-milled nanostructure NiCoCrAlY coatings by HVOF process, respectively. (a’, b’) and (a1’, b1’) the EDS elemental spectrum from (h),and (n) respectively.Permission from Elsevier. Copyright © 2020.

Figure 6 included a selection of materials, namely NiCrWMoCuCBFe, NiCrAY, and Cr3C2-NiCr, both in their initial received state and as milling powders [46]. These materials are employed in HVOF spray coatings, serving to produce a diverse range of coatings on metal substrates with the goal of improving their resistance to high-temperature oxidation, corrosion, and wear.

(a–c) SEM, particle size distribution, and inverse pole figure of as-received NiCrWMoCuCBFe powder; (d) XRD patterns of powder and coating; (e–f) SEM surface and cross-section of HVOF-sprayed coating; (g-i) surface and cross-sectional morphology of Cr₃C₂–NiCr coating; (j-m) SEM images of NiCrAlY powders (as-received and milled for 5, 10, and 15 h); (n, o) cross-sections of as-received and 15 h-milled NiCrAlY coatings. Permission from Elsevier. Copyright © 2022.
Figure 6.
(a–c) SEM, particle size distribution, and inverse pole figure of as-received NiCrWMoCuCBFe powder; (d) XRD patterns of powder and coating; (e–f) SEM surface and cross-section of HVOF-sprayed coating; (g-i) surface and cross-sectional morphology of Cr₃C₂–NiCr coating; (j-m) SEM images of NiCrAlY powders (as-received and milled for 5, 10, and 15 h); (n, o) cross-sections of as-received and 15 h-milled NiCrAlY coatings. Permission from Elsevier. Copyright © 2022.

The SEM analysis reveals that the NiCrWMoCuCBFe particles exhibit a predominantly spherical shape, with some of the smaller particles adhering to one another, resulting in the formation of larger particles as shown in Figure 6(a). The size distribution plot (Figure 6(b)), indicates that most of these particles fall within the 20-50 µm range. It has been previously reported that particles ranging from 10-30 µm are appropriate for use in HVOF spray coating technology. This is attributed to the substantial influence of particle size on their melting characteristics during the HVOF process. Figure 6(c) shows the orientation distribution map by inverse pole figure of cross-sectional surface of NiCrWMoCuBFe powder. After applying the NiCrWMoCuCBFe coatings onto the substrate, it was observed that there were some partially melted particles embedded within the coatings (as depicted in Figure 6e). These particles have the potential to enhance the bond strength between the HVOF spray coating and the substrate. However, it’s important to note that cracks and oxide formations tend to develop around these particles simultaneously. A cross-sectional analysis of the coatings revealed that the inner part of the coatings exhibits relatively low levels of porosity. The measured thickness of the coating is approximately 380 µm, as illustrated in Figure 6(f). The XRD results confirm that the grain size was significantly refined following the spray coating process, as depicted in Figure 6(d). Dervis Ozkan reported [47,48] the structural analysis, wear, corrosion, and oxidation performance assessment of hard metal Cr3C2-NiCr coating by the HVOF process. The SEM results revealed that the initial particles of the Cr3C2-NiCr powder possessed a spherical shape, making them well-suited for HVOF spray coatings (see Figure 6g). Points 1, 2, and 3 indicate the EDS point analyses shown in the inset of Figure 6(g), confirming the presence of Ni, C, and Cr. Further examination of the SEM cross-sectional microstructure demonstrated that the HVOF-sprayed Cr3C2-NiCr coating exhibited characteristics such as high density, low porosity, and a low oxide content as shown in Figure 6(h). A magnified image, as depicted in Figure 6(i), shows a low porosity observed in the Cr3C2-NiCr coating. Gurmail and Farzin et al. [41,49] conducted a study on the morphological characteristics of NiCrAlY powder both in its as-received state and after undergoing various milling durations ranging from 5 h to 15 h, as depicted in Figure 6(j-m). Additionally, they presented cross-sectional analyses of spray coatings using conventional NiCrAlY powder and the milled powder, as illustrated in Figures 6(n) and (o), respectively. The results show that the powder has a desirable disk-shaped morphology and a notably high surface-to-volume ratio after 15 h of milling. Comparing this specific morphology to traditional spherical NiCrAlY powder, it is advantageous for use in HVOF jet processes.

Wang et al. [50] conducted a study on the HVOF process for applying Tungsten carbide (WC) coatings to the surface of 316L stainless steel, mainly for marine applications. The morphology of the as-received powder is depicted in Figure 7. The spherical particles, which range in size from 15 to 45 µm, are especially suitable for HVOF spray coatings as shown in Figure 7(a,c,e). The magnified images of these powder microstructure are as shown in Figure 7(b,d,f). It’s significant to note that this spherical shape helps the particles distribute heat more evenly, which eventually results in coatings on the substrate that have less oxygen [5153].

(a,d), (c,d) and (e,f) SEM surface morphologies of as-received powder WC-10Co4Cr, WC-10Co, and WC-17Co, respectively. (g,h) Cross-sectional morphologies of WC-10Co4Cr, (i,j) WC-10Co, and (k,l) WC-17Co of the coatings. (m-o) show the XRD results of the as-received powder and coatings. Permission from Elsevier. Copyright © 2023.
Figure 7.
(a,d), (c,d) and (e,f) SEM surface morphologies of as-received powder WC-10Co4Cr, WC-10Co, and WC-17Co, respectively. (g,h) Cross-sectional morphologies of WC-10Co4Cr, (i,j) WC-10Co, and (k,l) WC-17Co of the coatings. (m-o) show the XRD results of the as-received powder and coatings. Permission from Elsevier. Copyright © 2023.

Figure 7(g,i,k) presents the cross-sectional morphologies of three distinct coatings: WC-10Co4Cr (referred to as WCC), WC-10Co (referred to as WC1), and WC-17Co (referred to as WC2). In these magnified images, it is evident that all three types of coatings exhibit a uniform distribution of WC phases with minimal cracks and pores as shown in Figure 7(h,j,l). The porosity levels in these coatings are as follows: WCC has a porosity level of 0.72% ± 0.16%, WC1 has a porosity level of 0.97% ± 0.22%, and WC2 has the lowest porosity level at 0.41% ± 0.09%. Understanding the porosity level is crucial when considering the resistance of the coatings to cavitation erosion and corrosion [54]. This is because cracks frequently start and spread from these initial flaws, which eventually affects how well the coatings perform overall in terms of withstanding this kind of damage. The XRD results for the coatings and powder are shown in Figure 7(m,n,o). These results verify that WC and Co phases make up most of the powder, whereas WC, W2C, and Co3W3C phases are present in the coatings. A minor decarburization of WC during the HVOF process leads to the formation of W2C [32,55]. Tabatabaei et al. [56] did a study where they used the V-shape method to produce a composite material made of NiCrBSi/WC-CoCr and then applied HVOF spray coating. Assessment of these coatings’ tribological characteristics and hardness at 500°C was the main goal of their study. NiCrBSi powder and WC-CoCr powder are the two initial feedstock powders shown in Figure 8(a,b). The researchers used the V-shape mixing process as shown in (Figure 8(c)) obtain the composite powder NiCrBSi/WC-CoCr (Figure 8(d).

SEM images of: (a) NiCrBSi powder, (b) WC–CoCr powder (c) V-shape mixing and (d) NiCrBSi + WC-CoCr powder. (e), (f), (g), and (h) SEM images of the coatings with 0, 15, 30, and 45 wt% of WC–CoCr, respectively, with magnified images in the inset. (i) and (j) backscattered SEM images with 0 and 30 wt% of WC–CoCr powder and corresponding EDS mapping and point analysis, (k) shows SEM results of 80Ni-20Cr coating powder, and (l) the cross-section SEM results of as-sprayed coating, (m1, m2, m3) are corresponding mapping analysis of Fe, Cr, and Ni respectively.Permission from Elsevier. Copyright © 2023.
Figure 8.
SEM images of: (a) NiCrBSi powder, (b) WC–CoCr powder (c) V-shape mixing and (d) NiCrBSi + WC-CoCr powder. (e), (f), (g), and (h) SEM images of the coatings with 0, 15, 30, and 45 wt% of WC–CoCr, respectively, with magnified images in the inset. (i) and (j) backscattered SEM images with 0 and 30 wt% of WC–CoCr powder and corresponding EDS mapping and point analysis, (k) shows SEM results of 80Ni-20Cr coating powder, and (l) the cross-section SEM results of as-sprayed coating, (m1, m2, m3) are corresponding mapping analysis of Fe, Cr, and Ni respectively.Permission from Elsevier. Copyright © 2023.

In the aforementioned study, it was observed that a composite coating consisting of 30 wt% WC–CoCr (hard phase) and 70 wt% NiCrBSi (soft phase) exhibited several advantageous characteristics. This included the development of a well-adhered, uniform, and densely packed microstructure, which, in turn, led to enhancements in the hardness, wear resistance, and friction properties of the coatings. In Figure 8(e-h), cross-sectional SEM images of the coatings are presented for compositions containing 0, 15, 30, and 45 wt% of WC–CoCr, and these images are accompanied by magnified insets displaying thicknesses ranging from 300 µm to 500 µm. These results convincingly demonstrate that the coating exhibits a higher density, uniformity, and reduced porosity. Furthermore, the EDS results, including EDS mapping and point analysis at positions 1 and 2, provide evidence of the even distribution of all elements i.e. Ni, Cr, C, Si, Fe, W and Co within the coating, as illustrated in Figure 8(i). Similarly, Figure 8(j) shows EDS mapping and point EDS analysis for the sample containing 30 wt% WC–CoCr/NiCrBSi coating. These findings reveal the presence of a novel WC phase alongside the predominant Ni solid solution, with intermetallic phases occurring in minor proportions. Binal [57] reported a study focused on investigating the hot corrosion and oxidation behavior of an 80Ni-20Cr coating applied onto a 316L steel substrate using the HVOF process. Figure 8(k,l) shows the as-received particles of 80Ni-20Cr, as well as cross-sectional SEM images of the coating on the stainless-steel substrate. It exhibited a dense and uniform composition, with a relatively low porosity level of approximately 0.7, as determined through analysis using Image J software. Elemental mapping of Fe, Cr and Ni, as illustrated in Figure 8(m1, m2, m3), provided insights into the composition of the coating powder. It indicated that the primary constituents of the coating were Ni and Cr, and these elements were evenly distributed throughout the coating zone. Additionally, traces of Fe were observed within the coating, likely resulting from diffusion from the underlying substrate. Furthermore, the substrate zone displayed the presence of the major elements found in the substrate, namely Fe, Cr, and Ni. This distinctive coating demonstrated a substantial enhancement in both oxidation resistance and corrosion resistance for the stainless-steel substrate, particularly when exposed to high-temperature conditions.

Chauhan and their colleagues [58] employed a novel blending method, as illustrated in schematic Figure 9(a), to prepare nano/micro CeO2 powders dispersed with Cr3C2-NiCr.

(a,b) Cr3C2-NiCr, (c,d) micro-CeO2 SEM images, and (e,f) nano-CeO2 powders TEM results; (A) schematic of the blending and HVOF coating process; (g–i, j–l) cross-sectional and surface SEM of Cr3C2-NiCr, micro-, and nano-CeO2-reinforced coatings; (m–r) high-magnification surface morphologies and EDS analyses; (s–t) elemental mapping confirming CeO2 dispersion after using HVOF process. Permission from Elsevier. Copyright © 2023.
Figure 9
(a,b) Cr3C2-NiCr, (c,d) micro-CeO2 SEM images, and (e,f) nano-CeO2 powders TEM results; (A) schematic of the blending and HVOF coating process; (g–i, j–l) cross-sectional and surface SEM of Cr3C2-NiCr, micro-, and nano-CeO2-reinforced coatings; (m–r) high-magnification surface morphologies and EDS analyses; (s–t) elemental mapping confirming CeO2 dispersion after using HVOF process. Permission from Elsevier. Copyright © 2023.

