10.8
CiteScore
 
5.3
Impact Factor
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Corrigendum
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Full Length Article
Full lenth article
Letter to Editor
Original Article
Research article
Retraction notice
Review
Review Article
SPECIAL ISSUE: ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY
10.8
CiteScore
5.3
Impact Factor
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Corrigendum
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Full Length Article
Full lenth article
Letter to Editor
Original Article
Research article
Retraction notice
Review
Review Article
SPECIAL ISSUE: ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original article
6 (
2
); 177-181
doi:
10.1016/j.arabjc.2011.01.033

Synthesis and antimicrobial activities of some novel 1,2,4-triazole derivatives

Organic Chemistry Division, Department of Chemistry, National Institute of Technology, Surathkal, Mangalore 575 025, Karnataka, India
Department of Microbiology, Veterinary University, Hebbal, Bangalore, India
Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2457, Riyadh 11451, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

*Corresponding authors. Tel.: +91 824 2474000x3206; fax: +91 824 2474033 isloor@yahoo.com (Arun M. Isloor)

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Elsevier and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Peer-review under responsibility of King Saud University.

Available online 5 February 2011

Abstract

In the present investigation, a series of new Schiff bases 4af were synthesized by the condensation of N-[(4-amino-5-sulfanyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)methyl]-4-substituted-benzamides 3ab with various substituted aromatic aldehydes in ethanol–dioxane mixture using catalytic amount of sulfuric acid. The starting materials 3ab were in turn synthesized by the fusion of benzoyl glycine/substituted benzoylglycine with thiocarbohydrazide. Newly synthesized compounds were characterized by IR, NMR, mass spectra and elemental analyses. All the compounds were evaluated for their antibacterial and antifungal activity using the Minimum Inhibition Concentration (MIC) method by serial dilution technique. Few of the compounds were found to be biologically active.

Keywords

1,2,4-Triazoles
Schiff bases
Antimicrobial activity
1

1 Introduction

Since last few decades, there is tremendous growth of research in the synthesis of nitrogen containing heterocyclic derivatives because of their utility in various applications, such as pharmaceuticals, propellants, explosives, pyrotechnics and especially in chemotherapy (Chavez and Parrish, 2009). A large number of ring systems containing 1,2,4-triazoles have been incorporated into a wide variety of therapeutically interesting drug candidates including anti-inflammatory, CNS stimulants, sedatives, anti-anxiety, antimicrobial agents (Nadkarni et al., 2001; Isloor et al., 2009), antimycotic agents such as Fluconazole, Itraconazole and Voriconazole (The Merck Index, 1996; Haber, 2001). Also there are some known drugs containing 1,2,4-triazole moiety, e.g. Triazolam (Brucato et al., 1978), Alprazalam (Coffen and Fryer, 1973), Etizolam (Shiroki et al., 1975), Furacylin (Povelista and Gural, 1973), Ribavirin (Sidwell et al., 1975), Hexaconazole (Shepherd, 1986), Triadimefon (Lye, 1987), Mycobutanil (Efthimiadis, 1988), Rizatriptan (Hart, 1999), Propiconazole (Reet et al., 1976), and Fluotrimazole (Worthington, 1984). 3-Substituted-4-amino-5-mercapto-1,2,4-triazoles by virtue of their ambient nucleophilic centre are good starting materials for the synthesis of several interesting N-bridged heterocycles. A detailed literature survey revealed that, Schiff bases possess diverse type of biological activities (El-Sayed, 2006). Some Schiff’s bases bearing aryl groups or heterocyclic residues exhibited interesting biological activities, which has attracted many researchers’ attention in recent years (Holla et al., 2000; Isloor et al., 2009; Marina et al., 2002). Keeping in view of the above facts and in continuation of our search on biologically potent molecules, we herein report the synthesis of some new 1,2,4-triazole derivatives and their antimicrobial activity.

2

2 Experimental

2.1

2.1 Measurements

Melting points were determined by open capillary method and are uncorrected. The IR spectra (in KBr pellets) were recorded on a Thermo Nicolet avatar 330-FT-IR spectrophotometer. 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra were recorded (DMSO-d6) on a Bruker (400 MHz) spectrometer using TMS as internal standard. Chemical shift values are given in δ scales. The mass spectra were recorded on LC–MS-Agilent 1100 series and API 2000 LC/MS system. Elemental analyses were performed on a Flash EA 1112 series CHNS–O analyzer. The completion of the reaction was checked by thin layer chromatography (TLC) on silica gel coated aluminium sheets (Silica Gel 60 F254). Commercial grade solvents and reagents were used without further purification. The reaction pathway has been summarized in Scheme 1.

Synthetic route for the Schiff bases 4a–f.
Scheme 1
Synthetic route for the Schiff bases 4af.

2.2

2.2 Synthesis

2.2.1

2.2.1 Synthesis of N-[(4-amino-5-sulfanyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)methyl]-4-substituted-benzamide 3ab

An equimolar mixture of N-benzoylglycine/N-(p-tolyl)glycine 2a (0.01674 mol) and thiocarbohydrazide 1 (0.01674 mol) were fused on oil bath for 1 h. Then the reaction mixture was cooled and treated with a cold solution of 5% NaHCO3. The resulted solid was filtered, washed with water and recrystallised from ethanol.

2.2.1.1
2.2.1.1 N-[(4-Amino-5-sulfanyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)methyl]benzamide 3a (Hassan, 2009)

Yield 63.63%, m.p. 279–280 °C. IR (cm−1) 3447, 3316 (N–H str), 3096 (C–H str), 1652 (C⚌O str), 1601 (C⚌N). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) δ = 13.58 (s, 1H, S–H), 8.95 (t, 1H, N–H), 7.46–7.88 (m, 5H, Ar-H), 5.61 (s, 2H, –NH2), 4.49 (d, 2H, –CH2). MS (EI). m/z 250[M+1].

2.2.1.2
2.2.1.2 N-[(4-Amino-5-sulfanyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)methyl]-4-methylbenzamide 3b

Yield 46.90%, m.p. 220–221 °C. IR (cm−1) 3321, 3258 (N–H str), 3079 (C–H str), 1682 (C⚌O str), 1617 (C⚌N). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) δ = 13.47 (s, 1H, S–H), 8.51 (t, 1H, N–H), 7.18–7.78 (m, 4H, Ar-H), 5.48 (s, 2H, –NH2), 4.51 (d, 2H, –CH2). MS (EI). m/z 264[M+1].

2.2.2

2.2.2 Synthesis of N-[(4-{[(E)-substituted]amino}-5-sulfanyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)methyl]-4-substituted-benzamide 4a–f

Equimolar mixture of N-[(4-amino-5-sulfanyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)methyl]-4-substituted-benzamide 3ab (0.0004 mol), substituted benzaldehyde (0.0004 mol) and 2–3 drops of concentrated sulfuric acid in ethanol–dioxane mixture was refluxed for 6 h. The resulting solution was cooled to room temperature and the precipitated solid was filtered under suction, washed with cold ethanol and recrystallised from hot ethanol.

2.2.2.1
2.2.2.1 N-[(4-{[(E)-(4-Nitrophenyl)methylidene]amino}-5-sulfanyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)methyl]benzamide 4a

Yield 88.88%, m.p. 276–279 °C. IR (cm−1) 3322 (N–H str), 3046 (C–H stretch), 1642 (C⚌O str), 1596 (C⚌N), 1277 (C⚌S). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) δ = 13.99 (s, 1H, S–H), 10.4 (s, 1H, N⚌CH), 9.01 (t, 1H, N–H), 7.42–8.33 (m, 9H, Ar-H), 4.67 (d, 2H, –CH2). 13C NMR (DMSO-d6) δ = 166.3, 161.8, 158.9, 149.4, 148.8, 138.1, 133.6, 131.4, 129.6, 128.2, 127.2, 124.0, 34.2. MS[EI] m/z 383[M+1]. Elemental analysis (C17H14N6O3S); calcd. C, 53.40; H, 3.69; N, 21.98; found C, 53.36; H, 3.72; N, 21.95%.

2.2.2.2
2.2.2.2 N-[(4-{[(E)-(4-Methoxyphenyl)methylidene]amino}-5-sulfanyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)methyl]benzamide 4b

Yield 66.34%, m.p. 232–235 °C. IR (cm−1) 3282 (N–H str), 3057 (C–H stretch), 1641 (C⚌O str), 1603 (C⚌N), 1251 (C⚌S). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) δ = 13.82 (s, 1H, S–H), 9.78 (s, 1H, N⚌CH), 8.97 (t, 1H, N–H), 7.04–7.84 (m, 9H, Ar-H), 4.60 (d, 2H, –CH2), 3.84 (s, 3H, –OCH3). 13C NMR (DMSO-d6) δ = 166.3, 163.2, 162.7, 161.6, 148.3, 133.7, 131.3, 130.6, 128.2, 127.2, 124.5, 114.5, 55.4, 34.3. MS[EI] m/z 368[M+1]. Elemental analysis (C18H17N5O2S); calcd. C, 58.84; H, 4.66; N, 19.06; found C, 58.80; H, 4.61; N, 19.09%.

2.2.2.3
2.2.2.3 4-Methyl-N-[(4-{[(E)-(4-nitrophenyl)methylidene]amino}-5-sulfanyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)methyl]benzamide 4c

Yield 64.88%, m.p. 269–272 °C. IR (cm−1) 3318 (N–H str), 3035.8 (C–H str), 1640 (C⚌O str), 1603 (C⚌N), 1276 (C⚌S). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) δ = 13.99 (s, 1H, S–H), 10.41 (s, 1H, N⚌CH), 8.93 (t, 1H, N–H), 7.24–8.34 (m, 8H, Ar-H), 4.67 (d, 2H, –CH2), 2.33 (s, 3H, CH3). 13C NMR (DMSO-d6) δ = 166.2, 161.8, 158.8, 149.3, 148.8, 141.3, 138.1, 130.8, 129.6, 128.8, 127.2, 124.0, 34.2, 20.8. MS[EI] m/z 397[M+1]. Elemental analysis (C18H16N6O3S); calcd. C, 54.54; H, 4.07; N, 21.20; found C, 54.59; H, 4.01; N, 21.25%.

2.2.2.4
2.2.2.4 N-[(4-{[(E)-(4-Methoxyphenyl)methylidene]amino}-5-sulfanyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)methyl]-4-methylbenzamide 4d

Yield 75.11%, m.p. 246–250 °C. IR (cm−1) 3283 (N–H str), 3053 (C–H stretch), 1634 (C⚌O str), 1604 (C⚌N), 1246 (C⚌S). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) δ = 13.68 (s, 1H, S–H), 10.12 (s, 1H, N⚌CH), 8.69 (t, 1H, N–H), 6.96–7.83 (m, 8H, Ar-H), 4.62 (d, 2H, –CH2), 3.86 (s, 3H, –OCH3), 2.38 (s, 3H, –CH3). MS[EI] m/z 382[M+1]. Elemental analysis (C19H19N5O2S); calcd. C, 59.82; H, 5.02; N, 18.36; found C, 59.78; H, 5.06; N, 18.31%.

2.2.2.5
2.2.2.5 N-[(4-{[(E)-(4-Chlorophenyl)methylidene]amino}-5-sulfanyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)methyl]-4-methylbenzamide 4e

Yield 62.10%, m.p. 257–258.5 °C. IR (cm−1) 3295 (N–H str), 3045 (C–H str), 1637 (C⚌O str), 1585 (C⚌N), 1274 (C⚌S). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) δ = 13.94 (s, 1H, S–H), 10.08 (s, 1H, N⚌CH), 8.94 (t, 1H, N–H), 7.24–7.93 (m, 8H, Ar-H), 4.61 (d, 2H, –CH2), 2.33 (s, 3H, –CH3). 13C NMR (DMSO-d6) δ = 166.2, 161.7, 161.3, 148.6, 141.4, 137.2, 131.0, 130.9, 130.2, 129.2, 128.8, 127.3, 34.2, 20.9. MS[EI] m/z 386. MS[EI] m/z 386[M+1]. Elemental analysis (C18H16ClN5OS); calcd. C, 56.03; H, 4.18; N, 18.15; found C, 56.07; H, 4.12; N, 18.20%.

2.2.2.6
2.2.2.6 N-[(4-{[(E)-(3,4-Dimethoxyphenyl)methylidene]amino}-5-sulfanyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)methyl]-4-methylbenzamide 4f

Yield 81.62%, m.p. 231–235 °C. IR (cm−1) 3372 (N–H stretch), 3052 (C–H stretch), 1653 (C⚌O str), 1595 (C⚌N), 1259 (C⚌S). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) δ = 13.88 (s, 1H, S–H), 9.82 (s, 1H, N⚌CH), 8.92 (t, 1H, N–H), 7.06–7.75 (m, 7H, Ar-H), 4.64 (d, 2H, –CH2), 2.33 (s, 3H, –CH3), 3.74 (s, 3H, –OCH3), 3.84 (s, 3H, –OCH3). 13C NMR (DMSO-d6) δ = 166.2, 163.0, 161.6, 152.7, 149.1, 148.4, 141.3, 131.0, 128.8, 127.3, 124.7, 124.6, 111.2, 108.8, 55.6, 55.3, 34.3, 20.9. MS[EI] m/z 412[M+1]. Elemental analysis (C20H21N5O3S); calcd. C, 58.38; H, 5.14; N, 17.02; found C, 58.41; H, 5.19; N, 17.07%.

