5.2
Impact Factor
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Corrigendum
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Full Length Article
Full lenth article
Letter to Editor
Original Article
Research article
Retraction
Retraction notice
Review
Review Article
SPECIAL ISSUE: ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY
5.3
Impact Factor
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Corrigendum
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Full Length Article
Full lenth article
Letter to Editor
Original Article
Research article
Retraction
Retraction notice
Review
Review Article
SPECIAL ISSUE: ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original article
10 (
2_suppl
); S2213-S2216
doi:
10.1016/j.arabjc.2013.07.055

Synthesis of tetrahydrobenzo[b]pyran under catalysis of NH4Al(SO4)2·12H2O (Alum)

Department of Chemistry, Islamic Azad University, Sabzevar Branch, Sabzevar, Iran
Department of Chemistry, Islamic Azad University, Omidieh Branch, Omidieh, Iran

⁎Corresponding author. Tel.: +98 571 2646810. Aliamohammadi@iaus.ac.ir (Ali A. Mohammadi)

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Elsevier and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Peer review under responsibility of King Saud University.

Abstract

A simple and efficient one-pot synthesis of tetrahydrobenzo[b]pyrans from the three-component reaction between dimedone, aldehydes, and active methylene compounds using NH4Al(SO4)2·12H2O (Alum) as a catalyst at 80 °C is described. The catalyst exhibits remarkable reactivity and is reusable.

Keywords

Aldehydes
Dimedone
Tetrahydrobenzo[b]pyrans
Multi component reaction
NH4Al(SO4)2·12H2O (Alum)
1

1 Introduction

Multi-component reactions (MCRs) are emerging as important tools for efficient synthesis of a wide variety of organic molecules (Domling and Ugi, 2000). Such reactions offer a number of practical, environmental, and economical advantages for construction of complex molecular architectures over the more traditional approaches. While numerous MCRs have been devised, relatively few processes that result in the formation of two or more intermolecular carbon–carbon bonds are known.

4H-pyrans belong to an important class of heterocyclic compounds having important biological activities (Green et al., 1995). They are reported to have diverse pharmacological activities such as anti-coagulant, anti-cancer, spasmolytic, diuretic, anti-ancaphylactia (Weber et al., 1999), Alzheimer’s disease, AIDs associated dementia and myoclonus (Konkoy et al., 2001). They are also reported to serve as an important regulator for potassium cation channel (Sun et al., 1997) and photochemical activities (Armetso et al., 1989).

Because of the intense interest in the biological activity of these compounds, several improved procedures for the synthesis of pyrans were reported. One of the most important methods for the synthesis of these compounds is one-pot condensation of an aldehyde, dimedone and malononitrile. Various catalysts such as acetic acid (Kamaljit et al., 1996), CeMgxZr1-xO2 (Rathod et al., 2010), HTMAB (Jin et al., 2004), TEBA (Shi et al., 2003), DBSA (Jin et al., 2004), basic quaternary ammonium salt (Zhao et al., 2010), RE(PFO)3 Wang et al., 2006, and s-proline (Balalaie et al., 2006) have been used for this reaction. Some of them are very fascinating from a synthetic chemist’s point of view. Despite their tremendous success, some drawbacks still remain for example, reacting at high temperature, expensive catalysts, etc. In order to circumvent these obstacles, we decided to reconsider developed new synthetic routes. The results are represented in the following section.

2

2 Results and discussion

Very recently, we reported the preparation of quinazolinediones (Azizian et al., 2003a), γ-spiroiminolactiones (Azizian et al., 2003b), pyroles (Azizian et al., 2003c), and cis-isoquinolonic acid (Azizian et al., 2005) via the respective multi-component reactions. Along this line, we designed a new method for the three-component synthesis of tetrahydrobenzo[b]pyrans in one step. In this direction, the use of relatively heterogeneous, nontoxic and inexpensive NH4Al(SO4)2·12H2O (Alum) was taken as the center of our study (Azizian et al., 2005; Mohammadi et al., 2008). In the course of our research on the application of heterogeneous catalysts in organic reactions, we have found that alum is an effective promoter for the preparation of tetrahydrobenzo[b]pyrans.

In addition, we have found that the one-pot condensation of dimedone 1, aldehydes 2a-t, and active methylene compounds (meldrum’s acid, malononitrile, ethyl and methyl cyanoacetate and indandione) in the presence of a catalytic amount of Alum results in a rapid formation of the corresponding tetrahydrobenzo[b]pyran 4a-t when the reaction mixtures were heated with stirring at 80 °C (Schemes 1 and 2) (Table 1).

Synthesis of tetrahydrobenzo[b]pyrans 4a-t.
Scheme 1 Synthesis of tetrahydrobenzo[b]pyrans 4a-t.
Proposed mechanism for the formation of products 4a-t.
Scheme 2 Proposed mechanism for the formation of products 4a-t.
Table 1 Synthesis of tetrahydrobenzo[b]pyrans 4 using NH4Al(SO4)2 12H2O (Alum) as catalyst.
Products R E Time (min) Yield (%)a Mp (°C) Lit.mp (°C)
4a Ph CN 120 92 231–3 233–4 Sharanina and Shklover (1986)
4b Ph CO2Et 120 83 192–4 190–2 Devi and Bhuyan (2004)
4c 4-NO2C6H4 CN 130 93 177–9 177–8 Kaupp et al. (2003)
4d 3-NO2C6H4 CN 130 90 212–13 210–12 Zhou et al. (2001)
4e 4-HOC6H4 CN 120 85 207–9 208–10 Tu et al. (2003)
4f 4-BrC6H4 CN 130 91 200–2 201–3 Wang et al. (2006)
4g 4-MeOC6H4 CN 130 90 190–2 192–4 Zhao et al. (2010)
4h 4-(CH3)2NC6H4 CN 130 91 207–9 208–10 Tu et al. (2003)
4i 4-ClC6H4 CN 120 94 217–9 218 Singh et al. (1996)
4j 4-ClC6H4 CO2Et 120 93 258–9 256–9 Devi and Bhuyan (2004)
4k 4-Me O2CC6H4 CN 130 95 257–9
4l 4-Me O2CC6H4 CO2Et 130 94 228–30
4m 4-Me O2CC6H4 CO2Me 130 93 240–2
4n 2-naphthyl CN 130 85 253–5
4o 4-ClC6H4 CO2Me 140 93 166–8 167–8 Zhao et al. (2010)
4p 4-MeC6H4 CN 130 90 221–3 223–5 Jin et al. (2004)
4q 4-NO2C6H4 CO2Et 140 85 182–4 181–3 Li et al. (2004)
4r 3-NO2C6H4 CO2Et 130 90 183–5 182–4 Li et al. (2004)
4s 4-CF3C6H4 CN 130 95 220–2 219–21 Balalaie et al. (2006)
4t 3-NO2C6H4 CO2Me 130 90 190–2 190–2 Li et al. (2004)
Isolated yields.

Furthermore, it is remarkable to note that the condensation proceeds with a slight amount of catalyst concentration (20 mol%, Alum) at ambient conditions and gives tetrahydrobenzo[b]pyrans in good yields. Interestingly, the heterogeneous catalyst was not deactivated and could be reused several times. Five consecutive runs of the reaction of dimedone, benzaldehyde and malononitrile with Alum were carried out (Fig. 1). The results demonstrate that there is almost no significant change in the activity of the catalyst, so, it could be used for at least five times successfully leading to high turn-over numbers (TONs).

Five consecutive runs of the reaction of dimedone, benzaldehyde and malononitryl with Alum.
Figure 1 Five consecutive runs of the reaction of dimedone, benzaldehyde and malononitryl with Alum.

3

3 Conclusions

We described a successful strategy including, an efficient and convenient green synthesis, for the preparation of tetrahydrobenzo[b]pyran derivatives via a three-component reaction between dimedone, aldehydes, and active methylene compounds using NH4Al(SO4)2·12H2O (Alum) as catalyst at 80 °C. The method offers several advantages including high yield of products, using the inexpensive, reusable, nontoxic, and easily available NH4Al(SO4)2·12H2O catalyst, and an easy experimental workup procedure that makes it a useful process for the synthesis of tetrahydrobenzo[b]pyrans.

4

4 Experimental

Melting points were measured on the Electrothermal 9100 apparatus and are uncorrected. IR spectra were measured on a Shimadzu IR-470 Spectrophotometer. 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra were determined on Bruker 300 DRX Avance instrument at 300 and 75 MHz, respectively. MS spectra were recorded on a Shimadzu QP 1100EX mass spectrometer operating at an ionization potential of 70 eV. Elemental analyses were performed using a Heracus CHN–O-Rapid analyzer.

4.1

4.1 General procedure

A mixture of dimedone (1 mmol), aldehyde (1 mmol), active methylene compounds (1 mmol) (malononitrile, ethyl and methyl cyanoacetate), 5 mL ethanol 96% and 0.2 g NH4Al(SO4)2·12H2O was heated with stirring at 80 °C for appropriate periods as indicated in Table 1. After completion of the reaction (TLC, ethyl acetate/n-hexane, 1/1), the crude product was recrystallized from ethanol.

4.1.1

4.1.1 Methyl 4-(2-amino-3-cyano-5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-7,7-dimethyl-5-oxo-4H-chromen-4-yl)benzoate (4k)

White powder; Mp 257–9 °C; IR (KBr) (υmax, cm−1): 3428, 2960, 2225, 1718, 1663; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δH (ppm) 0.98 (3 H, s, Me), 1.11 (3 H, s, Me), 2.12 (1 H, d, J = 15.3 Hz, 8-HB), 2.22(1 H, d, J = 15.3 Hz, 8-HA), 2.48 (2 H, s, H-6), 3.87 (3 H, s, OCH3), 4.80 (1 H, s, H-4), 7.37 (2 H, d, J = 7.5 Hz, arom), 7.92 (2 H, d, J = 7.5 Hz, arom); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δC (ppm) 27.17, 29.28, 32.11, 32.19, 40.81, 50.53, 51.87, 115.01, 115.04, 128.21, 128.49, 129.50, 129.53, 149.30, 162.61, 167.05, and 196.39; MS (70 eV) m/z (%): 352 (M+, 20), 273 (100), 217 (45), 161 (50), 152 (25), 133 (25), 115 (25), 83 (30), 77 (30), 59 (25), 41 (45); Anal. Calcd. for C20H20N2O4: C, 68.17; H, 5.72; N, 7.95. Found: C, 68.03; H, 5.61; N, 7.83.

4.1.2

4.1.2 Ethyl 4-(4-(methoxycarbonyl)phenyl)-2-amino-5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-7,7-dimethyl-5-oxo-4H-chromene-3- carboxylate (4l)

White powder; Mp 228–30 °C; IR (KBr) (υmax, cm−1): 3421, 2962, 1715, 1662; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δH (ppm) 0.98 (3 H, s, Me), 1.13 (3 H, s, Me), 1.42 (3 H, t, J = 7.2 Hz, CH3), 2.12 (1 H, d, J = 15.2 Hz, 8-HB), 2.22 (1 H, d, J = 15.2 Hz, 8-HA), 2.49 (2H, s, H-6), 3.98 (3 H, s, OCH3), 4.41 (2 H, q, J = 7.2 Hz, OCH2), 4.80 (1 H, s, H-4), 7.36 (2 H, d, J = 7.6 Hz, arom), 7.85 (2 H, d, J = 7.7 Hz, arom); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δC (ppm) 15.47, 27.24, 29.29, 32.12, 32.21, 40.79, 50.52, 51.80, 52.56, 116.02, 128.25, 128.44, 129.53, 149.26, 153.48, 163.23, 166.11, 167.86, and 197.22; MS (70 eV) m/z (%): 399 (M+, 50), 349 (50), 273 (100), 228 (25), 217 (35), 200 (25), 161 (30), 77 (30), 59 (30), 43 (30); Anal. Calcd. for C22H25NO6: C, 66.15; H, 6.31; N, 3.51. Found: C, 66.04; H, 6.22; N, 3.40.

4.1.3

4.1.3 Methyl 4-(4-(methoxycarbonyl)phenyl)-2-amino-5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-7,7-dimethyl-5-oxo-4H-chromene-3-carboxylate (4m)

White powder; Mp 240–2 °C; IR (KBr) (υmax, cm−1): 3428, 2961, 1718, 1658, 1618; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δH (ppm) 0.98 (3 H, s, Me), 1.11 (3 H, s, Me), 2.15 (1 H, d, J = 15.3 Hz, 8-HB), 2.37 (1 H, d, J = 15.3 Hz, 8-HA), 2.47 (2 H, s, H-6), 3.88 (3 H, s, OCH3), 3.97 (3 H, s, OCH3), 4.80, (1 H, s, H-4), 7.38 (2 H, d, J = 7.6 Hz, arom), 7.90 (2 H, d, J = 7.5 Hz, arom); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δC (ppm) 27.20, 29.32, 32.22, 32.30, 40.89, 50.88, 52.04, 52.60, 115.11, 128.23, 128.50, 129.60, 149.29, 153.88, 162.72, 166.06, 167.10, and 196.30; MS (70 eV) m/z (%): 385 (M+, 35), 349 (60), 273 (100), 217 (35), 161 (30), 152 (30), 83 (35), 77 (20), 59 (35), 41 (40); Anal. Calcd. for C21H23NO6: C, 65.44; H, 6.02; N, 3.63. Found: C, 65.32; H, 5.01; N, 3.51.

4.1.4

4.1.4 2-Amino-5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-7,7-dimethyl-4-(naphthalen-2-yl)-5-oxo-4H-chromene-3-carbonitrile (4n)

Cream powder; Mp 253–5 °C; IR (KBr) (υmax, cm−1): 3359, 3182, 2963, 2187, 1684, 1652; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δH (ppm) 0.99 (3 H, s, Me), 1.12 (3 H, s, Me), 2.13 (1 H, d, J = 16.2 Hz, 8-HB), 2.23(1 H, d, J = 16.3 Hz, 8-HA), 2.49 (1 H, s, H-6), 3.54 (1 H, s, H-6), 4.46 (1 H, s, H-4), 7.37 (1 H, d, J = 7.5 Hz, arom), 7.49 (2 H, m, arom), 7.66 (1 H, s, arom), 7.80–7.90 (3 H, m, arom); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δC (ppm) 27.22, 28.95, 32.27, 36.35, 50.45, 58.57, 112.90, 120.23, 125.97, 126.09, 126.65, 127.89, 128.12, 128.60, 132.51, 133.28, 143.01, 159.10, 163.04, and 195.99; MS (70 eV) m/z (%): 344 (M+, 60), 327 (50), 291 (25), 277 (55), 217 (100), 165 (35), 152 (65), 127 (35), 83 (30), 66 (25), 41 (45); Anal. Calcd. for C22H20N2O2: C, 76.72; H, 5.85; N, 8.13. Found: C, 76.63; H, 5.72; N, 8.02.

Acknowledgement

We gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the Research Council of Islamic Azad University, branched Sabzevar.

References

  1. , , , , , . J. Org. Chem.. 1989;54:3069.
  2. , , , . Synth. Commun.. 2003;33:415.
  3. , , , . Synth. Commun.. 2003;33:387.
  4. , , , , , . Mol. Diversity. 2003;6:223.
  5. , , , , . J. Org. Chem.. 2005;70:350.
  6. Balalaie, S., Bararjanian, M., Amani, A.M., Movassagh, B., 2006. Synlett 263, 2006.
  7. , , . Tetrahedron Lett.. 2004;45:8525.
  8. , , . Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl.. 2000;39:3321.
  9. , , , . , , , eds. Comprehensive Heterocyclic Chemistry II. Vol vol. 5. Oxford: Pergamon Press; . p. :469.
  10. , , , , , . Chin. J. Org. Chem.. 2004;2004:1598.
  11. Jin, T.S., Wang, A.Q., Wang, X., Zhang, J.S., Li, T.S., 2004. Synlett 871.
  12. , , , . Tetrahedron. 1996;52:14273.
  13. , , , . Tetrahedron. 2003;59:3753.
  14. , , , , , . PCT Int. Appl. Wo 0075123, 2000, Chem Abestr.. 2001;134:29313a.
  15. , , , , . Synth. Commun.. 2004;34:4565.
  16. , , , , . Heterocycles. 2008;75:947.
  17. , , , . Chin. J. Catal.. 2010;31:631.
  18. , , . J. Org. Chem.. 1986;22:1185.
  19. , , , , , . Chin. J. Org. Chem.. 2003;23:877.
  20. , , , . Tetrahedron. 1996;52:14273.
  21. , , , , , , . Chem. J. Chin. Univ.. 1997;18:730.
  22. , , , , , , , . Chin. J. Org. Chem.. 2003;23:488.
  23. , , , , , . J. Fluo. Chem.. 2006;127:97.
  24. Weber, L., Illegen, K., Almstetter, M., 1999. Synlett 366, 1999.
  25. , , , , . Chin. J. Org. Chem.. 2010;30:124.
  26. , , , , . Chin. J. Org. Chem.. 2001;21:742.
Show Sections