10.8
CiteScore
 
5.3
Impact Factor
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Corrigendum
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Full Length Article
Full lenth article
Letter to Editor
Original Article
Research article
Retraction notice
Review
Review Article
SPECIAL ISSUE: ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY
10.8
CiteScore
5.3
Impact Factor
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Corrigendum
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Full Length Article
Full lenth article
Letter to Editor
Original Article
Research article
Retraction notice
Review
Review Article
SPECIAL ISSUE: ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original article
2021
:14;
202109
doi:
10.1016/j.arabjc.2021.103318

Synthesis, characterization and antimicrobial investigation of new piperidinyl tetrahydrothieno[2,3-c]isoquinolines

Chemistry Department, Faculty of Science, Assiut University, Assiut 71516, Egypt
Chemistry Department, College of Sciences and Humanities, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Alkharj 11942, Saudi Arabia

⁎Corresponding author. m.alshammari@psau.edu.sa (Mohammed B. Alshammari)

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Elsevier and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

Abstract

Herein, we describe the synthesis of novel piperidinyl thieno tetrahydroisoquinolines attached or fused to other new heterocycles. The diazotization of the previously synthesized pyrrolyl carbohydrazide 1 followed by several reactions with ethanol, aniline and heterocyclization after boiling in dry xylene under Curtius rearrangement conditions yielded the corresponding carbamate, phenyl urea and pyrazino derivatives 35. Furthermore, the condensation of 1 with various aromatic aldehydes and ethyl acetoacetate afforded the consistent Schiff's bases 6a-c and 7. The ring closure of the ethyl butanoate ester 7 furnished pyrazolyl compound 8 after heating in an ethanolic sodium ethoxide solution. Moreover, the nucleophilic addition of the carbohydrazide 1 to carbon disulfide in pyridine produced oxadiazolyl thione 9 which was reacted with ethyl chloroacetate to give ethyl sulfanyl acetate ester 10. The assignments of the chemical structures of these new heterocycles were confirmed by using elemental and spectral analysis. Alternatively, selected compounds were examined for antibacterial and antifungal screening. The results revealed highly promising influences against the nominated pathogenic strains.

Keywords

Pyrrolyl carbohydrazide
Carboazide
Oxadiazolyl
Pyrrolopyrazine
Synthesis
Antimicrobial activity
1

1 Introduction

Tetrahydroisoquinoline moiety is one of the most privileged heterocyclic scaffolds and is abundantly originated in several plants, soils, and marine microorganisms (Bentley, 2005). Molecules containing this skeleton are essential intermediates in medicinal and pharmaceutical chemistry and have received unique attention as a result of their broad spectrum of pharmaceutical features. Many tetrahydroisoquinolines are considered as antibacterial, antifungal (Scott and Williams, 2002), antitumor (Castillo et al., 2018; Pingaew et al., 2014), anti-inflammatory (Siegfried et al., 1987), anticonvulsant (Gitto et al., 2010), antileukemic, anti-HIV ((Scott and Williams, 2002; Iwasa et al., 2001), antithrombotic (Ko et al., 2017) and analgesic agents (Fodale and Santamaria, 2002). Further, tetrahydroisoquinolines have cardiovascular efficacy and are beneficial frameworks as antagonists to NMDA, D1 receptors (Gao et al., 2006) and Parkinson's disease (Sano et al., 1997). Furthermore, the isolated alkaloids from natural sources holding a THIQ nucleus are highly abundant in several medications. For instance: noscapine (1) is applied as an antitussive, antitumor and anti-ischemic agents (Ko et al., 2006); almorexant, an antagonist of the orexin receptor (2), is used for the insomnia treatment (Perrey et al., 2013), the clinical drug Solifenacin (3); is utilized for the urinary incontinence therapy (Hoffstetter and Leong, 2009); the antimuscarinic agent for the treatment of overactive bladder (Xie et al., 2014), EDL-155 (4) showed an anti-glioma profile (Patil et al., 2011); and elacridar (5) has been established as a suppressor of tumor resistance to chemotherapy. Nowadays, THIQ's are emphasized as being P-glycoprotein blocker in cell biology investigation (Colabufo et al., 2010). Trabectedin (6) is considered to be illustrative of a large group of THIQ anticancer antibiotics (Scott and Williams, 2002), which was recently affirmed as a remedy for delicate tissue sarcomas (D’Incalci and Galmarini, 2010) (Fig. 1).

Some Naturally Occurring Medicines holding a THIQ moiety.
Fig. 1
Some Naturally Occurring Medicines holding a THIQ moiety.

In the light of the above biological significance of tetrahydroisoquinolines and continuing our plan to provide novel heterocycles involving thienotetrahydroisoquinoline moiety (Zaki et al., 2020; Zaki et al., 2017; Kamal et al., 2011; Zaki et al., 2016; Zaki et al., 2011a,b; Kamal El-Dean et al. 2010; Kamal El-Dean et al., 2008), here we have reported on the preparation of pyrrolyl tetrahydrothieno[2,3-c]isoquinoline carbohydrazide 1 and its analogues which proved to have promising antimicrobial impact compared to standard drugs.

2

2 Results and discussion

2.1

2.1 Chemistry

Building on the stimulating proficiency of and ongoing efforts to produce new thienotetrahydroisoquinolines based hybrids, here, we described the synthesis of new heterocycles such as: pyrazine, pyrazole and oxadiazole ring systems. Diazotization of the carbohydrazide 1 (Zaki et al., 2020) with sodium nitrite yielded the carbonyl azide 2. FT-IR revealed the disappearance of those bands distinctive of the hydrazino group and the release of bands at 2143 cm−1 that are unique to the azido set. The carboazide 2 was reacted with aniline under Curtius rearrangement conditions to produce the phenyl urea 3. FT-IR of 3 displayed bands at 3361, 3285 cm−1 which are distinctive of the 2NH groups as well as a band at 1691 cm−1 characteristic of amidic CO. 1H NMR of 3 in TFA exhibited multiplet signals at 7.01–7.46 ppm specific to NHCO and aromatic protons as well as a singlet signal at 9.59 ppm that refers to NHPh. 13C NMR spectrum exhibited a signal at 156.03 ppm that is characteristic of amidic CO group.

Moreover, the carboazide 2 was refluxed in absolute ethanol to provide the ethyl carbamate 4. This compound was elucidated by IR, 1H and 13C NMR analyses. FT-IR represented absorption bands at 3306 and 1660 cm−1 for NH and CO ester groups. 1H NMR of 4 emerged triplet and quartet signals at 1.24–1.29 ppm and at 4.21–4.27 ppm that are attributed to the ethoxyl protons, as well as singlet signal at 6.82 ppm unique for NH. 13C NMR exhibited signals at 14.42 and 62.44 ppm typical of the ethyl group and a signal at 160.31 ppm attributed to the CO ester. In an analogues manner, the carboazide 2 underwent Curtius reaction accompanied by heterocyclization after heating in an inert solvent to yield a newly fused pentacyclic system namely: pyrrolopyrazinothienotetrahydroisoquinoline compound 5. FT-IR analysis of 5 showed absence of the band specific to the azido group and attendance of bands at 3286 and 1643 cm−1 special for NH and CO of pyrazine. 1H NMR in CDCl3 displayed triplet and 2 doublet signals at 6.66 and 7.28–7.82 ppm assigned to the pyrrole protons as well as singlet signal at 11.13 ppm for NH. 13C NMR of 5 revealed a signal at 156.47 ppm attributed to CO pyrazinone (Scheme 1).

Synthesis and reactions of the pyrrolyl carboazide 2 with aniline, ethanol and boiling xylene under Curtius rearrangement producing compounds 3–5.
Scheme 1
Synthesis and reactions of the pyrrolyl carboazide 2 with aniline, ethanol and boiling xylene under Curtius rearrangement producing compounds 35.

The mechanism used to form compound 5 was proposed to occur through the Curtius reaction of carboazido 2 to produce the non-isolable intermediate (a). After that, cyclization occurred through the nucleophilic addition of the C2-C3 π bond of the pyrrolyl ring to the carbon of isocyanate group. These rearrangements led to the formation of the target pyrrolopyrazinothienotetrahydroisoquinoline 5 (Scheme 2).

The proposed mechanism of Curtius rearrangement for the formation of the newly pentacyclic pyrrolopyrazinothienotetrahydroisoquinoline ring system 5.
Scheme 2
The proposed mechanism of Curtius rearrangement for the formation of the newly pentacyclic pyrrolopyrazinothienotetrahydroisoquinoline ring system 5.

The carbohydrazide 1 was considered as an adaptable precursor for synthesis of new heterocyclic systems. Consequently, condensation with various aromatic aldehydes such as benzaldehyde, p-nitrobenzaldehyde and p-anisaldehyde in refluxing ethanol provided the Schiff́s bases analogous 6a-c. Elemental and spectral analyses of the latter compounds were in consistent with the postulated structures. FT-IR of 6a revealed the appearance of a sharp absorption band at 3295 cm−1 typical of NH. 1H NMR exhibited the absence of a signal unique for NH2 in 1 and the presence of multiplet signals at δ 7.25–7.39 ppm and 7.80–7.81 ppm distinctive of the protons of the phenyl ring and a singlet at 11.66 ppm attributed to NH. 13C NMR analysis of 6a exhibited signals at δ 113.80, 117.61, 118.27 ppm characteristic to aromatic protons and at 155.37 ppm for CO. Moreover, condensation of the carbohydrazide 1 with a 1,3–dicarbonyl compound such as ethyl acetoacetate in refluxing ethanol afforded the ethyl butanoate compound 7. Cyclization of 7 was successfully carried out after heating in ethanolic solution of sodium ethoxide to produce the methyl pyrazolone 8 in a quantitative yield. FT-IR of 8 exhibited disappearance of bands at 3330, 1734 and 1662 cm−1 attributed to NH and 2CO for the ester and amide groups, respectively. 1H NMR in CDCl3 represented two singlets at 1.19, 4.19 ppm ascribed to CH3 and CH2 of the pyrazolyl ring. 13C NMR displayed signals at 13.95 and 51.00 ppm are attributed to the CH3 and CH2 pyrazolyl groups as well as signals at 161.36 and 163.13 ppm typical for 2 CO groups (Scheme 3).

Condensation and cyclization of the carbohydrazide 1 with aromatic aldehydes and 1,3-dicarbonyl compounds producing Schiff's bases 6a-c, 7 and 8.
Scheme 3
Condensation and cyclization of the carbohydrazide 1 with aromatic aldehydes and 1,3-dicarbonyl compounds producing Schiff's bases 6a-c, 7 and 8.

In addition, the nucleophilic addition of the carbohydrazide 1 to carbon disulfide followed by elimination of H2S in pyridine upon heating in a steam bath afforded the oxadiazolyl thione 9. The thione group in compound 9 was S-alkylated through the reaction with ethyl chloroacetate to yield the ethyl oxadiazolyl sulfanyl acetate 10. FT-IR spectrum of 10 exhibited a band at 1721 cm−1 that is distinctive for CO ester. Also, 1H nuclear magnetic resonance revealed triplet and quartet signals at 1.25–1.30 ppm and 4.19–4.24 ppm characteristic to the ethyl ester and singlet signal at 3.82 ppm representative for SCH2. 13C NMR spectrum emerged signals at 14.08 and 62.28 ppm unique to the ethoxyl group as well as signals at 33.74 and 167.34 ppm specific to the SCH2 and CO ester groups, respectively (Scheme 4).

Condensation and cyclocondensation reactions of the carbohydrazide 1 with carbon disulfide affording compounds 9–10.
Scheme 4
Condensation and cyclocondensation reactions of the carbohydrazide 1 with carbon disulfide affording compounds 910.

2.2

2.2 Biological screening

Currently, one of the prominent problems for people's health is the resistance to the current antimicrobial medications. So, the main target of our work is the development of new and more efficient antimicrobial therapies through the synthesis of novel heterocyclic compounds. In our study, we focused on comparing the antimicrobial impacts between the cabohydrazide 1, phenyl urea 3, carbamate derivatives 4, pyrazinone 5 and some Schiff's bases 6a-c which have similar functional groups to each other. Thus, we have chosen compounds 1, 3, 4, 5 and 6a-c in order to screen their in vitro antimicrobial inhibitory activity against a set of Gram positive and Gram negative strains (Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus cereus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli) as well as four strains of pathogenic fungi (Candida albicans, Aspergillus flavus, Geotrichum candidium and Trihophyton rubrum). The inhibition zones and MIC of the screened derivatives were compared with Amoxicillin and Clotrimazole as references medicines.

2.2.1

2.2.1 Antibacterial activity

The results of the screened heterocycles displayed significant activities and were listed in Table 1. It was found that compounds 1 and 3 revealed the highest effect against all strains of bacteria (MIC 7–11 µg/ml). Furthermore, compound 6a exposed the least activity comparable to Amoxicillin (MIC 3.0 µg/ml). Compounds 1, 3, 4, 6b and 6c revealed the best efficacy against B. cereus with (MIC 8.0–11.0 µg/ml), while compounds 4, 6a and 6b showed inferior effect. With regard to S. aureus, compounds 1, 3, 5 and 6b displayed excellent effect against every strains of the pathogenic bacteria (MIC 8.0–9.0 µg/ml) in comparison to Amoxicillin (MIC 3.0 µg/ml). Consequently, compounds 5, 6b and 6c were detected to be the most active derivatives versus P. aeruginosa (MIC 8.0 and 9.0 µg/ml) compared to Amoxicillin (3.0 µg/ml), while compounds 1 and 3 showed good to moderate activities. Conversely, P. aeruginosa was resistant to 4 and 6a. Furthermore, compounds 1 and 6b represented the best influence against E. coli (MIC 7.0 µg/ml), whereas compounds 3, 5 and 6a exhibited moderate activity compared to the authentic drug (MIC 3.0 µg/ml). Otherwise, E. coli was resistant to compounds 4 and 6c.

