10.8
CiteScore
 
5.3
Impact Factor
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Corrigendum
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Full Length Article
Full lenth article
Letter to Editor
Original Article
Research article
Retraction notice
Review
Review Article
SPECIAL ISSUE: ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY
10.8
CiteScore
5.3
Impact Factor
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Corrigendum
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Full Length Article
Full lenth article
Letter to Editor
Original Article
Research article
Retraction notice
Review
Review Article
SPECIAL ISSUE: ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original article
2021
:14;
202106
doi:
10.1016/j.arabjc.2021.103143

Network pharmacology analysis of pharmacological mechanisms underlying the anti-type 2 diabetes mellitus effect of guava leaf

College of Chemistry and Bioengineering, Hechi University, Hechi 546300, China
Guangxi Key Laboratory of Microbiology and Plant Resources Development, Hechi 546300, China

⁎Corresponding authors at: College of Chemistry and Bioengineering, Hechi University, No. 42 Longjiang Road, Yizhou district, Hechi 546300, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China. qinyuehechi@outlook.com (Yue Qin), anhuihcu@outlook.com (Hui An)

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Elsevier and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

The current study aimed to explore the anti-type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) mechanism of guava leaf based on network pharmacology. The compounds contained in guava leaf was summarized from the literature, and a series of databases was used to identify the active components and corresponding potential targets. The intersection between diabetes-associated genes searched in the GeneCard database and the predicted targets of guava leaf active components was defined as target genes, which were then used to construct a “compound-active components-target genes” pharmacological network. The biological functions and pathway enrichment analyses of target genes were performed in KOBAS 3.0. The differential expression analysis of GSE76894 was performed to obtain the differential expressed genes (DEGs) in T2DM patients by comparing non-diabetic controls. Finally, the intersection between DEGs and target genes were named key genes, and the representative pathways in which these genes were involved were drawn through KEGG Mapper. We found that the active components of guava leaf may regulate the PI3K-AKT signaling pathway, T2DM regulation process, and insulin resistance pathway, which was evidenced by KEGG pathway analysis of key genes. These results implied that guava leaf has a potential anti-T2DM property and its mode of action may be exerted via regulating insulin secretion and reducing blood sugar level.

Keywords

Guava leaf
Network pharmacology
Type 2 diabetes mellitus
Flavonoid
Triterpenoid
Meroterpenoid
1

1 Introduction

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a secretory and metabolic disease that seriously endangers human health. Such disease is characterized by hyperglycemia and disorder of carbohydrate, protein and fat metabolism, which are ascribed to abnormal insulin secretion, genetic factors and immune dysfunction (Petersmann et al,. 2019; Patel et al., 2012). At present, diabetes and its complications have become the third leading cause of human disability and death after tumors and cardiovascular diseases (Landgraf, 2000). The common clinical types of diabetes are type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) (Petersmann et al., 2019). Compared with T1DM that is induced by autoimmune diseases, the incidence of T2DM has been continuously increasing. According to a previous report, approximately 170 million people were affected by T2DM worldwide, and the number of T2DM patients was expected to exceed 365 million by 2030 (Rathmann and Giani, 2004). Although the etiology and pathogenesis of T2DM remain unclear, insulin resistance was considered as a main pathological feature of T2DM patients (Guo et al., 2013). Therefore, to combat the T2DM, it is imperative to understand the mechanisms of insulin resistance and to discover new drugs that improve insulin sensitivity. Pharmacotherapy based on natural substances is considered a very promising therapeutic strategy for diabetes (Wińska et al., 2019), which might provide answers to the above questions.

Guava (Psidium guajava) is a famous tropical tree species, belonging to Myrtaceae family (Díaz-de-Cerio et al., 2017). Guava leaf extract contains a variety of effective components, including triterpenoids, flavonoids, tannins, sesquiterpenes, heteroterpenes, benzophenone glycosides, and meroterpenoid (Yang et al., 2007; de Souza et al., 2018). It was reported that guava leaf have many pharmacological effects such as hypoglycemic, anti-diarrheal, anti-oxidation, anti-tumor, anti-bacterial, and hypotensive activities (Gutiérrez et al., 2008; Naseer et al., 2018). A previous study in rat showed that the extract of guava leaf could improve insulin sensitivity and glucose metabolism by regulating insulin-related signal transduction (Guo et al., 2013). Similarly, through the T2DM rat model, researchers found that guava leaf extract could increase the activity of hepatic hexokinase (HKase), hepatic phosphofructokinase (PFKase) and hepatic glucose-6- phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PDHase) in the hepatic glycolysis pathway, thereby promoting hepatic glucose utilization (Shen et al., 2008). Moreover, due to the effectiveness and safety of guava leaf in treating T2DM, tea containing guava leaf extract was approved as a specific health food (beverage) in Japan in March 2000 (Deguchi and Miyazaki, 2010). However, the exact mechanism by which effective components of guava leaf work in concert to treat T2DM, has remained unclear. A meta-analysis conducted by Xu et al. evaluated the relationship between the intake of flavonoids and the risk of T2DM, and the results showed that participants with a high intake of flavonoids had a lower risk of T2DM (Xu et al., 2018). In addition, several previous studies have proved that triterpenoid might have anti-T2DM effects. For instance, Khanra et al. found that the triterpenoid from Abroma augusta leaf improved diabetic nephropathy in T2DM rats (Khanra et al., 2017). Besides, it was reported that triterpenoids in guava leaf could inhibit the enzymes involved in glucose metabolism, prevent the development of insulin resistance and normalize blood sugar/insulin levels aside from their hypolipidemic and anti-obesity activities (Nazaruk and Borzym-Kluczyk, 2015). Furthermore, through the experiments in mice, it was demonstrated that meroterpenoid (ganomycin I) could effectively reduce blood sugar, blood lipids, and promote insulin sensitivity (Wang et al., 2017).

The concept of network pharmacology has provided new ideas, theories and methods for the modern research on naturally-derived drugs (Hopkins, 2008). In recent years, network pharmacology has integrated bioinformatics, pharmacology, computer science and other multi-disciplinary tools to realize the network construction between naturally-derived drugs and diseases based on the interactions among effective components, functional pathways and target proteins, thereby providing a preliminarily perspective on the disease-specific pharmacological mechanism that support the development of new drugs (Hopkins, 2007; Luo et al., 2020).

As abovementioned, guava leaf contain many effective components, however, the underlying pharmacological mechanism has not been systematically analyzed. Therefore, through network pharmacology, this study aimed to explore the regulatory relationship between the main effective components in guava leaf and the corresponding target proteins in T2DM, in the hope of elucidating the underlying pharmacological mechanism.

2

2 Material and method

2.1

2.1 Database and software

2.1.1

2.1.1 Databases

The following databases were incorporated in the present study: database of traditional Chinese medicine systems pharmacology (TCMSP) (Ru et al., 2014), databases of substance and compound (PubChem) (Kim et al., 2016), pharmacophore mapping based web server for identifying potential drug target (PharmMapper) (Liu et al., 2010), the universal protein resource (UniProt) (UniProt, 2009), the human gene integrator (GeneCards) (Safran et al., 2010), the database for protein–protein interaction (PPI) networks (STRING) (Franceschini et al., 2013) and archive for high-throughput functional genomic data (GEO) (Barrett et al., 2009).

2.1.2

2.1.2 Softwares

Software for topological network analysis (Cytoscape 3.7.0) (Kohl et al., 2011), online interactive tool for drawing Venn diagram (Venny 2.1.0) (Oliveros, 2007), Gene ID conversion tool (g:Profiler) (Reimand et al., 2016), online software for functional enrichment and annotation (KOBAS 3.0) (Xie et al., 2011), pathway drawing tool (KEGG Mapper) (Kanehisa and Sato, 2020) were used in this current study.

2.2

2.2 Prediction of target genes of guava leaf active components

Active components of guava leaf and corresponding predicted targets were first retrieved from TCMSP according to a criterion of z′-score > 1.5. The 2- or 3-dimensional structures of candidate chemicals (defined in the previous step) were obtained from PubChem (Kim et al., 2016), and subsequently submitted to PharmMapper (Liu et al., 2010) for target prediction and classification of active compounds (they were roughly categorized into flavonoid, triterpenoid and meroterpenoid). The potential target genes of guava leaf components identified by both TCMSP and PubChem databases were used in our subsequent analyses.

2.3

2.3 Screening for potential target genes for guava leaf active components against T2DM

Keywords “type 2 diabetes mellitus” or “T2DM” were used as queries to search against GeneCards database, whereby known human genes associated with T2DM were retrieved. The search results were sorted by “relevance score” in descending order, the top 500 diabetes targets were filtered, and subsequently compared with the predicted targets of guava leaf active components. In this way, the intersection between predicted targets of guava leaf active components and diabetes-associated genes, which might contribute to the anti-T2DM effect of guava leaf, were defined as target genes.

2.4

2.4 Construction of a “compound-active components-target genes” pharmacological network

Information concerning active compounds, their chemical classification and potential therapeutic targets in T2DM were visualized via a drug-target interaction network constructed using Cytoscape 3.7.0 (Kohl et al., 2011).

2.5

2.5 Topological analysis of the target genes

Next, the abovementioned target genes were submitted to STRING database, the protein–protein interaction (PPI) network was constructed according to the highest confidence level (interaction score > 0.9). The results of the STRING analysis were downloaded and visualized/analyzed locally using Cytoscape 3.7.0. In brief, two topological parameters “Node Degree Distribution” and “Betweenness Centrality” were calculated for each node, the former is proportional to the connections between indicated node and other nodes, whereas the latter indicates how frequent a node serves as a bridge between other two nodes. The resultant large network was subjected to analysis by another Cytoscape plug-in called “MCODE”, whereby several sub-networks with stronger biological significance and central biological processes could be identified. In this way, pivotal players (we defined these genes as hub genes) in the PPI network that possess a high degree of connectivity and centrality were revealed.

2.6

2.6 GO and KEGG function enrichment analysis

Function enrichment analysis of target genes was performed based on GO terms and KEGG pathways using KOBAS 3.0 online tool (Xie et al., 2011). The results were downloaded and visualized using bubble plots.

2.7

2.7 Identification of differentially expressed gene (DEGs) in T2DM dataset from GEO

Keywords “type 2 diabetes” was used as a query to search against GEO database in compliance with the following criteria: 1, The experiments were associated with T2DM; 2, Number of experimental samples ≥ 10; 3, Availability of both T2DM and control samples. After defining control and case groups, online tool GEO2R was used for differential expression analysis. Then, after removal of replicated genes and genes with missing value, the remaining genes with p value < 0.05 were defined as DEGs

2.8

2.8 Drawing of pathway diagrams

The intersection of DEGs and target genes were named key genes, which deserves further investigation due to their strong biological significance. The key genes were mapped to KEGG database to retrieve the pathways in which the key genes were involved. Briefly, the HUGO IDs of key genes were first converted to Entrez IDs, and then imported into the pathway drawing tool (KEGG Mapper) (Kanehisa and Sato, 2020) to generate pathway diagrams, wherein up- and down-regulated key genes (obtained by DEG analysis) were colored yellow and red, respectively.

3

3 Results

3.1

3.1 Identification of targets for active components in guava leaf

According to our previous work (Jiang et al., 2020) and PubChem database, the chemical formula and structure of 68 active components were first downloaded and the corresponding *.sdf files were later input into the PharmMapper database to obtain the potential targets of active components of guava leaf. As a result, a total number of 530 predicted targets of guava leaf active components were identified at a threshold of z′-score ≥ 1.5, among which the numbers of targets of three predominant categories of compounds (triterpenoid, flavonoid, and meroterpenoid) were 411, 875, and 455, respectively. The information of the top 20 potential targets ordered by z′-score was shown in Table 1.

Table 1 The information of the top 20 potential targets of guava leaf ordered by z′-score.
Compounds Active components Potential targets Gene name Normalized Fit Score z′-score
Flavonoid Apigenin Cell division protein kinase 6 CDK6 0.9199 6.05915
Flavonoid Kaempferol Cell division protein kinase 6 CDK6 0.9249 5.94594
Flavonoid Ononin Galactosylgalactosylxylosylprotein 3-beta-glucuronosyltransferase 1 B3GAT1 0.7592 5.00886
Flavonoid Morin-3-O-α-L-lyxopyranoside Uridine-cytidine kinase 2 UCK2 0.7644 4.88183
Flavonoid Quercetin Cell division protein kinase 6 CDK6 0.8978 4.859
Flavonoid Quercetin-3-O-(6″-feruloyl) -β-D-galactopyranoside CD209 antigen CD209 0.5827 4.84559
Flavonoid Genistin Aldehyde dehydrogenase, mitochondrial ALDH2 0.9082 4.53315
Flavonoid Isoquercitrin Glucosamine-6-phosphate isomerase GNPDA1 0.6748 4.49132
Flavonoid Apigenin cAMP-specific 3,5-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4D PDE4B 0.6452 4.49097
Flavonoid Daidzin Aldehyde dehydrogenase, mitochondrial ALDH2 0.8941 4.44701
Flavonoid Kaempferol cAMP-specific 3,5-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4D PDE4B 0.6506 4.42388
Flavonoid Daidzin Galactosylgalactosylxylosylprotein 3-beta-glucuronosyltransferase 1 B3GAT1 0.7418 4.21266
Flavonoid Ononin Beta-hexosaminidase beta chain HEXB 0.7022 4.14004
Flavonoid Quercetin 3-O-beta-D-xylopyranoside Histone acetyltransferase PCAF KAT2B 0.4912 4.10724
Flavonoid Reynoutrin Carbonyl reductase [NADPH] 1 CBR1 0.8584 4.06041
Flavonoid Apigenin cGMP-specific 3,5-cyclic phosphodiesterase PDE5A 0.531 3.97935
Flavonoid Leucocyanidin Glucocorticoid receptor NR3C1 0.5577 3.97369
Flavonoid Myricetin Cell division protein kinase 6 CDK6 0.8552 3.9731
Flavonoid Genistin Galectin-3 LGALS3 0.7007 3.9062
Flavonoid Kaempferol-3-glucoside Cell division protein kinase 6 CDK6 0.9043 3.89581
Triterpenoid Obtusinin Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E EIF4E 0.4978 4.10176
Triterpenoid Goreishic acid I Corticosteroid 11-beta-dehydrogenase isozyme 1 HSD11B1 0.9576 3.70283
Triterpenoid Uvoal Corticosteroid 11-beta-dehydrogenase isozyme 1 HSD11B1 0.9576 3.70283
Triterpenoid Ilelatifol D Epidermal growth factor receptor EGFR 0.7682 3.43594
Triterpenoid Obtusinin Glutathione S-transferase A1 GSTA1 0.4895 3.42822
Triterpenoid Psidiumoic acid Serine/threonine-protein phosphatase PP1-gamma catalytic subunit PPP1CC 0.4055 3.42042
Triterpenoid Corosolic acid Trafficking protein particle complex subunit 3 TRAPPC3 0.8179 3.40365
Triterpenoid Jacoumaric acid Corticosteroid 11-beta-dehydrogenase isozyme 1 HSD11B1 0.9251 3.39745
Triterpenoid Asiatic acid Interleukin-2 IL2 0.5246 3.37554
Triterpenoid Corosolic acid Corticosteroid 11-beta-dehydrogenase isozyme 1 HSD11B1 0.9164 3.26152
Triterpenoid Guavacoumaric acid Corticosteroid 11-beta-dehydrogenase isozyme 1 HSD11B1 0.9623 3.23795
Triterpenoid Ilelatifol D Sorbitol dehydrogenase SORD 0.8007 3.16982
Triterpenoid Isoneriucoumaric acid Corticosteroid 11-beta-dehydrogenase isozyme 1 HSD11B1 0.9086 3.1421
Triterpenoid 2α-hydroxyoleanolic acid Aldo-keto reductase family 1 member C3 AKR1C3 0.6586 3.10459
Triterpenoid Guavanoic acid cAMP-specific 3,5-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4D PDE4B 0.7681 3.08659
Triterpenoid Oleanolic acid Trafficking protein particle complex subunit 3 TRAPPC3 0.7381 3.01578
Triterpenoid Goreishic acid I Sorbitol dehydrogenase SORD 0.8779 2.99474
Triterpenoid Uvoal Sorbitol dehydrogenase SORD 0.8779 2.99474
Triterpenoid Guavanoic acid Bile salt sulfotransferase SULT2A1 0.9373 2.97436
Triterpenoid Obtusinin Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E EIF4E 0.4978 4.10176
Meroterpenoid Guajadial C Adenosine kinase ADK 0.746 4.81728
Meroterpenoid Guajadial D Adenosine kinase ADK 0.746 4.81728
Meroterpenoid Psidial C Estrogen-related receptor gamma ESRRG 0.7545 4.29261
Meroterpenoid Psiguadial B Bile acid receptor NR1H4 0.6326 4.23767
Meroterpenoid Guajadial Renin REN 0.5374 3.97044
Meroterpenoid Guajadial B Renin REN 0.5374 3.97044
Meroterpenoid Guavadial Carbonic anhydrase 2 CA2 0.9737 3.8595
Meroterpenoid Psiguadial D Estradiol 17-beta-dehydrogenase 1 HSD17B1 0.8896 3.77446
Meroterpenoid Psiguadial A Histo-blood group ABO system transferase ABO 0.6709 3.73128
Meroterpenoid Psidial C E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase Mdm2 MDM2 0.7637 3.72858
Meroterpenoid Psidial B Angiogenin ANG 0.8709 3.47879
Meroterpenoid Psiguadial C Retinoic acid receptor gamma RARG 0.6494 3.47538
Meroterpenoid Psidial A Nuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 3 NR1I3 0.6745 3.3536
Meroterpenoid Guajadial E Glutathione S-transferase A1 GSTA1 0.696 3.32108
Meroterpenoid Guajadial F Glutathione S-transferase A1 GSTA1 0.696 3.32108
Meroterpenoid Guajadial Estrogen sulfotransferase SULT1E1 0.6468 3.28588
Meroterpenoid Guajadial B Estrogen sulfotransferase SULT1E1 0.6468 3.28588
Meroterpenoid Psiguadial C E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase Mdm2 MDM2 0.7796 3.26007
Meroterpenoid Diguajadial Interleukin-2 IL2 0.566 3.23955
Meroterpenoid Guajadial C Adenosine kinase ADK 0.746 4.81728

3.2

3.2 Identification of target genes for guava leaf active components against T2DM

Next, the gene name and UniProt ID of potential targets were obtained from UniProt database. A total of 500 diabetes-associated genes were obtained through searching the keywords “type 2 diabetes mellitus” or “T2DM” in the GeneCard database (Supplementary Table 1). As shown in Fig. 1, the intersection between the predicted targets of guava leaf active components (“Triterpenoid”, “Meroterpenoid”, and “Flavonoid”) and diabetes-associated genes (“T2DM”) was visualized by a Venn diagram. We obtained 179 potential targets for guava leaf active components against T2DM (the intersections between “Triterpenoid”/ “Meroterpenoid”/ “Flavonoid” and “T2DM”). These genes were defined as target genes. In addition, there were 73, 166 and 43 targets specific for guava leaf-derived triterpenoids, flavonoids and meroterpenoid in T2DM, respectively, accounting for 9.22%, 20.96% and 5.43% of the total number of T2DM-associated targets. The detailed information of the target genes was shown in Table 2.

The overlap of predicted target genes of guava leaf active components and diabetes genes.
Fig. 1
The overlap of predicted target genes of guava leaf active components and diabetes genes.
Table 2 The information of 179 target genes.
NO. Potential targets Gene name UniProt ID
1 Acetyl-CoA carboxylase 1 ACACA Q13085
2 Acetylcholinesterase ACHE P22303
3 Beta-2 adrenergic receptor ADRB2 P07550
4 Aldose reductase AKR1B1 P15121
5 RAC-alpha serine/threonine-protein kinase AKT1 P31749
6 RAC-beta serine/threonine-protein kinase AKT2 P31751
7 Aldehyde dehydrogenase, mitochondrial ALDH2 P05091
8 Arachidonate 5-lipoxygenase ALOX5 P09917
9 Intestinal-type alkaline phosphatase ALPI P09923
10 Annexin A5 ANXA5 P08758
11 Adenomatous polyposis coli protein APC P25054
12 Apolipoprotein A-I APOA1 P02647
13 Apolipoprotein B-100 APOB P04114
14 Androgen receptor AR P10275
15 Serine-protein kinase ATM ATM Q13315
16 Apoptosis regulator BAX BAX Q07812
17 Cholinesterase BCHE P06276
18 Apoptosis regulator Bcl-2 BCL2 P10415
19 Bcl-2-like protein 1 BCL2L1 Q07817
20 Baculoviral IAP repeat-containing protein 5 BIRC5 O15392
21 Caspase-3 CASP3 P42574
22 Caspase-8 CASP8 Q14790
23 Catalase CAT P04040
24 Caveolin-1 CAV1 Q03135
25 C-C motif chemokine 2 CCL2 P13500
26 G1/S-specific cyclin-D1 CCND1 P24385
27 CD209 antigen CD209 Q9NNX6
28 Platelet glycoprotein 4 CD36 P16671
29 CD40 ligand CD40LG P29965
30 Cell division protein kinase 4 CDK4 P11802
31 Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1 CDKN1A P38936
32 Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator CFTR P13569
33 Serine/threonine-protein kinase Chk2 CHEK2 O96017
34 Collagen alpha-1(I) chain COL1A1 P02452
35 Carnitine O-palmitoyltransferase 1, liver isoform CPT1A P50416
36 C-reactive protein CRP P02741
37 Cathepsin D CTSD P07339
38 C-X-C motif chemokine 10 CXCL10 P02778
39 Interleukin-8 CXCL8 P10145
40 Cytochrome c CYCS P99999
41 Cytochrome P450 19A1 CYP19A1 P11511
42 Cytochrome P450 1A1 CYP1A1 P04798
43 Cytochrome P450 1A2 CYP1A2 P05177
44 Steroid 21-hydroxylase CYP21A2 P08686
45 Cytochrome P450 2C8 CYP2C8 P10632
46 Cytochrome P450 2C9 CYP2C9 P11712
47 Cytochrome P450 3A4 CYP3A4 P08684
48 Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 DPP4 P27487
49 Pro-epidermal growth factor EGF P01133
50 Epidermal growth factor receptor EGFR P00533
51 Histone acetyltransferase p300 EP300 Q09472
52 Receptor tyrosine-protein kinase erbB-2 ERBB2 P04626
53 Estrogen receptor ESR1 P03372
54 Prothrombin F2 P00734
55 Tissue factor F3 P13726
56 Coagulation factor VII F7 P08709
57 Fatty acid-binding protein, adipocyte FABP4 P15090
58 Tumor necrosis factor ligand superfamily member 6 FASLG P48023
59 Fatty acid synthase FASN P49327
60 Heparin-binding growth factor 2 FGF2 P09038
61 Basic fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 FGFR1 P11362
62 Fibronectin FN1 P02751
63 Glucose-6-phosphatase G6PC P35575
64 Glucosylceramidase GBA A0A068F658
65 Vitamin D-binding protein GC P02774
66 Glucokinase GCK P35557
67 Glial fibrillary acidic protein GFAP P14136
68 Somatotropin GH1 P01241
69 Growth hormone receptor GHR P10912
70 Gap junction alpha-1 protein GJA1 P17302
71 Beta-galactosidase GLB1 P16278
72 Glycogen synthase kinase-3 beta GSK3B P49841
73 Glutathione S-transferase Mu 1 GSTM1 P09488
74 Glutathione S-transferase P GSTP1 P09211
75 Beta-hexosaminidase subunit beta HEXB P07686
76 Hexokinase-1 HK1 P19367
77 Hexokinase-2 HK2 P52789
78 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase HMGCR P04035
79 Heme oxygenase 1 HMOX1 P09601
80 GTPase HRas HRAS P01112
81 Corticosteroid 11-beta-dehydrogenase isozyme 1 HSD11B1 P28845
82 Heat shock protein beta-1 HSPB1 P04792
83 Intercellular adhesion molecule 1 ICAM1 P05362
84 Interferon gamma IFNG P01579
85 Insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor IGF1R P08069
86 Insulin-like growth factor II IGF2 P01344
87 Insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 3 IGFBP3 P17936
88 Inhibitor of nuclear factor kappa-B kinase subunit beta IKBKB O14920
89 NF-kappa-B essential modulator IKBKG Q9Y6K9
90 Interleukin-10 IL10 P22301
91 Interleukin-1 alpha IL1A P01583
92 Interleukin-1 beta IL1B P01584
93 Interleukin-2 IL2 P60568
94 Interleukin-4 IL4 P05112
95 Interleukin-6 IL6 P05231
96 Phosphatidylinositol-3,4,5-trisphosphate 5-phosphatase 2 INPPL1 O15357
97 Insulin INS P01308
98 Insulin receptor INSR P06213
99 Tyrosine-protein kinase JAK2 JAK2 O60674
100 Transcription factor AP-1 JUN P05412
101 Potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2 KCNH2 Q12809
102 ATP-sensitive inward rectifier potassium channel 11 KCNJ11 Q14654
103 Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 KDR P35968
104 Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin LCN2 P80188
105 Low-density lipoprotein receptor LDLR P01130
106 Dual specificity mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 1 MAP2K1 Q02750
107 Mitogen-activated protein kinase 1 MAPK1 P28482
108 Mitogen-activated protein kinase 14 MAPK14 Q16539
109 Mitogen-activated protein kinase 3 MAPK3 P27361
110 Mitogen-activated protein kinase 8 MAPK8 P45983
111 Hepatocyte growth factor receptor MET P08581
112 Interstitial collagenase MMP1 P03956
113 72 kDa type IV collagenase MMP2 P08253
114 Stromelysin-1 MMP3 P08254
115 Neutrophil collagenase MMP8 P22894
116 Matrix metalloproteinase-9 MMP9 P14780
117 Myeloperoxidase MPO P05164
118 Microsomal triglyceride transfer protein large subunit MTTP P55157
119 Myc proto-oncogene protein MYC P01106
120 Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 NFE2L2 Q16236
121 NF-kappa-B inhibitor alpha NFKBIA P25963
122 Nitric oxide synthase, inducible NOS2 P35228
123 Nitric-oxide synthase, endothelial NOS3 P29474
124 NAD(P)H dehydrogenase [quinone] 1 NQO1 P15559
125 Oxysterols receptor LXR-beta NR1H2 P55055
130 Progesterone receptor PGR P06401
131 Phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit, gamma isoform PIK3CG P48736
132 Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase regulatory subunit alpha PIK3R1 P27986
133 Tissue-type plasminogen activator PLAT P00750
134 Urokinase-type plasminogen activator PLAU P00749
135 Serum paraoxonase/arylesterase 1 PON1 P27169
136 Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha PPARA Q07869
137 Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor delta PPARD Q03181
138 Peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma PPARG P37231
139 Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1-beta PPARGC1B Q86YN6
140 Phosphatidylinositol-3,4,5-trisphosphate 3-phosphatase and dual-specificity protein phosphatase PTEN PTEN P60484
141 Cystathionine beta-synthase PTGS1 P23219
142 Prostaglandin G/H synthase 2 PTGS2 P35354
143 Tyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 1 PTPN1 P18031
144 Tyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 11 PTPN11 Q06124
145 Retinol-binding protein 4 RBP4 P02753
146 Lithostathine-1-alpha REG1A P05451
147 Transcription factor p65 RELA Q04206
148 Renin REN P00797
149 Transforming protein RhoA RHOA P61586
150 Runt-related transcription factor 2 RUNX2 Q13950
151 Retinoic acid receptor alpha/Retinoic acid receptor beta RXRA P19793
152 Protein S100-A9 S100A9 P06702
153 E-selectin SELE P16581
154 P-selectin SELP P16109
155 Plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 SERPINE1 P05121
156 Sex hormone-binding globulin SHBG P04278
157 NAD-dependent deacetylase sirtuin-1 SIRT1 Q96EB6
158 Solute carrier family 2,facilitated glucose transporter member 4 SLC2A4 P14672
159 Sodium-dependent serotonin transporter SLC6A4 P31645
160 Superoxide dismutase [Cu-Zn] SOD1 P00441
161 Superoxide dismutase [Mn], mitochondrial SOD2 P04179
162 Osteopontin SPP1 P10451
163 Proto-oncogene tyrosine-protein kinase Src SRC P12931
164 Signal transducer and activator of transcription 1-alpha/beta STAT1 P42224
165 Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 STAT3 P40763
166 Angiopoietin-1 receptor TEK Q02763
167 Transforming growth factor beta-1 TGFB1 P01137
168 Transforming growth factor beta-2 TGFB2 P61812
169 TGF-beta receptor type-1 TGFBR1 P36897
170 Tyrosine 3-monooxygenase TH P07101
171 Thrombomodulin THBD P07204
172 Metalloproteinase inhibitor 1 TIMP1 P01033
173 Tumor necrosis factor TNF P01375
174 Cellular tumor antigen p53 TP53 P04637
175 Triosephosphate isomerase TPI1 P60174
176 UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1–1 UGT1A1 P22309
177 Vascular cell adhesion protein 1 VCAM1 P19320
178 Vitamin D3 receptor VDR P11473
179 Vascular endothelial growth factor A VEGFA P15692

3.3

3.3 Construction of a “compound-active components-target genes” pharmacological network

Cytoscape was used to visualize the interaction between the compounds, active components, and target genes involved in T2DM, with unconnected nodes being removed. The “compound-active components-target genes” pharmacological network (Fig. 2) included 249 nodes (3 compounds, 66 active components, 179 target genes) and 1880 edges. In the network, the red oval/blue diamond/green hexagonal nodes correspond to different guava leaf-derived compounds/active components/target genes. The average degree centrality of the blue nodes and the green nodes were 14 and 4, respectively, suggesting that one active component can potentially target multiple genes. The information of the active components and target genes with degree centrality > 10 was shown in Table 3.

The “compound-active components-target genes” pharmacological network.
Fig. 2
The “compound-active components-target genes” pharmacological network.
Table 3 The information of the active components and target genes with degree >10 in the pharmacological network.
NO Name Composition type Degree Category
1 Quercetin Flavonoid 94 Compound
2 Genistein Flavonoid 60 Compound
3 Apigenin Flavonoid 46 Compound
4 Ursolic acid Triterpenoid 46 Compound
5 Daidzein Flavonoid 41 Compound
6 Kaempferol Flavonoid 38 Compound
7 Myricetin Flavonoid 28 Compound
8 Formononetin Flavonoid 23 Compound
9 Daidzin Flavonoid 20 Compound
10 Ononin Flavonoid 19 Compound
11 Oleanolic acid Triterpenoid 18 Compound
12 Prunetin Flavonoid 16 Compound
13 Rutin Flavonoid 16 Compound
14 Isoquercetrin Flavonoid 15 Compound
15 Goreishic acid I Triterpenoid 15 Compound
16 Uvoal Triterpenoid 15 Compound
17 Psidiumoic acid Triterpenoid 14 Compound
18 Genistin Flavonoid 13 Compound
19 Quercitrin Flavonoid 13 Compound
20 2α-hydroxyoleanolic acid Triterpenoid 13 Compound
21 Guavacoumaric acid Triterpenoid 13 Compound
22 Olmelin Flavonoid 12 Compound
23 Guavaric A Flavonoid 12 Compound
24 Hyperin Flavonoid 12 Compound
25 Guavanoic acid Triterpenoid 12 Compound
26 Quercetin-3-O-β-D-glucuronide Triterpenoid 11 Compound
27 Corosolic acid Triterpenoid 11 Compound
28 Isoneriucoumaric acid Triterpenoid 11 Compound
29 Psidial B Meroterpenoid 11 Compound
30 Guajadial C Meroterpenoid 11 Compound
31 Guajadial D Meroterpenoid 11 Compound
32 RXRA 23 Target
33 HSD11B1 21 Target
34 VDR 21 Target
35 NR3C1 20 Target
36 DPP4 19 Target
37 PTGS2 19 Target
38 IL2 18 Target
39 NR3C2 17 Target
40 HEXB 17 Target
41 SHBG 16 Target
42 GSK3B 15 Target
43 PPARG 14 Target
44 PARP1 14 Target
45 CD209 14 Target
46 RBP4 13 Target
47 HMGCR 13 Target
48 PTGS1 13 Target
49 MAP2K1 13 Target
50 REN 12 Target
51 GC 12 Target
52 NOS2 12 Target
53 AR 12 Target
54 ESR1 11 Target

3.4

3.4 Construction of the PPI network of target genes

The PPI network of 179 target genes was constructed using STRING database and the resultant *.TSV file was visualized by Cytoscape. As shown in Fig. 3, the network contained 166 nodes (13 nodes were removed due to the absence of biological interactions) and 961 edges, in which the thickness of the edge was proportional to the strength of protein interaction. A total of 37 hub genes, whose degrees and betweenness centrality exceeded the average, were identified in the topological network (colored in red). Sub-networks with stronger biological significance were identified by Cytoscape plug-in “MCODE”, among which the largest sub-network was visualized by setting the shape of each sub-network member to triangle. The network topology parameters of the 37 hub genes were shown in Supplementary Table 2.

The PPI network of 179 target genes.
Fig. 3
The PPI network of 179 target genes.

3.5

3.5 Functional enrichment analysis

To investigate the biological functions of target genes, we performed GO and KEGG functional enrichment analysis using KOBAS 3.0. The enriched biological functions of the target genes in 3 manually curated categories “Signal transduction pathways”, “Metabolism process” and “Other processes” were shown in Fig. 4 A-C. The full list of enriched pathways of 179 target genes was provided in Supplementary Table 4. Moreover, the results of function enrichment analyses of all sub-networks (identified by “MCODE” in previous step) were provided in Supplementary Table 3. The most representative pathways were “regulation of the metabolic process”, “regulation of leukocyte proliferation”, “positive regulation of defense”, and “regulation of signaling pathway”.

GO analysis of target genes (A) Metabolic process. (B) Signal transduction pathways. (C) Other processes.
Fig. 4
GO analysis of target genes (A) Metabolic process. (B) Signal transduction pathways. (C) Other processes.

3.6

3.6 Data processing and analysis of GSE76894

The differential expression analysis of the GSE76894 data was performed by GEO2R in NCBI. The DEGs were identified with a threshold of P < 0.05. As shown in Fig. 5A, there was a 49-gene overlap between DEGs and target genes, and these genes were defined as key genes. The expression profile of the 49 key genes were shown in Fig. 5B; and 13 genes (SOD2, INSR, HSPB1, CCL2, CRP, RELA, EP300, GJA1, F3, TGFB2, TGFBR1, MET, VCAM1) were significantly up-regulated and 4 genes (INS, SOD1, RBP4, TIMP1) were significantly down-regulated. The function enrichment (GO/KEGG) analyses of the 49 key genes were shown in Fig. 6. The most representative GO-BP terms (Fig. 6A) were “positive regulation of establishment of protein localization” and “positive regulation of protein transport” while the most representative GO-CC terms (Fig. 6B) were “membrane region”, “membrane microdomain” and “membrane raft”. The most representative GO-MF terms (Fig. 6C) were “signaling receptor activator activity” and “receptor ligand activity” while the most representative KEGG pathways (Fig. 6D) were “MAPK signaling pathway” and “AGE-RAGE signaling pathway”.

Data processing and analysis of GSE76894. (A) Venn diagram showing the overlaps between DEGs and target genes. (B) Heatmap showing Z-score scaled expression profile of 49 key genes in GSE76894. A red-blue gradient signifies whether a gene is up- or down-regulated.
Fig. 5
Data processing and analysis of GSE76894. (A) Venn diagram showing the overlaps between DEGs and target genes. (B) Heatmap showing Z-score scaled expression profile of 49 key genes in GSE76894. A red-blue gradient signifies whether a gene is up- or down-regulated.
Functional enrichment analysis of key genes (A) Biological process. (B) Cellular Component. (C) Molecular function. (D) KEGG enrichment.
Fig. 6
Functional enrichment analysis of key genes (A) Biological process. (B) Cellular Component. (C) Molecular function. (D) KEGG enrichment.

3.7

3.7 Pathway analyses of key genes

To further investigate the way by which key genes contribute to the anti-T2DM effect of guava leaf, we uploaded the Entrez IDs of 49 key genes to the KEGG Mapper for pathway analyses. The pathway diagram of one of the most representative pathway, namely PI3K-AKT pathway, was shown in Fig. 7, which demonstrated the involvement of 13 key genes through Toll-like receptor, B cell receptor, JAK/STAT, Focal adhesion and Chemokine signaling pathways; up- or down-regulated key genes were colored by yellow or red background, respectively. In the T2DM regulation process (Supplementary figure 1), 4 genes were found in the regulation of adipocytokine signaling pathway, insulin pathway, and mitochondria pathway. We also found 8 genes that participated in the regulation of the insulin resistance pathway (Supplementary figure 2), including the biological processes of muscle cell, liver cell, and O-GlcNAc regulation of insulin resistance. The corresponding detailed information was summarized in Supplementary Table 5.

Pathway diagram of PI3K-AKT pathway and the involvement of 13 key genes.
Fig. 7
Pathway diagram of PI3K-AKT pathway and the involvement of 13 key genes.

4

4 Discussion

Mounting evidence suggested that guava leaf have potential against T2DM (Okpashi et al., 2014; Shen et al., 2008; Shabbir et al., 2020), whereas the underlying mechanism remains obscure. This study explored the mechanism underlying the efficacy of guava leaf component in the treatment of T2DM with the help of network pharmacology. Initially, a total of 530 target genes of 68 guava leaf active compounds were obtained from the TCMSP and PharmMapper database. Subsequently, 179 target genes were obtained by intersecting the acquired guava leaf targets with T2DM-asscociated genes obtained from the GeneCard database. Then, a pharmacological network of guava leaf active components and target genes was constructed using Cytoscape and the results showed that target genes could be co-regulated by multiple active components. This finding indicated that guava leaf have the characteristics common to Chinese medicine in the treatment of T2DM, such as multi-component and multi-target effects, which was consistent with the research strategy based on network pharmacology (Zhou et al., 2020).

To summarize the collective effect of target genes at the protein level, and explain the treatment effect of guava leaf against T2DM, we constructed a “compound-active components-target genes” pharmacological network based on 68 guava leaf active components and target genes using the STRING database. The network showed that guava leaf are closely related to various target proteins in T2DM, suggesting that the therapeutic efficacy of guava leaf in the treatment of T2DM depends on collective effect of multiple target proteins, rather than the regulation of a single target. Here, we selected the top 5 active components according to their degree within the PPI network, and subsequently identified their target proteins, which included RXRA, HSD11B1, VDR, NR3C1, DPP4, PTGS2, and IL2. RXRA is a retinoid-X receptor that involves in the regulation of metabolic processes including lipid metabolism (Stossi et al., 2019). Several studies revealed that the methylation of RXRA was closely related to diabetes (Franzago et al., 2019; Castellano-Castillo et al., 2019). HSD11B1 is generally distributed in the liver and adipose, where it functions as the gate-keeper of activity levels of local glucocorticoid (Chapman et al., 2013). A previous study conducted by Masuzaki and co-workers demonstrated that HSD11B1 overexpression in mice can lead to dyslipidemia, visceral obesity, and even insulin-resistant diabetes (Masuzaki et al., 2001), highlighting that Hsd11b1 is closely related to the development of adverse metabolic features. As known, VDR is involved in maintaining insulin secretion and vitamin D metabolism process (Zeitz et al., 2003; Ogunkolade et al., 2002). Recently, an increasing body of literature reported that polymorphisms in the VDR gene might significantly reduce both mRNA and protein levels of VDR, which increases the risk of diabetes development (Angel et al., 2018; Xia et al., 2017). As a key regulatory enzyme of the incretin system, DPP4 has gained interest in the treatment of T2DM in the last decade (Röhrborn et al., 2015). It has been confirmed that DPP4 inhibitor not only improve glycemic control, but also preserve β-cell function in T2DM, highlighting that DDP4 inhibitor is a novel and promising anti-diabetic agent (Wang et al., 2018). Therefore, we speculated that guava leaf might play a therapeutic role in T2DM by regulating levels of insulin, vitamin D and DPP4, as well as retinoid-X receptor expression. Besides, there is few studies about the association between T2DM and several other guava leaf target proteins including PTGS2, NR3C1 and IL2. We suggested that these proteins might be used as novel targets in T2DM therapy. Then, we applied the Cytoscape software and KOBAS 3.0 platform to carry out functional enrichment analysis of target genes. Results of KEGG pathway analysis indicated that these genes were mainly enriched in several biological processes including the metabolic pathway, apoptosis, insulin resistance, and PI3K-Akt signaling pathways, implying that the anti-T2MD role of guava leaf might be achieved by regulation of these processes.

To further improve the biological significance of the currently identified 179 target genes, the intersection between DEGs (resulting from differential expression analysis of T2DM patients versus non-diabetic controls) and target genes was defined as key genes and used in subsequent analyses. Briefly, bioinformatics tool KEGG Mapper was used to depict how these key genes contribute to the anti-T2DM effect of guava leaf on the signaling pathway level. As the primary signal transduction pathway of insulin, the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway has been proved to reinforce the sensitivity of insulin and exert a role in regulating sugar lipid metabolism (Gao et al., 2019). Many studies revealed that amounts of active compounds of traditional Chinese medicine show therapeutic effect against diabetes via PI3K/Akt signaling pathway (Chan and Ye, 2013; Li et al., 2014; Dai et al., 2016). Given that insulin resistance would cause β-cell dysfunction even in the development of T2DM, targeting insulin resistance was proved to be a valuable therapeutic strategy for ameliorating the progression of T2DM (Arnold et al., 2018). Combined with our current findings and previous literature, we selected three signaling pathways including PI3K/Akt signaling, T2DM, and insulin resistance pathway for further interpretation. Functional enrichment analysis showed that the 49 key genes mainly participated in “mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway” and “AGE-RAGE signaling pathway in diabetic complications. MAPK has been proposed to maintain glucose homeostasis (Schultze et al., 2012), and is therefore associated with obesity and diabetes. The “AGE-RAGE signaling pathway” is a well-studied regulatory axis in diabetes (Kay et al., 2016). Specifically, RAGE is accountable for perturbed myocardial functions in diabetes; it also promotes other cardiovascular diseases such as atherosclerosis in the context of diabetes (Ramasamy et al., 2011). The present results indicated that the key genes are highly involved in diabetes and are promising candidate targets for guava leaf, and, thus, deserve further investigation.

Finally, representative diagrams of pathways where key genes were involved were drawn, among 49 key genes, 13 were found in PI3K/Akt signaling pathway, whereas 4 and 8 were found in the T2DM pathway and insulin resistance pathway, respectively. These results suggested that guava leaf is effective against T2DM mainly through regulating the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. Notably, one of the diabetes specific targets of guava leaf active components, PI3K, was found in all three pathways. Thus, we speculated that PI3K plays a crucial role in the anti-T2DM effect of guava leaf. Besides, INS, INSR and TNF were simultaneously found in insulin resistance and T2DM pathways; while PEPCK, NFKB and AKT were simultaneously found in PI3K-Akt signaling and insulin resistance pathways. Therefore, we hypothesized that guava leaf components regulate these genes (including INS, INSR, TNF, PEPCK, NFKB, and AKT) to alleviate insulin resistance and thereby exert anti-T2DM activity.

By taking the results of the above three pathways into consideration, it can be concluded that insulin binds with the insulin receptors to trigger signal transduction for activation of PI3K, thereby facilitating GLUT4 synthesis and transport. In muscle cells and liver cells, GLUT4 transports glucose from the blood to the cells for consumption, which lowers the blood sugar level, and regulates the insulin resistance (Gao et al., 2019; Beg et al., 2017). Meanwhile, PIP3 produced by PI3K can activate the Akt family, and activated Akt regulates cell growth cycle and metabolism and gluconeogenesis/glycolysis by phosphorylation. TNF plays a central role in insulin resistance in T2DM (Borst, 2004). In the insulin resistance pathway, TNF is capable of increasing free fatty acids to enhance the production of glycogen in liver cells (El-Moselhy et al., 2011). TNF acts as an activator to trigger NFKB action, then the activated NFKB can in turn further activate TNF, forming a positive feedback mechanism to interfere with the signal transduction of insulin receptors, thereby leading to insulin resistance (Yang et al., 2009). Collectively, our study revealed that the active components of guava leaf mainly target the PI3K-Akt signaling pathway to modulate various T2DM related genes and regulate levels of insulin, vitamin D and DPP4, as well as retinoid-X receptor expression in the treatment of T2DM. However, there are some limitations in our study. First, bioactive components and the corresponding targets of guava leaf reported in our study were not fully comprehensive as we merely focused on flavonoid, triterpenoid, and meroterpenoid. Second, this study lacks experimental evidence, therefore, in the future, further validations are required to consolidate the findings of this study.

In conclusion, for the first time, we uncovered the hypoglycemic mechanism of guava leaf through network pharmacology. This study preliminarily revealed that the active compounds of guava leaf are mainly involved in the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway, acting on TNFα, PEPCK and other factors to regulate insulin resistant and other biological pathways to achieve therapeutic effects against T2DM, providing a scientific base for further research on the molecular mechanism underlying guava leaf anti-T2DM effects.

Funding

This study was supported by the Basic Competence Improvement Project for Middle and Young Teachers in Guangxi Universities [grant number KY2016LX281], the Hechi University High-level Talent Research Startup Project [grant number XJ2018GKQ014] and the Guangxi Natural Science Foundation Program [grant number 2020GXNSFAA297218].

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. , , , , . The association of VDR polymorphisms and type 2 diabetes in older people living in community in Santiago de Chile. Nutr. Diabetes. 2018;8(1):31.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , , , . Brain insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes and Alzheimer disease: concepts and conundrums. Nat. Rev. Neurol.. 2018;14(3):168-181.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , , , . NCBI GEO: archive for high-throughput functional genomic data. Nucleic Acids Res.. 2009;37(Database issue):D885-D890.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , . Distinct Akt phosphorylation states are required for insulin regulated Glut4 and Glut1-mediated glucose uptake. Elife. 2017;6
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. , . The role of TNF-alpha in insulin resistance. Endocrine. 2004;23(2–3):177-182.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , , , . Altered adipose tissue dna methylation status in metabolic syndrome: relationships between global DNA methylation and specific methylation at adipogenic, lipid metabolism and inflammatory candidate genes and metabolic variables. J. Clin. Med.. 2019;8(1)
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. , , . Strategies for the discovery and development of anti-diabetic drugs from the natural products of traditional medicines. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci.. 2013;16(2):207-216.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , . 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenases: intracellular gate-keepers of tissue glucocorticoid action. Physiol. Rev.. 2013;93(3):1139-1206.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , , , . The effect of Liuwei Dihuang decoction on PI3K/Akt signaling pathway in liver of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) rats with insulin resistance. J. Ethnopharmacol.. 2016;192:382-389.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , , , , . Chemotype diversity of Psidium guajava L. Phytochemistry. 2018;153:129-137.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. , , . Anti-hyperglycemic and anti-hyperlipidemic effects of guava leaf extract. Nutr. Metab. (Lond). 2010;7:9.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , , , . Health effects of Psidium guajava L. leaves: an overview of the last decade. Int. J. Mol. Sci.. 2017;18(4)
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , , , . The antihyperglycemic effect of curcumin in high fat diet fed rats. Role of TNF-α and free fatty acids. Food Chem. Toxicol.. 2011;49(5):1129-1140.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , , , , . STRING v9.1: protein-protein interaction networks, with increased coverage and integration. Nucleic Acids Res.. 2013;41(Database issue):D808-D815.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , , . Nutrigenetics, epigenetics and gestational diabetes: consequences in mother and child. Epigenetics. 2019;14(3):215-235.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , , , , . To explore the pathogenesis of vascular lesion of type 2 diabetes mellitus based on the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. J. Diabetes Res.. 2019;2019:4650906.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. , , , , , , . Guava leaf extracts promote glucose metabolism in SHRSP.Z-Leprfa/Izm rats by improving insulin resistance in skeletal muscle. BMC Complement Altern. Med.. 2013;13:52.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. , , , . Psidium guajava: a review of its traditional uses, phytochemistry and pharmacology. J. Ethnopharmacol.. 2008;117(1):1-27.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. , . Network pharmacology. Nat. Biotechnol.. 2007;25(10):1110-1111.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. , . Network pharmacology: the next paradigm in drug discovery. Nat. Chem. Biol.. 2008;4(11):682-690.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. , , , , , . Antitumor effect of guava leaves on lung cancer: a network pharmacology study. Arabian J. Chem.. 2020;13(11):7773-7797.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. , , . KEGG Mapper for inferring cellular functions from protein sequences. Protein Sci.. 2020;29(1):28-35.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. , , , . The role of AGE/RAGE signaling in diabetes-mediated vascular calcification. J. Diabetes Res.. 2016;2016:6809703.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. , , , , , , . Taraxerol, a pentacyclic triterpenoid, from Abroma augusta leaf attenuates diabetic nephropathy in type 2 diabetic rats. Biomed. Pharmacother.. 2017;94:726-741.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. , , , , , , . PubChem substance and compound databases. Nucleic Acids Res.. 2016;44(D1):D1202-D1213.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. , , , . Cytoscape: software for visualization and analysis of biological networks. Methods Mol. Biol.. 2011;696:291-303.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. , . Meglitinide analogues in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Drugs Aging. 2000;17(5):411-425.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. , , , , , , . A network pharmacology approach to determine active compounds and action mechanisms of ge-gen-qin-lian decoction for treatment of type 2 diabetes. Evid. Based Complement Alternat. Med.. 2014;2014:495840.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. , , , , , , . PharmMapper server: a web server for potential drug target identification using pharmacophore mapping approach. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38(Web Server issue):W609-W614.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. , , , , , , . Network pharmacology in research of Chinese medicine formula: methodology, application and prospective. Chin. J. Integr. Med.. 2020;26(1):72-80.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. , , , , , , . A transgenic model of visceral obesity and the metabolic syndrome. Science. 2001;294(5549):2166-2170.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. , , , , , . The phytochemistry and medicinal value of Psidium guajava (guava) Clin. Phytosci.. 2018;4(1)
    [Google Scholar]
  33. , , . The role of triterpenes in the management of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Phytochem. Rev.. 2015;14(4):675-690.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. , , , , , , . Vitamin D receptor (VDR) mRNA and VDR protein levels in relation to vitamin D status, insulin secretory capacity, and VDR genotype in Bangladeshi Asians. Diabetes. 2002;51(7):2294-2300.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. Okpashi, V.E., Bayim, B.P.-R., Obi-Abang, M., 2014. Comparative Effects of Some Medicinal Plants: Anacardium occidentale, Eucalyptus globulus, Psidium guajava, and Xylopia aethiopica Extracts in Alloxan-Induced Diabetic Male Wistar Albino Rats. Biochem. Res. Int., 2014, 203051-203051, doi:10.1155/2014/203051.
  36. Oliveros, J.C., 2007. VENNY. An interactive tool for comparing lists with Venn Diagrams.
  37. , , , , . Diabetes mellitus: an overview on its pharmacological aspects and reported medicinal plants having antidiabetic activity. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed.. 2012;2(5):411-420.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. , , , , , , . Definition, classification and diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. Exp. Clin. Endocrinol. Diabetes. 2019;127(S 01):S1-S7.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. , , , . Receptor for AGE (RAGE): signaling mechanisms in the pathogenesis of diabetes and its complications. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.. 2011;1243:88-102.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. Rathmann, W., Giani, G., 2004. Global prevalence of diabetes: estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. Diabetes Care, 27(10), 2568-2569; author reply 2569, doi:10.2337/diacare.27.10.2568.
  41. , , , , , , . g:Profiler-a web server for functional interpretation of gene lists (2016 update) Nucleic Acids Res.. 2016;44(W1):W83-W89.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. , , , . DPP4 in Diabetes [10.3389/fimmu.2015.00386] Front. Immunol.. 2015;6:386.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. , , , , , , . TCMSP: a database of systems pharmacology for drug discovery from herbal medicines. J. Cheminform. 2014;6:13.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. Safran, M., Dalah, I., Alexander, J., Rosen, N., Iny Stein, T., Shmoish, M., et al., 2010. GeneCards Version 3: the human gene integrator. Database (Oxford), 2010, baq020, doi:10.1093/database/baq020.
  45. , , , , . PI3K/AKT, MAPK and AMPK signalling: protein kinases in glucose homeostasis. Expert Rev. Mol. Med.. 2012;14:e1
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  46. , , , , , , . In vivo screening and antidiabetic potential of polyphenol extracts from guava pulp, seeds and leaves. Animals (Basel). 2020;10(9)
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  47. , , , . Effect of guava (Psidium guajava Linn.) leaf soluble solids on glucose metabolism in type 2 diabetic rats. Phytother. Res.. 2008;22(11):1458-1464.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  48. , , , , , , . Tributyltin chloride (TBT) induces RXRA down-regulation and lipid accumulation in human liver cells. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(11):e0224405.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  49. UniProt, C., 2009. The Universal Protein Resource (UniProt) 2009. Nucleic Acids Res., 37(Database issue), D169-174, doi:10.1093/nar/gkn664.
  50. , , , , , , . A novel class of α-glucosidase and HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors from Ganoderma leucocontextum and the anti-diabetic properties of ganomycin I in KK-A(y) mice. Eur. J. Med. Chem.. 2017;127:1035-1046.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  51. , , , , , . Dipeptidyl peptidase-4(DPP-4) inhibitors: promising new agents for autoimmune diabetes. Clin. Exp. Med.. 2018;18(4):473-480.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  52. , , , , . Mushrooms of the genus ganoderma used to treat diabetes and insulin resistance. Molecules. 2019;24(22)
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  53. , , , , , , . Association of vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms with diabetic dyslipidemia in the elderly male population in North China. Clin. Interv. Aging. 2017;12:1673-1679.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  54. Xie, C., Mao, X., Huang, J., Ding, Y., Wu, J., Dong, S., et al., 2011. KOBAS 2.0: a web server for annotation and identification of enriched pathways and diseases. Nucleic Acids Res., 39(Web Server issue), W316-322, doi:10.1093/nar/gkr483.
  55. , , , , . Flavonoids intake and risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97(19):e0686.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  56. , , , , , , . Feed-forward signaling of TNF-alpha and NF-kappaB via IKK-beta pathway contributes to insulin resistance and coronary arteriolar dysfunction in type 2 diabetic mice. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.. 2009;296(6):H1850-H1858.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  57. , , , . Guajadial: an unusual meroterpenoid from guava leaves Psidium guajava. Org. Lett.. 2007;9(24):5135-5138.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  58. , , , , , , . Impaired insulin secretory capacity in mice lacking a functional vitamin D receptor. FASEB J.. 2003;17(3):509-511.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  59. , , , , , , . Applications of network pharmacology in traditional Chinese medicine research. Evid. Based Complement Alternat. Med.. 2020;2020:1646905.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Appendix A

Supplementary data

Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2021.103143.

Appendix A

Supplementary data

The following are the Supplementary data to this article:

The T2DM regulation pathway regulated by 4 key genes.
Supplementary figure 1
The T2DM regulation pathway regulated by 4 key genes.

The insulin resistance pathway regulated by 8 key genes.
Supplementary figure 2
The insulin resistance pathway regulated by 8 key genes.

Supplementary data 1

Supplementary data 1 The information of the T2DM-associated genes that were searched from the GeneCard database.

Supplementary data 2

Supplementary data 2

Supplementary data 3

Supplementary data 3

Supplementary data 4

Supplementary data 4

Supplementary data 5

Supplementary data 5

Show Sections