5.2
Impact Factor
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Corrigendum
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Full Length Article
Full lenth article
Letter to Editor
Original Article
Research article
Retraction
Retraction notice
Review
Review Article
SPECIAL ISSUE: ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY
5.3
Impact Factor
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Corrigendum
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Full Length Article
Full lenth article
Letter to Editor
Original Article
Research article
Retraction
Retraction notice
Review
Review Article
SPECIAL ISSUE: ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original article
10 (
2_suppl
); S2994-S3000
doi:
10.1016/j.arabjc.2013.11.038

Synthesis of 2-amino-7-hydroxy-4H-chromene derivatives under ultrasound irradiation: A rapid procedure without catalyst

Laboratory of Organic Chemistry Research, Department of Organic Chemistry, College of Chemistry, University of Kashan, 87317-51167 Kashan, Islamic Republic of Iran

⁎Corresponding author. Tel.: +98 361 5912320; fax: +98 361 5912935. Safari@kashanu.ac.ir (Javad Safari)

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Elsevier and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Peer review under responsibility of King Saud University.

Abstract

A highly efficient three-component synthesis of 2-amino-7-hydroxy-4H-chromenes by one-step condensation of aldehydes with malononitrile and resorcinol without catalyst in water under ultrasonic irradiation is described. This implies a convenient route avoiding the usage of hazardous organic solvents. The versatility of this method was checked by employing various aldehydes (acyclic, aromatic and heteroaromatic) which showed reasonable yields of chromene derivatives under ultrasound irradiation. Compared with conventional methods, the main advantages of the present procedure are its being a green method, its milder conditions, necessary shorter reaction time, and its higher yields and selectivity without the need for a transition metal or base catalyst.

Keywords

Ultrasound irradiation
Chromene
Catalyst-free
Resorcinol
Aqueous conditions
1

1 Introduction

Ultrasound has increasingly been used in organic synthesis. A large number of ultrasonic reactions can be carried out in higher yield, shorter reaction time or milder conditions (Mason and Peters, 2002; Luche, 1998; Li et al., 2002; Zang et al., 2009). As we know that the temperature of hot spots caused by the collapse of acoustic caves is generally as high as more than several hundred degrees, this energy can be transferred to the organic molecules and absorbed by them to dramatically raise their intrinsic energy. Due to the thermal effect of ultrasound wave, much larger amount of molecules can meet the demand for the active energy in a given reaction, leading to the apparent improvement of the reaction efficiency with increased rates and reduced reaction time. It is also observed that reactions under ultrasound irradiation are commonly easier to work-up than those in conventional stirring methods. A large number of organic reactions can be carried out in higher yield, shorter reaction time and under milder conditions, by using ultrasonic irradiation (Nikpassand et al., 2010; Mason, 2007; Kimmel, 2006; Rahman et al., 2009; Goharshadi et al., 2009; Safari et al., 2012). Also, multi-component reactions (MCRs) are a very powerful tool for the construction of complex organic molecules by using readily available starting materials. MCRs have been frequently used by synthetic chemists as a facile means to generate molecular diversity from substrates that react sequentially in an intramolecular fashion (Dömling and Ugi, 2000; Dömling, 2006; Grasso et al., 2000).

In recent years, much attention has been focused on multicomponent synthesis in water as solvent. Water is the cheapest abundantly available solvent. Indeed, water is recognized as an attractive medium for many organic reactions. Reactions in aqueous media are generally environmentally safe, devoid of any carcinogenic effects, simple to handle, comparatively cheaper to operate, and especially important in industry (Safari et al., 2011; Li et al., 2010; Shi et al., 2003). Heterocycles containing the chromene moiety show interesting features that make them attractive targets for MCRs. Among different types of chromene systems, 2-amino-4H-chromenes are of particular utility as they belong to privileged medicinal scaffolds serving for generation of small-molecule ligands with highly pronounced anticoagulant, diuretic, spasmolitic and antianaphylactic activities (Patchett and Nargund, 2000; Bonsignore et al., 1993; Foye, 1991). The current interest in 2-amino-4H-chromene derivatives arises from their potential application in the treatment of human inflammatory TNFα-mediated diseases, such as psoriatic arthritis and rheumatoid and in cancer therapy (Skommer et al., 2006; Gourdeau et al., 2004). Many of the methods reported for the synthesis of these compounds (Kabalka et al., 2004; Makarem et al., 2008; Shaabani et al., 2009) are associated with the use of toxic catalyst and bases, long reaction time, and lack of general applicability. Herein, we wish to report a simple and efficient procedure for the synthesis of 2-amino-7-hydroxy-4H-chromene without catalyst and base in water under ultrasound irradiation (Scheme 1), which is designed to overcome the above mentioned limitations. To the best of our knowledge the catalyst and base free synthesis of these compounds with use of aliphatic aldehydes and heteroaromatic aldehydes in water under ultrasound irradiation previously has not been reported.

Ultrasonic promoted green synthesis of 2-amino-7-hydroxy-4H-chromene in water.
Scheme 1 Ultrasonic promoted green synthesis of 2-amino-7-hydroxy-4H-chromene in water.

2

2 Experimental

2.1

2.1 Chemical and apparatus

Chemical reagents in high purity were purchased from the Merck Chemical Company. All materials were of commercial reagent grade. Melting points were determined in open capillaries using an Electrothermal Mk3 apparatus and are uncorrected. Infrared (IR) spectra were recorded using a Perkin-Elmer FT-IR 550 Spectrometer. 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra were recorded with a Bruker DRX-400 spectrometer at 400 and 100 MHz, respectively. NMR spectra were obtained in DMSO-d6 solutions. The element analyses (C, H, N) were obtained from a Carlo ERBA Model EA 1108 analyzer carried out on Perkin-Elmer 240c analyzer. Ultrasonication was performed in a EUROSONIC® 4D ultrasound cleaner with a frequency of 50 kHz and an output power of 200 W. The reaction ask was located in the maximum energy area in the cleaner, where the surface of reactants (reaction vessel) is slightly lower than the level of the water and the temperature of the water bath was controlled at 60 °C.

2.2

2.2 General procedure for the synthesis of 2-amino-7-hydroxy-4H-chromenes in water under ultrasound irradiation

A 50 mL flask was charged with aldehyde (1 mmol), malononitrile (1 mmol) and resorcinol (1 mmol) in water (2 mL). The mixture was sonicated under silent condition by ultrasound (50 kHz) at 60 °C for the appropriate time, as shown in Table 3. The temperature of reaction mixture was controlled by a water batch. After the completion of the reaction (monitored by TLC), the reaction was allowed to cool, the solvent was evaporated, then the solid residue was recrystallized from ethanol to afford the pure 2-amino-7-hydroxy-4H-chromene derivatives as white solid (Table 3).

Table 3 Synthesis of 2-amino-7-hydroxy-4H-chromene under ultrasonic conditions in water at 60 °C.
Entry R Product Time (min) Yielda (%) Mp (°C)
1 C6H5 4a 1 98 234–237b
2 4-MeC6H4 4b 1 96 183–186b
3 4-MeOC6H4 4c 1 97 110–112b
4 3-ClC6H4 4d 1 95 1106–109c
5 3-HOC6H4 4e 1 95 2215–217c
6 2-FC6H4 4f 1.3 97 2218–221c
7 2-MeOC6H4 4g 1.6 94 2222–224c
8 2,4-Cl2C6H3 4h 1.5 94 2256–258c
9 2,6-Cl2C6H3 4i 1.5 95 217–220c
10 3,5-(MeO)2C6H3 4j 1.3 95 191–193c
11 2-Naphthyl 4k 1 96 230–232c
12 2-Furyl 4l 1.8 97 208–210c
13 2-Thienyl 4m 1.6 96 228–231c
14 5-Mefuryl 4n 2 95 179–181c
15 Ethyl 4o 2.5 91 169–172c
16 Propyl 4p 2.5 93 160–162c
17 Hepthyl 4q 2.3 92 124–126c
18 OHCC6H4 4r 1.5 97 >300c

2.3

2.3 Spectroscopic data for new compounds

2.3.1

2.3.1 2-Amino-3-cyano-7-hydroxy-4-(3-chlorophenyl)-4H-chromene (4d)

IR (KBr) (νmax cm−1): 3423 (OH), 3338 (NH2), 2192 (CN), 1656 (C⚌C vinyl nitrile), 1582 (C⚌C aromatic); 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δH 4.739 (s, 1H, H-4), 6.382 (d, 1H, J = 3, H-Ar), 6.457 (dd, 1H, J = 3, J = 9, H-Ar), 6.591 (d, 1H, J = 9, H-Ar), 6.94 (s, 2H, NH2), 7.04–7.30 (m, 4H, H-Ar), 9.73 (s, 1H, OH) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): δC 56.32, 102.71, 112.96, 113.37, 113.66, 121.01, 128.23, 129.04, 129.75, 130.31, 130.38, 131.72, 145.79, 149.29, 157.69, 160.72 ppm;

2.3.2

2.3.2 2-Amino-3-cyano-7-hydroxy-4-(3-hydroxyphenyl)-4H-chromene (4e)

IR (KBr) (νmax cm−1): 3415 (OH), 3336 (NH2), 2188 (CN), 1651 (C⚌C vinyl nitrile), 1586 (C⚌C aromatic); 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δH 4.49 (s, 1H, H-4), 6.39 (d, 1H, J = 3, H-Ar), 6.46 (dd, 1H, J = 3, J = 9, H-Ar), 6.52 (d, 1H, J = 9, H-Ar), 6.84 (s, 2H, NH2), 6.53–7.08 (m, 4H, H-Ar), 9.33 (s,1H, OH), 9.68 (s, 1H, 7-OH) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): δC 57.04, 102.57, 112.79, 112.93, 114.38, 114.52, 121.19, 126.47, 128.89, 129.92, 130.39, 138.94, 149.22, 157.42, 158.42, 160.54 ppm.

2.3.3

2.3.3 2-Amino-3-cyano-7-hydroxy-4-(2-fluorophenyl)-4H-chromene (4f)

IR (KBr) (νmax cm−1): 3425 (OH), 3223 (NH2), 2192 (CN), 1652 (C⚌C vinyl nitrile), 1564 (C⚌C aromatic); 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δH 4.87 (s, 1H,H-4), 6.394 (d, 1H, J = 3, H-Ar), 6.464 (dd, 1H, J = 3, J = 9, H-Ar), 6.756 (d, 1H, J = 9, H-Ar), 6.918 (s, 2H, NH2), 7.09–7.25 (m, 4H, H-Ar) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): δC 56.09, 102.59, 112.72, 112.97, 113.32, 114.64, 121.25, 125.87, 128.69, 130.93, 131.17, 138.74, 149.21, 158.02, 158.32, 160.44 ppm.

2.3.4

2.3.4 2-Amino-3-cyano-7-hydroxy-4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-4H-chromene (4g)

IR (KBr) (νmax cm−1): 3449 (OH), 3351 (NH2), 2186 (CN), 1645 (C⚌C vinyl nitrile), 1587 (C⚌C aromatic); 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δH 3.77 (s, 3H, OMe), 4.97 (s, 1H, H-4), 6.37 (d, 1H, J = 3, H-Ar), 6.43 (dd, 1H, J = 3, J = 10, H-Ar), 6.80 (d, 1H, J = 10, H-Ar), 6.81 (s, 2H, NH2), 6.81–7.17 (m, 4H, H-Ar) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): δC 55.42, 56.22, 102.41, 113.16, 113.32, 113.96, 121.12, 127.23, 128.34, 128.67, 130.43, 130.57, 138.68, 148.79, 157.39, 158.61, 160.42 ppm.

2.3.5

2.3.5 2-Amino-3-cyano-7-hydroxy-4-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4H-chromene (4h)

IR (KBr) (νmax cm−1): 3470 (OH), 3342 (NH2), 2192 (CN), 1647 (C⚌C vinyl nitrile), 1585 (C⚌C aromatic); 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δH 5.12 (s, 1H, H-4), 6.39 (d, 1H, J = 3, H-Ar), 6.46 (dd, 1H, J = 9, J = 3, H-Ar), 6.69 (d, 1H, J = 9, H-Ar), 6.98 (s, 2H, NH2), 7.19 (d, 1H, J = 8, H-Ar), 7.38 (dd, 1H, J = 2, J = 8, H-Ar), 7.57 (d, 1H, J = 2, H-Ar), 9.77 (s, 1H, OH) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): δC 56.63, 102.72, 112.71, 112.91, 113.83, 113.97, 121.13, 121.63, 129.75, 129.95, 130.37, 142.04, 149.35, 155.62, 159.94, 160.69 ppm.

2.3.6

2.3.6 2-Amino-3-cyano-7-hydroxy-4-(2,6-dichlorophenyl)-4H-chromene (4i)

IR (KBr) (νmax cm−1): 3465 (OH), 3336 (NH2), 2191 (CN), 1648 (C⚌C vinyl nitrile), 1588 (C⚌C aromatic); 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δH 5.67 (s, 1H, H-4), 6.35 (d, 1H, J = 3, H-Ar), 6.43 (dd, 1H, J = 10, J = 3, H-Ar), 6.55 (d, 1H, J = 10, H-Ar), 6.92 (s, 2H, NH2), 7.27–7.53 (m, 3H, H-Ar), 9.73 (s, 1H, OH) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): δC 55.42, 102.58, 112.91, 113.24, 113.54, 120.22, 120.93, 130.14, 130.25, 131.96, 146.32, 149.36, 157.79, 160.73 ppm.

2.3.7

2.3.7 2-Amino-3-cyano-7-hydroxy-4-(3,5-dimethoxyphenyl)-4H-chromene (4j)

IR (KBr) (νmax cm−1): 3460 (OH), 3332 (NH2), 2191 (CN), 1643 (C⚌C vinyl nitrile), 1628 (C⚌C aromatic); 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δH 3.67 (s, 6H, OMe), 4.51 (s, 1H, H-4), 6.28 (d, 1H, J = 3, H-Ar), 6.33 (dd, 1H, J = 3, J = 9, H-Ar), 6.45 (d, 1H, J = 9, H-Ar), 6.84 (s, 2H, NH2), 6.97–7.28 (m, 3H, H-Ar), 9.73 (s, 1H, OH) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): δC 55.62, 56.47, 102.77, 112.73, 113.82, 121.02, 128.64, 129.65, 130.22, 131.02, 143.06, 149.15, 156.63, 159.83, 160.72 ppm.

2.3.8

2.3.8 2-Amino-3-cyano-7-hydroxy-4-(2-naphthyl)-4H-chromene (4k)

IR (KBr) (νmax cm−1): 3425 (OH), 3332 (NH2), 2192 (CN), 1655 (C⚌C vinyl nitrile), 1584 (C⚌C aromatic); 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δH 4.79 (s, 1H, H-4), 6.42 (d, 1H, J = 3, H-Ar), 6.44 (dd, 1H, J = 3, J = 9, H-Ar), 6.78 (d, 1H, J = 9, H-Ar), 6.93 (s, 2H, NH2), 7.22–7.89 (m, 7H, H-Ar), 9.72 (s, 1H, OH) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): δC 56.67, 102.59, 112.79, 113.27, 114.68, 114.95, 115.32, 116.21, 116.57, 121.14, 129.62, 129.83, 130.41, 131.36, 131.59, 143.11, 145.27, 146.79, 157.63, 160.67 ppm.

2.3.9

2.3.9 2-Amino-3-cyano-7-hydroxy-4-(2-furyl)-4H-chromene (4l)

IR (KBr) (νmax cm−1): 3478 (OH), 3419 (NH2), 2192 (CN), 1651 (C⚌C vinyl nitrile), 1585 (C⚌C aromatic); 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δH 4.75 (s, 1H, H-4), 6.12 (d, 1H, J = 2, H-Ar), 6.33 (dd, 1H, J = 2, J = 8, H-Ar), 6.51 (d, 1H, J = 8, H-Ar), 6.94 (s, 2H, NH2), 7.27–7.50 (m, 3H, H-furyl), 9.75 (s, 1H, OH) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): δC 53.83, 102.81, 106.78, 110.31, 112.34, 112.93, 116.33, 120.97, 130.36, 149.55, 151.43, 155.57, 157.62, 161.33 ppm.

2.3.10

2.3.10 2-Amino-3-cyano-7-hydroxy-4-(2-thienyl)-4H-chromene (4m)

IR (KBr) (νmax cm−1): 3459 (OH), 3421 (NH2), 2192 (CN), 1652 (C⚌C vinyl nitrile), 1588 (C⚌C aromatic); 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δH 4.96 (s, 1H, H-4), 6.37 (d, 1H, J = 3, H-Ar), 6.50 (d, 1H, J = 3, J = 10, H-Ar), 6.90 (d, 1H, J = 10, H-Ar), 6.91 (s, 2H, NH2), 6.96–7.33 (m, 3H, H-thienyl), 9.74 (s, 1H, OH) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): δC 53.87, 102.86, 106.94, 111.42, 112.39, 112.86, 116.53, 121.67, 130.97, 149.59, 153.49, 155.47, 157.69, 161.96 ppm.

2.3.11

2.3.11 2-Amino-3-cyano-7-hydroxy-4-(5-methylfuryl)-4H-chromene (4n)

IR (KBr) (νmax cm−1): 3437 (OH), 3333 (NH2), 2189 (CN), 1649 (C⚌C vinyl nitrile), 1586 (C⚌C aromatic); 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δH 2.14 (s, 3H, Me), 4.66 (s, 1H, H-4), 5.92 (d, 1H, J = 2, H-Ar), 6.98 (d, 1H, J = 2, J = 10, H-Ar), 6.375 (d, 1H, J = 10, H-Ar), 6.536 (d, 1H, H-furyl), 6.917 (s, 2H, NH2), 6.938 (d, 1H, H-furyl), 9.752(s, 1H, OH) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): δC 34.27, 53.86, 102.82, 106.74, 109.58, 110.32, 112.74, 120.96, 130.02, 146.79, 149.56, 151.40, 155.60, 157.82, 161.33 ppm.

2.3.12

2.3.12 2-Amino-3-cyano-7-hydroxy-4-(ethyl)-4H-chromene (4o)

IR (KBr) (νmax cm−1): 3460 (OH), 3332 (NH2), 2193 (CN), 1650 (C⚌C vinyl nitrile), 1625 (C⚌C aromatic); 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δH 0.635 (t, 3H, J = 6, Me), 1.541(qd, 2H, J = 6, J = 8, CH2), 3.438 (t, 1H, J = 8, H-4), 6.326 (d, 1H, J = 2, H-Ar), 6.527 (dd, 1H, J = 2, J = 10, H-Ar), 6.710 (s, 2H, NH2), 6.991 (d, 1H, J = 2, H-Ar), 9.607 (s, 1H, OH) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): δC 26.62, 27.57, 43.76, 102.66, 107.94, 111.43, 112.26, 114.57, 121.69, 131.92, 156.58, 160.96 ppm.

2.3.13

2.3.13 2-Amino-3-cyano-7-hydroxy-4-(propyl)-4H-chromene (4p)

IR (KBr) (νmax cm−1): 3466 (OH), 3338 (NH2), 2193 (CN), 1648 (C⚌C vinyl nitrile), 1620 (C⚌C aromatic); 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δH 0.778 (t, 3H, Me), 1.011 (m, 2H, CH3CH2), 1.497 (m, 2H, CH2CH), 3.358 (t, 1H, H-4), 6.307 (d, 1H, J = 2, H-Ar), 6.503 (dd, 1H, J = 2, J = 10, H-Ar), 6.695 (s, 2H, NH2), 6.959 (d, 1H, J = 10, H-Ar), 9.590 (s, 1H, OH) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): δC 26.42, 26.65, 27.59, 43.78, 102.73, 107.93, 111.39, 112.27, 114.56, 121.65, 131.86, 156.58, 160.92 ppm.

2.3.14

2.3.14 2-Amino-3-cyano-7-hydroxy-4-(hepthyl)-4H-chromene (4q)

IR (KBr) (νmax cm−1): 3482 (OH), 3328 (NH2), 2197 (CN), 1647 (C⚌C vinyl nitrile), 1589 (C⚌C aromatic); 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δH 0.783(t, 3H, Me), 2.36 (m, 12H, 6(CH2)) 3.358 (t, 1H, H-4), 6.307 (d, 1H, J = 2, H-Ar), 6.503 (dd, 1H, J = 2, J = 10, H-Ar), 6.695 (s, 2H, NH2), 6.959 (d, 1H, J = 10, H-Ar), 9.590 (s, 1H, OH) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): δC 23.86, 24.69, 24.76, 26.42, 26.65, 26.88, 27.59, 43.78, 102.82, 107.94, 111.46, 112.23, 114.59, 121.67, 131.93, 156.69, 160.90 ppm.

2.3.15

2.3.15 4,4′ (1,4-Phenylene) bis (2-amino-3-cyano-7-hydroxy-4H-chromene) (4r)

IR (KBr) (νmax cm−1): 3427 (OH), 3330 (NH2), 2191 (CN), 1650 (C⚌C vinyl nitrile), 1588 (C⚌C aromatic); 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δH 4.554 (s, 2H, H-4), 6.380 (d, 2H, J = 3, H-Ar), 6.455(dd, 2H, J = 3, J = 9, H-Ar), 6.522 (d, 2H, J = 9, H-Ar), 6.826 (s, 4H, NH2), 6.974–7.063 (m, 4H, H-Ar), 9.683 (s, 2H, OH) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): δC 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 57.43, 102.62, 112.79, 112.82, 113.74, 113.92, 121.66, 128.85, 130.27, 144.02, 149.25, 159.93, 160.67 ppm.

3

3 Results and discussion

To achieve suitable conditions for the synthesis of 2-amino-7-hydroxy-4H-chromene, various reaction conditions have been investigated in the reaction of aldehyde 1a, malononitrile 2, and resorcinol 3 as a model reaction.

3.1

3.1 Effects of the solvents under ultrasound irradiation

We examined the effect of various polar protic, aprotic and non polar solvents on a model reaction under ultrasound irradiation at room temperature (Table 1, entry 1–12). We did this experiment under solvent free condition but the reaction did not take place even after prolonged reaction time (Table 1, entry 1). The above results indicate that the solvent is required for the reaction. As could be seen in Table 1, in non polar solvents such as n-hexane, chloroform and dry diethyl ether, the reaction did not go in a forward direction, whereas in case of polar aprotic solvents such as DMSO, acetonitrile, THF, 1,4-dioxane and DMF, the yield of the reaction was found to be very low (15–30%, Table 1, entries 6–10) but in case of polar protic solvents such as ethanol (Table 1, entry 11), desire product was obtained in 62% yield. This observation revealed that, the present reaction required highly polar protic solvent system; thus we chose water as a greener and environmentally acceptable solvent for multicomponent reaction of benzaldehyde 1a, malononitrile 2, and resorcinol 3 for the synthesis of chromene derivatives (Table 1, entry 12).

Table 1 Optimization of reaction conditions for the synthesis of 4a under ultrasound irradiation.a
Entry Solvent Method Time (min) Yieldb (%)
1 Ultrasound 120
2 Hexane Ultrasound 120
3 Chloroform Ultrasound 120
4 Diethyl ether Ultrasound 120
5 DMSO Ultrasound 120 18
6 Acetonitrile Ultrasound 120 30
7 THF Ultrasound 120 15
8 1,4-Dioxane Ultrasound 120 25
9 DMF Ultrasound 120 20
10 EtOH Ultrasound 30 62
11 Water Ultrasound 9 73
12 Water High speed stirring 180 c
Reaction conditions: aldehyde 1a (1 mmol), malononitrile 2 (1 mmol), and resorcinol 3 (1 mmol), 2 ml solvent and the ultrasonic power 200 W at 25 °C in frequency of 10 kHz.
Isolated yield.
Only obtained intermediate 5a.

3.2

3.2 Effects of reaction temperature and frequency under ultrasonic irradiation

Subsequent efforts were focused on optimizing conditions for the formation of 2-amino-7-hydroxy-4H-chromene by using different temperatures and frequencies of ultrasonic irradiation to determine their effects on the reaction (Table 2). At 60 °C the yield of the product is maximum. Due to the unavailability of activation energy, the rate of the reaction is very slow at a temperature below 60 °C and at a higher temperature there might be some sort of polymerization of the Knoevenagel condensation product which lowers the yield of the desired product. It was observed that the reaction in the presence of water and ultrasonic irradiation with power 200 W at 60 °C in frequency of 50 kHz afforded the best result as obtained product with 98% isolated yield during 1 min (Table 2, entry 8).

Table 2 The model reaction in different conditions under ultrasound irradiation.a
Entry Temperature (°C) Frequency (kHz) Time (min) Yield (%)
1 25 10 9 73
2 30 15 8.5 75
3 35 20 7.8 76
4 40 30 6.5 81
5 45 35 6 83
6 50 40 5.6 86
7 55 45 4 90
8 60 50 1 98
9 65 55 1 92
Reaction conditions: aldehyde 1a (1 mmol), malononitrile 2 (1 mmol), and resorcinol 3 (1 mmol) and 2 ml water.

3.3

3.3 The effect of ultrasonic irradiation

To assess the efficiency of ultrasound irradiation in inducing this reaction, the reaction of aldehyde 1a with malononitrile 2 and resorcinol 3 as a model was investigated under high speed stirring conditions. We observed a small amount of solid in this system at first because of aldehyde and malononitrile insoluble or slightly soluble in water. The reaction failed to component (5a) in only 40% yield even after long hours of stirring (Table 1, entry 13).

The mechanism of this reaction can be seen as sequential reactions involving Knoevenagel reaction, Michael addition and an intra-molecular cyclization that may take place in the formation of the final product under ultrasound irradiation. The probable mechanism is given in Scheme 2 (Khaksar et al., 2012; Safari and Zarnegar, 2012). When the reaction was performed under sonication, the precipitates were observed disappearing gradually and forming again in great numbers. After filtration and analysis such as 1H NMR, it was surprising to find that the product is the desired one. In this solid–liquid heterogeneous system, ultrasound was found to have a beneficent effect on the synthesis. Passage of ultrasound through liquid medium gives rise to sinusoidal variation in the bulk pressure. This variation gives rise to the phenomenon of cavitations, a physical process that creates, enlarges, and implodes gaseous and vaporous cavities in an irradiated liquid, thus enhancing the mass transfer and allowing chemical reactions to occur (Atchley et al., 1989; Koda et al., 2003; Wang et al., 2005). Possible nuclei for occurrence of cavitation events are gas pockets trapped in the walls and crevices of the solid and reactor wall, or they could be small bubbles already present in the medium. The physical effects of ultrasound and cavitations are several folds. These effects are mainly responsible for generating strong convection in the liquid medium through several mechanisms such as microstreaming, microturbulence, acoustic waves and microjets which lead to the acceleration of dissolution and heat and mass transformations (Safari et al., 2012). Thus, ultrasound irradiation activates the reaction mixture by inducing high local temperatures and pressure generated inside the cavitation bubble and its interfaces when it collapses and accelerates the reaction rate and shortens the reaction time. Furthermore, it is indicated that the application of ultrasound irradiation plays an increasingly important role on promoting the route 5–4 than route 1–5 (Safari et al., 2012).

Synthetic route to 2-amino-7-hydroxy-4H- chromenes.
Scheme 2 Synthetic route to 2-amino-7-hydroxy-4H- chromenes.

3.4

3.4 High efficiency synthesis by ultrasound irradiation

After optimizing the conditions, the generality of this method was examined by the reaction of several aldehydes, malononitrile and resorcinol in water under ultrasound irradiation. Interestingly, a variety of aldehydes including aryl aldehydes, aliphatic aldehydes and heterocyclic aldehydes participated well in this reaction (Table 3). As evident from the results, this procedure is uniformly effective for both aliphatic and aromatic aldehydes. It is noteworthy that the methodology worked well for spatially-hindered aldehydes (entries 6–11). Encouraged by this achievement, the versatility of the reaction was explored further by extending the methodology to the synthesis of bis-4H-chromene. When p-phthalaldehyde was treated with two equiv malononitrile and resorcinol under similar conditions, the reaction proceeded cleanly to give the corresponding bis-4H-chromene (4r) in 97% yield (Scheme 3). It can be concluded that the presence of the CHO functional group as the electron-withdrawing substituents on the aromatic ring can increase the yield .The order of yield of aldehydes is aryl-, heterocyclic- > aliphatic aldehydes. The activity of aldehydes with electron-withdrawing groups is higher than that with electron-donating groups. The position of substituent in the benzene rings of aldehyde influences this reaction. In fact, two para position structures (entry 2 and 3 of Table 3) have the highest, and o and m-positioned aldehydes have lower yields (due to similar yields.

Catalyst and base free synthesis of bis-4H-chromene in water under ultrasound irradiation.
Scheme 3 Catalyst and base free synthesis of bis-4H-chromene in water under ultrasound irradiation.

4

4 Conclusion

In summary, we described an efficient and convenient route to the construction of 2-amino-4H-chromene in good to excellent yields. It is expected that the combined use of ultrasound will make further development and utilization in organic synthesis and material chemistry. Further, the use of water as a green solvent combined with the exploitation of the multicomponent strategy open to this process, suggests good prospects for its industrial applicability. The merits of low pollution, ready operation, improved yields and no catalyst involved made it an attractive approach to such significant compounds.

Acknowledgement

We gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the Research Council of the University of Kashan for supporting this work by Grant NO. (256722/14).

References

  1. , , , . Soc. Am.. 1989;86:1065.
  2. , , , , . Eur. J. Med. Chem.. 1993;28:517-520.
  3. , . Chem. Rev.. 2006;106:17.
  4. , , . Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.. 2000;39:3168.
  5. , . Prinicipi di Chemico Farmaceutica. Padova, PD: Piccin; . 416
  6. , , , , . Ultrason. Sonochem.. 2009;16:120.
  7. , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Mol. Cancer Ther.. 2004;3:1375-1384.
  8. , , , , , , , . Med. Chem.. 2000;43:2851.
  9. , , , . Synlett 2004:2194.
  10. , , , . J. Fluorine Chem.. 2012;141:11.
  11. , . Crit. Rev. Biomed. Eng.. 2006;34:05.
  12. , , , , . Ultrason. Sonochem.. 2003;13:149.
  13. , , , , . Synth. Commun.. 2002;32:547.
  14. , , , , , . J. Comb. Chem.. 2010;12:231.
  15. , . Synthetic Organic Sonochemistry. New York: Plenum; .
  16. , , , . Tetrahedron Lett.. 2008;49:7194-7196.
  17. , . Ultrason. Sonochem.. 2007;14:476.
  18. , , . Practical Sonochemistry (second ed.). London: EllisHorwood; .
  19. , , , , . Ultrason. Sonochem.. 2010;17:301.
  20. , , . Annu. Rep. Med. Chem.. 2000;35:289-298.
  21. , , , . Ultrason. Sonochem.. 2009;16:70.
  22. , , . Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn.. 2012;85:1332.
  23. , , , . J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem.. 2011;335:46-50.
  24. , , , . Ultrason. Sonochem.. 2012;19:1061.
  25. , , , , , , . Weng Ng, S. J. Comb. Chem.. 2009;11:956.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. , , , , . J. Chem. Res.. 2003;30:674.
  27. , , , , , . J. Leukemia Res.. 2006;30:322-331.
  28. , , , , , . Ultrason. Sonochem.. 2005;12:411.
  29. , , , , . Ultrason. Sonochem.. 2009;16:301.
Show Sections