10.8
CiteScore
 
5.3
Impact Factor
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Corrigendum
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Full Length Article
Full lenth article
Letter to Editor
Original Article
Research article
Retraction notice
Review
Review Article
SPECIAL ISSUE: ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY
10.8
CiteScore
5.3
Impact Factor
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Corrigendum
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Full Length Article
Full lenth article
Letter to Editor
Original Article
Research article
Retraction notice
Review
Review Article
SPECIAL ISSUE: ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original article
01 2021
:15;
103506
doi:
10.1016/j.arabjc.2021.103506

Pentacyclic Triterpenoids, Phytosteroids and Fatty Acid Isolated from the Stem-bark of Cola lateritia K. Schum. (Sterculiaceae) of Cameroon origin; Evaluation of Their Antibacterial Activity

Drug Discovery and Smart Molecules Research Laboratory, Department of Chemical Sciences, University of Johannesburg, P.O. Box 17011, Doornfontein, Johannesburg 2028, South Africa
Centre for Natural Product Research (CNPR), Chemical Sciences Department, University of Johannesburg, Doornfontein, Johannesburg 2028, South Africa
Research Center for Synthesis and Catalysis, Department of Chemical Sciences, University of Johannesburg-Kingsway Campus, Auckland Park, 2008, South Africa
Department of Organic Chemistry, The University of Yaoundé I, P.O. Box 812, Yaoundé, Cameroon
Department of Microbial Drugs, Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research GmbH, Inhoffenstrasse 7, 38124 Braunschweig, Germany
Department of Biochemistry, The University of Yaoundé I, P.O. Box 812, Yaoundé, Cameroon
Department of Biotechnology and Food Technology, Faculty of Science, University of Johannesburg, Doornfontein Campus, Johannesburg 2028, South Africa

⁎Corresponding authors. michaelhermannkamdem@gmail.com (Michael H.K. Kamdem), dndinteh@uj.ac.za (Derek T. Ndinteh)

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Elsevier and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Peer review under responsibility of King Saud University.

Abstract

Abstract

The phytochemical investigation on the chemical constituents of dichloromethane-methanol (1:1) stem-bark extract of Cola lateritia K. Schum. (Sterculiaceae) led to the isolation and characterization of five pentacyclic triterpenoids, one fatty acid and two phytosteroids. The compounds were identified as heptadecanoic acid (1), maslinic acid (2), betulinic acid (3), lupenone (4), lupeol (5), friedelin (6), β-stigmasterol (7) and ß-sitosterol-3-O-ß-D-glucoside (8). Their structures were determined by NMR analysis (1H, 13C, DEPT-135, COSY, HMBC and HSQC), high-resolution mass spectrometry (HR-ESI-MS) and comparisons with published data in the literature. This work, to the best of our knowledge, is the first isolation and identification of these compounds in pure forms from Cola lateritia. Also, compounds 13 are reported for the first time from Cola genus. In vitro antibacterial activity of the isolated compounds (18) and the crude extract were evaluated against Bacillus subtilis, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Enterococcus faecalis, Mycobacterium smegmatis, Staphylococcus aureus, Enterobacter cloacae, Klebsiella oxytoca, Proteus vulgaris, Klebsiella pneumonia, Escherichia coli, Proteus mirabilis and Klebsiella aerogenes with streptomycin, nalidixic acid and ampicillin as standard antibacterial drugs. Compound 2 was active against E. faecalis (MIC = 18.5 µg/mL), and it was 6.9 and 28 times lower and active than that of streptomycin (MIC 128 µg/mL) and nalidixic acid (MIC > 512 µg/mL) respectively. All the isolated compounds and crude extract showed significant activities against the tested bacterial strains.

Keywords

Cola lateritia
Fatty acid
Pentacyclic triterpenoids
Phytosteroids
Antibacterial activity

Abbreviations

13C NMR

Carbon-13 nuclear magnetic resonance

1H NMR

Proton nuclear magnetic resonance

COSY

Correlation spectroscopy

NOESY

Nuclear Overhauser effect spectroscopy

d

Doublet

dd

Doublet of doublet

DEPT-135

Distortionless Enhancement by Polarization Transfer-135

FTIR

Fourier-transform infrared

UV

ultra-violet

HMBC

Heteronuclear multiple bond correlation

HREIMS

High resolution electron ionisation spectroscopy

HSQC

Heteronuclear single quantum coherence

J

Coupling constant

m/z

Mass/charge ratio

Me

Methyl

EtOAc

ethyl acetate

MeOH

Methanol

NMR

Nuclear magnetic resonance

s

Singlet

t

Triplet

TLC

Thin Layer Chromatography

TMS

Tetramethyl silane

1

1 Introduction

Cola Schott & Endl. is an underutilized genus belonging to the family Sterculiaceae. The genus comprises about 125 species of medicinal plants, which are native to Western and Central Africa (Rätsch, 2005). Cola species are distributed mainly in the dry parts of the rainforest. However, some species, including Cola millenii, Cola gigantea and Cola nitida are commonly found in the dry and wet forest environments (N’Guessan, et al., 2018; Olorode, 1984). Traditionally, Cola species are used for treating many diseases and infections in different communities. Cola millenii leaves are ethnomedicinally used for treating ringworm, fever, opthalmia, dysentery and gonorrhoea (Odugbemi, 2006). The stems, flowers, twigs, leaves, and other parts of Cola acuminate, Cola lateritia and Cola nitida are used for the treatment of malaria, diarrhoea, dysentery, fever and coughs (Burkill, 1995; Irvine, 1961). Kola nuts, the mature fruits of the Cola species, are known for their characteristic bitter flavour and treatment of whooping cough, asthma, malaria and fever in many West African nations (Blades, 2000; Benjamin et al., 1991; Jayeola, 2001).

Available information from literature has shown that only few species of the Cola genus have been studied for their phytochemical constituents. Dongmo et al., 2019 identified unsaturated fatty acids and triterpenoids from the Cola rostrata K. Schum roots. Polyphenolic compounds were isolated from Cola nitida ssp. Alba (Atawodi et al., 2007). With regards to biological activities, some species from Cola genus have been studied for their various properties. The antibacterial activity of the aqueous extract of Cola gigantea leaves against Escherichia coli, Bacillus subtilis, and Staphylococcus aureous showed a very good activity (Sofowora et al., 2013; Kenneth et al., 2014). The antibacterial effects of hexane extracts of Cola millenii bark and leaves against Escherichia coli were greater than those of Cola gigantean (Nwidu et al., 2019). The decoction extract of Cola acuminata was reported to be toxic to the breast cancer cells (Abo et al., 2008). Currently, there is dearth of information on the chemical constituents as well as biological activities of Cola lateritia. Due to the numerous traditional uses of Cola species and our continuous attempt to search for novel antibacterial agents from plant sources, this study was aimed at investigating the phytochemical and antibacterial activity of Cola lateritia.

2

2 Material and methods

Materials: Reagents for extraction and isolation were used as supplied by Sigma-Aldrich. Thin layer chromatography was carried out using pre-coated Merck silica gel F254 plates. Merck silica gel 60 (0.040–0.063 mm) was used as stationary phase in carrying out column chromatography.

Instrumental: NMR spectra were recorded using Bruker 500 MHz and 600 MHz spectrometer using signal frequency of 125 MHz and 150.9 MHz for 13C and DEPT 135 while all the other experiments used a signal of 500 MHz and 600 MHz and were referenced using residual protonated solvent signals (δH: 2.50 ppm for DMSO‑d6, 3.31 ppm for CD3OD, 7.260 ppm for CDCl3; δC: 77.000 ppm for CDCl3, 39.50 ppm for DMSO‑d6 and 49.00 ppm for CD3OD). Chemical shifts (δ) are expressed relative to tetramethylsilane (TMS) in ppm as internal standard, and coupling constants are given in Hz. IR spectrum was recorded using a Perkin-Elmer FT-IR Spectrum 100 spectrometer operated in an attenuated total reflectance (ATR) mode. Mass spectra were recorded on a Waters API Q-TOF Ultima spectrometer (University of Stellenbosch, South Africa). Melting points were determined using a Reichert 281,313 hot-stage apparatus and were uncorrected.

2.1

2.1 General experimental procedures

2.1.1

2.1.1 Plant material

The stem-bark of C. lateritia was collected in September 2017 at Mount Kala, Yaounde, Cameroon. It was identified at the Cameroon National Herbarium, Cameroon where a voucher specimen (No.: CNH/56668) was deposited. Then, the harvested stem-bark were chopped, air-dried and crushed to afford 3200.92 g of powder.

2.1.2

2.1.2 Extraction and isolation

A portion (2500.54 g) of the obtained powder was macerated in CH2Cl2/MeOH (1:1) solvent mixture at room temperature for 72 h and evaporated using a rotary evaporator. Three successive macerations yielded 115.20 g of crude extract.

110.14 g of the crude extract obtained was reconstituted in CH2Cl2/MeOH and impregnated with silica (0.63–0.200 mm). After complete evaporation of the solvent, the powder obtained was mounted in a silica gel column (0.63–0.200 mm) and subjected to gradient elution with the solvent mixture hexane, hexane/ethyl acetate, ethyl acetate, ethyl acetate / methanol and finally with methanol (100% hexane, fractions 1–29; 2% EtOAc in hexane, fractions 30–71; 5% EtOAc in hexane, fractions 72–90; 10% EtOAc in hexane, fractions 91–125; 15% EtOAc in hexane, fractions 126–147; 20% EtOAc in hexane, fractions 148–172; 25% EtOAc in hexane, fractions 173–201; 30% EtOAc in hexane, fractions 202–219; 35% EtOAc in hexane, fractions 220–232; 35% EtOAc in hexane, fractions 233–250; 40% EtOAc in hexane, fractions 251–272; 60% EtOAc in hexane, fractions 273–293; 80% EtOAc in hexane, fractions 294–301; 100% EtOAc, fractions 302–314; 10% MeOH in EtOAc, fractions 315–325; 100% MeOH 326–350). A total of 350 fractions of 200 mL each were collected and then grouped into 5 series indexed from A to E according to similar chromatographic profiles. A white precipitate obtained from fractions 35–40 was recrystallized with MeOH leading to compound 6 (20 mg). The precipitate obtained from fractions 75–81 was washed using MeOH and filtered, giving a white powder, compound 4 (31 mg). After 24 h, precipitates were formed in fractions 95–103 and were mixed based on TLC. The precipitate was then washed using MeOH and filtered, yielding compound 5 (40 mg) a white powder. Fractions 107–114 were combined on the basis of TLC and washed using MeOH leading to a white powder, compound 1 (34 mg). The precipitate obtained from fractions 117–123 were filtered several times using hexane leading to a white powder, compound 7 (37 mg). A precipitate obtained from fractions 175–181 were combined on the basis of TLC and washed using hexane and acetone leading to a white powder, compound 3 (25 mg). Fractions 260–267 were left at room temperature and after two days, a deposit of white powder was observed in them. The powder was washed with hexane and filtered to yield to a white powder, compound 2 (21 mg). Fractions 294–298 were mixed on the basis of TLC and washed with MeOH leading to a white precipitate, compound 8 (30 mg).

2.1.3

2.1.3 Antibacterial assay

In vitro antibacterial activity of the isolated compounds (18) and the crude extract were studied against twelve bacteria strains using broth microdilution technique. The bacteria tested comprised of Gram-positive and Gram-negative strains which were purchased from Davies Diagnostic, South Africa. These include Staphylococcus aureus (SA) (ATCC25923), Bacillus subtilis (BS) (ATCC19659), Mycobacterium smegmatis (MS) (MC2155), Enterococcus faecalis (EF) (ATCC13047), Staphylococcus epidermidis (SE) (ATCC14990), Enterobacter cloacae (ECL) (ATCC13047), Escherischia coli (EC) (ATCC25922), Klebsiella aerogenes (Ka) (ATCC13048), Klebsiella oxytoca (KO) (ATCC8724), Proteus mirabilis (PM) (ATCC7002), Proteus vulgaris (PV) (ATCC33420) and Klebsiella pneumonia (KP) (ATCC13882). Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the compounds and crude extract were carried out following the procedure described by Fonkui et al., 2018, with little modification. Briefly, stock solutions were prepared by adding 3.4 mL of DMSO to 4 mg of each isolated compound in a vial. Each of these solutions was then serially diluted (6 times) in 100 uL of nutrient broth in a 96 well plates to the desired concentrations (588, 294, 147, 74, 37 and 18.5 µg/mL). Thereafter, 100 µL (in duplicate) of each of these solutions was seeded with 100 µL of an overnight bacterial culture brought to 0.5 Mc Farland in nutrient broth. The positive controls consisted of ampicillin, streptomycin and nalidixic acid while the negative control was made up of 50% nutrient broth in DMSO. Viable bacteria were confirmed in the presence of resazurin dye after 4 h incubation, and the MIC was taken for each compound (Table 1). All equipment and culture media were sterilised before use.

Table 1 Minimum inhibitory concentration of isolated compounds and the crude extract compared with standard drugs.
Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC, µg/mL)
Test compound Gram-positive Gram-negative
BS EF SE SA MS ECL PV KO KP PM EC KA
1 18.5 294 294 294 294 294 294 294 147 294 294 18.5
2 18.5 18.5 18.5 18.5 18.5 18.5 18.5 18.5 74.0 18.5 18.5 18.5
3 18.5 147 294 294 294 294 294 294 147 294 294 18.5
4 18.5 294 294 294 147 294 294 294 147 294 294 18.5
5 18.5 294 298 294 294 294 294 294 294 294 294 18.5
6 18.5 294 588 588 294 588 294 588 294 588 588 294
7 18.5 147 294 294 294 294 294 294 147 294 294 18.5
8 18.5 294 294 294 294 294 294 588 294 588 294 18.5
Crude Extract 18.5 74 294 147 74 147 294 147 74 294 294 18.5
AMP 26 26 26 26 26 26 416 26 26 26 26 26
STM 16 128 8 256 4 512 128 16 16 128 64 512
NLD 16 >512 64 64 512 16 128 8 256 32 512 256

AMP; Ampicillin, NLD; nalidixic acid, STM; Streptomycin; SE; Staphylococcus epidermidis; EF, Enterococcus faecalis; EC, Escherichia coli; MS, Mycobacterium smegmatis; SA, Staphylococcus aureous; ECL, Enterobacter cloacae; KO, Klebsiella oxytoca; PV, Proteus vulgaris; KP, Klebsiella pneumonia; PM, Proteus mirabilis; KA, Klebsiella aerogenes, BS; Bacillus subtilis.

2.1.4

2.1.4 Physical and spectroscopic data of the compounds 1–8

Compound 1, Heptadecanoic acid: white powder (34.0 mg); mp. 61.3 0C; HR-MS: [M+Na]+ at m/z: 293.2447; 1H NMR (CDCl3): 2.22 (2H, t, J = 7.3 Hz, H-2); 1.28 [m, 26H, (CH2)13]; 0.86 (t, 3H, J = 6.5 Hz, H-17), 13C NMR (CDCl3): 176.5 (C-1), 31.9 (C-2), 31.2 (C-3), 29.4 (C-4), 14.1 (C-17).

Compound 2, Maslinic acid: Colourless needles (21.0 mg); mp. 248–250 0C; HR-MS: [M+Na]+ at m/z 495.4339; UV: 227 nm, IR (KBr) cm−1: 3435, 2926, 2838, 2712, 1742, 1665, 1463, 1380, 1254, 1161, 1139, 1112, 1041, 1013, 975, 823, 794, 728, 580 cm−1; 1H NMR (DMSO‑d6): 0.88 (s, 3H, Me-23), 0.96 (s, 3H, Me-24), 0.98 (s, 3H, Me-25), 0.99 (s, 3H, Me-26), 1.02 (s, 3H, Me-27), 1.22 (s, 3H, Me-28), 1.24 (s, 3H, Me-29 and Me-30), 3.25 (dd, 1H, J = 4.6 and 14.6 Hz), 3.36 (d, 1H, J = 9.1 Hz, H-3), 4.11 (ddd, 1H, J = 4.6, 9.1 and 11.1 Hz, H-2), 5.45 (s, H-12); 13C NMR (CD3OD, 150 MHz): 46.5 (t, C-1), 67.9 (d, C-2), 88.9 (d, C-3), 39.0 (s, C-4), 55.4 (d, C-5), 18.1 (t, C-6), 31.9 (t, C-7), 38.4 (s, C-8), 48.1 (d, C-9), 37.7 (s, C-10), 23.4 (t, C-11), 122.3 (d, C-12), 144.1 (s, C-13), 41.4 (s, C-14), 27.5 (t, C-15), 22.9 (t,C-16), 46.2 (s, C-17), 41.5 (d, C-18), 45.6 (t, C-19), 30.0 (s, C-20), 33.2 (t, C-21), 32.5 (t, C-22), 27.9 (q, C-23), 16.10 (q, C-24), 15.7 (q, C-25), 16.30 (q, C-26), 25.0 (q, C-27), 180.1 (s, C-28), 32.4 (q, C-29), 22.4 (q, C-30) These data are in agreement with those reported by Kyeong et al., (2014).

Compound 3, Betulinic acid: white needles powder (24.8 mg); mp. 277–279 °C; EI-MS (positive ion mode): [M+] at m/z 456; IR v max (CCl4) cm−1: CH, C = C, C = O, C-H and O-H bend at 1457, 1648, 1688, 2942/2870 and 3447 respectively; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 600 MHz): 0.73 (s, Me-25), 0.86 (s, Me-24), 0.95 (s, Me-26), 0.97 (s, Me-27), 0.99 (s, Me-23), 1.70 (s, Me-30), 4.73 (s, H-29a) and 4.56 (s, H-29b), 3.12 (dd, J = 4.6, 11.2 Hz, H-3), 2.34 (ddd, J = 2.6, 11.6 Hz, H-13) and 3.04 (ddd, J = 4.8, 11.1 Hz, H-19); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 150 MHz): 39.8 (C-1), 28.8 (C-2), 78.7 (C-3), 39.9 (C-4), 56.4 (C-5), 19.3 (C-6), 35.3 (C-7), 41.6 (C-8), 51.5 (C-9), 38.1 (C-10), 21.7 (C-11), 26.7 (C-12), 39.2 (C-13), 43.3 (C-14), 31.7 (C-15), 33.4 (C-16), 57.2 (C-17), 50.3 (C-18), 48.3 (C-19), 151.8 (C-20), 30.8 (C-21), 38.1 (C-22), 29.2 (C-23), 16.8 (C-24), 16.9 (C-25), 16.9 (C-26), 15.4 (C-27), 179.3 (C-28), 110.4 (C-29), 19.9 (C-30) These data are in agreement with those reported by Machado et al., (2018).

Compound 4, Lupenone: white needles powder (31.1 mg), mp. 168–170 °C; EI-MS: [(M+H+)] at m/z 425, 109, 119, 135, 142, 154, 168; IR v max (CCl4) cm−1:

3079.7 (-C = CH–), 2924.3–2853.8 (C-H), 1738.3 (C = O), 1645.5 and 1376.9 (C = C), 1461.5 (CH3/CH2); 1H NMR (CDCl3, 600 MHz): 1.21 (s, Me-23), 1.21 (s, Me-24), 0.71 (s, Me-25), 1.22 (s, Me-26), 1.26 (s, Me-27), 1.26 (s, Me-28), 1.26 (s, Me-29), 1.72 (s, Me-30), 4.45 (t, J = 1.64 Hz, H-29α), 4.72 (t, J = 1.65 Hz, H-29β), 2.54 (m, H-2a), 2.43 (m, H-2b); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 150 MHz): 39.7 (C-1), 34.4 (C-2), 218.5 (C-3), 47.2 (C-4), 54.7 (C-5), 19.9 (C-6), 32.8 (C-7), 41.8 (C-8), 49.9 (C-9), 36.7 (C-10), 21.6 (C-11), 21.4 (C-12), 32.6 (C-13), 42.5 (C-14), 23.7 (C-15), 40.3 (C-16), 48.7 (C-17), 53.6 (C-18), 47.7 (C-19), 148.1 (C-20), 27.6 (C-21), 44.4 (C-22), 26.8 (C-23), 20.8 (C-24), 15.6 (C-25), 16.7 (C-26), 16.7 (C-27), 15.4 (C-28), 109.2 (C-29), 19.6 (C-30). These data were in accordance with those reported by Tsai et al., (2012).

Compound 5, Lupeol: white needles powder (40.0 mg); mp. 212–214 °C; EI-MS: [M+] at m/z = 426; IR v max (CCl4)cm−1: 3057, 2930, 2315, 1595, 1437, 1260; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 600 MHz): 4.72 (s, H-29α), 4.56 (s, H-29β), 3.1 (m, H-3), 0.78 (s, Me-25), 0.79 (s, Me-24), 0.86 (s, Me-26), 0.95 (s, Me-27), 0.98 (s, Me-23), 1.68 (s, Me-30); 13C NMR(CDCl3, 150 MHz): 38.6 (C-1), 27.6 (C-2), 79.2 (C-3), 38.6 (C-4), 55.2 (C-5), 18.2 (C-6), 33.2 (C-7), 41.9 (C-8), 50.2 (C-9), 37.4 (C-10), 20.6 (C-11), 23.7 (C-12), 32.5 (C-13), 42.5 (C-14), 27.5 (C-15), 40.4 (C-16), 48.6 (C-17), 53.8 (C-18), 47.8 (C-19), 148.1 (C-20), 27.6 (C-21), 44.5C-22), 28.2 (C-23), 15.7 (C-24), 16.8 (C-25), 16.1 (C-26), 15.3 (C-27), 16.8 (C-28), 109.3 (C-29), 19.4 (C-30). Based on these physical and spectroscopic data, compound 5 was assigned as Lup-20(29)-en-3β-ol or Lupeol which was in agreement with Tsai et al., (2012).

Compound 6, Friedelin: white powder (20.0 mg); m.p. 258–260 °C (lit. 260–262 °C, Subhadhirasakul and Pharkphoom, 2005); IR v max (CCl4)cm−1:, 1720, 2930, 1450; EIMS m/z (% intensity): 426 ([M+], 6.47), 411 ([M−CH3]), 302 (6.13), 273 (4.24), 55 (100.00); 1H NMR (CDCl3, 600 MHz): 1.17 (s, Me-28), 1.10 (s, Me-27), 1.05 (s, Me-26), 1.04 (s, Me-30), 0.97 (s, Me-29), 0.88 (s, Me-25) and 0.73 (s, Me-24), 0.87 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, Me-23), 2.24 (q, J = 6.7 Hz, H-4), 2.42 (ddd, J = 13.5, 5.0, 2.2 Hz, H-2) and 2.30 (ddd, J = 13.5, 7.2, 1.2 Hz, H-2) ; 13C NMR (CDCl3, 150 MHz): 21.9 (C-1), 40.8 (C-2), 212.8 (C-3), 58.0 (C-4), 41.8 (C-5), 41.1 (C-6), 18.0 (C-7), 53.5 (C-8), 37.7 (C-9), 59.6 (C-10), 35.7 (C-11), 30.5 (C-12), 39.3 (C-13), 38.7 (C-14), 32.5 (C-15), 36.1 (C-16), 29.7 (C-17), 42.6 (C-18), 34.9 (C-19), 28.5 (C-20), 32.6 (C-21), 39.4 (C-22), 6.9 (C-23), 14.8 (C-24), 18.2 (C-25), 20.4 (C-26), 18.8 (C-27), 32.3 (C-28), 35.4 (C-29), 31.5 (C-30). These data were in agreement with those reported by Almeida et al. (2011).

Compound 7, Stigmasterol: White powder (37.0 mg); mp: 175–177 °C; MS (m/z): 412 [M+], 394, 351, 314, 300, 271, 229, 213, 55; IR v max (CCl4)cm−1:, 3451, 2930, 1628, 1452; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz): 0.86 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, Me-28), 0.83 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, Me-27), 0.81 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, Me-26), 0.92 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, Me-21), 0.74 (s, Me-19), 1.05 (s, Me-18); 3.53 (tdd, J = 4.6, 4.5, 3.7 Hz, H-3), 5.34 (t, J = 6.5 Hz, H-5), 4.98 (m, H-22), 5.14 (m, H-23), 13CNMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz): 37.5 (C-1), 32.3 (C-2), 72.4 (C-3), 42.5 (C-4), 141.4 (C-5), 121.7 (C-6), 31.6 (C-7), 31.9 (C-8), 50.6 (C-9), 36.3 (C-10), 21.7 (C-11), 40.0 (C-12), 42.2 (C-13), 56.5 (C-14), 24.6 (C-15), 29.4 (C-16), 56.1 (C-17), 12.4 (C-18), 18.7 (C-19), 40.7 (C-20), 21.8 (C-21), 138.9 (C-22), 129.8 (C-23), 46.5 (C-24), 29.7 (C-25), 19.7 (C-26), 20.6 (C-27), 25.7 (C-28), 12.8 (C-29). The physical and spectral results were in agreement with the values reported by Jamal et al., (2009) and Subhadhirasakul and Pharkphoom (2005).

Compound 8, β-Sitosterol-3-O-β-D-glucoside: white amorphous solid (30.1 mg); mp: 279–281 °C; MS (m/z): 576.439 [M+]; IR v max (CCl4)cm−1: 3410 (–OH), 2940/2870 (CH3/CH2), 1635 (C = C), 1458 (-C-H), 1370 (-C-H) , 1250 (C-O), 1165 (C-O); 1H NMR (DMSO‑d6, 500 MHz): 2.97 (m, H-3), 2.28 (dt, J = 4.7, 8.12 Hz, H-4a), 1.97 (ddd, J = 2.01, 12.91, 12.95 Hz, H-4b), 5.32 (t, J = 3.7 Hz, H-6), 1.75 (ddd, J = 2.7, 7.2, 15.9 Hz, H-7a), 1.93 (ddd, J = 15.9, 2.7, 7.2 Hz, H-7b), 0.72 (s, Me-18), 0.92 (s, Me-19), 0.96 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, Me-21), 0.86 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, Me-26), 0.89 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, Me-27), 1.33 (m, CH2-28), 0.99 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, Me-29), 4.24 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, H-1′), 2.86 (dt, J = 4.7, 8.1 Hz, H-2′), 3.29 (dt, J = 4.7, 8.1 Hz, H-3′) 3.10 (dt, J = 4.7, 8.1 Hz, H-4′), 3.10 m (dt, J = 4.7, 8.1 Hz, H-5′), 4.58 (dd, J = 2.7, 11.8 Hz, H-6a’), 4.43 (dd, J = 5.4, 11.8 Hz, H-6b’), 3.58 (d, J = 4.8 Hz, OH-2′), 3.55 (d, J = 4.7 Hz, OH-3′), 3.42 (d, J = 4.7 Hz, OH 4′), 3.63 (t, J = 4.7 Hz, OH-6′), ; 13C NMR (DMSO‑d6, 125 MHz): 36.8 (C-1), 29.2 (C-2), 76.9 (C-3), 39.3 (C-4), 140.4 (C-5), 121.2 (C-6), 31.9 (C-7), 31.3 (C-8), 49.6 (C-9), 36.2 (C-10), 20.6 (C-11), 38.3 (C-12), 41.8 (C-13), 56.1 (C-14), 23.8 (C-15), 27.8 (C-16), 55.4 (C-17), 11.7 (C-18), 19.1 (C-19), 35.5 (C-20), 18.6 (C-21), 33.3 (C-22), 25.4 (C-23), 45.1 (C-24), 28.6 (C-25), 19.7 (C-26), 18.9 (C-27), 22.1 (C-28), 11.8 (C-29), 101.7 (C-1′), 73.5 (C-2′), 76.9 (C-3′), 70.2 (C-4′), 76.8 (C-5′), 62.9 (C-6′); these data were in accordance with those reported by Arora et al., (2013)

3

3 Results and discussion

The phytochemical investigation of dichloromethane-methanol (1:1) extract of the stem-bark of C. lateritia led to the isolation and characterization of eight known compounds such as: heptadecanoic acid (1), maslinic acid (2), betulinic acid (3), lupenone (4), lupeol (5), friedelin (6), stigmasterol (7) and ß-sitosterol-3-O-ß-D-glucoside (8). All these compounds were isolated for the first time from C. lateritia. Spectroscopic data of compound 1 has not been reported in the literature. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time it is isolated from a natural source in pure form, but it has been reported in the literature (Pfeuffer and Jaudszus, 2016). Fig. 1 depicts the chemical structures of all the isolated compounds.

Structures of compounds 1–8 isolated from the stem bark of Cola lateritia.
Fig. 1
Structures of compounds 1–8 isolated from the stem bark of Cola lateritia.

The antibacterial activity of the eight compounds was tested against five Gram-positive and seven Gram-negative bacteria strains using microdilution method. Table 1 depicts the MICs of the eight compounds against twelve bacteria strains. Tested compounds exhibited broad spectrum of antibacterial activity and their efficacy was concentration-dependent. For instance, amongst the Gram-negative bacteria, K. aerogenes was the most susceptible strain to all the compounds, with an MIC of 18.5 µg/mL except compound 6 (MIC 294 µg/mL). Therefore, these compounds appear to be 27.7 times more potent than streptomycin (MIC 512 µg/mL), 13.8 times more potent than nalidixic acid (MIC 256 µg/mL) and 1.4 time more potent than ampicillin (MIC 26 µg/mL). Likewise, amongst the Gram-positive bacteria investigated, B. subtilis was the most susceptible strain. All the compounds exhibited MIC of 18.5 µg/mL and thus being 1.4 times more potent than ampicillin (MIC 26 µg/mL).

Furthermore, compound 2 displayed best activity among all the isolated compounds with an MIC value of 18.5 µg/mL on all the strains except K. pneumonia where it exhibited activity at 74 µg/mL. Compound 2 was very active against E. faecalis with an MIC value of 18.5 µg/mL, which was 6.9 times and>28 times lower than that of streptomycin (MIC 128 µg/mL) and nalidixic acid (MIC >512 µg/mL) respectively. Similar result was obtained with P. vulgaris with an MIC value of 18.5 µg/mL which is 7 times lower than that of streptomycin or nalidixic acid (MIC 128 µg/mL) and 22.5 times lower than that of ampicillin (416 µg/mL). These observations suggest that compound 2 may be a more potent antibacterial agent than standard drugs like streptomycin, nalidixic acid and ampicillin for some of the tested bacterial, including E. faecalis, S. aureous; P. vulgaris, EC, Escherichia coli, K. aerogenes and P. mirabilis. The significant antibacterial activities of compound 2 corroborates many studies which have shown that triterpenoids from the same carbon skeleton such as oleanolic acid, ursolic acid and their derivatives have been reported to have good antibacterial activity (Jesus et al., 2015; Chouaïb et al., 2015). Maslinic acid has also been reported to have various biological activities including antitumor activity (Li et al, 2010), Anti-inflammatory activity (Napetschnig and Wu, 2013), Antiviral activity (Xu et al., 1996) and Cardioprotective effect (Hussain et al., 2012). The MIC values of compound 6 for the different bacteria strains compared to the other compounds and the standard drugs revealed that compound 6 was the least active of all the isolated compounds with MIC values ranging from 18.5 to 588 µg/ml. The poor activity of compound 6 could be explained by considering structure–activity relationship and polarity; compound 6 is the least polar amongst all the isolated compounds. One important factor that controls the interaction of cell membrane with different molecules is their polarity. Structure-activity relationship (SAR) showed that polar substituents or polar compounds have greater activity than non-polar substituents/compounds. For instance, compound 2 has two hydroxyl (–OH) groups in positions 2 and 3 of the first ring of the compound and according to the MIC obtained, we noticed that, that compound has the best antimicrobial activity. On the other hand, we noticed that compound 6 had the lowest activities against the bacteria strains compared to the other compounds.

This study brings a considerable significance for the use of this species against bacterial infections and corroborates that of several authors who reported the antibacterial activities of others species of the Cola genus (Ekalu and James, 2020). For instance, Cola acuminata was reported to demonstrate MIC ranging between 14 and 50 µg/ml against bacterial strains (Obey and Swamy, 2014). In another study, however Cola nitida showed better microbial potential against K. pneumonia, E. coli, S. aureus, and S. pneumonia, with MIC values ranging between (6.25–200 mg/ml) (Oghenerobo and Falodun, 2013). On the other hand, the leaf and stem bark of Cola gigantea exhibited significant antibacterial activity against S. aureus, E. coli, B. subtilis, and P. aeruginosa, with MIC values ranging between 0.125 and 2.75 mg/mL (Austarheim et al., 2012). Despite many studies that reported antibacterial activities of crude extracts from Cola genus, no isolated compound has been linked to be responsible for the antibacterial activities of the genus. At present, triterpenoids, steroids, and fatty acid isolated in this study demonstrated antibacterial activities.

We also noticed some compounds were more active than the crude extract with some bacteria strains. These results could be explained by the synergetic and/or antagonistic effects of different metabolites in the crude extract. The crude extract contains many compounds; which have different efficacy against the different bacterial strains, thus an antagonistic effect of those compounds will reduce the toxicity of the crude extracts to the various strains. This could be the reason why some compounds exhibited good activity than the crude extract.

4

4 Conclusion

The phytochemical studies of dichloromethane-methanol stem-bark extract of C. lateritia led to the isolation of eight compounds: one fatty acid, five triterpenoids and two phytosteroids. The isolated compounds and the crude extract showed good antibacterial activity against the twelve strains used; with one of the isolated compounds (Maslinic acid) being more efficacious than some of the standard drugs. The results obtained from this study and those previously reported in the literature confirm that the genus Cola is very rich in triterpenoids, steroids and fatty acids. The multiple biological activities of the isolated compounds and the crude extract justify the multiples uses of plants from Cola genus in traditional pharmacopeia.

Funding

This work is partially supported by the National Research Foundation, South Africa (Grant numbers 116740). The Centre for Natural Product Research (CNPR), and Drug Discovery and Smart Molecules Research Laboratory are also acknowledged for providing funding.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Michael H. K. Kamdem: Investigation, Conceptualization, writing – original draft. Olusesan Ojo: Investigation, formal analysis. Blondelle M. Kemkuignou: Formal analysis. Rostan M. Talla: Formal analysis. Thierry Y. Fonkui: Formal analysis. Kevine K. Silihe: Writing – review & editing. Charlotte M. Tata: Supervision, writing – review & editing. Marthe C. D. Fotsing: Project administration, supervision, writing – review & editing. Edwin M. Mmutlane: Supervision, writing – review & editing. Derek T. Ndinteh: Supervision, writing – review & editing.

Acknowledgements

The Department of Chemical Sciences of the University of Johannesburg is also recognised for providing laboratory space, chemicals and equipment to facilitate this work.

Declaration of Competing Interest

We have no competing interests to declare.

References

  1. , , , . Ethnobotanical studies of medicinal plants used in the management of diabetes mellitus in South Western Nigeria. J. Ethnopharmacol.. 2008;115:67-71.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Almeida, M. de F.O., Melo, A.C.R. de, Pinheiro, M.L.B., Silva, J.R. de A., Souza, A.D.L. de, Barison, A., Campos, F.R., Amaral, A.C.F., Machado, G.M. de C., Leon, L.L.P., 2011. Constituintes químicos e atividade Leishmanicida de Gustavia elliptica (Lecythidaceae). Quím. Nova 34, 1182–1187. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-40422011000700015.
  3. , , , , . Isolation and characterization of stigmasterol and β -sitosterol-D-glycoside from ethanolic extract of the stems of Salvadora persica Linn. Int. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci.. 2013;5:245-249.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , , . Content of polyphenolic compounds in the Nigerian stimulants Cola nitida ssp. alba, Cola nitida ssp. rubra A. Chev, and Cola acuminata Schott & Endl and their antioxidant capacity. J. Agric. Food Chem.. 2007;55:9824-9828.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Austarheim, I., Mahamane, H., Sanogo, R., Togola, A., Khaledabadi, M., 2012. Anti-ulcer polysaccharides from Cola cordifolia bark and leaves. J. Ethnopharmacol. 221–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2012.06.027.
  6. , , , . Coca-cola”, Caffeine, and Mental Deficiency -Harry Hollingworth and the Chattanooga trial of 1991. J. Histol. Behavioural Sci.. 1991;1:42-45.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , . Functional foods or nutraceuticals. Nutr. Food Sci.. 2000;30:73-76.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. , . The Useful Plants of West Tropical Africa (2nd Edition, Vol 3:11.). Kew. London: Royal Kew Botanical Gardens; . p. :522-527.
  9. , , , . Semi-synthesis of new antimicrobial esters from the natural oleanolic and maslinic acids. Food Chem.. 2015;183:8-17.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dongmo, T.T., W., Azebaze, A., Mbosso, E., Lenta, B., Bosyom, F., Tchaleu, B., Vardamides, J., 2019. New unsaturated fatty acid and other chemical constituents from the roots of Cola rostrata K. Schum. (Malvaceae). Biochem. Systemat. Ecol. 86, 103913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bse.2019.103913.
  11. , , . Phytochemistry, pharmacology and medicinal uses of Cola (Malvaceae) family: a review. Med. Chem. Res.. 2020;29:2089-2105.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , , , , , , , . Synthesis, characterization and biological applications of novel Schiff bases of 2-(trifluoromethoxy) aniline. J. Chin. Pharmaceut. Sci.. 2018;27:307-323.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , , , , . Maslinic acid protects against isoproterenol-induced cardiotoxicity in albino Wistar rats. JMFood.. 2012;15:741-746.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. , . Woody Plants of Ghana with Special Reference to their Uses. Woody Plants of Ghana with Special Reference to their Uses. Oxford University Press. 1961;17:498-502.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , . A Chemical Study on Phyllanthus columnaris. Eur. J. Sci. Res.. 2009;28:76-81.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. , . Preliminary studies on the use of kolanuts (Cola nitida) for soft drink production. J. Food Technol. Afr.. 2001;1:25-26.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. , , , , , . Antimicrobial activity of oleanolic and ursolic acids: an update. Evid.-Based Complement. Alternat. Med.. 2015;2015:14.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. , , , , . Phytochemical and Antimicrobial Properties of Crude n-Hexane and Methanol Extracts of Cola acuminata Nuts. J. Pharmaceut. Res. Int.. 2014;920–928
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. , , , , , . Triterpenes from Perilla frutescens var. acuta and Their Cytotoxic Activity. Nat. Prod. Sci.. 2014;20:71-75.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Li, C., Yang, Z., Zhai, C., Qiu, W., Li, D., Yi, Z., Wang, L., Tang, J., Qian, M., Luo, J., et al., 2010. “Maslinic acid potentiates the anti-tumor activity of tumor necrosis factor α by inhibiting NF-κB signaling pathway” MC. 73, 73:13.
  21. , , , , , , , . Synthesis of lupeol derivatives and their antileishmanial and antitrypanosomal activities. Nat. Prod. Res.. 2018;32:275-281.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. , , , , . Influence of Post-Harvest Storage Technologies on Weight and Rate Losses and Sensory Profile of Cola Nuts (Cola nitida) Produced in Côte d’Ivoire. Open J. Appl. Sci.. 2018;8:371-380.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. , , . Molecular basis of NF-κB signaling. ARB.. 2013;42:443-468.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. , , , , , . An investigation of potential sources of nutraceuticals from the Niger Delta Areas, Nigeria for attenuating oxidative stress. Medicines. 2019;6:1-16.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. , . Outlines and pictures of medicinal plants from Nigeria (1st ed.). Lagos: University of Lagos Press; .
  26. , , . Original research article antibacterial activity of methanolic extracts of Cola nitida seeds on selected pathogenic organisms. Int. J. Curr. Micriobiol. Appl. Sci.. 2014;3:999-1009.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. , , . Antioxidant activities of the leaf extract and fractions of Cola lepidota K. Schum (sterculiaceae) Niger. J. Biotechnol.. 2013;25:31-36.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. , . Taxonomy of West African flowering plants. New York: Longman, London; .
  29. , , . Pentadecanoic and Heptadecanoic Acids: Multifaceted Odd-Chain Fatty Acids. Adv. Nutr.. 2016;7:730-734.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. , . The Encyclopedia of Psychoactive Plants: Ethnopharmacology and Its Applications. Simon and Schuster; .
  31. , , , . The role and place of medicinal plants in the strategies for disease. Aftican J. Tradit. Complement. Alter. Med.. 2013;10:210-229.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. , , . A terpenoid and two steroids from the lowers of Mammea siamensis. Songklanakarin J. Sci. Technol.. 2005;27:555-561.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. , , , , . Chemical constituents of Broussonetia luzonicus. Pharmacognosy J.. 2012;4:1-4.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. , , , , . Anti-HIV triterpene acids from Geum japonicum. JNP. 1996;59:643-645.
    [Google Scholar]

Appendix A

Supplementary data

Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2021.103506.

Appendix A

Supplementary data

The following are the Supplementary data to this article:

Supplementary data 1

Supplementary data 1

Show Sections