5.2
Impact Factor
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Corrigendum
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Full Length Article
Full lenth article
Letter to Editor
Original Article
Research article
Retraction notice
Review
Review Article
SPECIAL ISSUE: ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY
5.3
Impact Factor
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Corrigendum
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Full Length Article
Full lenth article
Letter to Editor
Original Article
Research article
Retraction notice
Review
Review Article
SPECIAL ISSUE: ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Review article
2021
:14;
202107
doi:
10.1016/j.arabjc.2021.103213

Traditional uses, phytochemistry, pharmacology and other potential applications of Vitellaria paradoxa Gaertn. (Sapotaceae): A review

Drug Discovery and Smart Molecules Research Laboratory, Department of Chemical Sciences, University of Johannesburg, P.O. Box 17011, Doornfontein, Johannesburg 2028, South Africa
Research Centre for Synthesis and Catalysis, Department of Chemical Sciences, University of Johannesburg, Kingsway Campus, Auckland Park, P.O. Box 524, Johannesburg, South Africa
Centre for Natural Product Research (CNPR), Chemical Sciences Department, University of Johannesburg, Doornfontein, Johannesburg 2028, South Africa

⁎Corresponding authors at: Drug Discovery and Smart Molecules Research Laboratory, Department of Chemical Sciences, University of Johannesburg, P.O. Box 17011, Doornfontein, Johannesburg 2028, South Africa (D.T. Ndinteh). ojoolusesan33@gmail.com (Olusesan Ojo), dndinteh@uj.ac.za (Derek T. Ndinteh)

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Elsevier and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

Vitellaria paradoxa Gaertn. is a multipurpose medicinal plant of the family Sapotaceae, and it has been widely used usually in the clinical traditional medicine as remedy for a wide range of diseases for several decades. In addition, the plant has also found applications in confectionery, cosmetics and soaps, and pharmaceuticals both locally and internationally. V. paradoxa, which has been identified with >150 phytoconstituents, is rich in oleanane-type triterpene acids and glycosides, such as paradoxosides A-E, tieghemelin A, parkiosides A-C, bassic acid, as well as flavonoids such as quercetin and catechin-type compounds. The extracts and the active constituents of V. paradoxa have been investigated for various pharmacological activities, including but not limited to anticancer, melanogenesis-inhibitory, antibacterial, anti-diabetic, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anti-diarrhoeal, and antifungal activities. Additionally, V. paradoxa has also been utilized in nanoparticles (NPs) synthesis. These NPs among other things have shown significant antinociceptive and antiedematogenic activities as well as environmental friendly adsorptive properties for the removal of pollutants from pharmaceutical effluents. Overall, this review comprehensively examines the traditional uses, phytochemistry, pharmacology, toxicology, clinical studies, and nanoparticles synthesized from V. paradoxa and their applications.

Keywords

Vitellaria paradoxa
Sapotaceae
African traditional medicine
Pharmacological activities
Phytoconstituents
Nanoparticles

Abbreviations

COX-2

cyclooxygenase-2

EO

essential oils

MIC

minimum inhibitory concentration

BCG

bacillus calmette–guérin

MRSA

methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

IC50

half maximal inhibitory concentrations

MFC

minimum fungicidal concentrations

MDA

malondialdehyde

DPPH

2,2-diphenyl-1-picryl hydrazyl

ABTS

2,20-azinobis-(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid)

TYRP-1 & -2

tyrosinase-related protein-1 & -2

α‐MSH

α‐melanocyte‐stimulating hormone

ROS

reactive oxygen species

GC–MS

gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy

LD50

half-maximal lethal concentrations

MITF

microphthalmia-associated transcription factor

TPA

12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate

EBV-EA

Epstein-Barr virus early antigen

MTT

(3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide

iNOS

inducible nitric oxide synthase

IL

interleukins

TNF-α

tumor necrosis factor-α

LPS

lipopolysaccharide

PBP2

Penicillin-binding protein 2 (PBP2)

h-TNAP

Human tissue nonspecific alkaline phosphatase

NPs

Nanoparticles

XTT = 2

3-bis[2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sulfophenyl]-2H-tetrazolium5-carboxyanilide inner salt

HRSEM

High-resolution scanning electron microscopy

FT-IR

Fourier transformed infra-red

EDX

electron diffraction X-ray

XRD

X-ray diffraction

ELS

electrophoretic light scattering

DSC

differential scanning calorimetry

AFM

atomic force microscopy

DLS

dynamic light scattering

1

1 Introduction

Vitellaria paradoxa Gaertn. is a multipurpose medicinal plant of the family Sapotaceae (Table 1). The species is indigenous to sub-Saharan Africa, and usually found in semi-arid to arid regions of the humid forest zones (Akihisa et al., 2011; Di Vincenzo et al., 2005; Warra, 2011). V. paradoxa, which is commonly called Shea butter tree in English, is locally known as “Ori” (Yoruba, Nigeria), “Kadanya” (Hausa, Nigeria), “Lulu” (Arabic), “Taãnga” (Burkina Faso), “Karé” (Pular, Guinea), “karate” (French), “Tango” (Honduras) and “Somou/Yokuti” (Togo) (Félix et al., 2018; Soladoye et al., 1989). As a medicinal plant, V. paradoxa has a long history of preventing and curing diseases and infections in the clinical traditional medicine in sub-Saharan Africa for many decades (Soro et al., 2011; Tella, 1979). Its leaves, stems, roots, barks, fruits, oils, and seeds can be utilized as medicines with different therapeutic effects. In addition, V. paradoxa is also utilized commercially as a primary ingredient in confectionery, cosmetics, soaps, pharmaceuticals, and green chemistry products (Eneh, 2010; Maranz et al., 2004; Moldovan et al., 2021).

Table 1 Taxonomic classification of Vitellaria paradoxa Geartn. (TCLP, 2018).
Taxonomy
Kingdom Plantae
Division Magnoliophyta
Class Magnoliopsida
Order Ebenales
Family Sapotaceae
Genus Vitellaria C. F. Geartn.
Species Vitellaria paradoxa C. F. Geartn. – Shea butter

In recent years, modern pharmacological studies have shown that the extracts of V. paradoxa exhibited various pharmacological activities (Da et al., 2019; Eyong et al., 2018; Ndukwe et al., 2007a; Talla et al., 2016; Verma et al., 2012; Zhang et al., 2018). Interestingly, many of these biological activities are in support of those of clinical uses of V. paradoxa in the African traditional medicine (Karou et al., 2011; Ogbole and Ajaiyeoba, 2010; Segun et al., 2018). Because of notable pharmacological effects and nutritional values, several researchers have extensively and diffusely investigated, and isolated the active constituents of kernel, stem-bark, root, leaves, and nutshells of V. paradoxa. In the meantime, there is no known available systematic review that synthesizes the current knowledge on V. paradoxa. With the exception of limited reviews on nutritional compositions of V. paradoxa by Honfo et al. (2014), and Maanikuu and Peker (2017), we are not aware of any study that has extensively reviewed the phytochemical and pharmacological potential of this plant species worldwide.

This present work aimed to comprehensively examine the existing published scientific literature about the botany, traditional uses, phytochemistry, pharmacology, toxicology, and clinical applications of V. paradoxa extracts as well as its active constituents in recent years. Additionally, nanoparticles (NPs) synthesis obtained from V. paradoxa and their applications have also been reviewed, with the goal of providing a complete material for researchers to further discover its therapeutic values.

2

2 Review methodology

In this review, we retrieved reports from the databases of Google Scholar (https://scholar.google.com/), Online Wiley library (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/), ScienceDirect (https://www.sciencedirect.com/), Scopus (https://www.scopus.com/), Springer (https://www.springer.com/gp) and PubMed (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) to gather extensive scientific evidence on the botanical description, traditional uses, phytochemical constituents, pharmacological properties, clinical studies, toxicology and nanoparticles of Vitellaria paradoxa. Various combinations of key words used during the literature search include: “Vitellaria paradoxa” and “its traditional uses”, “phytochemistry”, “biological activity”, “toxicology”, “isolated compounds”, and “ethnomedicinal uses”. The literature search was conducted from inception to February 2021. Only published data resulting from different databases search were thoroughly screened and relevant published papers were collated using EndNote (https://endnote.com/), a web-based reference manager. Information gathered was analyzed and summarized in table forms where appropriate.

3

3 Botanical description of V. paradoxa

V. paradoxa, synonymous to Butyrospermum parkii (G. Don) Kotschy or Butyrospermum paradoxum (C. F. Gaertn.) Hepper, is a deciduous woody plant with a spreading crown. The tree grows about 25 m in height and thrives under plenty of sunlight within the daily temperature range of 24 – 38 °C. Also, the plant grows optimally on sandy soils with good humus cover, but can also grow on other types of soil (Hall et al., 1996). The leaves, which are usually oblong, are clustered at the ends of branches (Fig. 1). Its bark is corky. It has a taproot up to 1 m, and occasionally 2 m long. Its rooting system is firmly grounded, and this provides support and stability to withstand an extended period of dry seasons and drought. The plant starts flowering between the ages of 10–25 years. Its flowers are white, and they are usually clustered at the end of the shoots. Fruiting, which normally occurs during the dry season, begins at the ages of 10–15 years after planting. However, full production does not occur until 20–30 years. The fruits are green in colour, flat and round, containing about four shiny brown seeds (Glèlè Kakaï et al., 2011; Naughton et al., 2015; Pritchard et al., 2004) (http://tropical.theferns.info/viewtropical.php?id = Vitellaria + paradoxa). Morphologically, two forms of V. paradoxa are identified at the sub-species level, namely sub-species (ssp.) paradoxa (common in Western Africa), and ssp. nilotica (predominant in Eastern Africa), and are widely distributed across sub-Saharan Africa. Sub-species paradoxa has a wider range of precipitation about 600–1400 mm/annual than sub-species nilotica (900–1400 mm/annual). Similarly, V. paradoxa ssp. paradoxa grows at lower elevation (100–600 m) than ssp. nilotica (650–1600 m). The eastern subspecies flowers are larger and have thick ferrugineous indumentum on the flower stalk than the western individuals. Outer sepals of the eastern type have a wooly appearance due to their hairy nature (Allal et al., 2013; Hall et al., 1996; Hemsley, 1961).

Photograph of Vitellaria paradoxa leaves with the fruits (Photo by one of the authors, O.O).
Fig. 1
Photograph of Vitellaria paradoxa leaves with the fruits (Photo by one of the authors, O.O).

4

4 Traditional clinical uses of V. paradoxa

Most African states depend primarily on medicinal plants for the treatment of diseases and infections. V. paradoxa is a highly regarded source of medicine in traditional medicine practice in Africa, and has gained acceptability among the rural dwellers for combating infections and diseases. Table 2 summarizes the traditional uses of V. paradoxa, along with the part(s) used among some African nations. Different parts of V. paradoxa have been documented for treating one disease or the other. For example, in Nigeria, the seed oil decoction is used for curing cough and tuberculosis (Ariyo et al., 2020; Ogbole and Ajaiyeoba, 2010), while the bark decoction is used for the treatment of diarrhoea and hypertension in Benin (Dossou-Yovo et al., 2014; Lagnika et al., 2016). It is reported that some traditional healers in Côte d'Ivoire utilized the bark to ease labour pain and child delivery (Iwu, 2014). Malaria, a deadly infectious disease, is endemic to sub-Sahara Africa, and many people from Burkina Faso, Ghana, Mali and Guinea rely heavily on V. paradoxa as herbal remedy (Bekoe et al., 2020; Jansen et al., 2010; Keïta et al., 2020; Nadembega et al., 2011; Traore et al., 2013). These herbal remedies are usually involved some kinds of plant preparations, such as decoction, cream, charred, maceration, and infusion, and they may comprise a plant part or a whole plant (Iwu, 2014). Most traditional clinical uses of V. paradoxa, as illustrated in Table 2, have been reported from the Western Africa. A number of speculations could be responsible for this. First, this may be partly due to the richness of traditional medicine practice in Western African countries, especially in Nigeria, Burkina Faso and Ghana. Second, many of the V. paradoxa species are predominantly distributed in Western African nations compared to the Eastern Africa. This would give the rural dwellers in the Western African nations quick and easy access to the plant species.

Table 2 Traditional uses of Vitellaria paradoxa (Shea butter tree) in Africa.
Country Part(s) used/preparation Traditional usage References
Nigeria Bark, oil Cancer and tumor (Abubakar et al., 2020; Segun et al., 2018)
Stem-bark, seed nuts Diarrhoea and hemorrhoids (Mustapha, 2014; Sharaibi and Osuntogun, 2017)
Oil/decoction Tuberculosis and cough (Ariyo et al., 2020; Ogbole and Ajaiyeoba, 2010)
Leaf Headache (Iwu, 2014)
Stem Skin diseases, gastric ulcers (Adebayo-Tayo et al., 2010; Akinwumi and Sonibare, 2019)
Seeds Antimicrobial agent, coolant (Sonibare and Abegunde, 2012)
Leaf, fruit, bark Rash, skin and wound infections, chicken pox (Abubakar et al., 2017; Soladoye et al., 1989)
Fruits, bark Swollen pain, toothache, rheumatism (Ampitan, 2013; Ichoron et al., 2019)
Burkina Faso Leaf/Decoction Malaria, fever (Jansen et al., 2010; Nadembega et al., 2011)
Fruits/Charred Diarrhoea, obesity (Nadembega et al., 2011; Pare et al., 2016)
Root/Cream Hemorrhoids (Nadembega et al., 2011)
Stem-bark Stomach ache, mental disorders, liver disorders, lung disorders, heart disorders, throat sore, malnutrition, eyes diseases, headache, wound, navel pain, sinusitis (Nadembega et al., 2011)
Bark Oral diseases (Tapsoba and Deschamps, 2006)
Leave, roots Neuropsychiatric disorders (Kinda et al., 2017)
Guinea Stem-bark/Decoction Malaria
Neurological disorders
(Traore et al., 2013)
(Romeiras et al., 2012)
Togo Root Diabetes mellitus and hypertension (Karou et al., 2011)
Bark/Decoction Liver diseases (Kpodar et al., 2016)
Stem-bark, Root/Decoction Tumor and chronic wounds (Kola et al., 2020)
Ghana Stem (dried) Waist pains (Tina) (Wodah and Asase, 2012)
Bark, leaves, seeds Diabetes, stroke, waist pain, fracture (Ziblim et al., 2013)
Stem bark/Decoction Guinea worm, tapeworm (Agyare et al., 2014)
Root Hypertension, diabetes, malaria, typhoid, fever (Bekoe et al., 2020)
Cameroon Leaf, bark/Decoction Convulsions and epilepsy (Bum et al., 2011)
Bark/Decoction, Maceration Worms, ulcers, diarrhoea (Djoueche et al., 2011; Jiofack et al., 2010)
Côte d'Ivoire Bark Labour pain and child delivery (Iwu, 2014)
Roots Diarrhoea with blood, helminthes (Koné et al., 2005)
Benin Bark/Decoction Diarrhoea, hypertension (Dossou-Yovo et al., 2014; Lagnika et al., 2016)
Bark, leave, root Typhoid fever (Kakpo et al., 2019)
Uganda Root HIV/AIDS, stomach aches, skin infections (Anywar et al., 2020)
Mali Leaves/Decoction, root Malaria, schistosomiasis (Bah et al., 2006; Keïta et al., 2020)

5

5 Phytochemistry of V. paradoxa

5.1

5.1 Flavonoids and phenolics

Phytochemically, different parts of V. paradoxa have been documented as source of flavonoids and phenolic compounds. A review of available published literature revealed that as much as 36 flavonoids and phenolics have been identified so far from V. paradoxa. Seven phenolic compounds, including isotachioside, gallic acid, (+)-catechin, (-)-epicatechin, quercetin, rutin, and arbutin (17) were isolated from seed kernel of V. paradoxa (Zhang et al., 2014) (Fig. 2 and Table 3). Phytochemical methods and HPLC-DAD-Q-TOF-MS analysis of V. paradoxa nutshell led to the identification of flavonoids taxifolin isomer, myricetin, luteolin, quercitrin, eriodictyol, quercetin methyl ether, calycosin, scutellarein, kaempferol, diosmetin, together with some simple phenolic acids homogentisic acid, protocatechuic acid, homovanillic acid, vanillic acid, p-hydroxybenzoic acid, syringic acid, ferulic acid and methyl ester coumaric acid (825) (Da et al., 2019). Catechin-type molecules, such as (-)-epicatechin gallate (26), (+)-gallocatechin (27), (-)-epigallocatechin (28), (-)-gallocatechin gallate (29), and (-)-epigallocatechin gallate (30) were also isolated and reported from the V. paradoxa kernels and leaves methanol extracts (Ramsay et al., 2016; Steven et al., 2003; Sinan et al., 2020). A recent study by Sinan et al. (2020) also led to the identification of gambiriin C (31), luteolin-7-glucoside (32), myricitrin (33), and three myricetin derivatives (3436) from the stem-bark of V. paradoxa. Additionally, Talla et al. (2016) isolated the compounds catechin (3) and epicatechin (4) from the stem-bark. Similarly, epicatechin (4), quercetin (5), and (+)-catechin (3) were also reported from the stem-bark of V. paradoxa by Eyong and his colleagues (Eyong et al., 2018).

Chemical structures of some notable flavonoids and phenolic compounds from Vitellaria paradoxa.
Fig. 2
Chemical structures of some notable flavonoids and phenolic compounds from Vitellaria paradoxa.
Table 3 Flavonoids and phenolics isolated and identified from Vitellaria paradoxa.
No. Chemical constituent Extract Part(s) Reference
1 Isotachioside Methanol Kernel (Zhang et al., 2014)
2 Gallic acid Methanol Kernel (Steven et al., 2003; Zhang et al., 2014, 2018)
Methanol, Water Leaf, Stem-bark (Sinan et al., 2020)
3 (+)-Catechin Methanol Kernel (Steven et al., 2003; Zhang et al., 2014, 2018)
Stem-bark (Eyong et al., 2018; Talla et al., 2016)
Methanol, Water Root
Leaf
(Nyemb et al., 2018)
(Sinan et al., 2020)
4 (-)-Epicatechin Methanol Kernel (Steven et al., 2003; Zhang et al., 2014)
Stem-bark (Eyong et al., 2018; Talla et al., 2016)
Methanol, Water Leaf (Sinan et al., 2020)
5 Quercetin Methanol Kernel (Steven et al., 2003; Zhang et al., 2014, 2018)
Stem-bark (Eyong et al., 2018; Sinan et al., 2020)
6 Rutin Methanol Kernel (Zhang et al., 2014, 2018)
7 Arbutin Methanol Kernel (Zhang et al., 2014)
8 Taxifolin Methanol Nutshell (Da et al., 2019)
9 Myricetin Methanol Nutshell (Da et al., 2019)
10 Luteolin Methanol Nutshell (Da et al., 2019)
11 Quercitrin Methanol
Methanol, Water
Nutshell
Stem-bark
(Da et al., 2019)
(Sinan et al., 2020)
12 Eriodictyol Methanol Nutshell (Da et al., 2019)
13 Quercetin methyl ether Methanol Nutshell (Da et al., 2019)
14 Calycosin Methanol Nutshell (Da et al., 2019)
15 Scutellarein Methanol Nutshell (Da et al., 2019)
16 Kaempferol Methanol Nutshell (Da et al., 2019)
17 Diosmetin Methanol Nutshell (Da et al., 2019)
18 Homogentisic acid Methanol Nutshell (Da et al., 2019)
19 Protocatechuic acid Methanol Nutshell (Da et al., 2019)
20 Homovanillic acid Methanol Nutshell (Da et al., 2019)
21 Vanillic acid Methanol Nutshell (Da et al., 2019)
22 p-Hydroxybenzoic acid Methanol Nutshell (Da et al., 2019)
23 Syringic acid Methanol Nutshell (Da et al., 2019)
24 Ferulic acid Methanol Nutshell (Da et al., 2019)
25 Methyl ester coumaric acid Methanol Nutshell (Da et al., 2019)
26 (-)-Epicatechin gallate Methanol Kernel
Leaf
(Steven et al., 2003)
(Sinan et al., 2020)
27 (+)-Gallocatechin Methanol Kernel (Steven et al., 2003)
28 (-)-Epigallocatechin Methanol Kernel
Leaf
(Steven et al., 2003)
(Sinan et al., 2020)
29 (-)-Gallocatechin gallate Methanol Kernel (Steven et al., 2003)
30 (-)-Epigallocatechin gallate Methanol
Methanol
Kernel
Stem-bark
(Steven et al., 2003)
(Sinan et al., 2020)
31 Gambiriin C Methanol Leaf (Sinan et al., 2020)
32 Luteolin glucoside Methanol, Water Stem-bark (Sinan et al., 2020)
33 Myricitrin Methanol, Water Stem-bark (Sinan et al., 2020)
34 Myricetin 3-glucoside Methanol, Water Stem-bark (Sinan et al., 2020)
35 Myricetin 7-glucoside Methanol, Water Stem-bark (Sinan et al., 2020)
36 Myricetin galloylgalactoside Methanol, Water Stem-bark (Sinan et al., 2020)

5.2

5.2 Triterpenoids and steroids

V. paradoxa is highly rich in triterpenoids (Fig. 3 and Table 4). Tapondjou et al. (2011) isolated four triterpenoid saponins (3740) from the root-bark of V. paradoxa. Acetates of α-amyrin, β-amyrin, lupeol, butyrospermol, and cinnamates of α-amyrin, β-amyrin, lupeol and butyrospermol (4148) were reportedly isolated from the seed kernel (Akihisa et al., 2010b). Similarly, preparative HPLC analysis of the non-saponifiable lipid fraction of V. paradoxa hexane kernel extract led to the identification of four triterpene alcohols, namely α-amyrin, β-amyrin, lupeol, and butyrospermol with traces of parkeol (49), 24-methylene-24-dihydroparkeol (50), 24-methylenecycloartanol (51), 24-methylenedammarenol (52), dammaradienol (53), Ψ-taraxasterol (54), and taraxasterol (55) (Akihisa et al., 2010a). Recently, a total of 16 oleanane-type triterpene acids and glycosides, including paradoxoside A-E (5660) were reported from the kernel of V. paradoxa. Other identified compounds were tieghemelin A (61), arginine C (62), bassic acid (63), protobassic acid (64), 16α-hydroxyprotobassic acid (65), 3-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl bassic acid (66), 3-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl-16α-hydroxyprotobassic acid (67), 3-O-β-D-glucuronopyranosyl protobassic acid (68), 3-O-β-D-glucuronopyranosyl 16α-hydroxyprotobassic acid (69), Mi-glycoside I (70) and butyroside D (71) (Zhang et al., 2014). Two new ursane-type triterpenoids (7273) together with known compound betulinic acid (74) were isolated from the stem-bark of V. paradoxa (Eyong et al., 2018). In another study, Eyong et al. (2015) identified three new bassic acid derivatives (7577) along with previously isolated 16α-hydroxyprotobassic acid and 1α,2β,3β,19α-tetrahydroxyurs-12-en-28-oic acid (65, 72) from the stem-bark. Similarly, ursolic acid, oleanolic acid, together with tormentic acid, corosolic acid, maslinic acid and their 3-O-p-(Z/E)-coumaroyl derivatives (7885) were found to be present in the leaf of V. paradoxa (Catteau et al., 2017; 2020). A new triterpenoid, vitellaric acid (86), was recently reported from the stem-bark of V. paradoxa (Talla et al., 2016). Meanwhile, few steroidal compounds were found in V. paradoxa. They include β-sitosterol, stigmasterol (87, 88) (Eyong et al., 2018), spinasterol 3-O-β-D-glucopyranoside and 22-dihydrospinasterol-3-O-β-D-glucopyranoside (89, 90) (Zhang et al., 2014) and sitosterol cinnamate (91) (Buxton et al., 2020).

Chemical structures of triterpenoids and steroids from Vitellaria paradoxa.
Fig. 3
Chemical structures of triterpenoids and steroids from Vitellaria paradoxa.
Chemical structures of triterpenoids and steroids from Vitellaria paradoxa.
Fig. 3
Chemical structures of triterpenoids and steroids from Vitellaria paradoxa.
Chemical structures of triterpenoids and steroids from Vitellaria paradoxa.
Fig. 3
Chemical structures of triterpenoids and steroids from Vitellaria paradoxa.
Table 4 Triterpenoids and steroids isolated and reported from Vitellaria paradoxa.
No. Chemical constituent Extract Part(s) Reference
Triterpenoids
37 Parkioside A Butanol Root-bark (Tapondjou et al., 2011)
38 Parkioside B Butanol Root-bark (Tapondjou et al., 2011)
39 Parkioside C Butanol Root-bark (Tapondjou et al., 2011)
40 Androseptoside A Butanol Root-bark (Tapondjou et al., 2011)
41 α-Amyrin acetate Hexane Seed kernel (Akihisa et al., 2010b)
42 β-Amyrin acetate Hexane Seed kernel (Akihisa et al., 2010b)
43 Lupeol acetate Hexane Seed kernel (Akihisa et al., 2010b)
44 Butyrospermol acetate Hexane Seed kernel (Akihisa et al., 2010b)
45 α-Amyrin cinnamate Hexane Seed kernel (Akihisa et al., 2010b)
46 β-Amyrin cinnamate Hexane Seed kernel (Akihisa et al., 2010b)
47 Lupeol cinnamate Hexane Seed kernel (Akihisa et al., 2010b)
48 Butyrospermol cinnamate Hexane Seed kernel (Akihisa et al., 2010b)
49 Parkeol Hexane Kernel (Akihisa et al., 2010a)
50 24-methylene-24-dihydroparkeol Hexane Kernel (Akihisa et al., 2010a)
51 24-methylenecycloartanol Hexane Kernel (Akihisa et al., 2010a)
52 24-methylenedammarenol Hexane Kernel (Akihisa et al., 2010a)
53 Dammaradienol Hexane Kernel (Akihisa et al., 2010a)
54 Ψ-taraxasterol Hexane Kernel (Akihisa et al., 2010a)
55 Taraxasterol Hexane Kernel (Akihisa et al., 2010a)
56 Paradoxoside A Methanol Kernel (Zhang et al., 2014)
57 Paradoxoside B Methanol Kernel (Zhang et al., 2014)
58 Paradoxoside C Methanol Kernel (Zhang et al., 2014)
59 Paradoxoside D Methanol Kernel (Zhang et al., 2014)
60 Paradoxoside E Methanol Kernel (Zhang et al., 2014)
61 Tieghemelin A Methanol Kernel (Zhang et al., 2014)
62 Arginine C Methanol Kernel (Zhang et al., 2014)
63 Bassic acid Methanol Kernel
Stem-bark
(Zhang et al., 2014)
(Talla et al., 2016)
64 Protobassic acid Methanol Kernel (Zhang et al., 2014)
65 16α-hydroxyprotobassic acid Methanol
Ethyl acetate
Kernel
Stem-bark
(Zhang et al., 2014)
(Eyong et al., 2015)
66 3-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl bassic acid Methanol Kernel (Zhang et al., 2014)
67 3-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl-16α-hydroxyprotobassic acid Methanol Kernel (Zhang et al., 2014)
68 3-O-β-D-glucuronopyranosyl protobassic acid Methanol Kernel (Zhang et al., 2014)
69 3-O-β-D-glucuronopyranosyl 16α-hydroxyprotobassic acid Methanol Kernel (Zhang et al., 2014)
70 Mi-glycoside I Methanol Kernel (Zhang et al., 2014)
71 Butyroside D Methanol Kernel (Zhang et al., 2014)
72 1α,2β,3β,19α-tetrahydroxyurs-12-en-28-oic acid Methanol
Ethyl acetate
Stem-bark (Eyong et al., 2018)
(Eyong et al., 2015)
73 2β,3β,19α-trihydroxyurs-12-en-28-oic acid Methanol Stem-bark (Eyong et al., 2018)
74 Betulinic acid Methanol
Ethanol
Stem-bark
Leaves
(Eyong et al., 2018; Talla et al., 2016)
(Adeleke et al., 2018)
75 5, 6-dihydrobassic acid Ethyl acetate Stem-bark (Eyong et al., 2015)
76 6-dihydro-16α-hydroxybassic acid Ethyl acetate Stem-bark (Eyong et al., 2015)
77 16α-hydroxybassic acid Ethyl acetate Stem-bark (Eyong et al., 2015)
78 Ursolic acid Dichloromethane Leaf (Catteau et al., 2017, 2020)
79 Oleanolic acid Dichloromethane Leaf (Catteau et al., 2017, 2020)
80 Tormentic acid Dichloromethane Leaf (Catteau et al., 2020)
81 Corosolic acid Dichloromethane Leaf (Catteau et al., 2020)
82 Maslinic acid Dichloromethane Leaf (Catteau et al., 2020)
83 3-O-p-(Z/E)-coumaroyltormentic acid Dichloromethane Leaf (Catteau et al., 2020)
84 3-O-p-(Z/E)-coumaroylcorosolic acid Dichloromethane Leaf (Catteau et al., 2020)
85 3-O-p-(Z/E)-coumaroylmaslinic acid Dichloromethane Leaf (Catteau et al., 2020)
86 Vitellaric acid Methanol Stem-bark (Talla et al., 2016)
Steroids
87 β-sitosterol Methanol Stem-bark (Eyong et al., 2018)
88 Stigmasterol Methanol Stem-bark (Eyong et al., 2018)
89 Spinasterol 3-O-β-D-glucopyranoside Methanol Kernel (Zhang et al., 2014)
90 22-dihydrospinasterol-3-O-β-D-glucopyranoside Methanol Kernel (Zhang et al., 2014)
91 Sitosterol cinnamate Methanol Leaf (Buxton et al., 2020)

5.3

5.3 Essential oils/volatile compounds

Essential oils (EO) are invaluable ingredients in foods, insecticides, as well as in cosmetics. EO and volatile compounds constitute part and parcel of V. paradoxa (Fig. 4). A number of EO and volatile compounds have been identified in V. paradoxa, mainly including p-cymene (92), limonene (93), 1, 8-cineol (94), guaiacol (95), β-elemene (96), linalool (97), (E)-caryophyllene (98), camphor (99), germacrene A (100), germacrene D (101), bicyclogermacrene (102), p-ethylguajacol (103), (E)-phytol (104), phytone (105) , α-pinene (106), β-pinene (107), cyclocitral (108), p-vinylguaiacol (109), α-copaene (110), β-cubebene (111), n-octanol (112), nonanal (113), n-nonanol (114), (E)-α-ionone (115), (E)-β-ionone (116), α-humulene (117), δ-cadinene (118), (E)-nerolidol (119), (3Z)-hexenyl benzoate (120), (2E)-hexenyl benzoate (121), caryophyllene oxide (122), humulene epoxide II (123), (3Z)-hexenyl tiglate (124), pentadecanal (125), farnesyl acetone (126), hexanal (127), (2E)-hexenal (128), (3Z)-hexenol (129), (2Z)-hexenol (130), n-hexanol (131), n-decane (132), (3Z)-hexenyl acetate (133), (2E)-hexenyl benzoate (134), and benzaldehyde (135) (Aboaba et al., 2014; Bail et al., 2009; Owolabi et al., 2012).

Chemical structures of essential oil and volatile compounds from Vitellaria paradoxa.
Fig. 4
Chemical structures of essential oil and volatile compounds from Vitellaria paradoxa.

5.4

5.4 The other constituents

According to available literature, there are other phytoconstituents of V. paradoxa (Fig. 5 and Table 5), among which are 2-O-butyl-l-O-(2′-ethylhexyl) benzene-l, 8-dicarboxylate (136) and 1-phenyl-l, 4-pentanedione (137), which were isolated from the root-bark (Garba and Salihu, 2011). A new cerebroside (138) was found in the root of V. paradoxa (Nyemb et al., 2018). Compounds 3, 5, 7-trihydroxycoumarin (139), 5, 7-dihydroxycoumarin (140), lignans (+)-pinoresinol, (+)-medioresinol, (+)-syringaresinol (141143), organic acids quinic acid (144), gluconic acid (145) and malic acid (146), salicylic acid (147), p-methoxybenzoic acid (148), p-methoxyphenylacetic acid (149), 2-hydroxy-5-(2-methoxyethyl) benzoic acid (150), coniferaldehyde (151), p-hydroxybenzaldehyde (152) are reportedly identified from V. paradoxa (Da et al., 2019; Sinan et al., 2020). Zhang et al. (2015) identified two jasmonate derivatives (153154) from the defatted Shea kernels extract. Ndukwe et al. (2007b) isolated 1-naphthalene carboxylic acid derivative (155) from the methanolic stem extract. Similarly, two stereo-isomers of 2-O-(β-D-glucopyranosyl)pentane-2,4-diol (156157), and three sugars proto-quercitol (quercitol) (158), sucrose (159), and maltose (160) have also been reported from V. paradoxa (Zhang et al., 2014). Badifu (1989) found that Shea butter kernel contained 46% stearic acid, 41% oleic acid, 4% palmitic acid, 7% linoleic, and 1% linolenic acid. In a recent study, Yamamoto et al. (2018) found that lipids from V. paradoxa seeds contained palmitic acid, stearic acid, oleic acid, and linoleic acid. The fruit pulps and seeds are reported as good sources of proteins, vitamins C and A, fibres, ash, carbohydrate, minerals and energy (Abidemi and Hamilton-Amachree, 2021; Akoma et al., 2018; Okullo et al., 2010; Raimi et al., 2014; Ugese et al., 2008). Importantly, V. paradoxa seed oil contains twelve mineral elements, namely potassium (61.70 ± 0.30 ppm), iron (52.00 ± 0.11 ppm), calcium (30.24 ± 0.04 ppm), cobalt (0.01 ± 0.00 ppm), magnesium (6.24 ± 0.01 ppm), nickel (0.04 ± 0.00 ppm), zinc (0.72 ± 0.00 ppm), manganese (6.24 ± 0.01 ppm), lead (0.02 ± 0.00 ppm), sodium (5.10 ± 0.01 ppm), copper (0.80 ± 0.00 ppm) and cadmium (0.01 ± 0.00 ppm), and the contents of some harmful elements, such as lead and cadmium were not up to the maximum set by the food standard (Raimi et al., 2014). Therefore, the seeds and fruits of V. paradoxa could serve as the cheapest sources of nutrient supplements to fight dietary diseases, such as anaemia, night blindness and scurvy. The seeds are edible, and this is a plus for soap, food and cosmetic industries to fully utilize it as raw materials.

Structures of cerebroside, lignans, coumarins and other components from Vitellaria paradoxa.
Fig. 5
Structures of cerebroside, lignans, coumarins and other components from Vitellaria paradoxa.
Table 5 Other compounds from Vitellaria paradoxa.
No. Chemical constituent Compound class Extract Part(s) Reference
136 2-O-butyl-l-O-(2′-ethylhexyl) benzene-l, 8-dicarboxylate Ester Ethanol Root-bark (Garba and Salihu, 2011)
137 1-phenyl-l, 4-pentanedione Ketone Ethanol Root-bark (Garba and Salihu, 2011)
138 Vitellaroside Cerebroside Methanol Root (Nyemb et al., 2018)
139 3, 5, 7-trihydroxycoumarin Coumarin Methanol Nutshell (Da et al., 2019)
140 5, 7-dihydroxycoumarin Coumarin Methanol Nutshell (Da et al., 2019)
141 (+)-pinoresinol Lignan Methanol Nutshell (Da et al., 2019)
142 (+)-medioresinol Lignan Methanol Nutshell (Da et al., 2019)
143 (+)-syringaresinol Lignan Methanol Nutshell (Da et al., 2019)
144 Quinic acid Organic acid Methanol Nutshell (Da et al., 2019)
Methanol, Water Leaf, Stem-bark (Sinan et al., 2020)
145 Gluconic acid Organic acid Methanol Nutshell (Da et al., 2019)
146 Malic acid Organic acid Methanol Nutshell (Da et al., 2019)
Methanol, Water Leaf, Stem-bark (Sinan et al., 2020)
147 Salicylic acid Organic acid Methanol Nutshell (Da et al., 2019)
148 p-Methoxybenzoic acid Organic acid Methanol Nutshell (Da et al., 2019)
149 p-Methoxyphenylacetic acid Organic acid Methanol Nutshell (Da et al., 2019)
150 2-Hydroxy-5-(2-methoxyethyl) benzoic acid Organic acid Methanol Nutshell (Da et al., 2019)
151 Coniferaldehyde Organic aldehyde Methanol Nutshell (Da et al., 2019)
152 p-Hydroxybenzaldehyde Organic aldehyde Methanol Nutshell (Da et al., 2019)
153 Glucosylcucurbic acid Jasmonate Methanol Kernels (Zhang et al., 2015)
154 Methyl glucosylcucurbate Jasmonate Methanol Kernels (Zhang et al., 2015)
155 3, 5, 6-trihydroxy-7-octyl-5, 6-dihydro-1-naphthalene carboxylic acid Organic acid Methanol Stem (Ndukwe et al., 2007b)
156 (2R,4S)-2-O-(β-D-glucopyranosyl)pentane-2,4-diol Alcohol Methanol Kernel (Zhang et al., 2014)
157 (2S,4S)-2- O-(β-D-glucopyranosyl)pentane-2,4-diol Alcohol Methanol Kernel (Zhang et al., 2014)
158 Proto-quercitol (quercitol) Sugar Methanol Kernel (Zhang et al., 2014)
159 Sucrose Sugar Methanol Kernel (Zhang et al., 2014)
160 Maltose Sugar Methanol Kernel (Zhang et al., 2014)

6

6 Pharmacology of V. paradoxa

Various in vitro and in vivo pharmacological activities have been reported for the extracts and the bioactive constituents isolated from V. paradoxa (Fig. 6 and Table 6). The extracts and the isolated active compounds from different parts of V. paradoxa exhibited antibacterial, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anticancer, chemopreventive, antidiabetic, antiviral, antiepileptic, antifungal, anti-diarrhoeal, wound-healing, insecticidal, anthelmintic, and antiprotozoal activities.

Schematic representation of pharmacological activities of Vitellaria paradoxa, showing some of their mechanisms of actions.
Fig. 6
Schematic representation of pharmacological activities of Vitellaria paradoxa, showing some of their mechanisms of actions.
Table 6 Pharmacological activities of Vitellaria paradoxa extracts and its isolated compounds evaluated.
Activity Plant extract/compound Dose/concentration Reference drug/sample Experimental model/results Reference
Anticancer and melanogenesis-inhibitory Methanol bark extract GI50 = 27.00 ± 0.90, 24.00 ± 0.19, 67.00 ± 0.09 and 66.46 ± 0.37 μg/mL for NCI-H460, MCF7, PC3, and HeLa respectively. Doxorubicin, GI50 = 0.020 ± 0.001 to 0.62 ± 0.15 μg/mL Suppress the proliferation of cancer cell lines NCI-H460 (lung cancer), MCF7 (breast cancer), PC3 (prostate cancer), and HeLa (cervix cancer cell) respectively. (Tagne et al., 2014)
Methanol leaf extract IC50 = 133.7 ± 11.8 (HeLa), 331.6 ± 29.7 (DU-145), >400 (THP-1), >400 (MCF-7), and > 400 ug/ml (HepG2) Doxorubicin, IC50 = less than 3.1–5.5 ± 1.1 ug/ml XTT-based assay. Moderate inhibition of cancer prostate cells (DU145), cervix adenocarcinoma cells (HeLa), hepatocarcinoma cells (HepG2), breast cancer cells (MCF-7), and leukemia cells (THP-1) (Mbaveng et al., 2011)
Activity Plant extract/compound Dose/concentration Reference drug/sample Experimental model/results Reference
Methanol bark extract IC50 = 68.8 ± 5.7 (HeLa), 162.5 ± 12.8 (DU-145), 262.1 ± 17.4 (THP-1), 106.0 ± 7.1 (MCF-7), and > 400 ug/ml (HepG2)
Methanol root extract IC50 = > 400 ug/ml
Methanol seed kernels Melanin content = 39.4–42.5%
Cell viability = 78.6–91.6%
Activity-to-cytotoxicity ratio = 0.18–0.94
Arbutin Better melanogenesis-inhibitory activity than arbutin at 100 μg/mL (Zhang et al., 2018)
α-Amyrin acetate (41), β-Amyrin acetate (42), Lupeol acetate (43), Butyrospermol acetate (44), α-Amyrin cinnamate (45), β-Amyrin cinnamate (46), Lupeol cinnamate (47), IC50 = 401, 405, 383, 380, 470, 452, 379, and 373 mol ratio/32 pmol TPA respectively Retinoic acid, IC50 = 482 mol ratio/32 pmol TPA EBV-EA induced TPA in Raji cells (Akihisa et al., 2010b).
and Butyrospermol cinnamate (48)
Parkioside A (37) IC50 = 23.68 (T98G), 27.32 (A375), 35.97 (MDA-MB 231) and 55.44 µM (HCT116) Cisplatin, IC50 = 0.50 – 8.75 µM MTT-based assay (Tapondjou et al., 2011)
Parkioside B (38) IC50 = 2.93 (T98G), 2.74 (A375), 9.62 (MDA-MB 231) and 14.12 µM (HCT116)
1α,2β,3β,19α-tetrahydroxyurs-12-en-28-oic acid (72),
2β,3β,19α-trihydroxyurs-12-en-28-oic acid (73) and
Betulinic acid (74)
IC50 = 63.5, 230 and 19.9 µM respectively No report in vitro inhibitory effect on breast cancer cells MDA-MB-231 (Eyong et al., 2018)
Isotachioside (1), Catechin (3), Epicatechin (4), Quercetin (5), Melanin content (22.6–92.1%)
Cell viability (72.6–113.9%)
DMSO Moderate melanogenesis-inhibitory activities (Zhang et al., 2014)
Rutin (6), Arbutin (7), Paradoxoside C (58), Paradoxoside D (59), Paradoxoside E (60), Protobassic acid (64), 3-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl bassic acid (66), 3-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl-16α-hydroxyprotobassic acid (67), 3-O-β-D-glucuronopyranosyl protobassic acid (68), 3-O-β-D-glucuronopyranosyl 16α-hydroxyprotobassic acid (69), Mi-glycoside I (70), (2R,4S)-2-O-(β-D-glucopyranosyl)pentane-2,4-diol (156), (2S,4S)-2- O-(β-D-glucopyranosyl)pentane-2,4-diol (157) and Proto-quercitol (158) Activity-to-cytotoxicity (A/C) ratios (0.31–0.91) at varying concentrations (10, 30, and 100 µM) in α-MSH-stimulated B16 melanoma cells
Compounds 3, 4, 5, 58, 60, 63, 64, 66, 67, 68, 69, and 70 IC50 values of 293 – 380 M ratio 32 pmol−1 TPA β-carotene, IC50 = 397 M ratio 32 pmol−1 TPA) EBV-EA induced by TPA in Raji cells (Zhang et al., 2014)
Constituents 2, 5, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 66, 67, 69, and 71 IC50 values ranging from 7.6 to 82.0 µM Cisplatin, IC50 = 4.2 ± 1.1–18.8 ± 0.6 µM MTT-based assay; Cytotoxicity against leukemia (HL-60), stomach (AZ521), breast (SK-BR-3), and lung (A549) cell lines (Zhang et al., 2014)
Glucosylcucurbic acid (153) Melanin content (61.0%), Cell viability (84.9%) and A/C ratio (0.72)) at a higher concentration 100 μM Arbutin (melanin content = 92.7, 91.0 and 71.5% at 10, 30 and 100 μM respectively) Suppression of melanogenesis in a B16 melanoma cell (Zhang et al., 2015)
Antibacterial 2-O-butyl-l-O-(2′-ethylhexyl) benzene-l, 8-dicarboxylate (136) and 1-phenyl-l, 4-pentanedione (137) Zones of inhibition ranging from 25 to 28 mm at the test concentration of 7x10μg/cm3 Amoxicillin
Erythromycin
Gentamycin
Chloramphenicol
Paper disc diffusion method; Lower activity against P. aeruginosa, B. subtilis, S. aureus, S. typhi and E. coli compared to the reference antibiotics (Garba and Salihu, 2011)
Gallic acid (2), Catechin (3), Quercetin (5), Spinasterol 3-O-β-D-glucopyranoside (89) and Vitellaroside (138) MICs = 8–128 μg/mL Ciprofloxacin, MICs = 0.5–1 μg/mL Growth inhibition against two or more Gram-negative bacteria: E. coli, S. typhi and P. aeruginosa (Nyemb et al., 2018)
Methanol root extract MIC = 60 mg/ml No report Inhibition of S. aureus, E. coli, P. aeruginosa, K. pneumoniae and S. typhi (Ndukwe et al., 2007a)
Methanol stem extract MIC = 50 mg/ml Inhibition of P. aeruginosa, K. pneumoniae, B. cereus and S. typhi
Methanol leaf extract MIC = 70 mg/ml Inhibition of S. aureus, E. coli and S. typhi
Methanol bark extract MICs = 32 – 128 µg/ml Gentamycin, MICs = 0.5 – 32 µg/ml in vitro antigonorrhoeal activities against (Mbaveng et al., 2011)
strains of N. gonorrhoeae
Methanol leaves extract MICs = 64 – 512 µg/ml
Methanol root extract MICs = 128 – 512 µg/ml
Aqueous stem-bark extract Zones of inhibition (mm) at 7.2 ± 0.7, 6.5 ± 0.8, 10.0 ± 0.3, 9.1 ± 0.7, 11.04 ± 0.9 Sparfloxacin, zone of inhibition = 24.1 ± 3.7–32.7 ± 2.5 Agar-well dilution method; Inhibition of K. pneumoniae, P. mirabilis, Enterococcus faecalis, E. coli, and S. aureus respectively. However, P. aeruginosa and S. pyogenes were not inhibited. (Ayankunle et al., 2012)
Ethanol stem-bark extracts Zones of inhibition (mm) at 9,0 ± 0.7, 8.3 ± 0.9, 19.5 ± 0.8, 10.5 ± 0.7, and 21.0 ± 0.5
70% aqueous methanol combined extract, including V. paradoxa MICs at 154 µg/ml and 466 µg/ml Isoniazid Inhibition of H37Rv strain of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium bovis BCG respectively using broth microdilution method
(Ibekwe et al., 2014)
Hydroethanolic stem-bark extract
MICs = 78.13 and 625 μg/ml Rifampicin, MICs = 0.49 μg/ml and 3.91 μg/ml Inhibited H37Rv strain of M. tuberculosis and a clinical strain of M. tuberculosis respectively using broth microdilution method (Assam et al., 2020)
Whole essential oils (stem-bark) MIC > 625 μg/ml Gentamicin (positive control); DMSO (negative control) Microbroth dilution; No activity against S. aureus, P. aeruginosa, E. coli and B. cereus (Owolabi et al., 2012)
Antiprotozoal 70% aqueous methanol leaves and stem-bark extracts IC50 = 39 μg/ml (leaves); IC50 = 66 μg/ml (stem-bark) No report SYBRGreen I assay; in vitro antimalarial activity against 3D7 strain of P. falciparum (Amlabu and Nock 2018)
Dichloromethane bark extract IC50 = 43.94 ± 13.44 μg/ml Chloroquine: IC50 = 0.016 ± 0.004 μg/ml Moderate in vitro inhibition of P. falciparum (Jansen et al., 2010)
Antioxidant Methanol-water stem-bark extract IC50 = 0.008777 mg/ml Ascorbic acid (0.078777 mg/ml) Inhibition of DPPH radicals (Olasunkanmi et al., 2017)
Methanol stem-bark extract IC50 = 12.28 ± 5.87 μg/ml Ascorbic acid, IC50 = 9.32 ± 2.01 µg/ml DPPH free radical scavenging (Talla et al., 2016)
Methanol stem-bark extract 25 and 50 mg/kg for 8 days Reduction of glutathione and malondialdehyde (MDA) level in scopolamine-treated rats (Foyet et al., 2016)
Isotachioside (1), Gallic acid (2), catechin (3), epicatechin (4), Quercetin (5), and Rutin (6) IC50 = 46.4 ± 6.1, 10.9 ± 2.5, 7.1 ± 3.2,
5.8 ± 2.3, 12.9 ± 3.4 and 6.0 ± 0.3 μM respectively.
α-tocopherol (IC50 = 13.0 μM) DPPH free-radical scavenging activity (Zhang et al., 2014)
Parkioside B (38) IC50 = 16.2 ± 2 and 25 ± 2 μM respectively Trolox (IC50 = 18.8 ± 1.5 and 12.5 ± 0.3 μM respectively)
DPPH and ABTS radicals scavenging activities respectively (Tapondjou et al., 2011)
Anti-inflammatory Methanol stem-bark 75 mg/kg for 14 days Diclofenac (10 mg/kg) 66.67% inhibition of inflammation after 1 h of carrageenan–induced acute inflammation paw edema in rat (Foyet et al., 2015)
Ethyl acetate stem-bark extract 150 mg/ kg 66.67% inhibition in the first phase after 1 h of carrageenan-induced inflammation in rat (Eyong et al., 2015)
Nuts extract 111.6, 223.2, and 446.4 mg/kg for 8 weeks No report Reduce the expression of pro-inflammatory mediators - TNF-α, (IL)-1β, and IL-6 in post-traumatic-induced osteoarthritic rats (Sudirman et al., 2020)
α-amyrin acetate (41), β-amyrin acetate (42), lupeol acetate (43), butyrospermol acetate (44), α-amyrin cinnamate (45), β-amyrin cinnamate (46), lupeol cinnamate (47), and butyrospermol cinnamate (48) ID50 = 0.61, 0.75, 0.54, 0.71, 0.35, 0.27, 0.15, and 0.21 μmol ear-1 respectively Indomethacin, (ID50 = 0.91 μmol ear-1) in vivo anti-inflammatory activities in a TPA-induced inflammation ear edema in rats (Akihisa et al., 2010b).
Anti-diabetic Aqueous bark extract 125, 250, 500 mg/kg for 14 days Glibenclamide, 2.5 mg/kg Reduction in blood sugar level of alloxan-induced diabetic rats (Miaffo et al., 2019)
Aqueous bark extract 125, 250 and 500 mg/kg for 28 days Metformin (250 mg/kg) Significant reduction in the glucose concentration, and (Miaffo et al., 2021)
increase in serum insulin of the streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats at 250 and 500 mg/kg
Methanol leave extract 62.5, 125, 250, 500 μg/mL Acarbose, (IC50 of 76.34 ± 0.12 μg /ml) Inhibition of alpha amylase enzyme, with IC50 of 224.95 ± 0.14 μg /ml (Niwoye et al., 2019)
Methanol leave extract 200, 400 and 800 mg/kg Glibenclamide (5 mg/kg) Significant decrease in glucose level of alloxan-induced diabetic rats at the extract highest concentration from 196 ± 1.08 to 82 ± 1.58 (mg/dl) after 4 h (Odoh and Obiano, 2020).
Gallic acid (2), Catechin (3), Quercetin (5), Spinasterol 3-O-β-D-glucopyranoside (89) and Vitellaroside (138) (IC50 = 4.30 ± 0.01–68.3 ± 1.25 μM)
h-TNAP values (41.24 ± 1.33–312.54 ± 6.44 µM)
Acarbose (IC50 = 234.6 ± 2.01 μM)
Levamisole (20.2 ± 1.9 µM)
L-Phenylalanine (80.2 ± 0.001 µM)
Weak to strong in vitro inhibition of α-glucosidase, and moderate inhibition of alkaline phosphatases enzymes ((h-TNAP and h-IAP) (Nyemb et al., 2018)
h-IAP values (47.95 ± 0.35–777.47 ± 18.55 µM)
Anti-diarrhoeal Methanol stem-bark extract 100, 200 and 400 mg/kg for 6 h Diphenoxylate (5 mg/kg) Dose-dependent reduction in castor oil-induced diarrhoea in mice (Abubakar et al., 2013)
Antifungal Ethanol bark extract 200 mg/ml Growth inhibition of A. niger, A. flavus, E. floccosum, M. audouinii and T. mentagrophytes, with MICs ranging from 50 to 80 mg/ml (Ahmed et al., 2009)
Crude butter extract 2 ml, 4 ml and 6 ml No report Growth inhibition of Fusarium oxysporum, Zygomyces spp., A. niger, Candida tropicalis, and Penicillium italicum, with % inhibition ranging from 10% to 60% (Chuku et al., 2017)
Antiviral Ethanol extract 1 mg/ml No report 50% inhibition of human polio virus (Type 1) and Astrovirus (Kudi and Myint, 1999)
Toxicity Aqueous stem-bark extract 240 mg/kg for 14 days Acute toxicity observed in the tested mice (Rabo et al., 2000)
Methanol stem-bark 5, 50, 300, 2000, and 5000 mg/kg for 14 days Negative control (distill water, 1 ml) No behavioural change or mortality in the studied rats (Oduola et al., 2016)
Ethanol leaves and seed extracts 800 μg/ml 4-Nitroquinoline-1- oxide No genotoxicity below extract concentration. However, occurrence of marginal genotoxicity at 800 μg/ml was noticed. (Odunola et al., 2019)
Shea nuts colour 51.3, 226.1, 986.8, 3775.5 mg/kg/day for male rats for 13 weeks
56.4, 272.9, 1166.7 and 4387.7 mg/kg/day for the
No observable toxicological changes (Kitamura et al., 2003)
Essential oils (Leaf and stem-bark female rats for 13 weeks
10, 100, and 1000 ppm
DMSO (Negative control) Moderate toxicity against brine shrimp larvae (LC50 = 160.098 and 171.240 μg/ml respectively) (Aboaba et al., 2014).
Anthelmintic 90% ethanol root extract LC100 = 0.0963 mg/ml Ivermectin (LC100 = 0.00096 mg/ml) and fenbendazole (LC100 = 0.0123 mg/ml) Larvicidal activity against Haemonchus contortus (Koné et al., 2005)
Insecticidal Sitosterol cinnamate (91) LC50 = 6.92 mgmL−1 (adult)
LC50 = 3.91 mgmL−1 (larvae)
Deltamethrin Growth inhibition of adult and larvae forms of Tribolium castaneum Hebst (Buxton et al., 2020)
Wound-healing Ethanol stem-bark extract Mupirocin Reduction in wound size of studied rats from 5.0 ± 0.0 cm to 0.4 ± 0.05 cm on day 9 (Oyetoro and Sonibare, 2015)
Oil extract Dermazin 99.78% (13th day) Significant reduction in the wound size up to 99.50% (13th day) (Adedeji et al., 2019)

Concentration: ID50, 50% infectious dose; GI50, 50% of maximal inhibition of cell proliferation; IC50, half maximal inhibitory concentration; MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration; LC50, lethal concentration 50; LC100, absolute lethal concentration Cell lines: HCT-116, colon cancer cell; MDA-MB-231, human breast cancer cell; T98G, human glioblastoma multiforme cell; A375, human malignant melanoma cell; A549, lung cancer cell; B16 cells, murine tumor cells; Chemicals: DMSO, Dimethyl sulphoxide; BCG, Bacillus Calmette-Guérin; Activity: XTT, XTT (2,3-Bis-(2-Methoxy-4-Nitro-5-Sulfophenyl)–2H-Tetrazolium-5-Carboxanilide); TPA, 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate; EBV-EA, Epstein–Barr virus early antigen; MTT, 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide; α-MSH, alpha-melanocyte stimulating hormone; DPPH, 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl; ABTS, (2,2′-Azinobis-(3-Ethylbenzthiazolin-6-Sulfonic Acid)); Organisms: E. coli, Escherichia coli; S. typhi, Salmonella typhi; P. aeruginosa, Pseudomonas aeruginosa; B. subtilis, Bacillus subtilis; S. aureus, Staphylococcus aureus; K. pneumoniae, Klebsiella pneumoniae; N. gonorrhoeae, Niesseria gonorrhoeae; P. mirabilis, Proteus mirabilis; E. faecalis, Enterococcus faecalis; S. pyogenes, Streptococcus pyogenes; B. cereus, Bacillus cereus; P. falciparum, Plasmodium falciparum; A. niger, Aspergillus niger; A. flavus, Aspergillus flavus; E. floccosum, Epidermophyton floccosum; M. audouinii, Microsporum audouinii; T. mentagrophytes, Trichophyton mentagrophytes; Enzymes/proteins: TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor alpha; (IL)-1β, interleukin 1 beta; IL-6, interleukin 1; h-TNAP, human tissue nonspecific alkaline phosphatase; h-IAP, human intestinal alkaline phosphatase.

6.1

6.1 Anticancer and melanogenesis-inhibitory activity

Cancer, undoubtedly, remains a global burden, and the roles of medicinal plants in fighting this scourge are in no small measures. The increasingly continuous use of V. paradoxa in the treatment of cancer and tumor ethnomedicinally may be connected with reports on its cytotoxic and melanogenesis-inhibitory activity (Zhang et al., 2018) (Table 6). To start with, the methanol crude extracts from the leaves, bark and roots of V. paradoxa were found to suppress the proliferation of some cancer cell lines (Mbaveng et al., 2011; Tagne et al., 2014; Zhang et al., 2018). The methanol extract of the bark had the most effective cytotoxic activity against the cancer cell lines than the methanol leaves and root extracts (Mbaveng et al., 2011). These activities are attributed to the presence of triterpenoids and phenolics in V. paradoxa. An early study showed that triterpenoid esters and cinnamates (4148) exerted better in vivo antitumor promoting activity against Epstein-Barr virus early antigen (EBV-EA) induced by 12-O-teradecanoylphorbol 13-acetate (TPA) in Raji cells when compared with the standard retinoic acid (IC50 = 482 mol ratio/32 pmol TPA) (Akihisa et al., 2010b) (Table 6). One year after, triterpenoid 38 was found to be more cytotoxic against T98G cells than the clinically useful chemotherapeutic agent, cisplatin (IC50 of 7.79 µM) using (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. It showed inhibition of the T98G cell line with IC50 of 2.93 µM (Tapondjou et al., 2011).

Triterpenoids 72, 73 and 74 exerted inhibitory effect on cancer cell (Eyong et al., 2018). Mechanism of action indicates that the compound 74 induced apoptosis as it causes an increase in the number of cells positive for annexin V compared to vehicle-treated cells. However, necrosis was not detected at the approximate IC50 dose (19.9 µM). Table 6 depicts other constituents of V. paradoxa that have been reported for exerting anticancer and melanogenesis-inhibitory activities. Notably, mechanism studies on paradoxoside E (60) at 100 µM showed that it inhibited the occurrence of melanogenesis by regulating the differentiation and development of melanocytes, as well as enzymes tyrosinase-related protein-1 (TYRP-1) and TYRP-2, which are responsible for the production of melanin. Further mechanism studies showed that cytotoxicity of tieghemelin A (61) (IC50 = 13.5 μM) against A549 cells was due to cell death via apoptosis by flow cytometry (Zhang et al., 2014). In another study, Zhang and his colleagues (2015) demonstrated that glucosylcucurbic acid (153) inhibited the stimulation of melanogenesis at a concentration of 100 μM. Mechanism investigation revealed that 153, in a concentrated-dependent manner, inhibited the onset of melanogenesis by suppressing the expression of microphthalmia-associated transcription factor (MITF), followed by reduction in enzymes TYRP-1 and TYRP-2.

6.2

6.2 Antibacterial activity

V. paradoxa exhibited antibacterial activity against the strains of both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, when compared with clinically used fluoroquinolone drug, sparfloxacin (Table 6). While the crude extracts showed varying degree of inhibition of bacteria, the essential oils exhibited no activity. The choice of solvents plays a significant role in the antibacterial activities (Ajijolakewu and Awarun, 2015; Ayankunle et al., 2012; Falana et al., 2015; Mbaveng et al., 2011; Ndukwe et al., 2007a; Ogunwande et al., 2001; Olasunkanmi et al., 2017; Olaleye et al., 2015; Temitope and Oluwadare, 2015; Owolabi et al., 2012; Wada et al., 2019). In a separate study, the in vivo effects of aqueous extracts of V. paradoxa against infection caused by Salmonella typhimurium have been reported (Fodouop et al., 2015; Fodouop et al., 2017). Ibekwe et al. (2014) found that a combined plants recipe including V. paradoxa inhibited the growth of H37Rv strain of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium bovis BCG. It is worth mentioning that a recent study by Assam et al. (2020) has proved the effectiveness of V. paradoxa against tuberculosis by inhibiting the growth of H37Rv strain of M. tuberculosis and a clinical strain of M. tuberculosis.

Antibacterial activity of V. paradoxa extracts is attributed to its phytochemicals, including flavonoids, triterpenoids, cerebroside, and steroid present in the crude extracts (Table 6). Besides the direct antibacterial activity of these isolated constituents, a combinatory therapy has also been reported. Catteau et al. (2017) showed the potency of combining ursolic acid (78) and oleanolic acid (79) with known antibiotics β-lactams, namely ampicillin and oxacillin as potential resistance-reversing agents against clinical isolates of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). They attributed MRSA phenotype reversal to the capacity of 78 and 79 to delocalize penicillin-binding protein 2 (PBP2) from the septal division site, which further interrupts the synthesis of peptidoglycan. Combinatory therapy provides much better activity when compared with monotherapy and ensures an improved treatment efficiency with little or no side effects (Neutel, 2011). It has evolved as the new direction to combat antimicrobial drug-resistance. In the future, more studies on combination therapies between the active constituents of V. paradoxa and other drugs should be considered.

6.3

6.3 Antiprotozoal activity

The high prevalence of malaria in Africa shows that the disease is still endemic to the continent. It is caused by a parasitic protozoa, Plasmodium falciparum, and it is one of the major causes of death in the tropical regions (Mbacham et al., 2019). No doubt, the use of V. paradoxa in the treatment of fever and malaria is common in the traditional African medicine (Table 2). Only few studies have reported the pharmacological activity of V. paradoxa in terms of antiprotozoal activity (Table 6). Amlabu and Nock (2018) found that aqueous methanol leaves extract of the species moderately inhibited the 3D7 strain of Plasmodium falciparum. Previously, the bark extract of V. paradoxa has shown in vitro inhibition of this strain, but with weaker activity than the standard drug, chloroquine (Jansen et al., 2010). The lesser antiplasmodial activity of the V. paradoxa is probably due to its ursolic acid, oleanolic acid, tormentic acid, corosolic acid, maslinic acid, 3-O-p-(Z/E)-coumaroyltormentic acid, 3-O-p-(Z/E)-coumaroylcorosolic acid and 3-O-p-(Z/E)-coumaroylmaslinic acid (7885). These triterpenoids, in a recent study by Catteau et al. (2020), were shown to exhibited no good antiplasmodial activity against P. falciparum. However, they exhibited promising antitrypanosomal activity (IC50 = 0.7–15.3 μM) (Catteau et al., 2020).

6.4

6.4 Antioxidant activity

Oxidative stress has been linked to pathophysiological conditions, immune dysfunction, chronic diseases, such as inflammation, cancer, diabetes, atherosclerosis, as well as neurological disorders, such as Parkinson and Alzheimer which are very rampant nowadays (Dasgupta and Klein, 2014). Meanwhile, it has been reported that medicinal plants are natural reservoir of antioxidant compounds (Bhatt et al., 2013), and these compounds are potential secondary metabolites in the fight against oxidative stress-related diseases by preventing, intercepting and repairing the body cells via the mechanistic stoppage of excess reactive oxygen species (ROS), and free radicals production in the body. It is noteworthy that free radicals themselves maintain homeostasis in the body cell, and serve as signaling molecules; however excessive production is a major cause of oxidative stress diseases (Bhatt et al., 2013). The roles of V. paradoxa and its active constituents as natural source of antioxidants have been reported by researchers both in vitro and in vivo (Foyet et al., 2016; Olasunkanmi et al., 2017; Talla et al., 2016; Zhang et al., 2014). The techniques employed for identifying the antioxidant activity include free radical scavenging abilities using 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and the [2,2′-azinobis-(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonate)] (ABTS) assays. The stem-bark has been the most investigated part, and has been reported to be rich in phenolics and flavonoids (Talla et al., 2016). Table 6 depicts the antioxidant activities of the flavonoids, phenolic and triterpenoid from V. paradoxa (Tapondjou et al., 2011; Zhang et al., 2014). The phenolic and flavonoids showed stronger antioxidant than, or almost equivalent to, the standard α-tocopherol. The stronger radical scavenging activity of the flavonoids could be explained on the basis of presence of more phenolic (OH) groups, leading to increase in H-radical-donation to the rampaging free radicals, which subsequently interferes and halts the oxidative mechanisms.

6.5

6.5 Anti-inflammatory activity

V. paradoxa stem-bark extracts showed anti-inflammatory activity in vivo using carrageenan–induced acute inflammation paw edema model (Eyong et al., 2015; Foyet et al., 2015). The nuts extract ameliorates inflammation-related symptoms in post-traumatic-induced osteoarthritic rats by decreasing the expression of pro-inflammatory mediators (Sudirman et al., 2020). The anti-inflammatory effect of V. paradoxa was reportedly due to the suppression of the pro-inflammatory mediators, such as cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), and interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β), interleukin-8 (IL-8), and interleukin-12 (IL-12) via the nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB) pathway in a lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced J774 macrophage cell lines and LPS-induced inflammation in canine keratinocytes (Lim et al., 2021; Verma et al., 2012). Triterpenoids and phenolics in V. paradoxa are involved in the anti-inflammation process (Zhang et al., 2014). The acetates of α-amyrin (41), β-amyrin (42), lupeol (43), butyrospermol (44), and cinnamates of α-amyrin (45), β-amyrin (46), lupeol (47), and butyrospermol (48) showed in vivo inhibition of inflammation comparable to that presented by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), indomethacin (Akihisa et al., 2010b).

6.6

6.6 Anti-diabetic activity

Diabetes mellitus is a growing silent killer disease in the world. It is closely related to oxidative stress. Moreover, the roles of oxidative stress in the pathogenesis of diabetes, especially Type II diabetes and its complications have been emphasized (Dos Santos et al., 2019). The indigenous use of V. paradoxa in the treatment of diabetes and some of its complications has been documented (Table 2). Likewise, scientific validation of the traditional use of V. paradoxa has been reported in the available literature (Miaffo et al., 2019, 2021; Niwoye et al., 2019; Odoh and Obiano, 2020) (Table 6). V. paradoxa nutshells exhibited potent α-glucosidase inhibitory activity, with IC50 ranging from 8.76 to 30.68 µg/ml when compared to the standard, acarbose (IC50 = 119.71 µg/ml) (Da et al., 2019). The aqueous and the hydro-alcoholic bark extracts of V. paradoxa in rabbits at doses of 80, 400 and 800 mg/kg/bw showed hypoglycemic effects of 3.57% and 15.91%, respectively within 2 h of oral treatment. With a concentration of 800 mg/kg/bw, it was found that the blood glucose level was reduced from 60.87% to 3.26% to be stabilized to normal blood sugar level (Coulibaly et al., 2014). Regarding the chemical constituents of V. paradoxa, compounds 2, 3, 5, 89 and 138 were found to exert weak to strong in vitro inhibition of α-glucosidase. Notably, constituents 5, 2 and 3 showed potent α-glucosidase inhibition (IC50 = 4.30, 5.35 and 68.3 μM, respectively) in comparison to the anti-diabetic drug acarbose (IC50 = 234.6 μM). Furthermore, all the compounds had moderate alkaline phosphatase inhibition, with 5 exhibited better human intestinal alkaline phosphatase (h-IAP) inhibition (IC50 = 47.95 µM) and 89 showed promising human tissue nonspecific alkaline phosphatase (h-TNAP) inhibition (IC50 = 41.24 µM) (Nyemb et al., 2018).

6.7

6.7 Anti-diarrhoeal activity

V. paradoxa has not received much attention from the scientific community in term of its anti-diarrhoeal activity. Abubakar et al. (2013) found that V. paradoxa stem-bark exhibited anti-diarrhoeal activity. The study employed the use of castor oil-induced diarrhoea in mice using different doses of the plant extract. The percentage inhibition (%) of the diarrhoea in the treated mice was dose dependent, with 83% inhibition at highest extract concentration when compared with the reference drug diphenoxylate which produced 100% inhibition (Table 6).

6.8

6.8 Antifungal and antiviral activity

Ethanol, water and acetone extracts of V. paradoxa leaves, stem-bark and roots at concentrations of 62.5, 125 and 250 mg/ml against the dermatophytes (Microsporum audouinii, Microsporum ferugineum, Trichophyton rubrum, Trichophyton mentagrophytes, Trichophyton schoenleinii) were found to exhibit varying antifungal activities, with ethanol bark extract had largest zone of inhibition (20.5 mm at 250 mg/ml) against M. audouinii, which was followed by acetone barks extract, with zone of inhibition (19 mm at 250 mg/ml) against M. audouinii. The aqueous extracts showed no antifungal activity with the exception of the bark extract (6.0 mm at 250 mg/ml) against M. audouinii (Boyejo et al., 2019). In another study, V. paradoxa bark extract inhibited the growth of Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus flavus, Epidermophyton floccosum, M. audouinii and T. mentagrophytes (Ahmed et al., 2009). Crude butter extract of V. paradoxa show inhibition against Fusarium oxysporum, Zygomyces spp., Aspergillus niger, Candida tropicalis, and Penicillium italicum (Chuku et al., 2017). Bolu et al. (2015) showed that the bark extract of V. paradoxa at concentrations of 5 and 10 mg/ml exerted antifungal activity in Aspergillus-infected broiler birds. Meanwhile the only study on the antiviral activity of V. paradoxa showed that ethanol extract inhibited 50% of human polio virus (Type 1) and Astrovirus. However, the extract was not active against human herpes simplex virus (Type 1), bovine parvovirus, canine parvovirus and equine herpes simplex virus (Kudi and Myint, 1999). Further studies are needed to compare the antifungal and antiviral activities of the various extracts with a known standard antifungal and antiviral agent respectively.

6.9

6.9 Other pharmacological activities

Besides these pharmacological activities, Ramsay et al. (2016) reported the anthelmintic activity of proanthocyanidins from Shea meals against pig parasite, Ascaris suum. Koné et al. (2005) studied the anthelmintic activity of root extract of V. paradoxa against Haemonchus contortus (Table 6). The sitosterol cinnamate (91) isolated from the plant was found to exhibit insecticidal activity against Tribolium castaneum Hebst, a known storage pest (Buxton et al., 2020). Ethanol crude extract of V. paradoxa stem-bark was reported to exhibit noticeable in vivo wound-healing activity (Oyetoro and Sonibare, 2015), with reduction in wound is similar to the effect produced by the standard drug, mupirocin. Similarly, application of V. paradoxa oil to open wound in Wistar rats was found to produce wound-healing effects similar to reference dermazin (Adedeji et al., 2019). Ethyl acetate extract from V. paradoxa showed moderate protective effects against wood termites (Ekhuemelo et al., 2020). In vivo antiepileptic activity of the species has also been reported (Bum et al., 2011).

6.10

6.10 Nanoparticles synthesis using V. paradoxa extracts and their applications

Nanoparticles (NPs) consist of solid colloidal particles with size ranging from 10 to 1000 nanometres (nm). Over the last few years, researchers have developed keen interest in the synthesis of nanoparticles using various plant extracts, and thus it has emerged as a promising potential with applications in the development of novel antimicrobial agents, formulation of drug-delivery system and medical coating devices, bio-imaging and biosensor, cell labelling and gene delivery, hyperthermia, and theranostic (Barberia-Roque et al., 2019; Bindhu et al., 2020; Castillo-Henríquez et al., 2020; El-Refai et al., 2018; Ivanova et al., 2018; Ren et al., 2019; Shanmugapriya et al., 2020; Tiwari et al., 2019; Uddin et al., 2017; Yusefi et al., 2020). Phytosynthesis of NPs, which has formed an active area of current nanobiotechnological research, is more advantageous because of its simplicity, low-cost involvement, stronger reducing ability, zero contamination, eco-protection and lesser negative environmental impact (Burdușel et al., 2018; Rajan et al., 2015).

Research reports, though few, are documented in the literature which highlight the use of V. paradoxa for the synthesis of NPs. Green biosynthesis of silver and titanium NPs was achieved using leaf extract of V. paradoxa. The average size of the particles was found to be in the 200 nm range. The NPs synthesized were characterized using FT-IR spectroscopy, XRD, EDX and HRSEM. Synthesized NPs possessed adsorptive properties for the removal of phenol from pharmaceutical effluents (Mustapha et al., 2020). In another study, biosynthesis of lipid-based nanocarrier from Shea butter (V. paradoxa) was prepared as an efficient drug-delivery system for Nimesulide. The average mean size of the nanoparticle was 90 nm. The synthesized lipid nanoparticle exhibited significant in vivo antinociceptive and antiedematogenic activities compared to the free drug (Raffin et al., 2012). In another attempt, solid lipid nanoparticle (SLN) was formulated from V. paradoxa and investigated for its topical applications. The average size of the particles was approximately 220 nm with round and smooth shape. The NPs synthesized were characterized using ELS, DSC, AFM, SEM, and DLS (Avilés-Castrillo et al., 2020). Also, Shea butter (V. paradoxa) was utilized to prepare nanoparticles for the encapsulation of curcumin. The NPs size ranged from 50 to 230 nm and was found to have significant influence on the encapsulation efficiency (Hajjali et al., 2015). In vivo anti-inflammatory activity of diclofenac multiple emission has also been reported using V. paradoxa fat as carrier (Odeku, 2019). Biosynthesis of NPs using plant extracts is an eco-friendly process with several applications in different fields of science and technology. Despite the richness of bioactive constituents in V. paradoxa, the species has not been fully exploited for NPs synthesis.

6.11

6.11 Clinical studies

Shea nut oil extract (SheaFlex75) from V. paradoxa has been clinically conducted in relation to knee osteoarthritis by Chen et al. (2013). The experiment involved non-randomized control, intervention study in thirty-three patients with medical evidence of knee osteoarthritis. Participants were given 6 pills per day for 16 weeks. The result of this study showed significant improvement in the relieve of symptoms (pain and stiffness in particular) of knee osteoarthritis and muscle activity in the studied patients after 16-week intervention. Triterpenoids and phenolics could be responsible for the alleviation of pain and improvement in knee muscles since these compounds known for their anti-inflammatory potential are present in the seed kernel of the plant (Tables 3 and 4). Kalgo et al. (2019) studied the effects of the stem-bark aqueous extract of V. paradoxa on the viability of human neutrophil. Thirty healthy volunteered humans were used for the study. The study showed that the viability of the neutrophil decreases with the increase in extract concentrations (25, 50, 100 and 1000 µg/ml). In addition to the clinical study on human neutrophil stated above, cytotoxic effects of the aqueous stem-bark extract have been evaluated using peripheral blood mononuclear cells (Kalgo et al., 2020). Thirty healthy participants were recruited for the study. It was revealed that the level of cytotoxicity was simultaneously increased with the increment in extract concentrations (25, 50, 100 and 1000 µg/ml).

7

7 Toxicology

The safety and toxicity of the various parts of the V. paradoxa remain unclear according to the existing literature. Rabo et al. (2000) reported acute toxicity in mice of the aqueous crude extract of stem-bark at a dose of 240 mg/kg for 14 days. The clinical signs of manifestation ranged from mild depression, difficult respiratory and anorexia at low doses to weakness, pulmonary congestion, dehydration, nephritis, and necrosis before death at high doses. In another study by Oduola et al. (2016) on the acute hepatoxicity of the V. paradoxa stem-bark methanol extract at doses of 5, 50, 300, 2000, and 5000 mg/kg, it was found that there was no behavioural change or mortality in the studied rats after 24 h until 14 days after treatment. A study reported the genotoxicity of both the leaves and seed ethanol extracts of V. paradoxa to E. coli PQ34 strain using the SOS chromotest. It was found that both extracts showed no genotoxicity at extract concentration less than 800 μg/ml in comparison to the reference 4-Nitroquinoline-1- oxide (4-NQO). However, marginal genotoxicity was found at 800 μg/ml (Odunola et al., 2019). Kitamura et al. (2003) showed that there were no toxicological changes in Wistar rats when fed with Shea nuts colour at doses ranging from 51.3 to 3775.5 mg/kg/day for the males, and 56.4 to 4387.7 mg/kg/day for the females for 13 weeks. Baldrick et al. (2001) compared the toxicity of hardened Shea oleine (7 or 15%) with an unhardened type (7 or 15%) as well as other commercial products, including palm oils, toffee powder, and cocoa butter in rat model. The animals were examined after dose administration both at pre-reproductive and post-reproductive stages. It was revealed that the Shea oleines (hardened and unhardened) showed no toxicity in the treated rats. Regarding the essential oils from the leaves and stem-bark of V. paradoxa, it was reported that the extracted oils exhibited moderate toxicity (Aboaba et al., 2014) (Table 6). Although the toxicological investigations were mainly conducted on animals (rats), further studies on the toxicity of V. paradoxa extracts on healthy dogs, monkeys or human in clinical practice should be assessed.

8

8 Conclusions and future perspectives

V. paradoxa is a medicinal plant that is widely utilized in the clinical traditional medicine for the treatment of sickness and diseases, such as cancer, cough, tuberculosis, diarrhoea, hypertension, fever and skin infections, malaria, rheumatism, diabetes, obesity, inflammation, epilepsy, wounds, lung, liver, and kidney disorders. The herbal preparation often involved decoction of the plant parts. Different in vitro and in vivo studies conducted are in tandem with majority of the traditional uses; however, many of them still need clinical validation. Among the clinical traditional uses that are yet to be pharmacologically studied are the applications in the treatment of obesity, lung, liver and kidney disorders as well as neuropsychiatric-related illness. As for these uninvestigated traditional uses, they may be assumed as remarkable gaps for future experiments, both in vitro and in vivo. Similarly, clinical evaluation of the V. paradoxa bioactivities, particularly its anti-inflammatory, anti-diabetic, anti-cancer and antioxidant should be of top priority in the future. Besides, V. paradoxa has been utilized as an important precursor for the green synthesis of nanoparticles. These nanoparticles showed both pharmacological activity and adsorptive property.

Phytochemically, >150 compounds have been isolated and identified from V. paradoxa, of which triterpenoids, flavonoids and phenolic acids constitute the major active constituents. Others are lignans, coumarins, jasmonate derivatives, cerebroside, ester, ketone, acids, sugars, and essential oils. Although most of the reported compounds have been isolated from the methanol nutshell and the seed kernel, no study has documented the phytochemicals isolated from the fruits. Thus, the chemical studies on the fruits of this plant are needed. The isolated compounds have been shown to exhibit pharmacological activities, such as anti-inflammatory, anti-trypanosomal, antioxidant, anti-diabetic, insecticidal, antibacterial, anticancer and melanogenesis-inhibitory. Mechanism of actions of some of these activities have been proposed for the extracts and the compounds. The modes of action of anticancer and melanogenesis-inhibitory activity involve the induction of apoptosis by cell death, suppression of proliferation of cancer cells, and regulation of differentiation and development of melanocytes, TYRP-1 and 2. Mechanism of action for anti-diabetic activity is thought to be by the inhibition of α-glucosidase, h-TNAP, and h-IAP, while antioxidant activity is by proton donation. Mechanisms of action of anti-inflammatory activity is by the suppression of the level of pro-inflammatory cytokines, interleukins, and tumour necrosis factors. Antibacterial activity is believed to be through the reversal of MRSA phenotype. However, modes of actions of other pharmacological activities have not been fully studied, including antiviral, antifungal, anthelmintic, insecticidal, antiplasmodial and antiepileptic activities.

The seeds and fruits of V. paradoxa are edible. However, the safety and toxicity of other parts used in traditional medicine remain unclear as shown by various studies in this review. Therefore, there is a need for further research to generate more data concerning the toxicology of V. paradoxa and the isolated compounds in order to have sufficient scientific facts relating to its safety for human consumption. The plant could serve as, once scientifically proven safe, a sustainable and cheap source of new compounds for the development and design of novel pipelines of pharmacological products for human use. V. paradoxa, to the best of our knowledge, has not be included in any of the available pharmacopeia we searched. However, we found V. paradoxa-based cosmetic products in the literature.

Funding

This work was supported financially by the DST-NRF-TWAS fellowship (Ref: Grant Number 116110).

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Olusesan Ojo: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing - original draft. Micheal H.K. Kengne: Methodology, Writing - review & editing. Marthe C. Fotsing: Methodology, Writing - review & editing. Edwin M. Mmutlane: Writing - review & editing, Supervision. Derek T. Ndinteh: Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing - review & editing, Funding acquisition.

Acknowledgement

The authors are grateful to the National Research Foundation, South Africa, and The World Academy of Science (TWAS), Italy for providing research fund for this work.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. , , . Elemental composition and proximate analysis of shea butter sold in Swali Market, Yenegoa. Nigeria. Int. J. Environ. Agric. Biotechnol.. 2021;6(1):236-240.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , . Chemical composition and toxicity of essential oil of Vitellaria paradoxa (C.F. Gaertn.) from Nigeria. J. Essent. Oil Bearing Plants. 2014;17(1):126-130.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , , , , , , , . Ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants used for cancer treatment in Kebbi state, North-west Nigeria. Acta Ecol. Sinica.. 2020;306–314
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , . Evaluation of the antidiarrhoeal effect of Vitellaria paradoxa Gaertn F (Sapotaceae) stem bark extract. Adv. Life Sci. Technol.. 2013;15:1-5.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , , , . Ethnopharmacological survey of medicinal plants used for the management of pediatric ailments in Kano State, Nigeria. Res. J. Pharmacog.. 2017;4(3):29-39.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , . Rationalizing some medicinal plants used in treatment of skin diseases. Afri. J. Microbiol. Res.. 2010;4(10):958-963.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , . The morphology of re-epithelized skin following experimental open wound in Wistar rat treated with Vitellaria paradoxa oil. Asian Plant Res. J.. 2019;1–11
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , . Identification of betulinic acid in ethanol extract of Vitellaria paradoxa leaves using spectroscopy and high-performance liquid chromatography. J. Pharmacog. Phytochem.. 2018;7(5):571-576.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , , , . An ethnopharmacological survey and in vitro confirmation of the ethnopharmacological use of medicinal plants as anthelmintic remedies in the Ashanti region, in the central part of Ghana. J. Ethnopharmacol.. 2014;158:255-263.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , . Antifungal profiles of extracts of Vitellaria paradoxa (Shea-Butter) bark. Ethnobot. leaflets. 2009;13(6):679-688.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , , . Comparative antibacterial efficacy of Vitellaria paradoxa (shea butter tree) extracts against some clinical bacterial isolates. Notulae Sci. Biol.. 2015;7(3):264-268.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , , , , , , . Triterpene alcohol and fatty acid composition of shea nuts from seven African countries. J. Oleo Sci.. 2010;59(7):351-360.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , , , , , . Triacylglycerol and triterpene ester composition of shea nuts from seven African countries. J. Oleo Sci.. 2011;60(8):385-391.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , , , , , , . Anti-inflammatory and chemopreventive effects of triterpene cinnamates and acetates from shea fat. J. Oleo Sci.. 2010;59(6):273-280.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. , , . Use of medicinal plants for the treatment of gastric ulcer in some parts of Southwestern Nigeria. Afri. J. Pharm. Pharmacol.. 2019;13(15):223-235.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , , . Nutritional and phytochemical composition of Vitellaria paradoxa (Shea Fruit Pulp) Int. J. Biochem. Res. Rev.. 2018;22(1):1-7.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. , , , , , , , , , , . Fatty acid and tocopherol patterns of variation within the natural range of the shea tree (Vitellaria paradoxa) Agrofor. Syst.. 2013;87(5):1065-1082.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. , , . Antimalarial efficacy of Vitellaria paradoxa Gaertn (Family: Sapotaceae) leaves and stem bark. FUW Trends Sci. Technol. J.. 2018;3:605-609.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. , . Ethnobotanical survey of medicinal plants in Biu local government area of Borno state, Nigeria. Comp. J. Herbs and Med. Plants. 2013;2(1):7-11.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. , , , , , , . Indigenous traditional knowledge of medicinal plants used by herbalists in treating opportunistic infections among people living with HIV/AIDS in Uganda. J. Ethnopharmacol.. 2020;246:112205
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. , , , , , , , , . Ethnobotanical survey of medicinal plants used in the treatment of cough in Akinyele Local Government Area, Oyo State, Nigeria. Eur. J. Med. Plants. 2020;101–113
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. , , , , , , . Phytochemical screening, antimycobacterial activity of three medicinal Cameroonians plants and acute toxicity of hydroethanolic extract of Vitellaria paradoxa. J. Drug Deliv. Therap.. 2020;10:96-104.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. , , , , . Biotriborheology of shea butter solid lipid nanoparticles in a topical cream. Tribol. Int.. 2020;156:106836
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. , , , , . Antibacterial activity and sub-chronic toxicity studies of Vitellaria paradoxa stem bark extract. J. Pharmacol. Toxicol.. 2012;7:298-304.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. , . Lipid composition of Nigerian butyrospermum paradoxum Kernel. J. Food Comp. Anal.. 1989;2(3):238-244.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. , , , , . Ethnopharmacological survey of plants used for the treatment of Schistosomiasis in Niono District. Mali. J. Ethnopharmacol.. 2006;105(3):387-399.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. , , , , , . Volatile compounds of shea butter samples made under different production conditions in western, central and eastern Africa. J. Food Comp. Anal.. 2009;22(7–8):738-744.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. , , , . Reproduction studies in the rat with shea oleine and hardened shea oleine. Food Chem. Toxicol.. 2001;39(9):923-930.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. , , , , . Assessment of three plant extracts to obtain silver nanoparticles as alternative additives to control biodeterioration of coatings. Int. Biodet. Biodegrad.. 2019;141:52-61.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. , , , , , , , , , , . Ethnomedicinal survey and mutagenic studies of plants used in Accra metropolis. Ghana. J. Ethnopharmacol.. 2020;248:112309
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. , , , . Antioxidants in medicinal plants. In: Biotechnology for medicinal plants. Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg: Micropropagation and Improvement. Springer; . p. :295-326.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. , , , , , . Green synthesis and characterization of silver nanoparticles from Moringa oleifera flower and assessment of antimicrobial and sensing properties. J. Photochem. Photobiol.. 2020;205:111836
    [Google Scholar]
  33. , , , , . Effects of Vitellaria paradoxa bark extracts on performance, histology and serum biochemistry of Aspergillus-challenged broiler chicks. J. Pharm. Biores.. 2015;12(2):77-86.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. , , , , . Antifungal and phytochemical screening of extract from Vitellaria paradoxa (shea butter tree) leaves, barks and roots on Dermatophytes. Int. J. Sci. Res. Pub.. 2019;9(6):884-887.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. , , , , , , , , , , . Antiepileptic medicinal plants used in traditional medicine to treat epilepsy. In: Clinical and genetic aspects of epilepsy. London: IntechOpen; . p. :354-369.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. , , , , , , . Biomedical applications of silver nanoparticles: An up-to-date overview. Nanomaterials. 2018;8(9):680-705.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. , , , , , , . Insecticidal activities of cinnamic acid esters isolated from Ocimum gratissimum L. and Vitellaria paradoxa Gaertn leaves against Tribolium castaneum Hebst (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) Pest Manag. Sci.. 2020;76(1):257-267.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. , , , , , , . Green synthesis of gold and silver nanoparticles from plant extracts and their possible applications as antimicrobial agents in the agricultural area. Nanomaterials. 2020;10(9):1762-1786.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. , , , , , , , . Synergy between ursolic and oleanolic acids from Vitellaria paradoxa leaf extract and β-lactams against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: in vitro and in vivo activity and underlying mechanisms. Molecules. 2017;22(12):2245-2262.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. , , , , , , , . Antiprotozoal activities of triterpenic acids and ester derivatives isolated from the leaves of Vitellaria paradoxa. Planta Med.. 2020;1–8
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. , , , , , , . Validating efficacy of shea nut oil extract in knee osteoarthritis patients. Evid. Based Complement. Alternat. Med.. 2013;1–9
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. , , , . Antifungal potentials of butter extracts from Vitellaria paradoxa Gaertn. Nigerian J. Mycol.. 2017;9:105-112.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. , , , , . Evaluation of the antidiabetic activity of the extracts of Vitellaria paradoxa in oryctolaguscuniculus rabbit. Int. J. Sci. Technol.. 2014;24:1673-1682.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. , , , , , , , , , , . Vitellaria paradoxa nutshells from seven sub-Saharan countries as potential herbal medicines for treating diabetes based on chemical compositions, HPLC fingerprints and bioactivity evaluation. Chinese J. Nat. Med.. 2019;17(6):446-460.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  45. , , . Oxidative stress related to other diseases. In: Antioxidants in food, vitamins and supplements. San Diego: Elsevier; . p. :185-207.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  46. , , , , , , . Regional variation in shea butter lipid and triterpene composition in four African countries. J. Agri. Food Chem.. 2005;53(19):7473-7479.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  47. , , , . Investigation of plants used for the ethnoveterinary control of gastrointestinal parasites in Benoue region. Cameroon. Tropicult.. 2011;29(4):205-211.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. , , , . The role of oxidative stress in the development of Diabetes mellitus and its complications. J. Diabetes Res.. 2019;1–3
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  49. , , , . Assessment of the medicinal uses of plant species found on termitaria in the Pendjari biosphere reserve in Benin. J. Med. Plants Res.. 2014;8(8):368-377.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  50. , , , . Antitermitic properties of Vitellaria paradoxa (C. F. Gaertn.) stem bark extracts on Daniellia oliveri (Rolfe) Hutch. & Dalziel and Vitex doniana Sw. woods. J. Res. Forestry Wildlife Environ.. 2020;12:145-153.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. , , , , . Eco-friendly synthesis of metal nanoparticles using ginger and garlic extracts as biocompatible novel antioxidant and antimicrobial agents. J. Nanostruc. Chem.. 2018;8(1):71-81.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Eneh, M., 2010. An overview of shea nut and shea butter industry in Nigeria. National seminal organized by Central Bank of Nigeria in collaboration with Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development and Nigeria Export Promotion Council (NEPC) Niger State, 1-4.
  53. , , , , , , , , . Triterpenoids from the stem bark of Vitellaria paradoxa (Sapotaceae) and derived esters exhibit cytotoxicity against a breast cancer cell line. Med. Chem. Res.. 2018;27(1):268-277.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  54. , , , , , , , . A new ursane triterpenoic acid and other potential anti-inflammatory and anti-arthritic constituents from EtOAc extracts of Vitellaria paradoxa stem bark. J. Ethnopharmacol.. 2015;174:277-286.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  55. , , , . Differential antimicrobial effects of conventional and ethnobotanical extracts from Vitellaria paradoxa roots, barks and leaves. J. British Microbiol. Res.. 2015;6(1):54.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  56. , , , , , . Enhancing agroecosystem productivity with woody perennials in semi-arid West Africa. A meta-analysis. Agron. Sustain. Dev.. 2018;57:1-57.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  57. , , , , , , , . Effect of Salmonella typhimurium infection on rat's cell oxidation and in vivo antioxidant activity of Vitellaria paradoxa and Ludwigia abyssinica aqueous extract. Asian Pacific J. Trop. Dis.. 2015;5(1):38-46.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  58. Fodouop, S.P.C., Tala, S.D., Keilah, L.P., Kodjio, N., Yemele, M.D., kamdje Nwabo, A.H., Nji-Kah, B., Tchoumboue, J. Gatsing, D., 2017. Effects of Vitellaria paradoxa (CF Gaertn.) aqueous leaf extract administration on Salmonella typhimurium-infected rats. BMC Complement. Altern. Med., 17 (1), 1-11. doi: DOI: 10.1186/s12906-017-1643-1
  59. , , , , , , . Effects of the Methanolic extract of Vitellaria paradoxa stem bark against scopolamine-induced cognitive dysfunction and oxidative stress in the rat hippocampus. Cell Mol. Neurobiol.. 2016;36(7):1139-1149.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  60. , , , , , , . Anti-inflammatory and anti-arthritic activity of a methanol extract from Vitellaria paradoxa stem bark. Pharmacog. Res.. 2015;7(4):367-377.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  61. , , . Antibacterial activities of 2-o-butyl-1-o-(2’-ethylhexyl) benzene-1, 8-dicarboxylate and 1-phenyl-1, 4-pentanedione isolated from Vitellaria paradoxa root bark. Asian J. Sci. Res.. 2011;4(2):149-157.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  62. , , , , , , , , . Ecological adaptation of the shea butter tree (Vitellaria paradoxa CF Gaertn.) along climatic gradient in Bénin, West Africa. Afr. J. Ecol.. 2011;49(4):440-449.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  63. , , , , , , . Shea butter solid nanoparticles for curcumin encapsulation: Influence of nanoparticles size on drug loading. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol.. 2015;118(8):1168-1178.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  64. Hall, J.B., Aebischer, D.P., Tomlinson, H.F., Osei-Amaning, E. Hindle, J., 1996. Vitellaria paradoxa: A monograph. School of Agricultural and Forest Sciences, University of Wales Bangor UK, ISBN 0-904567-3-4, pp. 105
  65. , . Notes on African Sapotaceae: III. Kew Bull.. 1961;15(2):277-291.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  66. , , , , , . Nutritional composition of shea products and chemical properties of shea butter: a review. Critical Rev. Food Sci. Nutr.. 2014;54(5):673-686.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  67. , , , , , , , , , , . Some Nigerian anti-tuberculosis ethnomedicines: a preliminary efficacy assessment. J. Ethnopharmacol.. 2014;155(1):524-532.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  68. , , , , . A survey of medicinal plants used as traditional medicine in Ukum and Ogbadibo Local Government Areas of Benue state, Nigeria. Plants and Environ.. 2019;1(1):5-11.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. , , , , , , . Silver nanoparticles as multi-functional drug delivery systems. Nanomed.. 2018;72–89
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  70. , . Handbook of African medicinal plants. CRC Press. 2014:104.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. , , , , , , , . Evaluation of 13 selected medicinal plants from Burkina Faso for their antiplasmodial properties. J. Ethnopharmacol.. 2010;130(1):143-150.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  72. , , , , , , , , . Ethnobotanical uses of medicinal plants of two ethnoecological regions of Cameroon. Int. J. Med. Medic. Sci.. 2010;2(3):60-79.
    [Google Scholar]
  73. , , , , , , . Ethnopharmacological investigation of medicinal plants used to treat typhoid fever in Benin. J. Pharmacog. Phytochem.. 2019;8(6):225-232.
    [Google Scholar]
  74. , , , , . Effects of aqueous stem bark extract of Vitellaria paradoxa on human neutrophil function and viability. Int. J. Biol. Med. Res.. 2019;10(3):6782-6787.
    [Google Scholar]
  75. , , , , , , , , , . Cytotoxic effect of aqueous stem bark extract of vitellaria paradoxa on human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. J. Dental Med. Sci.. 2020;19(2):48-52.
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Karou, S.D., Tchacondo, T., Djikpo Tchibozo, M.A., Abdoul-Rahaman, S., Anani, K., Koudouvo, K., Batawila, K., Agbonon, A., Simpore, J. de Souza, C., 2011. Ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants used in the management of Diabetes mellitus and hypertension in the Central Region of Togo. Pharm. Biol., 49 (12), 1286-1297. doi: DOI: DOI: 10.3109/13880209.2011.621959
  77. , , , , , , , . Medicinal plants used against malaria by traditional therapists in malaria endemic areas of the Sgou region. Mali. J. Med. Plants Res.. 2020;14(9):480-487.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  78. , , , , , , . Medicinal plants used for neuropsychiatric disorders treatment in the Hauts Bassins region of Burkina Faso. Medicines. 2017;4(2):1-21.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  79. , , , , , , , , . A subchronic toxicity study of shea nut color in Wistar rats. Food Chem. Toxicol.. 2003;41(11):1537-1542.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  80. , , , , , , , , , . Ethnopharmacological survey on medicinal plants used by traditional healers in Central and Kara Regions of Togo for antitumor and chronic wound healing effects. Evidence-Based Complement. Altern. Med.. 2020;1–12
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  81. , , , , . Anthelmintic activity of medicinal plants used in northern Côte d'Ivoire against intestinal helminthiasis. Pharm. Biol.. 2005;43(1):72-78.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  82. , , , , , , , , , . An ethnobotanical study of plants used to treat liver diseases in the Maritime region of Togo. J. Ethnopharmacol.. 2016;181:263-273.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  83. , , . Antiviral activity of some Nigerian medicinal plant extracts. J. Ethnopharmacol.. 1999;68(1):289-294.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  84. , , , , , . Ethnobotanical survey on antihypertensive medicinal plants in municipality of Ouémé. Southern Benin. Adv. Herbal Med.. 2016;2(3):20-32.
    [Google Scholar]
  85. , , , . Anti-inflammatory effect of shea butter extracts in canine keratinocytes. J. Vet. Clin.. 2021;38(1):27-31.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  86. , , . Medicinal and nutritional benefits from the Shea tree (Vitellaria paradoxa) J. Biol. Agri. Healthcare. 2017;7(22):51-58.
    [Google Scholar]
  87. , , , , , . Nutritional values and indigenous preferences for shea fruits (Vitellaria paradoxa CF Gaertn. F.) in African agroforestry parklands. Econ. Bot.. 2004;58(4):588-600.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  88. Mbacham, W.F., Ayong, L., Guewo-Fokeng, M. Makoge, V., 2019. Current situation of malaria in Africa. In malaria control and elimination. Springer, pp. 29-44. doi: DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-9550-9_2
  89. , , , , , , , . Evaluation of four Cameroonian medicinal plants for anticancer, antigonorrheal and antireverse transcriptase activities. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol.. 2011;32(2):162-167.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  90. , , , , , . Antidiabetic and antioxidant potentials of Vitellaria paradoxa barks in alloxan-induced diabetic rats. Clin. Phytosci.. 2019;5(1):1-8.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  91. , , , , , . Hypoglycemic, antidyslipidemic and antioxydant effects of Vitellaria paradoxa barks extract on high-fat diet and streptozotocin-induced type 2 diabetes rats. Metabol. Open. 2021;9:1-7.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  92. , , , . Cosmetic products containing natural based emollients for restoring impaired skin barrier: Formulation and in vivo evaluation. Farmacia. 2021;69(1):129-134.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  93. , . Ethnobotanical field survey of medicinal plants used by traditional medicine practitioners to manage HIV/AIDS opportunistic infections and their prophylaxis in Keffi Metropolis, Nigeria. Asian J. Plant Sci. Res.. 2014;4(1):7-14.
    [Google Scholar]
  94. , , , , , . Silver and titanium oxides for the removal of phenols from pharmaceutical wastewater. Mater. Today:. Proc.. 2020;38:816-822.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  95. , , , , , . Medicinal plants in Baskoure, Kourittenga province, Burkina Faso: an ethnobotanical study. J. Ethnopharmacol.. 2011;133(2):378-395.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  96. , , , . Land suitability modeling of shea (Vitellaria paradoxa) distribution across sub-Saharan Africa. Appl. Geo.. 2015;58:217-227.
    [Google Scholar]
  97. , , , , . Phytochemical and antimicrobial screening of the crude extracts from the root, stem bark and leaves of Vitellaria paradoxa (Gaertn. F) Afr. J. Biotechnol.. 2007;6(16):1905-1909.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  98. , , , , . Isolation and characterization of 3, 5, 6-trihydroxy-7-octyl-5, 6-dihydro-1-naphthalene carboxylic acid from the stem methanolic extract of Vitellaria paradoxa. J. Med. Plants Res.. 2007;1(3):060-062.
    [Google Scholar]
  99. , . Advantages of combination therapy compared with monotherapy. In: , ed. Combination therapy in hypertension. Tarporley: Springer Healthcare Ltd.; . p. :23-35.
    [Google Scholar]
  100. , , , , . Antioxidants and hypoglycemic effect of some medicinal plants. Biol. Pharm. Sci.. 2019;8(2):70-80.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  101. , , , , , , . Vitellaroside, a new cerebroside from Vitellaria paradoxa (Sapotaceae) and its bioactivities. Nat. Prod. Chem. Res.. 2018;6:306.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  102. , . Formulation and in vivo anti-inflammatory properties of diclofenac multiple emulsions prepared using Vitellaria paradoxa fat (Shea Butter) Afr. J. Med. Med. Sci.. 2019;48:307-317.
    [Google Scholar]
  103. , , . Pharmacognostic profiling and antidiabetic effects of leaves of Vitellaria paradoxa CF Gaertn (Sapotaceae) J. Global Biosci.. 2020;9(5):7280-7306.
    [Google Scholar]
  104. , , , , . Assessment of in-vitro antioxidant activities and genotoxicity in E. coli of ethanol extracts of Vitellaria paradoxa (Gaertn. F) Archives Basic Appl. Med.. 2019;7(1):13-20.
    [Google Scholar]
  105. , , , , , , . Thyrotoxic evaluation and lipid peroxidation in Wistar Albino rats exposed to Vitellaria paradoxa stem bark. British J. Pharm. Res.. 2016;10(4):1-7.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  106. , , . Traditional management of tuberculosis in Ogun State of Nigeria: the practice and ethnobotanical survey. Afr. J. Trad. Complem. Altern. Med.. 2010;7(1):79-84.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  107. , , , , . Phytochemical and antimicrobial studies on Butyrospermum paradoxum. Fitoterapia. 2001;72(1):54-56.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  108. , , , , , , , . Proximate and mineral composition of shea (Vitellaria paradoxa C.F. Gaertn.) fruit pulp in Uganda. Afr. J. Food Agri. Nutr. Dev.. 2010;10(11):4430-4443.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  109. , , , . Identification of phytochemical constituents of the methanolic extract of Vitellaria paradoxa responsible for antimicrobial activity against selected pathogenic organisms. Sikkim Manipal Univ. Med. J.. 2015;2(1):177-189.
    [Google Scholar]
  110. , , , , , , . Investigations into antibacterial, phytochemical and antioxidant properties of Vitellaria paradoxa (Gaertn.) stem bark extracts. J. Pharm. Res. Int. 2017:1-17.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  111. , , , , . Volatile components from the stem bark of Vitellaria paradoxa. J. Essent. Oil Bearing Plants. 2012;15(4):531-533.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  112. , , . Preliminary study on the wound healing activity of ethanolic extract of Vitellaria paradoxa CF Gaertn. in rats. Nigerian. J. Pharm. Res.. 2015;11(1):89-93.
    [Google Scholar]
  113. , , , , . Ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants used as anti-obesity remedies in the nomad and hunter communities of Burkina Faso. Medicines. 2016;3(9):1-24.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  114. , , , , , , . Ecological correlates of seed desiccation tolerance in tropical African dryland trees. Am. J. Bot.. 2004;91(6):863-870.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  115. , , , , . Acute toxicity studies on aqueous extract of stem bark of Butyrospermum paradoxum in rats. Bulletin of Animal Health Produc. Afr.. 2000;48(1):39-43.
    [Google Scholar]
  116. , , , , , , , . Natural lipid nanoparticles containing nimesulide: synthesis, characterization and in vivo antiedematogenic and antinociceptive activities. J. Biomed. Nanotechnol.. 2012;8(2):309-315.
    [Google Scholar]
  117. , , , . Nutritional composition of seed and physicochemical properties of seed oil of Vitellaria paradoxa. Sci. Res. J.. 2014;2:35-39.
    [Google Scholar]
  118. , , , , , . Plant extract synthesized silver nanoparticles: An ongoing source of novel biocompatible materials. Ind. Crops and Prod.. 2015;70:356-373.
    [Google Scholar]
  119. , , , , . Galloylated proanthocyanidins from shea (Vitellaria paradoxa) meal have potent anthelmintic activity against Ascaris suum. Phytochem.. 2016;122:146-153.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  120. , , , , . Bio-synthesis of silver nanoparticles with antibacterial activity. Materials Chem. Phy.. 2019;235:1-7.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  121. , , , , . Medicinal plants used to treat neurological disorders in West Africa: a case study with Guinea-Bissau flora. Am. J. Plant Sci.. 2012;3(7):1028-1039.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  122. , , , . Medicinal plants used in the management of cancer among the Ijebus of Southwestern Nigeria. J. Herbal Med.. 2018;14:68-75.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  123. , , , , , , . An eco-friendly Gnaphalium polycaulon mediated silver nanoparticles: Synthesis, characterization, antimicrobial, wound healing and drug release studies. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol.. 2020;61:1-8.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  124. , , . Ethnomedicinal information and phytochemical screening of medicinal plants used in the treatment of diarrhoea in Lagos State. Nigeria. Eur. J. Med. Plants. 2017;1–7
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  125. , , , , , , , , . Novel insights into the biopharmaceutical potential, comparative phytochemical analysis and multivariate analysis of different extracts of shea butter tree - Vitellaria paradoxa C. F. Gaertn. Proc. Biochem.. 2020;98:65-75.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  126. Soladoye, M., Orhiere, S. Ibimode, B., 1989. Ethnobotanical study of two indigenous multipurpose plants in the Guinea savanna of Kwara state-Vitellaria paradoxa and Parkia biglobosa, Biennial Conference of the Ecol. Soc. Nigeria, 14th August, pp. 13.
  127. , , . Ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants used by the Laniba village people in South Western Nigeria. Afr. J. Pharm. Pharmacol.. 2012;6(24):1726-1732.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  128. , , , . Effect of the temperature and rainfall on Shea tree fruit production. J. Agri. Biol. Sci.. 2011;2(7):220-226.
    [Google Scholar]
  129. , , , . Phenolic constituents of Shea (Vitellaria) Kernels. J. Agri. Food Chem.. 2003;51:6268-6278.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  130. , , , , , , . Vitellaria paradoxa nut triterpene-rich extract ameliorates symptoms of inflammation on post-traumatic osteoarthritis in obese rats. J. Pain Res.. 2020;13:261-271.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  131. , , , , , , , , , , . Anticancer and antioxidant activities of methanol extracts and fractions of some Cameroonian medicinal plants. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Med.. 2014;7(1):442-447.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  132. , , , , , , , . Antioxidant activity and a new ursane-type triterpene from Vitellaria paradoxa (Sapotaceae) stem barks. Eur. J. Med. Plants. 2016;1–20
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  133. , , , , , , , , , . Cytotoxic and antioxidant triterpene saponins from Butyrospermum parkii (Sapotaceae) Carbohydrate Res.. 2011;346(17):2699-2704.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  134. , , . Use of medicinal plants for the treatment of oral diseases in Burkina Faso. J. Ethnopharmacol.. 2006;104(1–2):68-78.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  135. , . Preliminary studies on nasal decongestant activity from the seed of the shea butter tree, Butyrospermum parkii. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol.. 1979;7(5):495-497.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  136. , , . Antibacterial and phytochemical properties of five African medicinal plants used as chewing sticks south-western part of Nigeria. Int. J. Multidisc. Res. Dev.. 2015;2:146-152.
    [Google Scholar]
  137. The Catalogue of Life Partnership, 2018. Catalogue of Life. Checklist dataset DOI: 10.15468/rffz4x accessed via GBIF.org on 2021-04-30
  138. , , , , , , . One-pot green synthesis of highly luminescent silicon nanoparticles using Citrus limon (L.) and their applications in luminescent cell imaging and antimicrobial efficacy. Materials Today Comm.. 2019;19:62-67.
    [Google Scholar]
  139. , , , , , , , , , , . Ethnobotanical survey on medicinal plants used by Guinean traditional healers in the treatment of malaria. J. Ethnopharmacol.. 2013;150(3):1145-1153.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  140. , , , , . Synthesis of silver nanoparticles using Matricaria recutita (Babunah) plant extract and its study as mercury ions sensor. Sens. Bio-Sensing Res.. 2017;16:62-67.
    [Google Scholar]
  141. , , , . Nutritional composition of shea (Vitellaria paradoxa) fruit pulp across its major distribution zones in Nigeria. Tree, Forest, Sci, Biotechnol.. 2008;2(1):40-42.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  142. , , , , . Anti-Inflammatory effects of shea butter through inhibition of iNOS, COX-2, and cytokines via the Nf-Kb pathway in LPS-activated J774 macrophage cells. J. Complement. Integr. Med.. 2012;9(1):1-11.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  143. , , , , . Antibacterial activity of Vitellaria paradoxa seed oil extract and honey against bacterial isolates from wound infection. Int. J. Biol. Phy. Chem. Studies 2019:16-21.
    [Google Scholar]
  144. , . Cosmetic potentials of African shea nut (Vitellaria paradoxa) butter. Curr. Res. Chem.. 2011;3(2):80-86.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  145. Wodah, D., Asase, A., 2012. Ethnopharmacological use of plants by Sisala traditional healers in northwest Ghana. Pharm. Biol., 50 (7), 807-815. doi: DOI: 10.3109/13880209.2011.633920
  146. , , , , , , , . Lipids from Vitellaria paradoxa Gaertn seeds by supercritical CO2: Extraction and optimization of parameters by response surface methodology. J. Eng.. 2018;22(5):31-44.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  147. , , , , , . Evaluating anticancer activity of plant-mediated synthesized iron oxide nanoparticles using Punica granatum fruit peel extract. J. Mol. Struc.. 2020;1204:127539
    [Google Scholar]
  148. , , , , , , , , , , . Melanogenesis-inhibitory activity and cancer chemopreventive effect of glucosylcucurbic acid from shea (Vitellaria paradoxa) Kernels. Chem. Biod.. 2015;12(4):547-558.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  149. , , , , , , , , , , . Triterpene glycosides and other polar constituents of shea (Vitellaria paradoxa) kernels and their bioactivities. Phytochem.. 2014;108:157-170.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  150. , , , , , , , , , , . Compositions and melanogenesis-inhibitory activities of the extracts of defatted shea (Vitellaria paradoxa) kernels from seven African countries. J. Food Comp. Anal.. 2018;70:89-97.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  151. , , , . Exploitation and use of medicinal plants, Northern Region. Ghana. J. Med. Plants Res.. 2013;7(27):1984-1993.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Show Sections