5.2
Impact Factor
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Corrigendum
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Full Length Article
Full lenth article
Letter to Editor
Original Article
Research article
Retraction
Retraction notice
Review
Review Article
SPECIAL ISSUE: ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY
5.3
Impact Factor
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Corrigendum
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Full Length Article
Full lenth article
Letter to Editor
Original Article
Research article
Retraction
Retraction notice
Review
Review Article
SPECIAL ISSUE: ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original article
10 (
2_suppl
); S2138-S2144
doi:
10.1016/j.arabjc.2013.07.046

Solvothermal synthesis of Zn1−xMnxO nanoparticles using oxalate precursor route: Optical and magnetic properties

Nanochemistry Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi 110025, India
Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Tabuk, Tabuk 71491, Saudi Arabia

⁎Corresponding author. Tel.: +91 11 26981717x3261; fax: +91 11 26980229. tahmad3@jmi.ac.in (Tokeer Ahmad)

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Elsevier and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Peer review under responsibility of King Saud University.

Abstract

Nanoparticles of Zn1−xMnxO (x = 0.022, 0.061 and 0.098) were synthesized by a modified solvothermal method through the oxalate precursor route. The precursors were characterized by TG/DTA analysis. Their kinetics has also been studied using the Freeman and Carroll method. The prepared oxide nanoparticles were investigated by powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), optical and BET surface area studies. PXRD patterns were matched with hexagonal ZnO structure, however few impurity peaks of ZnMnO3 appeared. Reflectance measurements showed that Mn2+ is incorporated in the Zn matrix. The band gap decreases on increasing Mn concentration. The particle size decreases from 18 to 9 nm and the surface area increases (255.4–582.9 m2g−1) on increasing Mn concentration. All these solid solutions show paramagnetic behaviour with very weak antiferromagnetic interactions. The effective magnetic moment of these nanoparticles comes out to be 4.91, 4.77 and 4.18 μB/Mn2+.

Keywords

Mn-doped ZnO
Nanoparticles
Thermogravimetry
Transmission electron microscopy
Surface area
Magnetic properties
1

1 Introduction

Incorporating impurity ions into a semiconducting host to extend its properties has been one of the most important techniques that paved the way for the modern technology based on spintronic devices. Compared with conventional semiconductor devices, the potential advantages of spintronic devices are to increase data processing speeds, decrease electric power consumption and increase integration densities. Experimentally, room temperature ferromagnetism has been reported in V (Hong et al., 2005), Co (Jayakumar et al., 2006), Ni (Schwartz et al., 2004), Fe (Karmarkar et al., 2007), Cu (Herng et al., 2007) and Mn (Guo et al., 2008) doped ZnO systems. The key need for achieving practical applications of spintronic devices is to increase the Curie temperature Tc of dilute magnetic semiconducting material to above room temperature.

Among all the transition metal doped ZnO, Mn-doped ZnO has its own advantage because of its intrinsic physical properties of a large magnetic moment due to the half-filled 3d band and relatively small ionic radius difference between Mn2+ (0.66 Å) and Zn2+ (0.60 Å) host cation (Sato and Yoshida, 2002; Mandal et al., 2006). Several experimental reports are available in the literature for the appearance of ferromagnetism above room temperature in Mn-doped ZnO synthesized by different methods such as solid state reaction, chemical and citrate method (Theodoropoulou et al., 2003; Norberg et al., 2004; Radovanovic and Gamelin, 2003; Sluiter et al., 2005) and also on thin films made under non-equilibrium conditions (Neal et al., 2006; Cho et al., 2002; Kittilstved et al., 2005; Heo et al., 2004). However, controversy between the research groups was reported on the magnetic behaviour of these materials. Sol–gel synthesis of Mn doped ZnO (1, 2, 3, 4, 5 at.%) showed different magnetic behaviour with different Mn concentration. 1% Mn exhibit diamagnetism, however 5% Mn show both paramagnetic and ferromagnetic behaviour (Omri et al., 2013). Recently, Mn-doped ZnO of a similar composition has been reported using reverse micelles (Khatoon et al., 2012) in which the size of nanoparticles was comparatively high (20–50 nm). Very recently, Zn0.69Mn0.31O (2–5 nm) nanoparticles exhibit paramagnetic behaviour with antiferromagnetic coupling (Khatoon et al., 2013).

In this paper, we report the optical and magnetic properties of Zn1−xMnxO nanoparticles synthesized by the solvothermal method through the oxalate precursor route. Recently, this method has been used for the preparation of nanocrystalline Zn1−xNixO (Khatoon and Ahmad, 2012), Cd1−xMxO (M = Mn and Ni) (Ahmad et al., 2013; Ahmad et al., 2013) and In2−xMxO3 (M = Mn and Ni) (Khatoon et al., 2012; Ahmad et al., 2013) with controlled morphology. Using this method, we have achieved a very high surface area for these nanoparticles for the first time.

2

2 Experimental

Zn1−xMnxO (x = 0.022, 0.061 and 0.098) nanoparticles were synthesized by the solvothermal method through the oxalate precursor route. All metal salt solutions were prepared in double distilled water of 0.1 M concentration. Stoichiometric amounts of zinc acetate dihydrate (CDH, 98.5%) and manganese acetate tetrahydrate (CDH, 99%) were well mixed in a 500 mL round bottom flask and stirred for about 30 min. The mixture was precipitated with 75 mL of aqueous solution of ammonium oxalate. A white suspension immediately formed. 75 mL of ethanol was also added to the reaction mixture to form the low boiling azeotrope with water. The reaction mixture was refluxed at about 80 °C for 12 h in the closed environment so that the volume of reaction mixture remains constant. The precipitate was recovered by centrifugation, washed several times with water and finally with acetone. The precipitate was dried in an oven at 55 °C and finally ground to powder. Zn1−xMnxO nanoparticles were obtained by thermal decomposition of the precursor at 450 °C for 6 h in air.

3

3 Characterization techniques

The crystalline phases of Zn1−xMnxO were characterized by powder X-ray diffraction using a Bruker D8 Advance X-ray diffractometer with Ni-filtered Cu-Kα radiation. Normal scans were recorded with a step size of 0.050° and step time of 1 s. Thermal decomposition of the samples were studied by thermogravimetry (TG) and DTA with a EXSTAR 6000 instrument in nitrogen atmosphere at a heating rate of 15 °C min−1 with alumina as a reference sample. The order of reaction and activation energy can be calculated from the thermogram using Freeman and Carroll relation (Freeman and Carroll, 1958): ( - E / 2.3 R ) Δ ( 1 / T ) Δ log W r = - x + Δ log ( dw / dt ) Δ log W r where E is the activation energy, R is the gas constant, dw, dt and ΔT are the change in mass, time and temperature (in kelvin) respectively and Wr is the change in dw. The activation energy was determined from the slope (−E/2.3 R) by plotting a graph of [Δlog(dw/dt)/ΔlogWr] Vs [Δ(T)−1/ΔlogWr].

The composition of solid solutions was estimated by ICP-MS analysis using Agilent 7500a Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) with MS Detector. The crystal size and morphology have been studied by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) using FEI Technai G2 20 transmission electron microscope with an accelerating voltage of 200 kV. The TEM specimens were prepared by dispersing the samples in ethanol and placing a drop of the dispersed sample in a copper grid. Room temperature optical properties were recorded using the ocean optics lambda-25 UV–visible spectrophotometer in the reflectance mode. The powder samples were compacted to pellets. The energy band gap of these nanoparticles can be further calculated by the reflection spectra using the Kubelka–Munk remission function F(R) (Kortum, 1969): F ( R ) = ( 1 - R ) 2 / 2 R where R is the diffuse reflectance

Specific surface areas of the samples were determined by Quantachrome instruments (Model NOVA 2000e surface area and pore size analyser). Samples were degassed at 250 °C for 3 h in vacuum because of the removal of any adsorbed gases. After degassing, specific surface areas were obtained from the nitrogen adsorption experiments measured at 77.35 K. Magnetic properties of as-prepared Zn1−xMnxO (x = 0.022, 0.061 and 0.098) nanoparticles were investigated using a Quantum design physical properties measurement system.

4

4 Results and discussion

Fig. 1 shows TG and DTA curves recorded at 15 °C min−1 up to 500 °C for the thermal decomposition of Mn-doped zinc oxalate precursors in nitrogen atmosphere. The TG curves display two well-defined weight loss steps. The first one is attributed to the loss of water of hydration of Mn-doped zinc oxalate in the temperature range 95–200 °C. The measured weight loss accompanying this step is about 18.5% of the total weight resulting in the elimination of two water molecules. It is characterized by a broad endothermic DTA peak in the temperature range of 105–220 °C. This dehydration step was found to be completed at about 200 °C. The anhydrous oxalate was thermally stable up to 330 °C after which it starts to decompose in the second TG step. Heating from 330–440 °C results in a complete collapse of the material to its corresponding oxides with the simultaneous evolution of CO and CO2. The decarbonylation and decarboxylation reactions are characterized by the two exothermic DTA peaks in the temperature range 330–410 °C and 410–450 °C respectively, attributed to the decomposition of anhydrous oxalate with the formation of carbonate followed by the formation of its corresponding oxides. The residual weight corresponds to Mn-doped ZnO, which is confirmed by powder X-ray diffraction studies. On the basis of TG and DTA results, brown precipitate of Zn1−xMnxO (x = 0.022, 0.061 and 0.098) nanoparticles were obtained by the decomposition of precursors at 450 °C for 6 h.

(1)
Zn 1 - x Mn x C 2 O 4 . 2 H 2 O 95 - 200 ° C Zn 1 - x Mn x C 2 O 4 + 2 H 2 O
(2)
Zn 1 - x Mn x C 2 O 4 330 - 410 ° C Zn 1 - x Mn x CO 3 + CO
(3)
Zn 1 - x Mn x CO 3 410 - 440 ° C Zn 1 - x Mn x O + CO 2
The order of reaction for 2.08, 5.95 and 9.69% Mn-doped ZnC2O4.2H2O has been calculated from Freeman and Carroll plot (Fig. 2) and found to be 0.76, 0.88 and 0.74 respectively which is nearly the same for all the three compositions. The estimated activation energy comes out to be 290, 303 and 334 kJ/mol respectively. It has been observed that the activation energy increases on increasing Mn concentration from 2.08% to 9.69%. This may be due to the less electronegativity of Mn (1.55) than that of Zn (1.69). As a result, positive charge increases on Zn2+ ion, resulting in strengthening of C-OI bond (Knaepen et al., 1996). As the C-OI bond becomes stronger, activation energy increases.
TG/DTA curves of Zn1−xMnxC2O4 nanoparticles for x = (a) 0.021, (b) 0.059, and (c) 0.097.
Figure 1 TG/DTA curves of Zn1−xMnxC2O4 nanoparticles for x = (a) 0.021, (b) 0.059, and (c) 0.097.
[Δlog (dw/dt)/ΔlogWr] Vs [Δ(T)−1/ΔlogWr] plot for the determination of order of reaction and activation energy of Zn1−xMnxC2O4 nanoparticles for x = (a) 0.021, (b) 0.059 and (c) 0.097.
Figure 2 [Δlog (dw/dt)/ΔlogWr] Vs [Δ(T)−1/ΔlogWr] plot for the determination of order of reaction and activation energy of Zn1−xMnxC2O4 nanoparticles for x = (a) 0.021, (b) 0.059 and (c) 0.097.

The XRD patterns of the obtained oxides after calcination at 450 °C are shown in Fig. 3. The XRD pattern of Mn-doped ZnO demonstrated highly crystalline wurtzite ZnO (JCPDS No. 80-0075). However, few impurity peaks of ZnMnO3 have been detected (marked as ∗). The formation of ZnMnO3 will start immediately after surpassing the solubility limit of Mn2+ in ZnO reaching its maxima (Saraf et al., 2010). XRD results showed that the solubility limit of Mn2+ ions in ZnO is less than 2.19% because a new phase of ZnMnO3 arises which is clearly seen in the XRD pattern (Kim et al., 2010; Omri et al., 2013). The ionic radii of Mn2+ (0.66 Å) is greater than Zn2+ (0.60 Å), due to this, the larger Mn cations come out from the wurtzite structure to form the ZnMnO3 impurity (Ruby et al., 2007).
Powder X-ray diffraction pattern of Zn1−xMnxO nanoparticles for x = (a) 0.022, (b) 0.061, and (c) 0.098.
Figure 3 Powder X-ray diffraction pattern of Zn1−xMnxO nanoparticles for x = (a) 0.022, (b) 0.061, and (c) 0.098.

The actual percentage of manganese in the doped Zn-oxalate and zinc oxide nanoparticles was obtained by ICP-MS analysis. Result showed that the amount of manganese incorporated into the Zn host lattice is less than the amount of Mn used during the synthesis. This may be due to the less solubility of Mn than Zn. The ICP data and estimated molecular formula of Zn1-xMnxC2O4 and Zn1−xMnxO using ICP is shown in Tables 1 and 2 respectively.

Table 1 Estimated composition of Zn1−xMnxC2O4 using ICP-MS studies.
S. no. Amount of Mn used in synthesis (%) ICP-MS for Zn1−xMnxC2O4 Estimated composition
Zn (%) Mn (%)
1 5 97.92 2.08 Zn0.979Mn0.021C2O4
2 10 94.05 5.95 Zn0.941Mn0.059C2O4
3 15 90.31 9.69 Zn0.903Mn0.097C2O4
Table 2 Estimated composition of Zn1−xMnxO using ICP-MS studies.
S. no. Amount of Mn used in synthesis (%) ICP-MS for Zn1−xMnxO Estimated Composition
Zn (%) Mn (%)
1 5 97.81 2.19 Zn0.978Mn0.022O
2 10 93.86 6.14 Zn0.939Mn0.061O
3 15 90.20 9.80 Zn0.902Mn0.098O

The morphology and particle size have been estimated from transmission electron microscopic (TEM) studies. The TEM micrograph of Zn1−xMnxO (x = 0.022, 0.061 and 0.098) nanoparticles, shown in Fig. 4, indicates that the particles are uniform in size and hexagonal in shape. The average grain size estimated from these micrographs was found to be 18, 15 and 9 nm respectively which decreases on increasing Mn concentration in Zn lattice. The decrease in average particle size with increasing dopant ion concentration may be due to the lattice distortion and the internal stress which arises from the radius difference between Mn2+ and Zn2+ (Wei et al., 2008; Lee et al., 1998, Ahmad et al., 2013).

TEM micrographs of Zn1−xMnxO nanoparticles for x = (a) 0.022, (b) 0.061, and (c) 0.098.
Figure 4 TEM micrographs of Zn1−xMnxO nanoparticles for x = (a) 0.022, (b) 0.061, and (c) 0.098.

Room temperature UV–visible spectroscopic measurements were carried out in the range 200–900 nm to study the effect of manganese doping on the band gap of ZnO. Fig. 5 shows the reflectance spectra of Mn-doped ZnO nanoparticles. The first absorption band appeared at around 360 nm, which is the characteristic absorption edge of ZnO. Apart from the band gap transition, other absorption edges were also appeared. The second strong absorption in the range of 410–510 nm corresponds to the 6A1(S) → 4T2(G) transition at Mn2+ sites. Similar spin forbidden transition is reported earlier for Mn-doped ZnO system (Norberg et al., 2004; Fukumura et al., 1999; Bates et al., 1966; Jin et al., 2000; Deka and Joy, 2007). This may be due to the lattice distortion which arises because of the incorporation of larger Mn2+ ions in ZnO matrix (Norberg et al., 2004; Fukumura et al., 1999; Bates et al., 1966; Jin et al., 2000; Deka and Joy, 2007). A weak absorption peak appearing at around 680 nm may be due to spin forbidden 6A1 (S) → 4T1 (G) transition of Mn2+ (Bates et al., 1966; Deka and Joy, 2007). Thus, optical studies confirmed the presence of Mn2+ ions in tetrahedral sites. The band gap of these nanoparticles is calculated from the Kubelka–Munk plot (Fig. 6) and comes out to be 3.32, 3.30 and 3.28 nm respectively which decreases on increasing Mn concentration from 2.19% to 9.8% respectively. The decrease in the band gap may be due to the sp-d exchange interactions between the band electrons and the localized d electrons of the substituted Mn2+ ions (Ogale et al., 2003; Park and Kim, 2003; Bouloudenine et al., 2004; Colis et al., 2006; Bouaine et al., 2007; Khatoon and Ahmad, 2012; Khatoon et al., 2013).

UV–visible reflectance spectra of Zn1−xMnxO (x = 0.022, 0.061 and 0.098) nanoparticles.
Figure 5 UV–visible reflectance spectra of Zn1−xMnxO (x = 0.022, 0.061 and 0.098) nanoparticles.
[F(R) × Eg]2 versus energy plot for direct band gap determination of Zn1−xMnxO (x = 0.022, 0.061 and 0.098) nanoparticles.
Figure 6 [F(R) × Eg]2 versus energy plot for direct band gap determination of Zn1−xMnxO (x = 0.022, 0.061 and 0.098) nanoparticles.

Fig. 7 shows the N2 adsorption–desorption isotherm of Mn-doped ZnO nanoparticles. Isotherm displays the type IV curve with H3 type hysteresis loop. This type of hysteresis loop usually appeared for mesoporous materials (Sing et al., 1985). The specific surface area of these nanoparticles is estimated from BET plots in the P/P0 ranging from 0.05 to 0.30 and comes out to be 255.4, 520.4 and 582.9 m2g−1 respectively. This is the highest value of the surface area as reported earlier to the best of our knowledge. It has been observed that the surface area increases on increasing the dopant ion concentration. This may be due to the decrease in particle size. The pore size has been determined from the BJH method (Fig. 8) and found to be 18.38, 16.42 and 16.39 Å respectively. The increase in surface area and decrease in pore radius on increasing the Mn concentration are attributed to the decrease in average grain size due to an increase in disorder with the incorporation of Mn ions in Zn matrix (Barick et al., 2008). Variations of surface area, pore radius and particle size of Mn-doped ZnO have been tabulated in Table 3.

Nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms of Zn1−xMnxO (x = 0.022, 0.061 and 0.098) nanoparticles.
Figure 7 Nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms of Zn1−xMnxO (x = 0.022, 0.061 and 0.098) nanoparticles.
BJH plot of Zn1−xMnxO (x = 0.022, 0.061 and 0.098) nanoparticles.
Figure 8 BJH plot of Zn1−xMnxO (x = 0.022, 0.061 and 0.098) nanoparticles.
Table 3 BET surface area, BJH pore radius and particle size of Zn1−xMnxO (x = 0.022, 0.061 and 0.098) nanoparticles.
Composition Particle size (nm) BET surface area (m2g−1) BJH pore radius (Å)
Zn0.978Mn0.022O 18 255.4 18.38
Zn0.939Mn0.061O 15 520.4 16.42
Zn0.902Mn0.098O 9 582.9 16.40

The temperature dependence (5 K < T < 300 K) of the molar magnetic susceptibility and inverse molar magnetic susceptibility of Mn-doped ZnO solid solutions is plotted in Fig. 9. The molar magnetic susceptibility decreases continuously with increasing temperature, indicating the paramagnetic behaviour of the samples. It can be clearly seen from the inverse molar susceptibility versus temperature plot that χ M - 1 vary linearly with temperature. The result is consistent with the Curie–Weiss equation χ = C / ( T + θ ) where, χ is the magnetic susceptibility, C is the Curie constant and θ is the Curie–Weiss temperature. The Curie–Weiss temperature for Zn1−xMnxO (x = 0.022, 0.061 and 0.098) is close to zero. The exact temperature ranges of Curie–Weiss behaviour depend on the composition of the solid solutions. Using the least square fitting procedure, Curie constants and the effective magnetic moment have been determined and come out to be −0.4, −7 and −12 K respectively. This indicates the antiferromagnetic exchange between Mn ions is very weak. The calculated effective magnetic moment, μeff comes out to be 4.91, 4.67 and 4.18 μB/Mn2+ respectively. It is found that μeff for the sample with low doping concentration (x = 0.022) is consistent with the theoretical value (5 μB/Mn2+), indicating the presence of Mn2+. However, the effective magnetic moment decreases on increasing the Mn concentration. The lower value of the effective magnetic moment may be due to some mixed valence state at manganese site.

Temperature dependence of molar magnetic susceptibility and inverse susceptibility plot of Zn1−xMnxO (x = 0.022, 0.061 and 0.098) nanoparticles measured at magnetic field of 1 kOe.
Figure 9 Temperature dependence of molar magnetic susceptibility and inverse susceptibility plot of Zn1−xMnxO (x = 0.022, 0.061 and 0.098) nanoparticles measured at magnetic field of 1 kOe.

Additional information of magnetic behaviour can be achieved from magnetic field versus magnetic moment curve (Fig. 10). All curves passing to zero, confirmed the paramagnetic nature of Mn-doped ZnO nanoparticles. Hence all the studies provide strong evidence that the 2.2% Mn ions were completely substituted in ZnO matrix.

Magnetic field versus magnetic moment plot of Zn1−xMnxO (x = 0.022, 0.061 and 0.098) nanoparticles measured at temperature of 5 K.
Figure 10 Magnetic field versus magnetic moment plot of Zn1−xMnxO (x = 0.022, 0.061 and 0.098) nanoparticles measured at temperature of 5 K.

5

5 Conclusions

Zn1−xMnxO (x = 0.022, 0.061 and 0.098) nanoparticles have been synthesized by the solvothermal method through the oxalate precursor route. The kinetic analysis according to the Freeman and Carroll method showed an increase in activation energy with increasing manganese concentration. XRD results revealed that the solubility limit of Mn2+ ions in ZnO is less than 2.2%. The appearance of 6A1(S) → 4T1(G) and 4T1 → 4A2 transitions confirmed the incorporation of Mn2+ in ZnO lattice. The energy band gap of these nanoparticles decreases on increasing Mn content. TEM studies showed that the particle size decreases (18 to 9 nm) on increasing Mn concentration. The very high surface area of 255.4, 520.4 and 582.9 m2g−1 respectively has been obtained for the first time. All the samples showed paramagnetism with very weak antiferromagnetic interactions. Collective evidence from X-ray diffraction, reflectance and magnetic measurements suggests that Mn2+ is incorporated in ZnO lattice site.

Acknowledgements

TA thanks to CSIR, Govt. of India for financial support of the research project (No. 01(2448)/10EMR-II). The authors also thank Prof. K. V. Ramanujachary, Rowan University (USA) for ICP and magnetic measurements. SK thanks UGC and CSIR, New Delhi, India for research fellowships.

References

  1. , , , . Mater. Res. Bull.. 2013;48:3065.
  2. , , , , . J. Alloys Compd.. 2013;558:117.
  3. , , , , . J. Mater. Res.. 2013;28:1245.
  4. , , , , . J. Phys. Chem. C. 2008;112:15163.
  5. , , , . J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem.. 1966;28:397.
  6. , , , , , , . J. Phys. Chem. C. 2007;111:2924.
  7. , , , , . Chem. Phys. Lett.. 2004;397:73.
  8. , , , , , . Appl. Phys. Lett.. 2002;80:3358.
  9. , , , , , , . Chem. Phys. Lett.. 2006;422:529.
  10. , , . Solid State Commun.. 2007;142:190.
  11. , , . J. Phys. Chem.. 1958;62(4):394.
  12. , , , , , . Appl. Phys. Lett.. 1999;75:3366.
  13. , , , , , , . J. Phys. Chem. C. 2008;112:8832.
  14. , , , , , , , , , . Appl. Phys. Lett.. 2004;84:2292.
  15. , , , , , , , . Appl. Phys. Lett.. 2007;90:032509.
  16. , , , . J. Appl. Phys.. 2005;97:10D312.
  17. , , , . Adv. Mater.. 2006;18:1857.
  18. , , , , , , , . J. Cryst. Growth. 2000;55:214.
  19. , , , , , , , , , . Phys. Rev. B. 2007;75:144404.
  20. , , . J. Mat. Sci. Eng. B. 2012;2(6):325.
  21. , , , . Bull. Mater. Sci.. 2012;35:377.
  22. , , , , . J. Alloys Compd.. 2012;545:162.
  23. , , , , , , . Mater. Chem. Phys.. 2013;138:519.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. , , , , , , , . J. Korean Phys. Soc.. 2010;56:472.
  25. , , , . Phys. Rev. Lett.. 2005;94:147209.
  26. , , , , . Thermochim. Acta. 1996;284:213.
  27. , . Reflectance Spectroscopy: Principles, Methods, Applications. New York: Springer; .
  28. , , , , , , , . Appl. Phys. Lett.. 1998;72:299.
  29. , , , , . Appl. Phys. Lett.. 2006;89:144105.
  30. , , , , , , , . Phys. Rev. Lett.. 2006;96:197208.
  31. , , , , , , . J. Am. Chem. Soc.. 2004;126:9387.
  32. , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Phys. Rev. Lett.. 2003;91:077205.
  33. , , , , , , . Superlattices Microstruct.. 2013;60:139.
  34. , , . J. Appl. Phys.. 2003;94:6401.
  35. , , . Phys. Rev. Lett.. 2003;91:157202.
  36. , , , , , , . Phys. Rev. B. 2007;75:155322.
  37. , , , , . J. Sol–Gel Sci. Technol.. 2010;53:141.
  38. , , . Semicond. Sci. Technol.. 2002;17:367.
  39. , , , . Appl. Phys. Lett.. 2004;85:1395.
  40. , , , , , , , . Phys. Rev. Lett.. 2005;94:187204.
  41. , , , , , , , . Pure Appl. Chem.. 1985;57:603.
  42. , , , , , , , , , , , . Solid State Electron.. 2003;47:2231.
  43. , , , , , , . Mater. Lett.. 2008;62:3666.
Show Sections