Translate this page into:
Spectroscopic (IR, Raman, NMR), thermal and theoretical (DFT) study of alkali metal dipicolinates (2,6) and quinolinates (2,3)
⁎Corresponding author. Fax: +48 5 746 95 59. swider30@gmail.com (G. Świderski)
-
Received: ,
Accepted: ,
This article was originally published by Elsevier and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.
Peer review under responsibility of King Saud University.
Abstract
In the presented work the thermal, theoretical (DFT) and spectroscopic (IR, Raman, NMR) properties of alkali metal complexes with quinolinic acid (2,3-pyridinedicarboxylic acid) and dipicolinic acid (2,6-pyridinedicarboxylic acid) were studied. The IR and Raman spectra were registered and analyzed in the range of 400–4000 cm−1. 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra of analyzed compounds have been registered and assigned. The electronic charge distribution for the studied acids and their salts with lithium, sodium and potassium was calculated. All the calculations were done in the frame of density functional theory (DFT) using 6-311++G(d,p) basis set. The thermal decomposition of the analyzed compounds was done.
Keywords
Dipicolinic acid
Quinolinic acid
Pyridinedicarboxylic acid
Dipicolinates
Quinolinates
Alkali metal salts
1 Introduction
In this paper we decided to focus on the physicochemical properties and thermal decomposition of the quinolinic acid (2,3-pyridinedicarboxylic, 2,3-PDA) and dipicolinic acid (2,6-pyridinedicarboxylic, 2,6-PDA). These acids are two of the six pyridinedicarboxylic acid isomers. They are ligands of high biological importance. Quinolinic acid is one of the final products of tryptophan transformation in the kynurenine pathway (Fig. 1). The kynurenine pathway is a major route of tryptophan catabolism, resulting in the production of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+) and several neuroactive intermediates (Fig. 1) (Heyes et al., 1992). In the metabolic pathway there are also produced other pyridinecarboxylic acids (picolinic acid and nicotinic acid, studied in our earlier works) that play important roles in the body. In pathological conditions, the elevated concentration of quinolinic acid causes strong neurotoxicity (Pérez-De La Cruz et al., 2007). Quinolinic acid neurotoxicity is supposed to be caused partly by the over-excitation of the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor and partly by elevated levels of cytotoxic reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the brain tissue (Kubicova et al., 2015). There is accumulating evidence that quinolinic acid is involved in the neurotoxicity associated with several inflammatory brain diseases such as Alzheimer’s (Guillemin and Brew, 2002; Guillemin et al., 2003, 2005; Rahman et al., 2009), Parkinson’s (Zinger et al., 2011), motor neuron (Chen et al., 2010), Huntington’s diseases (Stoy et al., 2005; Bruyn and Stoof, 1990) and multiple sclerosis (Hartai et al., 2005; Lim et al., 2010). Dipicolinic acid and its salts are important components of the bacterial spores. These substances increase the resistance of the spores to UV radiation (Powell and Strange, 1953; Slieman and Nicholson, 2001) and improve the stability of bacterial spores (the aerobic Bacillus and anaerobic Clostridium).
Kynurenine pathway (Chen et al., 2011).
Pyridinecarboxylic and dipyridinecarboxylic acids are potent natural chelators. The presence of nitrogen in the pyridine ring can create a stable connection chelate of N, O-metal coordination of different types. In our previous work we studied complexes of some pyridinecarboxylic acid (nicotinic, isonicotinic and picolinic) isomers with various metals. We analyzed the effect of metal on the change in the electronic charge distribution under the influence of ligands complexing different metals, and antimicrobial properties of complexes. Examined were, inter alia, pyridinecarboxylic acid salts of alkali metals (lithium, sodium, potassium, rubidium and cesium). Alkali metals destabilized the electronic system of the aromatic ring in the analyzed acids (Lewandowski et al., 2005; Koczoń et al., 2006; Świderski et al., 2006; Kalinowska et al., 2007). It was shown that the degree of destabilization depended on the type of metal, and the position of the nitrogen in the pyridine ring relative to the carboxyl groups. Spectroscopic studies (FT-IR, FT-Raman, NMR) and theoretical calculations (electron charge distribution) showed that the alkali metal cations disrupted the electronic system of pyridinecarboxylic acid, and the perturbation increased in the following order: Li → Na → K → Rb → Cs (Lewandowski et al., 2005; Koczoń et al., 2006; Świderski et al., 2006; Kalinowska et al., 2007). Based on these studies, we have found that alkali metals have less impact on the electronic system of picolinic and nicotinic than of isonicotinic acid. Alkali metals to the highest degree interfered with the aromatic system of nicotinic acid. In the present study we compare the effect of alkali metals on the electron system of two other ligands – pyridinecarboxylic acids (dipicolinic and chinolinic acids); the thermogravimetric properties of the salts are tested (see Fig. 2).
FTIR spectra A, B, E, F and Raman spectra (C, D, G, H) for 2,3-pyridinedicarboxylic acid (A, D) and sodium salt (B, C); 2,6-pyridinedicarboxylic acid (E, H) and sodium salts (F, G).
2 Material and methods
2.1 Sample preparation
The alkali metal salts of 2,3-pyridinedicarboxylic and 2,6-pyridinedicarboxylic acids were prepared by dissolving appropriate weighed amount of particular acids in aqueous solution of alkali metal hydroxides in a stoichiometric ratio ligand:metal – 1:2. 0.1 mol of 2,3-pyridinedicarboxylic acid, was added to 20 mL of the previously prepared metal hydroxide solutions having a concentration of 0.1 M. The synthesis of alkali metal salts of 2,6-pyridinedicarboxylic acid was performed in a similar manner. The mixtures were heated on a steam bath with stirring until the acid dissolved in sodium hydroxide. Then, water was evaporated on a water bath and dried in an oven at 70 °C for 24 h. All chemicals were purchased from Sigma–Aldrich.
2.2 Measurement and calculation
The FT-IR spectra were recorded with an Alfa (Bruker) spectrometer within the range of 400–4000 cm−1. Samples in the solid state were measured in KBr matrix pellets and in ATR technique. FT-Raman spectra of solid samples were recorded in the range of 400–4000 cm−1 with a MultiRam (Bruker) spectrometer. The resolution of the spectrometer was 1 cm−1. The 1H and 13C NMR spectra of D2O solution of studied compounds were recorded with a Bruker Avance II 400 MHz unit at room temperature. TMS was used as an internal reference. To calculate optimized geometrical structures of 2,3-, 2,6-pyridinedicarboxylic acid and lithium, sodium and potassium salts quantum–mechanical methods were used: density functional (DFT) hybrid method B3LYP with non-local correlation provided by Lee–Young–Parr expression. All calculations were carried out with functional base 6-311++G(d,p). Calculations were performed using the Gaussian 09 (Frisch et al., 2009) package. Experimental spectra were interpreted in terms of DFT method calculations in B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p) level and literature data (McCann and Laane, 2008; Karabacak et al., 2015). Theoretical wave numbers were scaled according to the formula: νscaled = 0.98 · νcalculated for B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p) level method (Rode et al., 2001). Chemical shifts (δi) were calculated by subtracting the appropriate isotopic part of the shielding tensor (σi) from that of TMS (σTMS): δi = σTMS − σi (ppm). The isotropic shielding constants for TMS calculated using the DFT method at the same level of theory were equal to 31.8201 ppm and 182.4485 ppm for the 1H nuclei and the 13C nuclei, respectively. The products of dehydration and decomposition processes were determined from the TG curves. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was performed on a Mettler Toledo Star TGA/DSC1 unit. Argon was used as a purge gas (20 ml min−1). Samples between 2 and 4 mg were placed in aluminum pans and heated from 50 °C to 900 °C with a heating rate of 10 °C/min.
3 Results and discussion
3.1 IR and Raman Spectra
The wave numbers, intensities and assignments of the bands occurring in the IR (KBr and ATR) and Raman spectra of 2,3-pyridinedicarboxylates are presented in Table 1 and 2,6-pyridinedicarboxylates are presented in Table 2. The spectral assignments were done on the basis of the literature data (McCann and Laane, 2008; Karabacak et al., 2015) and calculated IR wave numbers of studied compounds. Theoretical spectra for acids and lithium, sodium, potassium salts were calculated by DFT/B3LYP method on 6-311++G∗∗ basis. Calculated normal vibrations were characterized by computer animation. A good correlation between experimental and theoretical IR and Raman spectra was noted. The correlation coefficients for the IR spectra are higher than 0.990. Normal vibrations of the aromatic ring were given by Varsanyi (1973). The changes of intensities and wave numbers of the bands of the aromatic system in the case of salts were discussed, in comparison with the free ligands. Substitution of the metal ion in the two groups of carboxylic acids results in the disappearance of the characteristic vibration of the carboxyl group, such as v(C⚌O) in 2,3-PDA present at 1707, 1622 cm−1 in the IRKBr spectrum, 1706 cm−1 in the IRATR spectrum, 1698 cm−1 in Raman, in the 2,6-PDA acid present at 1701 cm−1 in IRKBr, 1693 and 1634 cm−1 in IRATR and 1644 cm−1 in Raman; v(C—O) in 2,3-PDA present at 1307 cm−1 in IRKBr, 1307 cm−1 in IRATR, 1309 cm−1 in Raman, in 2,6-PDA present at 1328 cm−1 in IRKBr, 1331 cm−1 in IRATR and 1328 cm−1 in Raman. Vibration bands of the hydroxyl group i.e. v(OH), β(OH) and γ(OH) disappear as well. The disappearance of the bands characteristic of the carboxyl group indicates that the two carboxyl groups are being substituted by the metal ion. In the spectra of salts there appear bands assigned to vibrations of the carboxylate anion (the metal to ligand ratio was 2:1). In the alkali metal salts with 2,3-PDA these new vibrations give characteristic wide and intense two bands responsible for the νas(COO−) (1626–1590 and 1579–1575 cm−1 in IRKBr spectra, 1623–1587 and 1573–1562 cm−1 in IRATR, 1633–1623 and 1581–1571 cm−1 Raman spectra) and νsym(COO−) (1408–1382 cm−1 in IRKBr spectra, 1403–1372 cm−1 in IRATR, 1409–1386 cm−1 in Raman spectra) stretching of the carboxylic anion. The bands assigned to the symmetric in-plane deformation of the carboxylic anion (βsym: 843–830 cm−1 IRKBr spectra, 843–823 cm−1 IRATR, 846–823 cm−1 Raman spectra) and asymmetric in-plane deformation of the carboxylic anion (βas, observed only in the case of lithium salt, 497 IRKBr). Bands derived from the carboxylate anion vibration in the spectra of the alkali metal salt of the 2,6-PDA occur at somewhat higher wave numbers than it is the case of the spectra of 2,3-PDA salts. In the alkali metal salts with 2,6-PDA these vibrations gave characteristic wide and intense two bands responsible for the νas(COO−) (1656–1646 and 1612–1609 cm−1 in IRKBr spectra, 1658–1631 and 1614–1669 cm−1 in IRATR, 1665–1636 and 1619 cm−1 in Raman spectra) and νsym(COO−) (1384–1378 cm−1 in IRKBr spectra, 1385–1365 cm−1 in IRATR, 1397–1386 cm−1 in Raman spectra) stretching of the carboxylic anion. The bands assigned to the symmetric in-plane deformation of the carboxylic anion, βsym occur at 827–816 cm−1 in IRKBr, 826–813 cm−1 in IRATR, 826–815 cm−1 in Raman. Asymmetric in-plane deformation of the carboxylic anion was not observed in the 2,6-PDA salts.
2,3-pyridinedicarboxylic acid
2,3-pyridinedicarboxylate
Lithium
Sodium
Potassium
Assignments
IR KBr
IR ATR
Raman
IR theoret
Inten
IR KBr
IR ATR
Raman
IR theore
Inten
IR KBr
IR ATR
Raman
IR theor
Inten
IR KBr
IR ATR
Raman
IR theoret
Inten
3441 s
3627
112.96
ν(OH)
3170 vw
v(OH)
3104 s
3104 s
3104 s
3101
4.97
3104
5.26
3086
18.95
3102 w
3101
8.24
ν(CH)ar
2
3087 vs
3089
4.02
3079 vs
3084
10.71
3060 vs
3071
11.56
3079 s
3073
22.55
ν(CH)ar
7a
3059
11.13
3029 vw
3047
17.89
3040
22.07
3033
27.87
ν(CH)ar
7b
1707 m
1706 m
1698 w
1757
330.13
ν(C⚌O)
1622 s
1735
383.11
ν(C⚌O)
1626 vs
1623 s
1623 vw
1549
477.86
1593 vs
1592 s
1633 w
1555
290.22
1602 vs
1590 vs
1627 vw
1558
486.33
νasCOO−
1602 vs
1600 s
1600 m
ν(CH)ar. ν(CN)ar. β(CH)ar
1579 vs
1573 vs
1581 m
1485
301.13
1563 vs
1562 vs
1573 s
1528
65.19
1558 vs
1581 s
1491
357.42
νasCOO−
1586 vs
1583 m
ν(CH)ar. ν(CN)ar
1474 s
1471 s
1573
56.71
1464 s
1464 s
1469 m
1574
81.22
–
1457 s
1569
74.49
–
1571
101.87
ν(CC)ar. ν(CN)ar
8b
1446 vw
1432
12.09
1452 s
1452 s
1546
146.8
1456 m
1449 m
1543
290.41
1457 s
1453 s
1451 w
1546
132.07
ν(CC)ar. ν(CN)ar
8a
1418 s
1416 s
1423
24.63
1421
109.15
1429
15.86
1413
29.74
ν(CC)ar. ν(CN)ar. β(CH)ar
3
1328
40.42
1372
257.10
1369
297.10
1363
214.98
ν(CC)ar. ν(CN)ar. β(CH)ar
19b
1408 vs
1403 s
1409 w
1348
303.62
1394 vs
1391 vs
1395 vs
1338
219.33
1385 vs
1379 vs
1388 vs
1343
429.55
νsymCOO−
1398 vs
1395 vs
1393 m
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
νsymCOO−
1367 vs
1364 vs
1359 m
1324
186.58
β(OH)
1307 s
1307 m
1309 vw
β(OH)
1279 m
1274 vw
1251
1.67
1270 w
1269 w
1274 vw
1244
11.13
1266 vw
1266 vw
1266 vw
1245
8.61
1248 vw
1233 w
1233
9.69
ν(CC)ar. ν(CN)ar. β(CH)ar
15
1234 m
1235 w
1224 vw
1231
11.7
1241 w
1242 w
1241 vw
1225
7.98
1235 w
1236 w
1235 w
1223
23.51
1231 w
1231 w
1224
3.23
ν(CC)ar. ν(CN)ar. β(CH)ar
14
1173 m
1174 m
1187 vw
1189
157.63
1180 w
1183 w
1158
17.58
1175 w
1177 w
1154
28.98
1175 w
1176 w
1150
24.12
β(CH)ar
18b
1166 vw
1159
38.3
1152 vw
β(OH)
1132 m
1131 m
1133 w
1107
216.49
1128
17.36
1151 w
1147 w
1125
1.37
1156 w
1147 w
1154 w
1125
15.46
β(CH)ar
9b
1115 m
1100
135.72
1102 m
1102 m
1102 vw
1071
8.27
1096 m
1095 m
1095 vw
1070
17.92
1089 m
1088 w
1093 w
1065
15.34
β(CH)ar
9a
1057
54.44
1064 w
1064 m
1039
2.36
1059 vw
1058 s
1040
1.76
1059 w
1068 s
1039
1.26
β(CH)ar
18a
1038 s
1037 s
1044 m
1036
8.02
1039 vw
Ring def
1011 s
1005 s
980
1.12
996 vw
972
0.51
996 vw
992 vw
957
0.73
985 vw
971
0.74
Φ(CC)ar. γ(CH)ar
5
970 m
967 m
975 vw
954
0.21
965 vw
953
0.01
953 vw
956 vw
–
–
963 vw
944
0.07
Φ(CC)ar. γ(CH)ar
10b
874 w
878 m
879 m
880 vw
869
37.24
871 w
871 w
871 w
851
22.84
868 w
864 w
867 vw
–
–
α(CCC)
12
853 m
853 m
840 vw
821
1.29
γ(CH)ar
11
843 m
843 m
846 m
848
8.58
836 m
834 m
840 s
831
7.48
834 m
827 m
834 m
849
18.58
βsymCOO−
813 w
809
6.07
819 w
823
0.10
814 w
804 w
816
9.25
811 w
819
49.54
Ring def
782 s
779 s
780 vw
789
35.55
782 m
782 m
784 vw
776
44.22
785 m
785 m
788 vw
778
33.47
790 m
782 m
778
38.74
γ(CH)ar
763 s
760 vs
759
80.6
751 m
741
16.83
754 vw
758 w
721
29.99
756 w
753 w
757 vw
741
16.24
Ring def
749 m
728
22.01
γ(CH)ar
694 w
694 w
628
36.62
717 s
715 s
722 vw
720
45.49
717 s
715 s
717 vw
707
25.13
721 m
711 m
720 vw
708
37.17
α(CCC)
6b
673 w
673 w
668 w
667 w
670 w
γ(CH)ar
653 m
653 w
651 w
615
35.19
660 m
660 m
661 w
639
48.62
653 w
653 w
655 w
636
13.40
650 m
646 m
651 w
632
11.52
α(CCC)
6a
640 m
642 m
γ(CH)ar
616 m
618 vw
610 m
614 vw
601
180.17
605 w
605 w
605 vw
Ring def
591 s
580
65.88
γ(CH)ar
576 vw
557
12.58
568 m
564 vw
560
3.67
574 w
547 vw
548
3.30
579 m
584 vw
564
3.04
Φ(CC)ar. γ(CH)ar
4
518 m
518 vw
499
20.43
β(OH)
497 s
508
2.70
–
–
509
15.84
βasCOO−
438 w
439 vw
402
0.98
445 vw
434
98.19
436 w
433 w
451
46.64
422 w
423 w
443
55.70
Φ(CC)ar
16b
Rubidium 2,3-pyridinedicarboxylate
Cesium 2,3-pyridinedicarboxylate
Assignments
IR KBr
IR ATR
Raman
IR KBr
IR ATR
Raman
3060 vs
3054 vs
ν(CH)ar
7b
1596 vs
1590 vs
1595 vs
1587 vs
νasCOO−
1575 vs
1571 m
1575 vs
1573 s
νasCOO−
1454 m
1450 m
1453 m
1453 m
1447 m
1442 m
ν(CC)ar, ν(CN)ar
8a
1382 vs
1376 vs
1393 m
1382 vs
1372 vs
1386 vs
νsymCOO−
1265 vw
1266 vw
1263 vw
1257 vw
ν(CC)ar, ν(CN)ar, β(CH)ar
15
1229 w
1231 vw
1229 vw
1229 w
1226 w
ν(CC)ar, ν(CN)ar, β(CH)ar
14
1178 w
1173 w
1176 w
1178 w
1173 w
1174 m
β(CH)ar
18b
1149 w
1144 w
1145 w
1149 w
1143 w
1145 w
β(CH)ar
9b
1093 m
1086 w
1085 vw
1092 w
1083 w
1085 w
β(CH)ar
9a
1058 w
1052 s
1058 vw
1052 vs
β(CH)ar
18a
1021 vw
1031
Ring def
868 m
864 m
867 w
861 w
859 w
831 m
826 m
828 m
830 m
823 m
823 s
βsymCOO−
786 m
783 m
786 m
780 m
Ring def
751 vw
717 m
708 m
715 vw
717 m
709 m
713 vw
α(CCC)
6b
674 vw
668 m
γ(CH)ar
651 m
644 m
647 w
651 m
643 m
645 w
α(CCC)
6a
617 m
Ring def
581 m
583 vw
581 m
580 vw
Φ(CC)ar, γ(CH)ar
4
426 m
412 w
425 w
412 m
Φ(CC)a
16b
2,6-pyridinedicarboxylic acid
2,6-pyridinedicarboxylate
Lithium
Sodium
Potassium
Assignments
IR KBr
IR ATR
Raman
IR theor
Inten
IR KBr
IR ATR
Raman
IR theor
Inten
IR KBr
IR ATR
Raman
IR theore
Inten
IR KBr
IR ATR
Raman
IR theoret
Inten
3638
90.98
ν(OH)
3430 m
3638
109.64
v(OH)
3148 w
3141 vw
3141 vw
ν(CH)ar
20a
3098 s
3109
0.86
3109
3.11
3108
5.22
3106
6.44
ν(CH)ar
2
3068 s
3071 s
3106
1.27
3079 vs
3107
0.11
3075 s
3106
0.01
3063 w
3079 s
3104
0.09
ν(CH)ar
7b
2998 s
3008 vw
3080
4.90
3021 vw
3066
12.70
3006 w
3059
18.53
3000 vw
3053
22.75
ν(CH)ar
13
1701 vs
1693 vs
1726
136.17
ν(C⚌O)
1634 s
1644 vs
1721
557.03
ν(C⚌O)
1646 vs
1658 m
1665 w
1516
734.47
1656 m
1652 w
1527
113.97
1648 s
1650 vw
1533
93.59
νasCOO−
1609 s
1614 s
1516
73.10
1605 vs
1614 s
1527
697.24
1612 vs
1609 s
1619 vw
1532
593.41
νasCOO−
1566
4.26
1588 s
1580 s
1568
84.89
1568
143.58
1569
188.60
ν(CC)ar. ν(CN)ar
8a
1573 s
1575 s
1577 vs
1561
1.96
1573 s
1573 s
1562
4.74
1578 s
1576 s
1573 vs
1561
3.01
1576 s
1576 s
1571 s
1561
4.56
ν(CC)ar. ν(CN)ar
8b
1462 m
1463 m
1461 w
1434
0.01
1460 m
1463 m
1455 m
1419
54.03
1488 vw
1414
6.92
1412
4.22
ν(CC)ar. ν(CN)ar. β(CH)ar
19a
1456 w
1447 w
1408
19.09
1443 s
1447 m
1443 m
1442 m
1447 vs
1406
31.57
1433 m
1430 m
1436 s
1402
40.45
ν(CC)ar. ν(CN)ar. β(CH)ar
19b
1415 s
1416 s
1356
198.76
β(OH)
1384 vs
1385 vs
1361
5.60
1384 vs
1382 vs
1397 vs
1349
17.15
1379 vs
1375 vs
1392 vs
1345
32.88
νsymCOO−
1365
698.38
1344
667.96
1337
778.76
νsymCOO−
1328 s
1331 s
1324 w
β(OH)
1300 s
1299 vs
1297 m
1330
61.43
1295 vw
1299 vw
ν(CC)ar. ν(CN)ar. β(CH)ar
3
1263 s
1263 vs
1272 w
1277
6.41
1276 m
1273 m
1280 vw
1263
28.43
1273 w
1275 w
1257
30.63
1266 w
1267 m
1254
36.67
ν(CC)ar. ν(CN)ar. β(CH)ar
15
1193
197.53
β(OH)+def ring
1171 m
1178 m
1179 vw
1188 w
1159
5.54
1191 vw
1190 w
1191 w
1156
6.54
1184 w
1184 w
1189 w
1155
6.81
β(CH)ar
1164 s
1154 w
1136
1.04
1153 w
1152 w
1128
1.51
1151 vw
1152 w
1126
2.08
1147 w
1149 m
1123
2.01
β(CH)ar
18b
1106
260.87
ν(C—O)
1095
41.17
β(OH)
1082 m
1082 m
1085 vw
1088 w
1082 w
1083 vw
1061
22.98
1083 w
1081 w
1081 vw
1058
23.21
1072 w
1075 w
1075 vw
1056
23.71
β(CH)ar
18a
995
0.34
1013 m
1013 w
1015 s
994
0.53
1003 w
1005 w
1006 s
990
0.74
1000 w
1003 w
1004 vs
989
0.75
Φ(CC)ar. γ(CH)ar
17b
994 m
997 m
998 vs
981
9.14
978
4.03
977
3.56
977
3.15
α(CCC)
12
912 m
940
0.01
915 w
919 vw
942
0.01
909 w
911 w
909 vw
940
0.01
902 w
906 w
906 vw
936
0.01
Φ(CC)ar. γ(CH)ar
10a
854 w
854 w
853 w
855
4.20
862 vw
860 w
859 vw
862 vw
859 w
851 w
857 w
Ring def
840
5.69
850
3.42
854
0.01
858
3.64
Φ(CC)ar. γ(CH)ar
10b
817 w
821 w
826 m
827 w
826 w
825 m
817
16.62
819 w
819 m
821 m
803
27.70
βsymCOO−
783
0.01
808
0.01
811
0.01
Φ(CC)ar. γ(CH)ar
16a
753 m
751 m
