5.2
Impact Factor
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Corrigendum
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Full Length Article
Full lenth article
Letter to Editor
Original Article
Research article
Retraction
Retraction notice
Review
Review Article
SPECIAL ISSUE: ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY
5.3
Impact Factor
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Corrigendum
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Full Length Article
Full lenth article
Letter to Editor
Original Article
Research article
Retraction
Retraction notice
Review
Review Article
SPECIAL ISSUE: ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original article
13 (
1
); 1831-1836
doi:
10.1016/j.arabjc.2018.01.017

Revealing anti-diabetic potency of medicinal plants of Meru Betiri National Park, Jember – Indonesia

Graduate School of Biotechnology and Center for Development of Advanced Sciences and Technology (CDAST), University of Jember, Jember 68121, Indonesia
Departement of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematic and Natural Science, University of Jember, Jember 68121, Indonesia
Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Jember, Jember 68121, Indonesia
Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Jember, Jember 65121, Indonesia

⁎Corresponding authors at: Graduate School of Biotechnology and Center for Development of Advanced Sciences and Technology (CDAST), University of Jember, Jember 68121, Indonesia. arisatia@unej.ac.id (Ari Satia Nugraha), triagus.faperta@unej.ac.id (Tri Agus Siswoyo)

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Elsevier and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Peer review under responsibility of King Saud University.

Abstract

Eighteen extracts of six medicinal plants of Meru Betiri National Park (Jember, Indonesia) were studied for their anti-diabetic potency as well as their antioxidant activities (DPPH, superoxide anion and hydroxyl radical scavenging). Total phenolic and flavonoid content were also determined. Total phenols and flavonoid content increased with polarity order, from hexane, ethyl acetate to methanol extracts. Similar pattern resulted in antioxidant activity testing. Ethyl acetate extract of Antidesma bunius, methanol extract of Lagerstroemia speciosa and Lunasia amara possessed higher α-amilase inhibition compared to standard inhibitor, acarbose. Moreover, ethyl acetate extract of Antidesma bunius, methnaol extract of Arcangelisia flava, Lagerstroemia speciosa, Lunasia amara and hexane fraction of Merremia mamosa indicated higher α-glucosidase inhibition compared to standard anti-diabetic drug, acarbose. The extracts with higher phenolic and flavonoid content did not always showed higher inhibition activities α-amilase and α-glucosidase. Overall, the six medicinal plants exhibited potent sources for diabetic mellitus medication.

Keywords

Antioxidant
Phenolic
Flavonoid
α-amilase inhibitor
α-glucosidase inhibtior
Anti-diabetic
Meru Betiri National Park
Indonesian medicinal plants
1

1 Introduction

Despite Indonesian economic growth has benefited to standard of living improvement, the expansion has caused life style changes among Indonesian into poor diets which contributed to increasing metabolic syndromes cases including diabetic mellitus. International diabetes federation estimated around 415 million people are living with diabetes in 2015 which the number did not include the untreated and yet undiagnosed. In Indonesia, the diseases became a serious problem in which epidemiologic studies indicates the number of diabetic mellitus cases was 10 million and has increased in productive age (Federation, 2016).

Indonesian archipelago is occupied by 40,000 endemic plants including over 7000 recorded medicinal plants. This has made the archipelago becomes the second largest biodiversity in the world. The indigenous people of Indonesia has relied on medicinal plants for their health need through generations (Nugraha and Keller, 2011). However, only around 200 Indonesian medicinal plants have been studied which include medicinal plants used in diabetic therapy.

Located in East Java, the Meru Betiri National Park is home for enormous number of flora yet few species have been identified. These diverse flora are part of diverse vegetation including mangrove, swamp and dense tropical forest (Darmadja et al., 2012). Initial medicinal plant research in Meru Betiri National Park have identified 266 medicinal plants. Our studies selected six medicinal plants which are traditional used by the indigenous people of Indonesia in diabetic therapy (Antidesma bunius (L) Spreng, Antidesma montanum Blume, Arcangelisia flava (L) Merr, Lagerstroemia speciosa (L) Pers, Lunasia amara Blanco, and Merremia mammosa Hall .f. This paper reported inhibition activities of extracts fractions (hexane, ethyl acetate, methanol) against α-amylase, α-glucosidase as well as their antioxidant potency.

