Translate this page into:
Network pharmacology analysis of pharmacological mechanisms underlying the anti-type 2 diabetes mellitus effect of guava leaf
⁎Corresponding authors at: College of Chemistry and Bioengineering, Hechi University, No. 42 Longjiang Road, Yizhou district, Hechi 546300, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China. qinyuehechi@outlook.com (Yue Qin), anhuihcu@outlook.com (Hui An)
-
Received: ,
Accepted: ,
This article was originally published by Elsevier and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.
Abstract
The current study aimed to explore the anti-type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) mechanism of guava leaf based on network pharmacology. The compounds contained in guava leaf was summarized from the literature, and a series of databases was used to identify the active components and corresponding potential targets. The intersection between diabetes-associated genes searched in the GeneCard database and the predicted targets of guava leaf active components was defined as target genes, which were then used to construct a “compound-active components-target genes” pharmacological network. The biological functions and pathway enrichment analyses of target genes were performed in KOBAS 3.0. The differential expression analysis of GSE76894 was performed to obtain the differential expressed genes (DEGs) in T2DM patients by comparing non-diabetic controls. Finally, the intersection between DEGs and target genes were named key genes, and the representative pathways in which these genes were involved were drawn through KEGG Mapper. We found that the active components of guava leaf may regulate the PI3K-AKT signaling pathway, T2DM regulation process, and insulin resistance pathway, which was evidenced by KEGG pathway analysis of key genes. These results implied that guava leaf has a potential anti-T2DM property and its mode of action may be exerted via regulating insulin secretion and reducing blood sugar level.
Keywords
Guava leaf
Network pharmacology
Type 2 diabetes mellitus
Flavonoid
Triterpenoid
Meroterpenoid
1 Introduction
Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a secretory and metabolic disease that seriously endangers human health. Such disease is characterized by hyperglycemia and disorder of carbohydrate, protein and fat metabolism, which are ascribed to abnormal insulin secretion, genetic factors and immune dysfunction (Petersmann et al,. 2019; Patel et al., 2012). At present, diabetes and its complications have become the third leading cause of human disability and death after tumors and cardiovascular diseases (Landgraf, 2000). The common clinical types of diabetes are type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) (Petersmann et al., 2019). Compared with T1DM that is induced by autoimmune diseases, the incidence of T2DM has been continuously increasing. According to a previous report, approximately 170 million people were affected by T2DM worldwide, and the number of T2DM patients was expected to exceed 365 million by 2030 (Rathmann and Giani, 2004). Although the etiology and pathogenesis of T2DM remain unclear, insulin resistance was considered as a main pathological feature of T2DM patients (Guo et al., 2013). Therefore, to combat the T2DM, it is imperative to understand the mechanisms of insulin resistance and to discover new drugs that improve insulin sensitivity. Pharmacotherapy based on natural substances is considered a very promising therapeutic strategy for diabetes (Wińska et al., 2019), which might provide answers to the above questions.
Guava (Psidium guajava) is a famous tropical tree species, belonging to Myrtaceae family (Díaz-de-Cerio et al., 2017). Guava leaf extract contains a variety of effective components, including triterpenoids, flavonoids, tannins, sesquiterpenes, heteroterpenes, benzophenone glycosides, and meroterpenoid (Yang et al., 2007; de Souza et al., 2018). It was reported that guava leaf have many pharmacological effects such as hypoglycemic, anti-diarrheal, anti-oxidation, anti-tumor, anti-bacterial, and hypotensive activities (Gutiérrez et al., 2008; Naseer et al., 2018). A previous study in rat showed that the extract of guava leaf could improve insulin sensitivity and glucose metabolism by regulating insulin-related signal transduction (Guo et al., 2013). Similarly, through the T2DM rat model, researchers found that guava leaf extract could increase the activity of hepatic hexokinase (HKase), hepatic phosphofructokinase (PFKase) and hepatic glucose-6- phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PDHase) in the hepatic glycolysis pathway, thereby promoting hepatic glucose utilization (Shen et al., 2008). Moreover, due to the effectiveness and safety of guava leaf in treating T2DM, tea containing guava leaf extract was approved as a specific health food (beverage) in Japan in March 2000 (Deguchi and Miyazaki, 2010). However, the exact mechanism by which effective components of guava leaf work in concert to treat T2DM, has remained unclear. A meta-analysis conducted by Xu et al. evaluated the relationship between the intake of flavonoids and the risk of T2DM, and the results showed that participants with a high intake of flavonoids had a lower risk of T2DM (Xu et al., 2018). In addition, several previous studies have proved that triterpenoid might have anti-T2DM effects. For instance, Khanra et al. found that the triterpenoid from Abroma augusta leaf improved diabetic nephropathy in T2DM rats (Khanra et al., 2017). Besides, it was reported that triterpenoids in guava leaf could inhibit the enzymes involved in glucose metabolism, prevent the development of insulin resistance and normalize blood sugar/insulin levels aside from their hypolipidemic and anti-obesity activities (Nazaruk and Borzym-Kluczyk, 2015). Furthermore, through the experiments in mice, it was demonstrated that meroterpenoid (ganomycin I) could effectively reduce blood sugar, blood lipids, and promote insulin sensitivity (Wang et al., 2017).
The concept of network pharmacology has provided new ideas, theories and methods for the modern research on naturally-derived drugs (Hopkins, 2008). In recent years, network pharmacology has integrated bioinformatics, pharmacology, computer science and other multi-disciplinary tools to realize the network construction between naturally-derived drugs and diseases based on the interactions among effective components, functional pathways and target proteins, thereby providing a preliminarily perspective on the disease-specific pharmacological mechanism that support the development of new drugs (Hopkins, 2007; Luo et al., 2020).
As abovementioned, guava leaf contain many effective components, however, the underlying pharmacological mechanism has not been systematically analyzed. Therefore, through network pharmacology, this study aimed to explore the regulatory relationship between the main effective components in guava leaf and the corresponding target proteins in T2DM, in the hope of elucidating the underlying pharmacological mechanism.
2 Material and method
2.1 Database and software
2.1.1 Databases
The following databases were incorporated in the present study: database of traditional Chinese medicine systems pharmacology (TCMSP) (Ru et al., 2014), databases of substance and compound (PubChem) (Kim et al., 2016), pharmacophore mapping based web server for identifying potential drug target (PharmMapper) (Liu et al., 2010), the universal protein resource (UniProt) (UniProt, 2009), the human gene integrator (GeneCards) (Safran et al., 2010), the database for protein–protein interaction (PPI) networks (STRING) (Franceschini et al., 2013) and archive for high-throughput functional genomic data (GEO) (Barrett et al., 2009).
2.1.2 Softwares
Software for topological network analysis (Cytoscape 3.7.0) (Kohl et al., 2011), online interactive tool for drawing Venn diagram (Venny 2.1.0) (Oliveros, 2007), Gene ID conversion tool (g:Profiler) (Reimand et al., 2016), online software for functional enrichment and annotation (KOBAS 3.0) (Xie et al., 2011), pathway drawing tool (KEGG Mapper) (Kanehisa and Sato, 2020) were used in this current study.
