10.8
CiteScore
 
5.2
Impact Factor
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Corrigendum
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Full Length Article
Full lenth article
Letter to Editor
Original Article
Research article
Retraction notice
Review
Review Article
SPECIAL ISSUE: ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY
10.8
CiteScore
5.3
Impact Factor
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Corrigendum
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Full Length Article
Full lenth article
Letter to Editor
Original Article
Research article
Retraction notice
Review
Review Article
SPECIAL ISSUE: ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original article
10 (
1_suppl
); S297-S300
doi:
10.1016/j.arabjc.2012.07.037

Oxidative aromatization of novel tetrahydrochromeno[4,3-b]quinolines using silica sulfuric acid/NaNO2

Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Payam Noor University, Sari, Iran
Department of BioChemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran

⁎Corresponding author. Tel./fax: +98 9366799944. shimi50@yahoo.com (Mohammad Reza Rezaei)

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Elsevier and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Peer review under responsibility of King Saud University.

Abstract

A combination of silica sulfuric acid and sodium nitrite in the presence of wet SiO2 was used as an effective oxidizing agent for the oxidative aromatization of novel Tetrahydrochromeno[4,3-b]quinolines to their corresponding pyridine derivatives under reflux and heterogeneous conditions in high yields.

Keywords

Chromeno[4,3-b]quinoline
Oxidative aromatization
Silica sulfuric acid
1

1 Introduction

Tetrahydrochromeno–quinoline derivatives are found to exhibit a wide range of biological activities (Helmchen et al., 1986; Yamanaka et al., 2000), including psychotropic, anti-allergic, anti-inflammatory and estrogenic behavior (Munoz et al., 1982; Yamada et al., 1992; Lee et al., 2004). Among them, Tetrahydrochromeno[4,3-b]quinolines are an important class of 1,4-dihydropyridines (DHPs) and NADH models (Fig. 1).

Structure of Hantzsch 1,4-DHPs I and chromeno[4,3-b]quinolines II.
Figure 1
Structure of Hantzsch 1,4-DHPs I and chromeno[4,3-b]quinolines II.

In the human body, 1,4-dihydropyridine compounds are oxidized to pyridine derivatives by the action of cytochrome P-450 in the liver (Guengerich et al., 1991). The oxidation of 1,4-DHPs to the corresponding pyridine derivatives constitutes the principal metabolic route in biological systems as well as a facile access to the corresponding pyridine derivatives (Stout and Meyers, 1982), which show anti-hypoxic and anti-ischemic activities from the easily available DHPs (Khadikar and Borkat, 1998; Sabitha et al., 2003). Therefore, oxidative aromatization of tetrahydrochromenoquinolines has attracted continuing interests of organic and medicinal chemists and a plethora of protocols has been developed.

Initially a series of novel tetrahydrochromeno[4,3-b]quinoline derivatives(1an, Scheme 1) were prepared via the reaction of 4-aminocoumarin with 2-benzylidene-cyclohexane-1,3-dione derivatives in solvent free system at 200–210 °C, according to our recently reported work (Miri et al., 2011), and they were used to investigate their conversion to the corresponding pyridines.

Oxidative aromatization of Tetrahydrochromeno[4,3-b]quinolines.
Scheme 1
Oxidative aromatization of Tetrahydrochromeno[4,3-b]quinolines.

Herein, we report a simple, efficient and heterogeneous procedure for the aromatization of tetrahydrochromeno[4,3-b]quinoline derivatives using SiO2–OSO3H/NaNO2/wet SiO2 at reflux in CHCl3.

Therefore, a variety of tetrahydrochromeno–quinoline derivatives were subjected to aromatization via a combination of SSA/NaNO2 in chloroform at the reflux temperature with high yields (Table 1).

Table 1 Oxidative aromatization of novel tetrahydrochromeno[4,3-b]quinolines Using SSA/NaNO2.
GroupG Substrate Product MP(°C) Yield (%)
o-CH3 1a 2a 210–212 71
m-CH3 1b 2b 172–174 64
p-CH3 1c 2c 241–243 68
o-OCH3 1d 2d 180–182 71
m-OCH3 1e 2e 155–157 66
p-OCH3 1f 2f 185–187 75
o-Cl 1g 2g 253–255 66
m-Cl 1h 2h 188–190 68
p-Cl 1i 2i 281–283 70
m-NO2 1j 2j 161–163 70
p-NO2 1k 2k 265–267 67
m-Br 1l 2l 184–186 64
p-Br 1m 2m 279–281 65
H 1n 2n 121–123 74
Isolated yield.

Aromatization of tetrahydrochromeno[4,3-b]quinolines to the corresponding pyridines was carried out under completely heterogeneous conditions at refluxing chloroform. The aromatization procedure is very simple and the products are easily isolated from the reaction media by simple filtration and evaporation of chloroform.

In summary, in this paper we have introduced another ability of SiO2–OSO3H/NaNO2 as an efficient oxidizing agent for the oxidation of tetrahydrochromeno[4,3-b]quinolines under heterogeneous conditions. Also the cheapness and availability of the reagent, easy and clean work-up and high yields make this method attractive for chemists.

2

2 Result and discussion

The prepared 7-aryl-9,10,11,12-tetrahydro-6H-chromeno[4,3-b]quinoline-6,8-dione 1 were aromatized in the presence of silica sulfuric acid (Salehi et al., 2006), NaNO2 and wet SiO2 in boiling chloroform (Miri et al., 2011). The presence of wet SiO2 provides an effective heterogeneous surface area for the in situ generation of nitrosonium ion (Scheme 2). This oxidizing reagent was used for converting thiols to their corresponding thionitrils (Zolfigol, 2001). Application of the most common oxidants for oxidation of dihydropyridines such as CrO3 (Grinsteins et al., 1967), MnO2 (Vanden Eynde and Mayence, 2003) ferric nitrate (Khadikar and Borkat, 1998; Sadeghi et al., 2001) nicotinum dichromate (Sadeghi et al., 2000) and Multi-wall Carbon Nanotubes modified with manganese complex (MWNTs) was unsuccessful (Siswana et al., 2008). The aromatization of DHPs afforded 7-Aryl-10,11-dihydro-6H-chromeno[4,3-b]quinoline-6,8-dione 2 in 64–75% yields (Table 1). The structure according to NMR (1H and 13C, COSY, HMBC, HMQC) and EI-MS spectra was proved to be aromatized 1,4-DHP cyclic with the formation of pyridine cycle. The 1H NMR spectra showed the high deshielding character of aliphatic protons from 1.8–2.9 in 1 to 2.18–3.41 in 2 which is attributed to the formation of pyridine. The protons belonging to CH and NH in compounds 1 disappeared in compounds 2. Mass spectrum and elemental analysis clearly support the proposed structure.

The tentative mechanism for the oxidative aromatization of tetrahydrochromenoquinolines.
Scheme 2
The tentative mechanism for the oxidative aromatization of tetrahydrochromenoquinolines.

3

3 Experimental

3.1

3.1 Materials and apparatus

Chemicals and all solvents used in this study were purchased from Merck AG and Aldrich Chemical. Melting points were determined on a Kofler hot stage apparatus and are uncorrected. The IR spectra were obtained on a Shimatdzu 470 spectrophotometer (potassium bromide disks). 1HNMR spectra were measured using a Bruker FT-500 spectrometer, and chemical shifts are expressed as δ (ppm) with tetramethylsilane as internal standard. The mass spectra were run on a Finnigan TSQ-70 spectrometer at 70 eV. Merck silica gel 60 F254 plates were used for analytical TLC; column chromatography was performed on Merck silica gel (70–230 mesh). Yields are of purified products and were not optimized.

3.2

3.2 General procedure for the oxidative aromatization of 7-aryl-9,10,11,12-tetrahydro-6H-chromeno[4,3-b]quinoline-6,8-dione derivatives

Compounds 1an (5.4 mmol), sodium nitrite (l6 mmol, 1.1 g), silica sulfuric acid (1.6 g) and silica gel (1.07 g) were refluxed in chloroform (100 ml) for 8 h. The mixture was cooled to room temperature and filtered. The filtrate was evaporated to dryness under reduced pressure, and the crude product was purified by short column chromatography (20–80% ethyl acetate/petroleum ether) to give 2an.

3.3

3.3 Spectral and physical data for selected compounds

3.3.1

3.3.1 7-(2-Methylphenyl)-10,11-dihydro-6H-chromeno[4,3-b]quinoline-6,8-dione (2a)

Yield = 71%, Mp = 210–212 °C.

IR (KBr)ν: 2922, 2848, 1754, 1691, 757 cm−1.

1HNMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz), δ (ppm): 2.02 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.24 (q, 2H, J = 6.6 Hz, H10), 2.66 (t, 2H, J = 6.6 Hz, H9), 3.38 (t, 2H, J = 6.6 Hz, H11), 6.81 (d, 1H, J = 7.0 Hz, H15), 7.23 (t, 1H, J = 7.0 Hz H17), 7.28–7.35 (m, 3H, H16, H18, H4), 7.40 (t, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz, H2), 7.61 (t, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz, H3), 8.68 (d, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz, H1).

13C NMR(CDCl3-d), δ: 20.01, 20.98, 34.61, 40.13, 115.13, 116.90, 118.83, 124.61, 124.89, 125.58, 126.09, 127.44, 127.69, 129.26, 133.33, 134.24, 137.84, 153.43, 154.13, 156.39, 157.92, 169.58, 196.14.

MS: m/z (%), 355 (M+, 44), 340 (44), 327 (37), 299(100), 271(37), 151(50), 126 (50), 114 (63), 100(44), 87(25).

3.3.2

3.3.2 7-(3-Cholorophenyl)-10,11-dihydro-6H-chromeno[4,3-b]quinoline-6,8-dione (2h)

Yield = 68%, Mp = 188–190 °C.

IR (KBr)ν: 3018, 2853, 1744, 1691, 757 cm−1.

1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz), δ (ppm): 2.23–2.28 (q, 2H, J = 6.5 Hz, H10), 2.67–2.70 (t, 2H, J = 6.5 Hz, H9), 3.39–3.40 (t, 2H, J = 6.5 Hz, H11), 7.02 (d, 1H, J = 7.0 Hz, H16), 7.10 (s, 1H, H14), 7.30 (d, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz, H4), 7.37–7.42 (m, 3H, H2, H17, H18), 7.62 (t, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz, H3), 8.68 (d, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz, H1).

13C NMR (CDCl3-d) δ: 20.85, 34.57, 40.24, 114.86, 116.88, 118.64, 124.59, 124.72, 126.15, 126.27, 127.26, 127.62, 129.16, 133.49, 133.90, 139.79, 153.38, 154.04, 154.48, 158.07, 169.64, 196.08.

MS: m/z (%), 377 (M++2, 10), 375 (M+, 30), 340 (30), 319(27), 289(14), 227(44), 127 (44), 120 (100), 100(64), 87(32), 74(36).

3.3.3

3.3.3 7-(4-Bromophenyl)-10,11-dihydro-6H-chromeno[4,3-b]quinoline-6,8-dione (2m)

Yield = 65%, Mp = 279–281 °C.

IR (KBr)ν: 3042, 2922, 1745, 1693, 771 cm−1.

1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz), δ (ppm): 2.24 (q, 2H, J = 6.5 Hz, H10), 2.67 (t, 2H, J = 6.5 Hz, H9), 3.38 (t, 2H, J = 6.4 Hz, H11), 6.98 (d, 1H, J = 8.3 Hz, H14,H18), 7.32 (d, 1H, J = 7.0 Hz, H4), 7.40(t, 1H, J = 7.0 Hz, H2), 7.58 (d, 1H, J = 8.3 Hz, H15, H17),7.62(t, 1H, J = 70 Hz, H3), 8.67 (d, 1H, J = 7.0 Hz, H1).

13C NMR (CDCl3-d), δ: 20.87, 34.56, 40.28, 114.92, 116.91, 118.68, 124.71, 126.16, 126.26, 127.40, 127.91, 131.19, 133.48, 136.99, 153.39, 154.08, 155.10, 158.23, 169.57, 196.34.

MS: m/z (%), 421 (M++2, 11), 419 (M+, 11), 330(13), 289(100), 216(22), 149(20), 83(31), 57(76).

References

  1. , , , . Khim. Geterotsikl. Soedin.. 1967;6:1118.
  2. , , , , , , . J. Med. Chem.. 1991;34:1838.
  3. , , , . , ed. Modern Synthetic Methods, vol. 4. Berlin: Springer; . p. :216.
  4. , , . Synth. Commun.. 1998;28:207.
  5. , , , . Bull. Korean Chem. Soc.. 2004;25:207.
  6. , , , , , , . Archiv der Pharmazie.. 2011;344:111.
  7. , , , . J. Nat. Prod.. 1982;45:367.
  8. , , , , . Tetrahedron Lett.. 2003;44:4129.
  9. , , , , . Synth. Commun.. 2000;30:1661.
  10. , , , . J. Sci. I. R. Iran.. 2001;12:141.
  11. , , , . Sensors. 2008;8:5096.
  12. , , , , . Curr. Org. Chem.. 2006;10:2171.
  13. , , . Chem. Rev.. 1982;82:223.
  14. , , . Molecules. 2003;8:381.
  15. , , , , . Biochem. Pharmacol.. 1992;44:1211.
  16. , , , . Org. Lett.. 2000;2:159.
  17. , . Tetrahedron. 2001;57:9509.

Further reading

  1. , , , , . Tetrahedron. 1995;51:6511.
Show Sections