2

2 Materials and methods

2.1

2.1 Plant samples

The leaves of A. bunius, A. montanum, A. flava, L. speciosa, L. amara, and M. mammosa were collected from Meru Betiri National Park and identified by a botanist at Purwodadi Botanical Garden (Pasuruhan-Indonesia). Voucher specimens were deposited at Centre for Development of Advance Science and Technology (CDAST), University of Jember (Jember-Indonesia) under accession number AB, AM, AF, LS, LA MM, respectively.

2.2

2.2 Extraction

Dried leaves (50 g) was powdered and transferred into conical flask (500 ml). Subsequent extractions was employed from hexane (250 ml), ethyl acetate (250 ml) and methanol (250 ml). Each fractions were separately vacuum dried to obtain hexane, ethyl acetate and methanol extracts. Percentage yield were calculated using formula below.

(1)
% yield = weight of crude extract weight of raw material × 100

2.3

2.3 Total phenolic and flavonoid content analysis

Total phenolic concentration was determined using gallic acid as a standard, adapted from a published method (Taga et al.,1984). Sample solutions (50 μl) were loaded into separate tubes (4 replicates). Solution of Na2CO3 (2% w/v, 1 ml) was added and the tubes were incubated for 2 min. Folin-ciocalteu (50% v/v, 50 μl) was added and the mixture were again incubated for 30 min. Absorbance was read at λ 750 nm and the total phenolic value was calculated in gallic acid equivalent (GAE) against gallic acid standard curve. The solution of extract was then used as working solution for the next experiments.

The flavonoid content was also determined using quercetin as a standard based on published method (Choi et al., 2002). Sample solutions (150 μl) were loaded into separate tubes (4 replicates). Distilled water (400 μl) and NaNO2 (5% w/v, 30 μl) were added and mixture were incubated for 5 min. AlCl3 (10%, w/v, 30 μl) were added and the mixture were again incubated for 6 min. NaOH (1M, 200 μl) and distilled water (240 μl) were added and the mixture were incubated for 6 min. Absorbance was read at 415 nm and the total flavonoids was calculated in quercetin equivalent against quercetin standard curve.

2.4

2.4 Antioxidant activity

2.4.1

2.4.1 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH)

The ability of the extract fractions to scavenge free radicals was determined using a DPPH microplate assay adapted from a published method (Soler-Rivas et al., 2000). Sample solutions (2 µg GAE/mL, 200 μl) were loaded into a 96-well plate (in replicates of 4) and serially diluted. A separate set of wells were loaded with 200 μl of either MeOH or vitamin C (1 mM, 50 μl) for the negative and positive controls, respectively. To the first three rows of sample solution, DPPH (90 μM, 100 μl) was added and thoroughly mixed, allowing the last row to be used to correct for background absorbance (Abs blank). Plates were incubated for 30 min in the absence of light before the absorbance at 515 nm was measured using a microplate reader. Lower absorbances signified higher scavenging activities. Free radical-scavenging activities were determined using Eq. (2). These percentage activities were graphed against logarithmic sample concentrations and the sample concentrations that sequestered 50% of the DPPH free radicals (i.e. loss of purple colour) were interpolated and are presented as IC50 mean ± s.d. values. All antioxidant activity data were tested for significant differences between each pair using student’s t-tests (α = 0.05).

(2)
Percentage activity = A 0 - A 1 A 0 × 100 %

2.4.2

2.4.2 Superoxide anion radical scavenging

Free radical scavenging activity was also determined using pirogalol based on a published method (Tang et al., 2010). To sample solutions (2 µg GAE/ml, 200 μl) in tube, tris-HCl buffer (pH 8.2, 50 mM, 1.7 ml) was added and the mixture was then incubated for 10 min. Pirogalol (10 mM in HCl 10 mM, 100 μl) was added. Absorbance was read at 320 nm using spectrophotometry UV–Vis. The percentage activities were graphed against logarithmic sample concentrations (Eq. (2)). Vitamin C (1 mM, 50 μl) was used as a standard.

2.4.3

2.4.3 Hydroxyl radical scavenging

The activity was determined using a standard published method (Halliwell et al., 1987). A solution of extract (2 µg GAE/ml, 150 μl), 2-deoxy-D-ribose (28 mM, 50 µl), in phosphate buffer (20 mM, pH 7.4), EDTA (1 mM, 100 μl), FeCl3 (10 mM, 100 μl), H2O2 (11 mM, 50 μl) and ascorbic acid (1 mM, 50 μl) was loaded into eppendorf tube. Solution of 2-tiobarbiturat (ATB) (1%, 500 μl) and ATC (2.8%, 500 μl) were added and the mixture was incubated at 37 °C for 1 h. Mixture was then vortexed and re-incubated at 100 °C for 20 min to produce pink coloration. The solution was then cooled to room temperature and its absorbance was measured using spectrophotometry UV–Vis at λ 532 nm. The scavenging percentage was calculated using Eq. (2). Ascorbic acid (1 mM, 50 μl) was used as a standard compound.

2.5

2.5 α-Amilase and α-glucosidase inhibition activity

2.5.1

2.5.1 α-Amylase inhibition

The capability to inhibit α-amilase was determined using a published method (Hashim et al., 2013). Sample (25 µg GAE/ml, 100 µl) was loaded into eppendorf tubes and labelled with S+ and S. DMSO (100 µl) was loaded into separate eppendorf tubes as control with label C+ and C. Enzym α-amylase (0.1 unit/ml, 150 µl) was loaded to the eppendorf labelled S+ and C+ while phosphate buffer (pH 6.9, 150 µl) was loaded to the eppendorf labelled S and C. Solutions were then incubated at 37 °C for 15 min. Starch (1% w/v in water, 250 μl) were added to the tubes and incubated at 37 °C for 15 min. The enzymatic reaction was stopped by boiling the tubes for 1 min using water bath. A portion of solution (160 μl) were taken from each eppendorf and transferred into empty eppendorf with similar label and boiled for 15 min. Reagent 3, 5-dinitrosalisilat (80 μl) and distilled water (720 μl) were added. Solution (200 μl) was taken and loaded into 96-well plates. A standard anti-diabetic, acarbose, was used as comparison. Percentage α-amylase inhibition of extracts were calculated using Eq. (3).

(3)
Percentage inhibition = ( C + - C - ) - ( S + - S - ) ( C + - C - ) × 100 %

2.5.2

2.5.2 α-Glucosidase inhibition

The α-glucosidase inhibition was determined by using adapted method from published protocol (Miyazawa et al., 2005). Maltose (0.125 nM, 100 μl) was loaded into eppendorf tubes and labelled with C+, C, S+, S. Sample solution (25 µg GAE/ml, 100 μl) was added into eppendorf tubes S+ and S while DMSO (100 μl) was added into C+ and C. Phosphate buffer (pH 7, 190 μl) was added into each tubes. The tubes were vortexed and α-glucosidase (1 unit/μL, 10 μl) was added into tubes C+ and S+ while aqua (10 μl) was added into tubes C and S. The tubes were then incubated at 37 °C for 1 h. Reaction was quenched by boiling the tubes at water bath for 3 min. Phenol buffer (pH 7, 5 μl) and peroxides (0.5 unit/μl, 5 μl) aminoantipyrine (4 mg/ml, 5 μl) and glucose oxidase (0.8 unit/μl, 5 μl) were added in each tubes. Mixture were then incubated at 37 °C for 10 min. A portion of solution (200 μl) was loaded into well plates and the absorbance was recorded at 500 nm using microplate reader. Percentage inhibition was calculated based on formula 3.

2.5.3

2.5.3 The kinetic of α-amylase inhibition

The kinetic was determined by using method described in Section 2.5.1 with serial concentrations starch 15, 0.5%, 0.25%, 0.125%, 0.0625% with incubation period of 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 21 min for each starch concentration. Lineweaver-Burk curve was obtained using the formula 4 below.

(4)
1 v 0 = K M V Max 1 [ S ] + 1 V Max

2.5.4

2.5.4 The kinetic of α-glucosidase inhibition

The determination was used the same protocol described in Section 2.5.3. with serial concentration of maltose 1 M, 0.5 M, 0.25 M, 0.125 M, and 0.0625 M with incubation time frame of 0, 10, 20, 40, 60 and 80 min.

3

3 Results and discussion

Separately, six medicinal plants were sequentially extracted using hexane, ethyl acetate and methanol which methanol extract majored the highest yield (Fig. 1).

Extraction yield of Antidesma bunius (Ab), Antidesma montanum (Am), Arcangelisia flava (Af), Lagerstroemia speciosa (Ls), Lunasia amara (La), and Merremia mammosa (Mm).
Fig. 1 Extraction yield of Antidesma bunius (Ab), Antidesma montanum (Am), Arcangelisia flava (Af), Lagerstroemia speciosa (Ls), Lunasia amara (La), and Merremia mammosa (Mm).

Phenols is common molecules of bioactive secondary metabolites was distributed more in the extracts in line with solvent (extraction) polarity order. From eighteen extracts, methanol extract of Lagerstroemia speciosa has the highest phenolic content with value of 425 ± 1.16 mg GAE/g (Table 1).

Table 1 Phenolic and flavonoid equivalent number of extracts.
Plant species Phenolic total (mg GAE/g) Flavonoid total (mg QE/g)
Hexane Ethyl acetate Methanol Hexane Ethyl acetate Methanol
Antidesma bunius 26.11 ± 2.44 79.26 ± 5.73 106.55 ± 3.84 102.17 ± 1.62 175.94 ± 3.53 396.70 ± 14.90
Antidesma montanum 38.44 ± 2.48 41.43 ± 2.22 52.44 ± 0.72 110.27 ± 5.28 207.74 ± 2.80 209.19 ± 16.43
Arcangelisia flava 23.36 ± 0.68 114.99 ± 4.83 135.25 ± 6.02 56.70 ± 3.78 141.04 ± 3.59 267.61 ± 1.92
Lagerstroemia speciosa 6.68 ± 0.33 161.17 ± 3.19 425.51 ± 1.16 69.75 ± 1.88 211.35 ± 3.33 647.92 ± 7.12
Lunasia amara Blanco 18.90 ± 0.47 33.18 ± 0.95 42.74 ± 0.70 63.45 ± 2.73 127.14 ± 5.36 105.13 ± 3.80
Merremia mammosa 23.12 ± 0.92 157.05 ± 3.11 359.92 ± 10.77 215.62 ± 6.67 160.88 ± 2.00 449.46 ± 4.30

Note: GAE: Gallic acid equivalent; Quercetin equivalent.

The similar pattern was showed in the distribution of flavonoid contents in the different solvent extracts in which methanol extract Lagerstroemia speciosa possessed the highest flavonoid content with a value of 647.96 ± 7.12 mg QE/g.

Antioxidant molecules involves in protective mechanism of living cells against oxidative stress which could occur due to native metabolism activities or harsh environment. Prolonged oxidative stress can cause cell components malfunction, cell necrosis and lead to organ failure. Antioxidant active medicinal plants intake might suppress the oxidative stress preventing from pathologic condition (Fang et al., 2002; Lobo et al., 2010).

The three different antioxidant experiments showed the activities were proportional with phenolic and flavonoid content of the extracts (Tables 2 and 3). In the DPPH experiment, the methanol of Arcangelisia flava and Merreimia mammosa had higher activity against standard antioxidant, vitamin C with IC50 value of 0.57 ± 0.01, 0.79 ± 0.10 and 0.92 ± 0.19 μg GAE/ml, respectively.

Table 2 DPPH scavenging activity of plant extracts.
Plant species Antioxidant activity (IC50, μg GAE/ml)
Hexane Ethyl acetate Methanol
Antidesma bunius 2.93 ± 0.31 2.70 ± 0.21 1.40 ± 0.04
Antidesma montanum 2.50 ± 0.17 4.76 ± 1.20 3.01 ± 0.43
Arcangelisia flava 1.41 ± 0.02 0.80 ± 0.02 0.57 ± 0.01
Lagerstroemia speciosa 4.90 ± 0.50 1.42 ± 0.07 0.79 ± 0.10
Lunasia amara Blanco 13.60 ± 0.40 3.33 ± 0.13 3.32 ± 0.19
Merremia mammosa 1.36 ± 0.05 0.70 ± 0.01 0.69 ± 0.02
Asam Askorbat 0.92 ± 0.19
Table 3 Percentage inhibition of hydroxyl and superoxide anion radical scavenging of plant extracts.
Plant species Hydroxyl radical scavenging (%) Superoxide anion radical scavenging (%)
Hexane Ethyl acetate Methanol Hexane Ethyl acetate Methanol
Antidesma bunius 41.81 ± 2.28 46.11 ± 0.80 48.55 ± 0.80 22.81 ± 2.78 10.81 ± 1.75 47.71 ± 1.46
Antidesma montanum 26.95 ± 2.01 19.16 ± 2.28 34.73 ± 0.88 1.87 ± 0.41 5.31 ± 1.70 27.46 ± 2.28
Arcangelisia flava 59.25 ± 0.25 73.07 ± 0.96 90.51 ± 0.08 16.74 ± 0.04 22.16 ± 0.73 12.17 ± 0.11
Lagerstroemia speciosa 18.12 ± 0.35 48.08 ± 0.00 50.64 ± 0.73 11.03 ± 4.20 33.03 ± 4.76 36.56 ± 6.51
Lunasia amara Blanco 1.74 ± 0.70 38.68 ± 0.00 40.07 ± 0.70 8.76 ± 2.80 28.20 ± 5.88 27.54 ± 2.87
Merremia mammosa 64.55 ± 0.22 82.66 ± 2.88 91.76 ± 0.38 20.61 ± 0.84 18.67 ± 1.35 25.44 ± 1.21
Ascorbic acid 88.78 ± 0.08 20.43 ± 0.57

In the hydroxyl radical scavenging activity, methanol extracts of Arcangelisia flava and Merremia mammosa indicated higher inhibition than the standard antioxidant, vitamin C with value of 90.51 ± 0.08%, 91.76 ± 0.38%, 88.78 ± 0.08%, respectively. Compared to the less polar extracts (hexane and ethyl acetate extracts), methanol extracts of the six medicinal plants possessed higher antioxidant activity against superoxide anion radicals.

Acarbose is a standard drugs in diabetes mellitus therapy which is able to reduce the level of sugar in the bloods by inhibiting metabolic decomposition of carbohydrate. The acarbose treatment is commonly used in diabetes therapy related with cells response failure to insulin's property.

Six medicinal plants (Antidesma bunius, Antidesma montanum, Arcangelisia flava, Lagerstroemia speciosa, Lunasia amara and Merreimia mammosa), were reported to have anti-diabetic activity. Eighteen extract showed inhibition activity against α-amilase and α-glucosidase (Table 4). Ethyl acetate extract of Antidesma bunius indicated the highest inhibition among the other extract. Moreover, the extract had higher inhibition compared to standard drug, acarbose, with inhibition value of 95.39 ± 4.27%, 91.06 ± 2.15%, respectively. Further experiment showed 10 extracts to have α-glucosidase inhibition with percentage inhibition value higher than acarbose (Table 4).

Table 4 α-amilase and α-glucosidase inhibition.
Plant sepecies Inhibition (%)
α-amilase α-glukosidase
Hexane Ethyl acetate Methanol Hexane Ethyl acetate Methanol
Antidesma bunius 82.45 ± 1.84 95.39 ± 4.27 41.31 ± 4.83 53.01 ± 3.10 93.17 ± 4.95 5.04 ± 1.49
Antidesma montanum 16.84 ± 0.31 46.45 ± 4.03 15.25 ± 1.63 79.84 ± 3.46 17.89 ± 1.57 25.37 ± 1.76
Arcangelisia flava 43.18 ± 0.79 64.24 ± 3.53 3.48 ± 1.60 61.23 ± 3.20 78.96 ± 2.28 95.04 ± 3.55
Lagerstroemia speciosa 54.42 ± 2.36 58.50 ± 11.19 90.82 ± 2.70 79.77 ± 0.65 27.64 ± 1.31 94.44 ± 0.43
Lunasia amara 69.73 ± 4.71 86.39 ± 2.57 90.49 ± 2.95 32.62 ± 1.31 66.10 ± 0.89 83.33 ± 3.20
Merremia mammosa 47.73 ± 1.20 43.03 ± 2.15 11.82 ± 1.20 66.19 ± 0.41 52.25 ± 2.87 12.77 ± 2.56
Acarbose 91.06 ± 2.15 54.85 ± 1.48

Interestingly, the α-amylase and α-glucosidase inhibition activity of the extracts did not always agree with total phenol and flavonoid content (Table 4). For example, ethyl acetate extract of Antidesma bunius, Arcangelisa flava and Lunasia amara gave higher inhibtion than the standard (acarbose). Moreover, hexane extract of Antidesma montanum showed higher α-glucosidase than acarbose. These suggested that α-amylase and α-glucosidase inhibition activity might be correlated with non-phenolic or non-flavonoid bioactive constituents.

The enzyme inhibition was kinetically studied on selected extracts, methanol extract of Lagerstroemia speciosa, ethyl acetate extracts of Arcangelisia flava and Antidesma bunius (Fig. 2 and Table 5). The Lineweaver-Burk curve of Arcangelisia flava extract showed the cross section at value of x < 0 and y > 0 indicated non-competitive enzyme inhibition. From the graph, the extract of Lagerstroemia speciosa and Antidesma bunius showed competitive inhibition which referred to selective interaction of the extract with active site of enzymes. Inhibition interaction of extracts and enzyme interaction was clearly indicated from decreasing of KM values compared to the control (Table 5).

Lineweaver-Burk curve of α-amilase and α-glucosidase inhibition of Arcangelisia flava (a, b), Antidesma bunius (c, d), Lagerstroemia speciosa (e, f).
Fig. 2 Lineweaver-Burk curve of α-amilase and α-glucosidase inhibition of Arcangelisia flava (a, b), Antidesma bunius (c, d), Lagerstroemia speciosa (e, f).
Table 5 Kinetic study of α-amilase and α-glukosidase.
Plant species α-Amilase α-Glukosidase
Control Extract Control Extract
Af Vmax (μM/min) 7.84 ± 0.29 6.17 ± 0.29 3.12 ± 0.28 2.93 ± 0.20
KM (mM) 3.81 ± 0.01 4.66 ± 0.47 114.24 ± 15.69 170.90 ± 10.28
Ls Vmax (μM/min) 17.49 ± 1.01 17.18 ± 5.98 3.18 ± 0.06 2.74 ± 0.04
KM (mM) 3.19 ± 0.31 4.77 ± 2.21 106.63 ± 5.91 136.64 ± 8,88
Ab Vmax (μM/min) 13.24 ± 0.18 13.34 ± 0.38 22.96 ± 1.35 67.64 ± 1.40
KM (mM) 0.36 ± 0.01 0.43 ± 0.01 2.251 ± 0.03 7.08 ± 0.22

Note: Af: Arcangelisia flava; Ls: Lagerstroemia speciosa; Ab: Antidesma bunius.

4

4 Conclusions

To summarise, the six medicinal plants showed a potent activity for α-amylase and α-glucosidase inhibition agents which confirmed the traditional uses of the plants in diabetes mellitus therapy.

Funding

The research grant was supported by Ministry Research Technology and Higher Education, University of Jember-Indonesia.

Conflict of interest

The authors declared that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. , , , , , , , , . Antioxidant activity and free radical scavenging capacity between Korean medicinal plants and flavonoids by assay-guided comparison. Plant Sci.. 2002;163:1161-1168.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Darmadja, B., Indarto, B., Syarif, N.R., Ananda, A.A., Guntoro, D.A., 2012. Keanekaragaman hayati flora dan fauna di taman nasional Meru Betiri. Jember, Kementerian Kehutanan Direktorat jenderal Perlindaungan Hutan dan Konservasi Alam Balai Taman Nasional Meru Betiri, pp. 29–36.
  3. , , , . Free radicals, antioxidants, and nutrition. Nutrition.. 2002;18:872-879.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Federation, I.D., 2016. Indonesia. <http://www.idf.org/membership/wp/indonesia> (accessed, 20.03.16)
  5. , , , . The deoxyribose method: a simple “test-tube” assay for determination of rate constants for reactions of hydroxyl radicals. Anal. Biochem.. 1987;165:215-219.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , , . Antioxidant and a-amylase inhibitory property of Phyllanthus virgatus L.: an in vitro and molecular interaction study. BioMed Res. Int.. 2013;2013:1-12.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , . Free radicals, antioxidants and functional foods: impact on human health. Pharmacogn. Rev.. 2010;4:118-126.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , . Inhibitory compounds of α-glucosidase activity from Arctium lappa L. J. Oleo Sci.. 2005;54:589-594.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , . Revealing indigenous Indonesian traditional medicine: anti-infective agents. Nat. Prod. Comm.. 2011;6:1953-1966.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , . An easy and fast test to compare total free radical scavenger capacity of foodstuffs. Phytochem. Anal.. 2000;11:330-338.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , . Chia seeds as a source of natural lipid antioxidants. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc.. 1984;61:928-931.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , , , , . Peptide Fractionation and Free Radical Scavenging Activity of Zein Hydrolysate. J. Agric. Food Chem.. 2010;58:587-593.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections