5.2
Impact Factor
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Corrigendum
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Full Length Article
Full lenth article
Letter to Editor
Original Article
Research article
Retraction notice
Review
Review Article
SPECIAL ISSUE: ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY
5.3
Impact Factor
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Corrigendum
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Full Length Article
Full lenth article
Letter to Editor
Original Article
Research article
Retraction notice
Review
Review Article
SPECIAL ISSUE: ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original article
12 (
8
); 4044-4064
doi:
10.1016/j.arabjc.2016.04.002

Synthesis, structure elucidation, determination of antiproliferative activities, lipophilicity indices and pharmacokinetic properties of novel fused azaisocytosine-like congeners

Department of Medical Chemistry, Medical University, 4A Chodźki Street, 20-093 Lublin, Poland
Department of Biology and Genetics, Medical University, 4A Chodźki Street, 20-093 Lublin, Poland
Department of Physical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University, Maria Curie-Skłodowska Sq. 3, 20-031 Lublin, Poland
Laboratory of Bioorganic Synthesis and Analysis, Department of Medical Chemistry, Medical University, 4A Chodźki Street, 20-093 Lublin, Poland

⁎Corresponding author. Tel.: +48 81 4486195. malgorzata.sztanke@umlub.pl (Małgorzata Sztanke)

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Elsevier and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Peer review under responsibility of King Saud University.

Abstract

The aims of the present study were the synthesis, an original spectroscopic characterization, an evaluation of antiproliferative activities and lipophilicity indices along with pharmacokinetic properties of a novel class of fused azaisocytosine-containing congeners. An optimized, well-established and scalable general method for the synthesis of the target molecules (10–18) via the [4+2] annulation strategy was worked out successfully, which enables reacting the molar equivalents of 1-aryl-2-hydrazinylideneimidazolidine hydroiodides (1–9) and ethyl 4-nitrophenylglyoxylate upon gently heating in n-butanol containing triethylamine and further refluxing in a solvent mixture n-butanol/DMF. The synthesis was hypothesized to proceed via ketimine intermediates that undergo intramolecular cyclization. All the synthesized compounds (10–18) revealed antiproliferative effects in four tumour cell lines of the epithelial origin, exerting superior cytotoxic activities in A549, HeLa and T47D cells to that of a reference drug – pemetrexed. Especially the 12, 13, 14, 15 and 18 seem to be the most promising lead structures for designing more selective cytotoxic agents as they have a lower toxicity for normal epithelial cells after 24-h incubation period. In addition, a number of the innovative antimetabolite-type molecules have been preselected that possess the optimum lipophilicity range significantly correlated with some in silico bioactivity descriptors relevant to the satisfactory pharmacokinetic profile in vivo. Thus, these original molecules might be useful as drug discovery leads to an early phase of drug design.

Keywords

Fused azaisocytosine-containing congeners
Structure assignment
Antiproliferative activities
Retention factors
Principal component analysis
In silico bioactivity descriptors
1

1 Introduction

Cancer is still considered to be the second “killer” (after heart disease) in the developed countries (Patrick, 2009). On the other hand, in clinical treatment there is still a lack of cytotoxic agents that are selective for neoplastic versus normal cells in spite of current progress in chemotherapy of certain human tumours. An application of new cytotoxic (antiproliferative) agents in patients suffering from cancer is also limited because of their harmful effects on the normal dividing cells as well as by overlapping severe side effects of combined anticancer drugs that are recently used in adjuvant chemotherapy (Denny, 2001). Therefore, the rational design and development strategy allowing for the prioritization of novel synthetic anticancer agents that show a selective cytotoxicity for cancer over normal cells seems to be of great urgency in the continuous search for novel more effective as well as more safer cytotoxic agents.

A number of small molecular weight structures based upon the privileged 7,8-dihydroimidazo[2,1-c][1,2,4]triazin-4(6H)-one template with the common phenyl moiety at the C-3 and the modified aryl substitution patterns at the N-8 have previously been shown to possess remarkable antileukemic as well as antimetastatic activities (Fig. 1, the structures IVII) (Sztanke et al., 2009). The promising substituents attached at the N-8 of this template such as: 4-MeOC6H4 in I, monochloro-substituted phenyl moieties (mostly 2-ClC6H4 in II and 4-ClC6H4 in III) and dichloro-substituted phenyls (3,4-Cl2C6H3 in IV and 2,5-Cl2C6H3 in V) have previously been identified as beneficial for the antileukemic potency. In turn, some structures (e.g., those with 4-MeOC6H4 (I), 3-MeC6H4 (VI) and monochlorophenyl substitutions such as 2-ClC6H4 (II), 3-ClC6H4 (VII) and 4-ClC6H4 (III)) have previously been described as capable of evoking significant antimetastatic activities in human cervical epithelial cancer cells. Finally, the modification at the N-8 portion of the privileged imidazotriazinone scaffold in this class of compounds, followed by extensive in vitro testing, has led to the drug discovery lead (III), in which the 4-chlorophenyl moiety was identified as the best substitution pattern for the enhanced selectivity. This compound is deprived of cytotoxic effects towards normal cells, evokes enhanced dose-dependent viability decreases in human myeloma cells and is of importance due to the anticipated antimetastatic potential in human cervical epithelial cancer cells, as previously described (Sztanke et al., 2009). The same lead structure (conformationally stable and currently being investigated as potential drug candidate) has previously been proposed as useful for the subsequent design of lower toxic anticancer agents from this class of isosteric isomers of fused azacytosine-like congeners.

Previously reported (Sztanke et al., 2009) polynitrogenated bicyclic molecules comprising in their structures fused azaisocytosine template.
Figure 1
Previously reported (Sztanke et al., 2009) polynitrogenated bicyclic molecules comprising in their structures fused azaisocytosine template.

In view of the above findings and continuing our studies (Sztanke et al., 2009, 2015; Janicka et al., 2013), we have designed antimetabolite-type fused azaisocytosine-like congeners. Our interest in these compounds results from their structural novelty, the possibility of introducing various electron-donating and electron-withdrawing substituents at the aromatic phenyl ring and the anticipated biological activity as well as bioavailability. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to develop an optimized and effective approach leading to the synthesis of unknown angular nitrogen bicyclic molecules containing azaisocytosine-template (10–18) in order to perform, for the first time, the investigations concerning their complete spectroscopic, antiproliferative, lipophilic and pharmacokinetic properties.

Previous studies have found that antitumour active antimetabolite, azacytidine, is readily deaminated in vivo to inactive 6-azauridine by cytidine deaminase, whereas azaisocytosine is resistant to this enzyme (Hwang et al., 1995; Pitha et al., 1966). Therefore, we have designed a novel class of the compounds (e.g., fused azaisocytosine-containing congeners) that as derivatives of the isosteric isomers of 6-azacytosine (that could probably be utilized as false building blocks required for the DNA synthesis) may be of chemical as well as medical relevance due to their anticipated resistance to cytidine deaminase. Thus, the particular importance in these original molecules results from their potential possibility of therapeutic use as innovative antimetabolites for combating cancer. All the designed molecules, featuring modified substitution sites at the C-3 (e.g., para-nitrophenyl) and the N-8 (e.g., phenyl and variously substituted phenyl moieties) positions, are based on the drug-like 7,8-dihydroimidazo[2,1-c][1,2,4]triazin-4(6H)-one template (Sztanke et al., 2009). This seems to be an extremely good scaffold for the design of novel adenosine receptor antagonists that may be of the anticipated benefit in the therapy of diseases associated with angiogenesis, such as cancer and diabetic retinopathy (Keisuke et al., 1993; Taliani et al., 2012) and in the treatment and prevention of inflammatory diseases, mainly hepatic cirrhosis (Szuster-Ciesielska et al., 2012; Kandefer-Szerszeń et al., 2014). The selection of a substitution pattern on the phenyl ring at the N-8 of the privileged scaffold in this novel class of compounds is stringently based on prior scientific literature evidence (Sztanke et al., 2009, 2015) and the synthetic approach is carried out to obtain innovative antimetabolite-type molecules, revealing not only antiproliferative effects against tumour cells but foremost a lower toxicity towards normal cells. The choice of the introduced para-nitrophenyl moiety at the C-3 is based on previous research findings, which showed that this moiety is capable of significantly enhancing antiproliferative activities of successful antimetabolite-type analogues (Bruliková et al., 2011). Moreover, it has been reported that some nitroaromatic-containing molecules as tumour-activated prodrugs may be selectively activated in cancerous tissue (Denny, 2001).

The aim of our cell-based anticancer investigations is to identify novel antiproliferative active lead structures revealing more selectivity for malignant (A549, HeLa, T47D and TOV112D) over normal (Vero) cells of the same epithelial origin.

The novel aspect of our chromatographic measurements is to assess the utility of three types of RPLC columns (IAM, cholesterol and ISRP) with different stationary materials in systematic studies of the lipophilicity of a novel class of molecules. The subsequent purpose of these studies is to check the possibility of processing the determined isocratic retention factors (logs k) in rational bioavailability predictions (log BBpermeation, log BBdistribution, log KHSA, %F, fu, plasma, Caco-2, Pe, jejunum) that were performed to identify novel lead structures with an optimum lipophilicity range that allows their satisfactory pharmacokinetics. Moreover, principal component analysis is employed with the goal of visualizing trends in data matrixes of chromatographic, partitioning and pharmacokinetic parameters characterizing the title compounds (10–18).

2

2 Experimental protocols

2.1

2.1 Instrumentations and materials

Ethyl 4-nitrophenylglyoxylate of 98% purity was supplied from Alfa-Aesar GmbH (Germany) and was sufficiently pure to be used directly without further purification. Triethylamine (Et3N) (Sigma–Aldrich, Germany) was dried over anhydrous potassium hydroxide and distilled before use. Anhydrous solvents for the synthesis (e.g., n-butanol, N,N-dimethylformamide, methanol) were purchased from Roth (Germany) and Merck (Germany) companies. Additionally, the polar solvents, such as a distilled water and methanol, were used to remove successfully a soluble by-product derived from the synthetic approach, e.g., triethylammonium iodide which was the explicitly better soluble in these solvents than were the isolated solid final products (10–18). A Heidolph rotary evaporator (Germany), working under reduced pressure, was used to concentrate the volatile components of the reaction mixture to a suitable volume after the completion of the synthesis process. Melting point (m.p.) of each novel congener was determined on a Boetius apparatus (Germany) and the given value is uncorrected. The purity of each compound was checked by thin-layer chromatography. For this aim the routine preparative TLC analysis was carried out on commercial Merck 0.2 mm SiO2 gel aluminium sheets (60 F-254) with a fluorescence indicator that allows to visualize of each final product spot under UV light at an excitation wavelength of 254 nm. The combustion microanalyses for each element analyzed (C, H, Cl, N) were consistent within ±0.4% of the theoretical values. 1H NMR spectra (that were observed at 300 MHz for 1H nuclei) and 13C NMR spectra (that were observed at 75 MHz for 13C nuclei) for all novel compounds of this class (10–18) dissolved in deuterated dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO-d6) were carried out on a Bruker Avance 300 MHz spectrometer. DEPT-135 experiments were done additionally to fully assign carbon multiplicities for all the molecules that were analyzed. All the chemical shifts are given as δ values that were downfield in relation to an internal standard, e.g., tetramethylsilane (TMS) (δ = 0.00 ppm). Chemical shifts are provided in parts per million (ppm), whereas the magnitudes of coupling constants are reported in frequency units, e.g., hertz (Hz). Signal multiplicities, used to describe signals, are indicated as follows: s, singlet; d, doublet; t, triplet and m, multiplet. The reported retention times (tR) of solutes 10–18 were determined on IAM column in 20 °C (293 K), using as a mobile phase 50% acetonitrile in the buffer adjusted to pH 7.4.

2.1.1

2.1.1 1-Aryl-2-hydrazinylideneimidazolidine building blocks (1–9)

The patented earlier biologically active and stable at room temperature hydroiodide salts of 1-aryl-2-hydrazinylideneimidazolidines (1–9) (Sztanke, 2012) were employed as strongly nucleophilic species. They were sufficiently pure to be used directly in synthesis of the presented herein fused azaisocytosine-like congeners.

2.1.2

2.1.2 A general procedure for the synthesis of a novel class of 3-(4-nitrophenyl)-8-aryl-7,8-dihydroimidazo[2,1-c][1,2,4]triazin-4(6H)-ones (10–18)

1-Aryl-2-hydrazinylideneimidazolidine hydroiodide (0.02 mol) was suspended in 10 mL of n-butanol. Then, a slight molar excess of dry triethylamine (2.9 mL) and the molar equivalent of para-nitrophenylglyoxylate (0.02 mol) were added. The synthetic process was conducted in the first instance by gently heating of the starting reagents with stirring until the intermediate which appeared had fully crystallized. Then a relevant amount of DMF was added until a complete intermediate solid dissolution was accomplished during heating and stirring. Thermal cyclocondensation proceeded on refluxing in the resulting solvent mixture n-butanol-DMF with stirring, and its progress was monitored by preparative TLC that showed the process to be complete in 1–5 h. The boiling solution of reaction mixture was filtered off to remove sparse insoluble impurities and subsequently was concentrated to ca. half its volume by evaporation of the volatiles under reduced pressure. After cooling the concentrated mixture was subsequently kept refrigerated, a complete precipitation of the final product occurring after 3 h. Then a portion of the formed crude product was filtered off, washed sequentially with three treatments of water (5 mL) and with one or two treatments of cold methanol (5 mL), and finally purified by recrystallization from the solvent mixture DMF-methanol in the proportion as indicated below. The precipitate obtained after cooling was filtered off again, and finally dried using a dry heat sterilizer (MOV-212S-PE, Panasonic, Japan). The following novel compounds (that are given underneath) were obtained in a pure solid state by this general procedure.