Table 1 Antibacterial activities of compounds 1, 35 and 6a-c.
Strains of Bacteria
(inhibition zone, mm) and (MIC, µg/ml)
Gram-(+ve) bacteria Gram-(−ve) bacteria
Compound. B. cereus S. aureus P. aeruginosa E. coli
1 13 (11) 18 (9.0) 10 (11) 12 (7.0)
3 13 (8.0) 17 (9.0) 14 (10) 15 (10)
4 18 (9.0)
5 12 (10) 11 (11) 10 (9.0) 9 (13)
6a 8 (13)
6b 18 (9.0) 17 (8.0) 15 (7.0)
6c 13 (10) 13 (8.0) 18 (9.0)
Amoxicillin 26 (3.0) 28 (3.0) 22 (3.0) 29 (3.0)

2.2.2

2.2.2 Antifungal Activity

It is fascinating to assume that all the screened derivatives displayed distinctive influence against most species of fungi, as present in Table 2. Based on the results, we found that compounds 4, 6b and 6c exhibited the highest activity against G. candidium (MIC 8.0–9.0 µg/ml), while compound 1 represented the best inhibition zone (19 mm) which is very close to that of Clotrimazole (22 mm). Otherwise, compounds 5 and 6a displayed good to moderate effects. Whereas C. albicans and G. candidium were resistant to compound 3. Subsequently, compound 6c represented the best activity against C. albicans (MIC 6.0 µg/ml) compared to the reference drug (3.0 µg/ml), whereas, compounds 6a and 6b revealed excellent efficacy (MIC 7.0–8.0 µg/ml) in comparison to Clotrimazole (MIC 3.0 µg/ml). In case of T. rubrum, compounds 1, 4 and 6b exhibited excellent activity (MIC 9.0 µg/ml) compared to Clotrimazole (MIC 6.0 µg/ml), while compounds 3, 5 and 6a showed moderate impact. However, T. rubrum was resistant to compound 6c. Additionally, compounds 1, 3, 4, 5, 6b and 6c represented strong activity against A. flavus (MIC 8.0–9.0 µg/ml), while 6a displayed medium efficacy (MIC 10.0 µg/ml), in comparison to the authentic antifungal agent (MIC 4.0 µg/ml) (Table 2).

Table 2 Antifungal activities of compounds 1, 35 and 6a-c.
Fungal strains
(inhibition zone, mm) and (MIC, µg/ml)
Compd. G. candidium C. albicans T. rubrum A. flavus
1 19 (10) 13 (13) 18 (9.0) 19 (9.0)
3 15 (12) 15 (9.0)
4 13 (9.0) 18 (10) 19 (9.0) 14 (8.0)
5 10 (10) 12 (11) 12 (11) 11 (9.0)
6a 10 (10) 19 (8.0) 14 (11) 11 (10)
6b 15 (9.0) 18 (7.0) 16 (9.0) 14 (9.0)
6c 14 (8.0) 20 (6.0) 15 (9.0)
Clotrimazole 22 (5.0) 26 (3.0) 25 (6.0) 21 (4.0)
Table 3 Physical constants for the synthesized compounds 210.
Compound Empirical Formula (M. Wt) Found/Calculated (%) M.P. oC Yield
C H N S
2 C21H22N6OS
406.51
61.93
62.05
5.34
5.46
20.52
20.67
8.00
7.89
138–140 86 %
(0.26 g)
3 C27H29N5OS
471.62
68.64
68.76
6.32
6.20
14.73
14.85
6.94
6.80
248–250 52 %
(0.30 g)
4 C23H28N4O2S (424.56) 64.94
65.07
6.80
6.65
13.35
13.20
7.70
7.55
298–300 83 %
(0.83 g)
5 C21H22N4OS
(378.49)
66.52
66.64
5.74
5.86
14.68
14.80
8.35
8.47
270–272 70 %
(0.65 g)
6a C28H29N5OS
(483.63)
69.40
69.54
6.20
6.04
14.36
14.48
6.50
6.63
238–240 71 %
(0.85 g)
6b C28H28N6O3S (528.63) 63.50
63.62
5.48
5.34
15.78
15.90
6.20
6.06
230–232 67 %
(0.90 g)
6c C29H31N5O2S (513.66) 67.94
67.81
6.22
6.08
13.50
13.63
6.36
6.24
254–256 61 %
(0.80 g)
7 C27H33N5O3S (507.65) 63.76
63.88
6.43
6.55
13.70
13.80
6.18
6.32
238–240 55 %
(0.35 g)
8 C25H27N5O2S (461.58) 64.93
65.05
5.78
5.90
15.00
15.17
7.10
6.95
138–140 65 %
(0.09 g)
9 C22H23N5OS2 (437.58) 60.50
60.39
5.42
5.30
15.90
16.01
14.77
14.65
228–230 70 %
(0.84 g)
10 C26H29N5O3S2 (523.67) 59.51
59.63
5.46
5.58
13.25
13.37
12.12
12.24
148–150 71 %
(0.40 g)

2.2.3

2.2.3 Structure activity relationship (SAR) study

Tetrahydroisoquinoline is an important scaffold in organic and medicinal chemistry. Therefore, we attempted to study the effect of several carboxamides and carbohydrazone derivatives including the piperidinyl thienotetrahydroisoquinoiline nucleus on the bacterial inhibitory action. The information that was recorded in Table 1 illustrated that the pyrrolyl carbohydrazide 1 exhibited promising antibacterial activity against most of the pathogenic bacterial strains. Conversion to the phenyl urea 3 greatly enhanced the activity against B. cereus and P. aeruginosa and significantly reduced the activity towards E. coli, while the effect against S. aureus remained unchanged. Alternatively, the formation of carbamate ester 4 highly suppressed the activity against B. cereus, P. aeruginosa and E. coli, revealing a similar effect to that of the carbohydrazide 1 versus S. aureus. In addition, the pyrazinone 5 showed higher activity against B. cereus and P. aeruginosa than the pyrrolyl carbohydrazide starting compound 1 and was slightly less efficacious against the other strains. Moreover, condensation of the carbohydrazide 1 with various aldehydes to form the identical Schiff’s bases 6a-c strongly affected on the antibacterial impact. Therefore, condensation with benzaldehyde to from 6a greatly diminished the activity against B. cereus, S. aureus and P. aeruginosa, while displaying moderate activity versus E. coli. It is fascinating to observe that replacing the hydrogen in the para position of the phenyl ring with the electron withdrawing group (NO2) in 6b highly enhanced the activity against P. aeruginosa, S. aureus and E. coli, while revealing inferior activity against B. cereus. Contrarily, replacing the nitro with the methoxy group (electron donating group) in 6c greatly enhanced the activity against B. cereus, while displaying the same excellent activity versus P. aeruginosa and S. aureus, whereas E. coli was resistant to compound 6c. Compound 4 revealed inferior activity against every tested strain of bacteria except S. aureus.

Further, the newly synthesized compounds represented excellent activity against all strains of fungi. It is worth mentioning that compound 6b exhibited the best effect versus all the fungal strains. The pyrrolyl carbohydrazide 1 revealed promising activity against G. candidium, T. rubrum and A. flavus with moderate effect versus C. albicans. The antifungal activity of the carbamate 4 was very close to that of compound 1 versus all of the tested genera of fungi, while the formation of phenyl urea derivative 3 inhibited the activity against G. candidium and C. albicans. Contrary to the antibacterial activity, the carbamate ester 4 was more efficacious versus all of the genera of fungi except the carbohydrazide 1 and phenyl urea 3. Moreover, condensation of the carbohydrazide 1 with benzaldehyde to afford the benzylidene Schiff's base 6a significantly increased the activity against C. albicans and slightly decreased the activity against T. rubrum and A. flavus. Replacing the proton in the para position of phenyl ring with the nitro group (EWG) is compound 6b improved the efficiency against all genera of fungi, while replacement with the methoxyl group (EDG) in 6c greatly improved the influence against G. candidium, C. albicans and A. flavus which was very close to the effect of the nitro group in 6b. In contrast, T. rubrum was resistant to compound 6c. In conclusion, we can deduce that the phenyl urea 3 revealed higher antibacterial and lower antifungal activities than the carbamate 4. Also, replacing the protons of the phenyl ring in the Schiff's bases 6a-c by either electron donating and electron withdrawing groups highly improved the antimicrobial activity.

3

3 Experimental

3.1

3.1 Chemistry

The chemicals utilized in this research were purchased from the Loba and Merck Sigma-Aldrich companies. Melting points were estimated using a Fisher-John apparatus. Elemental analyses was measured at the Micro Analytical Center at Chemistry Department at Assiut University. The Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR, ν (cm−1)) spectra were recorded on a FT-IR 8201PC Shimadzu using potassium bromide disks. 1H and 13C NMR spectra (δ, ppm) for all of the above mentioned heterocycles were evaluated in CDCl3 except compound 3, which was determined in CF3CO2D using tetramethyl silane (Me4Si) as the internal standard on Bruker BioSpinGmbH spectrometers and Varian Mercury VX-300NMR (1H NMR 400 MHz, 13C NMR 100 MHz). All reactions were monitored using the TLC technique on silica gel covered with aluminum sheets (Silica gel60 F254, Merck). The pyrrolyl carbohydrazide 1 was synthesized according to literature procedure (Zaki et al., 2020). Physical constants of the synthesized compounds 2-10 were listed in (Table 3).

3.1.1

3.1.1 5-(Piperidino)-1-(1H-pyrrolyl)-6,7,8,9-tetrahydrothieno[2,3-c]isoquinoline-2-carbonyl azide (2)

A solution of sodium nitrite (0.30 g, 0.05 mmol, 10 %) was added dropwise with stirring to the carbohydrazide solution 1 (0.30 g, 0.75 mmol) in glacial acetic acid (20 ml) in an ice bath at 0 °C for 5 min. The solid precipitate that was produced on cooling was filtered off, dried and used without any additional purification for the next reactions. IR: 3107 (CH - py), 2934, 2848 (CH- aliph), 2143 (N3), 1707 (CO azide), 1650 (C⚌N). 1H NMR: 1.60–1.62 (6H, m, 3CH2: C3 - C5 piperidine), 1.72–1.75 (4H, m, 2CH2: C7, C8 cyclohexene), 2.33–2.37 (2H, m, CH2: C6 cyclohexene), 2.65–2.67 (2H, m, CH2: C9 cyclohexene), 3.18–3.20 (4H, m, 2CH2: C2′, C6′ piperidine), 6.42–6.44 (2H, m, C3″, C4″ pyrrole), 6.75–6.78 (2H, m, C2″, C5″ pyrrole). 13C NMR: 22.13 (C7 cyclohexene), 22.43 (C8 cyclohexene), 22.48 (C4′ piperidine), 24.58 (C3′, C5′ piperidine), 26.66 (C6 cyclohexene), 29.70 (C9 cyclohexene), 51.03 (C2′, C6′ piperidine), 111.47 (C3″, C4″ pyrrole), 122.47 (C5a), 122.85 (C2″, C5″ pyrrole), 123.41 (C9b), 123.85 (C9a), 129.43 (C2), 131.03 (C1), 143.66 (C3a), 156.12 (C5), 162.70 (C10, C⚌O).

3.1.2

3.1.2 N-Phenyl-N′-(5-(piperidino)-1-pyrrolyl-6,7,8,9-tetrahydrothieno[2,3-c]isoquinolin-2-yl) urea (3)

The carbonyl azide 2 (0.50 g, 1.20 mmol) and aniline (0.50 ml, 5.40 mmol) in dry benzene (5 ml) were refluxed for 2 h. The produced solid that was separated out on cooling was collected and recrystallized from dioxane as light brown crystals. IR: 3361, 3285 (2NH), 3104 (CH– py), 2932, 2853, 2818 (CH - aliph), 1691 (CO amide). 1H NMR: 1.49–1.61 (6H, m, 3CH2: C3′ - C5′ piperidine) , 1.62–1.69 (4H, m, 2CH2 : C7, C8 cyclohexene), 2.11– 2.15 (2H, m, CH2 : C6 cyclohexene), 2.61–2.65 (2H, m, CH2: C9 cyclohexene), 3.13–3.20 (4H, m, 2CH2: C2′, C6′ piperidine), 6.33–6.55 (2H, m, C3″, C4″ pyrrole), 6.87–6.99 (2H, m, C2″, C5″ pyrrole), 7.01–7.46 (6H, m, ArH + NHCO), 9.59 (1H, s, NHPh). 13C NMR: 22.50 (C7 cyclohexene), 23.45 (C8 cyclohexene), 24.44 (C3′ - C5′ piperidine), 24.69 (C6 cyclohexene), 26.31 (C9 cyclohexene), 51.65 (C2′, C6′ piperidine), 110.05 (C3″, C4″ pyrrole, C5a), 111.48 (C2″, C5″: pyrrole), 114.30 (C2′, C6′: Ph), 115.95 (C9b), 118.65 (C3-C5′: Ph), 123.63 (C9a), 125.28 (C1: Ph), 129.14 (C2), 129.24 (C1 + C3a), 129.39 (C5), 156.03 (C11: CONH).

3.1.3

3.1.3 Ethyl (5-(piperidino)-1-pyrrolyl-6,7,8,9-tetrahydrothieno[2,3-c] isoquinolin-2-yl) carbamate (4)

The carboazide 2 (1.00 g, 2.50 mmol) in absolute ethanol (20 ml) were heated under reflux for 2 h. The solid precipitate that was separated out on reflux was collected and recrystallized from a mixture of ethanol/ dioxane (1:1) as white crystals. IR: 3306 (NH), 3122, 3105 (CH - py), 2925, 2850 (CH - aliph), 1660 (CO carbamate), 1635 (C⚌N). 1H NMR: 1.24–1.29 (3H, t, J = 7.0 Hz, CH3 ester), 1.47–1.64 (6H, m, 3CH2-N: C3- C 5), 1.69–1.70 (4H, m, 2CH 2: C7, C8), 2.41–2.11 (2H, m, CH2: C6), 2.73–2.57 (2H, m, CH2: C9), 3.06–3.09 (4H, m, 2CH2-N: C2, C 6), 4.21–4.27 (2H, q, J = 7.0 Hz, CH2: ethyl ester), 6.37–6.38 (2H, m, C3, C 4), 6.70–6.82 (2H, m, C 2, C 5), 7.26 (1H, s, NH). 13C NMR: 14.42 (C14, CH3 : ethyl ester), 22.32 (C7), 22.56 (C8), 22.81 (C4), 24.62 (C 3, C 5), 26.03 (C 6), 26.31 (C9), 51.43 (C2, C 6′), 62.44 (C13, CH2 ester), 109.13 (C3, C 4), 110.17 (C 5a), 122.24, 122.69 (C2, C 5), 123.45 (C 9b), 123.61 (C9a), 133.99 (C2), 140.47 (C1), 149.93 (C3a), 152.75 (C5), 160.31 (C11, CO ester).

3.1.4

3.1.4 8-(Piperidino)-9,10,11,12-tetrahydropyrrolo[1′',2′':1′,6′]pyrazino[2′,3′:4,5]thieno [2,3-c]isoquinolin-4(5H)-one (5)

A suspension of the carboazide 2 (1.00 g, 25.00 mmol) in dry xylene (6 ml) was heated under reflux for 2 h. The precipitated solid that was produced during reflux was collected and recrystallized from dioxane into pale brown crystals. IR: 3286 (NH), 2930, 2853 (CH - aliph), 1643 (CO, pyrazino). 1H NMR: 1.67–1.74 (6H, m, 3CH2-N: C3′ - C5), 1.76–1.79 (4H, m, 2CH 2: C7, C8), 1.91 (2H, m, CH2: C6), 2.87 (2H, m, CH2: C9), 3.19 (4H, m, 2CH2-N: C2, C 6), 6.66 (1H, t, J = 3.10 Hz, C3), 7.28, 7.40 (1H, d, J = 2.70 Hz, C4), 7.81, 7.82 (1H, d, J = 4.00 Hz, C2), 11.13 (1H, s, NH). 13C NMR: 22.15 (C10 cyclohexene), 22.95 (C11 cyclohexene), 2312 (C4 piperidine), 24.16 (C3, C 5′ piperidine), 26.24 (C9 cyclohexene), 26.87 (C12 cyclohexene), 51.04 (C2, C 6′ piperidine), 109.60 (C2 pyrrole), 110.83 (C3 pyrrole), 120.44 (C8a), 122.15 (C12b), 124.10 (C3a), 128.65 (C12c), 129.52 (C12a), 131.18 (C1 pyrrole), 132.05 (C6a), 151.90 (C5a), 152.30 (C8), 158.47 (C4: CO).

3.1.5

3.1.5 N'-Arylidene-5-(piperidino)-1-pyrrolyl-6,7,8,9-tetrahydrothieno[2,3-c]isoquinoline-2-carbohydrazide (6a-c)

General procedure

The compound 1 (1.00 g, 2.00 mmol) and the corresponding aldehyde (2.50 mmol) in ethanol (20 ml) with catalytic drops of acetic acid (0.50 ml) were refluxed for 2 h. The precipitated solid which was obtained during reflux was collected and recrystallized from an appropriate solvent.

3.1.5.1
3.1.5.1 N'-Benzylidene-5-(piperidino)-1-pyrrolyl-6,7,8,9-tetrahydrothieno[2,3-c]isoquinoline-2-carbohydrazide (6a)

Benzaldehyde, white crystals (EtOH). IR: 3295 (NH), 3117, 3102 (CH - py), 3027 (CH - aromatic), 2954, 2925, 2850 (CH - aliph), 1657 (CONH), 1610 (C⚌N). 1H NMR: 1.62–1.71 (6H, m, 3CH2-N : C3′ - C5), 1.72–1.89 (4H, m, 2CH 2: C7, C8), 2.78–2.82 (2H, m, CH2 : C6), 3.05–3.11 (2H, m, CH2 : C9), 3.12–3.17 (4H, m, 2CH2-N : C2, C 6), 6.64–6.65 (2H, m, C 3, C 4), 7.26–7.39 (6H, m, ArH + N⚌CH benzylidene), 7.80–7.81 (2H, m, C2, C 5), 11.66 (1H, s, NH). 13C NMR: 16.92 (C7), 17.01 (C8), 19.50 (C3- C 5), 21.45 (C 6), 27.02 (C9), 46.81 (C2, C 6), 104.47 (C 3, C 4), 106.73 (C 5a), 107.72 (C2, C 5), 108.86 (C 9b), 113.80 (C3, C 5′: Ph), 117.61 (C2, C 4, C6′: Ph), 118.27 (C9a, C1: Ph), 119.93 (C2), 120.63 (C13, N⚌CH), 137.15 (C1), 145.09 (C3a), 152.49 (C5), 155.37 (C10 : CO).

3.1.5.2
3.1.5.2 N'-(4-Nitrobenzylidene)-5-(piperidino)-1-pyrrolyl-6,7,8,9-tetrahydrothieno[2,3-c] isoquinoline −2-carbohydrazide (6b)

p-Nitrobenzaldehyde, pale-yellow crystals (ethanol-dioxane mixture (1:1)). IR: 3294 (NH), 3101 (CH - py), 3050 (CH aromatic), 2937, 2856 (CH - aliphatic), 1663 (C⚌O), 1561 (C⚌N). 1H NMR: 1.70–1.80 (6H, m, 3CH2-N: C3′ - C5), 2.44–2.45 (4H, m, 2CH 2: C7, C8), 2.75 (2H, m, CH2: C6), 3.29 (2H, m, CH2: C9), 3.72 (4H, m, 2CH2-N: C2, C 6), 6.63 (2H, m, C 3, C 4), 6.96 (2H, m, C 2, C 5), 7.28 (1H, s, N ⚌CH benzylidene), 7.43–7.85 (4H, 2d, ArH p-sub), 8.21–8.23 (1H, s, NH) ppm. 13C NMR: 15.80 (C7), 18.92 (C8), 21.64 (C3- C 5), 24.53 (C 6), 36.20 (C9), 52.75 (C2, C 6′), 112.36 (C3, C 4), 113.45 (C 5a), 114.60 (C2, C 5), 122.84 (C 9b), 126.46 (C3, C 5′: Ph), 128.78 (C2, C 4, C6′: Ph), 134.68 (C9a, C1: Ph), 134.85 (C2), 152.25 (C13: N⚌CH), 156.74 (C1), 158.88 (C3a), 164.54 (C5), 170.75 (C10 : CO).

3.1.5.3
3.1.5.3 N'-(4-Methoxybenzylidene)-5-(piperidino)-1-pyrrolyl-6,7,8,9-tetrahydrothieno[2,3-c] isoquinoline −2-carbohydrazide (6c)

p-Anisaldehyde, yellow crystals (dioxane). IR: 3309 (NH amide), 3109 (CH - py), 3090 (CH - aromatic), 2928, 2842 (CH - aliphatic), 1659 (C⚌O), 1564 (C⚌N). 1H NMR: 1.61–1.67 (6H, m, 3CH2-N: C3′ - C5′), 1.71–1.90 (4H, m, 2CH2: C7, C8), 2.24–2.40 (2H, m, CH2: C6), 2.51–2.65 (2H, m, CH2: C9), 3.18–3.20 (4H, m, 2CH2-N: C2′, C6′), 3.71 (3H, s, OCH3), 6.60–6.61 (2H, m, C3″, C4″), 6.93–6.94 (2H, m, C2″, C5″), 7.26 (1H, s, N⚌CH), 7.34 (1H, s, NH), 7.81–8.21 (4H, 2d, ArH p-sub) ppm. 13C NMR: 14.14 (C7), 15.41 (C8), 21.84, 22.40 (C3′, C5′), 24.58 (C4′) 26.70 (C6), 44.46 (C9), 50.99 (C2′, C6′), 61.05 (C15, OCH3), 111.39 (C3″, C4″), 111.94 (C5a), 122.84 (C2″, C5″), 123.23 (C9b), 123.63 (C3′, C5′: Ph), 123.75 (C2′, C4′, C6′: Ph), 130.13 (C9a, C1′ Ph), 130.67 (C2), 150.73 (C13 N⚌CH), 156.51 (C1), 157.66 (C3a), 162.71 (C5), 169.64 (C10: CO).

3.1.6

3.1.6 Ethyl-3-(2-(5-(piperidino)-1-pyrrolyl-6,7,8,9-tetrahydrothieno[2,3-c]isoquinoline-2-carbonyl) hydrazono) butanoate (7)

A mixture of the carbohydrazide 1 (0.50 g, 1.20 mmol) and ethyl acetoacetate (0.15 ml, 1.20 mmol) in an ethanol/dioxane mixture (1:1) was heated under reflux for 1 h. The produced solid which was formed on heating was collected and recrystallized from ethanol as white crystals. IR: 3330 (NH), 3107 (CH - pyrrole), 2956, 2925, 2851 (CH - aliph), 1734 (C⚌O ester), 1662 (CONH), 1560 (C⚌N). 1H NMR: 1.23–1.26 (3H, t, J = 7.20 Hz, CH3 ester), 1.61–1.63 (6H, m, 3CH2-N: C3′ - C5), 1.70 –1.75 (4H, m, 2CH2: C7, C8), 1.97 (3H, s, N⚌CCH3), 2.65–2.73 (2H, m, CH2: C6), 2.93–2.98 (2H, m, CH2: C9), 3.14–3.17 (4H, m, 2CH2: C2, C 6), 3.70 –3.75 (2H, q, J = 7.20 Hz, CH2 ester), 4.56 (2H, s, COCH2), 6.24–6.25 (2H, m, C3, C 4), 6.71–6.79 (2H, m, C 2, C 5), 7.26 (1H, s, NH). 13C NMR: 16.02 (C19, N⚌C-CH3), 22.22 (C18, CH3 ester), 22.47 (C7), 22.84 (C8), 24.62 (C4), 26.16 (C3, C5), 26.42 (C6), 26.50 (C9), 29.70 (C14 : CH2-C⚌O), 51.17 (C2, C 6), 62.33 (C 17 , CH2 ester), 108.71 (C3, C 4), 122.50 (C 5a), 123.37 (C2, C 5), 123.51 (C 9b), 123.71 (C9a), 125.96 (C2), 134.29 (C13), 143.81 (C1), 154.98 (C3a), 156.49 (C5), 161.02 (C⚌O, C15 ester), 162.55 (C⚌O, C10).

3.1.7

3.1.7 5-Methyl-2-(5-(piperidino)-1-pyrrolyl-1–6,7,8,9-tetrahydrothieno[2,3-c]isoquinoline-2-carbonyl)-2,4-dihydro-3H-pyrazol-3-one (8)

The butanoate derivative 7 (0.15 g, 2.00 mmol) in an ethanolic sodium ethoxide solution (0.1 g Na in 5 ml EtOH) was refluxed for 30 min. The produced solid that was separated out during reflux was filtered off, dried and recrystallized from ethanol as white crystals. IR: 3127 (CH - pyrrole), 2989–2824 (CH - aliph), 1629 (2C⚌O). 1H NMR: 1.19 (3H, s, CH3 pyrazolone), 1.59–1.65 (6H, m, 3CH2: C3′ - C5′), 1.71–1.72 (4H, m, 2CH2: C7, C8), 2.28–2.38 (2H, m, CH2: C6), 2.57–2.65 (2H, m, CH2: C9), 3.18–3.20 (4H, m, 2CH2-N: C2′, C6′), 4.19 (2H, s, CH2 pyrazolone), 6.32–6.33 (2H, m, C3″, C4″), 6.69–6.70 (2H, m, C2″, C5″). 13C NMR: 13.95 (C6, CH3 pyrazolyl), 22.17 (C7), 22.40 (C8), 22.42 (C4′), 24.60 (C3′, C5′), 26.12 (C6), 26.74 (C9), 51.00 (C4, CH2 pyrazolyl), 61.20 (C2′, C6′), 109.06 (C3″, C4″), 122.84 (C5a), 123.58 (C2″, C5″, C9b), 123.77 (C9a), 124.09 (C2), 136.96 (C1, C3a), 144.43 (C5 pyrazolyl), 156.37 (C5), 161.36 (C3, CO pyrazolyl), 163.13 (C10: C⚌O).

3.1.8

3.1.8 5-(5-(Piperidino)-1-(1H-pyrrolyl)-6,7,8,9-tetrahydrothieno[2,3-c]isoquinolin-2-yl)-1,3,4-oxadiazole-2(3H)-thione (9)

A sample of the carbohydrazide 1 (1.00 g, 3.00 mmol) and carbon disulfide (2.00 ml, 0.03 mol) in dry pyridine (4 ml) was heated at 100 °C in a steam bath for 5 h. The precipitated solid which was separated out during reflux was triturated with ethanol, filtered, dried and recrystallized from a mixture of ethanol / dioxane (1:1) into yellow crystals. IR: 3119 (NH), 3106 (CH - pyrrole), 2927, 2849 (CH - aliph), 1251 (C⚌S). 1H NMR: 1.45–1.64 (6H, m, 3CH2-N: C3′ - C5), 1.66–1.72 (4H, m, 2CH 2: C7, C8), 2.16–2.37 (2H, m, CH2: C6), 2.54–2.66 (2H, m, CH2: C9), 3.19–3.22 (4H, m, 2CH2-N, C2, C 6), 6.39–6.40 (2H, m, C 3, C 4), 6.72–6.74 (2H, m, C 2, C 5), 7.26 (1H, s, NH). 13C NMR: 22.06 (C7), 22.37 (C8), 22.39 (C4), 24.56 (C 3, C 5), 26.79 (C 6), 29.70 (C9), 50.99 (C2, C 6′), 110.03 (C3, C 4), 115.10 (C 5a), 122.70 (C2, C 5), 124.09 (C 9b), 134.76 (C2), 136.86 (C9a), 144.12 (C1), 149.06 (C3a), 156.36 (C5: oxadiazole), 162.96 (C5), 177.70 (C⚌S, C2 oxadiazole).

3.1.9

3.1.9 Ethyl 2-((5-(5-(piperidino)-1-(1H-pyrrolyl)-6,7,8,9-tetrahydrothieno[2,3-c] isoquinolin-2-yl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl) thio) acetate (10)

The oxadiazolyl thione 9 (0.50 g, 1.00 mmol) and ethyl chloroacetate (0.20 ml, 1.30 mmol) in ethanol (20 ml) and fused sodium acetate (0.90 g, 0.01 mol) were refluxed for 2 h. The precipitate that was separated out during reflux was collected and recrystallized from ethanol as green crystals. IR: 3125, 3106 (CH - pyrrolyl), 2955–2831 (CH - aliphatic), 1721 (C⚌O ester). 1H NMR: 1.25–1.30 (3H, t, J = 7.10 Hz, CH3 ester), 1.37–1.65 (6H, m, 3CH2: C3′ - C5′), 1.71–1.97 (4H, m, 2CH2: C7, C8), 2.36–2.39 (2H, m, CH2: C6), 2.66–2.78 (2H, m, CH2: C9), 3.18–3.19 (4H, m, 2CH2: C2′, C6′), 3.82 (2H, s, SCH2), 4.19–4.24 (2H, q, J = 7.10 Hz, CH2 ester), 6.34–6.35 (2H, m, C3″, C4″), 6.71–6.72 (2H, m, C2″, C5″). 13C NMR: 14.08 (C15, CH3 ethyl ester), 22.11 (C7), 22.42 (C8), 24.57 (C4′), 26.11 (C3′, C5′), 26.72 (C6), 29.70 (C9), 33.74 (C11 , SCH2), 51.01 (C2′, C6′), 62.28 (C14, CH2 ethyl ester), 109.79 (C3″, C4″), 116.39 (C5a), 122.98 (C2″, C5″), 123.06 (C9b), 123.98 (C9a), 133.76 (C2), 143.81 (C1), 156.23 (C3a), 160.94 (C5, oxadiazolyl), 162.75 (C2, oxadiazolyl) 162.86 (C5), 167.34 (C10 : CO ester).

3.2

3.2 The in-vitro antibacterial assessment procedure

All of the used microorganisms were attained from the culture collection of the Microbiology Department at the Faculty of Medicine at Assiut University. The activities of several compounds were determined in comparison to bacterial strains using a 5 ml concentration of the verified compounds in DMSO as a solvent. The synthesized compounds were first screened in DMSO at a maximum concentration of 100 g/ mL with Amoxicillin as a control. Each Petri dish's sterile medium (Nutrient Agar Medium, 15 ml) was uniformly smeared with Gram (+ve) and Gram (-ve) bacteria cultures.

3.3

3.3 The in-vitro antifungal assessment procedure

The strains of fungi (Candida albicans, Aspergillus flavus, Geotrichum candidium and Trichophyton rubrum) were obtained from human dermatophytosis at the Mycological Center at Assiut University (AUMC). To prevent bacterial contamination, the strains were grown in 9-cm sterilized Petri dishes with Sabouraud's dextrose agar (SDA) supplemented with 0.05 percent chloramphenicol (Al-Doory, 1980). The spore-containing agar discs from these cultures (10 mm diameter) were aseptically transferred to screw-top vials containing 20 ml sterile distilled water.

After shaking, the spore suspension samples (1 ml) were pipetted into sterile Petri dishes, and a liquefied SDA medium was added (15 ml). The samples were then allowed to solidify. To achieve a 2.0 percent concentration, the studied compounds 1, 35, and 6a-c, as well as Clotrimazole, were dissolved in DMSO.

Antibacterial and antifungal activities were measured using 5-mm-diameter filter wells loaded with 50 μL of the solution under study (2.0 %) according to Kwon-Chung and Bennett's methodology (Kwon-Chung and Bennett, 1992). The inhibition zones were measured in mm (Tables 1 and 2) after 24 h of incubation 37 ± 2 °C.

3.4

3.4 The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) technique

The synthesized compounds 1, 3, 4, 5, and 6a-c were dissolved in DMSO to make a solution of 2 % concentration. Filter paper discs (Whatman No. 3) approximately 5 mm in diameter were soaked in 15 ml of the tested compound solutions before being put onto a surface of the previously prepared agar plates seeded by the tested bacteria. To ensure full contact with the agar surface, each disc was immersed. The agar plates were then incubated for bacteria at 37 °C for 16–18 h, and at room temperature for the rest of time. The diameters of the compound inhibition zones were calculated and described in the table above. The commercial antibiotic Amoxicillin, which was used as a positive control for bacteria, underwent a similar procedure (Kwon-Chung and Bennett, 1992; Al-Doory, 1980). The micro dilution technique was used to measure each compound's minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). The biologically active compounds were serially diluted in DMSO and inoculated with the test culture in 10 ml broth tubes for 24 h. The MIC of each compound was described as the lowest concentration (µg mL−1) at which no detectable bacteria were present.

4

4 Conclusion

In the current study, we have provided an easy and simple way to synthesize new piperidinyl thienotetrahydroisoquinoline heterocycles. The pyrrolyl carbohydrazide 1 was used as an adaptable precursor for synthesizing novel heterocycles attached or fused to the thieno tetrahydroisoquinoline moiety. The reactions based on diazotization of 1 followed by reactions with ethanol and aniline and boiling in dry xylene under Curtius reaction conditions producing compounds 35. Moreover, condensation of 1 with various aromatic aldehydes and 1,3-dicarbonyl compounds furnished the corresponding Schiff's bases in addition to the pyrazolone derivative 8. The new oxadiazolyl thione 9 was produced by nucleophilic addition to carbon disulfide, which was S-alkylated to compound 10 through the reaction with ethyl chloroacetate. The reaction products were isolated simply and cleaned by recrystallization. Selected compounds were chosen for screening the antibacterial and antifungal evaluation. The results confirmed that compounds 1 and 3 revealed the best antibacterial activity, while compounds 4, 6b and 6c displayed the highest antifungal effects. Therefore, this sophisticated approach could be applied for synthesizing medicinally and pharmaceutically important compounds.

Acknowledgements

The authors are very grateful to Prof. Dr./ Etaify A. Bakhite, Chairman of Chemistry Department for all the facilities providing to us, and very grateful too to the staff members of Chemistry Department, Faculty of Science, Assiut University, Egypt and Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Saudi Arabia for their support during this work.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Al-Doory, Y., 1980. Laboratory medical mycology. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia, USA, 20, 219–241.
  2. , . β-Phenylethylamines and the isoquinoline alkaloids. Nat. Prod. Rep.. 2005;22:249-268.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Castillo, J.C., Jiménez, E., Portilla, J., Insuasty, B., Quiroga, J., Moreno-Fuquen, R., Kennedy, A.R., Abonia, R., 2018. Application of a catalyst-free Domino Mannich/Friedel-Crafts alkylation reaction for the synthesis of novel tetrahydroquinolines of potential antitumor activity. Tetrahedron 74, 932−947. DOI: 10.1016/j.tet.2017.12.049.
  4. , , , , , , , . Substrates, inhibitors and activators of P-glycoprotein: candidates for radiolabeling and imaging perspectives. Curr. Top. Med. Chem.. 2010;10:1703-1714.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. , , . A review of trabectedin (ET-743): a unique mechanism of action. Mol. Cancer. Ther.. 2010;9:2157-2163.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fodale, V., Santamaria, L.B., 2002. In: Datta, S., Kodali, B.S., Segal, S. (Eds.), Obstetric Anesthesia Handbook. Eur. J. Anaesthesiol, 5th ed. Academic Press, New York, 466−473.
  7. , , , , , , , . Synthesis and structure–active relationship of 1-aryl-6,7-dimethoxy-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroiso quinoline anticonvulsants. Chem. Pharm. Bull.. 2010;58:1602-1605.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , . Synthesis of carbon-11 and fluorine-18 labeled N-acetyl-1-aryl-6,7-dimethoxy-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinoline derivatives as new potential PET AMPA receptor ligands. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.. 2006;16:2229-2233.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. , , . Solifenacin succinate for the treatment of overactive bladder Expert Opin. Drug. Metab. Toxicol.. 2009;5:345-350.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , , , , . In Vitro cytotoxicity of the protoberberine-type alkaloids. J. Nat. Prod.. 2001;64:896-898.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , . Synthesis and biological activity of pyrazolothienotetrahydroisoquinoline and [1,2,4]triazolo[3,4-a]thienotetrahydroisoquinoline derivatives. Eur. J. Med. Chem.. 2011;46:567-578.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , . Reactions of 1-amino-5-morpholino-6,7,8,9-tetrahydrothieno[2,3-c]isoquinoline-2-carbonitrile. J. Chem. Res.. 2010;34:596-602.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , . Synthesis of morpholinotetrahydro thieno[2,3-c]isoquinolines. J. Chin. Chem. Soc.. 2008;55:1290-1299.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , , , , , . A limited series of synthetic tetrahydroisoquinoline alkaloids reduce inflammatory gene iNOS via inhibition of p-STAT-1 and suppress HMGB1 secretion in LPS-treated mice lung tissue. Int. Immunopharmacol.. 2017;52:297-304.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ko, Y., Malone, D.C., Armstrong, E.P., 2006. Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of antimuscarinic agents for the treatment of overactive bladder, Pharmacotherapy 26, 1694–1702. https://doi.org/ 10.1592/phco.26.12.1694
  16. Kwon-Chung, K.J., Bennett, J.E., 1992. Principles of antifungal therapy. Medical Mycology. Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia, PA, USA., 81–102.
  17. , , , , , , , , , . Synthesis and evaluation of new 1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinoline analogs as antiglioma agents. Med. Chem. Res.. 2011;20:131-137.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. , , , , , , , . Substituted tetrahydroisoquinolines as selective antagonists for the orexin 1 receptor. J. Med. Chem.. 2013;56:6901-6916.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. , , , , , , . Design, synthesis and molecular docking studies of novel N-benzenesulfonyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinoline-based triazoles with potential anticancer activity. Eur. J. Med. Chem.. 2014;81:192-203.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. , , , , , . A highly efficient synthesis of 1-methyl-, 1-benzyl-, and 1-phenyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinolines by a modified pummerer reaction. Heterocycles. 1997;46:555-565.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. , , . Chemistry and biology of the tetrahydroisoquinoline antitumor antibiotics. Chem. Rev.. 2002;102:1669-1730.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Siegfried, L., Helmut, V., Guenther, W., Thomas, S., Eckart, S., Dieter, L., Gunter, L., 1987. Ger (East) DD. 1988, 258, 013; Appl. 1987, 300, 312; 5. Chem. Abstr. 1989, 110, 75554g.
  23. , , , , , , , . Practical metal-free C (sp3)[BOND]H functionalization: construction of structurally diverse asubstituted N-Benzyl and N-Allyl carbamates. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.. 2014;53:3904-3908.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. , , , , . Novel synthesis and reactions of pyrazolyl-substituted tetrahydrothieno [2, 3-c]isoquinoline derivatives. Heterocycl. Comm.. 2016;22:103-109.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. , , , , . Synthesis and antimicrobial activity of novel piperidinyl tetrahydrothieno[2,3-c]isoquinolines and related heterocycles. ACS Omega. 2020;5:252-264.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. , , , . Synthesis and reactions of novel thienotetrahydroisoquinoline compounds. Afinidad. 2011;68:424-434.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. , , , . A Convenient synthetic method and spectral characterization of new tetrahydro[1,3]oxazinothieno[2,3-c]isoquinoline and its pyrimidine derivatives. J. Chin. Chem. Soc.. 2017;64:1417-1431.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. , , , . Synthesis and reactions of 1-amino-5-morpholin-4-yl-6,7,8,9-tetrahydrothieno[2,3-c]isoquinoline. J. Chin. Chem. Soc.. 2011;58:544-554.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Show Sections