Translate this page into:
Identification of the roselle root rot pathogen and its sensitivity to different fungicides
⁎Corresponding author. zhaoyanhong402@163.com (Yanhong Zhao)
-
Received: ,
Accepted: ,
This article was originally published by Elsevier and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.
Peer review under responsibility of King Saud University.
Abstract
Root rot is the main disease affecting roselle plantings and production and can seriously affect the yield and quality of calyces. Thus, it is urgent to identify the pathogen causing roselle root rot and screen effective pesticides to control the disease. In the present study, morphological observation, pathogenicity assays and molecular biology methods were used to identify the pathogen causing roselle root rot in Nanning, Guangxi Province, and four biological and four chemical fungicides were evaluated for their effects on the mycelial growth rate of the pathogen. The results showed that the pathogen causing roselle root rot in Nanning, Guangxi, was Fusarium solani, marking the first report of this fungus causing root rot of roselle in China. The fungicidal activity screening revealed differences in the inhibitory effects of the eight fungicides on the colony growth of F. solani. For the biofungicides, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens exhibited the best fungistatic effect, with an IC50 of 1.10 mg/mL. When the mass concentration was 2.5 mg/mL, the mycelial growth of the pathogen was 100% inhibited, while Bacillus subtilis had the worst inhibitory effect, with an IC50 of 46.78 mg/mL. When its mass concentration was 80 mg/mL, mycelial growth was only inhibited by 74.67%. For the chemical fungicides, carbendazim and thiophanate-methyl presented the strongest effects on F. solani, with IC50 values of 0.0082 mg/mL and 0.0243 mg/mL, respectively. When the mass concentrations were 0.03 mg/mL and 0.075 mg/mL, mycelial growth was inhibited by 100%. These results provide a scientific basis for rationally selecting fungicides to control roselle root rot in field production.
Keywords
Hibiscus sabdariffa L
Root rot
Fusarium solani
Bactericide
Control effect
- PDA
-
potato dextrose agar
- SEM
-
scanning electron microscopy
- SOD
-
superoxide dismutase
- POD
-
peroxidase
- APX
-
ascorbic acid
- PAL
-
phenylalanine ammonia lyase
- PPO
-
polyphenol oxidase
Abbreviations
1 Introduction
Roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.) is an annual herbaceous plant of the Hibiscus genus in the Malvaceae family. It is widely distributed in tropical and subtropical regions and is cultivated in Guangdong, Guangxi, Fujian, Yunnan, and Taiwan, China (Izquierdo-Vega et al., 2020). The roselle calyx is rich in pigments that can be used as a natural food coloring additive; these pigments account for 1%-1.5% of the dry weight of the calyx (Cid-Ortega and Guerrero-Beltrán, 2015). In addition, the calyx is rich in vitamins, organic acids, proteins, fats, polyphenols, and flavonoids (Keyata et al., 2021) and has important medicinal value in preventing obesity (Giacoman-Martinez et al., 2019), providing antioxidative activity (Oyewopo et al., 2020; Wu et al., 2018), and protecting against tumors (Tsai et al., 2017), bacterial infection, inflammation (Si et al., 2019), hypertension (Abdel-Rahman et al., 2017), and other cardiovascular diseases (El-Shiekh et al., 2020). Therefore, the active ingredients in roselle have broad application prospects and great economic value in the fields of modern medicine and food.
Due to the continuous cropping of roselle, however, the planting soil environment has deteriorated, with serious continuous cropping obstacles and aggravation of soil-borne diseases (She et al., 2017). Root rot is one of the main diseases in roselle plantings. It is a cumulative annual epidemic disease that occurs from the seedling stage to the flowering and fruiting stages, mainly harming the rhizomes of roselle (Hassan et al., 2014). The diseased roots become discolored and rotten, and the xylem turns black, with necrosis extending along the main root to the junction of the rhizomes (Luo et al., 2014). The growth of the plants becomes weak after infection by the pathogenic fungus, with leaf chlorosis and vascular bundle browning (Koike, 2011). The leaves become desiccated and wilt during the beginning of the disease but may appear restored in the morning and evening. However, wilting is aggravated in the later stage and ultimately leads to plant death (Jeon et al., 2013). The disease incidence is higher and symptoms are more obvious from the flowering stage to the fruit maturity stage. The fruit size of the diseased plants decreases, the anthocyanin content decreases, and the plants often wilt and die.
In recent years, root rot has occurred continuously in the roselle growing areas of Nanning, China, especially at the blooming and fruit maturity stages, causing a large number of plant deaths and seriously affecting the yield and quality of roselle. This has become an important obstacle in roselle planting. However, the pathogenic and biological characteristics that contribute to roselle root rot in Nanning, Guangxi, remain unclear. Therefore, the identification of roselle root rot pathogens is of great value for the selection and creation of resistant varieties and chemical control as well as for biological control strategies. To identify the pathogenic causes of roselle root rot in Nanning, China, effective control agents were screened. In the present study, the pathogen was isolated from diseased plants, and virulence assays, morphological observations and molecular biological analyses were used to identify the pathogen of roselle root rot, while effective control agents were screened in the laboratory. The aim of this study was to provide an important theoretical basis for the effective prevention and control of roselle wilt disease in Guangxi, China.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Isolation and characterization of the pathogen
The diseased plants were collected from an open-field crop in Nanning, Guangxi Province, China (longitude E 108.33, latitude N 22.84). The infected tissue samples were rinsed thoroughly with sterile distilled water, cut with a sterile scalpel into approximately 0.5-cm pieces, surface disinfected with 75% ethanol for one minute, and then rinsed 3–4 times with sterile distilled water. Finally, all sterilized samples were transferred to potato dextrose agar (PDA) amended with 100 mg/L streptomycin and incubated at 28 °C in the dark for 3 days. Emerging colonies were transferred to new PDA two to three times until single colonies were obtained. Cultures on PDA were used for the observation of colony characteristics. The shape, length and width of 50 conidia of three representative isolates were observed by a Nikon Ni-U. The shape and external morphology of the isolated strain were also confirmed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) following the techniques of Liao et al. (2020). The colony was suspended in 90% ethanol and then placed on a stub. The specimens were sputter-coated with gold and then scanned and photographed using SEM (Hitachi SU8100, Tokyo, Japan).
2.2 Pathogenicity test of the isolated strain on roselle seedlings
A representative isolate (GXRST29) was selected for expansion culture for the pathogenicity test. Spores were collected from 7-day-old PDA cultures maintained at 28 °C and suspended in sterilized distilled water at 106-107 conidia/mL, as determined using a hemocytometer. The resulting suspension was filtered through four layers of sterile cheese cloth to remove mycelial fragments. Five roselle plants at the 5-leaf stage were artificially inoculated by root dipping into the conidial suspension. The experiment was conducted three times, and negative controls were treated with sterile water. All treated plants were placed in an incubator at 28 °C with a 16 h light period for 25 days. Plants were observed every two days after inoculation for symptom appearance. Isolations were made from any resulting lesions on the inoculated plants, and the morphological and cultural characteristics were compared with those of the original fungal isolates used as inoculum. The reisolated fungi were further identified using molecular methods.
2.3 Molecular identification of the pathogenic bacteria
Total DNA was extracted from fresh aerial mycelia grown on PDA plates using a Fungal Genomic DNA Kit (Coolaber, Beijing, China) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The internal transcribed spacer (ITS) rRNA region was amplified using the primer pairs ITS1/ITS4 (ITS1: 5′-TCCGTAGGTGAACCTGCGG-3′, ITS4: 5′-TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC-3′) (Chehri, 2014). DNA amplification was performed in a final volume of 20 μL of reaction mixture containing 10 μL of 2 × Taq Master Mix (Vazyme, Nanjing, China), 0.3 μM of each forward and reverse primer and 50 ng of DNA template. The thermal cycling program for PCR amplification was as follows: predenaturation at 94 °C for 3 min, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 40 s, annealing at 58 °C for 1 min, and extension at 72 °C for 2 min, with a final step of 72 °C for 5 min. Amplified products were visualized by gel electrophoresis in a 1% (w/v) agarose gel. PCR products were purified with a Gel DNA Extraction Kit (Vazyme, Nanjing, China) and cloned into a linearized pEASY-T1 cloning vector (TransGene Biotech, Beijing) according to standard procedures, followed by sequencing by a commercial sequencing service provider (Genecreate, Wuhan, China). Sequences were compared with those in the NCBI database (https://www.blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). Multiple sequence alignment was performed using DNAMAN software. The maximum likelihood (ML) method was used to perform phylogenetic analysis using MEGA X (Kumar et al., 2018), with 1000 bootstrap replications according to Sharma and Kumar (2021), and evolutionary distances were computed using the Kimura 2-parameter method (Kimura, 1980).
2.4 Laboratory determination of pathogenicity
The growth rate method was used to measure the effect of eight fungicides on the roselle root rot pathogen. Media containing a series of gradient concentrations of agents were prepared with PDA, and sterile water was used as a negative control. A mycelial plug of the pathogen was collected by a sterilized punch with a diameter of 0.7 cm and placed in the center of each reagent-amended medium. All medium-containing plates were incubated at 28 °C in the dark for six days. The cross method was applied to measure the diameter of the colony, and the growth inhibition rate was calculated by the following formula: rate of growth inhibition (%) = (colony diameter of control - colony diameter of treatment)/colony diameter of control) × 100% (Kong et al., 2018). Each treatment was repeated at least three times. The biopesticides used in this study were as follows: Paenibacillus polymyxa, 200 million live bacteria per gram (Henan Golden Key Agricultural Science and Technology Co. LTD, Henan, China); Bacillus subtilis, one billion living spores per gram (Baoding Kelufeng Biochemical Technology Co., LTD, Hebei, China); Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, one billion living spores per gram (Huaiyang Shuoda Biological Technology Co., LTD, Jiangsu, China); and 80% ethylicin emulsion (Zhejiang Pinghu Agricultural Pharmaceutical Factory, Zhejiang, China). The chemical pesticides used in this study were as follows: 50% carbendazim wettable powder (Shanghai Yuelian Chemical Co., LTD, China); 70% methyl thiobacillam wettable powder (Yunfa Chemical (Shanghai) Co., LTD, China); 80% mancozeb wettable powder (Dow Yinong Agricultural Technology (China) Co., LTD); and 98% oxazoline soluble powder (Tianjin Lvheng Chemical Co., LTD, China).
2.5 Statistical analysis
All data were statistically analyzed according to the appropriate procedure for one-way analysis of variance using SPSS 17.0 software. Each measure was expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (mean ± SD). Student-Newman-Keuls (S-N-K) post hoc test was performed to control for significant differences between groups, and significance was considered for P < 0.05. The IC50 was used to calculate the median inhibitory concentration and was obtained from the linear regression equation.
3 Results
3.1 Characteristics of roselle root rot disease
Field experiments revealed that the incidence of roselle root rot was higher in wet, acidic, hardened continuous cropping land. Diseased plants were occasionally found at the seedling stage. However, during the flowering and fruiting stages, the disease severity increased with a high temperature and humidity environment. In the early stage of the disease, plant leaves wilted, similar to symptoms observed under drought conditions, but could recover in the morning and evening. In the late stage, plant wilting was aggravated, and leaves began to turn yellow as they wilted. The primary and lateral roots of the infected plants were discolored and rotted, and the xylem became black, with necrosis extending along the main root to the junction of the rhizomes, in addition to vascular tissue browning, wilting and death (Fig. 1a, 1b).
3.2 Isolation and morphological identification of the pathogen
The diseased samples were collected from three different diseased plots for pathogen isolation and identification. A total of 18 fungal cultures were consistently isolated from the basal stems and roots of diseased roselle plants, and 29 pure strains derived from single spores were obtained; these were named and numbered as shown in Table 1. Colonies of the fungal isolates grown on PDA at 28 °C showed dry surfaces, compact texture, cottony or fluffy mycelia, and raised surfaces with wavy or curled edges (Fig. 2a). The aerial mycelium expanded rapidly and covered the medium surface, initially being white, then turning pale yellow after six days of growth. Microscopic observations revealed that microconidia were generally single-celled, hyaline and ovoid with sizes of 5.13 to 15.12 × 2.50 to 4.20 μm. Macroconidia were falciform with 3 to 4 septae and sizes of 19.08 to 24.35 × 4.5 to 8.00 μm (Fig. 2b-d). Based on the morphological and culture characteristics, the fungus was identified as Fusarium solani (Leslie and Summerell, 2006).
| Strain | Host | Pathogen |
|---|---|---|
| GXRST11 | roselle | Fusarium solani |
| GXRST12 | roselle | Fusarium solani |
| GXRST13 | roselle | Fusarium solani |
| GXRST14 | roselle | Fusarium solani |
| GXRST15 | roselle | Fusarium solani |
| GXRST16 | roselle | Fusarium solani |
| GXRST17 | roselle | Fusarium solani |
| GXRST18 | roselle | Fusarium solani |
| GXRST19 | roselle | Fusarium solani |
| GXRST191 | roselle | Fusarium solani |
| GXRST192 | roselle | Fusarium solani |
| GXRST21 | roselle | Fusarium solani |
| GXRST22 | roselle | Fusarium solani |
| GXRST23 | roselle | Fusarium solani |
| GXRST24 | roselle | Fusarium solani |
| GXRST25 | roselle | Fusarium solani |
| GXRST26 | roselle | Fusarium solani |
| GXRST27 | roselle | Fusarium solani |
| GXRST28 | roselle | Fusarium solani |
| GXRST29 | roselle | Fusarium solani |
| GXRST291 | roselle | Fusarium solani |
| GXRST31 | roselle | Fusarium solani |
| GXRST32 | roselle | Fusarium solani |
| GXRST33 | roselle | Fusarium solani |
| GXRST34 | roselle | Fusarium solani |
| GXRST36 | roselle | Fusarium solani |
| GXRST35 | roselle | Fusarium solani |
| GXRST37 | roselle | Fusarium solani |
| GXRST38 | roselle | Fusarium solani |

3.3 Molecular identification of the pathogen
The mycelia of the isolated pure strains were collected for DNA extraction for further characterization, and their internal transcribed spacer rRNA regions (ITSs) were amplified using the primer pair ITS1/ITS4. Agarose gel electrophoresis showed that the amplified products were approximately 500 bp (Fig. 3). The amplicons were recovered from the gel, cloned and sequenced. The sequencing data were aligned with the NCBI nucleotide database (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) by using BLAST. BLAST alignment showed that 29 of the isolates were homologous to F. solani (Table 1), and the sequences included a partial ITS1 sequence, 5.8S rRNA gene, complete ITS2 sequence and partial large subunit ribosomal RNA gene sequence. The multiple alignment showed that the rRNA sequences of F. solani were highly conserved among different host plants (Fig. 4). The 29 purified strains described above could be divided into four categories according to the differences in the sequences of the conserved regions of F. solani and were deposited in GenBank under accession numbers OL314654, OL314655, OL314656 and OL314657. A BLAST search showed that these sequences were 99.62%, 99.81%, 86.14% and 99.81% homologous to the published ITS sequences of F. solani identified in GenBank (MN653249, MN165653, MT937227 and MN960010, respectively). A representative isolate (GXRST29) was selected to construct a phylogenetic tree to further reveal interspecies relationships. Based on molecular data, the fungus was confirmed to be F. solani and had the closest phylogenetic relationship to F. solani of olive (KU528858.1) (Fig. 4).

Five roselle plants at the 5-leaf stage were artificially inoculated by root dipping into a 106-107-mL−1 spore suspension of the isolated strain GXRST29 for pathogenicity testing. The experiment was conducted three times, and the negative controls were inoculated with sterile water. Compared to the control, the symptoms began with the inhibition of growth, leaf yellowing, plant dwarfing and root rotting by three days after inoculation (Fig. 1c, 1d). All plants exhibited symptoms similar to those on diseased plants observed in the field seven days after inoculation. Fungi that were steadily reisolated from the root and stem tissues of inoculated symptomatic plants were confirmed as F. solani by morphological and molecular identification. In contrast, the noninoculated seedlings had no root rot and produced an abundance of new roots. No fungi were isolated from them, and the same results were obtained in all three repetitions of the pathogenicity tests. Thus, these results satisfied Koch’s postulates, and F. solani was the main cause of roselle root rot.
3.4 The effect of fungicides at different concentrations on mycelial growth of Fusarium solani
In the present study, eight different fungicides, including four biological fungicides (Fig. 5) and four chemical fungicides (Fig. 6), were used to investigate their inhibitory effects against F. solani on roselle. The results revealed that the four biofungicides showed different degrees of inhibition of F. solani, and the inhibition rate increased with increasing mass concentrations. There were significant differences in the colony diameter, which was significantly decreased compared with that of the CK (P < 0.05) and differed between treatments with different mass concentrations. The different biological fungicides exhibited different inhibitory effects on F. solani (Table 2). A comparison of the inhibition rates of the four biological fungicides with different mass concentrations on F. solani revealed that Bacillus amyloliquefaciens showed the best fungistatic effect. When the concentration of the agent was 1 mg/mL, the inhibition rate was 50.09%, and when the concentration of the agent was 2.5 mg/mL, the inhibition rate was 100%; the fungistatic activity was significantly different among different concentrations (P < 0.01). Following ethylicin treatment, when the concentration was 16 mg/mL, the fungistatic rate was 55.39%, and when the concentration was 80 mg/mL, the fungistatic rate reached 93.19%. When the concentration of Bacillus polymyxa was 60 mg/mL, its inhibition rate was 100% (Table 2). This result indicated that the diameter of the colonies varied significantly among different concentrations of acetoillin (P < 0.01); however, the fungistatic rate was lower than that of Paenibacillus polymyxa after treatment with a high-quality concentration of ethylicin. In this study, the inhibitory effect of Bacillus subtilis was the worst; when its mass concentration was 80 mg/mL, the inhibition rate was only 74.67% (Table 2). Combined with the virulence regression equation and the IC50 value, the effects of the four biofungicides against F. solani were comprehensively evaluated as follows: Bacillus amyloliquefaciens > 80% ethylicin > Paenibacillus polymyxa > Bacillus subtilis (Table 2).

| Fungicide | Concentration (mg/mL) | Mycelial diameter (cm) | Inhibition rate (%) | Toxicity regression equation | R2 | IC50 (mg/mL) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bacillus amyloliquefaciens | 0.1 | 6.09 ± 0.06aA | 7.88 ± 0.84aA | y = 0.3845x + 0.076 |
0.9917 | 1.10 |
| 0.5 | 4.80 ± 0.03bB | 27.41 ± 0.42bB | ||||
| 1 | 3.30 ± 0.12cC | 50.09 ± 1.75cC | ||||
| 2 | 0.85 ± 0.02dD | 87.15 ± 0.35dD | ||||
| 2.5 | 0 ± 0.00eE | 100.00 ± eE | ||||
| Paenibacillus polymyxa | 10 | 4.82 ± 0.06aA | 27.16 ± 0.91dD | y = 0.0145x + 0.152 | 0.9925 | 24.00 |
| 20 | 3.58 ± 0.08bB | 45.81 ± 1.22cC | ||||
| 40 | 1.57 ± 0.02cC | 76.31 ± 0.34bB | ||||
| 60 | 0 ± 0.00dD | 100.00 ± 0.00aA | ||||
| 80 | 0 ± 0.00dD | 100.00 ± 0.00aA | ||||
| Bacillus subtilis | 10 | 5.70 ± 0.06aA | 13.80 ± 0.87eE | y = 0.009x + 0.079 | 0.9559 | 46.78 |
| 20 | 5.10 ± 0.09bB | 22.87 ± 1.31dD | ||||
| 40 | 3.15 ± 0.02cC | 52.36 ± 0.29cC | ||||
| 60 | 2.39 ± 0.01dD | 63.87 ± 0.17bB | ||||
| 80 | 1.68 ± 0.03eE | 74.67 ± 0.38aA | ||||
| Ethylicin | 4 | 3.80 ± 0.03aA | 42.53 ± 0.44eD | y = 0.0065x + 0.4306 | 0.9771 | 10.68 |
| 8 | 3.51 ± 0.05bA | 46.92 ± 0.80dD | ||||
| 16 | 2.95 ± 0.05cB | 55.39 ± 0.78cC | ||||
| 32 | 2.10 ± 0.03dC | 68.24 ± 0.52bB | ||||
| 80 | 0.45 ± 0.06eD | 93.19 ± 0.87aA | ||||
| CK | 0.00 | 6.61 ± 0.08 |
Different lowercase letters indicate that there is a significant difference at P ≤ 0.05 (n = 3), and different uppercase letters indicate a significant difference at P ≤ 0.01 (n = 3).
As shown in Fig. 6, the four chemical fungicides exhibited different degrees of inhibition of F. solani of roselle, and the inhibition rate increased with increasing mass concentration. There were significant differences in colony diameter, which was significantly lower than that of the CK (P < 0.01) and differed between treatments with different mass concentrations. However, the antibacterial effect of the four chemical fungicides was stronger than that of the biological fungicides, and a relatively significant fungistatic effect could be achieved under treatment with low concentrations of chemicals. For example, when the mass concentration of carbendazim was only 0.005 mg/mL, its antibacterial effect reached 42.53% (Table 3). The virulence regression equation revealed that the IC50 of hymexazol (0.0050 mg/mL) was lower than that of carbendazim (0.0082 mg/mL). However, when the carbendazim concentration was 0.03 mg/mL, the fungistatic rate reached 100%, while when the hymexazol concentration was 0.5 mg/mL, the fungistatic rate only reached 94.68% (Table 3). In addition, although the IC50 of thiophanate-methyl (0.0243 mg/mL) was higher than that of oxazim (0.0050 mg/mL), when its mass concentration was 0.05 mg/mL, the fungistatic rate was 77.32%, and when its mass concentration was 0.075 mg/mL, the fungistatic rate reached 100% (Table 3). This indicated that thiophanate-methyl presented a better inhibitory effect on F. solani than hymexazol at low concentrations. Thus, based on the comprehensive evaluation by using the inhibition effect, toxicity regression equation and IC50 of the four chemical fungicides against F. solani, the effects of the four chemical agents against F. solani were as follows: carbendazim > thiophanate-methyl > hymexazol > carmazine.
| Fungicide | Concentration (mg/mL) | Mycelial diameter (cm) | Inhibition rate (%) | Toxicity regression equation | R2 | IC50 (mg/mL) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carbendazim | 0.0025 | 4.70 ± 0.03aA | 28.92 ± 0.49eE | y = 24.8x + 0.2977 | 0.9593 | 0.0082 |
| 0.005 | 3.80 ± 0.01bB | 42.53 ± 0.18dD | ||||
| 0.01 | 2.50 ± 0.04cC | 62.19 ± 0.61cC | ||||
| 0.02 | 1.15 ± 0.03dD | 82.61 ± 0.44bB | ||||
| 0.03 | 0 ± 0.00E | 100.00 ± 0.00aA | ||||
| Thiophanate-methyl | 0.005 | 4.85 ± 0.05aA | 26.65 ± 0.76eE | y = 10.231x + 0.251 | 0.9909 | 0.0243 |
| 0.01 | 4.25 ± 0.14bB | 35.73 ± 2.08dD | ||||
| 0.025 | 3.00 ± 0.02cC | 54.63 ± 0.3cC | ||||
| 0.05 | 1.50 ± 0.04dD | 77.32 ± 0.55bB | ||||
| 0.075 | 0 ± 0.00eE | 100.00 ± 0.00aA | ||||
| Carmazine | 0.05 | 3.70 ± 0.03aA | 47.02 ± 0.38eE | y = 0.3419x + 0.4879 | 0.9936 | 0.0354 |
| 0.1 | 3.10 ± 0.05bB | 53.12 ± 0.76dD | ||||
| 0.5 | 2.10 ± 0.09cC | 68.24 ± 1.38cC | ||||
| 1 | 1.20 ± 0.02dD | 81.85 ± 0.31bB | ||||
| 1.5 | 0 ± 0.00eE | 100.00 ± 0.00aA | ||||
| Hymexazol | 0.05 | 3.20 ± 0.13aA | 51.56 ± 1.93eE | y = 0.8766x + 0.4956 | 0.9812 | 0.0050 |
| 0.1 | 2.63 ± 0.08bB | 60.18 ± 1.16dD | ||||
| 0.2 | 2.05 ± 0.10cC | 69.00 ± 1.51cC | ||||
| 0.4 | 1.20 ± 0.13dD | 81.79 ± 1.99bB | ||||
| 0.5 | 0.35 ± 0.03eE | 94.68 ± 0.48aA | ||||
| CK | 0.00 | 6.61 ± 0.08 |
Different lowercase letters indicate that there is a significant difference at P ≤ 0.05 (n = 3), and different uppercase letters indicate a significant difference at P ≤ 0.01 (n = 3).
4 Discussion
4.1 F. Solani was the main pathogen that caused root rot on roselle
Root rot is an important disease affecting the growth and development of roselle, which could lead to a decline in the yield and quality of roselle calyces and serious economic losses. The disease has become an important obstacle in roselle planting (Nalim et al., 2011). However, there have been few reports on the characteristics of the pathogen causing roselle root rot in Nanning, Guangxi. In the present study, the pathogen of roselle root rot was isolated, and its morphological characteristics, pathogenicity and laboratory toxicity were determined. This was the first time that F. solani was confirmed to be the main pathogen causing roselle root rot in Nanning, Guangxi. The traditional classification of fungi is mainly based on their morphological, physiological and biochemical characteristics (Leslie and Summerell, 2006). However, due to the large diversity of fungi, traditional taxonomic methods often lead to false positive or false negative results, which creates certain difficulties for the classification and identification of fungi. The application of molecular biology technology based on nucleic acid sequencing provides a simpler and more convenient, sensitive and specific method for the classification of fungi (Chehri, 2014). In this study, the pathogen that causes roselle root rot was identified on the basis of morphology combined with an analysis of the specific ITS sequence of its rRNA. This method has been widely used in the isolation and identification of the pathogens causing dragon fruit rot (O Donnell, 2000), strawberry root rot (Mariscal et al., 2017), wolfberry root rot (Uwaremwe et al., 2020) and bitter gourd Fusarium wilt (Liu et al., 2017).
4.2 Biofungicide use is one of the main methods for Fusarium control
Fusarium is a worldwide-distributed soil-borne fungal disease that causes fusarium wilt; this disease can lead to vascular lesions and plant death and seriously reduce crop yield and quality. At present, dozens of crops, such as cotton (Zhu et al., 2020), banana (Kristle et al., 2019), tomato (Ye et al., 2020), and potato (Hussein et al., 2020), have been harmed by Fusarium, leading to serious effects on the development of the fruit and vegetable industry in China. In addition to breeding disease-resistant varieties, biological and chemical control are the main methods to inhibit pathogenic Fusarium. Bacillus biofungicides present good effects in the biocontrol of soil-borne and aboveground diseases. For example, Bacillus subtilis is an effective biocontrol agent against root rot pathogens of eggplant and tomato (Abdel et al., 2016; Madhi and Jumaah, 2020). Paenibacillus polymyxa showed a good control effect on cucumber fusarium wilt and fusarium head blight (Imen et al., 2016; Li and Chen, 2019).
In this study, four biological fungicides, Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, Paenibacillus polymyxa and acetoallicin, were analyzed for their inhibitory effects on F. solani isolated from roselle. The results showed that the four fungicides exhibited a certain inhibitory effect on F. solani, and the inhibitory effect increased gradually with increasing concentrations. Bacillus amyloliquefaciens showed a significant advantage over the other three biofungicides in its inhibitory effects against F. solani, with an IC50 of 1.10 mg/mL. This was consistent with the control effect of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens on watermelon Fusarium wilt (Zhao et al., 2018). Bacillus subtilis exhibited the worst inhibitory effect on F. solani, with an IC50 of 46.78 mg/mL. However, the control effect of Bacillus subtilis on strawberry root rot caused by F. oxysporum was better than that of other biological fungicides (Zhang et al., 2012). This indicates that different biological fungicides have different control effects on different crops, and this discrepancy might result from the differences in the mechanism of action of the different biofungicides.
Previous studies have suggested that Bacillus polymyxa can secrete enzymes that dissolve the cell wall components of pathogenic fungi (such as chitinase, protease, pectin, and cellulase) to cause mycelial lysis, mycelial cell malformation, spore wall fragmentation, and protoplasm overflow, rendering pathogens unable to infect host plants (Dahaieh et al., 2018). Bacillus amyloliquefaciens could control Fusarium wilt by inducing antioxidative enzymatic activities in maize seedlings (Paola et al., 2011). The biocontrol bacteria of sorghum wilt not only increased the activities of the related antioxidant enzymes, such as superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD), and ascorbic acid (APX), but also enhanced the activity of the defense enzymes phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL) and polyphenol oxidase (PPO) by inducing H2O2 reactive oxygen signaling. Moreover, the enzyme activities of urease, phosphatase, polyphenol oxidase and cellulase in soil were significantly improved (Dukare and Paul, 2021). This further indicates that different biological fungicides have different control mechanisms against F. oxysporum.