2.1.2.1
2.1.2.1 3-(4-Nitrophenyl)-8-phenyl-7,8-dihydroimidazo[2,1-c][1,2,4]triazin-4(6H)-one (10)

Obtained in 69% yield, when recrystallized from the solvent mixture DMF-MeOH (5:1) had m.p. 291–293 °C. Anal. Calcd for C17H13N5O3: C, 60.89; H, 3.91; N, 20.89. Found: C, 61.10; H, 3.90; N, 20.81. 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 4.26 (s, 4H, 2CH2), 7.18–8.46 (m, 9H, aromatic protons: 5H, phenyl-H and 4H, 4-nitrophenyl-H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 40.5 (C-6, CH2), 45.5 (C-7, CH2), 119.1 (2CH), 123.3 (2CH), 124.0 (CH), 128.5 (2CH), 128.9 (2CH), 138.4 (C-1′′), 139.9 (C-1′), 145.5 (C-4′′), 147.4 (C-3), 151.7 (C-8a), 152.1 (C-4); HPLC IAM 293K (50% acetonitrile in buffer pH 7.4): tR = 1.54 min.

2.1.2.2
2.1.2.2 3-(4-Nitrophenyl)-8-(2-methylphenyl)-7,8-dihydroimidazo[2,1-c][1,2,4]triazin-4(6H)-one (11)

Obtained in 53% yield, when recrystallized from the solvent mixture DMF-MeOH (3:1) had m.p. 210–211 °C. Anal. Calcd for C18H15N5O3: C, 61.89; H, 4.33; N, 20.05. Found: C, 61.67; H, 4.34; N, 19.98. 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 2.31 (s, 3H, CH3), 4.07–4.36 (m, 4H, 2CH2), 7.31–8.39 (m, 8H, aromatic protons: 4H, 2-methylphenyl-H and 4H, 4-nitrophenyl-H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 17.5 (CH3), 41.6 (C-6, CH2), 48.0 (C-7, CH2), 123.3 (2CH), 126.9 (CH), 126.9 (CH), 127.1 (CH), 128.3 (2CH), 131.0 (CH), 136.0 (C-2’), 136.1 (C-1′′), 140.2 (C-1′), 144.5 (C-4′′), 147.1 (C-3), 151.9 (C-8a), 153.2 (C-4); HPLC IAM 293K (50% acetonitrile in buffer pH 7.4): tR = 1.84 min.

2.1.2.3
2.1.2.3 3-(4-Nitrophenyl)-8-(4-methylphenyl)-7,8-dihydroimidazo[2,1-c][1,2,4]triazin-4(6H)-one (12)

Obtained in 72% yield, when recrystallized from the solvent mixture DMF-MeOH (9:1) had m.p. 278–280 °C. Anal. Calcd for C18H15N5O3: C, 61.89; H, 4.33; N, 20.05. Found: C, 62.11; H, 4.32; N, 20.11. 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 2.33 (s, 3H, CH3), 4.24 (s, 4H, 2CH2), 7.28 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H, aromatic protons: 4-methylphenyl-H-2′ and H-6′), 7.77 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H, aromatic protons: 4-methylphenyl-H-3′ and H-5′), 8.30–8.45 (m, 4H, aromatic protons: 4-nitrophenyl-H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 20.4 (CH3), 40.5 (C-6, CH2), 45.6 (C-7, CH2), 119.2. (2CH), 123.3 (2CH), 128.5 (2CH), 129.4 (2CH), 133.2 (C-4′), 136.0 (C-1′′), 140.0 (C-1′), 145.2 (C-4′′), 147.3 (C-3), 151.7 (C-8a), 152.1 (C-4); HPLC IAM 293K (50% acetonitrile in buffer pH 7.4): tR = 1.34 min.

2.1.2.4
2.1.2.4 3-(4-Nitrophenyl)-8-(2,3-dimethylphenyl)-7,8-dihydroimidazo[2,1-c][1,2,4]triazin-4(6H)-one (13)

Obtained in 55% yield, when recrystallized from the solvent mixture DMF-MeOH (2:1) had m.p. 274–276 °C. Anal. Calcd for C19H17N5O3: C, 62.80; H, 4.72; N, 19.27. Found: C, 62.58; H, 4.73; N, 19.20. 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 2.19 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.32 (s, 3H, CH3), 4.06 (t, J = 8.9 Hz, 2H, CH2), 4.31 (t, J = 8.9 Hz, 2H, CH2), 7.19–7.32 (m, 3H, aromatic protons: 2,3-dimethylphenyl-H), 8.29 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 2H, aromatic protons: 4-nitrophenyl-H), 8.38 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 2H, aromatic protons: 4-nitrophenyl-H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 14.1 (CH3), 19.9 (CH3), 41.5 (C-6, CH2), 48.3 (C-7, CH2), 123.3 (2CH), 124.7 (CH), 126.3 (CH), 128.3 (2CH), 129.6 (CH), 134.8 (C-2′), 136.1 (C-1′′), 138.1 (C-3′), 140.3 (C-1′), 144.4 (C-4′′), 147.1 (C-3), 151.9 (C-8a), 153.4 (C-4); HPLC IAM 293K (50% acetonitrile in buffer pH 7.4): tR = 1.33 min.

2.1.2.5
2.1.2.5 3-(4-Nitrophenyl)-8-(2-methoxyphenyl)-7,8-dihydroimidazo[2,1-c][1,2,4]triazin-4(6H)-one (14)

Obtained in 52% yield, when recrystallized from the solvent mixture DMF-MeOH (7:1) had m.p. 286–287 °C. Anal. Calcd for C18H15N5O4: C, 59.18; H, 4.14; N, 19.17. Found: C, 58.98; H, 4.15; N, 19.26. 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 3.85 (s, 3H, OCH3), 4.08 (t, J = 9.1 Hz, 2H, CH2), 4.31 (t, J = 9.1 Hz, 2H, CH2), 7.04–7.54 (m, 4H, aromatic protons: 2-methoxyphenyl-H), 8.30 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 2H, aromatic protons: 4-nitrophenyl-H), 8.38 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 2H, aromatic protons: 4-nitrophenyl-H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 41.5 (C-6, CH2), 47.3 (C-7, CH2), 55.8 (CH3O), 112.7 (CH), 120.6 (CH), 123.3 (2CH), 125.5 (C-1′′), 128.3 (2CH), 128.5 (CH), 129.4 (CH), 140.2 (C-1′), 144.7 (C-4′′), 147.2 (C-3), 151.8 (C-8a), 153.6 (C-4), 154.8 (C-2′); HPLC IAM 293K (50% acetonitrile in buffer pH 7.4): tR = 1.58 min.

2.1.2.6
2.1.2.6 3-(4-Nitrophenyl)-8-(2-chlorophenyl)-7,8-dihydroimidazo[2,1-c][1,2,4]triazin-4(6H)-one (15)

Obtained in 61% yield, when recrystallized from the solvent mixture DMF-MeOH (6:1) had m.p. 272–274 °C. Anal. Calcd for C17H12ClN5O3: C, 55.22; H, 3.27; Cl, 9.59; N, 18.94. Found: C, 55.01; H, 3.26; Cl, 9.56; N, 19.01. 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 4.15 (t, J = 8.9 Hz, 2H, CH2), 4.36 (t, J = 8.9 Hz, 2H, CH2), 7.46–8.39 (m, 8H, aromatic protons: 4H, 2-chlorophenyl-H and 4H, 4-nitrophenyl-H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 41.7 (C-6, CH2), 47.7 (C-7, CH2), 123.3 (2CH), 128.4 (2CH), 128.5 (CH), 129.9 (CH), 130.1 (CH), 130.3 (CH), 131.5 (C-2′), 134.8 (C-1′′), 140.0 (C-1′), 145.3 (C-4′′), 147.3 (C-3), 151.7 (C-8a), 153.5 (C-4); HPLC IAM 293K (50% acetonitrile in buffer pH 7.4): tR = 1.39 min.

2.1.2.7
2.1.2.7 3-(4-Nitrophenyl)-8-(3-chlorophenyl)-7,8-dihydroimidazo[2,1-c][1,2,4]triazin-4(6H)-one (16)

Obtained in 62% yield, when recrystallized from the solvent mixture DMF-MeOH (4:1) had m.p. 260–261 °C. Anal. Calcd for C17H12ClN5O3: C, 55.22; H, 3.27; Cl, 9.59; N, 18.94. Found: C, 43.14; H, 3.26; Cl, 9.57; N, 18.87. 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 4.26 (s, 4H, 2CH2), 7.24–8.46 (m, 8H, aromatic protons: 4H, 3-chlorophenyl-H and 4H, 4-nitrophenyl-H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 40.6 (C-6, CH2), 45.4 (C-7, CH2), 117.1 (CH), 118.6 (CH), 123.3 (2CH), 123.5 (CH), 128.7 (2CH), 130.6 (CH), 133.4 (C-1′′), 139.6 (C-3′), 139.8 (C-1′), 146.0 (C-4′′), 147.5 (C-3), 151.6 (C-8a), 152.0 (C-4); HPLC IAM 293K (50% acetonitrile in buffer pH 7.4): tR = 1.40 min.

2.1.2.8
2.1.2.8 3-(4-Nitrophenyl)-8-(4-chlorophenyl)-7,8-dihydroimidazo[2,1-c][1,2,4]triazin-4(6H)-one (17)

Obtained in 64% yield, when recrystallized from the solvent mixture DMF-MeOH (7:1) had m.p. 301–302 °C. Anal. Calcd for C17H12ClN5O3: C, 55.22; H, 3.27; Cl, 9.59; N, 18.94. Found: C, 55.39; H, 3.28; Cl, 9.59; N, 18.89. 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 4.25 (s, 4H, 2CH2), 7.52–8.45 (m, 8H, aromatic protons: 4H, 4-chlorophenyl-H and 4H, 4-nitrophenyl-H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 40.6 (C-6, CH2), 45.4 (C-7, CH2), 120.6 (2CH), 123.3 (2CH), 127.7 (C-4′), 128.6 (2CH), 128.8 (2CH), 137.4 (C-1′′), 139.7 (C-1′), 145.8 (C-4′′), 147.5 (C-3), 151.6 (C-8a), 152.0 (C-4); HPLC IAM 293K (50% acetonitrile in buffer pH 7.4): tR = 1.83 min.

2.1.2.9
2.1.2.9 3-(4-Nitrophenyl)-8-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-7,8-dihydroimidazo[2,1-c][1,2,4]triazin-4(6H)-one (18)

Obtained in 59% yield, when recrystallized from the solvent mixture DMF-MeOH (8:1) had m.p. 340–342 °C. Anal. Calcd for C17H11Cl2N5O3: C, 50.51; H, 2.74; Cl, 17.54; N, 17.33. Found: C, 50.32; H, 2.73; Cl, 17.48; N, 17.27. 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 4.25 (s, 4H, 2CH2), 7.71–8.45 (m, 7H, aromatic protons: 3H, 3,4-dichlorophenyl-H and 4H, 4-nitrophenyl-H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 40.6 (C-6, CH2), 45.4 (C-7, CH2), 118.7 (CH), 120.2 (CH), 123.3 (2CH), 125.4 (C-4′), 128.7 (2CH), 130.7 (CH), 131.3 (C-3′), 138.5 (C-1′′), 139.5 (C-1′), 146.2 (C-4′′), 147.5 (C-3), 151.5 (C-8a), 151.9 (C-4); HPLC IAM 293K (50% acetonitrile in buffer pH 7.4): tR = 2.34 min.

2.1.3

2.1.3 An assessment of DNA synthesis and cytotoxicity

The carried out determination is based on the measurement of the amount of the labelled synthetic nucleoside analogue, e.g., 5-bromo-2′-deoxyuridine (BrdUrd), incorporated into the cellular DNA in place of thymidine during the nascent synthesis phase in a panel of cells that were treated with the compounds of interest. Cells treated only with the culture media served as controls. A panel of four tumour cell lines (such as: A549 (ECACC 86012804) – human Caucasian lung carcinoma cells, HeLa (ECACC 93021013) – human Negroid cervix epitheloid carcinoma cells, T47D (ECACC 85102201) – human breast carcinoma cells and TOV112D (ATCC CRL-11731) – human ovarian malignant adenocarcinoma cells) and one normal cell line (e.g., Vero (ECACC 88020401) – African Green Monkey kidney cells) of the same epithelial origin were employed. The used cell lines were sourced and cultured as described in detail previously (Sztanke et al., 2015).

End-point determinations were performed on an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) reader (BIO-TEC Instruments, USA) using a commercially available chemiluminescent BrdUrd labelling and detection kit III (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, USA) (Muir et al., 1990; Ellwart and Dormer 1985; Magaud et al., 1988; Huong, 1991). Each freshly prepared stock solution of the screened compound in dimethyl sulfoxide (Sigma–Aldrich, Germany) of above 99.9% purity and filtered through an aseptic 0.22 μm-pore-size syringe filter (GE Water and Process Technologies, USA) was finally diluted into the cell culture media to obtain its 50 μg mL−1 concentration. The effect of each investigated solute at the tested concentration on the BrdUrd incorporation was assessed spectrophotometrically after 24-, 48- and 72-h periods of incubation at standard conditions (37 °C, 5% CO2, 90% humidity) and compared to the untreated control cells. Table 1 specifies the percentage values of growth inhibition over a time in malignant and normal cells for all novel compounds of interest. These values were determined in the following manner: at first mean absorbance levels of at least three measurements taken from the repeated true independent BrdUrd-based evaluations were derived; then these mean values were converted into the per cent of growth inhibition. A well-known folate antimetabolite – pemetrexed (Lilly, Slovakia) at a concentration of 0.23 mM (100 μg mL−1) was used as a positive control (Sztanke et al., 2015) for the DNA synthesis and cytotoxicity measurements.

Table 1 Growth inhibition ratios of normal and tumour cells by an effective concentration of novel small molecular weight fused azaisocytosine-like congeners.
Compound R Incubation time Growth inhibition (%)a in cell lines
Vero A549 HeLa T47D TOV112D
10 H 24 h 40 ± 4.5 70 ± 7.2 80 ± 7.8 100 ± 12.2 80 ± 7.8
48 h 95 ± 10.6 90 ± 8.9 90 ± 10.1 100 ± 9.9 100 ± 12.0
72 h 100 ± 15.2 100 ± 12.4 100 ± 9.8 100 ± 10.6 100 ± 9.6
11 2-CH3 24 h 50 ± 6.5 75 ± 8.0 80 ± 8.2 60 ± 5.8 80 ± 6.6
48 h 75 ± 5.2 80 ± 7.9 90 ± 10.2 80 ± 7.9 90 ± 8.4
72 h 95 ± 9.8 100 ± 11.4 100 ± 12.4 90 ± 8.9 100 ± 9.5
12 4-CH3 24 h 10 ± 1.8 25 ± 2.4 85 ± 8.2 90 ± 10.2 80 ± 6.2
48 h 80 ± 7.5 50 ± 5.6 90 ± 8.6 100 ± 10.6 90 ± 5.2
72 h 100 ± 15.4 80 ± 7.9 100 ± 10.6 100 ± 12.1 95 ± 7.2
13 2,3-(CH3)2 24 h 15 ± 1.9 25 ± 3.0 75 ± 6.9 80 ± 7.8 50 ± 3.5
48 h 50 ± 3.8 75 ± 8.1 85 ± 8.1 95 ± 8.6 90 ± 6.7
72 h 90 ± 12.5 85 ± 8.0 90 ± 8.9 100 ± 10.8 100 ± 11.2
14 2-OCH3 24 h 10 ± 1.5 30 ± 2.7 85 ± 7.9 80 ± 6.8 80 ± 6.8
48 h 40 ± 5.6 75 ± 8.2 90 ± 10.5 90 ± 7.8 90 ± 8.8
72 h 75 ± 5.2 80 ± 8.8 100 ± 9.6 100 ± 9.5 100 ± 9.7
15 2-Cl 24 h 15 ± 1.2 50 ± 4.8 65 ± 5.9 90 ± 6.8 80 ± 5.9
48 h 50 ± 5.8 90 ± 8.9 80 ± 7.8 100 ± 9.2 100 ± 9.5
72 h 80 ± 8.2 100 ± 11.8 100 ± 12.1 100 ± 8.6 100 ± 10.8
16 3-Cl 24 h 75 ± 6.8 80 ± 7.9 85 ± 7.9 95 ± 5.8 80 ± 6.9
48 h 85 ± 7.9 100 ± 11.2 95 ± 9.5 100 ± 8.8 100 ± 8.8
72 h 100 ± 9.2 100 ± 9.8 100 ± 10.9 100 ± 9.8 100 ± 9.4
17 4-Cl 24 h 50 ± 4.8 75 ± 6.8 85 ± 8.2 95 ± 8.2 90 ± 6.5
48 h 100 ± 11.2 100 ± 9.8 90 ± 8.8 100 ± 11.7 100 ± 8.5
72 h 100 ± 10.6 100 ± 10.6 100 ± 10.5 100 ± 10.4 100 ± 9.2
18 3,4-Cl2 24 h 30 ± 3.2 80 ± 8.4 90 ± 7.8 95 ± 6.8 90 ± 7.5
48 h 70 ± 7.4 100 ± 12.2 100 ± 8.9 100 ± 8.8 100 ± 9.2
72 h 100 ± 12.5 100 ± 11.5 100 ± 10.5 100 ± 12.6 100 ± 7.5
A reference drug 24 h 5 ± 0.2 10 ± 0.9 5 ± 0.7 10 ± 0.8 nd
48 h 10 ± 1.1 30 ± 2.4 10 ± 0.9 20 ± 1.2 nd
72 h 20 ± 1.9 50 ± 2.8 20 ± 1.5 30 ± 2.2 nd

Normal epithelial cell line: Vero – (ECACC 88020401) – African Green Monkey kidney cells.

Cancer cell lines of the epithelial origin: A549 (ECACC 86012804) – human Caucasian lung carcinoma cells; HeLa (ECACC 93021013) – human Negroid cervix epitheloid carcinoma cells; T47D (ECACC 85102201) – human breast carcinoma cells; TOV112D (ATCC CRL-11731) – human ovarian primary malignant adenocarcinoma cells.

An effective concentration of 50 μg mL−1 corresponds to the following millimolar concentration values: 0.149 mM (10), 0.143 mM (11, 12), 0.138 mM (13), 0.137 mM (14), 0.135 mM (15, 16, 17), 0.124 mM (18).

A reference drug – pemetrexed at a concentration of 100 μg mL−1 (0.23 mM) (Sztanke et al., 2015).

nd – not determined.

Each value is the mean of at least three independent experiment values ± standard deviation.

2.1.4

2.1.4 Chromatographic measurements

2.1.4.1
2.1.4.1 Reagents and materials

Acetonitrile (MeCN) of HPLC grade was purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany), whereas both citric acid and Na2HPO4 were certified as being of analytical purity and supplied from Avantor Performance Materials (Lublin, Poland). For HPLC measurements a double distilled water was used that was obtained using a Direct-Q 3 UV apparatus (Millipore, Warsaw, Poland). The buffer (used as a mobile phase component) was prepared from 0.01 mol L−1 solutions of Na2HPO4 and citric acid that were mixed together and finally filtered through a 0.45 μm-pore-size syringe filter (GE Water and Process Technologies, USA). It should be noted that the physiological pH value of resulting buffer solution (7.4) was achieved purposefully (as the corresponding to a normal blood pH range of humans, e.g., 7.35–7.45) before mixing with acetonitrile as an organic modifier.

2.1.4.2
2.1.4.2 HPLC experimental

HPLC measurements were performed employing a Shimadzu Vp (Shimadzu, Izabelin, Poland) liquid chromatographic system (which was equipped with columns packed with different reversed-phase materials as indicated below, a LC 10AT pump, a SPD 10A UV–VIS detector, a SCL 10A system controller, and a Rheodyne injector valve fitted with a 20 μL loop). All measurements were performed under the isocratic conditions at 20 °C (293 K) as well as 37 °C (310 K). The measurement temperatures were controlled by a CTO-10 AS chromatographic oven. In the investigations values of the peak asymmetry factor for each solute sample were in the acceptable range without none additional peaks on the registered chromatograms. Single peaks of the tested compounds were detected under middle ultraviolet (MUV) light at 254 nm. The dead time values were measured from the peaks of citric acid. The capacity factors were calculated from average values, that were taken from at least three independent experimental measurements. The following equation was employed to calculate the retention factor, k: k = ( t R - t 0 ) / t 0 where tR is the retention time of the original compound that was analyzed and t0 denotes the dead time which was established by injection of a non-retained marker, e.g., citric acid.

For RPLC experiments three different stationary phases that were employed were as follows: the IAM column IAM.PC.DD2 100 × 4.6 mm i.d., 10 μm, manufacture number 43751 (Regis Chemicals Company, Morton Grove, Illinois, USA), the cholesterol column Cosmosil Cholester, 75 × 2 mm i.d., 2.5 μm, manufacture number R75182 (Genore, Warsaw, Poland) and the ISRP GFF II column, 150 × 4.6 mm i.d., 5 μm, manufacture number 53310 (Regis Chemicals Company, Morton Grove, Illinois, USA).

Buffer-acetonitrile mixtures were employed as mobile phases for RPLC measurements in which acetonitrile concentration in the effluent (expressed as a volume fraction) was equal to 0.4 φ and 0.5 φ, respectively. The prepared mobile phases were filtered through a 0.45 μm-pore-size syringe filter (GE Water and Process Technologies, USA) before using them. Retention data were recorded at the flow rate of the following: 1.2 mL min−1 with the IAM column, 0.4 mL min−1 with the Cosmosil Cholester column and 0.6 mL min−1 with the ISRP column.

2.1.4.3
2.1.4.3 In silico calculations

The partition lipophilicities, expressed as log P values of the compounds of interest in the n-octanol–water system, as well as the molecular descriptors that are relevant to their pharmacokinetics (log BBpermeation, log BBdistribution, log KHSA, %F, fu, plasma, Caco-2, Pe, jejunum) were calculated using an ACD/Percepta software (Łódź, Poland). In silico calculations were carried out exploiting the Abraham’s linear solvation energy relationships (Kaliszan, 2007; Vitha and Carr, 2006).

2.1.4.4
2.1.4.4 Statistical calculations

Multivariate data analyses, e.g., principal component and cluster variables analyses, and the regression analysis have been done using a chosen Minitab 16 statistical software (Minitab Inc., State College, Pennsylvania, USA).

3

3 Results and discussion

3.1

3.1 Synthesis and spectroscopic characterization of a novel class of fused azaisocytosine-containing congeners (10–18)

The patented biologically active 1-aryl-2-hydrazinylideneimidazolidines (1–9) (Sztanke, 2012) were exploited (as excellent nucleophilic centred building blocks) in synthesis of novel 3-(4-nitrophenyl)-8-aryl-7,8-dihydroimidazo[2,1-c][1,2,4]triazin-4(6H)-ones (10–18).

The target fused azaisocytosine-like congeners (10–18), comprising in their structures the incorporated 6-azaisocytosine template, were successfully prepared employing the general synthetic pathway, as shown in Scheme 1. An efficient and simple procedure has been developed that allows a patent pending synthetic approach of that novel class of compounds (Sztanke and Sztanke, 2014a,b). It is clear that in this case a new 1,2,4-triazinone template was annelated to the existing four atoms’ fragment (N—C—N—N) of nucleophilic centred hydrazinylideneimidazolidines employing ethyl para-nitrophenylglyoxylate (as an excellent electrophilic donor of the two carbon atoms’ fragment (C—C⚌O)) according to the [4+2] pattern (Rusinov et al., 2008). For this purpose, the molar equivalents of the available hydroiodide salts of hydrazinylideneimidazolidines bearing various substitution patterns on the phenyl ring (1–9) were successfully treated with ethyl para-nitrophenylglyoxylate in the suitable reaction media under basic conditions. Initially, the condensation process was conducted by gently heating the above starting materials in n-butanol medium containing a small molar excess of triethylamine leading to the formation of suitable ketimine intermediates (drawn in square bracket in Scheme 1). In this case the nucleophilic attack of the most reactive exocyclic amino-type nitrogen of hydrazono moiety to the reactive electrophilic carbonyl carbon at the position next to the ester group took place. The step of condensation would be expected to proceed with a concomitant removal of water molecule, and additionally led to an evolution of the hydrogen iodide from the reaction mixture which had reacted with Et3N to give triethylammonium iodide (Et3NH+I) as a by-product of alkylation. Subsequently, ketimine-type intermediates, containing the protonated endocyclic N3 nitrogen, are cyclized on heating in an inert refluxing n-butanol/DMF mixture to novel fused azaisocytosine-like congeners (10–18) with a concomitant loss of ethanol molecule. The results of combined 1H NMR/13C NMR investigations have fully defined the structures of final products that are based on the privileged 7,8-dihydroimidazo[2,1-c][1,2,4]triazin-4(6H)-one template. Moreover, the opposite mode of cyclization to 3-(4-nitrophenyl)-7-aryl-5H-6,7-dihydroimidazo[2,1-c][1,2,4]triazole derivatives (that has also been thoroughly investigated) proved to be impossible under the established reaction conditions since no traces of such type of compounds were detected in the clear spectroscopic data of the final products. It is now believed that thermal cyclization of intermediates to the desired products proceeds in the direction which yields the most stable cyclic products possessing the least energy.

A scheme for the synthesis of 3-(4-nitrophenyl)-8-aryl-7,8-dihydroimidazo[2,1-c][1,2,4]triazin-4(6H)-ones (10–18).
Scheme 1
A scheme for the synthesis of 3-(4-nitrophenyl)-8-aryl-7,8-dihydroimidazo[2,1-c][1,2,4]triazin-4(6H)-ones (10–18).

The complete spectroscopic characterization of novel fused azaisocytosine-like congeners (10–18) is specified in Subsection 2.1.2. describing the experimental protocols. The title compounds (10–18) exhibited 13C NMR chemical shifts of the C7 atoms at δ in the region 45.4–48.3 ppm, whereas the corresponding lower shifts of the C6 atoms were found to be at δ in the region 40.5–41.7 ppm. These findings proved that there are two endocyclic methylene groups (in the five-membered imidazolidine ring) that reveal an unequal chemical character. Obviously these secondary methylene carbon atoms (C6 and C7) were unambiguously identified as the signals that go down, when analysing the results of DEPT-135 experiment. 1H NMR chemical shifts of the aromatic proton signals (derived from two rings attached to the bicyclic scaffold) were found to be at δ in the region 7.04–8.46 ppm, as indicated in the case of all the compounds (10–18). However, the compound 13 revealed the proton signals derived from the para-nitrophenyl ring (as two doublets in the aromatic region at δ 8.29 ppm and δ 8.38 ppm with coupling constants of J = 9.1 Hz and 9.1 Hz, respectively, integrating with two protons each) that were shifted the most downfield from those proton signals of the second 2,3-dimethylsubstituted phenyl ring (7.19–7.32 ppm).

In the present study we have optimized the general synthetic process by an adequate choice of reagents, solvents and suitable conditions that were required to synthesize the desired final products. It has been proved that the synthesis of novel fused-azaisocytosine-containing congeners (10–18), although conducted under mild conditions, proceeded with relatively good overall yields. Higher yields were obtained when the cyclization of the hypothetical intermediate ketimine-type Schiff bases was carried out for the suitable reaction period in refluxing n-butanol/DMF solvent mixture containing a small molar excess of Et3N. The general synthetic procedure was developed in the present study on a multi-gram scale that could be applicable to a number of identifiable derivatives of this novel class.

Preparative procedures of the title compounds as well as reactions of 1-aryl-2-hydrazonoimidazolidine derivatives with ethyl para-nitrophenylglyoxylate have not been reported in the scientific literature yet, including Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS). Thus, this not studied in the past approach for the synthesis of an unknown class of fused azaisocytosine-like congeners (with the common 4-nitrophenyl moiety at the C-3 and different substitution patterns at the N-8) is the first time presented. As the synthesized compounds contain a nitro substitution on the aromatic phenyl ring they could be utilized in further synthesis of arylamines as well as aryldiazonic salts and their related derivatives.

The initial formation of the suitable ketimine-type Schiff bases, e.g., ethyl (2Z)-(4-nitrophenyl)[(2E)-(1-arylimidazolidin-2-ylidene)hydrazinylidene]acetates (II), as intermediates in the synthesis of final products (10–18), probably proceeds through an intermediate stage according to the mechanism that may be represented by Scheme 2. A nucleophilic attack of an amine-type nitrogen of the suitable hydrazinylideneimidazolidine to an electrophilic α-carbonyl carbon of ethyl para-nitrophenylglyoxylate results in the formation of hemiaminal (I), e.g., ethyl hydroxy(4-nitrophenyl)[(2E)-2-(1-arylimidazolidin-2-ylidene)hydrazinyl]acetate. Its further conversion into the suitable ketimine (II) followed with concomitant dehydration is accomplished by deprotonation of the nitrogen in hemiaminal molecule and pushing the oxygen off of the carbon by the electrons of the same nitrogen atom. The first reversible step of this reaction is believed to be largely dependent on the rate of dehydration of I.

The proposed stepwise mechanism for the formation of ketimine-type Schiff bases (II).
Scheme 2
The proposed stepwise mechanism for the formation of ketimine-type Schiff bases (II).

3.2

3.2 In vitro antiproliferative activities of novel 3-(4-nitrophenyl)-8-aryl-7,8-dihydroimidazo[2,1-c][1,2,4]triazin-4(6H)-ones (10–18)

The designed and synthesized fused azaisocytosine-like congeners (10–18) were screened thoroughly for their in vitro antiproliferative effects (measured by BrdUrd incorporation) against a panel of five reference cell lines (A549, HeLa, T47D, TOV112D and Vero) of the same epithelial origin. An efficient, reliable and reproducible BrdUrd-ELISA method is a derivative of the traditional radioactive [3H]-thymidine incorporation assay. The main advantage of this approach is that it permits a quantitative estimate of the incorporation of the labelled nucleoside analogue (as the fraudulent thymidine precursor) without the possibility of working with radioactive isotopes (Sztanke et al., 2015). The employed assay is commonly accepted in the preliminary phase of the discovery process directed towards development of novel anticancer agents (Vega-Avila and Pugsley, 2011). The BrdUrd-based method proved to be as sensitive as [3H]-thymidine assay in previous in vitro investigations (Muir et al., 1990; Hawker, 2003). According to the manufacturer’s protocol the results obtained with these two assays are strongly correlated together.

Table 1 specifies the percentage growth inhibition ratio of both tumour and normal cells by the 50 μg mL−1 concentration of all fused azaisocytosine-like congeners (10–18) after 24-, 48- and 72-h periods of incubation. Table 2 lists the IC50 values (the half maximal inhibitory concentrations calculated from the concentration-dependent inhibition curves) for the examined compounds.

Table 2 The IC50 values for all novel fused azaisocytosine-like congeners.
Compound Incubation time IC50 values (mM)a
Vero A549 HeLa T47D TOV112D
10 24 h >0.15 0.11 ± 0.011 0.09 ± 0.009 0.08 ± 0.010 0.09 ± 0.009
48 h 0.08 ± 0.009 0.08 ± 0.008 0.08 ± 0.009 0.08 ± 0.008 0.08 ± 0.010
72 h 0.08 ± 0.012 0.08 ± 0.010 0.08 ± 0.008 0.08 ± 0.008 0.08 ± 0.008
11 24 h 0.14 ± 0.018 0.10 ± 0.011 0.09 ± 0.009 0.12 ± 0.012 0.09 ± 0.007
48 h 0.10 ± 0.007 0.09 ± 0.009 0.08 ± 0.009 0.09 ± 0.009 0.08 ± 0.007
72 h 0.08 ± 0.008 0.07 ± 0.008 0.07 ± 0.009 0.08 ± 0.008 0.07 ± 0.007
12 24 h >0.14 >0.14 0.08 ± 0.008 0.08 ± 0.009 0.09 ± 0.007
48 h 0.09 ± 0.008 0.14 ± 0.016 0.08 ± 0.008 0.07 ± 0.007 0.08 ± 0.005
72 h 0.07 ± 0.011 0.09 ± 0.009 0.07 ± 0.007 0.07 ± 0.008 0.08 ± 0.006
13 24 h >0.14 >0.14 0.09 ± 0.008 0.09 ± 0.009 0.14 ± 0.010
48 h 0.14 ± 0.011 0.09 ± 0.010 0.08 ± 0.008 0.07 ± 0.006 0.08 ± 0.006
72 h 0.08 ± 0.011 0.08 ± 0.008 0.08 ± 0.008 0.07 ± 0.008 0.07 ± 0.008
14 24 h >0.14 >0.14 0.08 ± 0.007 0.09 ± 0.008 0.09 ± 0.008
48 h >0.14 0.09 ± 0.010 0.08 ± 0.009 0.08 ± 0.007 0.08 ± 0.008
72 h 0.09 ± 0.006 0.09 ± 0.010 0.07 ± 0.007 0.07 ± 0.007 0.07 ± 0.007
15 24 h >0.14 0.14 ± 0.013 0.10 ± 0.009 0.08 ± 0.006 0.08 ± 0.006
48 h 0.14 ± 0.016 0.08 ± 0.008 0.08 ± 0.008 0.07 ± 0.006 0.07 ± 0.007
72 h 0.08 ± 0.008 0.07 ± 0.008 0.07 ± 0.008 0.07 ± 0.006 0.07 ± 0.008
16 24 h 0.09 ± 0.008 0.08 ± 0.008 0.08 ± 0.007 0.07 ± 0.004 0.08 ± 0.007
48 h 0.08 ± 0.007 0.07 ± 0.008 0.07 ± 0.007 0.07 ± 0.006 0.07 ± 0.006
72 h 0.07 ± 0.006 0.07 ± 0.007 0.07 ± 0.008 0.07 ± 0.007 0.07 ± 0.007
17 24 h 0.14 ± 0.013 0.09 ± 0.008 0.08 ± 0.008 0.07 ± 0.006 0.08 ± 0.006
48 h 0.07 ± 0.007 0.07 ± 0.007 0.08 ± 0.008 0.07 ± 0.008 0.07 ± 0.006
72 h 0.07 ± 0.008 0.07 ± 0.007 0.07 ± 0.007 0.07 ± 0.007 0.07 ± 0.006
18 24 h >0.12 0.08 ± 0.008 0.07 ± 0.006 0.07 ± 0.005 0.07 ± 0.006
48 h 0.09 ± 0.010 0.06 ± 0.007 0.06 ± 0.005 0.06 ± 0.005 0.06 ± 0.006
72 h 0.06 ± 0.008 0.06 ± 0.007 0.06 ± 0.006 0.06 ± 0.008 0.06 ± 0.005
Each value is the mean ± standard deviation.

All novel 3-(4-nitrophenyl)-8-aryl-7,8-dihydroimidazo[2,1-c][1,2,4]triazin-4(6H)-ones (10–18) exerted a cytotoxic effect in the majority of recruited tumour cells. It should be noted that all molecules at an effective concentration (50 μg mL−1) revealed significantly higher antiproliferative effects in three malignant cells (A549, HeLa and T47D) than those evoked by the 100 μg mL−1 concentration of commonly used folate antimetabolite – pemetrexed (Sztanke et al., 2015). Pemetrexed was employed in our studies as a standard drug, since this congener of folic acid is clinically used in patients suffering from non-small cell lung cancer. The inhibition of proliferation of tumour cells by the investigated congeners having incorporated fused azaisocytosine template is thought to be due to competition for nucleotides required for DNA biosynthesis (Rusinov et al., 2008).

Analysing the antiproliferative activities of the target fused azaisocytosine-containing congeners with the phenyl, alkylphenyl, dialkylphenyl and alkoxyphenyl substitution pattern at the N-8 (10–14) it has been noticed that the parent compound (10), with an electron-rich phenyl ring, is more cytotoxic for T47D, A549 and TOV112D cells than are either its substituted derivatives. However, the most promising compounds seemed to be 12 and 14 (bearing the electron-donating para-CH3 and ortho-CH3O group, respectively, at the phenyl ring) because they possess the highest cytotoxic activity against HeLa cells, displaying only a slight toxicity on normal cells after a 24-h incubation period.

Amongst the compounds bearing the mono- and dichlorophenyl substitution at the N-8 of the template (15–18), the derivatives 16, 17 and 18 (that have electron-withdrawing groups attached at meta-Cl, para-Cl and 3,4-Cl2 position, respectively, of the phenyl ring) were chosen as capable of producing the highest cytotoxic effects in T47D cells. The highest antiproliferative activities in TOV112D cells were achieved by introducing the 4-Cl and 3,4-Cl2 group at the phenyl ring (compounds 17 and 18, respectively), whereas in A549 cells – via the 3-Cl and 3,4-Cl2 substitution (compounds 16 and 18, respectively). The derivative 15 with the Cl group at an ortho position on the phenyl moiety, although displaying cytotoxic effects in tumour cells, proved to be the lowest toxic for normal cells in the series of chloro-substituted congeners, particularly when investigated after 24 and 48 h of incubation. Moving the Cl group to the meta position of the phenyl ring resulted in still antiproliferative active compound 16 (against T47D and TOV112D cells), with an increased cytotoxicity for A549 and HeLa cells after 24 and 48 h of incubation, respectively, when compared to 15. Almost none of the enhancement in the antiproliferative activity against tumour cells was attained by introducing the chlorine atom into the position para of the phenyl ring, as proved for 17 when compared to 16. In the case of the antiproliferative active compound with the 3-Cl substitution (16), introducing a further Cl substituent at position para of the phenyl moiety resulted in still antiproliferative active 3,4-Cl2 substituted molecule (18), although revealing the decreased cytotoxicity for normal cells after 24- and 48-h incubation periods.

The bioisosteric replacements of the CH3 group (susceptible to oxidation in vivo (Patrick, 2009)) that is placed both in the ortho and in the para position of the phenyl ring (compounds 11 and 12, respectively) with a Cl group (resistant to oxidative biotransformation in vivo (Patrick, 2009)) led to in vitro antiproliferative active bioisosteres (molecules 15 and 17, respectively). The best balance of cytotoxicity versus more selectivity was achieved by introducing a Cl group (compound 15) in the case of the ortho-substituted isosteres (11 and 15) or a CH3 group (compound 12) in the case of para-substituted isosteres (12 and 17).

Introducing the methoxy group at the ortho position of the phenyl ring turned out to be the successful structural modification leading to a decrease in the cytotoxicity towards normal cells, which was particularly seen after 24 and 48 h of incubation as confirmed in the case of the compound 14, when compared to the parent structure (10).

Placing a methyl group ortho to the phenyl ring led to a decrease in cytotoxicity towards normal cells only after 48- and 72-h incubation periods, as confirmed in the case of the structure 11 (when compared to 10). Introducing a further methyl group to the phenyl ring resulted in a decrease of toxic effects of the derivative 13 for normal cells mostly after 24 and 48 h of incubation, when compared to 11. Placing a methyl group para to the phenyl ring led to a decrease in cytotoxicity against normal cells after 24- and 48-h incubation periods, as confirmed in the case of the molecule 12 (when compared to 10).

Experimental results proved that the attachment of mostly electron-donating moieties such as 4-CH3, 2,3-(CH3)2, 2-CH3O and electron-withdrawing 2-Cl and 3,4-Cl2 groups at the phenyl ring, enhanced the selectivity for malignant over normal cells of the compounds 12, 13, 14, 15 and 18 after 24 h of their incubation. However, they showed rather little selectivity after 48- and 72-h incubation periods.

3.3

3.3 Assessment of the drug-likeness of the investigated fused azaisocytosine-containing congeners (10–18)

According to the Lipinski’s rule of five (Lipinski et al., 2001), all the reported in this study unknown congeners (10–18) have the increased chances of good oral bioavailability by the reason of fact that they have the following: the calculated log P values less than 5 and the overall molecular weights below 500 Da, not more than 5 H-bond donor and 10 H-bond acceptor sites. Furthermore, the analyzed compounds predicted to be conformationally stable as their molecules have less than 10 rotatable bonds, whereas their topological polar surface areas are less than 140 Å2. These predictable molecular descriptors, shown in Table S1 in Supplementary material, were in the optimum range as that reported for the orally and intestinally bioavailable pharmaceutics (Veber et al., 2002; Eartl et al., 2000; Palm et al., 1997).

3.4

3.4 Chromatographic behaviour and the individual retention factors of novel solutes (10–18)

The chromatographic behaviour of this novel class of the compounds (10–18) was established. The isocratic retention factors, logs k (Yamagami et al., 1990, 1994; Klein et al., 1988), were measured directly by reversed phase liquid chromatography (RPLC) on three different columns in 20 °C (293 K) as well as 37 °C (310 K). Chromatographic analyses were carried out using buffered aqueous eluent systems containing as an organic modifier 40% (v/v) (log k 0.4 MeCN) and 50% (v/v) acetonitrile (log k 0.5 MeCN). An immobilized artificial membrane (IAM), an immobilized cholesterol (that imitate biological systems) and an internal surface reversal phase (ISRP), respectively, were employed as three different stationary materials. The choice of the endcapped stationary phases was aimed at minimizing secondary retention mechanisms. It is well known that HPLC columns without endcapping have significant amounts of silanol groups capable of secondary silanophilic interactions which interfere with the partitioning mechanism. This is especially noticeable when employing acetonitrile as the mobile phase component.

The primary advantages of the performed direct RPLC measurements should be underlined. The retention parameters, logs k, were employed as the descriptors of lipophilicity. Thus this allowed not only to significantly shorten the retention times of compounds under study but also significantly reduce the overall time and costs of RPLC measurements that were carried out. It should be noted that the reliable and reproducible logs k of the compounds of interest are different flavours of their lipophilicity. All these isocratic retention factors that are the first time presented will be indispensable in further bioactivity predictions.

The correlation matrix concerning the results obtained on three different columns is listed in Table S2 in Supplementary material. The plot correlating log k 0.4 MeCN, 310K and log k 0.4 MeCN, 293K values measured on three different stationary phases is presented in Fig. S1A in Supplementary material. On the other hand, the plot of logs k 0.5 MeCN, 310K versus logs k 0.5 MeCN, 293K is shown in Fig. S1B in Supplementary material. The obtained results showed the column with an immobilized cholesterol is the most selective in relation to the analyzed compounds because their experimental logs k are the most varied. Furthermore, it has been shown that a bit weaker selectivity to the analyzed solutes reveals the IAM column, whereas the ISRP column seems to be the distinctly less selective for these types of analytes as their determined log k factors are the least varied.

It has been shown that the structure-dependent lipophilic properties of the individual compounds have a remarkable influence on their chromatographic behaviour and retention factors (Table 3). This is, as expected, taking into account the background theory of retention explaining that in the RPLC measurements the retention is governed by hydrophobic forces and therefore the lipophilicity of the individual solute is governing the retention (Cimpan et al., 2000; Dill and Dorsey, 1994; Dorsey et al., 1989; Dorsey and Khaledi, 1993; Valko, 2004; Gocan and Cimpan, 2006; Kaliszan, 2007). It is obvious that the structure-retention behaviour of solutes in reversed phase chromatographic investigations (that are of dynamic nature) determinates their fundamental processes of pharmacokinetic phase, e.g., liberation, absorption, distribution, metabolism and elimination (LADME) that occur in a living organism (Dorsey and Khaledi, 1993; Kaliszan, 2007; Perisic-Janjic et al., 2011; Janicka et al., 2013).

Table 3 The in silico molecular descriptors that are related to pharmacokinetics, retention factors (logs k) measured directly for a given system and calculated partition coefficients (expressed as logs P) of the compounds investigated.
Compound 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
log BB distribution −0.059 0.133 0.133 0.32 −0.086 0.049 0.102 0.038 0.183
f u plasma 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.019 0.021 0.011 0.011 0.014 0.007
log BB permeation −1.11 −0.96 −0.96 −0.77 −0.93 −1.01 −1.12 −1.15 −1.13
log K HSA 5.1 5.16 5.16 5.18 5.17 5.42 5.4 5.38 5.75
% F 77 62 62 53 71 27 26 18 5
Pe, jejunum × 104 [cm s−1] 7.96 7.84 7.84 7.71 7.73 7.87 7.87 7.85 7.75
Caco-2 × 106 [cm s−1] 223 232 232 238 218 236 236 230 241
log P 2.311 2.928 2.928 3.54 2.303 2.81 2.995 2.786 3.478
log k IAM, 0.4 MeCN, 293 K 0.091 0.402 −0.139 −0.086 0.18 −0.033 −0.043 0.364 0.661
log k IAM, 0.5 MeCN, 293 K −0.319 −0.114 −0.541 −0.55 −0.284 −0.469 −0.463 −0.118 0.097
log k IAM, 0.4 MeCN, 310 K 0.138 0.448 −0.075 −0.041 0.241 0.024 0.047 0.412 0.709
log k IAM, 0.5 MeCN, 310 K −0.252 −0.059 −0.419 −0.369 −0.198 −0.366 −0.343 −0.094 0.119
log k Cholester, 0.4 MeCN, 293 K 1.055 1.441 0.804 0.746 1.283 0.991 0.872 1.456 1.792
log k Cholester, 0.5 MeCN, 293 K 0.651 0.949 0.437 0.391 0.829 0.58 0.491 0.968 1.225
log k Cholester, 0.4 MeCN, 310 K 1.009 1.374 0.766 0.738 1.214 0.952 0.831 1.372 1.704
log k Cholester, 0.5 MeCN, 310 K 0.591 0.888 0.392 0.369 0.769 0.534 0.443 0.897 1.154
log k ISRP, 0.4 MeCN, 293 K −0.003 0.111 −0.058 −0.028 0.036 −0.014 −0.012 0.099 0.179
log k ISRP, 0.5 MeCN, 293 K −0.1 −0.046 −0.143 −0.134 −0.087 −0.118 −0.117 −0.047 0.002
log k ISRP, 0.4 MeCN, 310 K −0.084 0.016 −0.144 −0.12 0.072 −0.111 −0.114 0.02 0.148
log k ISRP, 0.5 MeCN, 310 K −0.316 −0.265 −0.351 −0.33 −0.321 −0.337 −0.324 −0.277 −0.229

log BB distribution – distribution of the solute between the blood–brain; fu, plasma – fraction unbound of the solute in the plasma; log BB permeation – permeation of the solute through the blood–brain barrier; log KHSA – binding of the compound with human albumin serum and controlling the fraction unbound in body compartments in equilibrium with the plasma;%F – oral bioavailability of the solute after per os administration at a dose of 50 mg; Pe, jejunum – human jejunal score (pH 6.5); Caco-2 permeability value – is employed for assessing the intestinal absorption; log P – the calculated logarithms of n-octanol-water coefficients; log k IAM, 0.4 MeCN, 293K – the retention factors, log k obtained on the immobilized artificial membrane (IAM)-type column with buffer-acetonitrile 0.4 v/v mobile phases at 20 °C (293 K); log k IAM, 0.5 MeCN, 293K – the retention factors, log k obtained on the IAM-type column with buffer-acetonitrile 0.5 v/v mobile phases at 20 °C (293 K); log k IAM, 0.4 MeCN, 310K – the retention factors, log k obtained on the IAM-type column with buffer-acetonitrile 0.4 v/v mobile phases at 37 °C (293 K); log k IAM, 0.5 MeCN, 310K – the retention factors, log k obtained on the IAM-type column with buffer-acetonitrile 0.5 v/v mobile phases at 37 °C (293 K); log k Cholester, 0.4 MeCN, 293K – the retention factors, log k obtained on the column with an immobilized cholesterol, as the stationary phase with buffer-acetonitrile 0.4 v/v mobile phases at 20 °C (293 K); log k Cholester, 0.5 MeCN, 293K – the retention factors, log k obtained on the column with an immobilized cholesterol, as the stationary phase with buffer-acetonitrile 0.5 v/v mobile phases at 20 °C (293 K); log k Cholester, 0.4 MeCN, 310K – the retention factors, log k obtained on the column with an immobilized cholesterol, as the stationary phase with buffer-acetonitrile 0.4 v/v mobile phases at 37 °C (310 K); log k Cholester, 0.5 MeCN, 310K – the retention factors, log k obtained on the column with an immobilized cholesterol, as the stationary phase with buffer-acetonitrile 0.5 v/v mobile phases at 37 °C (310 K); log k ISRP, 0.4 MeCN, 293K – the retention factors, log k obtained on the ISRP-type column with buffer-acetonitrile 0.4 v/v mobile phases at 20 °C (293 K); log k ISRP, 0.5 MeCN, 293K – the retention factors, log k obtained on the ISRP-type column with buffer-acetonitrile 0.5 v/v mobile phases at 20 °C (293 K); log k ISRP, 0.4 MeCN, 310K – the retention factors, log k obtained on the ISRP-type column with buffer-acetonitrile 0.4 v/v mobile phases at 37 °C (310 K); log k ISRP, 0.5 MeCN, 310K – the retention factors, log k obtained on the ISRP-type column with buffer-acetonitrile 0.5 v/v mobile phases at 37 °C (310 K).

The combined electronic effects of the groups within the molecules investigated and resulting steric interactions may have influence on their determined log k parameters (Table 3). It seems that these ones although in part were capable of significantly perturbing the reported earlier hydrophobicity constant increment of some substituents attached to the aromatic systems (Hansch and Leo, 1979; Fujita et al., 1964).

Effects of a number of electron-donating and electron-withdrawing substituents attached at the phenyl moiety on decreasing and increasing logs k were thoroughly investigated. The parent compound (10) has a non-substituted electron-rich phenyl as the first aromatic moiety attached at the N-8 of the common template and the electron-withdrawing para-NO2 group at the second phenyl ring. All the solutes 11–14 possess electron-donating substituents located at the first phenyl ring in different positions and additionally the electron-withdrawing NO2 group in the para position at the second phenyl moiety. In turn, all the compounds 15–18 have electron-withdrawing substituents located at the first phenyl ring in different positions as well as the electron-withdrawing NO2 group in the para position at the second phenyl moiety. It has been confirmed that electron-donating substituents located on the phenyl moiety decreased the logs k of the investigated compounds in the order: 2-CH3 > 2-CH3O > 4-CH3 > 2,3-(CH3)2, when the RPLC measurements were carried out on the cholesterol column at both temperatures and both acetonitrile volume concentrations as well as on the IAM column at 20 °C using 50% acetonitrile in the mobile phase. In turn, the log k parameters of the same compounds decreased in the order of 2-CH3 > 2-CH3O > 2,3-(CH3)2 > 4-CH3, when the chromatographic measurements were performed on the IAM column at 37 °C employing 40% acetonitrile in the mobile phase, on the IAM column at both temperatures employing 50% acetonitrile and on the ISRP column at both temperatures and both acetonitrile volume concentrations. Furthermore, it has been observed that electron-withdrawing substituents attached at the phenyl moiety decreased the log k factors of the studied solutes in the order: 3,4-Cl2 > 4-Cl > 2-Cl > 3-Cl, when the chromatographic measurements were carried out at both temperatures on the column with an immobilized cholesterol as the stationary phase employing both acetonitrile volume concentrations, on the IAM column using 50% acetonitrile in the mobile phase and on the ISRP column employing 40% acetonitrile. In turn, the logs k of the same compounds decreased in the order of 3,4-Cl2 > 4-Cl > 3-Cl > 2-Cl, when the chromatographic measurements were performed at both temperatures on the IAM column employing 40% acetonitrile in the mobile phase and on the ISRP column using 50% acetonitrile.

Introducing two electron-donating methyl groups to the parent molecule (10) resulted in a noticeable decrease of the determined logs k of the 2,3-(CH3)2-substituted compound (18). The most probable explanation would account for the steric hindrance of the modified molecule, which decreased its lipophilicity. Generally, it has been confirmed that the log k factors of the positional isomer with the para-Cl substitution (17) are higher than those of the ortho-Cl and meta-Cl substituted isomers (15 and 16, respectively). Introducing the second chlorine atom to the para-Cl and meta-Cl derivatives (16 and 17, respectively) evoked an increase in the log k parameters of the 3,4-Cl2-substituted solute (18). Additionally, the determined retention factors of the ortho-substituted compounds proved to be distinctly lower than those predicted by an ACD/Percepta software. The decreasing and increasing experimental log k values of the molecules with an ortho substitution at the phenyl ring can be explained by taking into account the ortho effect. The most probable hypothesis is that 2,3-(CH3)2 and 2-Cl substituents in the ortho position caused the steric hindrance forcing-out-of-plane free rotation, whereas 2-CH3 and 2-CH3O groups were engaged in internal H-bond interactions (Hsieh and Dorsey, 1993; Van de Waterbeemd et al., 1996; Lambert, 1993; Carrupt et al., 1997). This could be the cause why in our measurements 2,3-(CH3)2 and 2-Cl substituted molecules revealed decreased, whereas 2-CH3 and 2-CH3O ones had increased retention factors in relation to the parent structure (10).

3.5

3.5 Chromatographic retention factors versus partitioning lipophilicities

The relationships between computed log P values (by using an ACD/Percepta software) and experimentally obtained log k factors were carefully investigated.

Logs P versus logs k dependences were found to be explicitly linear for five compounds (10, 11, 14, 17 and 18) of nine investigated (Fig. 2). The remaining four solutes (12, 13, 15 and 16), as typical outliers, had to be excluded from the regression equation. These outliers, although revealing the explicitly overestimated log P values in in silico calculations, proved to be distinctly less lipophilic in the empirical RPLC measurements. The same figure also shows that in the case of these outliers there are significant objections against their calculated lipophilicity indices. This means that the prediction of reliable log P values of molecules 12, 13, 15 and 16 is impossible and there is a clear need to verify the computed results experimentally.

Log P versus log k relationships obtained for different HPLC systems at two temperatures (20 °C (293 K) and 37 °C (310 K)).
Figure 2
Log P versus log k relationships obtained for different HPLC systems at two temperatures (20 °C (293 K) and 37 °C (310 K)).

Statistics of the relationships obtained by plotting log P versus log k values is presented in Table 4. The statistically significant very strong linear correlations were disclosed between the logarithms of predicted 1-octanol/water coefficients (expressed as log P values) and the logarithms of chromatographic retention parameters (expressed as the isocratic log k factors) measured on IAM (R2 from 0.9684 to 0.9847; p < 0.003) and ISRP (R2 from 0.9492 to 0.9923; p < 0.005) columns. Logs P versus logs k correlations proved to be also strong (R2 from 0.8895 to 0.9056) and statistically significant (p < 0.002) when chromatographic measurements were performed on the column with an immobilized cholesterol as the stationary phase. This means that novel lipophilicity indices, giving a consistent scale of lipophilicity with the trustworthy partitioning descriptors (expressed as log P values) of the compounds 10, 11, 14, 17 and 18, may be regarded as their sustainable values of reference. However, the computed log P values of solutes 12, 13, 15 and 16 cannot be used as the trustworthy descriptors of their lipophilicity, as confirmed above.

Table 4 Statistics of the relationships obtained by plotting logs P versus logs k (determined on three columns with different reversed-phase materials).
Stationary phase φMeCN Temperature (K) a ± SE b ± SE S R2 F p n Outliers
Equation: log P vs. log k: y = a (±SE) x + b (±SE)
IAM 0.4 293 2.186 ± 0.196 2.019 ± 0.077 0.087 0.9763 124 0.0016 5 12, 13, 15, 16
310 2.199 ± 0.229 1.905 ± 0.100 0.100 0.9684 92 0.0024 5 12, 13, 15, 16
0.5 293 2.926 ± 0.211 3.193 ± 0.044 0.070 0.9847 193 0.0008 5 12, 13, 15, 16
310 1.522 ± 0.052 3.087 ± 0.047 0.084 0.9781 134 0.0014 5 12, 13, 15, 16
Cholester 0.4 293 1.712 ± 0.342 0.356 ± 0.488 0.185 0.8929 26 0.0154 5 12, 13, 15, 16
310 1.834 ± 0.340 0.327 ± 0.460 0.173 0.9056 29 0.0127 5 12, 13, 15, 16
0.5 293 2.193 ± 0.446 0.734 ± 0.421 0.187 0.8896 25 0.0161 5 12, 13, 15, 16
310 2.240 ± 0.456 0.835 ± 0.401 0.188 0.8895 25 0.0161 5 12, 13, 15, 16
ISRP 0.4 293 6.757 ± 0.903 2.191 ± 0.095 0.127 0.9492 57 0.0049 5 12, 13, 15, 16
310 5.198 ± 0.428 2.732 ± 0.036 0.080 0.9801 148 0.0012 5 12, 13, 15, 16
0.5 293 12.029 ± 1.089 3.430 ± 0.072 0.087 0.9760 123 0.0016 5 12, 13, 15, 16
310 12.782 ± 0.651 6.361 ± 0.185 0.050 0.9923 386 0.0003 5 12, 13, 15, 16

Chromatographic parameters: φMeCN 0.4 and φMeCN 0.5 – indicate that mobile phases contained 0.4 (log k 0.4) and 0.5 (log k 0.5) volume fraction of acetonitrile (MeCN), respectively; Statistical terms for the derived regression equations: SE – denotes the standard error of regression coefficient, R2 – is the square correlation coefficient, S – denotes the standard error of estimate, F – denotes the value of the Fischer’s significance test, p – is the statistical significance level, n – denotes a number of the solutes involved in the derived regression equation.

3.6

3.6 PCA

The principal component analysis-based approach was employed to visualize the systematic trends in existed similarities and dissimilarities between the chromatographic, partitioning and pharmacokinetic parameters characterizing fused azaisocytosine-like congeners of interest (10–18). The overall twenty data set variables including: the chromatographic retention factors (log k IAM 0.4, 293K, log k IAM 0.5, 293K, log k IAM 0.4, 310K, log k IAM 0.5, 310K, log k Cholester 0.4, 293K, log k Cholester 0.5, 293K, log k Cholester 0.4, 310K, log k Cholester 0.5, 310K, log k ISRP 0.4, 293K, log k ISRP 0.5, 293K, log k ISRP 0.4, 310K, log k ISRP 0.5, 310K), the predicted n-octanol/water partitioning parameters (expressed as log P values) and the in silico calculated molecular descriptors (log BBpermeation, log BBdistribution, log KHSA,%F, fu, plasma, Caco-2, Pe, jejunum) that are relevant to pharmacokinetics of the investigated compounds were submitted to a rational PCA-based approach.

Three principal components explained 64.9%, 84.6% and 95.5% of the total variance, respectively. It should be noted that the results obtained by the principal component (see the loading plot presented in Fig. 3A) and cluster variables (see the dendrogram shown in Fig. 3B) analyses are consistent, confirming high trends in similarity between the analyzed chromatographic, partitioning and bioactivity parameters.

Loading plot (A), dendrogram (B) and score plot of PC2 against PC1 for the PCA-based approach (C).
Figure 3
Loading plot (A), dendrogram (B) and score plot of PC2 against PC1 for the PCA-based approach (C).

The loading plot (Fig. 3A) presents the relationships between all the variables after subjecting them to PCA. The majority of data set variables, including valuable bioactivity descriptors such as Caco-2, log KHSA, log BBdistribution, all determined experimentally retention factors as well as the calculated partitioning coefficient logarithms, logs P proved to be similar to each other. In this case the in silico bioactivity descriptors were proportional to the retention parameters both determined experimentally and calculated in silico. All these data set variables formed an “acute arrow” on the right side of the chart. In turn, the other pharmacokinetic descriptor variables such as Pe, jejunum, %F, fu, plasma, log BBpermeation proved to be inversely proportional to the determined logarithms of retention factors as well as to the predicted logarithms of partition coefficients. All these data set variables formed an “acute arrow” on the left side of the chart.

Furthermore, the score plot (Fig. 3C) reveals the trends in similarities and dissimilarities between molecular structures of the compounds that were tested according to the chromatographic, partitioning and bioactivity variables. The investigated compounds have been divided into two separate clusters due to differences in their molecular structures. The first explicitly linear cluster is associated with five more lipophilic solutes (10, 11, 14, 17 and 18) and the second cluster (with the scattered data points) is formed for four less lipophilic analytes (12, 13, 15 and 16). Such grouping of the tested solutes is most likely directly due to similarities in their retention mechanism (as evidenced by their logs k) obtained on different RPLC materials. The diverse grouping on the analyzed compounds may also suggest that the retention of each group of substances is controlled by the different net effect of intermolecular forces between the solute on subsequent reversed phase materials and the mobile phase (Kaliszan, 2007; Perisic-Janjic et al., 2011). It cannot be excluded that clustering of the compounds 12, 13, 15 and 16 may be presumably evoked by more complicated steric and electronic effects within their molecules that have a significant influence on their retention behaviour and consequently on bioactivity descriptors.

3.7

3.7 Correlations between chromatographic lipophilicity parameters and in silico calculated pharmacokinetic descriptors

The data sets of the determined retention factors (log k) on three different RPLC columns as well as in silico bioactivity descriptors (e.g.,%F, fu, plasma, log KHSA, log BBdistribution, log BBpermeation, Caco-2, Pe, jejunum) were correlated with the goal of evaluating whether the lipophilicity parameters have influence on the pharmacokinetic properties of our novel compounds. This approach was performed with the purpose of preselecting the lead candidates for further in vivo studies with optimum lipophilicity ranges relevant to satisfactory pharmacokinetics. Knowledge about pharmacokinetic properties of compounds with sufficient in vitro biological activities is especially important before subjecting them to further in vivo investigations. It is commonly known that poor pharmacokinetics, in the majority cases, results in drug candidate failure. Therefore, in silico predictive models are very helpful at an early discovery phase of new biologically active compounds that are considered as potential drug candidates (Guerra et al., 2010; Matysiak et al., 2019).

All the in silico calculated pharmacokinetic descriptors of the investigated solutes are listed in Table 3. %F value is used in an early phase of the lead candidate selection process for predicting the bioavailability of the solute after per os administration, whereas the fu, plasma predictor is used for assessing a fraction unbound of the compound of interest in the plasma (e.g., actually active). Log KHSA value is employed for predicting the solute binding with human serum albumin as the most significant protein component. Caco-2 and Pe, jejunum predictors are used for assessing the intestinal absorption and an effective transport in human jejunum, respectively. Log BBdistribution value predicts the distribution of the individual solute between the blood–brain, whereas log BBpermeation value predicts the ability of the solute to penetrate the blood–brain barrier.

Plots of the in silico pharmacokinetic descriptors against the experimental retention factors are shown in Fig. 4A–C and apart from that in Fig. S2 in Supplementary material. The described correlations between physico-chemical properties strictly related to pharmacokinetics and retention factors of the analyzed new compounds on different reversed phase stationary materials are presented in Table 5 and apart from that in Table S3 in Supplementary material. The determined log k factors proved to be applicable in predictions of some fundamental pharmacokinetic properties of the studied solutes such as%F, f u, plasma, log KHSA values.

Relationships between pharmacokinetic descriptors and retention factors: (A) %F predictors versus log k factors; (B) f u plasma predictors versus log k factors; (C) log K HSA predictors versus log k factors.
Figure 4
Relationships between pharmacokinetic descriptors and retention factors: (A) %F predictors versus log k factors; (B) f u plasma predictors versus log k factors; (C) log K HSA predictors versus log k factors.
Table 5 Statistics of the relationships obtained by plotting the in silico molecular descriptors related to pharmacokinetics versus log k factors.
Stationary phase φMeCN Temperature (K) a ± SE b ± SE c ± SE S R2 F p n Compounds
Equation:%F vs. log k: y = a (±SE) x2 + b (±SE) x + c (±SE)
IAM 0.4 293 −185.079 ± 115.101 59.541 ± 34.709 68.142 ± 4.854 8.237 0.6032 1.6 0.3968 5 10–14
−32.720 ± 7.617 −10.357 ± 4.599 26.143 ± 0.492 0.764 0.9981 266 0.0434 4 15–18
310 −210.667 ± 110.859 88.434 ± 43.081 64.438 ± 4.190 7.417 0.6783 2.2 0.3217 5 10–14
−30.843 ± 5.581 −8.968 ± 4.038 26.879 ± 0.447 0.529 0.9991 554 0.0300 4 15–18
0.5 293 −317.289 ± 100.678 −199.729 ± 71.595 42.947 ± 10.846 4.799 0.8653 6.5 0.1347 5 10–14
−63.608 ± 11.237 −61.658 ± 4.810 11.588 ± 0.528 0.698 0.9984 319 0.0396 4 15–18
310 −380.403 ± 289.056 −163.568 ± 143.267 54.365 ± 15.185 9.093 0.5164 1.1 0.4836 5 10–14
−58.538 ± 8.947 −59.214 ± 2.590 12.893 ± 0.351 0.424 0.9994 861 0.0241 4 15–18
Cholester 0.4 293 157.310 ± 19.866 353.779 ± 43.173 −12.074 ± 22.204 2.085 0.9746 38.4 0.0254 5 10–14
−28.302 ± 5.262 51.960 ± 13.992 2.658 ± 8.649 0.853 0.9977 213 0.0484 4 15–18
310 −178.776 ± 38.556 385.549 ± 80.506 −131.285 ± 39.935 3.494 0.9286 13.1 0.0714 5 10–14
−39.502 ± 6.986 49.969 ± 17.710 5.377 ± 10.461 1.041 0.9965 143 0.0591 4 15–18
0.5 293 −243.733 ± 27.723 338.998 ± 36.847 −41.001 ± 11.129 1.865 0.9797 48.2 0.0203 5 10–14
−47.471 ± 6.741 52.225 ± 11.527 12.168 ± 4.392 0.679 0.9985 336 0.0386 4 15–18
310 −274.359 ± 54.935 354.987 ± 68.146 −37.844 ± 19.147 3.254 0.9381 15.2 0.0619 5 10–14
−48.180 ± 8.414 46.652 ± 13.416 15.215 ± 4.734 0.810 0.9979 236 0.0460 4 15–18
ISRP 0.4 293 −1545.96 ± 1593.22 110.460 ± 123.190 69.210 ± 6.690 10.665 0.3349 0.6 0.6651 5 10–14
−448.029 ± 89.381 −37.608 ± 14.348 26.094 ± 0.432 0.671 0.9985 344 0.0381 4 15–18
310 −1948.110 ± 1588.420 −211.860 ± 209.330 66.440 ± 4.480 9.736 0.4457 0.9 0.5543 5 10–14
−145.628 ± 55.517 −77.354 ± 3.923 19.631 ± 0.791 0.802 0.9979 241 0.0456 4 15–18
0.5 293 −5754.990 ± 3459.230 −1026.090 ± 669.050 27.200 ± 29.450 8.036 0.6224 1.7 0.3776 5 10–14
−1204.700 ± 236.148 −319.00 ± 29.883 5.650 ± 0.645 0.682 0.9985 333 0.0387 4 15–18
310 −5126.280 ± 6517.87 −3104.350 ± 3979.380 −399.850 ± 602.700 11.395 0.2407 0.4 0.7593 5 10–14
−1129.230 ± 87.159 −844.040 ± 49.423 −129.090 ± 6.863 0.206 0.9999 366 0.0117 4 15–18
Equation: fu, plasma vs. log k: y = a (±SE) x2 + b (±SE) x + c (±SE)
IAM 0.4 293 −0.008 ± 0.011 0.003 ± 0.003 0.020 ± 0.001 0.001 0.3611 0.6 0.6389 5 10–14
−0.047 ± 0.002 0.023 ± 0.001 0.01 ± 0.000 0.001 0.9988 417 0.0346 4 15–18
310 −0.010 ± 0.011 0.005 ± 0.004 0.020 ± 0.000 0.001 0.4320 0.8 0.5680 5 10–14
−0.049 ± 0.005 0.030 ± 0.003 0.010 ± 0.000 0.001 0.9936 78 0.0800 4 15–18
0.5 293 −0.016 ± 0.014 −0.009 ± 0.010 0.019 ± 0.002 0.001 0.5409 1.2 0.4591 5 10–14
−0.077 ± 0.002 −0.036 ± 0.001 0.011 ± 0.000 0.001 0.9992 633 0.0281 4 15–18
310 −0.014 ± 0.027 −0.005 ± 0.013 0.020 ± 0.001 0.001 0.2831 0.4 0.7169 5 10–14
−0.097 ± 0.013 −0.032 ± 0.004 0.012 ± 0.001 0.001 0.9876 40 0.1114 4 15–18
Cholester 0.4 293 −0.007 ± 0.006 0.016 ± 0.012 0.011 ± 0.006 0.001 0.6482 1.9 0.3518 5 10–14
−0.028 ± 0.011 0.070 ± 0.028 −0.030 ± 0.017 0.002 0.8979 5 0.3195 4 15–18
310 −0.008 ± 0.007 0.07 ± 0.015 0.011 ± 0.007 0.001 0.6008 1.6 0.3992 5 10–14
−0.030 ± 0.012 0.071 ± 0.030 −0.029 ± 0.018 0.002 0.38929 5 0.3273 4 15–18
0.5 293 −0.010 ± 0.009 0.015 ± 0.012 0.015 ± 0.004 0.001 0.6299 1.8 0.3701 5 10–14
−0.045 ± 0.017 0.0725 ± 0.028 −0.015 ± 0.011 0.001 0.9018 5 0.3133 4 15–18
310 −0.011 ± 0.011 0.015 ± 0.013 0.015 ± 0.004 0.001 0.5931 1.5 0.4069 5 10–14
−0.046 ± 0.018 0.070 ± 0.028 −0.012 ± 0.010 0.002 0.9880 5 0.3193 4 15–18
ISRP 0.4 293 −0.071 ± 0.131 0.008 ± 0.010 0.020 ± 0.001 0.001 0.2338 0.4 0.7662 5 10–14
−0.627 ± 0.018 0.081 ± 0.003 0.012 ± 0.000 0.001 0.9993 762 0.0256 4 15–18
310 −0.090 ± 0.143 −0.008 ± 0.019 0.020 ± 0.001 0.001 0.2275 0.3 0.7725 5 10–14
−0.311 ± 0.009 −0.006 ± 0.001 −0.014 ± 0.000 0.001 0.9994 780 0.0253 4 15–18
0.5 293 −0.259 ± 0.343 −0.042 ± 0.066 0.019 ± 0.003 0.001 0.3626 0.6 0.6374 5 10–14
−1.636 ± 0.039 −0.227 ± 0.005 0.007 ± 0.000 0.001 0.9996 1151 0.0208 4 15–18
310 −0.121 ± 0.563 −0.072 ± 0.344 0.110 ± 0.052 0.001 0.0324 0.1 0.9676 5 10–14
−1.839 ± 0.594 −1.074 ± 0.337 −0.143 ± 0.047 0.001 0.9312 7 0.2623 4 15–18
Equation: log KHSA vs. log k: y = a (±SE) x2 + b (±SE) x + c (±SE)
IAM 0.4 293 0.396 ± 0.548 −0.114 ± 0.165 5.146 ± 0.023 0.039 0.2149 0.3 0.7851 5 10–14
1.880 ± 0.200 −0.685 ± 0.121 5.381 ± 0.013 0.020 0.9957 116 0.0657 4 15–18
310 0.467 ± 0.574 −0.176 ± 0.223 5.153 ± 0.022 0.038 0.2465 0.4 0.7535 5 10–14
1.968 ± 0.009 −0.960 ± 0.006 5.441 ± 0.001 0.010 1.000 710 0.0027 4 15–18
0.5 293 0.711 ± 0.749 0.456 ± 0.533 5.207 ± 0.081 0.036 0.3501 0.6 0.6499 5 10–14
3.215 ± 0.146 1.790 ± 0.062 5.546 ± 0.007 0.009 0.9991 568 0.2967 4 15–18
310 0.844 ± 1.264 0.383 ± 0.627 5.183 ± 0.066 0.040 0.1927 0.3 0.8073 5 10–14
3.894 ± 0.089 1.636 ± 0.026 5.500 ± 0.003 0.004 0.9998 2626 0.0138 4 15–18
Cholester 0.4 293 0.435 ± 0.286 −0.952 ± 0.622 5.643 ± 0.320 0.030 0.5400 1.2 0.4600 5 10–14
1.141 ± 0.431 −2.709 ± 1.147 6.931 ± 0.709 0.070 0.9474 9 0.2295 4 15–18
310 0.478 ± 0.350 −1.006 ± 0.731 5.653 ± 0.362 0.032 0.4872 1.0 0.5128 5 10–14
1.213 ± 0.466 −2.725 ± 1.182 6.862 ± 0.698 0.070 0.9479 10 0.2282 4 15–18
0.5 293 0.694 ± 0.432 −0.932 ± 0.575 5.434 ± 0.174 0.029 0.5684 1.4 0.4316 5 10–14
1.045 ± 0.235 −3.051 ± 0.777 6.130 ± 0.225 0.044 0.9789 24 0.1453 4 15–18
310 0.763 ± 0.514 −0.952 ± 0.637 5.419 ± 0.179 0.030 0.5274 1.2 0.4726 5 10–14
1.929 ± 0.729 −2.654 ± 1.163 6.234 ± 0.410 0.040 0.9468 9 0.2306 4 15–18
ISRP 0.4 293 2.583 ± 6.351 −0.131 ± 0.491 5.146 ± 0.027 0.043 0.0779 0.1 0.9331 5 10–14
25.526 ± 1.295 −2.466 ± 0.208 5.374 ± 0.006 0.010 0.9990 490 0.0319 4 15–18
310 3.749 ± 6.702 0.423 ± 0.883 5.153 ± 0.033 0.041 0.1390 0.2 0.8610 5 10–14
11.920 ± 1.244 0.882 ± 0.088 5.358 ± 0.018 0.018 0.9965 143 0.0590 4 15–18
0.5 293 12.335 ± 16.758 2.259 ± 3.244 5.241 ± 0.143 0.039 0.2255 0.3 0.7745 5 10–14
66.847 ± 3.639 10.566 ± 0.461 5.729 ± 0.010 0.011 0.9998 420 0.0345 4 15–18
310 11.824 ± 23.801 7.126 ± 14.531 6.215 ± 2.201 0.042 0.1166 0.2 0.8834 5 10–14
76.139 ± 11.794 45.989 ± 6.688 12.286 ± 0.929 0.028 0.9916 60 0.0916 4 15–18

All statistical terms for the derived regression equations are explained underneath Table 5.

Fig. 4A shows the relationships between the calculated oral bioavailability values (expressed as %F) and the experimental retention factors. These dependences are described by two quadratic equations that were found to be separated for solutes 15–18 and 10–14. The statistically significant and very strong curvilinear relationships (R2 in the range from 0.9979 to 0.9999) were identified between the %F predictors and the log k factors of compounds 15–18 established on IAM and ISRP columns. %F versus logs k relationships were again very strong (R2 in the range from 0.9965 to 0.9985) when the measurements were performed on the column with an immobilized cholesterol. The disclosed curvilinear shapes of these correlation lines indicate that an enhancement in the solutes’ lipophilicities (expressed as logs k) reduces their bioavailability after per os administration. In turn, %F values of the compounds 1014 plotted against the log k factors determined on the cholesterol column at the temperature of 20 °C revealed also statistically significant and very strong parabolic correlations (R2 = 0.9746 and 0.9797).

Fig. 4B presents the relationships between the pharmacokinetically active fraction unbound in the plasma (f u, plasma) and the determined experimentally retention factors. The parabolic shape of shown correlation lines suggests that there exists an optimum range of lipophilicity providing a proper binding of the solute in the plasma. The relationships between the f u, plasma predictors and the chromatographic retention parameters are described by quadratic equations for solutes 15–18. The strongest and statistically significant correlations were identified by plotting f u, plasma predictors versus the log k factors obtained from measurements that were performed at 20 °C on IAM (R2 = 0.9988 and 0.9992) and ISRP (R2 = 0.9993 and 0.9996) columns. In turn, in the case of solutes revealing lower binding with plasma proteins and forming the separate group (10–14) no effect of the retention factors on their optimal binding with plasma was observed. All the tested substances (10–18) predicted to have a high protein binding behaviour (according to the known protein binding classification (Idaidek and Arafat, 2012; Amidon et al., 1995)) as their overall fraction unbound in human blood plasma is relatively low (<0.1).

Fig. 4C also shows plots correlating affinities for human serum albumin (log KHSA) of the compounds 15–18 and their retention factors determined experimentally. These relationships are described by quadratic equations. In this case it is seen that only a significant increase in the logs k of the solutes of interest evokes a significant enhancement in their binding with albumin in the human serum. The strongest and statistically significant correlations were derived by plotting log KHSA predictors versus the log k values determined on IAM column at 37 °C (R2 = 0.9998 and 1.0000) and on ISRP column at 20 °C (R2 = 0.9990 and 0.9998). Our results are consistent with some findings presented in earlier studies (Kaliszan et al., 1996; Ong et al., 1996; Caldwell et al., 1998; Nasal et al., 1994; Barbato et al., 2007; Stewart and Chan, 1998; Chan et al., 2005; Janicka and Pachuta-Stec, 2014) that described the advantages in bioactivity predictions of the retention parameters determined on IAM-type columns that imitate biosystems. In contrast, in the case of compounds 10–14 no effect of their lipophilicity on an optimal binding with human serum albumin was observed.

All the investigated small molecules (10–18) predicted to be highly permeable and therefore they are expected to be easily transported through the intestinal epithelium (according to the adopted classification of Caco-2 cell permeability (Yamashita et al., 2000; Yazdanian et al., 1998)). The computed Caco-2 values ranged from 218 × 10−6 cm s−1 for solute 14 to 241 × 10−6 cm s−1 for the most lipophilic compound 18. In turn, the calculated Pe, jejunum values ranged from 7.71 × 10−4 cm s−1 for analyte 13 to 7.96 × 10−4 cm s−1 for the parent compound 10. These values indicate that all these solutes should be fast absorbed in the human jejunum at physiological pH (Stępnik et al., 2014). Nevertheless, in the case of all the compounds that were studied no influence of the logs k on Caco-2 as well as Pe, jejunum predictors, respectively, was observed (Fig. S2 and Table S3 in Supplementary material).

Amongst this novel class of fused azaisocytosine-like congeners only molecules revealing the optimum lipophilicity range relevant to satisfactory pharmacokinetics may be regarded as the most promising candidates of the series for further in vivo testing. These lead structures emerged from a rational approach aiming at processing the experimental retention factors in bioactivity predictions. Statistically significant and highly predictive relationships presented in this study confirmed that the liquid chromatography with suitable reversed phase materials of diverse separation properties (including those imitating biosystems) is an excellent in vitro system that may be successfully used for assessing some fundamental pharmacokinetic properties (such as %F, f u, plasma, log KHSA) of our new solutes from their retention factors measured directly for given systems, as described above in detail. Pharmacokinetic properties of our novel compounds will be of value during their further in vivo investigations and finally all these descriptors of bioavailability could be validated in an animal model.

4

4 Conclusion

A novel class of fused azaisocytosine-containing congeners (10–18), as the anticipated false building blocks of nucleotides required for DNA synthesis, has been obtained employing the straightforward synthetic strategy. Their efficient and scalable synthesis was performed under mild reaction conditions with relatively good overall yields. All the original compounds demonstrated superior antiproliferative effects in three tumour cell lines to those of the commonly used folate antimetabolite – pemetrexed. The most promising candidates for designing more selective cytotoxic agents seem to be the representatives 12, 13, 14, 15 and 18 as they reveal a lower toxicity for normal cells of the same epithelial origin after 24-h incubation period. The lipophilicity factors were determined by RPLC on three diverse stationary materials for all novel molecules and were used in correlation studies with in silico pharmacokinetic properties. A number of compounds also showed the optimum values of logs k significantly correlated with in silico bioactivity descriptors (such as %F – in the case of 10–18 and f u, plasma, log KHSA – in the case of 15–18) required for the satisfactory pharmacokinetics in vivo. Therefore, these molecules seem to be the most promising lead structures that may be subjected to further more detailed drug development investigations.

References

  1. , , , , . A theoretical basis for a biopharmaceutic drug classification: the correlation of in vitro drug product dissolution and in vivo bioavailability. Pharm. Res.. 1995;12:413-420.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , . Comparison between immobilized artificial membrane (IAM) HPLC data and lipophilicity in n-octanol for quinolone antibacterial agents. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci.. 2007;31:288-297.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , . Synthesis of various 5-alkoxymethyluracil analogues and structure–cytotoxic activity relationship study. Carbohydr. Res.. 2011;346:2136-2144.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , . Evaluation of the immobilized artificial membrane phosphatidylcholine: Drug discovery column for high-performance liquid chromatographic screening of drug-membrane interactions. J. Chromatogr. A. 1998;800:161-169.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , . Computational approaches to lipophilicity: methods and applications. Chapter 5. In: , , eds. Reviews in Computational Chemistry. Vol vol. 11. New York: Wiley-VCH, J. Wiley and Sons Inc.; .
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , . Modeling Caco-2 permeability of drugs using immobilized artificial membrane chromatography and physicochemical descriptors. J. Chromatogr. A. 2005;1072:159-168.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , . Lipophilicity characterization by reversed-phase liquid chromatography of some furan derivatives. J. Chromatogr. A. 2000;869:49-55.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , . Prodrug strategies in cancer therapy. Eur. J. Med. Chem.. 2001;36:577-595.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , . The molecular mechanism of retention in reversed phase liquid chromatography. Chem. Rev.. 1994;66:500-546.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , , , . Liquid chromatography – theory and methodology. Anal. Chem.. 1989;89:331-346.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , , . Hydrophobicity estimations by reversed phase liquid chromatography – implications for biological partitioning processes. J. Chromatogr. A. 1993;656:485-499.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , . Fast calculation of molecular polar surface area as a sum of fragment-based contributions and its application to the prediction of drug transport properties. J. Med. Chem.. 2000;43:3714-3717.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. , , . Effect of 5-fluoro-2′-deoxyuridine (FdUrd) on 5-bromo-2′-deoxyuridine (BrdUrd) incorporation into DNA measured with a monoclonal BrdUrd antibody and by the BrdUrd/Hoechst quenching effect. Cytometry. 1985;6:513-520.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , . A new substituent constant π, derived from partition coefficients. J. Am. Chem. Soc.. 1964;86:5157-5180.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. , , . Lipophilicity measurements by liquid chromatography. J. Comer. Adv. Chromatogr.. 2006;44:79-176.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , . Neural computational prediction of oral drug absorption based on CODES 2D descriptors. Eur. J. Med. Chem.. 2010;45:930-940.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. , , . A Substituent Constants for Correlation Analysis in Chemistry and Biology. New York: Willey Interscience; .
  18. , . Chemiluminescence-based BrdU ELISA to measure DNA synthesis. J. Immunol. Meth.. 2003;274:77-82.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. , , . Accurate determination of log kw in reversed-phased liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr.. 1993;63:163-178.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. , , , , , , . Measurement of antigen specific lymphocyte proliferation using 5-bromo-deoxyuridine incorporation. An easy and low cost alternative to radioactive thymidine incorporation. J. Immunol. Meth.. 1991;140:243-248.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. , , , , , . Synthesis and structure assignment of 1-[(2-hydroxyethoxy)methyl]- and 1-[(1,3-dihydroxy-2-propoxy)methyl]-6-azaisocytosine. Heterocycles. 1995;41:293-301.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. , , . Saliva versus plasma pharmacokinetics: theory and application of a salivary excretion classification system. Mol. Pharm.. 2012;9:2358-2363.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. , , , . Reversed-phase liquid chromatography with octadecylsilyl, immobilized artificial membrane and cholesterol columns in correlation studies with in silico biological descriptors of newly synthesized antiproliferative and analgesic active compounds. J. Chromatogr. A. 2013;1318:92-101.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. , , . Retention-property relationships of 1,2,4-triazoles by micellar and reversed-phase liquid chromatography. J. Sep. Sci.. 2014;37:1419-1428.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. , . QSRR: Quantitative structure-(chromatographic) retention relationships. Chem. Rev.. 2007;107:3212-3246.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. , , , . Quantitative structure-retention relationships in the examination of the topography of the binding site of antihistamine drugs on α1-acid glycoprotein. J. Chromatogr. A. 1996;722:25-32.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Kandefer-Szerszeń, M., Szuster-Ciesielska, A., Sztanke, K., Pasternak, K., 2014. 8-(4-Methoxyphenyl)-4-oxo-4,6,7,8-tetrahydroimidazo[2,1-c][1,2,4]triazin-3-formic acid hydrazide used as a drug for liver diseases. Polish Patent 216264.
  28. Keisuke, M., Bonpei, Y., Masaak, M., Shintaro, I., Koichi, Y., 1993. Maillard reaction inhibitor, process for producing it, composition containing it and the use thereof. European Patent 0531812.
  29. , , , , . Updating of the OECD Test Guideline 107 “partition coefficient n-octanol/water”: OECD Laboratory intercomparison test on the HPLC method. Chemosphere. 1988;17:361-386.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. , . Modeling oil-water partitioning and membrane permeation using reversed-phase chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A. 1993;656:469-484.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. , , , , . Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.. 2001;46:3-26.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. , , , . Detection of human white cell proliferative responses by immunoenzymatic measurement of bromodeoxyuridine uptake. J. Immunol. Meth.. 1988;106:95-100.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. , , , , , , , , , . Design, synthesis and antiproliferative activity against human cancer cell lines of novel benzo-, benzofuro-, azolo- and thieno-1,3-thiazinone resorcinol hybrids. Arab. J. Chem.. 2019;12(8):2655-2667.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. , , , . An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for bromodeoxyuridine incorporation using fixed microcultures. Anal. Biochem.. 1990;185:377-382.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. , , , , , , , , . Quantitative relationships between the structure of beta-adrenolytic and antihistamine drugs and their retention on an alpha 1-acid glycoprotein HPLC column. Biomed. Chromatogr.. 1994;8:125-129.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. , , , . Immobilized-artificial-membrane chromatography: measurements of membrane partition coefficient and predicting drug membrane permeability. J. Chromatogr. A. 1996;728:113-128.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. , , , , . Polar molecular surface properties predict the intestinal absorption of drugs in humans. Pharm. Res.. 1997;14:568-571.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. , . An Introduction to Medicinal Chemistry. New York, USA: Oxford University Press Inc.; .
  39. , , , , , , . Reversed-phase TLC and HPLC retention data in correlation studies with in silico molecular descriptors and druglikeness properties of newly synthesized anticonvulsant succinimide derivatives. Mol. Pharm.. 2011;8:555-563.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. , , , . Nucleic acids components and their analogues. LXXXIL. The fine structure of 6-azaisocytosine and its derivatives. Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun.. 1966;31:1864-1871.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. , , , , . Azolo[5,1-c]1,2,4-triazines as a new class of antiviral compounds. Russ. Chem. Bull., Int. Ed.. 2008;57:985-1014.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. , , . Use of immobilized artificial membrane chromatography for drug transport applications. J. Pharm. Sci.. 1998;87:1471-1478.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. , , , . In vitro and in silico determination of oral, jejunum and Caco-2 human absorption of fatty acids and polyphenols. Micellar liquid chromatography. Talanta. 2014;130:265-273.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Sztanke, K., 2012. New 1-substituted-2-hydrazino-4,5-dihydroimidazole hydroiodides and method for their obtaining. Polish Patent 211550.
  45. , , , , , , . Crystal structure, antitumour and antimetastatic activities of disubstituted fused 1,2,4-triazinones. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.. 2009;19:5095-5100.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Sztanke, M., Sztanke, K., 2014a. Mono and dichlorophenyl substituted 3-(4-nitrophenyl)-7,8-dihydroimidazo[2,1-c][1,2,4]triazin-4(6H)-ones, method for obtaining them and medical applications. Polish Patent, Appl. No 410363, 2014.
  47. Sztanke, M., Sztanke, K., 2014b. Phenyl, alkylphenyl, dialkylphenyl, alkoxyphenyl substituted 3-(4-nitrophenyl)-7,8-dihydroimidazo[2,1-c][1,2,4]triazin-4(6H)-one derivatives, method for obtaining them and medical applications. Polish Patent, Appl. No 410364, 2014.
  48. , , , . Synthesis, structure elucidation and identification of antiproliferative activities of a novel class of thiophene bioisosteres bearing the privileged 7,8-dihydroimidazo[2,1-c][1,2,4]triazin-4(6H)-one scaffold. Bioorg. Med. Chem.. 2015;23:3448-3456.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. , , , . A novel fused 1,2,4-triazine aryl derivative as antioxidant and nonselective antagonist of adenosine A2A receptors in ethanol-activated liver stellate cells. Chem. Biol. Interact.. 2012;195:18-24.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . 3-Aryl-[1,2,4]triazinobenzimidazol-4(10H)-one: a novel template for the design of highly selective A2B adenosine receptor antagonists. J. Med. Chem.. 2012;55:1490-1499.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. , . Application of high-performance liquid chromatography based measurements of lipophilicity to model biological distribution. J. Chromatogr. A. 2004;1037:299-310.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. , , , , . Lipophilicity measurement by reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) In: , , , eds. Lipophilicity in Drug Action and Toxicology. New York: VCH Publishers Inc.; . p. :73-85.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. , , . An overview of colorimetric assay methods used to assess survival or proliferation of mammalian cells. Proc. West Pharmacol. Soc.. 2011;54:10-14.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. , , . The chemical interpretation and practice of linear solvation energy relationships in chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A. 2006;1126:143-194.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. , , , . Hydrophobicity parameters determined by reversed-phase liquid chromatography: I. Relationship between capacity factors and octanol-water partition coefficients for monosubstituted pyrazines and the related pyridines. J. Chromatogr.. 1990;514:123-136.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. , , , , . Hydrophobicity parameters determined by reversed-phase liquid chromatography. IX. Relationship between capacity factor and water-octanol partition coefficient of monosubstituted pyrimidines. Chem. Pharm. Bull.. 1994;42:907-912.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. , , , , , , . Optimized conditions for prediction of intestinal drug permeability using Caco-2 cells. Eur. J. Pharm.. 2000;10:195-204.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. , , , , . Correlating partitioning and Caco-2 cell permeability of structurally diverse small molecular weight compounds. Pharm. Res.. 1998;15:1490-1494.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. , , , , , , . Molecular properties that influence the oral bioavailability of drug candidates. J. Med. Chem.. 2002;45:2615-2623.
    [Google Scholar]

Appendix A

Supplementary material

Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2016.04.002.

Appendix A

Supplementary material

Supplementary data 1

Supplementary data 1

Show Sections