Translate this page into:
Role of heterojunction ZrTiO4/ZrTi2O6/TiO2 photocatalyst towards the degradation of paraquat dichloride and optimization study by Box–Behnken design
⁎Corresponding author. Tel.: +60 197114144. rusmidah@kimia.fs.utm.my (Rusmidah Ali),
-
Received: ,
Accepted: ,
This article was originally published by Elsevier and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.
Abstract
This study revealed that the existence of heterojunction of ZrTiO4/ZrTi2O6/TiO2 in the photocatalyst system has significantly enhanced the photodegradation of paraquat dichloride with respect to the increment of it thermal stability as shown in the XRD and XPS analyses. Several parameters such as ZrO2/TiO2 ratios (10:90, 20:80 and 30:70) and catalyst dosage (0.1–0.4 g) have been studied to achieve the optimum degradation of paraquat dichloride. The kinetic study was determined by using various ZrO2/TiO2 ratios calcined at 750 °C and showed that the photodegradation of paraquat over ZrO2/TiO2 photocatalyst follows a pseudo first-order kinetic. The optimum condition was obtained using ZrO2/TiO2 (20:80), calcined at 750 °C and with 0.3 g catalyst dosage which gave 84.41% degradation after 240 min under UV irradiation, λUV = 365 nm. The N2 adsorption–desorption analysis shows the mixture of Type III and IV isotherms with hysteresis loop type H2(b). Meanwhile, the Box–Behnken design showed the optimum photodegradation of paraquat was obtained at the calcination temperature of 750 °C, with the ZrO2/TiO2 ratio of 20:80 and 0.3 g catalyst dosage which was 0.24% lower than our experimental verification result.
Keywords
Photocatalyst
Paraquat dichloride
Zirconia
Titania
Box Behnken design
1 Introduction
An agricultural pesticide which contains hazardous organic compounds has led to the main environmental problem due to toxic properties and non-biodegradable properties of the compound in water. Paraquat dichloride (1,1-dimethyl-4,4′-bipyridylium dichloride) is common herbicide that was widely used in developed country due to the great feature such as high solubility in water and high binding potential. However, it may cause severe health problems to human such as Parkinson’s disease and dysfunction of kidney (Dhaouadi and Adhoum, 2009; Sorolla et al., 2012). Therefore, the degradation or removal of paraquat dichloride from water has become matter of paramount important.
Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) employing heterogeneous catalysts have been used extensively for various types of degradation of organic pollutants in water. This is due to the ability of the catalyst to generate a strongly oxidizing hydroxyl radical with high oxidative power of Eo = 2.8 eV and thus acts to degrade various organic pollutants. Among the semiconductor photocatalyst used, titania (TiO2) has been promoted as a potential photocatalyst that can be used for the degradation of the paraquat dichloride due to the ability to completely oxidize a large number of hazardous organic pollutants to non-toxic products (Madani et al., 2015; Santos et al., 2011).
According to the previous research, degradation of paraquat using commercial TiO2 has shown only 17% of paraquat degradation after 4 h under UV irradiation (Lee et al., 2002). Nevertheless, doping or coupling of TiO2 with other metal oxides shows synergic effect and had increased the percentage degradation of the organic pollutant. This might be due to the increase of the thermal stability and surface area as well as lowering the recombination rate of electron and hole in TiO2 (Kim et al., 2008). Sorolla et al.(2012), have been reported that only 55% paraquat degradation was achieved using 2 wt.% Cu–TiO2/SBA-15 after 4 h irradiation. Meanwhile, no paraquat degradation was observed using Ti1−xFexO2 (Florêncio et al., 2004). Incorporation of zirconia with TiO2 either as binary oxide or as solid solution photocatalyst had proven to have better photocatalytic activity for degradation of organic pollutant in the aqueous phase (Kim et al., 2012; Schiller et al., 2010).
In this study, the heterojunction of ZrTiO4/ZrTi2O6/TiO2 photocatalyst was successfully prepared using modified sol gel method and the photocatalytic activity was tested on the degradation of paraquat dichloride under UV irradiation for 240 min. Various ZrO2/TiO2 ratios and catalyst dosages have been studied to observe the effect on phase transformation of TiO2 and surface area of the prepared photocatalyst. Interestingly, the formation of heterojunction of ZrTiO4/ZrTi2O6/TiO2 photocatalyst and rutile phase of TiO2 at ratio anatase to rutile of 82:18 in the photocatalyst system has given positive effect on the degradation of paraquat dichloride. This is the new finding based on our best knowledge. Various analytical techniques were employed to reveal their physicochemical properties. The response surface analysis was used for optimization study and Box–Behnken design was applied to determine the optimum photodegradation of paraquat and also to explain the interaction among the parameters studied.
2 Experimental
2.1 Synthesis of Zr/Ti photocatalyst
TiO2 was synthesized using titanium isopropoxide (TTIP) obtained from Sigma Aldrich as precursor via modified sol gel method. Firstly, 1.76 g of PEG 2000 (Merck) was dissolved in 70 mL of ethanol (QRec). Next, 6.15 g of diethanolamine (Merck) was added to the solution followed by 12.00 g of TTIP. Subsequently, 1.60 mL of distilled water was added slowly and stirred continuously for another 2 h at room temperature (Ali and Hassan, 2008). Zirconium (IV) oxynitrate hydrate that has been dissolved in 10 mL of distilled water was then added into the clear solution. The mixture was stirred for 2 h to get homogenous photocatalyst. Then, it was aged at room temperature for 2 days and dried at 100 °C for 24 h before calcined at 750 °C for 5 h. Lastly, the sample was grinded to fine powder. The ratios were varied based on weight percentage from 10:90, 20:80 and 30:70.
2.2 Photocatalytic activity measurement
The photocatalytic degradation was conducted in a Pyrex beaker and was placed inside a box with 365 nm UV irradiation source (100 V, 6 W). Then, 0.1 g of Zr/Ti photocatalyst was added into 250 mL 15 ppm of paraquat dichloride solution. The suspension was stirred in the dark for the adsorption of paraquat dichloride for 30 min before irradiated for 240 min. The sample was collected every 60 min for 240 min irradiation. UV–Vis spectrophotometer Model UV-2501Pc Shimadzu was used to measure the samples. The percentage of photocatalytic activity was calculated using Eq. (1),
2.3 Characterization of the catalysts
X-ray diffraction analysis was done using Siemen D5000 diffractometer utilizing Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.54060 Å). Data were collected in range of 2θ from 10° to 80° and analysed by software called Diffract Plus. XPS surface study was performed using Kratos surface analysis spectrometer XSAM HS instrument with Mg Kα (1253.6 eV) as the X-ray source. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was performed using JEOL-JEM 2100 operated at 200 kV. N2 adsorption/desorption isotherm analysis was attained using Micromeritics ASAP 2010 volumetric adsorption analyser at −196 °C. Prior to the measurement, the calcined catalysts were degassed at 120 °C for 5 h. The DR UV–Vis spectra were measured by UV–vis spectroscopy model Perkin Elmer Lambda 550.
2.4 Response Surface Methodology (RSM)
The Response Surface Methodology (RSM) was used to validate the predicted value of the optimization parameter from RSM with actual value obtained from experiment. Design-Expert Version 7.1.6 software was used for generating and evaluating the statistical experimental design. To assess the interaction between parameters towards the degradation of paraquat dichloride (Y), three parameters were selected: calcination temperature (°C), ZrO2/TiO2 ratio and catalyst dosage (g). Total of 17 experiments were designed and performed in random order and levels of independent variables are displayed in Table 1.
Independent variable
Factor
Coded value
−1
0
1
Calcination temperature (°C)
A
700
750
800
ZrO2/TiO2 ratio
B
10
20
30
Catalyst dosage (g)
C
0.2
0.3
0.4
3 Results and discussion
In this study zirconium was added to TiO2 photocatalyst for in-depth investigation towards the effect of ZrO2/TiO2 ratios on the formation of ternary species which are ZrTiO4 and ZrTi2O6 in the photocatalyst system towards the degradation of paraquat dichloride. The experiment was run for 240 min under UV irradiation. Our previous study had reported that calcination temperatures of 450 > 750 > 1000 °C for TiO2 and 750 > 450 > 1000 °C for ZrO2/TiO2 (10:90) were observed which indicated that addition of zirconium at certain ratio had remarkable improvement over degradation of paraquat dichloride compared to the single TiO2. The best calcination temperature for TiO2 was 450 °C. Meanwhile for the ZrO2/TiO2 photocatalyst it was 750 °C at ZrO2/TiO2 ratio of 20:80 (Badli et al., 2015). In this paper, the ZrO2/TiO2 photocatalyst was further optimized at various ZrO2/TiO2 atomic ratios and catalyst dosage to investigate the formation of ternary species thus increasing the photodegradation activity.
3.1 Characterization of catalyst
Fig. 1 shows the diffractograms of XRD analysis for ZrO2/TiO2 photocatalyst at various ZrO2/TiO2 ratios. The XRD analysis showed the tetrahedral structure of anatase TiO2 was displayed at diffraction peaks of 2θ = 25.3° (I99), 48.0° (I24), 37.6° (I18), 53.9° (I15) and 55.1 (I15) in all samples. The percentage of anatase and rutile phases was calculated according to Eq. (2) and is tabulated in Table 2.
XRD diffractogram patterns of (a) ZrO2/TiO2 photocatalyst and (b) zoom-in XRD diffractogram patterns of the anatase (1 0 1) diffraction peaks at various ZrO2/TiO2 ratios and were calcined at 750 °C for 5 h. The PDF referenced of Ti2ZrO6 (JCPDS 00-046-1265) and TiZrO4 (JCPDS 00-007-0290).
Samples
Anatase (%)
Rutile (%)
(10:90)
57
43
(20:80)
82
18
(30:70)
100
–
The presence of Zr as shown in Fig. 1(a) has delayed the phase transformation of TiO2 at high temperature which was also reported by Kim et al. (2012). In addition, the new ternary species belong to orthorhombic structure of ZrTi2O6 (JCPDS 00-046-1265) at 2θ value of 30.71° (I100) and second highest peak at 24.87° (I72) was observed, while for ZrTiO4 (JCPDS 00-007-0290) occurred at value 30.59° (I100) and second highest peak at 24.71° (I16) were also observed at ZrO2/TiO2 ratio of 20:80 and 30:70. Besides that, no diffraction peak due to ZrO2 could be detected in all samples suggesting that the ZrO2 might be formed in the bulk matrix of TiO2 or was well dispersed in the catalyst surface and cannot be detected using XRD analysis.
The anatase diffraction peak (1 0 1) was slightly shifted to lower angle suggested that the Zr was merged in the lattice of TiO2 as shown in Fig. 1(b) and affects the lattice parameter and d-spacing value for ZrO2/TiO2 photocatalyst as tabulated in Table 3. The enhancement of distance between the crystal planes was due to the substitution of Zr ion which has larger ionic radius (0.072 nm) compared to Ti ion (0.065 nm) as has also been reported by Kim et al. (2008) and Venkatachalam et al. (2007).
Samples
d(101) valuea (Å)
Lattice parameter, ab
Surface areac (m2/g)
Average pore diameterd (Å)
Band gape (eV)
(10:90)
3.4951
4.9428
41.58
170.45
3.05
(20:80)
3.5172
4.9741
46.35
177.21
3.06
(30:70)
3.5195
4.9773
34.32
163.89
3.16
XPS analysis was conducted to measure the chemical composition and electronic state of ZrO2/TiO2 (20:80) calcined at 750 °C which showed the best photodegradation of paraquat dichloride. Fig. 2 shows the XPS spectra of Ti 2p, Zr 3d and O 1s that has been deconvoluted into components. From the Ti 2p3/2 three peaks of Ti4+ (457.21, 458.31 and 459.45 eV) were obtained belonging to ZrTi2O6, TiO2 and ZrTiO4 respectively (NIST XPS database). Meanwhile for the Zr 3d5/2 spectra, there are two peaks for Zr4+ (181.54 and 182.01 eV) which can be assigned to the ZrTi2O6 and ZrTiO4 respectively and also obtained by Gnatyuk et al. (2010).XPS spectra of ZrO2/TiO2 (20:80) photocatalyst (a) Ti 2p and (b) Zr 3d and O 1s.
The shifting in binding energy might be due to the electron transfer from Zr4+ to Ti4+ and formation of Ti–O–Zr species. Moreover, the binding energy of XPS O 1s composed of four signals at 529–532 eV corresponded to the lattice oxygen (Ti/Zr–O) and surface hydroxyl groups (Ti/Zr–OH) (Sun et al., 2011). The results obtained show that zirconium had undergone solid state reaction and forms ternary species and the remaining Zr was homogenously dispersed on TiO2 surface or incorporated in TiO2 lattice.
Fig. 3(a) shows the nanoparticles of ZrO2/TiO2 (20:80) photocatalyst were agglomerated with particle sizes ranging from 9 to 21 nm. HR-TEM image in Fig. 3(b) shows that the lattice fingers of anatase TiO2 (1 0 1) were located close to ZrTiO4 (1 1 1). Meanwhile, at upper part the rutile TiO2 was detected near ZrTi2O6 that corresponding with (1 1 0) and (1 1 1) planes respectively. This confirmed the existence of heterostructure in the catalyst interface that could retard the recombination of electron-hole.(a) TEM and (b) HR-TEM images of ZrO2/TiO2 (20:80) photocatalyst calcined at 750 °C.
Fig. 4 illustrates the N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms of ZrO2/TiO2 photocatalysts that show adsorption of Type III at ratio of 10:90. Meanwhile, at ratio of 20:80 and 30:70 it shows the mixture of Type III and IV isotherms with the presence of mesoporous and macroporous materials and exhibited hysteresis loop of type H2(b) which associated with capillary condensation in ink bottle pores that have larger neck radius (Thommes et al., 2015). At the ratio of 10:90, the hysteresis loop was appeared at higher relative pressure indicating the weak interaction between adsorbate and adsorbent.Isotherm plots of ZrO2/TiO2 photocatalysts at various ratios and were calcined at 750 °C for 5 h.
The largest specific surface area 46.35 m2/g was obtained at ratio 20:80 with average pore diameter of 177.21 Å which indicates higher adsorptibility compared to ratios 10:90 and 30:70 as listed in Table 3. At ratio 30:70 of ZrO2/TiO2, the ternary species were possibly deposited and covered the pore on the surface of photocatalyst leading to average pore diameter reduction and diminish the pore volume as proven by Wronski et al. (2015). This observation was supported by XRD diffractogram (Fig. 1). ZrO2/TiO2 with ratio of 20:80 showed significant increment of catalyst surface area from ratio 10:90 due to more uniform particle distribution. It can be shown from the closing loop at P/Po which was lower than the ratio of 10:90.
The optical properties were examined by using UV–Vis diffuse reflectance spectroscopy. Fig. 5 shows the band absorption edge was shifted to shorter wavelength when the Zr ratio was increased from 10:90 to 30:70. This might be due to the formation of ternary species as shown in XRD and XPS analyses. In contrast, Gao et al. (2010) stated that the formation of Ti2ZrO6 shifted the absorption band to longer wavelength at visible region with ratio 35:65.(a) DR UV–Vis spectra and (b) Tauc plots of ZrO2/TiO2, with various ZrO2/TiO2 ratios calcined at 750 °C for 5 h.
Two absorption bands at 250 nm and 320 nm were observed indicating the presence of nano-sized of TiO2 and assigned to ligand to metal charge transfer transition as also stated by Anzures et al. (2015) and Stefan et al. (2014). Besides that, overlapping at longer wavelength suggested the coexistence of heterojunction which is supported by the formation of hysteresis loop shown in Fig. 4. The extrapolated line fitted to the linear portions was carried out as shown in Fig. 5(b) to determine the band gap energy of the photocatalyst. Increasing of ZrO2/TiO2 ratio displayed bigger band gap energy might be due to the suppression of anatase to rutile phase transformation in the photocatalyst as shown in Table 3. Furthermore, it was concluded that the formation of heterojunction of ZrTiO4/ZrTi2O6/TiO2 has demonstrated larger band gap energy as illustrated from Tauc plot (Table 3).
3.2 Evaluation of photocatalytic activity
The control experiments were conducted to test the stability of paraquat dichloride before undergoing photodegradation reaction. Fig. 6 shows that 9.08% of paraquat dichloride was degraded without the presence of catalyst (photolysis), showing that paraquat dichloride is quite stable under UV irradiation (Cantavenera et al., 2007). Meanwhile adsorption/desorption experiment gave only 3.64% of paraquat dichloride degradation after 240 min reaction time. Interestingly, remarkable enhancement was obtained in the presence of UV irradiation and TiO2 calcined at 450 °C as photocatalyst that gave 22.41% of paraquat dichloride degradation after 240 min irradiation.Control experiment under different reaction systems, [paraquat, PQ] = 15 ppm, λUV = 365 nm, reaction time = 240 min. Catalysts = TiO2 (450 °C, 0.1 g).
Fig. 7 shows kinetic study of paraquat dichloride using ZrO2/TiO2 photocatalyst at various ZrO2/TiO2 ratios and TiO2 calcined at 450 °C for comparison study. The linear plots of ln(C/Co) versus irradiation time (t) that parallels to a pseudo first-order reaction kinetics analysis, which its usual form as shown in Eq. (3). The relevant data are tabulated in Table 4.
Pseudo first order kinetics of paraquat dichloride degradation.
Photocatalyst
Rate constant, k (min−1)
R2
TiO2-450 °C
0.0011
0.99
10:90–750 °C
0.0054
0.99
a20:80–750 °C
0.0056
0.99
a30:70–750 °C
0.0037
0.99
Further investigation was carried out using various catalyst dosages from 0.1 to 0.4 g of ZrO2/TiO2 (20:80) photocatalyst (Fig. 8) to gain the optimum photodegradation of paraquat dichloride. The order photocatalytic activity of 0.3 > 0.4 > 0.2 > 0.1 g was observed. From the results obtained, the optimum catalyst loading for ZrO2/TiO2 (20:80) was 0.3 g which gave 83.41% of paraquat dichloride degradation after 240 min reaction. Increasing the catalyst dosage increases the amount of active site and led to the increasing photodegradation of paraquat dichloride up to 0.3 g. In contrast, further increase of catalyst dosage up to 0.4 g lowers the photodegradation of paraquat dichloride. This might be due to scattering effect caused by increasing the turbidity of suspension that prevents UV light penetration into water as also observed by Bensaadi et al. (2014). In addition, Ahmed et al. (2011) had also reported that the agglomeration of catalyst might occur in the excess of catalyst dosage and this will result in the reduction of active site of the catalyst.Photodegradation of paraquat dichloride over ZrO2/TiO2 (20:80) photocatalyst calcined at 750 °C for 5 h at various catalyst dosages. [paraquat] = 15 ppm, λUV = 365 nm and reaction time = 240 min.
From the parameters studied, it can be summarized that the optimum condition for degradation of paraquat using ZrO2/TiO2 photocatalyst was obtained at calcination temperature of 750 °C with ZrO2/TiO2 ratio of 20:80 and 0.3 g of catalyst dosage which gave 8.41% degradation of paraquat dichloride after 240 min irradiation.
4 The optimization of Zr/Ti photocatalyst by Box–Behnken design
The Box–Behnken design was employed and 17 experiments were taken at random orders for optimization study. The variables are selected which were calcination temperature (A), ZrO2/TiO2 ratio (B) and catalyst dosage (C). The final quadratic equation was attained to elucidate the mathematical connection between the independent parameters and the dependent respond (Y) as presented in Eq. (4):
Table 5 shows the model is significant with the F-value is 2083.24 with corresponding p-value <0.0001.
Source
Sum of squares
Degree of freedom
Mean square
F-value
P-value
Model
3143.50
9
349.28
2083.24
<0.0001
A
348.61
1
348.61
2079.27
<0.0001
B
555.78
1
555.78
3314.90
<0.0001
C
9.97
1
9.97
59.45
0.0001
AB
111.72
1
111.72
666.37
<0.0001
AC
0.038
1
0.038
0.23
0.6484
BC
1.59
1
1.59
9.47
0.0179
A2
1828.87
1
1828.87
10908.19
<0.0001
B2
62.05
1
62.05
370.07
<0.0001
C2
114.79
1
114.79
684.63
<0.0001
Residual
1.17
7
0.17
Lack of fit
0.056
3
0.019
0.067
0.9745
Pure error
1.12
4
0.28
Total
3144.68
16
There is only a 0.01% chance that a larger “Model F-value” could occur due to noise. The lack of fit was not significant with F-value 0.067 and the p-value was 0.9745. In this study, the independent variable of the quadratic model calcination temperature (A), ZrO2/TiO2 ratio (B), catalyst dosage (C), the interaction between calcination temperature and ZrO2/TiO2 ratio and the interaction between ZrO2/TiO2 ratio and catalyst dosage are quite significant with the p-value less than 0.05. The ZrO2/TiO2 ratio was the most influent parameter which achieved 3314.90 F-value followed by calcination temperature (2079.27) and catalyst dosage (59.45). The high R2 value of 0.9996 indicates that the quadratic model is fitted with the data. The predicted R2 value of 0.9992 is in reasonable agreement with the adjusted R2 value of 0.9991. Fig. 9 shows a comparison between predicted and actual values of the response and confirms that the results obtained are in a good agreement with the predicted values.The relationship of predicted and actual values for BBD.
Three dimensional response surfaces of photodegradation of paraquat dichloride as function of (a) calcination versus ZrO2/TiO2 ratio (catalyst dosage = 0.3 g), (b) calcination temperature versus catalyst dosage (ZrO2/TiO2 ratio = 20) and (c) ZrO2/TiO2 ratio versus catalyst dosage (calcination temperature = 750 °C) are presented in Fig. 10.3-D surface plots of photodegradation as a function of (a) calcination temperature and ZrO2/TiO2 ratio, (b) calcination temperature and catalyst dosage and (c) ZrO2/TiO2 ratio and catalyst dosage.
The coordinates of central point within the maximum contour levels represent the optimal values of the respective parameters. Fig. 10(a) and (b) shows that calcination temperature gave significant enhancement on the photodegradation of paraquat dichloride until achieving the optimum point. The higher photodegradation of paraquat dichloride was obtained at higher catalyst dosage with lower ZrO2/TiO2 ratio as shown in Fig. 10(c). This might be due to the phase transformation of anatase to rutile and the formation of heterojunction of ZrTiO4/ZrTi2O6/TiO2 as shown in Figs. 1 and 2 as also reported by Gnatyuk et al. (2010).
To achieve the optimum condition for this model, each variable was adjusted to attain the maximum photodegradation of paraquat dichloride. The optimum condition for this model was achieved at calcination temperature 750 °C, 20% ZrO2/TiO2 ratio and 0.3 g catalyst dosage with 83.65% degradation of paraquat dichloride. An additional experimental was carried out under the optimum condition to confirm the agreement of the model and experimental data. The experimental value obtained was 83.17% which is in good agreement with the predicted results thus validated the finding of response surface optimization with percentage error of 0.24%.
5 Conclusion
The ZrO2/TiO2 photocatalyst was successfully synthesized using modified sol gel method. The existence of heterojunction of TiZrO4/Ti2ZrO6/TiO2 photocatalyst was confirmed using XRD and XPS analyses and was acted as anatase phase stabilizer and gave remarkable enhancement for the photodegradation of paraquat dichloride. Optimum photodegradation of paraquat dichloride was obtained using ZrO2/TiO2 atomic ratio of 20:80 calcined at 750 °C for 5 h with 0.3 g of catalyst dosage. This reaction followed the pseudo first order kinetic equation. The Box–Behnken experimental design revealed that the optimum photodegradation of paraquat was achieved at 750 °C, with Zr ratio (20:80) and 0.3 g catalyst dosage that gave 83.41% degradation which is 0.24% different from the experimental result.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science and Universiti Teknologi Malaysia for the financial support under GUP Grant Q.J130000.2526.07H78, the Ministry of Higher Education (MOHE) and to MyBrain15 for student’s scholarship grants to Nur Afiqah binti Badli.
References
- J. Environ. Manage.. 2011;92:311-330.
- Malaysian J. Anal. Sci.. 2008;12:77-87.
- Appl. Catal. A Gen.. 2015;489:218-225.
- Adv. Mater. Res.. 2015;1107:377-382.
- J. Environ. Chem. Eng.. 2014;2:1371-1377.
- J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem.. 2007;185:277-282.
- J. Electroanal. Chem.. 2009;637:33-42.
- Chemosphere. 2004;55:345-355.
- Appl. Catal. A Gen.. 2010;375:107-115.
- Surf. Interf. Anal.. 2010;42:1276-1280.
- Chem. Eng. J.. 2012;204–206:40-47.
- Bull. Korean Chem.. 2008;29:1217-1223.
- Water Res.. 2002;36:1776-1782.
- J. Chem.. 2015;8:181-185.
- J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem.. 2006;182:43-51.
- Chem. Eng. J.. 2011;175:279-290.
- Nanotechnology. 2010;21:405-603.
- J. Environ. Sci.. 2012;24:1125-1132.
- J. Appl. Phys.. 2014;116:114312-1-114312-11.
- J. Colloid Interf. Sci.. 2011;364:288-297.
- Pure Appl. Chem. 2015:1051-1069.
- J. Mol. Catal. A Chem.. 2007;266:158-165.
- Radiat. Phys. Chem.. 2015;109:40-47.