761 s
741
88.65
765 m
758 m
769 vw
747
62.94
768 m
758 m
771 vw
749
59.36
751 m
751 m
765 vw
749
55.10
γ(CH)ar
11
727 m
731 m
738
120.98
727 w
726 m
725
68.78
718 m
719 m
728 vw
715
101.08
Ring def
707
31.19
βOH
698 m
700 m
693 vw
703
74.41
704 m
702 m
699
20.24
701 m
702 m
700
16.98
701 m
700 m
703 vw
699
14.74
Φ(CC)ar. γ(CH)ar
4
646 m
649 m
647 w
623
62.16
660 m
666 m
663 w
652
51.72
654 m
653 m
655 w
643
13.27
651 m
650 m
655 w
641
15.24
α(CCC)
6a
632
55.27
βOH Ring d
626 m
627 m
α(CCC)
6b
582 w
588 w
591
0.01
γ(OH)
563
138.88
γ(OH)
543
0.01
543 vw
550
8.21
544 w
550
5.10
550
4.93
Ring def
518 w
515 w
518 m
518 w
512 vw
500 w
499 w
γ(CH)ar
496 w
487 vw
473 m
482
0.01
470 vw
487
0.01
481
0.01
Φ(CC)ar. γ(CH)ar
16a
493
2.99
481
9.62
477
9.31
βasCOO−
425
5.74
427
4.50
427
3.76
Φ(CC)ar
16b
449
14.24
Ring def
Rubidium 2,6-pyridinedicarboxylate
Cesium 2,6-pyridinedicarboxylate
Assignments
IR KBr
IR ATR
Raman
IR KBr
IR ATR
Raman
3135 w
3129 vw
ν(CH)ar
20a
3079 vs
3073 s
ν(CH)ar
7b
3000 vw
2994 vw
ν(CH)ar
13
1648 s
1650 w
1654 vw
1631 m
1636 w
νasCOO−
1612 vs
1607 s
1619 vw
1612 vs
1603 s
νasCOO−
1576 s
1575 m
1571 s
1575 s
1569 s
1569 s
ν(CC)ar, ν(CN)ar
8a
1552 vw
ν(CC)ar, ν(CN)ar
8b
1432 m
1426 m
1432 s
1433 m
1423 m
1428 s
ν(CC)ar, ν(CN)ar, β(CH)ar
19a
1378 vs
1371 vs
1390 vs
1379 vs
1365 vs
1386 vs
νsymCOO−
1291 vw
1293 vw
ν(CC)ar, ν(CN)ar, β(CH)ar
3
1266 w
1266 w
1266 w
1265 w
ν(CC)ar, ν(CN)ar, β(CH)ar
15
1183 w
1185 w
1189 w
1184 w
1184 w
1185 vw
β(CH)ar
1147 m
1147 w
1145 m
β(CH)ar
18b
1119 vw
1117 w
β(CH)ar
1072 w
1069 w
1073 vw
1074 w
1069 w
1073 vw
β(CH)ar
18a
1001 w
998 w
1004 vs
1000 w
997 w
1000 vs
Φ(CC)ar, γ(CH)ar
17b
902 vw
902 w
904 vw
904 w
899 w
900 vw
Φ(CC)ar, γ(CH)ar
10a
855 vw
855 vw
Φ(CC)ar, γ(CH)ar
10b
816 w
819 w
817 m
819 w
813 w
815 m
βsymCOO−
751 m
748 m
763 vw
752 m
751 m
759 vw
γ(CH)ar
11
715 m
718 m
718 m
715 m
726 vw
α(CCC)
701 w
703 vw
Φ(CC)ar, γ(CH)ar
4
653 w
650 w
655 w
651 w
647 w
653 w
α(CCC)
6a
617 w
α(CCC)
6b
578 w
575 w
564 vw
Ring def
501 w
499 vw
503 w
497 vw
Φ(CC)ar, γ(CH)ar
16a
The bands derived from aromatic ring vibrations of the studied acids and their salts with alkali metals are present in the entire spectral range. As compared to the spectra of acids, in the spectra of the salts a decrease in the wave numbers can be seen and the intensity of vibrations of the aromatic system is reduced. A number of bands present in the acid spectra disappear in the salts upon the metal ion substitution at the carboxyl group and as well some additional bands emerge that aren’t present in the spectra of the ligands. Based on the comparison of the wave numbers and intensities of the aromatic ring vibration bands (vibration of C—C and C—H bonds in the aromatic ring) in the ligand and salts, some conclusions can be drawn on the influence of metal on a disturbance or stabilization of the aromatic ring. The disturbance of this system is indicated by the reduction in the number and intensity of the bands derived from the aromatic system vibrations and/or their shift toward lower wave numbers in the IR and Raman spectra of the complexes compared to the spectrum of a given acid; this is due to the reduction in the force constants and polarization of C—C and C—H bonds in the ring. It was observed that in the IR and Raman spectra more bands present on the ligand disappear in the case of 2,3-PDA salts than it is in the case of 2,6-PDA salts. In addition, salts of 2,6-PDA reveal more new ligand bands than 2,3-PDA salts. The wave numbers of some bands present in the spectra of the salts tested decrease in the series Li → Na → K → Rb → Cs. These changes are not regular as it is observed for the spectra of alkali metal salts with monocarboxy-pyridinecarboxylic acids.
3.2 NMR spectra
Chemical shifts of the signals coming from protons in the 1H NMR spectra of 2,3- and 2,6-PDA alkali metal salts take lower values than the corresponding ones for acids (Tables 3 and 4). An aromatic pyridine ring is disturbed, resulting in a change in the electron density around the protons of the aromatic ring. The values for the chemical shifts of aromatic protons labeled H3, H4 and H5 in the spectra of acid and its salts 2,6-PDA overlap to give a single band in the spectrum. For 2,3-PDA acid and its salts the three aromatic protons give its spectral image of three clearly separated signals. Decreases in proton chemical shifts for H4 and H5 in 2,3-PDA acid salts are small, and the decreases in proton chemical shifts for H3 are much larger and similar in size as those in 2,6-PDA salts.
2,3-PDA acid
2,3-pyridinedicarboxylate
Lithium
Sodium
Potassium
Rubidium
Cesium
1H NMR
H4
Exp.
8.10
8.01
7.99
8.01
7.99
8.01
Theoret.
8.54
8.58
7.61
8.67
H5
Exp.
7.51
7.45
7.43
7.44
7.42
7.44
Theoret.
7.37
6.99
7.05
6.75
H6
Exp.
8.84
8.45
8.43
8.45
8.43
8.45
Theoret.
8.75
8.72
8.42
8.57
13C NMR
C2
Exp.
149.15
157.73
157.82
157.85
157.83
157.82
Theoret.
160.91
170.96
157.71
172.17
C3
Exp.
133.44
134.22
134.13
134.10
134.06
134.05
Theoret.
127.23
125.82
147.23
129.53
C4
Exp.
146.92
139.85
139.84
139.86
139.85
139.84
Theoret.
144.98
145.27
137.13
144.88
C5
Exp.
130.33
126.27
126.21
126.22
126.22
126.22
Theoret.
127.31
123.32
127.60
121.55
C6
Exp.
148.81
150.96
150.95
150.98
150.97
150.97
Theoret.
157.69
159.61
150.62
157.44
C7
Exp.
170.05
177.74
177.77
177.81
177.80
176.84
Theoret.
172.39
184.07
187.42
183.28
C8
Exp.
167.24
176.96
176.90
176.90
176.87
177.74
Theoret.
169.52
190.97
185.05
184.10
2,6-PDA acid
2,6-pyridinedicarboxylate
Lithium
Sodium
Potassium
Rubidium
Cesium
1H NMR
H3
Exp.
8.41
8.01
7.99
8.00
7.98
7.97
Theoret.
8.32
8.50
8.45
8.46
H4
Exp.
8.41
8.01
7.99
8.00
7.98
7.97
Theoret.
7.83
7.67
7.52
7.48
H5
Exp.
8.41
8.01
7.99
8.00
7.98
7.97
Theoret.
8.32
8.50
8.45
8.46
13C NMR
C2
Exp.
149.97
155.16
155.39
155.49
155.48
155.49
Theoret.
153.03
157.16
158.89
159.99
C3
Exp.
145.59
141.50
141.23
141.23
141.21
141.27
Theoret.
133.49
131.71
130.77
129.56
C4
Exp.
130.95
127.80
127.72
127.75
127.72
127.72
Theoret.
141.09
138.85
137.79
137.05
C5
Exp.
145.59
141.50
141.23
141.23
141.21
141.27
Theoret.
133.49
131.71
130.77
129.56
C6
Exp.
149.97
155.16
155.39
155.49
155.48
155.49
Theoret.
153.03
157.16
158.89
159.99
C7
Exp.
168.60
175.54
175.73
175.77
175.78
175.78
Theoret.
165.05
187.23
181.45
181.53
C8
Exp.
168.60
175.54
175.73
175.77
175.78
175.78
Theoret.
