5.2
Impact Factor
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Corrigendum
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Full Length Article
Full lenth article
Letter to Editor
Original Article
Research article
Retraction
Retraction notice
Review
Review Article
SPECIAL ISSUE: ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY
5.3
Impact Factor
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Corrigendum
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Full Length Article
Full lenth article
Letter to Editor
Original Article
Research article
Retraction
Retraction notice
Review
Review Article
SPECIAL ISSUE: ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original article
03 2021
:15;
103642
doi:
10.1016/j.arabjc.2021.103642

Novel phospha-oxazepinoquinazolinyl derivatives of ibuprofen as nitric oxide synthase inhibitors: Synthesis and biological evaluation

Department of Chemistry, College of Science Al-zulfi, Majmaah University, P.O. 66 Al-Majmaah 11952, Saudi Arabia
Egyptian Drug Authority (EDA), P.O. 29 Giza, Egypt
Chemistry Department, Faculty of Education, Ain Shams University, Roxy 11711, Cairo, Egypt

⁎Corresponding authors at: Department of Chemistry, College of Science Al-zulfi, Majmaah University, P.O. 66 Al-Majmaah, 11952, Saudi Arabia (A.M. Algohary). a.algohary@mu.edu.sa (Ayman M. Algohary), mmhassan121@yahoo.com (Mohamed M. Hassan)

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Elsevier and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Peer review under responsibility of King Saud University.

Abstract

The in vitro biological assessment of novel hybrid phospha-oxazepino derivatives bearing ibuprofenyl quinazolinone moiety as preventing stroke symptoms and inhibitors of nitric oxide synthase (iNOS and nNOS) isoforms was described. In general, products tested exhibited iNOS inhibition than nNOS. The phosphaoxazepinoquinazolinyl derivatives (4, 7, 10–12) are among the most effective inhibitors of all compounds tested, being also endowed with iNOS over nNOS selectivity. The structures of these new heterocycles were elucidated using spectral data and elemental analysis.

Keywords

Quinazolinone
Ibuprofen
Oxazepino
Nosteroidal
Inhibition
1

1 Introduction

One of the top ten most widely given pharmaceuticals in the world is ibuprofen (2-RS-(4-Isobutylphenyl) propanoic acid). Even though nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) such as profens, are useful in lowering inflammation and pain, their long-term use has been associated with undesirable effects for instance duodenal ulcers, gastric disorder, and dyspepsia. GI ulcers, bleeding, and nephrotoxicity (Tripathi, 2003). Traditional NSAIDs have different inhibitory potencies for two COX isoforms: COX-1 and COX-2. The main harm is caused by NSAIDs like ibuprofen, aspirin, and indomethacin, which are favored inhibitors of COX-1 and contain a free acidic moiety (Mehta, et al., 2010). By converting COOH moiety carrying on Ibuprofen or other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) into gastro-shielding amide drugs of NSAID, it hopes to take advantage of biochemical distinctions between the two COX enzymes. This is accomplished by covering the free carboxylic group, which can change the selectivity of enzyme from COX-1 to COX-2 (Algohary and Hassan, 2011; Algohary et al., 2021; Selinsky et al., 2001). Ibuprofen has been converted into a variety of heterocyclic derivatives with better analgesic efficacy and reduced ulcerogenic symptoms, as well as amino and other carboxylic acid derivatives of NSAID, which possess interesting anti-inflammatory effect (Cocco et al., 2003).

Quinazolinones have a unique structure with anticoagulant antiinflammatory, anticonvulsant, antibacterial, antiviral, antifibrotic, antiproliferative, antioxidant, antidiabetic, antimicrobial, antimalarial, antifungal, antituberculosis, CNS depressant activities and antihypertensive, (Salem et al., 2020). Phosphorus compounds, on the other hand, have gotten a lot of significance in the last few years due to their essential pharmaceutical properties including antibacterial (Dong et al., 2015) and analgesic, (Abdou et al., 2012) as well as their potential as anticancer therapeutic medicines (Akbaset al., 2013). Recently, it was reported that multiple phosphonate groups in heterocyclic compounds are also significant synthetic intermediates with a wide range of industrial and agricultural applications (Krecmerova et al., 2017; Rott et al., 2018; Han et al., 2017). The frameworks of oxazepine derivatives is significant structural motif in medicinal chemistry with a wide range of biological activity. Many bioactive compounds include these particular heterocyclic rings, which exhibit anti-histamine and anti-serotoninergic properties, progesterone receptor agonist properties, Anti-convulsant, histamine receptor agonist, Ca antagonist, anti-depressant, anticancer, anxiolytic, and analgesic properties have been reported for inhibitors of non-nucleoside HIV-1 (Hamidi et al., 2015).

L-arginine oxidation via NO synthase (NOS) in a NADPH and O2-dependent process creates nitric oxide (NO). NOS enzymes have three distinct isoforms: endothelial (eNOS), inducible (iNOS) and neuronal (nNOS). Neuro-disorder, Alzheimer's disease, migraine, stroke, and Huntington's disease have all been linked to the overproduction of NO by nNOS. Hypotensive disorders in neuropathic pain, colitis, arthritis, septic shock, tissue damage, and diverse inflammatory diseases have all been linked to increased iNOS production. Because the nNOS and iNOS enzymes are therapeutic targets, utilizing synthetic derivatives to inhibit them has emerged as an attractive area in the therapy of these diseases (López Cara et al., 2009).

Because of the biological significance of ibuprofens, quinazolinones, oxazepines, and phosphorus compounds, these skeletal frameworks were combined in one molecular framework to give the desired hybrid phospha-oxazepinoquinazolinyl derivatives including ibuprofen residues, which appeared to be of interest to be investegated as novel NOS inhibitors as an extension of our investigation line (Algohary and Hassan, 2021) Fig. 1.

Designing of novel hybrid phospha-oxazepinoquinazolinyl derivatives.
Fig 1 Designing of novel hybrid phospha-oxazepinoquinazolinyl derivatives.

2

2 Results and discussion

2.1

2.1 Chemistry

As a continuation effort of our research group in chemical synthesis of quinazolin-4-one derivatives, novel phospha-oxazepinoquinazolinyl derivatives were produced and examined as NOS inhibitor (Algohary and Hassan, 2021). Our recently described benzoxazinone (1) was refluxed with NH2OH.HCl, in dry pyridine to yield the 3-hydroxy derivative of quinazolin-4(3H)-one (2) through a ring-opening ring closure (RORC) process (Yu and Wu, 2003). Oxygen of benzoxazinone (1) that is swapped by a nitrogen-bearing hydroxyl group, is proposed for this reaction. The hydroxylamine nitrogen nucleophile attacks the benzoxazinone nucleus, followed by ring closure of the intermediate's carbonyl carbon with highly electrophilic sp2 hybridization, yielding the quinazolinone 2 (El-Hashash et al., 2016). The spectroscopic and analytical results of 3-hydroxyquinazolin-4-one 2 were used to determine its identity. Due to both (OH and C=Oqunazoline) groups, its IR spectra revealed significant intensity bands at v 3465 and 1665 cm−1, respectively in addition to the D2O exchangeable proton characteristic for its OH group which was found at δ 10.50 ppm in its 1H NMR spectrum.

When hydroxyquinazolin-4-one 2 was oxidized with SeO2 in aprotic solvent dioxane, the new 2-(3-hydroxy-6-nitro-4-oxo-3,4-dihydroquinazolin-2-yl)-2-(4-isobutylphenyl)acetaldehyde (3) was synthesized using approaches similar to those recommended by (Abbas et al., 2017) (Scheme 1). Correct elemental studies and comprehensive examinations of spectrum data characterized the structural elucidation of 3. In the IR spectra of aldehyde 3, carbonyl peaks at v 1720 (C=Oformyl) and v 1670 (C=Oquinazolinine) cm−1 were found. A doublet signal at δ 9.70 ppm was also detected in its 1H NMR spectra, which is indicative of the aldehydic CH proton. The characteristic CHO carbon atom was identified at δ 190.05 ppm in compound 3 13C NMR spectrum. Furthermore, its mass spectra showed a molecular ion peak at m/z 381 corresponding to its molecular formula (C20H19N3O5).

Synthesis of aldehyde 3.
Scheme 1 Synthesis of aldehyde 3.

As further validation for compound 3, a homonuclear NOE experiment (NOESY 1D) was performed in addition to its standard analytical techniques. According to our knowledge, this method of determining the structure of quinazolinyl derivatives is not frequently used. Irradiation of the OH singlet proton of compound 3 with a high proton frequency (11.20 ppm) has a specific impact on only the aldehydic CH singlet proton, whereas irradiation of the aldehydic CH singlet proton with a proton frequency of (9.70 ppm) has a significant effect on the adjacent chiral proton in addition to both OH and the nearest neighbor aromatic proton. According to the results of that experiment, selenium oxide (SeO2) only oxidized the chiral methyl group, leaving the other methyl groups unaffected by aldehydic transformation Fig. 2.

Structure elucidation of compound 3 using NOE effect.
Fig. 2 Structure elucidation of compound 3 using NOE effect.

As a result of the investigation of new synthetic strategies based on multi-component methods for preparation of our quinazolinones and studying of its therapeutic properties, we establish here a lithium bromide-catalyzed condensation three-component of our new aromatic aldehyde 3, phosphorus reagents, and active cyanomethylenes namely: cyanoacetamide, and/or malononitrile for the synthesis of our desired hybrid phospho-oxazepino quinazolinyl derivatives (4, 7, 1012). On the other hand, to compare the results we obtained here with the outcomes of our previously reported procedures (Ali et al., 2019; Ali and Hassan, 2017). The LiBr catalytic method was installed because of the oxophilicity of Li cation, as evidenced by previous researches. It was found that LiBr activates oxygen-containing electrophiles for nucleophilic attack with high yield anticipated products (Singh et al., 2011). To begin, a domino phospha-Michael reaction mixture involving each of aldehyde 3, cyanoacetamide, and phosphorous (phosphonic) acid was refluxed in the presence of catalytic LiBr (0.1 mmol) in H2O (5 mL) to yield the oxazepinoquinazolinylphosphonic acid 4. The formation of compound 4 was established through its spectroscopic and physical data analysis. The formyl moiety vanished from compound 4′s IR spectra, which verified the existence of absorption at ν 3310–3100 and 1660 cm−1 related to both NH2 and C=Oamide groups, respectively. Its 1H NMR spectrum clearly revealed the removal of the typical CHO proton and the existence of the characteristic two NH2 groups. Furthermore, the C atoms of P–CH and C=Oamide were detected at δ 33.50 and 168.05 ppm, respectively, in its 13C NMR spectra. Furthermore, the phosphorus atom resonated at δ 21.50 ppm in the 13P NMR spectra of compound 4. In addition, the molecular ion peak [M] + at m/z 529 was discovered in the ESI mass spectrum of compound 4.

Under the suggested approach, we suppose that the synergy of LiBr and aqueous medium has a major influence on the reaction's product. The LiBr/H2O system's success is assumed to be attributed to the lithium ion's ability to activate the aldehyde moeity, due to the generation of the intermediate Knoevenagel cyanoolefin product I and, eventually, the imino-oxazepinoquinazoline II. Following that, both imino and phosphorous (phosphonic) acid may also be activated in an unexpected manner by LiBr and H2O, resulting in the phospha-Michael addition to provide the desired product 4 Fig. 3.

A proper mechanism for the synthesis of oxazepinoquinazolinylphosphonic acid 4.
Fig. 3 A proper mechanism for the synthesis of oxazepinoquinazolinylphosphonic acid 4.

In absolute ethanol containing piperidine, adehyde 3 was allowed to react with cyanoacetamide according to typical preparation procedures (Ibrahim and Hassanin, 2018), yielding the anticipated product (3E)-5,11-dihydro-2-imino-5-(4-isobutylphenyl)-9-nitro-11-oxo-2H-[1,2]oxazepino[3,2-b]quinazoline-3-carboxamide (5). Compound 5′s 1H NMR spectra revealed a doublet signal ascribed to the H-4 oxazepino proton at δ 5.85, while the protons NH2 and NH emerged as D2O-exchanged signals at δ 9.20 and 8.70 ppm, respectively. The distinctive carbon atoms were found at δ 161.10(C=NH) and 163.00(C=Oamide) ppm in the 13C NMR spectra of compound 5. The molecular ion peak M+ at m/z 447 was visible in its mass spectrum, confirming the suggested structure.

Phosphorous acid was directed to react with compound 5 in dry dioxane in the presence of 4-toulenesulfonic acid as a catalyst to produce the intermediate A, that was generated through the phospha-Michael addition process (Zhao et al., 2009). Latter the transitional intermediate A was cyclized upon attack of an amino group nucleophile on a phosphorus atom, followed by the removal of a water molecule, yielding the predicted nonisolable intermediate B, which was then auto-oxidized to provide the end product 6 (Scheme 2). The occurrence of the addition reaction at this location was confirmed by the absence of the H-4oxazepino of compound 6 in its 1H NMR spectra. Furthermore, its 31P NMR spectrum was identical to that of the suggested structure, with chemical shifts at δ 21.50 ppm. The MS, which shown a formula ion peak at m/z 509 supported the formation of this product.

Synthesis of compounds 4, 5, 6.
Scheme 2 Synthesis of compounds 4, 5, 6.

As is evident from our results that by using the LiBr-catalyzed one-pot multi-component approach, we were able to isolate the Michael addition high yielded non-closed-loop phosphorous compounds, in the shortest time and with the least reagents and solvents toxicity. That had never been able to be achieved easily in most of our previous research articles (Ali et al., 2019a,2019b; Ali and Hassan, 2017; Ali et al., 2018), allowing us to investigate the predicted biological effect of such open chained compounds.

In the same approach, compound 7 was synthesized using the same phospha-Michael reaction mixture as for compound 4 synthesis, however with replacement of cyanoacetamid by malononitrile. The NH2 and CN functions were detected in the IR spectra of compound 7 at ν 3320, and 2195 cm−1. Its 1H NMR spectra indicated the characteristic NH2 protons as a singlet at δ 8.69 ppm, as well as the distinctive double doublet for P-CH proton at δ 3.90 ppm. The CN carbon atom was identified at δ 110.0 ppm in its 13C NMR spectrum. Furthermore, the phosphorus atom resonated at δ 20.10 ppm in the 13P NMR spectrum of compound 7. Compound 7′s ESI mass spectrum shown a (M+) peak at m/z 511, which matches the suggested formula.

Condensation of aldehyde 3 with the malononitril, followed by cycloaddition of the hydroxyl group into the nitrile functional group, results in compound 8. In the 1H NMR spectra of compound 8, the oxazepino H-5 proton was given a doublet at δ 2.70, whilst the protons NH were detected as D2O-exchanged signals at δ 8.30 ppm. The carbon atom CN was found at δ 116.50 ppm in the compound 8 13C NMR spectrum. The molecular ion peak M at m/z 429 was visible in its mass spectrum, confirming the hypothesized structure.

Instead of the anticipated compound 6, compound 8 was reacted with H3PO2 in the presence 4-toluenesulfonic acid as a catalyst to provide low yielded derivative 9 as an unexpected result under the same reaction conditions as compound 6 synthesis (Scheme 3). The reaction was initiated by an unanticipated nucleophilic assault of a phosphorus atom on the nitrile group, rather than the phospha-Michael addition mechanism, which bring about the formation of nonisolable intermediate D. The nonisolable intermediate E was formed by heterocyclization of the later intermediate by removing the water molecule·H2O and H3PO2 in the reaction media aided the imino group hydrolysis into C=O group, resulting in the end product 9.

Synthesis of compounds 7, 8, 9.
Scheme 3 Synthesis of compounds 7, 8, 9.

The amidic carbonyl group was detected at 1675 cm−1 in the IR spectra of 9. In addition to the existence of C=Oamide at δ 166.10 ppm in its 13C NMR spectra, its 1H NMR spectrum revealed a distinct signal at δ 3.25 (P-OH) ppm. Furthermore, at δ 25.50 ppm, its 31P NMR chemical shift was found, validating the suggested structure 9. Under electron impact, compound 9 recorded its molecular ion peak at m/z 494 which concurred with the future structure.

Because of the promising outcomes of the efficient and rapid LiBr catalyzed phospha-Michael addititon protocol, we decided to try to make additional potential open-loop phosphorous derivatives for biological testing and compare them to compounds made with the same phosphorous reagents using our standard methods detailed in our research papers (Assiri et al., 2018a, 2018b). Accordingly and in the same manner as compound 4 synthesis, phospha-Michael reaction mixture including each of aldehyde 3, cyanoacetamide, and some selective phosphrous reagents namely, tris(2-chloroethyl)phosphite, O,O-diethyldithiophosphoric acid, and P,P-dichloro(phenyl)phosphine in the presence of LiBr/H2O under refluxing condition afforded the phospha–oxazepinoquinazolinyl derivatives 10, 11 and 12, respectively (Scheme 4). All 1H-, 13C- and 31P NMR spectra proved all proposed structures (cf: ‘‘Experimental’’).

Synthesis of compounds 10, 11, 12.
Scheme 4 Synthesis of compounds 10, 11, 12.

The reaction of component 5 with tris(2-chloroethyl)phosphite and boron trifloride followed the parameters of our non-catalytic synthesis. At 80–90 0C, BF3.Et2O as a catalyst experienced Michael addition of a phosphorus atom at position C–5oxazepin, resulting in the intermediate G. Adding droplets of water to the last intermediate, the 2-chloroethanol molecule was removed, resulting in the nonisolable oxazepinoquinazolinyl phosphonate H. With the elimination of the 2-chloroethanol molecule, this intermediate was cyclized by nucleophilic attack of the amino group at the phosphorus atom, yielding compound 13 via auto oxidation process with hydrogen molecule elimination (Scheme 5). One moiety of OCH2CH2Cl was detected as two triplets at δ 3.35 and 4.40 (JHH = 6.6 Hz) ppm in the 1H NMR spectrum of compound 13, and one amidic NH proton was detected as a wide signal at δ 9.70 ppm. The specific carbon atoms ClCH2 and OCH2 were discovered in spectrum of 13C NMR of compound 13 at δ 35.80 and 54.70 ppm, respectively. Additionally, the MS of compound 13 revealed molecular ion peaks at m/z 573 (M + 2, 15 %) and 571 (M+ , 10 %) at a ratio of 1:3, confirming the existence of one chlorine atom, this pair of molecular ion peaks, often described as doublets confirming the suggested structure (Pavia et al., 2001).

Synthesis of compounds 13, 14, 15.
Scheme 5 Synthesis of compounds 13, 14, 15.

The novel thiazaphosphinine 14 was created by reacting compound 5 with O,O-diethyldithiophosphoric acid (generated in situ) in dry ethanol. This product's ESI mass spectrum revealed the expected peak (M) + at m/z 585. It also had significant absorption bands at ν 1710 (C=Oamide), ν 1070 (P–O–C), and ν 740 (P=S) cm−1 in its IR spectra. The ethoxy group's distinctive triplet at δ 1.25 ppm and quartet at δ 3.80 ppm were found in 14′s 1H NMR spectra. It also revealed a novel singlet corresponding to NH proton at δ 9.40 ppm. The structure of 14 was further corroborated by its 13C NMR spectra, which revealed the particular carbon atoms at δ 15.00 (CH3) and δ 62.50 (CH2). Furthermore, at δ 50.50 ppm, its 31P NMR chemical shift was detected. The reaction began with the addition of a sulfur-Michael group to the oxazepino CH=C to generate the nonisolable intermediate I, which was then cyclized by removing ethanol molecules, followed by the removal of hydrogen via an internal autoxidation mechanism (Scheme 5).

Compound 5 was allowed to react with P,P-dichloro(phenyl)phosphine and triethylamine in 1,4-dioxane as a catalyst to give the nonisolable intermediate J, after that Phospha-Michael added to the oxazepino CH=C to give the intermediate K, which was subsequently rearranged to give the product 15. The lack of the H-4oxapino proton in the starting material 5 and the development of a new doublet at δ 5.10 (H-3a) ppm in the 1H NMR spectrum of compound 15 confirmed the suggested formula. Due to its link through double bond with the phosphorus atom, its 13C NMR spectra recorded the typical carbon atom C-3a at δ 70.10 ppm. Furthermore, its 31P NMR spectrum exhibited a singlet at δ 30.10 ppm. Its MS presented the molecular ion peak at m/z 589, which assured its structure.

2.2

2.2 Inhibition properties of nNOS and iNOS

Using recombinant isoenzymes, the pharmacological activity of the newly synthesized derivatives (3–15) as nNOS and iNOS inhibitors, was tested in vitro (Bredt and Snyder, 1990). A pilot experiment was carried out utilizing 0.001 mol of each compound to choose the most potent structure Table 1.

Table 1 In vitro inhibition of nNOS and iNOS (%) observed by adding 1 mmole of novel synthesized products associated with the substrate L-arginine (L-NAME) (Kilbourn and Griffith, 1992) (L-NAME is included as control).
Compound % Inhibition of iNOS a % Inhibition of nNOS a
3 45.20 ± 0.69 30.02 ± 0.66
4 62.55 ± 1.02 44.36 ± 0.10
5 50.53 ± 1.43 35.80 ± 1.24
6 52.99 ± 0.38 40.03 ± 0.70
7 62.05 ± 0.21 43.30 ± 0.72
8 50.01 ± 1.30 34.02 ± 1.10
9 52.54 ± 0.35 39.20 ± 0.77
10 65.60 ± 1.03 52.11 ± 1.35
11 66.40 ± 1.47 52.80 ± 0.12
12 61.52 ± 1.22 43.05 ± 0.50
13 55.90 ± 2.30 41.08 ± 0.22
14 58.70 ± 1.00 42.01 ± 2.06
15 52.40 ± 1.05 41.00 ± 0.85
L-NAME b 77.01 ± 0.96 100.0 ± 1.03
The inhibition percentage of iNOS and nNOS produced by 1 mM of each synthesized compound. Each experiment was repeated three times and values were reported as the mean ± SEM using iNOS and nNOS enzymes.
See Ref. (1992) (Kilbourn and Griffith, 1992).

In general, compounds having nitro substituents have a strong enzymatic N-Oxygenation action with high inhibitory values (Winkler and Hertweck, 2017). Non-closed-loop phosphorous compounds (4, 7, 10–12) are the best inhibitors of all other investigated products, exhibiting more than 60% inhibition, according to iNOS inhibition values (Table 1). Nonetheless, certain assumptions may be drawn from the experimental results. From a qualitative viewpoint, the effect of different substituents on iNOS inhibitory efficacy varies in closed-loop phosphorous compounds (6, 9, 13–15). In general, substituted molecules with sulphur and halogen ring closed atoms isoforms (13, 14 and 15) exhibited higher inhibitory activity than substituted molecules with free out closed hydroxyl group (6 and 9) which had similar inhibition effects. The oxyazepino free phosphrous compounds (5 and 8) showed considerable inhibition as compared to the beginning formylquinazolinone 3, with no significant inhibition values as predicted. Supporting our concept of increasing the inhibitory impact by employing a hybrid molecular structure with several affected species that we synthasized.

The inhibition values of nNOS by our newly created products at a concentration of 1 mM are also shown in Table 1. Of all the substances examined in this case, products (4, 7, 10–12) exhibited the highest nNOS inhibitory values. Compounds (13, 14 and 15) had stronger inhibition effects than compounds (6 and 9) with moderate nNOS inhibition values, and hence had a better inhibitory effect than compounds (5 and 8). The inhibitory impact of compound 3 without the phosphaoxazeoino character is weaker than that of any other derivatives.

Table 2 shows the IC50 values for the most interesting phosphaoxazeoinoquinazolinyl substances (4, 7, 10–12). The IC50 values for both 10 and 11 for iNOS are around 18 M, showing that it is a very potent inhibitor. With IC50 values of 27.02 and 18.30 M, respectively, the derivatives 10 and 11 were the most efficient against nNOS, indicating that 11 is the best inhibitor of all synthesized compounds.

Table 2 IC50 values (µM) for the iNOS and nNOS inhibition by the four most potent derivatives (4, 7, 1012).
Compound IC50 iNOS (µM)* IC50 nNOS (µM) *
4 19.05 ± 0.60 30.50 ± 0.64
7 20.65 ± 0.42 31.80 ± 0.74
10 18.80 ± 0.75 27.02 ± 0.42
11 18.05 ± 0.62 18.30 ± 0.42
12 22.02 ± 0.35 32.31 ± 0.54
Inhibition percentages were calculated by measuring of at least five concentrations of inhibitor.

Our newly synthesized compounds have significantly high potency against iNOS and nNOS in comparison with L-NAME. Fig. 4 shows that our newly synthesized phospha-oxazepinoquinazolinyl derivatives enhance NOS inhibition where each value is reported from the mean of three triplicate experiments using iNOS or nNOS enzymes.

nNOS and iNOS activity as a percentage of control by adding 1 mM novel synthesized derivatives (3–15).
Fig. 4 nNOS and iNOS activity as a percentage of control by adding 1 mM novel synthesized derivatives (3–15).

3

3 Experimental

3.1

3.1 Instruments and reagent

Merck and Aldrich Chemical Company provided all of the essential chemicals. For TLC (Silica gel 60 F254, Merck Germany) were used, and UV light was applied to detect spots. Measuring of melting points were determined by a Veego REC-22038 A2 instrument and are uncorrected. Elementar Vario analyser was used for elemental analyses to performance. Bruker FTIR spectrophotometer was used to record the IR spectra (KBr). On a Bruker Spectrospin DPX 400 MHz and a Bruker Spectrospin DPX 75 MHz spectrometer, 1H, 13C and 31P NMR were recorded using DMSO‑d6 as a solvent and trimethylsilane (TMS) as an internal standard. The mass spectra were recorded using ESI-MS (AB-Sciex 2000, Applied Biosystem).

3.2

3.2 Synthesis

3.2.1

3.2.1 3-hydroxy-2-{1-[4-(2-methylpropyl) phenyl] ethyl}-6-nitroquinazolin-4(3H)-one (2)

Freshly prepared benzoxazinone 1 (3.52 g; 0.01 mol) and NH2OH.HCl (0.69 g; 0.01 mol) in dry pyridine (20 mL) were refluxed for 3 h. The reaction mixture was concentrated into its half volume and left to cool. The obtained oily product was dissolved in distilled water (15 mL) and heated for 30 min. The formed solid was filtered off and crystallized from appropriate solvents.

Recryst. Solvent: ethanol; orange crystals; yield 85 %; m.p. 200–202 °C; Anal. Calc. (%) for C20H21N3O4 (3 6 7):C, 65.38; H, 5.76; N, 11.44; found: C, 65.35; H, 5.72; N, 11.40; IR (KBr), ν (cm−1): 3465 (O–H), 3065 (C–Harom), 2955, 2945, 2870 (C–Haliph), 1665 (C=Oquinazolinone), 1616 (C=N). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO‑d6): 1.02 (d, 6H, CH2CH(CH3)2), 1.40 (d, 3H, CHCH3), 1.80 (m, 1H, CH2CH(CH3)2), 2.55 (d, 2H, CH2CH(CH3)2), 3.30 (q, H, CHCH3), 7.00–8.10 (m, 7H, Harom), 10.50 (s, 1H exchangeable with D2O, OH). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO‑d6): 168.70, 161.50, 147.50, 142.40, 136.70, 131.50, 129.30, 129.50, 128.60, 128.55, 125.70, 122.70, 120.50, 117.50, 44.80, 43.50, 29.80, 23.25, 23.55, 15.50; ESI-MS: m/z = 367 (M+).

3.2.2

3.2.2 (3-hydroxy-6-nitro-4-oxo-3,4-dihydroquinazolin-2-yl)[4-(2-methylpropyl)phenyl]acetaldehyde (3)

3-hydroxyquinazolin-4(3H)-one 2 (3.67 g; 0.01 mol) was dissolved in hot dioxane (20 mL), powdered selenium dioxide (1.11 g; 0.01 mol) was added portion-wise while stirring. After complete addition, the reaction mixture was boiled with stirring for 5 h. The reaction mixture was then filtered off. The filtrate was poured onto crushed ice, and the solid product obtained was filtered and crystallized from appropriate solvents.

Recryst. Solvent: benzene; beige crystals; yield: 80 %; m.p: 230–232 °C; Anal. Calc. (%) for C20H19N3O5 (3 8 1): C, 62.99; H, 5.02; N, 11.02; found: C: 62.94; H: 5.04; N: 11.00; FT-IR vmax (cm−1): 3450 (O–H), 3045 (C– Harom), 2930, 2940, 2850 (C–Haliph), 1720 (C=Oformyl), 1670 (C=Oquinazolinone), 1610 (C=N); 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO‑d6): 1.15 (d, 6H, CH2CH(CH3)2), 2.25 (m, 1H, CH2CH(CH3)2), 2.55 (t, 2H, CH2CH(CH3)2), 3.70 (d, H, CHCHO), 7.00–8.75 (m, 7H, Harom), 9.70 (d, 1H, CHO), 11.20 (s, 1H, D2O-exchangeable, OH); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO‑d6): 190.05, 165.01, 161.22, 153.00, 147.25, 137.20, 137.50, 128.11, 128.70, 126.70, 126.50, 125.90, 124.90, 123.70, 121.5, 45.70, 41.50, 28.70, 22.80, 22.30; ESI-MS: m/z = 381 (M+).

3.2.3

3.2.3 General procedure for the synthesis of compounds 4, 7, 10-12

To a mixture of aldehyde 3 (0.381 g; 1 mmol), cyanoacetamide (0.083 mL; 0.001 mol) / malononitrile (0.066 g; 0.001 mol) and the appropriate phosphrous reagent namely; phosphorous acid (0.082 g; 0.001 mol), tris(2-chloroethyl)phosphite (0.26 mL; 0.001 mol), phosphorus pentasulfide (0.22 g;1 mmol) dissolved in boiling ethanol (3 mL) and P,P-dichloro-phenylphosphine (0.14 mL; 0.001 mol); LiBr/ H2O (0.1 mmol; 5 mL) was added and the reaction mixture was then refluxed for 20 min. TLC was used to check achievement of the reaction. The mixture was treated with 5 mL water, and the organic phase was extracted with ethyl acetate (3 × 5 mL), and dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered, and reduced the volume under vacuum. Column chromatography was used to purify the crude product using an eluent of EtOAc–hexane (4:9) to produce pure samples of compounds 4, 7, 1012 in unforeseen yields. The aqueous layer was washed with Et2O (2 × 5 mL) to remove any organic impurity and dried to yield LiBr, which was used in subsequent runs.

3.2.4

3.2.4 (2Z)-2-amino-3-carbamoyl-5,11-dihydro-5-(4-isobutylphenyl)-9-nitro-11-oxo-4H-[1,2]oxazepino[3,2-b]quinazolin-4-yl-4-phosphonic acid (4)

Recryst. Solvent: ethanol; yellow crystals; yield: 88 %; m.p: 244–245 °C; Anal. Calc. (%) for C23H24N5O8P (5 2 9): C, 52.18; H, 4.57; N, 13.23; found: C: 52.16; H: 4.53; N: 13.20; FT-IR vmax (cm−1): 3380 (OH), 3310–3100 (br, NH2), 3040 (C–Harom), 2960 (C − Haliph), 1675 (C═Oamide), 1660 (C=Oquinazolinone), 1610 (C=N), 1205 (P=O); 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO‑d6): 1.10 (d, 6H, CH2CH(CH3)2), 2.20 (m, 1H, CH2CH(CH3)2), 2.65 (t, 2H, CH2CH(CH3)2), 2.80 (d, 1H, J = 10 Hz, H-5oxazepino), 3.50 (brs, 2H, P − OH, exchangeable with D2O), 4.05 (dd, 1H, JPCH = 24 Hz and 9 Hz, P–CH), 7.00–8.30 (m, 7H, Harom), 8.60 (s, 2H, NH2), 9.00 (s, 2H, NH2); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO‑d6): 168.05 ,165.01, 161.22, 157.30, 153.00, 147.25, 137.50, 137.20, 128.11, 128.70, 126.70, 126.50, 125.90, 124.90, 123.70, 121.50, 117.90, 45.50, 41.30, 33.50, 28.50 , 22.60, 22.10; 31P NMR (240 MHz, DMSO‑d6): 21.50 ppm; ESI-MS: m/z = 529 (M+).

3.2.5

3.2.5 (2Z)-2-amino-3-cyano-5,11-dihydro-5-(4-isobutylphenyl)-9-nitro-11-oxo-4H-[1,2]oxazepino[3,2-b]quinazolin-4-yl-4-phosphonic acid (7)

Recryst. Solvent: ethanol; pale yellow crystals; yield: 90 %; m.p: 230–232 °C; Anal. Calc. (%) for C23H22N5O7P (5 1 1): C, 54.02; H, 4.34; N, 13.69; found: C: 54.00; H: 4.30; N: 13.65; FT-IR vmax (cm−1): 3390 (OH), 3320 (NH2), 3045 (C–Harom), 2910 (C − Haliph), 2195 (C≡N), 1662 (C=Oquinazolinone), 1590 (C=N), 1200 (P=O); 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO‑d6): 1.15 (d, 6H, CH2CH(CH3)2), 2.22 (m, 1H, CH2CH(CH3)2), 2.55 (t, 2H, CH2CH(CH3)2), 2.75 (d, 1H, J = 8 Hz, H-5oxazepino), 3.90 (dd, 1H, JPCH = 22 Hz and 10 Hz, P–CH), 3.80 (brs, 2H, P − OH, exchangeable with D2O), 7.00–8.30 (m, 7H, Harom), 8.69 (s, 2H, NH2); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO‑d6): 164.90, 161.10, 156.35, 154.00, 146.20, 136.40, 136.20, 128.10, 128.05, 126.60, 126.10, 125.40, 124.30, 123.50, 121.30, 117.30, 110.20 (C≡N), 44.70, 42.50, 37.50 , 27.70, 21.70, 21.50; 31P NMR (240 MHz, DMSO‑d6): 20.10 ppm; ESI-MS: m/z = 511.

3.2.6

3.2.6 (2Z)-bis(2-chloroethyl)2-amino-3-carbamoyl-5,11-dihydro-5-(4-isobutylphenyl)-9-nitro-11-oxo-4H-[1,2]oxazepino[3,2-b]quinazolin-4-yl-4-phosphonate (10)

Recryst. Solvent: ethanol; reddish solid; yield: 90 %; m.p: 273–275 °C; Anal. Calc. (%) for C27H30Cl2N5O8P (6 5 3): C, 49.55; H, 4.62; N, 10.70; found: C: 49.53; H: 4.60; N: 10.68; FT-IR vmax (cm−1): 3300–3150 (br, NH2), 3010 (C–Harom), 2955 (C − Haliph), 1676 (C═Oamide), 1663(C=Oquinazolinone), 1615 (C=N), 1240 (P=O), 1020 (P − O − C); 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO‑d6): 1.15 (d, 6H, CH2CH(CH3)2), 2.25 (m, 1H, CH2CH(CH3)2), 2.50 (t, 2H, CH2CH(CH3)2), 2.70 (d, 1H, J = 9 Hz, H-5oxazepino), 3.80 (dd, 1H, JPCH = 20 Hz, P–CH), 3.40 (t, 4H, J = 7.2 Hz, ClCH2), 4.30 (t, 4H, J = 6.8 Hz, OCH2), 7.00–8.05 (m, 7H, Harom), 8.50 (s, 2H, NH2),8.95 (s, 2H, NH2).; 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO‑d6): 167.00 ,165.10, 161.70, 157.50, 153.40, 147.20, 137.30, 137.10, 128.70, 128.30, 126.50, 126.10, 125.30, 124.20, 123.50, 121.50, 118.90, 55.60 (OCH2), 44.70, 40.50, 37.50 , 36.80 (ClCH2), 27.50, 22.50, 18.90; 31P NMR (240 MHz, DMSO‑d6): 23.50 ppm; ESI-MS: m/z = 653 (M+).

3.2.7

3.2.7 S-(2Z)-2-amino-3-carbamoyl-5,11-dihydro-5-(4-isobutylphenyl)-9-nitro-11-oxo-4H-[1,2]oxazepino[3,2-b]quinazolin-4-yl O,O-diethyl phosphorodithioate (11)

Recryst. Solvent: acetone; yellow solid; yield: 95 %; m.p: 260–262 °C; Anal. Calc. (%) for C27H32N5O7PS2 (6 3 3): C, 51.18; H, 5.09; N, 11.05; found: C: 51.15; H: 5.05; N: 11.03; FT-IR vmax (cm−1): 3390 (NH2), 3050 (C–Harom), 2981 (C–Haliph), 1680 (C═Oamide), 1660(C=Oquinazolinone), 1615 (C=N), 1240 (P=O), 1075 (P − O − C), 750 (P=S); 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO‑d6): 1.10 (d, 6H, CH2CH(CH3)2), 1.45 (t, 6H, J = 8 Hz, OCH2CH3), 2.10 (m, 1H, CH2CH(CH3)2), 2.45 (t, 2H, CH2CH(CH3)2), 2.80 (d, 1H, J = 9 Hz, H-5oxazepino), 3.80 (dd, 1H, JPCH = 20 Hz, P–CH), 3.82 (q, 4H, J = 8 Hz, OCH2CH3), 7.00–8.10 (m, 7H, Harom), 8.40 (s, 2H, NH2),8.90 (s, 2H, NH2); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO‑d6): 167.10 ,165.30, 160.60, 156.40, 153.10, 147.00, 137.35, 137.15, 128.40, 128.10, 126.40, 126.20, 125.60, 124.20, 122.40, 121.10, 116.90, 60.60 (2OCH2), 43.70, 41.50, 36.50 , 26.50, 21.50, 17.90, 13.80 (2CH3); 31P NMR (240 MHz, DMSO‑d6): 23.50 ppm; ESI-MS: m/z = 633 (M + ).

3.2.8

3.2.8 2-amino-3-carbamoyl-4,5-dihydro-5-(4-isobutylphenyl)-9-nitro-11-oxo-4H-quinazolino-[3,2-b][1,2]oxazepine-4-phenyl phosphinic acid (12)

Recryst. Solvent: ethanol; pale brown solid; yield: 80 %; m.p: 280–282 °C; Anal. Calc. (%) for C29H28N5O7P (5 8 9): C, 59.08; H, 4.79; N, 11.88; found: C: 59.05; H: 4.77; N: 11.85; FT-IR vmax (cm−1): 3390 (OH), 3300 (NH2), 3030 (C–Harom), 2980 (C–Haliph), 1670 (C═Oamide), 1665(C=Oquinazolinone), 1610 (C=N), 1220 (P=O); 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO‑d6): 1.20 (d, 6H, CH2CH(CH3)2), 2.30 (m, 1H, CH2CH(CH3)2), 2.55 (t, 2H, CH2CH(CH3)2), 2.80 (d, 1H, H-5oxazepino), 4.10 (dd, 1H, JPCH = 22 Hz, P–CH), 5.05 (s, 1H, P– OH), 7.00–8.10 (m, 12H, Harom), 8.50 (s, 2H, NH2),8.80 (s, 2H, NH2); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO‑d6): 167.10 ,165.30, 160.60, 156.40, 155.20, 153.10, 147.30, 147.10, 137.35, 137.15, 128.40, 128.10,127.80, 127.50, 126.40, 126.20, 125.60, 125.00, 124.20,122.70, 122.40, 121.10, 116.90, 43.70, 41.50, 36.50 , 26.50, 21.50, 21.10; 31P NMR (240 MHz, DMSO‑d6): 23.50 ppm; ESI-MS: m/z = 589 (M+).

3.2.9

3.2.9 General procedure for the synthesis of compounds 5 and 8:

Active methylene compounds namely: cyanoacetamide (0.83 g; 0.01 mol) and/or malononitrile (0.65 g; 0.01 mol) were added to carboxaldehyde 3 (3.81 g; 0.01 mol) in absolute ethanol (15 mL) containing catalytic amount of piperidine. The reaction mixtures wwere refluxed for 5 h. The solids formed were filtered off and crystallized to produce both compounds 5 and/or 8.

3.2.10

3.2.10 (3E)-5,11-dihydro-2-imino-5-(4-isobutylphenyl)-9-nitro-11-oxo-2H-[1,2]oxazepino[3,2-b]quinazoline-3-carboxamide (5)

Recryst. Solvent: DMF/H2O; white crystals; yield: 60 %; m.p: 238–240 °C; Anal. Calc. (%) for C23H21N5O5 (4 4 7): C, 61.74; H, 4.73; N, 15.65; found: C: 61.72; H: 4.70; N: 15.62; FT-IR vmax (cm−1): 3340, 3300 (NH2, NH), 3045 (CHarom), 2985, 2946 (CHaliph), 1671 (C═Oamide), 1663 (C=Oquinazolinone), 1615 (C═N), 1575 (C═C); 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO‑d6): 1.05 (d, 6H, CH2CH(CH3)2), 2.10 (m, 1H, CH2CH(CH3)2), 2.60 (t, 2H, CH2CH(CH3)2), 2.75 (d, 1H, H-5oxazepino), 5.85 (d, 1H, H-4 oxazepino), 7.00–8.20 (m, 7H, Harom), 8.70 (s, 1H, NH), 9.20 (s, 2H, NH2).; 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO‑d6): 164.30, 163.00(C=NH), 161.10(C=Oamide), 160.20, 152.10, 148.20 (C − 4oxazepino), 147.20, 136.20, 136.50, 128.20, 128.10, 126.60, 126.30, 125.60, 124.10, 123.30, 121.10, 118.90 (C − 3oxazepino), 44.70, 42.50, 27.70, 22.50, 22.10; ESI-MS: m/z = 447 (M+).

3.2.11

3.2.11 (3Z)-5,11-dihydro-2-imino-5-(4-isobutylphenyl)-9-nitro-11-oxo-2H-[1,2]oxazepino[3,2-b]quinazoline-3-carbonitrile (8)

Recryst. Solvent: DMF/H2O; white crystals; yield: 65 %; m.p: 268–270 °C; Anal. Calc. (%) for C23H19N5O4 (4 2 9): C, 64.33; H, 4.46; N, 16.31; found: C: 64.30; H: 4.62; N: 16.28; FT-IR vmax (cm−1): 3150 (NH), 3040 (CHarom), 2980, 2940 (CHaliph), 2200 (C≡N), 1660 (C=Oquinazolinone), 1610 (C═N), 1570 (C═C); 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO‑d6): 1.15 (d, 6H, CH2CH(CH3)2), 2.05(m, 1H, CH2CH(CH3)2), 2.50 (t, 2H, CH2CH(CH3)2), 2.70 (d, 1H, H-5oxazepino), 5.80 (d, 1H, H-4 oxazepino), 7.00–8.15 (m, 7H, Harom), 8.30 (s, 1H, NH),; 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO‑d6): 164.10, 162.90(C=NH), 160.30, 153.15, 148.50 (C − 4oxazepino), 147.80, 135.60, 135.50, 128.10, 128.00, 126.40, 126.10, 125.10, 124.20, 123.40, 121.40, 118.50 (C − 3oxazepino), 116.50 (C≡N), 44.50, 41.30, 27.30, 22.20, 22.00; ESI-MS: m/z = 429 (M + ).

3.2.12

3.2.12 4-amino-1-hydroxy-1,2-dihydro-12-(4-isobutylphenyl)-8-nitro-4H-quinazolino[2,3-b][1,2]oxazepine-[4,3-c][1,2]azaphospholo −3,6-dione-1-oxide (6)

Compound 5 (4.47 g; 0.01 mol) was dissolved in dioxane (20 mL) and the temperature was maintained at 80 0C. The solution was treated with 4-toluenesulfonic acid (0.4 g) and crystalline phosphorous acid (0.82 g; 0.01 mol). At this temperature, the mixture was stirred for 6 h, and then concentrated under vacuum. The produced solid was crystallized.

Recryst. Solvent: ethyl acetate; yellow crystals; yield: 30 %; m.p: less than 300 °C; Anal. Calc. (%) for C23H20N5O7P (5 0 9): C, 54.23; H, 3.96; N, 13.75; found: C: 54.20; H: 3.94; N: 13.71; FT-IR vmax (cm−1): 3400–3200 (br, OH, NH and NH2), 3050 (C–Harom), 2950 (C − Haliph), 1680 (C═Oamide), 1663 (C=Oquinazolinone), 1610 (C=N), 1220 (P=O); 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO‑d6): 1.15 (d, 6H, CH2CH(CH3)2), 2.10 (m, 1H, CH2CH(CH3)2), 2.55 (t, 2H, CH2CH(CH3)2), 3.30 (s, 1H, P − OH, exchangeable with D2O), 7.00–8.30 (m, 7H, Harom), 8.50 (s, 2H, NH2), 9.30 (br, 1H, NH); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO‑d6): 169.30(C-NH2), 166.50(C=Oamide) ,164.00(C=Oquinazolinone), 160.10, 155.10, 145.00,139.50, 129.80, 129.30, 128.50, 128.10, 128.00, 126.50, 126.10, 125.40, 124.10, 123.20, 120.5, 115.50(C-4azaphosphol), 40.30, 28.20, 21.80, 21.30; 31P NMR (240 MHz, DMSO‑d6): 21.50 ppm; ESI-MS: m/z = 509 (M+).

3.2.13

3.2.13 1-hydroxy-1,10-dihydro-10-(4-isobutylphenyl)-6-nitro-4H-quinazolino[2,3-b][1,2]oxazepine-[3,2-c][1,2]azaphospholo −4,12-dione-1-oxide (9)

A mixture of compound 8 (4.29 g; 0.01 mol), in dry dioxane (30 mL), phosphonic acid (0.82 g; 0.01 mol) and 4-toluenesulfonic acid (0.1 g) was refluxed for 6 h. Volume of the reaction mixture was reduced to half, and then distilled water (15 mL) was added. The formed solid was filtered off and crystallized from appropriate solvent.

Recryst. Solvent: ethyl acetate; yellow crystals; yield: 30 %; m.p: less than 300 °C; Anal. Calc. (%) for C23H19N4O7P (4 9 4): C, 55.88; H, 3.87; N, 11.33; found: C: 55.85; H: 3.85; N: 11.30; FT-IR vmax (cm−1): 3300 (OH), 3055 (C– Harom), 2940 (C − Haliph), 1675 (C═Oamide), 1660 (C=Oquinazolinone), 1605(C=N), 1210 (P=O); 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO‑d6): 1.10 (d, 6H, CH2CH(CH3)2), 2.00 (m, 1H, CH2CH(CH3)2), 2.50 (t, 2H, CH2CH(CH3)2), 2.80 (d, 1H, H-5oxazepino), 3.25 (s, 1H, P − OH, exchangeable with D2O), 6.10 (d, 1H, H-4 oxazepino),7.00–8.20 (m, 7H, Harom); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO‑d6): 166.10(C=Oamide) ,163.50(C=Oquinazolinone), 160.30, 148.50 (C − 4oxazepino), 144.00, 139.10, 129.50, 129.30, 128.40, 128.20, 128.10, 126.30, 126.20, 125.10, 124.50, 123.30, 121.50, 120.40(C-4azaphosphol),43.20, 40.10, 29.20, 21.50, 21.10; 31P NMR (240 MHz, DMSO‑d6): 25.50 ppm; ESI-MS: m/z = 494 (M+).

3.2.14

3.2.14 4-amino-1-(2-chloroethoxy)-)-1-oxido-1,2-dihydro-12-(4-isobutylphenyl)-8-nitro-4H-quinazolino [2,3-b][1,2]oxazepine[4,3-c][1,2]azaphospholo-3,6-dione (13)

A mixture of tris(2-chloroethyl)phosphite (2.6 mL; 0.01 mol) and compound 5 (4.47 g; 0.01 mol) in the presence of trifluoroboron etherate (0.2 mL) as a catalyst, was fused on water bath for 7 h (0.15 mL of distilled water added after 3 h). The formed semi-solid was dissolved in hot ethanol and left to cool. The formed solid was filtered off and crystallized.

Recryst. Solvent: ethyl acetate; yellow solid; yield: 35 %; m.p: 284–285 °C; Anal. Calc. (%) for C25H23ClN5O7P (5 7 1): C, 52.50; H, 4.05; N, 12.25; found: C: 52.53; H: 4.02; N: 12.23; FT-IR vmax (cm−1): 3350–3210 (br, NH and NH2), 3030 (C– Harom), 2955 (C − Haliph), 1670 (C═Oamide), 1663 (C=Oquinazolinone), 1610 (C=N), 1200 (P=O), 1018 (P − O − C); 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO‑d6): 1.10 (d, 6H, CH2CH(CH3)2), 2.00 (m, 1H, CH2CH(CH3)2), 2.50 (t, 2H, CH2CH(CH3)2), 3.35 (t, 2H, J = 6.8 Hz, ClCH2), 4.40 (t, 2H, J = 6.8 Hz, OCH2), 7.00–8.10 (m, 7H, Harom), 8.60 (s, 2H, NH2), 9.70 (s, 1H, NH); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO‑d6): 169.30(C-NH2), 167.50(C=Oamide) ,165.00(C=Oquinazolinone), 161.10, 156.10, 146.00,139.40, 129.70, 129.10, 128.30, 128.00, 127.88, 126.40, 126.15, 125.30, 124.50, 123.10, 120.40, 115.30(C-4azaphosphol), 54.70 (OCH2), 43.30, 35.80 (ClCH2),27.40, 21.50, 21.10; 31P NMR (240 MHz, DMSO‑d6): 22.30 ppm; ESI-MS: m/z = 571 (M+).

3.2.15

3.2.15 5-amino-2-ethoxy-2-sulfido-2,3-dihydro-13-(4-isobutylphenyl)-9-nitro-4H-quinazolino-[2,3-b][1,2]oxazepine[4,3-c][1,3,2]-thiazaphosphinin-4,7-dione (14)

Compound 5 (4.47 g, 0.01 mol) was added to hot solution of P2S5 (2.2 g, 0.01 mol) in absolute ethanol (30 mL), and the mixture was refluxed for 16 h. The solid produced after cooling was filtered off and crystallized.

Recryst. Solvent: ethanol; yellow crystals; yield: 25 %; m.p: 290–292 °C; Anal. Calc. (%) for C25H24N5O6PS2 (5 8 5): C, 51.28; H, 4.13; N, 11.96; found: C: 51.26; H: 4.10; N: 11.93; FT-IR vmax (cm−1): 3300–3200 (br, NH and NH2), 3010 (C– Harom), 2950 (C − Haliph), 1674 (C═Oamide), 1661 (C=Oquinazolinone), 1605 (C=N), , 1070 (P − O − C), 750 (P=S); 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO‑d6): 1.15 (d, 6H, CH2CH(CH3)2), 1.25 (d, 3H, OCH2CH3), 2.10 (m, 1H, CH2CH(CH3)2), 2.54 (t, 2H, CH2CH(CH3)2), 3.80 (q, 2H, OCH2CH3), 7.00–8.10 (m, 7H, Harom), 8.50 (s, 2H, NH2), 9.40 (br, 1H, NH).; 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO‑d6): 167.20(C-NH2), 165.50(C=Oamide) ,164.00(C=Oquinazolinone), 161.10, 155.10, 148.00,136.30, 129.50, 129.20, 128.70, 128.30, 127.80, 126.40, 126.10, 125.10, 124.50, 123.20, 120.30, 116.20(C-4azaphosphol), 62.50 (OCH2), 42.30, 26.40, 22.50, 22.10, 15.00; 31P NMR (240 MHz, DMSO‑d6): 50.50 ppm; ESI-MS: m/z = 585 (M+).

3.2.16

3.2.16 1-chloro-4-imino--1-phenyl-2,3a,4-trihydro-12-(4-isobutylphenyl)-8-nitro-4H-quinazolino-[2,3-b][1,2]oxazepine[4,3-c][1,2]azaphospholo-3,6-dione (15)

To a mixture of P-chlorodiphenylphosphine (1.2 mL; 0.01 mol) and compound 5 (4.47 g; 0.1 mol) in 1,4-dioxane (10 mL), triethylamine (0.5 mL) was added as a catalyst under stirring condition for 1 h at 10 °C. The reaction mixture was then refluxed for 8 h, the reaction mixture was then left to cool. The formed solid was filtered and recrystallized.

Recryst. Solvent: benzene; Pale yellow crystals; yield: 30 %; m.p: 275–277 °C; Anal. Calc. (%) for C29H25ClN5O5P(5 8 9): C, 59.04; H, 6.01; N, 11.87; found: C: 56.02; H: 5.99; N: 11.85; FT-IR vmax (cm−1): 3335, 3201 (NH), 3020 (C– Harom), 2930 (C − Haliph), 1673 (C═Oamide), 1662 (C=Oquinazolinone), 1615 (C=N); 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO‑d6): 1.11 (d, 6H, CH2CH(CH3)2), 2.10 (m, 1H, CH2CH(CH3)2), 2.35 (t, 2H, CH2CH(CH3)2), 2.65 (s, 1H, H-5oxazepino), 5.10 (5, 1H, H − 3a), 7.10–8.30 (m, 12H, Harom), 6.30 (s, 1H, NH exchangeable with D2O), 8.90 (s, 1H, NH exchangeable with D2O); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO‑d6): 167.50(C=Oamide), 163.00(C=NH),165.00(C=Oquinazolinone), 161.10, 156.10, 146.00,139.40, 129.70, 129.10, 128.30, 128.00, 127.88, 126.40,126.30, 126.15, 125.30, 125.10,124.50,124.20, 123.10, 122.50, 122.10,120.40, 70.10 (C- 3a), 44.30, 42.10, 27.50, 22.30, 22.10; 31P NMR (240 MHz, DMSO‑d6): 30.10 ppm; ESI-MS: m/z = 589 (M+).

3.3

3.3 In vitro nNOS and iNOS inhibition activities

Sigma Aldrich provided all of the necessary chemicals. The Bredt and Snyder (Bredt and Snyder, 1990) technique for evaluating nNOS activity was used to track the conversion of L-[3H]-arginine to L-[3H]-citrulline. Here, we use 100 µl of total incubation volume, which contain 10 µl of a recombinant nNOS (specific activity 21.05 nmol/min/mg protein) added to a buffer solution with a concentration of 0.025 M TriseHCl, 0.001 M DTT, 0.004 mM of H4-biopterin, 0.1 mM CaCl2, 0.5 mM inosine, 0.01 mM of FAD, 0.5 mg/ml BSA, 10 µM L-arginine, and, 10 µg/mL calmodulin (only for nNOS) and 50 nM L-[3H]-arginine at pH 7.0 and 7.6 for nNOS and iNOS, respectively. In ethanol, 10 mL of 0.75 mM NADPH and 10 mL of each quinazolinyl derivative were added to 1 mM final concentration of (20 %). The tubes were incubated and vortexed for 30 min at 37 °C. The absence of NADPH was used to create control incubations. The process was ended by adding up 400 mL of cold 0.1 M HEPES, 0.175 mg/ml L-citrulline pH 5.5 and, 10 mM EGTA. The reaction mixture was poured into a 2 mL column package and washed with 1.2 mL water using Dowex-50 W ion-exchange resin (Na + form). liquid scintillation spectroscopy was utilized for determination of L-[3H]-citrulline. In this technique, L-[3H]-arginine was maintained at a rate of more than 98 percent. To determine particular enzyme activity, the control value, which was often less than 1% of the radioactivity administered, was removed. Picomoles of L-[3H]-citrulline produced per milligram of protein per minute were used to measure nNOS activity. The technique for detecting iNOS activity was very identical to that for determining nNOS activity, with the exception that instead of nNOS, an aliquot of 10 L recombinant iNOS was used, and the mixture was incubated without calmodulin.

3.4

3.4 Statistical analysis

The statistics data are labelled as a mean with SEM. The Newmane-Keuls multiple scale analysis was employed after the one-way analysis of variance. Statistical significance was defined as AP value of less than 0.05.

4

4 Conclusions

Finally, 4(3H)-quinazolinone moiety phosphaoxazepino derivatives were produced. The activity of nNOS and iNOS is also assessed in these novel structures. When compared to the control L-NAME, several drugs demonstrated promising inhibitory actions. The inhibitory effect of the investigated derivatives on iNOS is often stronger than that on nNOS, implying that combining the phosphaozaepino moiety with quinazolinyl derivatives in Ibuprofen feature enhances NOS inhibition. As a result, the compounds we investigated could be used to produce therapeutic drugs for NO-related diseases involving both isoforms, such as anti-stroke and Parkinson's disorder. Here, we plan to analyze the cytotoxicities of the synthesized formulas in order to ensure their safe usage, based on the findings of our investigation, which highlighted the relevance of biocompatibility of the produced compounds.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the Saudi Arabian Ministry of Education's Deputyship for Study and Innovation for supporting this research under project number IFP-2020-45.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors state that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have influenced the research presented in this study.

References

  1. , , , , . New series of 4(3H)-quinazolinone derivatives:syntheses and evaluation of antitumor and antiviral activities. Med. Chem. Res.. 2017;27(2):571.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , . Synthesis and antioxidant properties of some novel 1,3,4,2-oxadiazaphosphepino[6,7- c ]quinolinones and pyrazolo[3,4:4′,3′]quinolino[5,1- c ][1,4,2]oxazaphosphinine. J. Arch. Pharm. Chem. Life Sci.. 2012;345:884.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , , . Phosphorus–nitrogen compounds part 27. Syntheses, structural characterizations, antimicrobial and cytotoxic activities, and DNA interactions of new phosphazenes bearing secondary amino and pendant (4-fluorobenzyl)spiro groups. Eur. J. Med. Chem.. 2013;70:294.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , . Synthesis of some quinazolin-4-one derivatives carrying ibuprofenyl moiety and their antiinflammatory activity. Der Pharma Chem.. 2011;3:1-12.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , . Design, synthesis, and evaluation of new colorimetric chemosensors containing quinazolinones moiety for some cations detection in an aqueous medium and biological sample. J. Mex. Chem. Soc.. 2021;3:65.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , . Synthesis and biological evaluation of novel quinazolin-4(3H)-one Schiff base derivatives as nitric oxide synthase inhibitors. Arabian J. Chem.. 2021;14(10):103362
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , , , . Reaction of 2-imino-2h-chromene-3-carboxamide with phosphorus halides: synthesis of some novel chromeno- [2,3-d][1,3,2]diazaphosphinines and chromeno[4,3-c][1,2]- azaphosphole and their antioxidant and cytotoxicity properties. Heterocycles. 2019;98(5):681.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , . Facile synthesis of novel 6-methyl-5-phenyl-2-sulfido-1,2,3,5-tetrahydro-4H[1,2]oxazolo[4′,5′:5,6]pyrano[2,3-d][1,3,2]diazaphosphinines. J. Sulfur Chem.. 2018;39(5):1.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , , , . Reaction of 2-imino-2H-chromene-3-carboxamide with some phosphorus esters: synthesis of some novel chromenes containing phosphorus heterocycles and phosphonate groups and their antioxidant and cytotoxicity properties. Synthetic Commun.. 2019;49(21):1.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , , . Reaction of 2-cyano-3-(4-oxo-4H-chromen-3-yl)prop-2-enamide with some phosphorus reagents: synthesis of some novel diethyl phosphonates, 1,2,3-diazaphosphinanes, 1,2,3-thiazaphosphinine and 1,2-azaphospholes bearing a chromone ring. Res. Chem. Intermed.. 2017;44(1):173.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , , . Synthesis and characterization of some novel phosphorylated 4-oxo-2-phenylquinazolines. J. Heterocyclic Chem.. 2018;55(8):1955.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , , , . Reaction of 2-Imino-2 H -chromene-3-carboxamide with phosphorus isothiocyanates: first synthesis of novel chromeno[2,3- d ]pyrimidinyl and bis(chromeno[2,3- d ]pyrimidinyl)phosphines and chromeno[2′,3′:4,5]pyrimido[2,1- d ][1,3,5,2]triazaphosphinine. J. Heterocyclic Chem.. 2018;56:1646.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. , , . Isolation of nitric oxide synthetase, a calmodulin-requiring enzyme. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1990;87:682.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , , , . Synthesis of ibuprofen heterocyclic amides and investigation of their analgesic and toxicological properties. Eur. J. Med. Chem.. 2003;38:513.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , . Preparation and properties of cotton fabrics treated with a novel guanidyl-and phosphorus-containing polysiloxane antimicrobial and flame retardant. Lett.. 2015;142:35.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , . One-pot synthesis of some dynamic 2-substituted benzoxazinones and their corresponding qinazolinones of anticipated biological activity. J. Heterocyclic Chem.. 2016;53:95.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. , , , , , , , . Synthesis and anti-bacterial evaluation of novel thio- and oxazepino[7,6-b]quinolines. J. Iranian Chem. Soc.. 2015;12:2205.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. , , , , . Influence of phosphate and phosphonate ionic liquid structures on lubrication for different alloys (Mg, Al, Cu) Tribol. Inter.. 2017;114:469.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. , , . Synthesis and Reactions of the Novel 6-ethyl-4-hydroxy-2,5-dioxo-5,6-dihydro-2 H -pyrano[3,2-c]quinoline-3-carboxaldehyde. J. Heterocyclic Chem.. 2018;56(2):628.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. , , . Overproduction of nitric oxide in cytokine-mediated and septic shock. L Natl. Cancer Inst.. 1992;84:827.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. , , , , , , . New prodrugs of two pyrimidine acyclic nucleoside phosphonates: synthesis and antiviral activity. Bioorg. Med. Chem.. 2017;25:4637.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. , , , , , , , , , . Phenylpyrrole derivatives as neural and inducible nitric oxide synthase (nNOS and iNOS) inhibitors. Eur. J. Med. Chem.. 2009;44:2655.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. , , , , , , , . Synthesis, pharmacological and toxicological evaluation of amide derivatives of ibuprofen. Inter. J. Chem. Tech. Res.. 2010;2:233.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Pavia, D.L., Lampman, G.M., Kriz, G.S., 2001. Introduction to Spectroscopy, third ed. Harcourt College Publishers, Fort Worth, TX. p. 400.
  25. , , , . Organophosphonates: a review on environmental relevance, biodegradability and removal in wastewater treatment plants. Sci. Total Environ.. 2018;615:1176.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. , , , . Synthesis and antiproliferative evaluation of some novel quinazolin-4(3H)-one derivatives. J. Heterocyclic Chem.. 2020;57:3898.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. , , , , . Structural analysis of NSAID binding by prostaglandin H2 synthase: time-dependent and time-independent inhibitors elicit identical enzyme conformations. Biochemistry. 2001;40:5172.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. , , , . LiBr catalyzed solvent-free ring expansion of epoxides to 1,4-oxathian-2-ones with α-mercaptocarboxylic acids. Tetrahedron Lett.. 2011;52(28):3614.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Tripathi, K.D., 2003. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and anti-pyretic analgesics. In: Essentials of Medical Pharmacology, fifth ed. Jaypee Brothers, New Delhi. p. 176.
  30. , , . Biosynthesis of nitro compounds. Chem Bio. Chem.. 2017;8:973.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. , , , , . Highly enantioselective 1,4-addition of diethyl phosphite to enones using a dinuclear Zn catalyst. Chem. – Eur. J.. 2009;15(12):2738.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. , , . A theoretical study of the mechanisms and regiochemistry of the reactions of 5-alkoxyoxazole with thioaldehydes, nitroso compounds, and aldehydes. J. Org. Chem.. 2003;68(2):412-420.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Show Sections