10.8
CiteScore
 
5.3
Impact Factor
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Corrigendum
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Full Length Article
Full lenth article
Letter to Editor
Original Article
Research article
Retraction notice
Review
Review Article
SPECIAL ISSUE: ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY
10.8
CiteScore
5.3
Impact Factor
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Corrigendum
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Full Length Article
Full lenth article
Letter to Editor
Original Article
Research article
Retraction notice
Review
Review Article
SPECIAL ISSUE: ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original article
11 (
4
); 453-459
doi:
10.1016/j.arabjc.2016.08.007

Cyclic voltammetry, square wave voltammetry, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and colorimetric method for hydrogen peroxide detection based on chitosan/silver nanocomposite

Department of Inorganic Chemistry, School of Chemical Engineering, Hanoi University of Science and Technology (HUST), 1st Dai Co Viet Road, Hanoi, Viet Nam
Department of Network Technology, Faculty of Informatics, University of Transport Technology, 54 Trieu Khuc Street, Hanoi, Viet Nam
Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, ITODYS, UMR 7086 CNRS, 15 rue J-A de Baïf, 75205 Paris Cedex 13, France

⁎Corresponding author. hoang.tranvinh@hust.edu.vn (Hoang V. Tran)

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Elsevier and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Peer review under responsibility of King Saud University.

Abstract

In this paper, we demonstrate a promising method to fabricate a non-enzymatic stable, highly sensitive and selective hydrogen peroxide sensor based on a chitosan/silver nanoparticles (CS/AgNPs) hybrid. Using this composite, we elaborated both electrochemical and colorimetric sensors for hydrogen peroxide detection. The colorimetric sensor is based on a homogenous reaction which fades the color of CS/AgNPs solutions from red-orange to colorless depending on hydrogen peroxide concentration. For the electrochemical sensor, CS/AgNPs were immobilized on glassy carbon electrodes and hydrogen peroxide was measured using cyclic voltammetry, square wave voltammetry and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. The response time is less than 10 s and the detection limit is 5 μM.

Keywords

Spectrophotometric detection
Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy
Square wave voltammetry
Cyclic voltammetry
Chitosan/silver nanoparticles (CS/AgNPs) hybrid
Hydrogen peroxide
1

1 Introduction

Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) detection is of great significance because of wide industrial applications and vital role in many different fields such as environmental, food, pharmaceutical and clinical analysis. Moreover, H2O2 is involved in several biological events and intracellular pathways. It is a reactive oxygen metabolic by-product that serves as a key regulator for a number of oxidative stress-related states linked to several diseases. Therefore, rapid and accurate determination of hydrogen peroxide is of crucial practical importance in various fields such as food, clinical and environmental analysis (Fang et al., 2014; Tao et al., 2014; Yu et al., 2013; Kumar et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2013; Xia et al., 2014). Currently, several analytical techniques for determination of H2O2 have been reported, including fluorimetry (Vasicek et al., 2011; Palamakumbura and Trackman, 2002), chemiluminescence (Falcó et al., 2001; Fletcher et al., 2001), spectrophotometry (Sunil and Narayana, 2008; Mahmoodi et al., 2005) and various electrochemical methods (Chen et al., 2012; Zhu et al., 2007). Compared to other available methods, electrochemical sensing offers a fast and cost-effective approach for sensitive determination of H2O2 (Jakubec et al., 2015; Tian et al., 2014).

Hydrogen peroxide sensors can be achieved by either enzyme-based or enzyme-less approaches. The former includes immobilization of enzymes (such as horseradish peroxidase, HRP) in a host material or on a surface. However, enzymes are generally less active when immobilized, and their turnover depends on a number of parameters such as pH, temperature or the presence of toxic chemicals or even ions (Khan and Bandyopadhyaya, 2014). Enzyme-less sensors can well avoid such disadvantages, more particularly instability and poor reproducibility, providing an effective way for improving electrocatalytic detection of H2O2 (Tian et al., 2014).

Non-enzymatic H2O2 sensors are usually achieved based on transfer metal oxides, such as Cu2O (Liu et al., 2013), CuO (Gao and Liu, 2015; Song et al., 2010), MnO2 (He et al., 2014), CoOOH (Lee et al., 2013), titanium silicalite-1 zeolite microparticles (TSZMs) Liu et al., 2011 or using noble metal nanoparticles (NPs), such as Au Zhang et al. (2013a,b), Ag (Zhao et al., 2013, 2009; Habibi and Jahanbakhshi, 2014) or Pt (Heli et al., 2014) which have received increasing attention due to their high electrocatalytic activities (Chen et al., 2012; Zhou et al., 2012).

Among these noble metal NPs, silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) have aroused growing interest in applications because of their unique properties of biocompatibility, low toxicity and sustainable electrocatalytic activity (Tian et al., 2014). However, strong van der Waals force between AgNPs causes severe aggregations, resulting in a sharp loss in available electrochemical activity and detection sensitivity. In response to the aggregation problem, AgNPs are usually immobilized on various organic/inorganic support materials (Wang et al., 2013; Zhao et al., 2013, 2009; Habibi and Jahanbakhshi, 2014; Zhong et al., 2013), which are confirmed to be an effective strategy in protecting these metal NPs against agglomeration and improving their electrocatalytic activity and stability, such as AgNPs/mesoporous carbon (Habibi and Jahanbakhshi, 2014), AgNPs/graphene (or grapheme oxide) Wang et al., 2013; Tian et al., 2014; Zhao et al., 2013; Zhong et al., 2013, AgNPs/carbon nanotube (Zhao et al., 2009) or AgNPs/chitosan (Tran et al., 2016). For this purpose, chitosan was chosen because it was already described as an efficient green reducing reagent and stabilizer for synthesis of AgNPs (Tran et al., 2010). It also plays a role in the AgNPs immobilization on the electrode surface (Tran et al., 2016). Moreover, chitosan is a bio-polymer which presents good compatibility with biomolecules, and contains many amino groups which could eventually be used for anchoring of biomolecules (Tran et al., 2011).

In this work, we propose a simple approach for fabrication of a sensitive and selective H2O2 sensor, which can be used for several electrochemical detections (electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, square wave voltammetry or cyclic voltammetry) or for optical detection (spectrophotometry), thanks to the electrocatalytic property of a chitosan/AgNPs hybrid materials which efficiently and selectively catalyze H2O2 reduction.

2

2 Experimentals

2.1

2.1 Chemicals and reagents

Chitosan (CS, MW = 400,000 g mol−1, degree of acetylation DA = 70%) was prepared by deacetylation of chitin (Tran et al., 2010). H2O2, phosphate buffered saline (PBS), glucose, ascorbic acid and galactose were purchased from Sigma Aldrich. All chemicals were of analytical grade. Glassy carbon electrodes (GCE, 3 mm diameter, S = 0.07 cm−2) were purchased from BAS Inc (Japan).

2.2

2.2 Synthesis of CS/AgNPs

CS/AgNPs were synthesized following (Tran et al., 2010) with minor modifications. 25 mL of a fresh solution of 0.1 M AgNO3 was added into 100 mL of 1% w/w CS dissolved in 1% w/w acetic acid/water mixture. This colorless solution was heated to 90 °C for 6 h to obtain an orange-yellow CS/AgNPs colloid, then cooled down to room temperature and centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 30 min to eliminate the biggest CS/AgNPs particles. The supernatant constitutes the CS/AgNPs stock solution with a AgNPs concentration of 2.16 g L−1. Before use, 10 mL of stock solution was diluted in 90 mL of deionized (DI) water.

2.3

2.3 Immobilization of CS/AgNPs on GCE

Glassy carbon electrodes (GCEs) were first polished on wet silicon carbide paper using 1 μm and 0.05 μm Al2O3 powders sequentially, and then washed with DI water followed by ethanol for 2 min. GCEs were afterward modified with chitosan/silver nanoparticles (CS/AgNPs) hybrid by drop-casting: a 5 μL drop of diluted CS/AgNPs solution was casted onto the GCE surface and allowed to dry at ambient temperature.

2.4

2.4 Electrochemical measurements

All electrochemical experiments were performed using a PGSTAT30 potentiostat (Metrohm Autolab B.V.) coupled with GPES software. A conventional three electrode cell configuration was employed. CS/AgNPs-modified GCEs were used as working electrodes, while a saturated Ag/AgCl electrode (Radiometer Analytical SAS, France) and a platinum wire served as reference and counter electrodes, respectively. Prior to electrochemical measurements, solutions were deoxygenated by purging with pure argon. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) and square wave voltammetry (SWV) were used for electrochemical measurements. For CV, the potential was scanned from −0.1 V to −1 V (vs. SCE) at a scan rate of 50 mV s−1 in 0.1 M degassed PBS. For SWV, the following parameters were used: pulse height 50 mV, pulse width 50 ms, scan increment 2 mV, and frequency 12.5 Hz.

EIS was performed using an Autolab PGSTAT30 equipped with the FRA module. Impedance spectra were recorded in 0.1 M PBS buffer at room temperature at a fixed potential within a frequency range from 10 kHz to 100 mHz with a perturbation amplitude of 10 mV. As a pretreatment before each experiment, a constant potential corresponding to the one used for EIS was imposed, for 120 s.

All electrochemical experiments were performed at 25 °C under stirring. Electrochemical signals (CV, SWV, EIS) of CS/AgNPs-modified GC electrodes were first recorded in pure PBS, and then H2O2 was added and let to react for 10 s before another electrochemical measurement was done.

2.5

2.5 Colorimetric measurements

First, the UV-Vis spectrum of 3 mL of the diluted CS/AgNPs solution was recorded. Then, 50 μL of the H2O2 solution was added into the quartz cuvette. The solution was stirred for 10 s and then a UV-Vis spectrum was recorded. The optical density at 425 nm (OD425) of the CS/AgNPs solution before and after addition of various H2O2 quantities was used to draw a calibration curve, i.e. ΔA/A0 vs. [H2O2] (here, ΔA = A0 − AC where A0 and AC are OD425 of the CS/AgNPs solution before and after H2O2 addition, respectively).

3

3 Results and discussions

3.1

3.1 Characterization of CS/AgNPs and surface morphology of CS/AgNPs-modified GCE

After heating at 90 °C for 6 h, the AgNO3/chitosan mixture turned dark yellow (Fig. SI.1), indicating the formation of AgNPs into the chitosan matrix. As shown by the UV-vis spectra of CS/AgNPs (Fig. 1a, curve i), the adsorption band at 425 nm is attributed to the characteristic surface plasmon absorption of AgNPs, while no absorption is observed for the control sample (chitosan without AgNO3 in the mixture), where no AgNPs are formed (Fig. 1a, curve ii). TEM micrographs of CS/AgNPs (Fig. 1b) show that the AgNPs have a spherical shape, a smooth surface morphology and particle sizes from 5 nm to 20 nm. No aggregation of AgNPs was evidenced, which demonstrates the stabilizing role of chitosan. A diffractogram of CS/AgNPs is shown in Fig. 1b (insert), which evidences the typical diffraction planes (1 1 1), (2 0 0), (2 2 0) of the fcc lattice of AgNPs. The diffractogram does not exhibit any diffraction peak for CS only. Using the Scherrer’s formula, crystalline size D was calculated to be in the range of 10–15 nm, consistent with the particle size evidenced on the TEM picture (Fig. 1a).

(a) UV-Vis spectrum of CS/AgNPs obtained as described in the text; (b) TEM of the corresponding CS/AgNPs (insert: XRD of CS/AgNPs); (c) AFM of CS-modified GCE and (d) CS/AgNPs-modified GCE.
Figure 1
(a) UV-Vis spectrum of CS/AgNPs obtained as described in the text; (b) TEM of the corresponding CS/AgNPs (insert: XRD of CS/AgNPs); (c) AFM of CS-modified GCE and (d) CS/AgNPs-modified GCE.

The morphologies of CS-modified and CS/AgNPs-modified GCE were characterized by AFM (Fig. 1c and d, respectively). Fig. 1c shows a flat and homogeneous layer of CS, whereas Fig. 1d shows small dots corresponding to AgNPs. Fig. SI.2 shows the height profile of CS-modified and CS/AgNPs-modified GCE, consistent with the TEM picture. Fig. 1d also shows that AgNPs are evenly dispersed in the CS matrix.

The results confirmed the successful preparation of the CS/AgNPs layer. Chitosan plays the role of binder between AgNPs and the electrode surface to prevent their release, so that CS/AgNPs films can be stored for a long period and be stable in aqueous solutions.

3.2

3.2 Spectrometric assay for hydrogen peroxide detection

It is clearly shown that in situ growth of AgNPs in the chitosan matrix results in a strong absorption band at 425 nm (Fig. 2A, curve a), characteristic of surface plasmon absorption, responsible for the yellowish color. An obvious color fading was observed in the presence of H2O2, more pronounced for increased H2O2 concentration (Fig. 2B, insert). This behavior provides a potential for quantitative detection of H2O2. Fig. 2A shows the UV-vis absorption spectra of a CS/AgNPs solution in the presence of various amounts of H2O2. The color fading was attributed to the oxidation of AgNPs in the presence of H2O2, the standard potential of Ag+/Ag being lower than that of H2O2/H2O (E0Ag+/Ag = 0.8 V < E0H2O2/H2O = 1.77 V) in water at pH = 7. This reaction is described by Eq. (1) below. The detection mechanism is illustrated in Fig. 2C.

(1)
( CS ) Ag 0 + H 2 O 2 ( CS ) Ag + + 2 HO -
(A) UV-vis absorption spectra of CS/AgNPs hybrid solution in the presence of 0 (curve a), 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700, 750, 800, 850, 900, 950, 1000 and 1200 μM H2O2 and corresponding calibration curve (B) Plotting ΔA ∗ 100/A0 versus H2O2 concentration (ΔA = A0 − Ac with the following: A0 the absorbance at 425 nm without H2O2, and Ac the absorbance after adding H2O2 (insert: photographs of CS/AgNPs solutions in the presence of (a–h) 0, 200, 400, 600, 800, 900, 1000 and 1200 μM H2O2, respectively); (C) Possible detection mechanism of H2O2 by AgNPs using absorbance measurements at 425 nm.
Figure 2
(A) UV-vis absorption spectra of CS/AgNPs hybrid solution in the presence of 0 (curve a), 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700, 750, 800, 850, 900, 950, 1000 and 1200 μM H2O2 and corresponding calibration curve (B) Plotting ΔA ∗ 100/A0 versus H2O2 concentration (ΔA = A0 − Ac with the following: A0 the absorbance at 425 nm without H2O2, and Ac the absorbance after adding H2O2 (insert: photographs of CS/AgNPs solutions in the presence of (a–h) 0, 200, 400, 600, 800, 900, 1000 and 1200 μM H2O2, respectively); (C) Possible detection mechanism of H2O2 by AgNPs using absorbance measurements at 425 nm.

The reaction rate of Eq. (1) is very high and equilibrium constant of 1032.88; therefore, the concentration of Ag0 in the chitosan matrix ((CS)-Ag0 or CS-AgNPs) is depleted, which explain the fading of the CS/AgNPs solution when H2O2 is added. Therefore, the H2O2 concentration can be quantified by monitoring the decrease in the AgNPs surface plasmon resonance at 425 nm. A linear calibration was obtained by plotting 100 ∗ (A0 − Ac)/A0 versus H2O2 concentration (A0 is the absorbance at 425 nm without H2O2 and Ac the absorbance after adding H2O2) within a concentration range from 0 to 1200 μM (ordinate at origin = 3.7 ± 1.1; slope = 0.066 ± 0.002, R2 = 0.9927). The detection limit was estimated around 10 μM (Fig. 2B). For immediate and qualitative detection, this reaction can also be monitored by naked eyes. Our colorimetric strategy based on the peroxidase-like property of CS/AgNPs is comparable to the other methods reported in the recently published articles (Zhang et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2015; Chen et al., 2013; Ding et al., 2016; Li et al., 2016; Ge et al., 2015) (Table 1).

Table 1 Analytical performances of various nanomaterials-based H2O2 colorimetric sensors.
Materials Linear range Detection limit Ref.
Chitosan/silver nanoparticles hybrid (CS/AgNPs) 0–1.2 mM 10 μM This work
Prussian blue nanoparticles (PB NPs) 0.05–50 μM 0.03 μM Zhang et al. (2014)
Magnetic mesoporous silica nanoparticle (Fe3O4@MSN) 10–500 μM 10 μM Wang et al. (2015)
Co–Al layered double hydroxides (Co-Al LDH) 10–0.2 mM 10 μM Chen et al. (2013)
ZnS nanoparticles deposited on montmorillonite (ZnS-MMT) 70–600 μM 10.48 μM Ding et al. (2016)
Pd/Fe3O4-PEI-RGO nanohybrid 0.50–150 μM 0.1 μM Li et al. (2016)
PtPd porous nanorods (PtPd PNRs) 20 nM–50 mM 8.6 nM Ge et al. (2015)

The UV-vis absorption spectra of a CS/AgNPs solution in the presence of glucose, galactose and ascorbic acid at various concentrations are shown in Fig. SI.3. Only a small decrease in absorbance at 425 nm at high concentrations from 500 μM to 1 mM of glucose, galactose and ascorbic acid can be observed. These results demonstrate the good selectivity of out colorimetric sensor for hydrogen peroxide.

3.3

3.3 Electrochemical detection of hydrogen peroxide

3.3.1

3.3.1 Detection of H2O2 by cyclic voltammetry and square wave voltammetry

CVs of CS/AgNPs/GCE in PBS are shown in Fig. 3A. For Ar-saturated PBS without H2O2, no reduction peak was observed (Fig. 3A, curve a). On the contrary, when H2O2 was added, an increase in the reduction current at −0.7 V vs. SCE was observed, attributed to the electrocatalytic behavior of AgNPs to reduce H2O2 into water and dioxygen, as illustrated by Eq. (2); at a sufficiently reducing potential, dioxygen is in turn reduced into H2O2 on the electrode, as previously reported (Zhao et al., 2009; Šljukić et al., 2005; He et al., 2012; Flätgen et al., 1999; Wang et al., 2013) (Eq. (3)).

(2)
H 2 O 2 CS / AgNPs H 2 O + 1 2 O 2
(3)
1 2 O 2 + 2 e - + H 2 O Electrode H 2 O 2
(A) Cyclic voltammograms of CS/AgNPs-modified GCE as a function of H2O2 concentration from 0 to 1500 μM; (B) Cyclic voltammograms of CS/AgNPs-modified GCE in PBS in the presence of (a–c) 500 μM of Glucose (Glu), Galactose (Gal) and Ascorbic acid (AA), respectively; and (d) after adding 500 μM H2O2 in the same solution; (C) Possible detection mechanism of H2O2 by AgNPs using electrochemical method. All experiments were performed in Ar-saturated phosphate buffer (pH = 7.0) at a scan rate of 50 mV s−1. (C) Possible detection mechanism of H2O2 by AgNPs using cyclic voltammetry.
Figure 3
(A) Cyclic voltammograms of CS/AgNPs-modified GCE as a function of H2O2 concentration from 0 to 1500 μM; (B) Cyclic voltammograms of CS/AgNPs-modified GCE in PBS in the presence of (a–c) 500 μM of Glucose (Glu), Galactose (Gal) and Ascorbic acid (AA), respectively; and (d) after adding 500 μM H2O2 in the same solution; (C) Possible detection mechanism of H2O2 by AgNPs using electrochemical method. All experiments were performed in Ar-saturated phosphate buffer (pH = 7.0) at a scan rate of 50 mV s−1. (C) Possible detection mechanism of H2O2 by AgNPs using cyclic voltammetry.

CVs performed on the same electrode but without H2O2 did not present any peak reduction (Fig. 3B, curve a). Interferences were investigated; CVs stayed unchanged by adding 500 μM glucose (Glu) (Fig. 3B, curve b), galactose (Gal) (Fig. 3B, curve c) or ascorbic acid (AA) (Fig. 3B, curve d). Conversely, when 500 μM H2O2 was added, a strong reducing peak at −0.7 V was observed on the CV (Fig. 3B, curve e). These results clearly demonstrate that CS/AgNPs have specific catalytic behavior to reduce H2O2.

Square wave voltammetry (SWV) was also used. As shown in Fig. 4A, the peak current showed a linear relationship over a hydrogen peroxide concentration range from 100 μM to 1 mM; Ipeak (μA) = −500 [H2O2] − 179 (R2 = 0.9973). Fig. 4B, curve (i), shows the calibration curve obtained for H2O2; the detection limit was estimated around 50 μM. No dependency of the current with galactose (Gal), glucose (Glu) and ascorbic acid (AA) was identified, which demonstrates the specificity of the sensor for H2O2 (see Fig. SI.3 for the corresponding SWV spectra).

(A) SWV of a GCE modified by chitosan/silver nanoparticles (CS/AgNPs) hybrid recorded in Ar-saturated PBS (pH = 7.4, amplitude 25 mV, step height 5 mV, frequency 50 Hz) with various hydrogen peroxide concentrations; (B) Dependence of the reduction current intensity vs concentration of (i) H2O2; (ii) Galactose (Gal); (iii) Glucose (Glu); and (iv) Ascorbic Acid (AA).
Figure 4
(A) SWV of a GCE modified by chitosan/silver nanoparticles (CS/AgNPs) hybrid recorded in Ar-saturated PBS (pH = 7.4, amplitude 25 mV, step height 5 mV, frequency 50 Hz) with various hydrogen peroxide concentrations; (B) Dependence of the reduction current intensity vs concentration of (i) H2O2; (ii) Galactose (Gal); (iii) Glucose (Glu); and (iv) Ascorbic Acid (AA).

3.3.2

3.3.2 Detection of H2O2 by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy

Fig. 5A displays Nyquist plots acquired from a CS/AgNPs/GCE electrode before (a) and 30 s after (b−f) hydrogen peroxide (20 μM to 1.5 mM) was added in PBS. The impedance data were fitted with a Randles equivalent circuit (Fig. 5A, insert) in which the interfacial capacitance (Cdl) is in parallel with the diffusion impedance (W) and the charge transfer resistance (Rct). The fitting EIS data are given in Table SI.1. The double-layer being not a pure capacitor, we modeled it with a constant phase element. Y0 represents the capacitance Cdl and the parameter n determines the extent of the deviation from the pure capacitor model. When n = 1, the Cdl represents an ideal capacitor; for n = 0, it is a pure resistor. Here, n stays close to one. Without H2O2 in the medium, the resistivity of the film is larger than when H2O2 is present (Fig. 5A). The data reported in Table SI.1 clearly show that Rct decreased from 3940 to 694 Ω as the H2O2 concentration increased. Fig. 5B shows the linear relationship of ΔRctR = R0 − R, where R0 and R are the electron transfer resistances before and after hydrogen peroxide addition, respectively) with H2O2 concentration. The linear fit of these data gives Rct (kΩ) = (55.3 ± 0.7) − (15.3 ± 0.3) × log [H2O2] (R2 = 0.9976). The limit of detection was estimated around 5 μM.

(A) Nyquist plot of CS/AgNPs/GCE in PBS after adding different H2O2 concentrations. All measurements were performed in 0.1 M PBS solution, a frequency range from 0.1 Hz to 100 kHz, E = −0.5 V. Inset: Randles equivalent circuit used for data fitting; (B) Relationship between the Rct and H2O2 concentration.
Figure 5
(A) Nyquist plot of CS/AgNPs/GCE in PBS after adding different H2O2 concentrations. All measurements were performed in 0.1 M PBS solution, a frequency range from 0.1 Hz to 100 kHz, E = −0.5 V. Inset: Randles equivalent circuit used for data fitting; (B) Relationship between the Rct and H2O2 concentration.

4

4 Stability

Finally, for practical application, the reproducibility, repeatability and stability of the CS/AgNPs-based sensor are crucial. The CS/AgNPs/GCE reproducibility was studied in 20 μM H2O2 solution for five SWV measurements. The obtained relative standard deviation (RSD) was about 2.9%. Similarly, to observe the CS/AgNPs modified GCE repeatability, four independent CS/AgNPs/GCEs were used to determine 20 μM H2O2. The RSD was 3.2% using SWV measurements, which again reveals an excellent repeatability of the fabrication process.

The stability of the CS/AgNPs/GCEs was investigated as follows: after recording the peak current, the modified electrode was washed with distilled water and kept in argon-saturated phosphate buffer at 4 °C. It was founded that the intensity of the SWV measurements decreased of about 2.4% in 10 days, and 6.2% in 30 days. The excellent stability CS/AgNPs/GCE can be attributed to the good adhesion of CS/AgNPs, which allowed the materials to firmly attach on the electrode surface.

Conclusions

In this work, chitosan/silver nanoparticles (CS/AgNPs) hybrid has been synthesized by a green and facile procedure using chitosan as reducing and stabilizing reagent, leading to small (5–20 nm) silver nanoparticles. We have shown that a CS/AgNPs solution could be used for a colorimetric sensor for hydrogen peroxide detection. CS/AgNPs can also be used to functionalize GC electrodes and perform electrochemical measurements such as CV, SWV and EIS to determine the H2O2 concentration. These results indicated that the CS/AgNPs composite had excellent electrocatalytic activity toward H2O2 reduction and can be used to fabricate a non-enzymatic sensor with high sensitivity, selectivity, reproducibility and long-term stability. CS/AgNPs are easy to obtain even on a large scale and are very stable over up to one year if kept at temperatures lower than 10 °C. This makes the procedure very promising for the future development of non-enzymatic H2O2 sensors for environmental, food control, pharmaceutical or clinical analysis.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the Hanoi University of Science and Technology (HUST) (Project code: T2015-255) and Vietnam’s National Foundation for Science and Technology Development (NAFOSTED) with Project code 104.99-2016.23 for providing financial support.

References

  1. , , , , , . Analyst. 2012;137:49-58.
  2. , , , , , . J. Mater. Chem. B. 2013;1:2268-2274.
  3. , , , , , , , , . Mater. Sci. Eng., C. 2016;67:188-194.
  4. , , , . Talanta. 2001;55(2):403-413.
  5. , , , , , , , , , , , , . Biosen. Bioelectron.. 2014;55:294-300.
  6. , , , , , , , . Electrochim. Acta.. 1999;44:4499-4506.
  7. , , , , , . Luminescence. 2001;16(1):1-23.
  8. , , . RSC Adv.. 2015;5:24625-24634.
  9. , , , , , , , . Biosen. Bioelectron.. 2015;71:456-462.
  10. , , . Sens. Actuat. B Chem.. 2014;203:919-925.
  11. , , , . Langmuir. 2012;28:10266-10275.
  12. , , , , . RSC Adv.. 2014;4:49315-49323.
  13. , , , , . Sens. Actuat. B Chem.. 2014;192:310-316.
  14. , , , , . Electrochim. Acta.. 2015;153:62-67.
  15. , , . J. Electroanal. Chem.. 2014;727:184-190.
  16. , , , , . RSC Adv.. 2014;4:7944-7951.
  17. , , , , . Biosen. Bioelectron.. 2013;39(1):255-260.
  18. , , , , , , , . Dyes. Pigm.. 2016;125:64-71.
  19. , , , , , , . Analyst. 2011;136(10):2037-2039.
  20. , , , . Biosen. Bioelectron.. 2013;45:206-212.
  21. , , , , . Chem. Eng. J.. 2005;112:191-196.
  22. , , . Anal. Biochem.. 2002;300(2):245-251.
  23. , , , . J. Iran. Chem. Soc.. 2005;2(1):1-25.
  24. , , , . Talanta. 2010;80(5):1648-1652.
  25. , , . Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol.. 2008;81(4):422-426.
  26. , , , , . Chem. Commun.. 2014;50:3030-3032.
  27. , , , , , . Electrochim. Acta.. 2014;146:646-653.
  28. , , , , , , , . Colloids. Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp.. 2010;360:32-40.
  29. , , , , , , . Mater. Sci. Eng., C. 2011;31(2):477-485.
  30. , , , , . Sens. Lett.. 2016;14:32-38.
  31. , , , . Eur. J. Entomol.. 2011;108:481-485.
  32. , , , , , , . Talanta. 2013;107:146-153.
  33. , , , , , . Mater. Lett.. 2013;107:311-314.
  34. , , , , , . Talanta. 2015;134:712-717.
  35. , , , , , , , . Electrochem. Commun.. 2014;40:67-70.
  36. , , , , . RSC Adv.. 2013;3:14303-14307.
  37. , , , , , , , , . Nanoscale. 2013;5(5):1816-1819.
  38. , , , , , , . Electrochim. Acta.. 2013;90:550-555.
  39. , , , . Talanta. 2014;120:362-367.
  40. , , , , , , , , , , . Talanta. 2009;80:1029-1033.
  41. , , , , . Electrochem. Commun.. 2013;27:1-4.
  42. , , , , , , , . Electrochim. Acta.. 2013;89:222-228.
  43. , , , , , . Anal. Chim. Acta.. 2012;757:56-62.
  44. , , , , , . Biosen. Bioelectron.. 2007;22(8):1600-1604.

Appendix A

Supplementary material

Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2016.08.007.

Appendix A

Supplementary material

Supplementary data 1

Supplementary data 1

Show Sections