165.05
187.23
181.45
181.53
The decisive factor influencing the electron charge distribution on the pyridine ring of 2,3-PDA and 2,6-PDA is the distribution of carboxyl groups linked to the ring. In the case of dipicolinic acid, the carboxyl groups are arranged symmetrically with respect to the nitrogen atom, with the consequence that the electronic charge around the carbon atoms is arranged symmetrically in the molecule. This can be observed as the equal values of the chemical shifts of carbons C2⚌C6 and C3⚌C5 in the 13C NMR spectrum. In the case of 2,3-PDA, the carboxyl groups are asymmetrically attached to the aromatic ring, thereby the values for the chemical shifts of the carbons are asymmetrically distributed. Substitution of the carboxyl groups with an alkali metal atom induces the changes in the electronic charge distribution (implying the changes in the chemical shifts of the carbon atoms in the observed 13C NMR spectra). Changes in the values of the chemical shifts for the carbon atoms in the spectra of 2,6-PDA salts occur in a symmetrical manner, i.e. the same increase in the chemical shifts of carbon C2 and C6, and the same decrease in chemical shifts for carbons C3 and C5 can be observed. In the case of 2,3-PDA salts, changes in the chemical shifts of the carbons (indicating the redistribution of the electronic charge in the molecules) are not symmetrical. In the series of salts of both acids the same direction of changes in chemical shifts is observed, i.e. an increase in the value of the signals for the carbon atoms C2 and C6 (decrease in electron density) and a decline in the value of the signals for C4 and C5 (increase in electron density) are found. Otherwise, for the C3 carbon atom of the 2,3-PDA salts an increase in chemical shifts relative to acid can be seen, whereas for the 2,6-PDA salts chemical shift values decrease. In conclusion, the electronic charge of the pyridine ring in the case of 2,6-PDA is distributed more evenly than in 2,3-PDA. Alkali metals perturb the electronic system to much higher degree, if the alkali metal atom is substituted to the carboxyl groups of 2,3-PDA than to those of 2,6-PDA.
3.3 Thermogravimetric study
Thermogravimetric studies of the 2,3- and 2,6-pyridinecarboxylate alkali metal salts (Tables 5 and 6) showed that the degrees of hydration of the 2,6-PDA alkali metal salts were very similar in the series (Li—Na—K—Rb—Cs). In the case of 2,3-PDA salts, the degree of hydration of each salt was also similar. The salts prior to the studies were dried for 24 h at 70 °C. Dehydration occurs in a single step for the salts tested (all hydrated salts). For the 2,6-PDA salts the dehydration process begins at 100 °C. Sodium and potassium salts of 2,6-PDA loose water in the temperature range of 100–210 °C, and all other salts in the range of 100–150 °C. The process for the dehydration of the 2,3-PDA salts starts at slightly higher temperatures (above 130 °C). After dehydration, in subsequent steps the process of decomposition of the tested compounds occurs. Both acids are degraded completely in a one-step process of decomposition at about 250 °C. Studies on the decomposition of salts in the range of 70–890 °C showed that the decomposition proceeds via formation of alkali metal carbonates and in a later step in the case of certain salts, to alkali metal oxides. In the first step in a temperature range from ca 370 to 500 °C beside carbonates some residues of organic carbon are found as well that are formed during the decomposition of the aromatic ring. This can be seen as a pitch curve on TG and DTA graphs (Fig. 3). In a further step of the decomposition process the organic carbon residues are oxidized to carbon dioxide and a product in the form of carbonate is formed. In the case of sodium salts the produced carbonates are stable in a range of temperatures, while for the other salts a decomposition of carbonates to the oxides of alkali metals occurs. Comparing the curves illustrating the thermal decomposition of the alkali metal salts of the two studied acids (Fig. 3) one can observe that salts of 2,6-PDA are dehydrated at a slightly lower temperature than the salts of 2,3-PDA. In contrast, the decomposition of the aromatic ring occurs at a slightly lower temperature in the case of 2,3-PDA salts than for those of 2,6-PDA. Based on the decomposition curve, it can be concluded that the 2,3-pyridinedicarboxylates are thermally less stable than the 2,6-pyridinedicarboxylates of the alkali metals.
Compound
Range of decomposition
Weight loss (%)
Product decomposition
Calc.
Found
Li2L·0,5H2O
140–210
4.74
4.80
Li2L
370–550
–
31.0
Li2CO3 + Corg
550–850
61.11
62.0
Li2CO3
Na2L·H2O
140–160
7.78
7.75
Na2L
410–490
–
25.0
Na2CO3 + Corg
490–740
54.11
54.0
Na2CO3
K2L·0,5H2O
130–210
3.54
3.6
K2L
380–510
–
22
K2CO3 + Corg
510–750
45.6
45.0
K2CO3
750<
–
–
K2O
Rb2L·0,75H2O
130–210
3.84
3.6
Rb2L
400–480
–
15
Rb2CO3 + Corg
500–830
53.25
53.0
Rb2CO3
830<
–
–
Rb2O
Cs2L·0,5H2O
110–150
2.04
2.0
Cs2L
390–490
–
10.0
Cs2CO3 + Corg
490<
–
–
Cs2O
Compound
Range of decomposition
Weight loss (%)
Product decomposition
Calc.
Found
Li2L·0,75H2O
100–210
6.94
7.2
Li2L
450–510
–
20.0
Li2CO3 + Corg
510–890
84.3
85.0
Li2O
Na2L·0,75H2O
100–150
5.95
5.6
Na2L
460–510
–
22.0
Na2CO3 + Corg
510–850
52.1
52.0
Na2CO3
K2L·0,75H2O
100–170
5.21
5.0
K2L
450–490
–
21.0
K2CO3 + Corg
490–890
–
58.0
K2CO3 + K2O
Rb2L·0,5H2O
100–210
2.59
2.8
Rb2L
430–490
16.0
Rb2CO3 + Corg
>850
–
–
Rb2O
Cs2L·0,75H2O
100–210
3.02
3.0
Cs2L
410–480
–
10.0
Cs2CO3 + Corg
>830
–
–
Cs2O

TG/DTA curves of 2,3-pyridinedicarboxylic acid (A) and sodium salts (B), 2,6-pyridinedicarboxylic acid (C) and sodium salts (D).
4 Conclusions
It was observed that in the IR and Raman spectra of 2,3-PDA alkali metal salts there disappear more bands that are initially present in the ligand than in the case of 2,6-PDA salts. In addition, in the salts of 2,6-PDA more new bands appear than in the case of 2,3-PDA salts, as compared to the respective ligand.
Changes in the spectra of the alkali metal salt of the acid with respect to the acid spectra are related to the effects of metal on the electron charge distribution of the aromatic ring of the ligand. The alkali metals destabilize the electronic system, and the effect is greater for 2,3-pyridinecarboxylates. In the case of 2,6-PDA acid molecules electron charge distribution in the aromatic ring is symmetrical with respect to the nitrogen atom, due to the symmetrical position of the carboxyl groups, what is indicated by chemical shift values in 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra. Alkali metal substitution in the carboxyl group of this acid causes changes in the distribution of electron charge (seen as changes in chemical shifts), and the symmetry of the charge distribution in the aromatic ring is retained with respect to the heteroatom. When the carboxylic groups take an asymmetric position relative to the heteroatom in the 2,3-PDA ring, the asymmetric distribution of electron charge is observed. An alkali metal atom substitution in the carboxyl group induces an increase of an asymmetric charge distribution in the aromatic ring – a perturbation of the charge distribution increases in the tested series of salts in the order Li → Na → K → Rb → Cs. Based on the decomposition curve it can be concluded that the 2,3-pyridinedicarboxylates of alkali metals are thermally less stable compounds than the 2,6-pyridinedicarboxylates of the alkali metals.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by Bialystok University of Technology in the frame of funding for statutory research (no. S/WBiIŚ/1/2012).
Thermogravimetric study was performed at the Center of Synthesis and Analysis BioNanoTechno of the University of Bialystok. The equipment in the Center of Synthesis and Analysis BioNanoTechno of University of Bialystok was funded by the EU, project: POPW.01.03.00–20–034/09–00.
References
- The quinolinic acid hypothesis in Huntington’s chorea. J. Neurol. Sci.. 1990;95(1):29-38.
- [Google Scholar]
- Characterization of the kynurenine pathway in NSC-34 cell line: implications for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J. Neurochem.. 2011;118(5):816-825.
- [Google Scholar]
- The kynurenine pathway and inflammation in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurotox. Res.. 2010;18(2):132-142.
- [Google Scholar]
- Gaussian 09, revision A. 02. Wallingford, CT: Gaussian, Inc.; 2009. p. :227-238. 19
- Implications of the kynurenine pathway and quinolinic acid in Alzheimer’s disease. Redox Rep.. 2002;7:199-206.
- [Google Scholar]
- Indoleamine 2,3 dioxygenase and quinolinic acid Immunoreactivity in Alzheimer’s disease hippocampus. Neuropathol. Appl. Neurobiol.. 2005;31(4):395-404.
- [Google Scholar]
- Quinolinic acid in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol.. 2003;527:167-176.
- [Google Scholar]
- Kynurenine metabolism in multiple sclerosis. Acta Neurol. Scand.. 2005;112(2):93-96.
- [Google Scholar]
- Quinolinic acid and kynurenine pathway metabolism in inflammatory and non-inflammatory neurological disease. Brain. 1992;115:1249-1273.
- [Google Scholar]
- Spectroscopic (IR, Raman, UV, 1H and 13C NMR) and microbiological studies of Fe(III), Ni(II), Cu(II), Zn(II) and Ag(I) picolinates. J. Mol. Struct.. 2007;834:419-425.
- [Google Scholar]
- Spectral investigation and theoretical study of zwitterionic and neutral forms of quinolinic acid. J. Mol. Struct.. 2015;1095:100-111.
- [Google Scholar]
- Vibrational and microbiological study on alkaline metal picolinates and o-iodobenzoates. Anal. Bioanal. Chem.. 2006;384(1):302-308.
- [Google Scholar]
- Effects of endogenous neurotoxin quinolinic acid on reactive oxygen species production by Fenton reaction catalyzed by iron or copper. J. Organomet. Chem.. 2015;782:111-115.
- [Google Scholar]
- Spectroscopic (Raman, FT-IR and NMR) and theoretical study of alkali metal picolinates. J. Phys. Org. Chem.. 2005;18(9):918-928.
- [Google Scholar]
- Understanding the roles of the kynurenine pathway in multiple sclerosis progression. Int. J. Tryptophan Res.. 2010;3:157-167.
- [Google Scholar]
- Raman and infrared spectra and theoretical calculations of dipicolinic acid, dinicotinic acid, and their dianions. J. Mol. Struct.. 2008;890(1):346-358.
- [Google Scholar]
- Kynurenine pathway and disease: an overview. CNS Neurol. Disord. Drug Targets. 2007;6:398-410.
- [Google Scholar]
- Biochemical changes occurring during the germination of bacterial spores. Biochem. J.. 1953;54(2):205-209.
- [Google Scholar]
- The excitotoxin quinolinic acid induces tau phosphorylation in human neurons. PLoS One. 2009;4(7):e6344.
- [Google Scholar]
- Theoretical IR, Raman and NMR spectra of 1, 2-and 1, 3-dimethylenecyclobutane. Vib. Spectrosc.. 2001;25:133-149.
- [Google Scholar]
- Role of dipicolinic acid in survival of bacillus subtilis spores exposed to artificial and solar UV radiation. Appl. Environ. Microbial.. 2001;67(3):1274-1279.
- [Google Scholar]
- Tryptophan metabolism and oxidative stress in patients with Huntington’s disease. J. Neurochem.. 2005;93(3):611-623.
- [Google Scholar]
- Experimental (FT-IR, FT-Raman, 1 H NMR) and theoretical study of magnesium, calcium, strontium, and barium picolinates. Spectrochim. Acta Part A. 2006;64(1):24-33.
- [Google Scholar]
- Vibrational Spectra of 700 Benzene Derivatives, vol. I–II. Budapest: Academic Kiaclo; 1973.
- The involvement of neuroinflammation and kynurenine pathway in Parkinson’s disease. Parkinson’s Dis.. 2011;2011
- [Google Scholar]
Appendix A
Supplementary material
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2016.06.011.
Appendix A
Supplementary material
Supplementary data 1
Supplementary data 1
Supplementary data 2
Supplementary data 2