2.3

2.3 Antimicrobial studies

All the newly synthesized compounds were evaluated for their antimicrobial activities against various microorganisms representing Gram-positive bacteria (Staphylococcus aureus and Bacillus subtilis), Gram-negative bacteria (Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa) and fungus (Candida albicans), using the Minimum Inhibition Concentration (MIC) method by the serial dilution technique (Mackie and Mc Cartney, 1989). Several colonies of S. aureus, B. subtilis, E. coli and P. aeruginosa were picked off a fresh isolation plate and inoculated in corresponding tubes containing 5 mL of trypticase soya broth. The broth was incubated for 6 h at 37 °C until there was visible growth. Mc Farland No.5 standard was prepared by adding 0.05 mL of 1% w/v BaCl2·2H2O in Phosphate Buffered saline (PBS) to 9.95 mL of 1% v/v H2SO4 in PBS. The growth of all the four cultures was adjusted to Mc Farland No. 5 turbidity standard using sterile PBS. This gives a 108 cfu/mL suspension. The working inoculums of above mentioned four different microorganisms containing 105 cfu/mL suspension was prepared by diluting the 108 cfu/mL suspension, 103 times in trypticase soya broth.

Antimicrobial suspension was prepared by dissolving 0.5 μg of each compound in 10 mL of trypticase soya broth to get 50 μg/mL. This suspension was filter sterilized in syringe filters. To prepare the dilutions in all, for each of the eight anti-microbial compounds and standard antimicrobial i.e. Ceftriaxone, 24 tubes of 5 mL capacity were arranged in four rows with each row containing six tubes. Then 1.9 mL of trypticase soya broth was added in the first tube in each row and 1 mL in the remaining tubes. Now, 100 μl of filtered anti microbial suspension was added to the first tube in each row and after mixing the content, 1 mL was serially transferred from these tubes to the second tube in each of the rows. The contents in the second tube of each of the rows were mixed and transferred to the third tube in each of the rows. This serial dilution was repeated till the sixth tube in each of the rows. This provided anti microbial concentrations of 50, 25, 12.5, 6.25, 3.125, 1.6125 μg/mL in the first to sixth tube, respectively, in each row. Finally, 1 mL of 105 cfu/mL of S. aureus, B. subtilis, E. coli, P. aeruginosa and C. albicans suspension were added to the first, second, third and fourth rows of tubes, respectively. Along with the test samples and Ceftriaxone (standard), the inoculum control (without antimicrobial compound) and broth control (without antimicrobial compound and inoculum) were maintained. All the test sample and control tubes were then incubated for 16 h at 37 °C. The results of the antimicrobial studies are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1 Antimicrobial activity of newly synthesized compounds.
Compound No. Antibacterial (MIC, μg/mL) Antifungal (MIC, μg/mL)
S. aureus B. subtilis E. coli P. aeruginosa C. albicans
4a 3.125 3.125 3.125 3.125 1.6125
4b 3.125 3.125 3.125 3.125 3.125
4c 3.125 3.125 3.125 3.125 3.125
4d 3.125 3.125 3.125 3.125 3.125
4e 3.125 3.125 3.125 3.125 3.125
4f 3.125 3.125 25.00 25.00 1.6125
Ceftriaxone (standard) 3.125 1.6125 1.6125 1.6125 3.125
Inoculum control Growth in all concentrations Growth in all concentrations Growth in all concentrations Growth in all concentration Growth in all concentrations
Broth control No growth No growth No growth No growth No growth

3

3 Results and discussion

3.1

3.1 Chemistry

Formation of N-[(4-{[(E)-substituted]amino}-5-sulfanyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)methyl]-4-substituted-benzamide (4) was confirmed by recording their IR, NMR, mass spectra and elemental analyses. IR spectrum of compound 4a showed absorption bands at 3322, 3046, 1642, 1596 and 1277 cm−1 which is due to the N–H, C–H, C⚌O, C⚌N and C⚌S groups, respectively. The 1H NMR spectrum of 4a showed a singlet at δ 13.99 corresponds to S–H proton. A singlet at δ 10.4 was due to N⚌CH proton. A triplet was observed at δ 9.01 was due to N–H attached to –CH2. The appearance of doublet at δ 4.67 and multiplet at δ 7.42–8.33 was due to –CH2 and aromatic ring protons, respectively. Similarly the mass spectrum was recorded and reported as[M+1] values. For the compound 4a, molecular weight 383 is consistent with the molecular formula C17H14N6O3S. The values for the remaining compounds have been presented under the experimental part.

3.2

3.2 Antimicrobial activity

All the newly synthesized compounds were screened for their antibacterial and antifungal activities. For antibacterial studies, microorganisms employed were S. aureus, B. subtilis, E. coli and P. aeruginosa. For antifungal studies, microorganism employed was C. albicans. Both antimicrobial studies were assessed by Minimum Inhibition Concentration (MIC) method by the serial dilution technique.

From the antimicrobial activity study, it was found that, compounds 4af exhibited the same activity as that of the standard drug Ceftriaxone against S. aureus and moderate activity against other bacteria B. subtilis, E. coli, P. aeruginosa and also fungus C. albicans. The observed activity may be due to presence of chloro, methoxy and nitro groups in these compounds. The antifungal activity of compounds 4a and 4f against C. albicans was found to be higher than that for the standard drug. However, remaining compounds exhibited same activity as that of standard drug. The observed activity in 4a and 4f is may be due to the presence of nitro group alone for the 4a, and in 4f, it may be due to the number and orientation of methoxy group.

4

4 Conclusion

A novel series of Schiff bases bearing 1,2,4-triazole ring systems were synthesized. These were characterized by IR, NMR, mass spectrometry study and elemental analyses. All the compounds were screened for their antibacterial and antifungal activity by serial dilution method. Compounds 4af exhibited the same activity as that of the standard drug Ceftriaxone against S. aureus. Compounds 4a and 4f have showed excellent antifungal activity.

Acknowledgements

The Authors extend their appreciation to The Deanship of Scientific Research at King Saud University for the funding the work through the research group project No. RGP-VPP-207.

References

  1. , , , , . Bull. Soc. Ital. Sper.. 1978;54:1051.
  2. , , . J. Heterocycl. Chem.. 2009;46:88-90.
  3. Coffen, D.L., Fryer, R.I., 1973. U.S. Patent 3,849,434, 1974, Chem. Abstr. 82, 730044v.
  4. Efthimiadis, P., 1988. In: Proceedings of British Crop Conference, Brighton, vol. 3, p. 887.
  5. , . Cas. Lek. Cesk.. 2001;140:596-604.
  6. Hart, C., 1999. Drugs for migraine, In: Modern Drug Discovery, American Chemical Society.
  7. , . Phosphorus, Sulfur Silicon Relat. Elem.. 2009;184(11):2759-2776.
  8. , , , , . Farmaco. 2000;55:338-344.
  9. , , , . Eur. J. Med. Chem.. 2009;44:3784-3787.
  10. Lye, H., 1987. Modern Selective Fungicides, Longman Scientific Technical, Harlow, pp. 13–30.
  11. Mackie, Mc Cartney., 1989. Practical Medical Microbiology, 13th ed. Churchill Livingstone Longman Group UK Limited, pp. 46–48.
  12. , , , , , , , , . Farmaco. 2002;57:253-257.
  13. , , , . Arzneim. Forsch.. 2001;51:569-573.
  14. Povelista, F.D., Gural, A.G., 1973. Antibiotiki (Mosc.) 18, 71; Chem. Abstr. 78, 93044.
  15. Reet, G.V., Heeres, J., Wals, L., 1976. Ger. Pat. 2,551,560, 1976; Chem. Abstr. 85, 94368.
  16. El-Sayed, R., 2006. Indian J. Chem. 45B, 738–746.
  17. Shepherd, M.C., 1986. In: Proceedings of British Crop Protection Conference, Brighton, vol. 1, p. 19.
  18. Shiroki, M., Tahara, T., Araki, K., 1975. Jap. Pat. 75100096.
  19. , , , , , . Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med.. 1975;148:854-858.
  20. The Merck Index., 1996. 12th ed. Merck and Co. Inc., Whitehouse Station, New Jersey.
  21. Worthington, P.A., 1984. In: Proceedings of British Crop Protection Conference, Brighton, vol. 3, p. 955.
Show Sections