5.2
Impact Factor
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Corrigendum
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Full Length Article
Full lenth article
Letter to Editor
Original Article
Research article
Retraction notice
Review
Review Article
SPECIAL ISSUE: ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY
5.3
Impact Factor
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Corrigendum
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Full Length Article
Full lenth article
Letter to Editor
Original Article
Research article
Retraction notice
Review
Review Article
SPECIAL ISSUE: ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original article
10 (
2_suppl
); S1795-S1801
doi:
10.1016/j.arabjc.2013.07.004

Trivalent transition metal complexes derived from carbohydrazide and dimedone

Department of Chemistry, National Institute of Technology, Kurukshetra 136 119, Haryana, India
Department of Chemistry, M.L.N. College, Yamuna Nagar 135 001, Haryana, India

⁎Corresponding author. Tel.: +91 1744 233512. dpsinghchem@gmail.com (D.P. Singh) dpsinghchem@yahoo.co.in (D.P. Singh)

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Elsevier and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Peer review under responsibility of King Saud University.

Abstract

A new series of the complexes has been prepared by template condensation reaction of dimedone and carbohydrazide in the methanolic medium forming the complexes of the type [M(TML)X]X2; where TML is a tetradentate macrocyclic ligand; M = Cr(III), Fe(III); X = Cl, NO 3 - , CH3COO. The complexes have been characterized with the help of elemental analyses, conductance measurements, molecular weight determination, magnetic measurements, electronic, infrared, far infrared spectral and structural studies. Molar conductance values indicate them to be 1:2 electrolytes. Electronic spectra along with magnetic moments suggest the five coordinate square pyramidal geometry for these complexes. The complexes have also been tested for their in vitro antibacterial activity by agar well diffusion method and macro dilution tube method. Some of the complexes showed good antibacterial activity.

Keywords

Dimedone
Template synthesis
Infrared
Mass spectra
1

1 Introduction

The field of macrocyclic complexes is fast developing because of the wide variety of applications of these complexes in various fields. Macrocyclic ligands and their complexes have been widely studied because of their resemblance with naturally occurring macrocycles and analytical, industrial and medical applications (Singh, 2007; Lindoy, 1989; Ma et al., 2006; Gloe, 2005; Constable, 1999; Singh et al., 2007). Due to their kinetic and thermodynamic stabilities, the macrocyclic complexes find their potential applications as metal extractants (Adam et al., 1993) and radiotherapeutic agents (Cox et al., 1989). Macrocyclic metal complexes of lanthanides e.g. Gd3+ are used as MRI contrast agents (Watson and Rockladge, 1992). The metal ions direct the reaction preferentially toward cyclic rather than oligomeric or polymeric products (Singh, 2011). Transition metal macrocyclic complexes have received a great attention because of their biological activities including antiviral, anticarcinogenic (Chandra and Pundir, 2008), antifertile (Chandra, 2006), antibacterial and antifungal (Singh et al., 2009) activities. Prompted from these applications, in the present work, macrocyclic complexes of Cr(III) and Fe(III) derived from dimedone and carbohydrazide are discussed. The complexes have been characterized by various physico chemical techniques like IR, magnetic susceptibilities, elemental analyses and molar conductance measurements.

2

2 Experimental

2.1

2.1 Reagents

All the chemicals used in the study were of Anal R grade. Metal salts were purchased from E. merck and were used as received. All the solvents used were of high purity. Moisture was excluded from the glass apparatus using CaCl2 glass tubes.

2.2

2.2 Isolation of complexes

All the complexes were synthesized by template method i.e., by the condensation of dimedone and carbohydrazide in the presence of respective trivalent metal salts. To a hot, well stirred methanolic solution (∼50 cm3) of carbohydrazide (10 mmol), was added trivalent chromium or iron salt (5 mmol) dissolved in minimum quantity of methanol (20 cm3). The resulting solution was refluxed for 0.5 h. After that dimedone (10 mmol) dissolved in ∼20 cm3 methanol was added in the refluxing mixture and the mixture was again refluxed for 6–8 h. The mixture was concentrated to half of its volume and kept in a desiccator overnight. On overnight cooling, colored complexes were obtained which were filtered, washed with methanol, acetone and diethylether, dried in vacuo. The syntheses of the complexes may be shown by the following scheme (Fig. 1).

Synthesis of macrocyclic complexes derived from dimedone and carbohydrazide with trivalent metal salts.
Figure 1
Synthesis of macrocyclic complexes derived from dimedone and carbohydrazide with trivalent metal salts.

2.3

2.3 Analytical and physical measurements

The microanalyses of C, H and N were recorded at Elementar Vario EL III (Carlo Erba 1108) at Sophisticated Analytical Instrument Facility, CDRI, Lucknow. The magnetic susceptibility measurements were carried at SAIF, IIT Roorkee on a vibrating sample magnetometer. The IR spectra were recorded on Infrared spectrophotometer in the range 4000–200 cm−1 using KBr pellets at Sophisticated Analytical Instrument Facility, Punjab University, Chandigarh. Electronic spectra (DMF) were recorded on Cary 14 spectrophotometer in the Department of Chemistry, IIT Roorkee. The conductivity was measured on a digital conductivity meter (HPG System, G-3001). Melting Points were determined using capillaries in electrical M.P. apparatus. The metal contents were determined by standard EDTA methods.

2.4

2.4 Biological activity of complexes

2.4.1

2.4.1 Test pathogens

Four test pathogenic bacterial strains viz. Bacillus cereus (MTCC 1272), Salmonella typhi (MTCC 733), Escherichia coli (MTCC 739) and Staphylococcus aureus (MTCC 1144) were considered for antibacterial activity of complexes in the present study.

2.4.2

2.4.2 In vitro antibacterial activity

2.4.2.1
2.4.2.1 Primary screening

The antibacterial activity of synthesized macrocyclic complexes has been evaluated by the agar well diffusion method (Ahmad and Beg, 2009). All the cultures were adjusted to 0.5 McFarland standards, which is visually comparable to a microbial suspension of approximately 1.5 × 108 cfu/ml. 20 ml of Muller Hinton Agar medium was poured into each Petri plate and the agar plates were swabbed with 100 μl inocula of each test bacterium and kept for 15 min for adsorption. Using a sterile cork borer of 8 mm diameter, wells were bored into the seeded agar plates and these were loaded with 100 μl volume with a concentration of 4.0 μg/ml of each metal complex in DMSO. All the plates were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. Antibacterial activity of each synthesized complex was evaluated by measuring the zone of growth inhibition against the test microorganisms with zone reader (Hi Antibiotic zone scale). DMSO was used as a negative control whereas standard antibiotics Linezolid and Cefaclor were used as a positive control. This procedure was performed in three replicate plates for each microorganism.

2.4.3

2.4.3 Determination of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of synthesized complexes

Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) of the various complexes against various bacterial strains was tested through a macro dilution tube method (NCCLS, 2000). In this method, various test concentrations of the synthesized metal complexes were made from 128 to 0.25 μg/ml in sterile tubes no.1–10. A 100 μl sterile Mueller Hinton Broth (MHB) medium was poured in each sterile tube followed by addition of 200 μl test complex in tube 1. Two fold serial dilutions were carried out from the tube 1–10 and excess broth (100 μl) was discarded from the last tube no. 10. To each tube, 100 μl of standard inoculum (1.5 × 108 cfu/ml) was added. Turbidity was observed after incubating the inoculated tubes at 37 °C for 24 h. Dilutions of standard antibiotics (Linezolid and Cefaclor) were prepared in the same manner for comparison. DMSO was used as negative control.

3

3 Results and discussion

The analytical data of metal complexes show that the complexes may be represented by the formula: [M(C18H28O2N8)X]X2; where M = Cr(III) and Fe(III) and X = Cl−1, NO 3 - 1 , CH3COO−1. The tests for anions are positive before decomposing and after decomposing the complexes with conc. HNO3, indicating their presence outside and inside the coordination sphere. The monomeric nature of these complexes is confirmed by the molecular weight measurements. The complexes were found soluble in DMF and DMSO, but were insoluble in common organic solvents and water. Conductivity measurement in DMSO indicated them to be 1:2 electrolytes (150–180 ohm−1cm2 mol−1) (Singh and Kumar, 2006). All the complexes decomposed above 253 °C indicating their thermal stability. The analytical, spectroscopic and magnetic data enable us to predict the possible structure of the synthesized complexes. All complexes give satisfactory elemental analyses as shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Analytical data of trivalent chromium and iron complexes derived from dimedone and carbohydrazide.
S. no. Complexes Color Found (Calcd.), % Mol. Wt. found (Calcd.)
M C H N
1. [Cr(C18H28O2N8)Cl]Cl2 Dark brown 9.33 (9.52) 39.33 (39.52) 5.06 (5.12) 20.38 (20.49) 544.4 (546.5)
2. [Cr(C18H28O2N8)(NO3)](NO3)2 Yellowish brown 8.19 (8.31) 34.37 (34.50) 4.24 (4.47) 24.46 (24.60) −(626)
3. [Cr(C18H28O2N8)(CH3COO)](CH3COO)2 Brown 8.22 (8.43) 46.48 (46.68) 5.75 (5.99) 18.02 (18.15) −(617)
4. [Fe(C18H28O2N8)Cl]Cl2 Dark brown 9.95 (10.17) 39.13 (39.24) 4.98 (5.09) 20.21 (20.35) −(550.5)
5. [Fe(C18H28O2N8)(NO3)](NO3)2 Orange red 8.61 (8.88) 34.14 (34.29) 4.28 (4.44) 24.19 (24.44) 627.6 (630)
6. [Fe(C18H28O2N8)(CH3COO)](CH3COO)2 Reddish brown 8.93 (9.02) 46.10 (46.38) 5.80 (5.96) 17.93 (18.04) −(621)

Several attempts were unsuccessful to grow crystals of complexes in different solvents or mixture of solvents for the purpose of X-ray crystallography.

3.1

3.1 Infrared spectra

A pair of strong bands at ∼3215 and 3295 cm−1 corresponding to ν(NH2) which is present in the spectrum of carbohydrazide but absent in the spectra of all the complexes (Prasad, 2007). However a broad peak at 3340–3415 cm−1 corresponding to ν(N–H) was observed in the spectrum of all the complexes (Khan, 1998; Singh, 2012). A strong peak at ∼1685 cm−1 in the spectrum of carbohydrazide and all the complexes is attributed to the CO group of CONH moiety. A new strong absorption band in the region ∼1585–1615 cm−1 was observed which may be attributed to ν(C⚌N) stretching vibration (Singh, 2004; Gupta and Chandra, 2006). This confirms the condensation of carbonyl group of dimedone and amino group of carbohydrazide (Prasad and Mathur, 2006; Zeng, 1999). These results provide strong evidence for the formation of macrocyclic frame (Mohamed, 1999). The lower value of ν(C⚌N) indicates coordination of azomethine nitrogen to metal (Lodeiro, 2003). The bands present at ∼1342–1020 cm−1 may be assigned due to ν(C–N) vibration.

The Far infrared spectra show bands in the region ∼410–435 cm−1 corresponding to ν(M–N) vibrations in all the complexes (Mohamed, 1997; Aqra, 1993). The presence of bands in all complexes in 410–435 cm−1 region originate from ν(M–N) azomethine vibrational modes and give an idea about coordination of azomethine nitrogens (Rana, 1982). The bands present at 295–310 cm−1 correspond to ν(M–Cl) vibrations Shakir, 1999; Chandra and Kumar, 2004. The bands present at 210–250 cm−1 in all nitrato complexes are assignable to ν(M–O) Shakir, 1999.

3.2

3.2 Mass spectra

The mass spectra of trivalent chromium (III) and iron (III) macrocyclic complexes derived from dimedone and carbohydrazide have been recorded using NBA matrix. All the spectra exhibit parent peaks due to molecular ions [M]+ and [M+2]+. The proposed molecular formula of these complexes was confirmed by comparing their molecular formula weights with m/z values. The molecular ion peaks and other fragments arising from the thermal cleavage of the complexes have been given in Table 2.

Table 2 FAB mass spectral studies of trivalent chromium and iron complexes derived from dimedone and carbohydrazide.
S. no. Complexes Molecular ion peak [M]+ and [M+2]+ at m/z Important peaks due to complex fragmentation
1. [Cr(C18H28O2N8)Cl]Cl2 [M]+=546.5 (35Cl), [M+2]+ = 548.5 (37Cl) [Cr(C18H28O2N8)Cl]+ = 475.5, [Cr(C18H28O2N8)]+ = 440.0, [C18H28O2N8]+ = 388.0
2. [Cr(C18H28O2N8)(NO3)](NO3)2 [M]+ = 626.0 [Cr(C18H28O2N8)(NO3)]+ = 502.0, [Cr(C18H28O2N8)]+ = 440.0, [C18H28O2N8]+ = 388.0
3. [Cr(C18H28O2N8)(CH3COO)](CH3COO)2 [M]+ = 617.0 [Cr(C18H28O2N8)(OAc)]+ = 499.0, [Cr(C18H28O2N8)]+ = 440.0, [C18H28O2N8]+ = 388.0
4. [Fe(C18H28O2N8)Cl]Cl2 M]+ = 550.5(35Cl), [M+2]+ = 552.5 (37Cl) [Fe(C18H28O2N8)Cl]+ = 479.5, [Fe(C18H28O2N8)]+ = 444.0, [C18H28O2N8]+ = 388.2
5. [Fe(C18H28O2N8)(NO3)](NO3)2 [M]+ = 630.0 [Fe(C18H28O2N8)(NO3)]+ = 506.0, [Fe(C18H28O2N8)]+ = 444.0, [C18H28O2N8]+ = 388.2
6. [Fe(C18H28O2N8)(CH3COO)](CH3COO)2 [M]+ = 621.0 [Fe(C18H28O2N8)(OAc)]+ = 503.0, [Fe(C18H28O2N8)]+ = 444.0, [C18H28O2N8]+ = 388.2

3.3

3.3 Magnetic measurements and electronic spectra

The magnetic moment of chromium (III) complexes was found in the range 3.94–4.15 B.M. The electronic spectra of chromium (III) complexes show bands at ∼9165–9235 cm−11), ∼13 115–13 420 cm−12) , ∼17 342–18 214 cm−13), ∼27 218–27 652 cm−14) and ∼34 773 cm−15) respectively. These spectral bands cannot be interpreted in terms of four or six coordinated environment around the metal atom. The spectra are comparable with that of five coordinated Cr (III) complexes Wood, 1972. Thus, keeping in view the analytical data and electrolytic nature of these complexes, five coordinated square pyramidal geometry can be assigned for these complexes. Thus, assuming the symmetry C4V for these complexes (Chohan et al., 2006a), various spectral bands can be assigned as : 4 B 1 4 E a , (ν1), 4 B 1 4 B 2 , (ν2), 4 B 1 4 A 2 ,(ν3) and 4 B 1 4 E b 4), respectively.

The magnetic moments of iron (III) complexes lay in the range 5.87–5.92B.M. The electronic spectra of iron (III) complexes show various bands at ∼9854–9946 cm−1, 15 418–15 825 cm−1 and 27 535–27 860 cm−1. These bands do not suggest the octahedral or tetrahedral geometry of the complexes around the metal atom. The spectral bands are consistent with the range of spectral bands reported for five coordinated square pyramidal iron (III) complexes Chohan et al., 2006. Assuming C4V symmetry for these complexes, various bands can be assigned as: dxy → dyz,xz and dxy → dz2. Any attempt to make accurate assignment is difficult due to interactions of the metal–ligand- bond systems lifting the degeneracy of dxz and dyz pair.

3.4

3.4 Biological assay results

All the synthesized macrocyclic complexes were tested for their in vitro antibacterial activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. The antibacterial activity of synthesized macrocyclic complexes has been evaluated by the agar well diffusion method. Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) of various complexes against various bacterial strains was tested through a macrodilution tube method. Standard antibiotics namely Linezolid and Cefaclor were used for comparison with antibacterial activities shown by these complexes. Linezolid showed MIC of 4, 4, 16 and 32 μg/ml against B. cereus, S. aureus, E. coli and S. typhi, respectively, while Cefaclor showed MIC of 8, 2, 8, 16 μg/ml against B. cereus, S. aureus, E. coli and S. typhi respectively. Some complexes of the tested series possessed good antibacterial activity against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria.

Complexes (2), (5) and (6) exhibited good antibacterial activity against both Gram (+) and Gram (−) bacteria with zone of inhibition in the range 26.0 to 26.6 mm. Complexes (1), (3) and (4) showed good activity. The values are comparable with the zone of inhibition shown by standard antibiotics Linezolid and Cefaclor.

Complex (3) showed MIC of 32 μg/ml against S. typhi which is equal to the MIC shown by the standard antibiotic Linezolid for the same bacterial strain. Complex (6) showed MIC of 16 μg/ml against S. typhi which is equal to the MIC shown by the standard antibiotic Cefaclor for the same bacterial strain. Complexes (2) and (6) showed MIC of 16 μg/ml against E. coli which is equal to the MIC shown by the standard antibiotic Linezolid for the same bacterial strain. Complexes (3) and (5) showed MIC of 8 μg/ml against E. coli which is equal to the MIC shown by the standard antibiotic Cefaclor for the same bacterial strain. Complex (6) showed MIC of 4 μg/ml against S. aureus, which is equal to the MIC shown by the standard antibiotic Linezolid for the same bacterial strain. Complex (1) showed MIC of 8 μg/ml against B. cereus, which is equal to the MIC shown by the standard antibiotic Cefaclor for the same bacterial strain.

It has been suggested that chelation/coordination reduces the polarity of the metal ion mainly because of partial sharing of its positive charge with donor group within the whole chelate ring system. This process of chelation thus increases the lipophilic nature of the central metal atom, which in turn, favors its permeation through the lipoid layer of the membrane thus causing the metal complex to cross the bacterial membrane more effectively thus increasing the activity of the complexes. Besides from this many other factors such as solubility, dipole moment, conductivity influenced by metal ion may be possible reasons for remarkable antibacterial activities of these complexes.(Chohan et al., 2006, 2006a) It also has been observed that some moieties such as azomethine linkage or heteroaromatic nucleus introduced into such compounds exhibit extensive biological activities that may be responsible for increase in hydrophobic character and liposolubility of the molecules in crossing the cell membrane of the microorganism and enhance biological utilization ratio and activity of complexes (Chohan et al., 2006, 2006a) (Fig. 2, Tables 3 and 4).

Bar graph representation of antimicrobial activity of synthesized complexes. X axis: complexes/antibiotics; Y axis: MIC (μg/ml). a – Bacillus cereus (MTCC 1272), b – Staphylococcus aureus (MTCC1144), c – Escherichia coli (MTCC 739), d – Salmonella typhi (MTCC 733), Linezolid, Cefaclor – Standard antibiotics.
Figure 2
Bar graph representation of antimicrobial activity of synthesized complexes. X axis: complexes/antibiotics; Y axis: MIC (μg/ml). a – Bacillus cereus (MTCC 1272), b – Staphylococcus aureus (MTCC1144), c – Escherichia coli (MTCC 739), d – Salmonella typhi (MTCC 733), Linezolid, Cefaclor – Standard antibiotics.
Table 3 In vitro antibacterial activities of synthesized trivalent chromium and iron complexes derived from dimedone and carbohydrazide against test bacteria using agar well diffusion method.
S. no. Complexes Diameter of growth of inhibition zone/(mm)x
a b c d
(1) [Cr(C18H28O2N8)Cl] Cl2 25.3 18.3 20.0 18.6
(2) [Cr(C18H28O2N8)(NO3)](NO3)2 26.0 22.3 22.6 21.6
(3) [Cr(C18H28O2N8)(CH3COO)] (CH3COO)2 23.0 21.3 25.6 20.6
(4) [Fe(C18H28O2N8)Cl] Cl2 23.6 22.6 20.6 18.0
(5) [Fe(C18H28O2N8)(NO3)] (NO3)2 22.3 20.3 26.0 21.6
(6) [Fe(C18H28O2N8)(CH3COO)](CH3COO)2 21.0 26.6 22.3 20.6
(7) Linezolid 26.0 26.0 23.0 21.0
(8) Cefaclor 25.0 28.0 27.0 21.0
Table 4 Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) shown by trivalent chromium and iron complexes derived from dimedone and carbohydrazide against test bacteria using macrodilution tube method.
S. no. Complexes MIC/μg/ml
a b c d
(1) [Cr(C18H28O2N8)Cl] Cl2 I 8 64 32 64
(2) [Cr(C18H28O2N8)(NO3)](NO3)2 II 4 16 16 8
(3) [Cr(C18H28O2N8)(CH3COO)](CH3COO)2 III >16 32 8 32
(4) [Fe(C18H28O2N8)Cl] Cl2 IV 16 16 32 64
(5) [Fe(C18H28O2N8)(NO3)] (NO3)2 V 16 32 8 8
(6) [Fe(C18H28O2N8)(CH3COO)](CH3COO)2 VI 32 4 16 16
(7) Linezolid 4 4 16 32
(8) Cefaclor 8 2 8 16

(d) – Salmonella typhi (MTCC 733)., Linezolid, Cefaclor – Standard antibiotics

Mean of three replicates (a) Bacillus cereus (MTCC 1272), (b) Staphylococcus aureus (MTCC1144), (c) Escherichia coli (MTCC 739).

3.5

3.5 Structural Studies

The structural properties of the complexes have been studied. The geometry optimized structure of the [Fe(C18H28O2N8)Cl] Cl2, as shown in Fig. 3, has steric energy 14.98 kcal/mol. All other structural parameters, given in Table 5, also suggest a square pyramidal geometry.

Geometry optimized Structure of macrocyclic complexes.
Figure 3
Geometry optimized Structure of macrocyclic complexes.
Table 5 Structural parameters of the macrocyclic complexes.
Parameters Values Bond type Bond angles/bond lengths
Stretch 2.4464 N(7)-Fe-N(8) 91.991
Bend 20.6648 N(26)-Fe-N(8) 86.105
Stretch-Bend 0.4189 N(26)-Fe-N(25) 95.204
Torsion 0.0000 N(7)-Fe-N(25) 89.432
Non-1,4-VDW −5.8136 N(25)-Fe-N(8) 128.588
1,4-VDW −2.7386 N(26)-Fe-N(7) 175.197
Steric Energy 14.978 kcal/mol Fe–N (bond length, Å) 1.88

4

4 Conclusions

Based on elemental analyses, conductivity measurements, magnetic moments, electronic, IR and mass spectral and structural studies, a square pyramidal structure may be proposed for these complexes.

Acknowledgments

Authors are highly thankful to the authorities of N.I.T., Kurukshetra for providing the necessary research facilities required. Thanks are also due to Department of Microbiology, Kurukshetra University Kurukshetra for screening antimicrobial activity.

References

  1. , . Ligand design and metal ion recognition the interaction of Cu(II) with a range of 16-19 membered macrocycles incorporating oxygen, nitrogen and sulphur donor atoms. J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. 1993:1013-1017.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , . Synthesis and spectroscopic studies of biologically active compounds derived from oxalyldihydrazide and benzyl and their Cr(III), Fe(II) and Mn(III) complexes. Eur. J. Med. Chem.. 2009;44:1731-1736.
    [Google Scholar]
    Antibacterial activity and spectral studies of trivalent chromium, manganese and iron macrocyclic complexes derived from oxalyldihydrazide and glyoxal. J. Enzym. Inhib. Med. Chem. 24,883–889.
    , , . Antimicrobial and phytochemical studies on 45 Indian medicinal plants against multidrug resistant human pathogens. J. Ethnopharmacol.. 2001;74:113-123.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , . New macrocyclic complexes containing amide, imines and secondary amine functions. Transition Met. Chem.. 1993;24:337-339.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , . Biologically relevant macrocyclic complexes of copper spectral, magnetic, thermal and antibacterial approach. Transition Met. Chem.. 2006;31:147-151.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , . Synthesis and spectral studies on mononuclear complexes of chromium(III) and manganese(II) with 12-membered tetradentate N2O2, N2S2 and N4 donor macrocyclic ligands. Transition Met. Chem.. 2004;29:269-275.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , . Spectroscopic characterization of chromium (III), manganese (II) and nickel (II) complexes with a nitrogen donor tetradentate 12- membered aza macrocyclic ligand. Spectrochim. Acta A. 2008;69:1-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , . In vitro antibacterial, antifungal and cytotoxic properties of metal based furanyl derived sulfonamides. J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem.. 2006;21:771-781.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , . Antibacterial, antifungal and cytotoxic properties of novel N substituted sulfonamides from 4-hydroxycoumorin. J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem.. 2006;21:741-748.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , ed. Coordination Chemistry of Macrocyclic Compounds Oxford. Oxford University Press; .
  10. , . Synthesis of a kinetically stable yttrium-90 labelled macrocycle-antibody conjugate. J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1989:797-798.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , ed. Current Trends and Future Perspectives. Springer; .
  12. , , . Physicochemical and biological characterization of transition metal complexes with a nitrogen donor tetradentate novel macrocyclic ligand. Transition Met. Chem.. 2006;31:368-373.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. , . Tetraoxotetraamide macrocyclic complexes. Transition Met. Chem.. 1998;23:283-285.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. , . The Chemistry of Macrocyclic Ligand Complexes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; .
  15. , . Synthesis and characterisation of four novel NxOy Schiff base macrocyclic ligands and their metal complexes. Transition Met. Chem.. 2003;28:388-394.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. , . Synthesis and characterization of 1,8-bis(ferrocenylmethyl)-5,5,12,12,14-hexamethyl-1,4,8,11-tetraazacyclotetradecane, a macrocyclic ligand and its complexes. Transition Met. Chem.. 2006;31:97-102.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. , . Tetraamide macrocyclic complexes of transition metals with ligands derived from hydrazine. Transition Met. Chem.. 1997;22:189-192.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. , . Metal ion direct synthesis of 14–16 membered tetraimine macrocyclic complexes. Transition Met. Chem.. 1999;24:198-201.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. NCCLS. Method for dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility test for bacteria that grow aerobically, Approved Standards. 5th ed. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Villanova: PA 2000.
  20. , . Synthesis and spectroscopic studies of CrIII, FeIII and CoII complexs of hexaazamacrocycles. J. Indian Chem. Soc.. 2007;84:1202-1204.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. , , . Cr(III), Fe(III), Co(II), Ni(II), Cu(II) and Zn(II) complexes of 26- and 28- membered tetraazamacrocycles. J. Indian Chem. Soc.. 2006;83:1208-1213.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. , . Trivalent chromium, manganese, iron and cobalt chelates of a tetradentate N6 macrocyclic ligand. Transition Met. Chem.. 1982;7:174-177.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. , . Macrocyclic complexes of transition metals with divalent polyaza units. Transition Met. Chem.. 1999;24:577-580.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. , . Macrocyclic metal complexes : synthesis and characterization of 14- and 16- membered tetraaza macrocyclic complexes of transition metal ions. Transition Met. Chem.. 2004;29:867-869.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. , . Synthesis and characterization of complexes of Co(II), Ni(II), Cu(II), Zn(II) and Cd(II) with macrocycle 3,4,11,12-tetraoxo-1,2,5,6,9,10,13,14-octaaza-cyclohexadeca-6,8,14,16-tetraene and their biological screening. Transition Met. Chem.. 2007;32:1051-1055.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. , . Synthesis and characterization of divalent metal complexes of the macrocyclic ligand derived from isatin and 1,2-diaminobenzene. J. Serb. Chem. Soc.. 2011;76:385-393.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. , . Synthesis, spectral and antibacterial studies of 18-membered tetraazamacrocyclic complexes derived from carbohydrazide and diacetonyl. Int. J. Chem. Res.. 2012;3:21-24.
    [Google Scholar]
    , . New bis-macrocyclic complexes with transition metal ions. Transition Met. Chem.. 2003;28:160-162.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. , , . Chromium (III) complexes with different chromospheres macrocyclic ligands: synthesis and spectroscopic studies. Turk. J. Chem.. 2006;30:77-87.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. , . Template synthesis, spectroscopical studies and biological activities of macrocyclic complexes derived from thiocarbohydrazide and glyoxal. J. Enzym. Inhib. Med. Chem.. 2007;22:177-182.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. , . Antimicrobial active macrocyclic complexes of Cr(III), Mn(III) and Fe(III) with their spectroscopic approach. Eur. J. Med. Chem.. 2009;44:3299-3304.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. , , . Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Body. New York: Raven Press; .
  32. , . Stereochemical and electronic structural aspects of five coordination.Prog. Inorg. Chem. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; . 16, 227
  33. , . Synthesis and spectroscopic studies of dinuclear Cu(II) complexes with new pendant armed macrocyclic ligands. Transition Met. Chem.. 1999;23:371-373.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections