10.8
CiteScore
 
5.3
Impact Factor
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Corrigendum
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Full Length Article
Full lenth article
Letter to Editor
Original Article
Research article
Retraction notice
Review
Review Article
SPECIAL ISSUE: ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY
10.8
CiteScore
5.3
Impact Factor
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Corrigendum
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Full Length Article
Full lenth article
Letter to Editor
Original Article
Research article
Retraction notice
Review
Review Article
SPECIAL ISSUE: ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original article
9 (
1_suppl
); S150-S160
doi:
10.1016/j.arabjc.2011.02.027

Oxoperoxomolybdenum(VI) complexes of catalytic and biomedical relevance: Synthesis, characterization, antibacterial activity and 3D-molecular modeling of some oxoperoxomolybdenum(VI) chelates in mixed (O,O) coordination environment involving maltol and β-diketoenolates

Coordination and Bioinorganic Chemistry Laboratory, Department of P.G. Studies and Research in Chemistry, Rani Durgavati University, Jabalpur 482 001, M.P., India

⁎Corresponding author. Tel.: +91 761 2601303; fax: +91 761 2603752. rcmaurya1@gmail.com (R.C. Maurya)

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Elsevier and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Peer review under responsibility of King Saud University.

Abstract

A new series of four mixed-ligand complexes of oxoperoxomolybdenum(VI) of the general composition [MoO(O2)(ma)(L)]·H2O, where maH = 3-hydroxy-2-methyl-4-pyrone and LH = o-acetoacetanisidide (o-aansH), o-acetoacetotoluidide (o-aatdH), acetylacetone (acacH) or methylactoacetate (macacH), has been synthesized by the interaction of [MoO(O2)]2+ (obtained in situ during the interaction of MoO3 and 30% H2O2 on continuous stirring at 50 °C for 24 h) and the said ligands in aqueous-ethanol medium. The complexes so obtained have been characterized by elemental analyses, molybdenum determination, molar conductance, decomposition temperature and magnetic measurements, thermogravimetric studies, 1H NMR, IR, mass and electronic spectral studies. Antibacterial studies of one of the ligands maltol and the two representative metal complexes were also carried out and it has been observed that the complexes are more potent bactericides than the ligand. The 3D-molecular modeling and analysis for bond lengths and bond angles have also been carried out for one of the representative compound (1) to substantiate the proposed structure. Pseudopentagonal bipyramidal structures have been proposed for these complexes.

Keywords

Oxoperoxomolybdenum(VI) chelates
O,O-Donor organic matrix
Bioinorganic
Medicinal relevance
3D-Molecular modeling
1

1 Introduction

Molybdenum represents an important trace element involved in the structure of certain enzymes catalyzing redox reactions (Mancka and Plass, 2007). Although it can form complexes with numerous physiologically important compounds, it was supposed that this trace element is absorbed, transported and excreted in a simple molybdate form. Due to its role in the processes of nitrogen fixation and nitrate reduction, molybdenum is essential for normal growth and development of plants and sometimes it is necessary to enrich the substrate with some molybdenum compounds.

It is also worth mentioning that xanthine oxidase, the enzyme catalyzing xanthine oxidation to uric acid contains molybdenum. At low molybdenum levels, xanthine oxidase activity was found to be proportional to the molybdenum concentration while at higher concentrations, this metal may express an inhibitory effect on the enzymatic activity. The same concentration-dependent effects have been observed in some other biological processes influenced by molybdenum. It has been also reported that molybdenum significantly affects protein synthesis, as well as metabolism of phosphorus, sulfur, potassium, copper, zinc, and iodine. Metabolic interrelationship of molybdenum with other trace elements is important when either beneficial or harmful effects of molybdenum compounds are considered. For example, ammonium tetrathiomolybdate can be used in the therapy of Wilson’s disease defined as a congenital inability of copper excretion, thus resulting in its accumulation within the body (Haywood et al., 1998). Trace levels of molybdenum are not harmful to both animals and human beings. On the contrary, they may stimulate the growth and body mass gain. Acute toxicity of molybdenum compounds has been investigated only in experimental animals.

Xanthine dehydrogenase is a molybdenum-containing enzyme involved in purine catabolism. This enzyme also plays an important role in bioreductive activation of chemotherapeutic agents, a process indispensable for their full antineoplastic activity, as reported by Pritsos and Gustafson (1994).

Simple molybdenum compounds, such as Na2MoO4 and complex compounds, such as, cis-MoO2L2 [L = maltol (3-hydroxy-2-methyl-4-pyrone)] were found to significantly reduce the levels of blood glucose and free fatty acids (Thompson et al., 1999; Stankova et al., 2007). Also, Lord et al. (1999) observed beneficial effects of molybdate treatment on postischemic cardiac function of diabetic rats.

Antitumour activity of molybdenum compounds, especially of Mo 7 O 24 6 - anion, has been extensively studied and confirmed (Waern and Harding, 2004). Connected to that, several modes of antineoplastic action were hypothesized (Yamase, 1993). The polyoxomolybdenum anion has received a lot of interest with their potential applications in catalysis, solid-state technology and medicine including antitumour and anti-virus (HIV) activity (Bridgeman and Cavigliasso, 2002; Yamase et al., 1988; Rhule et al., 1998; Litos et al., 2006).

Coordination compounds of molybdenum can catalyze a variety of industrially important chemical reactions such as olefin epoxidation (Abrantes et al., 2003), isomerization of allyl alcohols (Fronczek et al., 2002) and olefin metathesis (Schrock, 2004). The useful role of molybdenum is not restricted to artificial catalysis alone, since it is an essential element in diverse biological systems, as nature has made use of molybdenum center in various redox enzymes (Collison et al., 1996; Hille, 1996; Enemark et al., 2004). Oxidized forms of these molybdoenzymes, e.g., aldehyde and sulfite oxidases, are supposed to contain cis-MoX2 units (X = O, S) coordinated to sulfur, nitrogen, and oxygen donor atoms of the protein structure. A large number of dioxomolybdenum(VI) complexes are known, some of which have been investigated as molecular models for these molybdoenzymes. For example, Dinda et al. (2003) and Pramanik et al. (2004) have demonstrated that certain MoO 2 2 + complexes of dibasic tridentate Schiff base ligands can oxidise PPh3, thus they mimic the active sites of oxotransfer enzymes. Barbaro et al. (1996) have reported similar results about MoO 2 2 + complexes with enantiomerically pure tridentate aminodiolato ligands.

Transition metal peroxo and peroxy complexes have played for sometime, now an important role in the epoxidation of alkene substrates to their respective epoxide products. In this regard Mo(VI) complexes are an important class of oxidants for this type of reaction and quite a number of studies have been conducted (Jørgensen and Schiøtt, 1990; Deubel et al., 2004; Dickman and Pope, 1994; Lane and Burgess, 2003; Burke, 2008; Li et al., 2010).

Maltol (3-hydroxy-2-methyl-4-pyrone) is a naturally occurring, non-toxic compound and common food additive (Schenck and Speilman, 1945). Many biologically important metals form stable complexes with maltol. Its stability arises from the easiness to deprotonate and to behave as an anionic, bidentate metal chelator (Hsieh et al., 2006). There are numerous metal–maltol complexes used in biomedical application. For instance, iron(III)–maltol complex has been used in the treatment of anemia (Ahmet et al., 1988) and tris(maltolato)aluminum complex has been found applications in the Alzheimer disease (Finnegan et al., 1986; Nelson et al., 1988; Yu et al., 2002). Perhaps the most significant is bis(maltolato)oxovanadium(IV), which has been the subject of many chemical and physiological studies due to its potent insulinomimetic properties (Saatchi et al., 2005). This complex is an excellent glucose- and lipid-lowering insulin mimetics and it is currently evaluated in clinical trials (Thompson et al., 2003, 2004; Lamboy et al., 2007).

In view of the above, it was thought worthwhile to synthesize and characterize four new oxoperoxomolybdenum(VI) complexes with 3-hydroxy-2-methyl-4-pyrone (maltol) and some β-diketoenolates, viz., o-acetoactanisidide (o-aansH), o-actoacto-toluidide (o-aatdH), acetylacetone (acacH) or methylacetoacetate (macacH). Structures of β-diketoenolates and 3-hydroxy-2-methyl-4-pyrone are given in Fig. 1.

Structures of ligands.
Figure 1
Structures of ligands.

2

2 Experimental

2.1

2.1 Materials

Molybdenum trioxide (99%) (Sisco Chem. Industries, Bombay), 30% hydrogen peroxide (E. Merck, India Ltd., Bombay), 3-hydroxy-2-methyl-4-pyrone (Lancaster, Alfa Aesar, England), o-acetoacetotoluidide and o-acetoacetanisidide (Aldrich Chemical Co., USA), methyl acetoacetate, acetylacetone and DMF (Tomas Baker Chemical Ltd., Mumbai) and ethanol (Bengal Chemical and Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Kolkata) were used as received. All other chemicals used were of analytical reagent (A.R.) grade.

2.2

2.2 Preparation of mixed ligands complexes

The mixed-ligand oxoperoxo complexes were prepared according to the following general method.

A suspension of MoO3 (0.025 mol, 0.359 g) in 30% H2O2 (35 mL) was stirred for 24 h at 50 °C giving a yellow solution. This was filtered and a solution of maltol (0.0025 mol, 0.315 g) in ethanol (15 mL) was added to the filtrate followed by the addition of 0.0025 mol of β-diketones: o-actoacetotoluidide (o-aatdH) (0.477 g), o-acetoacetanisidide (o-aansH) (0.517 g), acetylacetone (acacH) (0.26 mL) or methyl acetoacetate (macacH) (0.27 mL) in (20 mL) ethanol. The resulting mixture was stirred for 2 h. while cooling in ice-bath. The light brown precipitate appeared was suction filtered with water–ethanol (1:1) solution and dried in a desiccator over anhydrous calcium chloride.

2.3

2.3 Analysis

Carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen were determined micro-analytically at C.D.R.I., Lucknow. The molybdenum content in each chelate was determined (Mohanti et al., 1991) as follows. A weighed amount (∼200 mg) of the chelate was first decomposed by heating with concentrated nitric acid then strongly heating the residue over 500 °C for 45 min until constant weight was obtained.

2.4

2.4 Physical methods

The following physical methods were used to determine the structure of the resulting molybdenum(VI) complexes. Thermogravimetric analysis was done by heating the sample at the rate of 10 °C min−1 up to 1000 °C on a thermal analyzer at Sophisticated Analytical Instrument Facility (Formerly RSIC) Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay. Solid-state infrared spectra were obtained using potassium bromide pallets with a Perkin–Elmer model 1620 FT-IR spectrophotometer at C.D.R.I., Lucknow. Conductance measurements were made in dimethylformamide solution using Toshniwal Conductivity Bridge and dip type cell with a smooth platinum electrode of a cell constant 1.02. Magnetic measurements were performed by Gouy’s method using mercury(II)tetrathiocyanatocobaltate(II) as calibrant at Indian Institute Of Technology, Roorkee. The decomposition temperatures of the complexes were recorded by an electrically operated melting point apparatus (Kumar Industries, Bombay) of heating capacity up to 360 °C. Electronic spectra were recorded on Systronics Double Beam UV–vis Spectrophotometer: 2001 at Central Instrument Center, Bio-Science Department, R.D. University, Jabalpur. 1HNMR spectra in DMSO-d6, mass spectra and elemental analysis (micro-analytically) of the complexes were determined at Sophisticated Analytical Instrumentation Facility, C.D.R.I., Lucknow. The FAB mass spectrum of a representative complex was recorded on a JEOL SX 102/DA-6000 mass spectrometer/data system using xenon/argon (6 kV, 10 mA) as the FAB gas in the m/z range 94.36–508.17.

2.5

2.5 3D-Molecular modeling studies

The 3D-molecular modeling of one of the synthesized compound was carried out on CS Chem 3D Ultra Molecular Modeling and Analysis Programme (www.cambridgesoft.com). It is an interactive graphics program that allows rapid structure building, geometry optimization and molecular display. It has the ability to handle transition metal compounds.

3

3 Results and discussion

The mixed-ligand oxoperoxomolybdenum(VI) complexes of the ligands under study were prepared according to the following equations: MoO 3 + H 2 O 2 24 h 50 ° C [ MoO ( O 2 ) ] 2 + [ MoO ( O 2 ) ] 2 + + maH + LH stirring ice - saltbath [ MoO ( O 2 ) ( ma ) ( L ) ] · H 2 O where maH = 3-hydroxy-2-methyl-4-pyrone, LH = o-actoactotoluidide (o-aatdH) (1), o-acetoactanisidide (o-aansH) (2), acetylacetone (acacH) (3) or methyl acetoacetate (macacH) (4). Some physical properties of the complexes are given in Table 1. These complexes have been characterized using the following physical studies.

Table 1 Analytical data and some physical properties of the synthesized complexes.
S. No. Complexes (empirical formula) (F.W.) Found/(calculated) (%) Color Decomp. temp. (°C) ΛM−1 cm2 mol−1) Yield (%)
C H N Mo
1 [MoO(O2)(ma)(o-aatd)]·H2O 42.30 4.01 2.56 20.30 Flame 270 12.7 70
(C17H19NO9Mo) (476.94) (42.77) (3.98) (2.94) (20.12)
2 [MoO(O2)(ma)(o-aans)]·H2O 41.49 3.98 2.65 19.25 Rust 265 14.6 75
(C17H19NO10Mo) (492.94) (41.38) (3.85) (2.84) (19.46)
3 [MoO(O2)(ma)(acac)]·H2O 34.38 3.68 24.45 Volcano 250 12.5 78
(C11H14O9Mo)(385.94) (34.20) (3.63) (24.86)
4 [MoO(O2)(ma)(macac)]·H2O 32.65 3.65 23.62 Volcano 258 13.3 65
(C11H14O10Mo) (401.94) (32.84) (3.48) (23.87)

3.1

3.1 Infrared spectral studies

The important infrared spectral bands and their plausible assignment are given in Table 2. All synthesized complexes display a strong band at 949–955 cm−1, which has been assigned to the ν(Mo⚌O) mode. The metal peroxo grouping gives rise to three IR active vibrational modes and these are (O–O) stretching (ν1), the symmetric (Mo–O) stretching (ν2) and asymmetric (Mo–O) stretching (ν3). The characteristic (ν1) (O–O) mode of the complexes appears at 867–879 cm−1, while the (ν2) and (ν3) modes appear at 620–626 and 725–729 cm−1, respectively. These observations are in agreement with results reported elsewhere (Carreiro et al., 2006; Islam et al., 1994; Maurya et al., 2008).

Table 2 Some important IR spectral bands (cm−1) of the synthesized complexes.
S. No. Complexes ν(Mo⚌O) ν(O2) Peroxo ν(Mo–O) ν(C⚌O) maltol [ν(C⚌O) + ν(C⚌C)] maltol ν(C–O) maltol ν(C–O) acetyl ν(C⚌O) amide ν(C⚌C) keto-enolate ν(OH) water
1 [MoO(O2)(ma)(o-aatd)]·H2O 955 870 725 1620 1590, 1510 1275 a 1620 3450
620
2 [MoO(O2)(ma)(o-aans)]·H2O 955 868 735 1625 1580, 1520 1276 a 1625 3404
625
3 [MoO(O2)(ma)(acac)]·H2O 950 875 727 1619 1583, 1514 1273 1619 a 3448
624
4 [MoO(O2)(ma)(macac)]·H2O 949 879 729 1625 1585, 1515 1272 1616 a 3409
626
Merged with ν(C⚌O) (1583–1585) of maltol.

β-Diketones and related derivates such as β-diketoesters exhibit keto-enol tautomerism. Due to the presence of two oxygen donor atoms at suitable positions and facile keto-enol tautomerism (Fig. 2) they easily coordinate with metal ions after deprotonating the enolic hydrogen atom and provide stable metal complexes with six-membered chelate ring (Maurya, 2003; Maurya et al., 1991a). Among β-diketones, acetylacetone (acacH) is most common, and the infrared spectra of [M(acac)2] and [M(acac)3] type complexes have been studied extensively. The two significant absorption bands for acetylacetone at 1628 and 1553 cm−1, assignable to ν(C⚌O) (acetyl) and ν(C⚌C) modes, respectively, are shifted to lower wave numbers in these complexes on account of the coordinated acetylacetone after deprotonation of the enolic hydrogen and appear in the regions 1600–1530 and 1525–1480 cm−1, respectively (Nakamoto, 1978a; Maurya et al., 1991b, 1995). In complexes of neutral acetylacetone involving coordination of two ketonic groups, ν(C⚌O) bands appear at ∼1700 cm−1 (Nakamoto, 1978b).

Keto-enol forms of β-diketones and related derivatives and their metal chelates.
Figure 2
Keto-enol forms of β-diketones and related derivatives and their metal chelates.

The appearance of two strong bands at 1616–1619 and ∼1515 cm−1 [merged with ν(C⚌C) (maltol), see Table 2), respectively, attributed to ν(C⚌O) (acetyl) and ν(C⚌C) modes, respectively, in the complexes (3) and (4), is consistent with the chelating bidentate (O,O) coordination in enol form after deprotonation of enolic hydrogen of acetylacetone and methyl acetoacetate moieties (Nakamoto, 1978a; Maurya et al., 1991b, 1995; Maurya, 1997).

The chelating behavior of o-acetoacetotoluidide (o-aatd) and o-acetoacetanisidide (o-aans) is quite comparable to acetylacetone. Like acetylacetone they coordinate to a metal ion in their most common chelating bidentate fashion in enol form through a ketonic oxygen, and an enolic oxygen after deprotonation (Maurya et al., 1992). The two characteristic absorption bands due to coordinated o-aatd ando-aans anions are ν(C⚌O) (acetyl carbonyl) and ν(C⚌O) (amide carbonyl) (Maurya and Rajput, 2004). These two bands have been observed at ∼1580 (merged with ν(C⚌O) maltol, see Table 2) and 1619–1625 cm−1, respectively. These results are in agreement with the data reported elsewhere (Maurya and Rajput, 2004; Maurya et al., 2008).

The co-ligand, maltol, used in this investigation contains two donor sites: (i) the carbonyl oxygen, (ii) the hydroxyl oxygen. The IR spectrum of this ligandshows eight significant absorption bands at 3260, [3150, 3080], 2970, 1680, [1630, 1575], 1210 cm−1 assignable to ν(OH) (Parajon-Costa and Baran, 2011) (strongly intramolecular hydrogen bonded with carbonyl oxygen) (Zborowski et al., 2005), [ν(CH)], ν(CH3) (Parajon-Costa and Baran, 2011), ν(C⚌O), [ν(C⚌O) + ν(C⚌C)] (Lamboy et al., 2007), ν(C–O) (Maurya et al., 1998), respectively. When hydroxyl oxygen coordinates with the metal center after deprotonation, ν(OH) observed at 3260 cm−1 in the free ligand should be disappeared in the IR spectrum of all the complexes. Infact, this band is found to be disappeared in all the complexes, suggesting coordination of hydroxyl oxygen after deprotonation. This is further supported by the upward shift (Saatchi et al., 2005; Maurya et al., 1998), of ν(C–O) hydroxyl and appearing at 1272–1276 cm−1 in the complexes compared to ν(C–O) at 1210 cm−1 in free ligand. The coordination of carbonyl oxygen of this ligand to metal centers was inferred by the appearance of ν(C⚌O) at lower wave number (Thompson et al., 2004; Maurya and Mishra, 1991c) (1617–1625 cm−1) in all the complexes compared to ν(C⚌O) of the free maltol at 1680 cm−1. This is further supported by the lower energy shift of the combination bands [ν(C⚌O) + ν(C⚌C)] appearing at 1580–1590 cm−1 and 1510–1520 cm−1 (Lamboy et al., 2007) in the complexes compared to the free maltol combination bands at 1630 cm−1 and 1575 cm−1. These observations suggest that the maltol is acting as a monobasic bidentate (O,O)-donor, forming stable five member chelate ring.

The IR spectra of all the complexes show a broad band centered at 3409–3450 cm−1, attributable to ν(OH) mode possibly due to the presence of lattice water in these complexes. The IR spectra of maltol and compound (3) are given in Figs. 3 and 4, respectively.

IR spectrum of maltol.
Figure 3
IR spectrum of maltol.
IR spectrum of [MoO(O2)(ma)(acac)]·H2O (3).
Figure 4
IR spectrum of [MoO(O2)(ma)(acac)]·H2O (3).

3.2

3.2 Conductance measurements

The molar conductivities of all the complexes in 10−3 M DMF solution lies in the range 12.5–14.6 ohm−1 cm2 mol−1 (Table 1) as expected for non-electrolyte (Maurya et al., 2008). Such a non-zero molar conductance value for each of the complex in the present investigation is most probably due to the strong donor capacity of DMF, which may lead to the displacement of anionic ligand and change of electrolyte type.

3.3

3.3 Magnetic measurements

The observed magnetic moments of these complexes indicate they are diamagnetic (Maurya et al., 2008) as expected for molybdenum(VI) complexes.

3.4

3.4 Mass spectral studies

The FAB mass spectrum of a representative complex, [MoO(O2)(ma)(acac)]·H2O (3) (Fig. 5) was recorded assuming almost similar ones for other three complexes. The mass spectral peaks observed at 136,137, 154, 289 and 307 m/z are matrix (m-nitrobenzyl alcohol or NBA) peaks. The spectral peaks observed at, 95, 279, 333, 363, 364, 377, 391, 392, 407 and 491 m/z in the complex might be correlated possibly with the following types of ion associations (Yasumatsu et al., 2007): [ MoO ( O 2 ) ( ma ) ( acac ) ] + ( 368 ) - 4 [ H ] + = 364 [ MoO ( O 2 ) ( ma ) ( acac ) ] + ( 368 ) - 5 [ H ] + = 363 [ MoO ( O 2 ) ( ma ) ( acac ) ] + ( 368 ) - 3 [ H ] + - [ O⚌O ] + ( 32 ) = 333 [ MoO ( ma ) ( acac ) ] + ( 336 ) + [ matrix ] + ( 154 ) + [ H ] + = 491 [ MoO ( ma ) ] + ( 237 ) + [ matrix ] + ( 154 ) + [ H ] + = 392 [ MoO ( mal ) ] + ( 237 ) + [ matrix ] + ( 154 ) = 391 [ ( ma ) ] + ( 125 ) + [ matrix ] + ( 154 ) = 279 [ ( acac ) ] + ( 100 ) + [ matrix ] + ( 307 ) = 407 [ MoO ( ma ) ] + ( 237 ) + [ matrix ] + ( 154 ) - [ CH 3 ] + ( 15 ) + [ H ] + = 377 These results are consistent with the proposed molecular composition of the complex (3).

Mass spectrum of [MoO(O2)(ma)(acac)]·H2O (3).
Figure 5
Mass spectrum of [MoO(O2)(ma)(acac)]·H2O (3).

3.5

3.5 Electronic spectral studies

Electronic spectra of all the complexes were recorded in 10−3 M DMF solutions. The electronic spectral peaks observed in each of the complexes along with the molar extinction coefficients are given in the Table 3. The bands at 265–277 nm in the complexes are characteristic of intra-ligand n → π/π → π transition (Litos et al., 2006). The other two bands in each of the complexes are most probably due to ligand to metal charge transfer transitions (LMCT) (Litos et al., 2006) that might explain the colors of complexes obtained. The electronic spectrum of compound (3) is given in Fig. 6.

Table 3 Electronic spectral data of the synthesized complexes.
Compound No. Complexes λmax (nm) ε (L mol−1 cm−1) Peak assignment
1 [MoO(O2)(ma)(o-aatd)]·H2O 270 2305 n → π/π → π intra-ligand transition
340 2280 L → M charge transfer transition
365 2275 L → M charge transfer transition
2 [MoO(O2)(ma)(o-aans)]·H2O 265 2310 n → π/π → π intra-ligand transition
335 2275 L → M charge transfer transition
358 2260 L → M charge transfer transition
3 [MoO(O2)(ma)(acac)]·H2O 277 2291 n → π/π → π intra-ligand transition
346 2281 L → M charge transfer transition
377 2284 L → M charge transfer transition
4 [MoO(O2)(ma)(macac)]·H2O 267 2287 n → π/π → π intra-ligand transition
286 2288 L → M charge transfer transition
332 2770 L → M charge transfer transition
Electronic spectrum of [MoO(O2)(ma)(acac)]·H2O (3).
Figure 6
Electronic spectrum of [MoO(O2)(ma)(acac)]·H2O (3).

3.6

3.6 Thermogravimetric studies

The thermogravimetric curves of two representative compounds, namely, [MoO(O2)(ma)(acac)]·H2O (3) (Fig. 7) and [MoO(O2)(ma)(macac)]·H2O (4) were recorded in the temperature rang 50–1000 °C at the heating rate of 15 °C/min. Looking over the stability of the seven coordinate compound (3) up to 200 °C, and taking into account of the analytical data (Table 1) in favor of the presence of one water molecule in this compound along with the infrared result substantiating the same (vide supra), it appears that this compound would have shown a weight loss corresponding to elimination of one molecule of lattice water below 50 °C. It shows a second weight loss of 38% around 540 °C corresponding to the elimination of one acac and one (O–O) groups from the complex (calcd. weight loss = 38.60%). The final weight loss (obs. = 76.75) at 780 °C corresponds to the elimination of all the ligand groups (calcd. = 75.14%) from the complex. The final residue at ∼900 °C (obs. = 23.25%) roughly corresponds to MoO3 (calcd. = 37.29%). This difference in observed and calculated weight losses is most probably due to MoO3 starts volatilizing above 800 °C (melting point 795 °C, Greenwood and Earnshaw, 1984).

TG curve of [MoO(O2)(ma)(acac)]·H2O (3).
Figure 7
TG curve of [MoO(O2)(ma)(acac)]·H2O (3).

Similar to the compound (3), compound (4) is stable up to 210 °C. With the same explanation as given for the compound (3), it again appears that that this compound would have shown a weight loss corresponding to elimination of one lattice water molecule below 50 °C. This compound shows a second weight loss of 41% at 710 °C corresponding to the removal of one macac and one (OO) moieties from the complex (calcd. 41.05%). The final weight loss of 77.75% observed at 790 °C against a theoretical weight loss of 76.13% corresponds to the elimination of all the ligand moieties from the complex. The final residue at 880 °C (obs. = 22.25%) roughly corresponds to MoO3 (calcd. 35.81%).

3.7

3.7 1H NMR spectral studies

The proton NMR spectrum of one of the representative compounds, namely, [MoO(O2)(ma)(acac)]·H2O (3) was recorded in DMSO-d6 using TMS as a reference. This compound displays a proton signals at δ 8.52, δ 6.90, δ 3.33, δ 2.41 and δ 1.23 ppm, which are most probably due to O–CH (a), –CH (b), –CH (c), –CH3 (d), and –CH3 (e), respectively, present in this compound. The proton signal at 2.50 ppm is most probably due to solvent (DMSO-d6) taken. The absence of proton signal at ∼12 ppm in the complex indicates the coordination of enolic/hydroxyl oxygen to the metal ion after deprotonation (Maurya et al., 2008; Williams and Fleming, 1987) The NMR spectrum of compound (3) is given in Fig. 8. The indexing of various proton groups is given in the following Fig. 9.

1H NMR spectrum of [MoO(O2)(ma)(acac)]·H2O (3).
Figure 8
1H NMR spectrum of [MoO(O2)(ma)(acac)]·H2O (3).
Indexing of various proton groups in the compound (3).
Figure 9
Indexing of various proton groups in the compound (3).

3.8

3.8 Antibacterial studies

One of the co-ligands maltol and the two representative metal complexes, namely, [MoO(O2)(ma)(acac)]·H2O (3) and [MoO(O2)(ma)(macac)]·H2O (4) have been screened for their antibacterial activity against Escherichia coli and Vibrio cholera at a concentration of 300 μg cm−3 in DMSO by the agar diffusion method (Ong and Martelli, 1994; Ollee et al., 1989) using streptomycin as the standard antibacterial agent. The results so obtained are presented in Table 4. It is observed that both the metal complexes are more potent bactericides than the ligand maltol. The enhancement in the activity of complexes may depend upon the metal ions (Thimmaiah et al., 1985; Franklin and Snow, 1971), viz., size, charge distribution, shape and redox potential of the metal chelates and chelation. Moreover, steric and pharmacokinetic factors also play a decisive role in deciding the potency of an antimicrobial agent. Thus, antibacterial property of metal complexes is an intricate blend of several contributions (Levingson et al., 1978; Murukan and Mohanan, 2006).

Table 4 Antibacterial study of the ligand and metal complex.
S. No. Compound Compound zone of inhibition in (mm)
E. coli V. cholera
1 Maltol 17 19
2 [MoO(O2)(ma)(acac)]·H2O 29 30
3 [MoO(O2)(ma)(macac)]·H2O 32 29

3.9

3.9 3D-Molecular modeling and analysis

In view of the hepta-coordination of the present complexes (vide infra), and also taking into account of the well established hepta-coordinate pseudopentagonal bipyramidal structure (Burke, 2008) of bis(phenolato-oxazoline)-monoperoxomolybdenum(VI) (Fig. 10) [having (i) two momobasic bidentate (O,N-donor) phenolate-oxazoline ligand similar to momobasic (O,O-donor) maH and LH ligands in the present investigation and (ii) oxo, peroxo and phenolate oxygens of the two phenolate moieties at the equatorial positions, and the tertiary nitrogen of the each oxazoline moiety trnas to each other at the axial positions], the molecular modeling of a representative compound, [MoO(O2)(mal)(o-aatd)]⋅H2O (1), is based on its pseudopentagonal bipyramidal structure having oxo, peroxo and two enolate/hydroxyl oxygens of the β-diketone/maltol moieties at the equatorial positions, and the carbonyl oxygens of the of the β-diketone and maltol moieties trans to each other at the axial positions. The details of bond lengths and bond angles as per the 3D structure (Fig. 11) are given in Tables 5 and 6, respectively. For convenience of looking over the different bond lengths and bond angles, the various atoms in the compound in question are numbered in Arabic numerals. In all, 139 measurements of the bond lengths (48 in numbers), plus the bond angles (91 in numbers) are listed. Except few cases, optimal values of both the bond lengths and the bond angles are given in the tables along with the actual ones. The actual bond lengths/bond angles given in Tables are calculated values as a result of energy optimization in CHEM 3D Ultra (44 CS Chem 3D Ultra, www.cambridgesoft.com), while the optimal bond length/optimal bond angle values are the most desirable/ favorable (standard) bond lengths/bond angles established by the builder unit of the CHEM 3D. The missing of some values of standard bond lengths/bond angles may be due to the limitations of the software, which we had already noticed in modeling of other systems (Maurya et al., 2006, 2008, 2010). In most of the cases, the actual bond lengths and bond angles are close to the optimal values, and thus the proposed structures of the compound (1) as well as of the others are acceptable (Maurya et al., 2006, 2008, 2010).

Structure of bis(phenolato-oxazoline)monoperoxomolybdenum(VI).
Figure 10
Structure of bis(phenolato-oxazoline)monoperoxomolybdenum(VI).
3D Structure of compound (1).
Figure 11
3D Structure of compound (1).
Table 5 Various bond lengths of compound, [MoO(O2)(mal)(o-aatd)]·H2O (1).
S. No. Atoms Actual bond lengths Optimal bond lengths S. No. Atoms Actual bond lengths Optimal bond lengths
1 O(26)–O(27) 1.428 1.428 25 C(12)–C(13) 1.337 1.42
2 C(25)–H(44) 1.113 1.113 26 C(11)–H(33) 1.1 1.1
3 C(25)–H(43) 1.113 1.113 27 C(11)–C(12) 1.337 1.42
4 C(25)–H(42) 1.113 1.113 28 C(10)–C(15) 1.337 1.42
5 C(24)–C(25) 1.497 1.497 29 C(10)–C(11) 1.337 1.42
6 C(22)–O(23) 1.225 1.421 30 N(9)–H(32) 1.05 1.05
7 C(22)–C(24) 1.337 1.337 31 N(9)–C(10) 1.266 1.462
8 C(20)–C(22) 1.337 1.503 32 C(7)–H(31) 1.113 1.113
9 C(20)–O(21) 1.355 1.355 33 C(7)–H(30) 1.113 1.113
10 C(19)–H(41) 1.1 1.1 34 C(7)–H(29) 1.113 1.113
11 C(19)–C(20) 1.337 1.503 35 C(5)–C(7) 1.497 1.497
12 C(18)–H(40) 1.1 1.1 36 C(5)–O(6) 1.355 1.355
13 C(18)–C(19) 1.337 1.337 37 C(4)–H(28) 1.1 1.1
14 O(17)–C(24) 1.355 1.355 38 C(4)–C(5) 1.3396 1.503
15 O(17)–C(18) 1.6144 1.355 39 C(3)–N(9) 1.266 1.462
16 C(16)–H(39) 1.113 1.113 40 C(3)–O(8) 1.355 1.355
17 C(16)–H(38) 1.113 1.113 41 C(3)–C(4) 1.337 1.337
18 C(16)–H(37) 1.113 1.113 42 O(21)–Mo(1) 1.94
19 C(15)–C(16) 1.497 1.497 43 O(6)–Mo(1) 1.94
20 C(14)–H(36) 1.1 1.1 44 O(23)–Mo(1) 1.514
21 C(14)–C(15) 1.337 1.42 45 O(8)–Mo(1) 1.94
22 C(13)–H(35) 1.1 1.1 46 O(27)–Mo(1) 1.7414
23 C(13)–C(14) 1.337 1.42 47 O(26)–Mo(1) 1.94
24 C(12)–H(34) 1.1 1.1 48 Mo(1)–O(2) 2.2528
Table 6 Various bond angles of compound [MoO(O2)(2-hnd)(o-aatd)]·H2O (1).
S. No Atoms Actual bond angles Optimal bond angles S. No. Atoms Actual bond angles Optimal bond angles
1 H(40)–C(18)–C(19) 123.0002 120 47 O(26)–O(27)–Mo(1) 74.7516
2 H(40)–C(18)–O(17) 123.0011 116.4 48 O(27)–O(26)–Mo(1) 59.9998
3 C(19)–C(18)–O(17) 113.9988 49 C(22)–O(23)–Mo(1) 121.0942
4 H(44)–C(25)–H(43) 109.5198 109 50 C(20)–O(21)–Mo(1) 104
5 H(44)–C(25)–H(42) 109.4619 109 51 H(32)–N(9)–C(10) 119.9999 118
6 H(44)–C(25)–C(24) 109.4618 110 52 H(32)–N(9)–C(3) 119.9999 118
7 H(43)–C(25)–H(42) 109.4419 109 53 C(10)–N(9)–C(3) 120.0002 124
8 H(43)–C(25)–C(24) 109.442 110 54 C(3)–O(8)–Mo(1) 109.5001
9 H(42)–C(25)–C(24) 109.4999 110 55 N(9)–C(3)–O(8) 117.8499
10 C(24)–O(17)–C(18) 106.0372 112 56 N(9)–C(3)–C(4) 117.8505 120
11 C(25)–C(24)–C(22) 117.85 121.4 57 O(8)–C(3)–C(4) 124.2996 124.3
12 C(25)–C(24)–O(17) 117.8502 120 58 H(31)–C(7)–H(30) 109.5199 109
13 C(22)–C(24)–O(17) 124.2998 124.3 59 H(31)–C(7)–H(29) 109.4616 109
14 C(24)–C(22)–O(23) 128.9982 120 60 H(31)–C(7)–C(5) 109.4622 110
15 C(24)–C(22)–C(20) 120.0001 120 61 H(30)–C(7)–H(29) 109.4417 109
16 O(23)–C(22)–C(20) 110.9991 120 62 H(30)–C(7)–C(5) 109.4421 110
17 H(41)–C(19)–C(20) 119.9996 120 63 H(29)–C(7)–C(5) 109.4998 110
18 H(41)–C(19)–C(18) 120.0005 120 64 H(28)–C(4)–C(5) 120.0119 120
19 C(20)–C(19)–C(18) 119.9999 65 H(28)–C(4)–C(3) 120.0111 120
20 C(22)–C(20)–O(21) 110.9993 124.3 66 C(5)–C(4)–C(3) 119.977
21 C(22)–C(20)–C(19) 119.9999 120 67 C(7)–C(5)–O(6) 117.7506 120
22 O(21)–C(20)–C(19) 128.9983 124.3 68 C(7)–C(5)–C(4) 117.75 121.4
23 H(39)–C(16)–H(38) 109.5204 109 69 O(6)–C(5)–C(4) 124.4993 124.3
24 H(39)–C(16)–H(37) 109.4616 109 70 C(5)–O(6)–Mo(1) 109.5004
25 H(39)–C(16)–C(15) 109.4621 110 71 O(27)–Mo(1)–O(26) 45.2486
26 H(38)–C(16)–H(37) 109.4416 109 72 O(27)–Mo(1)–O(23) 95.3464
27 H(38)–C(16)–C(15) 109.4421 110 73 O(27)–Mo(1)–O(21) 144.7514
28 H(37)–C(16)–C(15) 109.4995 110 74 O(27)–Mo(1)–O(8) 90.0001
29 H(36)–C(14)–C(15) 120.0001 120 75 O(27)–Mo(1)–O(6) 135.2485
30 H(36)–C(14)–C(13) 119.9998 120 76 O(27)–Mo(1)–O(2) 143.5498
31 C(15)–C(14)–C(13) 120.0001 77 O(26)–Mo(1)–O(23) 97.6054
32 H(35)–C(13)–C(14) 119.9996 120 78 O(26)–Mo(1)–O(21) 170.0001
33 H(35)–C(13)–C(12) 120.0002 120 79 O(26)–Mo(1)–O(8) 90
34 C(14)–C(13)–C(12) 120.0002 80 O(26)–Mo(1)–O(6) 89.9999
35 H(34)–C(12)–C(13) 120.0001 120 81 O(26)–Mo(1)–O(2) 150.7362
36 H(34)–C(12)–C(11) 120 120 82 O(23)–Mo(1)–O(21) 82.5108
37 C(13)–C(12)–C(11) 119.9999 83 O(23)–Mo(1)–O(8) 172.3945
38 C(16)–C(15)–C(14) 120.0005 121.4 84 O(23)–Mo(1)–O(6) 90.0001
39 C(16)–C(15)–C(10) 119.9998 121.4 85 O(23)–Mo(1)–O(2) 106.8511
40 C(14)–C(15)–C(10) 119.9997 120 86 O(21)–Mo(1)–O(8) 90
41 H(33)–C(11)–C(12) 119.9998 120 87 O(21)–Mo(1)–O(6) 80.0001
42 H(33)–C(11)–C(10) 120.0006 120 88 O(21)–Mo(1)–O(2) 25.0918
43 C(12)–C(11)–C(10) 119.9997 89 O(8)–Mo(1)–O(6) 89.9999
44 C(15)–C(10)–C(11) 120.0005 120 90 O(8)–Mo(1)–O(2) 65.8616
45 C(15)–C(10)–N(9) 119.9999 120 91 O(6)–Mo(1)–O(2) 74.466
46 C(11)–C(10)–N(9) 119.9996 120

4

4 Conclusions

The satisfactory analytical data and all the studies presented above suggest that the present complexes may be formulated as [MoO(O2)(ma)(L)]·H2O, where maH = 3-hydroxy-2-methyl-4-pyrone and LH = o-acetoacetoanisidide (o-aans), o-acetoaceto-toluidide (o-aatd), acetylacetone (acacH) or methyl actoacetate (macac). Keeping in view the monomeric hepta-coordination of all the complexes, and well established hepta-coordinate pseudopentagonal bipyramidal structure of bis(phenolate-oxazoline)monoperoxomolybdenum(VI) (Burke, 2008) (Fig. 8) [having (i) two momobasic bidentate (O,N-donor) phenolate-oxazoline ligand similar to momobasic (O,O-donor) maH and LH ligands in the present investigation and (ii) the oxo, peroxo and phenolate oxygens of the two phenolate moieties at the equatorial positions, and the tertiary nitrogen of the each oxazoline moiety trans to each other at the axial positions], a pseudopentagonal bipyramidal structure (Fig. 12) (having oxo, peroxo and two enolate/hydroxyl oxygens of the β-diketone/maltol moieties at the equatorial positions, and the carbonyl oxygens of the of the β-diketone and maltol moieties trnas to each other at the axial positions) has been proposed for these complexes. X-ray crystallographic studies, which might confirm the proposed structures, could not be carried out, as suitable crystals were not obtained.

Proposed structures of synthesized complexes.
Figure 12
Proposed structures of synthesized complexes.

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to Prof. R.R. Mishra, Vice-Chancellor, Rani Durgavati University, Jabalpur (M.P.), India, for encouragement. Analytical facilities provided by the Central Drug Research Institute, Lucknow, India, and the Regional Sophisticated Instrumentation Centre, Indian Institute of Technology, Chennai and Mumbai are gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. , , , , , . Organometallics. 2003;22:2112.
  2. , , , . J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1988:1159.
  3. , , , , , . Inorg. Chem.. 1996;35:3362.
  4. , , . Inorg. Chem.. 2002;41:1761.
  5. , . Coord. Chem. Rev.. 2008;252:170.
  6. , , , . Inorg. Chim. Acta. 2006;359:1519.
  7. , , , . Chem. Soc. Rev.. 1996;25:25.
  8. CS Chem 3D Ultra Molecular Modeling and Analysis, Cambridge. Available from: <www.cambridgesoft.com>.
  9. , , , , , , . Acc. Chem. Res.. 2004;37:645. and references cited therein
  10. , , . Chem. Rev.. 1994;94:569. and references cited therein
  11. , , , , . Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2003:363.
  12. , , , , . Chem. Rev.. 2004;104:1175.
  13. , , , . J. Am. Chem. Soc.. 1986;108:5033.
  14. , , . Biochemistry of Antimicrobial Action (second ed.). London: Chapman and Hall; .
  15. , , , . Inorg. Chem. Commun.. 2002;5:384.
  16. , , . Chemistry of the Elements. Pergamon Press; . p. 1173
  17. , , , , . Br. J. Nutr.. 1998;79:29.
  18. , . Chem. Rev.. 1996;96:2757.
  19. , , , . Inorg. Chim. Acta. 2006;359:228.
  20. , , , . Indian J. Chem.. 1994;33A:1028.
  21. , , . Chem. Rev.. 1990;90:1483. and references cited therein
  22. , , , , . Inorg. Chim. Acta. 2007;360:2115.
  23. , , . Chem. Res.. 2003;103:2457. and references cited therein
  24. , , , , . , ed. Inorganic and Nutritional Aspects of Cancer. New York: Plenum Press; .
  25. , , , , , , . J. Mol. Cat. A: Chem.. 2010;322:55.
  26. , , , , , . Polyhedron. 2006;25:1337.
  27. , , , , , , . Can. J. Chem.. 1999;77:1249.
  28. , , . Inorg. Chem. Comm.. 2007;10:677.
  29. , . Proc. Indian Nat. Sci. Acad.. 1997;63A:507.
  30. , . Coord. Chem. Rev.. 2003;237:163.
  31. , , . Synth. React. Inorg. Met.-Org. Chem.. 1991;21:845.
  32. , , . J. Mol. Struct.. 2004;687:35.
  33. , , , , . Synth. React. Inorg.-Met. Org. Chem.. 1991;21:1107.
  34. , , , , , . Synth. React. Inorg.-Met. Org. Chem.. 1991;21:1219.
  35. , , , , , . Synth. React. Inorg.-Met. Org. Chem.. 1992;22:403.
  36. , , , . Synth. React. Inorg.-Met. Org. Chem.. 1995;25:1127.
  37. , , , . Synth. React. Inorg. Met.-Org. Chem.. 1998;28:1265.
  38. , , , . J. Mol. Struct.. 2006;798:89.
  39. , , , . Indian J. Chem.. 2008;47A:1333.
  40. , , , , . Int. J. Curr. Chem.. 2010;1:309.
  41. , , , . Indian J. Chem.. 1991;30:457.
  42. , , . Trans. Met. Chem.. 2006;31:441.
  43. , . Infrared and Raman Spectra of Coordination Compounds (third ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons; . pp. 249–251
  44. , . Infrared and Raman Spectra of Coordination Compounds (third ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons; . p. 254
  45. , , , , . Inorg. Chem.. 1988;27:1045.
  46. , , , , eds. Practical Medical Microbiology. New York: Churchill Livingstone; .
  47. , , . IL Farmaco. 1994;49:513.
  48. , , . Spectrochim. Acta, Part A. 2011;78:133.
  49. , , , , , , . Polyhedron. 2004;23:1595.
  50. , , . Oncol. Res.. 1994;6:477.
  51. , , , . Chem. Rev.. 1998;98:327.
  52. , , , , , , , . Inorg. Chem.. 2005;44:2689.
  53. , , . J. Am. Chem. Soc.. 1945;67:2276.
  54. , . J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem.. 2004;213:21.
  55. , , , , , . J. Trace Elem. Med. Biol.. 2007;21:8.
  56. , , , . Inorg. Chim. Acta. 1985;106:81.
  57. , , , . Chem. Rev.. 1999;99:2561.
  58. , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . J. Biol. Inorg. Chem.. 2003;8:66.
  59. , , , , , , . J. Inorg. Biochem.. 2004;98:683.
  60. , , . J. Organomet. Chem.. 2004;689:4655.
  61. , , . Spectroscopic Methods in Organic Chemistry (fourth ed.). New Delhi: Tata Mcgraw-Hill Publishing Company Limited; .
  62. , . Mol. Eng.. 1993;3:241.
  63. , , , . Inorg. Chim. Acta. 1988;151:15.
  64. , , , . Bioorg. Med. Chem.. 2007;15:4917.
  65. , , , , . J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 2002:2119.
  66. , , , . Vib. Spectrosc.. 2005;37:233.
Show Sections