The SEM and TEM results for the initial powder are depicted in Figure 9(a-f) for nano-CeO2 powder. These findings clearly indicate that the morphology of the powder is spherical with pores, and the CeO2 nanoparticles are agglomerated due to van der Waals forces. Subsequently, these composite powders were applied to a stainless-steel substrate using the HVOF process. The detailed role of micro/nano CeO2 reinforcement in enhancing mechanical and tribological properties will be discussed in the subsequent section. The cross-sectional results of SEM/EDS mappings (Figure 9g-i) reveal that all coatings have a thickness ranging between 280 and 300 µm, exhibit a lamellar microstructure, and are free of pores and cavities at the coating-substrate interface [58]. The magnified images further confirm the presence of CeO₂, as indicated by the yellow arrows, based on the SEM/EDS results in Figure 9(j–l). The surface microstructure of the as-sprayed coatings is shown in Figure 9(m, n, o), with corresponding magnified images (Figure 9(p, q, r)) for coatings both with and without CeO₂. SEM/EDS mapping further confirms the distribution of Ce, Cr, Ni, C, and O within the coatings, as shown in Figure 9(s, t). EDS analysis also reveals a reduced oxygen content and a more uniform dispersion of CeO₂ in the nanocomposite powder compared with the other coatings. It is worth noting that there are some variations in the concentration of CeO2 after deposition, with these variations being more pronounced in micro-reinforced coatings in comparison to CeO2-reinforced nanoparticles Cr3C2-NiCr coatings, which aligns with findings in other reported literature [59].

Section 3.1 provided an in-depth survey of recent literature, emphasizing the properties of as-received feedstock materials. This includes a focus on parameters such as particle size, shape, and microstructure. Additionally, the section explores composite powders, particularly NiCrAlY/NiCoCrAlY, prepared through various methods. These composite powders incorporate diverse hard particles, as elaborated upon earlier. The comprehensive analysis of NiCrAlY/NiCoCrAlY composite powders, along with the distribution of hard metal phases, proves to be important. The section clearly demonstrated the requirements, including the microstructure of appropriate composite powder and particle size for the HVOF process. Particle size plays an important role in the HVOF process because it strongly affects melting behavior, splat formation, and the resultant microstructure. The literature shows that powder particle sizes in the range of 10–30 µm are considered optimal for HVOF spraying. Powders within this range achieve more complete melting, enhanced lamellar interlocking, and denser coatings with low porosity, which in turn improve bond strength, hardness, corrosion, and oxidation resistance. For example, nanostructured NiCoCrAlY powders with a ∼15 nm grain size and 30 µm particle diameter produced coatings with finer splat morphology and reduced defects [42]. Similarly, spherical WC–Co powders of 15–45 µm yielded porosity levels below 1%. In contrast, powders with sizes above ∼50 µm are more difficult to fully melt during spraying, often resulting in partially molten or unmelted particles embedded in the coating. These larger particles can locally enhance bonding by mechanical interlocking but typically increase porosity, crack density, and oxide content, which negatively affect mechanical strength, adhesion, and oxidation resistance. Thus, the optimal particle size for HVOF coatings is 10–30 µm, providing improved bonding, adhesion, and resistance to high-temperature corrosion. The next section investigates how these variations significantly impact crucial aspects such as hot corrosion resistance, wear resistance, oxidation, and mechanical properties of coatings produced through HVOF Spraying. Hence, the subsequent section, 3.2, will elaborate on the key findings and insights derived from the recent literature survey.

3.2. Corrosion, wear, and oxidation performance of HVOF spray coatings

This section provides a detailed literature survey aimed at enhancing corrosion, wear, and oxidation resistance through various coatings deposited by the HVOF spray process.

Ozkan reported [47] on the oxidation and wear mechanisms of Cr3C2-NiCr hard-metal coatings on a stainless-steel substrate through the HVOF process, exploring different times and temperatures. Additionally, the study investigated the hot corrosion mechanism of Cr3C2-NiCr composite coatings in corrosive environments with Na2SO4 and V2O5. The oxidation results indicate that at 850°C, the thickness of the oxide layer increased as the oxidation time extended from 5 h to 50 h (Figure 10a). Figure 10(a-c) show the cross-sectional morphologies after oxidation at different times, where the yellow labels denote the cross-sectional views and the white arrows indicate mixed oxides, porosity, and inner oxides. Figure 10(b) shows the cross-sectional morphologies after hot corrosion for 1 h, 3 h, and 5 h, exhibiting similar degradation behavior. After 50 h of oxidation, the mixed oxide accelerated due to the increased time and high temperature, thereby enhancing the diffusion of oxygen from the atmosphere to the substrate layer. Elemental mappings confirmed the diffusion of elements and the presence of rich oxides after oxidation (Figure 10(c)). Figure 10(d) presents the elemental mapping after hot corrosion, revealing that vanadium elements penetrate through microcracks toward the coating/substrate interface. The worn surface morphology after the wear test, where oxide layer formation, microcracks, swelling, and fine scratches are observed, as depicted in Figure 10(e). The friction coefficient and volume loss values increase with the applied load, ranging from 4 N to 12 N, as illustrated in Figures 10(f, g). The graph illustrates that the increase in wear traces corresponds to increased volume loss, consequently contributing to elevated wear rates. It has been determined that, under high-temperature conditions, the Cr3C2-NiCr composite coatings demonstrate superior resistance to both wear and corrosion in corrosive environments.

(a), (b) Cross-sectional results of Cr3C2 -NiCr composite coatings after the oxidation at 850 0C (for 5 h, 25 h, and 50 h), and after corrosion (1 h, 3 h, and 5 h), respectively. (c) & (d), respectively, the mapping results for 50 h and 5 h after oxidation and hot corrosion. (e) shows SEM results of wear traces and worn surfaces of the Cr3C2 -NiCr coatings under varying loads. (f) and (g) show friction coefficient curves and volume loss/wear rate of the coatings, respectively. The white arrows indicate porosity, mixed oxides,oxide, wear trace, fine scractes, micro-cracks, and oxidation layer. Red arrows indicate the rich phases of Vanadium element using elemental mapping. Permission from Elsevier. Copyright © 2023.
Figure 10.
(a), (b) Cross-sectional results of Cr3C2 -NiCr composite coatings after the oxidation at 850 0C (for 5 h, 25 h, and 50 h), and after corrosion (1 h, 3 h, and 5 h), respectively. (c) & (d), respectively, the mapping results for 50 h and 5 h after oxidation and hot corrosion. (e) shows SEM results of wear traces and worn surfaces of the Cr3C2 -NiCr coatings under varying loads. (f) and (g) show friction coefficient curves and volume loss/wear rate of the coatings, respectively. The white arrows indicate porosity, mixed oxides,oxide, wear trace, fine scractes, micro-cracks, and oxidation layer. Red arrows indicate the rich phases of Vanadium element using elemental mapping. Permission from Elsevier. Copyright © 2023.

Wang and colleagues conducted a study [46] on the corrosion and wear performance of NiCrWMoCuCBFe coatings using the HVOF process in various environments, including H2O, HCl, NaOH, and NaCl. The coatings exhibited passivation characteristics in HCl, NaOH, and NaCl solutions (Figure 11a). The results also indicated that the coating had the lowest passivation potential in NaOH and the highest passivation potential in HCl solutions. Based on these passivation characteristics, the corrosion potential and current density of the coating in HCl environments were higher compared to those in NaOH and NaCl environments.

(a) Potentiodynamic polarization curve, (b) real-time friction coefficient, (c) average friction coefficient and wear rate, (d) SEM surface results of worn scars with 3D morphology results, (e) FESEM results of worn scars with magnified images in the right side of the NiCrWMoCuCBFe coatings in various environments, i.e., H2O, HCl, NaOH, and NaCl. Permission from Elsevier. Copyright © 2022.
Figure 11.
(a) Potentiodynamic polarization curve, (b) real-time friction coefficient, (c) average friction coefficient and wear rate, (d) SEM surface results of worn scars with 3D morphology results, (e) FESEM results of worn scars with magnified images in the right side of the NiCrWMoCuCBFe coatings in various environments, i.e., H2O, HCl, NaOH, and NaCl. Permission from Elsevier. Copyright © 2022.

Figure 11(b) shows the friction coefficient of the coating under different environmental conditions, indicating that the lowest friction occurs in the HCl solution compared to the other tested media. Notably, the friction coefficient in HCl solutions remains stable, dropping below 0.1 after 500 seconds of friction. In the case of the HCl solution, there is a discernible declining trend in the friction coefficient with an increase in wear distance. This behavior is likely due to the ongoing decrease in friction during the wear-corrosion process, resulting from the formation of corrosion species on the surface in HCl solution. Real-time friction measurements showed that the average friction coefficient was highest in the NaCl solution at 0.32, while the HCl solution exhibited the lowest value at around 0.05. In comparison, the average friction coefficients in water and NaOH solutions were 0.23 and 0.25, respectively (Figure 11c). The NiCrWMoCuCBFe coating exhibited both the lowest friction coefficient and the minimal wear rate when tested in an HCl solution. These findings indicate that the formation of corrosion products played a key role in influencing the coating’s friction and wear performance under acidic conditions. Figure 11(d) presents the SEM and 3D surface analyses of the worn NiCrWMoCuCBFe coating following friction tests in different solutions. The findings indicate that, following friction in H2O solution (Figure 11d(a1)), furrows and local exfoliations appeared on the coating surface due to shear frictional action. The 3D image of the coating after friction reveals details about the surface roughness and the width of the wear mark as shown in (Figure 11d(a2, b2 and c2, d2). In contrast, when subjected to friction in an HCl solution (Figure 11d(b1)), a significant number of corrosion products emerged on the surface, indicating pitting corrosion. Exposure to the NaOH solution (Figure 11d(c1)), resulted in the formation of furrows and partial exfoliation on the worn surface. SEM analysis indicated more pronounced corrosion within the wear tracks. Similarly, after friction in the NaCl solution (Figure 11d(d1)), the wear mark morphology appeared comparable to that seen in the NaOH environment. In summary, the distinct morphological changes observed in the SEM and 3D results emphasize the diverse effects of friction in different solutions on the NiCrWMoCuCBFe coating, ranging from shear-induced furrows and exfoliations in H2O solution to pitting corrosion (indicating using yellow arrows), in HCl solution and a combination of furrows and corrosion in NaOH and NaCl solutions.

The FESEM results revealed that the worn surface exhibited smoothness, with a few debris particles and micro-cracks indicated using yellow arrows present after friction in water (Figure 11e(a1,b1)). The surface comprised dark and bright regions, representing the wear debris (indicated with yellow arrows) and the coating surface, respectively. Additionally, numerous cracks were observed around semi-molten particles, likely originating during the coating preparation process. Upon friction in the HCl solution, numerous corrosion spots emerged on the coating surface, accompanied by cracks and nanoparticles around these corrosion spots indicated with yellow arrows as shown (Figure 11e(a2,b2)). Subsequent friction in the NaOH solution resulted in a distinct exfoliation, with nanoparticles evident on the worn spot. This phenomenon is a key factor contributing to its elevated wear rate in this environment (Figure 11e(a3,b3)). Similarly, after friction in the NaCl solution, the characteristics of the worn coating surface closely resembled those observed in NaOH (Figure 11e(a4,b4)). The above findings suggest that the coating’s performance is significantly influenced by the specific chemical environment, with corrosion, exfoliation, and nanoparticle formation being key factors affecting its wear resistance.

Figure 12a(a1,a2,a3) presents the wear track analysis of the conventional power Cr3C2-NiCr (CP), micro CeO2 (CMR), and nano CeO2 reinforcement coated samples using FESEM and EDS. The yellow boxes highlight the formation of a tribo-oxide layer in all three samples, as indicated by the yellow arrows. Additionally, there are high-magnification pictures of the wear tracks as shown in Figure 12a (a4-a9). Abrasive wear is the predominant mechanism, as evidenced by the distinct grooves that each coating exhibits along the wear path as indicated using yellow arrows. These results are in line with those of coatings applied using the HVOF process that have been previously published. Significant damage was seen to the CP coating, which is consistent with higher wear rates and friction coefficients. Numerous microcracks were also visible (denotes using yellow arrows) in the wear track. Abrasive wear mentioned with yellow arrows occurred on the CMR coating, resulting in grooves resembling those in CP. Despite experiencing abrasive wear as well, CNR outperformed CP and CMR in terms of wear resistance. Furthermore, there were fewer hard carbide particles in the wear debris from CNR compared to CP and CMR. Notably, in line with previous research, no microcracks were found on the CNR wear surface, and the oxide scale adhered better to the coating [58]. The observations revealed that, upon interaction with the corrosive environment (i.e., sodium sulfate vanadate), a layer of corrosion products, specifically Ni3V2O8 and Na2SO4, formed on the surface of the coatings for all tested durations as shown in Figure 12b(b1-b3). Cross-sectional results show that after hot corrosion, the coating layer and interface are damaged,minor alumina formation at the interface,while the formation of V2O5 +Na2SO4, in the coating is indicated by white arrows (Figure 12(b)). The friction coefficients, wear track profiles, and particular wear rates are shown in Figure 12(c,d, and e), respectively. According to the data, CNR’s friction coefficient is lower than CP’s and CMR’s by 44% and 16%, respectively (Figure 12c). The wear track profiles are displayed in Figure 12(d), while Figure 12(e) indicates that CNR has the lowest specific wear rate, followed by CMR and CP. These findings suggest that Cr3C2-NiCr coatings enhanced with nano-CeO2 offer superior tribological and mechanical performance relative to CP and CMR coatings.

(a) shows SEM low and magnification results (from white circles) of the wear track and EDS analysis of powder of Cr3C2-NiCr (CP), micro-CeO2 (CMR), and nano-CeO2 (CNR), respectively, yellow boxes indicates the formation of tribo-oxides layer. (b) shows cross-sectional results of the 80Ni-20Cr coatings after hot corrosion and white arrows indicates formation of minor oxides,coatings, damage interface and the formation of V2O5+Na2SO4 for 1 h, 3 h, and 5 h, respectively. (c), (d), and (e) depict, respectively, the coefficient of friction (COF), wear track profile, and wear rate of the coating. (f) shows the surface morphology of the coatings following the hot corrosion process and EDS analysis after 1h, 3h, and 5 h, (g) cross-sectional SEM low and high magnifcation results (from white circles) of the 80Ni-20Cr coatings after isothermal oxidation for 5 h, 25 h, 50 h, and 75 h, respectively. Permission from Elsevier. Copyright © 2023.
Figure 12.
(a) shows SEM low and magnification results (from white circles) of the wear track and EDS analysis of powder of Cr3C2-NiCr (CP), micro-CeO2 (CMR), and nano-CeO2 (CNR), respectively, yellow boxes indicates the formation of tribo-oxides layer. (b) shows cross-sectional results of the 80Ni-20Cr coatings after hot corrosion and white arrows indicates formation of minor oxides,coatings, damage interface and the formation of V2O5+Na2SO4 for 1 h, 3 h, and 5 h, respectively. (c), (d), and (e) depict, respectively, the coefficient of friction (COF), wear track profile, and wear rate of the coating. (f) shows the surface morphology of the coatings following the hot corrosion process and EDS analysis after 1h, 3h, and 5 h, (g) cross-sectional SEM low and high magnifcation results (from white circles) of the 80Ni-20Cr coatings after isothermal oxidation for 5 h, 25 h, 50 h, and 75 h, respectively. Permission from Elsevier. Copyright © 2023.

Binal conducted a study [57] on 80Ni-20Cr coatings applied to stainless steel using the HVOF process. The research focused on investigating the oxidation and hot corrosion behavior of the coatings over various time periods at high temperatures in a corrosive environment consisting of 55 wt% V2O5 and 45 wt% Na2SO4 (refer to Figure 12(b,f,g)). In Figure 12f(f1-f3), the surface morphology and EDS analysis after hot corrosion for 1, 3, and 5 h have been depicted. The oval (white circles) highlight regions magnified to further confirm the sample morphology after hot corrosion for various times, as shown in Figure 12f(f4–f6). The point EDS analysis additionally confirmed that the columnar and rod-like morphology observed after 3 h of hot corrosion corresponds to the Ni3V2O8 phase. Figure 12g(g1-g4) presents the cross-sectional results of the coatings after isothermal oxidation for 5, 25, 50, and 75 h. The magnified images further confirm the formation of Al₂O₃ and mixed oxides, as shown in Figure 12g(g5–g8). The findings led to the conclusion that all coated samples exhibited high resistance to isothermal oxidation at 750°C without experiencing damage such as peeling or flaking.

G. Singh and colleagues [9] studied the hot corrosion resistance of a carbide-based composite coating applied to boiler steel using the HVOF technique, exposing it to a Na2SO4–60% V₂O₅ environment at 900°C. The study revealed that the uncoated bare steel samples experienced severe corrosion, resulting in the formation of non-protective oxides Figure 13a(a1). In contrast, the NiCrAlY-SiC and 20B4C composite coatings demonstrated improved corrosion resistance Figure 13a(a2, a3). The SEM surface micrograph confirmed that surface spallation was more pronounced in the bare samples compared to the composite-coated samples, as shown in Figure 13a(a1-a3) after 50 cycles. Figure 13b(b1-b5) illustrates the surface morphology of both the bare sample and the sample after coating, as analyzed by SEM. EDS analysis from the yellow points marked in pink rectangular box confirmed the presence of various oxides on the sample surfaces following corrosion. The results indicate the formation of poorly developed oxides on the corroded bare steel surface, as depicted in Figure 13. The EDS results further show the rich contents of Fe and O on the corroded bare steel surface, suggesting the likely formation of Fe2O3. The scale formed on NiCrAlY-SIC coatings exhibits a homogeneous structure. EDS analysis confirms the presence of Ni, Al, Cr, O, and small amounts of Fe and C in the oxide scale. In the case of NiCrAlY-B4C coatings, the corrosion-induced scale appears more compact, dominated by Ni, Cr, and Al, with minor traces of other particles. It is concluded from the results that SEM and EDS analyses provided insights into the surface characteristics and elemental compositions, revealing distinctive features of oxide scales formed on bare steel, NiCrAlY-SIC, and NiCrAlY-B4C coatings after corrosion.

(a): Surface morphology after hot corrosion: (a1) uncoated T22 steel, (a2) NiCrAlY–20SiC coated, and (a3) NiCrAlY–20B₄C coated samples. (b): SEM/EDS analysis (b1–b5); orange dots within the purple rectangle indicate the locations selected for EDS analysis. (c): Surface morphology after hot corrosion: (c1-c2) bare 316L stainless steel and (c3-c4) WC–10CoCr coating; red arrows indicate fractures, pits, and cracks. (d): Cross-sectional SEM images of (d1) bare steel and (d2) WC–10Co–4Cr coating; in (d1), yellow circles and red arrows indicate spallation pits, while red lines and yellow arrows denote corrosion pits; in (d2), red lines show splat separation, and yellow circles with red arrows indicate micro-holes. Permission from Elsevier. Copyright © 2021.
Figure 13.
(a): Surface morphology after hot corrosion: (a1) uncoated T22 steel, (a2) NiCrAlY–20SiC coated, and (a3) NiCrAlY–20B₄C coated samples. (b): SEM/EDS analysis (b1–b5); orange dots within the purple rectangle indicate the locations selected for EDS analysis. (c): Surface morphology after hot corrosion: (c1-c2) bare 316L stainless steel and (c3-c4) WC–10CoCr coating; red arrows indicate fractures, pits, and cracks. (d): Cross-sectional SEM images of (d1) bare steel and (d2) WC–10Co–4Cr coating; in (d1), yellow circles and red arrows indicate spallation pits, while red lines and yellow arrows denote corrosion pits; in (d2), red lines show splat separation, and yellow circles with red arrows indicate micro-holes. Permission from Elsevier. Copyright © 2021.

Kumar et al. [60] reported on the microstructure, oxidation, and hot corrosion behavior of a WC-10Co-4Cr coating on 316LSS using the HVOF process in Na2SO4-88%Fe2(SO4)3 environments at 800°C. Figure 13(c)(c1-c4) presents the SEM analysis of both the bare and coated samples of 316LSS after exposure to the Na2SO4-88%Fe2(SO4)3 environment. The morphology of the bare sample appears uneven, with the magnified image revealing fractures, pits, and cracks (see red arrows) on the surface following SEM results. In contrast, the coated sample processed through HVOF shows the presence of an unmelted powder marked using red arrows, as depicted in Figure 13c(c3-c4). Cross-sectional results of both the bare and coated corroded samples are presented in Figure 13d(d1,d2). The outcomes clearly illustrate spalling pits (see yellow circles and red arrows) and corrosion pits indicated using red lines and yellow arrows on the uncoated sample surface. In comparison, the coated sample exhibits micro holes (yellow circles and red arrows) and surface separation indicated using red dotted lines attributed to the high-speed melting and semi-fused particles during the process. The result indicates that the WC-10Co-4Cr coating applied on 316LSS using the HVOF process sample exhibits improved oxidation resistance and enhanced resistance to hot corrosion when compared to the uncoated 316LSS sample.

In a separate study, Kumar et al. [61] fabricated WC-12Co and WC-10Co-4Cr coatings on a steel substrate using the HVOF process. Subsequently, they investigated hot corrosion in a corrosive environment containing Na2SO4-82%Fe2(SO4)3 at 650°C. The micrographs presented in Figure 14(a-c) illustrate the outcomes of 50 cycles of molten salt corrosion at 650°C on a bare sample, WC-10CoCr-coated, and WC-12Co-coated AISI316L substrate. The SEM morphologies of the uncoated sample and coated samples up to 50 cycles at 650°C in salty environments are depicted in Figure 14(d-f) at various magnifications. The results indicate that the uncoated sample exhibits cracks, corrosion pits, and spalling pits as indicated using red, black circles and yellow red arrows respectively (Figure 14(d, d1)). After post-corrosion testing, the WC-10CoCr-coated surface shows a globular structure, and cracking occurs due to constant oxidation on the sample surface caused by uneven heating and cooling (Figure 14e). Additionally, Figure 14(e1) reveals localized corrosion in Co-rich regions. The SEM morphology of the WC-12Co-coated surfaces after the corrosion test is shown in Figure 14(f, f1). Both the WC and Co matrix are visible in WC-Co coatings (Figure 14f), and the magnified image highlights voids and micro-cracks as mentioned using yellow arrows (Figure 14f1). The graph in Figure 14(g) compares the mass gain versus the number of cycles at 650°C after hot corrosion for stainless steel with WC-12Co and WC-10CoCr coatings compared to the bare sample. The results demonstrate that the coated samples gained less mass compared to the uncoated sample after different cycles of hot corrosion. Furthermore, the Kp value confirms that the HVOF-sprayed coated samples exhibit higher corrosion resistance than the bare steel sample in the Fe2(SO4)3-12%Na2SO4 environments. XRD results confirm the formation of various oxide types on the coating surface subjected to hot corrosion environments at 650°C (Figure 14h,h1). The graph illustrates the cumulative weight gain of WC-10CoCr, which had the lowest weight gain compared to WC-12Co and the bare steel sample (Figure 14i). These findings collectively highlight the potential of WC-10CoCr coatings in mitigating the deleterious effects of hot corrosion on stainless steel, making them a promising candidate for applications in harsh environments. These observations highlight that the apparent differences in reported performance of WC-Co, WC-CoCr, and WC-NiCr coatings are largely influenced by substrate coating compatibility, differences in HVOF process parameters such as flame temperature and particle velocity, and the evolution of oxides and its morphologies or intermetallics during exposure. For example, the addition of Cr promotes protective formation of Cr2O3 and CoCr2O4 scales, improving hot corrosion resistance compared to WC-Co, whereas variations in porosity and WC decarburization into W2C phases can accelerate degradation of coatings. Thus, the reported differences across WC-based systems are not contradictory but arise from these microstructural and processing-dependent factors.

Micrographs of (a) WC-10CoCr coated, (b) uncoated AISI316L, and (c) WC-12Co coated AISI316L, respectively, after hot corrosion. SEM results of the (d,d1) uncoated sample, (e,e1) WC-10CoCr coated, and (f,f1) WC-12Co coated AISI316L in the Na2SO4-82%Fe2(SO4)3 environment under hot corrosion. g) shows plot of hot corrosion cycle vs square of weight gain/area, (h,h1) shows XRD pattern for coating WC-10CoCr and WC-12Co respectively after hot corrosion. (i) shows the graphs between corrosion cycles Vs. accumulative weight gain for all corresponding three samples. Permission from Elsevier. Copyright © 2023.
Figure 14.
Micrographs of (a) WC-10CoCr coated, (b) uncoated AISI316L, and (c) WC-12Co coated AISI316L, respectively, after hot corrosion. SEM results of the (d,d1) uncoated sample, (e,e1) WC-10CoCr coated, and (f,f1) WC-12Co coated AISI316L in the Na2SO4-82%Fe2(SO4)3 environment under hot corrosion. g) shows plot of hot corrosion cycle vs square of weight gain/area, (h,h1) shows XRD pattern for coating WC-10CoCr and WC-12Co respectively after hot corrosion. (i) shows the graphs between corrosion cycles Vs. accumulative weight gain for all corresponding three samples. Permission from Elsevier. Copyright © 2023.

Hao and their colleagues [62] prepared NiCrAlY, NiCoCrAlYHfSi, and NiCoCrAlYTa coatings using the HVOF process and investigated their tribological properties at 800 C.

The surface morphology and EDS analysis of the wear marks on NiCrAlY have been shown in Figure 15(a). The results reveal the severe plastic deformation marks on the wear surface. Micro-cracks during friction lead to the exfoliation of splats, causing the COF of this coating to fluctuate more rapidly compared to the other coatings. Similarly, wear marks on the NiCoCrAlYHfSi coating resemble those on NiCrAlY, but adhesion and abrasion are milder (Figure 15b). Results also show that there are no obvious abrasive marks on the worn surface for the NiCoCrAlYTa coating, and the coating exhibited greater adhesion (Figure 15c). Furthermore, EDS results confirmed (Figure 15(a1,b1,c1)) the oxygen content after high-temperature friction analysis. The NiCoCrAlYTa coating exhibits high-performance tribological properties, which is why it was selected to investigate the formation mechanism of the glazed layer and its effect on wear and friction performance (Figure 15d). Raman results on the worn and non-worn surfaces confirm similar chemical reactions during friction, with various oxides such as Al2O3, Cr2O3, and NiO appearing (Figure 15e,f). Figure 15(g,h) shows TEM results of the cross-sectional, Figure 15(i-k) High resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) results of region 1 indicated using yellow rectangle, and Figure 15l is the diffraction pattern of region 2 of the NiCoCrAlYTa coating is the diffraction pattern of region 2 of the NiCoCrAlYTa coating. TEM results confirm the presence of amorphous and crystalline phases, as well as the formation of various oxides and the Ni3Al phase. Figure 15(m,n) shows the mechanical properties, hardness, and load-displacement curve after nano-indentation, respectively. All three types of coatings significantly enhance micro-hardness compared to stainless steel. The micro-hardness of 316L steel is 176.88 HV and gradually increases for coatings 1 to 3, 554.81 HV, 569.61 HV, and 599.61 HV, respectively (Figure 15m). Figure 15(o,p) depicts real-time COF value graphs, wear, and average COF values of the three types of coatings, respectively. During friction, the COF of NiCrAlY first decreases slowly and then gradually levels, with its value ranging from 0.28 to 0.40 in the stable period. The COF value for NiCoCrAlYHfSi coatings is about 0.40, and for the NiCoCrAlYTa coating, it is very stable, fluctuating slightly around 0.33. The average coefficient values gradually decrease in the sequence 0.45 ± 0.017, 0.42 ± 0.012, and 0.34 ± 0.016, respectively, for NiCrAlY, NiCoCrAlYHfSi, and NiCoCrAlYTa coatings. The wear rate of the coatings exhibits a similar trend to that of COF for all three types of coatings. The wear and friction mechanisms [62] of MCrAlY coatings are presented in Figure 16. In conclusion, the comprehensive analysis of Raman spectroscopy, TEM results, mechanical properties, and friction characteristics reveals that NiCoCrAlYTa coating demonstrates superior wear resistance and stable friction behavior compared to NiCrAlY and NiCoCrAlYHfSi coatings, supported by the presence of various oxides, crystalline phases, and enhanced micro-hardness.

(a–c) SEM/EDS results of the worn surfaces of NiCrAlY, NiCoCrAlYHfSi, and NiCoCrAlYTa coatings on 316L stainless steel. (d) SEM/EDS mapping of the NiCoCrAlYTa wear mark. (e,f) Raman spectra of the wear track and coatings. (g,h) TEM cross-sections of the NiCoCrAlYTa coating; (i–k) HRTEM images of region 1; (l) diffraction pattern of region 2. (m,n) microhardness and nanoindentation results. High-temperature tribological performance: (o) Coefficient of friction-distance curves, and (p) the average coefficient of friction and wear rate values. Permission from Elsevier. Copyright © 2023.
Figure 15.
(a–c) SEM/EDS results of the worn surfaces of NiCrAlY, NiCoCrAlYHfSi, and NiCoCrAlYTa coatings on 316L stainless steel. (d) SEM/EDS mapping of the NiCoCrAlYTa wear mark. (e,f) Raman spectra of the wear track and coatings. (g,h) TEM cross-sections of the NiCoCrAlYTa coating; (i–k) HRTEM images of region 1; (l) diffraction pattern of region 2. (m,n) microhardness and nanoindentation results. High-temperature tribological performance: (o) Coefficient of friction-distance curves, and (p) the average coefficient of friction and wear rate values. Permission from Elsevier. Copyright © 2023.
Shows the schematic for the wear and fraction mechanism of the NiCrAlY, NiCoCrAlYHfSi, and NiCoCrAlYTa coatings for the work presented in Figure 15 of this article . Permission from Elsevier. Copyright © 2023.
Figure 16.
Shows the schematic for the wear and fraction mechanism of the NiCrAlY, NiCoCrAlYHfSi, and NiCoCrAlYTa coatings for the work presented in Figure 15 of this article . Permission from Elsevier. Copyright © 2023.

The effectiveness of HVOF coatings on steel substrates to improve their tribological characteristics has also been studied by other researchers. Kaur et al. [63] reported on the use of the HVOF process to coat boiler steel with Cr3C2-NiCr, showing enhanced resistance to wear, erosion, and hot corrosion in boiler steel applications. For both coated and uncoated samples, the researchers used a molten salt mixture of Ni and Fe under particular circumstances. In the molten salt environments of Ni and Fe, the coated samples demonstrated excellent resistance to wear and corrosion. A study on the HVOF spray method for applying Cr3C2-NiCr, Ni-Cr, and WC-Co coatings on a steel substrate was carried out by Sidhu and his associates [64]. At a temperature of roughly 900°C, the study examined the hot corrosion resistance of these deposited coatings in the presence of Na2SO4-V2O5 environments.

The results showed that the surface was protected from hot corrosion attacks by the WC coating. On the other hand, the bare sample showed signs of severe corrosion, including peeling, scale cracking, and spallation. In order to apply tungsten carbide coatings in piston, valve, and aircraft applications, Bonora et al. [65] reported the HVOF process. When compared to traditional electroplating coatings, the results show that HVOF coatings have better mechanical and tribological properties on the preparation of novel WC-Cr3C2-CoNi coatings that are applied to a stainless-steel substrate by means of the HVOF TSC technique. The performance of these coatings with different WC-Cr3C2 contents is specifically examined in the study in relation to traditional WC coatings. The results indicate that the WC- Cr3C2-CoNi coating with a 20 wt% concentration of WC-Cr3C2 significantly improves the wear and corrosion resistance of the coatings. Furthermore, the homogeneous distribution of Ni and Cr in the WC- Cr3C2-CoNi coating results in a more stable oxide film during the corrosion process, thereby enhancing the corrosion resistance of the coatings.

4. Plasma spray coating technique

Many production and manufacturing industries widely employ steel components due to their strength, as well as their resistance to erosion, corrosion, and wear. Various surface coating techniques have been explored by researchers in the field of metallurgy to enhance these properties. Among these protective coatings, the plasma sprayed coating technique played an important role in the field of oxidation. In the PS coating process, a plasma torch creates an electric arc that heats the gas flowing between the anode and cathode electrodes. This heated gas is expelled through the nozzle as a high-temperature, high-velocity jet, as shown in Figure 17(a,b). The peak temperature and velocity during PS coatings typically range from 12,000 to 15,000 K and 500 to 2,500 m s-1, respectively. Coating thickness varies from 50 mm to 500 mm, and the coating deposition exhibits a bond strength ranging from 40 to 70 MPa. PS coating is recognized as one of the most versatile and effective coating processes to protect the surface of substrate materials against wear and corrosion, particularly at high temperatures [66,67].

(a) Schematic of PS proces, (b) Schematic of the Sulzer Metco PTF4 torch from reference. Permission from Elsevier. Copyright © 2022.
Figure 17.
(a) Schematic of PS proces, (b) Schematic of the Sulzer Metco PTF4 torch from reference. Permission from Elsevier. Copyright © 2022.

PS coating is a versatile technique applicable to a broad range of materials, including ceramics, soft metals, and carbides. Metals like aluminum, chromium, and nickel are commonly employed for their excellent wear and corrosion resistance. Ceramics such as alumina and zirconia find use due to their high-temperature resistance and wear resistance. Composites like tungsten carbide are chosen for their exceptional wear resistance. The process can accommodate very high temperatures, enabling the application of coatings even with materials possessing extremely high melting points. PS coatings tend to be dense, smooth, and fully melted. PS can be performed through different processes.

  • i)

    Atmospheric plasma spray (APS): In this method, the plasma jet is discharged into open air.

  • ii)

    Controlled atmospheric plasma spraying (CPS): This process operates within an inert argon atmosphere, minimizing oxidation by limiting oxygen exposure.

  • iii)

    Vacuum plasma spraying (VPS) or Low pressure plasma spraying (LPPS): The plasma jet is released into a low-pressure or vacuum environment.

Additionally, a new hybrid technique has been developed that combines plasma spraying with physical vapor deposition and electron beam physical vapor deposition methods. Figure 18 highlights the key factors that affect coating characteristics in the PS process.

A flowchart illustrating the various factors that influence coating properties in the PS process. Created by author.
Figure 18.
A flowchart illustrating the various factors that influence coating properties in the PS process. Created by author.

4.1. Studies on the microstructures of as-received powder and as-prepared coatings, as well as the corrosion, wear, and oxidation performance of plasma spray coatings

This section focuses on the microstructure of as-received feedstock materials and the unique features of coatings produced by the PS process. It also examines how the microstructure influences the mechanical, wear, corrosion, and oxidation resistance of these coatings.

Reddy and colleagues [68] used the PS coatings process in an aggressive Na2SO4+60 percent V2O5 salt environment at 700°C to study the hot corrosion and oxidation behavior of NiCrAlY-TiO2 and NiCrAlY-Cr2O3-YSZ coatings on alloy steel. Figure 19(a,b) illustrates the morphology of NiCrAlY-TiO2 and NiCrAlY-Cr2O3-YSZ powders. The results reveal that the particles exhibit a spherical shape with sizes ranging from -45 to +15 μm, produced through the gas atomized technique. The SEM micrographs and EDS analysis of the corroded surfaces of the samples, with and without coatings, are presented in Figure 19(c-e). These findings confirm the microstructure, the formation of oxides, and the elemental composition of the oxides, as mentioned using yellow arrows. Figure 19(f) illustrates the elemental mapping of the corroded surface of NiCrAlY-TiO2, indicating the predominant presence of Al, Cr, O, Ni, S, Ti, and Na in the formed scale. The distribution of these elements is clearly depicted in the mapping results, as shown in Figure 19(f). Additionally, a layer of iron is evident in the substrate portion. In Figure 19(g), the top layer of the NiCrAlY-Cr2O3-YSZ-coated scale predominantly comprises O, forming a thick layer in the measured scale. Al and Cr are observed at the boundaries of Ni-rich PS splats. The weight gain versus the number of cycles for both coated and uncoated samples is presented in Figure 19(h). The results indicate mass gains of 111.13, 38.97, and 29.94 mg/cm2 for the steel substrate, NiCrAlY+TiO2, and NiCrAlY+Cr2O3+YSZ coatings, respectively. The lower weight gain suggests that cermet coatings protect against corrosion in aggressive environments. The parabolic plots demonstrate that the NiCrAlY-Cr2O3-YSZ coating, with lower Kp values (Figure 19(i)), provides more effective protection in salt environments compared to the uncoated samples. In conclusion, the study found that coated samples exhibited less mass gain, lower Kp values, lower porosity, higher hardness values, higher bond strength, and better corrosion resistance at high temperatures compared to the uncoated samples.

Morphology of the (a) powder NiCrAlY-TiO2 and (b) NiCrAl-Cr2O3-YSZ, respectively. SEM/EDS results of (c) alloy steel, (d) NiCrAlY-TiO2, and (e) NiCrAl-Cr2O3-YSZ coatings, respectively, after being exposed to high-temperature corrosion environment of Na2SO4+60%V2O5 salt for 50 cycles at 700°C. cross-sectional elemental mapping analysis of (f) NiCrAlY-TiO2 and (g) NiCrAl-Cr2O3-YSZ coatings, respectively, after corrosion for 50 cycles at 700°C. (h) and (i) show the mass gain curve and corresponding parabolic plots of alloy steel, NiCrAlY-TiO2, and NiCrAl-Cr2O3-YSZ samples, respectively, in a corrosive environment at 700°C.Permission from Elsevier. Copyright © 2021.
Figure 19.
Morphology of the (a) powder NiCrAlY-TiO2 and (b) NiCrAl-Cr2O3-YSZ, respectively. SEM/EDS results of (c) alloy steel, (d) NiCrAlY-TiO2, and (e) NiCrAl-Cr2O3-YSZ coatings, respectively, after being exposed to high-temperature corrosion environment of Na2SO4+60%V2O5 salt for 50 cycles at 700°C. cross-sectional elemental mapping analysis of (f) NiCrAlY-TiO2 and (g) NiCrAl-Cr2O3-YSZ coatings, respectively, after corrosion for 50 cycles at 700°C. (h) and (i) show the mass gain curve and corresponding parabolic plots of alloy steel, NiCrAlY-TiO2, and NiCrAl-Cr2O3-YSZ samples, respectively, in a corrosive environment at 700°C.Permission from Elsevier. Copyright © 2021.

Jonca et al. [69] conducted a study on the oxidation behavior of a sprayed CoNiCrAlY/h-BN following exposure to temperatures of 750°C and 900°C. Additionally, they investigated the formation of protective alumina at high temperatures using various characterization techniques. The morphologies of the as-prepared CoNiCrAlY/h-BN coatings have been illustrated in Figure 20(a-d). The results revealed that the coating comprised unmelted particles, pores, and a lamellar structure. EDS analysis confirmed the formation of various oxides and mixed oxides during the deposition process. The oxidation behavior of the thermally sprayed CoNiCrAlY/h-BN coating was investigated after exposure to temperatures of 750°C and 900°C. The study also delved into the formation of protective alumina at high temperatures, employing various characterization techniques. The morphologies of the CoNiCrAlY/h-BN coating have been illustrated in Figure 20(a-d). The results revealed that the coating comprised unmelted particles, pores, and a lamellar structure. EDS analysis confirmed the formation of various oxides and mixed oxides during the deposition process.

(a-d) Surface morphologies of the CoNiCrAlY/h-BN coating. (e) XRD patterns after 500 h oxidation at 750°C and 900°C. (f) Mass change vs. time for 718 + NiAl + CoNiCrAlY/h-BN, CoNiCrAlY/h-BN, 718 alloy, and NiAl coatings at 750°C and 900°C. (g,h) Raman spectra after 500 h oxidation. (i–l) Surface morphologies and (m–p) cross-sectional views after 100 h and 500 h oxidation at 750°C and 900°C . Permission from Elsevier. Copyright © 2019.
Figure 20.
(a-d) Surface morphologies of the CoNiCrAlY/h-BN coating. (e) XRD patterns after 500 h oxidation at 750°C and 900°C. (f) Mass change vs. time for 718 + NiAl + CoNiCrAlY/h-BN, CoNiCrAlY/h-BN, 718 alloy, and NiAl coatings at 750°C and 900°C. (g,h) Raman spectra after 500 h oxidation. (i–l) Surface morphologies and (m–p) cross-sectional views after 100 h and 500 h oxidation at 750°C and 900°C . Permission from Elsevier. Copyright © 2019.

Figure 20(e) presents the XRD results of the CoNiCrAlY/h-BN at 750 and 900°C after 500 h of oxidation. The coating surface exhibited the presence of γ and γ/ phases, Cr2O3, as well as mixed oxides of CoNiO2 and CoCr2O4. The XRD peak intensities were notably higher at 900°C compared to 750°C. The mass change curves illustrating the oxidation performance of various samples over a 500-h period at 750°C and 900°C are displayed in Figure 20(f). The CoNiCrAlY/h-BN sample showed the most stable oxidation behavior among the tested coatings, with oxidation rate constants (Kp) of 1.12 × 10⁻11 mg2 cm⁻⁴ s⁻1 at 750°C and 2.29 × 10⁻1⁰ mg2 cm⁻⁴ s⁻1 at 900°C. The Raman spectra of the CoNiCrAlY/h-BN coating after 500 h of oxidation exposure at the corresponding temperatures are displayed in Figure 20(g) and (h). The obtained results verify that the coatings contain various oxides, including spinel oxides, Cr2O3, and alumina (α-Al2O3, a very stable and protective oxide) [70-72]. The continuous formation of an α-Al2O3 scale protects the coating from further oxidation, thereby extending its lifespan at high temperatures [73-78]. The surface morphology of the coating at 750°C for 100 h and 900°C for 500 h is depicted in Figure 20(i, j) and (k, l), respectively. The results show that at lower temperatures (750°C), the morphology exhibits needle or crystal-type structures, indicating the characteristics of metastable or θ-Al2O3. However, at higher temperatures and longer oxidation times, θ-Al2O3 transforms into α-Al2O3, leading to a significant reduction in the needle-type morphology content. Figure 20(m, o, and n, p) displays the cross-sectional morphology of the CoNiCrAlY/h-BN coatings. The results reveal the formation of various oxides, as confirmed by SEM/EDS analysis. Additionally, the presence of unmelted particles suggests a larger source of aluminum than the surrounding material, explaining the varying oxidation behavior across different parts of the coating and the heterogeneous distribution of oxides.

Alam and Das [5] investigated the hot corrosion resistance of a WC-CoCr coating applied to a steel substrate using the PS method. In their study, both coated and uncoated specimens were subjected to a corrosive mixture of Na2SO4 and 25% NaCl at 700°C over 50 thermal cycles. Figure 21(a) displays the cross-sectional analysis of the coated samples, confirming the uniform thickness of the coating on the steel substrate. Figure 21(b,c) depicts the morphology of oxidizing species at various magnifications. The magnified SEM results confirm the opening of some pores (mentioned using orange arrows) at the surface due to the penetration of oxidizing species. Once oxidation has occurred on all interior surfaces accessible (orange arrows), resulting in the formation of oxides at splat boundaries and within porosity, the coating undergoes a densification process. This densification leads to a slow-down in oxide diffusion, with further oxide development primarily restricted to the surface of the specimen.

SEM analysis of WC-CoCr-coated steel: (a) cross-section , (b) surface morphology of oxidation products and (c) high magnification SEM image of oxidation products; (d, e) XRD patterns before and after hot corrosion; (f, g) SEM/EDS with elemental mapping of uncoated steel post-corrosion; (h–j) oxide formation, splat morphology, and SEM/EDS with mapping of coated samples after corrosion (k-n) SEM/EDS spectra and elemental distributions; (o) mass gain, (p) cumulative weight gain, and (q) mass gain squared vs. time comparison between uncoated and coated samples. Permission from Springer nature. Copyright © 2023.
Figure 21.
SEM analysis of WC-CoCr-coated steel: (a) cross-section , (b) surface morphology of oxidation products and (c) high magnification SEM image of oxidation products; (d, e) XRD patterns before and after hot corrosion; (f, g) SEM/EDS with elemental mapping of uncoated steel post-corrosion; (h–j) oxide formation, splat morphology, and SEM/EDS with mapping of coated samples after corrosion (k-n) SEM/EDS spectra and elemental distributions; (o) mass gain, (p) cumulative weight gain, and (q) mass gain squared vs. time comparison between uncoated and coated samples. Permission from Springer nature. Copyright © 2023.

Figure 21(d) and (e) show the XRD patterns of WC-CoCr-coated samples prior to and following hot corrosion. Before corrosion, distinct peaks corresponding to WC and WC2 phases are clearly observed. The XRD results confirm the sharp peaks of WC and WC2 before hot corrosion. After hot corrosion testing, the main phases observed are WO3, CoW3, C, and CoWO4. Additionally, chromium (Cr) develops the Cr2O3 phase, and its spinel oxide CoCr2O4 acts as an intermediate phase. The formation of this intermediate phase contributes to enhanced corrosion resistance of the coating in a Na2SO4-25% NaCl salt environment. SEM/EDS analysis of the uncoated sample, illustrated in Figure 21(f) and (g) along with elemental mapping, reveals significant activity of iron (Fe) and chlorine (Cl) in the corrosion process. Upon oxidation, Fe promotes the formation of the unprotective oxide Fe2O3. Further interaction with the steel substrate at high temperatures causes molten salt diffusion, leading to slits and cracks. These slits and cracks are the initial sites for oxide formation and oxidation. Figure 21(h) illustrates the splats and oxides developed on the coatings ,as indicated using orange arrows. SEM/EDS results show the coated sample after hot corrosion in Figure 21(i,j) with the corresponding elemental mapping. Figure 21(k–n) presents the SEM/EDS elemental spectra, and the corresponding elemental percentage distribution of the coatings. The presence of oxides and their distribution indicate the response of the coating to hot corrosion conditions, indicating its protective capabilities in an aggressive environment. The presence of tungsten and chromium oxides, formed as scales on the surface and boundaries, enhances the resistance of WC-CoCr coatings to hot corrosion. These oxides serve as effective barriers, preventing the diffusion of corrosive elements and inhibiting their penetration through the coatings. Figure 21(o) illustrates the mass gain per unit curve versus the number of hot corrosion cycles for both the coated and uncoated samples in a molten salt environment at 700°C. The findings reveal a 74.45% reduction in weight gain for the WC-CoCr-coated sample compared to the uncoated sample in the corrosive environment. Figure 21(p) further demonstrates that the coated samples experienced lower weight gain when compared to the uncoated sample in corrosive environments. These graphs were generated following hot corrosion in an air environment, specifically in a corrosive atmosphere containing Na2SO4 + 25% NaCl at a temperature of 700°C. The graphs are intended to illustrate the corrosion behavior of both uncoated and WC-CoCr-coated samples under the test conditions. As shown in Figure 21(q), the data follow a parabolic trend, which is typical for hot corrosion kinetics. The parabolic rate constant (Kp) for the coated sample at 700°C is lower than that of the uncoated one, indicating that the WC-CoCr coating significantly enhances resistance to hot corrosion at this temperature.

Bolelli and colleagues [79] employed an innovative PS technique involving a hybrid injection of dry and liquid feedstock to fabricate a composite coating comprising a NiCrAlY metal matrix containing Al2O3 and h-BN sub-micron particles. The findings revealed a significant increase in hardness and sliding wear resistance as the content of Al2O3 and h-BN sub-micron particles was increased. This improvement was especially prominent at room temperature, with beneficial effects also observed at elevated temperatures of 400°C and 700°C. The presence of Al2O3 and h-BN contributed to the development and stabilization of a protective oxide-based tribo-film, which acted as a barrier to minimize direct interaction between the coating and the counter surface. Figure 22(a-d) depicts cross-sectional micrographs of different coatings, with their thickness approximately ranging from 300 to 400 µm. The microstructure reveals the presence of pores, clusters of Al2O3 and h-BN particles, as indicated by black arrows and circles, and a cone-shaped defect marked by a black dashed line. SEM results confirm that at room temperature, the worn surface shows the development of a tribo-film composed of oxide clusters, as indicated by black arrows in Figure 22(e, f), corresponding to samples Ny10Al10BN0 and Ny10Al10BN5. The wear reducing effect is less pronounced at 400°C (Figure 22(g, h)) and 700 °C (Figure 22(i, j)) compared to room temperature. The oxidized tribo-film clusters reduce abrasive grooving and adhesive tearing by mitigating direct contact between surfaces. This is evident in sample Ny10Al10BN0 (1 wt% Al2O3, no h-BN; Figure 22k) compared to Ny10Al10BN5 (10 wt% Al2O3, 9 wt% h-BN; Figure 22l). Wear scars at 400°C and 700°C (Figure 22(m, n)) show surfaces covered by various tribo-films as indicated by oval circles. These clusters consist of smeared debris patches, including larger metallic lamellar fragments (Figure 22(o)) within a matrix of oxidized submicron particles (Figure 22(p)). TEM images of loose debris confirm the presence of partially crystalline submicron and nanoparticles (Figure 22(q)). The high-resolution detail in Figure 22(r) reveals lattice planes, and the corresponding selected-area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern (from position marked as a white circle) displays diffraction spots and rings indicative of a glassy phase.

SEM cross-sectional images of coatings: (a) Ny10Al10BN0, (b) Ny10Al10BN1.25, (c) Ny10Al10BN2.5, and (d) Ny20Al10BN2.5, showing internal porosity and the presence of particles using black arrows and circles respectively. SEM of wear scars for Ny10Al10BN0 and Ny10Al10BN5 at: (e, f) room temperature, (g, h) 400°C, and (i, j) 700°C. Wear features on Ny10Al10BN0: (k) at room temperature, (m) at 400°C with white oval circles indicate tribo-film, and Ny10Al10BN5: (l) at room temperature, (n) at 700°C. Wear debris from Ny10Al10BN5 at room temperature: (o) SEM of smeared debris indicated using white arrows, (p) detailed SEM view, (q) TEM of loose particles, (r) HRTEM with SAED pattern. Permission from Elsevier. Copyright © 2017.
Figure 22.
SEM cross-sectional images of coatings: (a) Ny10Al10BN0, (b) Ny10Al10BN1.25, (c) Ny10Al10BN2.5, and (d) Ny20Al10BN2.5, showing internal porosity and the presence of particles using black arrows and circles respectively. SEM of wear scars for Ny10Al10BN0 and Ny10Al10BN5 at: (e, f) room temperature, (g, h) 400°C, and (i, j) 700°C. Wear features on Ny10Al10BN0: (k) at room temperature, (m) at 400°C with white oval circles indicate tribo-film, and Ny10Al10BN5: (l) at room temperature, (n) at 700°C. Wear debris from Ny10Al10BN5 at room temperature: (o) SEM of smeared debris indicated using white arrows, (p) detailed SEM view, (q) TEM of loose particles, (r) HRTEM with SAED pattern. Permission from Elsevier. Copyright © 2017.

Numerous researchers have reported the enhancement of tribological properties through PS coating on steel substrates. Doddamani et al. [80] studied three coating systems- NiCrAlY/WC-Co/Chemosphere/MoS2/CaF2, NiCrAlY/WC-Co/Chemosphere/MoS2/CaSO4, and NiCrAlY/WC-Co/Chemosphere-applied to steel substrates via plasma spraying. Their research focused on assessing the tribological performance of these coatings and the steel substrate over temperatures ranging from room temperature to 600°C under dry lubrication. Results showed that all coatings exhibited lower wear rates than the 321steel substrate throughout the testing conditions. Among them, the NiCrAlY/WC-Co/Chemosphere coatings containing MoS2 combined with CaF2 or CaSO4 demonstrated reduced friction coefficients compared to the NiCrAlY/WC-Co/Chemosphere coating without these additives and the bare substrate. Analysis of the worn surfaces showed that MoS2 functioned as an efficient lubricant at 200°C, while tribo-chemical formation of compounds like CaMoO4 and MoO3 maintained lubrication at 600°C. According to the study’s findings, the coatings under investigation—NiCrAlY/WC-Co/Chemosphere/MoS2/CaF2 and NiCrAlY/WC-Co/Chemosphere/MoS2/CaSO4 in particular-show improved tribological performance over a broad temperature range, indicating their potential use in situations requiring dry, high-temperature lubrication conditions. In a study conducted by Indupuri and Kumar [81], the microstructural, mechanical, tribological, and corrosion performance of plasma-sprayed aluminum nitride (AlN) coatings in a harsh environment were examined. Ball milling was used to create the feedstock powder, which was composed of Al and AlN in a 70:30 weight percent ratio. Both the c-AlN and h-AlN phases were present in the coating, according to the microstructural analysis. Hardness and elastic modulus were estimated to be around 7.2 GPa and 280 GPa, respectively. A low wear rate of roughly 0.18 × 10−3 mm3 N-1 m-1 and a COF of 0.45 ± 0.02 were found by tribological performance evaluation. Additionally, in a 3.5 w% NaCl solution, the AlN coating’s corrosion resistance behavior showed a low corrosion rate of 2.95 × 10−9 mm/s, suggesting the possibility of an extended lifetime for the coated components. These results support the recommendation of the plasma-sprayed AlN coating as a high-performance wear resistance solution. Sudana and Madhu et al. [82], examined the application of cermet coating by plasma spraying to alloy steel for use in aerospace. In this study, alloy steel was successfully coated with three different coatings using atmospheric PS technology: 35% (WC-Co)/65% (Cr3C2NiCr), 70% CrAlY + 30% TiO2, and 70% NiCrAlY + 25% Cr2O3 + 5% YSZ. The porosity levels of the coatings were 2.7–3.5%. At 700°C, a ductile erosive mechanism exhibiting significant plastic deformation was demonstrated by all coatings. In high-temperature erosion environments, the 70% NiCrAlY + 30% TiO2 coating outperformed the others in terms of protection. The coating’s superior performance compared to other coatings can be attributed to its enhanced ductility, uniform microstructure, and reduced porosity. Increased wear resistance was another benefit of adding chromium. The coated samples exhibited greater material loss than the uncoated steel, which is probably because the alumina particles embedded in the coated surface provided protection. The NiCrAlY-Ag-Mo coating using the plasma-sprayed coatings technique, and its tribological characteristics were examined in non-lubricated conditions between 20°C and 800°C. The findings show that, when compared to the pure NiCrAlY coating, adding molybdate improves the composite coating’s microhardness while also lowering porosity. According to the results, the NiCrAlY–Ag–Mo composite coating continuously showed low friction coefficients of roughly 0.3 over the whole temperature range. Furthermore, the wear rates for this coating were consistently on the order of 10−5 mm3 N-1 m-1 at all tested temperatures.

5. Our group contribution in the relevant field

Currently, our group is dedicated to advancing the surface modification of metallic materials through processes such as HVOF and PS coatings. The primary objective is to improve material properties, specifically enhancing resistance to corrosion, oxidation, and wear in high-temperature aggressive environments. In their series of publications, Kai Hu and Liu Xia [83] investigated the tribo-corrosion performance of HVOF-sprayed WC-based cermet coatings in a sodium chloride solution environment. They fabricated three types of coatings with WC and binders of Co, CoCr, and Cr3C2-7Ni matrices. The results showed that the as-sprayed coating’s binder phases significantly impacted their corrosion and wear performance. Each of the three coatings showed a dense structure with low porosity and high hardness. Different binder phases resulted in different corrosion and wear mechanisms. The corrosion process was accelerated in the WC-12Co coating by the combined effects of wear and corrosion. In contrast, corrosion and wear combined to accelerate the wear process in WC-10Co4Cr and WC-Cr3C2-7Ni coatings. It was concluded that wear had a greater effect on corrosion than the other way around, indicating that the coatings primarily underwent a corrosion-dominated regime during tribo-corrosion. After that, Yang [84] examined the improved oxidation and wear resistance of nano ZrB2-reinforced CoNiCrAlY composite coatings at high temperatures. Using mechanically alloyed powders and an HVOF spraying technique, these coatings were prepared. The study showed that a 35-h Mechanical Alloying (MA) powder process produced CoNiCrAlY-ZrB2 powder, which was distinguished by its high quality, expected particle size, and uniformly distributed nano-sized ZrB2. Results showed that adding nano-ZrB2 significantly improved wear resistance, oxidation performance, and mechanical properties. Interestingly, the CoNiCrAlY-ZrB2 coating’s wear resistance at 1000°C was 2.46 ×10-14 m3 N-1 m-1 was significantly superior to CoNiCrAlY coatings without ZrB2. This finding implies that high-temperature components in harsh environments are successfully protected by the ZrB2 phase. Most recently, Hu and Liu [85] studied ZrB2-NiCrBSi composite coatings made using the HVOF process, paying particular attention to their tribological and microstructural properties. They created NiCrBSi-ZrB2 composite coatings using HVOF spraying, adding ZrB2 at 20 wt%, 40 wt%, and 50 wt%. In particular, at 700°C, the study investigated the microstructure and high-temperature wear performance of coatings containing and lacking ZrB2. The findings showed that both NiCrBSi and ZrB2 powders had advantageous wetting properties in the solid-liquid sintering region [86]. In composite coatings with ZrB2 concentrations of 20% and 40%, the formation of the CrB phase occurred in the liquid phase contact zone. However, the 50% ZrB2 coating exhibited the absence of the CrB phase, attributed to the pinning effect induced by an excess of ZrB2. The microhardness of the composite coatings demonstrated an initial increase followed by a subsequent decrease. Notably, the 40% ZrB2 coating exhibited the peak hardness at 874 HV. The composite coating’s wear resistance significantly improved due to the even dispersion of ZrB2 and CrB phases. In contrast, the coating with 20% ZrB2 suffered from low fracture toughness, while the 50% ZrB2 coating experienced hardness inconsistencies because of the lack of CrB, both leading to severe abrasive wear. During friction, the formation of Cr2O3 contributed to enhanced wear protection [87]. The wear behavior of the 40% ZrB2 coating involved mild adhesive, abrasive, and oxidative wear, resulting in the best performance with a 56% decrease in wear rate, achieving a low value of 1.16 × 10⁻13 m3 N-1 m-1.

6. Comparative evaluation, challenges, and future perspectives

A critical evaluation of the reviewed studies clearly shows that the microstructural and performance variations between HVOF and PS coatings arise primarily from differences in process parameters and particle dynamics. As detailed in Table 1, HVOF coatings generally exhibit lower porosity (≤2%), higher bond strength (>70 MPa), and superior wear, corrosion, oxidation resistance due to higher particle velocities and reduced oxide inclusions, whereas PS coatings often possess higher porosity (up to 10%) and moderate adhesion strength, which already explained in the introduction section. These microstructural differences directly translate into improved mechanical integrity and high-temperature performance of HVOF coatings. Furthermore, recent developments in nanostructured, composite, and rare-earth metal modified coatings have shown significant potential in enhancing coating density, oxide scale adherence, and thermal stability. A trend toward hybrid feedstock designs, nanoscale reinforcements, and process optimization for improved interfacial bonding is also evident in current research.

Despite these advances, several challenges and gaps remain. Most published studies emphasize individual degradation mechanisms such as oxidation, wear, or hot corrosion in isolation, with limited attention to their combined effects under cyclic thermal environments. Additionally, variations in substrate compatibility, powder morphology, and process parameters make it difficult to directly compare coating performance across different studies. There is also a lack of long-term durability data, real-time characterization during exposure, and large-scale industrial validation. Addressing these limitations will be important for developing next-generation coatings with optimized microstructure property performance relationships and for bridging the gap between laboratory research and industrial applications.

7. Conclusions

This review comprehensively analyzed recent advancements in HVOF and PS coating technologies, emphasizing their microstructural evolution, mechanical integrity, and tribological performance under various environmental and thermal conditions. The unique characteristics and crucial spray parameters connected to these innovative coating techniques are highlighted in detail in the survey. Research and development currently underway has demonstrated the many benefits of HVOF and PS coatings, making them the go-to options for a variety of industrial applications. Their ability to be applied to a wide range of materials, such as metals, ceramics, and composite powders, is noteworthy among these advantages. Both techniques are essential for protecting structural components in harsh environments; however, their mechanisms, processing parameters, and performance vary significantly. Based on the reviewed literature, the following key conclusions are as follows:

  • HVOF coatings exhibit extremely low porosity (<1–2%), strong adhesion, compact coatings, cost effectiveness, and superior wear, corrosion, and oxidation resistance due to high particle velocities (500–1000 m s-1) and rapid solidification rates. Optimizing spray parameters such as fuel oxygen ratio, distance between sample and spray gun, and powder morphology directly enhances coating density, hardness, and residual stress control. The extensive use of HVOF highlights its vital role in delivering dependable protection and improving performance in demanding operating environments and extends to vital components like boiler parts, pumps, valves, and turbine engine parts. All things considered, HVOF coatings are essential for improving the durability and effectiveness of industrial parts in a variety of industries. Recent studies have demonstrated that incorporating nano- and micro-particle dispersions such as CeO2, Al2O3, ZrB2 into HVOF coatings further refines microstructure, accelerates oxide film formation, and improves thermal stability and corrosion resistance.

  • The diverse coatings achieved through the HVOF process are specifically designed to enhance the wear resistance, corrosion resistance, oxidation resistance, and mechanical properties of steel substrates (refer to Section 3.2). Central to this section are the analyses of WC, NiCrAlY, and CoNiCrAlY coatings, incorporating various nano/microparticles, the HVOF clearly demonstrates that coatings play an important role in significantly improving the aforementioned properties. Moreover, the assessment of corrosion and wear performance in diverse environments, including NaCl, KCl, H2SO4, H2O, NaOH, Na2SO4, V2O5, and Fe2(SO4)3, was also summarized. Specifically, section 3.2 highlights insights into recent advancements, providing a comprehensive understanding and detailed insights into high-temperature aggressive environments based on experimental results. This inclusive survey not only offers valuable insights into the performance of HVOF coatings under varying conditions but also provides a fine perspective on their efficiency in real-world applications.

  • The principal aim of Section 4 was to provide a comprehensive examination of the fine microstructural characteristics of feedstock materials, composite powder preparation techniques, plasma coating parameters, and the unique characteristics of coatings made using the PS process. Additionally, it explores its significance in depth and offers a thorough analysis, revealing important parameters and a variety of other factors that affect coating properties in the PS coating process. PS coatings usually have higher porosity, but they are very versatile and can be used to deposit many types of ceramic and composite materials. The plasma jet’s high temperature (12,000-15,000 K) allows deposition of refractory oxides and thermal barrier materials, making PS coatings especially attractive for turbine, aerospace, and energy applications. Innovations such as hybrid liquid–solid feedstock injection and suspension plasma spraying have markedly improved coating homogeneity, adhesion, and tribological stability.

In summary, this thorough analysis highlights important developments made possible by HVOF and plasma-sprayed coatings, which have led to notable improvements in mechanical, oxidation, corrosion, and wear resistance. Comparative evaluation reveals that HVOF is preferable for applications demanding dense, wear-resistant metallic and cermet coatings, whereas PS is suitable for thermal insulation and ceramic layer deposition. Emerging hybrid approaches that combine HVOF bond coats with plasma-sprayed top layers show promise in achieving multi-functional protection, balancing adhesion, toughness, and thermal resistance.

Acknowledgment

Support for this work came from the Chinese National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 52171058) and (Grant No. 52150410429), industry-university-research special fund project (H1WH202441), and Anhui Provincial Natural Science Foundation (2408085JX008). The reviewer’s insightful feedback is greatly appreciated by the authors. Funding is provided by Anhui University of Technology

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Azim Khan: Writing and editing, Reviewing, Resources, Conceptualization, Funding acquisition. Gobinda Gayawali: Data curation, Review and editing. S.S.A. Shah: Data curation, Writing, Review and editing. Muhammad Sohail: Investigation, Review and editing, data curation. Xia Liu: Investigation, Revision, Supervision and funding. Shihong Zhang: Supervision, Project administration, funding acquisition. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Declaration of competing interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Declaration of generative AI and AI-assisted technologies in the writing process

The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.

References

  1. , , . Accelerated phase transformation of thermally grown alumina on Ni2Al3: Effect of dispersion of hcp-oxides with various content and particle size and chemistry. Surface and Coatings Technology. 2020;394:125861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.125861
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , , . Effect of sintering temperature and time on the microstructure, density, phase, selected mechanical and tribological properties of Cf/Si3N4 composite fabricated by the spark plasma sintering. Arabian Journal of Chemistry. 2024;17:105378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2023.105378
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , , . Microstructure, mechanical properties, and corrosion resistance of biomedical Ti-Zn alloys prepared by spark plasma sintering. Intermetallics. 2025;185:108926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intermet.2025.108926
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , . Review on tribological and mechanical behavior in HVOF thermal-sprayed composite coatings. Journal of Bio- and Tribo-Corrosion. 2022;8:1-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40735-022-00631-x
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , . Hot corrosion behavior of plasma-sprayed WC-CoCr coatings on AISI 316L steel substrate in Na2SO4-25% NaCl salt environment. High Temperature Corrosion of Materials. 2023;99:415-430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11085-023-10162-6
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , , , , , , . Robust macroscale superlubricity in humid air via designing amorphous DLC/Crystalline TMDs friction pair. Advanced Functional Materials. 2024;34:2316036. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202316036
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , . A short review on the performance of high velocity oxy-fuel coatings in boiler steel applications. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2022;50:1442-1446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.09.014
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , , , , . Investigation on aging behavior and failure mechanism of blast-resistant polyurea coating in service environments. Materials Today Communications. 2025;44:112051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2025.112051
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , . Hot corrosion behavior of HVOF-sprayed carbide based composite coatings for boiler steel in Na2SO4–60 % V2O5 environment at 900 °C under cyclic conditions. Corrosion Science. 2021;190:109666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2021.109666
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , . High temperature friction and wear characteristics of various coating materials for steam valve spindle application. Wear. 2000;240:223-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0043-1648(00)00390-2
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , , , . Comparison of surface integrity, microstructure and corrosion resistance of Zr-4 alloy with various laser shock peening treatments. Surface and Coatings Technology. 2025;498:131799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2025.131799
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Handbook of tribology: Materials, coatings, and surface treatments. Choice Reviews Online. ;29:29-3326. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.29-3326
    [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , , , . Investigation of air oxidation and hot corrosion behavior of boiler grade material austenitic stainless steel AISI 347. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2020;22:1694-1701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.02.187
    [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , , , , . The design of oxidation resistant Ni superalloys for additive manufacturing. Additive Manufacturing. 2025;97:104616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2024.104616
    [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , , , , , . Study on dynamic wear evolution of modified gear rack considering the real-time variation of contact characteristics. Wear. 2025;571:205845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2025.205845
    [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , , , . Investigation of vermiculite infiltration effect on microstructural properties of thermal barrier coatings (TBCs) produced by electron beam physical vapor deposition method (EB-PVD) Surface and Coatings Technology. 2022;443:128645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2022.128645
    [Google Scholar]
  17. , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bonding mechanism in Cu coating deposited on Al alloy substrate: Combining molecular dynamics simulation and experiment. Materials Science and Engineering: A. 2025;942:148703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2025.148703
    [Google Scholar]
  18. , , , , , , . Cold spraying of Al-5Si/Al2O3 composite coatings on AZ31 Mg alloy: Microstructure, adhesion strength, and tribological properties. Surface and Coatings Technology. 2024;479:130543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2024.130543
    [Google Scholar]
  19. , , , , , , , , , , . Corrosion inhibition of mild steel in hydrochloric acid environment using terephthaldehyde based on Schiff base: Gravimetric, thermodynamic, and computational studies. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland). 2022;27:4857. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27154857
    [Google Scholar]
  20. , , , , . Applications and developments of thermal spray coatings for the iron and steel industry. Materials (Basel, Switzerland). 2023;16:516. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16020516
    [Google Scholar]
  21. , , , , , , , , , . Test and theoretical investigations on flexural behavior of high‐performance H‐shaped steel beam with local corrosion in pure bending zone. Steel Research International. 2025;96 https://doi.org/10.1002/srin.202400640
    [Google Scholar]
  22. , . A review of testing methods for thermal spray coatings. International Materials Reviews. 2014;59:179-223. https://doi.org/10.1179/1743280414y.0000000029
    [Google Scholar]
  23. , , , . Identifying the optimal HVOF spray parameters to attain minimum porosity and maximum hardness in iron based amorphous metallic coatings. Defence Technology. 2017;13:101-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dt.2017.03.001
    [Google Scholar]
  24. , , . Engineering HVOF-sprayed Cr3C2-NiCr coatings: The effect of particle morphology and spraying parameters on the microstructure, properties, and high temperature wear performance. Journal of Thermal Spray Technology. 2013;22:280-289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11666-012-9833-3
    [Google Scholar]
  25. , , , , , . Experimental investigation of obstruction effects on C3H8/H2 hybrid fuel explosion dynamics in semiconfined pipelines. ACS Omega. 2025;10:35954-35964. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.5c03366
    [Google Scholar]
  26. , , , , , , . Multi-dimensional design of slippery liquid-infused coatings empowering long-term corrosion protection for sintered Nd-Fe-B magnets in harsh environments. Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany). 2025;21:e2500629. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202500629
    [Google Scholar]
  27. , , , , . Tribological behaviour at various temperatures of WC-Co coatings prepared using different thermal spraying techniques. Tribology International. 2016;104:36-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2016.08.025
    [Google Scholar]
  28. , , . Sustainable corrosion Inhibitors: A key step towards environmentally responsible corrosion control. Ain Shams Engineering Journal. 2024;15:102672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2024.102672
    [Google Scholar]
  29. , . A review on thermal spray coating processes. International Journal of Current Trends in Engineering Research. 2016;2:556-563.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. , , , , . An influence of oxygen flow rate and spray distance on the porosity of HVOF coating and its effects on corrosion—A review. Materials. 2022;15:6329. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15186329
    [Google Scholar]
  31. , , , , . Microstructure and hot corrosion characteristics evaluation of sprayed Ni–20%Cr coating on AISI 321 steel with Na2SO4–60%V2O5 salt deposits. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part E: Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering. 2024;238:299-308. https://doi.org/10.1177/09544089221143341
    [Google Scholar]
  32. , , . Investigation on microstructure, mechanical and wear properties of HVOF sprayed composite coatings (WC–Co + CR) On Ductile Cast Iron. Materials. 2021;14:3282. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14123282
    [Google Scholar]
  33. , , , , , , , . Corrosion fatigue mechanisms and control technologies in aviation aluminum alloys: A critical review. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics 2025:103496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2025.103496
    [Google Scholar]
  34. , , , , . A comprehensive review of corrosion resistance of thermally-sprayed and thermally-diffused protective coatings on steel structures. Journal of Thermal Spray Technology. 2019;28:645-677. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11666-019-00855-3
    [Google Scholar]
  35. , . Thermal spray coatings: Replace hard chrome. Advanced Materials and Processes. 1997;152:19-21.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. , , . Hot Corrosion behaviour of nanostructured cermet based coatings deposited by different thermal spray techniques: A review. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2017;4:541-545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2017.01.055
    [Google Scholar]
  37. , , , , . Tribochemical behavior of alumina coatings deposited by high-velocity oxy fuel spraying. Ceramics International. 2015;41:5713-5720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.01.002
    [Google Scholar]
  38. , , , , , , . Security assessment of cascading failures in cyber-physical power systems with wind power penetration. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems. 2025;40:4480-4492. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpwrs.2025.3561125
    [Google Scholar]
  39. , , , , . Comparing study of high temperature erosion of HVOF sprayed Cr3C2-NiCr coating and mild steel for boiler tube. Thermal Spray 2008: Proceedings from the International Thermal Spray Conference 2008:1491-1495. https://doi.org/10.31399/asm.cp.itsc2008p1491.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. , , , . Tool wear analysis in turning inconel-657 using various tool materials. Materials and Manufacturing Processes. 2024;39 https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2024.2323434.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. , , . Oxidation behaviour of HVOF sprayed NiCrAlY and NiCrAlY-20SiC coatings on T-91 boiler tube steel. Protection of Metals and Physical Chemistry of Surfaces. 2020;56:134-150. https://doi.org/10.1134/s2070205120010220
    [Google Scholar]
  42. , , . Impact of MCrAlY feedstock powder modification by high-energy ball milling on the microstructure and high-temperature oxidation performance of HVOF-sprayed coatings. Surface and Coatings Technology. 2020;395:125935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.125935
    [Google Scholar]
  43. , , . Influence of cryomilling on the morphology and composition of the oxide scales formed on HVOF CoNiCrAlY coatings. Oxidation of Metals. 2004;61:219-238. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:oxid.0000025332.26757.41
    [Google Scholar]
  44. , , , , , . Microstructural characteristics of high-velocity oxygen-fuel (HVOF) sprayed nickel-based alloy coating. Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2013;581:398-403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.07.109
    [Google Scholar]
  45. , , . Tribological behaviour of thermally sprayed coatings: A review. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2019 https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3323697
    [Google Scholar]
  46. , , , , , . Effect of the microstructure of corrosion products on tribo-corrosion performance of HVOF-sprayed NiCrWMoCuCBFe coating. Corrosion Science. 2022;207:110597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2022.110597
    [Google Scholar]
  47. . Structural characteristics and wear, oxidation, hot corrosion behaviors of HVOF sprayed Cr3C2-NiCr hardmetal coatings. Surface and Coatings Technology. 2023;457:129319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2023.129319
    [Google Scholar]
  48. , , . Microstructure and selected properties of Cr3C2–NiCr coatings obtained by HVOF on magnesium alloy substrates. Materials. 2020;13:2775. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13122775
    [Google Scholar]
  49. , , . A comprehensive study on the microstructure evolution and oxidation resistance of conventional and nanocrystalline MCrAlY coatings. Scientific Reports. 2021;11:875. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-79323-w
    [Google Scholar]
  50. , , , , , . Effect of binder phases on the cavitation erosion behavior of HVOF sprayed WC-based coatings. Surface and Coatings Technology. 2023;472:129887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2023.129887
    [Google Scholar]
  51. , , . Improvement of corrosion performance of HVOF MMC coatings by laser surface treatment. Surface Engineering. 2011;27:729-733. https://doi.org/10.1179/1743294411y.0000000001
    [Google Scholar]
  52. , , , , , , . Microstructure and properties of HVOF-sprayed NiCrAlY coatings modified by rare earth. Journal of Thermal Spray Technology. 2014;23:809-817. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11666-014-0097-y
    [Google Scholar]
  53. , , , , , , . Mitigating hypersonic heat barrier via direct cooling enhanced by leidenfrost inhibition. Nature Communications. 2025;16:6931. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-62120-2
    [Google Scholar]
  54. , , , , , , . Microstructure and cavitation erosion resistance of arc ion plating NiCrAlY coating on the 304L stainless steel. Tribology International. 2022;173:107618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2022.107618
    [Google Scholar]
  55. , , , , , , , , , , . Cavitation erosion behavior of HVOF sprayed WC-10Co4Cr cermet coatings in simulated sea water. Ocean Engineering. 2019;190:106449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106449
    [Google Scholar]
  56. , , , . The effect of WC-CoCr content on hardness and tribological properties of NiCrBSi coatings fabricated by the HVOF process. Surface and Coatings Technology. 2023;466:129506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2023.129506
    [Google Scholar]
  57. . Isothermal oxidation and hot corrosion behavior of HVOF sprayed 80Ni-20Cr coatings at 750 °C. Surface and Coatings Technology. 2023;454:129141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2022.129141
    [Google Scholar]
  58. , , , , , , , . Role of micro- and nano-CeO2 reinforcements on characteristics and tribological performance of HVOF sprayed Cr3C2-NiCr coatings. Surface and Coatings Technology. 2023;467:129684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2023.129684
    [Google Scholar]
  59. , , , , , , . First-principles analysis of effects of cerium doping on electrochemical corrosion behaviors of steel. Journal of Rare Earths. 2025;43:1758-1768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jre.2025.04.027
    [Google Scholar]
  60. , . Experimental investigation on hot corrosion, oxidation and microstructure of WC based cermet HVOF coating. High Temperature Corrosion of Materials. 2024;101:413-432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11085-023-10179-x
    [Google Scholar]
  61. , . Effect of WC-Co and 86WC-10Co-4Cr coatings on type-II hot corrosion behaviour & microstructure characteristics at 650 degree celsius. Surface and Coatings Technology. 2023;469:129812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2023.129812
    [Google Scholar]
  62. , , , , , , , . Effect of alloying elements on microstructure evolution and wear mechanism of MCrAlX-based coatings at 800°C. Surface and Coatings Technology. 2023;456:129266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2023.129266
    [Google Scholar]
  63. , , . High-Temperature behavior of a high-velocity oxy-fuel sprayed Cr3C2-NiCr coating. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A. 2012;43:2979-2993. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-012-1118-4
    [Google Scholar]
  64. , . Erosion-corrosion of plasma as sprayed and laser remelted Stellite-6 coatings in a coal fired boiler. Wear. 2006;260:1035-1044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2005.07.003
    [Google Scholar]
  65. , , , , . Fatigue in AISI 4340 steel thermal spray coating by HVOF for aeronautic application. Procedia Engineering. 2010;2:1617-1623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2010.03.174
    [Google Scholar]
  66. , . A review on the development of thermal barrier coatings by using thermal spray techniques. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2022;50:1458-1464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.09.018
    [Google Scholar]
  67. P.L. Fauchais, J.V.R. Heberlein, M.I. Boulos, Thermal spray fundamentals: From powder to part, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-68991-3.
  68. , , , , , . Hot corrosion behavior of plasma-sprayed NiCrAlY/TiO2 and NiCrAlY/Cr2O3/YSZ cermets coatings on alloy steel. Surfaces and Interfaces. 2021;22:100810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfin.2020.100810
    [Google Scholar]
  69. , , , , , . Oxidation behaviour of a CoNiCrAlY/h-BN based abradable coating. Corrosion Science. 2019;153:170-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2019.02.030
    [Google Scholar]
  70. , , , . Effect of Cr2O3 nanoparticle dispersions on oxidation kinetics and phase transformation of thermally grown alumina on a nickel aluminide coating. Corrosion Science. 2019;150:91-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2019.01.032
    [Google Scholar]
  71. , , . Accelerated phase transformation of thermally grown alumina on Ni2Al3: Effect of dispersion of hcp-oxides with various content and particle size and chemistry. Surface and Coatings Technology. 2020;394:125861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.125861
    [Google Scholar]
  72. , , , , , . Effect of Cr nanoparticle dispersions with various contents on the oxidation and phase transformation of alumina scale formation on Ni2Al3 coating. Surface and Coatings Technology. 2022;438:128397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2022.128397
    [Google Scholar]
  73. , , , , , . The effect of grain refinement on the oxidation and phase transformation of alumina scale on Ni2Al3 coating. Intermetallics. 2022;146:107571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intermet.2022.107571
    [Google Scholar]
  74. , , , , . Thermally grown oxide formation on Ni2Al3 aluminide coating: The effect of nanocrystalline nickel film on oxide scale adhesion. Vacuum. 2022;197:110843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vacuum.2021.110843
    [Google Scholar]
  75. , , , , , . Effect of vacuum annealing on initial oxidation behavior and alumina transition of NiCoCrAlY coatings. Surface and Coatings Technology. 2020;404:126441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.126441
    [Google Scholar]
  76. , , , , , , . ZrO2-nanoparticle assisted phase transformation and oxidation kinetics of thermally grown alumina on nickel aluminide coatings. Surface and Coatings Technology. 2023;470:129852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2023.129852
    [Google Scholar]
  77. , , , , , , . Temperature effect on early oxidation behavior of NiCoCrAlY coatings: Microstructure and phase transformation. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters). 2022;35:975-984. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40195-021-01310-5
    [Google Scholar]
  78. , , , , , , , , . Tribocorrosion behaviours and mechanisms of Inconel 625–nano/micro Al2O3 composite coatings prepared by plasma enhanced high-velocity arc spraying. Corrosion Science. 2025;256:113221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2025.113221
    [Google Scholar]
  79. , , , , , , , , . “Hybrid” plasma spraying of NiCrAlY+Al2O3+h-BN composite coatings for sliding wear applications. Wear. 2017;378-379:68-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2017.02.027
    [Google Scholar]
  80. , , . Microstructure and tribological behavior of plasma sprayed NiCrAlY/WC-Co/cenosphere/solid lubricants composite coatings. Surface and Coatings Technology. 2018;354:92-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2018.09.018
    [Google Scholar]
  81. , , , , , , , . Plasma sprayed aluminium nitride (AlN) coating: Microstructural, mechanical, tribological, and corrosion resistance performance. Journal of the European Ceramic Society. 2024;44:1458-1469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2023.10.027
    [Google Scholar]
  82. , , , , . Investigation & characterization of plasma sprayed cermet coatings on special steel alloy for gas turbine applications. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2021;47:3720-3725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.02.092
    [Google Scholar]
  83. , , , , , . Tribocorrosion behavior of HVOF sprayed WC-based cermet coatings in sodium chloride solution environment in relation to binder phases. Surface and Coatings Technology. 2022;435:128248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2022.128248
    [Google Scholar]
  84. , , , , , , . High-temperature oxidation and wear resistance of nano-ZrB2 reinforced CoNiCrAlY composite coating via a step-fashion mechanical alloying powder process. Tribology International. 2023;181:108331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2023.108331
    [Google Scholar]
  85. , , , , , , , . Microstructure and tribological properties of ZrB2-enhanced NiCrBSi coatings prepared by high-velocity oxy-fuel spraying. Surface and Coatings Technology. 2023;468:129745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2023.129745
    [Google Scholar]
  86. , , , , . A flexible skin material with switchable wettability for trans-medium vehicles. International Journal of Smart and Nano Materials. 2025;16:419-442. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475411.2025.2504442
    [Google Scholar]
  87. , , , , . Effect of Cr2O3 on the microstructure and wear resistance of coatings prepared from Cr2O3-SiC-Al composite powders. Materials Chemistry and Physics. 2023;304:127860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2023.127860
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections