10.8
CiteScore
 
5.3
Impact Factor
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Corrigendum
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Full Length Article
Full lenth article
Letter to Editor
Original Article
Research article
Retraction notice
Review
Review Article
SPECIAL ISSUE: ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY
10.8
CiteScore
5.3
Impact Factor
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Corrigendum
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Full Length Article
Full lenth article
Letter to Editor
Original Article
Research article
Retraction notice
Review
Review Article
SPECIAL ISSUE: ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original article
10 (
1_suppl
); S691-S699
doi:
10.1016/j.arabjc.2012.11.010

Excess thermodynamic parameters for binary and ternary mixtures of {1-butanol (1) + cyclohexylamine (2) + n-heptane (3)} at different temperatures: A theoretical study

Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Malayer University, Malayer, Iran
Thermodynamics Research Laboratory, University of Kashan, Kashan, Iran

⁎Corresponding author. Tel.: +98 8513339843. mrsameti@gmail.com (M. Rezaei-Sameti)

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Elsevier and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Peer review under responsibility of the King Saud University.

Abstract

In this work, we used the experimental data of Kijevcanin et al. for determining the excess thermodynamic parameters such as excess thermal expansion coefficients αE, isothermal coefficient of pressure excess molar enthalpy ( H m E / P ) T and excess partial molar volumes V ¯ m,i E for the binary and ternary mixtures formed by {1-butanol + cyclohexylamine + n-heptanes} at (288.15–323.15) K. The αE values, for 1-butanol + cyclohexylamine are S-shaped and for 1-butanol + n-heptane are positive and for cyclohexylamine + n-heptane are negative over the mole fraction range. The ( H m E / P ) T values, for 1-butanol + cyclohexylamine are S-shaped and for binary mixture of 1-butanol + n-heptane are negative and for binary mixture of cyclohexylamine + n-heptane are positive over the mole fraction. The values of αE and ( H m E / P ) T are calculated by using the Flory theory, the results show a good agreement with experimental data. The values of αE and ( H m E / P ) T for ternary mixture {1-butanol + cyclohexylamine + n-heptanes} are determined and the experimental data are correlated as a function of the mole fraction by using the equations of Cibulka, Jasinski and Malanowski, Singe et al., Pintos et al., Calvo et al., Kohler, and Jacob–Fitzner. The results show that the Calvo et al. equation is better than others.

Keywords

Excess thermal expansion coefficients
Isothermal coefficient of pressure excess molar enthalpy
Flory theory
Temperature
1

1 Introduction

This paper is a continuation of our earlier work related to the study of thermodynamic properties of binary and ternary mixtures of different groups of organic compounds (Rezaei-Sameti et al., 2009; Rezaei-Sameti and Iloukhani, 2009; Iloukhani et al., 2005, 2006; Iloukhani and Rezaei-Sameti, 2005a,b). Excess thermodynamic properties of mixtures are useful in the study of molecular interactions and arrangements. In the recent years, measurements of thermodynamic and transport properties have been adequately employed in understanding the nature of molecular systems and physicochemical behavior in liquid mixtures. The non-rectilinear behavior of the above mentioned properties of liquid mixtures with changing mole fractions is attributed to the difference in size of the molecules and strength of interactions (Henni et al., 2005; Domiınguez et al., 2000; Lj Kijevcanin et al., 2009).

In this work we used the experimental data of Kijevcanin et al. for binary and ternary mixtures formed by 1-butanol + cyclohexylamine + n-heptane at (288.15–323.15) K for calculating thermal expansion coefficients, α, excess thermal expansion coefficients, αE, and isothermal coefficient of pressure excess molar enthalpy, ( H m E / P ) T . The values of αE and ( H m E / P ) T for binary mixtures are calculated by using the Flory theory. All excess parameters for binary mixtures have been fitted by Redlich–Kister (Redlich and Kister, 1948).

and the ternary mixture has been fitted by the Cibulka (Domiınguez et al., 2000), Jasinski and Malanowski (Domiınguez et al., 2000), Singe et al. (Domiınguez et al., 2000), Pintos et al. (Domiınguez et al., 2000), Calvo et al. (Domiınguez et al., 2000), Kohler (Domiınguez et al., 2000), and Jacob–Fitzner (Domiınguez et al., 2000), equations to determine the deviation between experimental and theoretical values.

2

2 Results and discussion

The experimental data are given at various temperatures (288.15–323.15 K) and the results are fitted by the Redlish–Kister (Redlich and Kister, 1948) equation of temperature-dependence:

(1)
Y E = x i x j p = 0 n B p ( x i - x j ) p where Y ≡ (VE, αE, ( H m E / P ) T, x ), xi and xj are the mole fraction; B is the fitting parameter; and n is the degree of the polynomial expansion. For excess molar volume, B is the temperature-dependent parameter as expressed in Eq. (2):
(2)
B p = q = 0 2 A pq T q

These parameters were obtained by the unweighted least-squares method. The parameters Apq for all the binary mixtures are listed in Table 2.

Table 2 Coefficients Apq of Eq. (2) and standard deviations for the fits of the binary excess molar volumes, excess thermal expansion coefficients and isothermal coefficient of pressure excess molar enthalpy in the temperatures range (288.15–323.15) K.
q 0 1 2 3 4 σ ( V m E )
p
0 9.5 × 10−1 −3.5 × 10−2 5.0 × 10−4 3.2 −1.0 × 10−3 5.0 × 10−3
1 7.1 × 10−6 −4.0 4.5 × 10−2 −1.0 × 10−4 2.5
2 −2.1 × 10−2 4.0 × 10−5 31.2 −2.1 × 10−1 4.0 × 10−4
{1-Butanol (1) + n-heptane (2)}
0 16.4 −1.2 × 10−1 2.0 × 10−4 2.1 −1.9 × 10−2 4.0 × 10−3
1 5.0 × 10−5 10.3 −6.1 × 10−2 1.0 × 10−4 16.5
2 −0.1260 2.0 × 10−4 16.9 −1.3 × 10−1 3.0 × 10−4
{Cyclohexylamine (1) + n-heptane (2)}
0 −1.2 2.6 × 10−2 −1.0 × 10−4 −2.6 1.9 × 10−2 2.0 × 10−3
1 −3.0 × 10−5 5.9 −3.2 × 10−2 4.0 × 10−5 5.8
2 −4.0 × 10−2 1.0 × 10−4 7.1 −4.0 × 10−2 1.0 × 10−4
p σ(αE)
{1-Butanol (1) + cyclohexylamine(2)}
0 −4.0 × 10−5 1.6 × 10−6 8.6 × 10−10 −2.0 × 10−4 6.9 × 10−7 8.7 × 10−8
1 −8.3 × 10−10 6.0 × 10−4 −3.3 × 10−6 2.7 × 10−9 −1.0 × 10−4
2 8.4 × 10−7 −9.3 × 10−10 −4.0 × 10−4 1.0 × 10−5 −1.0 × 10−8
{1-Butanol (1) + n-heptane (2)}
0 −1.6 × 10−3 −7.8 × 10−6 −7.2 × 10−9 −4.5 × 10−6 −5.3 × 10−7 1.7 × 10−7
1 −1.1 × 10−9 −7.0 × 10−4 2.9 × 10−6 −2.1 × 10−9 −1.2 × 10−3
2 −6.5 × 10−6 −6.4 × 10−9 −1.5 × 10−3 8.1 × 10−6 −8.0 × 10−9
{Cyclohexylamine (1) + n-heptane (2)}
0 2.6 × 10−3 −1.6 × 10−5 2.3 × 10−8 −6.8 × 10−4 4.5 × 10−6 5.3 × 10−6
1 −7.4 × 10−7 −3.2 × 10−3 1.8 × 10−5 −2.7 × 10−8 −3.2 × 10−3
2 1.9 × 10−5 −2.7 × 10−8 2.6 × 10−3 −1.6 × 10−5 −2.6 × 10−8
p σ ( ( H m E / P ) T, x )
{1-Butanol (1) + cyclohexylamine (2)}
0 8.9 × 10−1 4.0 × 10−4 −5.1 × 10−5 2.4 5.5 × 10−3 5.0 × 10−3
1 −1.6 × 10−5 −5.9 1.1 × 10−2 7.8 × 10−5 2.5
2 −2.2 × 10−4 −3.9 × 10−4 35.4 −2.6 × 10−2 −3.3 × 10−3
{1-Butanol (1) + n-heptane (2)}
0 16.2 1.4 × 10−3 −2.3 × 10−4 2.2 −6.6 × 10−4 4.0 × 10−3
1 −4.9 × 10−5 10.6 −1.9 × 10−3 −8.7 × 10−5 17.3
2 −5.1 × 10−3 −2.2 × 10−3 17.9 −6.8 × 10−3 −2.6 × 10−4
{Cyclohexylamine (1) + n-heptane (2)}
0 −9.3 × 10−1 −1.8 × 10−3 6.4 × 10−4 −1.5 −7.7 × 10−3 1.8 × 10−3
1 4.2 × 10−5 1.7 2.7 × 10−2 −9.0 × 10−5 3.1
2 1.8 × 10−2 −9.6 × 10−5 13.8 −4.4 × 10−2 −3.5 × 10−6

In the ternary mixture the excess molar volumes, VE excess thermal expansion coefficients, αE, and isothermal coefficient of pressure excess molar enthalpy, ( H m E / P ) T, were fitted with the following temperature-dependant equations:

  1. Cibulka equation:

    (3)
    Y ijk E = Y m,bin E + x 1 x 2 x 3 ( M 0 + M 1 x 1 + M 2 x 2 )

  2. Jasinski and Malonowski equation:

    (4)
    Y ijk E = Y m,bin E + x 1 x 2 x 3 ( M 0 + M 1 ( 2 x 1 - 1 ) + M 2 ( 2 x 1 - 1 ) 2 )

  3. Singe et al. equation:

    (5)
    Y ijk E = Y m,bin E + x 1 x 2 x 3 ( M 0 + M 1 x 1 ( x 2 - x 3 ) + M 2 x 1 2 ( x 2 - x 3 ) 2 )

  4. Pintos et al. equation:

    (6)
    Y ijk E = Y m,bin E + x 1 x 2 x 3 ( M 0 + M 1 ( x 1 2 + 2 x 1 x 2 - 1 ) + M 2 ( x 1 2 + 2 x 1 x 2 - 1 ) 2 )

  5. Calvo et al. equation:

    (7)
    Y ijk E = Y m,bin E + x 1 x 2 x 3 ( M 0 + M 1 ( 2 x 1 + 2 x 2 - 1 ) + M 2 ( 2 x 1 + 2 x 2 - 1 ) 2 ) where Y m,bin E are the contributions of binary mixture (i, j)
    (8)
    Y m,bin E = Y m, 12 E + Y m, 13 , E + Y m, 23 E
    Every Mi ternary parameter is a function of temperature as expressed in Eqs. (6)–(8):
    (9)
    M i = q = 0 2 B iq T q
    The parameters Biq for the ternary mixture are listed in Tables 3–5 along with the standard deviation σ. Among the semi-empirical equations used to predict, VE, αE and ( H m E / P ) T, for the studied system, the best for prediction were those of the Calvo equation, and other semi-empirical equations erred significantly. Thus, it is up to the design engineer to consider, the advantages of relying on these relations for the description of these properties as continuous models for the whole range of ternary compositions.

Table 3 Coefficients Ciq of Eq (9) and standard deviations for the fits of the ternary excess molar volumes in the temperatures range (288.15–323.15) K.
q i σ ( V m E )
0 1 2
Cibulka equation
{1-Butanol (1) + cyclohexylamine (2) + n-heptane (3)}
0 −9.7 5.9 × 10−3 −7.1 × 10−5
1 −52.6 4.1 × 10−1 −6.9 × 10−4 0.05
2 1.8 × 10−2 2.5 × 10−4 −4.5 × 10−7
Jasinski equation
{1-Butanol (1) + cyclohexylamine (2) + n-heptane (3)}
0 −36.2 2.1 × 10−1 −4.2 × 10−4
1 −21.2 1.7 × 10−1 −3.0 × 10−4 0.06
2 8.9 −5.2 × 10−2 6.3 × 10−5
Singe equation
{1-Butanol (1) + cyclohexylamine (2) + n-heptane (3)}
0 −27.3 1.4 × 10−1 −3.0 × 10−4
1 10.7 6.2 × 10−2 2.0 × 10−5 0.05
2 2.4 −1.9 × 10−2 2.6 × 10−5
Calvo equation
{1-Butanol (1) + cyclohexylamine (2) + n-heptane (3)}
0 −24.3 1.1 × 10−1 −2.4 × 10−4
1 −10.1 1.7 × 10−1 −2.9 × 10−4 0.01
2 8.1 −1.3 × 10−1 2.5 × 10−4
Pintos equation
{1-Butanol (1) + cyclohexylamine (2) + n-heptane (3)}
0 −48.9 3.3 × 10−1 −6.0 × 10−4
1 −33.7 2.8 × 10−1 −4.6 × 10−4 0.05
2 1.4 × 10−1 −1.2 × 10−4 1.3 × 10−7
Table 4 Coefficients Ciq of Eq. (9) and standard deviations for the fits of the ternary excess thermal expansion coefficients in the temperatures range (288.15–323.15) K.
q i σ(αE)
0 1 2
Cibulka equation
{1-Butanol (1) + cyclohexylamine (2) + n-heptane (3)}
0 −6.9 × 10−2 3.0 × 10−4 −6.6 × 10−7
1 1.0 × 10−1 −4.8 × 10−4 9.7 × 10−9 0.0003
2 −1.8 × 10−4 1.3 × 10−6 −1.8 × 10−9
Jasinski equation
{1-Butanol (1) + cyclohexylamine (2) + n-heptane (3)}
0 −1.4 × 10−2 5.9 × 10−5 1.6 × 10−7
1 −1.3 × 10−2 5.6 × 10−5 −1.3 × 10−7 0.0002
2 −1.1 × 10−1 5.3 × 10−4 −1.1 × 10−6
Singe equation
{1-Butanol (1) + cyclohexylamine (2) + n-heptane (3)}
0 −4.0 × 10−2 1.8 × 10−4 4.0 × 10−7
1 1.5 × 10−1 −5.4 × 10−4 1.3 × 10−6 0.0002
2 −6.5 × 10−5 −5.4 × 10−6 −4.5 × 10−9
Calvo equation
{1-Butanol (1) + cyclohexylamine (2) + n-heptane (3)}
0 −5.8 × 10−2 2.5 × 10−4 −5.6 × 10−7
1 9.9 × 10−2 −3.6 × 10−4 8.9 × 10−7 0.0001
2 −6.8 × 10−2 2.4 × 10−4 −6.1 × 10−7
Pintos equation
1-Butanol (1) + cyclohexylamine (2) + n-heptane (3)}
0 1.3 × 10−2 −5.1 × 10−5 8.7 × 10−8
1 5.1 × 10−2 −2.0 × 10−4 4.5 × 10−7 0.0002
2 −7.2 × 10−4 3.5 × 10−6 −6.8 × 10−9
Table 5 Coefficients Ciq of Eq. (9) and standard deviations for the fits of the ternary isothermal coefficient of pressure excess molar enthalpies in the temperatures range (288.15–323.15) K.
q i σ ( ( H m E / P ) T )
0 1 2
Cibulka equation
{1-Butanol (1) + cyclohexylamine (2) + n-heptane (3)}
0 −8.8 −4.0 × 10−1 1.2 × 10−3
1 −53.3 5.7 × 10−1 −1.0 × 10−3 0.05
2 1.0 × 10−1 −1.1 × 10−3 4.2 × 10−6
Jasinski equation
{1-Butanol (1) + cyclohexylamine (2) + n-heptane (3) }
0 −35.3 −1.2 × 10−1 7.3 × 10−4
1 −26.6 2.8 × 10−1 -5.0 × 10−4 0.08
2 3.1 −3.9 × 10−2 1.1 × 10−4
Singe equation
{1-Butanol (1) + cyclohexylamine (2) + n-heptane (3)}
0 −26.6 −2.2 × 10−1 9.2 × 10−4
1 25.9 −6.8 × 10−2 3.3 × 10−4 0.08
2 3.6 −2.4 × 10−2 4.7 × 10−5
Calvo equation
{1-Butanol (1) + cyclohexylamine (2) + n-heptane (3)}
0 −24.5 −2.6 × 10−1 9.8 × 10−4
1 −8.2 1.9 × 10−1 −3.4 × 10−4 0.04
2 12.3 −1.8 × 10−1 4.0 × 10−4
Pintos equation
{1-Butanol (1) + cyclohexylamine (2) + n-heptane (3)}
0 −45.5 4.7 × 10−3 5.6 × 10−4
1 −29.3 3.2 × 10−1 −4.4 × 10−4 0.06
2 5.9 × 10−2 −1.1 × 10−3 3.7 × 10−6

2.1

2.1 Thermal expansion coefficient and their excess values

The temperature dependence of density of the pure components was fitted to the equation:

(10)
ρ ( T ) / g cm - 3 = i = 0 4 a i T i

The parameters ai for the pure components are listed in Table 6. The thermal expansion coefficient, α, as in the case of pure components was obtained by analytical differentiation of the density fitting equation:

(11)
α = - ρ - 1 ( ρ / T ) P
Table 6 Coefficients ai of Eq. (10) of the pure components densities in the temperature range (288.15–323.15 K).
Component a0 a1 a2 a3 a4
1-Butanol −3.9 × 10−1 1.8 × 10−2 −9.4 × 10−5 2.1 × 10−7 −1.7 × 10−7
Cyclohexylamine 1.6 −7.0 × 10−3 3.2 × 10−5 −7.1 × 10−8 5.7 × 10−11
n-Heptane 1.7 −1.1 × 10−2 5.0 × 10−5 −1.1 × 10−7 8.6 × 10−11

The thermal expansion coefficients of pure components at different temperatures are presented in Table 1. The basic expression relating the molar volume of a mixture and its excess molar volume is, in accordance with the Eq. (1):

(12)
V = i = 1 N x i V i + V m E where Vi and xi correspond to the molar volume and to the mole fraction concentration of component i. By differentiating Eq. (12) and dividing by V and reversing the order of terms:
(13)
α = 1 / V V m E / T P , x i + i = 1 N ( x i V i ) / T
Table 1 Flory and related parameters of pure components at (288.15–323.15) K.
T/K 104 α/K−1 ρ/g cm−3 V/(cm3 mol−1) T/K v ̃ T ̃
1-Butanol
288.15 9.298 0.813373 74.296 5423.666 1.226 0.053
298.15 9.403 0.809573 74.313 5427.915 1.232 0.054
298.15 9.504 0.805762 74.336 5434.213 1.237 0.054
303.15 9.609 0.801923 74.360 5440.291 1.243 0.055
308.15 9.724 0.798053 74.376 5444.098 1.248 0.056
313.15 9.857 0.794147 74.375 5443.756 1.254 0.057
318.15 10.013 0.790231 74.348 5437.737 1.261 0.058
323.15 10.201 0.786238 74.290 5424.401 1.269 0.059
Cyclohexylamine
288.15 10.439 0.871290 91.099 5080.063 1.249 0.056
298.15 10.478 0.866747 91.259 5109.430 1.253 0.057
298.15 10.524 0.862207 91.414 5137.278 1.258 0.058
303.15 10.574 0.857671 91.565 5164.096 1.262 0.058
308.15 10.627 0.853138 91.716 5190.462 1.267 0.059
313.15 10.681 0.848607 91.870 5216.903 1.272 0.060
318.15 10.733 0.844073 92.031 5243.871 1.276 0.060
323.15 10.782 0.839547 92.201 5271.949 1.281 0.061
n-Heptane
288.15 12.249 0.687954 113.426 4670.356 1.284 0.061
298.15 12.372 0.683733 113.574 4687.364 1.290 0.063
298.15 12.512 0.679494 113.703 4701.826 1.297 0.063
303.15 12.666 0.675229 113.820 4714.529 1.303 0.064
308.15 12.830 0.670941 113.931 4726.326 1.310 0.065
313.15 13.001 0.666621 114.043 4737.890 1.318 0.066
318.15 13.175 0.662273 114.163 4749.926 1.325 0.067
323.15 13.349 0.657896 114.297 4763.044 1.332 0.068

From this expression, the excess thermal expansion coefficient can be rewritten as:

(14)
α E = α - i = 1 n ϕ i α i where
(15)
φ i = x i V i / i = 1 2 x i V i
and ϕi is the volumetric fraction of the components of the mixture. This property can be described as the variation of density with temperature due to the no ideality of the mixture. The thermal expansion coefficient α, and excess thermal expansion coefficient αE are for all binary mixtures recorded in Supplementary Tables and graphically represented in Fig. 1. The excess thermal expansions coefficient αE, for {1-butanol  + cyclohexylamine} at temperatures 288.15–323.15 K are S-shaped and it is positive in the 1-butanol rich-region and increase with increasing temperatures from (288.15 to 323.15) K. The excess thermal expansion coefficients, αE, are positive over the mole fraction range for the binary mixture of {1-butanol + n-heptane} and increase with increasing temperatures from (288.15 to 323.15) K and negative over the mole fraction range for a binary mixture of {cyclohexylamine + n-heptane} and decrease with increasing temperatures from (288.15 to 323.15) K. Positive values of αE due to self-association of components in the mixtures, and the components of mixture are strongly associated in the pure state and in mixtures. Negative values of αE reflected the association of components in the mixtures and are strongly associated in the mixtures. Thermal expansions’ coefficient is related to the fluctuation of cross term of enthalpy interaction and interaction volume of liquids and mixtures. The excess amount may reflect the molecular orientation and packing of mixtures. Molecular orientation effects are ascribed to the shapes of molecules for nonpolar solvents and dipole moments, higher multipole moments, and special interactions such as hydrogen bonds for polar solvents.
Plot of excess thermal expansion coefficients αE against mole fraction for {(a01); 1-butanol + cyclohexylamine, (a02); 1-butanol + n-heptane, (a03); cyclohexylamine + n-heptane} at 288.15 K (■), 293.15 K (□), 298.15 K (●), 303.15 K (○), 308.15 K (▴), 313.15 K (△), 318.15 K (♢), 323.15 K (♦).
Figure 1
Plot of excess thermal expansion coefficients αE against mole fraction for {(a01); 1-butanol + cyclohexylamine, (a02); 1-butanol + n-heptane, (a03); cyclohexylamine + n-heptane} at 288.15 K (■), 293.15 K (□), 298.15 K (●), 303.15 K (○), 308.15 K (▴), 313.15 K (△), 318.15 K (♢), 323.15 K (♦).

2.2

2.2 Isothermal coefficient of pressure excess molar enthalpy

The isothermal coefficient of pressure excess molar enthalpy can be derived accurately from volumetric measurements by application of the following expression:

(16)
( H m E / P ) T , x = V m E - T ( V m E / T ) P , x

This quantity represents the dependence of the excess molar enthalpy of mixing with pressure at fixed composition and temperature. The isothermal coefficient of pressure excess molar enthalpy, ( H m E / P ) T , for all binary mixtures is recorded in Supplementary Tables and graphically represented in Fig. 2. The isothermal coefficient of pressure excess molar enthalpy, ( H m E / P ) T , for binary mixture {1-butanol + cyclohexylamine} is S-shaped and dependence on composition with negative values in the 1-butanol rich-region decrease with increasing temperatures from (288.15 to 323.15) K. The values of, ( H m E / P ) T , are negative over the mole fraction range for binary mixture of {1-butanol + n-heptane} and decrease with increasing temperatures from (288.15 to 323.15) K. The ( H m E / P ) T values are positive over the mole fraction range for a binary mixture of {cyclohexylamine + n-heptane} and increase with increasing temperatures from 288.15 to 323.15 K. The values of ( H m E / P ) T for all binary mixtures are due to the presence of significant interactions between solvents in these mixtures. With increasing temperature the interactions of molecular mixtures increased and so the ( H m E / P ) T, x values are more negative.

Plot of isothermal coefficient of pressure excess molar enthalpy ( ∂ H m E / ∂ P ) T , against mole fraction for {(a11);1-butanol + cyclohexylamine, (a12); 1-butanol + n-heptane, (a13); cyclohexylamine + n-heptane} at 288.15 K (♦), 293.15 K (■), 298.15 K (▴), 303.15 K (×), 308.15 K (△), 313.15 K (●), 318.15 K (○), 323.15 K (□).
Figure 2
Plot of isothermal coefficient of pressure excess molar enthalpy ( H m E / P ) T , against mole fraction for {(a11);1-butanol + cyclohexylamine, (a12); 1-butanol + n-heptane, (a13); cyclohexylamine + n-heptane} at 288.15 K (♦), 293.15 K (■), 298.15 K (▴), 303.15 K (×), 308.15 K (△), 313.15 K (●), 318.15 K (○), 323.15 K (□).

2.3

2.3 Excess partial molar volume

The excess partial molar volumes, V ¯ m,i E , of a component in a binary mixture can be determined from excess molar volume data using,

(17)
V ¯ m,i E = V m E + ( 1 - x ) V m E x i P , T The excess partial molar volumes of V ¯ m,1 E and V ¯ m,2 E for all compositions can be calculated by using the Redlich–Kister coefficients, Apq (Table 3) in Eq. (1). Results of excess partial molar volumes for all binary mixtures are also listed in Supplementary Tables and graphically represented in Fig. 3. The excess partial molar volumes V i E for all binary mixtures in this study show that with increasing mole fraction of one component, the V i E values are increased. In the above binary mixtures, expansions in volume are due to a decrease in the molecular order in the lattice. With increasing of the mole fraction of one component in the mixtures the possibility of electron donor–acceptor type (or charge-transfer) interactions between the mixture’s components is decreased, so the V i E values are increased.
Plot of excess partial molar volume V ¯ m,i E , against mole fraction for {(a21);1-butanol + cyclohexylamine, (a22); 1-butanol + n-heptane, (a23); cyclohexylamine + n-heptane } at 288.15 K (■), 293.15 K (□), 298.15 K (●), 303.15 K (○), 308.15 K (▴), 313.15 K (△), 318.15 K (♢), 323.15 K (♦).
Figure 3
Plot of excess partial molar volume V ¯ m,i E , against mole fraction for {(a21);1-butanol + cyclohexylamine, (a22); 1-butanol + n-heptane, (a23); cyclohexylamine + n-heptane } at 288.15 K (■), 293.15 K (□), 298.15 K (●), 303.15 K (○), 308.15 K (▴), 313.15 K (△), 318.15 K (♢), 323.15 K (♦).

3

3 The Flory theory

The Flory (Flory, 1965, 1970; Flory et al., 1964a,b; Prigogine, 1957; Van and Patterson, 1982; Abe and Flory, 1965) model has been commonly employed to analyze the molar volume of the mixture and the excess molar volume parting from the equation of the state in a function of the reduced variables:

(18)
P ̃ v ̃ T ̃ = v ̃ 1 3 v ̃ 1 3 - 1 - 1 v ̃ T ̃ where
(19)
v ̃ = V V = 1 + 4 3 α T ( 1 + α T ) 3
(20)
T ̃ = T T = v ̃ 1 3 - 1 ( v ̃ 4 3 )

Theoretical values of V m E T were calculated from the Flory theory using:

(21)
T V m E T = i = 1 2 x i V i T ̃ v ̃ T - i = 1 2 x i V i T ̃ v ̃ T i where
(22)
T ̃ v ̃ T ̃ = v ̃ 1 - v ̃ - 1 3 [ 4 3 v ̃ - 1 3 - 1 ]

In the present study the value of the reduced volume for the liquids and their mixtures v was determined for α value of the mixtures using the Eq. (19). Table 1 shows the data used in the application of the Flory model. The excess function [ V m E T ] P was computed by analytical differentiation of the Eq. (1) at (288.15–323.15 K) and V m E of this work. we have also obtained isothermal coefficient of pressure excess molar enthalpy, ( H m E / P ) T , and excess thermal expansions coefficient αE, according to the Eqs. ()()()()()(18)–(22). Values of the isothermal coefficient of pressure excess molar enthalpy, ( H m E / P ) T ,and excess thermal expansions coefficient αE, for binary mixtures are reported in the supplementary data and are represented in Figs. 4 and 5. The results show a good agreement between experimental and theoretical values.

Plot of excess thermal expansion coefficients αE, against mole fraction for {(a31);1-butanol + cyclohexylamine, (a32); 1-butanol + n-heptane, (a33); cyclohexylamine + n-heptane } 323.15 K. (o) Experimental; (……) calculated by using Flory theory.
Figure 4
Plot of excess thermal expansion coefficients αE, against mole fraction for {(a31);1-butanol + cyclohexylamine, (a32); 1-butanol + n-heptane, (a33); cyclohexylamine + n-heptane } 323.15 K. (o) Experimental; (……) calculated by using Flory theory.
Plot of isothermal coefficient of pressure excess molar enthalpy ( ∂ H m E / ∂ P ) T , against mole fraction for {(a41);1-butanol + cyclohexylamine, (a42); 1-butanol + n-heptane, (a43); cyclohexylamine + n-heptane} 323.15 K. (o) Experimental; (……) calculated by using the Flory theory.
Figure 5
Plot of isothermal coefficient of pressure excess molar enthalpy ( H m E / P ) T , against mole fraction for {(a41);1-butanol + cyclohexylamine, (a42); 1-butanol + n-heptane, (a43); cyclohexylamine + n-heptane} 323.15 K. (o) Experimental; (……) calculated by using the Flory theory.

4

4 Conclusion

In this work thermal expansion coefficients α, their excess values αE, isothermal coefficient of pressure excess molar enthalpy ( H m E / P ) T , partial molar volumes V i and excess partial molar volumes V i E , were calculated from experimental densities. The results shown that: The diagrams αE and ( H m E / P ) T for binary mixture {1-butanol + cyclohexylamine} are S-shaped and those values for other binary mixtures are positive or negative over the whole mole fraction due to the presence of significant interactions between solvents in these mixtures. This study shows that, the V i E values increase with increasing mole fraction of one component. In the above binary mixtures, expansions in volume and changes in other calculated parameters are due to a decrease in the molecular order in the lattice. Among the semi-empirical equations used to predict, VE, αE and ( H m E / P ) T, for the studied system, the best for prediction were those of the Calvo equation, and other semi-empirical equations erred significantly. The comparison between the experimental and Flory theories shows a good agreement.

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to thank the Malayer University for providing the necessary facilities to carry out the research.

References

  1. , , . J. Am. Chem. Soc.. 1965;87:1838.
  2. , , , , , . J. Chem. Thermodyn.. 2000;32:1551.
  3. , . J. Am. Chem. Soc.. 1965;87:1833.
  4. , . Discuss. Faraday Soc.. 1970;49:7.
  5. , , , . J. Am. Chem. Soc.. 1964;86:3507.
  6. , , , . J. Am. Chem. Soc.. 1964;86:3515.
  7. , , , . J. Chem. Eng. Data. 2005;50:1038.
  8. , , . J. Chem. Eng. Data. 2005;50:1928.
  9. , , . J. Chem. Thermodyn.. 2005;37:1151.
  10. , , , . Thermochim. Acta. 2005;438:9.
  11. , , , . J. Chem. Thermodyn.. 2006;38:975.
  12. , , , , , . Thermochim. Acta. 2009;496:71.
  13. , . The Molecular Theory of Solution. Amsterdam: North Holland; .
  14. , , . Ind. Eng. Chem.. 1948;40:345.
  15. , , . Monatsh. Chem.. 2009;140:451.
  16. , , , . J. Mol. Liq.. 2009;149:96.
  17. , , . J. Solution Chem.. 1982;11:793.
Show Sections