2.2 Prediction of target genes of guava leaf active components
Active components of guava leaf and corresponding predicted targets were first retrieved from TCMSP according to a criterion of z′-score > 1.5. The 2- or 3-dimensional structures of candidate chemicals (defined in the previous step) were obtained from PubChem (Kim et al., 2016), and subsequently submitted to PharmMapper (Liu et al., 2010) for target prediction and classification of active compounds (they were roughly categorized into flavonoid, triterpenoid and meroterpenoid). The potential target genes of guava leaf components identified by both TCMSP and PubChem databases were used in our subsequent analyses.
2.3 Screening for potential target genes for guava leaf active components against T2DM
Keywords “type 2 diabetes mellitus” or “T2DM” were used as queries to search against GeneCards database, whereby known human genes associated with T2DM were retrieved. The search results were sorted by “relevance score” in descending order, the top 500 diabetes targets were filtered, and subsequently compared with the predicted targets of guava leaf active components. In this way, the intersection between predicted targets of guava leaf active components and diabetes-associated genes, which might contribute to the anti-T2DM effect of guava leaf, were defined as target genes.
2.4 Construction of a “compound-active components-target genes” pharmacological network
Information concerning active compounds, their chemical classification and potential therapeutic targets in T2DM were visualized via a drug-target interaction network constructed using Cytoscape 3.7.0 (Kohl et al., 2011).
2.5 Topological analysis of the target genes
Next, the abovementioned target genes were submitted to STRING database, the protein–protein interaction (PPI) network was constructed according to the highest confidence level (interaction score > 0.9). The results of the STRING analysis were downloaded and visualized/analyzed locally using Cytoscape 3.7.0. In brief, two topological parameters “Node Degree Distribution” and “Betweenness Centrality” were calculated for each node, the former is proportional to the connections between indicated node and other nodes, whereas the latter indicates how frequent a node serves as a bridge between other two nodes. The resultant large network was subjected to analysis by another Cytoscape plug-in called “MCODE”, whereby several sub-networks with stronger biological significance and central biological processes could be identified. In this way, pivotal players (we defined these genes as hub genes) in the PPI network that possess a high degree of connectivity and centrality were revealed.
2.6 GO and KEGG function enrichment analysis
Function enrichment analysis of target genes was performed based on GO terms and KEGG pathways using KOBAS 3.0 online tool (Xie et al., 2011). The results were downloaded and visualized using bubble plots.
2.7 Identification of differentially expressed gene (DEGs) in T2DM dataset from GEO
Keywords “type 2 diabetes” was used as a query to search against GEO database in compliance with the following criteria: 1, The experiments were associated with T2DM; 2, Number of experimental samples ≥ 10; 3, Availability of both T2DM and control samples. After defining control and case groups, online tool GEO2R was used for differential expression analysis. Then, after removal of replicated genes and genes with missing value, the remaining genes with p value < 0.05 were defined as DEGs
2.8 Drawing of pathway diagrams
The intersection of DEGs and target genes were named key genes, which deserves further investigation due to their strong biological significance. The key genes were mapped to KEGG database to retrieve the pathways in which the key genes were involved. Briefly, the HUGO IDs of key genes were first converted to Entrez IDs, and then imported into the pathway drawing tool (KEGG Mapper) (Kanehisa and Sato, 2020) to generate pathway diagrams, wherein up- and down-regulated key genes (obtained by DEG analysis) were colored yellow and red, respectively.
3 Results
3.1 Identification of targets for active components in guava leaf
According to our previous work (Jiang et al., 2020) and PubChem database, the chemical formula and structure of 68 active components were first downloaded and the corresponding *.sdf files were later input into the PharmMapper database to obtain the potential targets of active components of guava leaf. As a result, a total number of 530 predicted targets of guava leaf active components were identified at a threshold of z′-score ≥ 1.5, among which the numbers of targets of three predominant categories of compounds (triterpenoid, flavonoid, and meroterpenoid) were 411, 875, and 455, respectively. The information of the top 20 potential targets ordered by z′-score was shown in Table 1.
Compounds
Active components
Potential targets
Gene name
Normalized Fit Score
z′-score
Flavonoid
Apigenin
Cell division protein kinase 6
CDK6
0.9199
6.05915
Flavonoid
Kaempferol
Cell division protein kinase 6
CDK6
0.9249
5.94594
Flavonoid
Ononin
Galactosylgalactosylxylosylprotein 3-beta-glucuronosyltransferase 1
B3GAT1
0.7592
5.00886
Flavonoid
Morin-3-O-α-L-lyxopyranoside
Uridine-cytidine kinase 2
UCK2
0.7644
4.88183
Flavonoid
Quercetin
Cell division protein kinase 6
CDK6
0.8978
4.859
Flavonoid
Quercetin-3-O-(6″-feruloyl) -β-D-galactopyranoside
CD209 antigen
CD209
0.5827
4.84559
Flavonoid
Genistin
Aldehyde dehydrogenase, mitochondrial
ALDH2
0.9082
4.53315
Flavonoid
Isoquercitrin
Glucosamine-6-phosphate isomerase
GNPDA1
0.6748
4.49132
Flavonoid
Apigenin
cAMP-specific 3,5-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4D
PDE4B
0.6452
4.49097
Flavonoid
Daidzin
Aldehyde dehydrogenase, mitochondrial
ALDH2
0.8941
4.44701
Flavonoid
Kaempferol
cAMP-specific 3,5-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4D
PDE4B
0.6506
4.42388
Flavonoid
Daidzin
Galactosylgalactosylxylosylprotein 3-beta-glucuronosyltransferase 1
B3GAT1
0.7418
4.21266
Flavonoid
Ononin
Beta-hexosaminidase beta chain
HEXB
0.7022
4.14004
Flavonoid
Quercetin 3-O-beta-D-xylopyranoside
Histone acetyltransferase PCAF
KAT2B
0.4912
4.10724
Flavonoid
Reynoutrin
Carbonyl reductase [NADPH] 1
CBR1
0.8584
4.06041
Flavonoid
Apigenin
cGMP-specific 3,5-cyclic phosphodiesterase
PDE5A
0.531
3.97935
Flavonoid
Leucocyanidin
Glucocorticoid receptor
NR3C1
0.5577
3.97369
Flavonoid
Myricetin
Cell division protein kinase 6
CDK6
0.8552
3.9731
Flavonoid
Genistin
Galectin-3
LGALS3
0.7007
3.9062
Flavonoid
Kaempferol-3-glucoside
Cell division protein kinase 6
CDK6
0.9043
3.89581
Triterpenoid
Obtusinin
Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E
EIF4E
0.4978
4.10176
Triterpenoid
Goreishic acid I
Corticosteroid 11-beta-dehydrogenase isozyme 1
HSD11B1
0.9576
3.70283
Triterpenoid
Uvoal
Corticosteroid 11-beta-dehydrogenase isozyme 1
HSD11B1
0.9576
3.70283
Triterpenoid
Ilelatifol D
Epidermal growth factor receptor
EGFR
0.7682
3.43594
Triterpenoid
Obtusinin
Glutathione S-transferase A1
GSTA1
0.4895
3.42822
Triterpenoid
Psidiumoic acid
Serine/threonine-protein phosphatase PP1-gamma catalytic subunit
PPP1CC
0.4055
3.42042
Triterpenoid
Corosolic acid
Trafficking protein particle complex subunit 3
TRAPPC3
0.8179
3.40365
Triterpenoid
Jacoumaric acid
Corticosteroid 11-beta-dehydrogenase isozyme 1
HSD11B1
0.9251
3.39745
Triterpenoid
Asiatic acid
Interleukin-2
IL2
0.5246
3.37554
Triterpenoid
Corosolic acid
Corticosteroid 11-beta-dehydrogenase isozyme 1
HSD11B1
0.9164
3.26152
Triterpenoid
Guavacoumaric acid
Corticosteroid 11-beta-dehydrogenase isozyme 1
HSD11B1
0.9623
3.23795
Triterpenoid
Ilelatifol D
Sorbitol dehydrogenase
SORD
0.8007
3.16982
Triterpenoid
Isoneriucoumaric acid
Corticosteroid 11-beta-dehydrogenase isozyme 1
HSD11B1
0.9086
3.1421
Triterpenoid
2α-hydroxyoleanolic acid
Aldo-keto reductase family 1 member C3
AKR1C3
0.6586
3.10459
Triterpenoid
Guavanoic acid
cAMP-specific 3,5-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4D
PDE4B
0.7681
3.08659
Triterpenoid
Oleanolic acid
Trafficking protein particle complex subunit 3
TRAPPC3
0.7381
3.01578
Triterpenoid
Goreishic acid I
Sorbitol dehydrogenase
SORD
0.8779
2.99474
Triterpenoid
Uvoal
Sorbitol dehydrogenase
SORD
0.8779
2.99474
Triterpenoid
Guavanoic acid
Bile salt sulfotransferase
SULT2A1
0.9373
2.97436
Triterpenoid
Obtusinin
Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E
EIF4E
0.4978
4.10176
Meroterpenoid
Guajadial C
Adenosine kinase
ADK
0.746
4.81728
Meroterpenoid
Guajadial D
Adenosine kinase
ADK
0.746
4.81728
Meroterpenoid
Psidial C
Estrogen-related receptor gamma
ESRRG
0.7545
4.29261
Meroterpenoid
Psiguadial B
Bile acid receptor
NR1H4
0.6326
4.23767
Meroterpenoid
Guajadial
Renin
REN
0.5374
3.97044
Meroterpenoid
Guajadial B
Renin
REN
0.5374
3.97044
Meroterpenoid
Guavadial
Carbonic anhydrase 2
CA2
0.9737
3.8595
Meroterpenoid
Psiguadial D
Estradiol 17-beta-dehydrogenase 1
HSD17B1
0.8896
3.77446
Meroterpenoid
Psiguadial A
Histo-blood group ABO system transferase
ABO
0.6709
3.73128
Meroterpenoid
Psidial C
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase Mdm2
MDM2
0.7637
3.72858
Meroterpenoid
Psidial B
Angiogenin
ANG
0.8709
3.47879
Meroterpenoid
Psiguadial C
Retinoic acid receptor gamma
RARG
0.6494
3.47538
Meroterpenoid
Psidial A
Nuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 3
NR1I3
0.6745
3.3536
Meroterpenoid
Guajadial E
Glutathione S-transferase A1
GSTA1
0.696
3.32108
Meroterpenoid
Guajadial F
Glutathione S-transferase A1
GSTA1
0.696
3.32108
Meroterpenoid
Guajadial
Estrogen sulfotransferase
SULT1E1
0.6468
3.28588
Meroterpenoid
Guajadial B
Estrogen sulfotransferase
SULT1E1
0.6468
3.28588
Meroterpenoid
Psiguadial C
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase Mdm2
MDM2
0.7796
3.26007
Meroterpenoid
Diguajadial
Interleukin-2
IL2
0.566
3.23955
Meroterpenoid
Guajadial C
Adenosine kinase
ADK
0.746
4.81728
3.2 Identification of target genes for guava leaf active components against T2DM
Next, the gene name and UniProt ID of potential targets were obtained from UniProt database. A total of 500 diabetes-associated genes were obtained through searching the keywords “type 2 diabetes mellitus” or “T2DM” in the GeneCard database (Supplementary Table 1). As shown in Fig. 1, the intersection between the predicted targets of guava leaf active components (“Triterpenoid”, “Meroterpenoid”, and “Flavonoid”) and diabetes-associated genes (“T2DM”) was visualized by a Venn diagram. We obtained 179 potential targets for guava leaf active components against T2DM (the intersections between “Triterpenoid”/ “Meroterpenoid”/ “Flavonoid” and “T2DM”). These genes were defined as target genes. In addition, there were 73, 166 and 43 targets specific for guava leaf-derived triterpenoids, flavonoids and meroterpenoid in T2DM, respectively, accounting for 9.22%, 20.96% and 5.43% of the total number of T2DM-associated targets. The detailed information of the target genes was shown in Table 2.The overlap of predicted target genes of guava leaf active components and diabetes genes.
NO.
Potential targets
Gene name
UniProt ID
1
Acetyl-CoA carboxylase 1
ACACA
Q13085
2
Acetylcholinesterase
ACHE
P22303
3
Beta-2 adrenergic receptor
ADRB2
P07550
4
Aldose reductase
AKR1B1
P15121
5
RAC-alpha serine/threonine-protein kinase
AKT1
P31749
6
RAC-beta serine/threonine-protein kinase
AKT2
P31751
7
Aldehyde dehydrogenase, mitochondrial
ALDH2
P05091
8
Arachidonate 5-lipoxygenase
ALOX5
P09917
9
Intestinal-type alkaline phosphatase
ALPI
P09923
10
Annexin A5
ANXA5
P08758
11
Adenomatous polyposis coli protein
APC
P25054
12
Apolipoprotein A-I
APOA1
P02647
13
Apolipoprotein B-100
APOB
P04114
14
Androgen receptor
AR
P10275
15
Serine-protein kinase ATM
ATM
Q13315
16
Apoptosis regulator BAX
BAX
Q07812
17
Cholinesterase
BCHE
P06276
18
Apoptosis regulator Bcl-2
BCL2
P10415
19
Bcl-2-like protein 1
BCL2L1
Q07817
20
Baculoviral IAP repeat-containing protein 5
BIRC5
O15392
21
Caspase-3
CASP3
P42574
22
Caspase-8
CASP8
Q14790
23
Catalase
CAT
P04040
24
Caveolin-1
CAV1
Q03135
25
C-C motif chemokine 2
CCL2
P13500
26
G1/S-specific cyclin-D1
CCND1
P24385
27
CD209 antigen
CD209
Q9NNX6
28
Platelet glycoprotein 4
CD36
P16671
29
CD40 ligand
CD40LG
P29965
30
Cell division protein kinase 4
CDK4
P11802
31
Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1
CDKN1A
P38936
32
Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator
CFTR
P13569
33
Serine/threonine-protein kinase Chk2
CHEK2
O96017
34
Collagen alpha-1(I) chain
COL1A1
P02452
35
Carnitine O-palmitoyltransferase 1, liver isoform
CPT1A
P50416
36
C-reactive protein
CRP
P02741
37
Cathepsin D
CTSD
P07339
38
C-X-C motif chemokine 10
CXCL10
P02778
39
Interleukin-8
CXCL8
P10145
40
Cytochrome c
CYCS
P99999
41
Cytochrome P450 19A1
CYP19A1
P11511
42
Cytochrome P450 1A1
CYP1A1
P04798
43
Cytochrome P450 1A2
CYP1A2
P05177
44
Steroid 21-hydroxylase
CYP21A2
P08686
45
Cytochrome P450 2C8
CYP2C8
P10632
46
Cytochrome P450 2C9
CYP2C9
P11712
47
Cytochrome P450 3A4
CYP3A4
P08684
48
Dipeptidyl peptidase 4
DPP4
P27487
49
Pro-epidermal growth factor
EGF
P01133
50
Epidermal growth factor receptor
EGFR
P00533
51
Histone acetyltransferase p300
EP300
Q09472
52
Receptor tyrosine-protein kinase erbB-2
ERBB2
P04626
53
Estrogen receptor
ESR1
P03372
54
Prothrombin
F2
P00734
55
Tissue factor
F3
P13726
56
Coagulation factor VII
F7
P08709
57
Fatty acid-binding protein, adipocyte
FABP4
P15090
58
Tumor necrosis factor ligand superfamily member 6
FASLG
P48023
59
Fatty acid synthase
FASN
P49327
60
Heparin-binding growth factor 2
FGF2
P09038
61
Basic fibroblast growth factor receptor 1
FGFR1
P11362
62
Fibronectin
FN1
P02751
63
Glucose-6-phosphatase
G6PC
P35575
64
Glucosylceramidase
GBA
A0A068F658
65
Vitamin D-binding protein
GC
P02774
66
Glucokinase
GCK
P35557
67
Glial fibrillary acidic protein
GFAP
P14136
68
Somatotropin
GH1
P01241
69
Growth hormone receptor
GHR
P10912
70
Gap junction alpha-1 protein
GJA1
P17302
71
Beta-galactosidase
GLB1
P16278
72
Glycogen synthase kinase-3 beta
GSK3B
P49841
73
Glutathione S-transferase Mu 1
GSTM1
P09488
74
Glutathione S-transferase P
GSTP1
P09211
75
Beta-hexosaminidase subunit beta
HEXB
P07686
76
Hexokinase-1
HK1
P19367
77
Hexokinase-2
HK2
P52789
78
3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase
HMGCR
P04035
79
Heme oxygenase 1
HMOX1
P09601
80
GTPase HRas
HRAS
P01112
81
Corticosteroid 11-beta-dehydrogenase isozyme 1
HSD11B1
P28845
82
Heat shock protein beta-1
HSPB1
P04792
83
Intercellular adhesion molecule 1
ICAM1
P05362
84
Interferon gamma
IFNG
P01579
85
Insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor
IGF1R
P08069
86
Insulin-like growth factor II
IGF2
P01344
87
Insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 3
IGFBP3
P17936
88
Inhibitor of nuclear factor kappa-B kinase subunit beta
IKBKB
O14920
89
NF-kappa-B essential modulator
IKBKG
Q9Y6K9
90
Interleukin-10
IL10
P22301
91
Interleukin-1 alpha
IL1A
P01583
92
Interleukin-1 beta
IL1B
P01584
93
Interleukin-2
IL2
P60568
94
Interleukin-4
IL4
P05112
95
Interleukin-6
IL6
P05231
96
Phosphatidylinositol-3,4,5-trisphosphate 5-phosphatase 2
INPPL1
O15357
97
Insulin
INS
P01308
98
Insulin receptor
INSR
P06213
99
Tyrosine-protein kinase JAK2
JAK2
O60674
100
Transcription factor AP-1
JUN
P05412
101
Potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2
KCNH2
Q12809
102
ATP-sensitive inward rectifier potassium channel 11
KCNJ11
Q14654
103
Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2
KDR
P35968
104
Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin
LCN2
P80188
105
Low-density lipoprotein receptor
LDLR
P01130
106
Dual specificity mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 1
MAP2K1
Q02750
107
Mitogen-activated protein kinase 1
MAPK1
P28482
108
Mitogen-activated protein kinase 14
MAPK14
Q16539
109
Mitogen-activated protein kinase 3
MAPK3
P27361
110
Mitogen-activated protein kinase 8
MAPK8
P45983
111
Hepatocyte growth factor receptor
MET
P08581
112
Interstitial collagenase
MMP1
P03956
113
72 kDa type IV collagenase
MMP2
P08253
114
Stromelysin-1
MMP3
P08254
115
Neutrophil collagenase
MMP8
P22894
116
Matrix metalloproteinase-9
MMP9
P14780
117
Myeloperoxidase
MPO
P05164
118
Microsomal triglyceride transfer protein large subunit
MTTP
P55157
119
Myc proto-oncogene protein
MYC
P01106
120
Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2
NFE2L2
Q16236
121
NF-kappa-B inhibitor alpha
NFKBIA
P25963
122
Nitric oxide synthase, inducible
NOS2
P35228
123
Nitric-oxide synthase, endothelial
NOS3
P29474
124
NAD(P)H dehydrogenase [quinone] 1
NQO1
P15559
125
Oxysterols receptor LXR-beta
NR1H2
P55055
130
Progesterone receptor
PGR
P06401
131
Phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit, gamma isoform
PIK3CG
P48736
132
Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase regulatory subunit alpha
PIK3R1
P27986
133
Tissue-type plasminogen activator
PLAT
P00750
134
Urokinase-type plasminogen activator
PLAU
P00749
135
Serum paraoxonase/arylesterase 1
PON1
P27169
136
Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha
PPARA
Q07869
137
Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor delta
PPARD
Q03181
138
Peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma
PPARG
P37231
139
Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1-beta
PPARGC1B
Q86YN6
140
Phosphatidylinositol-3,4,5-trisphosphate 3-phosphatase and dual-specificity protein phosphatase PTEN
PTEN
P60484
141
Cystathionine beta-synthase
PTGS1
P23219
142
Prostaglandin G/H synthase 2
PTGS2
P35354
143
Tyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 1
PTPN1
P18031
144
Tyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 11
PTPN11
Q06124
145
Retinol-binding protein 4
RBP4
P02753
146
Lithostathine-1-alpha
REG1A
P05451
147
Transcription factor p65
RELA
Q04206
148
Renin
REN
P00797
149
Transforming protein RhoA
RHOA
P61586
150
Runt-related transcription factor 2
RUNX2
Q13950
151
Retinoic acid receptor alpha/Retinoic acid receptor beta
RXRA
P19793
152
Protein S100-A9
S100A9
P06702
153
E-selectin
SELE
P16581
154
P-selectin
SELP
P16109
155
Plasminogen activator inhibitor 1
SERPINE1
P05121
156
Sex hormone-binding globulin
SHBG
P04278
157
NAD-dependent deacetylase sirtuin-1
SIRT1
Q96EB6
158
Solute carrier family 2,facilitated glucose transporter member 4
SLC2A4
P14672
159
Sodium-dependent serotonin transporter
SLC6A4
P31645
160
Superoxide dismutase [Cu-Zn]
SOD1
P00441
161
Superoxide dismutase [Mn], mitochondrial
SOD2
P04179
162
Osteopontin
SPP1
P10451
163
Proto-oncogene tyrosine-protein kinase Src
SRC
P12931
164
Signal transducer and activator of transcription 1-alpha/beta
STAT1
P42224
165
Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3
STAT3
P40763
166
Angiopoietin-1 receptor
TEK
Q02763
167
Transforming growth factor beta-1
TGFB1
P01137
168
Transforming growth factor beta-2
TGFB2
P61812
169
TGF-beta receptor type-1
TGFBR1
P36897
170
Tyrosine 3-monooxygenase
TH
P07101
171
Thrombomodulin
THBD
P07204
172
Metalloproteinase inhibitor 1
TIMP1
P01033
173
Tumor necrosis factor
TNF
P01375
174
Cellular tumor antigen p53
TP53
P04637
175
Triosephosphate isomerase
TPI1
P60174
176
UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1–1
UGT1A1
P22309
177
Vascular cell adhesion protein 1
VCAM1
P19320
178
Vitamin D3 receptor
VDR
P11473
179
Vascular endothelial growth factor A
VEGFA
P15692
3.3 Construction of a “compound-active components-target genes” pharmacological network
Cytoscape was used to visualize the interaction between the compounds, active components, and target genes involved in T2DM, with unconnected nodes being removed. The “compound-active components-target genes” pharmacological network (Fig. 2) included 249 nodes (3 compounds, 66 active components, 179 target genes) and 1880 edges. In the network, the red oval/blue diamond/green hexagonal nodes correspond to different guava leaf-derived compounds/active components/target genes. The average degree centrality of the blue nodes and the green nodes were 14 and 4, respectively, suggesting that one active component can potentially target multiple genes. The information of the active components and target genes with degree centrality > 10 was shown in Table 3.The “compound-active components-target genes” pharmacological network.
NO
Name
Composition type
Degree
Category
1
Quercetin
Flavonoid
94
Compound
2
Genistein
Flavonoid
60
Compound
3
Apigenin
Flavonoid
46
Compound
4
Ursolic acid
Triterpenoid
46
Compound
5
Daidzein
Flavonoid
41
Compound
6
Kaempferol
Flavonoid
38
Compound
7
Myricetin
Flavonoid
28
Compound
8
Formononetin
Flavonoid
23
Compound
9
Daidzin
Flavonoid
20
Compound
10
Ononin
Flavonoid
19
Compound
11
Oleanolic acid
Triterpenoid
18
Compound
12
Prunetin
Flavonoid
16
Compound
13
Rutin
Flavonoid
16
Compound
14
Isoquercetrin
Flavonoid
15
Compound
15
Goreishic acid I
Triterpenoid
15
Compound
16
Uvoal
Triterpenoid
15
Compound
17
Psidiumoic acid
Triterpenoid
14
Compound
18
Genistin
Flavonoid
13
Compound
19
Quercitrin
Flavonoid
13
Compound
20
2α-hydroxyoleanolic acid
Triterpenoid
13
Compound
21
Guavacoumaric acid
Triterpenoid
13
Compound
22
Olmelin
Flavonoid
12
Compound
23
Guavaric A
Flavonoid
12
Compound
24
Hyperin
Flavonoid
12
Compound
25
Guavanoic acid
Triterpenoid
12
Compound
26
Quercetin-3-O-β-D-glucuronide
Triterpenoid
11
Compound
27
Corosolic acid
Triterpenoid
11
Compound
28
Isoneriucoumaric acid
Triterpenoid
11
Compound
29
Psidial B
Meroterpenoid
11
Compound
30
Guajadial C
Meroterpenoid
11
Compound
31
Guajadial D
Meroterpenoid
11
Compound
32
RXRA
–
23
Target
33
HSD11B1
–
21
Target
34
VDR
–
21
Target
35
NR3C1
–
20
Target
36
DPP4
–
19
Target
37
PTGS2
–
19
Target
38
IL2
–
18
Target
39
NR3C2
–
17
Target
40
HEXB
–
17
Target
41
SHBG
–
16
Target
42
GSK3B
–
15
Target
43
PPARG
–
14
Target
44
PARP1
–
14
Target
45
CD209
–
14
Target
46
RBP4
–
13
Target
47
HMGCR
–
13
Target
48
PTGS1
–
13
Target
49
MAP2K1
–
13
Target
50
REN
–
12
Target
51
GC
–
12
Target
52
NOS2
–
12
Target
53
AR
–
12
Target
54
ESR1
–
11
Target
3.4 Construction of the PPI network of target genes
The PPI network of 179 target genes was constructed using STRING database and the resultant *.TSV file was visualized by Cytoscape. As shown in Fig. 3, the network contained 166 nodes (13 nodes were removed due to the absence of biological interactions) and 961 edges, in which the thickness of the edge was proportional to the strength of protein interaction. A total of 37 hub genes, whose degrees and betweenness centrality exceeded the average, were identified in the topological network (colored in red). Sub-networks with stronger biological significance were identified by Cytoscape plug-in “MCODE”, among which the largest sub-network was visualized by setting the shape of each sub-network member to triangle. The network topology parameters of the 37 hub genes were shown in Supplementary Table 2.The PPI network of 179 target genes.
3.5 Functional enrichment analysis
To investigate the biological functions of target genes, we performed GO and KEGG functional enrichment analysis using KOBAS 3.0. The enriched biological functions of the target genes in 3 manually curated categories “Signal transduction pathways”, “Metabolism process” and “Other processes” were shown in Fig. 4 A-C. The full list of enriched pathways of 179 target genes was provided in Supplementary Table 4. Moreover, the results of function enrichment analyses of all sub-networks (identified by “MCODE” in previous step) were provided in Supplementary Table 3. The most representative pathways were “regulation of the metabolic process”, “regulation of leukocyte proliferation”, “positive regulation of defense”, and “regulation of signaling pathway”.
GO analysis of target genes (A) Metabolic process. (B) Signal transduction pathways. (C) Other processes.
3.6 Data processing and analysis of GSE76894
The differential expression analysis of the GSE76894 data was performed by GEO2R in NCBI. The DEGs were identified with a threshold of P < 0.05. As shown in Fig. 5A, there was a 49-gene overlap between DEGs and target genes, and these genes were defined as key genes. The expression profile of the 49 key genes were shown in Fig. 5B; and 13 genes (SOD2, INSR, HSPB1, CCL2, CRP, RELA, EP300, GJA1, F3, TGFB2, TGFBR1, MET, VCAM1) were significantly up-regulated and 4 genes (INS, SOD1, RBP4, TIMP1) were significantly down-regulated. The function enrichment (GO/KEGG) analyses of the 49 key genes were shown in Fig. 6. The most representative GO-BP terms (Fig. 6A) were “positive regulation of establishment of protein localization” and “positive regulation of protein transport” while the most representative GO-CC terms (Fig. 6B) were “membrane region”, “membrane microdomain” and “membrane raft”. The most representative GO-MF terms (Fig. 6C) were “signaling receptor activator activity” and “receptor ligand activity” while the most representative KEGG pathways (Fig. 6D) were “MAPK signaling pathway” and “AGE-RAGE signaling pathway”.
Data processing and analysis of GSE76894. (A) Venn diagram showing the overlaps between DEGs and target genes. (B) Heatmap showing Z-score scaled expression profile of 49 key genes in GSE76894. A red-blue gradient signifies whether a gene is up- or down-regulated.
Functional enrichment analysis of key genes (A) Biological process. (B) Cellular Component. (C) Molecular function. (D) KEGG enrichment.
3.7 Pathway analyses of key genes
To further investigate the way by which key genes contribute to the anti-T2DM effect of guava leaf, we uploaded the Entrez IDs of 49 key genes to the KEGG Mapper for pathway analyses. The pathway diagram of one of the most representative pathway, namely PI3K-AKT pathway, was shown in Fig. 7, which demonstrated the involvement of 13 key genes through Toll-like receptor, B cell receptor, JAK/STAT, Focal adhesion and Chemokine signaling pathways; up- or down-regulated key genes were colored by yellow or red background, respectively. In the T2DM regulation process (Supplementary figure 1), 4 genes were found in the regulation of adipocytokine signaling pathway, insulin pathway, and mitochondria pathway. We also found 8 genes that participated in the regulation of the insulin resistance pathway (Supplementary figure 2), including the biological processes of muscle cell, liver cell, and O-GlcNAc regulation of insulin resistance. The corresponding detailed information was summarized in Supplementary Table 5.Pathway diagram of PI3K-AKT pathway and the involvement of 13 key genes.
4 Discussion
Mounting evidence suggested that guava leaf have potential against T2DM (Okpashi et al., 2014; Shen et al., 2008; Shabbir et al., 2020), whereas the underlying mechanism remains obscure. This study explored the mechanism underlying the efficacy of guava leaf component in the treatment of T2DM with the help of network pharmacology. Initially, a total of 530 target genes of 68 guava leaf active compounds were obtained from the TCMSP and PharmMapper database. Subsequently, 179 target genes were obtained by intersecting the acquired guava leaf targets with T2DM-asscociated genes obtained from the GeneCard database. Then, a pharmacological network of guava leaf active components and target genes was constructed using Cytoscape and the results showed that target genes could be co-regulated by multiple active components. This finding indicated that guava leaf have the characteristics common to Chinese medicine in the treatment of T2DM, such as multi-component and multi-target effects, which was consistent with the research strategy based on network pharmacology (Zhou et al., 2020).
To summarize the collective effect of target genes at the protein level, and explain the treatment effect of guava leaf against T2DM, we constructed a “compound-active components-target genes” pharmacological network based on 68 guava leaf active components and target genes using the STRING database. The network showed that guava leaf are closely related to various target proteins in T2DM, suggesting that the therapeutic efficacy of guava leaf in the treatment of T2DM depends on collective effect of multiple target proteins, rather than the regulation of a single target. Here, we selected the top 5 active components according to their degree within the PPI network, and subsequently identified their target proteins, which included RXRA, HSD11B1, VDR, NR3C1, DPP4, PTGS2, and IL2. RXRA is a retinoid-X receptor that involves in the regulation of metabolic processes including lipid metabolism (Stossi et al., 2019). Several studies revealed that the methylation of RXRA was closely related to diabetes (Franzago et al., 2019; Castellano-Castillo et al., 2019). HSD11B1 is generally distributed in the liver and adipose, where it functions as the gate-keeper of activity levels of local glucocorticoid (Chapman et al., 2013). A previous study conducted by Masuzaki and co-workers demonstrated that HSD11B1 overexpression in mice can lead to dyslipidemia, visceral obesity, and even insulin-resistant diabetes (Masuzaki et al., 2001), highlighting that Hsd11b1 is closely related to the development of adverse metabolic features. As known, VDR is involved in maintaining insulin secretion and vitamin D metabolism process (Zeitz et al., 2003; Ogunkolade et al., 2002). Recently, an increasing body of literature reported that polymorphisms in the VDR gene might significantly reduce both mRNA and protein levels of VDR, which increases the risk of diabetes development (Angel et al., 2018; Xia et al., 2017). As a key regulatory enzyme of the incretin system, DPP4 has gained interest in the treatment of T2DM in the last decade (Röhrborn et al., 2015). It has been confirmed that DPP4 inhibitor not only improve glycemic control, but also preserve β-cell function in T2DM, highlighting that DDP4 inhibitor is a novel and promising anti-diabetic agent (Wang et al., 2018). Therefore, we speculated that guava leaf might play a therapeutic role in T2DM by regulating levels of insulin, vitamin D and DPP4, as well as retinoid-X receptor expression. Besides, there is few studies about the association between T2DM and several other guava leaf target proteins including PTGS2, NR3C1 and IL2. We suggested that these proteins might be used as novel targets in T2DM therapy. Then, we applied the Cytoscape software and KOBAS 3.0 platform to carry out functional enrichment analysis of target genes. Results of KEGG pathway analysis indicated that these genes were mainly enriched in several biological processes including the metabolic pathway, apoptosis, insulin resistance, and PI3K-Akt signaling pathways, implying that the anti-T2MD role of guava leaf might be achieved by regulation of these processes.
To further improve the biological significance of the currently identified 179 target genes, the intersection between DEGs (resulting from differential expression analysis of T2DM patients versus non-diabetic controls) and target genes was defined as key genes and used in subsequent analyses. Briefly, bioinformatics tool KEGG Mapper was used to depict how these key genes contribute to the anti-T2DM effect of guava leaf on the signaling pathway level. As the primary signal transduction pathway of insulin, the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway has been proved to reinforce the sensitivity of insulin and exert a role in regulating sugar lipid metabolism (Gao et al., 2019). Many studies revealed that amounts of active compounds of traditional Chinese medicine show therapeutic effect against diabetes via PI3K/Akt signaling pathway (Chan and Ye, 2013; Li et al., 2014; Dai et al., 2016). Given that insulin resistance would cause β-cell dysfunction even in the development of T2DM, targeting insulin resistance was proved to be a valuable therapeutic strategy for ameliorating the progression of T2DM (Arnold et al., 2018). Combined with our current findings and previous literature, we selected three signaling pathways including PI3K/Akt signaling, T2DM, and insulin resistance pathway for further interpretation. Functional enrichment analysis showed that the 49 key genes mainly participated in “mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway” and “AGE-RAGE signaling pathway in diabetic complications. MAPK has been proposed to maintain glucose homeostasis (Schultze et al., 2012), and is therefore associated with obesity and diabetes. The “AGE-RAGE signaling pathway” is a well-studied regulatory axis in diabetes (Kay et al., 2016). Specifically, RAGE is accountable for perturbed myocardial functions in diabetes; it also promotes other cardiovascular diseases such as atherosclerosis in the context of diabetes (Ramasamy et al., 2011). The present results indicated that the key genes are highly involved in diabetes and are promising candidate targets for guava leaf, and, thus, deserve further investigation.
Finally, representative diagrams of pathways where key genes were involved were drawn, among 49 key genes, 13 were found in PI3K/Akt signaling pathway, whereas 4 and 8 were found in the T2DM pathway and insulin resistance pathway, respectively. These results suggested that guava leaf is effective against T2DM mainly through regulating the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. Notably, one of the diabetes specific targets of guava leaf active components, PI3K, was found in all three pathways. Thus, we speculated that PI3K plays a crucial role in the anti-T2DM effect of guava leaf. Besides, INS, INSR and TNF were simultaneously found in insulin resistance and T2DM pathways; while PEPCK, NFKB and AKT were simultaneously found in PI3K-Akt signaling and insulin resistance pathways. Therefore, we hypothesized that guava leaf components regulate these genes (including INS, INSR, TNF, PEPCK, NFKB, and AKT) to alleviate insulin resistance and thereby exert anti-T2DM activity.
By taking the results of the above three pathways into consideration, it can be concluded that insulin binds with the insulin receptors to trigger signal transduction for activation of PI3K, thereby facilitating GLUT4 synthesis and transport. In muscle cells and liver cells, GLUT4 transports glucose from the blood to the cells for consumption, which lowers the blood sugar level, and regulates the insulin resistance (Gao et al., 2019; Beg et al., 2017). Meanwhile, PIP3 produced by PI3K can activate the Akt family, and activated Akt regulates cell growth cycle and metabolism and gluconeogenesis/glycolysis by phosphorylation. TNF plays a central role in insulin resistance in T2DM (Borst, 2004). In the insulin resistance pathway, TNF is capable of increasing free fatty acids to enhance the production of glycogen in liver cells (El-Moselhy et al., 2011). TNF acts as an activator to trigger NFKB action, then the activated NFKB can in turn further activate TNF, forming a positive feedback mechanism to interfere with the signal transduction of insulin receptors, thereby leading to insulin resistance (Yang et al., 2009). Collectively, our study revealed that the active components of guava leaf mainly target the PI3K-Akt signaling pathway to modulate various T2DM related genes and regulate levels of insulin, vitamin D and DPP4, as well as retinoid-X receptor expression in the treatment of T2DM. However, there are some limitations in our study. First, bioactive components and the corresponding targets of guava leaf reported in our study were not fully comprehensive as we merely focused on flavonoid, triterpenoid, and meroterpenoid. Second, this study lacks experimental evidence, therefore, in the future, further validations are required to consolidate the findings of this study.
In conclusion, for the first time, we uncovered the hypoglycemic mechanism of guava leaf through network pharmacology. This study preliminarily revealed that the active compounds of guava leaf are mainly involved in the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway, acting on TNFα, PEPCK and other factors to regulate insulin resistant and other biological pathways to achieve therapeutic effects against T2DM, providing a scientific base for further research on the molecular mechanism underlying guava leaf anti-T2DM effects.
Funding
This study was supported by the Basic Competence Improvement Project for Middle and Young Teachers in Guangxi Universities [grant number KY2016LX281], the Hechi University High-level Talent Research Startup Project [grant number XJ2018GKQ014] and the Guangxi Natural Science Foundation Program [grant number 2020GXNSFAA297218].
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
References
- The association of VDR polymorphisms and type 2 diabetes in older people living in community in Santiago de Chile. Nutr. Diabetes. 2018;8(1):31.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Brain insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes and Alzheimer disease: concepts and conundrums. Nat. Rev. Neurol.. 2018;14(3):168-181.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- NCBI GEO: archive for high-throughput functional genomic data. Nucleic Acids Res.. 2009;37(Database issue):D885-D890.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Distinct Akt phosphorylation states are required for insulin regulated Glut4 and Glut1-mediated glucose uptake. Elife. 2017;6
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- The role of TNF-alpha in insulin resistance. Endocrine. 2004;23(2–3):177-182.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Altered adipose tissue dna methylation status in metabolic syndrome: relationships between global DNA methylation and specific methylation at adipogenic, lipid metabolism and inflammatory candidate genes and metabolic variables. J. Clin. Med.. 2019;8(1)
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Strategies for the discovery and development of anti-diabetic drugs from the natural products of traditional medicines. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci.. 2013;16(2):207-216.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenases: intracellular gate-keepers of tissue glucocorticoid action. Physiol. Rev.. 2013;93(3):1139-1206.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- The effect of Liuwei Dihuang decoction on PI3K/Akt signaling pathway in liver of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) rats with insulin resistance. J. Ethnopharmacol.. 2016;192:382-389.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Chemotype diversity of Psidium guajava L. Phytochemistry. 2018;153:129-137.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Anti-hyperglycemic and anti-hyperlipidemic effects of guava leaf extract. Nutr. Metab. (Lond). 2010;7:9.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Health effects of Psidium guajava L. leaves: an overview of the last decade. Int. J. Mol. Sci.. 2017;18(4)
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- The antihyperglycemic effect of curcumin in high fat diet fed rats. Role of TNF-α and free fatty acids. Food Chem. Toxicol.. 2011;49(5):1129-1140.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- STRING v9.1: protein-protein interaction networks, with increased coverage and integration. Nucleic Acids Res.. 2013;41(Database issue):D808-D815.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Nutrigenetics, epigenetics and gestational diabetes: consequences in mother and child. Epigenetics. 2019;14(3):215-235.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- To explore the pathogenesis of vascular lesion of type 2 diabetes mellitus based on the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. J. Diabetes Res.. 2019;2019:4650906.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Guava leaf extracts promote glucose metabolism in SHRSP.Z-Leprfa/Izm rats by improving insulin resistance in skeletal muscle. BMC Complement Altern. Med.. 2013;13:52.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Psidium guajava: a review of its traditional uses, phytochemistry and pharmacology. J. Ethnopharmacol.. 2008;117(1):1-27.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Network pharmacology: the next paradigm in drug discovery. Nat. Chem. Biol.. 2008;4(11):682-690.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Antitumor effect of guava leaves on lung cancer: a network pharmacology study. Arabian J. Chem.. 2020;13(11):7773-7797.
- [Google Scholar]
- KEGG Mapper for inferring cellular functions from protein sequences. Protein Sci.. 2020;29(1):28-35.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- The role of AGE/RAGE signaling in diabetes-mediated vascular calcification. J. Diabetes Res.. 2016;2016:6809703.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Taraxerol, a pentacyclic triterpenoid, from Abroma augusta leaf attenuates diabetic nephropathy in type 2 diabetic rats. Biomed. Pharmacother.. 2017;94:726-741.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- PubChem substance and compound databases. Nucleic Acids Res.. 2016;44(D1):D1202-D1213.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Cytoscape: software for visualization and analysis of biological networks. Methods Mol. Biol.. 2011;696:291-303.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Meglitinide analogues in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Drugs Aging. 2000;17(5):411-425.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- A network pharmacology approach to determine active compounds and action mechanisms of ge-gen-qin-lian decoction for treatment of type 2 diabetes. Evid. Based Complement Alternat. Med.. 2014;2014:495840.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- PharmMapper server: a web server for potential drug target identification using pharmacophore mapping approach. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38(Web Server issue):W609-W614.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Network pharmacology in research of Chinese medicine formula: methodology, application and prospective. Chin. J. Integr. Med.. 2020;26(1):72-80.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- A transgenic model of visceral obesity and the metabolic syndrome. Science. 2001;294(5549):2166-2170.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- The phytochemistry and medicinal value of Psidium guajava (guava) Clin. Phytosci.. 2018;4(1)
- [Google Scholar]
- The role of triterpenes in the management of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Phytochem. Rev.. 2015;14(4):675-690.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Vitamin D receptor (VDR) mRNA and VDR protein levels in relation to vitamin D status, insulin secretory capacity, and VDR genotype in Bangladeshi Asians. Diabetes. 2002;51(7):2294-2300.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Okpashi, V.E., Bayim, B.P.-R., Obi-Abang, M., 2014. Comparative Effects of Some Medicinal Plants: Anacardium occidentale, Eucalyptus globulus, Psidium guajava, and Xylopia aethiopica Extracts in Alloxan-Induced Diabetic Male Wistar Albino Rats. Biochem. Res. Int., 2014, 203051-203051, doi:10.1155/2014/203051.
- Oliveros, J.C., 2007. VENNY. An interactive tool for comparing lists with Venn Diagrams.
- Diabetes mellitus: an overview on its pharmacological aspects and reported medicinal plants having antidiabetic activity. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed.. 2012;2(5):411-420.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Definition, classification and diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. Exp. Clin. Endocrinol. Diabetes. 2019;127(S 01):S1-S7.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Receptor for AGE (RAGE): signaling mechanisms in the pathogenesis of diabetes and its complications. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.. 2011;1243:88-102.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Rathmann, W., Giani, G., 2004. Global prevalence of diabetes: estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. Diabetes Care, 27(10), 2568-2569; author reply 2569, doi:10.2337/diacare.27.10.2568.
- g:Profiler-a web server for functional interpretation of gene lists (2016 update) Nucleic Acids Res.. 2016;44(W1):W83-W89.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- TCMSP: a database of systems pharmacology for drug discovery from herbal medicines. J. Cheminform. 2014;6:13.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Safran, M., Dalah, I., Alexander, J., Rosen, N., Iny Stein, T., Shmoish, M., et al., 2010. GeneCards Version 3: the human gene integrator. Database (Oxford), 2010, baq020, doi:10.1093/database/baq020.
- PI3K/AKT, MAPK and AMPK signalling: protein kinases in glucose homeostasis. Expert Rev. Mol. Med.. 2012;14:e1
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- In vivo screening and antidiabetic potential of polyphenol extracts from guava pulp, seeds and leaves. Animals (Basel). 2020;10(9)
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Effect of guava (Psidium guajava Linn.) leaf soluble solids on glucose metabolism in type 2 diabetic rats. Phytother. Res.. 2008;22(11):1458-1464.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Tributyltin chloride (TBT) induces RXRA down-regulation and lipid accumulation in human liver cells. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(11):e0224405.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- UniProt, C., 2009. The Universal Protein Resource (UniProt) 2009. Nucleic Acids Res., 37(Database issue), D169-174, doi:10.1093/nar/gkn664.
- A novel class of α-glucosidase and HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors from Ganoderma leucocontextum and the anti-diabetic properties of ganomycin I in KK-A(y) mice. Eur. J. Med. Chem.. 2017;127:1035-1046.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Dipeptidyl peptidase-4(DPP-4) inhibitors: promising new agents for autoimmune diabetes. Clin. Exp. Med.. 2018;18(4):473-480.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Mushrooms of the genus ganoderma used to treat diabetes and insulin resistance. Molecules. 2019;24(22)
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Association of vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms with diabetic dyslipidemia in the elderly male population in North China. Clin. Interv. Aging. 2017;12:1673-1679.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Xie, C., Mao, X., Huang, J., Ding, Y., Wu, J., Dong, S., et al., 2011. KOBAS 2.0: a web server for annotation and identification of enriched pathways and diseases. Nucleic Acids Res., 39(Web Server issue), W316-322, doi:10.1093/nar/gkr483.
- Flavonoids intake and risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97(19):e0686.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Feed-forward signaling of TNF-alpha and NF-kappaB via IKK-beta pathway contributes to insulin resistance and coronary arteriolar dysfunction in type 2 diabetic mice. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.. 2009;296(6):H1850-H1858.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Guajadial: an unusual meroterpenoid from guava leaves Psidium guajava. Org. Lett.. 2007;9(24):5135-5138.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Impaired insulin secretory capacity in mice lacking a functional vitamin D receptor. FASEB J.. 2003;17(3):509-511.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Applications of network pharmacology in traditional Chinese medicine research. Evid. Based Complement Alternat. Med.. 2020;2020:1646905.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Appendix A
Supplementary data
Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2021.103143.
Appendix A
Supplementary data
The following are the Supplementary data to this article:The T2DM regulation pathway regulated by 4 key genes.
The insulin resistance pathway regulated by 8 key genes.
Supplementary data 1
Supplementary data 1
The information of the T2DM-associated genes that were searched from the GeneCard database.
Supplementary data 2
Supplementary data 2
Supplementary data 3
Supplementary data 3
Supplementary data 4
Supplementary data 4
Supplementary data 5
Supplementary data 5