4.3 Chemical fungicides are also an effective method to control Fusarium
In addition, chemical fungicides are often used for the control of pathogenic Fusarium. Mancozeb showed a better control effect on ginger root rot (Veerubommu et al., 2013), and the antimicrobial effect of thiophanate-methyl on dry bean root rot was stronger than that of other chemical fungicides (Abd-El-Khair et al., 2019). In this study, the activities of carbendazim, thiophanate-methyl, hymexazol and mancozeb against F. solani of roselle were studied. The results showed that carbendazim had the highest activity against F. solani, followed by thiophanate-methyl, while mancozeb had the weakest effect. Previously, the inhibitory effect of carbendazim on F. solani was shown to be better than that of mancozeb (Rather et al., 2020), which was consistent with the results of our study. Zhang et al. (2021) reported that the control efficiency of thiophanate-methyl on saffron bulb rot was significantly outperformed by hymexazol, which was consistent with the results of our study. Guan et al. (2021) found that hymexazol exhibited a better inhibitory effect than carbendazim on F. oxysporum of bitter gourd. In the present study, although the IC50 of hymexazol (0.0050 mg/mL) was lower than that of carbendazim (0.0082 mg/mL), the inhibition rate of carbendazim reached 82.61% at a lower concentration of 0.02 mg/mL, and when the concentration was 0.03 mg/mL, the rate reached 100%. The inhibition rate of hymexazol was only 94.68% when its concentration was 0.5 mg/mL. This indicated that the sensitivity of roselle F. solani to carbendazim was higher than that to hymexazol at low mass concentrations.
5 Conclusion
The use of traditional chemical pesticides could easily lead to resistance in pathogens, reducing pesticide efficiency and creating a vicious cycle; moreover, roselle is commonly used in medicines and food. Thus, for safe consumption of this crop, safe control measures should be promoted for the prevention and control of pests and diseases, and few or no chemical pesticides should be used. The polypeptide substances secreted by biological fungicides not only inhibit fungi but also improve the disease resistance of plants, promote plant growth, increase yield, and improve the plant growth environment. In this study, the growth rate method was used to screen the fungistatic efficiency of biological and chemical fungicides against roselle F. solani in the laboratory. The results provide a theoretical and scientific basis for the effective selection of fungicides to control roselle F. solani in field production.
Funding
This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi Province (2020JJA130114), the Basic Business Expenses Project of Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences (No. Guinongke2021JM12, Guinongke2021JM63, Guinongke2021YT061 and Guinongke2020YM114) and the National Bast Fiber Crops Industry Technical System Project of China (CARS-16S15).
References
- Field application of Trichoderma spp. combined with thiophanate-methyl for controlling Fusarium solani and Fusarium oxysporum in dry bean. Bull. Nat. Res. Centre.. 2019;43(1):19.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Field suppression of Fusarium soil borne diseases of tomato plants by the combined application of bio agents and chitosan. Biotechnol. J. Int.. 2016;13:1-10.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Antihypertensive effects of roselle-olive combination in L-NAME-induced hypertensive rats. Oxid. Med. Cell Longev.. 2017;2017:9460653.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Molecular phylogeny of the Fusarium solani species complex (FSSC) isolated from soils in Iran. Botany.. 2014;92(11):815-820.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Roselle calyces (Hibiscus sabdariffa), an alternative to the food and beverages industries: a review. J. Food Sci. Technol.. 2015;52(11):6859-6869.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Isolation and characterisation of endophytic strain Paenibacillus polymyxa SR19 from Urtica dioica and the study of their effect against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp tomato. Ann. Res. Rev. Biol.. 2018;29(4):1-8.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Biological control of Fusarium wilt and growth promotion in pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan) by antagonistic rhizobacteria, displaying multiple modes of pathogen inhibition. Rhizosphere.. 2021;17:100278
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Hibiscus sabdariffa L.: A potent natural neuroprotective agent for the prevention of streptozotocin-induced Alzheimer’s disease in mice. Biomed. Pharmacother.. 2020;128:110303
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Triterpenoids from Hibiscus sabdariffa L. with PPARδ/γ dual agonist action: in vivo, in vitro and in silico studies. Planta Med.. 2019;85(5):412-423.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Guan, F., Zhang, J.Y., Shi, B., Wan, X.J., Huang, C.L., 2021. Identification and fungicides screening of bitter gourd Fusarium wilt pathogen. Acta Agriculture Jiangxi. 33(11), 68–72. 10.19386/j.cnki.jxnyxb.2021.11.011.
- Occurrence of root rot and vascular wilt diseases in roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.) in Upper Egypt. Mycobiology.. 2014;42(1):66-72.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Characterization, pathogenicity and enzymatic profile of Fusarium solani associated with potato tubers in Upper Egypt. Arch. Phytopathol. Plant Protect.. 2020;53(11–12):495-508.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Antagonist effects of Bacillus spp. strains against Fusarium graminearum for protection of durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L. subsp. durum) Microbiol Res.. 2016;192:148-158.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Organic acids from roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.)-a brief review of its pharmacological effects. Biomedicines.. 2020;8(5):100.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Root rot of balloon flower (Platycodon grandiflorum) caused by Fusarium solani and Fusarium oxysporum. Plant Pathol. J.. 2013;29(4):440-445.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Phytochemical contents, antioxidant activity and functional properties of Raphanus sativus L, Eruca sativa L. and Hibiscus sabdariffa L. growing in Ethiopia. Heliyon.. 2021;7(1):e5939
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J. Mol. Evol.. 1980;16(2):111-120.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Fusarium crown and root rot of tarragon in California caused by Fusarium solani. Plant Dis.. 2011;95(6):768.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Antimicrobial genes from Allium sativum and Pinellia ternata revealed by a Bacillus subtilis expression system. Sci Rep. 2018;8:14514.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Genetic diversity of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. Cubense causing Panama wilt of banana in the Philippines. Pathogens.. 2019;9(1):32.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol.. 2018;35(6):1547-1549.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- The Fusarium Laboratory Manual. Blackwell Publishing; 2006. p. :pp250..
- Fusaricidin produced by Paenibacillus polymyxa WLY78 induces systemic resistance against Fusarium wilt of cucumber. Int. J. Mol. Sci.. 2019;20(20):5240.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Comparative analysis of mitochondrial genome and expression variation between UG93A and UG93B reveals a candidate gene related to cytoplasmic male sterility in kenaf. Ind. Crop Prod.. 2020;152:112502
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Isolation and identification of Fusarium wilt pathogens from bitter gourd in Hainan province. Agricultural. Biotechnology.. 2017;6(4):38-42.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- First report of Fusarium solani causing root rot on Coptis chinensis in southwestern China. Plant Dis.. 2014;98(9):1273.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Affectivity evaluation of Bacillus subtilis in controlling eggplant root rot caused by Rhizoctonia solani and Fusarium solani. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science.. 2020;553(1):12-26.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Mariscal, A.L.A., Dávalos, G.P.A., Jofre, G.A.E., Ávila, M.D., 2017. Strawberry germplasm response to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. fragariae under greenhouse conditions, and identification of sources for resistance in Mexico. Acta Horticulturae. 1156, 765-770. 10.17660/actahortic.2017.1156.112.
- New species from the Fusarium solani species complex derived from perithecia and soil in the old world tropics. Mycologia.. 2011;103(6):1302-1330.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Molecular phylogeny of the Nectria haematococca-Fusarium solani species complex. Mycologia.. 2000;92(5):919-938.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Hibiscus sabdariffa extract protects against cadmium-induced ovarian toxicity in adult Wistar rats. Int. J. Physiol. Pathophysiol. Pharmacol.. 2020;12(4):107-114.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Effects of maize inoculation with Fusarium verticillioides and with two bacterial biocontrol agents on seedlings growth and antioxidative enzymatic activities. Appl. Soil Ecol.. 2011;51:52-59.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Rather, T.R., Razdan, V.K.,.Tewari, A.K., Shanaz, E., Bhat, Z.A., Hassan, M.G., Wani, T.A., Singh, D., Singh, J.K., Kumar, M., Kumar, S., Kumar, A., Mehta, N., Sonakshi, Vincent, J,M., Zhao, J.C., Zhao, Y., Gu, Z.F., 2020. Efficacy of fungicides in management of Fusarium wilt of cucumber. Plant Dis. Res. 35(2), 132–136. 10.5958/2249-8788.2020.00027.X.
- Fast and accurate bootstrap confidence limits on genome-scale phylogenies using little bootstraps. Nat. Comput. Sci.. 2021;1(9):573-577.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Significant relationship between soil bacterial community structure and incidence of bacterial wilt disease under continuous cropping system. Arch. Microbiol.. 2017;199(2):267-275.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Roselle attenuates cardiac hypertrophy after myocardial infarction in vivo and in vitro. Excli J.. 2019;18:876-892.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Anthocyanins from roselle extract arrest cell cycle G2/M phase transition via ATM/Chk pathway in p53-deficient leukemia HL-60 cells. Environ. Toxicol.. 2017;32(4):1290-1304.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Molecular identification and pathogenicity of Fusarium and Alternaria species associated with root rot disease of wolfberry in Gansu and Ningxia provinces China. Plant Pathol.. 2020;70(2):397-406.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Veerubommu, S., Himankshi, T., Jannaseer, K., Samriti, G., Subramani, R., N. P.D., 2013. Genetic diversity of Fusarium spp. inciting rhizome rot of ginger and its management by PGPR consortium in the western Himalayas. Biol Control. 66(1), 1–7. 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2013.03.001.
- Roselle anthocyanins: antioxidant properties and stability to heat and pH. Molecules.. 2018;23(6):1357.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Genetic diversity and identification of wilt and root rot pathogens of tomato in China. Plant Dis.. 2020;104(6):1715-1724.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Identification and characterization of a Bacillus subtilis strain TS06 as bio control agent of strawberry replant disease Fusarium and Verticilium wilts. African J. Biotechnol.. 2012;11(3):570-580.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- The rhizosphere microbial community response to a bio-organic fertilizer: finding the mechanisms behind the suppression of watermelon Fusarium wilt disease. Acta Physiol. Plant.. 2018;40:17.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- First report of Fusarium fujikuroi causing wilt on Pima cotton (Gossypium barbadense) seedlings in New Mexico, USA. Plant Dis.. 2020;105:228.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, C.H., Zhang, G., Yan, P., Du, T.Y., Zhao, C.C., Li, M.H., Yan, X.Y., Wang Z.H., 2021. The evaluation of fungicide combinations controlling wilt disease of Pleutorus ostreatus caused by Fusarium oxysporum. Acta Agriculturae Nucleatae Sinica. 35(10), 2311–2318. 10.11869 /j.issn.100-8551.2021.10.2311.
